Next Article in Journal
Effects of 25(OH)VD3 on Growth Performance, Pork Quality and Calcium Deposit in Growing-Finishing Pigs
Next Article in Special Issue
Livelihood Capitals and Opportunity Cost for Grazing Areas’ Restoration: A Sustainable Intensification Strategy in the Ecuadorian Amazon
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of Indigo (Indigofera tinctoria L.) Waste on Growth Performance, Digestibility, Rumen Fermentation, Hematology and Immune Response in Growing Beef Cattle
Previous Article in Special Issue
Does Gender Impact Technology Adoption in Dual-Purpose Cattle in Mexico?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Extending Milk Replacer Feeding during the Fattening Period on the Behaviour and Welfare of Lambs: A Preliminary Study

by
Ana González-Martínez
1,*,
Andrés Luis Martínez Marín
1,
Rubén Lucena
1,
Miriam González-Serrano
1,
Miguel Ángel de la Fuente
2,
Pilar Gómez-Cortés
2 and
Evangelina Rodero
1
1
Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Cordoba, 14071 Córdoba, Spain
2
Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Alimentación (CIAL, CSIC-UAM), Nicolás Cabrera, 9, 28049 Madrid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2023, 13(1), 85; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13010085
Submission received: 22 November 2022 / Revised: 21 December 2022 / Accepted: 23 December 2022 / Published: 26 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability of Local Dairy Farming Systems)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Artificial milk feeding in fattening lambs would promote the functionality of the reticular groove reflex in order to avoid the rumen fermentation of selected feed supplements included in the milk replacer. However, there is a lack of information of the behavioural and welfare effects of such practice. Therefore, we studied the effects of extending or not milk replacer feeding during fattening with a high concentrate diet on the behaviour of 16 non castrated male lambs of the Manchega breed (eight lambs were in the group that were fed daily a bottle of milk, and the other eight were in the fully weaned group) by means of a video recording system. Both groups consumed the same solid diet (concentrate plus cereal straw) and were kept under the same conditions. Weaned lambs showed longer resting episodes and a higher frequency of self-grooming, whereas unweaned lambs showed a higher frequency of interaction behaviour. From the interpretation of such behaviours in the conditions of the present study, we concluded that the welfare status was almost similar in both groups.

Abstract

There is a lack of information on the behavioural and welfare effects of sustaining artificial milk feeding in fattening lambs. Therefore, the present work aimed to study the effects of prolonged artificial milk feeding during fattening with a high concentrate diet on the behaviour of lambs. The behaviour of 16 non castrated male lambs of the Manchega sheep breed (eight lambs were in the group that were fed daily a bottle of milk, and the other eight were in the weaned group) was recorded with four fixed cameras just before bottle feeding (~8:30 a.m.) of the unweaned group till four hours later, every day for 7 weeks. The solid diet (pelleted concentrate plus cereal straw) and housing conditions were the same in both groups. Solid feeds were offered ad libitum. There were no differences between groups in time spent eating nor in drinking, playing, scratching and oral activity behaviours (p > 0.05), but resting episodes were longer in weaned lambs (p < 0.05). Weaned lambs presented a higher frequency of self-grooming behaviour (p < 0.05), while the unweaned group performed a higher frequency of interaction behaviour (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the behaviours of lambs that were fed daily a bottle of milk during the fattening period did not substantially differ from the weaned individuals.

1. Introduction

The behaviour of lambs can be affected by many endogenous and exogenous factors, including the type of feeding and management and housing conditions [1]. In sheep milk production systems, the rearing of lambs with milk replacer instead of maternal milk is a common practice in order to maximize saleable milk [2,3]. Weaning is one of the most critical moments for lambs, since it involves social, nutritional and environmental changes [4]. Natural weaning is a slow process, which takes place between 100 and 150 days of life, in which the animal gradually transitions from milk feeding to solid feeding. The artificial weaning means forcibly ending the sucking of maternal milk by the offspring, which may affect animal welfare. In both weaning types, when lambs are regrouped with other lambs of similar age, either on pasture or in feedlots, they develop a strong attachment to their peers, which influences their behaviour [5,6]. Keeping the lambs in groups after weaning helps in their socialization and can reduce abnormal behaviour [7]. Behavioural effects of rearing lambs with either their dams or milk replacer plus solid feed until slaughter at 45 days of age (no weaning) has been previously reported [8]. Herath et al. [9] studied the effects of feeding milk replacer along with pelleted concentrates until slaughter at 57 days of age, with or without weaning at 42 days of age, on growth performance and body composition. However, there is a lack of information on the behavioural effects of prolonged artificial milk feeding during fattening with a high concentrate diet. One reason to sustain this artificial milk feeding is to keep functional the reticular groove reflex to avoid rumen fermentation of selected feed supplements included in the milk replacer [10,11]. In this line, it has been shown that supplementing algae meal within the milk replacer has remarkable effects on lamb meat quality (i.e., modifying meat fatty acid profile and volatile compounds) [12,13], but the behavioural effects, if any, have not been described yet. Moreover, the observation of lamb behaviour can provide information on their preferences, requirements and internal states, which should be taken into account to improve farm animal welfare [1].
The aim of the present work was to study the effects of extending milk replacer feeding along with solid feed during the fattening period on the behaviour and welfare of lambs.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals, Housing and General Management

2.1.1. Initial Handling of Lambs

A total of 16 non castrated male lambs of the Manchega breed were used. Typically, lambs from the Manchega sheep breed, one of the main Spanish autochthonous sheep breeds, are removed from their mothers after colostration until 3–5 days of age, being reared from then on with milk replacer. Experimental lambs were purchased in a commercial farm and transferred to the same conditioned room (equipped with heaters, forced ventilation and natural and artificial lighting) in the premises of the Animal Production building at the University of Córdoba (Spain) just after colostrum feeding. The lambs were bottle-fed milk replacer ad libitum, a couple of times per day, up to 28 days of age. In order to stimulate the rumen development, from 15 days of age onwards, a concentrate, based on cereals and soybean meal and formulated for growing lambs (16% crude protein, 11 MJ/kg as fed), was offered ad libitum as well. At 28 days of age, the daily volume of milk replacer was reduced to 500 mL, in a single shot. The aim was to foster solid feed consumption. After 7 days, the daily volume of milk replacer was further reduced to 250 mL. Milk replacer (Vigolait Active, Iniciativas Alimentarias S.A., Ciudad Real, Spain) was prepared as the package leaflet recommended.

2.1.2. Management of Animals throughout the Experiment

At 42 days of age, lambs were weighed, painted with large dorsal numbers, and assigned to one of eight pens, in pairs of similar body weight. The pens were 1.40 m2 raised, slatted floor cages with individual troughs for feed and water. Afterward, all the pens were weighed. Then they were blocked by pairs in four groups attending to the recorded weights. Within each pair, the pens were randomly allocated to one of two groups (four pens per group and a total of eight animals per group), namely weaned and unweaned. Hence, all the weights were represented in both treatments. In contrast, feeding of the individuals of the unweaned group was complemented with 250 mL daily of milk replacer in a single shot until slaughter. Final experimental body weight was fixed at ~25 kg as the average and the experimental period lasted seven weeks (between 42 and 91 days of age). During the experimental period, body weight per pen was recorded weekly and feed intake per pen was recorded daily. Then, the average daily gain (g/day), average feed intake (g/day) and feed conversion ratio (feed to gain g/g) were calculated for each pen. The animals were clinically examined at the beginning and throughout the experiment to ensure that they were healthy, there was no loss due to death or disease.

2.2. Data Collection

A set of four fixed video cameras (AXIS M2014-E), controlled by a computer running Noldus Media Recorder XT® software (Noldus, Wageningen, The Netherlands) were placed in front of two pens each at a height of approximately 2.10 m. In order to prevent other stimuli interfering in the test, the time for the observations was determined by the interval between the activities of replacing the concentrate for the animals and those of cleaning the facilities. Thus, the behaviour of all lambs was recorded just after bottle feeding (~8:30 a.m.) till four hours later. All the video recordings were analysed by means of the Noldus© Observer XT 12 software (Noldus, Wageningen, The Netherlands) by the same trained observer. The behaviours studied were eating (eating either pelleted concentrate or cereal straw from the feed through), resting (lamb lying down), drinking (lamb swallowing water from the water through), self-grooming (lamb licking itself with the tongue or rubbing its coat with the teeth), interaction (lamb sniffing or grooming partners), playing (lamb butting, nudging, kicking or tupping partners), scratching (lamb rubbing itself with its hind hooves or against pen structures) and oral activity (lamb sucking the pen structures). Length or counts of the behaviours were transferred to an Excel spreadsheet (Microsoft Inc., Redmond, WA, USA).

2.3. Statistical Analysis

SAS UE 3.8 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used to perform the statistical analyses. All behaviours were considered quantitative variables, i.e., we measured the average time (s) that the lambs spent eating and resting, and the frequencies (%) of drinking, grooming, interaction, playing, scratching and oral activities. A repeated measurements analysis was conducted with the MIXED procedure [14]. The statistical model included the fixed effects of group (weaned and unweaned), fattening phase (weeks 1 to 7) and their interaction; the repeated effect was time; the subject of the repeated measurements was the animal nested within group and pen. When the fixed effects were significant, differences between least squares means were assessed by paired t-test.

3. Results and Discussion

Average feed intake, daily body weight gain and feed conversion ratio did not differ between experimental groups [15]. The values were 806 ± 49.7 g, 321 ± 34.0 g and 2.5 ± 0.24 g/g, for average feed intake, daily body weight gain and feed conversion ratio respectively. Those values are in agreement with previous studies on the same breed, age range and intensive feeding conditions, except for milk replacer feeding [16]. Experimental animals were homogeneous in initial age, weight (11.3 ± 1.69 and 11.2 ± 1.43 kg body weight, respectively; p = 0.91) and sex, as well as they were maintained under the same housing and management conditions. Thus, any differences in the analysed behaviours with the help of Observer XT® 12 software should be only ascribed to the effects of group (weaned vs. unweaned), time on fattening and their interaction. This software has proved to be useful in behavioural research with sheep, such as studies focused on the self-organization of flocks at pasture and classification of behaviours of grazing, ruminating and non-eating and other biologically relevant behaviours [17,18,19].
Table 1 shows the effects of group and time (week) on fattening and their interaction on frequency of drinking behaviour and average duration of each episode elicited in eating and resting behaviours. Average duration of eating and resting episodes was 116 ± 34.5 and 470 ± 165.9 s, respectively. There were no differences between groups (p = 0.67) in time spent eating in each episode. The duration of eating episodes showed an increasing linear trend over the experimental period in both groups, as might be expected from the raising feed intake of the lambs in order to meet their nutritional requirements for growth [20]. The increase in eating duration was more pronounced during the first two weeks especially in the weaned group, which would suggest a quicker adaptation of this group to the only-solid feeding to satisfy their nutritional demands for body growth [9]. Resting episodes were longer in weaned lambs (526 ± 167.2 vs. 422 ± 149.8 s, p < 0.05). Resting is a high priority and an inelastic behavioural need in ruminants and longer resting times in the absence of illness can be associated with a positive state of welfare [21]. Moreover, a longer resting time in unweaned lambs has been attributed to the absence of distress that the separation from the mother causes [22]. Nevertheless, rather than ascribing this behaviour to an inferior welfare in the unweaned group, the present results should be ascribed to the loss of the human–lamb bond after weaning and the subsequent lack of expectation in milk feeding of the weaned group [23]. One should bear in mind that the recordings began just at the time of preparation routines of the milk replacer, thus associated sounds and smells would anticipate milk feeding in the unweaned lambs thereby exciting them. In this manner, milk feeding acted as a reward that elicited an anticipatory behaviour [24]. The frequency of drinking episodes did not differ between groups (5.5 ± 4.58%; p = 0.15). Mohapatra et al. [22] found that weaned lambs spent more time drinking, probably due to water supplied by the consumption of milk in the unweaned lambs.
Average frequencies of self-grooming, interaction, playing, scratching and oral activity behaviours were 39 ± 14.3, 27 ± 12.1, 4.0 ± 3.3, 8.3 ± 4.76 and 17 ± 9.3%, respectively. There were no differences (p > 0.05) in the frequencies of playing, scratching and oral activity behaviours between groups (Table 2). On the contrary, Mohapatra et al. [22] observed that weaned lambs exhibited shorter playing time than unweaned lambs kept with their mothers from 17:00 p.m. to 9:00 a.m. Playing behaviour is considered as a yardstick to measure animal welfare [25], thus in the present study a diminished welfare as a result of ceasing milk feeding in weaned lambs did not occur. Moreover, the absence of differences in scratching and oral activity behaviours would indicate that the welfare status was similar between groups [26,27,28]. The significant differences of playing, scratching and oral activity behaviours over the experimental period suggests that they were more related to age-dependent factors than to the cessation of milk feeding [25,27].
Weaned lambs presented a higher frequency of self-grooming behaviour than unweaned lambs (44 ± 15.1% vs. 34 ± 11.6%) (Table 2). In calves, self-grooming is considered a comfort activity facilitated by a greater space availability in the stalls [29]. In the present study, the available space for the lambs within the pens was the same, thus the higher number of self-grooming episodes in the weaned group might be due to differences in spare time between groups [30], i.e., unweaned lambs spent more time paying attention to the supply of the milk replacer, which would be in concordance with the lower resting time in that group. In agreement with previous studies in goats and sheep, self-grooming behaviour decreased with age (p < 0.05) [31].
The unweaned group performed a higher frequency of interaction behaviour than the weaned one (30 ± 11.8% vs. 24 ± 11.7%,) (Table 2), which might be related to the need to compensate for the reduced suckling stimulus provided by the short time spent while bottle feeding. Affiliative behaviours included within the so-called “interaction” have been also related with the supply of straw [32] but both groups in the present study were offered straw ad libitum. The manifestation of affiliative relationships between lambs improves their welfare by reducing aggressive relationships [33]. In this regard, the performance of affiliative behaviours by the unweaned lambs would allow them to reduce the stress caused by the demand for the bottle. Affiliative behaviours can be used as an indicator of positive experiences in farm animals [34], but they are also a way of conflict resolution [35]. Therefore, the increase of interaction behaviour over time (p < 0.05) in the present study might be interpreted as a means used by the lambs to reduce the social tension derived by the diminishing available space as their body size increased.

4. Conclusions

Most of the behaviours of lambs that were fed daily a bottle of milk during the fattening period under intensive feeding conditions were not substantially modified in comparison with weaned lambs. The results of the present study also suggest that, at least, a four-week period of adaptation to the experimental conditions is required to maintain the welfare status. New research increasing the number of animals as well as behavioural and performance parameters would be needed to shed more light on this issue.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology, all authors; formal analysis, software, data curation, data processing, A.G.-M., R.L., M.G.-S. and E.R.; statistical analysis, A.L.M.M. and A.G.-M.; validation and investigation, A.G.-M., E.R. and A.L.M.M.; visualization, E.R. and A.G.-M.; supervision, A.L.M.M. and E.R., project administration, M.Á.d.l.F. and P.G.-C.; funding acquisition, M.Á.d.l.F. All authors have been involved in developing, writing, commenting, editing and reviewing the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (grant number AGL2016-75159-C2-2-R and PID2021-122989OB-I00) and by Consejeria de Innovación, Ciencia y Empresa, Junta de Andalucía (with FEDER funds) (grant number IE 57_174).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Universidad de Córdoba and the competent authorities (protocol code 04/05/2018/074 and date 5 May 2018).

Inform Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. De, K.; Kumar, D.; Kumar, K.; Sahoo, A.; Naqvi, S.M.K. Effect of different types of housing on behavior of Malpura lambs during winter in semi-arid tropical environment. J. Vet. Behav. 2015, 10, 237–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Napolitano, F.; Marino, V.; De Rosa, G.; Capparelli, R.; Bordi, A. Influence of artificial rearing on behavioral and immune response of lambs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1995, 45, 245–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Caroprese, M.; Taibi, L.; Franco, V.; Musto, M.; Muscio, A. Gentling and welfare of lambs. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2005, 4 (Suppl. S2), 333–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Napolitano, F.; De Rosa, G.; Sevi, A. Welfare implications of artificial rearing and early weaning in sheep. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2008, 110, 58–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Barkley, M. Weaning Practices Limit Stress to Ewes and Lambs. Penn State Extension. 2014. Available online: https://extension.psu.edu/weaning-practices-limit-stress-to-ewes-and-lambs (accessed on 2 November 2022).
  6. Pascual-Alonso, M.; Miranda-de la Lama, G.C.; Aguayo-Ulloa, L.; Ezquerro, L.; Villarroel, M.; Marín, R.H.; Maria, G.A. Effect of postweaning handling strategies on welfare and productive traits in lambs. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 2015, 18, 42–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Sambraus, H.H. Stereotypes. In Ethology of Farm Animals; Fraser, A.F., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1985; pp. 431–441. [Google Scholar]
  8. Napolitano, F.; Braghieri, A.; Cifuni, G.F.; Pacelli, C.; Girolami, A. Behaviour and meat production of organically farmed unweaned lambs. Small Rumin. Res. 2002, 43, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Herath, H.M.; Pain, S.J.; Kenyon, P.R.; Blair, H.; Morel, P.C. Growth and body composition of artificially-reared lambs exposed to three different rearing regimens. Animals 2021, 11, 3370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Orskov, E.R.; Benzie, D. Using the oesophageal groove reflex in ruminants as a means of bypassing rumen fermentation with high-quality protein and other nutrients. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 1969, 28, 30A–31A. [Google Scholar]
  11. Dobarganes-García, C.; Pérez Hernández, M.; Cantalapiedra, G.; Salas, J.M.; Merino, J.A. Bypassing the rumen in dairy ewes: The reticular groove reflex vs. calcium soap of olive fatty acids. J. Dairy Sci. 2005, 88, 741–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Avilés-Ramírez, C.; Vioque Amor, M.; Polvillo Polo, O.; Horcada, A.; Gómez-Cortés, P.; De la Fuente, M.Á.; Núñez, N.; Martínez Marín, A.L. Influence of Dietary Algae Meal on Lipid Oxidation and Volatile Profile of Meat from Lambs with Competent Reticular Groove Reflex. Foods 2022, 11, 2193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gómez-Cortés, P.; De la Fuente, M.A.; Peña Blanco, F.; Núñez-Sánchez, N.; Requena Domenech, F.; Martínez Marín, A.L. Feeding algae meal to feedlot lambs with competent reticular groove reflex increases omega-3 fatty acids in meat. Foods 2021, 10, 366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. St-Pierre, N.R. Design and analysis of pen studies in the animal sciences. J. Dairy Sci. 2007, 90, E87–E99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Núñez-Sánchez, N.; Avilés Ramírez, C.; Peña Blanco, F.; Gómez-Cortés, P.; de la Fuente, M.Á.; Vioque Amor, M.; Horcada Ibáñez, A.; Martínez Marín, A.L. Effects of Algae Meal Supplementation in Feedlot Lambs with Competent Reticular Groove Reflex on Growth Performance, Carcass Traits and Meat Characteristics. Foods 2021, 10, 857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Avilés Ramírez, C.; Peña Blanco, F.; Horcada Ibáñez, A.; Núñez Sánchez, N.; Requena Domenech, F.; Guzmán Medina, P.; Martínez Marín, A. Effects of concentrates rich in by-products on growth performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality traits of light lambs. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2019, 59, 593–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ramseyer, A.; Boissy, A.; Dumont, B.; Thierry, B. Decision making in group departures of sheep is a continuous process. Anim. Behav. 2009, 78, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Walton, E.; Casey, C.; Mitsch, J.; Vázquez-Diosdado, J.A.; Yan, J.; Dottorini, T.; Ellis, K.A.; Winterlich, A.; Kaler, J. Evaluation of sampling frequency, window size and sensor position for classification of sheep behaviour. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2018, 5, 171442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Mansbridge, N.; Mitsch, J.; Bollard, N.; Ellis, K.; Miguel-Pacheco, G.G.; Dottorini, T.; Kaler, J. Feature selection and comparison of machine learning algorithms in classification of grazing and rumination behaviour in sheep. Sensors 2018, 18, 3532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Van der Merwe, D.A.; Brand, T.S.; Theron, P.G.; Hoffman, L.C. Predicting feed intake from weaning to maturity in South African sheep reared on high-energy grain-based diets. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 2022, 52, 291–303. [Google Scholar]
  21. Mattiello, S.; Battini, M.; De Rosa, G.; Napolitano, F.; Dwyer, C. How can we assess positive welfare in ruminants? Animals 2019, 9, 758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Mohapatra, A.; De, K.; Saxena, V.K.; Mallick, P.K.; Devi, I.; Singh, R. Behavioral and physiological adjustments by lambs in response to weaning stress. J. Vet. Behav. 2021, 41, 47–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rault, J.L.; Boissy, A.; Boivin, X. Separation distress in artificially-reared lambs depends on human presence and the number of conspecifics. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2011, 132, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Anderson, C.; Yngvesson, J.; Boissy, A.; Uvnäs-Moberg, K.; Lidfors, L. Behavioural expression of positive anticipation for food or opportunity to play in lambs. Behav. Processes 2015, 113, 152–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Oliveira, A.F.S.; Rossi, A.O.; Silva, L.F.R.; Lau, M.C.; Barreto, R.E. Play behaviour in nonhuman animals and the animal welfare issue. J. Ethol. 2010, 28, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Karaagac, F.; Özcan, M.; Savaş, T. Some behaviour traits observed on the Kıvırcık and crossbred lambs raised in intensive conditions. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2005, 29, 803–809. [Google Scholar]
  27. Mahrous, U.; Meneeh, I.; Darwish, M. Effect of mothering ability on the development of behavior and performance of lambs. Assiut Vet. Med. J. 2005, 51, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  28. Miranda-de La Lama, G.C.; Villarroel, M.; María, G.A. Behavioural and physiological profiles following exposure to novel environment and social mixing in lambs. Small Rumin. Res. 2012, 103, 158–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wilson, L.L.; Terosky, T.L.; Stull, C.L.; Stricklin, W.R. Effects of individual housing design and size on behavior and stress indicators of special-fed Holstein veal calves. J. Anim. Sci. 1999, 77, 1341–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ishiwata, T.; Uetake, K.; Kilgour, R.J.; Eguchi, Y.; Tanaka, T. Comparison of time budget of behaviors between penned and ranged young cattle focused on general and oral behaviours. Anim. Sci. J. 2008, 79, 518–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hart, B.L.; Pryor, P.A. Developmental and hair-coat determinants of grooming behaviour in goats and sheep. Anim. Behav. 2004, 67, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Teixeira, D.L.; Miranda-De La Lama, G.C.; Villarroel, M.; García-Belenguer, S.; Sañudo, C.; María, G.A. Effect of straw on lamb welfare, production performance and meat quality during the finishing phase of fattening. Meat Sci. 2012, 92, 829–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Miranda-de la Lama, G.C.; Mattiello, S. The importance of social behaviour for goat welfare in livestock farming. Small Rumin. Res. 2010, 90, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Boissy, A.; Manteuffel, G.; Jensen, M.B.; Moe, R.O.; Spruijt, B.; Keeling, L.J.; Winckler, C.; Forkman, B.; Dimitrov, I.; Langbein, J.; et al. Assessment of positive emotions in animals to improve their welfare. Physiol. Behav. 2007, 92, 375–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Waiblinger, S.; Menke, C.; Fölsch, D.W. Influences on the avoidance and approach behaviour of dairy cows towards humans on 35 farms. Appl. Anim. Behav.Sci. 2003, 84, 23–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Average length of eating and resting episodes (in seconds) and frequency of drinking behaviour (in percentage) of lambs fed milk replacer (UNWEAN) or not (WEAN) during the fattening period.
Table 1. Average length of eating and resting episodes (in seconds) and frequency of drinking behaviour (in percentage) of lambs fed milk replacer (UNWEAN) or not (WEAN) during the fattening period.
BehaviourGroup (G)Week (W)SEM 1p
1234567GWG × W
EatingWEAN81 C125 AB125 AB136 A117 AB112 B135 A3.30.65<0.0010.26
UNWEAN78 B96 B121 A132 A107 AB122 A143 A
RestingWEAN631 AB455 BCDa350 D672 Aa500 C535 BC539 BC16.2<0.05<0.001<0.05
UNWEAN577 A321 Bb243 B410 Bb398 B465 B538 A
DrinkingWEAN7.5 AB5.8 AB7.1 AB10 A8.3 AB4.7 B6.9 AB0.050.15< 0.010.75
UNWEAN3.0 C3.5 BC6.8 AB7.1 A7.2 A1.3 C3.4 BC
ABC For each behaviour, within a group, least square means without a common superscript differ significantly (p < 0.05) between weeks. ab For each behaviour, within a week, least square means without a common superscript differ significantly (p < 0.05) between groups. 1 Standard error of the mean.
Table 2. Frequency of behaviours elicited (in percentage) of lambs fed (unweaned, UNWEAN) or not (weaned, WEAN) with milk replacer during the seven weeks of fattening period time.
Table 2. Frequency of behaviours elicited (in percentage) of lambs fed (unweaned, UNWEAN) or not (weaned, WEAN) with milk replacer during the seven weeks of fattening period time.
BehaviourGroup (G)Week (W)SEM 1p
1234567GWG × W
Self-groomingWEAN41 B51 ABa41 B55 A55 Aa40 Ba44 AB1.4<0.05<0.0010.67
UNWEAN31 B37 ABb36 AB44 A35 ABb25 Bb31 B
InteractionWEAN19 BC18 C20 BC18 C22 BCb36 A28 AB1.2<0.05<0.0010.80
UNWEAN23 C27 BC26 BC21 C35 Aa46 A33 B
PlayingWEAN2.6 BC3.4 BC1.4 C2.9 BC3.3 BC4.8 B8.7 A0.350.79<0.010.06
UNWEAN6.6 A3.7 AB1.5 B4.3 AB3.0 B4.7 AB4.5 AB
ScratchingWEAN9.5 A7.4 AB9.7 A9.4 A7.2 AB4.7 B9.4 A0.460.86<0.050.82
UNWEAN11 A9.4 AB7.6 AB9.8 AB6.4 B6.0 B8.6 AB
Oral activityWEAN24 A24 A27 A13 B12 B12 B11 B0.10.57<0.0010.23
UNWEAN22 A19 A20 A13 B10 B12 B16 AB
ABC For each behaviour, within a group, least square means without a common superscript differ significantly (p < 0.05) between weeks. ab For each behaviour, within a week, least square means without a common superscript differ significantly (p < 0.05) between groups. 1 Standard error of the mean.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

González-Martínez, A.; Martínez Marín, A.L.; Lucena, R.; González-Serrano, M.; de la Fuente, M.Á.; Gómez-Cortés, P.; Rodero, E. Effects of Extending Milk Replacer Feeding during the Fattening Period on the Behaviour and Welfare of Lambs: A Preliminary Study. Animals 2023, 13, 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13010085

AMA Style

González-Martínez A, Martínez Marín AL, Lucena R, González-Serrano M, de la Fuente MÁ, Gómez-Cortés P, Rodero E. Effects of Extending Milk Replacer Feeding during the Fattening Period on the Behaviour and Welfare of Lambs: A Preliminary Study. Animals. 2023; 13(1):85. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13010085

Chicago/Turabian Style

González-Martínez, Ana, Andrés Luis Martínez Marín, Rubén Lucena, Miriam González-Serrano, Miguel Ángel de la Fuente, Pilar Gómez-Cortés, and Evangelina Rodero. 2023. "Effects of Extending Milk Replacer Feeding during the Fattening Period on the Behaviour and Welfare of Lambs: A Preliminary Study" Animals 13, no. 1: 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13010085

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop