Next Article in Journal
Special Issue on Body Area Networks
Next Article in Special Issue
Application of Thermoeconomics in HVAC Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Trapping Entomopathogenic Fungi from Vine Terroir Soil Samples with Insect Baits for Controlling Serious Pests
Previous Article in Special Issue
Energy Efficiency and Thermal Performance of Office Buildings Integrated with Passive Strategies in Coastal Regions of Humid and Hot Tropical Climates in Madagascar
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

i-Yard 2.0: Integration of Sustainability into a Net-Zero Energy House

School of Architecture and Design, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(10), 3541; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10103541
Submission received: 21 April 2020 / Revised: 17 May 2020 / Accepted: 18 May 2020 / Published: 20 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Efficiency and Optimization of Buildings Energy Consumption)

Abstract

:
This research introduces a residential net-zero energy house named i-Yard 2.0, which was built by a team from Beijing Jiaotong University for the 2018 Solar Decathlon China competition. The concept was based on the needs of an aging population and achieves energy self-sufficiency through both active (i.e., solar energy) and passive design strategies. With the growing recognition of the need for better environmental protection, green building strategies have become mainstream in building development. A building’s energy balance is one of the most important indexes for assessing green buildings. The i-Yard 2.0 adopts an integrated design strategy with a sustainable development background. It takes a senior citizen-oriented design as the starting point and innovates in aspects such as community modeling, building strategies, passive spatial planning, the energy and building environment, and intelligent building control. The community comprises a new residential model called “cooperative living.” The building strategy adopts a modular assembly approach in order to achieve rapid construction suitable for this type of competition. The passive spatial plan uses the notion of the courtyard as a green core to regulate the microclimate. The building environment achieves net-zero energy by improving active energy access and reducing passive energy consumption. The internet control model was designed to incorporate intelligent building control. The i-Yard 2.0 provides not only a new form of senior residential housing for developing areas, it also provides a novel and worthy reference for net-zero energy housing in China.

1. Introduction

Energy balance is one of the most important indexes for assessing green buildings [1]. After sustainable architectural design became mainstream in the world of building development [2], more and more projects began to consider, refer to, and even be based on green building evaluation. Among all of the green building evaluation indexes, building energy balance is one of the most intuitive, efficient, and recognizable [3]. Therefore, determining how to improve building energy balance is one of the first aspects to consider when engaging in green building design.
Improving active energy access and reducing passive energy consumption can improve building energy balance. Improving access to active energy [4] enhances efficiency through the use of solar panels, heat and light-shading louvers, and so on. Reducing passive energy consumption [5] reduces unnecessary daily energy loss via passive regulation courtyards, composite walls, etc. By increasing sources and reducing consumption, building energy balance can be improved.
The i-Yard 2.0 was Beijing Jiaotong University’s entry in the 2018 Solar Decathlon China competition [6,7]. In terms of design, it is quite different from a passive house, low-energy house, and the nearly zero energy houses that can be seen in green buildings. For example, the “zero house” is a nearly zero energy house built in the suburbs of Beijing in 2019 [8]. Research on energy-saving strategies and design methods used in passive houses was published by Kai Liu and other Chinese scholars in 2020 [9]. The i-Yard 2.0 is a net-zero energy house that achieves energy self-sufficiency via solar energy [10]. The net-zero energy house uses renewable energy to completely supply the annual energy consumption of the building via a variety of active and passive designs and efficient energy savings equipment [11]. For example, the Aldo Leopold heritage center, built in the United States, realized net-zero energy consumption through a comprehensive strategic design [12]. A net-zero energy house can not only maximize energy consumption throughout the lifecycle of the building and achieve complete energy self-sufficiency, but also indirectly improve the ecological environment.
To address problems such as city population size, scarce resources, the environment, and China’s aging population [13], the object market of the design was a senior residential house in a new town development. This was not a study of the net-zero energy design as applied to a type architecture, such as the 2020 work by Yu Zhang and other Chinese scholars who studied the development of an American net-zero energy structure that took the form of an education building [14]. Nor was it similar to the 2019 work by Jie Cheng and other Chinese scholars who studied the technology of net-zero energy houses in hot summer and cold winter regions [15]. Rather, the present work was based on China’s increasingly acute population aging problem, and thus targeted a net-zero energy design for senior residential housing. The i-Yard 2.0 is quite specific in its design, and thus not entirely suitable for all types of residential housing.
“I-Yard 2.0,” the name of the entry, is a continuation of the 2013 entry in the same competition. The “i” represents the “3i” technology system—industrial, individual, and intelligent. Industrial construction and modular assembly can greatly reduce the construction cycle of net-zero energy houses, but this type of structure requires more thermal insulation and treatments to guarantee air-tightness at the junctions of building modules. For example, in 2018, AiSheng Wei and other Chinese scholars studied the thermal insulation and air-tightness of the joints of net-zero energy houses [16]. A variety of modular space combinations can meet different individual needs, breaking the homogeneity of traditional net-zero energy residential building spaces. Intelligent design provides a superior solution strategy for senior occupants and comprehensively improves the daily user experience of the elderly. “Yard” references China’s traditional living space and history of enjoying life by returning to the garden and through self-care. In order to achieve the design objective of net-zero energy, the i-Yard 2.0, based on a senior-living building design [17], incorporated innovations in community modeling, building strategies, passive spatial planning, the energy and building environment, and intelligent building control. The i-Yard 2.0 serves as a new design concept for net-zero energy houses in new town developments.

2. High-Performance Design Strategy

2.1. Community Model

Due to China’s aging society, being “senior” is becoming a general social phenomenon. In 2013, more than 200 million of China’s population was over the age of 60, 14.9% of the gross population. This phenomenon is expected to reach its peak by 2050. At that time, the aging population will be about 430 to 450 million, or one-third of the gross population [18]. Thus, research on the living environment is transforming from the traditional focus on architectural spatial functions to a greater emphasis on life order [19]. Conventional senior institutions and senior society models are being replaced by new paradigms [20] that show the diverse characteristics of the senior living environment.
The i-Yard 2.0 comprises a new residential model called “cooperative living” which is a continuation of the “senior cohousing” living model (see Figure 1), first developed in Denmark. Through free building, community residents combine traditional housing with shared public facilities, consciously participate in community design and management, and regularly organize public activities to enhance communication among residents [21]. This model has significantly influenced the American community to change to a cohabitation model. The cohabitation model enriches senior life, motivating a “senior cohousing” trend [22,23,24]. The German model of cohabitation constitutes a new neighborhood in which the elderly live with peers and nonpeers, enriching communication and encouraging shared lives [25].

2.2. Building Strategy

2.2.1. Response to the Rapid Construction Competition—Modular Assembly Strategy

In order to meet the needs of construction efficiency and quality in new senior housing and conform to the potential for free combination, variable function, and multiple structures during a use cycle, the i-Yard 2.0 adopted a modular assembly construction strategy of heavy and light steel [26]. Modular assembly can greatly accelerate construction [27] to meet the exacting demands of a mere 23-day site construction schedule. During the 2018 Solar Decathlon China competition, the main building structure took only two days. On the first day, six boxes were built on the first floor. On the second day, three boxes were built on the second floor. The modular assembly strategy not only accelerates construction, but also reduces construction costs. For the i-Yard 2.0, the total construction cost was USD $218,700, less than the average cost of NAHB (National Association of Home Builders) in 2013.
The i-Yard 2.0 was assembled from nine modules of the same size—9.6 × 2.4 m. The long side of each module was divided into two spans, each 4.8 m. Therefore, from the view of module assembly, each side was a multiple of 2.4 m, providing for the possibility of free assembly of the modules. The 2.4 m width is less than the standard size of a Chinese highway. Thus, after prefabrication, this type of module can be sent to construction sites at economical and reasonable transportation costs (see Figure 2).

2.2.2. Response to the Rapid Construction Competition—“Pin” Connection Method for Modules

The modules depend on a “pin” connection method developed by the project team. Importantly, this allows for module connections to be both horizontal and vertical. The connection structure is comprised of a connection unit with a lifting lug serving as the connection node. The connection unit is used to connect prestressed screws. The lifting lugs at both ends of the connection unit are the end lifting lugs; the lifting lugs in the middle of the connection unit are the middle lifting lugs. The lifting lugs are of a hollow frame construction. Alignment connectors are set into the upper and lower sides of the lifting lugs, and screws pass between the alignment connectors. The screws between the connection units are connected to each other by nuts. The ends of the screws passing through the lower ends of the lifting lugs are fixed with embedded parts. The screws and nuts use prestressed screws and interconnect between the connection unit to provide prestrain [28]. The alignment connectors include a base plate connected to the lifting lugs. A cone-shaped positioning block is set in the base plate. On the base plate and positioning block, there is a through hole of a position and size relative to the through screw. The “pin” connection overcomes defects in prior work, providing a new connection between steel member modules that does not require welding. Advantages include a simple structure, reliable force transmission, and strong structural integrity. All of the connection workings are outside of the modules. The “pin” connection method was adopted to perfectly match with the interior decoration of the modules. Thus, the connection units focus on a design that integrates the structural connections for hoisting, connecting, bending, shear, and seismic designs. They also satisfy the positioning accuracy problem of modular assembly (see Figure 3).

2.2.3. Response to Rapid Construction Competition—Rear-Mounted Integrated Composite Wall Panel

The gap in the connection is the most decisive design node in the modular assembly. Not only is it crucial for building quality, it is also one of the most difficult issues to solve in modular buildings. Connections must be properly handled to prevent problems with waterproofing, insulation, and hot bridges, as well as improve air tightness. The i-Yard 2.0 uses a rear-mounted integrated composite wall panel construction method for model connection. The building’s basic module is 600 mm. After finishing the main frame assembly, an integration wall was added onto the outer wall. The integration wall incorporates a hitting technology that uses an OSB (Oriented Strand Board) as the structural base with aerogel felt attached. The waterproof permeable film is on the back of the OSB; this is also where the keel and trim were installed. After prefabrication of the integrated wall, the integrated wall panels were installed in the reserved pendant of the main steel beam structure and secured with self-tapping nails. This method integrates the structural, insulation, moisture-proofing, and decorative layers and is good for repeated disassembly, movement, and reassembly of buildings (see Figure 4).

2.3. Passive Spatial Plan

In order to improve the comfort of the building and health of the user, the i-Yard 2.0 adopted microclimate and microenvironment regulation as the main design strategy in the spatial plan of the building. Through this reasonable spatial plan, natural elements could be introduced into the interior to create a “country life” experience of returning to the pastoral. This climatic adaptation design is a response to the local environment [29]. It enables the building to make full use of the local climate conditions and dynamically adjusts and adapts to climate change to achieve function, comfort, and energy savings.

2.3.1. Ternary Spatial Plan

The i-Yard 2.0 is a two-story detached house 160 m2 in size, located in northern China. The inner space contains a living room, dining room, kitchen, three bedrooms, and two bathrooms. In the spatial plan, the sitting room, master bedroom, and study, all of which require sunshine, are located on the south side of building and form a strip of “living area.” The auxiliary space (such as the courtyard) is located in the middle to regulate the microclimate. The kitchen and dining room are in the northern part of the building to form a strip of “service area.” On the one hand, these rooms can use the sunshine and air brought in from the courtyard to adjust for thermal comfort [30]. On the other hand, these rooms block the northern cold wind in winter through service space such as an equipment room and staircase on the northernmost side. This spatial plan not only offers sunshine to those in the living space, it also improves the thermal insulation capacity of the building and reduces energy consumption during operation (see Figure 5).

2.3.2. Green Core—Elevated Courtyard Combined with Passive Climate Regulation

The courtyard is a key point of the i-Yard 2.0′s design. It actually incorporates two types of courtyard. One is the inner courtyard, which is the green core of the courtyard. The other is the outer landscape gallery frame space. The size of the building’s courtyard is 2.4 × 3.2 m. The platform of the courtyard, established through mechanical devices that borrow and modify the mechanical principles of a car parking system, can achieve the up-and-down movement of electric lifting to provide a “lifting floor,” allowing for second-floor access without barriers for the elderly.
The courtyard platform is a floor with two layers of toughened glass embedded with 32 mm aerogel particles [31]. It offers good heat preservation, insulation, and light transmission [32]. According to the temporal and seasonal characteristics, the courtyard platform can regulate the heat gain and loss from solar radiation in the courtyard by changing the position of the movable floor in a vertical direction and thus adjusting the thermal environment inside the courtyard. The courtyard then forms a buffer zone between the indoors and outdoors to regulate the indoor light and heat environment, meet the requirements of human comfort, and reduce energy consumption during operation. On winter days, the floor is lowered to the bottom of the courtyard so that the it can receive full solar radiation. The illumination of the courtyard can be improved by using natural lighting, and the temperature can be increased by leveraging the greenhouse effect to fully absorb the heat of solar radiation. On winter nights, the floor can be raised to the middle of the courtyard (level with the second floor). The floor with heat preservation capacity is then converted into the building roof to reduce heat loss and store heat, maintaining the thermal environment of the courtyard. On summer days, the floor is raised to the middle of the courtyard (level with the second floor). The integrated floor has a shading design to block excessive solar radiation heat and prevent overheating of the courtyard. On summer nights, the floor is lowered to the bottom of the courtyard. The double-height space of the courtyard forms a “chimney effect” [33]. With the help of a window at the top, the courtyard forms hot pressure ventilation [34] and obtains a good passive cooling effect (see Figure 6).

2.3.3. Landscape Gallery Frame: Grey Space Placement

The site is accessed from the south, but the entrance to the building is located on the north side. The best use of the southern sunshine is provided to the inner space. With the help of the landscape gallery frame on the west side, the grey space appears at the entrance of the building, enriching the outdoor courtyard landscape. The gallery space on the west side is combined with the vertical planting, enhancing the lives of the elderly inhabitants and allowing them to moderately participate in farming and planting. This offers a sense of returning to nature and an opportunity to socialize. The plants’ greening affects air filtration, bringing healthier and more comfortable air to the indoor space [35]. Placement of the grey space on the west side effectively prevents intense solar radiation on that side in the summer. The grey space decreases heat gain on the west side of the building, improves indoor comfort, and reduces energy consumption (see Figure 7).

3. Energy and the Built Environment

In order to improve energy use and the built environment, the i-Yard 2.0 adopted a series of active and passive strategies such as solar panels and a geothermal system. The end result was that the i-Yard 2.0 achieved net-zero energy consumption for an electromechanical equipment cost of USD $30,300. This was higher than the average cost of NAHB (National Association of Home Builders) in 2013.

3.1. Solar Energy Generation

3.1.1. N-Type Double-Sided Double Glass Photovoltaic Module

Among the nine building modules of i-Yard 2.0, only three were laid with solar photovoltaic panels. These achieved complete energy self-sufficiency during the competition and won first place in the energy balance category. The photovoltaic power generation per square meter is a significant advantage (see Figure 8) [36]. The photovoltaic power system for the main double-sided body includes the photovoltaics as a smart energy solution. The N-type double-sided double-glass module (Jolywood, Taizhou, Suzhou, China) was selected for its high efficiency and excellent performance. The front-side efficiency is higher than 22%, and the back-side efficiency is higher than 19%. The module includes the advantages of no LID (Light Induced Degradation), low working temperature and temperature coefficient, and excellent weak light response (see Table 1) [37].
To maximize energy access as much as possible, the i-Yard 2.0’s HVAC(Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning) system uses a photovoltaic direct-drive air conditioning system [38], further improving energy conversion efficiency and reducing energy consumption.

3.1.2. Sunshade Louver

The sunroom in the high courtyard provides ample natural daylight and preheats the interior space in winter via solar radiation [39]. In summer, however, sunroom overheating is inevitable. Therefore, the top of the courtyard was designed with a set of sunshade louvers [40] combined with a solar thermal system (see Figure 9). The angle of the sunshade louver is favorable for blocking direct sunlight in summer and sending diffuse natural light into the room. At the end of each sunshade louver the heat medium pipe system of the solar thermal system is hidden to provide hot water sufficient for the entire building. During the competition, the i-Yard 2.0 scored full marks for the hot water item.

3.1.3. Passive Solar Collector Air Wall

A passive heat-collecting air wall was designed in the independent module located on the second floor on the south side of the building, using the principle of solar radiation in the winter [41] (see Figure 9). In winter, the black heat-collecting tube absorbs solar radiation to heat the air in the heat-collecting tube. Then, a fan is used to send the hot air directly into the living room below the module and achieve passive heating during winter days [42], saving on heating energy. The heat-collecting air wall can also be connected to the fresh air system to preheat the fresh air sent into the room and achieve the dual goals of indoor heating and air conditioning.

3.2. Building Energy Balance Test Results

Based on the above building energy design strategy and in order to test the energy balance benefit of the building in the actual use stage, the i-Yard 2.0 team conducted convincing field, real, and energy efficiency tests and data collection, along with the help of the 2018 Solar Decathlon China competition. The i-Yard 2.0 won first place in the energy item in the final awards evaluation stage.
The solar system of the i-Yard 2.0 uses 36 custom photovoltaic modules (dimensions—1950 × 710 mm). The photovoltaics’ effective area is 49.82 m2, and the installed capacity is 9 KWp. Within 15 days of the competition’s test time, the i-Yard 2.0 produced a total of 602.71 KWH and consumed 573.23 KWH. This resulted in an energy balance of +29.48 KWH. The efficiency of the photovoltaic power generation per square meter was 20.392 KWH/m2 at the time of the test, showing that complete net-zero energy consumption was achieved and resulting in building energy balance (see Table 2).

3.3. Building Comfort

The i-Yard 2.0 has a relatively comprehensive design with regard to spatial comfort [43], regulating the internal building environment through an active system and passive spatial design [44,45]. The active design strategies targeting the indoor building environment include a geothermal system, photovoltaic direct-drive multiconnected air conditioner (Gree, Zhuhai, Guangdong, China), fresh air waste heat exchange system, etc. The passive design strategies include a heat-collecting air wall, variable atrium system, and others. The team for the Solar Decathlon China 2018 competition conducted field tests for indoor building environment comfort and recorded various indoor parameters during the 15-day competition, including indoor temperature and humidity and CO2 and PM2.5 concentrations [46,47].
Indoor temperature was controlled at about 20 to 30 °C during the competition. With the help of active regulation and passive cooling, the circulation system absorbs heat during the day and releases heat at night, maintaining a good indoor temperature environment [48] (see Figure 10).
During the competition, the indoor humidity was controlled to 50% to 80% by the active fresh air system and passive regulation. Most of the time it was higher than 60%, which is the human body’s best comfort zone. Despite the extremely high outdoor humidity in summer, the variation range of indoor building humidity was relatively smooth and stable. The i-Yard 2.0 maintained a good indoor humidity environment (see Figure 11).
The 90% indoor CO2 concentration that the i-Yard 2.0 obtained during the competition was less than 1000 ppm, which is in the most comfortable range for the human body. Only about 10% of the time was the indoor CO2 concentration more than 1000 ppm and less than 1200 ppm. The i-Yard 2.0 maintained a good indoor CO2 environment (see Figure 12).
For 80% of the competition time, the indoor PM2.5 concentration for the i-Yard 2.0 was less than 35 ug/m3, which is in the best comfort zone. Only about 20% of the time was the concentration more than 35 ug/m3 and less than 50 ug/m3. The i-Yard 2.0 maintains a good indoor PM2.5 environment (see Figure 13).

4. Intelligent Building Control

As the “blood” of building, the building system has a decisive influence on the quality of daily use. The building system is not a single system but rather the integration of several subsystems. Through the integration and coordination of each system, the overall stability and security of the system is achieved [49], creating a high-quality building environment.

4.1. Safety Monitoring System

Due to the decline in their physiology, the elderly often experience a decrease in mobility and ability to physically recover from injuries. Their bodies also become more vulnerable to other problems like sudden illnesses [50]. Thus, in this design, attention needed to be paid to the inhabitants’ daily life and safety. Therefore, the i-Yard 2.0 team developed an intelligent app system that integrates a series of safety monitoring functions such as maintenance of occupants’ physical condition and means of dealing with emergency situations. Information collected is transmitted to medical supervision, adult children, and outside peers by alarms, SMS messages, etc. The app includes systems for monitoring bodily condition and home positioning, as well as sounding emergency alarms [51]. All three systems acquire and transmit data through bracelets worn by the elderly occupants (see Figure 14).

4.2. Environmental Control System

The i-Yard 2.0 has a number of intelligent control systems based on a backflow line. There are infrared motion-sensing lights that provide safety to elderly occupants when they wake up at night, power rails to increase or decrease the number of outlets in each room according to need, and a long electric guide rail arranged at the head of each bed, making it convenient to add an oxygen supply, first aid system, monitoring equipment, and other first aid paraphernalia if the inhabitant should become bedridden [52]. The design also features the intelligent app, which makes it possible to control all indoor lighting via wireless physical switches, thus meeting the needs of users of all ages (see Figure 15).

4.3. Psychological and Physical Care System

The psychology of the elderly can gradually change, due to a decline in physiological function [53]. Weakening perceptions of the outside world, reduced ability and means to communicate, and children’s long-term absence are all likely to make the elderly feel lonely [54]. At the same time, feelings of powerlessness may result in nostalgia for life when they were young. All of these changes require architectural designers to pay attention to the mental health of elderly occupants [55] to provide them with quality environments.
In the i-Yard 2.0, psychological and physiological care of the elderly are realized mainly through intelligent voice dialogue and living habits recognition systems that control indoor lighting, conduct health inspections, etc. The indoor lighting adjustment system uses a two-way control method to achieve remote control through a variety of wireless connection devices. Dual control is available through wireless physical switches and the intelligent app. By adjusting the light’s brightness, color, temperature, one-key control mode, and nighttime wake-up sensing function, the internal light environment can best meet the psychological needs of the elderly in different user scenarios [56]. For example, it can set the lights to a warm color when the occupant is cooking in the kitchen. By enabling the one-click control mode, one can easily and quickly control all of the lights in the house when it is time to leave, arrive home, go to bed, and so on. At night, the light sensors protect elderly occupants’ safety.
The lifestyle learning system uses intelligent control to simplify tedious tasks by learning daily routines, accumulating data, and gradually optimizing for the best experience. In consideration of the mobility and complex operation of smart panels, the intelligent voice dialogue system provides a convenient method of operation for older inhabitants. Occupants can speak into a mobile phone or face the intelligent control panel (the Kang Yang Magic Mirror located in the bathroom) to use voice control commands and achieve convenient home operation. Data on sleep quality, blood pressure, blood lipids, body weight, body fat, heart rate, body water content, cortex, tooth brushing, and other factors can be collected with the help of the Kang Yang Magic Mirror in the bathroom and other health monitoring systems, allowing for better health maintenance.

5. Conclusions

The residential i-Yard 2.0 was designed for senior living and features novel innovations in community model, construction method, spatial plan, energy efficiency, and smart building control. By improving active energy access and passive energy consumption, the i-Yard 2.0 was designed for energy balance. This was illustrated in a field test conducted during the 2018 Solar Decathlon competition, which showed that the i-Yard 2.0 realizes the goal of energy self-sufficiency and a net-zero house [57].
Therefore, if society seeks to promote the development of net-zero energy houses in new town developments, the novel design framework of the i-Yard 2.0 offers the following benefits:
  • The modular assembly and rapid construction can shorten the construction cycle, reducing the energy and materials consumed in the process;
  • The reasonable passive building space design can improve the comfort level of the environment within the building space, indirectly reducing energy consumption;
  • A dynamic balance between energy acquisition and consumption can be achieved by improving active energy acquisition through techniques such as solar energy; and
  • The smart building control can reduce energy waste by more rationally and effectively regulating the daily operation of the entire building system based on different times and use modes.
The relatively high building cost limits the generalization of the i-Yard 2.0. Modular assembly can minimize the construction cycle, but also inevitably increases the building cost. Therefore, future research will focus on how to achieve relatively appropriate cost control with different materials according to the economic capacities of different users.

Author Contributions

The three authors have made different contributions to the article. Y.J. is one of the main designers of the i-Yard 2.0. He participated in the construction, and wrote and translated the article. J.L. is the main faculty adviser of the i-Yard 2.0, leading the team to complete the design and construction, and guiding the writing and translation of articles. W.W. is one of the participants of i-Yard 2.0. He is mainly responsible for project publicity and participated in the construction as well as the translation of the article. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51708019) and the Fundamental Funds for Beijing Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 8182043).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jalaei, F.; Jalaei, F.; Mohammadi, S. An integrated BIM-LEED application to automate sustainable design assessment framework at the conceptual stage of building projects. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 53, 101979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. de Gaulmyn, C.; Dupre, K. Teaching sustainable design in architecture education: Critical review of Easy Approach for Sustainable and Environmental Design (EASED). Front. Architect. Res. 2019, 8, 238–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yang, Y. Comparative analysis of Chinese and American green building evaluation system. Build. Mater. Décor. 2019, 86–87. [Google Scholar]
  4. Cho, H.I.; Cabrera, D.; Patel, M.K. Estimation of energy savings potential through hydraulic balancing of heating systems in buildings. J. Build. Eng. 2020, 28, 101030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chen, X.; Huang, J.; Yang, H.; Peng, J. Approaching low-energy high-rise building by integrating passive architectural design with photovoltaic application. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 220, 313–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Navarro, I.; Gutiérrez, Á.; Montero, C.; Rodríguez-Ubinas, E.; Matallanas, E.; Castillo-Cagigal, M.; Porteros, M.; Solórzano, J.; Caamaño-Martín, E.; Egido, M.A.; et al. Experiences and methodology in a multidisciplinary energy and architecture competition: Solar Decathlon Europe 2012. Energy Build. 2014, 83, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Shrestha, P.P.; Mulepati, S. Energy Performance of a Solar Home Constructed for the Solar Decathlon Competition 2013. Procedia Eng. 2016, 145, 1298–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. China’s first “near zero energy” building has been completed in Beijing. Brick and Tile 2020, 2, 9.
  9. Liu, K.; Sun, Y. Research on energy saving strategy and design method of passive house. Jiangxi Build. Mat. 2020, 4, 82–83. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ascione, F.; Bianco, N.; Böttcher, O.; Kaltenbrunner, R.; Vanoli, G.P. Net zero-energy buildings in Germany: Design, model calibration and lessons learned from a case-study in Berlin. Energy Build. 2016, 133, 688–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, S.; Ma, X.B.; Yu, Y.Z. Development status and practice of zero energy building in the United States—A case study of bullitt center. Heating Vent. Air Cond. 2019, 49, 108–114. [Google Scholar]
  12. Fan, A.; Peng, Z. The meaning of zero energy building—The inspiration from the aldo Leopold heritage center. Anhui Build. 2019, 26, 22–58. [Google Scholar]
  13. Cheng, Z.; Ma, J. The evolution of China’s aging population and its countermeasures. Acad. Exch. 2018, 12, 101–109. [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhang, Y.; Ren, L.; Tang, X. New development and enlightenment of “net zero energy” buildings in the United States—A case study of “net zero energy” buildings in education in the United States. World Archit. 2020, 3, 126–133. [Google Scholar]
  15. Cheng, J.; Liu, S.; Wang, S.; Ma, X. Research on application and promotion model of zero-energy building technology in hot summer and warm winter areas. Constr. Technol. 2019, 24, 25–27. [Google Scholar]
  16. Wei, A.; Zhang, T.; Jiang, F. Construction technology of heat preservation and airtight joints in net zero energy prefabricated buildings. Constr. Tech. 2018, 47, 1673–1676. [Google Scholar]
  17. Dadzie, J.; Ding, G.; Runeson, G. Relationship between Sustainable Technology and Building Age: Evidence from Australia. Procedia Eng. 2017, 180, 1131–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tang, J.; Kang, X.; Chen, R.; Gu, W. Research on functional spatial model and index system of comprehensive elderly care community. J. Urban Plan. 2015, 2, 83–92. [Google Scholar]
  19. Yin, J.; Peng, Z. Active aging: The enlightenment of active retirement communities in the United States on the construction of retirement communities in China. Int. Urban Plan. 2017, 32, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Pak, T.-Y. Social protection for happiness? The impact of social senior reform on subjective well-being of the Korean elderly. J. Policy Model. 2020, 42, 349–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fang, M.; Luo, Y.; Qiu, B. Experience and enlightenment of developing housing cooperatives—Based on the model of western countries and China’s preliminary practice. Urban Dev. Res. 2016, 23, 19–27. [Google Scholar]
  22. Lu, F.; Xia, H. From physical space planning to public participation—On intelligent community planning based on spring hill cooperative ecological settlements. World Archit. 2015, 8, 124–131. [Google Scholar]
  23. McCamant, K.; Durrett, C. Creating Senior Cohousing: Building Sustainable Communities; New Society Publishers: Gabriola Island, BC, Canada, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  24. McCamant, M.; Durrett, C. Senior Cohousing: A Contemporary Approach to Housing Ourselves; Ten Speed Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 1994; p. 12. [Google Scholar]
  25. Sargisson, L. Fool’s Gold? Utopianism in the Twenty-Frist Century; Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  26. Generalova, E.M.; Generalov, V.P.; Kuznetsova, A.A. Modular Buildings in Modern Construction. Procedia Eng. 2016, 153, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Wang, Z.; Pan, W. A hybrid coupled wall system with replaceable steel coupling beams for high-rise modular buildings. J. Build. Eng. 2020, 31, 101355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fernández-Ruiz, M.A.; Moskaleva, A.; Gil-Martín, L.M.; Palomares, A.; Hernández-Montes, E. Design and form-finding of compression structures with prestressing tendons. Eng. Struct. 2019, 197, 109394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Osman, M.M.; Sevinc, H. Adaptation of climate-responsive building design strategies and resilience to climate change in the hot/arid region of Khartoum, Sudan. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2019, 47, 101429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Valinejadshoubi, M.; Heidari, S.; Zamani, P. The impact of temperature difference of the sunny and shady yards on the natural ventilation of the vernacular buildings. J. Build. Eng. 2019, 26, 100880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Patil, S.P.; Shendye, P.; Markert, B. Mechanical properties and behavior of glass fiber-reinforced silica aerogel nanocomposites: Insights from all-atom simulations. Scr. Mater. 2020, 177, 65–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chi, F.; Xu, L.; Peng, C. Integration of completely passive cooling and heating systems with daylighting function into courtyard building towards energy saving. Appl. Energy 2020, 266, 114865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lim, H.; Seo, J.; Song, D.; Yoon, S.; Kim, J. Interaction Analysis of Countermeasures for the Stack Effect in a High-Rise Office Building. Build. Environ. 2019, 168, 106530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, A.; Gao, X.; Ren, T. Study on thermal pressure in a sloping underground tunnel under natural ventilation. Energy Build. 2017, 147, 200–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Pettit, T.; Irga, P.J.; Abdo, P.; Torpy, F.R. Do the plants in functional green walls contribute to their ability to filter particulate matter? Build. Environ. 2017, 125, 299–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, G.; Xuan, Q.; Akram, M.W.; Akhlaghi, Y.G.; Liu, H.; Shittu, S. Building integrated solar concentrating systems: A review. Appl. Energy 2020, 260, 114288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jolywood (Taizhou) Solar Technology. N-type Bifacial High Efficiency Mono Silicon Double Glass Module. Available online: http://www.jolywood.cn/upload/202004/26/202004260928161729.pdf (accessed on 21 April 2020).
  38. Asfour, O.S. A comparison between the daylighting and energy performance of courtyard and atrium buildings considering the hot climate of Saudi Arabia. J. Build. Eng. 2020, 30, 101299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chen, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, D.; Dong, Y. The Research on Solar Photovoltaic Direct-driven Air Conditioning System in Hot-humid Regions. Procedia Eng. 2017, 205, 1523–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tao, Q.; Jiang, F.; Li, Z.; Zheng, J. A model of heat gain calculation for buildings with shuttle louvers: Verification and a case study. J. Build. Eng. 2019, 29, 101101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chen, B.; Zhuang, Z.; Chen, X.; Jia, X. Field survey on indoor thermal environment of rural residences with coupled Chinese kang and passive solar collecting wall heating in Northeast China. Solar Energy 2006, 81, 781–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Akaf, H.R.; Kohansal, M.E.; Moshari, S.; Gholami, J. A novel decision-making method for the prioritization of passive heating systems use; case study: Tehran. J. Build. Eng. 2019, 26, 100865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Acosta, I.; Campano, M.Á.; Molina, J.F. Window design in architecture: Analysis of energy savings for lighting and visual comfort in residential spaces. Appl. Energy 2016, 168, 493–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ginestet, S.; Aschan-Leygonie, C.; Bayeux, T.; Keirsbulck, M. Mould in indoor environments: The role of heating, ventilation and fuel poverty. A French perspective. Build. Environ. 2020, 169, 106577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ren, J. Research on the Influence Factors of Energy Consumption and Indoor Comfort of Existing Residential Buildings in Cold Areas; Dalian University of Technology: Dalian, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  46. Zhai, J.; Yu, J.; Kang, Y. Advances in research for underground buildings: Energy, thermal comfort and indoor air quality. Energy Build. 2020, 215, 109916. [Google Scholar]
  47. Li, F. Research on Indoor Thermal Environment and Thermal Comfort of Residents in Nanjing Heating Houses; Nanjing Normal University: Nanjing, China, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  48. Chandel, S.S.; Sharma, V.; Marwah, B.M. Review of energy efficient features in vernacular architecture for improving indoor thermal comfort conditions. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 65, 459–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Tang, Y. Distributed aggregation control of grid-interactive smart buildings for power system frequency support. Appl. Energy 2019, 251, 113371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Frumkin, K. Toppling Oranges: Death, Disability, Decline, and Readmission of Community-Dwelling Elderly Patients after an Emergency Department Visit. J. Emerg. Med. 2020, 58, 339–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Huang, L.C.; Chang, H.C.; Chen, C.C.; Kuo, C.C. A ZigBee-based monitoring and protection system for building electrical safety. Energy Build. 2011, 43, 1418–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Dhakal, K.; Alsadoon, A.; Prasad PW, C.; Ali, R.S.; Pham, L.; Elchouemi, A. A novel solution for a Wireless Body Sensor Network: Telehealth elderly people monitoring. Egypt. Inform. J. 2019, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yu, Q. Analysis on the status quo of mental health of elderly people in communities and nursing countermeasures. Modern Salt Chem. Ind. 2019, 46, 134–135. [Google Scholar]
  54. Shen, Y. Discussion on related factors affecting mental health level of the elderly. World’s Latest Med. Inf. Abstr. 2019, 19, 354–355. [Google Scholar]
  55. Jing, Z.; Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Ding, L.; Tang, X.; Feng, Y.; Zhou, C. The mediating effect of psychological distress on cognitive function and physical frailty among the elderly: Evidence from rural Shandong, China. J. Affect. Disord. 2020, 268, 88–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wu, Y.; Liu, H.; Li, B.; Kosonen, R.; Kong, D.; Zhou, S.; Yao, R. Thermal adaptation of the elderly during summer in a hot humid area: Psychological, behavioral, and physiological responses. Energy Build. 2019, 203, 109450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Oki, R.; Tsuneoka, Y.; Yamaguchi, S.; Sugano, S.; Watanabe, N.; Akimoto, T.; Hayashi, Y.; Wakao, S.; Tanabe, S.-I. Renovating a house to aim for net-zero energy, thermal comfort, energy self-consumption and behavioural adaptation: A method proposed for ENEMANE HOUSE 2017. Energy Build. 2019, 201, 183–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. “Menu” for the independent customization model.
Figure 1. “Menu” for the independent customization model.
Applsci 10 03541 g001
Figure 2. Modular assembly strategy for the i-Yard 2.0.
Figure 2. Modular assembly strategy for the i-Yard 2.0.
Applsci 10 03541 g002
Figure 3. Structural module “pin” connection method. 1: lifting lug, 1-1: end lifting lug, 1-2: middle lifting lug, 1-3: void, 2: column, 3: alignment connector, 3-1: floor, 3-2: positioning block, 3-3: connection hole, 4: screw, 5: nuts, 6: embedded parts, 7: through hole.
Figure 3. Structural module “pin” connection method. 1: lifting lug, 1-1: end lifting lug, 1-2: middle lifting lug, 1-3: void, 2: column, 3: alignment connector, 3-1: floor, 3-2: positioning block, 3-3: connection hole, 4: screw, 5: nuts, 6: embedded parts, 7: through hole.
Applsci 10 03541 g003
Figure 4. Installation of exterior wall panel with integrated finish, waterproofing, thermal insulation, and structure.
Figure 4. Installation of exterior wall panel with integrated finish, waterproofing, thermal insulation, and structure.
Applsci 10 03541 g004
Figure 5. (a) Introduction of green ternary space; (b) ternary spatial plan for climate response.
Figure 5. (a) Introduction of green ternary space; (b) ternary spatial plan for climate response.
Applsci 10 03541 g005
Figure 6. Elevated courtyard combined with passive climate regulation.
Figure 6. Elevated courtyard combined with passive climate regulation.
Applsci 10 03541 g006
Figure 7. Landscape gallery frame on the west side of the building (actual photo).
Figure 7. Landscape gallery frame on the west side of the building (actual photo).
Applsci 10 03541 g007
Figure 8. Rooftop solar photovoltaic and solar thermal panels.
Figure 8. Rooftop solar photovoltaic and solar thermal panels.
Applsci 10 03541 g008
Figure 9. South facade passive solar heat collector air wall.
Figure 9. South facade passive solar heat collector air wall.
Applsci 10 03541 g009
Figure 10. Indoor Temperature.
Figure 10. Indoor Temperature.
Applsci 10 03541 g010
Figure 11. Indoor Humidity.
Figure 11. Indoor Humidity.
Applsci 10 03541 g011
Figure 12. Indoor CO2 Concentration.
Figure 12. Indoor CO2 Concentration.
Applsci 10 03541 g012
Figure 13. Indoor PM2.5 Concentration.
Figure 13. Indoor PM2.5 Concentration.
Applsci 10 03541 g013
Figure 14. Schematic diagram of the intelligent control system.
Figure 14. Schematic diagram of the intelligent control system.
Applsci 10 03541 g014
Figure 15. Intelligent app control and monitoring system.
Figure 15. Intelligent app control and monitoring system.
Applsci 10 03541 g015
Table 1. i-Yard 2.0 Photovoltaic System Parameters Table.
Table 1. i-Yard 2.0 Photovoltaic System Parameters Table.
ItemParameters
Housing module size2400 × 9600 mm
Basic size of single crystal156.75 × 156.75 mm
Custom component size1182 × 992 mm
Roof layer6 × 9
Series and parallel27 × 2
Effective area63.31 m2
Comprehensive efficiency23.2%
Voc27.44 V
Vmmp22.61 V
Isc9.82 A
Current temperature coefficient+0.048%/K
Voltage temperature coefficient−0.30%/K
Power temperature coefficient−0.38%/K
Table 2. Energy Balance Benefits.
Table 2. Energy Balance Benefits.
ENERGY
ENERGY BALANCE (80%)
Date & TimeGrid to House (E2)House to Grid (E2)Score Earned
2018-08-02 10:00:00 (Initial)621.03 kwh81.42 kwh
2018-08-16 22:00:00 (Final)1194.26 kwh684.13 kwh
ENERGY BALANCE = (E2Final − E2Initial) − (E2Final − E2Initial) = 29.48 kwh80.00
GENERATING CAPACITY (20%)
Date & TimePower Generation (E3)PV Area (A)Score Earned
2018-08-02 10:00:00 (Initial)122.15 kwh63.32 m2
2018-08-16 22:00:00 (Final)1413.38 kwh63.32 m2
GENERATING CAPACITY = (E3Final − E3Initial)/A = 20.392 kwh/m2
Highest Generating Capacity among teams: 20.392 kwh/m2
20.00

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jin, Y.; Li, J.; Wu, W. i-Yard 2.0: Integration of Sustainability into a Net-Zero Energy House. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3541. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10103541

AMA Style

Jin Y, Li J, Wu W. i-Yard 2.0: Integration of Sustainability into a Net-Zero Energy House. Applied Sciences. 2020; 10(10):3541. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10103541

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jin, Yichun, Junjie Li, and Wei Wu. 2020. "i-Yard 2.0: Integration of Sustainability into a Net-Zero Energy House" Applied Sciences 10, no. 10: 3541. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10103541

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop