Next Article in Journal
Performance Comparisons of Broadband Power Line Communication Technologies
Previous Article in Journal
The Combination of Plasma-Processed Air (PPA) and Plasma-Treated Water (PTW) Causes Synergistic Inactivation of Candida albicans SC5314
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of Frequency and Distance on Acoustic Emission Velocity Propagating in Various Dielectrics

Faculty of Electrical Engineering Automatic Control and Informatics, Opole University of Technology, 45-758 Opole, Poland
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(9), 3305; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10093305
Submission received: 10 April 2020 / Revised: 24 April 2020 / Accepted: 6 May 2020 / Published: 9 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Acoustics and Vibrations)

Abstract

:
The results obtained for the measurements of acoustic emission (AE) signal parameters emitted in three dielectric liquids are presented in this paper. In particular, the velocity of AE wave was calculated based on the time of arrival of the AE signal. A frequency modulated signal was generated by a piezoelectric transducer and measured at various distances by a hydrophone. The changes in velocity values at particular distances and for different frequencies were investigated. The analyses include the determination of the dependency of the velocity values from the distance between the communicating devices. A nonlinear regression model was calculated, and the differences between AE velocities propagating in the considered dielectrics were determined. Similarly, the influence of modulation frequency on the AE velocity was determined using nonlinear regression. Based on the calculation data, it can clearly be stated that the velocity of AE wave depends significantly on the frequency and distance at which it is registered. These two factors may have an important influence on the localization of partial discharges (PD) occurring in these types of dielectric liquids.

1. Introduction

Acoustic emission (AE) is one of the noninvasive methods used for the detection and localization of partial discharges (PD), occurring in the insulation systems of power transformers [1,2,3]. PD may pose a serious risk to the proper functioning of this type of equipment. In the field of high-voltage power transformer diagnostics, there are various other existing methods to calculate their technical condition estimation, e.g., optical spectrophotometry [4,5,6], or UHV [7,8,9] methods. The advantage of non-invasive PD detection methods is their resistance to electromagnetic interference, which makes them appropriate for application under on-line operation [10,11,12].
Apart from the detection of the PD occurrence, its localization inside the device is crucial [11,13]. Knowing the speed of the waveform of AE is the key parameter in the application of methods for locating incomplete discharges. The location of the PD source is calculated by assuming the known AE velocity value and coordinates of the measuring sensor. Regarding the AE velocity, within literature, various values are defined, e.g., the speed of 1417 m/s is assumed in [13], 1431 m/s in [14] or 1400 m/s in [15,16]. Both within literature and in the IEEE standard C57.127-2007 [17], the impact from temperature and moisture content is mentioned.
The speed of AE wave has an important impact on the localization result, as shown in [18], where authors measured AE velocity changes at various distances while propagating in concrete. Therefore, in this study, experiments have been carried out to determine the AE wave velocity in the chosen propagation centers. At the present time, new electro- and thermo-insulating materials are being developed. Aside from mineral oils, this also includes natural and synthetic esters [19,20,21].
PD emit AE waves in a wide-frequency spectrum. Therefore, the effect of modulation frequencies was studied in this paper. In practice, the surveyors do not know where the AE source is located, thus, they place the sensors at various locations. For that reason, the AE velocity at different distances between the source and receiver was determined. Transformers are usually large in size, but the distance from the isolation system to the sensor can be up to several meters long. As the AE wave undergoes significant attenuation, especially in the HF range, it is impossible to record pressure changes over long distances. The distances considered in this study were chosen experimentally, as part of basic works [22]. In real transformers, the AE wave will undergo additional phenomena such as damping, refraction, reflections, etc. In this work, we did not analyze the barriers to propagation as the primary objective was to determine the AE velocity in barrier-free centers.
The main contribution of the here presented research study lies in the determination of the influence of distance and modulation frequency of the AE wave on its velocity, in various dielectric liquids. The results of preliminary works were obtained for natural ester and are presented in [22]. In this article, comparative analyses for the velocity measurements of AE waves propagating in three types of dielectrics are presented. In particular, mineral oil type TRAFO EN [23], natural ester type eN1204 [24], and synthetic ester type 7131 [25] are considered.

2. Materials and Methods

The measurements were conducted in a laboratory. The system was modelled to test the parameters of the acoustic wave propagating in a typical propagation medium such as mineral oil or ester, which are used in the insulation systems of power transformers. A piezoelectric transducer (disc type PRYY+0354, material type PIC255 [26]) was applied as the AE source and a spherical hydrophone type 8105 [27] was used as the AE receiver. Standard AE measuring apparatus was used for signal registration. The signals propagated in a plastic tank of the following dimensions: 187 mm wide, 147 mm high and 1000 mm long. The tank was filled with the considered dielectric liquids, details of their physical properties are given in Table 1. A detailed description of the measuring setup and parameters of the applied transducers is given in previously published work [22]. A scheme diagram of the experimental setup is depicted in Figure 1.
The measuring procedure involved 2 tasks: (1) investigation of frequency modulated AE signals, in particular, values up to 400 Hz were considered. AE waves up to 400 kHz were generated and recorded, but values above 400 Hz were not detectable, and so were therefore not included in this paper. The frequency range presented was a result of hardware limitations, and (2) an investigation of the influence of distance between the transducers in the range from 2.5 cm to 82.5 cm. Within the first task, the frequency modulated AE signal was emitted at a constant location, in a series of 32 samples for each of the regarded frequency values. Within the second task, the AE signal was registered with a sampling frequency of 250 MHz at various distances to the source. The AE velocity was calculated as quotient of the distance between the measuring devices and the time of arrival ta values. An exemplary AE waveform generated at frequency f = 150 Hz is depicted in Figure 2. An exemplary AE waveform measured by a hydrophone at distance d = 82.5 cm and frequency f = 150 Hz is depicted in Figure 3. In Figure 3, the vertical line shows the value of ta.

3. Results Analysis and Discussion

In Figure 4, detailed results depicting the median velocity values calculated for AE waveform generated in synthetic ester at various frequencies and measured at various distances, are presented in the form of heat maps. The values should be read as on a chessboard—each value represents a particular row and column, as described on the axes. The shade of grey corresponds to the AE velocity. Darker fields indicate higher values and lighter fields indicate lower values. The observation of colors allows for the consideration of the dynamics of speed changes, depending on the parameter f or d. It should be noted that in the diagrams, the values are not presented in a linear way for the frequency. Linear increments are used only for distances. Corresponding results gathered for the natural ester and mineral oil are depicted in Figure 5 and Figure 6, respectively.
From the values depicted in Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6, it can clearly be seen that the velocity of the AE wave strongly depends on the location it is measured, and that the values differ significantly in the differing liquids. They are more stable, despite modulation frequency, only in the synthetic ester (see Figure 4), while they change more dynamically in the natural ester (see Figure 5) and in the mineral oil (see Figure 6).
From Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6, it can also be seen that the highest velocities registered were for the greatest frequencies and the smallest distances between the AE source and sensor location. The values reached 1785 m/s for the synthetic ester, 1730 m/s for the natural ester and 1693 m/s for mineral oil. Contrary to this, the lowest values were registered at the smallest modulation frequencies, but at various distances between the emitter and receiver. In these cases, the AE wave propagated at 1132 m/s in synthetic ester, 1133 m/s in natural ester, and 1102 m/s in mineral oil.
In Figure 7, corresponding results depicting the velocity values in function of generation frequencies are presented. In Figure 8, detailed results depicting the median velocity values calculated for the AE waveform generated in the considered dielectrics, in function of distance between the emitter and receiver, are shown.
In order to determine the trend for the relationships shown in Figure 7 and Figure 8, appropriate models of the regression functions were selected. The regression process was performed in the MATLAB programming environment with the use of the cftool tool, which allows for the selection of any set of regression functions. Dependency (1), depicts the regression model F1(f) applied for the approximation of the impact from generation frequencies f on the velocity values. This is used as a power function. Dependency (2), depicts the corresponding regression model F2(d) applied for the distance d impact determination. This model is a sum of two exponential functions. The resulted approximation curves are depicted in Figure 7 and Figure 8. The regression coefficients a1-a3 and b1-b4 were calculated with 95% confidence bounds for both models.
F 1 ( f ) = a 1 f a 2 + a 3
F 2 ( d ) = b 1 e b 2 d + b 3 e b 4 d
In Table 2, the F1(f) regression model coefficients a1-a3, calculated for the median velocities of AE signals propagating in the considered dielectric liquids regarding the dependency from frequency and the goodness parameters: SSE, Rsquare, Adjrsquare, RMSE are summarized. In Table 3, the corresponding values calculated for the second regression model F2(d) coefficients b1-b4 are summarized.
As mentioned in previous section, the results obtained refer to the median values calculated over 32 samples for each distance and modulation frequency. In order to determine a specific numerical value, the median over all considered frequencies (see Figure 7) and distances (see Figure 8) was analyzed. Based on these charts, the differences are clearly recognizable. Another significant issue that may be noticed is the rapid increase in AE speed up to 100 Hz, which was confirmed by the power function applied for the regression analysis F1(f), and a rapid decrease in these values at the smallest distances between the applied sensors, which was confirmed by the exponential function F2(d).
Both regression analyses were performed achieving high goodness parameters (see Table 2 and Table 3), e.g., Rsquare values exceeding 0.89 for all liquids. The value of the coefficient a3 is closely related to the stabilized velocity value, regarding the dependency from modulation frequency. It can therefore be stated that the stable AE velocity equals to 1372 m/s in the synthetic ester, 1424 m/s in the mineral oil, and 1477 m/s in the natural ester.
In the case of dependency from the distance between the source and receiver, the AE velocity may be determined from the value of coefficient b3, which differs slightly, with amounts of 1377 m/s in the synthetic ester, 1422 m/s in the mineral oil, and 1487 m/s in the natural ester.
It must also be stated that the measured AE speed values do not correlate directly with the densities of the dielectric liquids (see Table 1).
From the mathematical dependencies F1(f) and F2(d), it can be predicted that a further increase in modulation frequency or distance between the sensors will not significantly influence the AE velocity, as both models indicate stabilized tail values. Nevertheless, it may be beneficial to consider obtaining further measurements, including higher distances, frequencies and temperature influences on the velocities of AE waves in the considered liquids.

Funding

This research was funded by National Science Centre in Poland, grant number: 2017/01/X/ST8/00263.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Pompili, M.; Bartnikas, R. On partial discharge measurement in dielectric liquids. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr Insul. 2012, 19, 1476–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pompili, M. Partial discharge measurements in dielectric liquids. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Conference on Dielectric Liquids, Poitiers, France, 30 June–3 July 2008; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Han, Y.; Song, Y.H. Condition monitoring techniques for electrical equipment: A literature survey. IEEE Power Eng. Rev. 2002, 22, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kozioł, M.; Boczar, T.; Nagi, Ł. Identification of electrical discharge forms, generated in insulating oil, using the optical spectrophotometry method. IET Sci. Meas. Technol. 2019, 13, 416–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Koziol, M.; Nagi, L. Analysis of Optical Radiation Spectra Emitted by Electrical Discharges, Generated by Different Configuration Types of High Voltage Electrodes. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Dielectrics (ICD), Budapest, Hungary, 1–5 July 2018; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kozioł, M.; Nagi, Ł.; Kunicki, M.; Urbaniec, I. Radiation in the Optical and UHF Range Emitted by Partial Discharges. Energies 2019, 12, 4334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Siegel, M.; Beltle, M.; Tenbohlen, S.; Coenen, S. Application of UHF sensors for PD measurement at power transformers. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2017, 24, 331–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, Y.P.; Wang, H.B.; Chen, W.J.; Yang, Y.J.; Jian, T. Test study on corona onset voltage of UHV transmission lines based on UV detection. In Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on High Voltage Engineering and Application, ICHVE 2008, Chongqing, China, 9–12 November 2008; pp. 387–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kunicki, M. Variability of the UHF signals generated by partial discharges in mineral oil. Sensors (Switzerland) 2019, 19, 1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Kunicki, M.; Nagi, L. Correlation analysis of partial discharge measurement results. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2017 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe (EEEIC/I&CPS Europe), Milan, Italy, 6–9 June 2017; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Boczar, T.; Witkowski, P.; Borucki, S.; Cichon, A. Solving a set of spherical equations for localization of partial discharges by acoustic emission method. Acta Phys. Pol. A 2015, 128, 299–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Boczar, T.; Witkowski, P. Partial discharges localization using triangular method with Rogowski coil. Prz. Elektrotechniczny 2010, 86, 70–73. [Google Scholar]
  13. Markalous, S.; Tenbolhen, S.; Feser, K. Detection and Location of Partial Discharges in Power Transformers using acoustic and electromagnetic signals. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2008, 15, 1576–1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hekmati, A.; Hekmati, R. Optimum acoustic sensor placement for partial discharge allocation in transformers. IET Sci. Meas. Technol. 2017, 11, 581–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Antony, D.; Punekar, G.S. Noniterative Method for Combined Acoustic-Electrical Partial Discharge Source Localization. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2018, 33, 1679–1688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, Q.; Kundur, D.; Yuan, H.; Liu, Y.; Lu, J.; Ma, Z. Noise Suppression of Corona Current Measurement From HVdc Transmission Lines. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2016, 65, 264–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. C57.127TM-2007. IEEE Guide for the Detection and Location of Acoustic Emissions from Partial Discharges in Oil-Immersed Power Transformers and Reactors; IEEE Std: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 31 August 2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, J.; Qin, L. Study on Acoustic Emission Localization of Concrete Using Modified Velocity. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rajab, A.; Tsuchie, M.; Kozako, M.; Hikita, M.; Suzuki, T. PD properties and gases generated by palm fatty acids esters (PFAE) oil. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Dielectrics, ICD 2016, Montpellier, France, 3–7 July 2016; Volume 2, pp. 816–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pompili, M.; Mazzetti, C.; Bartnikas, R. Comparative PD pulse burst characteristics of transformer type natural and synthetic ester fluids and mineral oils. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2009, 16, 1511–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jing, Y.; Timoshkin, I.V.; Wilson, M.P.; Given, M.J.; Macgregor, S.J.; Wang, T.; Lehr, J. Dielectric properties of natural ester, synthetic ester midel 7131 and mineral oil diala, D. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2014, 21, 644–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Wotzka, D.; Koziol, M.; Nagi, L. Measurement of acoustic emission velocity in natural ester. In Proceedings of the 20th International Scientific Conference on Electric Power Engineering, EPE 2019, Kouty nad Desnou, Czech Republic, 15–17 May 2019; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Danvers, MA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. ORLEN OIL TRAFO EN Product Brochure. Available online: https://www.orlenoil.pl/PL/NaszaOferta/Produkty/Strony/produkt.aspx?produkt=ORLEN_OIL_TRAFO_EN (accessed on 8 May 2020).
  24. MIDEL eN 1204 Product Brochure. Available online: https://www.midel.com/downloads/ (accessed on 8 May 2020).
  25. MIDEL 7131 Product Brochure. Available online: https://www.midel.com/downloads/ (accessed on 8 May 2020).
  26. PI Piezoelectric Discs Datasheet. Available online: https://www.piceramic.com/en/products/piezoceramic-components/disks-rods-and-cylinders/piezoelectric-discs-1206710/#downloads (accessed on 8 May 2020).
  27. Product Brochure—Hydrophones—Types 8103, 8104, 8105 and 8106. Available online: https://www.bksv.com/media/doc/bp0317.pdf (accessed on 8 May 2020).
Figure 1. Scheme diagram of the experimental setup.
Figure 1. Scheme diagram of the experimental setup.
Applsci 10 03305 g001
Figure 2. Exemplary acoustic emission (AE) waveform generated at frequency f = 150 Hz.
Figure 2. Exemplary acoustic emission (AE) waveform generated at frequency f = 150 Hz.
Applsci 10 03305 g002
Figure 3. Exemplary AE waveform measured by hydrophone at distance d = 82.5 cm and frequency f = 150 Hz.
Figure 3. Exemplary AE waveform measured by hydrophone at distance d = 82.5 cm and frequency f = 150 Hz.
Applsci 10 03305 g003
Figure 4. Detailed results depicting velocity values calculated for AE waveform generated in synthetic ester at various frequencies and measured at various distances.
Figure 4. Detailed results depicting velocity values calculated for AE waveform generated in synthetic ester at various frequencies and measured at various distances.
Applsci 10 03305 g004
Figure 5. Detailed results depicting velocity values calculated for AE waveform generated in natural ester at various frequencies and measured at various distances.
Figure 5. Detailed results depicting velocity values calculated for AE waveform generated in natural ester at various frequencies and measured at various distances.
Applsci 10 03305 g005
Figure 6. Detailed results depicting velocity values calculated for AE waveform generated in mineral oil at various frequencies and measured at various distances.
Figure 6. Detailed results depicting velocity values calculated for AE waveform generated in mineral oil at various frequencies and measured at various distances.
Applsci 10 03305 g006
Figure 7. Detailed results depicting the median velocity values calculated for AE waveform generated in the considered dielectrics, in function of generation frequencies.
Figure 7. Detailed results depicting the median velocity values calculated for AE waveform generated in the considered dielectrics, in function of generation frequencies.
Applsci 10 03305 g007
Figure 8. Detailed results depicting the median velocity values calculated for AE waveform generated in the considered dielectrics, in function of distance between the emitter and receiver.
Figure 8. Detailed results depicting the median velocity values calculated for AE waveform generated in the considered dielectrics, in function of distance between the emitter and receiver.
Applsci 10 03305 g008
Table 1. Properties of the considered dielectric liquids [23,24,25].
Table 1. Properties of the considered dielectric liquids [23,24,25].
PropertyDensity
at 20 °C (g/cm3)
Viscosity
at 40 °C (mm2/s)
Water contentBreakdown Voltage (kV)
Test methodISO 3675ISO 3104IEC 60814IEC 60156/ASTM D877/IEC 60296
Natural ester0.923750 (mg/kg)≥ 30
Synthetic ester0.972950 (mg/kg)≥ 75
Mineral oil0.879.950 (m/m)≥ 69
Table 2. Regression coefficients for F1(f) and goodness parameters calculated for the median velocities of AE signals propagating in the considered dielectric liquids.
Table 2. Regression coefficients for F1(f) and goodness parameters calculated for the median velocities of AE signals propagating in the considered dielectric liquids.
PropertyNatural EsterSynthetic EsterMineral Oil
Coeff. a1−424,600−53,840−1,182,000
Coeff. a2−2.069−1.638−2.329
Coeff. a3147713721424
SSE156522513324
Rsquare0.9680.8920.942
Adjrsquare0.9650.8790.935
RMSE9.8911.8614.41
Table 3. Regression coefficients for F2(d) and goodness parameters calculated for the median velocities of AE signals propagating in the considered dielectric liquids.
Table 3. Regression coefficients for F2(d) and goodness parameters calculated for the median velocities of AE signals propagating in the considered dielectric liquids.
PropertyNatural EsterSynthetic EsterMineral Oil
Coeff. b1323.4778.3−398.4
Coeff. b2−17.86−30.69−21.47
Coeff. b3148713771422
Coeff. b4−0.05−0.03557−0.02653
SSE26153244915
Rsquare0.9580.9760.983
Adjrsquare0.9370.9640.974
RMSE20.8723.2513.53

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wotzka, D. Influence of Frequency and Distance on Acoustic Emission Velocity Propagating in Various Dielectrics. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3305. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10093305

AMA Style

Wotzka D. Influence of Frequency and Distance on Acoustic Emission Velocity Propagating in Various Dielectrics. Applied Sciences. 2020; 10(9):3305. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10093305

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wotzka, Daria. 2020. "Influence of Frequency and Distance on Acoustic Emission Velocity Propagating in Various Dielectrics" Applied Sciences 10, no. 9: 3305. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10093305

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop