Next Article in Journal
Mode of Action of the Natural Product Allicin in a Plant Model: Influence on the Cytoskeleton and Subsequent Shift in Auxin Localization
Next Article in Special Issue
Sound Activity Monitor Circuit for Low Power Consumption of Always-On Microphone Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Fault Detection and Isolation of Load Mutation Caused by Electrical Interference of Single-Shaft Combined Cycle Power Plant
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Cross-Zone Navigation and Signage Systems for Combatting Cybersickness and Disorientation in Middle-Aged and Older People within a 3D Virtual Store
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Auxiliary Decision-Making System for Steel Plate Cold Straightening Based on Multi-Machine Learning Competition Strategies

Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(22), 11473; https://doi.org/10.3390/app122211473
by Zhen-Hu Dai 1,2,†, Rui-Hua Wang 3,† and Ji-Hong Guan 1,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(22), 11473; https://doi.org/10.3390/app122211473
Submission received: 10 October 2022 / Revised: 9 November 2022 / Accepted: 10 November 2022 / Published: 11 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Selected Papers from IMETI 2021)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Thanks for the performed work. Please find attached my comments for the manuscript.

Comments for author File: Comments.docx

Author Response

Thanks for the comments and suggestions to the article.

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

It is unclear what train:test split ratio was used during classification? Results must be provided considering different holdout % and holdout validation approaches. Refer to this article to understand the holdout validation approach. ‘A Bayesian Optimized Discriminant Analysis Model for Condition Monitoring of Face Milling Cutter Using Vibration Datasets’. In addition to this, results of k-fold cross-validation must be provided.

Include an actual picture of the experimentation setup. In addition clearly explain the process of data collection, instrumentation used, etc.

What about classification using a blind dataset (No labels)? Classification results must be provided considering the blind dataset (No labels). Apply the trained model to classify blind datasets. Refer to “Figure 8: Framework for classification of blind data” from the following article ‘Application of Bayesian Family Classifiers for Cutting Tool Inserts Health Monitoring on CNC Milling’.

Refer some recent references for bagging and boosting such as ‘Design of Bagged Tree Ensemble for carbide coated inserts fault diagnosis’, ‘Supervision of Carbide Tool Condition by Training of Vibration-based Statistical Model using Boosted Trees Ensemble’, ‘Cutting Tool Condition Monitoring using a Deep Learning-based Artificial Neural Network,’ ‘Multi-Point Face Milling Tool Condition Monitoring Through Vibration Spectrogram and LSTM-Autoencoder,’

How to deal with the diversity between the data distributions of present and future moments? Traditional ML algorithms can only resolve classification issues within the same data distributions. In predicting various parameters, what would be the critical steps of generalizing to unknown moments?

How to predict future faults with the collected raw signal from the present configuration of defined levels of different factors?

The grammar is improvable in a few places. There must be thorough proofreading of the paper.

 

 

Author Response

Thanks for the comments and suggestions to the article.

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Thanks for addressing my comments. Please find attached my responses. Some comments need to be further addressed.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thanks for the reviewing and advice for the manuscript. 

I have revised and improved the manuscript according to the comments in response. And made some further clarification to the responses. 
I have marked the main changes using the MS word’s “Track Changes” function to be easily viewed.

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have tried addressing my comments, and the paper may be accepted.

Author Response

Thanks for the reviewing and suggestions again.

Back to TopTop