Next Article in Journal
Multi-Issue Negotiation Protocol with Pre-Domain Narrowing
Previous Article in Journal
Comprehensive Evaluations of NLOS and Linearization Errors on UWB Positioning
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Biogeochemical State of Salinized Irrigated Soils of Central Fergana (Uzbekistan, Central Asia)

by
Avazbek Turdaliev
1,
Kamoliddin Askarov
1,
Evgeny Abakumov
2,*,
Elyorbek Makhkamov
1,
Gayratbek Rahmatullayev
3,
Gaybullo Mamajonov
4,
Avazbek Akhmadjonov
1 and
Akmal Axunov
1
1
Fergana State University, Department of Soil Science, Fergana 150100, Uzbekistan
2
Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg 199034, Russia
3
Fergana Scientific Research Institute of Cotton Breeding, Seed Breeding and Cultivation Agrotechnologies, Fergana 150100, Uzbekistan
4
Fergana Polytechnic Institute, Fergana 150100, Uzbekistan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(10), 6188; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13106188
Submission received: 17 April 2023 / Revised: 10 May 2023 / Accepted: 13 May 2023 / Published: 18 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Ecology Science and Engineering)

Abstract

:
The Central Fergana region is one of the overpopulated regions of Central Asia, which includes parts of Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan. Here, in the dry subtropical climate are the most ancient, irrigated oases used for agriculture. Fergana valley is the key to the food security of the region as a whole. The article provides information on diversity and chemical composition of newly developed, new and old-irrigated Calcisols soils formed on alluvial and alluvial–prolluvial sediments. Soils are poor with organic matter (0.37–0.81% of organic carbon), with high nitrogen content (C/N ratio is 4.92–5.79), and with neutral (7.01–7.30) pH values. Data on the content and the ratio of the key components of soil salinity (Na2CO3, Ca(HCO3)2, CaSO4, MgSO4, Na2SO4, NaCl) and the bulk content of salts in soils under different irrigation regimes are presented. It was shown that Na2CO3 concentration is minimal in all the soils, and this salt presents only in ground waters (0.100–0.135 g L−1). Newly irrigated soils are characterized by higher content of salts than old irrigated soils. All the soils investigated are characterized by increasing salinity rate within the soil depth with the highest content of all salts in ground waters. This chloride–sulfate type of salinization is most pronounced in all the soils studied. Gypsum content in agricultural soils results in limited water and nutrient retention and the potential for dissolution, primarily in response to irrigation. The soils of the Fergana Valley are also subjected to polychemical pollution, so the content of trace elements in them was studied. Irrigated meadow-takyr and meadow-saz soils show low levels of environmental hazard, but irrigation results in accumulation of such trace elements as nickel (30 mg kg−1), arsenic (11.75 mg kg−1), bromine (5.00 mg kg−1), antimony (1.48 mg kg−1), cesium (5.00 mg kg−1), and hafnium (2.97 mg kg−1). Irrigation also affects the soil texture and thus increases fine particle percentages in the superficial soil horizons. Thus, the complex chemical characteristics of salinized soils are presented for numerous irrigated landscapes of the region.

1. Introduction

Soil degradation in Central Asia is pronounced in Russia, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, and Kyrgyzstan [1]. Often, it is an irreversible process, especially when taking into account the intensive expansion of agricultural lands in this region [2]. At present, as a result of the degradation of cultivated areas—desertification and waterlogging, water and wind erosion, salinization and pollution—thousands of hectares of land fall out of agricultural turnover [3]. Secondary salinization is one of the decisive factors of deterioration of soil properties and reduction of its productivity. Salt composition of moisture used for irrigation and chemical composition of groundwater plays an essential role in this process [4,5,6]. In the southeastern part of Uzbekistan this problem acquires a special dimension in connection with the intensive conduction of agriculture that, in turn, is connected with the very dense population of the Fergana valley region [7]. Salinization of soils has stretched far to the north; now saline soils have become typical not only for the southern regions of Russia, but also for the central sub-boreal regions, while they have increased their spread in the traditional areas of saline soil distribution [8,9]. Thus, soil salinization, previously restricted to traditional ranges associated with the geochemistry of the landscapes and water hydrochemistry has become a typical process for many soil types. In this connection the urgency of the study of soil salinization of long-range salinization scenarios in the Fergana valley as representative of the subtropical-piedmont area of Central Asia has not weakened.
Nowadays, soil and agricultural land salinization processes are being investigated in various aspects for Uzbekistan—with the use of satellite thermography [10], in terms of soil water quality [11], in terms of landscape dynamics and soil chemical property alteration [12], and in terms of investigation of soil biological stress and its regulation [13]. The reclamation practices of salinized soils of Uzbekistan with the use of cyanobacteria has been reported [14]. The quality and amount of mineral fertilizers make an essential contribution to bulk soil salinity and the quality and yield of crops [5,15] and essentially could affect environmental management effectiveness and practices in long term irrigated areas [5].
Among the large agricultural oases of Uzbekistan, the two largest oases stand out—Zeravshan and Fergana Valley. Both territories are characterized by a main problem—the deficit of available and cost-effective moisture. Salt composition of irrigation water as well as its secondary use in irrigation is also an acute problem. A large area of Central Fergana has been anthropogenically modified and almost all areas are irrigated with the exception of a few thousand hectares of the unique Yazvan sands with endemic flora and fauna. Flooding for half a year of paddy soil type under rice cultivation, shows degradation in the subtropical ecosystem of the Fergana valley, even under an environmentally adopted agricultural production system [16]. Depending on the initial condition of soil cover, the established hydromeliorative irrigation system structure, crop cultivation technologies, and several other phenomena, the evolution of irrigated soils has multidirectional character [17]. Another factor of salts distribution across the Fergana valley is the high speed of winds [18], thus salts could be redistributed not only through irrigation or ground waters [19] but also with the Aeolian factor. The study of trends in the spatial dynamics of biogeochemical indicators of soils in southern Uzbekistan is the most important problem of modern applied soil science and agroecology [4,6].
Thus, saline soils of Uzbekistan in the whole and in the Fergana valley in particular have been investigated rather actively in various aspects. At the same time, the study of salinity dynamics, texture class, and heavy metal content in soils of the Fergana valley is demanded in the conditions of the development of irrigation farming practices. The study of dynamics and component composition of trace elements, in particular lanthanides, in soils of geochemically subordinate landscapes of irrigated areas of the Fergana valley is also of particular interest. The aim of this work was to study the complexity of soil transformation processes and their salt state under the influence of irrigational practices in the Fergana valley.
Thus, the objective of the study was to analyze soil chemical state alteration under the irrigation effect on soil of the Central Fergana region.
The following tasks were formulated to achieve the objective: (1) to study the basic chemical properties of saline irrigated soils of the region, (2) to study particle size composition of soils and trends of their dynamics under irrigated conditions, (3) to study the component and quantitative composition of readily soluble salts in saline irrigated soils, (4) to determine levels of heavy metal pollution in irrigated soils and assess the role of irrigation in this process, (5) to determine the chemical composition of trace elements and lanthanides in the saline irrigated soils of the region.

2. Materials and Methods

The object of the research were newly developed, new and old-irrigated meadow hydromorphic, meadow-takyr soils, formed on alluvial and alluvial-prolluvial sediment of Central Fergana. Geographically the landform belongs to Fergana sediment or Fergana depression, initial toponymal was the “Pargana”—“valley between mountains” [20]. The objects of investigation are located in the Yazvan distirict, Fergana region, Fergana valley, South-East Uzbekistan (Figure 1). Meadow-saz, meadow-takyr soils are formed under influence of saline groundwater in the desert zone, they are saline of different degrees and their parent rock consists of alluvial–prolluvial deposits that belong mainly to light and medium loamy and sometimes heavy loamy soils. In this study we used sections and samples of the following soil pits: Section 1 (40,035′01″ N, 71,046′18″ E, h = 448 m. asl)—old irrigated meadow-takyr soils, Section 12 (40,035′07″ N, 71,046′48″ E, h = 449 m. asl)—old-irrigated meadow-saz soils, Section 20 (40,039′19″ N, 71,042′29″ E, h = 426 m. als)—recently irrigated meadow-saz soils, Section 24 (40,040′15″ N, 71,042′22″ E, h = 425 m. asl)—recently irrigated meadow-takyr soils, Section 28 (40,039′24″ N, 71,044′05″ E, h = 428 m. asl)—old irrigated meadow-saz soils, Section 35 (40,023′58″ N, 71,036′20″ E, h = 486 m. asl)—recently irrigated meadow-saz soils.
There are no background soils in the area—they are fully involved in agriculture. The exception is the soils of barkhan (unstable migratory) sands, but they cannot serve as a background due to initial pronounced differences. According to the state soil maps of the “Uzgiprozem” Institute, in 1972 and 1984 soils distributed in the area of section 20 A belong to newly cultivated, and soils distributed in the area of sections 24 A and 35 A belong also to newly cultivated. Based on field investigations, changes in the morphological characteristics of soils, and the rules accepted in soil science, it can be noted that the level of their cultivation has changed, i.e., by now the soils of section 20 A have turned into newly-irrigated meadow saz soils. The newly irrigated soils of sections 24 A and 35 A were transferred to the category of old-irrigated meadow-saz and meadow-takyr soils. Additional soil sections—1, 12, and 28 were selected for verification of filed and laboratory data.
The general soil section formula is as follows: PJ (arable light gray humus horizon, 5YR 4/1 color, thickness up to 30 cm), BCAcs (carbonate and gypsum accumulative horizon, 2.5 YR 8/6 color, depth from 30 to 70 cm), Cg (parent material with lithogenically inherited (from parent material) carbonates and gypsum and yellowish dark color—10 YR 6/4, due to development of the hydromorphic process as a result of irrigation effect). Pictures of the soil sections are given in Figure 2. Sample plot is located on current agricultural field placed inside the settlement, between roads and complexes of houses (“Makhalya” in Uzbek language).
Normally parent materials are presented by alluvial and prolluvial sediments of the Fergana valley. The climate is dry, with an average precipitation rate of about 200 mm and average annual temperature of about 14.3 °C. Water deficit makes agriculture completely impossible without irrigation which completely depends on the supply region with waters of natural sources—river and artificial ones—and irrigation channels. Nowadays more that 95% of the region area is completely occupied by antropogenic soils, mainly of agrogenic origin.
Research was carried out on the basis of methods and techniques accepted in soil science, in the field, and in cameral and laboratory conditions; soil samples were taken from soil sections. Field research was conducted during the summer of 2015. Soil samples were air-dried, ground, and passed through a 2 mm sieve. Total organic carbon (TOC) was determined by a standard Tuyrin dichromate oxidation method [21], and total nitrogen was determined by the standard Kjeldahl procedure [22]. To determine the water-soluble salt gravimetrical concentrations, we used the traditional method of analysis of aqueous extract at a ratio of soil:water of 1:5. Dry residue was determined by evaporating 50 mL of the extract and further drying to a constant weight at 105 °C with a gravimetric finalization. The calcium and magnesium contents were determined by titration in the presence of Trilon-B (EDTA disodium salt dehydrate). The sodium content was calculated from the difference in the abundances of anions and cations. The chlorine content was determined argentometrically by titration. The potassium and sodium contents were determined by flame-photometry. The particle size distribution of the soils was measured by the sedimentation (gravimetric) method [23]. Exchangeable phosphorous and potassium within the Olsen extract were detected with the use of molybdenum ammonium and flame photometry correspondingly. Elemental analysis of the soils’ fine earths was carried out by the neutron activation method at the Institute of Nuclear Physics, ANRUz. Statistical treatment processing was carried out using the “Microelement” program according to the methodology of Kuziev et al. [24] and Kuziev and Sektimenko [25]. Figures, diagrams, and statistics (Pearson correlation coefficient) were performed using Macromedia Flash and Microsoft Excel software.
Statistical processing of the data was performed using correlation analysis and calculations of the basic soil characteristics (RMS deviation, coefficient of variation, Pearson correlation coefficient.). Data visualization was performed using GraphPad Prizm 9.0.0 and Golden Software Grapher 13.0.

3. Results and Discussion

Soil chemical properties are provided in Table 1. The arable horizons do not show a high organic matter content such as in northern most soils [26]. This is typical for Serozems [26,27,28] (this is a name of these soils in Russian and Soviet soil classifications [29,30]) or Calcisols according to WRB [31].
The reason for the low carbon content is the high organic matter mineralization rate [26], thus only stabilized fractions of calcium humates accumulate in soils [26]. The nitrogen content is low, but the C/N ratio is narrow, which indicated high enrichness of humus by nitrogen. This could be the result of soil amendment by fertilizers, and, simultaneously, be affected by intensive organic matter mineralization in the dry semi desert conditions in a subtropical climate. The superficial horizon of these soils is well fitted to the definition of light humus horizon (AJ) in Russian soil taxonomy [30] due to the alkaline reaction of the fine earth and low humus content. Some of these horizon could be additionally named as takyric according to WRB [31]. The lower horizons are defined as BCA [26] due to accumulation of secondary carbonates in diffusive forms without formation of noodles or other evident pedological features; this is the typical form of irrigated Serozems/Calcisols of Uzbekistan [32,33]. There are not statistical differences in soil carbon and nitrogen content between pairs of old irrigated–recently irrigated soils and takyr-saz soils. Thus, there is not an effect of long-term irrigation on the parameter of the soil humus state in terms of Orlov’s grade systems [26]. The soil bulk phosphorous content is low, but there is biological accumulation in the superficial arable layers. Our data is in good correspondence with the recently published concentration of bulk phosphorous in the so-called “Light Serozems” of the Fergana valley [34]. Apparently high potassium content is typical for soils of the Fergana valley, formed on a loess type of parent materials [35] dominating in this region [36]. There is also increased content of potassium in bulk form and available nutrient content in the superficial arable horizons due to biological accumulation and vertical pulling of soil solutions under the evaporation process. Available potassium is about 1–2% of the bulk form, while the form of phosphorous is about 5–7%. Thus, phosphorous seems to be more mobile that potassium; at the same time the reserve of potassium in the soil is higher, which could be a reason for the apparent lower ratio of the available form of potassium to the bulk form compared to the case of phosphorous. In general, the content of nutrients is higher in old, irrigated soils than in recently irrigated ones. The biological accumulation of ammonium in superficial soil horizons is more pronounced than the mobile forms of phosphorous and potassium. The pH is neutral or slightly alkaline which is an indicator of the absence of sodium salinization [26]. The content of carbonate of calcium and magnesium is also not very high, which is caused by year by year leaching of these materials from soil under the influence of the irrigation process.
Data on soil particle distribution are given in Table 2. The soil investigated belongs to the loamy or sandy loam class according to the texture tringle (Figure 3). Fine particle content is increased in topsoils in comparison to middle and deep soil horizons. It could be the result of colmatage (accumulation of fine particles in the topsoil from turbid water with suspended matter) [37].
In most Eurasian soils, the content of fine particles strongly depends on the humus content, but in this case, a very low humus content did not affect the granulometric composition of the soil [26]. One could assume that the vertical distribution of fine particles is inherited from the parent materials and may therefore be non-homogeneous, but the content of sand and fine sand fractions shows no heterogeneity, hence fine particles were accumulated during soil formation, in particular under the influence of irrigation. The presence of the fraction with diameter 0.05–0.01 mm in soils and sediments is one of the key indicators of loess origin of material [38]; thus, our soils belong to the loess soil group in terms of lithology. The more intensive accumulation of fine particles in the upper horizons of old irrigated soils compared to recently irrigated soils also testifies in favor of the irrigational hypothesis of the transformation of the particle size distribution.
Data on water-soluble salt content are given in Table 3. Due to specific soil-climatic conditions of Central Fergana, these soils are gypsum and carbonate and chloride–sulfate salinity type, dry residue after leaching is relatively high, dry residue in studied meadow saz and meadow takyr soils varies by about 0.505–0.926% as expected, while the highest indicator corresponds to gypsum. Magnesium sulfate stands second after gypsum and the positive correlation between them is 0.9; the process of leaching out of chloride salts is observed up to limits of the threshold concentration. The results of research are presented on the number and migration of macroelements in the soil, the geoenergetic properties, and the amounts of trace elements, the geochemical properties of biogenic microelements, the assessment of heavy metals and metalloids in the soil and their pollution levels, the quantity and differentiation of the heavy metals and metalloids in the soil. According to the obtained data, the content of Na+ and Mg2+ in genetic horizons of old-irrigated and newly irrigated meadow-takyr, meadow-saz soils varies between 0.42–2.57%.
Their content in arable horizons is 0.71–0.92%. Concentrations of sodium and magnesium in genetic horizons of old-irrigated soils are practically equally located, but in general the quantity of Mg2+ is more than Na+. The gypsum content in agricultural soils results in limited water and nutrient retention and the potential for dissolution, primarily in response to irrigation [39]. The absence of Na2CO3 in soil horizons and its presence in ground waters concerns the low stability of this chemical compound in soil porous media. The soil concentrations of water-soluble salts are quite important in the regulation of osmotic and physiological states of agricultural plants [40,41] and should be taken into account in planning of land-use practices.
The content of trace elements is given in Table 4. At the end of the table the lithosphere clarke is given for every chemical element in Table 4.
The scandium content is lower than the clarke in the lithosphere. These rare elements do not show any trends in vertical soil distribution within the soil profile, in spite of the recently published fact of biogenic accumulation in some soils of boreal climatic belt [42]. According to Ladonin’s data, scandium adsorbs very quickly in soils, making it similar to the alkaline earth elements [43]. The chromium content is also lower than the clarke but higher in saz soils than in takyr ones. According to some reports, chromium accumulation in soils may be associated with alluvial deposits and river waters [44], which is quite possible in the Fergana Valley. Mobility of cobalt increases in wet soils, in connection with what is the possible removal of this element in irrigation; in any case, its accumulation is at a level two times lower than clarke [45]. Accumulation of nickel above the clarke occurs in saz soils, it does not occur in takyr soils. Nickel is known as an element which may accumulate on the surface of aluminosilicate chemicals [46] and, especially in soils, enriched by smectite. There is an essential accumulation of arsenic in both saz- and takyr-soils and exceedance of clarke is up to 8–9 times. Recently, a high content of arsenic was reported for Western Siberia [46,47], but high concentrations are not obligatorily dangerous, cause the bulk forms are higher than water soluble. As for bromide salt concentration which exceed clarke by 2.5 times, it has been reported that this element may be immobilized by calcium carbonate salts [48]. Antimony in soils is very poorly studied; it is assumed that it may be related to iron hydroxides [46,49,50], but it is not clear whether correlation of antimony content with iron in alkaline conditions of soils in the Fergana Valley is possible. In any case, the clarke in irrigated soils is exceeded twice or more, which may indicate the role of irrigation in the accumulation of this element. Antimony is considered as an active part of biological food chains [50], thus, exceeding its content in comparison with clarke could be a possible predictor of crop production, planted on irrigated soils.
Cesium concentration exceeded clarke in irrigated soils, taking into account the fact that cesium is characterized by its low ability to dissolve in water; its migration and accumulation are affected by suspended particles of clay minerals in topsoils which corresponds well with the results of particle size distribution in soil sections. Probably irrigation by water enriched by suspended clays could be a reason for cesium accumulation in both types of soil investigated as was suggested for antimony. Hafnium accumulation normally deals with translocation from parent materials or accumulation in the lowlands form of adjacent uplands [51]. Both these factors could be possible predictors of hafnium accumulation in both types of soils investigated. Hafnium behavior in the soil-plant system is poorly studied, nevertheless it is known that even different grains are characterized by different selectivity in hafnium absorption from soils with different levels of contamination [52]. Hafnium accumulation could be essentially affected by loess type of mineral material in the environment [53].
As for tantalum content its content deals normally with thecnogenic sources [54], thus due to that fact that clarke is not exceeded, the role of thecnogenic factor in soil chemical composition is low. Tantalum is known as a very conservative element in biogeochemical terms but real understanding of its cycle and reactivity would require extensive and meaningful data collection [55]. The content of tungsten and aurum in soil is low and does not exceed the clarke concentration, thus it corresponds with the background level. At the end of this section we conclude that trace elements like nickel, arsenic, bromine, antimony, cesium, and hafnium could be accumulated in irrigated soil during their agrogenic transformation. In opposite, such elements as scandium, chromium, cobalt, tantalum, tungsten, and aurum are supposedly inherited from parent materials and are not incoming with irrigation waters in both types of the soils investigated.
Statistical treatment of chemical analyses (Figure 4) showed that there is strong positive correlation between magnesium sulfate and potassium sulfate, thus the binding of cations by sulfate is a simultaneous process in the soils investigated. Thus, the sulfate type of salinization could be dominant in soils.
The percentage of fine particles is in strong positive correlation with Br and Ni as it was grouped with those elements which accumulate under the irrigation process. The key sulfates are negatively correlated with fine particles; this is understandable since the accumulation of salts is the reverse process of sorption of substances and cations in the soil absorbing complex [26]. The totality of positive and negative correlation between the main components of the chemical composition of soils indicates that irrigation significantly disturbs the chemical state of soils, resulting in the soil becomes a kind of polychemical matrix with an extremely heterogeneous component and a cationic composition.
This section can be divided by the subheadings. It should provide a concise and precise description of the experimental results, their interpretation, as well as the experimental conclusions that can be drawn.

4. Conclusions

Almost the entire territory of the Fergana Valley is occupied by agricultural land, except for a small area of barkhan sands, where farming is impossible. Irrigated soils are conditionally divided into two large groups—takyr and saz soils. It was established that the content of humus in the relatively thick in-depth humus horizon is small and slightly higher than its content in the middle soil horizon, which corresponds to the zonal norm for Serozems (Calcisols). The studied agricultural soils are characterized by high enrichments rate of nitrogen, gross bulk, and mobile ammonium forms, as well as mobile forms of potassium. The soil salinity type is relatively favorable. At least, there is no soda salinization; the low salt concentration can be attributed to good leaching of the soil by irrigation waters and the occurrence of groundwater at a depth of about 3 m, which provides drainage of the soil column. In terms of the texture of the fine earth, the soils investigated were loams or sandy loams; the arable horizons are enriched by fine particles, supposedly due to colmatage, initiated by irrigation practices, This corresponds well with accumulation of nickel, arsenic, bromine, antimony, cesium, and hafnium in soils in amounts higher than clarke. Other elements, like scandium, chromium, cobalt, tantalum, tungsten, and aurum are probably inherited from parent materials. Thus, irrigation results in the partial transformation of soil of biogeochemical composition, mainly in terms of trace elements, while such soil properties as the nutrient state, remain more stable in the temporal scale. Further monitoring of soil chemical properties should be continued for the entire region of the Fergana valley.

Author Contributions

A.T.—methodology, visualization, formal analysis, investigation, K.A.—writing—review and editing, E.A.—conceptualization, data curation, investigation, E.M.—conceptualization, resources, investigation, G.M.—project administration, investigation, G.R.—field research, A.A. (Avazbek Akhmadjonov)—laboratory research, A.A. (Akmal Axunov)—filed research. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the international project “Development of theoretical and practical basics of soil and plant geochemistry in Fergana Valley” in 2013–2018. This work was also supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation in accordance with agreement No. 075-15-2022-322 date 22 April 2022 on providing a grant in the form of subsidies from the Federal budget of Russian Federation. The grant was provided for state support for the creation and development of a World-class Scientific Center “Agrotechnologies for the Future”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Authors are thankful to Timur Nizamutdinov for technical help with manuscript preparation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ivanov, I.D.; Aleksandrovskiy, A.L.; Makeev, A.O.; Bulgakov, D.S.; Abakumov, E.V.; Arkchangelskaya, T.A.; Belobrov, V.P.; Borisov, A.V.; Borisova, O.K.; Vasyenov, I.I.; et al. Evolution of Soils and Soil Cover. Theory, Diversity of Natural Evolution and Anthropogenic Transformations of Soils; Geos: Moscow, Russia, 2015; 925p. [Google Scholar]
  2. Smith, D.R. Salinization in Uzbekistan. Post-Sov. Geogr. Econ. 1992, 33, 21–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Anderson, C.R.; Maughan, C.; Pimbert, M.P. Transformative agroecology learning in Europe: Building consciousness, skills and collective capacity for food sovereignty. Agric. Hum. Values 2019, 36, 531–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Abakumov, E.; Yuldashev, G.; Mirzayev, U.; Isagaliev, M.; Sotiboldieva, G.; Makhramhujaev, S.; Mamajonov, I.; Azimov, Z.; Sulaymonov, O.; Askarov, K.; et al. The Current State of Irrigated Soils in the Central Fergana Desert under the Effect of Anthropogenic Factors. Geosciences 2023, 13, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Abakumov, E.; Yuldashev, G.; Darmonov, D.; Turdaliev, A.; Askarov, K.; Khaydarov, M.; Mirzayev, U.; Nizamutdinov, T.; Davronov, K. Influence of Mineralized Water Sources on the Properties of Calcisol and Yield of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plants 2022, 11, 3291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Isagaliev, M.; Abakumov, E.; Turdaliev, A.; Obidov, M.; Khaydarov, M.; Abdukhakimova, K.; Shermatov, T.; Musaev, I. Capparis spinosa L. Cenopopulation and Biogeochemistry in South Uzbekistan. Plants 2022, 11, 1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Imangulov, L.R.; Kuksin, Y.K. The Regional Dimension of Socio-Cultural Modernization of the Population: Results of Expeditionary Research in Uzbekistan and Southern Kyrgyzstan. Her. St. Petersburg Univ. Earth Sci. 2023; 68, in print. [Google Scholar]
  8. Khitrov, N.; Rukhovivh, D.I.; Kalinina, N.V.; Novikova, A.F.; Pankova, E.I.; Chernousenko, G.I. Estimation of the areas of salt-affected soils in the European part of Russia on the basis of a digital map of soil salinization on a scale of 1: 2.5 M. Eurasian Soil Sci. 2009, 42, 581–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Khitrov, N.B.; Chernikov, E.A.; Popova, V.P.; Fomenko, T.G. Factors and mechanisms of soil salinization under vineyards of southern Taman. Eurasian Soil Sci. 2016, 49, 1228–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ivushkin, K.; Bartholomeus, H.; Bregt, A.K.; Pulatov, A. Satellite Thermography for Soil Salinity Assessment of Cropped Areas in Uzbekistan. Land Degrad. Develop. 2017, 28, 870–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kulmatov, R.; Mirzaev, J.; Abuduwaili, J.; Karimov, B. Challenges for the sustainable use of water and land resources under a changing climate and increasing salinization in the Jizzakh irrigation zone of Uzbekistan. J. Arid Land. 2020, 12, 90–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Egamberdiyeva, D.; Garfurova, I.; Islam, K.R. Salinity effects on irrigated soil chemical and biological properties in the Aral Sea basin of Uzbekistan. In Climate Change and Terrestrial Carbon Sequestration in Central Asia; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shurigin, V.; Egamberdieva, D.; Li, L.; Davranov, K.; Panosyan, H.; Birkeland, N.-K.; Wirth, S.; Bellingrath-Kimura, S.D. Endophytic bacteria associated with halophyte Seidlitzia rosmarinus Ehrenb. ex Boiss. from saline soil of Uzbekistan and their plant beneficial traits. J. Arid Land. 2020, 12, 730–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Taira, H.; Baba, J.; Togashi, S.; Berdiyar, J.; Yashima, M.; Inubushi, K. Chemical characteristics of degraded soils in Uzbekistan and remediation by cyanobacteria. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 2021, 120, 193–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Khasanov, S.; Kulmatov, R.; Li, F.; Amstel, A.; Bartholomeus, H.; Aslanov, I.; Sultonov, K.; Kholov, N.; Liu, H.; Chen, G. Impact assessment of soil salinity on crop production in Uzbekistan and its global significance. Agric. Ecos. Envirt. 2023, 342, 108262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zang, M.; Nascimento, P.C.D.; Bayer, C.; Anghinoni, I.; de Toni, C.; Silva, E.R.; Vodzik, G.; Martínez, C. Soil quality in hydromorphic ecosystems decrease with intensification of pre-germinated rice production, even under ecologically based production system. Geoderma Reg. 2022, 31, e00582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Aksenova, Y.V. Influence of irrigation on the humus state of black earth soils of the Irtysh region of Omsk. Ph.D. Thesis, Tyumen State Agrarian University, Tyumen, Russia, 2005. 17p. [Google Scholar]
  18. Isakov, V.Y.; Mirzaev, U.B.; Yusupova, M.A. Peculiarities of Soil Characteristics of Sandy Massifs of Fergana Valley. Sci. Review. Biol. Sci. 2020, 1, 15–19. [Google Scholar]
  19. Xayitmurodovich, K.I.; Abbosxonovich, M.A.; Dilmurod Qizi, M.M. Estimation of Irrigated Soils of Fergana Region (on The Example of Dangara District). Am. J. Agric. Biomed. Engin. 2021, 3, 8–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhabbarov, A. Physical and geographical features of the Fergana valley. Internl. J. Orange Tech. 2021, 3, 94–97. [Google Scholar]
  21. FAO. Standard Operating Procedure for Soil Organic Carbon Walkley-Black Method: Titration and Colorimetric Method; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2019; p. 27. [Google Scholar]
  22. Arinushkina, E.V. Guidance on Chemical Analysis of Soils; Moscow State University: Moscow, Russia, 1970; p. 489. [Google Scholar]
  23. Shein, E.V. Field and Laboratory Methods for Studying Physical Soil Physical Properties and Regimes; MSU: Moscow, Russia, 2001; p. 200. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kuziev, R.K.; Sektimentko, V.E. Soils if Uzbekistan; Extremum Press Publishing House: Tashkent, Uzbekistan, 2009; 351p. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kuziev, R.K.; Yuldashev, G.Y.; Akramov, I.A. Bonitization of Soils; The Way of Science Publishing House: Teberda, Russia, 2004; 127p. [Google Scholar]
  26. Orlov, D.S. Chemistry of Soils; Moscow State University Press: Moscow, Russia, 1985; p. 376. [Google Scholar]
  27. Menci, A.A.; Klavdienko, K.M. Soils of Central Fergana (Yaz-Yavan-Boston-Sharikhan Massive); Nauka: Tashkent, Uzbekistan, 1931. [Google Scholar]
  28. Umarov, M.U. Soils of Uzbekistan; Fan: Tashkent, Uzbekistan, 1975. [Google Scholar]
  29. Russian Soil Taxonomy; Oykumena: Moscow, Russia, 2004; 342p.
  30. Classification and Diagnosis of Soils of the USSR; Kolos: Moscow, Russia, 1977; 223p.
  31. IUSS Working Group WRB. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014, Update 2015. International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps; World Soil Resources Reports No. 106; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2015; p. 203. [Google Scholar]
  32. Pankova, E.I. Salinization of soils of Djizak steppe, patterns of its distribution and assessment criteria. Eurasian Soil Sci. 1982, 4, 90–100. [Google Scholar]
  33. Turdaliev, A.; Yuldashev, G.; Askarov, K.; Abakumov, E. Chemical and biochemical features of desert soils of the Central Ferana. Agriculture 2021, 67, 16–28. [Google Scholar]
  34. Gulom, Y.; Khaydarov, M.; Isagaliyev, M.; Isomiddinov, M. Agrarian science to agriculture agrochemical characteristics of virgin and irrigated modern sierozems in the North of Fergana. In Proceedings of the XIV International Scientific and Practical Conference; Altai State Agrarian University: Barnaul, Russia, 2019; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  35. Kimberg, N.V. Serozems; Cottonwood: Tashkent, Uzbekistan, 1957; 199p. [Google Scholar]
  36. Yuldashev, G.; Isagaliev, M. Genesis of Loess and Loess-Like Rocks of Fergana Valley/Agrarian Science to Agriculture. Agriculture: A Collection of Articles: In Three Parts/XI International Scientific-Practical Conference (February 4–5, 2016); Altai State Agrarian University: Barnaul, Russia, 2016; Volume 2, pp. 458–460. [Google Scholar]
  37. Hasanov, G.N.; Abasov, M.M.; Musaev, M.R.; Abdurachmanov, G.M. EcologicalStatus and Scientific Basis for Improving the Fertility of Saline, Desertification-Prone Soils of the Western Caspian Sea; Nauka: Moscow, Russia, 2006; 264p. [Google Scholar]
  38. Gagarina, E.I. Lithological Factor of Soil Formation: (On the Example of the North-West of the Russian Plain); Publishing House of Saint-Petersburg State University: Saint-Petersburg, FL, USA, 2004; 257p. [Google Scholar]
  39. Rabot, E.; Guiresse, M.; Pittatore, Y.; Angelini, M.; Keller, C.; Lagacherie, P. Development and spatialization of a soil potential multifunctionality index for agriculture (Agri-SPMI) at the regional scale. Case study in the Occitanie region (France). Soil Secur. 2022, 6, 100034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Khalid, M.; Hussain, S.; Anjum, M.A.; Ahmad, S.; Arif Ali, M.; Ejaz, S.; Morillon, R. Better salinity tolerance in tetraploid vs. diploid volkamer lemon seedlings is associated with robust antioxidant and osmotic adjustment mechanisms. J. Plant Physiol. 2020, 244, 153071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Khalid, M.F.; Morillon, R.; Anjum, M.A.; Ejaz, S.; Rao, M.J.; Ahmad, S.; Hussain, S. Volkamer Lemon Tetraploid Rootstock Transmits the Salt Tolerance When Grafted with Diploid Kinnow Mandarin by Strong Antioxidant Defense Mechanism and Efficient Osmotic Adjustment. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2022, 41, 1125–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yanin, E.P. Scandium in the environment (prevalence, anthropogenic sources, secondary resources). Probl. Environ. Nat. Resour. 2007, 8, 70–90. [Google Scholar]
  43. Ladonin, D.V. Comparative assessment of adsorption of rare-earth elements in some soil types. Eurasian Soil Sci. 2019, 52, 1175–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sosorova, S.B. Chromium in soils and plants of the selenga river delta. Agrochemistry 2008, 12, 56–62. [Google Scholar]
  45. Sosorova, S.B. Cobalt in soils and plants of the Selenga River Delta. Eurasian Soil Sci. 2009, 42, 750–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Vodyanitskii, Y.N. Heavy Metals and Metalloids in Soils; GNU Soil Institute. V.V. Dokuchaev Russian Academy of Agricultural Sciences: Moscow, Russia, 2008; 86p. [Google Scholar]
  47. Alekseev, I.I.; Abakumov, E.V.; Shamilishvili, G.A.; Lodygin, E.D. Heavy metals and hydrocarbons content in soils of settlements of the Yamal-Nenets autonomous region. Gig Sanit. 2016, 95, 818–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Perminova, T.A.; Baranovskaya, N.V.; Laratte, B.; Zhornyak, L.V.; Sudyko, A.F. Bromine in the soils of the Tomsk region. Bull. Tomsk. Polytech. Univ. Geo Assets Eng. 2017, 328, 36–45. [Google Scholar]
  49. Vodyanitskii, Y.N. The role of iron compounds in the fixation of heavy metals and metalloids in soils: A review of publications. Eurasian Soil Sci. 2010, 5, 519–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Vidya, C.S.-N.; Shetty, R.; Vaculíková, M.; Vaculík, M. Antimony toxicity in soils and plants, and mechanisms of its alleviation. Env. Exp. Bot. 2022, 202, 104996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Shtangeeva, I. Accumulation of scandium, cerium, europium, hafnium, and tantalum in oats and barley grown in soils that 451 differ in their characteristics and level of contamination. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2022, 29, 40839–40853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Gabbasova, I.M.; Yakupov, I.J.; Asylbaev, I.G.; Yakupova, R.A. Geochemical Ecology in the Southern Urals; The World of Printing: Ufa, Russia, 2010; 256p. [Google Scholar]
  53. Scheib, A.; Birke, M.; Dinelli, E. GEMAS Project Team Geochemical evidence of aeolian deposits in European soils. Boreas 2014, 43, 175–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Nifantov, B.F.; Potapov, V.P.; Mitina, N.V. Geochemistry and Resource Assessment of Rare Earth and Radioactive Elements in Kuznetsk Coals. Processing Prospects; Institute of Coal and Coal Chemistry: Kemerovo, Russia, 2003; 104p. [Google Scholar]
  55. Filella, M. Tantalum in the environment. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2017, 173, 122–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Location of sample plots. Red button designates region of field survey.
Figure 1. Location of sample plots. Red button designates region of field survey.
Applsci 13 06188 g001
Figure 2. Soil sections of saz soils (a) and takyr soils (b).
Figure 2. Soil sections of saz soils (a) and takyr soils (b).
Applsci 13 06188 g002
Figure 3. Texture triangles of soils investigated.
Figure 3. Texture triangles of soils investigated.
Applsci 13 06188 g003aApplsci 13 06188 g003b
Figure 4. Pearson correlation coefficient rates.
Figure 4. Pearson correlation coefficient rates.
Applsci 13 06188 g004
Table 1. Soil agrochemical properties.
Table 1. Soil agrochemical properties.
Soil Section NoDepth, cmpH
H2O
CaCO3, %MgCO3, %TOC, %C:NBulk Gravimetric Concentrations, %Available Gravimetric Concentrations, mg kg−1
NPKNH4PK
10–297.015.602.100.66 ± 0.055.500.120.311.8617.319.6187
29–447.057.202.680.54 ± 0.025.400.100.231.7712.117.8135
120–287.103.242.210.69 ± 0.054.920.140.321.9018.520.1210
28–427.154.312.670.56 ± 0.055.090.110.251.8113.218.5143
200–307.307.502.300.48 ± 0.045.330.090.301.7315.217.8175
30–457.307.602.200.37 ± 0.035.280.070.221.6511.016.2118
240–307.107.202.560.44 ± 0.055.500.080.261.7014.917.0168
30–467.157.402.700.37 ± 0.055.280.070.211.6110.615.7112
280–357.106.782.800.81 ± 0.085.790.140.341.9421.520.7229
35–547.256.902.950.53 ± 0.065.300.100.321.8514.717.2192
350–307.205.902.350.55 ± 0.055.000.110.301.8616.817.1172
30–437.256.452.500.45 ± 0.085.620.080.251.7511.212.0114
Table 2. Particle size distribution in soil sections.
Table 2. Particle size distribution in soil sections.
Soil SectionDepth, cmParticle Size, mm<0.01 mm
1–0.250.25–0.10.1–0.050.05–0.010.01–0.0050.005–0.001<0.001
10–2912.718.417.212.813.511.314.138.9
29–4413.517.318.414.112.311.013.436.7
44–6715.421.617.913.711.710.49.331.4
67–10212.124.919.215.78.59.410.228.1
102–13217.325.420.717.36.27.65.519.3
120–2818.115.617.011.912.910.713.837.4
28–4212.613.918.514.315.213.312.240.7
42–7214.317.623.515.88.47.812.628.8
72–13117.225.718.119.46.55.37.819.6
131–15219.720.821.616.36.86.58.321.6
152–20016.821.619.515.79.17.89.526.4
200–3010.614.321.419.211.411.012.134.5
30–4512.715.419.120.110.310.611.832.7
45–6210.217.412.311.614.218.715.648.5
62–9718.421.717.615.58.610.37.926.8
97–12017.623.220.415.88.28.16.723.0
240–3011.217.519.218.410.713.29.833.7
30–4612.715.419.122.18.910.611.230.7
46–7514.916.521.619.77.49.610.327.3
75–9221.418.919.915.38.67.48.524.5
92–10914.517.221.418.78.710.29.328.2
280–3510.214.716.211.413.515.318.747.5
35–549.516.117.710.612.016.717.446.1
54–7213.115.318.412.610.513.916.240.6
72–9112.718.619.215.38.314.511.434.2
91–14010.613.515.612.015.914.617.848.3
350–3010.414.620.418.212.311.512.636.5
30–4312.514.919.120.110.911.911.534.3
44–8615.017.721.821.89.17.27.423.7
86–12924.714.615.716.48.610.39.728.6
129–19515.417.520.318.910.59.67.827.9
Table 3. Content and amount of salts in irrigated meadow soils, %.
Table 3. Content and amount of salts in irrigated meadow soils, %.
Soil SectionDepth, cmNa2CO3Ca(HCO3)2CaSO4MgSO4Na2SO4NaClBulk Salts Content
10–29-0.0150.2360.2140.0230.0140.502
29–44-0.0290.2940.2550.0270.0120.617
44–67-0.0160.2960.2350.0210.0120.580
67–102-0.0170.3010.2450.0270.0140.604
102–132-0.0200.4080.2450.0270.0190.719
Ground water, g L−10.1350.2013.7952.1040.8010.6047.640
120–28-0.0210.3410.2280.0240.0130.627
28–42-0.0310.3380.2750.0240.0110.679
42–72-0.0150.3580.2450.0280.0120.658
72–131-0.0160.4210.2560.0380.0140.745
131–152-0.0170.4600.3010.0320.0140.824
152–200-0.0200.4780.3100.0380.0180.864
Ground water, g L−1-0.3014.2012.2040.8210.5058.032
200–30-0.0350.3810.2380.0280.0150.697
30–45-0.0390.3410.3010.0270.0150.723
45–62-0.0380.3280.3040.0380.0640.772
62–97-0.0510.4380.3330.0410.0140.877
97–120-0.0580.4700.3370.0410.0200.926
Ground water, g L−10.1000.5854.3082.3080.8410.6448.786
Table 4. Trace elements content in soils, mg kg−1.
Table 4. Trace elements content in soils, mg kg−1.
Soil SectionDepth, cmScCrCoNiAsBrSbCsHfTaWAu
10–297.343.99.132016.74.11.676.53.630.714.190.0055
29–447.343.29.1335.415.94.61.66.73.420.813.20.006
44–677.644.69.801619.83.41.947.23.060.742.80.0076
67–1026.940.68.8312.917.01.71.66.52.720.65<0.10.0062
120–285.029.36.4640011.35.92.283.92.230.43<1.0<0.001
28–427.549.58.102513.05.51.265.33.620.62<1.00.0042
42–726.436.48.01512.52.31.395.52.940.63<1.00.0051
72–1315.732.58.301412.71.51.374.83.322.7<1.00.0060
131–1529.053.58.49138.31.91.406.74.310.76<1.00.0085
152–2007.645.87.65148.31.11.625.52.970.62<1.00.0056
200–307.544.78.8319.99.55.91.46.12.860.59<0.10.0037
30–456.440.28.4825026.03.81.66.01.730.46<0.1<0.001
45–628.853.310.93510.64.41.427.73.410.79<0.10.0052
62–903.923.74.0427.101.70.672.82.300.36<0.10.0033
240–306.238.07.20<5.015.4101.404.53.050.64<1.00.0064
30–465.635.76.55248.7121.123.92.960.46<1.00.0048
46–754.932.03.411407.255.71.243.52.200.69<1.0<0.001
75–924.625.76.604910.04.91.473.12.800.59<1.00.0043
92–1095.738.66.767.33.93.01.483.92.980.51<1.00.0049
109–1596.136.06.80<5.02.80.981.304.22.870.432.7<0.001
280–356.449.27.2234.17.247.51.14.43.760.80<1.00.0047
35–546.744.57.58199.15.61.165.43.560.65<1.00.0045
54–726.941.77.0311.510.23.41.495.93.500.683.60.0067
72–914.346.08.48528.77.01.675.63.930.77<0.10.0054
91–1406.436.97.6168.903.41.044.03.440.67<1.00.0042
350–306.642.97.5721.26.357.60.763.93.180.61<0.10.0043
30–436.943.17.4018.97.081.90.954.33.510.59<0.10.0042
44–866.242.17.333176.836.90.853.82.670.53<1.00.0031
86–1297.851.39.019.77.7311.51.25.03.850.78<0.10.0042
129–1957.044.28.2824.010.09.01.14.63.230.65<0.10.0040
Lithosphere clarke108318581.72.10.53.712.51.30.0043
Average for meadow-takyr soils6.237.87.4230.511.755.001.485.002.970.621.290.0046
Average for medow-saz soils6.642.57.8468.110.074. 901.295.103.220.730.180.0043
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Turdaliev, A.; Askarov, K.; Abakumov, E.; Makhkamov, E.; Rahmatullayev, G.; Mamajonov, G.; Akhmadjonov, A.; Axunov, A. Biogeochemical State of Salinized Irrigated Soils of Central Fergana (Uzbekistan, Central Asia). Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 6188. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13106188

AMA Style

Turdaliev A, Askarov K, Abakumov E, Makhkamov E, Rahmatullayev G, Mamajonov G, Akhmadjonov A, Axunov A. Biogeochemical State of Salinized Irrigated Soils of Central Fergana (Uzbekistan, Central Asia). Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(10):6188. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13106188

Chicago/Turabian Style

Turdaliev, Avazbek, Kamoliddin Askarov, Evgeny Abakumov, Elyorbek Makhkamov, Gayratbek Rahmatullayev, Gaybullo Mamajonov, Avazbek Akhmadjonov, and Akmal Axunov. 2023. "Biogeochemical State of Salinized Irrigated Soils of Central Fergana (Uzbekistan, Central Asia)" Applied Sciences 13, no. 10: 6188. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13106188

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop