Next Article in Journal
The Potential for Restoring the Activity of Oxidoreductases and Hydrolases in Soil Contaminated with Petroleum Products Using Perlite and Dolomite
Previous Article in Journal
Sports Biomechanics Applied to Performance Optimization
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

MoSe2 with Ultra-Fine Pt Decoration for Efficient Photodegradation

by
Yong Chen
1,
Dawei Shao
1,
Fupeng Xu
1,
Zhongjia Huang
2 and
Xinying Shi
1,*
1
School of Physics and Electronic Engineering, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, China
2
Anhui Key Laboratory of High-Performance Non-Ferrous Metal Materials, Anhui Polytechnic University, Wuhu 241000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(9), 3592; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14093592
Submission received: 17 March 2024 / Revised: 20 April 2024 / Accepted: 21 April 2024 / Published: 24 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Topic Nanomaterials for Energy and Environmental Applications)

Abstract

:
Transition metal dichalcogenides are widely studied for their photocatalytic ability due to the adjustable bandgap, high carrier mobility and possibility of foreign-element doping. In this work, multilayer molybdenum diselenide (MoSe2) was decorated with ultra-fine Pt nanoparticles through the mild hydrothermal method. MoSe2-Pt nanocomposites were synthesized and showed good structural and chemical stabilities. The incorporation of Pt nanoparticles provides plenty of active sites for MoSe2. The dominant Pt particle sizes are 1.8 nm, 1.8 nm, and 1.9 nm for the three synthesized samples, respectively. The mean crystal sizes of Pt (111) were calculated from X-ray diffraction patterns and we found that they were in accordance with the particle sizes. Both the particle sizes and mean crystal sizes are related to the synthesis conditions. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) characterizations revealed the formation of Se–Pt bonding. The relative contents of Pt–Se bonding were also calculated from XPS results, and they show the same trends as the optical absorption properties. Combining the XPS and optical absorption results, the effects of Se–Pt bonding during the photo-related process could be further confirmed. By degrading methylene blue (MB) under visible light, the synthesized nanocomposites proved promising for application in real-case degradation of organic pollutants. The sample synthesized with a moderate content of MoSe2 exhibited the best photodegradation efficiency, which could be explained by the maximum Pt-Se contents. Based on the experimental findings, we proposed a possible photodegradation mechanism.

1. Introduction

Photodegradation of organic pollutants in natural water has been studied for several decades [1,2]. By employing sunlight and semiconducting materials, redox reactions could be taking place to degrade and remove those dissolved pollutants, especially organic dyes [3] such as methylene blue, methyl orange, bisphenol A (BPA), etc. It provides a green and sustainable route for natural water purification. Among so many semiconducting candidates, transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) are known for their suitable bandgaps for visible light absorption and utilization [4,5]. As layered two-dimensional materials, TMDs are formed by covalence bonds in layers and van der Waals forces between layers [6]. Such a layered structure also brings an adjustable bandgap which can be easily manipulated by controlling the layer numbers [7]. They usually have active edge sites due to various types of defects but a relatively inert basal surface [8,9]. Thanks to their host ability for incorporating dopants, especially noble metal nanoparticles, the light–matter interaction as well as the photocatalytic performance could be improved. In this case, members of the TMD group are currently featured as photocatalysts for hydrogen evolution and organic-pollutant decomposition in water [10]. It is believed that the TMDs would hopefully provide a solution towards current fossil fuel deficiency and natural water pollution problems.
As a typical member of the TMD family, molybdenum diselenide (MoSe2) has similar atomic arrangements to molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) [11], and has been widely investigated for applications such as transistors, gas sensors, photodetectors and photocatalysts [12,13]. For example, n-MoSe2 transistors perform well in detecting the streptavidin molecule, due to the controllable high reverse current [14]. As for photocatalytic ability, researchers proposed the hydrothermal synthesis method to prepare MoSe2 for hydrogen evolution reactions and organic dye degradations [15]. MoSe2 is stacked into layers of Se-Mo-Se sandwich planes through the van der Waals force. The typically tunable bandgap also exists in MoSe2, making it suitable for light absorption among a wide range of wavelengths. It should be mentioned that MoSe2 has relatively smaller band gap than MoS2, which brings more efficient photoexcitation [16]. In the photocatalytic applications, researchers proposed several routes to improve its total activities. For instance, the typical core-shell structures are beneficial for strong chemical activities which could be achieved by incorporating carbon nanotubes, MoS2 nanoflakes, and transition metals, especially noble metals [17,18,19,20,21]. The optical absorption of MoSe2 has been successfully adjusted by phase engineering, providing another choice for obtaining efficient photocatalytic performance [22]. Moreover, it is also possible to form Z-scheme nanocomposites by introducing other semiconducting materials [23,24]. Among the above methods, noble-metal doping is an effective and controllable way. Noble metal nanoparticles could be easily anchored to MoSe2 edges due to the commonly existing Se defects. However, it usually requires sophisticated synthesis to activate the inert MoSe2 basal planes [8]. For instance, there should be a pre-synthesis to prepare MoSe2@mesoporous hollow carbon spheres, and the following step to obtain the incorporation of Pt nanoparticles [25].
Herein, we report a feasible and straightforward synthetic method to introduce Pt nanoparticles onto MoSe2. The Pt nanoparticles are well formed and their sizes are controlled within 2.3 nm, which could be called ultra-fine Pt nanoparticles. The synthesized MoSe2-Pt nanocomposites exhibit great structural and chemical stabilities. The introduced Pt nanoparticles provide plenty of active sites for light absorption and photocatalysis. We performed the photodegradation of MB under visible light irradiation. It has been found that the synthesized materials could decompose MB efficiently compared to pristine MoSe2. Such improved photocatalytic performance has been explained by the enhanced light absorption and photoelectron transportation. Using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), the chemical bonding between Se and Pt was confirmed. It explains not only the great stabilities of the compounds but also the efficient channels for charge transfer during photocatalytic reactions. The Pt–Se bonding also contributes to the enhanced visible light absorption. Considering the excellent photocatalytic properties of the MoSe2-Pt nanocompounds, we believe that the reported synthetic method might be suitable for further investigation and mass production.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Sample Preparations

The materials were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MA, USA) with analytical grade, and deionized water was produced at our own lab. The MoSe2-Pt samples were synthesized with the following steps: (a) multilayer MoSe2 nanopowders were dispersed into deionized water with various ratios. The concentration of MoSe2 suspension was 0.1 mg/mL, 0.2 mg/mL and 0.3 mg/mL, respectively. (b) In order to obtain Pt nanoparticles with an extremely small size, K2PtCl4 and trisodium citrate were used as precursors to obtain Pt nanoparticles [26,27]. K2PtCl4 and trisodium citrate were added into the MoSe2 suspension by mechanically stirring. (3) The mixed solution was set under an ultrasonic bath at 50 °C for 150 min or 200 min. (4) Pt0 can be reduced from PtCl42−, and Pt nanoparticles would finally grow onto MoSe2 nanoflakes. After synthesis, three samples with different mass ratios were obtained, as shown in Table 1. These samples are labelled according to their contents, which were M1Pt, M2Pt and M3Pt, respectively.

2.2. Characterizations

The sample morphologies were studied through a transmission electron microscope (TEM, JEOL 2200FS (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan)). The crystal structures of MoSe2 and the synthesized complexes were measured through X-ray diffraction (XRD, Bruker (Billerica, MA, USA)). Cu Kα emission (λ = 1.5406 Å) was employed as the X-ray source. The optical properties were measured through a Lambda 950 UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Spectralab Scientific Inc., Markham, ON, Canada) with BaSO4 as reference. The synthesized powder was dissolved in deionized water for UV–vis absorption tests. The chemical states were analyzed by Thermo Fisher (Waltham, MA, USA) K-Alpha X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy.

2.3. Photodegradation Measurements

The photocatalytic properties of the synthesized MoSe2-Pt catalysts were studied by degrading Methylene blue (MB). During each photocatalytic reaction, 50 mg of the catalyst was put in 50 mL of MB solution (10 mg/L). Reactions were carried out under a 300 W Xe lamp. We used a cutoff filter (#84-689, TECHSPEC, Co., Ltd., Gauteng, South Africa) to block the light under the wavelength of 400 nm. Before degradation tests, MB solutions with catalysts inside were stirred under a dark environment for half an hour to dispose of the adsorption/desorption effects. During photocatalytic degradations, 2 mL of the solution was taken every 30 min and was centrifuged to remove the MoSe2-Pt powder. Visible-light absorption spectra ranging from 400 nm to 800 nm were measured through a Lambda 950 UV-Vis spectrophotometer. During measurements, the absorption peak of MB was set at 664 nm and the concentration of residual MB could be determined by the integration of the MB absorption peaks. The photocatalytic reactions were therefore presented by time-course decrease in MB concertation.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. MoSe2-Pt Morphologies and Crystal Structures

After synthesis, a drop of the solution containing MoSe2-Pt was placed onto a holey carbon grid and dried in air. Then the samples were observed under TEM. The morphologies of MoSe2 flakes among the three samples were similar in shape and size. Therefore, we chose sample M1Pt as an example whose morphologies are shown in Figure 1. In Figure 1a, MoSe2 nanoflakes are of a round shape with a typical size of 40 nm. There are tiny Pt dots on the edge of the MoSe2. The Pt dots are clearer in the zoomed-in image in Figure 1b. Due to the mild synthetic conditions and low concentration of K2PtCl4 in solution 1, PtCl42− was reduced to ultrafine particles. There are more Pt nanoparticles formed on the edge sites compared to the surfaces of the MoSe2 because the edge sites are more reactive than the basal planes [28]. Although very small in size, the Pt particles were well crystallized in (111) phase with a lattice spacing of 2.29 Å, as shown in Figure 1c. Such crystalline structure is compatible with the MoSe2 (100) facet. It suggests the Pt particles are well grown on MoSe2. Figure 1d–f show the distribution of Pt nanoparticles for the samples of M1Pt, M2Pt, and M3Pt, respectively. It can be seen that the samples of M1Pt and M2Pt have the same dominant Pt size of 1.8 nm, while M3Pt has a slightly larger Pt size of 1.9 nm.
In Figure 2, the XRD spectra show the crystal structure of the three samples of MoSe2-Pt nanocomposites and pristine MoSe2 nanopowder. The crystal planes of MoSe2 and Pt were marked with diamonds and stars, respectively. The MoSe2 (100), (103), (105), (110) and (200) planes were identified from both samples, which was in good agreement with previous reports [29]. Compared to the pristine MoSe2, Figure 2 shows that MoSe2 is stable and keeps its crystal structure after synthesis.
Pt (111) and (200) planes were identified in the synthesized MoSe2-Pt samples. The Pt (111) lattice spacings are shown in Table 2. We can see that Pt (111) peak positions were slightly varied among the three samples. The lattice spacings are calculated as 0.2285, 0.2291, and 0.2274 nm, respectively. Moreover, the mean crystal sizes (D (111) in Table 2) were also calculated through Scherrer’s equation [30]. They are very close for the M1Pt and M2Pt samples, while slightly larger for the M2Pt sample. It should be noted that the calculated mean crystal sizes are not the particle sizes which could be directly measured under TEM; however, the D (111) values show the same trends with the particle sizes shown in Figure 1d–f.

3.2. Chemical States, Mechanism of Efficient Photocatalytic Reactions

The chemical electronic states of the MoSe2-Pt samples were evaluated through XPS. The high-resolution XPS spectra of Pt 4f and Se 3d are shown in Figure 3. In Figure 3a–c, there are two Pt species which were identified by fitting the original Pt 4f spectra. Pt0 peaks are the reduced Pt nanoparticles in metal form, and Pt-Se peaks are attributed to the Pt–Se bonding. The binding energies of these Pt peaks are slightly shifted among the three samples which may be caused by partial electron transfer between MoSe2 and Pt [31]. In Figure 3d–f, two main contents are found in the Se 3d spectra, which are the Se-Mo peaks and Se-Pt peaks. Such results are typical for MoSe2 and PtSe2 characteristics [32], and further confirm the formation of Se–Pt bonding. Therefore, it is obvious that chemical bonding of Pt–Se formed after the synthesis. Such chemical bonding can provide an effective pathway for charge transportation during photocatalytic reactions [9]. The Se-Mo 3d5/2 peaks at 54.56 eV are barely shifted among the three samples, suggesting that MoSe2 takes a dominant content compared to the Se-Pt species.
Based on the XPS results, it is noticed that the relative contents of Pt-Se varies among the samples, which may have influence on electron transportation. The relative contents of Pt-Se can be calculated from Pt 4f spectra, which are 34.78%, 40.02%, and 19.79%, respectively. It suggests that too much MoSe2 involved in the synthesis (the M3Pt sample) may limit the formation of Pt–Se bonding.
In this case, there may be two ways that the photocatalytic abilities could be affected. Firstly, Pt–Se bonding provides an efficient pathway for charge transfer, so more contents of Pt-Se would be beneficial to the photocatalytic reactions. Secondly, the existence of Pt nanoparticles (Pt0) can be confirmed by TEM results in Figure 1. Such ultra-fine Pt nanoparticles offer active sites for photocatalytic reactions where degradation could take place [33]. Introducing noble metal nanoparticles on edge sites of MoSe2 is a typical method for enhancing the photocatalytic properties.

3.3. Optical Properties of the Catalysts

In order to evaluate the optical performance of the synthesized samples, they were prepared in aqua solution for UV–visible absorption measurements. Figure 4 shows the absorption spectra of MoSe2 and the three samples. In the visible wavelength range, there are obvious absorption peaks at around 475 nm and 710 nm, respectively. Such optical behavior is typical for multilayer MoSe2 on a nanometer scale [34]. It can be seen that the pristine MoSe2 has a weak response to visible light, while the MoSe2-Pt samples strongly absorb the short wavelength of visible light, mainly between 450 and 550 nm. Among the three synthesized samples, M2Pt shows the best absorption ability for visible light while M3Pt shows the worst. Moreover, there is slight red-shift between the pristine MoSe2 and the catalysts. Such feature enhances the absorption of light in a longer wavelength, making it suitable for the utilization of the solar spectrum.

3.4. Photodegradation

The aforementioned characterizations provide chemical and optical insights into the synthesized materials. Their photocatalytic performance is evaluated by MB degradation, as shown in Figure 5. The time-course photodegradation results are shown in Figure 5a. Here, C/C0 is used to represent the decrease of MB concentration, where C0 and C are the original MB concentration and the MB concentration at a certain time, respectively. The dark process suggests that the synthesized materials show obvious adsorption of MB, while the pristine MoSe2 can hardly adsorb MB. Such adsorption abilities are usually related to the photocatalytic process. We can see that pristine MoSe2 can hardly degrade MB and the samples are all reactive with MB. Within around 60 min, MB is nearly removed by the samples of M1Pt and M2Pt. However, the M3Pt sample performs slightly less efficiently, but it can still degrade more than 90% of MB after 120 min. Such photocatalytic results are in accordance with the optical absorption properties shown in Figure 4. Considering the catalyst amount used in the degradation process, the above photocatalytic performance is comparable to other popular photocatalysts, such as Bi2WO6/BiOCl [35]. As a comparison, pristine MoSe2 removes only 5.4% of the MB in 120 min with the same irradiation condition. It suggests that the introduction of Pt to MoSe2 edges greatly improves the photocatalytic property.
The photodegradation kinetics was evaluated by the pseudo-first-order model. With this model, the pseudo-first-order constant k could be expressed as
k = ln ( C 0 / C ) t
The results of ln(C0/C) are shown in Figure 5b. The constants were calculated as 0.0361 min−1, 0.0379 min−1, and 0.0185 min−1 for the three samples, respectively. It is obvious that the M2Pt sample has the best photocatalytic kinetics. The constant values have the same trends as the Pt-Se contents. This indicates the correlation between Se–Pt bonding and photocatalytic performance. On the other hand, k values are not lineally affected by either the Pt amount used in the synthesis nor the relative contents of Pt–Se bonding. This may indicate that the surface segregation occurred during synthesis [36].
The possible photocatalytic mechanism can therefore be discussed. During the degradation process, photo-generated electrons from valence bands of MoSe2 reach the conduction bands, and finally migrate to the active sites provided by Pt nanoparticles. The electron-hole pairs participate in redox reactions, where the holes oxidize water to H+ and ·OH. The hydroxyl radicals then react with MB [9]. Meanwhile, the electrons reduce H+ to ·H. The Pt–Se bonding offers stable and efficient routes for charge transfer during the whole process.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we synthesized MoSe2-Pt complexes with a facile method, where Pt is reduced to ultra-fine nanoparticles. The synthetic method is simple and straightforward, making it suitable for mass production. The synthesized samples show a greatly enhanced photocatalytic performance for degrading the organic pollutant of MB under visible-light irradiation. Such properties show the excellent ability of visible-light utilization. The photodegradation mechanism could be explained through XPS analysis. Effective Pt–Se bonding provides pathways for charge transportation and ultra-fine Pt nanoparticles offer active sites for photocatalytic reactions. This work may be helpful for further photocatalyst design and applications in real cases.

Author Contributions

Y.C., investigation, characterization, and writing—original draft; D.S., characterization; F.X., characterization; Z.H., investigation, revision; X.S., supervision and writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China (No. 19KJB140008), and the Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation (No. 2008085ME141).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Sellers, P.; Kelly, C.A.; Rudd, J.W.M.; MacHutchon, A.R. Photodegradation of methylmercury in lakes. Nature 1996, 380, 694–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Saeed, M.; Muneer, M.; Haq, A.U.; Akram, N. Photocatalysis: An effective tool for photodegradation of dyes—A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 293–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jiang, Q.; Lu, Y.; Huang, Z.; Hu, J. Facile solvent-thermal synthesis of ultrathin MoSe2 nanosheets for hydrogen evolution and organic dyes adsorption. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 402, 277–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, C.; Ma, W.; Zhao, J. Semiconductor-mediated photodegradation of pollutants under visible-light irradiation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 4206–4219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Krasnok, A.; Lepeshov, S.; Alú, A. Nanophotonics with 2D transition metal dichalcogenides. Opt. Express 2018, 26, 15972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chhowalla, M.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, H. Two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide (TMD) nanosheets. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 2584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tan, C.; Zhang, H. Two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide nanosheet-based composites. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 2713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kibsgaard, J.; Chen, Z.; Reinecke, B.N.; Jaramillo, T.F. Engineering the surface structure of MoS2 to preferentially expose active edge sites for electrocatalysis. Nat. Mater. 2012, 11, 963–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shi, X.; Posysaev, S.; Huttula, M.; Pankratov, V.; Hoszowska, J.; Dousse, J.C.; Zeeshan, F.; Niu, Y.; Zakharov, A.; Li, T.; et al. Metallic contact between MoS2 and Ni via Au nanoglue. Small 2018, 14, 1704526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shi, X.; Zhang, M.; Wang, X.; Kistanov, A.A.; Li, T.; Cao, W.; Huttula, M. Nickel nanoparticle-activated MoS2 for efficient visible light photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Nanoscale 2022, 14, 8601–8610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shim, G.W.; Yoo, K.; Seo, S.B.; Shin, J.; Jung, D.Y.; Kang, I.S.; Ahn, C.W.; Cho, B.J.; Choi, S.Y. Large-area single-layer MoSe2 and its van der Waals heterostructures. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 6655–6662. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Mathew, S.; Sai Chandu, K.K.; Halder, S.; Polumati, G.; Chakraborty, C.; Sahatiya, P.; Pal, S. Band alignment and charge transport study of Au nanoparticles decorated over MoS2/MoSe2 hybrid heterostructure for plasmon enhanced photodetection. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2023, 156, 107302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kumar, S.; Mirzaei, A.; Kumar, A.; Lee, M.H.; Ghahremani, Z.; Kim, T.U.; Kim, J.Y.; Kwoka, M.; Kumar, M.; Kim, S.S.; et al. Nanoparticles anchored strategy to develop 2D MoS2 and MoSe2 based room temperature chemiresistive gas sensors. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2024, 503, 215657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nisar, S.; Dastgeer, G.; Shahzadi, M.; Shahzad, Z.M.; Elahi, E.; Irfan, A.; Eom, J.; Kim, H.; Kim, D.K. Gate-assisted MoSe2 transistor to detect the streptavidin via supporter molecule engineering. Mater. Today Nano 2023, 24, 100405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shi, H.; Zhang, H.; Li, M.; Wang, Y.; Wang, D. Nanoflower-like 1T/2H mixed-phase MoSe2 as an efficient electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 878, 160381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, Y.; Chang, T.R.; Zhou, B.; Cui, Y.T.; Yan, H.; Liu, Z.; Schmitt, F.; Lee, J.; Moore, R.; Chen, Y.; et al. Direct observation of the transition from indirect to direct bandgap in atomically thin epitaxial MoSe2. Nat. Nanotech. 2014, 9, 111–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Maity, S.; Das, B.; Samanta, M.; Das, B.K.; Ghosh, S.; Chattopadhyay, K.K. MoSe2-Amorphous CNT Hierarchical Hybrid Core–Shell Structure for Efficient Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2020, 3, 5067–5076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hwang, Y.; Shin, N. Colloidal Synthesis of MoSe2/WSe2 Heterostructure Nanoflowers via Two-Step Growth. Materials 2021, 14, 7294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Su, J.; Nie, Z.; Feng, Y.; Hu, X.; Li, H.; Zhao, Z.; Zan, S.; Qi, S. Hollow core–shell structure Co/C@MoSe2 composites for high-performance microwave absorption. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2022, 162, 107140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rao, B.G.; Matte, H.S.S.R.; Rao, C.N.R. Decoration of few-layer graphene-like MoS2 and MoSe2 by noble metal nanoparticles. J. Clust. Sci. 2012, 23, 929–937. [Google Scholar]
  21. Upadhyay, S.N.; Pakhira, S. Nanostructured Pt-doped 2D MoSe2: An efficient bifunctional electrocatalyst for both hydrogen evolution and oxygen reduction reactions. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2022, 37, 22823–22844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hanson, E.D.; Lilley, L.M.; Cain, J.D.; Hao, S.; Palacios, E.; Aydin, K.; Wolverton, C.; Meade, T.; Dravid, V.P. Phase engineering and optical properties of 2D MoSe2: Promise and pitfalls. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2019, 225, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, F.; Lu, T.; Cheng, X.; Zhang, Y.; Xiao, X. Fabrication of MoSe2/Bi3O4Br Z-scheme heterojunction with enhanced photocatalytic performance. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 111991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, X.; Wang, X.; Huang, J.; Li, S.; Meng, A.; Li, Z. Interfacial chemical bond and internal electric field modulated Z-scheme Sv-ZnIn2S4/MoSe2 photocatalyst for efficient hydrogen evolution. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 4112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Yang, F.; Qiao, W.; Yu, L.; Wang, S.; Feng, L. Support engineering modulated Pt/hierarchical MoSe2@mesoporous hollow carbon spheres for efficient methanol-assisted water splitting. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 483, 149055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Huang, X.; Zeng, Z.; Bao, S.; Wang, M.; Qi, X.; Fan, Z.; Zhang, H. Solution-phase epitaxial growth of noble metal nanostructures on dispersible single-layer molybdenum disulfide nanosheets. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lin, C.S.; Khan, M.R.; Lin, S.D. Platinum states in citrate sols by EXAFS. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2005, 287, 366–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Tsai, C.; Chan, K.; Abild-Pedersenb, F.; Nørskov, J.K. Active edge sites in MoSe2 and WSe2 catalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction: A density functional study. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 13156–13164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shelke, N.T.; Late, D.J. Hydrothermal growth of MoSe2 nanoflowers for photo- and humidity sensor applications. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2019, 295, 160–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Holzwarth, U.; Gibson, N. The Scherrer equation versus the ‘Debye-Scherrer equation’. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 6, 534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Qiao, W.; Yu, L.; Chang, J.; Yang, F.; Feng, L. Efficient bi-functional catalysis of coupled MoSe2 nanosheet/Pt nanoparticles for methanol-assisted water splitting. Chin. J. Catal. 2023, 51, 113–123. [Google Scholar]
  32. Avsar, A.; Ciarrocchi, A.; Pizzochero, M.; Unuchek, D.; Yazyev, O.V.; Kis, A. Defect induced, layer-modulated magnetism in ultrathin metallic PtSe2. Nat. Nanotech. 2019, 14, 674–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Li, Z.; Liao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zeng, W.; Zhou, Q. Room temperature detection of nitrogen dioxide gas sensor based on Pt-modified MoSe2 nanoflowers: Experimental and theoretical analysis. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2023, 610, 155527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dong, N.; Li, Y.; Feng, Y.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, X.; Chang, C.; Fan, J.; Zhang, L.; Wang, J. Optical limiting and theoretical modelling of layered transition metal dichalcogenide nanosheets. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 14646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zhu, S.; Yang, C.; Li, F.; Li, T.; Zhang, M.; Cao, W. Improved photocatalytic Bi2WO6/BiOCl heterojunctions: One-step synthesis via an ionic-liquid assisted ultrasonic method and first-principles calculations. Mol. Catal. 2017, 435, 33–48. [Google Scholar]
  36. Sidorowicz, A.; Yigit, N.; Wicht, T.; Stöger-Pollach, M.; Concas, A.; Orrù, R.; Cao, G.; Rupprechter, G. Microalgae-derived Co3O4 nanomaterials for catalytic CO oxidation. RSC Adv. 2024, 14, 4575–4586. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Morphologies of MoSe2-Pt samples. (a) TEM image of MoSe2-Pt; (b) zoomed-in image of the squared region in (a); (c) HR-TEM image shows the crystal structure of Pt; (df) Pt size distributions of the samples of M1Pt, M2Pt, and M3Pt, respectively.
Figure 1. Morphologies of MoSe2-Pt samples. (a) TEM image of MoSe2-Pt; (b) zoomed-in image of the squared region in (a); (c) HR-TEM image shows the crystal structure of Pt; (df) Pt size distributions of the samples of M1Pt, M2Pt, and M3Pt, respectively.
Applsci 14 03592 g001
Figure 2. XRD spectra of the synthesized MoSe2-Pt nanocomposite and MoSe2 nanopowder.
Figure 2. XRD spectra of the synthesized MoSe2-Pt nanocomposite and MoSe2 nanopowder.
Applsci 14 03592 g002
Figure 3. XPS spectra of the synthesized MoSe2-Pt samples. (a) Pt 4f of M1Pt, (b) Pt 4f of M2Pt, (c) Pt 4f of M3Pt, (d) Se 3d of M1Pt, (e) Se 3d of M2Pt, (f) Se 3d of M3Pt.
Figure 3. XPS spectra of the synthesized MoSe2-Pt samples. (a) Pt 4f of M1Pt, (b) Pt 4f of M2Pt, (c) Pt 4f of M3Pt, (d) Se 3d of M1Pt, (e) Se 3d of M2Pt, (f) Se 3d of M3Pt.
Applsci 14 03592 g003
Figure 4. UV–vis absorption spectra of MoSe2 and the synthesized samples.
Figure 4. UV–vis absorption spectra of MoSe2 and the synthesized samples.
Applsci 14 03592 g004
Figure 5. The time-course photocatalytic MB degradation under visible light irradiation. (a) Photodegradation of the synthesized samples and pristine MoSe2. (b) Photodegradation kinetics of ln(C0/C).
Figure 5. The time-course photocatalytic MB degradation under visible light irradiation. (a) Photodegradation of the synthesized samples and pristine MoSe2. (b) Photodegradation kinetics of ln(C0/C).
Applsci 14 03592 g005
Table 1. The synthetic details of the samples.
Table 1. The synthetic details of the samples.
SamplesMoSe2K2PtCl4Conditions
M1Pt0.1 mg/mL × 10 mL41.5 mg50 °C, 150 min
M2Pt0.2 mg/mL × 10 mL41.5 mg50 °C, 150 min
M3Pt0.3 mg/mL × 10 mL41.5 mg50 °C, 200 min
Table 2. Pt (111) lattice spacings and mean crystal sizes.
Table 2. Pt (111) lattice spacings and mean crystal sizes.
Samples2θFWHM/°d (111)/nmD (111)/nm
M1Pt39.4012.42170.22850.6793
M2Pt39.3012.40170.22910.6802
M3Pt39.6012.07520.22740.6992
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, Y.; Shao, D.; Xu, F.; Huang, Z.; Shi, X. MoSe2 with Ultra-Fine Pt Decoration for Efficient Photodegradation. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 3592. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14093592

AMA Style

Chen Y, Shao D, Xu F, Huang Z, Shi X. MoSe2 with Ultra-Fine Pt Decoration for Efficient Photodegradation. Applied Sciences. 2024; 14(9):3592. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14093592

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Yong, Dawei Shao, Fupeng Xu, Zhongjia Huang, and Xinying Shi. 2024. "MoSe2 with Ultra-Fine Pt Decoration for Efficient Photodegradation" Applied Sciences 14, no. 9: 3592. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14093592

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop