Next Article in Journal
Investigating the Linkage between Economic Growth, Electricity Access, Energy Use, and Population Growth in Pakistan
Next Article in Special Issue
Non-Contact Measurement of Small-Module Gears Using Optical Coherence Tomography
Previous Article in Journal
Composite Hydrogels with the Simultaneous Release of VEGF and MCP-1 for Enhancing Angiogenesis for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Computer-Aided Analysis of Gland-Like Subsurface Hyposcattering Structures in Barrett’s Esophagus Using Optical Coherence Tomography
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

OCT Angiography: A Technique for the Assessment of Retinal and Optic Nerve Diseases in the Pediatric Population

by
María Concepción Guirao Navarro
1,
Manuel Saenz de Viteri Vazquez
1,*,
Javier Zarranz-Ventura
2,3 and
Jesús Barrio-Barrio
1,4
1
Department of Ophthalmology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain
2
Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques Agustí Pi i Sunyer, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
3
Institut Clínic d’Oftalmologia, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
4
Institute for Health Research (IdisNA), 31008 Pamplona, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2018, 8(12), 2441; https://doi.org/10.3390/app8122441
Submission received: 16 October 2018 / Revised: 22 November 2018 / Accepted: 23 November 2018 / Published: 1 December 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Optical Coherence Tomography and its Applications)

Abstract

:

Featured Application

To provide the first review article regarding the use of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) in pediatric population. The knowledge of its application in the daily clinical practice and research, can help to define future utilities of this complementary technique.

Abstract

Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) is a novel, rapidly evolving, non-invasive imaging technique that allows images of the retinal vasculature to be obtained in a few seconds. Blood vessels of different retinal vascular plexuses and the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) can be examined without the administration of any contrast or dye. Due to these characteristics, OCT-A could be an excellent complementary test to study retinal vascularization in children. Until now, most of the studies with OCT-A have been conducted in adults and only a few have been carried out in children. In this review, we describe the principles and advantages of OCT-A over traditional imaging methods and provide a summary of the OCT-A findings in retinopathy of prematurity and other retinal and optic disc pathologies in children. In view of the promising results from studies, the advantages of a relatively rapid and non-invasive method to assess the retinal vasculature makes OCT-A a tool of which applications in the field of pediatric ophthalmology will be expanded in the near future for patient diagnosis and follow-up in every day clinical practice.

1. Introduction

Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) is a technique that arose in 2013 as a non-invasive diagnostic imaging technique, which can provide data from microvascular retinal flow in a few seconds [1]. To date, there are two gold-standard procedures that are used to study retinal and choroidal circulation: Fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) [2,3] and indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) [2]. Both procedures require the administration of an intravenous dye with the consequent risk of allergic reactions [2,3]. They are time-consuming [3], and discrimination of the different layers of the retinal and choroidal microvasculature is limited due to the generation of two-dimensional images [4]. On the contrary, OCT-A provides images of the retinal vasculature in a few seconds without the need to use a dye, eliminating the risk of allergic reactions and patient discomfort [2]. In light of the foregoing, OCT-A could be an excellent ancillary test for the diagnosis and follow-up of several pediatric retinal and optic nerve head pathologies.
OCT-A obtains images of the retinal vessels by comparing the signals of a series of consecutive B-scans performed at the same location [5]. The temporal evolution of the optical coherence tomography (OCT) signal, caused by the motion of scattering particles such as erythrocytes within vessels, allows the visualization of functional blood vessels [2,5,6,7]. Furthermore, OCT-A allows a separate visualization of different capillary networks (inner retina, outer retina, and choriocapillaris) [4], which are allocated to the superficial or deep retinal slabs depending on the segmentation method and retinal layer designation used by each device [2]. Moreover, in the inner retinal vascular plexus two different plexuses can be recognized: A superficial and a deep vascular plexus [2]. The former would supply the retinal nerve fiber and ganglion cell layers and the latter would supply the inner plexiform, inner nuclear, and outer plexiform layers [2,8,9]. Furthermore, OCT-A is able to examine the size and the contour of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) [10,11]. The FAZ is an avascular area that results from the absence of terminal capillaries of both superficial and deep plexuses [8]. The FAZ is considered to be of special relevance for the appropriate development of the fovea and it is thought to remain avascular throughout ocular development [12], being already visible at the 25th week of gestational age. In fact, the process of foveal formation begins at the 12th week and continues its development until the individual is 13–16 years old [4]. Such development of the fovea is a sequential process in which several stages can be distinguished. Some of the most relevant stages are: Centrifugal displacement of the inner retinal layers, centripetal displacement of the photoreceptors, and specialization of the cones [8,12,13,14,15,16]. The aim of these changes in the foveal area, in which the FAZ is involved, is to facilitate light transmission to the photoreceptors and avoid as much as possible any potential interference [17,18]. In this regard, some studies have shown that the size and morphology of the FAZ correlates with the visual acuity in some vascular retinal pathologies [19,20,21].
Another advantage of OCT-A is its ability to provide quantitative information [22,23]. Therefore, it can be very useful to describe the status of the retinal vasculature and help during the follow-up of retinal and optic nerve disorders in which microcirculation is affected. Several quantitative OCT-A parameters have been reported in previous studies such as: FAZ size, vessel density, area of non-perfusion, blood flow index, skeletonized vessel density or vessel length density, and fractal dimension [22,23]. OCT-A has also been shown to have good reproducibility between different operators, as well as good reliability and sensitivity both in the study of healthy subjects and in the study of individuals who have different retinal and/or optic nerve pathologies [1,24].
To date, this complementary technique has been used in the evaluation of common and also infrequent ophthalmologic diseases such as diabetic retinopathy [25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]; congenital and acquired retinopathies [36]; preretinal, intraretinal, and subretinal neovascularization [37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47]; retinal venous occlusions [48,49,50,51]; retinal artery occlusions [52]; macular teleangiectasia [53,54,55,56,57]; senile macular degenerations [58,59,60]; glaucoma [60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67]; uveitis [68,69,70,71]; and optic neuropathies [72,73,74,75,76,77], among other ocular conditions. Until now, most of these studies describing the use of OCT-A have been conducted in adults with very few studies carried out in pediatric patients [10,12,78,79,80,81,82,83,84].

2. OCT-A Applications in Pediatric Population

2.1. OCT-A in Retinopathy of Prematurity

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), a vasoproliferative retinal disorder that occurs in preterm children, is one of the leading causes of childhood blindness in the world [85]. This vasoproliferative eye condition is a consequence of abnormal retinal blood vessel growth due to a complex physiopathology that merges vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) overexpression, secondary to an incomplete development of the retinal vasculature [86]. Therefore, knowledge about the process of normal retinal vascularization and FAZ development are important to understand the changes that occur in ROP. In healthy subjects, retinal vascularization arises from mesenchymal cells that are near the hyaloid artery at the 16th week of gestational age. Once the blood vessels have been formed, they grow centrifugally from the optic nerve reaching the nasal ora serrata at the 32nd week and the temporal ora serrata at the 40th week [87]. The development of the FAZ has already been described in the previous section.
Historically, the standard procedure for diagnosing ROP has been indirect ophthalmoscopy performed by an experienced examiner. However, inter-observer agreement has been shown to be variable and subjective by some authors [88]. In this regard, complementary diagnostic tools could be helpful to diminish this variable inter-observer agreement, as spectral domain OCT has allowed the description of several anatomical aspects of ROP and OCT-A is able to provide important information about the retinal vasculature in these infants. Some of these anatomical aspects described with OCT are: Persistence of the inner retinal layers in the foveal center, decreased foveal depression, decreased thickness of the retinal layers, attenuation or alterations of the photoreceptor layer, absence of the outer limiting membrane layer, and absence of the layer that represents the interdigitations between the OS of the photoreceptors and the retinal pigment epithelium [13,89].
Moreover, absence of FAZ has been described by FFA in some patients with ROP [90]. In fact, several studies have reported the absence of FAZ in all patients who suffered from threshold or pre-threshold disease [91,92]. Falavarjani et al. [10] conducted a study in 43 subjects to quantify the FAZ in preterm patients using OCT-A and compared the measurements with age-matched term subjects. These authors found that both gestational age and birth weight influenced the dimensions of the FAZ. In this regard, a lower birth weight and lower gestational age were related to a smaller FAZ and a denser superficial capillary plexus (SCP). On the other hand, they also studied the existing differences between preterm patients who required retinal laser treatment and preterm patients who did not require retinal laser treatment. They found that laser-treated patients had smaller FAZ and greater vascular density in the foveal area. furthermore, among patients with ROP who required laser treatment, there was a higher percentage in which FAZ was not distinguishable. Against all expectations, the vision found in these patients was in some cases as good as 20/20. This finding was in accordance with other previous studies that suggest that the decrease in visual acuity is attributable to a failure in the specialization of the cones that are located in the fovea rather than alterations in the FAZ [12,93].
The following figure provides an example of OCT-A images from a patient with ROP who required laser treatment and a healthy child of the same age. A smaller FAZ and a disruption of the deep capillary plexus (DCP) can be seen in the ROP patient compared with a normal OCT-A of the healthy child in Figure 1.
Imaging children is sometimes challenging due to lack of cooperation, patient motion, poor fixation, and positioning, among other issues. In an effort to overcome these difficulties, new handheld OCT (HH-OCT) and OCT-A (HH-OCTA) devices are undergoing development and validation to determine the role they will play in the clinical management of patients with ROP and children with other ophthalmic pathologies [89,94,95,96,97]. In 2010, Maldonado et al. evaluated the specific problems that arose from performing hand-held spectral domain OCT (HH-SD OCT) in children. They tested some technical corrections in the OCT device, which led to an improved image acquisition [94]. Later, Campbell et al. presented a prototype of a portable OCT-A and a portable ultra-wide field OCT [89]. When this device was used with a noncontact lens, only a 40° field of view was obtained, but when a pediatric wide-angle lens and a contact lens were used, almost a 100° × 100° OCT and 20° × 20° OCT-A scans could be obtained in two seconds [89]. The development of these OCT-A portable devices could improve the understanding of choroidal and retinal vasculature development. In addition, portable ultra-wide field OCTs could depict the changes that occur in the peripheral vitreoretinal interface of ROP patients [89,94,95,96,97].

2.2. Applications of OCT-A in Other Pediatric Retinopathies

OCT-A has been used in the study of other pediatric retinal pathologies including X-linked retinoschisis (XLRS) [78,98,99], an X-linked recessive disorder that occurs almost exclusively in young males and that entails an early-onset bilateral visual loss due to foveal schisis. In these studies, a reduced macular deep vessel density was seen. This finding was attributed to a displacement and disruption of the vessels due to schitic cysts [98,99].
OCT-A has also been used to study epiretinal membranes in children, which are a rare condition and usually secondary to other pathologies or personal past ophthalmic histories [78]. However, an erroneous segmentation due to an important anatomic disruption made it difficult to interpret the images provided by OCT-A [78].
OCT-A use has also been reported in the study of Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) [78], the most frequent macular dystrophy characterized by yellowish vitelliform or egg yolk-like lesions that are usually localized in the macular area [100,101]. In these patients, OCT-A was found to be useful to detect choroidal neovascularization (CNV) associated with BVMD.
Furthermore, OCT-A has been used to investigate retinal vascular networks in patients with Coats’ disease [78,102], of which etiology and pathophysiology remain to be studied in greater depth. In this ocular disease, OCT-A demonstrated saccular aneurysmal dilatations [78] and suggested that a distortion of the inner blood–retinal barrier takes place in this entity, probably due to a bilateral defect in midcapillary angiogenesis [102].
Furthermore, OCT-A has been used to study children with idiopathic and secondary-to-laser-pointer-exposure CNV. Thus, children with idiopathic CNV showed type 1 CNV on OCT-A, while patients with secondary-to-laser-pointer-exposure CNV had type 2 CNV on OCT-A [79]. Regarding CNV in the pediatric population, it is interesting to remember that, unlike what happens in the adult population, CNV in children is more often a classic type 2 membrane affliction and they do not have thickening or calcification of Bruch’s membrane, nor diffuse disruption of the retinal pigment epithelium [103]. Moreover, CNV in the pediatric population usually has a solitary vascular in-growth site, as opposed to what happens in age-related macular degeneration-associated CNV [103].
Some patients with foveal hypoplasia, a condition that can be present in aniridia, albinism, nanoftalmos, incontinentia pigmenti, retinopathy of prematurity, and achromatopsia, have been studied with OCT-A [12]. The findings in these cases commonly include the presence of SCP and the absence of DCP [12].
OCT-A may be particularly useful in the study of patients with paracentral acute middle maculopathy (PAMM) as it has been proposed that an ischemia of the capillaries in the DCP is the possible cause and FFA is limited in visualizing vascular lesions located in this vascular plexus [103]. Thus, OCT-A of patients with PAMM show images corresponding to perfusion of the acute focal lesions followed by a reduction of blood flow in the deep vascular plexuses in long term cases. On the other hand, this entity may also be idiopathic or secondary to vascular diseases of the retina or systemic vascular diseases. When the disease is secondary to an occlusion of the central retinal artery, a marked hypoperfusion of the deep capillary plexus is observed [103].

2.3. Applications of OCT-A in Children in Other Conditions

With regard to the use of OCT-A in congenital alterations of the optic nerve, a dense peripapillar microvascular network has been shown in Morning Glory syndrome, a network that is absent both in colobomas and in optic disc pits [81]. With respect to papillary edema and papillitis, greater vascular tortuosity and dilatation have been described in the prelaminar capillary network [74], a fact which can be seen in Figure 2.
Recently, OCT-A has also been used to assess the vascular density of the retinal capillary and radial peripapillary plexuses and FAZ in children with amblyopia. [104,105]. A reduced macular vessel density in both the SCP and the DCP was found in amblyopic patients when compared to control eyes. The decreased vessel density that was found in amblyopic eyes has been hypothesized to be secondary to alterations in the retinal or choroid microvasculature due to underuse or to congenital or acquired retinal vascular capillary disorders associated with amblyopia [104,105]. In addition, the absence of abnormalities in the papillary and peripapillary vessel density in amblyopic eyes found in the study of Lonngi et al. [104] supported the findings of the Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group, in which amblyopia did not seem to be related with a pathologic condition of the optic nerve [106]. Finally, amblyopic eyes did not show differences in the dimensions of the FAZ in the SCP and DCP when compared to healthy controls in any of the studies [104,105].

3. Future Perspectives

Despite the mentioned advantages, OCT-A is still infrequently used in children. Only few ophthalmic pediatric conditions have been studied by OCT-A and normal values for patients younger than 18 years are not available yet. Although there have been some initial reports for Chinese children [84], normative databases for OCT-A parameters in healthy pediatric populations for other ethnicities is still not accessible. Moreover, in all likelihood a specific database should be built for each of the commercially available OCT-A devices since they use different segmentation algorithms.
A non-invasive technique such as OCT-A would be ideal for pediatric disease screening purposes in patients at risk or as an aid in assessing the stage of a disease. For example, studies by OCT-A in diabetic adults have found a correlation between microvascular abnormalities and different stages of the retinopathy. Even in diabetic patients, with the absence of diabetic retinopathy, some alterations have been found [39]. Until now, OCT-A measurements between healthy and diabetic children without retinopathy have not shown differences and longitudinal studies will be needed to stablish if these measurements have any predictive value [107].
OCT-A could also be useful in a different spectrum of pediatric conditions in which anatomic ocular changes are not a hallmark of the disease. In this regard, a recent study has found that OCT-A reveals diminished superficial and deep retinal capillary density in the macula of patients with amblyopia [104]. In the future, pediatric neurologic diseases could also be analyzed by OCT-A in search for new biomarkers.

4. Conclusions

Since the introduction of conventional OCT in 1991 [108] and the emergence of OCT-A around 2013, we have witnessed from our experience [109,110,111,112,113,114] and the experience of the scientific community that this technology is constantly evolving [115,116]. OCT-A is a novel, relatively rapid, and non-invasive imaging technique that can be useful in distinguishing the blood vessels of the different retinal vascular plexuses and the FAZ. It can provide qualitative and quantitative information. To date, few OCT-A studies have been published in pediatric subjects to assess children with retinopathy of prematurity, choroidal neovascularization, foveal hypoplasia, PAMM, congenital alterations of the optic nerve, and other pediatric macular diseases. The advantages of this technique in assessing the retinal vasculature makes OCT-A a tool of which applications in the field of pediatric ophthalmology will be expanded in the future for the diagnosis and follow-up of patients in clinical practice.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: J.B.-B., and M.C.G.N.; Methodology: M.C.G.N.; Writing-Original Draft Preparation: M.C.G.N.; Writing—eview & Editing, M.S.d.V.V., J.B.-B., and M.C.G.N.; Visualization: J.Z.-V.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lumbroso, B.; Huank, D.; Jia, Y.; Fujimito, J.G.; Rispoli, M. Clinical Guide to Angio-OCT. Non Invasive, Dyeless OCT Angiography, 1st ed.; Jaypee: New Delhi, India, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kashani, A.H.; Chen, C.L.; Gahm, J.K.; Zheng, F.; Richter, G.M.; Rosenfeld, P.J.; Shi, Y.; Wang, R.K. Optical coherence tomography angiography: A comprehensive review of current methods and clinical applications. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2017, 60, 66–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lim, H.B.; Lim, H.B.; Kim, Y.W.; Kim, J.M.; Jo, Y.J. The importance of signal strength in quantitative assessment of retinal vessel density using optical coherence tomography angiography. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 12897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. De Carlo, T.E.; Romano, A.; Waheed, N.K.; Duker, J.S. A review of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). Int. J. Retin. Vitr. 2015, 1, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Cheng, Y.; Guo, L.; Pan, C.; Lu, T.; Hong, T.; Ding, Z.; Li, P. Statistical analysis of motion contrast in optical coherence tomography angiography. J. Biomed. Opt. 2015, 20, 116004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Wang, R.K.; Jacques, S.L.; Ma, Z.; Hurst, S.; Hanson, S.R.; Gruber, A. Three dimensional optical angiography. Opt. Express 2007, 15, 4083–4097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Zhang, M.; Wang, J.; Pechauer, A.D.; Hwang, T.S.; Gao, S.S.; Liu, L.; Liu, L.; Bailey, S.T.; Wilson, D.J.; Huang, D.; Jia, Y. Advanced image processing for optical coherence tomographic angiography of macular diseases. Biomed. Opt. Express 2015, 6, 4661–4675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Cicinelli, M.V.; Carnevali, A.; Rabiolo, A.; Querques, L.; Zucchiatti, I.; Scorcia, V.; Bandello, F.; Querques, G. Clinical spectrum of macular-foveal capillaries evaluated with optical coherence tomography angiography. Retina 2017, 37, 436–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Wang, L.; Murphy, O.; Caldito, N.G.; Calabresi, P.A.; Saidha, S. Emerging applications of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in neurological research. Eye Vis. 2018, 5, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Ghasemi Falavarjani, K.; Iafe, N.A.; Velez, F.A.; Schwartz, S.D.; Sadda, S.R.; Sarraf, D.; Tsui, I. Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography of the Fovea in Children Born Preterm. Retina 2017, 37, 2289–2294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. De Oliveira, P.R.; Berger, A.R.; Chow, D.R. Optical coherence tomography angiography in chorioretinal disorders. Can. J. Ophthalmol. 2017, 52, 125–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Pakzad-Vaezi, K.; Keane, P.A.; Cardoso, J.N.; Tufail, A. Optical coherence tomography angiography of foveal hypoplasia. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2017, 101, 985–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Maldonado, R.S.; O’Connell, R.V.; Sarin, N.; Freedman, S.F.; Wallace, D.K.; Cotten, C.M.; Winter, K.P.; Stinnett, S.; Chiu, S.J.; Izatt, J.A.; et al. Dynamics of human foveal development after premature birth. Ophthalmology 2011, 118, 2315–2325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mann, I. The Development of the Human Eye, 3rd ed.; Grune and Stratton: New York, NY, USA, 1964. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hendrickson, A.E.; Yuodelis, C. The morphological development of the human fovea. Ophthalmology 1984, 91, 603–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yuodelis, C.; Hendrickson, A.E. A qualitative and quantitative analysis of the human fovea during development. Vis. Res. 1986, 26, 847–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Thomas, M.G.; Kumar, A.; Mohammad, S.; Proudlock, F.A.; Engle, E.C.; Andrews, C.; Chan, W.M.; Thomas, S.; Gottlob, I. Structural Grading of Foveal Hypoplasia Using Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography. A Predictor of Visual Acuity? Ophthalmology 2011, 118, 1653–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. O’Brien, K.M. Development of the foveal specialization. In Visual Transduction and Non-Visual Light Perception; Tombran-Tink, J., Barnstable, C.J., Eds.; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2008; pp. 17–33. [Google Scholar]
  19. AttaAllah, H.R.; Mohamed, A.A.M.; Ali, M.A. Macular vessels density in diabetic retinopathy: Quantitative assessment using optical coherence tomography angiography. Int. Ophthalmol. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Balasubramanian, S.; Borrelli, E.; Lonngi, M.; Velez, F.; Sarraf, D.; Sadda, S.R.; Tsui, I. Visual function and optical coherence tomography angiography features in children born preterm. Retina 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Li, Z.; Alzogool, M.; Xiao, J.; Zhang, S.; Zeng, P.; Lan, Y. Optical coherence tomography angiography findings of neurovascular changes in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients without clinical diabetic retinopathy. Acta Diabetol. 2018, 55, 1075–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lei, J.; Durbin, M.K.; Shi, Y.; Uji, A.; Balasubramanian, S.; Baghdasaryan, E.; Al-Sheikh, M.; Sadda, S.R. Repeatability and Reproducibility of Superficial Macular Retinal Vessel Density Measurements Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography En Face Images. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017, 135, 1092–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kadomoto, S.; Muraoka, Y.; Ooto, S.; Miwa, Y.; Iida, Y.; Suzuma, K.; Murakami, T.; Ghashut, R.; Tsujikawa, A.; Yoshimura, N. Evaluation of macular ischemia in eyes with branch retinal vein occlusion: An optical coherence tomography angiography study. Retina 2018, 38, 272–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Coscas, F.; Sellam, A.; Glacet-Bernard, A.; Jung, C.; Goudot, M.; Miere, A.; Souied, E.H. Normative data for vascular density in superficial and deep capillary plexuses of healthy adults assessed by optical coherence tomography angiography. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016, 57, 211–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. De Barros Garcia, J.M.B.; Isaac, D.L.C.; Avila, M. Diabetic retinopathy and OCT angiography: Clinical findings and future perspectives. Int. J. Retin. Vitr. 2017, 3, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Lee, J.; Rosen, R. Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Diabetes. Curr. Diab. Rep. 2016, 16, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Salz, D.A.; de Carlo, T.E.; Adhi, M.; Moult, E.; Choi, W.; Baumal, C.R.; Witkin, A.J.; Duker, J.S.; Fujimoto, J.G; Waheed, N.K. Select Features of Diabetic Retinopathy on Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomographic Angiography Compared with Fluorescein Angiography and Normal Eyes. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016, 134, 644–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Durbin, M.K.; An, L.; Shemonski, N.D.; Soares, M.; Santos, T.; Lopes, M.; Neves, C.; Cunha-Vaz, J. Quantification of Retinal Microvascular Density in Optical Coherence Tomographic Angiography Images in Diabetic Retinopathy. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017, 135, 370–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Ting, D.S.W.; Tan, G.S.W.; Agarwal, R.; Yanagi, Y.; Sie, N.M.; Wong, C.W.; San Yeo, I.Y.; Lee, S.Y.; Cheung, C.M.G.; Wong, T.Y. Optical Coherence Tomographic Angiography in Type 2 Diabetes and Diabetic Retinopathy. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017, 135, 306–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Hwang, T.S.; Zhang, M.; Bhavsar, K.; Zhang, X.; Campbell, J.P.; Lin, P.; Bailey, S.T.; Flaxel, C.J.; Lauer, A.K.; Wilson, D.J.; et al. Visualization of 3 Distinct Retinal Plexuses by Projection-Resolved Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Diabetic Retinopathy. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016, 134, 1411–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Hwang, T.S.; Hagag, A.M.; Wang, J.; Zhang, M.; Smith, A.; Wilson, D.J.; Huang, D.; Jia, Y. Automated Quantification of Nonperfusion Areas in 3 Vascular Plexuses with Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Eyes of Patients with Diabetes. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018, 136, 929–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Johannesen, S.K.; Viken, J.N.; Vergmann, A.S.; Grauslund, J. Optical coherence tomography angiography and microvascular changes in diabetic retinopathy: A systematic review. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ishibazawa, A.; Nagaoka, T.; Takahashi, A.; Omae, T.; Tani, T.; Sogawa, K.; Yokota, H.; Yoshida, A. Optical coherence tomography angiography in diabetic retinopathy: A prospective pilot study. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2015, 160, 35.e1–44.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Matsunaga, D.R.; Yi, J.J.; De Koo, L.O.; Ameri, H.; Puliafito, C.A.; Kashani, A.H. Optical coherence tomography angiography of diabetic retinopathy in human subjects. Ophthalmic Surg. Lasers Imaging Retin. 2015, 46, 796–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Eladawi, N.; Elmogy, M.; Khalifa, F.; Ghazal, M.; Ghazi, M.; Aboelfetouh, A.; Riad, A.; Sandhu, H. Schaal, S.; El-Baz, A. Early diabetic retinopathy diagnosis based on local retinal blood vessel analysis in optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) images. Med Phys. 2018, 45, 4582–4599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Minnella, A.M.; Pagliei, V.; Savastano, M.C.; Federici, M.; Bertelli, M.; Maltese, P.E.; Placidi, G.; Corbo, G.; Falsini, B.; Caporossi, A. Swept source optical coherence tomography and optical coherence tomography angiography in pediatric enhanced S-cone syndrome: A case report. J. Med. Case Rep. 2018, 12, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Jia, Y.; Bailey, S.T.; Wilson, D.J.; Tan, O.; Klein, M.L.; Flaxel, C.J.; Potsaid, B.; Liu, J.J.; Lu, C.D.; Kraus, M.F.; et al. Quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography of choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 2014, 121, 1435–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Jia, Y.; Bailey, S.T.; Hwang, T.S.; McClintic, S.M.; Gao, S.S.; Pennesi, M.E.; Flaxel, C.J.; Lauer, A.K.; Wilson, D.J.; Hornegger, J.; et al. Quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography of vascular abnormalities in the living human eye. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, E2395–E2402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Querques, G.; Corvi, F.; Querques, L.; Souied, E.H.; Bandello, F. Optical coherence tomography angiography of choroidal neovascularization secondary to pathologic myopia. Dev. Ophthalmol. 2016, 56, 101–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. De Carlo, T.E.; Bonini Filho, M.A.; Chin, A.T.; Adhi, M.; Ferrara, D.; Baumal, C.R.; Witkin, A.J.; Reichel, E.; Duker, J.S.; Waheed, N.K. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography angiography of choroidal neovascularization. Ophthalmology 2015, 122, 1228–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Coscas, G.; Lupidi, M.; Coscas, F.; Français, C.; Cagini, C.; Souied, E.H. Optical coherence tomography angiography during follow-up: Qualitative and quantitative analysis of mixed type I and II choroidal neovascularization after vascular endothelial growth factor trap therapy. Ophthalmic Res. 2015, 54, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Huang, D.; Jia, Y.; Rispoli, M.; Tan, O.; Lumbroso, B. Optical coherence tomography angiography of time course of choroidal neovascularization in response to anti-angiogenic treatment. Retina 2015, 35, 2260–2264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kuehlewein, L.; Dansingani, K.K.; de Carlo, T.E.; Bonini Filho, M.A.; Iafe, N.A.; Lenis, T.L.; Freund, K.B.; Waheed, N.K.; Duker, J.S.; Sadda, S.R.; et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography of type 3 neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration. Retina 2015, 35, 2229–2235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kim, J.Y.; Kwon, O.W.; Oh, H.S.; Kim, S.H.; You, Y.S. Optical coherence tomography angiography in patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2016, 254, 1505–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Inoue, M.; Balaratnasingam, C.; Freund, K.B. Optical coherence tomography angiography of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy and polypoidal choroidal neovascularization. Retina 2015, 35, 2265–2274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Bonini Filho, M.A.; de Carlo, T.E.; Ferrara, D.; Adhi, M.; Baumal, C.R.; Witkin, A.J.; Reichel, E.; Duker, J.S.; Waheed, N.K. Association of choroidal neovascularization and central serous chorioretinopathy with optical coherence tomography angiography. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015, 133, 899–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Mc Clintic, S.M.; Jia, Y.; Huang, D.; Bailey, S.T. Optical coherence tomographic angiography of choroidal neovascularization associated with central serous chorioretinopathy. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015, 133, 1212–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Nobre Cardoso, J.; Keane, P.A.; Sim, D.A.; Bradley, P.; Agrawal, R.; Addison, P.K.; Egan, C.; Tufail, A. Systematic Evaluation of Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Retinal Vein Occlusion. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2016, 163, 93.e6–107.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Sambhav, K.; Grover, S.; Chalam, K.V. The application of optical coherence tomography angiography in retinal diseases. Surv. Ophthalmol. 2017, 62, 838–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Ghashut, R.; Muraoka, Y.; Ooto, S.; Iida, Y.; Miwa, Y.; Suzuma, K.; Murakami, T.; Kadomoto, S.; Tsujikawa, A.; Yoshimura, N. Evaluation of macular ischemia in eyes with central retinal vein occlusion: An Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Study. Retina 2018, 38, 1571–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Casselholmde Salles, M.; Kvanta, A.; Amrén, U.; Epstein, D. Optical coherence tomography angiography in central retinal vein occlusion: Correlation between the foveal avascular zone and visual acuity. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016, 57, OCT242–OCT246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Bonini Filho, M.A.; Adhi, M.; de Carlo, T.E. Optical coherence tomography angiography in retinal artery occlusion. Retina 2015, 35, 2339–2346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Thorell, M.R.; Zhang, Q.; Huang, Y.; An, L.; Durbin, M.K.; Laron, M.; Sharma, U.; Stetson, P.F.; Gregory, G.; Wang, R.K.; et al. Swept-Source OCT angiography of macular teleangiectasia type 2. Ophthalmic Surg. Lasers Imaging Retin. 2014, 45, 369–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Zheng, F.; Motulsky, E.H.; de Oliveira Dias, J.R.; de López, E.P.; Gregory, G.; Rosenfeld, P.J. OCT Angiography Helps Distinguish Between Proliferative MacularTelangiectasia Type 2 and Neovascular Age-Related MacularDegeneration. Ophthalmic. Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2018, 49, 303–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Spaide, R.F.; Klancnik, J.M. Jr.; Cooney, M.J.; Yannuzzi, L.A.; Balaratnasingam, C.; Dansingani, K.K.; Suzuki, M. Volume-Rendering optical coherence tomography angiography of macular teleangiectasia type 2. Ophthalmology 2015, 122, 2261–2269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Toto, L.; Di Antonio, L.; Mastropasqua, R.; Mattei, P.A.; Carpineto, P.; Borrelli, E.; Rispoli, M.; Lumbroso, B.; Mastropasqua, L. Multimodal imaging of macular teleangiectasia type 2: Focus on vascular changes using optical coherence tomography angiography. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016, 57, OCT268–OCT276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Zhang, Q.; Wang, C.L.; Chen, A.D.; Legarreta, A.D.; Durbin, M.K.; An, L.; Sharma, U.; Stetson, P.F.; Legarreta, J.E.; Roisman, L.; et al. Swept source optical coherence tomography angiography of neovascular macular telangiectasia type 2. Retina 2015, 35, 2285–2299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Coscas, G.J.; Lupidi, M.; Coscas, F.; Cagini, C.; Souied, E.H. Optical coherence tomography angiography versus traditional multimodal imaging in assessing the activity of exudative age-related macular degeneration. Retina 2015, 35, 2219–2228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Moult, E.; Choi, W.; Waheed, N.K.; Adhi, M.; Lee, B.; Lu, C.D.; Jayaraman, V.; Potsaid, B.; Rosenfeld, P.J.; Duker, J.S.; et al. Ultrahigh-speed swept-source OCT angiography in exudative AMD. Ophthalmic Surg. Lasers Imaging Retin. 2014, 45, 496–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Liu, L.; Jia, Y.; Takusagawa, H.L.; Pechauer, A.D.; Edmunds, B.; Lombardi, L.; Davis, E.; Morrison, J.C.; Huang, D. Optical coherence tomography angiography of the peripapillary retina in glaucoma. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015, 133, 1045–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Wang, X.; Jiang, T.; Ko, X.; Yu, X.; Min, W.; Shi, G.; Sun, X. Correlation between optic disc perfusion and glaucomatous severity in patients with open-angle glaucoma: An optical coherence tomography angiography study. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2015, 253, 1557–1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Leveque, P.M.; Zeboulon, P.; Brasnu, E.; Baudouin, C.; Labbé, A. Optic disc vascularization in glaucoma: Value of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography angiography. J. Ophthalmol. 2016, 2016, 6956717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Bojikian, K.D.; Chen, C.L.; Wen, J.C.; Zhang, Q.; Xin, C.; Gupta, D.; Mudumbai, R.C.; Johnstone, M.A.; Wang, R.K.; Chen, P.P. Optic disc perfusion in normal eyes and eyes with glaucoma using optical coherence tomography-based microangiography. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0154691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Yarmohammadi, A.; Zangwill, L.M.; Diniz Filho, A.; Suh, M.H.; Manalastas, P.I.; Fatehee, N.; Yousefi, S.; Belghith, A.; Saunders, L.J.; Medeiros, F.A.; et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography vessel density in healthy, glaucoma suspect, and glaucoma eyes. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016, 57, OCT451–OCT459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Hou, H.; Moghimi, S.; Zangwill, L.M.; Shoji, T.; Ghahari, E.; Manalastas, P.I.C.; Penteado, R.C.; Weinreb, R.N. . Inter-eye asymmetry of optical coherence tomography angiography vessel density in bilateral glaucoma, glaucoma suspect, and healthy eyes. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2018, 190, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Rao, H.L.; Kadambi, S.V.; Weinreb, R.N.; Puttaiah, N.K.; Pradhan, Z.S.; Rao, D.A.S.; Kumar, R.S.; Webers, C.A.B.; Shetty, R. Diagnostic ability of peripapillary vessel density measurements of optical coherence tomography angiography in primary open-angle and angle-closure glaucoma. Br. J. Ophtahlmol. 2017, 101, 1066–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Akagi, T.; Iida, Y.; Nakanishi, H.; Terada, N.; Morooka, S.; Yamada, H.; Hasegawa, T.; Yokota, S.; Yoshikawa, M.; Yoshimura, N. Microvascular density in glaucomatous eyes with hemifield visual field defects: An optical coherence tomography angiography study. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2016, 168, 237–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. De Carlo, T.E.; Bonini Filho, M.A.; Adhi, M.; Duker, J.S. Retinal and choroidal vasculature in birdshot chorioretinopathy analyzed using spectral domain optical coherence tomography angiography. Retina 2015, 35, 2392–2399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Hassan, M.; Agarwal, A.; Afridi, R.; daSilva, M.J.; Karaca, I.; Sadiq, M.A.; Nguyen, Q.D.; Do, D.V. The Role of Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in the Management of Uveitis. Int. Ophthalmol. Clin. 2016, 56, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Kim, A.Y.; Rodger, D.C.; Shahidzadeh, A.; Chu, Z.; Koulisis, N.; Burkemper, B.; Jiang, X.; Pepple, K.L.; Wang, R.K.; Puliafito, C.A.; et al. Quantifying Retinal Microvascular Changes in Uveitis Using Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2016, 171, 101–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Levison, A.L.; Baynes, K.M.; Lowder, C.Y.; Kaiser, P.K.; Srivastava, S.K. Choroidal neovascularisation on optical coherence tomography angiography in punctate inner choroidopathy and multifocal choroiditis. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2017, 101, 616–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Gao, S.S.; Jia, Y.; Zhang, M.; Su, J.P.; Liu, G.; Huang, T.S.; Biley, S.T.; Huang, D. Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016, 57, OCT27–OCT36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Wang, X.; Jia, Y.; Spain, R.; Potsaid, B.; Liu, J.J.; Baumann, B.; Hornegger, J.; Fujimoto, J.G.; Wu, Q.; Huang, D. Optical coherence tomography angiography of optic nerve head and parafovea in multiple sclerosis. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2014, 98, 1368–1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Ghasemi Falavarjani, K.; Tian, J.J.; Akil, H.; Garcia, G.A.; Sadda, S.R.; Sadun, A.A. Swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography of the optic disk in optic neuropathy. Retina 2016, 36 (Suppl. 1), S168–S177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. De Rojas, J.O.; Rasool, N.; Chen, R.W.; Horowitz, J.; Odel, J.G. Optical coherence tomography angiography in Leber hereditary optic neuropathy. Neurology 2016, 87, 2065–2066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Takayama, K.; Ito, Y.; Kaneko, H. Optical coherence tomography angiography in leber hereditary optic neuropathy. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017, 95, e344–e345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Matsuzaki, M.; Hirami, Y.; Uyama, H.; Kurimoto, Y. Optical coherence tomography angiography changes in radial peripapillary capillaries in Leber hereditary optic neuropathy. Am. J. Ophthalmol. Case Rep. 2018, 9, 51–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Stanga, P.E.; Papayannis, A.; Tsamis, E.; Chwiejczak, K.; Stringa, F.; Jalil, A.; Cole, T.; Biswas, S. Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography of Paediatric Macular Diseases. Dev. Ophthalmol. 2016, 56, 166–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Veronese, C.; Maiolo, C.; Huang, D.; Jia, Y.; Armstrong, G.W.; Morara, M.; Ciardella, A.P. Optical coherence tomography angiography in pediatric choroidal neovascularization. Am. J. Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2016, 2, 37–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Vinekar, A.; Chidambara, L.; Jayadev, C.; Sivakumar, M.; Webers, C.A.B.; Shetty, B. Monitoring neovascularization in aggressive posterior retinopathy of prematurity using optical coherence tomography angiography. J. AAPOS 2016, 20, 271–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Cennamo, G.; Rossi, C.; Ruggiero, P.; Crecchio, G.; Cennamo, G. Study of the radial peripapillary capillary network in congenital optic disc anomalies with optical coherence tomography angiography. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2017, 176, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Lee, H.; Proudlock, F.A.; Gottlob, I. Pediatric optical coherence tomography in clinical practice-Recent progress. Investig. Ophthalmol Vis. sci. 2016, 57, OCT69–OCT79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Falavarjani, K.G.; Shenazandi, H.; Naseri, D.; Anvari, P.; Kazemi, P.; Aghamohammadi, F.; Alissmail, F.; Alemzadeh, S.A. Foveal avascular zone and vessel density in healthy subjects: An optical coherence tomography angiography study. J. Ophthalmic Vis. Res. 2018, 13, 260–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Zhang, Z.; Huang, X.; Meng, X.; Chen, T.; Gu, Y.; Wu, Y.; Wu, Z. In vivo assessment of macula in eyes of healthy children 8 to 16 years old using optical coherence tomography angiography. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 8936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Gilbert, C.; Foster, A. Childhood blindness in the context of VISION 2020—The right to sight. Bull. World Health Organ. 2001, 79, 227–232. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  86. Jensen, A.K.; Ying, G.S.; Huang, J.; Quinn, G.E.; Binenbaum, G. Postnatal serum insulin-like growth factor I and retinopathy of prematurity. Retina 2017, 37, 867–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Zhang, L.; Li, D.W. SUMOylation Regulation of Retina Development and Functions. Curr. Mol. Med. 2016, 16, 803–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Chiang, M.F.; Jiang, L.; Gelman, R.; Du, Y.E.; Flynn, J.T. Interexpert agreement of plus disease diagnosis in retinopathy of prematurity. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2007, 125, 875–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Campbell, J.P.; Nudleman, E.; Yang, J.; Tan, O.; Chan, R.V.P.; Chiang, M.F.; Huang, D.; Liu, G. Handheld Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography and Ultra–Wide-Field Optical Coherence Tomography in Retinopathy of Prematurity. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017, 135, 977–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Mintz-Hittner, H.A.; Knight-Nanan, D.M.; Satriano, D.R.; Kretzer, F.L. A small foveal avascular zone may be an historic mark of prematurity. Ophthalmology 1999, 106, 1409–1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Henaine-Berra, A.; Garcia-Aguirre, G.; Quiroz-Mercado, H.; Martinez-Castellanos, M.A. Retinal fluorescein angiographic changes following intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy. JAAPOS 2014, 18, 120–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Lepore, D.; Quinn, G.E.; Molle, F.; Baldascino, A.; Orazi, L.; Sammartino, M.; Purcaro, V.; Giannantonio, C.; Papacci, P.; Romagnoli, C. Intravitreal bevacizumab versus laser treatment in type 1 retinopathy of prematurity: Report on fluorescein angiographic findings. Ophthalmology 2014, 121, 2212–2219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Noval, S.; Freedman, S.F.; Asrani, S.; El-Dairi, M.A. Incidence of fovea plana in normal children. J. AAPOS 2014, 8, 471–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Maldonado, R.S.; Izatt, J.A.; Sarin, N.; Wallace, D.K.; Freedman, S.; Cotton, C.M.; Toth, C.A. Optimizing hand-held spectral domain optical coherence tomography imaging for neonates, infants, and children. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010, 51, 2678–2685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Lee, H.; Proudlock, F.; Gottlob, I. Is handheld optical coherence tomography reliable in infants and young children with and without nystagmus? Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013, 54, 8152–8159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Avery, R.A.; Cnaan, A.; Schuman, J.S.; Chen, C.L.; Glaug, N.C.; Packer, R.J.; Quinn, G.E.; Ishikawa, H. Intra- and inter-visit reproducibility of ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer measurements using handheld optical coherence tomography in children with optic pathway gliomas. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2014, 158, 916–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Gerth, C.; Zawadzki, R.J.; Heon, E.; Werner, J.S. High-resolution retinal imaging in young children using a handheld scanner and Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. J. AAPOS 2009, 13, 72–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Padró-Pérez, N.; Catalá-Mora, J.; Díaz, J.; Arias, L.; Prat, J.; Caminal, J.M. Swept-source and optical coherence tomography angiography in patients with X-linked retinoschisis. Eye 2018, 32, 707–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Mastropasqua, R.; Toto, L.; Di Antonio, L.; Parodi, M.B.; Sobrino, L.; Antonucci, I.; Stuppia, L.; Di Nicola, M.; Mariotti, C. Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Findings in X-Linked retinoschisis. Ophthalmic Surg. Lasers Imaging Retin. 2018, 49, e20–e31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Boon, C.J.; van den Born, L.I.; Visser, L.; Keunen, J.E.; Bergen, A.A.; Booij, J.C.; Riemslag, F.C.; Florijn, R.J.; van Schooneveld, M.J. Autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy: Differential diagnosis and treatment options. MJ Ophthalmol. 2013, 120, 809–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Boon, C.J.; Klevering, B.J.; den Hollander, A.I.; Zonneveld, M.N.; Theelen, T.; Cremers, F.P.; Hoyng, C.B. Clinical and genetic heterogeneity in multifocal vitelliform dystrophy. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2007, 125, 1100–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Stanga, P.E.; Romano, F.; Chwjejczak, K.; Tsamis, E.; Stringa, F.; Biswas, S.; Bento, G.; Arrigo, A.; Parodi, M.B.; Bandello, F. Swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography assessment of fellow eyes in Coats disease. Retina 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Nemiroff, J.; Kuehlewein, L.; Rahimy, E.; Tsui, I.; Doshi, R.; Gaudric, A.; Gorin, M.B.; Sadda, S.; Sarraf, D. Assessing deep retinal capillary ischemia in paracentral acute middle maculopathy by optical coherence tomography angiography. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2016, 162, 121–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Lonngi, M.; Velez, F.G.; Tsui, I.; Davila, J.P.; Rahimi, M.; Chan, C.; Sarraf, D.; Demer, J.L.; Pineles, S.L. Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomographic Angiography in Children with Amblyopia. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017, 135, 1086–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Yilmaz, I.; Ocak, O.B.; Yilmaz, B.S.; Inal, A.; Gokyigit, B.; Taskapili, M. Comparison of quantitative measurement of foveal avascular zone and macular vessel density in eyes of children with amblyopia and healthy controls: An optical coherence tomography angiography study. J. AAPOS 2017, 21, 224–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Repka, M.X.; Kraker, R.T.; Tamkins, S.M.; Suh, D.W.; Sala, N.A.; Beck, R.W. Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in amblyopic eyes. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2009, 148, 143–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Gołębiewska, J.; Olechowski, A.; Wysocka-Mincewicz, M.; Odrobina, D.; Baszynska-Wilk, M.; Groszek, A.; Szalecki, M.; Hautz, W. Optical coherence tomography angiography vessel density in children with type 1 diabetes. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0186479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Huang, D.; Swanson, E.A.; Lin, C.P.; Schuman, J.S.; Stinson, W.G.; Chang, W.; Hee, M.R.; Flotte, T.; Gregory, K.; Puliafito, C.A. Optical coherence tomography. Science 1991, 254, 1178–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  109. Barrio-Barrio, J.; Ruiz-Canela, M.; Noval, S.; Galdós, M. Retinal thickness measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in eyes without retinal abnormalities: The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2015, 160, 209–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Barrio-Barrio, J.; Noval, S.; Galdós, M.; Ruiz-Canela, M.; Bonet, E.; Capote, M.; Lopez, M. Multicenter Spanish study of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in normal children. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013, 91, e56–e63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Sala-Puigdollers, A.; Figueras-Roca, M.; Hereu, M.; Hernández, T.; Morató, M.; Adán, A.; Zarranz-Ventura, J. Repeatability and reproducibility of retinal and choroidal thickness measurements in Diabetic Macular Edema using Swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0200819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Lee, C.S.; Lee, A.Y.; Sim, D.A.; Keane, P.A.; Mehta, H.; Zarranz-Ventura, J.; Fruttiger, M.; Egan, C.A.; Tufail, A. Reevaluating the definition of intraretinal microvascular abnormalities and neovascularization elsewhere in diabetic retinopathy using optical coherence tomography and fluorescein angiography. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2015, 159, 101–110.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Sim, D.A.; Keane, P.A.; Mehta, H.; Fung, S.; Zarranz-Ventura, J.; Fruttiger, M.; Patel, P.J.; Egan, C.A.; Tufail, A. Repeatibility and reproducibility of choroidal vessel layer measurements in diabetic retinopathy using enhanced depth optical coherence tomography. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013, 54, 2893–2901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Moreno-Montañés, J.; Olmo, N.; Alvarez, A.; García, N.; Zarranz-Ventura, J. Cirrus high-definition optical coherence tomography compared with Stratus optical coherence tomography in glaucoma diagnosis. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010, 51, 335–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Choma, M.; Sarunic, M.; Yang, C.; Izatt, J. Sensitivity advantage of swept source and Fourier domain opctical coherence tomography. Opt. Express 2003, 11, 2183–2189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Cogliati, A.; Canavesi, C.; Hayes, A.; Tankam, P.; Duma, V.F.; Santhanam, A.; Thompson, K.P.; Rolland, J.P. MEMS-based handheld scanning probe with pre-shaped input signals for distortion-free images in Gabor-Domain Optical Coherence Microscopy. Opt. Express 2016, 24, 13365–13374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (A,B) Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) of 4.5 × 4.5 mm (DRI OCT Triton (plus), TOPCON Co., Japan) corresponding to the right eye of a patient with ROP that required laser treatment. In the superficial capillary plexus (SCP) segmentation (A), a decreased foveal avascular zone (FAZ) (43.97 µm2) and disorganization of the capillaries in the deep capillary plexus (DCP) (B) were observed. (C,D) OCT-A of 4.5 × 4.5 mm (DRI OCT Triton system, Topcon) corresponding to a patient born at term of the same age as the first patient. We can appreciate a bigger FAZ (265,694 µm2) in this case and a normal capillary architecture in the DCP (D).
Figure 1. (A,B) Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) of 4.5 × 4.5 mm (DRI OCT Triton (plus), TOPCON Co., Japan) corresponding to the right eye of a patient with ROP that required laser treatment. In the superficial capillary plexus (SCP) segmentation (A), a decreased foveal avascular zone (FAZ) (43.97 µm2) and disorganization of the capillaries in the deep capillary plexus (DCP) (B) were observed. (C,D) OCT-A of 4.5 × 4.5 mm (DRI OCT Triton system, Topcon) corresponding to a patient born at term of the same age as the first patient. We can appreciate a bigger FAZ (265,694 µm2) in this case and a normal capillary architecture in the DCP (D).
Applsci 08 02441 g001
Figure 2. Optic nerve OCT (DRI OCT Triton system, Topcon) corresponding to the right eye of a patient with chronic bilateral papilledema secondary to intracranial hypertension (AE). (A,B) Vascular tortuosity in different segmentations and enlargement of the vessels and capillaries can be seen. (CE) The corresponding vessel density map, fundus photograph and B scan are provided in (CE) respectively.
Figure 2. Optic nerve OCT (DRI OCT Triton system, Topcon) corresponding to the right eye of a patient with chronic bilateral papilledema secondary to intracranial hypertension (AE). (A,B) Vascular tortuosity in different segmentations and enlargement of the vessels and capillaries can be seen. (CE) The corresponding vessel density map, fundus photograph and B scan are provided in (CE) respectively.
Applsci 08 02441 g002

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guirao Navarro, M.C.; Saenz de Viteri Vazquez, M.; Zarranz-Ventura, J.; Barrio-Barrio, J. OCT Angiography: A Technique for the Assessment of Retinal and Optic Nerve Diseases in the Pediatric Population. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 2441. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8122441

AMA Style

Guirao Navarro MC, Saenz de Viteri Vazquez M, Zarranz-Ventura J, Barrio-Barrio J. OCT Angiography: A Technique for the Assessment of Retinal and Optic Nerve Diseases in the Pediatric Population. Applied Sciences. 2018; 8(12):2441. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8122441

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guirao Navarro, María Concepción, Manuel Saenz de Viteri Vazquez, Javier Zarranz-Ventura, and Jesús Barrio-Barrio. 2018. "OCT Angiography: A Technique for the Assessment of Retinal and Optic Nerve Diseases in the Pediatric Population" Applied Sciences 8, no. 12: 2441. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8122441

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop