Next Article in Journal
Effects of Crop Leaf Angle on LAI-Sensitive Narrow-Band Vegetation Indices Derived from Imaging Spectroscopy
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Amphiphilic Polymer/Nano-Silica Composite on Shale Stability for Water-Based Muds
Previous Article in Journal
Asymptotic and Spectral Analysis of a Model of the Piezoelectric Energy Harvester with the Timoshenko Beam as a Substructure
Previous Article in Special Issue
Influence of Graphene Nanoplatelet and Silver Nanoparticle on the Rheological Properties of Water-Based Mud
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Suppression Characteristics of NH4H2PO4/Red Mud Composite Powders on Methane Explosion

1
The Collaboration Innovation Center of Coal Safety Production of Henan Province, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, Henan, China
2
State Key Laboratory Cultivation Bases Gas Geology and Gas Control, College of Safety Science and Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, Henan, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2018, 8(9), 1433; https://doi.org/10.3390/app8091433
Submission received: 15 July 2018 / Revised: 19 August 2018 / Accepted: 20 August 2018 / Published: 22 August 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanotech for Oil and Gas)

Abstract

:
The composite powders composed of red mud (RM) and NH4H2PO4 (NH4H2PO4/RM) were successfully prepared by the anti-solvent method. The composition and structure of the NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders were characterized by the techniques of X-ray diffraction (XRD), SEM, N2 adsorption-desorption and Thermogravimetry-Differential scanning calorimetry (TG-DSC). The analysis results indicate that the as-prepared samples are composed with uniform nanoparticles and possess the porous structure. The methane explosion suppression characteristics of the NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders were tested by a 20 L spherical explosion system and a 5 L pipe test system. The results show that the NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders possess considerable suppression properties on methane explosion. When the loading content of NH4H2PO4 reached 30%, the maximum pressure and the maximum pressure rise rate of methane explosion were decreased by 35.1% and 95.8%, respectively. When comparing with no powder addition, the time to reach the pressure peak was extended from 0.07 s to 0.50 s. The NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders presented a synergistic suppression effect between NH4H2PO4 and RM, which made it exhibit considerable suppression property than that of pure NH4H2PO4 or red mud powders.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Gas explosion is an extraordinary serious coal mine disaster that can cause massive damage and casualties. In order to reduce the impact of coal mine gas explosion, researchers have carried out a lot of research works. On the one hand, the refuge chamber has been widely investigated and used for miners who are unable to escape during an accident, which can provide basic survival conditions [1,2,3]. Zhao et al. simulated and analyzed the structure strength of a coal mine mobile refuge chamber under gas explosion load by a finite element method [4]. Li et al. simulated and analyzed the air pressure distribution law in the mine refuge chamber [5]. Zhang et al. studied the design and optimation of the refuge chambers based on the simulation of the gas explosion pressure fields [6]. Jia et al. studied the relationship between the propagation regulation about shock wave of gas explosion and the laneway cross-sectional area [7]. Zhang et al. established the underground mine tunnel model and the refuge chamber model by using the finite element software ANSYS/LA-DYNA, the propagation of methane/air mixture blast waves, and the fluid-structure interactions were also simulated by the Arbitrary Lagrange-Euler (ALE) method [8].
On the other hand, the suppression of gas explosion in the coal mine is also significant for the safety of mine production. Methane is the major component of mine gas and its explosion limits is 5–15%. In the previous studies, water mists [9,10,11,12], inert gas [13,14,15,16], and chemical powders [17,18,19,20,21] have been used to suppress the methane explosion. Because of its excellent performance on methane explosion suppression, chemical powders are studied extensively. In recent years, the composite powders were appreciated and studied widely for its synergistic effect on the explosion suppression. Harris et al. systematically studied the relationship between the particle size distributions, specific surface area, and the explosion suppression effectiveness of the rock dusts [22]. Ni et al. fabricated a new type fire suppressant with core–shell structure while using zeolites and NaHCO3 [23]. The composites could extinguish the oil fire with less powder amount and shorter time when comparing with the common BC (…) powders. Bertolino et al. report a novel procedure to fabricate multilayer composite biofilms based on halloysite nanotubes (HNTs) and sustainable polymers [24]. The thermal properties analysis of the nanocomposite indicated that the chitosan/halloysite layer generates a flame retardant action on the biomaterials and the multilayer morphology confers a fire resistance to the nanocomposite. In our previous work, the NaHCO3/red-mud composite powders were prepared and its suppression effect on the methane explosion was tested in detail [25]. Due to the synergistic suppression effect between NaHCO3 and red-mud, the NaHCO3/red-mud composite powders exhibited better suppression properties than that of the pure NaHCO3 and red mud powders. Thus, the use of composite powders gradually became an important development trend for the gas explosion suppression.
Red mud is the waste residue of alumina industry, which is mainly composed of Al2O3, CaO, SiO2, and Fe2O3, and caused serious environmental pollution. The recycle and utilization of red mud have become an urgent problem. On this condition, many works have been done to find the novel utilization of red mud [26,27,28,29,30]. In our previous research, the red mud was modified by a facile method and presented a considerable suppression property on methane explosion [31]. Producing methane explosion suppression reagents with red mud could both solve the pollution problem and bring considerable economic value. NH4H2PO4 is a kind of common fire-extinguishing agent. Kordylewski and Amrogowicz studied the suppression effect of NH4H2PO4 and NaHCO3 powders on the methane explosion, and the results indicated that the NH4H2PO4 powders had a better suppression effect on the methane explosion [32]. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is still no research about the preparation and methane explosion suppression application of the NH4H2PO4 and red mud composite powders.
Herein, a new composite (NH4H2PO4/RM) for methane explosion suppression was successfully prepared with NH4H2PO4 and red mud. The composition and structure of the NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders were characterized, and their methane explosion suppression properties were tested in detail. Furthermore, the suppression mechanism of the NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders on methane explosion was also discussed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders were prepared with the modified red mud and NH4H2PO4 particles by an anti-solvent method. The raw red mud was provided by Henan Zhongmei Aluminum Corporation, China (major compositions: SiO2 16.94 wt %; Al2O3 23.25 wt %; Fe2O3 15.05 wt %; CaO 16.94 wt %; TiO2 4.27 wt %; Na2O 3.72 wt %; MgO 1.93 wt %). The raw red mud was dried, ground, and sieved to a size of <150 μm. Other chemical reagents were of analytical grade. The modified red mud powders were prepared at first and the method was shown in the literature [31]. The preparation process of NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders with different weight percentage of NH4H2PO4 (5%, 10%, 15%, 10%, 25%, and 30%) was as follows. Firstly, a certain amount of NH4H2PO4 was solved in deionized water to become a saturated solution. Then, 10 g modified red mud powders were dispersed in the anti-solvent ethanol to become a suspension solution. Under magnetic stirring, the prepared suspension solution of modified red mud was added into the NH4H2PO4 saturated solution. The obtained mixture was stirred for 2 h, aged for 4 h, and then the precipitate was separated by filtration and dried in vacuum for 12 h. Finally, NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders with a different weight percentage of NH4H2PO4 were obtained, and denoted as 5%-NH4H2PO4/RM, 10%-NH4H2PO4/RM, 15%-NH4H2PO4/RM, 20%-NH4H2PO4/RM, 25%-NH4H2PO4/RM, and 30%-NH4H2PO4/RM.

2.2. Characterization

X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was carried on Bruker-AXS D8 (Bruker, Madison, WI, USA) with CuKα radiation at 40 kV and 25 mA. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, Quanta™ 250 FEG) (FEI, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) was used to analyze the morphologies of the prepared samples. N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms were obtained on a Quantachrome Autosorb-iQ sorption analyzer (Quantachrome, Boynton Beach, FL, USA). Before carrying out the measurement, the samples were degassed at 150 °C for more than 6 h. The specific surface areas (SBET) of the samples were calculated while following the multi-point BET (Brunauer-Emmett-Teller) procedure. Thermogravimetry-Differential scanning calorimetry (TG-DSC) analysis was completed on a Simultaneous Thermal Analyzer (NETZSCH, Selb, Germany) in a flow of air (20 mL·min−1) at a heating rate of 10 °C·min−1.

2.3. Explosion Experiment Device and Test Process

The effects on the methane-air premixed gas explosion pressure of NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders with different weight percentage of NH4H2PO4 were tested by the 20 L spherical explosion system. The illustration of 20 L spherical explosion system was presented in Figure 1. The system mainly includes the gas distribution system, ignition system, powder injection system, and data acquisition system. Firstly, the 9.5% methane/air was mixed by the partial pressure method. Then, the NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders were put into the powder storage tank and the 2 MPa injection air was introduced into the tank. The high-pressure air and the powders were injected and dispersed into the spherical vessel after pushing the ignition button. The igniter is electrical pulse and the ignition energy is about 100 J. The explosion pressure was collected by the pressure sensor and then saved by the computer at the same time.
The average velocity of flame propagation was measured by a pipe test system with a cross-sectional area of 100 × 100 mm2 and a length of 500 mm. The illustration of the pipe test system was shown in our previous published paper [18]. Firstly, the NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders were put into the powder container. Then, the premixed 9.5% methane/air was introduced into the pipe. The powders were injected into the pipe by the high-pressure gas and then the methane/air was ignited by the electrical pulse igniter. Meanwhile, the flame propagation images were captured by a high-speed camera and saved in the computer.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Sample Characterization

The X-diffraction patterns of NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders, red mud, and NH4H2PO4 are shown in Figure 2, respectively. From Figure 2, we can see that the NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders and red mud powders have the similar X-ray diffraction patterns. The diffraction patterns of the composite powders also present the characteristic diffraction peaks of NH4H2PO4 (2θ = 19.6°, 27.6°, 36.4°, 42.1°) after loading the NH4H2PO4 particles. The results indicate that the red mud was the main component of the composite powders and the NH4H2PO4 particles were loaded on the red mud successfully.
The SEM images of NH4H2PO4 powders, red mud, and the NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders are shown in Figure 3. As shown in Figure 3A, the sizes of NH4H2PO4 particles are large and not uniform, and the diameters are from 5 to 20 μm. The surface of red mud is rich in pores and the pores are in irregular distribution, as shown in Figure 3B. The surface of the NH4H2PO4/RM is coated with small particles according to Figure 3C, which indicates that NH4H2PO4 are successfully loaded on the surface of red mud, forming the uniform composite powders.
The N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms of red mud and the NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders are shown in Figure 4. Both of the isotherms are type IV in the IUPAC classification with the H4 hysteresis loop. The results indicate that these two powders possess the mesoporous structure, and capillary condensation occurred during the adsorption-desorption process. After loading the NH4H2PO4 particles, the adsorption capacity of the composite is lower than red mud in the P/P0 range of 0.5–1.0, indicating the decrease of mesopores in the NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders and the formation of a granulation structure during the loading process. The data of this experiment confirmed the changes of the NH4H2PO4/RM morphology that are presented in SEM images (Figure 3). The specific surface area and pore volume of red mud are 123.16 m2·g‒1 and 0.158 cm3·g‒1. After loading the NH4H2PO4 particles, the data of the composite powders are reduced to 75.83 m2·g‒1 and 0.116 cm3·g‒1. It means that the NH4H2PO4 particles were loaded on the surface and/or in the pore of red mud.
The TG-DSC curves of the NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders are shown in Figure 5. From the TG curve, there are three weight loss stages in the whole process. The first stage from 120 °C to 220 °C is attributed to the lost and the thermal decomposition of adsorbed and intercalated moisture of the NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders. The second stage from 220 °C to 300 °C could be ascribed to the decomposition of NH4H2PO4. The third stage from 300 °C to 420 °C could be ascribed to the decomposition of the hydroxides (such as: Al(OH)3 and Fe(OH)3). After 420 °C, there is no further weight loss, indicating that the composite powder became stable. The total weight loss of the NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders is 93.7%. The DSC curve of the composite powders exhibited three endothermic peaks, which is consistent with the TG curve. According to the DSC curve, the total endothermic quantity of the NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders is 1257.9 J·g−1, indicating that the composite powders presented an excellent heat absorption performance.

3.2. Suppression Properties of the NH4H2PO4/RM Composite Powders

The suppression properties of the NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders with different amount of NH4H2PO4 (weight percentage of 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, and 30%) were tested and the results are presented in Figure 6. Figure 6A shows the 9.5% premixed methane-air explosion pressure curves with no powders, pure red mud powders, and the NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders. It can be seen from Figure 6A that the maximum explosion pressure is decreased and the time of pressure peak arriving is delayed by adding suppression powders. The explosion suppression effect of red mud was improved after loading NH4H2PO4, and enhanced gradually with increasing the amount of NH4H2PO4. When the loading amount is more than 20%, the suppression performance of the NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders on the maximum explosion pressure is even better than the pure NH4H2PO4 powders. The 30%-NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders show a better suppression effect than the pure NH4H2PO4 powders both in the maximum explosion pressure and the time of pressure peak arriving. The maximum rate of pressure rise and the time of pressure peak arriving of the NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders and the pure NH4H2PO4 and red mud (RM) powders are illustrated in Figure 6B, and the detailed data are shown in Table 1.
From Table 1, we can see that when adding the 30% NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders as the suppression agent, the maximum explosion pressure is decreased from 0.749 MPa (no powders) to 0.486 MPa, which reduce 35.1%. Accordingly, the maximum rate of pressure rise is decreased from 41.16 MPa·s−1 to 1.72 MPa·s−1, which reduce 95.8%, and the delay time of pressure peak arriving is increased from 0.07 s to 0.50 s, which delay 0.43 s.
The flame propagation images of the 9.5% premixed methane-air explosion with the red mud, NH4H2PO4, and the NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders are shown in Figure 7. As shown in this figure, the time of explosion flame propagating to the top of the pipe is 26 ms with no powders addition. When the pure red mud or the NH4H2PO4 powders was added, the time is 50 ms and 132 ms, respectively. When the NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders with the different amount of NH4H2PO4 (5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, and 30%) were added, the time of explosion flame reached the top are 73 ms, 85 ms, 97 ms, 110 ms, 130 ms, and 160 ms, respectively. The results indicate that the NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders present a much better suppression effect on flame propagation speed than that of pure RM powders. In addition, the 30%-NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders exhibit the best inhibition performance, which is consistent with the results that were tested by the 20 L spherical explosive system.

3.3. Suppression Mechanism of the NH4H2PO4/RM Composite Powders

According to the results of the explosion experiments, the NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders present the considerable suppression properties on the methane explosion. The schematic diagram of the NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders in the explosion process is illustrated in Figure 8. The suppression mechanism of the NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders could be analyzed from two aspects, as follows.
Physical inhibition effect: The NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders have a good heat absorption performance, as shown in the Figure 5. When the composite powders were added into the explosion vessel, the NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders were separated into the NH4H2PO4 particles and red mud under the high pressure and temperature during the 9.5% premixed methane-air explosion. Then, the NH4H2PO4 particles and the hydroxides (Al(OH)3, Fe(OH)3) in the red mud decomposed with absorbing a lot of heat, leading to a good endothermic effect for explosion suppression.
Chemical inhibition effect: The mechanism of methane explosion is shown as the following chain reactions [33].
CH 4   +   O 2 CH 3   +   HO 2
CH 3   +   O 2 CH 2 O   +   HO
HO   +   CH 4 CH 3   +   H 2 O
CH 2 O   +   HO CH 3   +   H 2 O
CH 2 O   +   O 2 HO 2   +   CHO
CHO   +   O 2 CO   +   HO 2
HO 2   +   CH 4 H 2 O 2   +   CH 3
HO 2   +   CH 2 O H 2 O 2   +   CHO
During the methane explosion process, the NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders decomposed and they generated a lot of gaseous free radicals, which can combine with the generated radicals by methane explosion. In addition, the red mud powders expose more pores on their surface due to the separation of the loaded NH4H2PO4 particles, which can adsorb and capture more free radicals that are generated by methane explosion. Both two reasons simultaneously contribute to the chemical inhibition effect of the NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders.

4. Conclusions

In this work, the NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders with porous structure and high surface area are successfully prepared by using the industrial waste red mud as the base material. The resulting NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders are found to possess considerable suppression properties on methane explosion, and the explosion suppression properties enhanced with increasing the amount of NH4H2PO4 in the composites. When the loading content of NH4H2PO4 reached 30%, the maximum pressure and the maximum pressure rise rate of the 9.5% premixed methane-air explosion were decreased by 35.1% and 95.8%, and the time reached the pressure peak was extended from 0.07 s to 0.50 s. The explosion suppression properties of NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders are caused by the physical and chemical inhibition effect. Due to the unique properties and high-value utilization of the waste from the aluminum industry, the NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders could be a desirable and economical inhibitor for the methane explosion suppression application.

Author Contributions

Y.Z., X.M. and L.Z. managed all the experimental and performed the experiments and analyzed the data; Y.W. and J.G. conceived and designed the experiments and writing process as the corresponding authors; all authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51874120, 51504083, 51674104), Program for Science & Technology Innovation Talents in Universities of Henan Province (19HASTIT042), Project funded by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2016M592290), the Research Foundation for Youth Scholars of Higher Education of Henan Province (2017GGJS053), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Universities of Henan Province (NSFRF1606), Program for Innovative Research Team in University of Ministry of Education of China (IRT_16R22), Program for Innovative Research Team of Henan Polytechnic University (T2018-2), Foundation for Distinguished Young Scientists of Henan Polytechnic University (J2017-3) and the State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base for Gas Geology and Gas Control (Henan Polytechnic University) (WS2017A03).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yang, D.M. The construction and development of the emergency refuge system in coal mine. J. Saf. Sci. Technol. 2010, 11, 6–9. [Google Scholar]
  2. Mitchell, M.D. Analysis of Underground Coal Mine Refuge Shelters. Ph.D. Thesis, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA, 20 April 2008. [Google Scholar]
  3. Sun, J.P. The function and configuration scheme in coal mine. Ind. Mine Autom. 2010, 11, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhao, H.J.; Qian, X.M.; Li, J. Simulation analysis on structure safety of coal mine mobile refuge chamber under explosion load. Saf. Sci. 2012, 50, 674–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, F.W.; Jin, L.Z.; Zhan, Z.N. Numerical simulation study of air distribution law of air pressure system in the mine refuge chamber. J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol. 2012, 45, 205–211. [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhang, B.Y.; Zhao, W.; Wang, W.; Zhang, X.H. Pressure characteristics and dynamic respond of coal mine refuge chamber with underground gas explosion. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2014, 30, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jia, Z.W.; Jing, G.X.; Cheng, L. Study on propagation regulation about shock wave of gas explosion at laneway area break. China Saf. Sci. J. 2007, 17, 92–94. [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhang, B.Y.; Zhai, D.X.; Wang, W. Failure mode analysis and dynamic response of a coal mine refuge chamber with a gas explosion. Appl. Sci. 2016, 6, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yu, M.G.; Wan, S.J.; Xu, Y.L.; Zheng, K.; Liang, D.L. The influence of the charge-to-mass ratio of the charged water mist on a methane explosion. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2016, 41, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cao, X.Y.; Ren, J.J.; Zhou, Y.H.; Wang, Q.J. Suppression of methane explosion by ultrafine water mist containing sodium chloride additive. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 285, 311–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Cao, X.Y.; Ren, J.J.; Bi, M.S.; Zhou, Y.H.; Li, Y.M. Experimental research on the characteristics of methane explosion affected by ultrafine water mist. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 324, 489–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Xu, Y.L.; Wang, L.Y.; Yu, M.G.; Wan, S.J. Study on the characteristics of gas explosion affected by induction charged water mist in confined space. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2016, 40, 227–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mitu, M.; Giurcan, V.; Razus, D.; Oancea, D. Inert gas influence on the laminar burning velocity of methane-air mixtures. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 321, 440–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mitu, M.; Giurcan, V.; Razus, D.; Oancea, D. Influence of inert gas addition on propagation indices of methane–air deflagrations. Process. Saf. Environ. 2016, 102, 513–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, Z.R.; Ni, L.; Liu, X.; Jiang, J.C.; Wang, R. Effects of N2/CO2 on explosion characteristics of methane and air mixture. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2014, 31, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jiang, B.Y.; Liu, Z.G.; Tang, M.Y.; Yang, K.; Lv, P.; Lin, B.Q. Active suppression of premixed methaneair explosion propagation by non-premixed suppressant with nitrogen and ABC powder in a semiconfined duct. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2016, 29, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Luo, Z.M.; Wang, T.; Tian, Z.H.; Cheng, F.M.; Deng, J.; Zhang, Y.T. Experimental study on the suppression of gas explosion using the gas-solid suppressant of CO2/ABC powder. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2014, 30, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zheng, L.G.; Li, G.; Wang, Y.L.; Zhu, X.C.; Pan, R.K.; Wang, Y. Effect of blockage ratios on the characteristics of methane/air explosion suppressed by BC powder. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 355, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Nie, B.S.; Yang, L.L.; Ge, B.Q.; Wang, J.W.; Li, X.C. Chemical kinetic characteristics of methane mixture explosion and its affecting factors. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2017, 49, 675–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cheng, W.M.; Hu, X.M.; Xie, J.; Zhao, Y.Y. An intelligent gel designed to control the spontaneous combustion of coal: Fire prevention and extinguishing properties. Fuel 2017, 210, 826–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jiang, H.P.; Bi, M.S.; Gao, W.; Gan, B.; Zhang, D.W.; Zhang, Q. Inhibition of aluminum dust explosion by NaHCO3 with different particle size distributions. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 344, 902–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Harris, M.L.; Sapko, M.J.; Zlochower, I.A.; Perera, I.E.; Weiss, E.S. Particle size and surface area effects on explosibility using a 20-L chamber. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2015, 37, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Ni, X.M.; Kuang, K.Q.; Yang, D.L.; Jin, X.; Liao, G.X. A new type of fire suppressant powder of NaHCO3/zeolite nanocomposites with core–shell structure. Fire Saf. J. 2009, 44, 968–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bertolino, V.; Cavallaro, G.; Milioto, S.; Parisi, F.; Lazzara, G. Thermal Properties of Multilayer Nanocomposites Based on Halloysite Nanotubes and Biopolymers. J. Compos. Sci. 2018, 2, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, Y.; Cheng, Y.S.; Yu, M.G.; Li, Y.; Cao, J.L.; Zheng, L.G.; Yi, H.W. Methane explosion suppression characteristics based on the NaHCO3/red-mud composite powders with core-shell structure. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 335, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Rachel, A.P.; Sara, J.C.; Graeme, J.M. Value adding red mud waste: Impact of red mud composition upon fluoride removal performance of synthesised akaganeite sorbents. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 2063–2074. [Google Scholar]
  27. Li, Y.C.; Min, X.B.; Ke, Y.; Chai, L.Y.; Shi, M.Q.; Tang, C.J.; Wang, Q.W.; Liang, Y.J.; Lei, J.; Liu, D.G. Utilization of red mud and Pb/Zn smelter waste for the synthesis of a red mud-based cementitious material. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 344, 343–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Singh, S.; Aswath, M.U.; Ranganath, R.V. Effect of mechanical activation of red mud on the strength of geopolymer binder. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 177, 91–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Toniolo, N.; Rincón, A.; Avadhut, Y.S.; Hartmann, M.; Bernardo, E.; Boccaccini, A.R. Novel geopolymers incorporating red mud and waste glass cullet. Mater. Lett. 2018, 219, 152–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cao, J.L.; Yan, Z.L.; Deng, Q.F.; Yuan, Z.Y.; Wang, Y.; Sun, G.; Wang, X.D.; Hari, B.; Zhang, Z.Y. Homogeneous precipitation method preparation of modified red mud supported Ni mesoporous catalysts for ammonia decomposition. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2014, 4, 361–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yu, M.G.; Kong, J.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, K.; Zheng, L.G. Experimental research on gas explosion suppression by modified red mud. J. China Coal Soc. 2014, 39, 1289–1294. [Google Scholar]
  32. Kordylewski, W.; Amrogowicz, J. Comparison of NaHCO3 and NH4H2PO4 Effectiveness as Dust Explosion Suppressants. Combust. Flame 1992, 90, 344–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Frenklach, M.; Wang, H.; Rabinowitz, M.J. Optimization and analysis of large chemical kinetic mechanisms using the solution mapping method-combustion of methane. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 1992, 18, 47–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The illustration of 20 L spherical explosion system.
Figure 1. The illustration of 20 L spherical explosion system.
Applsci 08 01433 g001
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders, red mud (RM), and NH4H2PO4.
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders, red mud (RM), and NH4H2PO4.
Applsci 08 01433 g002
Figure 3. SEM images of NH4H2PO4 particles (A), red mud (B), and the NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders (C).
Figure 3. SEM images of NH4H2PO4 particles (A), red mud (B), and the NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders (C).
Applsci 08 01433 g003aApplsci 08 01433 g003b
Figure 4. N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms of NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders and RM.
Figure 4. N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms of NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders and RM.
Applsci 08 01433 g004
Figure 5. Thermogravimetry-Differential scanning calorimetry (TG-DSC) curves of the NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders.
Figure 5. Thermogravimetry-Differential scanning calorimetry (TG-DSC) curves of the NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders.
Applsci 08 01433 g005
Figure 6. The suppression effect of NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders: the explosion pressure curves (A), the maximum pressure, the maximum rate of pressure rise, and the time of pressure peak arriving (B).
Figure 6. The suppression effect of NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders: the explosion pressure curves (A), the maximum pressure, the maximum rate of pressure rise, and the time of pressure peak arriving (B).
Applsci 08 01433 g006
Figure 7. The images of explosion flame in different conditions: no powder, red mud, NH4H2PO4 and the NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders with different content of NH4H2PO4.
Figure 7. The images of explosion flame in different conditions: no powder, red mud, NH4H2PO4 and the NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders with different content of NH4H2PO4.
Applsci 08 01433 g007aApplsci 08 01433 g007b
Figure 8. The schematic diagram of the NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders in the explosion process.
Figure 8. The schematic diagram of the NH4H2PO4/RM composite powders in the explosion process.
Applsci 08 01433 g008
Table 1. The explosion parameters of methane-air premixed gas with different powders.
Table 1. The explosion parameters of methane-air premixed gas with different powders.
SamplesMax Pressure (MPa)The Rate of Max-Pressure Rise (MPa·s−1)Time of Pressure Peak Arriving (s)Decline Rate of Max Pressure (%)Decline Rate of Max Pressure Rise (%)Delay Time of Pressure Peak Arriving (s)
No powders0.74941.160.07000
RM0.65121.480.1113.147.80.04
5%-NH4H2PO4/RM0.6078.790.2319.978.60.16
10%-NH4H2PO4/RM0.5716.160.2623.885.10.19
15%-NH4H2PO4/RM0.5625.170.2924.987.40.22
20%-NH4H2PO4/RM0.5194.320.3630.789.50.29
25%-NH4H2PO4/RM0.4972.540.4033.693.80.33
30%-NH4H2PO4/RM0.4861.720.5035.195.80.43
NH4H2PO40.5452.990.4527.292.80.38

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Meng, X.; Zheng, L.; Gao, J. The Suppression Characteristics of NH4H2PO4/Red Mud Composite Powders on Methane Explosion. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1433. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8091433

AMA Style

Zhang Y, Wang Y, Meng X, Zheng L, Gao J. The Suppression Characteristics of NH4H2PO4/Red Mud Composite Powders on Methane Explosion. Applied Sciences. 2018; 8(9):1433. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8091433

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Yimin, Yan Wang, Xiangqing Meng, Ligang Zheng, and Jianliang Gao. 2018. "The Suppression Characteristics of NH4H2PO4/Red Mud Composite Powders on Methane Explosion" Applied Sciences 8, no. 9: 1433. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8091433

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop