Next Article in Journal
Cardiovascular Events throughout the Disease Course in Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia Patients Treated with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors—A Single-Centre Retrospective Study
Previous Article in Journal
HbA1c and Aortic Calcification Index as Noninvasive Predictors of Pre-Existing Histopathological Damages in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Natriuretic Peptides, Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: An Intriguing Pathogenic Link with Implications in Hypertension
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 9
Issue 10
10.3390/jcm9103267
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Complexity of TNF-α Signaling in Heart Disease

by
Filip Rolski
1 and
Przemysław Błyszczuk
1,2,*
1
Department of Clinical Immunology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 30-663 Cracow, Poland
2
Center of Experimental Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Zurich, 8952 Schlieren, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(10), 3267; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103267
Submission received: 13 August 2020 / Revised: 8 October 2020 / Accepted: 9 October 2020 / Published: 12 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cardiovascular Disease: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Therapies)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Heart disease is a leading cause of death with unmet clinical needs for targeted treatment options. Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) represents a master pro-inflammatory cytokine that plays an important role in many immunopathogenic processes. Anti-TNF-α therapy is widely used in treating autoimmune inflammatory disorders, but in case of patients with heart disease, this treatment was unsuccessful or even harmful. The underlying reasons remain elusive until today. This review summarizes the effects of anti-TNF-α treatment in patients with and without heart disease and describes the involvement of TNF-α signaling in a number of animal models of cardiovascular diseases. We specifically focused on the role of TNF-α in specific cardiovascular conditions and in defined cardiac cell types. Although some mechanisms, mainly in disease development, are quite well known, a comprehensive understanding of TNF-α signaling in the failing heart is still incomplete. Published data identify pathogenic and cardioprotective mechanisms of TNF-α in the affected heart and highlight the differential role of two TNF-α receptors pointing to the complexity of the TNF-α signaling. In the light of these findings, it seems that targeting the TNF-α pathway in heart disease may show therapeutic benefits, but this approach must be more specific and selectively block pathogenic mechanisms. To this aim, more research is needed to better understand the molecular mechanisms of TNF-α signaling in the failing heart.

1. Introduction

Heart disease refers to a group of diseases characterized by the affected function of the heart muscle. Epidemiologic data suggest that heart disease is a leading cause of death in the world. Heart failure affects 26 million people worldwide and causes 1 million annual hospitalizations in the United States and Europe [1]. Insufficient blood supply of the heart muscle by coronary arteries, which is termed coronary artery disease, represents the most common cause of heart disease. Extended ischemia in the myocardium is a life-threating condition that can lead to myocardial infarction or sudden cardiac death. Aberrant or impaired cardiac function (heart failure) can also develop in the absence of coronary artery disease. Such non-ischemic heart disease is a consequence of pathological changes in the structure of the cardiac muscle. In case of heart failure, the heart is unable to efficiently pump the blood due to ineffective muscle contraction (systolic heart failure) or relaxation (diastolic heart failure). From a clinical point of view, the type of heart failure depends on the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) parameter. For LVEF < 40%, systolic heart function is impaired, and this condition is referred to as heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Diastolic heart failure patients are often characterized by LVEF > 50% (or sometimes >40%); therefore, this type of heart failure is currently defined as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Both HFrEF and HFpEF patients show reduced life expectancy [2,3].
Inflammation plays an important role in the progression of many types of cardiovascular disease. On the one hand, the systemic inflammatory condition enhances atherogenesis, leading to coronary artery disease, but it also can promote the development of diastolic heart failure. On the other hand, cardiac inflammation occurs in post-ischemic myocardial events, and in more rare cases, it develops as a response to non-ischemic cardiac injury that often causes pathogenic changes in the cardiac tissue resulting in systolic dysfunction [4]. Thus, anti-inflammatory treatment has been suggested to protect the heart and cardiovascular system [5].
Tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) represents one of the most potent pro-inflammatory cytokines, and therefore, it was selected as the first target in the cytokine-targeted approach. Currently, TNF-α inhibitors are clinically used anti-inflammatory drugs to treat mainly patients with systemic inflammatory diseases. Roughly 1 million patients receive this type of treatment, and TNF-α antagonists are currently the most profitable class of drugs in the world, accounting for 25 billion US dollars in sales annually [6]. In case of heart failure, clinical data indicated that TNF-α inhibitors were not effective and even could worsen disease outcomes. However, the reasons of these disappointing results remain elusive.

2. TNF-α Biosynthesis

In humans, TNF-α is encoded by the TNFA gene located on chromosome 6 and shares locus with major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II genes, which plays a central role in antigen presentation [7]. The TNFA gene consists of 200 nucleotide promoters with binding sites for several transcription factors, resulting in a high plasticity of transcription and responsiveness to various types of stimuli, which also vary between cell types [8].
At the post-transcript stage, the biosynthesis of TNF-α is controlled mainly through the competitive binding of the mRNA 3′ AU-rich untranslated region by RNA-binding proteins tristetraprolin (TTP) and stabilizing factor human antigen R (HuR). The dephosphorylated form of TTP effectively binds to mRNA and degrades it. The phosphorylation of TTP weakens its affinity to mRNA preventing its degradation. This allows the binding of HuR to mRNA and enables a more efficient translation of TNFA transcripts. Pro-inflammatory stimuli, such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS), regulate the activity of TTP and the translocation of HuR from the nucleus to cytoplasm, thereby enhancing TNF-α biosynthesis. TTP activity is regulated by p38 mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK), which controls TTP target genes at the post-transcriptional level and the binding of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) to the promoter of TTP, which positively regulates its translation [9,10,11]. The deficiency of TTP in mice leads to increased TNF-α production that results in growth retardation, cachexia, arthritis, and autoimmune response [12]. The biosynthesis of TNF-α is regulated by a number of inflammatory mediators such as LPS, interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, interferon gamma (IFN-γ), tissue trauma, or hypoxia [13,14,15].
Upon translation, TNF-α is synthesized as a 17 kDa type II (i.e., possessing a single, uncleavable transmembrane segment, which anchors the protein in a cell membrane with the C-terminal end oriented toward cytoplasm) transmembrane protein. This membrane form of TNF-α (mTNF-α) can function as a ligand. The extracellular domain of mTNF-α can be cleaved by TNF-α cleaving enzyme (TACE; ADAM17) and released as soluble TNF-α (sTNF-α) [16]. mTNF-α and sTNF-α assemble as noncovalently bound homotrimers and in this form exert their biological functions [17].

3. TNF-α Receptors

TNF-α represents a ligand for two types of TNF-α receptors (TNFRs), namely TNFR1 (CD120a, p55) and TNFR2 (CD120b, p75). TNFRs represent single transmembrane glycoproteins with extracellular TNF-α binding domains characterized by four tandem-repeated cysteine-rich motifs [18]. TNFRs are typically located on the cell membrane, but they can be shed and released in soluble forms with the ability to bind and neutralize the activity of circulating sTNF-α. In the body, most cells constitutively express TNFR1. In contrast, the expression of TNFR2 is often induced by pro-inflammatory factors and is restricted mainly to immune cells, but it can be also upregulated by endothelial cells or cardiomyocytes [19,20]. The activation of TNFR1 or TNFR2 depends on the bioavailability of the soluble and membrane-bound forms of TNF-α. sTNF-α shows a far greater affinity to TNFR1, whereas TNFR2 is activated mainly by mTNF-α [21]. The stimulation of TNFR1 and TNFR2 activates a distinct molecular response resulting in different effector outputs in the affected cell. Furthermore, mTNF-α is capable of transmitting reverse signaling and therefore must be considered as a receptor, too [22]. In this case, TNFRs (membrane and soluble) serve as ligands for mTNF-α. The mTNF-α reverse signaling is mainly triggered by TNFR2 [22]. A schematic presentation of TNF-α signaling is shown in Figure 1.

3.1. TNFR1 Signaling

In the presence of the ligand, TNFR1 recruits a number of adaptor proteins including TNFR-associated death domain (TRADD), TNF-α receptor associated factor 2 (TRAF2), receptor-interacting protein (RIP) kinase, inhibitors of apoptosis proteins (IAPs), Fas-associated death domain (FADD) and MAPK activating death domain (MADD) [19,21]. The newly formed TNFR1/TRADD/TRAF2/RIP/IAPs complex activates MAPKs, mainly c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and the p38 isoforms, and inhibitor of kappa B (IκB) kinases (IKKs). MAPKs transduce a signal into the nucleus through activation protein-1 (AP-1) and other transcription factors that bind to the specific DNA motifs of the target genes. IKKs activate the NF-κB response by degrading the IκB complex and thus releasing the p50 subunit, which translocates to the nucleus and directly regulates gene expression. These MAPK- and IKK-dependent responses contribute mainly to pro-inflammatory cytokine production and cell survival, but they also mediate other processes [19,23]. Alternatively, TNFR1 can be internalized, and due to its intracellular death domain, it can form the TNFR1/TRADD/FADD complex with pro-caspase-8. Activated caspase-8 initiates a proteolytic cascade causing cell apoptosis. Of note, TNF-α-induced apoptosis is also mediated by MAPK/JNK [24]. Furthermore, TNFR1 can induce necroptosis through mitochondrial fission. Necroptosis is independent of other caspases, and the process occurs under conditions of caspase-8 inhibitor or depletion. TNF-α mediated necrosome formation critically depends on RIP1, RIP3, and mixed lineage kinase domain like (MLKL) pseudokinase [25,26].

3.2. TNFR2 Signaling

Unlike TNFR1, TNFR2 lacks the intracellular death domain and is unable to bind TRADD and initiate caspase-mediated apoptosis. Instead, activated TNFR2 recruits adaptor proteins TRAF2 and IAPs, activating the canonical NF-κB signaling through IKK. In addition, TNFR2, TRAF2, and IAPs form a complex with NF-κB-inducing kinase (NIK). As a result, NIK is released from the complex and activated. Active NIK induces the non-canonical NF-κB pathway through IKKα that ultimately produces a transcriptionally active p52 subunit [27]. TNFR2 can also activate phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)-dependent signaling. In this pathway, activated PI3K phosphorylates protein kinase B, also known as Akt, which in turn modulates several downstream effectors [28]. TNFR2-mediated activation of the canonical and non-canonical NF-κB and PI3K/Akt pathways typically promotes cell proliferation and survival. In cells expressing both TNFRs, the cross-talk between TNFR1 and TNFR2 may occur, which is mediated by TRAF2 [19,29]. As prolonged TNFR2 activation leads to TRAF2 degradation, this negatively regulates transcription factors and the immune response but enhances TNFR1-dependent caspase-mediated apoptosis and necroptosis [21,30].

3.3. mTNF-α Reverse Signaling

mTNF-α acts not only as a ligand for TNFRs triggering forward signaling in the target cells but also transduces a reverse signaling back to the mTNF-α expressing cell. Physiologically, the mTNF-α reverse signaling is triggered by TNFR2 expressed by the neighboring cells [31]. Furthermore, soluble TNFRs (mainly TNFR2) or even selected anti-TNF-α antibodies can activate the mTNF-α reverse signaling [32,33]. The intracellular domain of mTNF-α shows no kinase activity; however, the binding of TNFR to mTNF-α can activate MAPKs JNK and p38 signaling and the downstream transcriptional activities in the nucleus. mTNF-α reverse signaling regulates the production of certain inflammatory cytokines, but it is also involved in the modulation of other immune processes [34]. It should be noted that the role and mechanisms of mTNF-α reverse signal transduction are not well understood.

4. Anti-TNF-α Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases in Humans

In the 20th century, TNF-α has been recognized as the key pro-inflammatory cytokine in humans. This led to the development of the first cytokine-targeted therapy with etanercept approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1998. Anti-TNF-α therapy has revolutionized the treatment of autoimmune inflammatory diseases by offering an alternative for non-specific immunosuppressive drugs, which cause multiple adverse effects for a long-term use [35]. To date, five FDA-approved TNF-α inhibitors are being used in routine clinical practice to treat patients with rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis, ankylosing spondylitis, or Crohn’s disease. TNF-α inhibitors represent the fusion protein of TNF-α receptors linked to the Fc region of human antibody (etanercept) or chimeric (infliximab), fully human (adalimumab and golimumab), or modified human (certolizumab–pegol) anti-TNF-α antibodies [36]. Although all these inhibitors neutralize TNF-α bioactivity, their therapeutic effect may vary [37,38].
The positive effects of anti-TNF-α therapy in autoimmune inflammatory diseases encouraged testing its therapeutic value in patients with systolic heart failure. These patients are characterized by elevated plasma levels of TNF-α and other pro-inflammatory cytokines [39,40,41,42], and improvement of their cardiac functions has been associated with decreasing TNF-α levels [43]. In fact, heart failure patients show also elevated cardiac TNF-α levels associated with dynamic changes in TNFR1 and TNFR2 expression [44]. Furthermore, genetic studies suggested that polymorphism in the TNFA gene was associated with increased risk of coronary heart disease development [45] and in case of coronary heart disease with increased risk of gastrointestinal complications [46]. Pilot studies suggested that a higher dose of etanercept increased the ejection fraction and quality-of-life scores [47,48], as well as improved systemic endothelial vasoreactivity in patients with advanced heart failure [49]. Nonetheless, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies failed to prove the therapeutic effect of etanercept in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction. In fact, the RECOVER (Research into Etanercept: Cytokine Antagonism in Ventricular Dysfunction) and RENAISSANCE (Randomized Etanercept North American Strategy to Study Antagonism of Cytokines) clinical trials were terminated early due to a general lack of improvement in composite clinical score and due to the dose-dependent toxicity observed in some patients [50]. Furthermore, the ATTACH (Anti-Tnf alpha Therapy Against Chronic Heart failure) study showed that high doses of infliximab in HFrEF patients increased the risk of death or heart failure-related hospitalization [51]. The injection of a single high dose of etanercept did not improve outcomes of patients following acute myocardial infarction [52]. In conclusion, continuous anti-TNF-α therapy in patients with systolic heart failure show no evident benefits and may even be harmful and exacerbate the disease. Consequently, the use of TNF-α inhibitors is not recommended for HFrEF patients.
Unlike for HFrEF patients, a long-term anti-TNF-α therapy in patients with autoimmune inflammatory diseases is generally not harmful, and it may even protect from enhanced cardiovascular complications and cardiovascular death [53,54]. Although heart failure cases have been reported in patients treated with TNF-α inhibitors [55], the risk of new onset of heart failure in patients under age 50 receiving etanercept or infliximab is low [56]. Anti-TNF-α treatment is most commonly used to treat rheumatoid arthritis. Importantly, these patients are characterized by a more rapid development of subclinical changes in diastolic function [57], and in case of incident heart failure, they are more likely to show the HFpEF phenotype [58]. In fact, rheumatoid arthritis patients with preserved left ventricular function treated with infliximab showed improvement in cardiac function [59] and decreased the left ventricular torsion [60]. A growing body of evidence suggests that anti-TNF-α therapy could effectively protect from the development of vascular diseases and atherosclerosis in particular. Standard anti-TNF-α treatment employed in treating rheumatoid arthritis has been demonstrated to decrease levels of soluble endothelial adhesions molecules [61] as well as improve arterial stiffness [62] and endothelial functions [63]. The use of TNF-α antagonists has been associated with a decreased risk of myocardial infarction [64] and development of acute coronary syndrome [65] pointing to anti-TNF-α treatment as an effective anti-atherosclerotic therapy in rheumatoid arthritis. In line with these data, large cohort clinical studies reported the unchanged or reduced overall cardiovascular-related death of rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving TNF-α inhibitors [66,67,68,69]. Importantly, in rheumatoid arthritis, anti-TNF-α therapy protects from the development of ischemic cardiac events, but it shows no cardioprotective effects in the post-ischemic heart [64]. Noteworthy, anti-TNF-α therapy in elderly rheumatoid arthritis patients might exacerbate heart failure and reduce survival [70].
Psoriasis represents another autoimmune inflammatory disease associated with increased serum levels of TNF-α [71]. Similarly to other systemic inflammatory diseases, psoriasis patients are at increased risk of developing cardiovascular diseases [72]. In psoriasis, patients treated with adalimumab showed improvement in vascular functions [73]. A large retrospective cohort study has demonstrated a significantly reduced incidence of myocardial infarction in psoriasis patients receiving TNF-α inhibitors [74]. In line with these findings, the use of TNF-α inhibitors in psoriasis lowered the occurrence of major cardiovascular events [75]. Reductions of cardiovascular events due to treatment with TNF-α inhibitors were also observed in ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis [76,77].
Summarizing, in the light of published clinical data (summarized in the Table 1), anti-TNF-α treatment seems to reduce the risk of cardiovascular episodes mainly by inhibiting systemic inflammation and thereby suppressing the development of atherosclerosis and ischemic events. On the other hand, in the failing heart, TNF-α plays more of a cardioprotective role, but the mechanism remains unknown.

5. TNF-α in Animal Models of Cardiovascular Diseases

Results of anti-TNF-α treatments in patients with heart failure or with autoimmune inflammatory diseases demonstrated the relevance and a dual role of TNF-α in cardiovascular diseases in humans. However, these clinical data are insufficient to elucidate the underlaying mechanisms. Animal models of cardiovascular diseases, on the other hand, can be used to specifically define the role of gene of interest and to study cellular and molecular mechanisms. In the case of TNF-α signaling, there is a number of available transgenic mouse models allowing for the systemic or cell type-specific overexpression or genetic knockdown of selected components of the TNF-α pathway. The results of these animal studies are summarized in the Table 2. A growing body of experimental data confirmed a dual role of TNF-α and pointed to the opposing effects of TNFR1 and TNFR2. Thus, experimental data from transgenic mouse models might explain the failure of clinical application of anti-TNF-α inhibitors in heart failure patients. Prospectively, these data suggest that targeting TNFRs, rather than TNF-α, with selective agonists or antagonists might represent a more promising cardioprotective strategy in the post-ischemic heart.

5.1. TNF-α in Gain-of-Function Approaches

A gain-of-function approach is based on the overexpression of the gene of interest in a cell or in an organism and represents one strategy to study its function. A popular knock-in mice model non-specifically overexpressing human TNF-α shows high TNF-α production mainly in synovial fibroblasts and in endothelial cells (without evident effects in other cell types) and develops severe erosive arthritis [78,79]. Therefore, these mice are used as a mouse model of rheumatoid arthritis. Instead, transgenic mice overexpressing TNF-α in cardiomyocytes are considered as a better model to address the role of TNF-α in the heart. An initial study showed that the cardiac-restricted overexpression of TNF-α caused lethal myocarditis with diffuse lymphohistiocytic infiltrates and interstitial edema that led to cardiac death at the age of 7–11 days [80]. In contrast, in other cardiac-restricted TNF-α overexpressing models (TNF1.6 and MHCsTNF strains), most of the transgenic mice survived and developed mild inflammation and dilated cardiomyopathy phenotype with cardiac tissue remodeling as well as systolic and diastolic dysfunction associated with atrial and ventricular arrhythmias [81,82,83]. Mathematical modeling suggested that the reentrant arrhythmias spontaneously occurring in these mice are caused by a reduced intercellular coupling [84]. Yet, it needs to be noted that cardiac tissue levels of TNF-α in these models were elevated up to 200-fold comparing native myocardium. The pathogenic effect caused by cardiac-restricted TNF-α overexpression depended mainly on the TNFR1 signaling. Accordingly, left ventricular dysfunction was preserved by the adenoviral-mediated expression of soluble TNFR1 [83], and the genetic deletion of Tnfrsf1a (gene encoding TNFR1) improved cardiac functions and completely protected from cardiac death [85]. On the contrary, Tnfrsf1b (gene encoding TNFR2) genetic deficiency exacerbated heart failure and increased the lethality of TNF-α overexpressing mice pointing to the cardioprotective role of TNFR2 [85]. Interestingly, the overexpression of non-cleavable mTNF-α in cardiomyocytes led to a concentric cardiac hypertrophy phenotype without evidence of myocarditis or systolic dysfunction [86]. This may suggest that in the TNF-α overexpressing heart, the mTNF-α reverse signaling regulates different processes than TNFR1 and TNFR2.

5.2. Atherosclerosis and Ischemic Heart Disease Models

Atherosclerosis is a pathogenic condition of arteries characterized by the development of atherosclerotic plaques. A rupture of atherosclerotic plaques and the subsequent blood clot formation can cause life-threatening ischemic events, such as myocardial infarction or sudden cardiac death. In a typical clinical scenario of myocardial infarction, atherosclerotic plaque rupture and the subsequent thrombosis blocks blood flow in larger coronary arteries, causing an ischemic condition in the myocardium and death of cardiomyocytes. Myocardial infarct size depends on the time and the extent of ischemia as well as the subsequent inflammatory response. In animal models, myocardial infarction is typically performed in non-atherosclerotic condition.

5.3. Atherosclerosis

Experimental atherosclerosis is typically induced by feeding animals an atherogenic high-fat, high-cholesterol diet over at least 3 months. The development of atherosclerotic plaques is significantly enhanced in mice with naturally elevated plasma cholesterol levels, such as Apoe−/− or Ldlr−/− mouse strains. In mice, TNF-α has been recognized as one of the most potent proatherogenic cytokines, and the formation of atherosclerotic lesions was preceded by an increased expression of TNF-α, TNFR1, and TNFR2, which were elevated even further during plaque growth [87]. Knockout of the Tnfa gene in Apoe−/− mice fed a high-fat diet retarded the progression of plaque growth and decreased levels of pro-atherosclerotic factors without affecting cholesterol levels [88,89]. Experiments with the APOE*3-Leiden Tnfa−/− strain fed a high-cholesterol diet also demonstrated that TNF-α promoted necrosis in plaque-infiltrating cells and enhanced advanced lesion formation [90]. Data obtained from bone marrow chimeric mice suggested that TNF-α expressed by the bone marrow cells played a key role in an Apoe−/− mouse model of atherosclerosis [91]. In line with this data, Apoe−/− mice on a high-fat, high-cholesterol diet receiving recombinant TNF-α developed an enhanced atherosclerotic phenotype, which could be reversed by NF-κB inhibitors [92].
In contrast to data from transgenic models, the results of the pharmacological inhibition of TNF-α in mouse models were less consistent. It has been demonstrated that recombinant soluble TNFR1 successfully attenuated the formation of aortic lesions in an Apoe−/− model [91]. Beneficial effects of infliximab on endothelial reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and plaque formation were further confirmed in Apoe−/− mice kept in hypoxia conditions and fed a high-fat diet [93]. However, in Ldlr−/− mice, monotherapy with etanercept failed to reduce the development of atherosclerotic plaques, and the atheroprotective effect of etanercept was observed only in combination with cholesterol-lowering drugs [94]. Instead, treatment with anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibody CNTO5048 (neutralizing specifically murine TNF-α) surprisingly increased plaque burden, the expression of vascular inflammatory genes, and the pro-atherogenic lipid profile in hypercholesterolemic Ldlr−/− mice [95]. These inconsistent findings could potentially be explained by the involvement of mTNF-α, because most of the anti-TNF-α antibodies neutralize exclusively sTNF-α. Indeed, the proatherogenic effect of mTNF-α has been associated with its presence on exosomes produced by dendritic cells and the activation of the pro-inflammatory NF-κB pathway in endothelial cells [96]. Although experiments with transgenic mice expressing an exclusively non-cleavable form of mTNF-α demonstrated the involvement of mTNF-α, these findings pointed primarily to the key role of sTNF-α in mouse atherogenesis [97,98,99]. On the other hand, mice with an increased expression of mTNF-α (due to a reduced expression of Adam17) showed enhanced macrophage adhesion and atherosclerosis in an Ldlr−/− mouse model [98]. It should be noticed that in this model, an increased expression of mTNF-α was associated with the constitutive activation of TNFR2 signaling. Mouse models have been also used to elucidate the role of TNFR1 in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Tnfrsf1a−/− were initially reported to develop enhanced atherogenesis when fed an atherogenic diet [100]. However, Tnfrsf1a−/− mice on a proatherogenic Apoe−/− background showed reduced atherosclerosis, and the data pointed to the key role of TNFR1 expressed in arteries [101]. Summarizing, the proatherogenic role of TNF-α has been generally confirmed in animal studies, but there is a surprisingly high discrepancy in results obtained from different models. It seems that Apoe−/−, rather than Ldlr−/− or non-transgenic mice, represents the most relevant animal model to study TNF-α signaling in atherosclerosis.

5.4. Myocardial Infarction

Experimental acute myocardial infarction is typically achieved by permanent or temporary mechanical ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Animals surviving this procedure eventually develop fibrotic scars (that replaces necrotic myocardium), and their hearts show impaired function and hemodynamic abnormalities. Published data report elevated sTNF-α levels in the serum of post-infarcted mice and increased mTNF-α expression in the infarct and peri-infarct zones [102]. In a permanent occlusion model, Tnfa−/− mice showed a significantly smaller infarct area, decreased expression of intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), and lower numbers of heart-infiltrating neutrophils and macrophages [103]. However, in the same model, a lack of both TNFRs led to a significant increase in the infarction size and to an increased apoptosis of cardiomyocytes [104]. A smaller infarct size, better cardiac function, and reduced inflammatory response were observed in Tnfa−/− mice also in a myocardial ischemia–reperfusion injury model [105]. Similarly, the blockade of TNF-α with etanercept 10 min prior to ischemia–reperfusion injury improved cardiac functions, reduced infarct size, and cardiomyocyte apoptosis [106]. Moreover, a single dose of etanercept injected at the time of myocardial infarction improved long-term cardiac function and reduced cardiac tissue remodeling in rats [107]. In another study, pharmacological inhibitor preventing TNF-α binding to its receptor (CAS1049741-03-8) reduced post-infarction inflammatory response but worsened cardiac function due to enhanced cardiomyocyte apoptosis [108]. The injection of anti-TNF-α antibody 3 h prior to ischemia–reperfusion was also shown to reduce endothelial dysfunction by reducing the production of endothelial ROS [109]. Pathogenic processes over a long term are primary mediated by TNFR1-dependent pathways, as Tnfrsf1a−/− mice were consistently reported to develop less impaired cardiac contractile functions and showed better survival rates up to several weeks after infarction [110,111,112,113]. This phenotype was associated with the reduced expression of inflammatory cytokines, matrix metalloproteinase activity, and diminished NF-κB and MAPK activation in the cardiac tissue. Data from mice lacking an NF-κB p50 subunit confirmed the involvement of this TNFR1-downstream pathway in the pathogenesis of myocardial infarction [114]. The pathogenic role of TNFR1 in myocardial infarction is not limited to its signaling in the heart. Cardiovascular homeostasis is regulated by the subfornical organ located in the forebrain, which controls cardiac sympathetic excitation. The targeted inactivation of TNFR1 in the subfornical organ reduced left ventricular dysfunction induced by coronary artery ligation in rats [115]. Unlike TNFR1 signaling, TNFR2-dependent pathways mainly activate cardioprotective processes in the post-infarction heart. Accordingly, Tnfrsf1b−/− mice showed exacerbated cardiomyocyte apoptosis and fibrosis as well as worsened cardiac function and long-term survival in a permanent occlusion model [110,111]. Of note, ischemia–reperfusion experiments on isolated hearts confirmed the deteriorating effect of TNF-α [116] and cardioprotective role of TNFR2 on myocardial function recovery [117]. Summarizing, mouse data underlined the activation of TNF-α signaling in the infarcted myocardium and highlighted the counteractive effects mediated by both TNFRs.

5.5. Non-Ischemic Heart Failure Models

Non-ischemic heart diseases refer to cardiac abnormalities occurring in the absence of coronary artery diseases. Cardiomyopathies represent the most common type of non-ischemic heart disease, in which ventricles become enlarged and stiff. Cardiomyopathies may be caused by an abnormally thick myocardium (hypertrophic cardiomyopathy) or by the dilatation of the ventricles (dilated cardiomyopathy) [118]. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy may be genetic or can be caused by chronic hypertension or stress, and it is characterized by ineffective muscle relaxation. On the other hand, the phenotype of dilated cardiomyopathy, which is associated with left ventricular or biventricular dilatation and systolic and diastolic dysfunction, can be a consequence of the ongoing inflammatory processes in the heart. Cardiomyopathies are often progressive pathologies causing not only impaired blood pumping but also heart valve problems, blood clots, and arrhythmias, leading to heart and secondary organ failures. There is a number of established animal models that reproduce both hypertrophic and dilated cardiomyopathy conditions [119].

5.6. Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Experimental hypertension in rodents is commonly achieved by the partial occlusion of the aorta (transverse aortic constriction model) or by continuous infusion of the vasoconstrictor angiotensin II using osmotic minipumps. In these models, increased blood pressure in the heart induces a compensatory mechanism, by which the left ventricle becomes over time thicker and thereby less effective in muscle relaxation. On the cellular level, cardiac tissue is characterized by cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and interstitial fibrosis. Data from a mouse model of pressure overload induced by aortic banding pointed to the active role of TNF-α–TNFR1 signaling in the development of hypertensive cardiomyopathy, as initially suggested by the correlation between progressive hypertrophy and increasing myocardial levels of TNF-α, TNFR1, and TACE [120,121]. In line with this suggestion, Tnfa−/− mice developed significantly lower inflammatory response, cardiac hypertrophy, and left ventricular remodeling, showing preserved cardiac functions in several studies [120,121,122,123]. This phenotype was attributed to the abrogated production of superoxide in a TNF-α/PI3K-dependent manner in cardiomyocytes and in cardiac fibroblasts [122], changes in the expression and activity of metalloproteinases [120], decreased cardiac inflammation, and abrogated cardiomyocyte apoptosis [121]. Interestingly, in this model of hypertension, cardiac TACE activity and TNF-α levels were controlled by tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP)-3 [120]. The pathogenic mechanism is mainly mediated by TNFR1. Accordingly, Tnfrsf1a−/− mice are partially protected from transverse aortic constriction-induced hypertrophy and are characterized by better survival rates [124]. In the same model, mice lacking the TNFR1 adaptor molecule TRADD also developed significantly attenuated fibrosis with better cardiac functions, suggesting a key role of the TNFR1–TRADD-dependent cell death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy [125]. This pathogenic TNFR1 signaling seems to be counter-regulated by TNFR2. In response to the increased blood pressure induced by transverse aortic constriction, mice lacking Tnfrsf1b showed worsened survival rates and increased cardiac hypertrophy, and the cardioprotective TNFR2 signaling has been linked to its effects in mitochondria [124]. Moreover, mice with cardiac-specific TRAF2 deletion developed exacerbated heart failure with pathological remodeling and cardiomyocyte necroptosis [30].
Similar data were obtained in another model of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. In an angiotensin II osmotic minipump model, Tnfa−/− and Tnfrsf1a−/− mice showed significantly attenuated phenotype [126,127]. In-depth analysis demonstrated reduced immunofibrotic changes in the myocardium of Tnfrsf1a−/− mice, but there was no protective effect on diastolic dysfunction in this model [127]. In contrast, Tnfrsf1b−/− mice receiving angiotensin II infusion developed fibrosis and showed only slight changes in expression of pro-fibrotic genes [128]. Thus, it seems that also in this model of hypertrophy, TNF-α–TNFR1 signaling is involved in disease progression.
Cardiac hypertrophy associated with diastolic dysfunction can be alternatively induced by the continuous delivery of β-adrenergic agonist isoproterenol. In this model, mice lacking TNFR1 developed reduced inflammatory response, but this was insufficient to protect them from isoproterenol-induced hypertrophy, whereas mice deficient of TNFR2 showed an increased pro-inflammatory response and exacerbated cardiac hypertrophy [129]. Of note, in vitro experiments confirmed that TNF-α indeed could enhance isoproterenol-induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, but surprisingly, this effect was completely blocked by anti-TNFR2 antibody [130].
Mice consuming increasing doses of ethanol over longer periods of time develop a specific type of alcoholic cardiomyopathy with fibrotic and structural changes in the left ventricle. In this model, mice showed TNFR1-dependent elevated serum levels of TNF-α, left ventricle dysfunction, and increased cardiac ROS and pro-inflammatory cytokine production [131]. Increased TNF-α levels have been also observed in a rat model of adriamycin-induced cardiomyopathy. Animals with higher serum TNF-α levels showed worse heart function and increased mortality [132].
Summarizing, data from hypertrophic cardiomyopathy models suggest that targeting TNF-α indeed might successfully prevent from disease development. It should be noted that as in other cardiovascular diseases, pathogenic TNF-α signaling is mainly mediated by TNFR1.

5.7. Inflammatory Heart Diseases

In animal models, heart-specific inflammation is induced either by infection with cardiotropic virus (mainly coxsackievirus B3) or by the active induction of heart-specific autoimmunity [133]. In the infectious model, myocarditis is triggered by the immune response to the virus infecting and replicating in cardiomyocytes, whereas in the autoimmune model, myocarditis is mainly mediated by the activated heart-specific CD4+ T lymphocytes. Published data suggest that the TNF-α–TNFR1 axis plays an active role in the development of myocarditis. In a coxsackievirus B3 model, Tnfa−/− and Tnfrsf1a−/− but not Tnfrsf1b−/− mice showed strikingly reduced cardiac inflammation [134]. Interestingly, defects in TNF-α signaling showed no effect on viral titers. In a mouse model of experimental autoimmune myocarditis induced by immunization with cardiac myosin, TNF-α/β neutralizing antibodies delivered prior to but not after immunization reduced the incidence of myocarditis [135]. Furthermore, Tnfrsf1a−/− mice were completely protected from the development of myocarditis induced by immunization with cardiac myosin or by an adoptive transfer of autoreactive T lymphocytes [136]. Although published data point to the pathogenic role of TNF-α signaling in the development of inflammatory heart disease, it should be noted that current knowledge is based on a few studies only and that the role of TNF-α signaling in the transition from myocarditis to dilated cardiomyopathy remains unknown.
Table
Table 2. Summary of phenotypes observed in animal models of cardiovascular diseases in relation to modification of the TNF-α signaling pathway.
Table 2. Summary of phenotypes observed in animal models of cardiovascular diseases in relation to modification of the TNF-α signaling pathway.
ModelTransgene/InterventionPhenotypeRef.
Overexpression
Cardiomyocyte-specific TNF-α overexpressionnoneLethal myocarditis with interstitial edema[80]
noneProgressive heart failure with severe LV remodeling[81]
noneCalcium-dependent atrial and ventricular arrhythmias[82]
sTNFR1 overexpressionPreservation of LV function[83]
Tnfrsf1a−/−Improved cardiac function, reduced mortality[85]
Tnfrsf1b−/−Exacerbated heart failure, increased mortality
Cardiomyocyte-specific mTNF-α overexpressionnoneCardiac hypertrophy without inflammation and systolic dysfunction[86]
Atherosclerosis
Atherogenic dietTnfa−/−Protection from atherosclerotic lesion formation, lowered atherogenic lipid profile, decreased IL-6 levels[99]
Exclusive expression of mTNF-αPartial protection from atherosclerosis. Lower lipid deposition and macrophage accumulation, no changes in atherogenic lipid profile and IL-6
Apoe−/− on atherogenic dietTnfa−/−Slower plaque growth, decreased atherosclerotic markers, no changes in cholesterol levels[88,89]
Tnfa−/−Reduced plaque growth[91]
sTNFR1 treatmentReduced plaque growth
Transplantation of Tnfa−/− bone marrowReduced plaque growth
Tnfrsf1a−/− grafted arteriesReduced plaque growth and adhesion molecule expression[101]
Weekly infliximab injectionsImproved endothelial functions, reduced atherosclerotic plaques, and decreased ROS[93]
Single injection of DC-derived mTNF-bearing exosomesIncreased levels of adhesion molecules in lesions, increased plaque formation[96]
Apoe*3-Leiden on atherogenic dietTnfa−/−Higher number of early lesions and lower number of advanced lesions. Decreased necroptosis and increased apoptosis in lesion area. No changes in inflammatory parameters and lipid profiles[90]
Ldlr−/− on atherogenic dietADAM17 deficiency(increased mTNF and permanent TNFR2 activation)Faster plaque growth, enhanced macrophage adhesion, increased macrophage, and smooth muscle proliferation[98]
Etanercept in combination with pravastatin/saprogrelate therapyDecrease in aortic lesion area, endothelial adhesion molecules, and improved lipid profile in comparison to pravastatin/saprogrelate[94]
Monoclonal anti-mouse TNF-α antibody administrationReduced plaque stability, increased vascular pro-inflammatory gene expression, and larger plaque area[95]
Recombinant TNF-α administrationIncreased plaque burden and endothelial LDL transcytosis. Prevented by pharmacological NF-κB inhibitors[92]
Myocardial Infarction
Permanent occlusionTnfa−/−Lower infarct area, less infiltrating mononuclear cells, reduced expression of endothelial adhesion molecules at day 1 and 7[103]
Improved cardiac functions up to 3 days, but not at day 7[113]
Tnfrsf1a−/−Improved contractile functions, diminished hypertrophy and remodeling, reduced NF-κB activation after 4 weeks[110]
Lower infarct area and fibrosis, preserved cardiac functions at day 7[113]
Improved contractile functions, increased survival rate after 4 weeks[111]
Protection for infarction-induced death, improved LV functions, and decreased hypertrophy after 6 weeks[112]
Reduced mortality 24 h post infarction, lower inflammation, and improved cardiac recovery after 28 days[123]
Pharmacological TNFR1 inactivation in subfornical organReduced LV dysfunction after 4 weeks[115]
Tnfrsf1b−/−Worsened remodeling, hypertrophy and contractile functions, increased fibrosis and apoptosis at day 28[110]
Worsened cardiac functions, increased infarct size, exacerbated fibrosis at day 3 and 7[113]
Exacerbated hypertrophy, fibrosis, ventricular dilatation, and dysfunction after 4 weeks[111]
Increased mortality during the first 7 days, reduced number of functional blood vessels in infarct area after 28 days[123]
Daily monoclonal anti-TNF-α antibody administration during the first week after myocardial infarctionReduced inflammation, worsened cardiac functions, inhibited autophagy and increased apoptosis in cardiomyocytes after 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks[108]
Single etanercept injection directly after myocardial infarctionReduced inflammation, improved remodeling, and preserved LV functions after 4 days[107]
Ischemia-reperfusionTnfa−/−Lower infarct area, improved cardiac functions, reduced cardiac NF-κB activation measured 120 min from reperfusion[105]
Etanercept administration 10 min prior to myocardial infarctionLower infarct area, improved cardiac functions, 3 h, 24 h, or 14 days after reperfusion[106]
Anti-mouse TNF-α antibody injection 3 h prior myocardial infarctionPreserved endothelial functions, reduced endothelial production of ROS 90 min after reperfusion[109]
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Transverse aortic constrictionTnfa−/−Reduced inflammatory response, decreased hypertrophy, improved cardiac functions[121]
Tnfa−/−Timp3−/−Attenuated LV dilation, improved cardiac functions, increased survival after 7 weeks. Complete prevention of heart disease upon additional MMP inhibitors administration[120]
Tnfa−/−Improved cardiac functions, suppression of MMPs expression, reduction in superoxide production[122]
Tnfrsf1b−/−Increased survival rates, decreased hypertrophy, improved mitochondrial functions[124]
Tradd−/−Reduced hypertrophy with improved cardiac functions, attenuated TAK1/p38 MAPK phosphorylation[125]
Tnfrsf1a−/−Tnfrsf1b−/−Increased mortality, hypertrophy, and mitochondrial DNA damage[124]
Traf2−/−TNFR1-dependent pathological remodeling and increased cardiomyocyte death[30]
Angiotensin II-induced hypertrophyTnfa−/−Reduced hypertrophy and hypertension[126]
Tnfrsf1a−/−Slower progression of hypertrophy, reduced fibrosis and immune response[127]
Tnfrsf1a−/−No effect on early inflammatory phase, increased uptake of bone marrow-derived fibroblasts progenitors and exacerbated fibrosis[128]
Tnfrsf1b−/−No effects[128]
Isoproterenol-induced hypertrophyTnfrsf1a−/−Reduced inflammatory response at day 1, unchanged hypertrophy at day 7[129]
Tnfrsf1b−/−Increased inflammatory response at day 1, exacerbated hypertrophy at day 7
Alcoholic cardiomyopathyTnfrsf1a−/−Preserved LV functions, decreased ROS in LV, lower serum levels of TNF-α[131]
Inflammatory Heart Diseases
Coxsackievirus B3 induced myocarditisTnfa−/−Reduced myocarditis, no changes in virus titers[134]
Tnfrsf1a−/−Reduced myocarditis, no changes in virus titers
Tnfrsf1b−/−Unaffected myocarditis, no changes in virus titers
Myocarditis induced by cardiac myosin immunizationAnti-TNF-α/β before immunizationReduced myocarditis[135]
Anti-TNF-α/β after immunizationUnaffected myocarditis
Tnfrsf1a−/−Protection from myocarditis despite of T cell activation[136]
Myocarditis induced by autoreactive T cell transferTnfrsf1a−/−Protection from myocarditis
LDL: low-density lipoprotein LV: left ventricular, MMP: matrix metalloproteinase, ROS: reactive oxygen species, Timp3−/−: metalloproteinase inhibitor 3 knockout, Tnfa−/−: tumor necrosis factor-α knockout, Tnfrsf1a−/−: TNFR1 knockout, Tnfrsf1b−/−: TNFR2 knockout, TRADD−/−: tumor necrosis factor receptor type 1-associated death domain protein knockout.

6. Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of TNF-α Signaling in Cardiovascular Diseases

The heart is made up of three main cell types: cardiomyocytes, cardiac microvascular endothelial cells, and cardiac stromal cells (mainly fibroblasts). In addition, heart-resident macrophages represent a small but important cell population in the healthy heart. Furthermore, in response to injury, cardiac tissue is infiltrated by immune cells, such as inflammatory monocytes and lymphocytes. It should be noted that TNF-α can be produced by many cardiac cell types, but immune cells seem to represent a particularly important source of this cytokine in cardiac pathology. TNF-α signaling controls many biological processes ranging from pro-inflammatory and proapoptotic to regenerative and cardioprotective (Figure 2). The actual effect of TNF-α depends not only on the cell type and activation of other molecular pathways, but also on expression of inducible TNFR2 (TNFR1 is generally stably expressed in nearly all cell types). As demonstrated in animal models, the deleterious effects of TNF-α are mainly mediated by the prolonged or excessive activation of TNFR1, while the activation of TNFR2 often exerts cardioprotective results.

6.1. Pathogenic Mechanisms

The activation of endothelial cells represents one of the best described pro-inflammatory mechanisms. Endothelial cells respond to TNF-α by an increased expression of adhesion molecules, which control the rolling and adhesion of inflammatory immune cells into the tissue. In this mechanism, both TNFRs are also critically engaged in the process of diapedesis [137]. TNF-α is also known to increase ROS levels and decrease nitric oxide production in blood vessels, which can lead to endothelial dysfunction: an initial step in atherogenesis [138]. In this process, TNF-α-induced ROS production depends on the activation of NADH oxidase [139,140]. TNF-α contributes also to the development of atherosclerotic plaques through an increase of LDL transcytosis in endothelial cells [91,92] and by regulating the activity of macrophage scavenger receptor and foam cell formation [141]. TNFR2 signaling contributes also to deleterious effects by increasing macrophage and smooth muscle proliferation [98].
In cardiomyocytes TNF-α triggers a hypertrophic response and induces apoptosis [131]. Endogenous TNF-α contributes to increased protein synthesis and hypertrophy [142] through the NF-κB-mediated production of ROS [143]. In cardiomyocytes, this process is dependent on TNFR1 activation, but it also negatively regulates calcium handling and cell contractility [144]. Moreover, TNF-α-induced superoxide production was shown to depend on NADPH oxidase activation by PI3K and to control the secretion of several matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) [122]. Oxidative stress mediated by TNF-α is also responsible for mitochondrial DNA damage through the sphingomyelin–ceramide signaling pathway [145], which was also shown to induce apoptosis in cardiomyocytes [146]. TNFR1 promotes also cardiomyocyte apoptosis independently of NF-κB through RIP1–RIP3–MLKL axis activation by apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1) [20,30].
Cardiac fibroblasts represent another heart-resident cell type that can be activated by TNF-α. In response to TNF-α, cardiac fibroblasts contribute to the inflammatory cascade by secreting monocyte chemoattractant proteins (MCP)-1 and MCP-3, which control monocyte recruitment but also positively regulate TNF-α production [147]. Furthermore, TNF-α mediates ROS production and MMP secretion in cardiac fibroblasts via the activation of PI3Kγ [122]. TNF-α contributes to hearts fibrosis also by stimulating cardiac fibroblasts proliferation and fibronectin deposition [148]. Moreover, TNF-α induces MMP9 production and promotes the transition of cardiac fibroblasts into pathogenic myofibroblasts [149]. Excessive collagen deposition and the expression of pro-fibrotic genes in these cells leading to pathological heart remodeling is controlled by TNFR1 [128,149]. TNFR1 is also important to induce fibroblast maturation from myeloid cells [150]. All these data demonstrate a wide spectrum of pathogenic effects of TNF-α in all cardiac cell types.

6.2. Cardioprotective Mechanisms

Most of the cardioprotective mechanisms are mediated by TNFR2. It seems that one of the most important effects of TNFR2-dependent signaling is to suppress activation of the pathogenic TNFR1 downstream pathways. It has been observed that in the absence of TNFR2, there is an increased activity of TNFR1 downstream effector molecules NF-κB [110] and MAPK p38 [129] as well as an increased production of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-6 [111]. The TNFR2 cardioprotective mechanism has been described to counter-regulate the deleterious effects of TNFR1-mediated signaling in cardiomyocytes. Accordingly, the activation of TNFR2 protected cardiomyocytes from apoptosis and promoted cell cycle entry by activating endothelial/epithelial tyrosine kinase (ETK) [20], enhanced resistance to oxidative stress [130,144], and mediated positive calcium transient [144]. Of interest, TNFR2 was also shown to be critically involved in the differentiation of cardiomyocytes from stem cells in vitro [151] and in promoting cell cycle entry in resident cardiac stem cells [152]. Furthermore, TNFR2 signaling plays an important role in immunosuppression. In particularly, the activation of TNFR2 on regulatory T cells stimulated their expansion [153] and suppressed effector T cell differentiation [31]. TNFR2 signaling plays also a crucial role in the recruitment of myeloid suppressor cells [154], which exert cardioprotective functions in heart failure [155]. It should be noted that the immunomodulatory effect of TNF-α in heart failure is not well understood, mostly because of its involvement in the activation of endothelial cells and pro-inflammatory role during the early inflammatory phase.

7. Clinical Perspectives

TNF-α is undoubtedly an important pro-inflammatory cytokine playing a key role during the early inflammatory phase. Clinical studies and data from animal models confirmed that TNF-α enhanced the development of a number of cardiovascular pathologies. However, preventive anti-TNF-α therapy would not be recommended due to side effects and economic reasons. Instead, such targeted immunomodulatory therapeutic intervention was considered in heart failure patients, but the failure of anti-TNF-α therapy could be explained by the cardioprotective properties of TNF-α in the failing heart. Currently, our knowledge on the beneficial activity of TNF-α is limited; therefore, more experimental research is needed to uncover these processes and the underlying mechanisms. Available data suggest that most of the cardioprotective activity is mediated by TNFR2, whereas the activation of TNFR1 initiates pathogenic processes. So far, most of these findings have been obtained in mouse models using transgenic mice lacking one or the other TNFR. In the next step, targeting these receptors, either by blocking TNFR1 or activating TNFR2, should be performed pharmacologically. The development of drugs selectively targeting TNFRs, rather than blocking TNF-α activity, might represent a novel and more effective therapeutic concept in the treatment of heart disease.

Funding

Funding Information National Science Centre (Poland): 2016/21/B/NZ5/01397.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Savarese, G.; Lund, L.H. Global Public Health Burden of Heart Failure. Card. Fail. Rev. 2017, 3, 7–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bloom, M.W.; Greenberg, B.; Jaarsma, T.; Januzzi, J.L.; Lam, C.S.P.; Maggioni, A.P.; Trochu, J.N.; Butler, J. Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2017, 3, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dunlay, S.M.; Roger, V.L.; Redfield, M.M. Epidemiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2017, 14, 591–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Van Linthout, S.; Tschöpe, C. Inflammation – Cause or Consequence of Heart Failure or Both? Curr. Heart Fail. Rep. 2017, 14, 251–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Dick, S.A.; Epelman, S. Chronic heart failure and inflammation. Circ. Res. 2016, 119, 159–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Monaco, C.; Nanchahal, J.; Taylor, P.; Feldmann, M. Anti-TNF therapy: Past, present and future. Int. Immunol. 2015, 27, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Shiina, T.; Blancher, A.; Inoko, H.; Kulski, J.K. Comparative genomics of the human, macaque and mouse major histocompatibility complex. Immunology 2017, 150, 127–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Falvo, J.V.; Tsytsykova, A.V.; Goldfeld, A.E. Transcriptional control of the TNF Gene. Curr. Dir. Autoimmun. 2010, 11, 27–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Tiedje, C.; Ronkina, N.; Tehrani, M.; Dhamija, S.; Laass, K.; Holtmann, H.; Kotlyarov, A.; Gaestel, M. The p38/MK2-Driven Exchange between Tristetraprolin and HuR Regulates AU-Rich Element-Dependent Translation. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Clark, A.R.; Dean, J.L.E. The control of inflammation via the phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of tristetraprolin: A tale of two phosphatases. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2016, 44, 1321–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Chen, Y.L.; Jiang, Y.W.; Su, Y.L.; Lee, S.C.; Chang, M.S.; Chang, C.J. Transcriptional regulation of tristetraprolin by NF-κB signaling in LPS-stimulated macrophages. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2013, 40, 2867–2877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Taylor, G.A.; Carballo, E.; Lee, D.M.; Lai, W.S.; Thompson, M.J.; Patel, D.D.; Schenkman, D.I.; Gilkeson, G.S.; Broxmeyer, H.E.; Haynes, B.F.; et al. A pathogenetic role for TNF-α in the syndrome of cachexia, arthritis, and autoimmunity resulting from tristetraprolin (TTP) deficiency. Immunity 1996, 4, 445–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Yimin; Kohanawa, M. A regulatory effect of the balance between TNF-alpha and IL-6 in the granulomatous and inflammatory response to Rhodococcus aurantiacus infection in mice. J. Immunol. 2006, 177, 642–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Chung, I.Y.; Benveniste, E.N. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha production by astrocytes. Induction by lipopolysaccharide, IFN-gamma, and IL-1 beta. J. Immunol. 1990, 144, 2999–3007. [Google Scholar]
  15. Li, D.L.; Liu, J.J.; Liu, B.H.; Hu, H.; Sun, L.; Miao, Y.; Xu, H.F.; Yu, X.J.; Ma, X.; Ren, J.; et al. Acetylcholine inhibits hypoxia-induced tumor necrosis factor-α production via regulation of MAPKs phosphorylation in cardiomyocytes. J. Cell. Physiol. 2011, 226, 1052–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Moss, M.L.; Jin, S.-L.C.; Milla, M.E.; Bickett, D.M.; Burkhart, W.; Carter, H.L.; Chen, W.-J.; William, C.; Didsbury, J.R.; Hassler, D.; et al. Erratum: Cloning of a disintegrin metalloproteinase that processes precursor tumour-necrosis factor-α. Nature 2003, 386, 738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Grell, M.; Douni, E.; Wajant, H.; Löhden, M.; Clauss, M.; Maxeiner, B.; Georgopoulos, S.; Lesslauer, W.; Kollias, G.; Pfizenmaier, K.; et al. The transmembrane form of tumor necrosis factor is the prime activating ligand of the 80 kDa tumor necrosis factor receptor. Cell 1995, 83, 793–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. MacEwan, D.J. TNF ligands and receptors—A matter of life and death. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2002, 135, 855–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Cabal-Hierro, L.; Lazo, P.S. Signal transduction by tumor necrosis factor receptors. Cell. Signal. 2012, 24, 1297–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Al-Lamki, R.S.; Brookes, A.P.; Wang, J.; Reid, M.J.; Parameshwar, J.; Goddard, M.J.; Tellides, G.; Wan, T.; Min, W.; Pober, J.S.; et al. TNF receptors differentially signal and are differentially expressed and regulated in the human heart. Am. J. Transplant. 2009, 9, 2679–2696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Wajant, H.; Pfizenmaier, K.; Scheurich, P. Tumor necrosis factor signaling. Cell Death Differ. 2003, 10, 45–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Ardestani, S.; Deskins, D.L.; Young, P.P. Membrane TNF-alpha-activated programmed necrosis is mediated by Ceramide-induced reactive oxygen species. J. Mol. Signal. 2013, 8, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Liu, T.; Zhang, L.; Joo, D.; Sun, S.-C. NF-κB signaling in inflammation. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2017, 2, 17023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Schneider-Brachert, W.; Heigl, U.; Ehrenschwender, M. Membrane trafficking of death receptors: Implications on signalling. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 14475–14503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Remijsen, Q.; Goossens, V.; Grootjans, S.; Van den Haute, C.; Vanlangenakker, N.; Dondelinger, Y.; Roelandt, R.; Bruggeman, I.; Goncalves, A.; Bertrand, M.J.; et al. Depletion of RIPK3 or MLKL blocks TNF-driven necroptosis and switches towards a delayed RIPK1 kinase-dependent apoptosis. Cell Death Dis. 2014, 5, e1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Vanlangenakker, N.; Bertrand, M.J.M.; Bogaert, P.; Vandenabeele, P.; Vanden Berghe, T. TNF-induced necroptosis in L929 cells is tightly regulated by multiple TNFR1 complex i and II members. Cell Death Dis. 2011, 2, e230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wajant, H.; Siegmund, D. TNFR1 and TNFR2 in the control of the life and death balance of macrophages. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2019, 7, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Yang, S.; Wang, J.; Brand, D.D.; Zheng, S.G. Role of TNF-TNF Receptor 2 Signal in Regulatory T Cells and Its Therapeutic Implications. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Borghi, A.; Verstrepen, L.; Beyaert, R. TRAF2 multitasking in TNF receptor-induced signaling to NF-κB, MAP kinases and cell death. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Guo, X.; Yin, H.; Li, L.; Chen, Y.; Li, J.; Doan, J.; Steinmetz, R.; Liu, Q. Cardioprotective Role of Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor-Associated Factor 2 by Suppressing Apoptosis and Necroptosis. Circulation 2017, 136, 729–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Miller, P.G.; Bonn, M.B.; McKarns, S.C. Transmembrane TNF-TNFR2 Impairs Th17 Differentiation by Promoting Il2 Expression. J. Immunol. 2015, 195, 2633–2647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Van den Brande, J.M.H.; Braat, H.; Van den Brink, G.R.; Versteeg, H.H.; Bauer, C.A.; Hoedemaeker, I.; Van Montfrans, C.; Hommes, D.W.; Peppelenbosch, M.P.; Van Deventer, S.J.H. Infliximab but not etanercept induces apoptosis in lamina propria T-lymphocytes from patients with Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 2003, 124, 1774–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, M.; Wang, J.; Jia, L.; Huang, J.; He, C.; Hu, F.; Yuan, L.; Wang, G.; Yu, M.; Li, Z. Transmembrane TNF-α promotes activation-induced cell death by forward and reverse signaling. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 63799–63812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Rossol, M.; Meusch, U.; Pierer, M.; Kaltenhäuser, S.; Häntzschel, H.; Hauschildt, S.; Wagner, U. Interaction between Transmembrane TNF and TNFR1/2 Mediates the Activation of Monocytes by Contact with T Cells. J. Immunol. 2007, 179, 4239–4248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Elliott, M.J.; Maini, R.N.; Feldmann, M.; Kalden, J.R.; Antoni, C.; Smolen, J.S.; Leeb, B.; Breedveld, F.C.; Macfarlane, J.D.; Bijl, J.A.; et al. Randomised double-blind comparison of chimeric monoclonal antibody to tumour necrosis factor α (cA2) versus placebo in rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet 1994, 344, 1105–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Willrich, M.A.V.; Murray, D.L.; Snyder, M.R. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors: Clinical utility in autoimmune diseases. Transl. Res. 2015, 165, 270–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Meroni, P.L.; Valentini, G.; Ayala, F.; Cattaneo, A.; Valesini, G. New strategies to address the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors: A systematic analysis. Autoimmun. Rev. 2015, 14, 812–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Singh, J.A.; Saag, K.G.; Bridges, S.L.; Akl, E.A.; Bannuru, R.R.; Sullivan, M.C.; Vaysbrot, E.; McNaughton, C.; Osani, M.; Shmerling, R.H.; et al. 2015 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 2016, 68, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Ghigo, A.; Franco, I.; Morello, F.; Hirsch, E. Myocyte signalling in leucocyte recruitment to the heart. Cardiovasc. Res. 2014, 102, 270–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Javed, Q.; Murtaza, I. Therapeutic Potential of Tumour Necrosis Factor-alpha Antagonists in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure. Heart Lung Circ. 2013, 22, 323–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Xing, J.; Liu, Y.; Chen, T. Correlations of chemokine CXCL16 and TNF-α with coronary atherosclerotic heart disease. Exp. Ther. Med. 2018, 15, 773–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Li, X.; Zhang, F.; Zhou, H.; Hu, Y.; Guo, D.; Fang, X.; Chen, Y. Interplay of TNF-α, soluble TNF receptors and oxidative stress in coronary chronic total occlusion of the oldest patients with coronary heart disease. Cytokine 2020, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Shao, T.; Zhang, Y.; Tang, R.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Q.; Yang, Y.; Liu, T. Effects of milrinone on serum IL-6, TNF-α, Cys-C and cardiac functions of patients with chronic heart failure. Exp. Ther. Med. 2018, 16, 4162–4166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Torre-Amione, G.; Kapadia, S.; Lee, J.; Durand, J.B.; Bies, R.D.; Young, J.B.; Mann, D.L. Tumor necrosis factor-α and tumor necrosis factor receptors in the failing human heart. Circulation 1996, 93, 704–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pulido-Gómez, K.; Hernández-Díaz, Y.; Tovilla-Zárate, C.A.; Juárez-Rojop, I.E.; González-Castro, T.B.; López-Narváez, M.L.; Alpuin-Reyes, M. Association of G308A and G238A Polymorphisms of the TNF-α Gene with Risk of Coronary Heart Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Arch. Med. Res. 2016, 47, 557–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, T. ping Association between TNF-α polymorphisms and the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding induced by aspirin in patients with coronary heart disease. Ann. Hum. Genet. 2019, 83, 124–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Deswal, A.; Bozkurt, B.; Seta, Y.; Parilti-Eiswirth, S.; Hayes, F.A.; Blosch, C.; Mann, D.L. Safety and efficacy of a soluble P75 tumor necrosis factor receptor (Enbrel, etanercept) in patients with advanced heart failure. Circulation 1999, 99, 3224–3226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bozkurt, B.; Torre-Amione, G.; Warren, M.S.; Whitmore, J.; Soran, O.Z.; Feldman, A.M.; Mann, D.L. Results of targeted anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy with etanercept (ENBREL) in patients with advanced heart failure. Circulation 2001, 103, 1044–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Fichtlscherer, S.; Rössig, L.; Breuer, S.; Vasa, M.; Dimmeler, S.; Zeiher, A.M. Tumor necrosis factor antagonism with etanercept improves systemic endothelial vasoreactivity in patients with advanced heart failure. Circulation 2001, 104, 3023–3025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Mann, D.L.; McMurray, J.J.V.; Packer, M.; Swedberg, K.; Borer, J.S.; Colucci, W.S.; Djian, J.; Drexler, H.; Feldman, A.; Kober, L.; et al. Targeted Anticytokine Therapy in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure: Results of the Randomized Etanercept Worldwide Evaluation (RENEWAL). Circulation 2004, 109, 1594–1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Chung, E.S.; Packer, M.; Lo, K.H.; Fasanmade, A.A.; Willerson, J.T. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, pilot trial of infliximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody to tumor necrosis factor-α, in patients with moderate-to-severe heart failure: Results of the anti-TNF therapy against congestive heart failure (ATTACH). Circulation 2003, 107, 3133–3140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Padfield, G.J.; Din, J.N.; Koushiappi, E.; Mills, N.L.; Robinson, S.D.; Le May Cruden, N.; Lucking, A.J.; Chia, S.; Harding, S.A.; Newby, D.E. Cardiovascular effects of tumour necrosis factor α antagonism in patients with acute myocardial infarction: A first in human study. Heart 2013, 99, 1330–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Roubille, C.; Richer, V.; Starnino, T.; McCourt, C.; McFarlane, A.; Fleming, P.; Siu, S.; Kraft, J.; Lynde, C.; Pope, J.; et al. The effects of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors, methotrexate, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroids on cardiovascular events in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2015, 74, 480–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Błyszczuk, P.; Szekanecz, Z. Pathogenesis of ischaemic and non-ischaemic heart diseases in rheumatoid arthritis. RMD Open 2020, 6, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Keating, E.; Kelleher, T.B.; Lahiff, C. De novo Anti-TNF-α-induced Congestive Heart Failure in a Patient with Turner Syndrome and Crohn’s Disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Curtis, J.R.; Kramer, J.M.; Martin, C.; Saag, K.G.; Patkar, N.; Shatin, D.; Burgess, M.; Xie, A.; Braun, M.M. Heart failure among younger rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn’s patients exposed to TNF-α antagonists. Rheumatology 2007, 46, 1688–1693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Davis, J.M.; Lin, G.; Oh, J.K.; Crowson, C.S.; Achenbach, S.J.; Therneau, T.M.; Matteson, E.L.; Rodeheffer, R.J.; Gabriel, S.E. Five-year changes in cardiac structure and function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared with the general population. Int. J. Cardiol. 2017, 240, 379–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Davis, J.M.; Roger, V.L.; Crowson, C.S.; Kremers, H.M.; Therneau, T.M.; Gabriel, S.E. The presentation and outcome of heart failure in patients with rheumatoid arthritis differs from that in the general population. Arthritis Rheum. 2008, 58, 2603–2611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Kotyla, P.J.; Owczarek, A.; Rakoczy, J.; Lewicki, M.; Kucharz, E.J.; Emery, P. Infliximab treatment increases left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Assessment of heart function by echocardiography, endothelin 1, interleukin 6, and NT-pro brain natriuretic peptide. J. Rheumatol. 2012, 39, 701–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ayyildiz, Y.O.; Vural, M.G.; Efe, T.H.; Ertem, A.G.; Koseoglu, C.; Ayturk, M.; Yeter, E.; Keskin, G.; Akdemir, R. Effect of Long-Term TNF-α Inhibition with Infliximab on Left Ventricular Torsion in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. Hellenic J. Cardiol. 2015, 56, 406–413. [Google Scholar]
  61. Hürlimann, D.; Forster, A.; Noll, G.; Enseleit, F.; Chenevard, R.; Distler, O.; Béchir, M.; Spieker, L.E.; Neidhart, M.; Michel, B.A.; et al. Anti-tumor necrosis factor-α treatment improves endothelial function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Circulation 2002, 106, 2184–2187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Wong, M.; Oakley, S.P.; Young, L.; Jiang, B.Y.; Wierzbicki, A.; Panayi, G.; Chowienczyk, P.; Kirkham, B. Infliximab improves vascular stiffness in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2009, 68, 1277–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Ursini, F.; Leporini, C.; Bene, F.; D’Angelo, S.; Mauro, D.; Russo, E.; De Sarro, G.; Olivieri, I.; Pitzalis, C.; Lewis, M.; et al. Anti-TNF-alpha agents and endothelial function in rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Low, A.S.L.; Symmons, D.P.M.; Lunt, M.; Mercer, L.K.; Gale, C.P.; Watson, K.D.; Dixon, W.G.; Hyrich, K.L. Relationship between exposure to tumour necrosis factor inhibitor therapy and incidence and severity of myocardial infarction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2017, 76, 654–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Ljung, L.; Askling, J.; Rantapää-Dahlqvist, S.; Jacobsson, L.; Klareskog, L.; Lindblad, S.; von Vollenhoven, R.; Baecklund, E.; Cöster, L.; Forsblad, H.; et al. The risk of acute coronary syndrome in rheumatoid arthritis in relation to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors and the risk in the general population: A national cohort study. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2014, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Greenberg, J.D.; Kremer, J.M.; Curtis, J.R.; Hochberg, M.C.; Reed, G.; Tsao, P.; Farkouh, M.E.; Nasir, A.; Setoguchi, S.; Solomon, D.H. Tumour necrosis factor antagonist use and associated risk reduction of cardiovascular events among patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2011, 70, 576–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Al-Aly, Z.; Pan, H.; Zeringue, A.; Xian, H.; McDonald, J.R.; El-Achkar, T.M.; Eisen, S. Tumor necrosis factor-α blockade, cardiovascular outcomes, and survival in rheumatoid arthritis. Transl. Res. 2011, 157, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Jacobsson, L.T.H.; Turesson, C.; Nilsson, J.Å.; Petersson, I.F.; Lindqvist, E.; Saxne, T.; Geborek, P. Treatment with TNF blockers and mortality risk in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2007, 66, 670–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Solomon, D.H.; Rassen, J.A.; Kuriya, B.; Chen, L.; Harrold, L.R.; Graham, D.J.; Lewis, J.D.; Lii, J.; Liu, L.; Griffin, M.R.; et al. Heart failure risk among patients with rheumatoid arthritis starting a TNF antagonist. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2013, 72, 1813–1818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Setoguchi, S.; Schneeweiss, S.; Avorn, J.; Katz, J.N.; Weinblatt, M.E.; Levin, R.; Solomon, D.H. Tumor necrosis factor-α antagonist use and heart failure in elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Am. Heart J. 2008, 156, 336–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Arican, O.; Aral, M.; Sasmaz, S.; Ciragil, P. Serum levels of TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-6, IL-8, IL-12, IL-17, and IL-18 in patients with active psoriasis and correlation with disease severity. Mediators Inflamm. 2005, 2005, 273–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Wakkee, M.; Thio, H.B.; Prens, E.P.; Sijbrands, E.J.G.; Neumann, H.A.M. Unfavorable cardiovascular risk profiles in untreated and treated psoriasis patients. Atherosclerosis 2007, 190, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Bissonnette, R.; Tardif, J.-C.; Harel, F.; Pressacco, J.; Bolduc, C.; Guertin, M.-C. Effects of the tumor necrosis factor-α antagonist adalimumab on arterial inflammation assessed by positron emission tomography in patients with psoriasis: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2013, 6, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Wu, J.J.; Poon, K.Y.T.; Channual, J.C.; Shen, A.Y.J. Association between tumor necrosis factor inhibitor therapy and myocardial infarction risk in patients with psoriasis. Arch. Dermatol. 2012, 148, 1244–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Wu, J.J.; Guérin, A.; Sundaram, M.; Dea, K.; Cloutier, M.; Mulani, P. Cardiovascular event risk assessment in psoriasis patients treated with tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors versus methotrexate. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2017, 76, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Lee, J.L.; Sinnathurai, P.; Buchbinder, R.; Hill, C.; Lassere, M.; March, L. Biologics and cardiovascular events in inflammatory arthritis: A prospective national cohort study. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2018, 20, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Eder, L.; Joshi, A.A.; Dey, A.K.; Cook, R.; Siegel, E.L.; Gladman, D.D.; Mehta, N.N. Association of Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Treatment with Reduced Indices of Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Patients with Psoriatic Disease. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018, 70, 408–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Butler, D.M.; Malfait, A.M.; Mason, L.J.; Warden, P.J.; Kollias, G.; Maini, R.N.; Feldmann, M.; Brennan, F.M. DBA/1 mice expressing the human TNF-alpha transgene develop a severe, erosive arthritis: Characterization of the cytokine cascade and cellular composition. J. Immunol. 1997, 159, 2867–2876. [Google Scholar]
  79. Li, G.; Wu, Y.; Jia, H.; Tang, L.; Huang, R.; Peng, Y.; Zhang, Y. Establishment and evaluation of a transgenic mouse model of arthritis induced by overexpressing human tumor necrosis factor alpha. Biol. Open 2016, 5, 418–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Kubota, T.; McTiernan, C.F.; Frye, C.S.; Demetris, A.J.; Feldman, A.M. Cardiac-specific overexpression of tumor necrosis factor-alpha causes lethal myocarditis in transgenic mice. J. Card. Fail. 1997, 3, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Sivasubramanian, N.; Coker, M.L.; Kurrelmeyer, K.M.; MacLellan, W.R.; DeMayo, F.J.; Spinale, F.G.; Mann, D.L. Left ventricular remodeling in transgenic mice with cardiac restricted overexpression of tumor necrosis factor. Circulation 2001, 104, 826–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. London, B.; Baker, L.C.; Lee, J.S.; Shusterman, V.; Choi, B.R.; Kubota, T.; McTiernan, C.F.; Feldman, A.M.; Salama, G. Calcium-dependent arrhythmias in transgenic mice with heart failure. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2003, 284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Li, Y.Y.; Feng, Y.Q.; Kadokami, T.; McTiernan, C.F.; Draviam, R.; Watkins, S.C.; Feldman, A.M. Myocardial extracellular matrix remodeling in transgenic mice overexpressing tumor necrosis factor α can be modulated by anti-tumor necrosis factor α therapy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 12746–12751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Petkova-Kirova, P.S.; London, B.; Salama, G.; Rasmusson, R.L.; Bondarenko, V.E. Mathematical modeling mechanisms of arrhythmias in transgenic mouse heart overexpressing TNF-α. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2012, 302, H934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Higuchi, Y.; McTiernan, C.F.; Frye, C.B.; McGowan, B.S.; Chan, T.O.; Feldman, A.M. Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptors 1 and 2 Differentially Regulate Survival, Cardiac Dysfunction, and Remodeling in Transgenic Mice with Tumor Necrosis Factor-α-Induced Cardiomyopathy. Circulation 2004, 109, 1892–1897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Dibbs, Z.I.; Diwan, A.; Nemoto, S.; DeFreitas, G.; Abdellatif, M.; Carabello, B.A.; Spinale, F.G.; Feuerstein, G.; Sivasubramanian, N.; Mann, D.L.; et al. Targeted overexpression of transmembrane tumor necrosis factor provokes a concentric cardiac hypertrophic phenotype. Circulation 2003, 108, 1002–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Niemann-Jönsson, A.; Söderberg, I.; Lindholm, M.W.; Jovinge, S.; Nilsson, J.; Fredrikson, G.N. Medial Expression of TNF-α and TNF Receptors Precedes the Development of Atherosclerotic Lesions in Apolipoprotein E/LDL Receptor Double Knockout Mice. Int. J. Biomed. Sci. 2007, 3, 116–122. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  88. Xiao, N.; Yin, M.; Zhang, L.; Qu, X.; Du, H.; Sun, X.; Mao, L.; Ren, G.; Zhang, C.; Geng, Y.; et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha deficiency retards early fatty-streak lesion by influencing the expression of inflammatory factors in apoE-null mice. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2009, 96, 239–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Ohta, H.; Wada, H.; Niwa, T.; Kirii, H.; Iwamoto, N.; Fujii, H.; Saito, K.; Sekikawa, K.; Seishima, M. Disruption of tumor necrosis factor-α gene diminishes the development of atherosclerosis in ApoE-deficient mice. Atherosclerosis 2005, 180, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Boesten, L.S.M.; Zadelaar, A.S.M.; Van Nieuwkoop, A.; Gijbels, M.J.J.; De Winther, M.P.J.; Havekes, L.M.; Van Vlijmen, B.J.M. Tumor necrosis factor-α promotes atherosclerotic lesion progression in APOE*3-leiden transgenic mice. Cardiovasc. Res. 2005, 66, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Brånén, L.; Hovgaard, L.; Nitulescu, M.; Bengtsson, E.; Nilsson, J.; Jovinge, S. Inhibition of tumor necrosis factor-α reduces atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E knockout mice. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2004, 24, 2137–2142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Zhang, Y.; Yang, X.; Bian, F.; Wu, P.; Xing, S.; Xu, G.; Li, W.; Chi, J.; Ouyang, C.; Zheng, T.; et al. TNF-α promotes early atherosclerosis by increasing transcytosis of LDL across endothelial cells: Crosstalk between NF-κB and PPAR-γ. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2014, 72, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Tuleta, I.; Franҫa, C.N.; Wenzel, D.; Fleischmann, B.; Nickenig, G.; Werner, N.; Skowasch, D. Hypoxia-induced endothelial dysfunction in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice; effects of infliximab and L-glutathione. Atherosclerosis 2014, 236, 400–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Park, K.-Y.; Heo, T.-H. Critical role of TNF inhibition in combination therapy for elderly mice with atherosclerosis. Cardiovasc. Ther. 2017, 35, e12280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Oberoi, R.; Vlacil, A.K.; Schuett, J.; Schösser, F.; Schuett, H.; Tietge, U.J.F.; Schieffer, B.; Grote, K. Anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy increases plaque burden in a mouse model of experimental atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis 2018, 277, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Gao, W.; Liu, H.; Yuan, J.; Wu, C.; Huang, D.; Ma, Y.; Zhu, J.; Ma, L.; Guo, J.; Shi, H.; et al. Exosomes derived from mature dendritic cells increase endothelial inflammation and atherosclerosis via membrane TNF-α mediated NF-κB pathway. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2016, 20, 2318–2327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Canault, M.; Peiretti, F.; Poggi, M.; Mueller, C.; Kopp, F.; Bonardo, B.; Bastelica, D.; Nicolay, A.; Alessi, M.C.; Nalbone, G. Progression of atherosclerosis in ApoE-deficient mice that express distinct molecular forms of TNF-alpha. J. Pathol. 2008, 214, 574–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Nicolaou, A.; Zhao, Z.; Northoff, B.H.; Sass, K.; Herbst, A.; Kohlmaier, A.; Chalaris, A.; Wolfrum, C.; Weber, C.; Steffens, S.; et al. Adam17 Deficiency promotes atherosclerosis by enhanced TNFR2 signaling in Mice. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2017, 37, 247–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Canault, M.; Peiretti, F.; Mueller, C.; Kopp, F.; Morange, P.; Rihs, S.; Portugal, H.; Juhan-Vague, I.; Nalbone, G. Exclusive expression of transmembrane TNF-α in mice reduces the inflammatory response in early lipid lesions of aortic sinus. Atherosclerosis 2004, 172, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Schreyer, S.A.; Peschon, J.J.; LeBoeuf, R.C. Accelerated atherosclerosis in mice lacking tumor necrosis factor receptor p55. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 26174–26178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Zhang, L.; Peppel, K.; Sivashanmugam, P.; Orman, E.S.; Brian, L.; Exum, S.T.; Freedman, N.J. Expression of tumor necrosis factor receptor-1 in arterial wall cells promotes atherosclerosis. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2007, 27, 1087–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Irwin, M.W.; Mak, S.; Mann, D.L.; Qu, R.; Penninger, J.M.; Yan, A.; Dawood, F.; Wen, W.-H.; Shou, Z.; Liu, P. Tissue Expression and Immunolocalization of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α in Postinfarction Dysfunctional Myocardium. Circulation 1999, 99, 1492–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Sato, T.; Suzuki, H.; Shibata, M.; Kusuyama, T.; Omori, Y.; Soda, T.; Shoji, M.; Iso, Y.; Koba, S.; Geshi, E.; et al. Tumor-necrosis-factor-alpha-gene-deficient mice have improved cardiac function through reduction of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 in myocardial infarction. Circ. J. 2006, 70, 1635–1642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Kurrelmeyer, K.M.; Michael, L.H.; Baumgarten, G.; Taffet, G.E.; Peschon, J.J.; Sivasubramanian, N.; Entman, M.L.; Mann, D.L. Endogenous tumor necrosis factor protects the adult cardiac myocyte against ischemic-induced apoptosis in a murine model of acute myocardial infarction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 5456–5461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Maekawa, N.; Wada, H.; Kanda, T.; Niwa, T.; Yamada, Y.; Saito, K.; Fujiwara, H.; Sekikawa, K.; Seishima, M. Improved myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury in mice lacking tumor necrosis factor-α. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2002, 39, 1229–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Gao, C.; Liu, Y.; Yu, Q.; Yang, Q.; Li, B.; Sun, L.; Yan, W.; Cai, X.; Gao, E.; Xiong, L.; et al. TNF-α antagonism ameliorates myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in mice by upregulating adiponectin. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2015, 308, H1583–H1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Berry, M.F.; Woo, Y.J.; Pirolli, T.J.; Bish, L.T.; Moise, M.A.; Burdick, J.W.; Morine, K.J.; Jayasankar, V.; Gardner, T.J.; Sweeney, H.L. Administration of a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor at the time of myocardial infarction attenuates subsequent ventricular remodeling. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 2004, 23, 1061–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Wang, X.; Guo, Z.; Ding, Z.; Mehta, J.L. Inflammation, autophagy, and apoptosis after myocardial infarction. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2018, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Zhang, C.; Xu, X.; Potter, B.J.; Wang, W.; Kuo, L.; Michael, L.; Bagby, G.J.; Chilian, W.M. TNF-α contributes to endothelial dysfunction in ischemia/reperfusion injury. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2006, 26, 475–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Hamid, T.; Gu, Y.; Ortines, R.V.; Bhattacharya, C.; Wang, G.; Xuan, Y.T.; Prabhu, S.D. Divergent TNF Receptor-Related Remodeling Responses in Heart Failure: Role of NF-κB and Inflammatory Activation. Circulation 2009, 119, 1386–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Monden, Y.; Kubota, T.; Inoue, T.; Tsutsumi, T.; Kawano, S.; Ide, T.; Tsutsui, H.; Sunagawa, K. Tumor necrosis factor-α is toxic via receptor 1 and protective via receptor 2 in a murine model of myocardial infarction. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2007, 293, 743–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Ramani, R.; Mathier, M.; Wang, P.; Gibson, G.; Tögel, S.; Dawson, J.; Bauer, A.; Alber, S.; Watkins, S.C.; McTiernan, C.F.; et al. Inhibition of tumor necrosis factor receptor-1-mediated pathways has beneficial effects in a murine model of postischemic remodeling. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2004, 287, 1369–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Zhang, Y.; Zhao, J.; Lau, W.B.; Jiao, L.Y.; Liu, B.; Yuan, Y.; Wang, X.; Gao, E.; Koch, W.J.; Ma, X.L.; et al. Tumor Necrosis Factor-α and Lymphotoxin-α Mediate Myocardial Ischemic Injury via TNF Receptor 1, but Are Cardioprotective When Activating TNF Receptor 2. PLoS ONE 2013, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Frantz, S.; Hu, K.; Bayer, B.; Gerondakis, S.; Strotmann, J.; Adamek, A.; Ertl, G.; Bauersachs, J. Absence of NF-κB subunit p50 improves heart failure after myocardial infarction. FASEB J. 2006, 20, 1918–1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Yu, Y.; Wei, S.G.; Weiss, R.M.; Felder, R.B. TNF-α receptor 1 knockdown in the subfornical organ ameliorates sympathetic excitation and cardiac hemodynamics in heart failure rats. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2017, 313, 744–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Jude, B.; Vetel, S.; Giroux-Metges, M.A.; Pennec, J.P. Rapid negative inotropic effect induced by TNF-α in rat heart perfused related to PKC activation. Cytokine 2018, 107, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Wang, M.; Crisostomo, P.R.; Markel, T.A.; Wang, Y.; Meldrum, D.R. Mechanisms of sex differences in TNFR2-mediated cardioprotection. Circulation 2008, 118, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Braunwald, E. Cardiomyopathies: An overview. Circ. Res. 2017, 121, 711–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Carlson, W.D. Animal models of heart failure. In Heart Failure, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2012; Volume 111, pp. 78–94. ISBN 9781420077018. [Google Scholar]
  120. Kassiri, Z.; Oudit, G.Y.; Sanchez, O.; Dawood, F.; Mohammed, F.F.; Nuttall, R.K.; Edwards, D.R.; Liu, P.P.; Backx, P.H.; Khokha, R. Combination of tumor necrosis factor-α ablation and matrix metalloproteinase inhibition prevents heart failure after pressure overload in tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-3 knock-out mice. Circ. Res. 2005, 97, 380–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Sun, M.; Chen, M.; Dawood, F.; Zurawska, U.; Li, J.Y.; Parker, T.; Kassiri, Z.; Kirshenbaum, L.A.; Arnold, M.; Khokha, R.; et al. Tumor necrosis factor-α mediates cardiac remodeling and ventricular dysfunction after pressure overload state. Circulation 2007, 115, 1398–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Awad, A.E.; Kandalam, V.; Chakrabarti, S.; Wang, X.; Penninger, J.M.; Davidge, S.T.; Oudit, G.Y.; Kassiri, Z. Tumor necrosis factor induces matrix metalloproteinases in cardiomyocytes and cardiofibroblasts differentially via superoxide production in a PI3Kγ-dependent manner. Am. J. Physiol.-Cell Physiol. 2010, 298, 679–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Kishore, R.; Tkebuchava, T.; Sasi, S.P.; Silver, M.; Gilbert, H.Y.; Yoon, Y.S.; Park, H.Y.; Thorne, T.; Losordo, D.W.; Goukassian, D.A. Tumor necrosis factor-α Signaling via TNFR1/p55 is deleterious whereas TNFR2/p75 signaling is protective in adult infarct myocardium. In Proceedings of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology; Springer Nature Switzerland AG: Cham, Switzerland, 2011; Volume 691, pp. 433–448. [Google Scholar]
  124. Nan, J.; Hu, H.; Sun, Y.; Zhu, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhong, Z.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, N.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; et al. TNFR2 Stimulation Promotes Mitochondrial Fusion via Stat3- and NF-kB-Dependent Activation of OPA1 Expression. Circ. Res. 2017, 121, 392–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Wu, L.; Cao, Z.; Ji, L.; Mei, L.; Jin, Q.; Zeng, J.; Lin, J.; Chu, M.; Li, L.; Yang, X. Loss of TRADD attenuates pressure overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy through regulating TAK1/P38 MAPK signalling in mice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017, 483, 810–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Sriramula, S.; Haque, M.; Majid, D.S.; Francis, J. Involvement of tumor necrosis factor-α in angiotensin II-mediated effects on salt appetite, hypertension, and cardiac hypertrophy. Hypertension 2008, 51, 1345–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Mayr, M.; Duerrschmid, C.; Medrano, G.; Taffet, G.E.; Wang, Y.; Entman, M.L.; Haudek, S.B. TNF/Ang-II synergy is obligate for fibroinflammatory pathology, but not for changes in cardiorenal function. Physiol. Rep. 2016, 4, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Duerrschmid, C.; Crawford, J.R.; Reineke, E.; Taffet, G.E.; Trial, J.A.; Entman, M.L.; Haudek, S.B. TNF receptor 1 signaling is critically involved in mediating angiotensin-II-induced cardiac fibrosis. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2013, 57, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Garlie, J.B.; Hamid, T.; Gu, Y.; Ismahil, M.A.; Chandrasekar, B.; Prabhu, S.D. Tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 signaling limits β-adrenergic receptor-mediated cardiac hypertrophy in vivo. Basic Res. Cardiol. 2011, 106, 1193–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Keck, M.; Flamant, M.; Mougenot, N.; Favier, S.; Atassi, F.; Barbier, C.; Nadaud, S.; Lompré, A.M.; Hulot, J.S.; Pavoine, C. Cardiac inflammatory CD11b/c cells exert a protective role in hypertrophied cardiomyocyte by promoting TNFR 2- and Orai3- dependent signaling. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Nakashima, M.A.; Silva, C.B.P.; Gonzaga, N.A.; Simplicio, J.A.; Omoto, A.C.M.; Tirapelli, L.F.; Tanus-Santos, J.E.; Tirapelli, C.R. Chronic ethanol consumption increases reactive oxygen species generation and the synthesis of pro-inflammatory proteins in the heart through TNFR1-dependent mechanisms. Cytokine 2019, 121, 154734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Tang, J.; Xie, Q.; Ma, D.; Wang, W. Effects of ET-1 and TNF-α levels on the cardiac function and prognosis in rats with chronic heart failure. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2019, 23, 11004–11010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Błyszczuk, P. Myocarditis in Humans and in Experimental Animal Models. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2019, 6, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  134. Huber, S.A.; Sartini, D. Roles of Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNF-α) and the p55 TNF Receptor in CD1d Induction and Coxsackievirus B3-Induced Myocarditis. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 2659–2665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Smith, S.C.; Allen, P.M. Neutralization of endogenous tumor necrosis factor ameliorates the severity of myosin-induced myocarditis. Circ. Res. 1992, 70, 856–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  136. Bachmaier, K.; Pummerer, C.; Kozieradzki, I.; Pfeffer, K.; Mak, T.W.; Neu, N.; Penninger, J.M. Low-molecular-weight tumor necrosis factor receptor p55 controls induction of autoimmune heart disease. Circulation 1997, 95, 655–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Chandrasekharan, U.M.; Siemionow, M.; Unsal, M.; Yang, L.; Poptic, E.; Bohn, J.; Ozer, K.; Zhou, Z.; Howe, P.H.; Penn, M.; et al. Tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) receptor-II is required for TNF-α-induced leukocyte-endothelial interaction in vivo. Blood 2007, 109, 1938–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  138. Lee, J.; Lee, S.; Zhang, H.; Hill, M.A.; Zhang, C.; Park, Y. Interaction of IL-6 and TNF-α contributes to endothelial dysfunction in type 2 diabetic mouse hearts. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Gao, X.; Belmadani, S.; Picchi, A.; Xu, X.; Potter, B.J.; Tewari-Singh, N.; Capobianco, S.; Chilian, W.M.; Zhang, C. Tumor necrosis factor-α induces endothelial dysfunction in Lepr db mice. Circulation 2007, 115, 245–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. De Keulenaer, G.W.; Alexander, R.W.; Ushio-Fukai, M.; Ishizaka, N.; Griendling, K.K. Tumour necrosis factor α activates a p22phox-based NADH oxidase in vascular smooth muscle. Biochem. J. 1998, 329, 653–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Hsu, H.Y.; Twu, Y.C. Tumor necrosis factor-α-mediated protein kinases in regulation of scavenger receptor and foam cell formation on macrophage. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 41035–41048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  142. Yokoyama, T.; Nakano, M.; Bednarczyk, J.L.; McIntyre, B.W.; Entman, M.; Mann, D.L. Tumor necrosis factor-α provokes a hypertrophic growth response in adult cardiac myocytes. Circulation 1997, 95, 1247–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Higuchi, Y.; Otsu, K.; Nishida, K.; Hirotani, S.; Nakayama, H.; Yamaguchi, O.; Matsumura, Y.; Ueno, H.; Tada, M.; Hori, M. Involvement of reactive oxygen species-mediated NF-κB activation in TNF-α-induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2002, 34, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Defer, N.; Azroyan, A.; Pecker, F.; Pavoine, C. TNFR1 and TNFR2 signaling interplay in cardiac myocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 35564–35573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  145. Suematsu, N.; Tsutsui, H.; Wen, J.; Kang, D.; Ikeuchi, M.; Ide, T.; Hayashidani, S.; Shiomi, T.; Kubota, T.; Hamasaki, N.; et al. Oxidative stress mediates tumor necrosis factor-α-induced mitochondrial DNA damage and dysfunction in cardiac myocytes. Circulation 2003, 107, 1418–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  146. Krown, K.A.; Page, M.T.; Nguyen, C.; Zechner, D.; Gutierrez, V.; Comstock, K.L.; Glembotski, C.C.; Quintana, P.J.E.; Sabbadini, R.A. Tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced apoptosis in cardiac myocytes: Involvement of the sphingolipid signaling cascade in cardiac cell death. J. Clin. Investig. 1996, 98, 2854–2865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Lindner, D.; Zietsch, C.; Tank, J.; Sossalla, S.; Fluschnik, N.; Hinrichs, S.; Maier, L.; Poller, W.; Blankenberg, S.; Schultheiss, H.P.; et al. Cardiac fibroblasts support cardiac inflammation in heart failure. Basic Res. Cardiol. 2014, 109, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Jacobs, M.; Staufenberger, S.; Gergs, U.; Meuter, K.; Brandstätter, K.; Hafner, M.; Ertl, G.; Schorb, W. Tumor necrosis factor-α at acute myocardial infarction in rats and effects on cardiac fibroblasts. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 1999, 31, 1949–1959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Porter, K.E.; Turner, N.A.; O’Regan, D.J.; Ball, S.G. Tumor necrosis factor α induces human atrial myofibroblast proliferation, invasion and MMP-9 secretion: Inhibition by simvastatin. Cardiovasc. Res. 2004, 64, 507–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  150. Bunney, P.E.; Zink, A.N.; Holm, A.A.; Billington, C.J.; Kotz, C.M. Tumor Necrosis Factor: A Mechanistic Link between Angiotensin-II-Induced Cardiac Inflammation and Fibrosis. Physiol. Behav. 2017, 176, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Aker, S.; Belosjorow, S.; Konietzka, I.; Duschin, A.; Martin, C.; Heusch, G.; Schulz, R. Serum but not myocardial TNF-α concentration is increased in pacing-induced heart failure in rabbits. Am. J. Physiol.-Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2003, 285, R463–R469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  152. Al-Lamki, R.S.; Lu, W.; Wang, J.; Yang, J.; Sargeant, T.J.; Wells, R.; Suo, C.; Wright, P.; Goddard, M.; Huang, Q.; et al. TNF, acting through inducibly expressed TNFR2, drives activation and cell cycle entry of c-Kit+ cardiac stem cells in ischemic heart disease. Stem Cells 2013, 31, 1881–1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  153. Wang, J.; Ferreira, R.; Lu, W.; Farrow, S.; Downes, K.; Jermutus, L.; Minter, R.; Al-Lamki, R.S.; Pober, J.S.; Bradley, J.R. TNFR2 ligation in human T regulatory cells enhances IL2-induced cell proliferation through the non-canonical NF-κB pathway. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  154. Ba, H.; Li, B.; Li, X.; Li, C.; Feng, A.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, J.; Li, Z.; Yin, B. Transmembrane tumor necrosis factor-α promotes the recruitment of MDSCs to tumor tissue by upregulating CXCR4 expression via TNFR2. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2017, 44, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Zhou, L.; Miao, K.; Yin, B.; Li, H.; Fan, J.; Zhu, Y.; Ba, H.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, F.; Wang, J.; et al. Cardioprotective Role of Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells in Heart Failure. Circulation 2018, 138, 181–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jcm 09 03267 g001 550
Figure 1. Overview of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) downstream signaling pathway mediated by two TNF-α receptors, TNFR1 and TNFR2, and by membrane form of TNF-α (mTNF-α) reverse signaling.
Figure 1. Overview of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) downstream signaling pathway mediated by two TNF-α receptors, TNFR1 and TNFR2, and by membrane form of TNF-α (mTNF-α) reverse signaling.
Jcm 09 03267 g001
Jcm 09 03267 g002 550
Figure 2. Biological effects mediated by TNFR1 and TNFR2 in main cellular components of the heart. ECM: extracellular matrix, LDL: low-density lipoprotein, MMP: matrix metalloproteinase, NO: nitric oxide.
Figure 2. Biological effects mediated by TNFR1 and TNFR2 in main cellular components of the heart. ECM: extracellular matrix, LDL: low-density lipoprotein, MMP: matrix metalloproteinase, NO: nitric oxide.
Jcm 09 03267 g002
Table
Table 1. Effects of anti-TNF-α treatments on cardiovascular outcomes in heart failure and in systemic inflammatory disease patients.
Table 1. Effects of anti-TNF-α treatments on cardiovascular outcomes in heart failure and in systemic inflammatory disease patients.
Type of TrialDiseaseInterventionOutcomesRef.
Single-center clinical trial (18 patients)Class III NYHA heart failureSingle infusion of etanercept (1, 4, or 10 mg/m2) or placeboDose-dependent increased quality-of-life scores and ejection fraction measured at 14th day[47]
Single-center clinical trial (47 patients)Class III-IV NYHA heart failureBiweekly injections of etanercept for 3 months (5 or 12 mg/m2) or placeboDose-dependent increase in functional status, LV functions, and remodeling after 3 months[48]
Single-center clinical trial (13 patients)Class III NYHA heart failureSingle injection of etanercept (25 mg) in combination with standard treatmentMajor improvement in systemic endothelial vasodilator capacity 7 days from intervention when compared to standard treatment group[49]
Multi-center, double-blind clinical trial RECOVER (1123 patients)Class II-IV NYHA heart failureWeekly or biweekly injections of 25 mg etanercept for 6 months or placeboPrematurely terminated due to lack of improvement in clinical outcome. No change in hospitalization or death occurrence[50]
Multi-center, double-blind clinical trial RENAISSANCE (925 patients)Class II-IV NYHA heart failureBiweekly or 3 times a week injections of 25 mg etanercept for 6 months or placeboPrematurely terminated due to lack of improvement in clinical outcome.
Worsened clinical composite score in some patients		[50]
Multi-center, double-blind clinical trial ATTACH (150 patients)Class III-IV NYHA heart failureInjections of 5 or 10 mg/kg infliximab at 0, 2, and 6 weeks or placeboAfter 14 weeks modest improvement in ejection fraction at 5 mg/kg dose. No improvement in composite clinical score at either dose, increased hospitalization and death occurrence at 10 mg/kg dose[51]
Randomized controlled trial (26 patients)Acute myocardial infarctionSingle infusion of 10 mg etanercept in combination with standard treatmentReduced systemic inflammation, increased platelet activation. No effect on peripheral vasomotor or fibrinolytic function when compared to standard treatment[52]
Single-center clinical trial (23 patients)Rheumatoid arthritis3 mg/kg infliximab infusions every 2 monthsImprovement in LV ejection fraction, reduction in IL-6, endothelin 1, and NT-proBNP serum levels[59]
Single-center clinical trial (68 patients)Rheumatoid arthritis180 days of infliximab or prednisolone treatment Improvement in LV longitudinal and radial systolic deformation and decreased LV torsion in comparison to prednisolone treatment[60]
Multi-center comparative study (14,258 patients)Rheumatoid arthritis90+ days of adalimumab, etanercept, or infliximab treatment with median of 5 years follow-up Significantly decreased risk of myocardial infarction in comparison to patients receiving synthetic DMARD[64]
Multi-center comparative study (7704 patients)Rheumatoid arthritisLong-term treatment (average of 2 years) with adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximabSignificantly decreased risk of acute coronary syndrome compared to biologic-naïve RA patients or DMARD treatment[65]
Multi-center comparative study (10,156 patients)Rheumatoid arthritisLong-term treatment (median exposure period of 22,9 months) with adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximabReduced risk of cardiovascular-related death compared to patients receiving DMARD[66]
Multi-center retrospective comparative study (20,811 patients)Rheumatoid arthritisLong-term treatment (median duration of 20 months) with TNF-α inhibitorsNo change in cardiovascular-related death risk, improved cardiovascular outcomes in younger patients[67]
Multi-center retrospective comparative study (7077 patients)Rheumatoid arthritisLong term (up to 5 years) treatment with TNF-α inhibitorsReduction in cardiovascular-related death in women[68]
Multi-center retrospective comparative study (20,243 patients)Rheumatoid arthritisSwitch from non-biological disease modifying antirheumatic drug to TNF antagonistsNo change in risk of cardiovascular event (including in patients with heart failure history)[69]
Multi-center retrospective comparative study (7077 patients)Rheumatoid arthritisLong-term treatment (1–2 years) with TNF-α inhibitors or methotrexateIncreased risk of heart failure onset and exacerbation of existent heart failure in elderly patients treated with TNF-α inhibitors[70]
Multi-center comparative study (8845 patients)PsoriasisAt least 2 months of adalimumab, etanercept, or infliximab treatmentReduced risk of myocardial infarction in comparison to TNF-α inhibitor naïve patients[74]
Multi-center comparative study (17,729)Psoriasis150 days of adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, or methotrexate treatmentTreatment with TNF-α inhibitors was shown to reduce overall cardiovascular event risk in comparison to methotrexate[75]
Multi-center retrospective comparative study (4140 patients)Rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, ankylosing spondylitisLong-term treatment (at least 1 year) with TNF-α inhibitorsContinuous use of TNF-α inhibitors reduced the incidence of major cardiovascular events in comparable manner in all studied diseases[76]
Multi-center comparative study (319)Psoriatic arthritisLong-term treatment (2–3 years) with TNF-α inhibitorsReduced atherosclerosis in men, but not women, receiving TNF-α inhibitors. Reduction of vascular inflammation in both sexes[77]
LV: left ventricle, NT-proBNP: N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide, DMARD-disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rolski, F.; Błyszczuk, P. Complexity of TNF-α Signaling in Heart Disease. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 3267. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103267

AMA Style

Rolski F, Błyszczuk P. Complexity of TNF-α Signaling in Heart Disease. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020; 9(10):3267. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103267

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rolski, Filip, and Przemysław Błyszczuk. 2020. "Complexity of TNF-α Signaling in Heart Disease" Journal of Clinical Medicine 9, no. 10: 3267. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103267

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop