Next Article in Journal
Predicting the Risk of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism: Current Challenges and Future Opportunities
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparison of White Blood Cell Scintigraphy, FDG PET/CT and MRI in Suspected Diabetic Foot Infection: Results of a Large Retrospective Multicenter Study
Previous Article in Journal
Intracellular Water Content in Lean Mass as an Indicator of Muscle Quality in an Older Obese Population
Previous Article in Special Issue
Imaging Modalities for the Diagnosis of Vascular Graft Infections: A Consensus Paper amongst Different Specialists
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 9
Issue 5
10.3390/jcm9051581
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparison of the Diagnostic Value of MRI and Whole Body 18F-FDG PET/CT in Diagnosis of Spondylodiscitis

by
Corinna Altini
1,
Valentina Lavelli
1,
Artor Niccoli-Asabella
2,
Angela Sardaro
3,
Alessia Branca
1,
Giulia Santo
1,
Cristina Ferrari
1,* and
Giuseppe Rubini
1
1
Nuclear Medicine Unit, Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Piazza Giulio Cesare, 11–70124 Bari, Italy
2
Nuclear Medicine Unit, AOU Policlinic “A. Perrino”, 72100 Brindisi, Italy
3
Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Piazza Giulio Cesare, 11–70124 Bari, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(5), 1581; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9051581
Submission received: 22 April 2020 / Revised: 18 May 2020 / Accepted: 19 May 2020 / Published: 22 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Selected Papers from the 3rd European Congress on Imaging Infection and Inflammation)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Spondylodiscitis is a spine infection for which a diagnosis by a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered the most appropriate imaging technique. The aim of this study was to compare the role of an 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) and an MRI in this field. For 56 patients with suspected spondylodiscitis for whom MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT were performed, we retrospectively analyzed the results. Cohen’s κ was applied to evaluate the agreement between the two techniques in all patients and in subgroups with a different number of spinal districts analyzed by the MRI. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were also evaluated. The agreements of the 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI in the evaluation of the entire population, whole-spine MRI, and two-districts MRI were moderate (κ = 0.456, κ = 0.432, and κ = 0.429, respectively). In patients for whom one-district MRI was performed, 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI were both positive and completely concordant (κ = 1). We also separately evaluated patients with suspected spondylodiscitis caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis for whom the MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT were always concordant excepting in 2 of the 18 (11%) patients. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT were 100%, 60%, 97%, and 92%, 100%, and 94%, respectively. Our results confirmed the 18F-FDG PET/CT diagnostic value in the diagnosis of spondylodiscitis is comparable to that of MRI for the entire spine evaluation. This could be considered a complementary technique or a valid alternative to MRI.

1. Introduction

Spondylodiscitis is an infection of the vertebral body or disc that can extend to contiguous soft tissues [1]. Its incidence is rising due to increased life expectancy. It mainly affects men aged between 50 and 70 years [1,2]. It is often associated to the presence of debilitating conditions, such as endocarditis, diabetes mellitus, septic arthritis, urinary tract infections and indwelling catheter infections, malignancy, and spinal surgery [1,2]. The most frequent district involved is the lumbar spine, followed by the dorsal tract and the cervical tract [2]. The principal causes of spondylodiscitis are pyogenic agents, most commonly Staphylococcus aureus, followed by Escherichia coli. Less commonly, spondylodiscitis is caused by non-pyogenic agents, such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Brucella, fungi, and parasites [1,3].
The diagnosis of spondylodiscitis is based on a clinical suspect for the presence of symptoms, such as focal back pain, fever and/or neurological deficit associated with nonspecific laboratory findings [2,4,5]. Imaging findings are also fundamental for diagnosis and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered the most accurate technique for the early detection of spondylodiscitis [4,6,7].
More recently, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) was proven to be a useful multimodality imaging method to study infectious and other benign disease, including spondylodiscitis [8,9].
The aim of this study was to compare the role of an 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI in the diagnosis of spondylodiscitis.

2. Experimental Section

We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent a whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT for the suspicion of spondylodiscitis, performed from April 2013 to October 2018. There were 105 patients (74 men, 31 women; mean age 63 years; range: 18–90 years) for whom 18F-FDG PET/CT was performed. Only 56/105 patients for whom MRI was performed before 18F-FDG PET/CT were included in the analysis, whereas the other 49/105 were excluded. All the MRIs were performed in an average of 8 days before the 18F-FDG PET/CT (range: 3–15 days) and included at least one spinal district.
All patients had already given their consent for the use of their data for clinical research. Our Institutional Review Board does not require the Ethical Committee’s approval for the review of the patients’ files.
The MRI examinations of the spine were acquired on a 1.5 T scanner (ACHIEVA, Philips Healthcare, Amsterdam, Netherlands). The choice of which and how many spinal districts to scan was driven by clinical suspicion. The MRI scan protocol consisted of a T1-weighted (T1-W), Turbo Spine Echo (TSE), T2-Weighted (T2-W), and Short Time Inversion Recovery-Weighted (STIR-W). The T1-W sagittal, axial, and coronal scans were performed after the contrast agent was administered to all patients. The total duration of the examination was 20–25 minutes without considering post-processing. The MRI findings indicative of spondylodiscitis were decrease signal intensity from the disc and adjacent vertebral bodies on T1-W images, increase signal intensity from the disc and adjacent vertebral bodies on T1-W, increase signal intensity on T2-W images (due to edema), and loss of endplate definition on T1-W. The gadolinium enhancement of the discs, vertebrae, and surrounding soft tissue helped to differentiate the infective lesions from degenerative changes (Modic type 1 abnormalities) or neoplasm [10].
An integrated PET/CT scanner Discovery IQ (GE, Healthcare Technologies, Milwaukee, WI, USA) was used for obtaining results. Patients were recommended to fast for six hours before the acquisition of the PET/CT. Before the 18F-FDG injection, the blood sugar levels were measured and the optimal value was <140 mg/dL. We proceeded with the intravenous injection of 2.5–3 MBq/kg of 18F-FDG using a venous line and the patients were allowed to stay in the room for approximately 60 minutes. Whole-body PET/CT acquisitions were performed by placing patients in a supine position with their arms raised above their heads. PET images were obtained in a three-dimensional mode and were analyzed qualitatively and semi-quantitatively with a Multivol PET/CT program of Advantage™ workstation (GE, Healthcare Technologies, Milwaukee, WI, USA). PET findings were analyzed by evaluating the different 18F-FDG uptakes between the soft tissue infection and the bone marrow.
In all patients, the final diagnosis of spondylodiscitis was confirmed or excluded on the basis of resolution or significant improvement of constitutional symptoms (back pain and/or fever), laboratory, such as C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and white blood cells (WBCs), and instrumental (e.g., MRI and biopsy) follow-ups were performed for at least 6 months.
Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT were calculated. Cohen’s κ was also applied to evaluate the agreement between the MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the entire population analyzed and in subgroups who performed whole-spine, two-districts and one-district MRI. Analyses were performed by MedCalc® statistical software version 2020 (MedCalc Software Ltd., Ostend, Belgium).

3. Results

The demographic and clinical characteristics of the 56 patients are shown in Table 1.
None of patients were started on any antibiotic therapies before the imaging techniques performance.
The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for 18F-FDG PET/CT were 92%, 100%, and 94%, and for MRI were 100%, 60%, and 97%, respectively.
In agreement with clinical and instrumental findings, final diagnosis of spondylodiscitis in 51/56 (91%) patients was confirmed, whereas in 5/56 (9%) patients, it was ruled out.
18F-FDG PET/CT showed pathological uptake in the spine and correctly identified 44/56 (79%) patients with spondylodiscitis. Equally, 18F-FDG PET/CT showed no significant uptake in the spine and therefore, correctly ruling out spondylodiscitis in 12/56 patients (21%). The MRI identified 53/56 patients (95%) with spinal infection and ruled out infection in 3/56 patients (5%). 18F-FDG PET/CT had a false-negative in 4/56 patients (7%). MRI had a false-positive in 2/56 patients (4%) with a final diagnosis of severe degenerative disc disease.
Table 2 reports the κ values for the agreement results.
Table 3 reports the MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT results for all patients and subgroups.
Figure 1 reports an example case of spine infection detected by both MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT. Figure 2 reports a case of discordance between the MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT.
In the subgroup of patients for whom whole-spine MRI was performed, 14/19 patients (74%), had the same lesions where the two techniques were identified. In 4/19 patients (21%), the MRI identified lesions in two districts, whereas the 18F-FDG PET/CT only in one. In 1/19 patients (5%), the 18F-FDG PET/CT identified one lesion more than MRI.
In the subgroup of patients for whom two-districts MRI was performed, seven of nine patients (78%) had the same lesions which the two techniques identified. In one of nine patients (11%), MRI identified lesions in two districts whereas the 18F-FDG PET/CT in only one. In one of nine patients (11%), the 18F-FDG PET/CT identified one lesion more than the MRI.
In the subgroup of 19 patients for whom the one-district MRI was performed, the 18F-FDG PET/CT and the MRI were both positive and completely concordant for lesions identified that were: cervical in 1/19 (5%), dorsal in 5/19 (26%), and lumbar in 13/19 (69%).
The average value of Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) was 6.7 (SD ± 3.2).
The results concerning patients with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TBC) etiology are reported separately in Table 4.

4. Discussion

Diagnosis of spondylodiscitis is a combination of clinical, laboratory, and radiological findings. Symptoms and clinical signs of spondylodiscitis are non-specific and include severe back pain, fever and, in one-third of cases, neurological deficit such as leg weakness, paralysis, sensory deficit, radiculopathy, and loss of sphincter control [2,11]. For this reason, spondylodiscitis is difficult to diagnose because laboratory results are also nonspecific and not always present; they could include elevated levels of CRP, increased ESR, and elevated WBC [1].
Diagnosis of certainty associated with the detection of the etiological agent can be obtained by invasive investigations, such as biopsy, but this is associated with significant risks and side effects. For this reason, it is necessary to be able to have non-invasive diagnostic methods with repeatable and high performance value [2,12].
Generally, the first imaging modality required for suspected spinal infection, despite its low sensitivity and specificity, are plain radiographs [2,13,14,15,16]. Usually, the signs are not present on radiographs until two to eight weeks after the onset of symptoms and may not be evident in patients with severe degenerative disc disease [2,15,16]. Nowadays, MRI is the imaging procedure most used due to its high sensitivity in the diagnosis of infection and in assessing the extent of disease [4,17]. The main MRI findings for spondylodiscitis are impairment of the intervertebral discs associated with disc space narrowing or possible epidural involvement and increased contrast enhancement in the spine [4,6]. Contrast-enhanced MRI is the method of choice in clinical practice due to its advantages including high contrast resolution, high sensitivity for soft tissue, absence of ionizing radiation exposure, and the possibility to show evidence of bone marrow abnormalities [2,5]. MRI cannot be performed in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices, cardioverter defibrillators, or cardiac resynchronization devices; even patients with metallic implants cannot undergo the process. The high costs and long run times for whole-spine examination do not make it a suitable examination for all patients. MRI diagnostic performance decreases in follow-up evaluation and in post-operative infection of the spine [2,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. These drawbacks, over time, lead many to look for other methods that could replace an MRI, mostly when it is contraindicated, not available, or doubtful [2,24,25].
Over the years, 18F-FDG PET/CT, a whole-body technique, has shown advantages in the clinical and therapeutic management of oncological disease and, simultaneously, its usefulness in the management of several non-oncological disease has been proven [26]. However, different from MRI, 18F-FDG PET/CT exposes patients to ionizing radiation even if updated protocols minimize radio exposure. In patients with spondylodiscitis, 18F-FDG PET/CT allows for differentiation of degenerative and infectious abnormalities found on an MRI [4,27]. It is considered positive when 18F-FDG uptake is higher than bone marrow uptake in adjacent vertebrae or soft tissue around the spine. Therefore, unlike morphological imaging, 18F-FDG PET/CT highlights glycidic metabolism, which may already be increased in the early stages of infection [4,5].
The diagnostic value of an MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in our study is in line with current literature and confirm the higher sensitivity of an MRI and its relatively lower specificity than 18F-FDG PET/CT (100% vs. 92% and 60% vs. 100%, respectively). The two techniques showed similar accuracy (94% and 97%). The high sensitivity of an MRI allows the identification of almost all spondylodiscitis lesions, but the lower specificity is indicative of the possibility of misunderstanding lesions due to inflammatory or degenerative spondyloarthropathy, recent vertebral fractures, postoperative inflammation, or bone tumors. The high specificity of 18F-FDG PET/CT improves the interpretation of ambiguous MRI images [9].
Previous studies that investigated the value of an MRI in diagnosing spondylodiscitis showed results similar to our study, such as sensitivity of 82–96%, specificity of 85–93%, and accuracy of 81–94% [5,28,29,30].
Even though this imaging modality is considered the gold standard for spinal infection diagnoses, in 2015, a prospective study of 26 patients who underwent an MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT reported encouraging results for the use of an 18F-FDG PET/CT as a valid alternative in the evaluation of patients with suspected spondylodiscitis that could not perform an MRI. In particular, Fauster et al. found sensitivity and specificity of 83% and 88% for 18F-FDG PET/CT and 94% and 38% for MRI, respectively [4]. Similar results were reported in a recent meta-analysis that 18F-FDG PET/CT has a superior accuracy than MRI (97% vs. 81%) in detecting spondylodiscitis, as well as high sensitivity (95% vs. 85%) and specificity (88% vs. 66%) [31]. Smids et al. analyzed a group of 75 patients with clinical suspicion of spondylodiscitis and found that 18F-FDG PET/CT had higher sensitivity and accuracy in the early diagnosis of spondylodiscitis than MRI, especially when performed in the first two weeks of the onset of symptoms [5].
Our study included a homogeneous group of 56 patients with suspected spondylodiscitis, even though the comparison for the entire spine was not performed for all patients. For this reason, we also evaluated the agreement of the two techniques for all of the lesions and it always resulted moderately except for patients with a single-spine district MRI, for whom the agreement was complete and absolute. The differentiation in groups, based on the district studied from the MRI, was necessary to compare overlapping data and therefore to identify differences in numbers and locations of the infection, which can involve multiple spine sites.
Discordant results were found in 6 of 56 patients for whom the MRI was positive, but the 18F-FDG PET/CT did not reveal any lesions. In four of them, the diagnosis of spondylodiscitis was confirmed and false-negative 18F-FDG PET/CT results were probably due to a weak infection characterized only by epidural involvement, whereas the low 18F-FDG uptake may have been related to the different immune reaction caused by the various etiological agents [22,32,33]. In the remaining two patients, spondylodiscitis was finally not confirmed by follow-up and the false-positive MRI results were due to the presence of severe degenerative disc disease [22].
Differences among patients in whom the MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT were concordant in the identification of the suspected lesions were observed. In patients for whom the whole-body MRI was performed, MRI identified one lesion more than the 18F-FDG PET/CT in four patients, whereas the 18F-FDG PET/CT detected one lesion more than the MRI in only one patient. Similarly, in the subgroup for whom two-districts MRI was performed, it identified one lesion more than the 18F-FDG PET/CT in one patient, whereas the 18F-FDG PET/CT detected one lesion more than the MRI in only one patient. The higher number of lesions identified by the MRI was related to the presence of edema-like changes in the end plates and to epidural abscesses. The patients in whom additional 18F-FDG PET/CT lesions were found, psoas abscesses were detected. For all the additional lesions found by the two techniques, the final diagnosis of spondylodiscitis was confirmed.
Mycobacterium tuberculosis is one of the etiological agents of spondylodiscitis, but it can differ from bacterial disease for clinical and imaging. In these patients, the back pain and neurological deficit onset occurred only later in chronic forms [34]. Imaging-guide vertebral biopsy is a gold standard for differentiating tubercular and pyogenic spondylodiscitis. MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT were helpful for evaluating the extension of the infection [35]. The main MRI findings, suggestive for tubercular spondylodiscitis, indicated sparing of the intervertebral disc in the early stages of infection, loss of vertebral body cortical definition, multiple vertebral involvement, and the presence of muscular (paraspinal, psoas) abscesses [34,35]. Tuberculous spondylodiscitis 18F-FDG PET/CT commonly presents as 18F-FDG uptake lesions. However, in some cases, a cold abscess is characterized by moderate 18F-FDG uptake in the cortex and low uptake in the center [36].
In our study, we described separate patients with tuberculous spondylodiscitis. In most of them, the MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT results were both of positive and in concordance in identifying lesions due to their typical imaging presentation at two techniques. The remaining two patients’ results were discordant. The false-positive MRI result was the same as described in the entire population and therefore was due to degenerative end-plate abnormalities. Similarly, the false-negative 18F-FDG PET/CT result was previously described and may be related to low-virulence bacteria.
Despite the encouraging results, some limitations of our study should be reported. First of all, we analyzed a small sample size in line with the literature. Other limitations were the heterogeneous groups of pathogens and the difference in the numbers of spine districts examined by the MRI.
Our results show the complementary role of 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI in a spondylodiscitis diagnosis. The combination of 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI detected lesions in 100% of patients with spondylodiscitis, identifying the site and the extent of the disease and correctly guiding the therapeutic choice [2,4,37,38].

5. Conclusions

Our results confirmed the high diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of spondylodiscitis in comparison with MRI. Given the increasing evidence of the diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT, it could be proposed as a possible alternative to MRI, especially when MRI is contraindicated, non-diagnostic, or inconclusive. The agreement between these two techniques suggests their complementary role in selected and more complicated patients.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.A.; methodology, V.L.; data curation, G.S.; writing—original draft preparation, A.B.; writing—review and editing, A.S.; visualization, A.N.-A.; supervision, C.F.; project administration, G.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Raghavan, M.; Lazzeri, E.; Palestro, C.J. Imaging of Spondylodiscitis. Semin. Nucl. Med. 2018, 48, 131–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lazzeri, E.; Bozzao, A.; Cataldo, M.A.; Petrosillo, N.; Manfrè, L.; Trampuz, A.; Signore, A.; Muto, M. Joint EANM/ESNR and ESCMID-endorsed consensus document for the diagnosis of spine infection (spondylodiscitis) in adults. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2019, 46, 2464–2487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Prodi, E.; Grassi, R.; Iacobellis, F.; Cianfoni, A. Imaging in Spondylodiskitis. Magn. Reson. Imaging Clin. North Am. 2016, 24, 581–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Fuster, D.; Tomás, X.; Mayoral, M.; Soriano, A.; Manchón, F.; Cardenal, C.; Monegal, A.; Granados, U.; Garcia, S.; Pons, F. Prospective comparison of whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI of the spine in the diagnosis of haematogenous spondylodiscitis. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2014, 42, 264–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Smids, C.; Kouijzer, I.J.E.; Vos, F.J.; Sprong, T.; Hosman, A.J.F.; de Rooy, J.W.J.; Aarntzen, E.H.J.G.; de Geus-Oei, L.F.; Oyen, W.J.G.; Bleeker-Rovers, C.P. A comparison of the diagnostic value of MRI and 18F-FDG-PET/CT in suspected spondylodiscitis. Infection 2016, 45, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Cottle, L.; Riordan, T. Infectious spondylodiscitis. J. Infect. 2008, 56, 401–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gaudio, F.; Pedote, P.; Niccoli Asabella, A.; Ingravallo, G.; Sindaco, P.; Alberotanza, V.; Perrone, T.; Laddaga, F.E.; Rubini, G.; Stabile Ianora, A.A.; et al. Bone involvement in hodgkin’s lymphoma: Clinical features and outcome. Acta Haematol. 2018, 140, 178–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Inanami, H.; Oshima, Y.; Iwahori, T.; Takano, Y.; Koga, H.; Iwai, H. Role of 18F-fluoro-d-deoxyglucose PET/CT in diagnosing surgical site infection after spine surgery with instrumentation. Spine 2015, 40, 109–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Treglia, G.; Pascale, M.; Lazzeri, E.; van der Bruggen, W.; Delgado Bolton, R.C.; Glaudemans, A.W.J.M. Diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with spinal infection: A systematic review and a bivariate meta-analysis. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2020, 47, 1287–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Niccoli Asabella, A.; Iuele, F.; Simone, F.; Fanelli, M.; Lavelli, V.; Ferrari, C.; Di Palo, A.; Notaristefano, A.; Merenda, N.C.; Rubini, G. Role of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of response to antibiotic therapy in patients affected by infectious spondylodiscitis. Hell. J. Nucl. Med. 2015, 18 (Suppl. 1), 17–22. [Google Scholar]
  11. Mylona, E.; Samarkos, M.; Kakalou, E.; Fanourgiakis, P.; Skoutelis, A. Pyogenic Vertebral Osteomyelitis: A Systematic Review of Clinical Characteristics. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 2009, 39, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Chaudhary, S.B.; Vives, M.J.; Basra, S.K.; Reiter, M.F. Postoperative spinal wound infections and postprocedural diskitis. J. Spinal Cord Med. 2007, 30, 441–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Duarte, R.M.; Vaccaro, A.R. Spinal infection: State of the art and management algorithm. Eur. Spine J. 2013, 22, 2787–2799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Jevtic, V. Vertebral infection. Eur. Radiol. Suppl. 2004, 14, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Khoo, L.A.L.; Heron, C.; Patel, U.; Given-Wilson, R.; Grundy, A.; Khaw, K.T.; Dundas, D. The diagnostic contribution of the frontal lumbar spine radiograph in community referred low back pain—A prospective study of 1030 patients. Clin. Radiol. 2003, 58, 606–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Leone, A.; Dell’atti, C.; Magarelli, N.; Colelli, P.; Balanika, A.; Casale, R.; Bonomo, L. Imaging of spondylodiscitis. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2012, 16, 8–19. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Desanto, J.; Ross, J.S. Spine infection/inflammation. Radiol. Clin. North Am. 2011, 49, 105–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tins, B.J.; Cassar-Pullicino, V.N. MR imaging of spinal infection. Semin. Musculoskelet. Radiol. 2004, 8, 215–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Grane, P.; Josephsson, A.; Seferlis, A.; Tullberg, T. Septic and aseptic post-operative discitis in the lumbar spine—Evaluation by MR imaging. Acta Radiol. 1998, 39, 108–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kawakyu-O’Connor, D.; Bordia, R.; Nicola, R. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Spinal Emergencies. Magn. Reson. Imaging Clin. North Am. 2016, 24, 325–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Danchaivijitr, N.; Temram, S.; Thepmongkhol, K.; Chiewvit, P. Diagnostic accuracy of MR imaging in tuberculous spondylitis. J. Med. Assoc. Thail. 2007, 90, 1581–1589. [Google Scholar]
  22. Rosen, R.S.; Fayad, L.; Wahl, R.L. Increased 18F-FDG uptake in degenerative disease of the spine: Characterization with 18F-FDG PET/CT. J. Nucl. Med. 2006, 47, 1274–1280. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hong, S.H.; Choi, J.Y.; Lee, J.W.; Kim, N.R.; Choi, J.A.; Kang, H.S. MR imaging assessment of the spine: Infection or an imitation? Radiographics 2009, 29, 599–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Di Martino, A.; Papapietro, N.; Lanotte, A.; Russo, F.; Vadalà, G.; Denaro, V. Spondylodiscitis: Standards of current treatment. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2012, 28, 689–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Diehn, F.E. Imaging of Spine Infection. Radiol. Clin. North Am. 2012, 50, 777–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Niccoli Asabella, A.; Di Palo, A.; Altini, C.; Ferrari, C.; Rubini, G. Multimodality Imaging in Tumor Angiogenesis: Present Status and Perspectives. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Stumpe, K.D.M.; Zanetti, M.; Weishaupt, D.; Hodler, J.; Boos, N.; Von Schulthess, G.K. FDG positron emission tomography for differentiation of degenerative and infectious endplate abnormalities in the lumbar spine detected on MR imaging. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2002, 179, 1151–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gratz, S.; Dörner, J.; Fischer, U.; Behr, T.M.; Béhé, M.; Altenvoerde, G.; Meller, J.; Grabbe, E.; Becker, W. 18F-FDG hybrid PET in patients with suspected spondylitis. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2002, 29, 516–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Modic, M.T.; Feiglin, D.H.; Piraino, D.W.; Boumphrey, F.; Weinstein, M.A.; Duchesneau, P.M.; Rehm, S. Vertebral osteomyelitis: Assessment using MR. Radiology 1985, 157, 157–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ledermann, H.P.; Schweitzer, M.E.; Morrison, W.B.; Carrino, J.A. MR imaging findings in spinal infections: Rules or myths? Radiology 2003, 228, 506–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kim, S.J.; Pak, K.; Kim, K.; Lee, J.S. Comparing the Diagnostic Accuracies of F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Spondylodiscitis: A Meta-analysis. Spine 2019, 44, E414–E422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Dauchy, F.A.; Dutertre, A.; Lawson-Ayayi, S.; de Clermont-Gallerande, H.; Fournier, C.; Zanotti-Fregonara, P.; Dutronc, H.; Vital, J.M.; Dupon, M.; Fernandez, P. Interest of [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for the diagnosis of relapse in patients with spinal infection: A prospective study. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2016, 22, 438–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Squaiella, C.C.; Ananias, R.Z.; Mussalem, J.S.; Braga, E.G.; Rodrigues, E.G.; Travassos, L.R.; Lopes, J.D.; Longo-Maugéri, I.M. In vivo and in vitro effect of killed Propionibacterium acnes and its purified soluble polysaccharide on mouse bone marrow stem cells and dendritic cell differentiation. Immunobiology 2006, 211, 105–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kumar, Y.; Gupta, N.; Chhabra, A.; Fukuda, T.; Soni, N.; Hayashi, D. Magnetic resonance imaging of bacterial and tuberculous spondylodiscitis with associated complications and non-infectious spinal pathology mimicking infections: A pictorial review. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2017, 18, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bassetti, M.; Merelli, M.; Di Gregorio, F.; Della Siega, P.; Screm, M.; Scarparo, C.; Righi, E. Higher fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) uptake in tuberculous compared to bacterial spondylodiscitis. Skelet. Radiol. 2017, 46, 777–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yago, Y.; Yukihiro, M.; Kuroki, H.; Katsuragawa, Y.; Kubota, K. Cold tuberculous abscess identified by FDG PET. Ann. Nucl. Med. 2005, 19, 515–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mazzie, J.P.; Brooks, M.K.; Gnerre, J. Imaging and Management of Postoperative Spine Infection. Neuroimaging Clin. North Am. 2014, 24, 365–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Skanjeti, A.; Penna, D.; Douroukas, A.; Cistaro, A.; Arena, V.; Leo, G.; Longo, G.; Traverso, A.; Belloro, S.; Pelosi, E. PET in the clinical work-up of patients with spondylodiscitis: A new tool for the clinician? Q. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2012, 56, 569. [Google Scholar]
Jcm 09 01581 g001 550
Figure 1. MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in a 55-year-old man with back pain, fever, and with positive microbiology culture (Staphilococcus aureus). Sagittal MRI images showed in T1-Weighted (A) and Short Time Inversion Recovery (B) sequences pathological signal in the L4-L5 intervertebral disc and bone marrow edema (arrows). 18F-FDG PET/CT images (C–E) showed pathological uptake in L4–L5 (Standardized Uptake Value 6.7) (arrows). The final diagnosis of spondylodiscitis was confirmed.
Figure 1. MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in a 55-year-old man with back pain, fever, and with positive microbiology culture (Staphilococcus aureus). Sagittal MRI images showed in T1-Weighted (A) and Short Time Inversion Recovery (B) sequences pathological signal in the L4-L5 intervertebral disc and bone marrow edema (arrows). 18F-FDG PET/CT images (C–E) showed pathological uptake in L4–L5 (Standardized Uptake Value 6.7) (arrows). The final diagnosis of spondylodiscitis was confirmed.
Jcm 09 01581 g001
Jcm 09 01581 g002 550
Figure 2. MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in a 62-year-old man with back pain and low-grade fever. Sagittal MRI T1-Weighted (A) and T2-Weighted (B) images showed low T1 and high T2 signal at the L1–L2 end plates (arrows). 18F-FDG PET/CT images (C–E) showed no significant FDG uptake in the spine (arrows). These findings confirmed severe degenerative disc disease.
Figure 2. MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in a 62-year-old man with back pain and low-grade fever. Sagittal MRI T1-Weighted (A) and T2-Weighted (B) images showed low T1 and high T2 signal at the L1–L2 end plates (arrows). 18F-FDG PET/CT images (C–E) showed no significant FDG uptake in the spine (arrows). These findings confirmed severe degenerative disc disease.
Jcm 09 01581 g002
Table
Table 1. Baseline characteristics.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics.
VariableNumber (Percentage)
Total Number of Patients56
Sex
Male39 (70%)
Female17 (30%)
Median age (years)63 (18–90)
Symptoms
Fever35 (62%)
Back pain38 (69%)
None18 (32%)
Etiological agent52 (93%)
Mycobacterium tuberculosis18 (35%)
Staphilococcus aureus14 (27%)
Escherichia coli4 (8%)
Haemophilus influenzae4 (8%)
Brucella3 (6%)
Propionibacterium acnes2 (3%)
Streptococcus epidermidis2 (3%)
Pseudomonas aeruginosa1 (2%)
Candida albicans1 (2%)
Aspergillus1 (2%)
Staphilococcus capitis1 (2%)
Granulicatella elegans1 (2%)
Not found4 (7%)
MRI district study
One19 (34%)
Cervical1 (5%)
Dorsal5 (26%)
Lumbar13 (69%)
Two12 (21%)
Cervical/dorsal1 (8%)
Dorsal/lumbar5 (42%)
Cervical/lumbar1 (8%)
Lumbar/sacral5 (42%)
Whole-spine25 (45%)
Table
Table 2. Agreement results in all patients and MRI subgroups.
Table 2. Agreement results in all patients and MRI subgroups.
κ95% Confidence Interval
All patients560.4560.11–0.80
Subgroup I (whole-spine MRI)25/56 (45%)0.4320.01–0.85
Subgroup II (two-district MRI)12/56 (21%)0.4290–1.00
Subgroup III (one-district MRI)19/56 (34%)10.79–1.00
Table
Table 3. Results in all patients and in MRI subgroups.
Table 3. Results in all patients and in MRI subgroups.
MRI (+)MRI (+)MRI (−)MRI (−)
18F-FDG PET/CT (+)18F-FDG PET/CT (−)18F-FDG PET/CT (+)18F-FDG PET/CT (−)
All patients (n = 56)47603
Subgroup I (whole-spine MRI) 19402
Subgroup II (two-districts MRI) 9201
Subgroup III (one-district MRI) 19000
Note: MRI (+), 18F-FDG PET/CT (+), positive concordance; MRI (+/−), 18F-FDG PET/CT (− /+), discordance; MRI (−), 18F-FDG PET/CT (−), negative concordance.
Table
Table 4. Results in all patients affected by Mycobacterium tuberculosis and MRI subgroups.
Table 4. Results in all patients affected by Mycobacterium tuberculosis and MRI subgroups.
MRI (+)MRI (+)MRI (−)MRI (−)
18F-FDG PET/CT (+)18F-FDG PET/CT (−)18F-FDG PET/CT (+)18F-FDG PET/CT (−)
All patients (n = 18)16200
Subgroup I (whole-spine MRI) 5200
Subgroup II (two-districts MRI) 3000
Subgroup III (one-district MRI) 8000
Note: MRI (+); 18F-FDG PET/CT (+): positive concordance. MRI (+/−); 18F-FDG PET/CT (− /+): discordance. MRI (−); 18F-FDG PET/CT (−): negative concordance.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Altini, C.; Lavelli, V.; Niccoli-Asabella, A.; Sardaro, A.; Branca, A.; Santo, G.; Ferrari, C.; Rubini, G. Comparison of the Diagnostic Value of MRI and Whole Body 18F-FDG PET/CT in Diagnosis of Spondylodiscitis. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 1581. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9051581

AMA Style

Altini C, Lavelli V, Niccoli-Asabella A, Sardaro A, Branca A, Santo G, Ferrari C, Rubini G. Comparison of the Diagnostic Value of MRI and Whole Body 18F-FDG PET/CT in Diagnosis of Spondylodiscitis. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020; 9(5):1581. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9051581

Chicago/Turabian Style

Altini, Corinna, Valentina Lavelli, Artor Niccoli-Asabella, Angela Sardaro, Alessia Branca, Giulia Santo, Cristina Ferrari, and Giuseppe Rubini. 2020. "Comparison of the Diagnostic Value of MRI and Whole Body 18F-FDG PET/CT in Diagnosis of Spondylodiscitis" Journal of Clinical Medicine 9, no. 5: 1581. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9051581

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop