Sovereignty of the Living Individual: Emerson and James on Politics and Religion
AbstractWilliam James and Ralph Waldo Emerson are both committed individualists. However, in what do their individualisms consist and to what degree do they resemble each other? This essay demonstrates that James’s individualism is strikingly similar to Emerson’s. By taking James’s own understanding of Emerson’s philosophy as a touchstone, I argue that both see individualism to consist principally in self-reliance, receptivity, and vocation. Putting these two figures’ understandings of individualism in comparison illuminates under-appreciated aspects of each figure, for example, the political implications of their individualism, the way that their religious individuality is politically engaged, and the importance of exemplarity to the politics and ethics of both of them. View Full-Text
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Bush, S.S. Sovereignty of the Living Individual: Emerson and James on Politics and Religion. Religions 2017, 8, 164.
Bush SS. Sovereignty of the Living Individual: Emerson and James on Politics and Religion. Religions. 2017; 8(9):164.Chicago/Turabian Style
Bush, Stephen S. 2017. "Sovereignty of the Living Individual: Emerson and James on Politics and Religion." Religions 8, no. 9: 164.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.