Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Evaluation of the Mechanism of the Gold Cluster Growth during Heating of the Composite Gold-Polytetrafluoroethylene Thin Film
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Improved Dispersion of Carbon Nanotubes in Polymers at High Concentrations
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 2
Issue 4
10.3390/nano2040348
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characterization of Hybrid Epoxy Nanocomposites

by
Shelly Simcha
,
Ana Dotan
*,
Samuel Kenig
and
Hanna Dodiuk
Shenkar College of Engineering and Design, Ramat Gan, 52562, Israel
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2012, 2(4), 348-365; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano2040348
Submission received: 4 September 2012 / Revised: 24 September 2012 / Accepted: 9 October 2012 / Published: 26 October 2012
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Composite Nanomaterials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study focused on the effect of Multi Wall Carbon Nanotubes (MWCNT) content and its surface treatment on thermo-mechanical properties of epoxy nanocomposites. MWCNTs were surface treated and incorporated into two epoxy systems. MWCNT's surface treatments were based on: (a) Titania coating obtained by sol-gel process and (b) a nonionic surfactant. Thermo-mechanical properties improvement was obtained following incorporation of treated MWCNT. It was noticed that small amounts of titania coated MWCNT (0.05 wt %) led to an increase in the glass transition temperature and stiffness. The best performance was achieved adding 0.3 wt % titania coated MWCNT where an increase of 10 °C in the glass transition temperature and 30% in storage modulus were obtained.

1. Introduction

Carbon Nanotubes (CNTs) have high potential to improve the properties of polymers. Due to their unique structure and high aspect ratio (length to diameter ratio, L/D), they possess an outstanding combination of exceptional mechanical, electrical and thermal properties in addition to flexibility and low density. Nevertheless, CNTs give rise to aggregation due to their high aspect ratio, flexibility, strong inter-tube Van Der Waals (VDW) attraction. The key factors for properties improvement of polymer/CNT nanocomposites are good dispersion and low agglomeration [1,2,3,4]. Consequently, two approaches have been proposed to disperse CNT in polymer matrix: application of stresses to break mechanically the agglomerates and obtain adequate dispersion and surface treatments of CNT based on chemical and physical methods [5,6,7,8,9,10]. According to Coleman et al. [3] well dispersed CNT is of utmost importance to maximize the interfacial area, to achieve efficient load transfer and minimize the presence of stress concentration centers. The frictional forces in polymer/CNT interfaces are expected to be large and, even if debonding has occurred, there will be significant load transfer from the polymer to the CNT, contrary to traditional fiber reinforced composite, where complete debonding implies failure of the composite [11,12,13,14]. According to Huang et al. [14] good dispersion can be seen at low concentrations of CNT and they re-aggregate after long period of time. At concentrations above the threshold (2-3 wt %) an elastic gel of entangled CNT has been observed. Furthermore, high concentration of CNT in epoxy increases resin viscosity and makes the dispersion of CNT extremely difficult [15]. Compatible surface treatment of CNT with the epoxy matrix has been found to give good stress transfer at the interface [4]. An effective dispersion of CNT requires overcome inter-tube attraction, separating CNT from aggregates and stabilizing them within the polymer matrix. In order to optimize the dispersion of CNTs in a polymer matrix chemical surface treatments can be used together with mechanical dispersion methods (ultrasonication, calendering, ball milling and shear mixing) [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Direct covalent treatment is associated with a change of hybridization from sp2 to sp3 and a simultaneous loss of ð-conjugation system in CNT. This is achieved by processes such as: fluorination, hydrogenation, cyclo-addition, oxidation and further derivative reactions. Defect sites on CNT surface like: open ends, holes in the sidewalls, irregularities in CNT scaffold, are utilized in order to tie up different functional groups. Oxidation can be obtained by wet chemical methods with concentrated acids or by milder approaches using the photo-oxidation, oxygen plasma, or gas phase treatment. [10,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. Covalent treatments greatly enhance the solubility of CNT and can provide multiple and strong bonding sites to the polymer matrix. It is believed that the improvements in nanocomposite properties are addressed in connection with improved dispersion and efficient load transfer via epoxy/CNT interface. However, this route can strongly influence the intrinsic characteristics of CNT and result in fragmentation and degradation of CNT structure, which further reflects in the overall performance of polymer/CNT nanocomposites [7,15].
Table 1 summarizes the main literature based experimental results and emphasizes the effect of covalent treatment for MWCNT on the thermo-mechanical properties of epoxy nanocomposites. It can be noticed that small amounts of covalent treated MWCNT (in most cases less than 1 wt %) have a positive effect on thermo-mechanical properties of epoxy nanocomposites. The results show an average increase of 40%-50% in modulus and strength and an average increase of 20% of Tg, compared to neat epoxy. Covalent treated MWCNT also improved the toughness of nanocomposites. In addition, amino-functionalization seems to be a usual surface treatment of CNT due to its high reactivity with epoxy resin [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. Non-covalent treatments are an efficient alternative route to functionalized CNT and yet preserving the intrinsic characteristics of CNT and ð-conjugation system. In addition, this route leads to higher efficiency of the functionalization, compare to covalent treatments where VDW active sites on CNT surface are limited (mostly at the defects and end caps). There are three main methods for non-covalent CNT treatments: (a) polymer wrapping; (b) surfactant adsorption and (c) endohedral method. Polymer wrapping process is achieved through the interactions and ð-ð stacking between CNT and polymer chains containing aromatic rings. The surfactants studied are classified according to the charge of their head groups: nonionic, anionic and cationic. In general, ionic surfactants have some advantages in water-soluble polymers, while nonionic surfactants are proposed in case of water-insoluble polymers. There are three possible surfactant-CNT interaction mechanisms: (a) electrostatic attraction or repulsion; (b) hydrogen bonding between the -O- of polyethoxylate and -OH and/or -COOH groups of CNT and; (c) hydrophobic and π-π interactions. According to Vaisman et al. [8] it is important to achieve mechanical dispersion of CNT prior to surfactant adsorption in order to obtain an efficient de-agglomeration of CNT. In the “endohedral” method guest atoms or molecules are inserted in the inner cavity of CNT through defect sites localized at the ends or on the sidewalls [10,39,40]. Surfactants composed of hydrophilic polyethoxyl group (including polyethoxyl chain and hydroxyl groups) and hydrophobic group (4-(1,1,1,3-tetramethylbutyl)-phenyl group) bridge between CNT and polymers [39,40]. According to Bai et al. [40] adsorption of Triton X-series (i.e., Triton X-305, Triton X-165, Triton X-114, Triton X-100) surfactants facilitates the suspension of MWCNT in water mainly by hydrophobic and π-π interactions mechanisms. Furthermore, Triton X-series with shorter hydrophilic chains showed higher suspendability of MWCNT, which could be affected by the surfactant adsorption and, also possibly through the formation of larger micelles both in surfactant solution and on MWCNT surface at the surfactant concentration above the CMC. Rastogi et al. [41] investigated the dispersion of MWCNT in aqueous medium using four different surfactants. It was concluded that Triton X-100 (Polyoxyethylene octyl phenyl ether) has the highest dispersing power by virtue of its benzene ring. Molecules having a benzene ring structure adsorb more strongly to the graphitic surface due to π-π stacking type interaction. In addition, MWCNT-to surfactant ratio has shown to affect the MWCNT dispersion significantly. The poor dispersion at high surfactant loading was concluded to be caused by a possible mechanism of flocculation. Flocculation of CNT occurs when portions of surfactant molecules interact with others surfactant molecules on neighboring CNT, thus bridging between CNT and avoid dispersion. Coating of CNT surface is an additional method based on non-covalent treatments. CNT was coated with a precursor of titania by sol-gel or hydrothermal methods [42,43,44,45]. In order to improve the affinity of titania coated CNT to a polymer it can be modified with a coupling agent such as silane. Sol-gel coatings can be obtained by a simple process based on hydrolysis and polycondensation reactions carried usually at room temperature [42,43,44,45,46,47].
Table 2 summarizes the main literature based experimental results emphasizing the effect of different non-covalent treated MWCNT on thermo-mechanical properties of epoxy nanocomposites. It can be concluded that small amounts of non-covalent treated MWCNT (1 wt %) have a positive effect on thermo-mechanical properties of epoxy nanocomposites. An average increase of 50%-60% in modulus and strength and 20% in Tg could be noticed. Non-covalent treated MWCNT also improved the toughness of nanocomposites [48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56].
Table
Table 1. Effect of covalent treatment of MWCNT on the thermo-mechanical properties of epoxy nanocomposites.
Table 1. Effect of covalent treatment of MWCNT on the thermo-mechanical properties of epoxy nanocomposites.
Covalent treatmentMechanical dispersionSolvent dispersionContent (wt %)Maximum increase in thermo-mechanical properties compared to neat epoxy (%)RemarksRef.
ModulusS,T,FStrengthT,FTgToughness
Amino groupsStirred, sonicated 0.01-118.95F120.41F10.53 Aromatic and less aliphatic amino group structure is better for mechanical reinforcement.15,28
Sonicated 0.05-0.75 29.69 Suspension of MWCNT was performed within the hardener.29
Stirred, sonicatedAcetone0.1-2 51T22.3893 (kJ/m2)Amino groups can act as a curing agent and lead to a more highly cross-linked structure.30
Stirred 53S26.32F5.34 Amine functionalization improved curing kinetics. MWCNT content was 3 phr of epoxy resin.31
TETA Tri ethylene tetra amineStirred, sonicatedEthyl alcohol0.2-122F29F 84 (kJ/m2) 32
Stirred, sonicated 0.05-0.5 18.6497 (kJ/m2)Epoxy contain 0.05 wt % TETA-MWCNT kept near 50% light transmittance of the neat epoxy.33
Polyetheramine (JeffamineT-403)Stirred, sonicatedChloroform127.51T104.17T Mechanical properties of nanocomposites based rubbery system (Tg = 25 °C) was higher compared to glassy system (Tg = 80 °C). Suspention of MWCNT was performed within the hardener.16
OxidationSonicatedAcetone175S (HNO3 treatment) The increase of surface oxygen per type of treatment is: HCl< NH4OH/H2O2 < piranha < refluxed HNO3. Higher degree of oxidation leads to higher degradation of the CNT shell.27
Plasma oxidationSonicated 12. 33T123T Nanocomposites containing plasma treated MWCNT showed the best mechanical and rheological behavior, compared to those containing acid and amine treated MWCNT.34
Plasma maleic anhydrideShear mixed, sonicated 0.1-1100T50T27 Suspension of MWCNT was performed within the hardener.35
SilaneSonicatedEthanol0.05-0.524.14F14.40F8.8410.17(MPa m2) 36
EpoxyStirred, sonicatedAcetone0.1-190T45T16.67 37
PEIStirred, sonicatedAcetone1 PEI was covalently and non-covalently attached to MWCNT. Covalently treated MWCNT exhibited higher storage modulus compare to non-covalently treated and untreated MWCNT.38
S for storage, T for tensile and F for flexural.
Table
Table 2. Effect of non-covalent treated MWCNT on the thermo-mechanical properties of epoxy nanocomposites.
Table 2. Effect of non-covalent treated MWCNT on the thermo-mechanical properties of epoxy nanocomposites.
Non-covalent treatmentMechanical dispersionSolvent dispersionContent (wt %)Maximum increase in thermo-mechanical properties compared to neat epoxy (%)RemarksRef.
ModulusS,T,FStrengthT,FTgToughness
Sodium salt of 2-aminoethanolSonicated 0.126S Improvement in electrical conductivity with a percolation threshold of 0.05 wt %48
Triton X-100SonicatedAcetone0.025-0.2524.14F17.92F27.5951.51 (kJ/m2)Triton X-100 (10 CMC) treatment showed the best performance.39
Silane modified Titania coating Acetone0.25-185.03F 58.57T93.04F 115.90T 45
Polyaniline coatingSonicatedToluene0.5-1052T 150S61T There is an optimal value of polyaniline concentration above which mechanical properties of nanocomposites decreased.49
BCP (Disperbyk-2150)Stirred, sonicatedEthanol0.2550T50T The BCP act as dispersing agent: the lyophobic (solvent repelling) blocks adsorb onto the surface of CNT, while the lyophilic (solvent attracting) blocks are swollen by the solution.50,51
0.5-1 23.21
Titania coatingHomogenized 0.05-0.331.8S Previous study. Tan delta curves below the Tg of nanocomposites showed increase in toughness without dependency in MWCNT treatment.
Sonicated 0.05-0.327S 10 Current study. MWCNT treated with Triton X-100 didn’t show thermo-mechanical improvement.
S for storage, T for tensile and F for flexural.
Table
Table 3. Epoxy systems [57,58,59].
Table 3. Epoxy systems [57,58,59].
Epoxy systemMolecular structureTg (°C)
ResinCuring agentDiluent
1. Epon 828/Jeffamine T-403 (5/2) Nanomaterials 02 00348 i001 Nanomaterials 02 00348 i002 ~70
2. LY556/Amine hardener A/DY026(20/5/2) Nanomaterials 02 00348 i003Amine hardener A Confidential Amine value: 72-90 gr/eq Nanomaterials 02 00348 i004~150
In the current study, Multi Wall Carbon Nanotubes (MWCNT) were surface treated and incorporated into epoxy matrix. One of the MWCNT treatments was based on a titania (TiO2) coating obtained by sol-gel process. The surfactant Polyoxyethylene octyl phenyl ether (Triton X-100) was also used as a surface treatment. The study focused on the influence of MWCNT content and surface treatment on thermo-mechanical properties of the nanocomposites. The objective of this work was to characterize the properties of epoxy CNT nanocomposites based to be used as composite's matrix for filament winding technology. The main factor in selecting a resin for filament winding is adequate viscosity. Low viscosity is desirable to help wet the fibers, spread the fibers and lower the friction over the guides during the winding process.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

The epoxy systems that have been utilized were based on diglycidyl ether of bis-phenol A (DGEBPA) and detailed in Table 3.
MWCNTs have been incorporated into the two different epoxy systems. MWCNTs were coated with titania and Triton X-100 (Table 4). Titania coating was obtained according to procedure of Nemeth et al. [42] through the dispersion of 0.5 gr of MWCNT in 500 gr of isopropanol; 1.5 gr of titanium (IV) butoxide was added to the resulting dispersion; 250 gr of distilled water was added into the mixture; and the resulting mixture was stirred for 48 h; the MWCNT were filtered, dried, and calcined at 300 °C for 1 h. The surface treatment with Triton X-100 was obtained by dispersing MWCNT with Triton X-100 in ethanol, the resulting mixture was mechanically blended for 10 h and ultrasonic mixed for 1 h, the mixture was left for 36 h at room temperature, for swelling and dried for 8 h at 80 °C. Nanoparticles were dispersed in the resin (Part A), and sonicated for 10 min. Curing agent was added and degassing was applied using a vacuum system for 3 h. The resin systems were cured according to manufacturers prescribed requirements.
Table
Table 4. List of materials [60,61,62,63].
Table 4. List of materials [60,61,62,63].
MaterialsManufacturerChemical nameMolecular structure
MWCNT NC7000Nanocyl
Precursor of titaniaSigma-Aldrichtitanium(IV) butoxide Nanomaterials 02 00348 i005
Triton X-100Sigma-Aldrich Nanomaterials 02 00348 i006

2.2. Characterization Methods

Rheology properties were measured using a Dynamic Parallel Plate Rheometer (TA AR2000) using an oscillatory shear mode at a temperature range of 25-70 °C, constant strain of 2%, frequency of 1 Hz and heating rate of 5 °C/min. Thermo-mechanical properties were measured using a DMA analyzer (TA Q800) using single cantilever and three point bending mode, constant amplitude of 15 µm, at a heating rate of 2 °C/min and a frequency of 1 Hz. Microscopy images were obtained using contact mode AFM (Autoprobe CP Research, ThermoMicroscopes) and SEM (Zeiss ULTRA 55, Oberkochen).

3. Results and Discussion

Results of complex viscosity |η*| of Epon 828/MWCNT suspensions before curing were obtained by Dynamic Parallel Plate Rheometry and can be seen in Table 5 and Figure 1. It can be noticed that addition of 0.05 wt % untreated or treated MWCNT did not change significantly the complex viscosity of Epon 828 at the temperature range tested. At higher contents of MWCNT only titania coated MWCNT suspensions maintained the low viscosity of neat epoxy matrix. According to Abdalla et al. [17] higher viscosity indicates of either a better dispersed system or stronger interfacial interactions. Conversely, Song et al. [64], claimed that poorly dispersed CNT in epoxy resin have a more solid-like behavior and leads to higher complex viscosity. In the current study, at 0.3 wt % MWCNT loading, untreated MWCNTs exhibited the highest complex viscosity and the lowest thermo-mechanical properties after curing. These findings can only suggest that untreated MWCNTs lead to a relatively poor dispersion, while the titania coated MWCNTs lead to better dispersion. In addition, it can be assumed that titania coating reduced the VDW interaction between MWCNTs themselves by neutralizing the polar groups known to be present at MWCNT surface. In order to maintain the low viscosity the content of untreated and Triton X-100 treated MWCNTs should be lower than 0.3 wt %.
Table
Table 5. Complex viscosity |η*| of Epon 828/MWCNT suspensions before curing.
Table 5. Complex viscosity |η*| of Epon 828/MWCNT suspensions before curing.
SampleAdditive (wt %)Complex viscosity (Pa.s) @25 °CComplex viscosity variation (%)
Untreated MWCNT0.0512.758
0.3064.24442
Titania coated MWCNT0.0511.70−1
0.3012.626
Triton X-100 MWCNT0.0512.253
0.3044.58276
Nanomaterials 02 00348 g001 1024
Figure 1. Effect of MWCNT content on the complex viscosity of Epon 828 before curing.
Figure 1. Effect of MWCNT content on the complex viscosity of Epon 828 before curing.
Nanomaterials 02 00348 g001
Thermo-mechanical properties of Epon 828/Jeffamine T-403 nanocomposites are depicted in Table 6 and Figure 2. It can be seen that addition of treated MWCNTs caused a higher crosslink density compared to neat resin, as could be noticed by the increase of approximately 10% in the Tg of the nanocomposites. Furthermore, treated MWCNT induced an increase in thermal stability of nanocomposites in the rubbery state of storage modulus (Figure 3 b,e). According to Ma et al. [36] this behavior can be explained in terms of interfacial bonding. The improved interfacial bonding reduces the mobility of the matrix around the MWCNT, increasing thermal stability at elevated temperatures. Simultaneous increase of approximately10% in storage modulus and Tg can be seen for 0.05 wt % titania coated MWCNT and 0.3 wt % Triton X-100 MWCNT. Nanocomposites containing titania coated MWCNT showed the best thermo-mechanical properties. This finding can be due to the hydrophilic and polar nature of titania. Another explanation can be the possible chemical reaction between OH groups known present on CNTs surface and titanium precursor molecules [42]. It should be mentioned that the addition of treated MWCNT did not lead to toughening effects.
Table
Table 6. Epoxy system 1: Thermo-mechanical properties of nanocomposites.
Table 6. Epoxy system 1: Thermo-mechanical properties of nanocomposites.
SampleAdditive (wt %)Storage modulus (GPa) @25 °CStorage modulus variation (%)Loss modulus peak (°C)Loss modulus peak variation (%)
Epon 828/Jeffamine T-40302.33 74
Untreated MWCNT0.051.99−1573−1
0.101.62−3068−8
0.301.75−25785
Titania Coated MWCNT0.052.5811797
0.102.3308312
0.302.08−118211
Triton X-100 MWCNT0.051.72−26797
0.101.98−15808
0.302.528819
Nanomaterials 02 00348 g002 1024
Figure 2. Effect of MWCNT content on thermo-mechanical properties of nanocomposites (Epoxy system 1).
Figure 2. Effect of MWCNT content on thermo-mechanical properties of nanocomposites (Epoxy system 1).
Nanomaterials 02 00348 g002
Table 7 and Figure 3 show the thermo-mechanical properties of LY556/Amine hardener A/DY026 nanocomposites. An increase in the Tg of the samples containing titania coated and untreated MWCNTs was noticed, most probably as a result of a higher crosslink density. Moreover, an increase in storage modulus has been also observed through the whole temperature range investigated. Maximum increase of 10% in Tg and 30% in storage modulus was achieved for nanocomposites containing 0.3 wt % titania coated MWCNTs. The unexpected improvement in thermo-mechanical properties of nanocomposites containing untreated MWCNTs can be explained by the relatively low viscosity of LY556 resin. This characteristic imparts low shear forces during sonication resulting in less damage to the MWCNT structure. In addition, a relatively low viscosity of the matrix before curing favors the formation of uniform nanocomposites [16]. These explanations can also relate to the better results obtained for nanocomposites containing titania coated MWCNTs of epoxy system 2 compared to epoxy system 1. It should be mentioned that toughening effects have not been observed.
Table
Table 7. Epoxy system 2: Thermo-mechanical properties of nanocomposites.
Table 7. Epoxy system 2: Thermo-mechanical properties of nanocomposites.
SampleAdditive (wt %)Storage modulus (GPa) @25 °CStorage modulus variation (%)Loss modulus peak (°C)Loss modulus peak variation (%)
LY556/Amine hardener A/DY02602.07 150
Untreated MWCNT0.051.97-51607
0.102.40161607
0.302.58251575
Titania Coated MWCNT0.052.33131649
0.102.40161564
0.302.632716510
Nanomaterials 02 00348 g003 1024
Figure 3. Effect of MWCNT content on thermo-mechanical properties of nanocomposites (Epoxy system 2).
Figure 3. Effect of MWCNT content on thermo-mechanical properties of nanocomposites (Epoxy system 2).
Nanomaterials 02 00348 g003
Figure 4 and Table 8 show SEM and AFM images of fractured surface morphologies of nanocomposites contain 0.3 wt % MWCNT based on epoxy systems 1 and 2. Nanocomposites containing titania coated MWCNT and uncoated MWCNT have shown a fracture mechanism known as crack front bowing, that can clearly be seen from SEM image in Figure 4. From AFM images (Table 8) a crack pinning mechanisms was noticed for the titania coated MWCNT nanocomposites, a toughening mechanism that indicates the strong interaction between the carbon nanotubes and the epoxy matrix through the coating. The toughening effect could not be clearly seen in the thermo-mechanical results due to the poor dispersion in the matrix, in all cases.
Nanomaterials 02 00348 g004 1024
Figure 4. SEM image of epoxy system 1 with 0.3% untreated MWCNT showing a “crack front bowing” toughening mechanism.
Figure 4. SEM image of epoxy system 1 with 0.3% untreated MWCNT showing a “crack front bowing” toughening mechanism.
Nanomaterials 02 00348 g004
Table
Table 8. AFM images of fractured surface morphologies of nanocomposites contain 0.3 wt% MWCNT.
Table 8. AFM images of fractured surface morphologies of nanocomposites contain 0.3 wt% MWCNT.
AFM images (contact mode; 5 × 5 µm)SampleEpoxy System *
3D2D
Nanomaterials 02 00348 i007 Nanomaterials 02 00348 i008Neat1
Nanomaterials 02 00348 i009 Nanomaterials 02 00348 i010Untreated MWCNT
Nanomaterials 02 00348 i011 Nanomaterials 02 00348 i012Titania coated MWCNT
Nanomaterials 02 00348 i013 Nanomaterials 02 00348 i014Neat2
Nanomaterials 02 00348 i015 Nanomaterials 02 00348 i016Untreated MWCNT
* Epoxy system 1: Epon 828/Jeffamine T-403; Epoxy system 2: LY556/Amine hardener A/DY026.
Nanomaterials 02 00348 g005 1024
Figure 5. SEM images of titania coated and non-treated MWCNT nanocomposites.
Figure 5. SEM images of titania coated and non-treated MWCNT nanocomposites.
Nanomaterials 02 00348 g005
Figure 5 depicts selected scanning electron microscopy images of surface fractured nanocomposites (cryogenic fracture) showing higher amounts of broken nanotubes in epoxy system 1 for both untreated and titania coated MWCNT samples. Broken nanotubes at the fracture surface indicate a strong interfacial strength. Longer nanotubes could be seen in SEM images of the epoxy system 2, indicating a pull-out mechanism, related to a weaker nanotube/matrix interface. According Gojny et al. [4] a fracture of the outer layer and a telescopic pull-out of the inner tube(s) can occur due to strong interfacial bonding. Accordingly it is possible that some images of pulled-out MWCNTs in Figure 5 represent a nanotube inner layer pull-out, implying on a strong interfacial bonding.

4. Conclusions

It can be concluded from the experimental results that titania coating obtained from a sol-gel method is a preferable surface treatment for enhancement of thermo-mechanical properties of epoxy nanocomposites, without causing a significant increase in viscosity, a crucial parameter for filament winding resin systems. A maximum increase of about 10% in Tg has been achieved for the two epoxy matrices containing 0.05-0.3 wt % titania coated MWCNT. An increase of 30% in the storage modulus has been achieved for LY556/Amine hardener A/DY026 matrix containing 0.3 wt % titania coated MWCNT.

References

  1. Thostenson, E.T.; Ren, Z.; Chou, T.W. Advances in the science and technology of carbon nanotubes and their composites: A review. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2001, 61, 1899–1912. [Google Scholar]
  2. Shen, J.; Huang, W.; Wu, L.; Hua, Y.; Ye, M. Study on amino-functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2007, 464, 151–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Coleman, J.N.; Khan, U.; Blau, W.J.; Gun’ko, Y.K. Small but strong: A review of the mechanical properties of carbon nanotube-polymer composites. Carbon 2006, 44, 1624–1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gojny, F.H.; Wichmann, M.H.G.; Fiedler, B.; Schulte, K. Influence of different carbon nanotubes on the mechanical properties of epoxy matrix composites—A comparative study. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2005, 65, 2300–2313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Paradise, M.; Goswami, T. Carbon nanotubes—Production and industrial applications. Mater. Des. 2007, 28, 1477–1489. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bokobza, L. Multiwall carbon nanotube elastomeric composites: A review. Polymer 2007, 48, 4907–4920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bose, S.; Khare, R.A.; Moldenaers, P. Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of various types of pre-treatments of carbon nanotubes on the properties of polymer/carbon nanotubes composites: A critical review. Polymer 2010, 51, 975–993. [Google Scholar]
  8. Vaisman, L.; Wagner, H.D.; Marom, G. The role of surfactants in dispersion of carbon nanotubes. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006, 128-130, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Szleifer, I.; Yerushalmi-Rozen, R. Polymers and carbon nanotubes—Dimensionality, interactions and nanotechnology. Polymer 2005, 46, 7803–7818. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ma, P.C.; Siddiqui, N.A.; Marom, G.; Kim, J.K. Dispersion and functionalization of carbon nanotubes for polymer-based nanocomposites: A review. Composites: Part A 2010, 41, 1345–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Thostenson, E.T.; Li, C.; Chou, T.W. Nanocomposites in context. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2005, 65, 491–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, H.; Jacobs, O.; Wu, W.; Rudiger, G.; Schadel, B. Effect of dispersion method on tribological properties of carbon nanotube reinforced epoxy resin composites. Polym. Test. 2007, 26, 351–360. [Google Scholar]
  13. Desai, A.V.; Haque, M.A. Mechanics of the interface for carbon nanotube-polymer composites. Thin-Walled Struct. 2005, 43, 1787–1803. [Google Scholar]
  14. Huang, Y.Y.; Terentjev, E.M. Dispersion and rheology of carbon nanotubes in polymers. Int. J. Mater. Form. 2008, 1, 63–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shen, J.; Huang, W.; Wu, L.; Hu, Y.; Ye, M. The reinforcement role of different amino-functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes in epoxy nanocomposites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2007, 67, 3041–3050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, L.; Wagner, H.D. Rubbery and glassy epoxy resins reinforced with carbon nanotubes. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2005, 65, 1861–1868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Abdalla, M.; Dean, D.; Adibempe, D.; Nyairo, E.; Robinson, P.; Thompson, G. The effect of interfacial chemistry on molecular mobility and morphology of multiwalled carbon nanotubes epoxy nanocomposite. Polymer 2007, 48, 5662–5670. [Google Scholar]
  18. Ahir, S.V.; Huang, Y.Y.; Terentjev, E.M. Polymers with aligned carbon nanotubes: Active composite materials. Polymer 2008, 49, 3841–3854. [Google Scholar]
  19. Bittmann, B.; Haupert, F.; Schlarb, A.K. Ultrasonic dispersion of inorganic nanoparticles in epoxy resin. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2009, 16, 622–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Isayev, A.I.; Kumar, R.; Lewis, T.M. Ultrasound assisted twin screw extrusion of polymer-nanocomposites containing carbon nanotubes. Polymer 2009, 50, 250–260. [Google Scholar]
  21. Bittmann, B.; Haupert, F.; Schlarb, A.K. Preparation of TiO2/epoxy nanocomposites by ultrasonic dispersion and their structure property relationship. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2011, 18, 120–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hilding, J.; Grulke, E.A.; Zhang, Z.G.; Lockwood, F. Dispersion of carbon nanotubes in liquids. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 2003, 24, 1–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Thostenson, E.T.; Chou, T.W. Processing-structure-multi-functional property relationship in carbon nanotube/epoxy composites. Carbon 2006, 44, 3022–3029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ma, P.C.; Tang, B.Z.; Kim, J.K. Effect of CNT decoration with silver nanoparticles on electrical conductivity of CNT-polymer composites. Carbon 2008, 46, 1497–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, B.J.; Ma, P.C.; Chow, W.S.; To, C.K.; Tang, B.Z.; Kim, J.K. Correlations between percolation threshold, dispersion state, and aspect ratio of carbon nanotubes. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2007, 17, 3207–3215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Datsyuk, V.; Kalyva, M.; Papagelis, K.; Parthenios, J.; Tasis, D.; Siokou, A.; Kallitsis, I.; Galiotis, C. Chemical oxidation of multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Carbon 2008, 46, 833–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Špitalsky´, Z.; Krontiras, C.A.; Georga, S.N.; Galiotis, C. Effect of oxidation treatment of multiwalled carbon nanotubes on the mechanical and electrical properties of their epoxy composites. Composites: Part A 2009, 40, 778–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Shen, J.; Huang, W.; Wu, L.; Hu, Y.; Ye, M. Thermo-physical properties of epoxy nanocomposites reinforced with amino-functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Composites: Part A 2007, 38, 1331–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gojny, F.H.; Schulte, K. Functionalization effect on the thermo-mechanical behaviour of multi-wall carbon nanotube/epoxy-composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2004, 64, 2303–2308. [Google Scholar]
  30. Chen, X.; Wang, J.; Lin, M.; Zhong, W.; Feng, T.; Chen, X.; Chen, J.; Xue, F. Mechanical and thermal properties of epoxy nanocomposites reinforced with amino-functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2008, 492, 236–242. [Google Scholar]
  31. Choi, W.J.; Powell, R.L.; Kim, D.S. Curing behavior and properties of epoxy nanocomposites with amine functionalized multiwall carbon nanotubes. Polym. Compos. 2009, 30, 415–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yang, K.; Gu, M.; Guo, Y.; Pan, X.; Mu, G. Effects of carbon nanotube functionalization on the mechanical and thermal properties of epoxy composites. Carbon 2009, 47, 1723–1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, J.; Fang, Z.; Gu, A.; Xu, L.; Liu, F. Effect of amino-functionalization of multi-walled carbon nanotubes on the dispersion with epoxy resin matrix. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2006, 100, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kim, J.A.; Seong, D.G.; Kang, T.J.; Youn, J.R. Effects of surface modification on rheological and mechanical properties of CNT/epoxy composites. Carbon 2006, 44, 1898–1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tseng, C.H.; Wang, C.C.; Chen, C.Y. Functionalizing carbon nanotubes by plasma modification for the preparation of covalent-integrated epoxy composites. Chem. Mater. 2007, 19, 308–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ma, P.C.; Kim, J.K.; Tang, B.Z. Effects of silane functionalization on the properties of carbon nanotube/epoxy nanocomposites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2007, 67, 2965–2972. [Google Scholar]
  37. Zou, W.; Du, Z.; Liu, Y.; Yang, X.; Li, H.; Zhang, C. Functionalization of MWNTs using polyacryloyl chloride and the properties of CNT-epoxy matrix nanocomposites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2008, 68, 3259–3264. [Google Scholar]
  38. Liu, L.; Etika, K.C.; Liao, K.S.; Hess, L.A.; Bergbreiter, D.E.; Grunlan, J.C. Comparison of covalently and noncovalently functionalized carbon nanotubes in epoxy. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2009, 30, 627–632. [Google Scholar]
  39. Geng, Y.; Liu, M.Y.; Li, J.; Shi, X.M.; Kim, J.K. Effects of surfactant treatment on mechanical and electrical properties of CNT/epoxy nanocomposites. Composites Part A 2008, 39, 1876–1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bai, Y.; Lin, D.; Wu, F.; Wang, Z.; Xing, B. Adsorption of triton X-series surfactants and its role in stabilizing multi-walled carbon nanotube suspensions. Chemosphere 2010, 79, 362–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rastogi, R.; Kaushal, R.; Tripathi, S.K.; Sharma, A.L.; Kaur, I.; Bharadwaj, L.M. Comparative study of carbon nanotube dispersion using surfactants. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2008, 328, 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Nemeth, Z.; Dieker, C.; Kukovecz, K.; Alexander, D.; Forro, L.; Seo, J.W.; Hernadi, K. Preparation of homogeneous titania coating on the surface of MWNT. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2011, 71, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Jitianu, A.; Cacciaguerra, T.; Benoit, R.; Delpeux, S.; Beguin, F.; Bonnamy, S. Synthesis and characterization of carbon nanotubes-TiO2 nanocomposites. Carbon 2004, 42, 1147–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Jitianu, A.; Cacciaguerra, T.; Berger, M.H.; Benoit, R.; Beguin, F.; Bonnamy, S. New carbon multiwall nanotubes—TiO2 nanocomposites obtained by the sol-gel method. J. Non-Crystalline Solids 2004, 345-346, 596–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ma, C.C.M.; Yuen, S.M.; Chuang, C.Y. TiO2-coated CNT reinforced polymer composite and methods of preparation thereof. United States Patent Application 20080242785, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  46. Hernadi, K.; Ljubovic, E.; Seo, J.W.; Forro, L. Synthesis of MWNT-based composite materials with inorganic coating. Acta Materialia 2003, 51, 1447–1452. [Google Scholar]
  47. Yuen, S.M.; Ma, C.C.M.; Chuang, C.Y.; Hsiao, Y.H.; Chiang, C.L.; Yu, A.D. Preparation, morphology, mechanical and electrical properties of TiO2 coated multiwalled carbon nanotube/epoxy composites. Composites Part A 2008, 39, 119–125. [Google Scholar]
  48. Li, X.; Wong, S.Y.; Tjiu, W.C.; Lyons, B.P.; Oh, S.A.; He, C.B. Non-covalent functionalization of multi walled carbon nanotubes and their application for conductive composites. Carbon 2008, 46, 818–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Spitalsky, Z.; Matejka, L.; Slouf, M.; Konyushenko, E.N.; Kovarova, J.; Zemek, J.; Kotek, J. Modification of carbon nanotubes and its effect on properties of carbon nanotube/epoxy nanocomposites. Polym. Compos. 2009, 30, 1378–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, Q.; Zaiser, M.; Koutsos, V. Carbon nanotube/epoxy resin composites using a block copolymer as a dispersing agent. Phys. Stat. Sol. 2004, 201, 89–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Cho, J.; Daniel, I.M. Reinforcement of carbon/epoxy composites with multi-wall carbon nanotubes and dispersion enhancing block copolymers. Scripta Materialia 2008, 58, 533–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Luis, J.; Almeida Prado, S.A.S.; Sriyai, M.; Schulte, K. Titania-doped multi-walled carbon nanotubes epoxy composites: Enhanced dispersion and synergistic effects in multiphase nanocomposites. Polymer 2008, 49, 5105–5112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sui, G.; Zhong, W.H.; Liu, M.C.; Wu, P.H. Enhancing mechanical properties of an epoxy resin using “liquid nano-reinforcements”. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2009, 512, 139–142. [Google Scholar]
  54. Li, J.; Wong, P.S.; Kim, J.K. Hybrid nanocomposites containing carbon nanotubes and graphite nanoplatelets. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2008, 483-484, 660–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yang, S.Y.; Lin, W.N.; Huang, Y.L.; Tien, H.W.; Wang, J.Y.; Ma, C.C.M.; Li, S.M.; Wang, Y.S. Synergetic effects of graphene platelets and carbon nanotubes on the mechanical and thermal properties of epoxy composites. Carbon 2010, 49, 793–803. [Google Scholar]
  56. Kim, K.S.; Rhee, K.Y.; Lee, K.H.; Byun, J.H.; Park, S.J. Rheological behaviors and mechanical properties of graphite nanoplate/carbon nanotube-filled epoxy nanocomposites. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2010, 16, 572–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. EPON™ Resin 828. Available online: http://www.momentive.com/Products/TechnicalDataSheet.aspx?id=3942 (accessed on 20 October 2012).
  58. Jeffamine T-403. Available online: http://www.huntsman.com/portal/page/portal/performance_products/Media%20Library/a_MC348531CFA3EA9A2E040EBCD2B6B7B06/Products_MC348531D0B9FA9A2E040EBCD2B6B7B06/Amines_MC348531D0BECA9A2E040EBCD2B6B7B06/Polyetheramines%20%20%20JE_MC348531D0E07A9A2E040EBCD2B6B7B06/Triamine%20products_MC348531D0EEEA9A2E040EBCD2B6B7B06/files/jeffamine_t_403_us_2_08.pdf (accessed on 24 October 2012).
  59. Goodman, S.H. Handbook of Thermoset Plastics, 2nd ed; Noyes Publications: New Jersey, N, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  60. Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes Nanocyl 7000. Available online: http://www.nanocyl.com/Products-Solutions/Products/Nanocyl-NC-7000-Thin-Multiwall-Carbon-Nanotubes (accessed on 24 October 2012).
  61. POSS Information. Available online: http://www.hybridplastics.com/products/catalog.htm (accessed on 24 October 2012).
  62. Triton X-100. Available online: http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/search?interface=All&term=Polyoxyethylene+octyl+phenyl+ether&lang=en&region=IL&focus=product&N=0+220003048+219853146+219853286&mode=match%20partialmax (accessed on 24 October 2012).
  63. ASTM International, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Section 8, Volume 08.02, Plastics (II): D 2383–D 4322, ASTM, Easton, MD, USA, 2002; 594–600.
  64. Song, Y.S.; Youn, J.R. Influence of dispersion states of carbon nanotubes on physical properties of epoxy nanocomposites. Carbon 2005, 43, 1378–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Simcha, S.; Dotan, A.; Kenig, S.; Dodiuk, H. Characterization of Hybrid Epoxy Nanocomposites. Nanomaterials 2012, 2, 348-365. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano2040348

AMA Style

Simcha S, Dotan A, Kenig S, Dodiuk H. Characterization of Hybrid Epoxy Nanocomposites. Nanomaterials. 2012; 2(4):348-365. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano2040348

Chicago/Turabian Style

Simcha, Shelly, Ana Dotan, Samuel Kenig, and Hanna Dodiuk. 2012. "Characterization of Hybrid Epoxy Nanocomposites" Nanomaterials 2, no. 4: 348-365. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano2040348

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop