Next Article in Journal
Enhanced Efficiency in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells by Electron Transport and Light Scattering on Freestanding TiO2 Nanotube Arrays
Next Article in Special Issue
Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting Properties of Ti-Ni-Si-O Nanostructures on Ti-Ni-Si Alloy
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of the Effects of Nanoparticle Mixtures on Brassica Seed Germination and Bacterial Bioluminescence Activity Based on the Theory of Probability
Previous Article in Special Issue
Study of the Photodynamic Activity of N-Doped TiO2 Nanoparticles Conjugated with Aluminum Phthalocyanine
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ti-Based Biomedical Material Modified with TiOx/TiNx Duplex Bioactivity Film via Micro-Arc Oxidation and Nitrogen Ion Implantation

1
Institute of Advanced Wear & Corrosion Resistant and Functional Materials, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
2
Analytical and Testing Center, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2017, 7(10), 343; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano7100343
Submission received: 29 September 2017 / Revised: 16 October 2017 / Accepted: 18 October 2017 / Published: 23 October 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue ZnO and TiO2 Based Nanostructures)

Abstract

:
Titanium (Ti) and Ti-based alloy are widely used in the biomedical field owing to their excellent mechanical compatibility and biocompatibility. However, the bioinert bioactivity and biotribological properties of titanium limit its clinical application in implants. In order to improve the biocompatibility of titanium, we modified its surface with TiOx/TiNx duplex composite films using a new method via micro-arc oxidation (MAO) and nitrogen ion implantation (NII) treatment. The structural characterization results revealed that the modified film was constructed by nanoarrays composed of TiOx/TiNx composite nanostitches with a size of 20~40 nm. Meanwhile, comparing this with pure Ti, the friction property, wear resistance, and bioactivity were significantly improved based on biotribological results and in vitro bioactivity tests.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Titanium alloys have been widely used in the skeletal system of the human body as constituents of reconstructive devices (e.g., hip or knee join replacement implant) or fracture fixation products (e.g., bone plates, screws, and nails) [1,2,3,4,5]. The stability of the implant-bone interface is of great importance for a successful bone restoration or bone replacement [6,7,8,9]. The oxide films covering titanium implant surfaces have attracted extensive research interest as they are demonstrated to be crucial for fast osseointegration [10,11,12]. In particular, titanium dioxide (TiO2) thin films on Ti alloys could lead to many desirable properties such as excellent biocompatibility, blood compatibility, corrosion resistance, excellent bonding strength with the substrate, and negative surface charge in physiological solution [13].
To obtain a ceramic-like TiO2 film on the implant surface, micro-arc oxidation (MAO) is one of the most economic choices; thus it is easy to adopt for mass production. Another advantage of MAO is that it can be applied to an implant with complex structures and leads to a uniform oxide layer. By applying a positive voltage to Ti alloy implants, a TiO2 layer could be obtained in an electrolyte [14,15]. This layer is beneficial to cell attachment and bone growth and also shows a better apatite forming ability than nature oxide film on a pure titanium surface [16]. The characteristics of the titanium surface can affect cell proliferation and differentiation; therefore, the choice of the surface modification is crucial to ensure the quality of the process of the formation of new tissues [17,18]. The surfaces of titanium biomaterials with different porosity or structures would offer a superior performance in supporting cell growth than a common tissue culture plate [19].
In current practice, many failures of titanium implants have been found to be related to excessive wear of the implant material [20]. Clinical experience showed that pure Ti and its alloy were known to be more susceptible to wear than stainless steels, which resulted in greater amounts of metallic particles for a loose functional implant [21]. The worn metallic particles might cause local irritations or systemic effects and even the removal of implants [22,23,24]. To improve the wear resistance of the pure titanium surface, titanium nitride (TiN) has been proposed for orthopedic and dental implants due to its high hardness and remarkable resistance to wear and corrosion [25,26]. Moreover, TiN surface has been found to beneficial for the spontaneous nucleation of calcium phosphate [27].
To enhance titanium implants’ mechanical, tribological, and biological properties and to improve their friction and wear properties in the human body and their long-term performance, it is proposed to coat a film with multifunctional properties by combining different surface modification techniques. TiO2/TiN duplex films combine the advantages of TiO2 and TiN. On one side, a titanium oxide layer on the outer surface could get high blood compatibility. On the other side, the TiN films between the TiO2 and the titanium alloy substrate might improve the wear resistance and the adherence strength between the deposited films on the titanium implants.
In this paper, a Ti-based bioactive material with TiOx/TiNx duplex bioactivity films was synthesized by a new modification method via micro-arc oxidation and nitrogen ion implantation (MAO-NII). Firstly, porous ceramic-like TiO2 films were formed on the titanium substrate by MAO treatment. The TiO2 films were then treated by nitrogen ion implantation with different nitrogen ion doses. The structural characteristics of the TiOx/TiNx composite modified film (including morphology, phase component, and element composition) were studied. The in vitro bioactivities of the coated specimens were investigated by immersing them in simulated body fluid (SBF) and by examining the apatite formation on their surfaces. Additionally, cell culturing was carried out to study the cyto-compatibility of the duplex films.

2. Experimental Procedure

2.1. Preparation (MAO and NII Treatments)

Commercially available pure titanium alloys (TA2, purchased from the Northwest Non-ferrous Institute of Technology in Xi’an, China), were used as substrates in the current study. The titanium samples were cut into plates with a size of 15 mm × 10 mm × 2 mm. The surfaces of the plates were abraded with silica papers of 200, 400, 600, 800, and 1200 grit in turn and washed in an ultrasonic bath for 20 min with acetone, ethanol, and de-ionized water, respectively. The titanium plates were then dried in an oven at 40 °C. Micro-arc oxidation (MAO) was carried out using an alternating current-type high power supply (PN-III). The Ti plates served as the anode electrodes, and a stainless steel plate was used as the counter electrode. 0.2 M of calcium acetate monohydrate ((CH3COO)2Ca·H2O, CA) and 0.02 M of β-glycerophosphoric acid disodium salt pentahydrate (C3H7Na2O6P·5H2O, β-GP) were used as electrolytes. After being treated at 350 V for 5 min, a porous TiO2 film formed on the surface of the Ti substrate.
Nitrogen ion implantation (NII) treatment was then performed by using ion implantation equipment with a Kaufman gas ion source (Southwestern Institute of Physics, Chengdu, China). The initial gas pressure in the implantation chamber was under 3 × 10−3 Pa. Nitrogen was implanted into the above TiO2 films to produce MAO-NII modified samples with an acceleration energy of 80 keV and implantation doses of 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 5.0, 10, and 20 × 1017 ions/cm2. The corresponding samples were denoted as Ti-MAO-N0.1 Ti-MAO-N0.5, Ti-MAO-N1.0, Ti-MAO-N5.0, Ti-MAO-N10, and Ti-MAO-N20, respectively.

2.2. Structure Characterization

The morphologies of the specimen before and after soaking in SBF were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, ZEISS SUPRA 40, Oberkochen, Germany) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-2100F, Tokyo, Japan). For the as prepared sample with kind conductivity, the specimens, after being rinsed and dried, were directly sent for SEM observation. A small amount of powder scraped from the specimen by a diamond knife was dispersed on a micro grid and sent for TEM observation under 200 kV. After SBF and cell tests with poor conductivity, the samples must be rinsed, dried, and sprayed with gold. The phase compositions were characterized by X-ray diffractions (XRD, D/Max 2400 V, Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) using Cu Kα radiation in the regular range of 2θ = 20°~80°, with an accelerating voltage of 36 kV and a current of 100 mA.

2.3. Friction and Wear Test Bioactivity Evaluation

A wet friction and wear test was carried on a ball-on-disc high speed reciprocation friction and wear tester (MFT-R4000, Lan zhou, China, Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences). An Al2O3 ceramic ball with a diameter of 4.0 mm and a radius of 0.032 μm was used as the friction match pair. 50% calf serum (the ratio of calf serum with demonized water is 1:1) was chosen as the lubricant. During the friction tests, the applied normal load was 200 g, with a reciprocation frequency of 2 Hz. The reciprocation distance was fixed as 5 mm, and the friction time was 1 h. Each material is tested for five parallel samples, and the average value is taken by removing the highest and lowest values.
The SBF solution was prepared on the basis of Kokubo’s recipe [22] for the bioactivity evaluation. The SBF tests were referenced according to Hiroaki’s method [28]. The volume of SBF that is used for testing was determined by Equation (1).
Vs = Sa/10
where Vs is the volume of SBF (mL) and Sa is the apparent surface area of the specimen (mm2) [28]. Put the calculated volume of SBF into a plastic bottle or beaker. After heating the SBF to 36.5 °C, the specimens were submerged pensile in the SBF to avoid over-saturation. After soaking for 24 days, the specimens were washed gently with distilled water and dried at room temperature.
The MC3T3 E1 cell line from embryonic osteoblasts of mouse embryos was used for cytotoxicity tests. The culture medium consisted of alpha-minimum essential medium (α-MEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U·mL−1 of penicillin, and 100 μg·mL−1 of streptomycin sulfate. The experiments were conducted in an incubator at 37 °C, with a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2 for two days. The specimens were sterilized by heating at 180 °C for 1 h. The cells were fixed with 5 mL of 10% formalin for 30 min, stained with 8 mL of 0.15% methylene blue for an additional 30 min, washed thoroughly with different concentrations of alcohol, and dried [29,30].

3. Results and Discussion

The XRD patterns of all the specimens treated with the MAO-NII procedure are shown in Figure 1. In addition to the anatase and rutile TiO2 obtained in the MAO process, unsaturated titanium oxide and titanium nitride were also detected. The XRD peaks marked with rhombi in all patterns, as shown in Figure 1, could be indexed to an unsaturated titania of Ti5O9. The XRD peaks marked with stars corresponded to Ti3N1.29. It can be concluded that titanium nitrides and various titanium oxides coexist in the modified layer after nitrogen ion implantation. Namely, a TiOx/TiNx composite film on the surface of Ti substrate has been obtained.
Then the morphology of the composite films was investigated by SEM. The top-view surface morphology of the samples implanted with different nitrogen doses is shown in Figure 2. The typical characteristics of MAO-NII modified films with micron-sized pores are shown in Figure 2a. The wall surfaces of the holes are very slick when the N implantation dose is very low (0.1 × 1017 ions/cm2). By increasing the N implantation dose, the surface morphology was changed in varying degrees. Some small pores appeared on the surface of the MAO modified layer, as shown in Figure 2b,c. When the N implantation dose was 5.0 × 1017 ions/cm2, most of the surface was not slick anymore, as shown in Figure 2d. This rough morphological feature of the surface is made more obvious in Ti-MAO-N10 and Ti-MAO-N20 by continuously increasing the N implantation dose to 10 and 20 × 1017 ions/cm2 (Figure 2e,f). Thus we found that the surface would become rougher with increasing N implantation doses.
Interestingly, unique nanoarrays composed of vertically aligned nanostitches with a size of 20 to 40 nm were found in Ti-MAO-N10 by a high magnification morphological observation under SEM, as shown in Figure 3a. Moreover, the sharp tips of the nanostitches were only about 5~10 nm. However, the nanostitch array structure disappeared when the N implantation dose was increased to 20 × 1017 ions/cm2, as shown in Figure 3b, and it was replaced by many small pores with a size of 30~60 nm. Presumably, the nanostitch array structure collapsed due to the high ion implant energy from the increase of the implantation dose.
To further study the crystallographic structure of the TiOx/TiNx composite film, a small amount of powder was scraped from the surface of Ti-MAO-N1.0 for TEM observation. The result is shown in Figure 4. It is proved again the nanostitch structure has a tip diameter of 5 nm and a bottom diameter of about 30 nm. As shown in Figure 4a, the main diffraction spots in the selected area of the electron diffraction (SAED) pattern from a circle area of the film correspond to anatase TiO2 and Ti3N1.29 phases. High resolution TEM (HRTEM) suggests the presence of Ti3N1.29 and Ti5O9 respectively within the top and bottom of the nanostitch. Hence, the formation mechanism of the composite modified film with the nanostitch array structure can be speculated based on the above results. As shown in Figure 5, lots of defects such as nanopores appeared with the bombardment of implanted ionic fluxes towards the surfaces at first. Then nanostricks formed and grew to form nanoarrays, which should be mainly composed of unsaturated titania due to the O atoms in TiO2 being be partly removed by implanted N ions during the NII process. Meanwhile, some of the O atoms of titanium oxide on the surface nanostitches, especially on the top surface, were replaced by N, resulting in the nucleation of nano-sized titanium nitride on the tips. However, if the NII dose is too high, the nanostitch array structure will collapse due to the high implantation energy and superheat.
The friction factors for specimens after MAO and NII treatment are obtained under 50% mavericks serum lubrication conditions, as shown in Figure 6. It can be found that the friction factors for the treated specimens were all lower than that of the pure titanium (0.404). In addition, the results showed that Ti-MAO-N1.0 (1017 ions/cm2) exerted the lowest average friction factor, which may lead to the best biological friction performance. As discussed above, the composite modified layer is composed of antatase and rutile TiO2, Ti5O9 and Ti3N1.29. Ceramic TiO2 and titanium nitride are hard phases, which show much higher hardness than pure Ti. As well, the surface hardness increased with the amount of hard nitrides and oxides, which resulted in the reduction of the friction factor. However, the nitrogen ion implantation exists as a saturation injection dose. The increasing amount of implantation will not enhance the surface hardness unlimitedly. In this study, 1017 ions/cm2 was the best implantation dose, when considering the biological friction performance.
In addition to biological friction, biological activity is also concerned in this study. The specimens treated by MAO and NII were immersed in biomimetic mineralization solution for 24 days. The samples after soaking were examined by SEM, and the results are shown in Figure 7. SEM images showed that all the sample surfaces were almost fully covered with ball–shaped particles. There are some nano-flakes on the surfaces of the globular objects, which is similar to the urchin shown with the red arrow. Compared with the SBF soaking result of pure Ti, shown in Figure S1a in the supporting information, the bioactivity of the Ti-MAO-NI (Figure S1b,c) samples is improved. Additionally, combed with the energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS) results shown in Table 1, it can be predicted that Ca and P are fully deposited on the surfaces of the samples after MAO and NII. It can be predicted that apatite was deposited, which is one of the important human bone inorganic compositions [30,31]. Hence, this illustrates a good ability to inducer phosphate deposition, which also leads to good in vitro bioactivity and also indicates that all the samples after MAO and NII modification show good bioactivity. Furthermore, it can also found that the change of the content of Ca and P is consistent with the content of N implantation. Hence, it can be suspected that titanium nitride is beneficial to apatite deposition and facilitates bioactivity.
The cyto-compatibility of the samples was also evaluated by cell cultures on the different surfaces. The surface morphology of the Ti-MAO-NI specimens after cell culturing for two days is shown in Figure 8 and Figure S2 in the supporting information. The alkaline phosphatase activity of osteoblasts on pure Ti and Ti-MAO-N1.0 surface was shown in Figure S3. The cells spread well and showed a good attachment, with a plumpness and a polygon shape on the specimen surface. The cells also developed numerous filopodia, sensing the different surface specimens. Compared with the Ti-MAO-N0.1, Ti-MAO-N0.5, Ti-MAO-N1.0, Ti-MAO-N10, and Ti-MAO-N20, the amount of cells in Ti-MAO-N5.0 is the most. Thus, it can be concluded that cyto-compatibility can be promoted by NII treatment.
The porosity and nanostitch array structures of the samples can affect cell proliferation and differentiation, which is crucial to ensuring the quality of the process of the formation of new tissues. The morphology of these surfaces could have a mechanical influence on the cells used. It should be further investigated [32].

4. Conclusions

A composite modified film has been successfully synthesized on the surface of Ti alloy by MAO-NII treatment. The as-prepared film is composed of titania (anatase and rutile TiO2), unsaturated titania (Ti5O9), and titanium nitride (Ti3N1.29). The surface exhibits a unique nanostitch array structural feature, the growth mechanism of which has been studied by detailed TEM characterization. The friction factor of the composite modified film was much lower than that of pure titanium (0.404). Bioactivity and cellular compatibility have improved greatly with the MAO and NII treatment compared with pure Ti. Additionally, it was also found that the nanostitch array structure collapsed due to the high implantation energy and superheat when the implantation dose rose to 20 × 1017 ions/cm2.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/7/10/343/s1, Figure S1: Surface morphology of pure Ti (a), Ti-MAO-N0.5(b) and Ti-MAO-N10 (c) after soaking in biomimetic mineralization solution for 24 days, Figure S2: The surface morphology of MAO specimens with different N implantation dose after cell cultured for 2 days: Ti-MAO-N0.5 (a,b), Ti-MAO-N10 (c,d), Figure S3: The alkaline phosphatase activity of osteoblasts on pure Ti and Ti-MAO-N1.0 surface.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Guangdong Province Science and Technology Project (No. 2015A030310488) and the Scientific Cultivation and Innovation Fund Project of Jinan University (No. 21617427). Xianfeng Yang thanks the New Faculty Start-up for support in the form of funding and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2015ZZ046) from South China University of Technology. Jie Cui thanks the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2017BQ046) from South China University of Technology.

Author Contributions

Peng Zhang conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, collected the data, analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript; Xiaojian Wang designed the study and reviewed the manuscript. Zhidan Lin, Huaijun Lin, Zhiguo Zhang and Wei Li designed the study, contributed the reagents, the materials and the analysis tools; Xianfeng Yang analysed the data, interpreted data, reviewed and edited the manuscript. Jie Cui conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote and reviewed the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Rack, H.J.; Qazi, J.I. Titanium alloys for biomedical applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2006, 26, 1269–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kokubo, T.; Kim, H.M.; Kawashita, M. Novel bioactive materials with different mechanical properties. Biomaterials 2003, 24, 2161–2175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hotchkiss, K.M.; Reddy, G.B.; Hyzy, S.L.; Schwartz, Z.; Boyan, B.D.; Olivares-Navarrete, R. Titanium surface characteristics, including topography and wettability, alter macrophage activation. Acta Biomater. 2016, 31, 425–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Feng, B.; Chen, J.Y.; Qi, S.K.; He, L.; Zhao, J.Z.; Zhang, X.D. Characterization of surface oxide films on titanium and bioactivity. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2002, 13, 457–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Jung, H.D.; Jang, T.S.; Wang, L.; Kim, H.E.; Koh, Y.H.; Song, J. Progress in Research on the Surface/Interface of Materials for Hard issue Implant. Biomaterials 2015, 37, 49–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Singh, R.; Lee, P.D.; Dashwood, R.J.; Lindley, T.C. Titanium foams for biomedical applications: A review. Mater. Technol. 2010, 25, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Niinomi, M.; Akahori, T. Improvement of the fatigue life of titanium alloys for biomedical devices through microstructural control. Expert Rev. Med. Devices 2010, 7, 481–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Niinomi, M. Metallic biomaterials. J. Artif. Organs 2008, 11, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Oshida, Y.; Tuna, E.B.; Aktören, O.; Gençay, K. Dental Implant Systems. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2010, 11, 1580–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Subramani, K.; Jung, R.E.; Molenberg, A. Biofilm on Dental Implants—A Review of the Literature. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 2009, 24, 616–626. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  11. Graham, W.G.; Stalder, K.R. Plasmas in liquids and some of their applications in nanoscience. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2011, 44, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dzhurinskiy, D.; Gao, Y.; Yeung, W.K.; Strumban, E.; Leshchinsky, V.; Chu, P.J.; Matthews, A.; Yerokhin, A.; Maev, R.G. Characterization and corrosion evaluation of TiO2:n-HA coatings on titanium alloy formed by plasma electrolytic oxidation. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2015, 269, 258–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, Q.; Cheng, M.Q.; He, G.; Zhang, X.L. Surface mdification of porous titanium with microarc oxidation and its effects on osteogenesis activity in vitro. J. Nanomater. 2015, 16, 408634. [Google Scholar]
  14. Walsh, F.C.; Low, C.T.J.; Wood, R.J.K.; Stevens, K.T.; Archer, J.; Poeton, A.R.; Ryder, A. Plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO) for production of anodised coatings on lightweight metal (Al, Mg, Ti) alloys. Trans. Inst. Met. Finish. 2009, 87, 122–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Beline, T.; Marques, I.D.V.; Matos, A.O.; Ogawa, E.S.; Ricomini, A.P.; Rangel, E.C.; da Cruz, N.C.; Sukotjo, C.; Mathew, M.T.; Landers, R. Production of a biofunctional titanium surface using plasma electrolytic oxidation and glow-discharge plasma for biomedical applications. Biointerphases 2016, 11, 11–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Marin, E.; Diamanti, M.V.; Boffelli, M.; Sendoh, M.; Pedeferri, M.P.; Mazinani, A.; Moscatelli, M.; Del Curto, B.; Zhu, W.; Pezzotti, G. Effect of etching on the composition and structure of anodic spark deposition films on titanium. Mater. Des. 2016, 108, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Paduanoa, F.; Marrelli, M.; Alom, N.; Amer, M.; White, J.L.; Shakesheff, M.K.; Tatulloa, M. Decellularized bone extracellular matrix and human dental pulp stem cells as a construct for bone regeneration. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2017, 28, 730–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Marrelli, M.; Tatullo, M. Influence of PRF in the healing of bone and gingival tissues. Clinical and histological evaluations. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2013, 17, 1958–1962. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Marrelli, M.; Falisi, G.; Apicella, A.; Apicella, D.; Amantea, M.; Cielo, A.; Bonanome, L.; Palmieri, F.; Santacroce, L.; Giannini, S.; et al. Behaviour of dental pulp stem cells on different types of innovative mesoporous and nanoporous silicon scaffolds with different functionalizations of the surfaces. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents 2015, 29, 217–223. [Google Scholar]
  20. Lai, Y.K.; Huang, J.Y.; Cui, Z.Q.; Ge, M.Z.; Zhang, K.Q.; Chen, Z.; Chi, L.F. Recent advances in TiO2-based nanostructured surfaces with controllable wettability and adhesion. Small 2016, 12, 2203–2224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Krasimir, V.; Melanie, M.R. Plasma Nanoengineering and Nanofabrication. Nanomaterials 2016, 6, 122. [Google Scholar]
  22. Nabavi, H.F.; Aliofkhazraei, M.; Rouhaghdam, A.S. Morphology and corrosion resistance of hybrid plasma electrolytic oxidation on CP-Ti. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2017, 322, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Aleksandra, R.; Adrian, T.; Tomasz, J.; Wiesław, K.; Beata, S.; Marzena, W.S.; Magdalena, S.; Ewa, T.; Lars, P.N.; Piotr, P. The Bioactivity and Photocatalytic Properties of Titania Nanotube Coatings Produced with the Use of the Low-Potential Anodization of Ti6Al4V Alloy Surface. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, 197. [Google Scholar]
  24. Geetha, M.; Singh, A.K.; Asokamani, R.; Gogia, A.K. Ti based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants—A review. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2009, 54, 397–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, J.D.; Zhao, S.P.; Wang, H.L.; Cui, Y.X.; Jiang, W.W.; Liu, S.M.; Wang, N.; Liu, C.Q.; Chai, W.P.; Ding, W.Y. Study on the chemical bond structure and chemical stability of N doped into TiO2 film by N ion beam implantation. Micro Nano Lett. 2016, 11, 758–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Piscanec, S.; Colombi Ciacchi, L.; Vesselli, E.; Comelli, G.; Sbaizero, O.; Meriani, S.; De Vita, A. Bioactivity of TiN-coated titanium implants. Acta Mater. 2004, 52, 1237–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hamidia, M.F.F.A.; Harunb, W.S.W.; Samykanoc, M.; Ghanib, S.A.C.; Ghazallib, Z.; Ahmadd, F.; Sulonge, A.B. A review of biocompatible metal injection moulding process parameters for biomedical applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2017, 78, 1263–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Tadashi, K.; Hiroaki, T. How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity? Biomaterials 2006, 27, 2907–2915. [Google Scholar]
  29. Shirai, T.; Shimizu, T.; Ohtani, K.; Zen, Y.; Takaya, M.; Tsuchiya, H. Antibacterial iodine-supported titanium implants. Acta Biomater. 2011, 7, 1928–1933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Zhang, P.; Zhang, Z.G.; Li, W.; Zhu, M. Effect of Ti-OH groups on microstructure and bioactivity of TiO2 coating prepared by micro-arc oxidation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 268, 381–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bose, S.; Tarafder, S. Calcium phosphate ceramic systems in growth factor and drug delivery for bone tissue engineering: A review. Acta Biomater. 2012, 8, 1401–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Tatullo, M.; Marrelli, M.; Falisi, G.; Rastelli, C.; Palmieri, F.; Gargari, M.; Zavan, B.; Paduano, F.; Benagiano, V. Mechanical influence of tissue culture plates and extracellular matrix on mesenchymal stem cell behavior: A topical review. Int. J. Immunopathol. Pharmacol. 2016, 29, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (af) X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the micro-arc oxidation (MAO) specimens with different N implantation doses: Ti-MAO-N0.1, Ti-MAO-N0.5, Ti-MAO-N1.0, Ti-MAO-N5.0, Ti-MAO-N10, and Ti-MAO-N20.
Figure 1. (af) X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the micro-arc oxidation (MAO) specimens with different N implantation doses: Ti-MAO-N0.1, Ti-MAO-N0.5, Ti-MAO-N1.0, Ti-MAO-N5.0, Ti-MAO-N10, and Ti-MAO-N20.
Nanomaterials 07 00343 g001
Figure 2. Surface morphologies of the micro-arc oxidation and nitrogen ion implantation (MAO-NII) modified specimens with different N ion implantation doses: (a) Ti-MAO-N0.1; (b) Ti-MAO-N0.5; (c) Ti-MAO-N1.0; (d) Ti-MAO-N5.0; (e) Ti-MAO-N10; and (f) Ti-MAO-N20.
Figure 2. Surface morphologies of the micro-arc oxidation and nitrogen ion implantation (MAO-NII) modified specimens with different N ion implantation doses: (a) Ti-MAO-N0.1; (b) Ti-MAO-N0.5; (c) Ti-MAO-N1.0; (d) Ti-MAO-N5.0; (e) Ti-MAO-N10; and (f) Ti-MAO-N20.
Nanomaterials 07 00343 g002aNanomaterials 07 00343 g002b
Figure 3. Surface images of nitrogen ion implantation MAO specimen under high magnification morphology: (a) Ti-MAO-N10 and (b) Ti-MAO-N20.
Figure 3. Surface images of nitrogen ion implantation MAO specimen under high magnification morphology: (a) Ti-MAO-N10 and (b) Ti-MAO-N20.
Nanomaterials 07 00343 g003
Figure 4. (a) Bright field transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image with selected area of the electron diffraction (SAED) pattern inset and (b) high resolution TEM (HRTEM) image of TiOx/TiNx film of Ti-MAO-N1.0.
Figure 4. (a) Bright field transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image with selected area of the electron diffraction (SAED) pattern inset and (b) high resolution TEM (HRTEM) image of TiOx/TiNx film of Ti-MAO-N1.0.
Nanomaterials 07 00343 g004
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of the growth mechanism of the TiOx/TiNx composite modification layer with a nanostitch array structure during NII.
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of the growth mechanism of the TiOx/TiNx composite modification layer with a nanostitch array structure during NII.
Nanomaterials 07 00343 g005
Figure 6. Friction coefficient of MAO specimens with different N doses under 50% mavericks serum lubrication conditions.
Figure 6. Friction coefficient of MAO specimens with different N doses under 50% mavericks serum lubrication conditions.
Nanomaterials 07 00343 g006
Figure 7. Surface morphology of the samples after soaking in biomimetic mineralization solution for 24 days: (a) Ti-MAO-N0.1; (b) Ti-MAO-N1.0; (c) Ti-MAO-N5.0; and (d) Ti-MAO-N20.
Figure 7. Surface morphology of the samples after soaking in biomimetic mineralization solution for 24 days: (a) Ti-MAO-N0.1; (b) Ti-MAO-N1.0; (c) Ti-MAO-N5.0; and (d) Ti-MAO-N20.
Nanomaterials 07 00343 g007
Figure 8. The surface morphology of MAO specimens with different N implantation doses after cell culturing for two days: (a,b) Ti-MAO-N0.1; (c,d) Ti-MAO-N1.0; (e,f) Ti-MAO-N5.0; (g,h) Ti-MAO-N20.
Figure 8. The surface morphology of MAO specimens with different N implantation doses after cell culturing for two days: (a,b) Ti-MAO-N0.1; (c,d) Ti-MAO-N1.0; (e,f) Ti-MAO-N5.0; (g,h) Ti-MAO-N20.
Nanomaterials 07 00343 g008
Table 1. Energy dispersive spectrum (EDS) analysis results of samples with different doses of N ion implantation after soaking in biomimetic mineralization solution for 24 days.
Table 1. Energy dispersive spectrum (EDS) analysis results of samples with different doses of N ion implantation after soaking in biomimetic mineralization solution for 24 days.
Sample NameElement Content (wt %)
TiOCaPN
Ti-MAO-N0.141.1243.3910.303.471.72
Ti-MAO-N1.042.3041.1911.013.482.02
Ti-MAO-N5.036.7940.5214.434.943.32
Ti-MAO-N2051.8936.055.874.142.05

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, P.; Wang, X.; Lin, Z.; Lin, H.; Zhang, Z.; Li, W.; Yang, X.; Cui, J. Ti-Based Biomedical Material Modified with TiOx/TiNx Duplex Bioactivity Film via Micro-Arc Oxidation and Nitrogen Ion Implantation. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, 343. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano7100343

AMA Style

Zhang P, Wang X, Lin Z, Lin H, Zhang Z, Li W, Yang X, Cui J. Ti-Based Biomedical Material Modified with TiOx/TiNx Duplex Bioactivity Film via Micro-Arc Oxidation and Nitrogen Ion Implantation. Nanomaterials. 2017; 7(10):343. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano7100343

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Peng, Xiaojian Wang, Zhidan Lin, Huaijun Lin, Zhiguo Zhang, Wei Li, Xianfeng Yang, and Jie Cui. 2017. "Ti-Based Biomedical Material Modified with TiOx/TiNx Duplex Bioactivity Film via Micro-Arc Oxidation and Nitrogen Ion Implantation" Nanomaterials 7, no. 10: 343. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano7100343

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop