Next Article in Journal
Toxicity of Ammonia Stress on the Physiological Homeostasis in the Gills of Litopenaeus vannamei under Seawater and Low-Salinity Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
When Nature Requires a Resource to Be Used—The Case of Callinectes sapidus: Distribution, Aggregation Patterns, and Spatial Structure in Northwest Europe, the Mediterranean Sea, and Adjacent Waters
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Analysis of the HSF Gene Family Reveals Its Role in Astragalus mongholicus under Different Light Conditions

1
Pharmacy of College, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin 150040, China
2
Experimental Teaching and Practical Training Center, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin 150040, China
3
College of Jiamusi, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Jiamusi 154007, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2024, 13(4), 280; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13040280
Submission received: 2 April 2024 / Revised: 18 April 2024 / Accepted: 18 April 2024 / Published: 19 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Science)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Heat shock (HSF) transcription factors are among the most important transcription factors in plants and are involved in the transcriptional regulation of various stress responses, including drought, salinity, oxidation, osmotic stress, and high light, thereby regulating growth and developmental processes. Astragalus mongholicus is a traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) with important medicinal value and is widely used worldwide. Although the HSF gene has been reported in most species, it has not been thoroughly studied in A. mongholicus. This study not only confirmed all HSF genes genome-wide in A. mongholicus, but also conducted systematic bioinformatics analysis. At the same time, the expression patterns of AmHSF genes in different tissues of A. mongholicus and under light response were explored. These results will provide a theoretical basis for understanding the function of HSF genes.

Abstract

Astragalus mongholicus is a traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) with important medicinal value and is widely used worldwide. Heat shock (HSF) transcription factors are among the most important transcription factors in plants and are involved in the transcriptional regulation of various stress responses, including drought, salinity, oxidation, osmotic stress, and high light, thereby regulating growth and developmental processes. However, the HFS gene family has not yet been identified in A. mongholicus, and little is known regarding the role of HSF genes in A. mongholicus. This study is based on whole genome analysis of A. mongholicus, identifying a total of 22 AmHSF genes and analyzing their physicochemical properties. Divided into three subgroups based on phylogenetic and gene structural characteristics, including subgroup A (12), subgroup B (9), and subgroup C (1), they are randomly distributed in 8 out of 9 chromosomes of A. mongholicus. In addition, transcriptome data and quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analyses revealed that AmHSF was differentially transcribed in different tissues, suggesting that AmHSF gene functions may differ. Red and blue light treatment significantly affected the expression of 20 HSF genes in soilless cultivation of A. mongholicus seedlings. AmHSF3, AmHSF3, AmHSF11, AmHSF12, and AmHSF14 were upregulated after red light and blue light treatment, and these genes all had light-corresponding cis-elements, suggesting that AmHSF genes play an important role in the light response of A. mongholicus. Although the responses of soilless-cultivated A. mongholicus seedlings to red and blue light may not represent the mature stage, our results provide fundamental research for future elucidation of the regulatory mechanisms of HSF in the growth and development of A. mongholicus and its response to different light conditions.

1. Introduction

Crops often encounter abiotic stresses such as high temperature, low temperature, drought, and salinity during growth and development. High temperature stress can block plant growth and development, inhibit physiological activities, and ultimately reduce yield and even cause crop failure [1]. Transcription factors play a crucial role in plant growth. They are key regulators of several signaling networks that activate or repress the transcription of downstream target genes by binding to their promoter or enhancer regions of the corresponding genes, thereby responding to plant growth, development, and environmental stress [2]. The heat shock transcription factor (HSF) is an important transcriptional regulator widely found in plants and is essential for regulating the differential expression of heat shock proteins (HSP) and other functional genes [3]. When plants are subjected to heat stress, it can help plants resist heat stress by binding to the cis-element HSE (5′-AGAAG-3′) upstream of the heat stress protein gene and initiating the expression of downstream HSP and its related genes [4]. The HSF protein consists of a DNA-binding domain (DBD), an oligomerization domain (OD or HR-A/B), a nuclear localization signal (NLS), a nuclear export signal (NES), and a C-terminal activation motif (AHA) [5]. The DBD is the most conserved structural domain in HSFs and is characterized by a central helix-turn-helix motif that is responsible for binding to HSE located in the promoters of target genes [6]. The HR-A/B structural domain is a hydrophobic hepta-peptide repeat sequence. NLS are enriched in Arg (R) and Lys (K) residues, whereas NES are enriched in Leu (L) residues [7]. Several studies have demonstrated that HSFs play important roles in plant responses to high-temperature stress. Overexpression of ATHSFA1 and SlHSFA1 significantly increased heat tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana and Solanum lycopersicum [8]. The class A HSF gene TaHsfA2d, which is similar to Oryza sativa OsHsfA2d, was isolated from wheat, and plants overexpressing TaHsfA2d in A. thaliana showed higher tolerance to high temperatures [9].
Astragali Radix (Huang Qi) is a traditional bulk Chinese medicine. The dried root of the leguminous plant A. membranaceus (Fisch.) Bge. and A. membranaceus (Fisch.) Bge. var. mongholicus (Bge) Hsiao was first recorded in Shennong Ben Cao Jing (Shennong’s Materia Medica) [10]. Huang Qi has anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antitumor properties, improves immune function, and protects against cardiovascular and cerebrovascular effects. There are >200 types of traditional Chinese medicines (TCM) made of Huang Qi, which are known as holy medicines for tonifying qi and fixing the surface [11]. To date, various metabolites have been identified in Huang Qi, including saponins, flavonoids, polysaccharides, and amino acids, with isoflavones and saponins being the main bioactive components [12]. In recent years, there has been increasing evidence of the therapeutic activity of Astragalus isoflavonoid constituents, and there has been great interest in improving the yield and quality of A. mongholicus [13]. Previous studies have shown that many biotic and abiotic factors, such as soil microorganisms, ultraviolet light, drought, and temperature, are closely related to the yield of Astragalus isoflavones [14]. Under drought stress, the combined action of six bacterial consortia significantly promotes the accumulation of isoflavones in A. mongholicus, promotes plant growth, and increases the antioxidant enzyme activities of A. mongholicus to alleviate the adverse effects caused by drought [15]. Under UV-B radiation, calycosin and calycosin-7-glucoside in A. membranaceus and A. mongholicus accumulate in large quantities to help plants respond to UV-B stress [16]. Overall, studies on the effect of Astragalus isoflavone synthesis have focused on different biotic and abiotic stresses, whereas the effect of light treatment at a single wavelength for a short period on the isoflavone content of A. mongholicus at the seedling stage in soilless cultures is not known. Recently, whole-genome sequencing of A. mongholicus was completed and the biosynthetic pathway of isoflavones was identified [17]. However, little research has been conducted to develop high-quality A. mongholicus varieties with high isoflavone content by studying the molecular mechanisms of light response.
Several plant HSF TFs have been extensively studied for their key regulatory functions in response to development and different stresses, and previous studies have shown that not only high temperature but also different light, low temperature, and salinity–drought stresses affect the expression of HSF genes [18]. Thus, the molecular regulation of HSFs in response to various stressors is a complex and delicate process that involves changes in multiple genes and metabolites. Although A. mongholicus has a long medicinal history and its isoflavone biosynthetic pathway has been elucidated, HSF TFs have not been thoroughly studied. Therefore, we used a bioinformatics approach to identify HSF gene family members under the whole A. mongholicus genome and in this study examined the physical and chemical properties, phylogenetics, gene structure, collinear relationship, and differential expression in different tissues of A. mongholicus. In addition, the expression levels of AmHSF genes under different light conditions were analyzed by qRT-PCR to provide reference data for further study of AmHSF gene function. It is important to note that light-treated soilless-cultivated seedlings of A. mongholicus were selected for this study, and alterations at this stage in response to light and HSF gene expression may not represent a response to the mature stage. Taken together, these findings provide data support for future in-depth studies on the function of AmHSF genes and subsequently lay the foundation for comprehensively revealing the role of the HSF gene family in the growth and light response.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Soilless Cultivation of A. mongholicus Culture and Light Treatment

A. mongholicus seeds purchased from the Anguo market were used as experimental materials and were identified by Ma Wei from Heilongjiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Fully mature seeds with full grains were selected, washed first, and then soaked for 8–10 h, and the clean seeds were placed in a soilless cultivation device developed by our research group for cultivation (patent number: 201220490816.3). The plants were incubated in a light incubator with an average light intensity of 22,000 l×, a day/night temperature of 25/20 °C, and a light/dark photoperiod of 16/8 h. The nutrient solution used was Hoagland’s nutrient solution (Coolaber Science & Technology, Beijing, China), which was changed every 2 weeks. When the age of the seedlings was 40 d, the roots, stems, and leaves were sampled from the plants with good growth and consistency, and the samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored in the refrigerator at −80 °C.

2.2. Identification and Physicochemical Properties Analysis of the HSF Gene Family in A. mongholicus

A. mongholicus genome was downloaded from the Global Pharmacopoeia Genome Database (GPGD; http://www.gpgenome.com/, 2 February 2024). All CDS sequences in the genome of A. mongholicus were extracted and converted into protein sequences using TBtools software V2.083 [19]. The hidden Markov model (PF00447) of the HSF gene was downloaded from the Pfam database (http://pfam.xfam.org/, accessed on 2 February 2024) to screen for the HSF gene in the genome of A. mongholicus with an E value of 10−10. The candidate sequences were validated using the National Center of Biotechnology Information (NCBI)-CDD (https://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov-443.webvpn.nefu.edu.cn/, accessed on 2 February 2024), Plant Transcription Factor Database (TFDB; https://planttfdb.gao-lab.org/index.php, accessed on 2 February 2024), and Simple Modular Architecture Research Tool (SMART; http://smart.embl.de/, accessed on 2 February 2024). After eliminating genes that did not contain DBD conserved domains and redundant genes, they were summarized and named based on their sequential order of chromosome position. Physicochemical properties such as amino acid number, molecular weight, and hydrophobicity of the AmHSF protein were analyzed using the online software Expasy-ProtParam (https://web.expasy.org/protparam/, accessed on 2 February 2024).

2.3. Phylogenetic Analysis of AmHSF Proteins

The A. thaliana HSF protein sequence was downloaded from The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR) database (http://www.arabidopsis.org/, accessed on 4 February 2024). Multiple sequence comparisons of AtHSF and AmHSF protein sequences were performed using the MEGA-X software [20], and a phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the neighbor-joining (NJ) method, with the calibration parameter bootstrap set to 1000. Phylogenetic trees were constructed using the EvolView online tool (https://evolgenius.info//evolview-v2/login, accessed on 4 February 2024). Members of the AmHSF family were grouped into pre-existing subgroups in A. thaliana for cluster analysis.

2.4. Conserved Motifs and Gene Structure Analysis of the AmHSF Gene Family

The AmHSF protein sequence was subjected to motif analysis using the MEME online server (https://meme-suite.org/meme/tools/meme, accessed on 5 February 2024) with 10 predicted motifs. In addition, the identified AmHSF gene sequences were processed and screened in their annotation files based on the identified sequences. The results were processed using the online software Gene Structure Display Server 2.0 (GSDS; http://gsds.gao-lab.org/, accessed on 5 February 2024) to complete the gene structure analysis and visualized using TBtools software.

2.5. Analysis of Cis-Elements of the AmHSF Gene Family

The 2000 bp sequence upstream of the HSF gene was obtained from the genome of A. mongholicus using TBtools software, and the cis-elements were predicted using the online website PlantCARE (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html, accessed on 6 February 2024), which used the TBtools software to map and analyze the main cis-elements.

2.6. Chromosomal Mapping and Collinearity Analysis of AmHSF Gene

TBtools software was used to perform chromosome localization and visualization of the AmHSF gene family. The whole gene data of Cannabis sativa (GCA_029168945.1), Malus domestica (GCF_002114115.1), and Solanum lycopersicum (GCA_000188115.4) were downloaded from the NCBI website and analyzed for inter-species covariance using MCScanX software [21], visualized using TBtools software, and the HSF genes were highlighted.

2.7. Analysis of AmHSF Gene Family Expression Pattern in Different Tissue Sites and Quantitative Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR) Validation

RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data of A. mongholicus soilless-cultivated seedlings in different tissue sites were sequenced by our group. Fragments per kilobase of transcript per million fragments mapped (FPKM) were used as a measure of gene expression abundance, and TBtools software was used to analyze the expression patterns of the HSF gene family in roots, stems, and leaves. The log2 (FPKM + 1) transformation was used for processing.
Total RNA was extracted using the RNAprep Pure Plant kit (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China), reverse transcribed according to the MS 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis SuperMix for qPCR (+gDNA wiper) kit (Msunflowers Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), and analyzed using qRT-PCR on the AriaMx Real-Time PCR System platform using the reaction system configured using the ChamQ Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix kit (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China). The 18s gene was used as the reference gene, and the amplification procedure was as follows: pre-denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 10 s and 60 °C for 30 s. Quantitative data were analyzed using the 2−∆∆CT method [22], and t-tests were performed on the results using GraphPad Prism 8.0.2 software.

3. Results

3.1. Identification and Physicochemical Properties Analysis of the HSF Gene Family in A. mongholicus

Based on HMM, a comprehensive search was conducted for the HSF genes of A. mongholicus. After removing the incomplete domains and redundant sequences, 22 HSF genes were identified in the entire genome of A. mongholicus (Supplementary Table S1). Renaming them as AmHSF1-AmHSF22 based on their position on the chromosome, with the prefix Am indicating A. mongholicus, analysis of the physicochemical properties showed that the amino acid length of the AmHSF proteins ranged from 204 aa (AmHSF13) to 496 aa (AmHSF10). Their molecular weights ranged from 23747.23 Da to 54897.07 Da, and their isoelectric points ranged from 4.83 (AmHSF16) to 8.73 (AmHSF9). The grand average hydropathicity (GRAVY) of the AmHSF proteins was less than 0, indicating that the AmHSF proteins were all hydrophilic.

3.2. Chromosomal Distribution and Gene Duplication Event Analysis of AmHSF Genes

The identified 22 AmHSF genes were unevenly distributed on the 8 chromosomes of A. mongholicus. We named these sequences AmHSF1-AmHSF22 based on their specific chromosomal locations. Except for chromosome 8, each chromosome contained a different number of AmHSF genes. The distribution of AmHSF genes on chromosome 5 was the highest (five), followed by chromosomes 2 and 4, each containing four genes. The distribution on chromosome 1 was the lowest, with only one AmHSF gene (Figure 1).
One of the important factors leading to the functional differentiation and amplification of genes is gene duplication. Of the 22 AmHSF genes, seven pairs of fragment duplication events were identified, with most duplication events on chromosome 4, and only one pair on the remaining chromosomes. These results suggest that these fragment duplication events were primarily responsible for the evolution of AmHsf genes.

3.3. Phylogenetic Analysis of AmHSF Gene Family

To further clarify the family taxonomic relationship of HSF in A. mongholicus, we constructed a phylogenetic tree by combining the HSF proteins in A. thaliana with the HSF proteins in A. mongholicus (Supplementary Table S2) (Figure 2). The results showed that the 22 AmHSF proteins could be categorized into three subfamilies: Group A, Group B, and Group C. Group A contained eight subfamilies (A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A8, and A9), group B contained three subfamilies (B1, B2, and B3), and Group C contained only one C1 subfamily. Notably, subfamilies A7, B4, B5, and C2 were missing in both A. thaliana and A. mongholicus, suggesting evolutionary specificity among the species. In addition, different subfamilies in families A and B contained different numbers of family members, such as A1 (AmHSF10 and AmHSF12), A4 (AmHSF14 and AmHSF17), A5 (AmHSF2 and AmHSF15), and A6 (AmHSF5 and AmHSF22), all of which contained two family members, whereas the remaining A families only had one gene. From a genetic perspective, there were 10 pairs of directly homologous genes between A. thaliana and A. mongholicus, including AmHSF8, AtHSFB2B, AmHSF21, and AtHSFB3, indicating that their evolutionary trends are consistent and may have similar biological functions.

3.4. Analysis of Conserved Motifs and Gene Structures in AmHSF

The conserved motifs and structural features of the AmHSF genes were analyzed. To understand the potential functions of AmHSF genes, the conserved motifs of AmHSF proteins were predicted using the Motif Elicitation website. Ten conserved motifs in the AmHSF proteins were predicted, and a motif corresponding to the conserved domain was identified (Figure 3A). Based on the conserved amino acid sequences of motifs 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, and 9, these were divided into five categories (DBD, HR-A/B or OD, NLS, NES, and AHA). Gene structure analysis showed that the AmHSF gene had little difference in its structural features (Figure 3B). AmHSF genes contained between 0 and 3 introns, 17 genes contained 1 intron, 4 genes contained 2 introns, and AmHSF2 contained the most introns (3).

3.5. Syntenic Analysis of AmHSF Genes in Different Species

To further understand the evolutionary pattern of the AmHSF gene family, we conducted a genomic association analysis between A. mongholicus and four different dicotyledonous plants (Malus domestica, Solanum lycopersicum, Cannabis sativa, and Cicer arietinum), among which C. arietinum and A. mongholicus are both leguminous species (Figure 4). The results showed that A. mongholicus had the strongest collinearity with M. domestica with 41 gene pairs, followed by S. lycopersicum with 28 gene pairs, C. arietinum with 26 gene pairs, and C. sativa with the worst collinearity, with only 10 gene pairs. In addition, the HSF genes that were collinear with these four species in A. mongholicus were AmHSF1, AmHSF5, AmHSF6, AmHSF9, AmHF20, and AmHSF22, indicating that these six AmHSF genes may have existed before the differentiation of these species.

3.6. Cis-Element Analysis of AmHsf Genes

Using the online tool plantCARE, 18 types of 422 valuable cis-elements were identified in the promoter region of AmHsf gene after screening (Figure 5). These cis-elements can be broadly classified into the following three categories: hormonal responses, environmental stress, and growth and development. The diversity of these cis-elements suggests that the different AmHSF genes have different functions. All AmHSF genes had light cis-elements, except for AmHSF17. All other AmHSF genes had abscisic acid-responsive elements. In addition, low-temperature cis-elements, anaerobic induction elements, and defense and stress response elements were present in the promoter region of the AmHSF gene, indicating that they are involved in different stress responses. Notably, the AmHSF genes promoter region was also a cis-element in the MYB transcription factor-binding site for light response, drought response, and flavonoid synthesis, suggesting that AmHSF and AmMYB may form a molecular regulatory network that jointly regulates the growth and development of A. mongholicus. In summary, these results indicated that the AmHSF gene responds to a wide range of hormones and can cope with various stresses.

3.7. Expression Profile and qRT-PCR Verification of AmHsf Genes in Different Tissues of A. mongholicus

To explore the potential functions of the AmHsf genes during the development of different tissues and organs, RNA-seq data from the roots, stems, and leaves of A. mongholicus were used to examine their expression patterns (Supplementary Table S3) (Figure 6). Thirteen genes were expressed in all tissues of A. mongholicus (FPKM > 0.5), of which AmHSF8, AmHSF10, AmHSF19, and AmHSF20 were the most highly expressed (FPKM > 10). Seven genes had extremely high expression levels in roots, five genes had extremely high expression levels in stems, and four genes had extremely high expression levels in leaves. AmHSF3 was specifically expressed in leaves, and AmHSF21 and AmHSF22 were specifically expressed in roots. AmHSF7, AmHSF11, AmHSF13, and AmHSF17 were not expressed in all tissues; these genes may be false and may be expressed in response to stimulation or special time and space. The different expression patterns of AmHsf genes have different functions in the growth and development of A. mongholicus.
To confirm the accuracy of the RNA-seq data and further validate the expression patterns of key AmHSF genes in different tissues of A. mongholicus, 11 AmHSF genes with high expression levels were selected for qRT-PCR analysis (Figure 7). The results showed the expression patterns of nine genes in the roots, stems, and leaves of A. mongholicus together with RNA-seq data. Notably, the expression of AmHSF10 and AmHSF15 was the highest in the roots in the RNA-seq data, whereas the qRT-PCR results showed that their expression was higher in the stems.

3.8. Analysis of AmHSF Expression Patterns after Different Light Treatments

Based on the prediction of cis-elements in the AmHSF promoter, all AmHSF genes had light-responsive cis-elements. Therefore, we compared the gene expression changes of AmHSF after light treatment to determine whether the expression of HSF genes would be affected during light treatment (Supplementary Table S4). We subjected A. mongholicus to dark, red, and blue light treatments and performed qRT-PCR on the responses of 22 AmHSF genes to assess their expression patterns and further understand their possible functions under different light treatments. The results showed that blue and red light treatments significantly altered the expression of these genes (Figure 8). The results showed that the blue and red light treatments significantly altered the expression of these genes. All AmHSF genes, except AmHSF11 and AmHSF21, showed higher responses to red light than to blue light. Seventeen genes were upregulated by red light-induced expression, five genes were upregulated by blue light-induced expression, and AmHSF3, AmHSF11, AmHSF12, and AmHSF14 were upregulated under both red and blue light treatments. Four genes were previously not expressed in various tissues, and AmHSF13 and AmHSF17 were still not expressed, whereas AmHSF7 and AmHSF11 were expressed under light treatment, indicating that blue and red light can activate the expression of these genes.

4. Discussion

As plants are stationary, they have evolved complex transcriptional regulation systems to cope with changes in their surroundings [23]. Studies have shown that the HSF gene is a heat shock transcription factor that plays an important role in plant growth, development, and response to abiotic stress [24]. HSF TFs have been identified and studied in a variety of plants. The number of HSF TFs is not the same in different species, e.g., 29 in Fagopyrum tataricumt [25], 21 in A. thaliana [26], 19 in S. lycopersicum, 16 in Medicago sativa [27], and 13 in Beta vulgaris [28]. However, the HSF family has not been systematically studied in A. mongholicus. In the present study, we identified 22 HSF genes in the genome of A. mongholicus, which provided evidence to explore the evolutionary relationships of AmHSF genes and identify key genes related to plant developmental processes and responses to different light treatments. Based on the reported phylogenetic tree results for A. thaliana HSF genes, we divided them into three groups: A, B, and C. The number of HSF genes in A. mongholicus is roughly equivalent to that in A. thaliana. There are more AmHSF genes in the A5, A6, B1, B4, and B2 subfamilies; however, they are not found in the A7 subfamily. The reasons for the increase or decrease in these genes require further research but are typically related to the expansion or contraction of gene families during evolution [29].
In addition, we determined that the gene structure of AmHSF has a similar exon–intron pattern (Figure 3). The number of introns can affect gene expression efficiency [30], and the presence of similar domains and conserved motifs suggests that they may have similar functions. Not only are the gene structures similar, but each subgroup of AmHSF has a similar motif. The three helical bundle structures of the DBD domain are the most conserved, and motifs 1, 2, and 3, which encode the DBD domain, are present in all AmHSF subgroups. The amino acids encoded by motif8 are LFGV-peptides that regulate the response of HSF genes to heat shock and belong to the B subfamily. The HSF members in each subgroup have similar motifs, which have also been reported in Gossypium hirsutum [31] and Populus trichocarpa [32].
The function of AmHSFs can be predicted by combining transcriptome data, qRT-PCR, and phylogenetic analyses of A. thaliana homologous genes [33]. According to the transcriptome data analysis of different tissues of A. mongholicus, the AmHSF gene family has tissue-specific expression levels (Figure 6 and Figure 7). Owing to the unique structure of the B subfamily, most members of the HSF can control the development of nutrition and reproductive tissues. For example, AtHSFB2A plays an important role in regulating gametophyte development in A. thaliana [34]. According to the phylogenetic relationships (Figure 2), AmHSF1, AmHSF4, AmHSF8, AmHSF9, AmHSF19, and AmHSF21 belong to the B subfamily and are highly expressed in the roots, which may regulate root development. It is worth noting that AtHSFB4 can regulate the root development of A. thaliana [35], but its homologs AmHSF7 and AmHSF11 are not expressed in the roots, which may require further research. Similarly, some genes in subgroup A have been reported to regulate plant developmental processes. AtHSFA9 from the A9 subgroup has been reported to be involved in the regulation of A. thaliana seed development [36], and its homologous AmHSF18 may have the same biological function.
The HSF family is particularly important for the stress response [37]. Overexpression of AtHSFA6A increases drought tolerance in A. thaliana [38], as does the overexpression of the Glycine max GmHSF34 gene in A. thaliana. GmHSFB2b can promote the synthesis of flavonoids, reduces ROS accumulation in vivo, and improves the salt tolerance of G. max [39]. In A. mongholicus, HSF has multiple stress-related cis-elements in their promoter regions (Figure 5). AmHSF5 and AmHSF22, homologous to AtHSFA6A, and AmHSF6, homologous to GmHSF34, contain cis-elements for a variety of abiotic stresses, including anaerobic induction, stress resistance, and participation in drought induction. AmHSF4, AmHSF5, AmHSF6, AmHSF10, AmHSF14, AmHSF16, AmHSF17, AmHSF20, and AmHSF21 have low-temperature-induced response elements that may help A. mongholicus resist cold stress. Similar studies have been conducted on A. thaliana, P. trichocarpa, and Vigna radiata [40]. In summary, genes with stress-responsive cis-elements may serve as candidates for abiotic stress resistance.
The HSF family not only responds to abiotic stress, but also plays an important role in light response. Studies have shown that blue light and red light significantly enhance the expression of HSF genes in C. sativa and affect cannabinoid biosynthesis [41]. In A. thaliana, HSFA1s is a key regulator that integrates light and temperature signals. The HSFA1s gene interacts with the PIF4 gene to form a module that mediates the regulation of daytime thermal morphogenesis, which helps the plant adapt better to summer [42]. Overexpression of HSFA2 protects A. thaliana against high light stress [43]. Our data showed that blue and red light treatments altered AmHSF expression in soilless-cultivated seedlings of A. mongholicus (Figure 8). We performed qRT-PCR analysis of 22 AmHSF genes to analyze their expression patterns of AmHSF genes under red and blue light treatments. Seventeen AmHSF genes were upregulated under red light, and five genes were upregulated under blue light. Among these, AmHSF3, AmHSF11, AmHSF12, and AmHSF14 were upregulated under both red and blue light. In addition, we showed that all these upregulated genes possessed light-responsive cis-elements. It has been reported that red and blue light can promote the accumulation of Astragalus isoflavones [44]. In our study, red light and blue light can also positively regulate the expression of AmHSF genes, so it is speculated that AmHSF genes may have the function of regulating the accumulation of isoflavones in A. mongholicus under different light, but its true biological function needs to be further verified. However, soilless-cultivated A. mongholicus seedlings may not represent a more realistic stage of maturity for light treatment of AmHSF expression. In view of the above facts, further studies are needed to understand its effects on mature A. mongholicus. By studying the effects of light on AmHS expression, we hope to contribute to a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying isoflavone synthesis in A. mongholicus.

5. Conclusions

In this study, 22 AmHSF gene family members were identified in the whole genome of A. mongholicus, and their physicochemical properties, chromosome distribution, phylogeny, gene structure, collinearity, and cis-elements were systematically analyzed. Transcriptome analysis and examination of gene expression patterns in different tissues revealed that AmHSF genes were specifically expressed in different tissues. In addition, the expression of AmHSF genes was significantly altered by blue and red light treatment. In summary, this is a preliminary study of the A. mongholicus HSF gene family that provides a reference for further studies of the function of HSF genes in different species and expands our understanding of the molecular mechanism of A. mongholicus in response to different light.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biology13040280/s1, Table S1: The list of 22 AmHSF genes identified in this study. Table S2: Phylogenetic analysis of AmHSF protein. Table S3: Expression data of HSF genes in A. mongholicus under different tissues. Table S4: The qRT-PCR primers sequences used in this study.

Author Contributions

Z.W.: writing original draft, methodology, investigation. P.W. and J.H.: methodology, software. W.Z., L.K. and W.L.: formal analysis, data curation. X.L. and W.M.: project administration, funding acquisition, conceptualization. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China, mining and functional study of key enzyme genes of Astragalus isoflavone biosynthesis (82173927), talent training project supported by the central government for the reform and development of local colleges and universities (ZYRCB2021008), Heilongjiang Touyan Innovation Team Program (Grant Number: [2019] No. 5) and Heilongjiang Province “Double first-class” discipline Collaborative Innovation Project (LJGXCG2023-058).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The transcriptome data were deposited at NCBI database under accession number PRJNA1064679.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ohama, N.; Sato, H.; Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. Transcriptional Regulatory Network of Plant Heat Stress Response. Trends Plant Sci. 2017, 22, 53–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. von Koskull-Döring, P.; Scharf, K.D.; Nover, L. The diversity of plant heat stress transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci. 2007, 12, 452–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Baniwal, S.K.; Bharti, K.; Chan, K.Y.; Fauth, M.; Ganguli, A.; Kotak, S.; Mishra, S.K.; Nover, L.; Port, M.; Scharf, K.D.; et al. Heat stress response in plants: A complex game with chaperones and more than twenty heat stress transcription factors. J. Biosci. 2004, 29, 471–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kotak, S.; Port, M.; Ganguli, A.; Bicker, F.; von Koskull-Döring, P. Characterization of C-terminal domains of Arabidopsis heat stress transcription factors (Hsfs) and identification of a new signature combination of plant class A Hsfs with AHA and NES motifs essential for activator function and intracellular localization. Plant J. 2004, 39, 98–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Scharf, K.D.; Berberich, T.; Ebersberger, I.; Nover, L. The plant heat stress transcription factor (Hsf) family: Structure, function and evolution. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1819, 104–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Guo, J.; Wu, J.; Ji, Q.; Wang, C.; Luo, L.; Yuan, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J. Genome-wide analysis of heat shock transcription factor families in rice and Arabidopsis. J. Genet. Genom. 2008, 35, 105–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Döring, P.; Treuter, E.; Kistner, C.; Lyck, R.; Chen, A.; Nover, L. The role of AHA motifs in the activator function of tomato heat stress transcription factors HsfA1 and HsfA2. Plant Cell 2000, 12, 265–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kim, J.; Park, J.; Kim, H.; Son, N.; Kim, E.J.; Kim, J.; Byun, D.; Lee, Y.; Park, Y.M.; Nageswaran, D.C.; et al. Arabidopsis heat shock factor binding protein is required to limit meiotic crossovers and HEI10 transcription. EMBO J. 2022, 41, e109958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Chauhan, H.; Khurana, N.; Agarwal, P.; Khurana, J.P.; Khurana, P. A seed preferential heat shock transcription factor from wheat provides abiotic stress tolerance and yield enhancement in transgenic Arabidopsis under heat stress environment. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e79577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Wang, P.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Cao, H.; Kong, L.; Ma, W.; Ren, W. A review of the botany, phytochemistry, traditional uses, pharmacology, toxicology, and quality control of the Astragalus memeranaceus. Front. Pharmacol. 2023, 14, 1242318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Li, L.; Zheng, S.; Brinckmann, J.A.; Fu, J.; Zeng, R.; Huang, L.; Chen, S. Chemical and genetic diversity of Astragalus mongholicus grown in different eco-climatic regions. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e184791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Tseng, A.; Yang, C.H.; Chen, C.H.; Chen, C.H.; Hsu, S.L.; Lee, M.H.; Lee, H.C.; Su, L.J. An in vivo molecular response analysis of colorectal cancer treated with Astragalus membranaceus extract. Oncol. Rep. 2016, 35, 659–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhang, J.; Liu, L.; Wang, J.; Ren, B.; Zhang, L.; Li, W. Formononetin, an isoflavone from Astragalus membranaceus inhibits proliferation and metastasis of ovarian cancer cells. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2018, 221, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Pan, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, T.; Fang, C.; Nan, P.; Wang, X.; Li, X.; Wei, Y.; Chen, J. Phenylalanine ammonia lyase functions as a switch directly controlling the accumulation of calycosin and calycosin-7-O-beta-D-glucoside in Astragalus membranaceus var. mongholicus plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2008, 59, 3027–3037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lin, Y.; Zhang, H.; Li, P.; Jin, J.; Li, Z. The bacterial consortia promote plant growth and secondary metabolite accumulation in Astragalus mongholicus under drought stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2022, 22, 475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Liu, Y.; Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; Abozeid, A.; Tian, D.M.; Zhang, X.N.; Tang, Z.H. The Different Resistance of Two Astragalus Plants to UV-B Stress is Tightly Associated with the Organ-specific Isoflavone Metabolism. Photochem. Photobiol. 2018, 94, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Chen, Y.; Fang, T.; Su, H.; Duan, S.; Ma, R.; Wang, P.; Wu, L.; Sun, W.; Hu, Q.; Zhao, M.; et al. A reference-grade genome assembly for Astragalus mongholicus and insights into the biosynthesis and high accumulation of triterpenoids and flavonoids in its roots. Plant Commun. 2023, 4, 100469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gomez-Pastor, R.; Burchfiel, E.T.; Thiele, D.J. Regulation of heat shock transcription factors and their roles in physiology and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018, 19, 4–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Chen, C.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Thomas, H.R.; Frank, M.H.; He, Y.; Xia, R. TBtools: An Integrative Toolkit Developed for Interactive Analyses of Big Biological Data. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 1194–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Wang, Y.; Tang, H.; Debarry, J.D.; Tan, X.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Lee, T.H.; Jin, H.; Marler, B.; Guo, H.; et al. MCScanX: A toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, e49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Nishizawa, A.; Yabuta, Y.; Yoshida, E.; Maruta, T.; Yoshimura, K.; Shigeoka, S. Arabidopsis heat shock transcription factor A2 as a key regulator in response to several types of environmental stress. Plant J. 2006, 48, 535–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Haider, S.; Raza, A.; Iqbal, J.; Shaukat, M.; Mahmood, T. Analyzing the regulatory role of heat shock transcription factors in plant heat stress tolerance: A brief appraisal. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2022, 49, 5771–5785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Liu, M.; Huang, Q.; Sun, W.; Ma, Z.; Huang, L.; Wu, Q.; Tang, Z.; Bu, T.; Li, C.; Chen, H. Genome-wide investigation of the heat shock transcription factor (Hsf) gene family in Tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum). BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Nover, L.; Bharti, K.; Döring, P.; Mishra, S.K.; Ganguli, A.; Scharf, K.D. Arabidopsis and the heat stress transcription factor world: How many heat stress transcription factors do we need? Cell Stress Chaperones 2001, 6, 177–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wang, F.; Dong, Q.; Jiang, H.; Zhu, S.; Chen, B.; Xiang, Y. Genome-wide analysis of the heat shock transcription factors in Populus trichocarpa and Medicago truncatula. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2012, 39, 1877–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Talaee, L.; Fathipour, Y.; Talebi, A.A.; Khajehali, J. Screening of Potential Sources of Resistance to Spodoptera exigua (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in 24 Sugar Beet Genotypes. J. Econ. Entomol. 2017, 110, 250–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Van de Peer, Y.; Maere, S.; Meyer, A. The evolutionary significance of ancient genome duplications. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009, 10, 725–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Luehrsen, K.R.; Taha, S.; Walbot, V. Nuclear pre-mRNA processing in higher plants. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol. 1994, 47, 149–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Wang, J.; Sun, N.; Deng, T.; Zhang, L.; Zuo, K. Genome-wide cloning, identification, classification and functional analysis of cotton heat shock transcription factors in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). BMC Genom. 2014, 15, 961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zhang, J.; Liu, B.; Li, J.; Zhang, L.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, H.; Lu, M.; Chen, J. Hsf and Hsp gene families in Populus: Genome-wide identification, organization and correlated expression during development and in stress responses. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Tian, J.; Shu, J.; Xu, L.; Ya, H.; Yang, L.; Li, S.; Wang, D. Genome-wide identification of R2R3-MYB transcription factor family in Docynia delavayi (Franch.) Schneid and its expression analysis during the fruit development. Food Biosci. 2023, 54, 102878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wunderlich, M.; Gross-Hardt, R.; Schöffl, F. Heat shock factor HSFB2a involved in gametophyte development of Arabidopsis thaliana and its expression is controlled by a heat-inducible long non-coding antisense RNA. Plant Mol. Biol. 2014, 85, 541–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Begum, T.; Reuter, R.; Schöffl, F. Overexpression of AtHsfB4 induces specific effects on root development of Arabidopsis. Mech. Dev. 2013, 130, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kotak, S.; Vierling, E.; Bäumlein, H.; von Koskull-Döring, P. A novel transcriptional cascade regulating expression of heat stress proteins during seed development of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 182–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Guo, M.; Liu, J.H.; Ma, X.; Luo, D.X.; Gong, Z.H.; Lu, M.H. The Plant Heat Stress Transcription Factors (HSFs): Structure, Regulation, and Function in Response to Abiotic Stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Hwang, S.M.; Kim, D.W.; Woo, M.S.; Jeong, H.S.; Son, Y.S.; Akhter, S.; Choi, G.J.; Bahk, J.D. Functional characterization of Arabidopsis HsfA6a as a heat-shock transcription factor under high salinity and dehydration conditions. Plant Cell Environ. 2014, 37, 1202–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Li, P.S.; Yu, T.F.; He, G.H.; Chen, M.; Zhou, Y.B.; Chai, S.C.; Xu, Z.S.; Ma, Y.Z. Genome-wide analysis of the Hsf family in soybean and functional identification of GmHsf-34 involvement in drought and heat stresses. BMC Genom. 2014, 15, 1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Li, S.; Wang, R.; Jin, H.; Ding, Y.; Cai, C. Molecular Characterization and Expression Profile Analysis of Heat Shock Transcription Factors in Mungbean. Front. Genet. 2018, 9, 736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Qian, G.; Meng, X.; Wang, S.; Mi, Y.; Qin, Z.; Liu, T.; Zhang, Y.; Wan, H.; Chen, W.; Sun, W.; et al. Genome-wide identification of HSF gene family and their expression analysis in vegetative tissue of young seedlings of hemp under different light treatments. Ind. Crops Prod. 2023, 204, 117375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jacob, P.; Hirt, H.; Bendahmane, A. The heat-shock protein/chaperone network and multiple stress resistance. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2017, 15, 405–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Nishizawa-Yokoi, A.; Nosaka, R.; Hayashi, H.; Tainaka, H.; Maruta, T.; Tamoi, M.; Ikeda, M.; Ohme-Takagi, M.; Yoshimura, K.; Yabuta, Y.; et al. HsfA1d and HsfA1e involved in the transcriptional regulation of HsfA2 function as key regulators for the Hsf signaling network in response to environmental stress. Plant Cell Physiol. 2011, 52, 933–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Xu, X. The influence of LEDs light on Growth and Biosynthesis of Formononetin and Calycosin in the Astragalus membranaceus (Fisch.) Bunge Hairy Root Cultures. Master’s Thesis, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, China, 2022. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Chromosomal distribution and duplication events. Highlighted lines indicate gene duplication events in the AmHSF gene, and gray lines show collinear pairs of all A. mongholicus genes. Red line, Purple lines and the blue bar indicate the gene density in each chromosome.
Figure 1. Chromosomal distribution and duplication events. Highlighted lines indicate gene duplication events in the AmHSF gene, and gray lines show collinear pairs of all A. mongholicus genes. Red line, Purple lines and the blue bar indicate the gene density in each chromosome.
Biology 13 00280 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic and classification analysis of HSF proteins in A. thaliana and A. mongholicus. Different colors indicate the various subgroups. AmHSF protein is highlighted in red.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic and classification analysis of HSF proteins in A. thaliana and A. mongholicus. Different colors indicate the various subgroups. AmHSF protein is highlighted in red.
Biology 13 00280 g002
Figure 3. Motif and gene structure features of AmHSF genes. (A) Distribution of motifs within each AmHSF protein. (B) AmHSF gene structures. Lines indicate introns.
Figure 3. Motif and gene structure features of AmHSF genes. (A) Distribution of motifs within each AmHSF protein. (B) AmHSF gene structures. Lines indicate introns.
Biology 13 00280 g003
Figure 4. Syntenic analysis of genes between A. mongholicus and four other species. (A) M. domestica, (B) S. lycopersicum, (C) C. sativa, (D) C. arietinum. Red lines represent AmHSF genes in homologous pairs. Gray lines symbolize the colinear blocks within A. mongholicus and other genomes.
Figure 4. Syntenic analysis of genes between A. mongholicus and four other species. (A) M. domestica, (B) S. lycopersicum, (C) C. sativa, (D) C. arietinum. Red lines represent AmHSF genes in homologous pairs. Gray lines symbolize the colinear blocks within A. mongholicus and other genomes.
Biology 13 00280 g004
Figure 5. Prediction of cis-elements in the promoter regions of 22 AmHSF genes. Different colors represent various cis-elements.
Figure 5. Prediction of cis-elements in the promoter regions of 22 AmHSF genes. Different colors represent various cis-elements.
Biology 13 00280 g005
Figure 6. Expression profile analysis of AmHSF genes in different tissues of A. mongholicus. The color bar on the right side of the figure shows log2 FPKM values.
Figure 6. Expression profile analysis of AmHSF genes in different tissues of A. mongholicus. The color bar on the right side of the figure shows log2 FPKM values.
Biology 13 00280 g006
Figure 7. RT-PCR analysis of AmHSF genes in different tissues of A. mongholicus. Error bars represent three biological replicates and technical replicates. Significance analysis was performed for each component using the one-way ANOVA method. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 7. RT-PCR analysis of AmHSF genes in different tissues of A. mongholicus. Error bars represent three biological replicates and technical replicates. Significance analysis was performed for each component using the one-way ANOVA method. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001.
Biology 13 00280 g007
Figure 8. AmHSF gene expression levels after different light treatments. Error bars represent three biological replicates and technical replicates. Significance analysis was performed for each component using the one-way ANOVA method. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 8. AmHSF gene expression levels after different light treatments. Error bars represent three biological replicates and technical replicates. Significance analysis was performed for each component using the one-way ANOVA method. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001.
Biology 13 00280 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Z.; Wang, P.; He, J.; Kong, L.; Zhang, W.; Liu, W.; Liu, X.; Ma, W. Genome-Wide Analysis of the HSF Gene Family Reveals Its Role in Astragalus mongholicus under Different Light Conditions. Biology 2024, 13, 280. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13040280

AMA Style

Wang Z, Wang P, He J, Kong L, Zhang W, Liu W, Liu X, Ma W. Genome-Wide Analysis of the HSF Gene Family Reveals Its Role in Astragalus mongholicus under Different Light Conditions. Biology. 2024; 13(4):280. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13040280

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Zhen, Panpan Wang, Jiajun He, Lingyang Kong, Wenwei Zhang, Weili Liu, Xiubo Liu, and Wei Ma. 2024. "Genome-Wide Analysis of the HSF Gene Family Reveals Its Role in Astragalus mongholicus under Different Light Conditions" Biology 13, no. 4: 280. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13040280

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop