Next Article in Journal
Nitrogen Footprint of a Recycling System Integrated with Cropland and Livestock in the North China Plain
Next Article in Special Issue
Spatial Distribution of Pinus koraiensis Trees and Community-Level Spatial Associations in Broad-Leaved Korean Pine Mixed Forests in Northeastern China
Previous Article in Journal
The Grapevine Microbiome to the Rescue: Implications for the Biocontrol of Trunk Diseases
Previous Article in Special Issue
Contrasting Hydraulic Efficiency and Photosynthesis Strategy in Differential Successional Stages of a Subtropical Forest in a Karst Region
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 11
Issue 7
10.3390/plants11070841
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Growth of Deciduous and Evergreen Species in Two Contrasting Temperate Forest Stands in Korea: An Intersite Experiment

by
Byung Bae Park
1,*,
Youngtak Ko
1,
Jonathan O. Hernandez
1,2,
Ser-Oddamba Byambadorj
1 and
Si Ho Han
1
1
Department of Forest and Environmental Sciences, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea
2
Department of Forest Biological Sciences, University of the Philippines, Los Baños 4031, Philippines
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(7), 841; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11070841
Submission received: 15 February 2022 / Revised: 14 March 2022 / Accepted: 21 March 2022 / Published: 22 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Forest Environment and Ecology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Poor seedling establishment and growth can be a result of the limitation of light and soil resources in the forest understory. Here, we investigate the interacting effects of stand and soil characteristics on the seedling growth of deciduous species (Fraxinus rhynchophylla and Zelkova serrata) and evergreen species (Pinus koraiensis) through a 3-year intersite experiment in two contrasting forest stands. Seedlings were grown in both oak and pine stands using two different soil types, i.e., gray-brown forest soil (GB) and red-yellow forest soil (RY). Soil physicochemical properties, light intensity, tree-seedling height, root-collar diameter (RCD), and biomass growth were analyzed between two stands and/or soil types. Light availability was generally more abundant in the pine stand (mean: 1074.08 lx or 20.25%) than the oak stand (mean: 424.33 lx or 9.20%) throughout the year. The height and RCD growth of fast-growing and deciduous F. rhynchophylla and Z. serrata were higher in the pine than in the oak stand, particularly in GB soil. The growth of the slow-growing and evergreen P. koraiensis was not affected by the forest stand, except for its higher root growth in the oak stand and RY soil. Therefore, abundant light availability can enhance the growth and seedling establishment of F. rhynchophylla and Z. serrata in the pine-stand understory. Contrarily, P. koraiensis may be planted in the understory regardless of light condition, but with a slower growth rate.

1. Introduction

Tree-seedling establishment and juvenile growth of newly germinated seeds are critical life-history stages of trees, because survival and growth performance at the seedling stage affect the succession, structure, and function of forest ecosystems [1,2]. Poor seedling-community establishment and growth can be a result of resource limitation and heterogeneity of light and soil resources in the forest [3]. Seedlings of different species and life-history traits are thus expected to respond differently to resource limitation and heterogeneity due to variation in growth potential and shade tolerance [4]. In temperate forests, trade-offs between survival and growth along resource gradients are well-documented for saplings, but there is less evidence available for the seedling stage [5,6,7]. Thus, studies on seedling growth of contrasting species with different requirements for essential resources can help us understand how seedlings perform relative to each other via inter-site conditions.
The amount of light is one of the most important and heterogeneous factors influencing plant recruitment, survival, and growth, particularly of the newly established seedlings in the forest understory. The extent of the effects of light on tree seedlings’ overall performance in the understory may be influenced by the type of forest. In a deciduous forest, trees lose their leaves in the fall, the canopy opens, and abundant light begins to penetrate the forest floor; and then during spring and summer, they form a dense layer of canopy leaves which again blocks most of the sunlight. Such a characteristic of a deciduous forest plays a crucial role in the regeneration and early growth of woody species in the understory through the canopy-gap heterogeneity. For example, the seedling density and growth of hardwood species increases with increases in the canopy gap, which influences the availability of microsites [8]. Contrarily, previous studies have reported that coniferous trees significantly decrease light availability to the understory, resulting in a considerable reduction in vascular plant growth [9]. Broadleaf canopy favors the growth and establishment of full-sun plants, whereas evergreen coniferous trees increase the abundance of shade-tolerant plants [10,11]. Plant responses to contrasting light availability within a single site are well-documented in tropical rainforests [12], but to the best of our knowledge, only a few intersite experiments have been conducted in temperate regions to date. A better understanding of the seedling growth of fast-growing and slow-growing species in different forest types can help inform forest-management practices in temperate zones.
The characteristics of soil are also an important factor influencing seedling growth and establishment [13]. Soil texture affects the root growth and biomass allocation of fast-growing Prosopis seedlings, such that root growth is greater in sandy soils than loamy soils and aboveground growth is higher in clayey soils than other texture classes [14]. Similarly, well-drained sandy soils were found to be ideal for the seedling growth and establishment of legume species due to good aeration and drainage [15]. In Scots-pine stand, soil mineral contents also showed a positive correlation with seedling-height growth [16]. Further, the interaction of soil characteristics and light availability was a significant environmental factor that influenced vegetation growth in a mixed-conifer understory [17]. While light is deemed the most important resource for seedling growth [18], different soil characteristics and tree species have not yet been fully investigated simultaneously with light under intersite conditions.
It has long been recognized that there exist life-history trade-offs between full-sun and shade-tolerant tree species in their degree of dependence on light for growth, survival, and establishment in the understory [19]. For example, the reduction in seedling height and biomass due to shade was greater in full-sun, fast-growing pioneer species compared with slow-growing shade-tolerant ones [20]. Fast-growing species are more plastic to changing environments, enabling them to expedite growth rates in high-light conditions. Thus, in this study, we used three species that have contrasting life-history traits: namely, Fraxinus rhynchophylla Hance, Pinus koraiensis Siebold & Zucc., and Zelkova serrata (Thunb.) Makino. Two of these species are broadleaved deciduous (i.e., F. rhynchophylla and Z. serrata), while the other one is a needle-leaved evergreen tree species (i.e., P. koraiensis). These species are co-occurring in the forest; thus, the differences in their responses to resource availability in the forest understory may have important implications for forest management.
In this study, we investigated the seedling growth of fast-growing and deciduous F. rhynchophylla and Z. serrata and slow-growing and evergreen P. koraiensis in different forest stands with contrasting light conditions and soil characteristics through an inter-site experiment. We hypothesized that (1) seedling growth of fast-growing and deciduous species are higher in needle-leaf stands or in sites with higher light availability than oak stands or sites with lower light availability; (2) seedling growth of slow-growing evergreen species are unaffected, regardless of light and soil conditions; and (3) the effects of soil attributes on seedling growth vary significantly by forest stand.

2. Results

2.1. Variation in Soil Characteristics and Light Availability in Oak and Pine Forest Stand

Soils from the oak stand and pine stand were matched to gray-brown forest soils (GB) and red-yellow forest soils (RY), which were filed by the National Institute of Forest Science in Korea. The present study showed that the interaction effects of forest stand and soil horizon on the soil’s physicochemical characteristics were not statistically significant (Table S1). However, the main effects of either stand and soil horizon on OM, TN, exchangeable K+ and Mg2+, and CEC were statistically significant between GB and RY soil and between A- and B-soil horizons (Table 1 and Table S1). OM, TN, and CEC were significantly higher in RY soil than that GB soil. Contrarily, the GB soil had a significantly higher exchangeable K+ and Mg2+ than the RY soil. Soil pH and sand proportion were significantly higher in the GB than the RY soil. On average, the A-soil horizon had a considerably higher OM, TN, exchangeable K+ and Mg2+, and CEC than the B-soil horizon in both GB and RY soils.
Relative light availability was higher in the pine stand (mean: 1074.08 lx or 20.25%) than the oak stand (mean: 424.33 lx or 9.20%) throughout the year (Figure 1). During growing season, light availability was higher in the pine stand than the oak stand because light interception was lower in the former stand than in the latter stand as light intensity increased from April and May to August (Figure 1).

2.2. Height Growth, RCD Growth, and Biomass of Fraxinus rhynchophylla, Pinus koraiensis, and Zelkova serrata between Forest Stands and Soil Types

There were no significant interaction effects of stand × soil treatments on the height growth of all species, but the effect of time × stand in F. rhynchophylla was significant (Table S2). The main effect of forest stand on the height growth was also significant in both fast-growing and deciduous F. rhynchophylla and Z. serrata, but not in the slow-growing and evergreen P. koraiensis (Figure 2 and Figure S2; Table S2). Specifically, the relative height growth of the seedlings was generally higher in the pine stand compared with oak stand for F. rhynchophylla and Z. serrata. In the pine stand, the height of F. rhynchophylla and P. koraiensis seedlings generally increased with time by 13–73% and 15–56%, respectively (Figure 2 and Figure S2). In contrast, the relative height growth of Z. serrata declined with time by 22–80% in the oak stand, but when it was planted in the pine stand using RY soil, the relative height growth significantly increased by 58% in the 2015–2016 period (Figure 2 and Figure S2). In this study, a significant effect (p = 0.029) of soil on the height growth of Z. serrata was also detected: GB generally had a higher height growth than the RY soil type in both oak and pine stands (Figure 2; Table S2).
The effect of time × stand interaction on RCD was significant for F. rhynchophylla and Z. serrata (Figure 3; Table S2). Similar to relative height growth, the pine stand resulted in a significantly higher relative RCD growth rate than the oak stand for the two fast-growing deciduous species, especially in the 2016–2017 experimental period (Figure 2 and Figure S3). The marginal interaction effects of time × soil and stand × soil on the RCD of Z. serrata were also detected (Table S2). Specifically, GB resulted in a higher RCD compared with RY in the pine stand and the 2016–2017 period (Figure 3). Similar to height, the RCD growth of P. koraiensis was significantly influenced by time, but no stand or soil-treatment effects were observed. The relative RCD of P. koraiensis increased with time regardless of forest stands and soil types.
No significant interaction effect of stand × soil type was detected on biomass growth of F. rhynchophylla and P. koraiensis, but a significant interaction effect was found in the case of Z. serrata (Table S3). Specifically, Z. serrata seedlings grown in the pine stand using the GB soil type showed better biomass growth than the oak stand (Figure 4). Here, the pine stand yielded a significantly higher biomass growth of F. rhynchophylla than the oak stand regardless of soil type (Figure 4). There were contrasting patterns among species in biomass allocation between above-ground and below-ground: the oak stand resulted in a significantly higher root–shoot ratio of P. koraiensis than the pine stand in all soil types, but the opposite direction was observed for F. rhynchophylla and Z. serrata.

2.3. Principal Component Biplot Analysis

We performed PCA to determine the relationship of the growth, light availability, and soil variables measured in F. rhynchophylla, P. koraiensis, and Z. serrata across forest-stand and soil-type treatments (Figure 5). The first two components accounted for 87.3% of the variation in the dataset. Specifically, Dim1 accounted for 62.2% of the variation and was highly related to most of the soil variables, represented mostly by seedlings planted in pine soil on the left side and by seedlings grown using oak soil on the right side of the biplot. P. koraiensis was strongly influenced by soil characteristics rather than stand characteristics. F. rhynchophylla and Z. serrata are influenced by both the soil and stand characteristics. Dim2 accounted for 25.1% of the variation and was highly related to growth variables, light availability, and soil temperature (ST). Light and ST were highly correlated with height, RCD, and biomass growth.

3. Discussion

Based on our first hypothesis, we found that the fast-growing, deciduous F. rhynchophylla yielded higher relative height and RCD growth in the pine stand than the oak stand, with light intensities ranging from 1001.16–1147.01 lx and 396.67–452.66 lx, respectively. Although the effects of soil on height and RCD growth rates were not significant based on the results of the ANOVA, the PCA revealed that F. rhynchophylla seedlings (i.e., ZRP) planted in RY soil were highly associated with OM, TN, and CEC, whose concentrations were significantly higher in the pine stand than the oak stand. This suggests that the higher annual light availability and/or OM, TN, and CEC in the pine stand may have increased the growth of F. rhynchophylla. This can also be supported by the observed high correlation between soil temperature (ST) and light availability. The higher soil temperature in the pine stand due to higher light penetration may have facilitated decomposition of organic matter, resulting in higher CEC. A study showed that soil temperature can regulate root–soil interactions by influencing the rate of litter decomposition and soil microorganisms’ activity [21]. Contrarily, the PCA biplot showed that the F. rhynchophylla seedlings planted in the oak stand (i.e., FRO) were highly associated with K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, and soil pH instead of light availability, suggesting that the lower light availability in the oak stand may have resulted in a lower RCD growth of F. rhynchophylla seedlings. Our findings support the results of Yan et al. [22], who reported the ability of F. rhynchophylla to regenerate naturally in a completely cleared and degraded forest. Any silvicultural systems that can provide species with abundant sunlight (e.g., clear-cutting) have also been recommended for Fraxinus species [23]. For example, the understory of Larix kaempferi plantations was dominated by F. rhynchophylla seedlings after thinning [24]. Further, a previous study reported the increasing trend in the density of shade-intolerant F. rhynchophylla from the forest understory to large gaps [25]. This confirms the observed lower height, RCD, and biomass growth of the species in the broadleaf oak stand, with lower light availability throughout the year. Lastly, it has long been reported that seedlings of Fraxinus species develop best in at least 45% full sunlight [23].
Neither soil nor stand characteristics significantly impacted the height and RCD growth of P. koraiensis, and this contradicted our second and third hypotheses. This suggests that other factors may have also influenced the growth of the species. Here, we found that the relative RCD of P. koraiensis increased with time in all forest stands and soil types. Results can be attributed to the functional type (i.e., slow-growing and evergreen) and shade tolerance of P. koraiensis. Many slow-growing evergreen conifers have low photosynthetic capacity and low nitrogen concentrations but with a long leaf lifespan, which is typical of tree species growing in environments unsuited for rapid growth [26]. A previous study revealed that slow-growing species in the temperate forest grew slowly or remained unaffected regardless of light condition (high, moderate, low levels) [6]. Similarly, Valladares et al. [27] reported that the two evergreen tree species exhibited a reduced growth due to their low light response to light and nutrient availability. The authors further attributed the results to the conservative resource-use strategy typical of evergreens. Young P. koraiensis seedlings may have exhibited such a conservative strategy, particularly during the initial months of the experiment because of the need to allocate more biomass to persistent tissues necessary for shade tolerance. In this study, we found a significantly higher root–shoot ratio (RSR) and coarse root of P. koraiensis in the oak stand (with lower light availability) than pine stand in all soil types. The PCA biplot also showed that soil characteristics predominantly influenced P. koraiensis’s RSR, which is negatively correlated with aboveground growth. Several studies have long reported that the higher root–shoot ratios of shade-tolerant species compared with shade-intolerant ones are an important trait related to shade tolerance [1,28]. A similar study also found a significantly higher biomass allocation to coarse roots of shade-tolerant Fagus and Acer species compared with other shade-intolerant species when planted under shade conditions [29]. This may have allowed the establishment of P. koraiensis seedlings that are less susceptible to resource limitations, i.e., soil nutrients and light in the oak stand, by capturing below-ground resources more effectively. Furthermore, plants adapted to low-resource environments, such as evergreen trees, are expected to exhibit a conservative resource-use strategy at the expense of fast growth [30]. This could further explain the observed insignificant effect of the stand and soil and their interactions on the height and RCD growth of P. koraiensis.
The results we observed in the fast-growing and deciduous Z. serrata also supported our first hypothesis, such that its seedlings grew well in the pine stand, with higher light availability throughout the year. Similar to F. rhynchophylla, Z. serrata seedlings did not grow well in the oak stand. The effect of light was also seen in the significant decrease in relative height growth in the 2016–2017 experimental periods in both forest stands, possibly indicating an increased canopy closure with time. Plant height may have served an important trait in determining the growth of the species under the growing canopy of the stands. Our result is consistent with that of Tripathi et al. [4], who reported that a fast-growing and deciduous Acacia species showed the highest growth rate in high-light conditions among species planted under different forest-canopy conditions. However, the result of the present study is in contrast to the results in Choi et al. [31], i.e., above-ground growth of Z. serrata seedlings increased with decreases in light intensity. This discrepancy between these studies was probably because of the differences in light intensity and the observed interaction effects of stand × soil on most of the growth parameters measured in Z. serrata. This effect of soil characteristics can be seen in the PCA biplot, in which the growth performance of Z. serrata are influenced by both soil characteristics and light availability. Specifically, the growth of Z. serrata seedlings planted in the pine stand using RY soil (ZRO) is strongly and positively correlated with light availability and soil temperature, which are negatively correlated with all the soil variables. This could explain the decrease in relative height growth of Z. serrata seedlings planted in RY soil in the oak stand and a reverse effect when planted in the pine stand. Thus, we can deduce that higher and faster growth is possible for Z. serrata seedlings even in nutrient-deficient, sandy-soil conditions, provided that sufficient light is available. This can also explain the observed higher biomass growth of Z. serrata seedlings when planted in well-drained, porous GB soil in the pine stand. Our result confirms the findings that Z. serrata grows naturally in the lowlands with either full sunlight or partial shade and prefers well-drained alkaline soil [32].
In this study, both height and RCD growth of all species generally increased with time in all forest stands and soil types. This implies that all the species studied were able to adapt and respond positively to fluctuating or contrasting light and soil conditions, but with varying growth performance depending on how they change with time. This is because dependence on light, for example, may have been either gradual or abrupt depending on the species’ life-history traits (e.g., fast-growing vs. slow-growing). Here, the seedlings of the two fast-growing, deciduous species were affected by both stand and soil characteristics, whereas the slow-growing, evergreen species were mostly associated with soil characteristics as shown in their loadings in the PCA biplot. This suggests that the magnitude of the treatment effects may have also been influenced by the contrasting life-history traits.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Study Site

A 3-year intersite experiment was carried out from 2015 to 2017 at the experimental forest at Chungnam National University: one at the oak stand (36°22′13.68″ N, 127°20′33.07″ E) and the other at pine stand (36°22′11.52″ N, 127°20′32.55″ E). Oak stand is dominated by deciduous Quercus acutissima Carruth, whereas pine stand is dominated by evergreen Pinus rigida Mill. (Table 2). Q. acutissima has higher DBH and lower tree height than P. rigida. Tree density was higher in pine stand but with a lower basal area than oak stand. Based on our observation and tree-height data, we could say that the ratio of canopy depth/tree height may be higher in the oak stand than the pine stand. Thus, the forest canopy at the pine stand is generally more open (c.a., 30–45%), and therefore receives more light than oak stand throughout the year (Figure S1). In Korea, Q. acutissima drops litter both in the spring and fall seasons [33]. Contrarily, the peak time of leaf-litterfall production in P. rigida was observed in October–November and in June–July for reproductive-part litterfall [34].
The environmental data used in the study were obtained from a weather station close to the experimental sites (1 km in distance, 36°22′19.2″ N 127°22′19.6″E) (Figure 6). Mean annual temperature of the two stands was 13.79 °C, with the highest and lowest monthly temperature of −1.3 °C to 0 °C in January (winter) and 25.4 °C–27.1 °C in July (summer), respectively. The mean monthly precipitation was 88 mm and the highest precipitation rate was also observed during summer, particularly in July (145.6 mm–434.5 mm). Mean annual relative humidity was 69.4%, with the highest values obtained in the summer and fall season (July–November). Mean solar radiation was 481 MJ m−2, with the highest radiation (759 MJ m−2–769 MJ m−2) detected in May in all the experimental periods. Soil-surface temperature, with a mean annual value of 16 °C, was also at its peak during summer (28.13 °C–29.48 °C) and started to decline from fall towards winter. The same pattern was observed in soil temperature at 10 cm depth across experimental periods.

4.2. Plant Materials and Experimental Design

One-year-old nursery-grown seedlings of the three forest-tree species with contrasting life-history and/or ecophysiological traits were used in this study (Table 3), two of which are broadleaved deciduous (i.e., F. rhynchophylla and Z. serrata), while the other is a needle-leaf evergreen tree species (i.e., P. koraiensis). All species occur in a range of different habitats from low to high elevations. In terms of light requirement, both F. rhynchophylla and P. koraiensis are in between full-sun and shade-tolerant, whereas Z. serrata is a heliophilous species or well-adapted to full sunlight. In addition to their contrasting characteristics, these species were selected because of their high economic and ecological importance in temperate forests, particularly in East Asia.
Seedlings of the three species were planted in 45-L pots, with a depth of 49 cm and an inner surface diameter of 36 cm. We used 60 pots for each forest stand and each pot was filled with both A- and B-soil horizons from oak and pine stands to maintain the original soil layer. To conduct the intersite experiment, potted seedlings were grown in two contrasting forest stands (i.e., oak vs. pine) using two different soil types, i.e., gray-colored sandy loam (GB) from the oak stand and dark-red-colored sandy clay loam (RY) from the pine stand. Thus, the treatments in the present study were the two types of forest stands and the two different soil types.
Five plots were established in each forest stand, each consisting of three species, two soil types, and two pots per plot. Thirty pots, or half of the total number of pots, were filled with soil from the oak stand and the remaining pots were filled with soil from the pine stand. No additional soil or amendment from the other sources was added in the pots. Some potted seedlings were placed in the prepared holes to have the same level with the forest floor in all stands. The average distance between pots was 2 m × 3 m and was randomly distributed in each plot, while the distance between rows was 2 m. The two forest stands were approximately 100 m away from each other. During the acclimatization period, the seedlings were watered using 10 L/pot/day for several days until treatment imposition. Manual weeding and spraying of pesticide were also performed every year in each stand.

4.3. Soil Analysis

In 2015 at 8:00 to 10:00 a.m., soil samples were collected from three randomly selected points per plot in the study site. Samples were categorized into soil horizon A (i.e., 0–25 cm depth) and horizon B (i.e., 25–50 cm depth) by soil color. After drying at 65 °C for 48 h in the oven, the physical and chemical properties of the composited soil samples (n = 5) by horizon per plot were analyzed. The soil pH was determined using a pH-meter method, organic matter (OM) and total nitrogen (TN) by the dry-oxidation (utilizing C-N analyzer equipment) method, and available phosphorus (P) with the Lancaster method. The other soil properties such as cation-exchange capacity (CEC), electrical conductivity, and exchangeable K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+ were analyzed using the 1N-ammonium acetate-replacement-leaching method, EC-meter (1:5 soil-water) method, and 1N-ammonium acetate leaching with the atomic absorption spectrophotometry method, respectively.

4.4. Light Measurement

Light measurement in lux (converted to a percentage) was conducted in each forest stand from March (spring season) to November (fall season). The measurement was taken once a week, 1–2 h before noon in the three pre-identified points in each forest stand using a handheld light meter (TENMARS TM-202 Lux/fc, Taipei, Taiwan). An average value of 3–5 readings was recorded and taken only during sunny days from each point. Relative light availability (%) was calculated by values at each stand divided by values at open space between two stands. During the measurement, we made sure that the light meter sensor was facing directly upwards in order to accurately detect the amount of light reaching the sensor from the sky hemisphere. The distance between the oak and pine stands was within a distance of 200 m, so the time between light measurements did not exceed ten minutes.

4.5. Growth Measurement and Analysis

Tree-seedling height and root-collar-diameter (RCD) growth were measured yearly after planting, while the biomass growth was measured at the harvesting time in 2017. Measurements of RCD and height of seedlings were carried out using a digital caliper and foldable ruler, respectively. Seedling height was measured from the RCD to the highest terminal bud. At the end of the growing season in 2017, the seedlings were harvested for biomass-growth measurement. Relative growth rates were also analyzed for each species. Harvested seedlings were separated into leaf, stem, and root components. The above-ground and below-ground biomasses were determined using the oven-drying method (i.e., 65 °C for 48 h).

4.6. Statistical Analysis

All the statistical analyses were conducted in the R Statistical Package Software at a 95% confidence level. Two-way repeated analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post hoc test was carried out for each species to evaluate the treatment and interaction effects on RCD and height growth between oak and pine stands and between soil types with three years of repeated measures. Two-way ANOVA with post hoc test was carried out for each species to evaluate the treatment and interaction effects on biomass growth between oak and pine stands and between soil types. Principal component analysis (PCA) was also run to analyze the relationship among growth, soil, and stand characteristics for all species using the prcomp function. Only principal components (PCs) with ≥1 eigenvalues were considered in the biplot using the factoextra and devtools R packages.

5. Conclusions

It is difficult to determine which of the complexities of different canopy characteristics of the forest stands and light environments are more important for seedling growth in this study; however, we revealed that the seedling growth of fast-growing and deciduous F. rhynchophylla and Z. serrata were higher in the pine stand or in sites with higher light availability than the oak stand or in sites with lower light availability. The seedling growth of slow-growing and evergreen P. koraiensis was not impacted by both light and soil conditions. Lastly, the significant growth effects of soil attributes were observed only in the seedlings of Z. serrata in both forest stands. The present study recommends further studies to consider the effects of the other traits influencing the plant responses and/or environmental factors affecting the actual environment in the forest floor.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants11070841/s1, Figure S1: crown structure of (A) pine stand and (B) oak stand; Figure S2: Relative height growth rate of Fraxinus rhynchophylla, Pinus koraiensis, and Zelkova serrata in different soil and forest stands from 2015 to 2017; Figure S3: Relative root collar diameter growth of Fraxinus rhynchophylla, Pinus koraiensis, and Zelkova serrata in different soil and forest stands from 2016 to 2017; Table S1: p values estimated by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for soil physical and chemical properties across soil horizons and stands; Table S2: p values estimated by two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) for height growth and RCD growth of three species at harvesting year across soil horizons and stands; Table S3: p values estimated by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for biomass growth of three species across soil properties and stands.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.B.P. and Y.K.; methodology, B.B.P. and Y.K.; software, Y.K. and S.H.H.; validation, B.B.P., J.O.H., S.-O.B. and S.H.H.; formal analysis, B.B.P. and Y.K.; investigation, Y.K. and S.-O.B.; resources, B.B.P.; data curation, B.B.P. and S.H.H.; writing—original draft preparation, B.B.P. and Y.K.; writing—review and editing, B.B.P. and J.O.H.; visualization, B.B.P.; supervision, B.B.P.; project administration, B.B.P. and S.H.H.; funding acquisition, B.B.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was carried out with the support of ‘R&D Program for Forest Science Technology (Project No. 2021379B10-2223-BD02 and 2020184C10-2222-AA02)’ provided by Korea Forest Service (Korea Forestry Promotion Institute) and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (No. 2021R1A2C201017812).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article or Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

The authors of the present study would like to thank the members of the Silviculture Laboratory for the assistance in establishing the experiment at the CNU experimental forest.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Modrzyński, J.; Chmura, D.J.; Tjoelker, M.G. Seedling growth and biomass allocation in relation to leaf habit and shade tolerance among 10 temperate tree species. Tree Physiol. 2015, 35, 879–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Mediavilla, S.; Escudero, A. Mature trees versus seedlings: Differences in leaf traits and gas exchange patterns in three co-occurring Mediterranean oaks. Ann. For. Sci. 2003, 60, 455–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Park, B.; Han, S.; Hernandez, J.; An, J.; Nyam-Osor, B.; Jung, M.; Lee, P.; Lee, S. The use of deep container and heterogeneous substrate as potentially effective nursery practice to produce good quality nodal seedlings of Populus sibirica Tausch. Forests 2021, 12, 418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tripathi, S.; Bhadouria, R.; Srivastava, P.; Devi, R.S.; Chaturvedi, R.; Raghubanshi, A.S. Effects of light availability on leaf attributes and seedling growth of four tree species in tropical dry forest. Ecol. Processes 2020, 9, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gilbert, B.; Wright, S.J.; Muller-Landau, H.C.; Kitajima, K.; Hernandéz, A. Life history trade-offs in tropical trees and Lianas. Ecology 2006, 87, 1281–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Seiwa, K. Trade-offs between seedling growth and survival in deciduous broadleaved trees in a temperate forest. Ann. Bot. 2007, 99, 537–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Hernandez, J.O.; Maldia, L.S.J.; Park, B.B. Research trends and methodological approaches of the impacts of windstorms on forests in tropical, subtropical, and temperate zones: Where are we now and how should research move forward? Plants 2020, 9, 1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sapkota, I.P.; Oden, P.C. Gap characteristics and their effects on regeneration, dominance and early growth of woody species. J. Plant Ecol. 2009, 2, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Kumar, P.; Chen, H.Y.; Thomas, S.C.; Shahi, C. Linking resource availability and heterogeneity to understorey species diversity through succession in Boreal Forest of Canada. J. Ecol. 2018, 106, 1266–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hart, S.A.; Chen, H.Y. Understory vegetation dynamics of North American boreal forests. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2006, 25, 381–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Su, X.; Wang, M.; Huang, Z.; Fu, S.; Chen, H.Y.H. Forest understorey vegetation: Colonization and the availability and heterogeneity of resources. Forests 2019, 10, 944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Brenes-Arguedas, T.; Roddy, A.; Coley, P.D.; Kursar, T.A. Do differences in understory light contribute to species distributions along a tropical rainfall gradient? Oecologia 2010, 166, 443–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Matkala, L.; Salemaa, M.; Bäck, J. Soil total phosphorus and nitrogen explain vegetation community composition in a northern forest ecosystem near a phosphate massif. Biogeosciences 2019, 17, 1535–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Meijer, S.S.; Holmgren, M.; Van der Putten, W.H. Effects of plant–soil feedback on tree seedling growth under arid conditions. J. Plant Ecol. 2011, 4, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Travlos, I.S.; Karamanos, A.J. Effects of soil texture on vegetative growth of the tropical legume Marama Bean (Tylosema esculentum). J. Agron. 2006, 5, 609–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Kuuluvainen, T.; Hokkanen, T.J.; Järvinen, E.; Pukkala, T. Factors related to seedling growth in a Boreal Scots Pine Stand: A spatial analysis of a vegetation–soil system. Can. J. For. Res. 1993, 23, 2101–2109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. North, M.; Oakley, B.; Fiegener, R.; Gray, A.; Barbour, M. Influence of light and soil moisture on Sierran mixed-conifer understory communities. Plant Ecol. 2005, 177, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Youn, W.B.; Hernandez, J.O.; Park, B.B. Effects of shade and planting methods on the growth of Heracleum moellendorffii and Adenophora divaricata in different soil moisture and nutrient conditions. Plants 2021, 10, 2203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hubbell, S.P.; Foster, R.B.; O’Brien, S.T.; Harms, K.E.; Condit, R.; Wechsler, B.; Wright, S.J.; de Lao, S.L. Light-gap disturbances, recruitment limitation, and tree diversity in a neotropical forest. Science 1999, 283, 554–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Khurana, E.; Singh, J.S. Impact of life-history traits on response of seedlings of five tree species of tropical dry forest to Shade. J. Trop. Ecol. 2006, 22, 653–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Onwuka, B. Effects of soil temperature on some soil properties and plant growth. Adv. Plants Agric. Res. 2018, 8, 34–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yan, Q.; Gang, Q.; Zhu, J. Size-dependent patterns of seed rain in gaps in temperate secondary forests, Northeast China. Forests 2019, 10, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Kim, J.H.; Yang, H.M.; Kang, S.K. Natural regeneration of Fraxinus mandshurica and F. rhynchophylla in the natural deciduous forest. For. Sci. Technol. 2010, 6, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yeo, U.S.; Lee, D.K. Early regeneration of Fraxinus rhynchophylla in the understorey of Larix kaempferi stands in response to thinning. For. Int. J. For. Res. 2006, 79, 167–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lu, D.; Zhu, J.; Sun, Y.; Hu, L.; Zhang, G. Gap closure process by lateral extension growth of canopy trees and its effect on woody species regeneration in a temperate secondary forest, Northeast China. Silva Fenn. 2015, 49, 1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Walters, M.B.; Reich, P.B. Low-light carbon balance and shade tolerance in the seedlings of woody plants: Do winter deciduous and broad-leaved evergreen species differ? New Phytol. 1999, 143, 143–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Valladares, F.; Martinez-Ferri, E.; Balaguer, L.; Perez-Corona, E.; Manrique, E. Low leaf-level response to light and nutrients in Mediterranean Evergreen oaks: A conservative resource-use strategy? New Phytol. 2000, 148, 79–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Day, M.E.; Zazzaro, S.; Perkins, L.B. Seedling ontogeny and environmental plasticity in two co-occurring shade-tolerant conifers and implications for environment-population interactions. Am. J. Bot. 2014, 101, 45–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Giertych, M.J.; Karolewski, P.; Oleksyn, J. Carbon allocation in seedlings of deciduous tree species depends on their shade tolerance. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2015, 37, 216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Heberling, J.M.; Fridley, J.D. Resource-use strategies of native and invasive plants in eastern North American forests. New Phytol. 2013, 200, 523–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Choi, J.H.; Kwon, K.W.; Chung, J.C. Effect of artificial shade treatment on the growth and biomass production of several deciduous tree species. J. Korean Soc. 2002, 21, 65–75. [Google Scholar]
  32. Orwa, C.; Mutua, A.; Kindt, R.; Jamnadass, R.; Simons, A. Agroforestree Database: A Tree Reference and Selection Guide Version 4.0. 2009. Available online: http://www.worldagroforestry.org/af/treedb/ (accessed on 2 March 2022).
  33. Song, U. Forest litter and shrubs act as an understory filter for the survival of Quercus mongolica seedlings in Mt. Kwan-ak, South Korea. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 4193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Kim, G.-K.; Chang, N.-K. Litter production and decomposition in the Pinus rigida Plantation in Mt. Kwan-ak. Korean J. Ecol. 1989, 12, 9–20. [Google Scholar]
  35. Ji, M.; Jin, G.; Liu, Z. Effects of ontogenetic stage and leaf age on leaf functional traits and the relationships between traits in Pinus koraiensis. J. For. Res. 2021, 32, 2459–2471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yi, X.; Xiao, Z.; Zhang, Z. Seed dispersal of Korean pine Pinus koraiensis labeled by two different tags in a northern temperate forest, northeast China. Ecol. Res. 2007, 23, 379–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Oyama, H.; Fuse, O.; Tomimatsu, H.; Seiwa, K. Variable seed behavior increases recruitment success of a hardwood tree, Zelkova serrata, in spatially heterogeneous forest environments. For. Ecol. Manag. 2018, 415–416, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, M.; Zhu, J.; Yan, Q. Seed germination of Pinus koraiensis in response to light regimes caused by shading and seed positions. For. Syst. 2012, 21, 426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Jung, B.-N.; Choi, Y.-J.; Shin, H.-D.; Park, J.-H. Macruropyxis fraxini on Fraxinus rhynchophylla: Confirmation in the Korean Peninsula after 82 years and the first record in South Korea. Mycobiology 2020, 48, 518–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lin, L.; He, J.; Xie, L.; Cui, G. Prediction of the suitable area of the Chinese white pines (Pinus subsect. strobus) under climate changes and implications for their conservation. Forests 2020, 11, 996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhu, J.; Wang, K.; Sun, Y.; Yan, Q. Response of Pinus koraiensis seedling growth to different light conditions based on the assessment of photosynthesis in current and one-year-old needles. J. For. Res. 2014, 25, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 11 00841 g001 550
Figure 1. Light availability (%) at oak and pine stands measured during the onset of leaf flush until mid-November.
Figure 1. Light availability (%) at oak and pine stands measured during the onset of leaf flush until mid-November.
Plants 11 00841 g001
Plants 11 00841 g002 550
Figure 2. Height growth of (A) Fraxinus rhynchophylla, (B) Pinus koraiensis, and (C) Zelkova serrata in different soil and forest stands from 2015 to 2017.
Figure 2. Height growth of (A) Fraxinus rhynchophylla, (B) Pinus koraiensis, and (C) Zelkova serrata in different soil and forest stands from 2015 to 2017.
Plants 11 00841 g002
Plants 11 00841 g003 550
Figure 3. Root-collar-diameter growth of (A) Fraxinus rhynchophylla, (B) Pinus koraiensis, and (C) Zelkova serrata in different soil and forest stands from 2016 to 2017.
Figure 3. Root-collar-diameter growth of (A) Fraxinus rhynchophylla, (B) Pinus koraiensis, and (C) Zelkova serrata in different soil and forest stands from 2016 to 2017.
Plants 11 00841 g003
Plants 11 00841 g004 550
Figure 4. Biomass growth of (A) Fraxinus rhynchophylla, (B) Pinus koraiensis, and (C) Zelkova serrata in different soil and forest stands at harvesting year.
Figure 4. Biomass growth of (A) Fraxinus rhynchophylla, (B) Pinus koraiensis, and (C) Zelkova serrata in different soil and forest stands at harvesting year.
Plants 11 00841 g004
Plants 11 00841 g005 550
Figure 5. Principal-component-loading plot of the growth and site variables and individuals of Fraxinus rhynchophylla (FGP, FGO, FRO, FRP), Pinus koraiensis (PRP, PGP, PRO, PGO) and Zelkova serrata (ZGP, ZRO, ZRP, ZGO) planted in oak and pine stands. RCD—root collar diameter, HT—height, BB—below-ground biomass, AB—above-ground biomass, TB—total biomass, RSR—root-to-shoot ratio, ST—soil temperature, TN—total nitrogen, CEC—cation-exchange capacity, OM—organic matter, pH—soil pH, Na—exchangeable sodium, Mg—exchangeable magnesium, P—available phosphorus, Ca—exchangeable calcium, and K—exchangeable potassium.
Figure 5. Principal-component-loading plot of the growth and site variables and individuals of Fraxinus rhynchophylla (FGP, FGO, FRO, FRP), Pinus koraiensis (PRP, PGP, PRO, PGO) and Zelkova serrata (ZGP, ZRO, ZRP, ZGO) planted in oak and pine stands. RCD—root collar diameter, HT—height, BB—below-ground biomass, AB—above-ground biomass, TB—total biomass, RSR—root-to-shoot ratio, ST—soil temperature, TN—total nitrogen, CEC—cation-exchange capacity, OM—organic matter, pH—soil pH, Na—exchangeable sodium, Mg—exchangeable magnesium, P—available phosphorus, Ca—exchangeable calcium, and K—exchangeable potassium.
Plants 11 00841 g005
Plants 11 00841 g006 550
Figure 6. Environmental variables ((A) monthly average air temperature, (B) monthly average relative humidity, (C) monthly precipitation, (D) monthly sunlight, (E) monthly solar radiation, (F) monthly average soil-surface temperature) measured close to the study sites. All variables were measured at the Daejeon Meteorological weather station (36°22′19.2″ N 127°22′19.6″ E) from 2015 to 2017.
Figure 6. Environmental variables ((A) monthly average air temperature, (B) monthly average relative humidity, (C) monthly precipitation, (D) monthly sunlight, (E) monthly solar radiation, (F) monthly average soil-surface temperature) measured close to the study sites. All variables were measured at the Daejeon Meteorological weather station (36°22′19.2″ N 127°22′19.6″ E) from 2015 to 2017.
Plants 11 00841 g006
Table
Table 1. Soil properties from oak and pine stands. Parentheses are standard errors of the mean (n = 5).
Table 1. Soil properties from oak and pine stands. Parentheses are standard errors of the mean (n = 5).
Soil HorizonA HorizonB Horizon
Forest TypeOak StandPine StandOak StandPine Stand
(GB)(RY)(GB)(RY)
Soil texture
Sand (%)74.3(2.2)62.3(1.9)77.9(3.2)58.1(1.0)
Silt (%)19.4(2.4)26.7(1.2)16.2(0.8)27.2(1.3)
Clay (%)6.3(0.7)10.9(0.8)5.9(2.5)14.7(0.4)
Organic matter (%)2.3(0.3)4.8(0.3)0.5(0.1)2.0(0.3)
pH5.43(0.12)4.87(0.09)5.57(0.09)4.93(0.07)
Total nitrogen (%)0.13(0.01)0.16(0.00)0.05(0.01)0.09(0.01)
Available phosphorus (mg kg−1)17.67(3.53)14.33(2.85)7.00(1.00)5.67(0.88)
Exchangeable K+ (cmolc kg−1)0.34(0.02)0.11(0.01)0.21(0.03)0.10(0.02)
Exchangeable Ca2+ (cmolc kg−1)1.56(0.34)1.10(0.11)1.23(0.17)0.82(0.06)
Exchangeable Mg2+ (cmolc kg−1)0.67(0.02)0.22(0.03)0.41(0.06)0.14(0.04)
Exchangeable Na+ (cmolc kg−1)0.10(0.01)0.08(0.01)0.09(0.01)0.11(0.01)
CEC (cmolc kg−1)6.82(0.46)10.01(0.44)4.03(1.18)8.91(0.32)
Table
Table 2. The forest structure of oak and pine stands in the experimental forest at Chungnam National University, South Korea. Parentheses are standard errors of the mean (n = 5).
Table 2. The forest structure of oak and pine stands in the experimental forest at Chungnam National University, South Korea. Parentheses are standard errors of the mean (n = 5).
StandsDominant SpeciesAverage Height
(m)		DBH
(cm)		Density (Trees ha−1)Basal Area
(m2 ha−1)
OakQuercus acutissima13.7 (2.0)39.8 (11.2)500 (33)78 (15)
PinePinus rigida18.1 (1.8)26.7 (1.8)800 (58)47 (8)
Table
Table 3. Contrasting life-history/ecological traits of Fraxinus rhynchophylla, Pinus koraiensis, and Zelkova serrata.
Table 3. Contrasting life-history/ecological traits of Fraxinus rhynchophylla, Pinus koraiensis, and Zelkova serrata.
Plant TraitsSpecies
Fraxinus rhynchophyllaPinus koraiensisZelkova serrata
Functional typeBroadleaf deciduousNeedle-leaf evergreenBroadleaf deciduous
Growth rateSemi-fast-growingSlow-growingFast-growing
Native rangeEast Asia (temperate)East Asia (temperate)East Asia (temperate)
Mature sizeDBH: 50–60 cm; height: 25–30 m [23]DBH: >50 cm; height: >22–40 m [35]DBH: 50–60 cm; height: 20–25 m
Seed dispersalBy windBy animals (e.g., birds, squirrels, and rodents) [36]Seed-bearing shoot [37]
Seed/cone size/massVery small winged seed (c.a. 10 g/300 pcs)Large (500–600 mg) [38]1 g/90 shoot-seeds
Seedling architectureEpigealEpigealEpigeal
Habitat requirementsMoist, fertile soils; hillsides and river valleys [39]Deep fertile soil; wide range of rainfall levels [40]Tolerates most soil types, with pH of about 7.5, moist, and well-drained soils
Light requirementIn between full-sun and shade-tolerant [23]In between full-sun and shade-tolerant [41]Full sunlight
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Park, B.B.; Ko, Y.; Hernandez, J.O.; Byambadorj, S.-O.; Han, S.H. Growth of Deciduous and Evergreen Species in Two Contrasting Temperate Forest Stands in Korea: An Intersite Experiment. Plants 2022, 11, 841. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11070841

AMA Style

Park BB, Ko Y, Hernandez JO, Byambadorj S-O, Han SH. Growth of Deciduous and Evergreen Species in Two Contrasting Temperate Forest Stands in Korea: An Intersite Experiment. Plants. 2022; 11(7):841. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11070841

Chicago/Turabian Style

Park, Byung Bae, Youngtak Ko, Jonathan O. Hernandez, Ser-Oddamba Byambadorj, and Si Ho Han. 2022. "Growth of Deciduous and Evergreen Species in Two Contrasting Temperate Forest Stands in Korea: An Intersite Experiment" Plants 11, no. 7: 841. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11070841

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop