Next Article in Journal
Alginate Oligosaccharides Alleviate Salt Stress in Rice Seedlings by Regulating Cell Wall Metabolism to Maintain Cell Wall Structure and Improve Lodging Resistance
Previous Article in Journal
Magnaporthe oryzae Effector AvrPik-D Targets Rice Rubisco Small Subunit OsRBCS4 to Suppress Immunity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Microwave-Assisted Extraction of Secondary Metabolites Using Ethyl Lactate Green Solvent from Ambrosia arborescens: LC/ESI-MS/MS and Antioxidant Activity

1
Departamento de Química, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Formales, Universidad Nacional de San Agustín, Arequipa 68513, Peru
2
Instituto de Farmacia, Facultad de Ciencias, Campus Isla Teja, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia 5090000, Chile
3
Laboratory of Algal Biotechnology, Centre ALGATECH, Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Opatovický Mlýn, 379 81 Třeboň, Czech Republic
4
Departamento de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Andrés Bello, Campus Viña del Mar, Quillota 980, Viña del Mar 2520000, Chile
5
Departamento de Química, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Las Palmeras 3425, Nuñoa, Santiago 8320000, Chile
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2024, 13(9), 1213; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13091213
Submission received: 20 March 2024 / Revised: 17 April 2024 / Accepted: 23 April 2024 / Published: 27 April 2024

Abstract

:
Alternative solvents are being tested as green solvents to replace the traditional organic solvents used in both academy and industry. Some of these are already available, such as ethyl lactate, cyrene, limonene, glycerol, and others. This alternative explores eco-friendly processes for extracting secondary metabolites from nature, thus increasing the number of unconventional extraction methods with lower environmental impact over conventional methods. In this context, the Peruvian Ambrosia arborescens was our model while exploring a microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) approach over maceration. The objective of this study was to perform a phytochemical study including UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS and the antioxidant activity of Ambrosia arborescens, using sustainable strategies by mixing both microwaves and ethyl lactate as a green solvent. The results showed that ethyl lactate/MAE (15.07%) achieved a higher extraction yield than methanol/maceration (12.6%). In the case of the isolation of psilostachyin, it was similar to ethyl lactate (0.44%) when compared to methanol (0.40%). Regarding UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS studies, the results were similar. Twenty-eight compounds were identified in the ethyl lactate/MAE and methanol/maceration extracts, except for the tentative identification of two additional amino acids (peaks 4 and 6) in the MeOH extract. In relation to the antioxidant assay, the activity of the ethyl lactate extract was a little higher than the methanol extract in terms of ORAC (715.38 ± 3.2) and DPPH (263.04 ± 2.8). This study on A. arborescens demonstrated that the unconventional techniques, such as MAE related to ethyl lactate, could replace maceration/MeOH for the extraction and isolation of metabolites from diverse sources. This finding showed the potential of unconventional methods with green solvents to provide eco-friendly methods based on green chemistry.

1. Introduction

Ambrosia arborescens Miller is an aromatic medicinal plant that belongs to the Asteraceae family. This species is common in Peru, Colombia, Ecuador, and Bolivia at altitudes between 2000 and 3500 m above sea level. It is commonly known as “marco” and its conservation status is common and abundant. Its leaves are used externally in traditional medicine for rheumatism and muscle pain [1]. Extraction of secondary metabolites from plants requires various isolation techniques because the plants’ metabolite content is generally low, and extraction techniques are often the bottleneck in natural product chemistry. These techniques can be divided into conventional and unconventional. The conventional techniques, which include maceration, percolation, and Soxhlet extraction, are the most widely used, and they are characterized by high cost, long extraction times, and the use of toxic organic solvents. Unconventional or modern techniques include ultrasound, microwave, enzyme extraction, supercritical fluid extraction, and high pressure, which are characterized by lower cost, shorter extraction time, and energy conservation [2].
Chemat et al. (2012) propose the following definition for green extraction of natural products: “Green extraction is based on the discovery and development of extraction processes that reduce energy consumption, allow the use of alternative solvents and renewable natural products, and ensure a safe and high-quality extract or product”. With this in mind, there are six principles for environmentally friendly extraction of natural products that all chemists should be aware of in order to follow an environmentally conscious path in natural product chemistry: 1. Innovate by selecting and using varieties of renewable plant resources. 2. Use alternative solvents, especially water or agro-solvents. 3. Reduce energy consumption through energy recovery and use of innovative technologies. 4. Generate byproducts instead of waste involving bio- and agro-refining industry. 5. Reduce operation units and promotion of safe, robust and controlled processes. 6. Aim for a non-denatured and biodegradable extract without impurities [3].
Alternative solvents have been tested as green solvents to replace the traditional organic solvents used in both in academy and industry. A green solvent should be biodegradable, recyclable, non-toxic, non-volatile, cheap, and readily available, such as ethyl lactate, cyrene, limonene, glycerol, deep eutectic solvents, and water [2]. Many natural product chemists base their research on considering the health of the planet. Thus, the implementation of ecopharmacognosy proposed by Cordell (2015) will be incorporated into the process of future natural product research [4]. It is known that the main ecological challenge in phytochemistry is the use of solvents due to the risk of environmental pollution [4,5]. This fact has opened up the search for more efficient processes in combination with more environmentally friendly solvents, whose negative impact is lower. In this sense, many pharmaceutical companies such as Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, and Sanofi have developed guidelines and new processes in this field.
Based on this context, and continuing our research on green chemistry applied to plant natural products, we now report the results of a phytochemical study of green extracts of Ambrosia arborescens Miller obtained using the green solvent ethyl lactate and microwaves. Finally, all extracts were verified by UHPLC/ESI/MS/MS.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Extraction Using Conventional or Non-Conventional Techniques

Powdered samples of A. arborescens (50 g) were extracted with MeOH and ethyl lactate, using conventional or non-conventional techniques. Maceration was used in the first case and microwaves in the second. Extraction with methanol and ethyl lactate (MAE) yielded 12.5% and 15.0%, respectively. These results suggest that ethyl lactate could replace methanol as an extraction solvent despite its higher cost. Thus, these results suggest that the non-conventional technique based on MAE is better than maceration.

2.2. Isolation

To isolate the main compound, crude extracts (CM and NCM) obtained after solvent evaporation were fractionated by both flash column chromatography (SiO2) and CC (SiO2). Psilostachyin 1 was isolated from methanol (maceration) and ethyl lactate (MAE) extracts, in yields of 0.40% and 0.44%, respectively. Psilostachyin was identified based on spectroscopic analysis (1H-NMR). The chemical structure of psilostachyin is shown in Figure 1. This result shows that the isolation of psilostachyin with green solvents is comparable to that of methanol in terms of yield. On the other hand, the extraction of metabolites from plants usually requires the use of organic solvents such as hexane, dichloromethane, acetone, methanol, or their mixtures. Hexane is used for the extraction of lipophilic metabolites, and it is the first choice due to its low price. Methanol is preferred because of its polar compounds. However, hexane and methanol have negative effects on the environment and living organisms. An alternative to the use of organic solvents for extraction could be ethyl lactate and heptane or their mixtures [6,7].

2.3. Metabolomic Profiling Using UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS

The ethyl lactate and methanolic extracts were selected for metabolic profiling and comparative purposes, as shown in Table 1. All compounds were compared and identified with previously published LC/MS/MS data [8,9,10,11,12,13].

2.3.1. Carbohydrates

Peak 1 was tentatively identified as sucrose, with a molecular ion at m/z 341.1042. It was found in both extracts [8].

2.3.2. Simple Organic Acids

Peaks 2, 3, and 5 were identified as quinic acid (C7H12O6), malic acid (C4H5O5), and succinic acid (C4H5O4), with m/z 191.0613, 133.0130, and 117.0201, respectively [8,9]. All these compounds were found in both extracts.

2.3.3. Nitrogen-Containing Compounds

Peak 4 and peak 6 were identified by HRMS and MS/MS, respectively. Fragments of amino acids were detected, including leucine-hexose (m/z 292.1420; 130.0875) or its isomer isoleucine-hexose and phenylalanine (m/z 164.0713; 147.0492) [8,9]. These compounds were found in the methanolic extract and not in the ethyl lactate extract.

2.3.4. Hydroxybenzoic Acid and Its Derivatives

Peaks 7, 8, and 18 showed a deprotonated molecule at m/z 315.0745 (C13H15O9), in almost all cases. In the MS/MS, ions at 153.0200 corresponding to dihydroxybenzoic acid fragments were observed, indicating the presence of dihydroxybenzoic acid hexosides. Vanillic acid hexoside was assigned to peak 9 based on the losses of the aglycone (m/z 167.0351). Galloyl dihexoside (peak 13) showed one molecular ion at m/z 493.1188 and its daughter ions at m/z 331.0668 (loss of hexoside) and m/z 169.0149 (loss of two hexosides) [8,9,14]. All these hydroxybenzoic acids were found in both methanol and ethyl lactate extracts.

2.3.5. Hydroxycinnamic Acids

Numerous studies have demonstrated the antioxidant potential of extracts containing hydroxycinnamic acids [8,9,14]. Six compounds (peaks 10–12 and 14–16) were tentatively identified in both extracts studied. In this regard, peaks 10–12 with molecular ions at m/z 353.0881, 353.0880, and 367.1045 correspond to monocaffeoylquinic acid, monocaffeoylquinic acid I, and caffeoylquinic acid methyl ester, respectively. All of these peaks have an identical daughter ion at 191.0562 (quinic acid). Peak 14 was identified as dicaffeoylquinic acid with molecular ions at m/z 515.1220 and its MS/MS fragments (caffeoylquinic acid, quinic acid, and caffeic acid). The isomeric peaks 15–16 were assigned to chlorogenic acid hexoside based on their fragments at m/z 353.0880 and 191.0566 [8,9,14].

2.3.6. Flavonoid Derivatives

Among flavonoids, two compounds known as quercetin methyl ether (peak 20) and tetrahydroxy dimethoxy flavone (peak 21) were identified in both extracts [8,9,14].

2.3.7. Terpenoid Derivatives

Based on HRMS, MS/MS, and findings from Ambrosia phytochemistry [10,11,12,13], five compounds belonging to two sesquiterpenoid skeletons (ambrosanolide and oplopanone) were tentatively identified. Peak 19 was assigned to the sesquiterpene lactone dehydropsilostachyin (m/z 281.1408; C15H21O5). Peak 19 produced fragment ions at m/z 237.1512, corresponding to the loss of CO2 and then an additional CO2 (m/z 191.1558). The sesquiterpene lactone psilostachyin was tentatively assigned to peak 23 based on its daughter ions at m/z 265.1451 (loss of CO2). Psilostachyin was isolated, as shown above, and identified by NMR in both extracts. Peak 24 was tentatively identified as a psilostachyin derivative (m/z 263.1357; C15H19O4). Peaks 25 (m/z 251.1717; C15H23O3) and 26 (m/z 249.11560; C15H21O3) were tentatively assigned to oxooplopanone and hydroxyoxooplopanone sesquiterpenoids, respectively [10].

2.3.8. Lipid Derivatives

Four compounds were detected in both extracts of A. arborescens, including azelaic acid (peak 17), trihydroxyoctadecadienoic acid (peak 22), and hydroxyoctadecatrienoic acids (peaks 27 and 28) [8,9,14].

2.4. Antioxidant Activity

Flavonoid content, total phenolics, and antioxidant activity were evaluated by the Folin–Ciocalteau method and the ferric trichloride method, while antioxidant activity was expressed as FRAP, ferric reducing antioxidant power, ORAC, oxygen radical absorbance, and DPPH bleaching capacity (Table 2). MeOH extraction by maceration (CM) showed FRAP ferrous reduction ability (711.43 ± 23.2 mg/g extract), followed by ethyl lactate extraction by MAE (NCM, 705.22 ± 15.42 mg Trolox/g extract). In terms of DPPH quenching capacity, the extract of NCM (263.04 ± 2.9) was more effective than that of CM (180.47 ± 2.6). These results are in agreement with the ORAC assay (Table 2). Our results are in agreement with those from antioxidant plants, but lower in relation to fruits [15,16].
As you can see in Table 2, the TPC of NCM (ethyl lactate/MAE) is almost twice as low as the TPC of CM (MeOH/maceration), while the TFC of NCM is 2.5 times lower than that of CM. In this sense, even though NCM uses a green solvent, it produces more yield than CM. These are general data and do not take into account the real extraction capacity of both methodologies. Moreover, the FRAP potency is similar between the two extracts, while ORAC capacity is higher for the NCM (715.38 ± 3.2) than for the CM (541.13 ± 4.8), with the same trend occurring in the case of the quenching of the DPPH radical (Table 2). Therefore, this means that the green NCM extract can differentiate between and extract more antioxidant compounds than the MeOH extract. In terms of yields, both extracts are comparable; however, the green extract was a little higher (15.0%), thus having more antioxidant power.
In relation to the phytochemistry and biological activities of A. arborescens, Hilario-Vargas et al. reported the acute toxicity of an aqueous extract of the leaves of A. arborescens Mill at a single dose of 300 and 2000 mg/kg in rats. The study showed that the aqueous extract had an LD50 greater than 2000 mg/kg, causing mild congestion in the liver and kidneys based on creatinine, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and histopathological examinations [17]. Another work indicated that the sesquiterpene lactones coronopilin and damsin from Bolivian A. arborescens inhibited the expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and MCP-1 via NF-κB inhibition, suggesting that they could be useful as anti-inflammatory agents for human skin [18]. In our case, psilostachyin and coronopilin were tentatively identified by LC/MS/MS. Psilostachyin was isolated from Peruvian A. arborescens as the main component, while damsin (13.4 mg/g) and coronopilin (12.3 mg/g) were detected in high concentrations in the Bolivian sample. These results indicate the presence of damsin in Bolivian samples, but not in Peruvian plants, which could be due to environmental conditions including the climatic and edaphic factors of these countries. In cancer research, the sesquiterpene lactones damsin, coronopilin, ambrosin, and dindol 01 inhibited cell proliferation by down-regulating cyclin-dependent kinase 2 at doses up to 5 µM. Moreover, these compounds inhibited tumor necrosis factor-α, and damsin and ambrosin decreased the subpopulation of cancer stem cells [19], while coronopilin inhibited leukemia cells with an IC50 ≤ 20 µM [20]. On the other hand, Solís-Quispe et al. (2022) identified one hundred and thirteen essential oil compounds, with sesquiterpenes and monoterpenes being the most important classes. Moreover, it was found that the essential oil exhibited a free radical scavenging effect, in addition to antioxidant activity, by inhibiting lipid peroxidation in the brain of rats [21]. It is known that the Ambrosia genus produces characteristic chemical skeletons such as pseudoguaianolides, eudesmanes, and oplopanones [10,11,12,13]. One of the first reports on Peruvian A. arborescens described the isolation of the sesquiterpenoids damsin, coronopilin, psilostachyin, and psilostachyin C [22]. On the other hand, De Leo et al. 2010 [10] reported the presence of sesquiterpenoids such as damsin, damsinic acid, 10α-hydroxydamsin, psilostachyin, psilostachyin C, 10α-hydroxy-11,13-dihydro-5-epi psilostachyin, volenol, 12-hydroxy-4(5), 11(13)-eudesmadien-15-al, 4(15)-eudesmene-1β,7α-diol, eudesm-11(13)-en-4β,9β-diol, dehydrocoronopilin, coronopilin, 13-hydroxy-4-oxo-7(11)-pseudoguaien-12,6-olide, 4β-hydroxypseudoguaian-12,6-olide-4-O-β-D-glucopyranoside, and 1α-hydroxy-7-oxo-iso-anhydrooplopanone in the leaves of A. arborescens from Ecuador. In addition, the two diterpenoids 15R,16-dihydroxy-3-oxoisopimar-9(11)-ene and 15S,16-dihydroxy-3-oxoisopimar-9(11)-ene were isolated. These results are of great importance for Ambrosia chemistry, as six new compounds were detected for the first time.
From the point of view of green extraction techniques and green isolation, the use or substitution of toxic solvents was minimal. In our case, psilostachyin was isolated from a 50 g sample of Peruvian A. arborescens using ethyl lactate (green solvent) with mixtures of n-heptane (GRAS solvent), representing a new transition from classical to green isolation in natural product chemistry. Although the yields were comparable to those of methanol, this is the first report of the application of green chemistry to A. arborescens.
The green extraction process is one important step for alternative phytochemical analysis in natural product chemistry. This process determines the isolation, identification, and composition of secondary metabolites prior to their assessment by analytical techniques such as LC-ESI/MS/MS. In recent years, a combination of unconventional techniques with green solvents has been used to promote a substantial reduction of toxic solvents in favor of producing higher quality extracts. A promising method includes MAE with ethyl lactate solvent; this extraction is simple, ecological, and low-energy and involves reduced time for extraction and low consumption of solvents for the extraction of compounds from natural sources. In this context, MAE has demonstrated itself to be an advantageous method for the extraction with the following influential factors: volume of the solvent, microwave power, extraction time, matrix, and temperature. All works reported in the literature include a combination of these factors to obtain caffeine and polyphenols from green tea; phenolic acids, flavonoid and its glycosides from Hibiscus sabdariffa; polyphenols and flavonoids from Cynara scolymus; pectins from orange peel; polyphenols in quercus shells; tannins and flavonoids from Myrtus communis leaves; polyphenols of stems, flowers, and seeds from Ocimum basilicum; and oleuropein from olive leaves [23,24].
In relation to the use of ethyl lactate as an alternative solvent, it shows a direct relationship with the green criterion, and it follows green chemistry principles. Ethyl lactate is biodegradable with an oral LD50 over 2000 mg/kg, with properties such as low surface tension, low vapor pressure, and high boiling point. Thus, it can replace organic solvents such as acetone, xylene, toluene, methyl ethyl ketone, or other toxic solvents for many applications including paints, cleaning of graffiti, composites, and adhesives, among others [25]. Therefore, the use of ethyl lactate is increasingly available in academic laboratories as alternative extracting agent to traditional solvents. In recent years, the use of ethyl lactate for extraction and separation has increased, showing the potential use of this solvent in natural product chemistry, such as for carotenoids and their congeners, tocopherol, sclareol, quercetin, rutin, caffeine, amino acids, and phenols from lichens [26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33].
The use of unconventional techniques, together with green solvents, could open new avenues for the extraction and isolation of secondary metabolites from plants, in order to provide eco-friendlier processes.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Plant Material

Specimens were collected in 2019 in Distrito de Chiguata, Arequipa, Peru (GPS coordinates: 16°01′28″ N, 71°01′25″ E) and identified as Ambrosia arborescens Miller by Prof. Fatima Caceres of San Agustin University, Arequipa, Peru. A voucher specimen (N° AMA-03032020) was delivered from the Herbarium of the Universidad de San Agustin.

3.2. Chemicals

TLC (Kieselgel 60 GF254, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was performed in heptane/EtOAc mixtures (9:1; 7:3 and 1:1 v/v), and spots were visualized by spraying plates with H2SO4-MeOH (5:95, v/v) and heating to 120 °C. Silica gel (Kieselgel 60, Merck 0.063–0.200 mm) and Sephadex (LH-20, Merck) were used for column chromatography (CC). Ethyl lactate was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Saint Louis, MO, USA). Purified water (TOC < 5 µg/L) was obtained from a reverse osmosis system (Arium 126 61316-RO and Arium 611 UV unit (Sartorius, Goettingen, Germany)). Methanol (HPLC grade) and formic acid (for mass spectrometry, puriss. p.a.) were purchased from J.T. Baker (Phillipsburg, NJ, USA). Folin–Ciocalteu (FC) reagent, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), ferric chloride hexahydrate, 2,4,6-tris(2-pyridyl)-s-triazine, Trolox, quercetin, gallic acid, di-methyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and trichloroacetic acid were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany).

3.3. Maceration Extraction

The powdered sample of Ambrosia arborescens (200 mg) was added to 10 mL of methanol at room temperature with constant stirring (200 rpm) and left for 24 h. After centrifugation (9000× g, 30 min), the methanolic solution was evaporated in vacuum to yield 25.07 ± 0.4 mg of a dark extract (12.6 ± 0.21%). Extractions were performed in triplicate following previous work [34].

3.4. Microwave-Assisted Extraction (MAE)

The powdered samples of A. arborescens (200 mg) were placed in 10 mL of ethyl lactate. They were then put in a microwave reactor (Anton Parr, Buchs, Switzerland) with adjustable parameters (100 °C, 30 min, 15 W). After centrifugation at 9000× g for 30 min, the supernatant was evaporated under vacuum to yield a dark gummy extract (29.93 ± 1.2 mg; 15.0 ± 0.62%). Extractions were performed in triplicate following previous work [34].

3.5. Extraction and Isolation

Maceration and MAE in green solvents were used to prepare extracts, along with conventional organic solvents to fractionate and purify the main compound for comparative purposes.

3.5.1. Conventional Methods

Dried and powdered material of A. arborescens (50 g) was macerated with methanol (3 times, 1.0 L, 3 days/extraction), yielding a methanolic extract (CM; 6 g). This extract (5 g) was subjected to flash chromatography on silica gel (63–200 µm, 60 g, column length 15 cm, i.d. 10 cm) and eluted with n-hexane/EtOAc mixtures (1 L each) of increasing polarity (7:3, 4:6, 0:1; v/v) to yield three fractions (CM 1–3). Fraction CM-1 (1 g, n-hexane/EtOAc 7:3) was submitted to CC and eluted with EtOAc-n-hexane (0:1, 0.5:9.5, 1:9, 1.5:8.5, 2:8, 3:7 v/v) and combined into two fractions (ACM-1A and ACM-1B) after TLC comparison. CC (silica gel 63–200 µm, 70 g) on fraction ACM-1A (0.7 g), eluted with n-hexane-EtOAc mixtures (0–30% EtOAc) resulted in the isolation of the main compound 1, known as psilostachyin (150 mg) [35]. The fraction CM-2 (0.8 g, n-hexane/EtOAc 4:6) was purified by CC using n-hexane-EtOAc mixtures (20–60% EtOAc) as the mobile phase, allowing compound 1 (50 mg) to be separated again.

3.5.2. Non-Conventional Methods

MAE was used together with green solvents to obtain the green extracts. Fractionation and purification of A. arborescens (50 g) after microwave extraction was performed as described above. Subsequently, the ethyl lactate solution was concentrated under reduced pressure, yielding a green extract (NCM; 7.5 g). This extract (5.0 g) was subjected to CC on silica gel (63–200 µm, 60 g, column length 15 cm, i.d. 10 cm) and eluted with n-heptane/ethyl lactate mixtures (1 L each) of increasing polarity (7:3, 4:6; 0:1; v/v) to produce three fractions (NCM 1–3). Fraction NCM-1 (1 g, n-heptane/EL 7:3) was submitted to CC and eluted with n-heptane/ethyl lactate (0:1, 0.5:9.5, 1:9, 1.5:8.5, 2:8, 3:7 v/v) and combined according to their similarity after TLC comparison, yielding psilostachyin as the main compound (160 mg). Fraction NCM-2 (0.8 g, n-heptane/EL 4:6) was purified under the same conditions as CM-2, where the compound 1 (60 mg) was re-isolated.

3.6. UHPLC-APCI-HRMS/MS Instrument

The chemical identity of the target compounds was determined through a Dionex UltiMate 3000 HPLC system (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) connected to a high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry (HRMS/MS) detector with atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) source (Impact HD mass spectrometer Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) (HPLC-APCI-HRMS). Some 2 mg of extract (obtained of the point 3.3 and 3.4) was dissolved in methanol (2 mL) and then filtered (PTFE filter), and finally 10 µL was injected into the instrument, as previously described [34,36].

HPLC and MS Parameters

HPLC was performed using a C18 column (Accucore, 150 mm × 4.6 mm ID, 2.5 µm, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany) at 25 °C. Detection wavelengths were 254, 280, 330, and 354 nm, and PDA from 200 to 800 nm for peak identification. The mobile phase was 0.1% formic acid aqueous solution (A) and 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile (B). The gradient program (time (min), % B) was: (0.00, 12); (5.00, 12); (10.00, 20); (15.00, 40); (20.00, 40); (25.00, 70); (35.00, 12) and 15 min for column equilibration before each injection. The flow rate was 1.00 mL min−1, and the injection volume was 10 µL. The extracts and standards dissolved in methanol were kept at 10 °C during storage in the auto sampler. The parameters of the Impact HD mass spectrometer were set as previously described [8,34,36].

3.7. Antioxidant and Content of Phenolic Assays

3.7.1. Polyphenol and Flavonoid Contents

The determination of total phenolic compounds (TPC) was performed following protocols previously described [8,36]. Approximately 12 μL of the extract and 168 μL of 1% Folin–Ciocalteu reagent (Merck) were added to a well of a microplate reader. The mixture was allowed to react for 5 min, and then 120 μL of 10% Na2CO3 was added. The mixture was incubated at room temperature for 30 min in darkness. Then, the absorbance was measured at 765 nm using a UV-visible multiplate reader (Synergy HTX, Billerica, MA, USA). The content of phenolic compounds was then expressed as micromoles of gallic acid per gram of dry weight (μmol GAE/g extract). The AlCl3 method was used to determine the total flavonoid content. For this assay, 30 μL of sample (2 mg/mL) was added to 159 µL of 5% NaNO2. After a 5-min rest period, 18 μL of 10% AlCl3 was added to the mixture. At the sixth minute, 18 μL of 1 M NaOH was added, and the absorbance was measured at 510 nm using a UV-visible multiplate reader (Synergy HTX, Billerica, MA, USA). The flavonoid content (TFC) was calculated using a quercetin standard calibration curve (25–150 ppm). Results were expressed as quercetin micromoles per gram of dry sample (μmol Q/g dry weight).

3.7.2. DPPH Test

The DPPH radical was measured by the decolorization method [8,36]. Briefly, 9 μL of green or methanol extract (2 mg/mL) and 341 μL methanolic DPPH solution (400 μM) were adjusted with methanol to an absorbance of 1.10 ± 0.02 at 517 nm. The mixture was mixed and left to react in the dark at room temperature for 20 min, after which the time absorbance at 517 nm was measured. The percentage of discoloration of the DPPH radical was determined by measuring the change in absorbance at 517 nm, and the values obtained were converted to percentage inhibition of the DPPH moiety. A curve was plotted with different dilutions of the extract, and the results were expressed as IC50 in µg/mL.

3.7.3. Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power Test (FRAP)

The methodology was performed as published with slight modifications [8,36]. Briefly, 10 μL of the solubilized extracts (2 mg/mL) were mixed with 290 μL of the FRAP solution, mixed in the wells of the microplate, and left to react in the dark at room temperature for 5 min. Absorbance measurement of the stained Fe-TPTZ complex was performed at 595 nm. The absorbance data were fitted to the Trolox standard curve equation (μmol/L). Results were calculated as Trolox equivalents (TE), in mg Trolox per gram dry weight (mg Trolox/g dry weight).

3.7.4. Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity (ORAC) Test

ORAC activity was determined according to the method previously described [8,36]. Fluorescein (3′,6′-dihydroxyspiro [2-benzofuran-3,9′-xanthene]-1-one) was prepared as stock solution (4 μM) in 75 mM phosphate buffer pH 7.4, stored at 4 °C, and used as fluorescent probe. AAPH reagent (203.4 mg) was freshly prepared in 15 mL of 75 mM phosphate buffer and used to generate the peroxyl radical. Trolox was used as an internal standard. In all experiments, 150 μL of fluorescein was added to each well. The blank wells received 25 μL of phosphate buffer, the standards received 25 μL of Trolox dilution, and the samples received 25 μL of sample. Excitation was monitored at 485 nm and emission at 528 nm with a band pass of 20 nm on an HTX Multi-Mode Microplate Reader. Results were determined by a quadratic regression equation (Trolox/sample vs. fluorescence decay curves) and expressed as μM Trolox equivalents per 100 g of dry plant.

3.8. Statistical Analysis

Results were reported as the mean ± S.D. In all experiments, statistical differences between samples and controls were checked by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s test. The significance level was set at p < 0.01. All statistical analyses were executed using GraphPad Prism 6 for Windows.

4. Conclusions

MAE was both used in combination with ethyl lactate to produce extracts and compared with a conventional method such as maceration to isolate and purify the main component of the Peruvian A. arborescens. Our study showed that the isolation of psilostachyin by MAE/ethyl lactate was comparable to maceration/methanol, based on the yield obtained (0.40–0.44%). In the metabolomic profile by UHPLC/ESI/MS/MS, the ethyl lactate and methanol extracts were similar in terms of secondary metabolites (in all, twenty-eight), except for the identification of two amino acids (peaks 4 and 6) in the MeOH extract. Finally, in relation to the antioxidant assay, the activity of the ethyl lactate extract was a little higher than the methanol extract in terms of ORAC (715.38 ± 3.2) and DPPH (263.04 ± 2.8). These unconventional techniques, together with the use of green solvents, could replace toxic solvents for the extraction and isolation of secondary metabolites from plants and provide more sustainable methods based on green chemistry.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.T. and C.A.; methodology, E.G., M.J.S. and C.A.; formal analysis, E.G., J.C., B.S. and T.C.d.T.; resources, E.G. and C.A.; data curation, J.C., M.J.S. and J.H.; writing—original draft preparation, B.S., M.J.S. and C.A.; writing—review and editing, e.g., M.J.S., J.C., B.S. and C.A.; supervision, H.T. and C.A.; project administration, E.G. and C.A.; funding acquisition, H.T. and C.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Universidad Nacional de San Agustín de Arequipa-UNSA [grant contract number 08-2019-UNSA]; and Carlos Areche acknowledges funds from ANID-Fondecyt Regular [1230414].

Data Availability Statement

The raw data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the authors.

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank the editor and the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. De la Cruz, H.; Vilcapoma, G.; Zevallos, P.A. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used by the Andean people of Canta, Lima, Peru. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2007, 111, 284–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zullaikah, S.; Rachmaniah, O.; Utomo, A.T.; Niawanti, H.; Ju, Y.H. Green Separation of Bioactive Natural Products Using Liquefied Mixture of Solids. In Green Chemistry; Saleh, H.M., Koller, M., Eds.; Intechopen: London, UK, 2018; pp. 17–38. [Google Scholar]
  3. Chemat, F.; Abert Vian, M.; Cravotto, G. Green Extraction of Natural Products: Concept and Principles. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 8615–8627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Cordell, G.A. Ecopharmacognosy and the responsibilities of natural product research to sustainability. Phytochem. Lett. 2015, 11, 332–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Funari, C.S.; Rinaldo, D.; Bolzani, V.S.; Verpoorte, R. Reaction of the phytochemistry community to Green chemistry: Insights obtained since 1990. J. Nat. Prod. 2023, 86, 440–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Chemat, F.; Abert-Vian, M.; Fabiano-Tixier, A.S.; Strube, J.; Uhlenbrock, L.; Gunjevic, V.; Cravotto, G. Green extraction of natural products. Origins, current status, and future challenges. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2019, 118, 248–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pereira, C.S.M.; Silva, V.M.T.M.; Rodrigues, A.E. Ethyl lactate as a solvent: Properties, applications and production processes—A review. Green Chem. 2011, 13, 2658–2671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Guerrero-Castillo, P.; Reyes, S.; Robles, J.; Simirgiotis, M.J.; Sepulveda, B.; Fernandez-Burgos, R.; Areche, C. Biological activity and chemical characterization of Pouteria lúcuma sedes: A possible use of an agricultural waste. Waste Manag. 2019, 88, 319–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Abu-Reidah, I.M.; Contreras, M.M.; Arraez-Roman, D.; Segura-Carretero, A.; Fernandez-Gutierrez, A. Reversed-phase ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray ionization-quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometry as a powerful tool for metabolomic profiling of vegetables: Lactuca sativa as an example of its application. J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1313, 212–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. De Leo, M.; Vera Saltos, M.B.; Naranjo Puente, B.F.; De Tommasi, N.; Braca, A. Sesquiterpenes and diterpenes from Ambrosia arborescens. Phytochemistry 2010, 71, 804–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Ata, A.; Diduck, C.; Udenigwe, C.C.; Zahid, S.; Decken, A. New chemical constituents of Ambrosia spilostachya. Arkivoc 2007, 13, 195–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Oberti, J.C.; Silva, G.L.; Sosa, V.E.; Kulanthaivel, P.; Herz, W. Ambrosanolides and secoambrosanolides from Ambrosia tenuifolia. Phytochemistry 1986, 25, 1355–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Abdel-Salam, N.A.; Mahmoud, Z.F.; Ziesche, J.; Jakupovic, J. Sesquiterpene lactones from Ambrosia marítima (Damssissa). Phytochemistry 1984, 23, 2851–2853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Abu-Reidah, I.M.; Arraez-Roman, D.; Segura-Carretero, A.; Fernandez-Gutierrez, A. Extensive characterization of bioactive phenolic constituents from globe artichoke (Cynara scolymus L.) by HPLC-DAD-ESI-QTOF-MS. Food Chem. 2013, 141, 2269–2277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Genskowsky, E.; Puente, L.A.; Pérez-Álvarez, J.A.; Fernández-López, J.; Muñoz, L.A.; Viuda-Martos, M. Determination of polyphenolic profile, antioxidant activity and antibacterial properties of maqui [Aristotelia chilensis (Molina) Stuntz] a Chilean blackberry. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2016, 96, 4235–4242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ramos, L.C.; Palacios, J.; Barrientos, R.E.; Gómez, J.; Castagnini, J.M.; Barba, F.J.; Tapia, A.; Paredes, A.; Cifuentes, F.; Simirgiotis, M.J. UHPLC-MS Phenolic Fingerprinting, Aorta Endothelium Relaxation Effect, Antioxidant, and Enzyme Inhibition Activities of Azara dentata Ruiz & Pav Berries. Foods 2023, 12, 643. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Silva-Correa, C.R.; Villarreal-La Torre, V.E.; González-Siccha, A.D.; Cruzado-Razco, J.L.; Gonzalez-Blas, M.V.; Sagastegui-Guarniz, W.A.; Calderon-Peña, A.A.; Aspajo-Villalaz, C.L.; Hilario-Vargas, J. Acute toxicity of aqueous extract of Ambrosia arborescens Mill. on biochemical and histopathological parameters in rats. Toxicol. Res. 2022, 38, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Svensson, D.; Lozano, M.; Almanza, G.R.; Nilsson, B.O.; Sterner, O.; Villagomez, R. Sesquiterpene lactones from Ambrosia arborescens Mill. Inhibit pro-inflammatory cytokine expression and modulate NF-Kb signaling in human skin cells. Phytomedicine 2018, 50, 118–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Sotillo, W.S.; Villagomez, R.; Smiljanic, S.; Huang, X.; Malakpour, A.; Kempengren, S.; Rodrigo, G.; Almanza, G.; Sterner, O.; Oredsson, S. Anti-cancer stem cell activity of a sesquiterpene lactone isolated from Ambrosia arborescens and of a synthetic derivative. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0184304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cotugno, R.; Fortunato, R.; Santoro, A.; Gallotta, D.; Braca, A.; De Tommasi, N.; Belisario, M.A. Effect of sesquiterpene lactone coronopilin on leukaemia cell population growth cell type-specific induction of apoptosis and mitotic catastrophe. Cell Prolif. 2012, 45, 53–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Solís-Quispe, L.; Pino, J.A.; Marín-Villa, J.Z.; Tomaylla-Cruz, C.; Solís-Quispe, J.A.; Aragón-Alencastre, L.J.; Hernández, I.; Cuellar, C.; Rodeiro, I.; Fernández, M.D. Chemical composition and antioxidant activity of Ambrosia arborescens Miller leaf essential oil from Peruvian Andes. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2022, 34, 439–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Herz, W.; Anderson, G.; Gibaja, S.; Raulais, D. Sesquiterpene lactones of some Ambrosia species. Phytochemistry 1969, 8, 877–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Da Silva, R.F.; Carneiro, C.N.; De Souza, C.B.; Gomez, F.J.V.; Espino, M.; Boiteux, J.; Fernandez, M.A.; Silva, M.F.; Dias, F.S. Sustainable extraction bioactive compounds procedures in medicinal plants based on the principles of green analytical chemistry: A review. Microchem. J. 2022, 175, 107184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Majid, I.; Khan, S.; Aladel, A.; Dar, A.H.; Adnan, M.; Khan, M.I.; Awadelkareem, A.M.; Ashraf, S.A. Recent insights into green extraction techniques as efficient methods for the extraction of bioactive components and essential oils from foods. CyTA-J. Food 2023, 21, 101–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Calvo-Flores, F.G.; Monteagudo-Arrebola, M.J.; Dobado, J.A.; Isac-Garcia, J. Green and Bio-Based Solvents. Top. Curr. Chem. (Z) 2018, 376, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ishida, B.; Chapman, M.H. Carotenoid extraction from plants using a novel, enviromentally friendly solvent. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 1051–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Vicente, G.; Paiva, A.; Fornari, T.; Najdanovic-Visak, V. Liquid-liquid equilibria for separation of tocopherol from olive oil using ethyl lactate. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 172, 879–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tombokan, X.C.; Aguda, R.M.; Danehower, D.A.; Kilpatrick, P.K.; Carbonell, R.G. Three-component phase behavior of the sclareol-ethyl lactate-carbon dioxide system for GAS applications. J. Supercrit. Fluids. 2008, 45, 146–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Velho, P.; Requejo, P.F.; Gomez, E.; Macedo, E.A. Novel ethyl lactate based ATPS for the purification of rutin and quercetin. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 252, 117447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kua, Y.L.; Gan, S.; Morris, A.; Ng, H.K. Ethyl lactate as a potential green solvent to extract hydrophilic (polar) and lipophilic (non-polar) phytonutrients simultaneously from fruit and vegetable by-products. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2016, 4, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kamalanathan, I.; Canal, L.; Hegarty, J.; Najdanovic-Visak, V. Partitioning of amino acids in the novel biphasic systems based on environmentally friendly ethyl lactate. Fluid Phase Equilibr. 2018, 462, 6–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rajkowska, K.; Simińska, D.; Kunicka-Styczyńska, A. Bioactivities and Microbial Quality of Lycium Fruits (Goji) Extracts Derived by Various Solvents and Green Extraction Methods. Molecules 2022, 27, 7856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Sepulveda, B.; Benites, D.; Albornoz, L.; Simirgiotis, M.; Castro, O.; Garcia-Beltran, O.; Areche, C. Green ultrasound-assisted extraction of lichen substances from Hypotrachyna cirrhata. Ethyl lactate, a better extracting agent tan metanol toxic organic solvent? Nat. Prod. Res. 2023, 37, 159–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Calla-Quispe, E.; Robles, J.; Areche, C.; Sepulveda, B. Are Ionic Liquids Better Extracting Agents Than Toxic Volatile Organic Solvents? A Combination of Ionic Liquids, Microwave and LC/MS/MS, Applied to the Lichen Stereocaulon glareosum. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Borges del Castillo, J.; Manresa-Ferrero, M.T.; Rodriguez-Luis, F.; Vasquez-Bueno, P.; Joseph-Nathan, P. 13C NMR study of psilostachyinolides from some Ambrosia species. Org. Magn. Reson. 1981, 17, 232–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Areche, C.; Hernandez, M.; Cano, T.; Ticona, J.; Cortes, C.; Simirgiotis, M.; Caceres, F.; Borquez, J.; Echeverria, J.; Sepulveda, B. Corryocactus brevistylus (K. Schum. ex Vaupel) Britton & Rose (Cactaceae): Antioxidant, Gastroprotective Effects, and Metabolomic Profiling by Ultrahigh-Pressure Liquid Chromatography and Electrospray High Resolution Orbitrap Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 417. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Chemical structure of psilostachyin.
Figure 1. Chemical structure of psilostachyin.
Plants 13 01213 g001
Table 1. LC-ESI-MS/MS identification of secondary metabolites from Peruvian A. arborescens.
Table 1. LC-ESI-MS/MS identification of secondary metabolites from Peruvian A. arborescens.
PeakTR (min)CompoundsFormula MolecularTheoretical
Mass
Experimental
Mass
MS Ions
(m/z)
Solvent
Maceration
Solvent
MAE
13.33SucroseC15H17O9341.1031341.1042179.0569MeOHEL
23.47Quinic acidC7H12O6191.0561191.0563---MeOHEL
34.78Malic acidC4H5O5133.0149133.0139---MeOHEL
45.65Leucine/isoleucine-hexoseC12H22NO7292.1402292.1420202.1085,
130.0875
MeOH-
56.54Succinic acidC4H5O4117.0193117.0201---MeOHEL
610.10PhenylalanineC9H10NO2164.0717164.0713147.0492MeOH-
710.24Dihydroxybenzoic acid hexosideC13H15O9315.0735315.0745153.0200MeOHEL
811.66Dihydroxybenzoic acid hexoside IC13H15O9315.0734315.0740---MeOHEL
912.47Vanillic acid hexoside C14H17O9329.0878329.0886167.0351MeOHEL
1014.07Monocaffeoylquinic acid C16H17O9353.0878353.0881191.0563MeOHEL
1114.61Monocaffeoylquinic acid IC16H17O9353.0878353.0880191.0562MeOHEL
1215.14Caffeoylquinic acid methyl esterC17H20O9367.1035367.1045191.0565MeOHEL
1315.54Galloyl dihexosideC19H26O15493.1199493.1188331.0668
169.0149
MeOHEL
1415.81Dicaffeoylquinic acid C25H23O12515.1195515.1220353.0871
191.0566
179.0350
MeOHEL
1516.35Chlorogenic acid hexoside C22H27O14515.1418515.1428353.0880
191.0560
MeOHEL
1617.02Chlorogenic acid hexoside IC22H27O14515.1418515.1428353.0881
191.0566
MeOHEL
1718.76Nonanedioic acid (azelaic acid)C9H16O4187.0976187.0984---MeOHEL
1819.83Dihydroxybenzoic acid hexoside IIC13H15O9315.0735315.0739---MeOHEL
1921.30DehydropsilostachyinC15H21O5281.1389281.1408191.1558
237.1512
253.1829
265.1447
MeOHEL
2021.83Quercetin methyl etherC16H11O7315.0510315.0523---MeOHEL
2122.37Tetrahydroxy dimethoxy flavoneC17H14O8345.0616345.0629---MeOHEL
2222.64Trihydroxyoctadecadienoic acidC18H31O5327.2177327.2189---MeOHEL
2323.17PsilostachyinC15H19O5279.1238-265.1451MeOHEL
2423.98Psilostachyin derivative
or coronopilin
C15H19O4263.1289263.1357---MeOHEL
2524.64Oxo-oplopanoneC15H23O3251.1647251.1717---MeOHEL
2625.45Hydroxy-oxo-oplopanoneC15H21O3249.1496249.1560---
2729.06Hydroxyoctadecatrienoic acidC18H29O3293.2117293.2198---MeOHEL
2829.46Hydroxyoctadecatrienoic acid IC18H29O3293.2117293.2198---MeOHEL
Table 2. Total phenolic content, total flavonoid content, and antioxidant activity (FRAP, ferric reducing antioxidant power; ORAC, oxygen radical absorbance capacity; and DPPH bleaching capacity) of different extractions from Ambrosia.
Table 2. Total phenolic content, total flavonoid content, and antioxidant activity (FRAP, ferric reducing antioxidant power; ORAC, oxygen radical absorbance capacity; and DPPH bleaching capacity) of different extractions from Ambrosia.
SampleTPCTFCFRAP *ORAC *DPPH *
NCM (ethyl lactate, MAE)5.541 ± 0.54 a3.84 ± 0.43 b705.22 ± 15.42 c715.38 ± 3.2 d263.04 ± 2.8 e
CM (MeOH, maceration)9.581 ± 0.626.32 ± 0.44 g711.43 ± 23.2 c541.13 ± 4.8180.47 ± 2.6
All values are expressed as means ± SD (n = 3). * micrograms per gram of plant. Values in the same column marked with the same letter are not statistically different (p < 0.05).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guillen, E.; Terrones, H.; de Terrones, T.C.; Simirgiotis, M.J.; Hájek, J.; Cheel, J.; Sepulveda, B.; Areche, C. Microwave-Assisted Extraction of Secondary Metabolites Using Ethyl Lactate Green Solvent from Ambrosia arborescens: LC/ESI-MS/MS and Antioxidant Activity. Plants 2024, 13, 1213. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13091213

AMA Style

Guillen E, Terrones H, de Terrones TC, Simirgiotis MJ, Hájek J, Cheel J, Sepulveda B, Areche C. Microwave-Assisted Extraction of Secondary Metabolites Using Ethyl Lactate Green Solvent from Ambrosia arborescens: LC/ESI-MS/MS and Antioxidant Activity. Plants. 2024; 13(9):1213. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13091213

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guillen, Evelyn, Hector Terrones, Teresa Cano de Terrones, Mario J. Simirgiotis, Jan Hájek, José Cheel, Beatriz Sepulveda, and Carlos Areche. 2024. "Microwave-Assisted Extraction of Secondary Metabolites Using Ethyl Lactate Green Solvent from Ambrosia arborescens: LC/ESI-MS/MS and Antioxidant Activity" Plants 13, no. 9: 1213. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13091213

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop