The Impact of COVID-19 and Climate Change on Food Security in Pamijahan District, Bogor Regency
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Data Collection Method
2.2. Data Analysis
2.3. Model Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Food Security Conditions in Pamijahan District
3.1.1. FSVA Analysis
3.1.2. SKPG Analysis
3.2. Determination of the Most Influential Indicators on Food Security in Pamijahan District, Bogor Regency
3.2.1. Common Method Bias
3.2.2. Model Measurement
3.2.3. Result Analysis
3.3. Public Perception of the Effects of Climate Change and the COVID-19 Outbreak on Food Security in Pamijahan District
3.4. Managerial Implications
4. Discussion
- The variable food availability has been positively and significantly impacted by the COVID-19 outbreak; this shows that the outbreak has reduced household income in Cibunian Village and Purwabakti Village. The COVID-19 outbreak in Cibunian Villagae and Purwabakti Village has also had an impact on rising food prices, difficulties in food delivery, and the closure of food supply facilities (shops/basketball stalls). A policy to impose local operational restrictions also had an impact on the food distribution system during the COVID-19 outbreak situation.
- Utilization of food has been positively and significantly impacted by the COVID-19 outbreak. This shows that the COVID-19 outbreak has resulted in a decrease in overall food consumption and an increase in the use of carrots as a food source.
- Access to food is positively and significantly affected by climate change. This shows how catastrophic floods caused by climate change reduce the amount of money available to buy food and change the mode of transportation for those who deliver food since the floods cut off access to roads. Additionally, during flood situations, food supply facilities such as booths and shops are closed.
- Food security is positively and significantly affected by climate change. The nutritional and health status of a community reflects the level of food security in that location. This shows that flooding due to climate change has made people sick more often in the Cibunian and Puwabakti villages.
- Food use is positively and significantly affected by climate change. It shows how disasters caused by climate change reduce the quality of food and water.
5. Conclusions and Implications
5.1. Conclusions
5.2. Limitations and Future Research
5.3. Policy Implications
5.4. Policy Recommendations
- Improving the process of developing social capital and other resources in order to build a disaster-resilient and food-independent society based on local ecological knowledge combined with scientific findings and cutting-edge technology.
- Investigating and protecting local ecological knowledge through the use of the law and the establishment of non-commercial cultural places.
- Improving farmers’ access to financial independence by developing an environmentally and health-friendly circular economy.
- The government should add sustainable living information to formal and non-formal education.
- The government should invest in agriculture research and innovation that is both sustainable and health-friendly.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Latent Variable | Manifest Variable | Code | Value | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||
Climate Change | The current temperature/environment is hotter than it was 10–20 years ago | PI1 | |||||
The rainy season lasts longer now than 10–20 years ago | PI2 | ||||||
The dry season lasts longer than 10–20 years ago | PI3 | ||||||
Rainy season patterns are easier to predict today than they were 10–20 years ago | PI4 | ||||||
The dry season pattern is easier to predict now than it was 10–20 years ago | PI5 | ||||||
Rainfall more often now than 10–20 years ago | PI6 | ||||||
There has been a lot of deforestation and land conversion over the past 10–20 years | PI7 | ||||||
Landslides are happening more frequently now than 10–20 years ago | PI8 | ||||||
Tornado disasters are happening more frequently now than 10–20 years ago | PI9 | ||||||
Flood disasters are more common now than 10–20 years ago | PI10 | ||||||
Crop failure due to disasters is more common now than 10–20 years ago | PI11 | ||||||
Plant pests were more common 10–20 years ago | PI12 | ||||||
Droughts are more common today than they were 10–20 years ago | PI13 | ||||||
COVID-19 | Some villagers who have been confirmed infected by COVID-19 | PC1 | |||||
There are restrictions on activities during the COVID-19 | PC2 | ||||||
There is independent isolation for residents positive for COVID-19 | PC3 | ||||||
The head of the family often gets sick | PC4 | ||||||
Family members often experience pain | PC5 | ||||||
There are anticipatory steps to prevent disease | PC6 | ||||||
There are efforts by the village government to anticipate the threat of disease outbreaks | PC7 | ||||||
There is cooperation in handling sick residents | PC8 | ||||||
There is a movement for the consumption of healthy, nutritious, and balanced food | PC9 | ||||||
The family always does regular exercise | PC10 | ||||||
Online school | PC11 | ||||||
There is a health protocol in every social activity in the village | PC12 | ||||||
Villagers wear masks when going out | PC13 | ||||||
Villagers always wash their hands | PC14 | ||||||
Villagers keep their distance | PC15 | ||||||
Villagers carry out vaccines | PC16 | ||||||
Food Availability | Climate Change | ||||||
Climate change causes floods | KP1 | ||||||
Food production decreased due to the flood disaster | KP2 | ||||||
The amount of food availability in the market is reduced after the flood disaster due to climate change | KP3 | ||||||
The type of food availability in the market is reduced after the flood disaster due to climate change | KP4 | ||||||
The amount of food availability in households has increased after the floods caused by climate change | KP5 | ||||||
The type of household food availability has increased after the flood disaster due to climate change | KP6 | ||||||
Household food stores decreased after the flood disaster | KP7 | ||||||
There is a reserve fund to buy food after catastrophic floods due to climate change | KP8 | ||||||
There is a village food barn after the flood disaster caused by climate change | KP9 | ||||||
COVID-19 | |||||||
Food production has decreased due to COVID-19 | KP10 | ||||||
The amount of food availability in the market has decreased after the COVID-19 | KP11 | ||||||
The type of food availability in the market has decreased after the COVID-19 | KP12 | ||||||
The amount of food availability in households has increased after the COVID-19 | KP13 | ||||||
The type of household food availability has increased after the COVID-19 | KP14 | ||||||
Household food stocks are reduced after the COVID-19 | KP15 | ||||||
There is a reserve fund to buy food after the COVID-19 | KP16 | ||||||
There is a village food barn after the COVID-19 | KP17 | ||||||
Food Access | Climate Change | ||||||
Family income decreased after the flood disaster | AP1 | ||||||
Income decreased after the flood disaster | AP2 | ||||||
The flood disaster caused food distribution to be hampered | AP3 | ||||||
Changes in means of transportation of foodstuffs after the flood disaster | AP4 | ||||||
The flood disaster caused a decrease in the cost of storing food | AP5 | ||||||
Food prices increased after the floods | AP6 | ||||||
Increased food prices cause food shortages in households | AP7 | ||||||
Many roads were damaged by the floods | AP8 | ||||||
Stores/stalls providing food are closed due to the flood | AP9 | ||||||
COVID-19 | |||||||
Family income has decreased after COVID-19 | AP10 | ||||||
Income reduced after COVID-19 | AP11 | ||||||
COVID-19 has hampered food distribution | AP12 | ||||||
Changes in food transportation equipment after COVID-19 | AP13 | ||||||
COVID-19 causes a decrease in the cost of storing food | AP14 | ||||||
Food prices increased after the COVID-19 | AP15 | ||||||
Food Access | Increased food prices cause food shortages in households | AP16 | |||||
Stores/stalls providing food are closed due to the COVID-19 | AP17 | ||||||
Food Utilization | Climate Change | ||||||
There was a decrease in the quality of food after the flood disaster | PP1 | ||||||
Flood disaster causes foodstuffs/food to be cleaner and safer | PP2 | ||||||
Flood disaster caused foodstuffs/food to be stored longer | PP3 | ||||||
The amount of food eaten became more after the flood disaster | PP4 | ||||||
The frequency of eating is more frequent after the flood disaster | PP5 | ||||||
Utilization of coral reefs for food crops increased after the flood | PP6 | ||||||
Leftover food decreased after the flood disaster | PP7 | ||||||
The frequency of cooking decreased after the flood disaster | PP8 | ||||||
COVID-19 | |||||||
There has been a decline in the quality of drinking water after COVID-19 | PP9 | ||||||
There has been a decline in food quality after COVID-19 | PP10 | ||||||
COVID-19 causes foodstuffs/food to be cleaner and safer | PP11 | ||||||
COVID-19 causes foodstuffs/food to be stored longer | PP12 | ||||||
The type of food has become more varied COVID-19 | PP13 | ||||||
The amount of food eaten becomes more | PP14 | ||||||
The amount of food consumption is higher after COVID-19 | PP15 | ||||||
The use of coral reefs for food crops increased after COVID-19 | PP16 | ||||||
The application of hydroponic cultivation has increased after the outbreak | PP17 | ||||||
Food leftovers have decreased after the COVID-19 Outbreak | PP18 | ||||||
Cooking frequency decreased after the COVID-19 Outbreak | PP19 | ||||||
COVID-19 causes patterns of food consumption | PP20 | ||||||
Climate Change | |||||||
Flood disasters cause you to get sick more often | KTP1 | ||||||
Flood disasters due to climate change cause your family members to get sick more often | KTP2 | ||||||
I feel all of my suits getting bigger after flood disaster | KTP3 | ||||||
The weight of your family members decreased after the flood disaster | KTP4 | ||||||
Food availability at household decreased after the flood disaster | KTP5 | ||||||
Food Security | Food consumption increased after the flood disaster | KTP6 | |||||
Consumption of animal and vegetable side dishes increased after the flood | KTP7 | ||||||
Vegetable consumption increased after the flood | KTP8 | ||||||
Your toddler’s body weight went down after the flood | KTP9 | ||||||
Your toddler is often sick after the flood | KTP10 | ||||||
COVID-19 | |||||||
COVID-19 cause you to get sick more often | KTP11 | ||||||
COVID-19 cause your family members to get sick more often | KTP12 | ||||||
I feel all of my suits getting bigger after COVID-19 | KTP13 | ||||||
The weight of your family members decreased after the COVID-19 | KTP14 | ||||||
Food availability at household decreased after COVID-19 | KTP15 | ||||||
Food Security | Food consumption increased after the COVID-19 | KTP16 | |||||
Consumption of animal and vegetable side dishes increased after COVID-19 | KTP17 | ||||||
Vegetable consumption increased after COVID-19 | KTP18 | ||||||
Your toddler’s body weight went down after COVID-19 | KTP19 | ||||||
Your toddler is often sick after the COVID-19 | KTP20 |
References
- Alam, Md Mahmudul, Basri Abdul Talib, Chamhuri Siwar, and Abu N. M. Wahid. 2016. Climate Change and Food Security of the Malaysian East Coast Poor: A Path Modeling Approach. Journal of Economic Studies 43: 458–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alfatikha, Muhammad, Susni Herwanti, Indra Gumay Febryano, and Slamet Budi Yuwono. 2020. Identifikasi Jenis Tanaman Agroforestri Untuk Mendukung Ketahanan Pangan Rumah Tangga Di Desa Pulau Pahawang. Gorontalo Journal of Forestry Research 3: 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alinovi, Luca, Erdgin Mane, and Donato Romano. 2010. Alinovi Etal_2010_Measuring Households Resilience to Food Security. Agricultural Survey Methods, 342–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayu Dessy Sugiharni, Gusti. 2018. Pengujian Validitas Konten Media Pembelajaran Interaktif Berorientasi Model Creative Problem Solving. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan 2: 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azizah, Mir’atul, Adi Subiyanto, Sugeng Triutomo, and Dewi Wahyuni. 2022. Pengaruh Perubahan Iklim Terhadap Bencana Hidrometeorologi Di Kecamatan Cisarua—Kabupaten Bogor. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education 6: 541–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baliwati. 2019. Pemodelan Status Gizi Dan Ketahanan Pangan Jawa Barat. Available online: https://repository.ipb.ac.id/jspui/handle/123456789/97551 (accessed on 8 March 2023).
- Barbier, Edward B. 2020. Greening the Post-Pandemic Recovery in the G20. Environmental and Resource Economics 76: 685–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Béné, Christophe, Deborah Bakker, Mónica Juliana Chavarro, Brice Even, Jenny Melo, and Anne Sonneveld. 2021. Global Assessment of the Impacts of COVID-19 on Food Security. Global Food Security 31: 100575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boyacι-Gündüz, Cennet Pelin, Salam A. Ibrahim, Ooi Chien Wei, and Charis M. Galanakis. 2021. Transformation of the Food Sector: Security and Resilience during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Foods 10: 497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- BPS. 2021. Kecamatan Pamijahan Dalam Angka 2021. Kabupaten Bogor. Available online: https://bogorkab.bps.go.id/publication/2021/09/24/93e6137dd7f34efd3444039b/kecamatan-pamijahan-dalam-angka-2021.html (accessed on 1 July 2023).
- Cheung, Mike W. L. 2013. Multivariate Meta-Analysis as Structural Equation Models. Structural Equation Modeling 20: 429–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Creswell, John W. 2014. Research Design, Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publication, Inc. [Google Scholar]
- Dohlman, Lena, Matthew Dimeglio, Jihane Hajj, and Krzysztof Laudanski. 2019. Global Brain Drain: How Can the Maslow Theory of Motivation Improve Our Understanding of Physician Migration? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16: 1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Food Security Agency. 2022. Peta Ketahanan Dan Kerentanan Pangan (Food Security and Vulnerability Atlas) 2022. Badanpangan.Go.Id (021). Available online: https://fsva.badanpangan.go.id/ (accessed on 1 July 2023).
- Ghozali, Imam, and Hengky Latan. 2015. Partial Least Square (PLS) Konsep, Teknik Dan Aplikasi Menggunakan Program SmartPLS 3.0. Semarang: Badan Penerbit UNDIP. [Google Scholar]
- Gilbert, Natasha. 2012. One-Third of Our Greenhouse Gas Emissions Come from Agriculture. Nature 31: 10–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, Joe F., Marko Sarstedt, Lucas Hopkins, and Volker G. Kuppelwieser. 2014. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM): An Emerging Tool in Business Research. European Business Review 26: 106–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, Josep H., G. Thomas M. Hult, Christian M. Ringle, and Marko Sarstedt. 2017. A Primer on Partial Least Square Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM), 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publication. [Google Scholar]
- Hair, Joseph F., Jeffrey J. Risher, Marko Sarstedt, and Christian M. Ringle. 2019. When to Use and How to Report the Results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review 31: 2–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hendriks, Sheryl L., Hugh Montgomery, Tim Benton, Ousmane Badiane, Gonzalo Castro De La Mata, Jessica Fanzo, Ramon R. Guinto, and Jean-François Soussana. 2022. Global Environmental Climate Change, COVID-19, and Conflict Threaten Food Security and Nutrition. BMJ 378: e071534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Indonesian Ministry of Agriculture’s Food Security Agency. 2021. Peta Ketahanan Dan Kerentanan Pangan 2021. Jakarta: Badan Ketahanan Pangan Kementrian Pertanian. [Google Scholar]
- Iskandar, Johan. 2018. Etnobiologi, Etnoekologi Dan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan. Pertama. Yogyakarta: Plantaxia. [Google Scholar]
- Kock, Ned. 2015. Common Method Bias in PLS-SEM: A Full Collinearity Assessment Approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration 11: 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kusdiwanggo, Susilo. 2020. Leuit Is Not Just a Barn. Jurnal Lingkungan Binaan Indonesia 9: 194–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laborde, David, Will Martin, Johan Swinnen, and Rob Vos. 2020. COVID-19 Risks to Global Food Security. Science 369: 500–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lam, Steven, Giang Pham, and Hung Nguyen-Viet. 2017. Emerging Health Risks from Agricultural Intensification in Southeast Asia: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health 23: 250–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Molden, David, Eklabya Sharma, Gyan Acharya, Farid Ahmad, Sanjeev Bhuchar, Chanda Gurung Goodrich, Abid Hussain, Nanki Kaur, Arabinda Mishra, Golam Rasul, and et al. 2020. COVID-19 Impact and Policy Responses in the Hindu Kush Himalaya. Kathmandu: International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mucharam, Iim, Ernan Rustiadi, Akhmad Fauzi, and Harianto. 2022. Signifikansi Pengembangan Indikator Pertanian Berkelanjutan Untuk Mengevaluasi Kinerja Pembangunan Pertanian Indonesia. Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian Dan Lingkungan Rumusan Kajian Strategis Bidang Pertanian dan Lingkungan 9: 61–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mun’im, Akhmad. 2021. Analisis Pengaruh Faktor Ketersediaan, Akses, Dan Penyerapan Pangan Terhadap Ketahanan Pangan Di Kabupaten Surplus Pangan: Pendekatan Partial Least Square Path Modeling. Jurnal Argo Ekonomi 30: 41–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nuraisah, Getmi, and Rani Andriani Budi Kusumo. 2019. Dampak Perubahan Iklim Terhadap Usahatani Padi Di Desa Wanguk Kecamatan Anjatan Kabupaten Indramayu. Mimbar Agribisnis: Jurnal Pemikiran Masyarakat Ilmiah Berwawasan Agribisnis 5: 60–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahmah, Nur, Andi Muhammad Akram Mukhlis, and Andi Alamsyah Rivai. 2020. Sistem Agribisnis Berbasis Zero Waste Agriculture Sebagai Upaya Ketahanan Pangan Rumahtangga Di Masa Pandemi COVID-19. Seminar Nasional Hasil Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, Makassar, 544–60. Available online: https://ojs.unm.ac.id/semnaslpm/article/view/16046 (accessed on 1 December 2022).
- Ramachandran, Srikanthan, Maheswar Rupakheti, and Mark G. Lawrence. 2020. Black Carbon Dominates the Aerosol Absorption over the Indo-Gangetic Plain and the Himalayan Foothills. Environment International 142: 105814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rasul, Golam. 2021. Twin Challenges of COVID-19 Pandemic and Climate Change for Agriculture and Food Security in South Asia. Environmental Challenges 2: 100027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Regional Disaster Management Agency. 2022. Update Bencana Banjir Bandang & Tanah Longsor Pamijahan & Leuwiliang. Available online: https://bpbd.bogorkab.go.id/update-bencana-banjir-bandang-tanah-longsor-pamijahan-leuwiliang/ (accessed on 1 December 2022).
- Rimadianti, Dini Maharani, Arief Daryanto, and Yayuk Farida Baliwati. 2016. Strategi Peningkatan Ketahanan Pangan Dinas Pertanian Dan Ketahanan Pangan Kota Tangerang Selatan. Jurnal Gizi dan Pangan 11: 75–82. [Google Scholar]
- Roubík, Hynek, Michal Lošťák, Chama Theodore Ketuama, Jana Soukupová, Petr Procházka, Adam Hruška, Josef Hakl, Lukáš Pacek, Petr Karlík, Lucie Kocmánková Menšíková, and et al. 2023. COVID-19 Crisis Interlinkage with Past Pandemics and Their Effects on Food Security. Globalization and Health 19: 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rume, Tanjena, and S. M. Didar-Ul Islam. 2020. Environmental Effects of COVID-19 Pandemic and Potential Strategies of Sustainability. Heliyon 6: e04965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sakya, Andi Ekaika, and Ressa Mahardh. 2010. Perspektif Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Kecuacaan Dan Keikliman Untuk Mendukung Langkah Ketahanan Pangan Dan Adaptasi Perubahan Iklim Di Indonesia. Badan Meteorologi Klimatologi dan Geofisika (BMKG) 1: 1–18. [Google Scholar]
- Shaw, D. John. 2007. Global Information and Early Warning System. World Food Security 1945: 163–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sowe, Marten Luther, Yundi Hafizrianda, and Elisabet Leny Marit. 2015. Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi Dan Studi Pembangunan Volume II No. 3 Desember 2015. Kajian Ekonomi dan Studi Pembangunan II: 55–66. [Google Scholar]
- The Economist Group. 2022. Global Food Security Index (GFSI) 2022. London: The Economist Intelligence Unit. [Google Scholar]
- Ulfah Rahayu, Ana Mariana, Andri Noor Ardiansyah, and Neng Sri Nuraeni. 2019. Wilayah Kerawanan Longsor Di Kecamatan Pamijahan Kabupaten Bogor. Jurnal Geografi Gea 19: 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UNFCC. 2015. UNFCC Paris Agreement. UNFCC 45. Available online: https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement (accessed on 3 July 2023).
- Watts, Michael. 2009. The Will to Improve: Govermentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics by Tania Murray Li. American Anthropologist 111: 534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Xiaoxu, Yongmei Lu, Sen Zhou, Lifan Chen, and Bing Xu. 2016. Impact of Climate Change on Human Infectious Diseases: Empirical Evidence and Human Adaptation. Environment International 86: 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yudhanto, Aditya Ari, Emma Rochima, and Rivani. 2023. Strategic Entrepreneurship and the Performance of Women-Owned Fish Processing Units in Cibinong District, Bogor Regency. Economies 11: 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuwansyah, Yeti, Ayu Idaningsih, and Farida Fitriani. 2021. Hubungan Pengetahuan Ibu Dengan Status Gizi Balita Pada Masa Pandemi COVID-19 Di Posyandu Blok Cipeucang Ii Desa Talagawetan Uptd Puskemas Talaga Kabupaten Majalengka Tahun 2021. Journal of Midwifery Care 2: 11–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Village | Year | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
2017 | 2019 | 2021 | 2022 | |
Cibunian | 1 | 4 | 3 | 3 |
Purwabakti | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 |
Items | AP | KTP | KP | PC | PP | PI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AP | 2.023 | |||||
KTP | ||||||
KP | 1.096 | |||||
PC | 1.194 | 1.510 | 1.194 | 1.194 | ||
PP | 1.739 | |||||
PI | 1.194 | 1.509 | 1.194 | 1.194 |
Item | Indicator | Measurement Result | Supported | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Outer Loading | >0.7 | PI4 | 0.874 | KP4 | 0.821 | KP3 | 0.783 | Yes |
PC15 | 0.816 | AP4 | 0.760 | AP1 | 0.754 | |||
KP8 | 0.796 | KTP1 | 0.799 | PP5 | 0.811 | |||
PP2 | 0.896 | PC13 | 0.872 | PC7 | 0.833 | |||
PI5 | 0.884 | KP5 | 0.796 | PP1 | 0.853 | |||
PC16 | 0.810 | AP9 | 0.874 | KTP12 | 0.900 | |||
KP9 | 0.816 | KTP11 | 0.886 | PC6 | 0.732 | |||
PP3 | 0.829 | PC14 | 0.830 | KP6 | 0.838 | |||
Average Variance Extracted (AVE) | >0.5 | PI | 0.773 | PC | 0.667 | Yes | ||
KP | 0.649 | AP | 0.636 | |||||
PP | 0.718 | KTP | 0.734 | |||||
Composite Reliability | >0.6 | PI | 0.872 | PC | 0.923 | Yes | ||
KP | 0.937 | AP | 0.839 | |||||
PP | 0.911 | KTP | 0.892 | |||||
Cronbach Alpha | >0.6 | PI | 0.901 | PC | 0.901 | Yes | ||
KP | 0.924 | AP | 0.731 | |||||
PP | 0.871 | KTP | 0.816 |
Items | AP | KTP | KP | PC | PP | PI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AP | 0.798 | |||||
KTP | 0.429 | 0.857 | ||||
KP | 0.259 | 0.263 | 0.805 | |||
PC | 0.551 | 0.317 | 0.149 | 0.816 | ||
PP | 0.597 | 0.457 | 0.254 | 0.455 | 0.848 | |
PI | 0.526 | 0.522 | 0.104 | 0.403 | 0.489 | 0.879 |
Items | AP | KTP | KP | PC | PP | PI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AP | 0.798 | |||||
KTP | 0.429 | 0.857 | ||||
KP | 0.259 | 0.263 | 0.805 | |||
PC | 0.551 | 0.317 | 0.149 | 0.816 | ||
PP | 0.597 | 0.457 | 0.254 | 0.455 | 0.848 | |
PI | 0.526 | 0.522 | 0.104 | 0.403 | 0.489 | 0.879 |
Variable | R-Square |
---|---|
Access to Food | 0.413 |
Food security | 0.355 |
Food availability | 0.025 |
Path | Original Sample | T-Statistic | p-Value | Hypotheses |
---|---|---|---|---|
AP → KTP | 0.074 | 0.428 | 0.334 | H1 not accepted |
KP → KTP | 0.155 | 1.359 | 0.087 | H2 not accepted |
PC → AP | 0.404 | 4.017 | 0.000 | H3 accepted |
PC → KTP | 0.021 | 0.127 | 0.449 | H4 not accepted |
PC → KP | 0.128 | 0.648 | 0.259 | H5 not accepted |
PC → PP | 0.308 | 1.765 | 0.039 | H6 accepted |
PP → KTP | 0.184 | 1.450 | 0.074 | H7 not accepted |
PI → AP | 0.363 | 3.377 | 0.000 | H8 accepted |
PI → KTP | 0.368 | 2.879 | 0.002 | H9 accepted |
PI → KP | 0.052 | 0.374 | 0.354 | H10 not accepted |
PI → PP | 0.365 | 2.784 | 0.003 | H11 accepted |
Characteristics | Criteria | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|
Age (year) | 31–40 | 43.8 |
<50 | 21.9 | |
21–30 | 20.3 | |
41–50 | 14.1 | |
Job | Agricultural labor | 70.2 |
Self-employed | 10.9 | |
Farmer | 9.4 | |
Trader | 3.1 | |
Driver | 1.6 | |
Debt collector | 1.6 | |
Motorcycle driver | 1.6 | |
Teacher | 1.6 | |
Level of education | Elementary School | 76.6 |
Junior High School | 12.5 | |
Senior High School | 7.8 | |
Bachelor Degree | 3.1 | |
Income per month (IDR) | Rp. 1,000,000–1,500,000 | 32.8 |
Rp. 500,000–1,000,000 | 20.3 | |
Rp. 2,000,000–3,000,000 | 18.8 | |
Rp. 1,500,000–2,000,000 | 17.2 | |
Rp. 0–500,000 | 9.4 | |
Rp. >3,000,000 | 1.6 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Apdita, F.; Iskandar, J.; Rochima, E. The Impact of COVID-19 and Climate Change on Food Security in Pamijahan District, Bogor Regency. Economies 2023, 11, 271. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11110271
Apdita F, Iskandar J, Rochima E. The Impact of COVID-19 and Climate Change on Food Security in Pamijahan District, Bogor Regency. Economies. 2023; 11(11):271. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11110271
Chicago/Turabian StyleApdita, Frema, Johan Iskandar, and Emma Rochima. 2023. "The Impact of COVID-19 and Climate Change on Food Security in Pamijahan District, Bogor Regency" Economies 11, no. 11: 271. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11110271