Next Article in Journal
Photovoice in Aggression Management Training for Medical and Nursing Students—A Pilot Study
Previous Article in Journal
Be Cool: A Holistic and Innovative Approach to Rehabilitation in Multiple Sclerosis: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Healthcare
Volume 12
Issue 9
10.3390/healthcare12090872
healthcare-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Emotional Intelligence in Hemodialysis Patients: The Impact of an Intradialytic Exercise Training Program

by
Stefania S. Grigoriou
1,
Christina Karatzaferi
1,
Christoforos D. Giannaki
2,3 and
Giorgos K. Sakkas
1,4,*
1
School of Physical Education, Sport Science and Dietetics, University of Thessaly, 38221 Trikala, Greece
2
Department of Life Sciences, University of Nicosia, Nicosia 2417, Cyprus
3
Research Centre for Exercise and Nutrition (RECEN), University of Nicosia, Nicosia 2417, Cyprus
4
School of Sports and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff CF5 2YB, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Healthcare 2024, 12(9), 872; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12090872
Submission received: 7 March 2024 / Revised: 9 April 2024 / Accepted: 19 April 2024 / Published: 23 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Exercise Interventions and Testing for Effective Health Promotion)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The current study aimed to investigate whether there is a relationship between emotional intelligence (EI), functional capacity, fatigue, cognitive function, and quality of life (QoL) in HD patients and to assess the effect of a 9-month intradialytic exercise training program on EI levels. Seventy-eight dialysis patients (50 M/28 F, 60.6 ± 17.2 years) participated in the cross-sectional study. Afterward, a subgroup of 18 patients (15 M/3 F, 56.7 ± 12.3 years) completed a 9-month supervised intradialytic exercise training program (three times weekly). EI was assessed by the Schutte Self Report Emotional Intelligence Test (SSEIT) and the Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale (WLEIS). Functional capacity was assessed by a battery of tests. Sleep quality, depression levels, and daily sleepiness were assessed via validated questionnaires. All assessments were carried out before and after the intervention. A significant positive correlation was found between the WLEIS scores and the physical component summary of the QoL questionnaire. In contrast, the WLEIS scores were negatively associated with general and physical fatigue. The SSEIT scores were positively associated with cognitive function. After nine months of exercise training, only the group with low WLEIS scores improved their EI score significantly compared to the baseline values (98.7 ± 7.0 vs. 73.0 ± 4.0, p = 0.020), while no changes were observed in the medium or high EI groups. In conclusion, patients with higher levels of EI showed increased quality of life and lower levels of fatigue. Patients with low levels of EI are more likely to benefit from an exercise training program compared to their medium- and high-level counterparts.

1. Introduction

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) may receive hemodialysis (HD) therapy as a maintenance treatment, which is considered both a life-saving and life-altering process. The disease per se, along with HD therapy, induces serious alterations in various physical, social, and mental-related parameters, which can negatively impact the patient’s quality of life (QoL). More specifically, it has been shown that patients receiving HD therapy experience very low levels of QoL, which are usually accompanied by significant emotional distress symptoms such as depression and anxiety [1]. Additionally, low QoL scores are strongly correlated with higher levels of hospitalization and mortality and accordingly are considered an established predictor of these two factors [2,3,4]. Indeed, low levels of QoL are associated with the patient’s mental, social, and physical problems [1,5,6], including depression [7,8].
Emotional intelligence (EI) refers to a set of social cognitive abilities specifically related to emotions. EI has been conceptualized as “the ability to engage in sophisticated information processing about one’s own and others’ emotions and the ability to use this information as a guide to thinking and behavior” [9]. Research shows that high levels of EI are negatively related to anxiety and depression symptoms [10]. Moreover, fatigue, sleep disturbances, anxiety, and depression, which are common problems in patients on HD [11], are associated with EI in healthy participants [12]. Recent research suggests an important relationship between EI and health-related QoL in patients with chronic diseases [13]. A study by Rey et al. [13] examined EI concerning personality and health-related QoL in cancer patients and found that EI was positively associated with different dimensions of health-related QoL. The authors proposed that EI could be a useful variable to assess and identify patients who may be at risk for experiencing low health-related QoL [13].
So far, there is limited information relating to EI levels in HD patients. The study by Khan et al. [14] published in 1971 examined the emotional status, level of intelligence, and self-concept in children with CKD and found that the highest percentage of the children suffered from serious social and emotional difficulties, such as feelings of social isolation, excessive dependency upon their parents, and depression [14]. To our knowledge, only a few studies have examined the relationships between EI, quality of life, and other psychological variables in HD patients. In a recent study in HD patients, EI was found to be significantly related to post-traumatic growth and, thus, mediates the relationship between uncertainty, anxiety, and depression [15]. According to the current literature, high physical activity levels are associated with good levels of EI in healthy individuals [16,17], while it is still unknown whether exercise can improve EI in hemodialysis patients.
The primary aim of the cross-sectional part of this study was to investigate whether there are relationships between emotional intelligence and aspects linked to health-related QoL in HD patients. The secondary aim was to investigate whether an exercise intervention training program could alter EI levels.

2. Materials and Methods

Seventy-eight dialysis patients (50 M/28 F, 61.2 ± 17.1 years) were recruited from local HD units in order to participate in the cross-sectional study. Patients were divided into groups according to their scores on the EI scales. As two different scales of EI (WLEIS and SSEIT) were used to assess EI levels in the current study, the 78 patients were divided into two groups per scale (low WLEIS and high WLEIS, and low SSEIT and high SSEIT) using the quartiles approach. Therefore, four patient subgroups were used. In addition, the rationale behind the development of 4 patient subgroups based on WLEIS and SSEIT scores is to assess whether the level of EI (low or high score) could affect the effectiveness of an exercise training program. The four patient subgroups were developed using the quartile approach, using the lower quartile for the low group and the upper quartile for the high group, excluding the values for the median quartile. For the WLEIS, the lower quartile of patients scored less than 79, and the upper quartile scored greater than 96. For the SSEIT, the lower quartile of patients scored less than 111, and the upper quartile scored greater than 134.
The 78 patients were also assessed for eligibility in order to participate in a 9-month exercise training program (Figure 1). Eighteen stable HD patients (15 M/3 F, 56.7 ± 12.3) completed the 9-month supervised exercise training program during HD (3 times weekly). The exercise sessions were supervised by 2 specialized exercise scientists. The 18 patients were divided into 3 groups according to the WLEIS score (low, medium, and high) for further analysis.
Inclusion criteria were dialysis for at least six months with adequate dialysis delivery (Kt/V > 1.1) and stable clinical condition. Exclusion criteria were as follows: being unable to give informed consent; opportunistic infection within 3 months prior to enrollment; malignancy or infection requiring intravenous antibiotics within 2 months prior to enrollment; HIV, musculoskeletal contraindication to exercise, or requirement for systemic anticoagulation; participating or having participated in an investigational drug or medical device study within 30 days or five half-lives; females who were pregnant, breast feeding or of childbearing potential who did not agree to remain abstinent or to use an acceptable contraceptive regimen; patients who were judged to have clinically-significant abnormalities upon clinical examination or laboratory testing; patients who were unable to adequately cooperate because of personal or family conditions; or patients who suffered from a mental disorder that interferes with the diagnosis and/or with the conduct of the study (e.g., patients were excluded if they had been diagnosed with schizophrenia, major depression, or dementia).
The study was approved by the Human Research and Ethics Committee of the University of Thessaly, the Bioethics Committee of the University General Hospital of Larissa, and the General Hospital of Trikala, Greece. All patients gave their written informed consent prior to study participation. The whole study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01721551) as a clinical trial, while this current study presents a subset of data acquired under the registered RCT study.

2.1. HD Procedure

The patients underwent HD therapy (Fresenius Medical Care, Fresenius 4008B, Oberursel, Germany) 3 times per week with low flux, hollow-fiber dialyzers and a bicarbonate buffer. The HD session lasted 4 h. An enoxaparin dose of 40–60 mg was administered intravenously before the beginning of each HD session. EPO therapy was given after the completion of the HD session in order to normalize hemoglobin levels within 11–12 g/dL.

2.2. General Study Design

Patients were assessed before (PRE) and after (POST) the 9-month aerobic exercise training program. Exercise training was implemented during HD while the exercise program was supervised by 2 specialized exercise trainers. A cycle exercise was performed 3 times weekly for 60 min each time, starting between the first 2 h of HD using an adapted cycle ergometer (Model 881 Monark Rehab Trainer, Monark, Varberg, Sweden) at an intensity of 50–60% of the patient’s maximal exercise capacity, which was estimated during a previous HD session [18,19]. During and before release from the HD unit, body mass, systolic and diastolic blood pressures (SBP, DBP), and heart rate (using the RS800CX, Polar Electro Oy, Kempele, Finland) were monitored and recorded. Participants’ blood chemistry records were recorded before and at the end of the 9-month study. Participants were assessed in aspects related to mental and physical health as well as exercise and functional capacity.

2.3. Emotional Intelligence

Emotional intelligence was assessed by two tests. Firstly, the Schutte Self Report Emotional Intelligence Test (SSEIT) [20] was used. This is a 33-item self-report instrument where patients are asked to indicate their responses to items reflecting adaptive tendencies towards emotional intelligence according to a 5-point scale, with “1” representing strong agreement and “5” representing strong disagreement.
Secondly, the Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale (WLEIS) [21], which is a shorter instrument and is administered by an external examiner, was also completed by the participants. This test contains 16 items grouped into four subscales as follows: (a) self-emotion appraisal (SEA), (b) emotion appraisal of others (OEA), (c) use of emotion (UOE), and (d) regulation of emotion (ROE).

2.4. Exercise Capacity

Using an incremental cycle ergometer test [19], exercise capacity was assessed before, at 3 months, at 6 months, and at the end of the 9-month exercise intervention. Values recorded were used to re-adjust the submaximal training intensity of the intradialytic exercise sessions of this program.

2.5. Functional Capacity and Strength

The patient’s functional capacity levels were evaluated using two sit-to-stand functional tests from which three scores were recorded (time taken to complete 5 sit-to-stands [STS-5], number of repetitions in 30 s [STS-30], and number of repetitions in a whole minute [STS-60]). Maximum isometric handgrip strength (HGS) was measured on the non-fistula (dominant) side [22] using a handgrip dynamometer (Charder MG4800 Medical Handgrip Dynamometer, Charder Electronic Taiwan, Guozhong Rd., Dali Dist., Taichung City, 41262 Taiwan (R.O.C.)).

2.6. Body Composition

Each patient’s dry weight (ideal weight after removal of excess fluids) was recorded. Dry weight and height were used to calculate body mass index (BMI). Waist and hip peripheries were measured and the waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) was calculated. Body composition was assessed using a whole-body, multi-frequency, bio-impedance spectroscopy system (BCM®, Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, Germany) to estimate fat mass (FM), lean tissue mass (LTM), total body water (TBW), and body cell mass (BCM) [23]. The body composition measurements were taken immediately before the initiation and after the completion of the HD session, with the participants resting in the supine position. Electrodes were placed on the wrist of the arm without the arterio-venous fistula as well as on the ipsilateral ankle and connected to the BCM device [24].

3. Questionnaires

3.1. Fatigue

Fatigue was estimated using various questionnaires evaluating chronic and acute aspects of fatigue. The general severity of fatigue was assessed using the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) [25]. This questionnaire contains nine statements concerning respondents’ fatigue. Subacute fatigue was assessed using the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) [26], which is an instrument that can be administered in a clinical setting to assess the severity of fatigue experienced by patients, as well as its impact on their ability to function over the previous 24 h. Finally, the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) [27], which is a 20-item scale designed to evaluate the dimensions of general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity, and mental fatigue, was completed by participants.

3.2. Cognitive Function

Cognitive function was assessed by the Mini-Mental State Examination questionnaire (MMSE) [28], which is a brief 30-point questionnaire test that evaluates cognitive impairment. This questionnaire consists of simple questions and problems in a number of areas: the time and place of the test, repeating lists of words, arithmetic such as the serial sevens, language use and comprehension, and basic motor skills.

4. Symptoms of Depression

Depressive symptoms were evaluated using the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (with a score > 44 being considered the cut-off for diagnosis of depression). Moreover, the Beck Depression Inventory II (Beck Depression Test, BDT) [29] was used to assess the intensity of depressive symptoms.

4.1. Pain Perception

Each participant also completed the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) [30]. This self-administered questionnaire was developed to measure fibromyalgia (FM) patient status, progress, and outcomes. The instrument contains 11 questions measuring physical functioning, work status (missed days of work and job difficulty), depression, anxiety, morning tiredness, pain, stiffness, fatigue, and well-being over the past week.

4.2. Perceived Quality of Life

Quality of life was assessed by the Generic Medical Outcomes 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) [31], which contains eight dimensions, generating a profile of health-related quality of life. These dimensions are (1) physical functioning; (2) role limitations due to physical functioning; (3) bodily pain; (4) general health perceptions; (5) vitality; (6) social functioning; (7) role limitations due to emotional functioning; and (8) mental health. Total SF-36 QoL scores range from 0 (extremely poor) to 100 (very good). Moreover, the quality of life in patients was evaluated by the Missoula–VITAS Quality of Life Index Version-15R. The MVQOLI is an assessment instrument that gathers patient-reported information about QoL during advanced illness. We used the short version with 15 items, which is for HD patients [32].

4.3. Sleep Quality and Daily Sleepiness

Sleep disturbances and usual sleep habits during the preceding month were evaluated by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), which contains 19 questions [33].
Furthermore, the HD patients’ daily sleepiness status was assessed by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) [34]. This scale differentiates between typical sleepiness and excessive daytime sleepiness that requires intervention.

4.4. Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables were analyzed using independent sample t-tests. In the case of outcome variables that changed in the same direction in both the progressive exercise and control groups, between-group comparisons were also made (comparing Δ-change values) to evaluate if the change in one group was significantly greater than that of the other group. Kendall’s correlation test was used to assess the relationships between the examined variables. For comparing initial and final values (pre- and post-exercise training), two-way, repeated measures analysis of variance tests (ANOVAs) were performed. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 21.0 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA). Data are presented as mean ± SD, and the level for statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05.

5. Results

Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of the participants. All the patients successfully completed the questionnaires, and no adverse effects were reported.
The results of the correlations between patients’ characteristics and functional capacity are presented in Table 2.
A t-test was conducted in order to determine if significant differences in EI scores between divided groups existed: low WLEIS, low SSEIT, high WLEIS, and high SSEIT. The EI data are presented in Table 3. There were no significant differences between the groups in the functional capacity tests performed. There were significant differences in the scores of the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) and quality of life (MVQOLI) between the WLEIS group patients.
There was a statistically significant difference between the general perceptions of fatigue scores (FSS, BFI) and divided groups of EI regarding the WLEIS scores (Table 3). Furthermore, it was observed that patients with lower EI scores showed higher scores in general fatigue.
Taking into account the differences in the questionnaire scores regarding the EI status in the HD patients’ groups, MMSE scores increased in the group with high scores in the SSEIT [M (high EI SSEIT) = 26.8, SD = 2.5, p = 0.046], while the group with low SSEIT scores had low scores in the MMSE [M (low EI SSEIT) = 25.0, SD = 2.9, p = 0.046]. In addition, there was a statistically significant difference between the general perceptions of fatigue scores (FSS, MFI) and divided groups of EI. Patients with low EI status showed higher scores in general fatigue. Specifically, the FSS score was higher in the group with a low SSEIT score [M (low EI SSEIT) = 5.1, SD = 2.6, p = 0.015] than in the group with a high SSEIT score [M (high EI SSEIT) = 3.9, SD = 1.8, p = 0.015]. Furthermore, the MFI score still was correspondingly high in the low SSEIT group [M (low EI SSEIT) = 61.9, SD = 19.1, p = 0.008] compared to the high SSEIT group [M (high EI SSEIT) = 47.9, SD = 16.6, p = 0.008].
The subset of 18 patients completed the exercise intervention. Their mean age was 56.7 ± 12.3 years (15 males), and their mean duration in HD treatment was 61.7 ± 47.5 months. The effects of the 9-month exercise training on emotional intelligence are presented in Table 4.
Two-way repeated measures analyses of variance (ANOVAs) were conducted to determine if there were significant differences in the WLEIS EI test between the divided groups: low WLEIS, medium WLEIS, and high WLEIS. The EI data are presented in Table 5.

6. Discussion

This study initially investigated whether there is a relationship between EI, functional capacity, cognitive function, fatigue, and quality of life in HD patients and whether an exercise training program could change the level of EI in patients receiving HD therapy. The results of the cross-sectional part of this study revealed significant correlations between EI and quality of life, fatigue, and cognitive function in HD patients. Secondly, a nine-month intradialytic exercise training program was applied; however, it was effective only in patients with low EI, while it was ineffective in terms of inducing changes in EI in patients with moderate to high EI scores.
The relationship between EI status and quality of life has been investigated in other patients with chronic diseases reporting similar results including cancer [13,35] and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients [36]. According to the above authors, EI is an ability that can be learned and could be a complementary, non-expensive tool to the rehabilitation programs aiming to improve the low levels of QoL that patients with chronic diseases experience.
Furthermore, an association between EI and fatigue in HD patients was found in this study. Studies have shown that a higher EI status is associated with less fatigue in healthy participants [12]. Specifically, Brown and Schutte who assessed EI status in university students in combination with the psychosocial variables of depression, anxiety, optimism, internal health locus of control, amount of social support, and satisfaction with social support, indicated that EI and fatigue had an impact on each variable [12]. Indeed, previous studies that examined the relationship between EI and depression revealed a significant negative relationship between EI and depression [37]. Specifically, Downey et al. (2008) investigated whether an association exists between EI and clinical diagnosis of depression and demonstrated that measurement of EI has a predictive value for assessing patients with a high risk of developing depression [37]. Furthermore, the negative relationship between EI and depression has been observed among adolescents [38]. Specifically, a recent study by Balluerka et al. demonstrated that high levels of emotional clarity and repair were related to lower levels of depressed mood in adolescents [39]. In addition, another study by Vlachaki et al. (2013), who examined the relationship between different dimensions of EI and coronary heart disease, found that facets of trait EI were associated with a high incidence of coronary heart disease [40].
A correlation between EI and cognitive function was found in this study, indicating that patients with higher EI scores had higher scores on the MMSE. Previous findings from other studies have supported that people with higher EI are likely to achieve higher scores on a cognitive task [41] Moreover, high EI individuals confronted with difficulties in a cognitive task were able to ward off the detrimental emotional effects and persist on the task [41].
Nine months of exercise training improved the EI status of the HD patients with low WLEIS but not in the whole sample. The failure of the examined exercise intervention to improve the EI status of the whole sample could be attributed to the fact that the exercise intensity was moderate, between 50 and 60% of the patient’s maximal exercise capacity, while a higher level of intensity could have been more effective. According to published guidelines on exercise in hemodialysis patients, aerobic exercise at an intensity above 60% of the patients’ maximum capacity is recommended to improve various physiological and health-related parameters [42], and this is the reason why we chose the intensity for the current study. However, we are aware that this level of intensity is higher [43] or lower [44] compared to the levels utilized in similar studies within the same population.
Regarding the association between EI and physical activity, a contemporary review by Grigoriou et al. (2012) demonstrated that EI is positively related to good health and exercise habits. Specifically, participation in vigorous and moderate physical activities seems to positively affect EI [45]. Solansky and Lane (2010) have supported that exercise beneficially regulates mood, and this mood improvement had a positive impact on EI status. These authors suggested that exercise training could improve mood and accordingly increase EI scores [46]. EI could be developed and learned at any time or age and, in combination with exercise training programs, could increase well-being and better emotional regulation in patients with chronic diseases [36].
Cognitive impairment is common in chronic kidney disease patients, particularly among those receiving hemodialysis therapy [47,48]. Although exercise intervention was found to be beneficial specifically for patients with low EI levels in the present study, prior research has demonstrated the effectiveness of intradialytic exercise in enhancing cognitive function [49]. The increased cerebral blood flow resulting from exercise has been identified as a potential mechanism through which intradialytic aerobic exercise may help reduce cognitive decline and preserve brain function [50]. Other potential mechanisms include improved sleep, reduced depression, and improved cardiovascular-related parameters, all reported to be improved after intradialytic aerobic exercise training in HD populations [51,52]. Unfortunately, the investigation of the physiological mechanisms that could explain the beneficial effects of exercise on EI and cognition was out of the scope of this trial. Emotional intelligence is a promising parameter for influencing physical and psychological characteristics in populations suffering from chronic conditions or diseases. It seems that exercise, especially chronic exercise training, can alter the state of EI, improving the mental state and facilitating changes in the physical component. However, more research is necessary to assess the precise exercise prescription needed to maximize the positive effect on human health.
There are some limitations in the current study that need to be acknowledged. The small pool of subjects that completed the exercise intervention (N = 3 in one of the subgroups (Low EI)) and the lack of a control group could have jeopardized the generalization of the findings of the current study. In addition, the cohort of patients was not gender balanced as can be seen in both the cross-sectional and intervention parts of the study. Finally, as the intervention part of the study used a small number of patients, the results should be treated with caution.

7. Conclusions

In conclusion, this is the first study to investigate EI levels in HD patients using two different EI questionnaires and assessing the impact of an intradialytic exercise training program. There was a significant positive correlation between EI scores and physical fitness and cognitive function, while it was negatively associated with fatigue. An intradialytic exercise training program lasting for 9 months improved EI scores, especially in the group with low EI scores. A better understanding of the interactions between factors that influence EI and functional capacity may help researchers develop interventions for quality-of-life improvement among dialysis patients. Even though the EI is a construct that has not been recognized yet as a useful tool in healthcare, future research is needed to focus on healthcare aspects.

Author Contributions

For the preparation of the current research article, all authors equally contributed. More specifically, for the conceptualization, S.S.G., G.K.S. and C.K.; methodology, S.S.G., C.D.G. and G.K.S.; formal analysis, S.S.G., C.K. and C.D.G.; writing—original draft preparation, S.S.G. and G.K.S.; writing—review and editing, S.S.G., C.D.G., C.K. and G.K.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Human Research and Ethics Committee of the University of Thessaly, the Bioethics Committee of the University General Hospital of Larissa, and the General Hospital of Trikala, Greece. The whole study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01721551) from all subjects involved in the study. This study was approved on 10 October 2012 by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at University of Thessaly (approval no. 0634).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data are unavailable due to privacy or ethical restrictions. They will be available upon request.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the patients who participated in the study as well as the medical and nursing staff for their support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of the data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Finkelstein, F.O.; Wuerth, D.; Finkelstein, S.H. Health related quality of life and the CKD patient: Challenges for the nephrology community. Kidney Int. 2009, 76, 946–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lowrie, E.G.; Curtin, R.B.; LePain, N.; Schatell, D. Medical outcomes study short form-36: A consistent and powerful predictor of morbidity and mortality in dialysis patients. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2003, 41, 1286–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mapes, D.L.; Bragg-Gresham, J.L.; Bommer, J.; Fukuhara, S.; McKevitt, P.; Wikstrom, B.; Lopes, A.A. Health-related quality of life in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2004, 44, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Yonata, A.; Islamy, N.; Taruna, A.; Pura, L. Factors Affecting Quality of Life in Hemodialysis Patients. Int. J. Gen. Med. 2022, 15, 7173–7178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Theofilou, P. Quality of life in patients undergoing hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis treatment. J. Clin. Med. Res. 2011, 3, 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Rikos, N.; Kassotaki, A.; Frantzeskaki, C.; Fragiadaki, M.; Mpalaskas, A.; Vasilopoulos, G.; Linardakis, M. Investigation of Perception of Quality of Life and Psychological Burden of Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis-Quality of Life of Hemodialysis Patients. Nurs. Rep. 2023, 13, 1331–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Barello, S.; Anderson, G.; Acampora, M.; Bosio, C.; Guida, E.; Irace, V.; Guastoni, C.M.; Bertani, B.; Graffigna, G. The effect of psychosocial interventions on depression, anxiety, and quality of life in hemodialysis patients: A systematic review and a meta-analysis. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2023, 55, 897–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Riezebos, R.K.; Nauta, K.J.; Honig, A.; Dekker, F.W.; Siegert, C.E. The association of depressive symptoms with survival in a Dutch cohort of patients with end-stage renal disease. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2010, 25, 231–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mayer, J.D.; Salovey, P.; Caruso, D.R. Emotional intelligence: New ability or eclectic traits? Am. Psychol. 2008, 63, 503–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lloyd, S.J.; Malek-Ahmadi, M.; Barclay, K.; Fernandez, M.R.; Chartrand, M.S. Emotional intelligence (EI) as a predictor of depression status in older adults. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2012, 55, 570–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Giannaki, C.D.; Hadjigeorgiou, G.M.; Karatzaferi, C.; Pantzaris, M.C.; Stefanidis, I.; Sakkas, G.K. Epidemiology, impact, and treatment options of restless legs syndrome in end-stage renal disease patients: An evidence-based review. Kidney Int. 2014, 85, 1275–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Brown, R.F.; Schutte, N.S. Direct and indirect relationships between emotional intelligence and subjective fatigue in university students. J. Psychosom. Res. 2006, 60, 585–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Rey, L.; Extremera, N.; Trillo, L. Exploring the Relationship Between Emotional Intelligence and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Cancer. J. Psychosoc. Oncol. 2013, 31, 51–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Khan, A.U.; Herndon, C.H.; Ahmadian, S.Y. Social and emotional adaptations of children with transplanted kidneys and chronic hemodialysis. Am. J. Psychiatry 1971, 127, 1194–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sadeghpour, F.; Heidarzadeh, M.; Naseri, P.; Nadr-Mohammadi Moghadam, M. Emotional intelligence as a predictor of posttraumatic growth in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Illn. Crisis Loss 2021, 29, 131–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ubago-Jimenez, J.L.; Gonzalez-Valero, G.; Puertas-Molero, P.; Garcia-Martinez, I. Development of Emotional Intelligence through Physical Activity and Sport Practice. A Systematic Review. Behav. Sci. 2019, 9, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, K.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, T.; Ouyang, Y.; Liu, B.; Luo, J. The Relationship Between Physical Activity and Emotional Intelligence in College Students: The Mediating Role of Self-Efficacy. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Heyward, V. Assessing Cardiorespiratory Fitness, 3rd ed.; Heyward, Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sakkas, G.K.; Hadjigeorgiou, G.M.; Karatzaferi, C.; Maridaki, M.D.; Giannaki, C.D.; Mertens, P.R.; Rountas, C.; Vlychou, M.; Liakopoulos, V.; Stefanidis, I. Intradialytic aerobic exercise training ameliorates symptoms of restless legs syndrome and improves functional capacity in patients on hemodialysis: A pilot study. ASAIO J. 2008, 54, 185–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Schutte, N.S.; Malouff, J.M.; Hall, L.E.; Haggerty, D.J.; Cooper, J.T.; Golden, C.J.; Dornheim, L. Development and validation of a measure of emotional intelligence. Personal. Individ. Differ. 1998, 25, 167–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wong, C.S.; Law, K.S. The effects of leader and follower emotional intelligence on performance and attitude: An exploratory study. Leadersh. Q. 2002, 13, 243–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Norman, K.; Stobaus, N.; Gonzalez, M.C.; Schulzke, J.D.; Pirlich, M. Hand grip strength: Outcome predictor and marker of nutritional status. Clin. Nutr. 2011, 30, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chamney, P.W.; Wabel, P.; Moissl, U.M.; Muller, M.J.; Bosy-Westphal, A.; Korth, O.; Fuller, N.J. A whole-body model to distinguish excess fluid from the hydration of major body tissues. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2007, 85, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Passauer, J.; Petrov, H.; Schleser, A.; Leicht, J.; Pucalka, K. Evaluation of clinical dry weight assessment in haemodialysis patients using bioimpedance spectroscopy: A cross-sectional study. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2010, 25, 545–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Krupp, L.B.; LaRocca, N.G.; Muir-Nash, J.; Steinberg, A.D. The fatigue severity scale. Application to patients with multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Arch. Neurol. 1989, 46, 1121–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mendoza, T.R.; Wang, X.S.; Cleeland, C.S.; Morrissey, H.; Johnson, B.A.; Wendt, J.K.; Huber, S.L. The rapid assessment of fatigue severity in cancer patients—Use of the brief fatigue inventory. Cancer 1999, 85, 1186–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Smets, E.; Garsen, B.; Bonke, B.; De Haes, J. The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI): Psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1995, 48, 315–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Folstein, M.F.; Folstein, S.E.; McHugh, P.R. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J. Psychiatr. Res. 1975, 12, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Faravelli, C.; Albanesi, G.; Poli, E. Assessment of Depression—A Comparison of Rating-Scales. J. Affect. Disord. 1986, 11, 245–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Burckhardt, C.S.; Clark, S.R.; Bennett, R.M. The Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire—Development and Validation. J. Rheumatol. 1991, 18, 728–733. [Google Scholar]
  31. Mchorney, C.A.; Ware, J.E.; Raczek, A.E. The Mos 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (Sf-36): II. Psychometric and Clinical-Tests of Validity in Measuring Physical and Mental-Health Constructs. Med. Care 1993, 31, 247–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Namisango, E.; Katabira, E.; Karamagi, C.; Baguma, P. Validation of the Missoula-Vitas Quality-of-Life Index among patients with advanced AIDS in urban Kampala, Uganda. J. Pain Symptom Manag. 2007, 33, 189–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Buysse, D.J.; Reynolds, C.F.; Monk, T.H.; Berman, S.R.; Kupfer, D.J. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index—A New Instrument for Psychiatric Practice and Research. Psychiatry Res. 1989, 28, 193–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hardinge, F.M.; Pitson, D.J.; Stradling, J.R. Of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale to Demonstrate Response to Treatment with Nasal Continuous Positive Airways Pressure in Patients with Obstructive Sleep-Apnea. Respir. Med. 1995, 89, 617–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Yalcin, B.M.; Karahan, T.F.; Ozcelik, M.; Igde, F.A. The Effects of an Emotional Intelligence Program on the Quality of Life and Well-Being of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Educ. 2008, 34, 1013–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Benzo, R.P.; Kirsch, J.L.; Dulohery, M.M.; Abascal-Bolado, B. Emotional Intelligence: A Novel Outcome Associated with Wellbeing and Self-Management in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2016, 13, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Downey, L.A.; Johnston, P.J.; Hansen, K.; Schembri, R.; Stough, C.; Tuckwell, V.; Schweitzer, I. The relationship between emotional intelligence and depression in a clinical sample. Eur. J. Psychiatry 2008, 22, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fernandez-Berrocal, P.; Alcaide, R.; Extremer, N. The Role of Emotional Intelligence in Anxiety and Depression among Adolescents. Individ. Differ. Res. 2006, 4, 16–27. [Google Scholar]
  39. Balluerka, N.; Aritzeta, A.; Gorostiaga, A.; Gartzia, L.; Soroa, G. Emotional intelligence and depressed mood in adolescence: A multilevel approach. Int. J. Clin. Health Psychol. 2013, 13, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Vlachaki, C.; Maridaki Kassotaki, K. Coronary Heart Disease and Emotional Intelligence. Glob. J. Health Sci. 2013, 5, 156–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Schutte, N.S.; Malouff, J.M. Measuring Emotional Intelligence and Related Constructs; E. Mellen Press: Lewiston, NY, USA, 1999; p. ix. 212p. [Google Scholar]
  42. Smart, N.A.; Williams, A.D.; Levinger, I.; Selig, S.; Howden, E.; Coombes, J.S.; Fassett, R.G. Exercise & Sports Science Australia (ESSA) position statement on exercise and chronic kidney disease. J. Sci. Med. Sport 2013, 16, 406–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Anding-Rost, K.; von Gersdorff, G.; von Korn, P.; Ihorst, G.; Josef, A.; Kaufmann, M.; Huber, M.; Bar, T.; Zeissler, S.; Hofling, S.; et al. Exercise during Hemodialysis in Patients with Chronic Kidney Failure. NEJM Evid. 2023, 2, EVIDoa2300057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Morais, M.J.D.; Raimundo, R.D.; Oliveira, F.S.; Abreu, L.C.; Bezerra, I.M.P.; Silva, R.P.M.; Rodrigues, A.S.; Valenti, V.E.; Perez-Riera, A.R. Evaluation of the effects of aerobic training during hemodialysis on autonomic heart rate modulation in patients with chronic renal disease. Medicine 2019, 98, e15976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Grigoriou, S.S.; Zisi, V.; Taxias, F.; Gkilyana, M.; Bougiesi, M. Emotional Intelligence, Age and Physical Activity: Review of Contemporary Literature. Inq. Sport Phys. Educ. 2012, 10, 17–29. [Google Scholar]
  46. Solanksi, D.; Lane, A. Relationships between Exercise as a Mood Regulation Strategy and Trait Emotional Intelligence. Asian J. Sports Med. 2010, 14, 195–200. [Google Scholar]
  47. Schneider, S.M.; Malecki, A.K.; Muller, K.; Schonfeld, R.; Girndt, M.; Mohr, P.; Hiss, M.; Kielstein, H.; Jager, K.; Kielstein, J.T. Effect of a single dialysis session on cognitive function in CKD5D patients: A prospective clinical study. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2015, 30, 1551–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Post, J.B.; Jegede, A.B.; Morin, K.; Spungen, A.M.; Langhoff, E.; Sano, M. Cognitive profile of chronic kidney disease and hemodialysis patients without dementia. Nephron Clin. Pract. 2010, 116, c247–c255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Kaltsatou, A.; Grigoriou, S.S.; Karatzaferi, C.; Giannaki, C.D.; Stefanidis, I.; Sakkas, G.K. Cognitive function and exercise training for chronic renal disease patients: A literature review. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther. 2015, 19, 509–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Stringuetta Belik, F.; Oliveira, E.S.V.R.; Braga, G.P.; Bazan, R.; Perez Vogt, B.; Costa Teixeira Caramori, J.; Barretti, P.; de Souza Goncalves, R.; Fortes Villas Boas, P.J.; Hueb, J.C.; et al. Influence of Intradialytic Aerobic Training in Cerebral Blood Flow and Cognitive Function in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Nephron 2018, 140, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Giannaki, C.D.; Sakkas, G.K.; Karatzaferi, C.; Hadjigeorgiou, G.M.; Lavdas, E.; Kyriakides, T.; Koutedakis, Y.; Stefanidis, I. Effect of exercise training and dopamine agonists in patients with uremic restless legs syndrome: A six-month randomized, partially double-blind, placebo-controlled comparative study. BMC Nephrol. 2013, 14, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Koufaki, P.; Greenwood, S.; Painter, P.; Mercer, T. The BASES expert statement on exercise therapy for people with chronic kidney disease. J. Sports Sci. 2015, 33, 1902–1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Healthcare 12 00872 g001
Figure 1. Flow of participants through the exercise intervention study.
Figure 1. Flow of participants through the exercise intervention study.
Healthcare 12 00872 g001
Table 1. Patients’ basic characteristics, functional capacity, and questionnaire assessment.
Table 1. Patients’ basic characteristics, functional capacity, and questionnaire assessment.
VariablesPool DataPre-Training GroupPost-Training Groupp Value *
Μ/F50/2815/315/3
Age61.2 ± 17.156.7 ± 12.356.7 ± 12.3
BMI25.8 ± 4.925.4 ± 4.425.9 ± 4.70.080
WHR1.0 ± 0.11.0 ± 0.11.0 ± 0.10.914
Pills/day7.7 ± 4.78.0 ± 5.07.6 ± 4.00.270
Months in dialysis63.4 ± 67.052.7 ± 47.561.7 ± 47.5
MMSE25.3 ± 2.926.3 ± 1.927.0 ± 2.00.010
FSS4.9 ± 2.43.6 ± 1.33.6 ± 1.60.989
FIQ22.5 ± 16.114.9 ± 4.67.4 ± 5.70.000
WLEIS81.9 ± 22.788.4 ± 9.389.4 ± 12.60.802
SSEIT121.5 ± 19.9128.8 ± 12.7133.2 ± 16.30.438
SF-36—Physical Health75.9 ± 89.665.9 ± 17.866.9 ± 18.10.760
SF-36—Mental Health66.4 ± 66.665.0 ± 11.165.0 ± 12.30.955
SF-36—Total48.7 ± 21.570.0 ± 13.167.0 ± 15.80.418
BDI9.5 ± 7.45.3 ± 4.96.9 ± 6.40.195
MVQOL16.1 ± 4.318.3 ± 3.618.7 ± 3.20.664
ESS4.5 ± 2.64.3 ± 2.65.4 ± 2.80.328
PSQI9.3 ± 4.85.6 ± 3.05.9 ± 4.90.771
Pain1.7 ± 3.60.1 ± 0.60.1 ± 0.50.331
BFI2.7 ± 2.61.5 ± 1.11.9 ± 1.80.332
Handgrip (Nw)23.5 ± 10.8 (N = 38)26.5 ± 8.229.4 ± 8.20.031
STS 5 (sec)10.9 ± 4.4 (N = 24)12.7 ± 5.29.6 ± 3.20.042
STS30 (rep)12.1 ± 3.5 (N = 24)11.5 ± 2.416.1 ± 3.70.001
STS60 (rep)22.4 ± 7.1 (N = 24)20.0 ± 5.228.7 ± 7.60.001
Abbreviations: BMI, Body Mass Index; WHR, waist-to-hip ratio; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Exam; FSS, Fatigue Severity Scale; FIQ, Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire; WLEIS, Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale; SSEIT, Schutte Self-Report Emotional Intelligence Test; BDI, Beck Depression Inventory; MVQOLI, Missoula–VITAS Quality of Life Index; ESS, Epworth Sleepiness Scale; PSQI, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; BFI, Brief Fatigue Inventory; STS, sit-to-stand. * Pre/post comparisons.
Table 2. Correlations between the examined parameters.
Table 2. Correlations between the examined parameters.
Correlations between Patients’ Basic Characteristics, Functional Capacity, and Emotional Intelligence
GenderAgeBMIWHRPills/DayMonths on HDHandgrip
WLEISr = 0.037r = −0.710r = −0.094r = 0.070r = −0.190r = −0.150r = 0.091
p = 0.740p = 0.450p = 0.350p = 0.642p = 0.098p = 0.195p = 0.443
SSEITr = −0.062r = −0.117r = −0.007r = 0.006r = 0.023r = 0.037r = 0.070
p = 0.569p = 0.209p = 0.942p = 0.966p = 0.839p = 0.745p = 0.551
Correlations between Patients’ Emotional Intelligence and Questionnaires
MMSEFSSFIQSF-36 PCSSF-36 MCSWLEISSSEIT
WLEISr = 0.216r = −0.215 *r = −0.023r = 0.191 *r = 0.064-r = 0.407 **
p = 0.081p = 0.024p = 0.848p = 0.037p = 0.488-p = 0.000
SSEITr = 0.268 *r = −0.222 *r = 0.146r = 0.058r = 0.050r = 0.407 **-
p = 0.029p = 0.018p = 0.218p = 0.524p = 0.579p = 0.000-
BDIMVQOLIESSPSQIFIQMFIBFI
WLEISr = −0.109r = 0.255 **r = 0.002r = −0.077r = 0.104r = −0.206 *r = −0.195
p = 0.254p = 0.007p = 0.985p = 0.440p = 0.421p = 0.031p = 0.102
SSEITr = −0.140r = 0.205 *r = −0.054r = −0.001r = 0.145r = −0.255 **r = −0.031
p = 0.139p = 0.027p = 0.576p = 0.995p = 0.256p = 0.006p = 0.796
Abbreviations: HD, hemodialysis; BMI, Body Mass Index; WHR, waist-to-hip ratio; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Exam; FSS, Fatigue Severity Scale; FIQ, Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire; MCS, mental component summary; PCS, physical component summary; WLEIS, Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale; SSEIT, Schutte Self-Report Emotional Intelligence Test; BDI, Beck Depression Inventory; MVQOLI, Missoula–VITAS Quality of Life Index; ESS, Epworth Sleepiness Scale; PSQI, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; MFI, Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory; BFI, Brief Fatigue Inventory. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Table 3. Basic characteristics, functional capacity, and questionnaire data divided into two groups according to scores in the two emotional intelligence questionnaires.
Table 3. Basic characteristics, functional capacity, and questionnaire data divided into two groups according to scores in the two emotional intelligence questionnaires.
VariablesLow EI SSEITHigh EI SSEITLow EI WLEISHigh EI WLEISp Value
N54165817
Gender (M/F)37/1710/641/179/80.672
0.213
Age61.3 ± 17.956.9 ± 15.162.3 ± 16.856.7 ± 17.90.337
0.259
BMI26.8 ± 4.924.1 ± 4.726.3 ± 5.124.4 ± 4.20.069
0.125
WHR1.0 ± 0.11.0 ± 0.40.9 ± 0.11.0 ± 0.30.648
0.409
ABI1.0 ± 0.11.0 ± 0.21.0 ± 0.11.0 ± 0.10.765
0.337
Months in Dialysis69.4 ± 76.453.6 ± 37.972.1 ± 73.745.3 ± 45.90.338
0.125
Hand Grip (Newton)23.7 ± 11.126.4 ± 10.423.8 ± 11.026.1 ± 10.60.461
0.493
Questionnaires
WLEIS84.4 ± 13.293.4 ± 8.482.3 ± 11.799.4 ± 2.80.003 **
0.000 **
SSEIT114.7 ± 17.3143.9 ± 6.8117.8 ± 20.5133.6 ± 10.90.000 **
0.000 **
MMSE25.0 ± 2.926.8 ± 2.525.0 ± 3.126.7 ± 1.50.046 *
0.011 *
FSS5.1 ± 2.63.9 ± 1.85.2 ± 2.53.9 ± 1.90.045 *
0.044 *
MFI61.9 ± 19.147.9 ± 16.660.8 ± 19.051.7 ± 18.60.008 **
0.095
BFI2.6 ± 2.62.5 ± 2.63.0 ± 2.71.4 ± 1.30.912
0.011 *
Physical Health (SF-36)82.0 ± 93.455.9 ± 36.866.9 ± 80.896.7 ± 85.60.100
0.213
Mental Health (SF-36)69.4 ± 74.365.4 ± 49.570.7 ± 74.955.3 ± 24.70.805
0.185
MVQOL16.0 ± 4.217.8 ± 4.315.6 ± 4.118.6 ± 3.80.144
0.013 *
BDI9.9 ± 7.57.3 ± 7.19.8 ± 7.47.4 ± 6.70.221
0.226
ESS4.5 ± 2.54.3 ± 3.04.2 ± 2.54.9 ± 2.90.839
0.437
PSQI8.5 ± 5.38.6 ± 4.78.5 ± 5.08.2 ± 5.50.940
0.865
FIQ22.4 ± 15.725.2 ± 18.024.1 ± 16.919.6 ± 13.30.653
0.341
FIQ1.6 ± 3.52.4 ± 3.41.6 ± 3.52.1 ± 4.00.512
0.658
Abbreviations: BMI, Body Mass Index; WHR, waist-to-hip ratio; ABI, Ankle Brachial Index; WLEIS, Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale; SSEIT, Schutte Self-Report Emotional Intelligence Test; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Exam; FSS, Fatigue Severity Scale; MFI, Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory; BFI, Brief Fatigue Inventory; MVQOLI, Missoula–VITAS Quality of Life Index; FIQ, Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire; BDI, Beck Depression Inventory; ESS, Epworth Sleepiness Scale; PSQI, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; FIQ, Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Table 4. Effect of 9 months of exercise training on the emotional intelligence questionnaires.
Table 4. Effect of 9 months of exercise training on the emotional intelligence questionnaires.
Pre-TrainingPost-Trainingp Values
N1818
WLEIS88.4 ± 9.389.4 ± 3.00.802
SSEIT128.8 ± 133.2133.2 ± 16.30.438
Abbreviations: WLEIS, Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale; SSEIT, Schutte Self-Report Emotional Intelligence Test.
Table 5. Effect of 9 months of exercise training on the emotional intelligence questionnaire WLEIS. Data divided into three groups according to scores in the emotional intelligence test.
Table 5. Effect of 9 months of exercise training on the emotional intelligence questionnaire WLEIS. Data divided into three groups according to scores in the emotional intelligence test.
Low MediumHighp Values
N3114
Pre-WLEIS score73.0 ± 4.088.6 ± 4.799.2 ± 2.60.106
Post-WLEIS score98.7 ± 7.0 *85.7 ± 14.092.5 ± 7.90.541
Delta changes25.7 ± 6.4−2.9 ± 15.2−6.7 ± 5.90.048
Abbreviations: WLEIS, Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale. p values GLM repeated measures; * Pre/post differences, p = 0.02.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Grigoriou, S.S.; Karatzaferi, C.; Giannaki, C.D.; Sakkas, G.K. Emotional Intelligence in Hemodialysis Patients: The Impact of an Intradialytic Exercise Training Program. Healthcare 2024, 12, 872. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12090872

AMA Style

Grigoriou SS, Karatzaferi C, Giannaki CD, Sakkas GK. Emotional Intelligence in Hemodialysis Patients: The Impact of an Intradialytic Exercise Training Program. Healthcare. 2024; 12(9):872. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12090872

Chicago/Turabian Style

Grigoriou, Stefania S., Christina Karatzaferi, Christoforos D. Giannaki, and Giorgos K. Sakkas. 2024. "Emotional Intelligence in Hemodialysis Patients: The Impact of an Intradialytic Exercise Training Program" Healthcare 12, no. 9: 872. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12090872

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop