Next Article in Journal
Modern Analytical Techniques for Berry Authentication
Previous Article in Journal
Optimization of the Geometrical Design for an All-Dielectric Metasurface Sensor with a High Refractive-Index Response
Previous Article in Special Issue
Green Synthesis of Multifunctional Silver Nanoparticles Using Plectranthus amboinicus for Sensitive Detection of Triethylamine, with Potential In Vitro Antibacterial and Anticancer Activities
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Chemosensors for Ion Detection

Department of Applied Chemistry, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
Chemosensors 2023, 11(9), 499; https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11090499
Submission received: 25 August 2023 / Accepted: 1 September 2023 / Published: 12 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chemosensors for Ion Detection)
The advancement in chemosensory research towards the ionic species quantitation becomes vital to securing the environment for the future [1,2,3]. Moreover, such research often leads to advances in developing organic molecules, inorganic materials and hybrid conjugates including small Schiff base molecules, carbon dots (CDs), metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), perovskites (inorganic/hybrid), etc. [4,5,6]. In this thematic issue, the most recent advances in sensory materials towards biologically/environmentally important ionic species detection and antibacterial/anticancer activities of certain materials are both highlighted and pronounced in great detail. This Special Issue is composed of four review articles and eleven research papers, which extensively covered different materials for the sensing of ions.
Recently, the use of gold nanoparticles (Au NPs) in the test strip-based detection of Hg2+ ions has been recognized as a distinct tactic. Komova et al., demonstrated the utilization of mercaptosuccinic acid (MSA) conjugated with a protein carrier (bovine serum albumin) on a pre-impregnated test strip with tween-20 functionalized Au NPs for the detection of Hg2+ [7], wherein, the formation of Au-Hg alloys plays a vital mechanistic role. With regard to the employment of BODIPY-based probes, Li and co-workers [8] described the use of three BODIPY-based fluorescent probes for detecting Zn2+ with sucessful validation in cellular imaging studies. Rossi and co-workers demonstrated the use of mercaptoundecanoic acid functionalized silver nanoparticles (AgNPs@11MUA) as metal ion sensors (Ni2+, Zn2+, Co2+, Cd2+, Mn2+, and Cu2+) and investigated the role of surface coating density in the sensors [9]. Their work provides valuable information for the research community. Sousa et al., developed the fluorescent CDs from olive mill wastes for detecting the azo dye [10]. These CDs displayed high selectivity to methyl orange (MO) and methyl red (MR) than that of other anionic and cationic azo dyes. Dalapati and co-workers synthesized the supramolecular nanorods by means of the copper ion-induced self-assembly of N,N-bis[aspartic potassium salt]-3,4,9,10-perylenetetracarboxylic diimide (APBI-K) and adopted them in the fluorometric and colorimetric quantification of sulfide ions [11]. Rahman and co-workers reported the counter ion effect (SO42− > Cl > NO3) on the detection of Cu2+ in aqueous solution by using the quartz tuning fork (QTF) sensors modified with L-cysteine self-assembled monolayers [12]. Their report was validated through both experimental and density functional theory (DFT) investigations.
More recently, the use of one-pot synthesized AIEE active Schiff base derivatives as metal ion sensors has become an emerging topic. M. Shellaiah and co-workers reported the one-pot synthesized pyrene-based Schiff base derivative for sequential detection of Cu2+ and CN [13]. This report also demonstrated the detection of Cu2+ and CN in cellular imaging, TLC plates, and blended polymer membrane studies. F. Paré and co-workers reported their electrochemical detection of NO3 via direct ink writing [14], wherein, graphite-based inks with hydrophobicity were used to avoid the formation of a water layer between the solid contact and the polymeric selective membrane. J. Kumar et al. delivered the utilization of the rhodamine derivative linked silica coated upconverting nanophosphor (NaYF4: Yb3+/Er3+@SiO2-RBDA) for the ratiometric detection of Pb2+ [15]. This report has advanced the hybrid NIR-upconverting nanophosphors (UCNPs)-based sensory research. P. Shiveshwarkar et al. delivered the spray coating tactic for stimuli responsive materials for the colorimetric detection of Pb2+ [16], in which dipicolylamine-terminated diacetylene-containing amphiphiles were spray-coated for detecting the Pb2+. L. Prabakaran and co-workers discussed the use of green synthesized Ag NPs towards the detection of triethylamine and also demonstrated the antibacterial and anticancer activities of the NPs [17]. This report has accelerated the development of the green synthetic pathways for Ag NPs for multiple applications.
Y. Wang and co-workers [18] wrote a thorough review on rhodamine-based chemosensors, which has attracted the scientific community and aids in further advancing research towards novel rhodamine-based molecule development. Their review shows great impact with reliable citation metrics. G. Alberti and co-workers described the use of deferoxamine (DFO)-based materials towards the Fe3+ detection [19]. Their review outlines the DFO materials-based Fe3+ sensors and includes enough detail to help the researchers working in the field of DFO-based sensors. Shellaiah et al. delivered a review regarding the “Antiaggregation-based sensing utilities of Au NPs and Ag NPs” with highlighted linear ranges, limit of detection (LOD) and mechanistic aspects [20]. Their review can greatly advance research on the anti-aggregation-based sensors. S. Chen and co-workers contributed a detailed review on the pH sensing ability of perylene diimide-based probes [21]. This review, in particular, describes the most valuable information for the design of perylene diimide-based probes in a pH sensing-based study.
I would like to express my sincere gratefulness to all the authors who have contributed their excellent research work to this Special Issue. I would also like to thank the reviewers and editors for their efforts in the peer review processes, which have greatly improved the quality of the published manuscripts.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kaur, B.; Kaur, N.; Kumar, S. Colorimetric metal ion sensors—A comprehensive review of the years 2011–2016. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2018, 358, 13–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hu, T.; Lai, Q.; Fan, W.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Z. Advances in Portable Heavy Metal Ion Sensors. Sensors 2023, 23, 4125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhou, W.; Saran, R.; Liu, J. Metal Sensing by DNA. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 8272–8325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Goshisht, M.K.; Patra, G.K.; Tripathi, N. Fluorescent Schiff base sensors as a versatile tool for metal ion detection: Strategies, mechanistic insights, and applications. Mater. Adv. 2022, 3, 2612–2669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Šafranko, S.; Goman, D.; Stanković, A.; Medvidović-Kosanović, M.; Moslavac, T.; Jerković, I.; Jokić, S. An Overview of the Recent Developments in Carbon Quantum Dots—Promising Nanomaterials for Metal Ion Detection and (Bio)Molecule Sensing. Chemosensors 2021, 9, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Shellaiah, M.; Sun, K.-W. Review on Sensing Applications of Perovskite Nanomaterials. Chemosensors 2020, 8, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Komova, N.S.; Serebrennikova, K.V.; Berlina, A.N.; Zherdev, A.V.; Dzantiev, B.B. Low-Tech Test for Mercury Detection: A New Option for Water Quality Assessment. Chemosensors 2022, 10, 413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, Y.; Yao, S.; Fang, H.; He, W.; Chen, Y.; Guo, Z. Rational Design of Ratiometric Fluorescent Probe for Zn2+ Imaging under Oxidative Stress in Cells. Chemosensors 2022, 10, 477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rossi, A.; Cuccioloni, M.; Magnaghi, L.R.; Biesuz, R.; Zannotti, M.; Petetta, L.; Angeletti, M.; Giovannetti, R. Optimizing the Heavy Metal Ion Sensing Properties of Functionalized Silver Nanoparticles: The Role of Surface Coating Density. Chemosensors 2022, 10, 483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sousa, D.A.; Berberan-Santos, M.N.; Prata, J.V. Detection of Azo Dyes Using Carbon Dots from Olive Mill Wastes. Chemosensors 2022, 10, 487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dalapati, R.; Hunter, M.; Zang, L. A Dual Fluorometric and Colorimetric Sulfide Sensor Based on Coordinating Self-Assembled Nanorods: Applicable for Monitoring Meat Spoilage. Chemosensors 2022, 10, 500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rahman, S.; Al-Gawati, M.A.; Alfaifi, F.S.; Muthuramamoorthy, M.; Alanazi, A.F.; Albrithen, H.; Alzahrani, K.E.; Assaifan, A.K.; Alodhayb, A.N.; Georghiou, P.E. The Effect of Counterions on the Detection of Cu2+ Ions in Aqueous Solutions Using Quartz Tuning Fork (QTF) Sensors Modified with L-Cysteine Self-Assembled Monolayers: Experimental and Quantum Chemical DFT Study. Chemosensors 2023, 11, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shellaiah, M.; Thirumalaivasan, N.; Aazaad, B.; Awasthi, K.; Sun, K.-W.; Wu, S.-P.; Lin, M.-C.; Ohta, N. An AIEE Active Anthracene-Based Nanoprobe for Zn2+ and Tyrosine Detection Validated by Bioimaging Studies. Chemosensors 2022, 10, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Paré, F.; Visús, A.; Gabriel, G.; Baeza, M. Novel Nitrate Ion-Selective Microsensor Fabricated by Means of Direct Ink Writing. Chemosensors 2023, 11, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kumar, J.; Roy, I. Rhodamine Derivative-Linked Silica-Coated Upconverting Nanophosphor (NaYF4: Yb3+/Er3+@SiO2-RBDA) for Ratiometric, Ultrasensitive Chemosensing of Pb2+ Ions. Chemosensors 2023, 11, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shiveshwarkar, P.; Jaworski, J. Spray-On Colorimetric Sensors for Distinguishing the Presence of Lead Ions. Chemosensors 2023, 11, 327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Prabakaran, L.; Sathyaraj, W.V.; Yesudhason, B.V.; Subbaraj, G.K.; Atchudan, R. Green Synthesis of Multifunctional Silver Nanoparticles Using Plectranthus amboinicus for Sensitive Detection of Triethylamine, with Potential In Vitro Antibacterial and Anticancer Activities. Chemosensors 2023, 11, 373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Ma, W.; Lu, R.; Zhou, W.; Gao, H. Recent Developments in Rhodamine-Based Chemosensors: A Review of the Years 2018–2022. Chemosensors 2022, 10, 399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Alberti, G.; Zanoni, C.; Magnaghi, L.R.; Biesuz, R. Deferoxamine-Based Materials and Sensors for Fe(III) Detection. Chemosensors 2022, 10, 468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shellaiah, M.; Sun, K.-W. Review on Anti-Aggregation-Enabled Colorimetric Sensing Applications of Gold and Silver Nanoparticles. Chemosensors 2022, 10, 536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, S.; Zhou, M.; Zhu, L.; Yang, X.; Zang, L. Architectures and Mechanisms of Perylene Diimide-Based Optical Chemosensors for pH Probing. Chemosensors 2023, 11, 293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, K.W. Chemosensors for Ion Detection. Chemosensors 2023, 11, 499. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11090499

AMA Style

Sun KW. Chemosensors for Ion Detection. Chemosensors. 2023; 11(9):499. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11090499

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Kien Wen. 2023. "Chemosensors for Ion Detection" Chemosensors 11, no. 9: 499. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11090499

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop