Next Article in Journal
Development of New Models of Oral Mucosa to Investigate the Impact of the Structure of Transmembrane Mucin-1 on the Mucosal Pellicle Formation and Its Physicochemical Properties
Next Article in Special Issue
Metabolomic Profiling of Mice with Tacrolimus-Induced Nephrotoxicity: Carnitine Deficiency in Renal Tissue
Previous Article in Journal
Mice Generated with Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Derived from Mucosal-Associated Invariant T Cells
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomedicines
Volume 12
Issue 1
10.3390/biomedicines12010138
biomedicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Opinion

Targeting TLR Signaling Cascades in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Update

by
George D. Kalliolias
1,2,3,
Efthimia K. Basdra
4 and
Athanasios G. Papavassiliou
4,*
1
Hospital for Special Surgery, Arthritis & Tissue Degeneration, New York, NY 10021, USA
2
Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA
3
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY 10591, USA
4
Department of Biological Chemistry, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2024, 12(1), 138; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12010138
Submission received: 16 December 2023 / Revised: 6 January 2024 / Accepted: 8 January 2024 / Published: 9 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pharmacological Targets in Inflammation: Advanced Research)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Evidence from animal models and human genetics implicates Toll-like Receptors (TLRs) in the pathogenesis of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). Endosomal TLRs sensing nucleic acids were proposed to induce lupus-promoting signaling in dendritic cells, B cells, monocytes, and macrophages. Ligation of TLR4 in synovial macrophages and fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLSs) by endogenous ligands was suggested to induce local production of mediators that amplify RA synovitis. Inhibition of TLRs using antagonists or monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that selectively prevent extracellular or endosomal TLR ligation has emerged as an attractive treatment strategy for SLE and RA. Despite the consistent success of selective inhibition of TLR ligation in animal models, DV-1179 (dual TLR7/9 antagonist) failed to achieve pharmacodynamic effectiveness in SLE, and NI-0101 (mAb against TLR4) failed to improve arthritis in RA. Synergistic cooperation between TLRs and functional redundancy in human diseases may require pharmacologic targeting of intracellular molecules that integrate signaling downstream of multiple TLRs. Small molecules inhibiting shared kinases involved in TLR signaling and peptidomimetics disrupting the assembly of common signalosomes (“Myddosome”) are under development. Targeted degraders (proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs)) of intracellular molecules involved in TLR signaling are a new class of TLR inhibitors with promising preliminary data awaiting further clinical validation.

1. Toll-like Receptors: Structure, Signaling, Regulation

In 1997, a human homolog of the Drosophila Toll protein was discovered to induce the activation of nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) and the production of proinflammatory cytokines and co-stimulatory molecules [1]. To date, the family of human Toll-like Receptors (TLRs) comprises 10 members (TLR1-10) [2]. Structurally, TLRs contain a ligand-binding extracellular domain and a cytoplasmic Toll/interleukin 1 receptor (TIR) homology domain that orchestrates intracellular signaling cascades [3]. These receptors operate as sentinels of “stranger” or “danger” signals, recognizing structure-conserved molecules of microbes and endogenous ligands released from damaged cells. TLRs are strategically localized either on the cell surface (TLR1, TLR2, TLR4, TLR5, TLR6, and TLR10) surveilling the extracellular space or in the endosomal compartments (TLR3, TLR7, TLR8, and TLR9) monitoring the intracellular space [2,4]. Cell-surface TLRs mainly recognize ligands derived from microbial membrane components including lipids, lipoproteins, and proteins. Endosomal TLRs recognize viral, bacterial, and self-nucleic acid fragments of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA; TLR3), single-stranded RNA (ssRNA; TLR7, TLR8), and single-stranded DNA (ssDNA; TLR9) [4].
Due to structural similarities, TLRs share common signaling principles and signaling molecules [2]. Upon ligand binding, TLRs homo- or hetero-dimerize, and then TIR domains facilitate the assembly of signaling complexes (signalosomes). Apart from TLR3, a critical step of the signaling cascade in TLRs is the assembly of a signalosome termed the “Myddosome”, comprised of myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88) and members of the interleukin 1 receptor-associated kinase (IRAK) family [3]. Downstream of signalosomes, there is activation of the NF-κB and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways that induce the production of a constellation of inflammatory mediators (e.g., proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines, tissue-damaging enzymes). Endosomal TLRs and TLR4 also activate interferon regulatory factors (IRFs), a family of transcription factors that induce the production of type I interferons (IFNs) [4]. The functional consequences of TLR activation are tightly regulated at the levels of TLR protein expression, proximal signaling, and chromatin accessibility for TLR-induced transcription factors [4,5,6]. Dysregulated TLR activation has been described in many rheumatic diseases [7,8,9]. Here, we focus on recent developments in the therapeutic targeting of TLR signaling cascades in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA).

2. Pathogenetic Role of Nucleic Acid Sensing by Endosomal TLRs in SLE

The hallmark of SLE is the break of tolerance to self-nucleic acids and the production of antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) with specificities against double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) and ribonucleoproteins (RNPs; anti-RNPs) [8]. Enhanced TLR7 signaling, triggered by nucleic acid-containing immune complexes (ICs), has emerged as a central event in the pathogenesis of SLE. Human genetics and studies in animal models indicate at least three distinct mechanisms of enhanced TLR7 signaling that may coordinate during SLE pathogenesis: (1) continuous engagement of TLR7 due to endosomal abundance of stimulating ligands [4,8], (2) hypersensitive TLR7 due to gain-of-function mutations in the TLR7 gene that lower the activation threshold of TLR7 [10], and (3) increased expression of TLR7 due to a higher number of functional copies of the TLR7 gene [11] or single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that render TLR7 transcripts resistant to degradation [12].
Under physiologic conditions, the endosomal availability of nucleic acids is tightly regulated to prevent “inappropriate” activation of endosomal TLRs [4]. Regulation involves nucleic acid handling at the levels of release, clearance, receptor-mediated uptake, and export from endosomes. Nucleic acid handling is dysregulated in SLE and, as a result, there is increased endosomal availability of nucleic acids. Dysfunctional neutrophils extruding nucleic acid-containing neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) [13] and defective digestion of nucleic acids have been observed in SLE [4]. Three receptor systems have been involved in the process of uptake and delivery of nucleic acids to the endosomes, operating in a cell type-specific manner. In B cells, DNA- and RNA-containing antigens obtain access to the endosomes via binding to the B-cell receptor (BCR) [14,15]. In other TLR7-bearing cells (plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs), myeloid DCs (mDCs), monocytes, and macrophages), nucleic acid uptake is mediated by Fcgamma receptors (FcγRs) [16,17,18] and the receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE) [19,20,21]. RAGE binds nucleic acids directly [20,21] or through the high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) protein [19]. TLR7 ligands are actively exported from the endosomes by a family of nucleoside transporters including solute carrier family 29 member 3 (SLC29A3). Slc29a3-/- mice display endosomal accumulation of nucleosides that drive enhanced TLR7 activation [22]. In Asian patients with SLE, an SNP (rs780669) in the SLC29A3 gene was recently identified as a risk variant for SLE [23]. The mRNA levels of SLC29A3a were found to be lower in the monocytes of these Asian patients compared to healthy controls.
The recent discovery of a lupus-causing gain-of-function TLR7 variant (Y264H) [10] represents the most compelling and human-relevant evidence that enhanced TLR7 signaling is involved in SLE pathogenesis. The mutated tyrosine residue of the Y264H variant lies in the ligand-binding site of TLR7. This single amino-acid substitution increases the binding affinity of TLR7, specifically for guanosine-containing ligands, and notably raises the TLR7 sensitivity to otherwise non-stimulating ssRNAs. The functional consequences of lowering the threshold of TLR7 activation were revealed when the Y264H variant was introduced into mice that otherwise were not prone to lupus. This new mouse strain, named kika, spontaneously developed a lupus-like phenotype with proliferative glomerulonephritis, widespread lymphadenitis, ANAs, thrombocytopenia, and decreased survival [10]. Increased levels of MyD88 in splenocytes of kika mice are consistent with enhanced TLR7 signaling. Crossing of kika mice with MyD88-knock-out mice completely rescued the lupus-like phenotype, further supporting the role of the TLR7–MyD88 signaling axis in SLE pathogenesis.
Prior studies have identified enhanced TLR7 signaling due to a higher number of functional TLR7 gene copies producing more copies of TLR7 mRNA and protein. A 4-megabase DNA locus, duplicated from the X chromosome and translocated to the Y chromosome, was discovered in the males of the SB/Le mice strain. Notably, when this locus was transferred by crossing or inserted via genetic engineering in various lupus-prone mice, it induced the exacerbation of disease phenotype in males [24]. Thus, this locus was named Y-linked autoimmune accelerator (Yaa). Carriers of Yaa have an additional copy of the TLR7 gene (TLR7 duplication), express higher cellular levels of TLR7 mRNA and protein, and display enhanced TLR7 signaling. The impact of the TLR7 gene copy number in the development of lupus was further investigated using genetically engineered mice that carry varying copy numbers of the TLR7 gene (TLR7 gene dose ranged from 0 to 32 copies) [25]. In lupus-prone mice strains, a reduction of the TLR7 copy number from 2 to 1 abrogated the autoimmune accelerator effect. In mice strains not prone to lupus, overexpression of TLR7 (introduction of over four copies of the TLR7 gene) was sufficient to induce a spontaneous lupus-like phenotype (glomerulonephritis, ANAs, increased serum levels of inflammatory cytokines, and increased lethality) [25].
The concept that TLR7 dosage is positively associated with SLE-provoking signaling could be a potential explanation for the strong female bias observed in SLE, the 14-fold higher incidence of SLE in 47 XXY males (Klinefelter syndrome) compared to 46 XY males, and the lower incidence of SLE in 45 XO females (Turner syndrome) [26]. TLR7 is encoded by a gene on the X chromosome and is primarily expressed in pDCs, mDCs, monocytes/macrophages, and B cells. In 46 XX females, each cell randomly inactivates one of its two X chromosomes to equalize gene dosage (monoallelic expression) with 46 XY males. However, up to 30% of X-linked human genes escape X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) so that both alleles can be expressed simultaneously (biallelic expression) [27]. Single-cell analysis has recently demonstrated that a large proportion of pDCs, B cells, and monocytes from 46 XX women and 47 XXY Klinefelter males are biallelic for the TLR7 gene [11]. Functional experiments indicate that the escape of the TLR7 gene from XCI endows the biallelic B cells with a higher cellular expression of TLR7 and increased responsiveness to TLR7 ligands. In addition to copy number variations, increased TLR7 expression was found to be the result of decreased TLR7 mRNA degradation. An SNP (rs3853839) in the 3′ untranslated region (UTR) of TLR7 mRNA is a risk variant for SLE in Asians and was found to decrease the binding of miR3148 to TLR7 mRNA [12]. As a result, there is reduced TLR7 mRNA degradation and increased expression of TLR7, combined with a higher IFN-signature score in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of SLE patients.
The lupus-promoting functional consequences of enhanced TLR7 signaling result from the direct activation of the TLR7-bearing cell types [8]. In pDCs and mDCs, TLR7 activation induces migration to the sites of inflammation, propagation of autoimmunity, and tissue damage due to the secretion of type I IFNs, inflammatory cytokines, and chemokines [16,17]. In autoreactive B cells, B-cell-intrinsic and -extrinsic TLR7 signaling provides the necessary co-stimulation for proliferation and differentiation to plasma cells and the production of autoantibodies against RNA-containing antigens [15]. In monocytes, TLR7 induces monocyte subset-specific signaling, endowing distinct SLE-related pathogenic functions. In the inflammatory Ly6Chi monocyte subset, TLR7 drives the differentiation to inflammatory hemophagocytes with a high phagocytic capacity that may contribute to the inflammatory cytopenia and macrophage activation syndrome observed in SLE [28]. In the CD14dim monocyte subset, nucleic acid sensing by TLR7 induces the production of CCL3 and TNF [29]. CD14dim patrolling monocytes are present in the glomeruli of lupus patients. In lupus glomerulonephritis, deposited nucleic acid-containing ICs induce the TLR7-mediated activation of CD14dim monocytes. Another study has demonstrated that TLR7 signaling protects pDCs and B cells from glucocorticoid-induced cell death [30], suggesting that TLR7 activation is not only disease-promoting but may also confer resistance to the standard-of-care treatment with glucocorticoids. In this context, pharmacologic inhibition of TLR7 signaling has emerged as an attractive treatment and steroid-sparing approach for SLE.

3. Therapeutic Targeting of Endosomal TLRs in SLE

Several TLR7 inhibitors have been developed in the last decade. Based on their mechanism of action, TLR7 inhibitors are classified into the following categories (Figure 1): (1) molecules that sequester TLR ligands, preventing their binding to endosomal TLRs [31]; (2) oligonucleotide-based antagonists [32]; (3) small-molecule antagonists [33]; (4) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against TLR7 (anti-TLR7) [34]; and (5) small molecules inhibiting kinases [35] or targeting adaptor/scaffolding molecules downstream of TLRs [36]. Below, we describe TLR7 inhibitors that have passed the pre-clinical stage of in vitro and in vivo validation and we highlight those that have entered clinical development in humans (Table 1).
A proof of concept regarding the therapeutic potential of endosomal TLR inhibition in SLE comes from the effectiveness of antimalarial drugs (hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), chloroquine, and quinacrine) in SLE patients [37]. Inhibition of endosomal TLR signaling is one mechanism that explains, at least in part, the clinical benefit of antimalarials in SLE [38]. Due to high lipophilicity, antimalarial compounds can pass through the cell membranes and accumulate in lysosomes and endosomes (lysosomotropism). Within the endosomal compartments, antimalarial drugs directly bind and sequester nucleic acids, preventing ligation to endosomal TLRs and inhibiting downstream signaling [39]. This discovery has opened the avenue of steric inhibition of endosomal TLRs by synthetic chemical compounds that interact physically either with TLR ligands or with TLRs.
The discovery of short DNA immunoregulatory sequences (IRS) led to the development of oligonucleotide-based inhibitors of endosomal TLRs [40,41]. IRS 954 (DV-1079; dual TLR7/9 antagonist) and IRS 661 (TLR7 antagonist) have shown effectiveness in murine models of SLE [42]. Chemically modified oligonucleotides were developed subsequently, including immune-modulatory oligonucleotides (IMOs) such as IMO-8400 (Bazlitoran; triple TLR7/8/9 antagonist), IMO-9200 (triple TLR7/8/9 antagonist), and IMO-3100 (dual TLR7/9 antagonist) [33,43]. Despite the promising results of the above oligonucleotide-based antagonists in murine models of lupus, the clinical development of DV-1179 (a dual TLR7/9 antagonist) was halted after failing to achieve pharmacodynamic effectiveness in SLE patients [43] and none of these inhibitors is currently in clinical development for SLE (Table 1).
Recent studies have revealed the structural requirements for effective TLR7 ligation and have shown that TLR7 is a dual receptor that recognizes oligonucleotide-based ligands and small-molecule ligands with distinct binding sites [44,45,46]. These studies have paved the way for the rational design of small molecules, synthesized by chemical switches on the scaffold of TLR7 agonists (chemotypes) that retain TLR7-binding capacity but eliminate downstream signaling (antagonistic ligand mimetics) [33]. Depending on their fine structure, these chemotypes display variable selectivity (single- vs. double- vs. triple selectivity for TLR7, TLR8, and TLR9) and antagonistic potency. Four small molecules, dual inhibitors of TLR7 and TLR8 (Afimetoran/BMS-986256, Enpatoran/M5049, MHV370, and E6742), have successfully passed the stage of preclinical validation in various murine models of lupus and recently entered the early phases of clinical development in humans [47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57]. CPG-52364 (triple TLR7/8/9 antagonist) has been evaluated only in a phase I study (NCT00547014) with no further clinical development [33].
Recent evidence suggests that TLR7 shuttles not only between the endoplasmic reticulum and endosomal compartment but also to the cell surface [58]. TLR7 on the surface of the cell becomes accessible to inhibitory anti-TLR7 mAbs and forms TLR7/anti-TLR7 complexes that are internalized to endosomal compartments. The gradual accumulation of these complexes results in endosomes with TLR7 molecules covered by mAbs, incapable of recognizing nucleic acids [59]. The anti-TLR7 mAbs inhibit TLR7 responses in B cells, DCs, macrophages, and Ly6Clow patrolling monocytes and ameliorate serologic and pathologic manifestations of lupus in mice [60]. DS-7011a is an anti-TLR7 mAb that has shown ex vivo suppression of cytokine production by TLR7-stimulated PBMCs [61]. In a phase 1 single ascending dose study (NCT05203692), DS-7011a was well tolerated by healthy volunteers and it is now under evaluation in an ongoing phase 1b/2 study (NCT05638802) in patients with Systemic and Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus [62,63].
Targeting downstream signaling molecules is another promising strategy for the therapeutic inhibition of endosomal TLRs. In the context of SLE, TLR7 ligation by self-nucleic acids results in the formation of the “Myddosome”, a signaling complex comprised of MyD88, IRAK1, and IRAK4 (Figure 1) [3]. Although numerous kinase inhibitors, with single specificity for IRAK4 (IRAK4i) or dual specificity for IRAK1 and IRAK4 (IRAK1/4i), are under in vitro testing and preclinical validation in animal models, only a few have entered clinical development in human phase I/II studies [35]. Among them, Edecesertib (GS-5718; IRAK4i) [64,65], Zimlovisertib (PF-06650833; IRAK4i) [66,67,68], and R835 (IRAK1/4i) [69,70,71] have shown promising effectiveness in murine models of lupus, ex vivo proof-of-mechanism in human PBMCs, and favorable safety in phase I studies. Edecesertib is currently in phase II (NCT05629208) for cutaneous lupus erythematosus. In addition to the kinase inhibitors, various peptidomimetic small molecules that inhibit TLR signaling by disrupting the assembly of “Myddosome” are under development [36].

4. Pathogenetic Role of TLR4 in RA

Germ-free conditions decrease the incidence and severity of inflammatory arthritis in susceptible animal models [72]. In humans, alterations in oral and intestinal microbiota (dysbiosis) have been involved in the pathogenesis of RA [73,74]. The link between oral dysbiosis (due to the predominance of periodontal pathogens such as Porphyromonas gingivalis and Prevotella intermedia) leading to periodontitis and RA has been supported by extensive evidence [73]. In addition, adjuvant administration is a typical methodology to provoke arthritis in animal models [75]. Activation of TLR pathways is a potential mechanism that links dysbiosis and adjuvants with the development of synovial inflammation. Animal models indicate a role of TLR4 in the propagation of inflammatory arthritis. Mice with a mutant defective TLR4 resolved faster serum transfer arthritis. In a model of collagen-induced arthritis, global knock-out of TLR4, although it had no inhibitory effect in the systemic production of proinflammatory mediators and anti-collagen antibody production, reduced the incidence and severity of arthritis, protected from cartilage damage, and decreased the levels of antibodies against citrullinated peptides (anti-CCP) [76]. These findings in animal models suggest that systemic events are TLR4-independent, while local joint inflammation and cartilage damage are, at least in part, TLR4-dependent.
Evidence from human studies provides additional support for the role of TLR4 in RA pathogenesis. SNPs in the TLR4 gene have been associated with disease susceptibility, severity, progression, and prognosis [77,78,79]. Increased synovial expression of TLR4 [80,81,82], together with a dysregulated miRNA network that may influence TLR4 activity [83], has been described in patients with RA. The concept of TLR4 as a local amplifier of synovial inflammation and joint destruction is further supported by the observation of abundant endogenous TLR4 ligands within the inflamed joint [84,85]. The release of endogenous TLR4 ligands is the result of cell activation and local tissue damage. Continuous engagement of the overexpressed TLR4 by endogenous ligands in innate immune cells and fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLSs) induces the production of inflammatory cytokines and tissue-destructive enzymes that fuel synovial inflammation and propagate joint destruction [86,87]. CD8+ cells expressing high levels of TLR4 with robust capacity of cytokine production in response to lipopolysaccharides (LPSs) were identified in the bloodstream of RA patients [88]. Notably, surface expression of TLR4 in CD8+ cells was directly correlated with disease activity. The unconventional expression of TLR4 in a subset of activated lymphocytes suggests that endogenous TLR4 ligands may contribute to RA pathogenesis by direct activation of TLR4-bearing cell subsets beyond innate immunity.

5. Therapeutic Targeting of TLRs in RA

Therapeutic strategies for inhibiting the TLR4 pathway in RA are summarized in Figure 2 and Table 1. Despite the evidence from preclinical mechanistic studies and human genetics about the potential involvement of TLR4 in the perpetuation of RA synovitis, NI-0101, a humanized mAb against TLR4, failed to improve arthritis in RA patients with an inadequate response to methotrexate [89]. Additional therapeutic modalities specifically targeting TLR4 signaling are under development and are expected to shed light on the actual role of the TLR4 pathway in human RA. For example, TAK-242 (Resatorvid) is a cell-permeable small molecule that selectively binds to Cys747 of the intracellular domain of TLR4, disrupting the interaction with adaptor proteins and inhibiting downstream signaling [90]. In a recent preclinical study, TAK-242 was proven effective in an animal model of inflammatory arthritis [91].
Emerging evidence implicates additional members of the TLR family in the pathogenesis of RA, suggesting a redundancy in TLR signaling. SNPs in TLR2, TLR3, TLR8, and TLR9 have been associated with RA [76]. Increased expression of TLR1, TLR2, TLR3, TLR7, and TLR8 has been described in RA synovium [80,81,82,87]. Serum amyloid A (SAA), an acute phase reactant produced during synovitis, was identified as an endogenous ligand for TLR2, mediating proinflammatory and angiogenic effects [92]. TLR2 was also found to promote FLS metabolic dysfunction [93], migration, and invasiveness [94]. An anti-TLR2 mAb (OPN301) inhibited ex vivo cytokine production by synovial tissue explants [95]. Notably, accumulating evidence reveals a potential role of TLR7 in RA. Expression levels of TLR7 in RA monocytes were strongly correlated with disease activity [96]. Endogenous TLR7 ligands (ssRNA and miR-let7b) were elevated in RA synovial fluid and the miR-Let7b/TLR7 pathway was found to foster metabolic malfunction in RA macrophages and FLSs, promote osteoclastogenesis, and potentiate murine synovitis [96,97]. Altogether, these observations indicate synergistic cooperation between TLRs overexpressed in the RA synovium that goes beyond TLR4. Pharmacologic targeting of molecules that integrate signaling downstream of multiple TLRs (e.g., IRAK inhibitors (IRAKi) and peptidomimetics targeting the “Myddosome”) are under development and will allow the broader inhibition of TLR pathways compared to TLR4 inhibition alone [98,99,100,101,102,103].

6. Future Perspectives

Evidence from animal models suggests that the TLR9 pathway has a controversial role in SLE, with studies indicating a protective impact [104]. In addition, distinct endosomal TLRs are required for different autoantibody specificities: TLR7 signaling promotes antibodies against RNA-containing antigens [15], whereas TLR9 signaling induces antibodies against DNA [14]. SLE displays large clinical and serologic heterogeneity [105], and it is worth investigating in future clinical trials whether TLR7-specific inhibition might be a more appropriate treatment choice, especially for patients with antibodies against RNA-containing antigens. This hypothetical concept that the serologic profile of SLE patients might be used as a biomarker to predict responsiveness to TLR7-specific inhibition opens an opportunity for a precision medicine approach in the management of SLE.
Novel strategies for therapeutic inhibition of TLRs are under development for SLE and RA. Protein degraders targeting the “Myddosome” have emerged recently as promising alternatives to kinase inhibitors and peptidomimetics (Table 1). KT-474 (SAR444656) is a proteolysis-targeting chimera (PROTAC) composed of an E3 ligase-binding portion linked to an IRAK4-binding portion [106]. This heterobifunctional small molecule links the E3-ligase cereblon (CRBN) to IRAK4, leading to the ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of IRAK4. Preliminary data from a phase 1 study in patients with Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS) and Atopic Dermatitis (AD) suggest a promising safety and pharmacodynamic profile. Notably, the IRAK4 kinase inhibitor Zimlovisertib has failed to show clinically significant effectiveness in HS and RA (Table 1). The theoretical advantage of IRAK4 degraders over the IRAK4 kinase inhibitors is that protein depletion abrogates both the kinase activity and the scaffolding function of IRAK4 [106]. Additional PROTACs targeting IRAK4 (GS-6791/NX-0479) or other signaling components of TLRs are under development. Further studies are required to investigate whether protein degraders will be proven safe and more efficacious than kinase inhibitors and peptidomimetics. Finally, targeting the mechanisms regulating neutrophil extracellular trap activation and release (NETosis) [107], the clearance of nucleic acids [4], the receptor-mediated shuttling of nucleic acids from the extracellular space to the endosomes [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21], the chaperone molecules that control TLR trafficking [108], and the miRNA network that regulates TLR signaling [83] represents promising future approaches for the therapeutic manipulation of TLRs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.D.K., E.K.B. and A.G.P.; writing—original draft preparation, G.D.K.; writing—review and editing, E.K.B. and A.G.P.; supervision, A.G.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

G.D.K. is a full-time employee and shareholder at Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. E.K.B. and A.G.P. declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Medzhitov, R.; Preston-Hurlburt, P.; Janeway, C.A., Jr. A human homologue of the Drosophila Toll protein signals activation of adaptive immunity. Nature 1997, 388, 394–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Duan, T.; Du, Y.; Xing, C.; Wang, H.Y.; Wang, R.F. Toll-Like Receptor Signaling and Its Role in Cell-Mediated Immunity. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 812774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Balka, K.R.; De Nardo, D. Understanding early TLR signaling through the Myddosome. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2019, 105, 339–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lind, N.A.; Rael, V.E.; Pestal, K.; Liu, B.; Barton, G.M. Regulation of the nucleic acid-sensing Toll-like receptors. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2022, 22, 224–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Guven-Maiorov, E.; Keskin, O.; Gursoy, A.; Nussinov, R. A Structural View of Negative Regulation of the Toll-like Receptor-Mediated Inflammatory Pathway. Biophys. J. 2015, 109, 1214–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Smale, S.T.; Tarakhovsky, A.; Natoli, G. Chromatin contributions to the regulation of innate immunity. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2014, 32, 489–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Arleevskaya, M.I.; Larionova, R.V.; Brooks, W.H.; Bettacchioli, E.; Renaudineau, Y. Toll-Like Receptors, Infections, and Rheumatoid Arthritis. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 2020, 58, 172–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Caielli, S.; Wan, Z.; Pascual, V. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Pathogenesis: Interferon and Beyond. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2023, 41, 533–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Frasca, L.; Lande, R. Toll-like receptors in mediating pathogenesis in systemic sclerosis. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2020, 201, 14–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Brown, G.J.; Cañete, P.F.; Wang, H.; Medhavy, A.; Bones, J.; Roco, J.A.; He, Y.; Qin, Y.; Cappello, J.; Ellyard, J.I.; et al. TLR7 gain-of-function genetic variation causes human lupus. Nature 2022, 605, 349–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Souyris, M.; Cenac, C.; Azar, P.; Daviaud, D.; Canivet, A.; Grunenwald, S.; Pienkowski, C.; Chaumeil, J.; Mejía, J.E.; Guéry, J.C. TLR7 escapes X chromosome inactivation in immune cells. Sci. Immunol. 2018, 3, eaap8855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Gaffney, P.M.; Sivils, K.M.; James, J.A.; Gregersen, P.K.; Anaya, J.M.; Niewold, T.B.; Merrill, J.T.; Criswell, L.A.; Stevens, A.M.; Boackle, S.A.; et al. MicroRNA-3148 modulates allelic expression of toll-like receptor 7 variant associated with systemic lupus erythematosus. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9, e1003336. [Google Scholar]
  13. Lood, C.; Blanco, L.P.; Purmalek, M.M.; Carmona-Rivera, C.; De Ravin, S.S.; Smith, C.K.; Malech, H.L.; Ledbetter, J.A.; Elkon, K.B.; Kaplan, M.J. Neutrophil extracellular traps enriched in oxidized mitochondrial DNA are interferogenic and contribute to lupus-like disease. Nat. Med. 2016, 22, 146–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Leadbetter, E.A.; Rifkin, I.R.; Hohlbaum, A.M.; Beaudette, B.C.; Shlomchik, M.J.; Marshak-Rothstein, A. Chromatin-IgG complexes activate B cells by dual engagement of IgM and Toll-like receptors. Nature 2002, 416, 603–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lau, C.M.; Broughton, C.; Tabor, A.S.; Akira, S.; Flavell, R.A.; Mamula, M.J.; Christensen, S.R.; Shlomchik, M.J.; Viglianti, G.A.; Rifkin, I.R.; et al. RNA-associated autoantigens activate B cells by combined B cell antigen receptor/Toll-like receptor 7 engagement. J. Exp. Med. 2005, 202, 1171–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Båve, U.; Magnusson, M.; Eloranta, M.L.; Perers, A.; Alm, G.V.; Rönnblom, L. Fc gamma RIIa is expressed on natural IFN-alpha-producing cells (plasmacytoid dendritic cells) and is required for the IFN-alpha production induced by apoptotic cells combined with lupus IgG. J. Immunol. 2003, 171, 3296–3302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Boulé, M.W.; Broughton, C.; Mackay, F.; Akira, S.; Marshak-Rothstein, A.; Rifkin, I.R. Toll-like receptor 9-dependent and -independent dendritic cell activation by chromatin-immunoglobulin G complexes. J. Exp. Med. 2004, 199, 1631–1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Means, T.K.; Latz, E.; Hayashi, F.; Murali, M.R.; Golenbock, D.T.; Luster, A.D. Human lupus autoantibody-DNA complexes activate DCs through cooperation of CD32 and TLR9. J. Clin. Investig. 2005, 115, 407–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tian, J.; Avalos, A.M.; Mao, S.Y.; Chen, B.; Senthil, K.; Wu, H.; Parroche, P.; Drabic, S.; Golenbock, D.; Sirois, C.; et al. Toll-like receptor 9-dependent activation by DNA-containing immune complexes is mediated by HMGB1 and RAGE. Nat. Immunol. 2007, 8, 487–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bertheloot, D.; Naumovski, A.L.; Langhoff, P.; Horvath, G.L.; Jin, T.; Xiao, T.S.; Garbi, N.; Agrawal, S.; Kolbeck, R.; Latz, E. RAGE Enhances TLR Responses through Binding and Internalization of RNA. J. Immunol. 2016, 197, 4118–4126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sirois, C.M.; Jin, T.; Miller, A.L.; Bertheloot, D.; Nakamura, H.; Horvath, G.L.; Mian, A.; Jiang, J.; Schrum, J.; Bossaller, L.; et al. RAGE is a nucleic acid receptor that promotes inflammatory responses to DNA. J. Exp. Med. 2013, 210, 2447–2463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Shibata, T.; Sato, R.; Taoka, M.; Saitoh, S.I.; Komine, M.; Yamaguchi, K.; Goyama, S.; Motoi, Y.; Kitaura, J.; Izawa, K.; et al. TLR7/8 stress response drives histiocytosis in SLC29A3 disorders. J. Exp. Med. 2023, 220, e20230054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wang, Y.F.; Wei, W.; Tangtanatakul, P.; Zheng, L.; Lei, Y.; Lin, Z.; Qian, C.; Qin, X.; Hou, F.; Zhang, X.; et al. Identification of Shared and Asian-Specific Loci for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Evidence for Roles of Type III Interferon Signaling and Lysosomal Function in the Disease: A Multi-Ancestral Genome-Wide Association Study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022, 74, 840–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Pisitkun, P.; Deane, J.A.; Difilippantonio, M.J.; Tarasenko, T.; Satterthwaite, A.B.; Bolland, S. Autoreactive B cell responses to RNA-related antigens due to TLR7 gene duplication. Science 2006, 312, 1669–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Deane, J.A.; Pisitkun, P.; Barrett, R.S.; Feigenbaum, L.; Town, T.; Ward, J.M.; Flavell, R.A.; Bolland, S. Control of toll-like receptor 7 expression is essential to restrict autoimmunity and dendritic cell proliferation. Immunity 2007, 27, 801–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Scofield, R.H.; Bruner, G.R.; Namjou, B.; Kimberly, R.P.; Ramsey-Goldman, R.; Petri, M.; Reveille, J.D.; Alarcón, G.S.; Vilá, L.M.; Reid, J.; et al. Klinefelter’s syndrome (47 XXY) in male systemic lupus erythematosus patients: Support for the notion of a gene-dose effect from the X chromosome. Arthritis Rheum. 2008, 58, 2511–2517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Shen, N.; Fu, Q.; Deng, Y.; Qian, X.; Zhao, J.; Kaufman, K.M.; Wu, Y.L.; Yu, C.Y.; Tang, Y.; Chen, J.Y.; et al. Sex-specific association of X-linked Toll-like receptor 7 (TLR7) with male systemic lupus erythematosus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 15838–15843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Deng, Y.; Zhao, J.; Sakurai, D.; Kaufman, K.M.; Edberg, J.C.; Kimberly, R.P.; Kamen, D.L.; Gilkeson, G.S.; Jacob, C.O.; Scofield, R.H.; et al. Chronic TLR7 and TLR9 signaling drives anemia via differentiation of specialized hemophagocytes. Science 2019, 363, eaao5213. [Google Scholar]
  29. Cros, J.; Cagnard, N.; Woollard, K.; Patey, N.; Zhang, S.Y.; Senechal, B.; Puel, A.; Biswas, S.K.; Moshous, D.; Picard, C.; et al. Human CD14dim monocytes patrol and sense nucleic acids and viruses via TLR7 and TLR8 receptors. Immunity 2010, 33, 375–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Guiducci, C.; Gong, M.; Xu, Z.; Gill, M.; Chaussabel, D.; Meeker, T.; Chan, J.H.; Wright, T.; Punaro, M.; Bolland, S.; et al. TLR recognition of self-nucleic acids hampers glucocorticoid activity in lupus. Nature 2010, 465, 937–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lamphier, M.; Zheng, W.; Latz, E.; Spyvee, M.; Hansen, H.; Rose, J.; Genest, M.; Yang, H.; Shaffer, C.; Zhao, Y.; et al. Novel small molecule inhibitors of TLR7 and TLR9: Mechanism of action and efficacy in vivo. Mol. Pharmacol. 2014, 85, 429–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lenert, P.S. Classification, mechanisms of action, and therapeutic applications of inhibitory oligonucleotides for Toll-like receptors (TLR) 7 and 9. Mediat. Inflamm. 2010, 2010, 986596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zheng, H.; Wu, P.; Bonnet, P.A. Recent Advances on Small-Molecule Antagonists Targeting TLR7. Molecules 2023, 28, 634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Fukui, R.; Murakami, Y.; Miyake, K. New application of anti-TLR monoclonal antibodies: Detection, inhibition and protection. Inflamm. Regen. 2018, 38, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Bai, Y.R.; Yang, W.G.; Hou, X.H.; Shen, D.D.; Zhang, S.N.; Li, Y.; Qiao, Y.Y.; Wang, S.Q.; Yuan, S.; Liu, H.M. The recent advance of Interleukin-1 receptor associated kinase 4 inhibitors for the treatment of inflammation and related diseases. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2023, 258, 115606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Saikh, K.U. MyD88 and beyond: A perspective on MyD88-targeted therapeutic approach for modulation of host immunity. Immunol. Res. 2021, 69, 117–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Dima, A.; Jurcut, C.; Chasset, F.; Felten, R.; Arnaud, L. Hydroxychloroquine in systemic lupus erythematosus: Overview of current knowledge. Ther. Adv. Musculoskelet. Dis. 2022, 14, 1759720X211073001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Schrezenmeier, E.; Dörner, T. Mechanisms of action of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine: Implications for rheumatology. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2020, 16, 155–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Kuznik, A.; Bencina, M.; Svajger, U.; Jeras, M.; Rozman, B.; Jerala, R. Mechanism of endosomal TLR inhibition by antimalarial drugs and imidazoquinolines. J. Immunol. 2011, 186, 4794–4804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Duramad, O.; Fearon, K.L.; Chang, B.; Chan, J.H.; Gregorio, J.; Coffman, R.L.; Barrat, F.J. Inhibitors of TLR-9 act on multiple cell subsets in mouse and man in vitro and prevent death in vivo from systemic inflammation. J. Immunol. 2005, 174, 5193–5200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Barrat, F.J.; Meeker, T.; Gregorio, J.; Chan, J.H.; Uematsu, S.; Akira, S.; Chang, B.; Duramad, O.; Coffman, R.L. Nucleic acids of mammalian origin can act as endogenous ligands for Toll-like receptors and may promote systemic lupus erythematosus. J. Exp. Med. 2005, 202, 1131–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Barrat, F.J.; Meeker, T.; Chan, J.H.; Guiducci, C.; Coffman, R.L. Treatment of lupus-prone mice with a dual inhibitor of TLR7 and TLR9 leads to reduction of autoantibody production and amelioration of disease symptoms. Eur. J. Immunol. 2007, 37, 3582–3586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Patinote, C.; Karroum, N.B.; Moarbess, G.; Cirnat, N.; Kassab, I.; Bonnet, P.A.; Deleuze-Masquéfa, C. Agonist and antagonist ligands of toll-like receptors 7 and 8: Ingenious tools for therapeutic purposes. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 193, 112238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zhang, Z.; Ohto, U.; Shibata, T.; Krayukhina, E.; Taoka, M.; Yamauchi, Y.; Tanji, H.; Isobe, T.; Uchiyama, S.; Miyake, K.; et al. Structural Analysis Reveals that Toll-like Receptor 7 Is a Dual Receptor for Guanosine and Single-Stranded RNA. Immunity 2016, 45, 737–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Tojo, S.; Zhang, Z.; Matsui, H.; Tahara, M.; Ikeguchi, M.; Kochi, M.; Kamada, M.; Shigematsu, H.; Tsutsumi, A.; Adachi, N.; et al. Structural analysis reveals TLR7 dynamics underlying antagonism. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ruan, P.; Wang, S.; Yi, P.; Yang, M.; Chen, Y.; Yang, M. Identification of the potential TLR7 antagonists by virtual screening and experimental validation. Mol. Divers. 2023; online ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Dudhgaonkar, S.; Chopra, P.; Rudra, A.; Subramani, S.; Palachandra, S.; Bhatt, N.; Pabbala, V.; Ranade, S.; Prasad Ega, D.; Dyckman, A.; et al. Steroid-sparing Effects of Afimetoran (BMS-986256), an Equipotent Toll-like Receptor (TLR)7 and TLR8 Antagonist, in a Lupus Mouse Model [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023, 75. [Google Scholar]
  48. Hosein, F.; Ignatenko, S.; Chadwick, K.; Zhu, L.; Baribaud, F.; Bach, T.; Karabeber, H.; Dawes, M.; Carayannopoulos, L.; Krishna, G. Safety, Tolerability, and Exploratory Efficacy of Afimetoran, a TLR7/8 Inhibitor, in Patients with Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus: A Phase 1b Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023, 75. [Google Scholar]
  49. Vlach, J.; Bender, A.T.; Przetak, M.; Pereira, A.; Deshpande, A.; Johnson, T.L.; Reissig, S.; Tzvetkov, E.; Musil, D.; Morse, N.T.; et al. Discovery of M5049: A Novel Selective Toll-Like Receptor 7/8 Inhibitor for Treatment of Autoimmunity. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2021, 376, 397–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Port, A.; Shaw, J.V.; Klopp-Schulze, L.; Bytyqi, A.; Vetter, C.; Hussey, E.; Mammasse, N.; Ona, V.; Bachmann, A.; Strugala, D.; et al. Phase 1 study in healthy participants of the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of enpatoran (M5049), a dual antagonist of toll-like receptors 7 and 8. Pharmacol. Res. Perspect. 2021, 9, e00842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Klopp-Schulze, L.; Shaw, J.V.; Dong, J.Q.; Khandelwal, A.; Vazquez-Mateo, C.; Goteti, K. Applying Modeling and Simulations for Rational Dose Selection of Novel Toll-Like Receptor 7/8 Inhibitor Enpatoran for Indications of High Medical Need. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2022, 112, 297–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Hawtin, S.; André, C.; Collignon-Zipfel, G.; Appenzeller, S.; Bannert, B.; Baumgartner, L.; Beck, D.; Betschart, C.; Boulay, T.; Brunner, H.I.; et al. Preclinical characterization of the Toll-like receptor 7/8 antagonist MHV370 for lupus therapy. Cell Rep. Med. 2023, 4, 101036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Shisha, T.; Posch, M.G.; Lehmann, J.; Feifel, R.; Junt, T.; Hawtin, S.; Schuemann, J.; Avrameas, A.; Danekula, R.; Misiolek, P.; et al. First-in-Human Study of the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of MHV370, a Dual Inhibitor of Toll-Like Receptors 7 and 8, in Healthy Adults. Eur. J. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet. 2023, 48, 553–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Alper, P.; Betschart, C.; André, C.; Boulay, T.; Cheng, D.; Deane, J.; Faller, M.; Feifel, R.; Glatthar, R.; Han, D.; et al. Discovery of the TLR7/8 Antagonist MHV370 for Treatment of Systemic Autoimmune Diseases. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2023, 14, 1054–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Ishizaka, S.T.; Hawkins, L.; Chen, Q.; Tago, F.; Yagi, T.; Sakaniwa, K.; Zhang, Z.; Shimizu, T.; Shirato, M. A novel Toll-like receptor 7/8-specific antagonist E6742 ameliorates clinically relevant disease parameters in murine models of lupus. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2023, 957, 175962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Yamakawa, N.; Tago, F.; Nakai, K.; Kitahara, Y.; Ikari, S.; Hojo, S.; Hall, N.; Aluri, J.; Hussein, Z.; Gevorkyan, H.; et al. First-in-Human Study of the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of E6742, a Dual Antagonist of Toll-like Receptors 7 and 8, in Healthy Volunteers. Clin. Pharmacol. Drug Dev. 2023, 12, 363–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Tanaka, Y.; Tago, F.; Yamakawa, N.; Aoki, M.; Yagi, T.; Akira, S. A new therapeutic target for systemic lupus erythematosus: The current landscape for drug development of a toll-like receptor 7/8 antagonist through academia-industry-government collaboration. Immunol. Med. 2023, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Mielcarska, M.B.; Bossowska-Nowicka, M.; Toka, F.N. Cell Surface Expression of Endosomal Toll-Like Receptors—A Necessity or a Superfluous Duplication? Front. Immunol. 2021, 11, 620972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kanno, A.; Tanimura, N.; Ishizaki, M.; Ohko, K.; Motoi, Y.; Onji, M.; Fukui, R.; Shimozato, T.; Yamamoto, K.; Shibata, T.; et al. Targeting cell surface TLR7 for therapeutic intervention in autoimmune diseases. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Murakami, Y.; Fukui, R.; Tanaka, R.; Motoi, Y.; Kanno, A.; Sato, R.; Yamaguchi, K.; Amano, H.; Furukawa, Y.; Suzuki, H.; et al. Anti-TLR7 Antibody Protects against Lupus Nephritis in NZBWF1 Mice by Targeting B Cells and Patrolling Monocytes. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 777197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Manno, A.; Honda, T.; Kuwata, C.; Ito, S.; Kadokura, M.; Mizutani, R.; Yamada, S.; Tomimori, Y. Targeting Toll-Like Receptor 7 with DS-7011a, a Promising Novel Antagonistic Antibody for the Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023, 75. [Google Scholar]
  62. Senaldi, G.; Mohan, A.; Zhang, L.; Tanaka, J.; Pandya, G.; Grossman, S.; Urbina, S.; Reynolds, S.; Hand, A. First-in-Human Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics Study of DS-7011a, an Anti-TLR7 Antagonistic Monoclonal Antibody for the Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023, 75. [Google Scholar]
  63. Zhang, L.; Tanaka, J.; Dodds, M.; Trame, M.; Xu, S.; Kumazaki, M.; Tomimori, Y.; Patel, S.; Mohan, A.; Senaldi, G.; et al. Selection of the Dose for Subcutaneous Administration to Non-Japanese Subjects and Intravenous Administration to Japanese Subjects in the First-in-Human Study of DS-7011a, an Anti-TLR7 Monoclonal Antibody for the Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023, 75. [Google Scholar]
  64. Yadon, A.; Gorney, V.; Hammond, A.; Grant, E.; Clarke, A. The Clinical, Oral Small Molecule IRAK4 Inhibitor, GS-5718, Improves Survival and Reduces Disease Pathologies by Modulating Multiple Inflammatory Endpoints in the Murine NZB/W Model of Spontaneous Lupus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021, 73. [Google Scholar]
  65. Roedder, S.; Wendt, E.; Burris, C.; Nazareon, J.; Park, G.; Pangilinan, P.; Huang, G.; Mathur, A.; Taylor, J.; Billin, A.; et al. Phase 1 Study Results of GS-5718, an Oral IRAK4-Inhibitor: Pharmacodynamics of Single and Multiple Doses of GS-5718 in Healthy Subjects [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021, 73. [Google Scholar]
  66. Winkler, A.; Sun, W.; De, S.; Jiao, A.; Sharif, M.N.; Symanowicz, P.T.; Athale, S.; Shin, J.H.; Wang, J.; Jacobson, B.A.; et al. The Interleukin-1 Receptor-Associated Kinase 4 Inhibitor PF-06650833 Blocks Inflammation in Preclinical Models of Rheumatic Disease and in Humans Enrolled in a Randomized Clinical Trial. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021, 73, 2206–2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Danto, S.I.; Shojaee, N.; Singh, R.S.P.; Li, C.; Gilbert, S.A.; Manukyan, Z.; Kilty, I. Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of PF-06650833, a selective interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 4 (IRAK4) inhibitor, in single and multiple ascending dose randomized phase 1 studies in healthy subjects. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2019, 21, 269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Singh, R.S.P.; Dowty, M.E.; Salganik, M.; Brodfuehrer, J.I.; Walker, G.S.; Sharma, R.; Beebe, J.S.; Danto, S.I. A Phase 1 Study to Assess Mass Balance and Absolute Bioavailability of Zimlovisertib in Healthy Male Participants Using a 14 C-Microtracer Approach. Clin. Pharmacol. Drug Dev. 2022, 11, 815–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Lamagna, C.; Chan, M.; Bagos, A.; Tai, E.; Young, C.; Chen, Y.; Chou, L.; Park, G.; Masuda, E.; Taylor, V. Targeting IRAK1 and IRAK 4 signaling with R835, a novel oral small molecule inhibitor: A potential new treatment for systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Lamagna, C.; Gundel, C.; Chan, M.; Young, C.; Braselmann, S.; Frances, R.; Yi1, S.; Chen, Y.; Park, G.; Chou, L.; et al. R835, a novel IRAK1/4 dual inhibitor in clinical development, blocks Toll-Like receptor 4 (TLR4) signaling in human and mouse. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2020, 79, 579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Yan, L.; Tong, S.; Absalom, A.; Daas, I.D.; Park, G.; Taylor, V.; Chow, D.; Lee, M.; Zheng, H.; Chow, A. First-inhuman study of safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of IRAK1/4 inhibitor R835 in healthy subjects. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2020, 79, 336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Liu, X.; Zeng, B.; Zhang, J.; Li, W.; Mou, F.; Wang, H.; Zou, Q.; Zhong, B.; Wu, L.; Wei, H.; et al. Role of the Gut Microbiome in Modulating Arthritis Progression in Mice. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 30594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Krutyhołowa, A.; Strzelec, K.; Dziedzic, A.; Bereta, G.P.; Łazarz-Bartyzel, K.; Potempa, J.; Gawron, K. Host and bacterial factors linking periodontitis and rheumatoid arthritis. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 980805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Horta-Baas, G.; Romero-Figueroa, M.D.S.; Montiel-Jarquín, A.J.; Pizano-Zárate, M.L.; García-Mena, J.; Ramírez-Durán, N. Intestinal Dysbiosis and Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Link between Gut Microbiota and the Pathogenesis of Rheumatoid Arthritis. J. Immunol. Res. 2017, 2017, 4835189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Billiau, A.; Matthys, P. Modes of action of Freund’s adjuvants in experimental models of autoimmune diseases. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2001, 70, 849–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Choe, J.Y.; Crain, B.; Wu, S.R.; Corr, M. Interleukin 1 receptor dependence of serum transferred arthritis can be circumvented by toll-like receptor 4 signaling. J. Exp. Med. 2003, 197, 537–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Gębura, K.; Świerkot, J.; Wysoczańska, B.; Korman, L.; Nowak, B.; Wiland, P.; Bogunia-Kubik, K. Polymorphisms within Genes Involved in Regulation of the NF-κB Pathway in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wang, Y.; Chen, L.; Li, F.; Bao, M.; Zeng, J.; Xiang, J.; Luo, H.; Li, J.; Tang, L. TLR4 rs41426344 increases susceptibility of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) in a central south Chinese Han population. Pediatr. Rheumatol. Online J. 2017, 15, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Davis, M.L.R.; LeVan, T.D.; Yu, F.; Sayles, H.; Sokolove, J.; Robinson, W.; Michaud, K.; Thiele, G.M.; Mikuls, T.R. Associations of toll-like receptor (TLR)-4 single nucleotide polymorphisms and rheumatoid arthritis disease progression: An observational cohort study. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2015, 24, 346–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Radstake, T.R.; Roelofs, M.F.; Jenniskens, Y.M.; Oppers-Walgreen, B.; van Riel, P.L.; Barrera, P.; Joosten, L.A.; van den Berg, W.B. Expression of toll-like receptors 2 and 4 in rheumatoid synovial tissue and regulation by proinflammatory cytokines interleukin-12 and interleukin-18 via interferon-gamma. Arthritis Rheum. 2004, 50, 3856–3865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Ospelt, C.; Brentano, F.; Rengel, Y.; Stanczyk, J.; Kolling, C.; Tak, P.P.; Gay, R.E.; Gay, S.; Kyburz, D. Overexpression of toll-like receptors 3 and 4 in synovial tissue from patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: Toll-like receptor expression in early and longstanding arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008, 58, 3684–3692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Clanchy, F.I.L.; Borghese, F.; Bystrom, J.; Balog, A.; Penn, H.; Hull, D.N.; Wells, G.M.A.; Kiriakidis, S.; Taylor, P.C.; Sacre, S.M.; et al. TLR expression profiles are a function of disease status in rheumatoid arthritis and experimental arthritis. J. Autoimmun. 2021, 118, 102597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Peng, X.; Wang, Q.; Li, W.; Ge, G.; Peng, J.; Xu, Y.; Yang, H.; Bai, J.; Geng, D. Comprehensive overview of microRNA function in rheumatoid arthritis. Bone Res. 2023, 11, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Midwood, K.; Sacre, S.; Piccinini, A.M.; Inglis, J.; Trebaul, A.; Chan, E.; Drexler, S.; Sofat, N.; Kashiwagi, M.; Orend, G.; et al. Tenascin-C is an endogenous activator of Toll-like receptor 4 that is essential for maintaining inflammation in arthritic joint disease. Nat. Med. 2009, 15, 774–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Roelofs, M.F.; Boelens, W.C.; Joosten, L.A.; Abdollahi-Roodsaz, S.; Geurts, J.; Wunderink, L.U.; Schreurs, B.W.; van den Berg, W.B.; Radstake, T.R. Identification of small heat shock protein B8 (HSP22) as a novel TLR4 ligand and potential involvement in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. J. Immunol. 2006, 176, 7021–7027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Hu, F.; Li, Y.; Zheng, L.; Shi, L.; Liu, H.; Zhang, X.; Zhu, H.; Tang, S.; Zhu, L.; Xu, L.; et al. Toll-like receptors expressed by synovial fibroblasts perpetuate Th1 and th17 cell responses in rheumatoid arthritis. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e100266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Roelofs, M.F.; Joosten, L.A.; Abdollahi-Roodsaz, S.; van Lieshout, A.W.; Sprong, T.; van den Hoogen, F.H.; van den Berg, W.B.; Radstake, T.R. The expression of toll-like receptors 3 and 7 in rheumatoid arthritis synovium is increased and costimulation of toll-like receptors 3, 4, and 7/8 results in synergistic cytokine production by dendritic cells. Arthritis Rheum. 2005, 52, 2313–2322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Tripathy, A.; Khanna, S.; Padhan, P.; Smita, S.; Raghav, S.; Gupta, B. Direct recognition of LPS drive TLR4 expressing CD8+ T cell activation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Monnet, E.; Choy, E.H.; McInnes, I.; Kobakhidze, T.; de Graaf, K.; Jacqmin, P.; Lapeyre, G.; de Min, C. Efficacy and safety of NI-0101, an anti-toll-like receptor 4 monoclonal antibody, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis after inadequate response to methotrexate: A phase II study. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2020, 79, 316–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Karami, J.; Farhadi, E.; Delbandi, A.A.; Shekarabi, M.; Tahmasebi, M.N.; Sharafat Vaziri, A.; Akhtari, M.; Mousavi, M.J.; Jamshidi, A.; Mahmoudi, M. Evaluation of TAK-242 (Resatorvid) Effects on Inflammatory Status of Fibroblast-like Synoviocytes in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Trauma Patients. Iran. J. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021, 20, 453–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Samarpita, S.; Kim, J.Y.; Rasool, M.K.; Kim, K.S. Investigation of toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 inhibitor TAK-242 as a new potential anti-rheumatoid arthritis drug. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2020, 22, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Connolly, M.; Rooney, P.R.; McGarry, T.; Maratha, A.X.; McCormick, J.; Miggin, S.M.; Veale, D.J.; Fearon, U. Acute serum amyloid A is an endogenous TLR2 ligand that mediates inflammatory and angiogenic mechanisms. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2016, 75, 1392–1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. McGarry, T.; Biniecka, M.; Gao, W.; Cluxton, D.; Canavan, M.; Wade, S.; Wade, S.; Gallagher, L.; Orr, C.; Veale, D.J.; et al. Resolution of TLR2-induced inflammation through manipulation of metabolic pathways in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 43165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. McGarry, T.; Veale, D.J.; Gao, W.; Orr, C.; Fearon, U.; Connolly, M. Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) induces migration and invasive mechanisms in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2015, 17, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Ultaigh, S.N.; Saber, T.P.; McCormick, J.; Connolly, M.; Dellacasagrande, J.; Keogh, B.; McCormack, W.; Reilly, M.; O’Neill, L.A.; McGuirk, P.; et al. Blockade of Toll-like receptor 2 prevents spontaneous cytokine release from rheumatoid arthritis ex vivo synovial explant cultures. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2011, 13, R33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Chamberlain, N.D.; Kim, S.J.; Vila, O.M.; Volin, M.V.; Volkov, S.; Pope, R.M.; Arami, S.; Mandelin, A.M., 2nd; Shahrara, S. Ligation of TLR7 by rheumatoid arthritis synovial fluid single strand RNA induces transcription of TNFα in monocytes. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2013, 72, 418–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Kim, S.J.; Chen, Z.; Essani, A.B.; Elshabrawy, H.A.; Volin, M.V.; Volkov, S.; Swedler, W.; Arami, S.; Sweiss, N.; Shahrara, S. Identification of a Novel Toll-like Receptor 7 Endogenous Ligand in Rheumatoid Arthritis Synovial Fluid that Can Provoke Arthritic Joint Inflammation. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016, 68, 1099–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Umar, S.; Palasiewicz, K.; Van Raemdonck, K.; Volin, M.V.; Romay, B.; Amin, M.A.; Zomorrodi, R.K.; Arami, S.; Gonzalez, M.; Rao, V.; et al. IRAK4 inhibition: A promising strategy for treating RA joint inflammation and bone erosion. Cell Mol. Immunol. 2021, 18, 2199–2210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Umar, S.; Palasiewicz, K.; Volin, M.V.; Zanotti, B.; Al-Awqati, M.; Sweiss, N.; Shahrara, S. IRAK4 inhibitor mitigates joint inflammation by rebalancing metabolism malfunction in RA macrophages and fibroblasts. Life Sci. 2021, 287, 120114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Lavazais, S.; Jargosch, M.; Dupont, S.; Labéguère, F.; Menet, C.; Jagerschmidt, C.; Ohm, F.; Kupcsik, L.; Parent, I.; Cottereaux, C.; et al. IRAK4 inhibition dampens pathogenic processes driving inflammatory skin diseases. Sci. Transl. Med. 2023, 15, eabj3289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Yoon, S.B.; Hong, H.; Lim, H.J.; Choi, J.H.; Choi, Y.P.; Seo, S.W.; Lee, H.W.; Chae, C.H.; Park, W.K.; Kim, H.Y.; et al. A novel IRAK4/PIM1 inhibitor ameliorates rheumatoid arthritis and lymphoid malignancy by blocking the TLR/MYD88-mediated NF-κB pathway. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2023, 13, 1093–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Ramirez-Perez, S.; Vekariya, R.; Gautam, S.; Reyes-Perez, I.V.; Drissi, H.; Bhattaram, P. MyD88 dimerization inhibitor ST2825 targets the aggressiveness of synovial fibroblasts in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2023, 25, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Kwon, H.K.; Patra, M.C.; Shin, H.J.; Gui, X.; Achek, A.; Panneerselvam, S.; Kim, D.J.; Song, S.J.; Hong, R.; Kim, K.S.; et al. A cell-penetrating peptide blocks Toll-like receptor-mediated downstream signaling and ameliorates autoimmune and inflammatory diseases in mice. Exp. Mol. Med. 2019, 51, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Christensen, S.R.; Shupe, J.; Nickerson, K.; Kashgarian, M.; Flavell, R.A.; Shlomchik, M.J. Toll-like receptor 7 and TLR9 dictate autoantibody specificity and have opposing inflammatory and regulatory roles in a murine model of lupus. Immunity 2006, 25, 417–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Agmon-Levin, N.; Mosca, M.; Petri, M.; Shoenfeld, Y. Systemic lupus erythematosus one disease or many? Autoimmun. Rev. 2012, 11, 593–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Ackerman, L.; Acloque, G.; Bacchelli, S.; Schwartz, H.; Feinstein, B.J.; La Stella, P.; Alavi, A.; Gollerkeri, A.; Davis, J.; Campbell, V.; et al. IRAK4 degrader in hidradenitis suppurativa and atopic dermatitis: A phase 1 trial. Nat. Med. 2023, 29, 3127–3136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Wang, M.; Ishikawa, T.; Lai, Y.; Nallapothula, D.; Singh, R.R. Diverse Roles of NETosis in the Pathogenesis of Lupus. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 895216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Petes, C.; Odoardi, N.; Gee, K. The Toll for Trafficking: Toll-Like Receptor 7 Delivery to the Endosome. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biomedicines 12 00138 g001
Figure 1. Pharmacologic inhibition of TLR7 pathway. TLR7 inhibitors either prevent the binding of ligands to TLR7 (1–3) or block downstream signaling cascades (4–6). Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) prevents TLR7 engagement by sequestering TLR ligands through direct binding (1). TLR7 antagonists (ligand analogs) occupy TLR7 binding sites without inducing downstream signaling (2). Monoclonal antibodies against TLR7 (anti-TLR7) mask the ligand-binding sites (3). Small molecules inhibit the kinase activity of IRAKs (4). Protein degraders induce targeted ubiquitination and proteasome degradation of ΙRAΚ4 (5). Peptidomimetics inhibit the assembly of “Myddosome” (6). TLR, Toll-like Receptor; ssRNA, single-stranded RNA; MyD88, myeloid differentiation factor 88; IRAK1/4, interleukin 1 receptor-associated kinase 1/4; TRAF6, tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR)-associated factor 6; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; NEMO, nuclear factor κB essential modulator; IKKα, inhibitory κB kinase alpha; IKKβ, inhibitory κB kinase beta; NF-κB, nuclear factor κB; AP-1, activating protein-1; IRF7, interferon regulatory factor 7; IFNs, interferons. This figure was created using the tools provided by BioRender.com (accessed on 5 January 2024).
Figure 1. Pharmacologic inhibition of TLR7 pathway. TLR7 inhibitors either prevent the binding of ligands to TLR7 (1–3) or block downstream signaling cascades (4–6). Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) prevents TLR7 engagement by sequestering TLR ligands through direct binding (1). TLR7 antagonists (ligand analogs) occupy TLR7 binding sites without inducing downstream signaling (2). Monoclonal antibodies against TLR7 (anti-TLR7) mask the ligand-binding sites (3). Small molecules inhibit the kinase activity of IRAKs (4). Protein degraders induce targeted ubiquitination and proteasome degradation of ΙRAΚ4 (5). Peptidomimetics inhibit the assembly of “Myddosome” (6). TLR, Toll-like Receptor; ssRNA, single-stranded RNA; MyD88, myeloid differentiation factor 88; IRAK1/4, interleukin 1 receptor-associated kinase 1/4; TRAF6, tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR)-associated factor 6; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; NEMO, nuclear factor κB essential modulator; IKKα, inhibitory κB kinase alpha; IKKβ, inhibitory κB kinase beta; NF-κB, nuclear factor κB; AP-1, activating protein-1; IRF7, interferon regulatory factor 7; IFNs, interferons. This figure was created using the tools provided by BioRender.com (accessed on 5 January 2024).
Biomedicines 12 00138 g001
Biomedicines 12 00138 g002
Figure 2. Pharmacologic inhibition of TLR4 pathway. (1) Monoclonal antibodies against TLR4 (anti-TLR4) mask the ligand-binding sites. (2) Small molecules inhibit the kinase activity of IRAKs. (3) Peptidomimetics and small molecules inhibit the assembly of “Myddosome”. (4) Protein degraders induce targeted ubiquitination and proteasome degradation of IRAK4. TLR, Toll-like Receptor; MyD88, myeloid differentiation factor 88; IRAK1/4, interleukin 1 receptor-associated kinase 1/4; TRAF6, tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR)-associated factor 6; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; NEMO, nuclear factor κB essential modulator; IKKα, inhibitory-κB kinase alpha; IKKβ, inhibitory-κB kinase beta; NF-κB, nuclear factor κB; AP-1, activating protein-1; IRF3, interferon regulatory factor 3; IFNs, interferons. This figure was created using the tools provided by BioRender.com (accessed on 5 January 2024).
Figure 2. Pharmacologic inhibition of TLR4 pathway. (1) Monoclonal antibodies against TLR4 (anti-TLR4) mask the ligand-binding sites. (2) Small molecules inhibit the kinase activity of IRAKs. (3) Peptidomimetics and small molecules inhibit the assembly of “Myddosome”. (4) Protein degraders induce targeted ubiquitination and proteasome degradation of IRAK4. TLR, Toll-like Receptor; MyD88, myeloid differentiation factor 88; IRAK1/4, interleukin 1 receptor-associated kinase 1/4; TRAF6, tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR)-associated factor 6; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; NEMO, nuclear factor κB essential modulator; IKKα, inhibitory-κB kinase alpha; IKKβ, inhibitory-κB kinase beta; NF-κB, nuclear factor κB; AP-1, activating protein-1; IRF3, interferon regulatory factor 3; IFNs, interferons. This figure was created using the tools provided by BioRender.com (accessed on 5 January 2024).
Biomedicines 12 00138 g002
Table 1. TLR inhibitors in clinical development for autoimmune/inflammatory diseases. TLR, Toll-like Receptor; IMO, immune modulatory oligonucleotide; SLE, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus; CLE, Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus; RA, Rheumatoid Arthritis; DM, Dermatomyositis; SS, Sjogren’s Syndrome; MCTD, Mixed Connective Tissue Disease; IBD, Inflammatory Bowel Disease; AD, Atopic Dermatitis; HS, Hidradenitis Suppurativa; IRAK1/4, interleukin 1 receptor-associated kinase 1/4.
Table 1. TLR inhibitors in clinical development for autoimmune/inflammatory diseases. TLR, Toll-like Receptor; IMO, immune modulatory oligonucleotide; SLE, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus; CLE, Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus; RA, Rheumatoid Arthritis; DM, Dermatomyositis; SS, Sjogren’s Syndrome; MCTD, Mixed Connective Tissue Disease; IBD, Inflammatory Bowel Disease; AD, Atopic Dermatitis; HS, Hidradenitis Suppurativa; IRAK1/4, interleukin 1 receptor-associated kinase 1/4.
Class of TLR InhibitorsNameTargetClinical Development
Monoclonal AntibodiesDS-7011aTLR7SLE, CLE: phase 2 (NCT05638802)
NI-0101TLR4RA: failed (NCT03241108)
TLR Ligand Sequestration
Molecules (Antimalarial Drugs)		Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ)Endosomal TLRsSLE, RA: in clinical use
Oligonucleotide-based
Antagonists		DV-1179TLR7/9SLE: failed
IMO-3100TLR7/9Psoriasis:
completed phase 2 (NCT01622348)
No updates since 2018
IMO-8400TLR7/8/9Psoriasis:
completed phase 2 (NCT01899729)
DM:
completed phase 2 (NCT02612857)
No updates since 2019
IMO-9200TLR7/8/9Discontinued
Small-molecule AntagonistsCPG-52364TLR7/8/9Discontinued after phase 1 (NCT00547014)
Afimetoran (BMS-98652)TLR7/8SLE:
phase 2b (NCT04895696)
Enpatoran (M5049)TLR7/8SLE, CLE:
phase 2 (NCT05162586)
MHV370TLR7/8Healthy Adults:
well tolerated in phase 1
(EudraCT number 2017-004559-21)
SS & MCTD:
Phase 2 discontinued by Sponsor (NCT04988087)
E6742TLR7/8SLE:
phase 1/2 (NCT05278663)
Kinase InhibitorsEdecesertib (GS-5718)IRAK4RA: withdrawn (NCT05165771)
IBD: discontinued
CLE: phase 2 (NCT05629208)
Zimlovisertib (PF-06650833)IRAK4RA: failed (NCT02996500)
BAY1830839IRAK4Phase 1:
NCT03965728, NCT03540615, NCT05003089
Zabedosertib (BAY1834845)IRAK4AD: phase 2
Active, not recruiting (NCT05656911)
EVO101IRAK4AD: discontinued (NCT05579899)
R835IRAK1, IRAK4Phase 1
Protein DegradersKT-474 (SAR444656)IRAK4AD: phase 2 (NCT06058156)
HS: phase 2 (NCT06028230)
GS-6791 (NX-0479)IRAK4Planned
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kalliolias, G.D.; Basdra, E.K.; Papavassiliou, A.G. Targeting TLR Signaling Cascades in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Update. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 138. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12010138

AMA Style

Kalliolias GD, Basdra EK, Papavassiliou AG. Targeting TLR Signaling Cascades in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Update. Biomedicines. 2024; 12(1):138. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12010138

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kalliolias, George D., Efthimia K. Basdra, and Athanasios G. Papavassiliou. 2024. "Targeting TLR Signaling Cascades in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Update" Biomedicines 12, no. 1: 138. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12010138

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop