Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Household Air Pollution: Sources and Exposure Levels to Fine Particulate Matter in Nairobi Slums
Previous Article in Journal
Development of a Biomarker for Penconazole: A Human Oral Dosing Study and a Survey of UK Residents’ Exposure
Previous Article in Special Issue
Current Status of Air Toxics Management and Its Strategies for Controlling Emissions in Taiwan
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxics
Volume 4
Issue 2
10.3390/toxics4020011
toxics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

UNMIX Methods Applied to Characterize Sources of Volatile Organic Compounds in Toronto, Ontario

by
Eugeniusz Porada
1 and
Mieczysław Szyszkowicz
2,*
1
Department of Computer Science, University of Québec at Outaouais, Gatineau, QB J8X 3X7, Canada
2
Population Studies Division, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0K9, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxics 2016, 4(2), 11; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics4020011
Submission received: 16 March 2016 / Revised: 17 May 2016 / Accepted: 7 June 2016 / Published: 18 June 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Air Toxics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
UNMIX, a sensor modeling routine from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), was used to model volatile organic compound (VOC) receptors in four urban sites in Toronto, Ontario. VOC ambient concentration data acquired in 2000–2009 for 175 VOC species in four air quality monitoring stations were analyzed. UNMIX, by performing multiple modeling attempts upon varying VOC menus—while rejecting the results that were not reliable—allowed for discriminating sources by their most consistent chemical characteristics. The method assessed occurrences of VOCs in sources typical of the urban environment (traffic, evaporative emissions of fuels, banks of fugitive inert gases), industrial point sources (plastic-, polymer-, and metalworking manufactures), and in secondary sources (releases from water, sediments, and contaminated urban soil). The remote sensing and robust modeling used here produces chemical profiles of putative VOC sources that, if combined with known environmental fates of VOCs, can be used to assign physical sources’ shares of VOCs emissions into the atmosphere. This in turn provides a means of assessing the impact of environmental policies on one hand, and industrial activities on the other hand, on VOC air pollution.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Principal human sources of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) include refining of fossil fuels, distribution of fuels, their combustion, and their usage in industries and consumer products. Most of the VOC species released into atmosphere contribute to ambient air pollution. Several are known carcinogens and many become toxic at higher concentrations or with prolonged exposure; see the toxicity list in reference [1]. References [2,3] provide toxicological and environmental-fate information for the compounds we investigate, with the most common pollutants having additional documentation.
Dangerous volatile compounds such as benzene [4], 1,3-butadiene [5], ethylbenzene [6], xylenes [7], 1,1,1-trichloroethane [8], trichloroethylene [8], tetrachloroethylene [9], carbontetrachloride [10], or chloroform [11] often appear in epidemiological research [12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. Such compounds often undergo scrutiny from public health institutions, with governments imposing legal limits on their industrial emissions in order to reduce human exposure [19,20,21,22,23,24].
Air pollution caused by urban traffic requires our constant attention: the ever-growing bulk of traffic may render ineffective the measures implemented with regard to limiting air pollution in large cities with heavy metals and other carcinogenic substances [24]. The concentrations of traffic pollutants form a recognizable hourly pattern, but the daily averages create a ubiquitous background of industrial air pollution. The determination of concentrations is complicated by atmospheric photochemistry when it comes to remote sensing of sources. Complex processes—chemical, physical, and biological—affect the environmental fate of VOCs. In particular, solar radiation converts the more reactive VOCs by oxygenation and through reactions with oxides of nitrogen to secondary VOCs, free radicals, ozone, and, subsequently, smog [25,26,27,28,29,30]. Secondary sources of ambient VOCs arise from contaminated water, sediment, landfill, contaminated urban soil, and waste-treatment facilities [31,32,33,34,35]. These secondary sources have the potential to contribute to the steady accumulation of substances and prolonged releases into the atmosphere [36,37]. Estimates of this pollution are compulsory for planning effective measures against the most widespread and persistent pollution.
The large number of organic substances contributing to air pollution is a challenge for air quality management, but it also allows for crafting intricate chemical fingerprints of putative sources by modeling ambient VOC multi-receptors operating in air quality monitoring stations. Some of these modeling methods consist of principal component techniques, mainly Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) and Chemical Mass Balance (CMB) [38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49]. In such methods, the chemical characteristics of sources are constructed in the form of emission profiles representing the share each species has of the total concentration measured at a station. These emission profiles are assigned to the user-specified inventory of sources (in the CMB system), or to putative sources (in the PMF approach).
Complex atmospheric chemistry makes it a challenge to build a reliable receptor model [50,51,52,53]. The task is complicated not only by removal processes (photochemical degradation, aerosol formation), but also by intermedia transport and deposition [53,54,55,56,57,58]. This research addresses these issues by developing robust source discrimination routines searching for reliable information about VOC emissions, even if approximate or incomplete. This is achieved by applying the principal component methods implemented by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in UNMIX [59,60]. UNMIX has the advantage of telling the user which modeling attempts cannot be successful, thus narrowing the output to reliable (even if partial in the sense of a limited VOC menu) receptor models. More extensive source profiles are built from vast libraries of restricted models created for the given receptor.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. VOC Measurements and Data

In this work, ambient VOC concentrations—expressed in micrograms per cubic meter (μg/m3)—are examined. The concentration data are from the National Air Pollution Surveillance (NAPS) Canadian federal program [61]. NAPS sensors at air quality monitoring stations across Canada have performed every six days since 1989 hourly measurements of 175 species of VOCs, including hydrocarbons (from methane up to the C12 fraction), halogens, aldehydes, and ketones. The sensors operate based on a gas chromatography/flame ionization detector system (GC/FID) for quantification of light hydrocarbons in the C2 fraction, while a combined gas chromatography/mass selective detector (GC/MSD) system operating in selected ion monitoring (SIM) mode is used for quantification of the heavier hydrocarbons, in the C3 to C12 fractions. We use data obtained at four monitoring stations in Toronto, Ontario (see Figure 1); for sensor modeling purposes, we only utilize the daily averages of VOC concentration data acquired in years 2000–2009.
Station #60413 is located in a park close to the international airport in Toronto. Stations #60418 and #60427 are situated in downtown Toronto. Station #60429 is located close to a large body of water (Lake Ontario) and nearby highway 401, farther from the industrial districts.
Many VOCs may have incomplete measurement data due to malfunctioning at one or more stations. For this research, species that missed more than 5% of their daily averages (within the study period) were removed from the affected station’s data. The number of VOCs adequately measured and processed for each station is around 100. We also examined the VOC data acquired at the same NAPS station in 1991–1999 in order to observe general trends in the temporal variations of ambient VOC concentrations.

2.2. VOC Data Processing Method

The U.S. EPA makes available an application for processing VOC data, the UNMIX routine, through their website. UNMIX is a principal component method, but is based on geometrical analysis of the measurement dataset [59]. The routine performs linear modeling of many variables, with a few expressly constructed predictors named “source profiles”. As usual, the profiles give chemical descriptions of putative sources or, precisely, apportionments of VOCs to those sources. UNMIX deduces the number of sources from the geometrical properties of the VOC data captured by a sensor. The application ensures that the source profiles represent physical sources and not only one of the large number of mathematically correct solutions to the modeling problem. Thus, UNMIX results are robust: the application fails to give results when a particular profiling cannot be made reliable.
The UNMIX routine does not constrain profiles to positive values; a profile, which is supposed to represent emissions of various gas-phase species from a source, is expected to be implicitly positive. However, persistent negative values appear in UNMIX models. Scrutiny of a large number of UNMIX models leads to a conclusion that the “negative emissions” hint at VOC depletion in the atmosphere and that the initial emissions from the “positive sources” are evaluated correctly (then their total percentage contribution may exceed 100%).
The success of the UNMIX profiling essentially depends on the collection of VOC species fed into the routine. Basically, no more than 30 VOCs can be fed into the routine at a time. Thus, one run can provide only a “partial reliable” profile. By combining results from many successful runs on various VOC menus—thus combining partial reliable profiles of diverse but limited VOC ranges—reliable and exhaustive chemical descriptions of VOC sources can be produced. Thereby, modeling the 175-VOC multi-receptor required running UNMIX several hundred times in order to produce a sufficiently exhaustive library of reliable partial profiles. For a given monitor, up to 700 profiles were created to ensure that each correctly measured VOC was accounted for in a successful profiling.
When two partial profiles are defined using different lists of VOC species but characterize the same source, they can be spliced into one larger profile characterizing the source with VOCs from both lists. A measure of similarity between two profiles must be elaborated heuristically. Considering a profile a function on a domain of VOCs, the notion of distance between two profiles can be built involving the two profiles’ values exhibited on the overlap of their domains. Also, as experimentation shows, the smaller the VOC concentration is, the less reliable its source apportionment. Therefore, a realistic measure of distance between profiles must also involve weighing with average VOC concentrations.
With such premises, two profiles could be considered describing the same source only if the overlap of their VOCs was large enough to cover at least half of the shorter profile. This usually signified 15 or more common VOCs. Next, the distance of the two profiles was defined as the normalized weighted sum of distances between the profiles’ percentage values assumed on their common domain (on all shared VOCs). See ref. [62] for a more detailed description of the measure of distance between two profiles.

3. Results and Discussion

The VOC measurements, when compared with earlier measurements, reflect implementation of several international and federal clean-air programs [19,20,21,22]: total hydrocarbon concentrations decreased by half over the 10-year measurement period; also see refs. [63,64,65].
For each of the NAPS monitoring stations #60413, #60418, #60427, and #60429, several source profiles have been created from data captured at the station. Each profile was assembled by connecting several partial profiles produced by UNMIX, as described in the previous section. When searching for partial reliable profiles that extend a profile under construction, the possibility of forking—attaching partial profiles for two different sources—exists. This happens because the profiling fuzziness and error margins are often larger than separations—in any realistic metric—between the locally observed profiles of different distant sources. These bogus splices could be occasionally exposed by confronting models for different monitors. However, a fairly efficient method of eliminating the ambiguous connections consists in attempts to join together, repeatedly, different permutations of a collection of partial profiles—and getting a recurrent result. We report only the infrequent results of profiling attempts that were insensitive to permutations.
Actually, the results can be organized into two clearly distinguishable groups of profiles. The first group features long profiles of about 100 VOCs describing typical hydrocarbon urban air pollution, or the “inert background” of gases permeating the atmosphere, or else specific industrial emissions, showing several larger values and many small values implying an absence of emissions. Such a profile also has blank entries for VOCs not conceding to a reliable analysis of their sources.
The second group is made of up to several dozen shorter profiles (bringing out 30–50 VOCs) showing numerous negative values. Arguably, the negative values are attempts at describing the complicated dynamics of appearance and removal of VOCs in the urban atmosphere—the conspicuous processes of photochemistry and climate effects blurring the picture [66,67]. Here, as in the first group, the absence of a VOC in a source profile does not signify that the VOC is foreign to the source. It rather signifies that, for some VOC menus, UNMIX was unable to quantitatively evaluate the emissions from “positive” putative sources and the absorptions by “negative” alleged sources. An analytical overview of the short profiles is not given; at this stage of research they elude analysis.
Negative and higher than 100% percentage points also appear in the profiles we describe here in some detail. For the most prominent VOCs, if they possess values, possibly negative, reliably assigned to all the sources “visible” at a station, the values add up to roughly 100%. This signifies that UNMIX was able to estimate the depletion of some VOCs travelling from their sources to the sensor.
When describing a compound marking a point source or characterizing a distributive source, we accompany the compound’s name with its Compound Identification Number (CID number). This can be used to access information about the compound on the Internet; see PubChem portal in the United States’ National Center for Biotechnology Information [68]. The Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) registry number can be used as well to access the compound’s data via chemistry portals. Also, references may provide information about the compound’s production or its industrial applications. We tabulate this information about compounds; it has the potential for providing leads to point sources of the ambient VOCs in Toronto.

3.1. Motor Vehicle Exhaust and Automotive Evaporative Emissions in Toronto, Ontario

Pollution associated with urban traffic forms an intense background to the pollution from industrial sources and from the usage of industrial goods. All C4–C8 aliphatic and aromatic alkanes (and some alkenes, even an alkyne, the 1-propyne) appear in Toronto’s ambient air and have associations with traffic. Traffic source scarcely emits any aldehydes or ketones. Halogenated species are rare, while C2 to C12 hydrocarbons—aliphatic and aromatic—appear often. Actually, the traffic source is made of two sources: “exhaust”—which includes fuel combustion products and unburned hydrocarbons—and “evaporative emissions”, which include evaporation from moving and parked vehicles, from refueling operations, and losses from the usage of Liquefied Petroleum Gases (LPG): propane, butane, propylene, and butadiene (1,3-butadiene).
In Toronto, the two sources are clearly visible; UNMIX consistently produces two distinct profiles. This is compatible with reports from many other places affected by dense traffic [67,69,70,71,72,73,74,75]; however, the UNMIX traffic profiles have many blanks (uncertain, but not null, values), particularly when the monitoring station is situated far away from the intense urban traffic. Indeed, the traffic sources appear to be strongly affected by factors such as weather and landscape. Nonetheless, evaporations and exhaust gases coexist in the atmosphere, but their contributions to air pollution in the presence of petrochemicals or sources of natural gas are relatively small. In fact, after petrochemicals and natural gas, evaporative emissions may be the chief environmental concern for VOCs in many large cities [41,42,47,62]. The city of Toronto does not seem affected by petrochemicals or natural gas mining; still the concentrations of evaporation and exhaust gases appear lower than those reported elsewhere. The presence of LPG is significant; indeed, the “evaporative” profile may be distinguished from the “exhaust” profile just by the strong presence of LPG. Also, the profile of the evaporative emissions mostly consists of light hydrocarbons (C4 to C6) and it contributes more than exhaust to urban VOC pollution now that vehicle exhaust systems have improved [76,77,78,79,80].
Among the four constituents of BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes), benzene is not markedly present in exhaust or in vehicular evaporations in Toronto, which apparently is due to the significantly increased usage of reformulated gasoline in Canada and the USA [64,81,82]. The three other BTEX components abound, particularly toluene showing the highest concentration in the air among all measured VOC species; in the urban air in Toronto it is about three times more concentrated than benzene (see also [83,84,85]). There also appears to be an omnipresent and strongly correlated pair: o-xylene and ethylbenzene (cf. [86]).
The BTEX constituents are also used extensively in manufacturing processes; in particular, ethylbenzene is used in the production of an important HPV chemical—styrene, which makes ethylbenzene a common pollutant [87,88]. However, apportionment of BTEX amid point sources could not be assessed with our method of remote sensing and modeling.
The traffic sources contribute to the city-wide presence of straight-chain alkanes, from ethane and propane up to undecane and dodecane. The presence of LPG in the traffic profiles indicates an “evaporative” source. Here, the “evaporative” concentrations of the alkenes decrease when the carbon number increases. The “exhaust” source is more noticeable for heavier hydrocarbons, in fractions C8–C10 (cf. [89]).
Table 1 describes the traffic sources by their typical VOC menus.

3.2. Inert Gases and Stable Background

Great restrictions have been imposed since 1980 in the use of chlorofluorocarbons [20,105,106,107,108]—freon-11, freon-12, freon-113, freon-114—as refrigerants and propellants. They were replaced by the less ozone-depleting hydrochlorofluorocarbon, freon-22 (CID 6372). Despite the restrictions, the freons still persist in the urban environment in two distinct constituents of ambient air, forming a “stable background” of the atmospheric pollution. These are extremely slow reacting gases (the half-lives of the reactions with hydroxyl radicals are measured in years). The stable background also features halogens (chloroform, chloromethane, bromomethane, dibromomethane, and dichloromethane) and the ozone-depleting carbontetrachloride; these are slowly reacting gases (the half-lives of the reactions with hydroxyl radicals are measured in months). Besides this, many more reactive hydrocarbons exist in the stable background; it appears that they persist in the atmosphere in equilibrium between the atmospheric degradation and the renewal processes associated with slow evaporation from contaminated waters and soils.
UNMIX consistently creates two profiles featuring freons and other inert gases. The first, well-defined “inert” profile describes a uniformly distributed source featuring the inert gases and many light hydrocarbons, including ethane, ethylene, and propane; see Table 2.
The second, “stable” profile features besides the inert compounds numerous alkanes of industrial provenance, sometimes including heavier hydrocarbons such as dodecane. Traces of 2,2-dimethylpropane (isomer of pentane), 2,2-dimethylpentane (isomer of heptane), 2,4-/2,5-dimethylhexane (octanes), and cis-1,3-dimethylcyclohexane (a cyclohexane) appear to persist in the “stable” background as sequels of the fugitive releases of pentanes, heptanes, octanes, and cyclic hydrocarbons from petroleum industries and fuels. (Still, alkene, like 1-Methylcyclohexene, has no discernible source.) The “stable” profile is poorly defined and less distributed in the environment: it adopts local pollution features (see Table 3; the table does not show station #60427, where profiling of the “stable” source was unreliable).
Table 4 describes the inert gases persisting in the inert and stable background air pollution (the hydrocarbons occurring in the inert/stable background are described in the “traffic” Table 1 and/or the “industrial” Table 5).

3.3. Polymer, Plastics, and Metalworking Industries

The city of Toronto and its surrounding area produces more than half of Canada’s manufactured goods. The polymer and plastics industries, which mostly consume petrochemical products, release many of the VOCs already seen in traffic profiles. For example, the ethylbenzene present in the traffic pollution is an HPV alkylbenzene important in the petrochemical industry [6], but its derivative, styrene (also an HPV), is characteristic of the polymer and plastics industries [88,89].
Another abundant species is isoprene (yearly emissions of isoprene by vegetation are about equivalent to total emitted methane and accounts for ~1/3 of all hydrocarbons released into the atmosphere [116]); however, in urban air, anthropogenic isoprene from industrial sources and fossil fuels may dominate [117,118].
Many species usually reported as solvents and intermediates can provide clues leading to local industrial sources. The following compounds allow for making informed guesses about their provenance when considering apportionments of putative industrial sources versus dominant traffic sources.
Table 6, Table 7, Table 8 and Table 9 describe point sources “visible” at different stations in Toronto. The visibility strongly depends on the distance between the source and the station. A clearly visible source has a well-defined profile (a limited number of blanks) on the whole large menu of about 100 VOCs that usually appear. For large number of VOCs the profile is close to 0, pointing to an absence of emissions of VOCs from the source; the tables may not show the absent VOCs.
The point-source profiles are labeled A, B, C... and are shown in bold-faced columns, together with the background traffic pollution, i.e., with the distributed-source profiles “Evaporation” and “Exhaust” detected for the same monitoring station. The tables also show average ambient concentrations (in μg/m3) of the VOCs.
There are point sources that can be seen from two monitoring stations. The more distant station provides a rather incomplete profile. In Table 6, source A is detected at stations #60413 (good visibility) and #60418 (bad visibility). At station #60427 source A is not detectable (neither at station #60429, not shown). It can be seen that the definition of a traffic profile is clearer when point sources are not in sight.
Table 7 shows point sources B and C also detected at station #60413; they are not visible at other stations.
At station #60418, there are two point sources clearly visible and one many-VOC hardly visible and therefore poorly defined, arguably more distant, source. The two well-defined sources are shown in Table 8.
At station #60427 two many-VOC sources can be detected and partially defined; judging by their VOC menu, they are industrial sources and one of them has been seen from station #60418. The other seems to also appear at station #60429. However, the partial definitions do not yield unambiguous conclusions. By contrast, the traffic profiles seen at station #60427 are very well defined and catch almost all of the ambient hydrocarbon load.
Station #60429 appears to feebly “see” an industrial source already detected at station #60427. The feebly defined profiles from stations #60418, #60427, and #60429 are shown in Table 9.
Station #60429 also detected a strong concentration of styrene (about three times stronger than elsewhere); all of the styrene was assigned to one very well-defined source (not tabulated), which also was emitting trace amounts of 1-hexene and n-propylbenzene—and nothing else.

3.4. Food Industries

There are more than 500 food companies in Toronto; however, the flavoring and fungicidal agents cis-3-methyl-2-pentene (CID 643935) and cis-4-methyl-2-pentene (CID 5326159) only occur in some profiles in trace quantities. The occurrences of dichloromethane and trichloroethylene in the profiles indicate industrial usage of the agents as solvents rather than in flavoring (trichloroethylene was banned from the food and pharmaceutical industries in most of the world due to concerns about its toxicity; see [129]). Also, there are no discernible sources of aldehydes or ketones; these compounds are almost undetectable in Toronto’s air, unlike in Montreal, a large metropolis in the neighboring province of Quebec, which accommodates the forestry, lumber, and pulp industries [62].

3.5. Secondary Sources

Persistent air pollution from aromatic and chlorinated hydrocarbons arises due to volatilization from contaminated soil, sediment, and water (cf. refs. [31,32,33,34,35,36,37]). Formerly (before 2000), in the Great Lakes areas in Canada and the United States, volatilizations from sediment, contaminated soils, and water surface contained significant concentrations of aromatic and chlorinated hydrocarbons; see refs. [130,131,132,133]. Research concentrated on the deposition of these pollutants into lakes and on the prevention of ecological disasters; chemical waste dump leachates and direct manufacturing effluents were reported to be the major source of chlorobenzenes [134,135], particularly in the Great Lakes of North America. Their biodegradation in water and soil is slow; volatilization is the most important environmental fate process and the main mechanism of their transport from soil and water into air.
Volatilization of deposited materials (see e.g., [56,136]), the most persistent input to air pollution, does not appear as releases from discernible sources. The volatilizations contribute to the “inert” and “stable” sources (see Table 2 and Table 3)—probably as remnants of their presently reduced, but constant, release from wastewater, sediment, and lake surfaces.
Trihalomethanes, chloroform, bromodichloromethane, dibromochloromethane, and bromoform, which are byproducts of water chlorination, have a very limited presence in Toronto’s atmosphere; there only persist moderate amounts of chloroform, forming a stable constituent in the urban pollution. The reduction in pollution caused by chlorination followed on from intense discussions of the health effects of trihalomethanes (cf. refs. [12,13,14,137,138]) and subsequent governmental regulations concerning the usage of water disinfectants [139,140,141,142,143,144,145].
The dimethylbutanes (described in Table 1) also exist in the stable background, supposedly because of their potential to adsorb to soils, suspended solids, and sediments and then slowly volatilize. Also, dichlorobenzenes (1,2-, 1,3-, 1,4-) can appear in the stable background as uniform releases from contaminated sediments and soils (through industrial and municipal effluents); in Toronto, only 1,4-dichlorobenzene was detected.

4. Conclusions

Our results may provide information on identifying and resolving pollution sources. Many less prominent species captured at monitoring stations may be considered characteristic of specific point sources, while the prominent ones describe distributed background sources and secondary sources, and their VOC loadings.
These results endorse the finding concerning the trends in urban VOC pollution over time. Biogenic VOCs, and their photochemistry and natural cycles, have no role in degrading the quality of urban air. The pollution associated with traffic and transportation becomes dominant; here, the evaporative emissions of a large variety of fuel hydrocarbons, including unsaturated hydrocarbons, both aliphatic and aromatic, overwhelm the pollution caused by exhaust hydrocarbons. However, in Toronto, the ambient concentrations of hydrocarbons strongly diminish over time; growing urban traffic produces less exhaust pollution due to reformulated gasoline, better combustion technology, and governmental regulations targeting fossil fuel usage and combustion.
Halocarbons (freons) still persist in the atmosphere, accompanied by the abundant and relatively stable chlorinated hydrocarbons. The ambient concentration of the stable and/or abundant gases strongly depends on the prevailing winds; this may be the cause of negative values of apportionments for the “Inert” or “Stable” source. Indeed, removal by the wind of some locally occurring compounds may be correlated with arrivals of the compound released by a remote source located in the upwind direction (cf. [146,147]).
Governmental restrictions on water chlorination result in a very limited presence of trihalomethanes in the Toronto atmosphere (see [148])—excepting persistent but moderated amounts of chloroform in the inert/stable background of urban pollution.
The highly hazardous pollutants, trichlorobenzenes, were not detected in Toronto. They have a relatively short half-life in the atmosphere. Their possible sources—volatilization from sediments and soils contaminated by the petrochemical industry—are apparently absent. Based on our analysis, it would seem as though the clean-air bylaws prevented their release into industrial waste streams.
Dichlorobenzenes (1,2-, 1,3-, 1,4-) are widely used in manufacturing polymers, degreasing engines, and metal cleaning; however, they are hard to assign to a specific source. In Toronto, they appear in the stable background as uniform releases from contaminated sediments and soils. Chlorobenzene—a massively used solvent in degreasing automobile parts—is not detectable in Toronto, since, arguably, American production declined considerably in the second half of the last century [131]. Chloroethane—used in leaded gasoline, but banned in Canada since 1980—disappeared from traffic sources; its counterpart in unleaded gasoline, methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE), is also absent, which indicates a broad reduction in exhaust emissions [149].
For all the “industrial” VOCs, volatilization from soils and waters receiving industrial seepage is an important environmental fate process. It runs differently for different substances, and the dynamics of removal also vary. This confuses simultaneity of incidence of VOCs coming from the same source. Thereby, industries shall be distinguished mainly by their chemical menus rather than by the temporal patterns of their emissions. Still, UNMIX mainly associates with one source the VOCs that occasionally vanish simultaneously from the air. Then, irregular volatilizations may incapacitate modeling for many VOC menus.
The UNMIX results suggest that without taking into consideration atmospheric photochemistry (cf. [150]), weather (cf. [53,147]), and the mechanisms of secondary formation (cf. [151,152]), we can only achieve a coarse apportionment of sources detected at a particular monitoring station.
Still, UNMIX routines provide dependable information by imposing strong criteria of reliability and acceptability on the source profiling results. At the same time, negative values are allowed. These aspects enable creating “sources,” whereby a group of vanishing VOCs is aligned with an appearance of another group. For instance, a negative value may represent a deficit in concentration of a species undergoing partial removal, the removal having dynamics uncorrelated with its emission dynamics. However, these dynamics may be correlated with arrivals of some other species, if the removal and the arrivals have the same cause, such as moving air masses. It appears that such effects are quite natural and frequent and they rationalize the plethora of profiles generated by the UNMIX routines.
Assuming such mechanisms are at work in the UNMIX routines, we can speculate that positive percentage values of an apportionment (occasionally higher than 100%) represent the initial emissions unaffected by the journey to the sensor, while negative values would represent removal of vapors from the air. Further studies are needed to fully explain the UNMIX results and to exploit them for better understanding the information obtained by remote sensing. The most problematic are trace concentrations originating from point sources: environmental influences destroy the relationship between the source emission pattern and the measurements performed by a distant station.
The large number of species under scrutiny, which may be limiting when directly building many-VOC models (cf. [45,46]), may be turned into an advantage: many reliable partial chemical fingerprints may be spliced into exhaustive, however approximated, source profiles. Also, arguably, there is a potential to consider “negative sources”, i.e., the processes of removal and depletion. Thus, a better understanding of the environmental fates of VOCs—combined with robust modeling (cf. [153]), including modeling of the VOC depletion and removal—may result in useful depictions of environmental health hazards.

Acknowledgments

The authors want to thank Janina Porada, Master of Science, from the Abbott Corporation for her verification of the chemical content and references. Environment Canada was very supportive in making available to us the NAPS data.

Author Contributions

Eugeniusz Porada developed methodology and performed many software intensive experiments. Mieczysław Szyszkowicz was an initiator of this study, organized the data, and performed preliminary analysis using PMF software. Both authors interpreted the results and wrote the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. ATSDR Priority List of Hazardous Substances. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR): Atlanta, GA, USA, 2013. Available online: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/spl/index.html (accessed on 26 January 2016).
  2. Integrated Risk Information System. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Washington, DC, USA, 2005. Available online: www.epa.gov/iris (accessed on 3 February 2016).
  3. United States National Library of Medicine. Toxicology Data Network HSDB: Hazardous Substances Data Bank. Available online: http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/sis/htmlgen?HSDB (accessed on 3 February 2016).
  4. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Carcinogenic Effects of Benzene: An Update (Final); Office of Research and Development, National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington Office: Washington, DC, USA, 1998. Available online: http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/risk/recordisplay.cfm?deid=2806 (accessed on 11 January 2016).
  5. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). 1,3-butadiene, ethylene oxide and vinyl halides (vinyl fluoride, vinyl chloride and vinyl bromide). IARC Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Lyon, France, 2008. Available online: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol97/mono97.pdf (accessed on 25 January 2016).
  6. Welch, V.A.; Fallon, K.J.; Gelbke, H.-P. “Ethylbenzene” in Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  7. Fabri, J.; Graeser, U.; Simo, T.A. Xylenes. In Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  8. Doherty, R.E. A History of the Production and Use of Carbon Tetrachloride, Tetrachloroethylene, Trichloroethylene and 1,1,1-Trichloroethane in the United States: Part 2—Trichloroethylene and 1,1,1-Trichloroethane. J. Environ. Forensics 2000, 1, 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rossberg, M.; Lendle, W.; Pfleiderer, G.; Tögel, A.; Dreher, E.-L.; Langer, E.; Rassaerts, H.; Kleinschmidt, P.; Strack, H.; Cook, R.; et al. Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, in Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  10. Toxic Substances Portal—Carbon Tetrachloride. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR): Atlanta, GA, USA, 2005. Available online: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/phs/phs.asp?id=194&tid=35 (accessed on 10 February 2016).
  11. Marshall, K.A. Chlorocarbons and Chlorohydrocarbons, Survey. Kirk-Othmer Encycl. Chem. Technol. 2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pereira, M.A.; Lin, L.H.; Lippitt, J.M.; Herren, S.L. Trihalomethanes as initiators and promoters of carcinogenesis. Environ. Health Perspect. 1982, 46, 151–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Shaw, G.M.; Malcoe, L.H.; Milea, A.; Swan, S.H. Chlorinated water exposures and cardiac anomalies. Epidemiology 1991, 2, 459–460. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. King, W.D.; Dodds, L.; Allen, A.C. Relation between stillbirth and specific chlorination by-products in public water supplies. Environ. Health Perspect. 2000, 108, 883–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Elliott, L.; Longnecker, M.P.; Kissling, G.E.; London, S.J. Volatile organic compounds and pulmonary function in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. Environ. Health Perspect. 2006, 114, 1210–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. McCarthy, M.C.; O’Brien, T.E.; Charrier, J.G.; Hafner, H.R. Characterization of the chronic risk and hazard of hazardous air pollutants in the United States using ambient monitoring data. Environ. Health Perspect. 2009, 117, 790–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Villeneuve, P.J.; Jerrett, M.; Su, J.; Burnett, R.T.; Chen, H.; Brook, J.; Wheeler, A.J.; Cakmak, S.; Goldberg, M.S. A cohort study of intra-urban variations in volatile organic compounds and mortality, Toronto, Canada. Environ. Pollut. 2013, 183, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Villeneuve, P.J.; Jerrett, M.; Brenner, D.; Su, J.; Chen, H.; McLaughlin, J. A case-control study of long-term exposure to ambient volatile organic compounds and lung cancer in Toronto, Canada. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Norman, C.S.; DeCanio, S.J.; Fan, L. The Montreal Protocol at 20: Ongoing opportunities for integration with climate protection. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2008, 18, 330–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. United Nations Environment Programme. Ozone Secretariat 2015: The Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer. Available online: http://ozone.unep.org/new_site/en/montreal_protocol.php (accessed on 11 January 2016).
  21. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Overview of the Clean Air Act and Air Pollution. Updated on 17 November 2015. Available online: http://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview (accessed on 14 January 2016).
  22. Beauregard-Tellier, F.; Banks, S.N.K.; Douglas, K.; Lynne, C.; Myers, T.W. Legislative Summary of Bill C-30, 2006: Canada’s Clean Air and Climate Change Act. Available online: http://www.lop.parl.gc.ca/Content/LOP/LegislativeSummaries/39/1/c30-e.pdf (accessed on 15 January 2016).
  23. Stockholm Convention. Overview: Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants. UNEP: Châtelaine, Switzerland, 2008. Available online: http://chm.pops.int/TheConvention/Overview/tabid/3351/ (accessed on 31 January 2016).
  24. Propper, R.; Wong, P.; Bui, S.; Austin, J.; Vance, W.; Alvarado, Á.; Croes, B.; Luo, D. Ambient and Emission Trends of Toxic Air Contaminants in California. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 6, 11329–11339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Seinfeld, J.H.; Pandis, S.N. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change, 2nd ed.; Wiley-Interscience: New York, NY, USA, 2006; pp. 38–54. [Google Scholar]
  26. Atkinson, R. Gas-Phase Tropospheric Chemistry of Organic Compounds: A Review. Atmos. Environ. 1990, 24A, 1–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Atkinson, R. Atmospheric Chemistry of VOC and NOx. Atmos. Environ. 2000, 34, 2063–2101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Calvert, J.G.; Atkinson, R.; Becker, K.H.; Kamens, R.M.; Seinfeld, J.H.; Wallington, T.H.; Yarwood, G. The Mechanisms of Atmospheric Oxidation of the Aromatic Hydrocarbons; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  29. Alam, M.S.; Camredon, M.; Rickard, A.R.; Carr, T.; Wyche, K.P.; Hornsby, K.E.; Monks, P.S.; Bloss, W.J. Total radical yields from tropospheric ethene ozonolysis. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 11002–11015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Vereecken, L.; Francisco, J.S. Theoretical studies of atmospheric reaction mechanisms in the troposphere. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 6259–6293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Howard, P.H. Handbook of Environmental Fate and Exposure Data for Organic Chemicals; CRC Press (Lewis Publishers): Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1993; Volume 4, pp. 110–117. [Google Scholar]
  32. Meuser, H. Contaminated Urban Soils. Chaptar 3: Causes of Soil Contamination in the Urban Environment. Environ. Pollut. 2010, 18, 29–94. [Google Scholar]
  33. Jones, V.T.; Burtell, S.G. Soil vapor—Petroleum product constituents contained in near surface soils and/or groundwater. In Hydrocarbon Flux Variations in Natural and Anthropogenic Seeps, in Hydrocarbon Migration and its Near Surface Expression; Schumacher, D., Abrams, M.A., Eds.; AAPG Memoir 66; AAPG: Tulsa, OK, USA, 1996; pp. 203–221. [Google Scholar]
  34. Valsaraj, K.T.; Thibodeaux, L.J.; Reible, D.D. Modeling Air Emissions from Contaminated Sediment Dredged Materials. In Dredging, Remediation, and Containment of Contaminated Sediments; Demars, K.R., Richardson, G.N., Yong, R.N., Chaney, R.C., Eds.; ASTM: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1995; pp. 227–238. [Google Scholar]
  35. Namkung, E.; Rittmann, B.E. Estimating Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Publicly Owned Treatment Works. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 1987, 59, 670–678. [Google Scholar]
  36. Rosner, D.; Markowitz, G. Persistent pollutants: A brief history of the discovery of the widespread toxicity of chlorinated hydrocarbons. Environ. Res. 2013, 120, 126–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. EPA International Cooperation. Persistent Organic Pollutants: A Global Issue, a Global Response. Washington, DC, USA, 2002. Available online: http://www.epa.gov/international-cooperation/persistent-organic-pollutants-global-issue-global-response (accessed on 31 January 2016). [Google Scholar]
  38. Watson, J.G.; Chow, J.C.; Fujita, E.M. Review of volatile organic compound source apportionment by chemical mass balance. Atmos. Environ. 2001, 35, 1567–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Srivastava, A. Source apportionment of ambient VOCS in Mumbai city. Atmos. Environ. 2004, 38, 6829–6843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Srivastava, A.; Majumdar, D. Emission Inventory of evaporative emissions of VOCs in four metro cities in India. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2010, 160, 315–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Kim, E.; Brown, S.; Hafner, H.; Hopke, P. Characterization of non-methane volatile organic compound sources in Houston during 2001 using positive matrix factorization. Atmos. Environ. 2005, 39, 5934–5946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Buzcu, B.; Fraser, M. Source identification and apportionment of volatile organic compounds in Houston, TX. Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40, 2385–2400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Reimann, S.; Lewis, A.C. Anthropogenic VOCs. In Volatile Organic Compounds in the Atmosphere; Koppman, R., Ed.; Blackwell Publishing Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 2007; pp. 33–81. [Google Scholar]
  44. Brown, S.G.; Frankel, A.; Hafner, H.R. Source apportionment of VOC in the Los Angeles area using positive matrix factorization. Atmos. Environ. 2007, 41, 227–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Song, Y.; Shao, M.; Liu, Y.; Lu, S.; Kuster, W.; Goldan, P.; Xie, S. Source apportionment of ambient volatile organic compounds in Beijing. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 4348–4353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Song, Y.; Dai, W.; Shao, M.; Liu, Y.; Lu, S.; Kuster, W.; Goldan, P. Comparison of receptor models for source apportionment of volatile organic compounds in Beijing, China. Environ. Pollut. 2008, 156, 174–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Liu, Y.; Shao, M.; Lu, S.; Chang, C.-C.; Wang, J.-L.; Fu, L. Source apportionment of ambient volatile organic compounds in the Pearl River Delta, China, Part II. Atmos. Environ. 2008, 42, 6261–6274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, Y.; Sheesley, R.J.; Schauer, J.J.; Lewandowski, M.; Jaoui, M.; Offenberg, J.H. Source apportionment of primary and secondary organic aerosols using positive matrix factorization (PMF) of molecular markers. Atmos. Environ. 2009, 43, 5567–5574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bon, D.M.; Ulbrich, I.M.; de Gouw, J.A.; Warneke, C.; Kuster, W.C.; Alexander, M.L.; Baker, A.; Beyersdorf, A.J.; Blake, D.; Fall, R.; et al. Measurements of volatile organic compounds at a suburban groundside (T1) in Mexico City during the MILAGRO 2006 campaign: Measurement comparison, emission ratios, and source attribution. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2011, 11, 2399–2421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rosenbaum, A.S.; Axelrad, D.A.; Woodruff, T.J.; Wei, Y.; Ligocki, M.P.; Cohen, J.P. National estimates of outdoor air toxic concentrations. J. Air Waste Manag. 1999, 49, 1138–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Miller, S.L.; Anderson, M.J.; Daly, E.P.; Jana, B.; Milford, J.B. Source apportionment of exposures to volatile organic compounds. I. Evaluation of receptor models using simulated exposure data. Atmos. Environ. 2002, 36, 3629–3641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Cahill, T.M.; Mackay, D. Complexity in Multimedia Mass Balance Models: When are simple models adequate and when are more complex models necessary? Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2003, 22, 1404–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Mukerjee, S.; Norris, G.A.; Smith, L.A.; Noble, C.A.; Neas, L.M.; Ozkaynak, A.H.; Gonzales, M. Receptor model comparisons and wind direction analyses of volatile organic compounds and submicrometer particles in an arid, binational, urban air shed. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 2317–2327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Allen, D.; Cohen, Y.; Kaplan, I.R. Intermedia Pollutant Transport: Modeling and Field Measurements; Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1989; pp. 143–146. [Google Scholar]
  55. Rathbuna, R.E. Transport, Behavior, and Fate of Volatile Organic Compounds in Streams. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 30, 129–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Pankow, J.F.; Thomson, N.R.; Johnson, R.L.; Baehr, A.L.; Zogorski, J.S. The urban atmosphere as a non-point source for the transport of MTBE and other volatile organic compounds (VOC’s) to shallow groundwater. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1997, 31, 2821–2828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Gouin, T.; Mackay, D.; Jones, K.C.; Harner, T.; Meijer, S.N. Evidence for the “grasshopper” effect and fractionation during long-range atmospheric transport of organic contaminants. Environ. Pollut. 2004, 128, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Mackay, D.; Webster, E.; Gouin, T. Partitioning, Persistence and Long-Range Transport. In Chapter 7 Chemicals in the Environment: Assessing and Managing Risk; Hester, R.E., Harrison, R.M., Eds.; Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  59. Henry, R.C. Multivariate receptor modeling by N-dimensional edge detection. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. 2003, 65, 179–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Norris, G.A.; Vedantham, R.; Duvall, R.M. EPA UNMIX 6.0 User Guide (EPA/600/R-07/089). Washington, DC, USA, 2007. Available online: http://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-02/documents/unmix-6-user-manual.pdf (accessed on 18 January 2016). [Google Scholar]
  61. Environment Canada. National Air Pollution Surveillance Program (NAPS). Ottawa, ON, Canada, 1969. Available online: http://www.ec.gc.ca/rnspa-naps/ (accessed on 1 May 2014).
  62. Porada, E.; Kousha, T. Factorization methods applied to characterize the sources of volatile organic compounds in Montreal, Quebec. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health 2016, 29, 15–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Environment Canada. 10 Years of Data from the National Air Pollution Surveillance (NAPS) Network. Data Summary from 1999 to 2008. 2013. Available online: http://www.ec.gc.ca/rnspa-naps/77FECF05-E241-4BED-8375-5A2A1DF3688C/NAPS_Annual_Report_August2013_E.pdf (accessed on 10 February 2016).
  64. Fortin, T.J.; Howard, B.J.; Parrish, D.D.; Goldan, P.D.; Kuster, W.C.; Atlas, E.L.; Harley, R.A. Temporal changes in U.S. benzene emissions inferred from atmospheric measurements. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 1403–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Curren, K.C.; Dann, T.F.; Wang, D.K. Ambient air 1,3-butadiene concentrations in Canada (1995–2003): Seasonal, day of week variations, trends, and source influences. Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40, 170–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. McKeen, S.A.; Liu, S.C. Hydrocarbon ratios and photochemical history of air masses. Geophys. Res. Lett. 1993, 20, 2363–2666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Baldasano, J.M.; Delgado, R.; Calbo, J. Applying Receptor Models to Analyze Urban/Suburban VOCs Air Quality in Martorell (Spain). Environ. Sci. Technol. 1998, 32, 405–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. PubChem. Available online: http://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ (accessed on 9 June 2016).
  69. Wixtrom, R.N.; Brown, S.L. Individual and population exposures to gasoline. J. Expo. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 1992, 2, 23–78. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  70. Lee, S.C.; Chiu, M.Y.; Ho, K.F.; Zou, S.C.; Wang, X. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in urban atmosphere of Hong Kong. Chemosphere 2002, 48, 375–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Guo, H.; Lee, S.C.; Louie, P.K.; Ho, K.F. Characterization of hydrocarbons, halocarbons and carbonyls in the atmosphere of Hong Kong. Chemosphere 2004, 57, 1363–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Rubin, J.I.; Kean, A.J.; Harley, R.A.; Millet, D.B.; Goldstein, A.H. Temperature dependence of volatile organic compound evaporative emissions from motor vehicles. J. Geophys. Res. 2006, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Chan, Y.C.; Christensen, E.; Golding, G.; King, G.; Gore, W.; Cohen, D.D.; Hawas, O.; Stelcer, E.; Simpson, R.; Denison, L.; et al. Source Apportionment of Ambient Volatile Organic Compound in Major Cities in Australia by Positive Matrix Factorization. Clean Air Environ. Qual. 2008, 42, 21–29. [Google Scholar]
  74. Ras, M.R.; Marcé, R.M.; Borrull, F. Volatile organic compounds in air at urban and industrial areas in the Tarragona region by thermal desorption and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2010, 161, 389–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Ling, Z.H.; Guo, H.; Cheng, H.R.; Yu, Y.F. Sources of ambient volatile organic compounds and their contributions to photochemical ozone formation at a site in the Pearl River Delta, southern China. Environ Pollut. 2011, 159, 2310–2319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. HEP (Office of Planning, Environment, & Realty) 2006: Transportation Air Quality Facts and Figures. Available online: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/air_quality/publications/fact_book/ (accessed on 11 February 2016).
  77. Ajit, S.; Thirumalini, S. Investigation on evaporative emission from a gasoline polycarbonate fuel tank. IJRET 2013, 2, 46–49. [Google Scholar]
  78. CRC Report: Phase 2 of the Advanced Collaborative Emissions Study. Coordinating Research Council: Alpharetta, GA, USA, 2013. Available online: http://crcao.org/reports/recentstudies2013/ACES%20Ph2/03-17124_CRC%20ACES%20Phase2-%20FINAL%20Report_Khalek-R6-SwRI.pdf (accessed on 11 February 2016).
  79. Thomas, L.M. Report 11/89: A US Perspective on Hydrocarbon Controls at Service Stations; Environmental Science for the European Refining Industry (CONCAWE): Hague, The Netherlands, 1989; Available online: https://www.concawe.eu/uploads/Modules/Publications/rpt_89-11ocr-2004-;01315-01-e.pdf (accessed on 11 February 2016).
  80. Report 4/05: Evaluation of Automotive Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Emissions. Environmental Science for the European Refining Industry (CONCAWE): Brussels, Belgium, 2005. Available online: https://www.concawe.eu/uploads/Modules/Publications/rpt_98-55-2004-01306-01-e.pdf (accessed on 11 February 2016).
  81. Government of Canada, Environment Canada. Benzene in Canadian Gasoline: Effect of the Benzene in Gasoline Regulations 2010–2012 Triennial Report. Internet: Environment and Climate Change Canada; 2015. Available online: http://ec.gc.ca/Publications/default.asp?lang=En&xml=E376ABE7-85E1-4C5C-855D-0EFB5F50179B (accessed on 11 February 2016). [Google Scholar]
  82. Harley, R.A.; Hooper, D.S.; Kean, A.J.; Kirchstetter, T.W.; Hesson, J.M.; Balberan, N.T.; Stevenson, E.D.; Kendall, G.R. Effects of reformulated gasoline and motor vehicle fleet turnover on emissions and ambient concentrations of benzene. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 5084–5088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Mohamed, M.F.; Kang, D.; Aneja, V.P. Volatile organic compounds in some urban locations in United States. Chemosphere 2002, 47, 863–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Bravo, H.; Sosa, R.; Sanchez, P.; Bueno, E.; Gonzalez, L. Concentrations of benzene and toluene in the atmosphere of the Southwestern area at the Mexico City Metropolitan Zone. Atmos. Environ. 2002, 36, 3843–3849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Kim, K.-H.; Ho, D.X.; Park, C.G.; Ma, C.-J.; Pandey, S.K.; Lee, S.C.; Jeong, H.J.; Lee, S.H. Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air at Four Residential Locations in Seoul, Korea. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2012, 29, 875–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Monod, A.; Sive, B.C.; Avino, P.; Chen, T.; Blake, D.R.; Rowland, F.S. Monoaromatic compounds in ambient air of various cities: A focus on correlations between the xylenes and ethylbenzene. Atmos. Environ. 2001, 35, 135–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. James, D.H.; Castor, W.M. “Styrene”, in Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2005; Available online: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14356007.a25_329.pub2/abstract (accessed on 1 February 2016).
  88. ToxGuide for Styrene. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR): Atlanta, GA, USA, 2011. Available online: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxguides/toxguide-53.pdf (accessed on 16 May 2016).
  89. McLaren, R.; Singleton, D.L.; Lai, J.Y.K.; Khouw, B.; Singer, E.; Wu, Z.; Niki, H. Analysis of motor vehicle sources and their contribution to ambient hydrocarbon distributions at urban sites in Toronto during the Southern Ontario Oxidants Study. Atmos. Environ. 1996, 30, 2219–2232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. “Ethylene” in New World Encyclopedia 2014. Available online: http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Ethylene (accessed on 24 January 2016).
  91. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Screening Information Data Set (OECD SIDS). UNEP Chemicals 2007: Record for Ethylene. Available online: http://www.chem.unep.ch/irptc/sids/OECDSIDS/sidspub.html (accessed on 15 January 2016).
  92. Kirchstetter, T.W.; Singer, B.C.; Harley, R.A.; Kendall, G.R.; Hesson, J.M. Impact of California reformulated gasoline on motor vehicle emissions. 2. Volatile organic compound speciation and reactivity. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 33, 329–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Streicher, C.; Asselineau, L.; ForestiBre, A. Separation of alcohol/ether/hydrocarbon mixtures in industrial etherification processes for gasoline production. Pure Appl. Chem. 1995, 67, 985–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. SABIC Americas, Inc. The Company: Products. Chemicals: Butane-1. Available online: http://www.sabic.com/corporate/en/productsandservices/chemicals/butene-1 (accessed on 16 January 2016).
  95. Wilson, E.W., Jr.; Hamilton, W.A.; Kennington, H.R.; Evans, B., 3rd; Scott, N.W.; DeMore, W.B. Measurement and estimation of rate constants for the reactions of hydroxyl radical with several alkanes and cycloalkanes. J. Phys. Chem. A 2006, 16, 593–604. [Google Scholar]
  96. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Screening Information Data Set (OECD SIDS). 2-Methyl-2-Butene CAS N°: 513–35–9. Available online: http://www.chem.unep.ch/irptc/sids/OECDSIDS/513359.pdf (accessed on 24 January 2016).
  97. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Screening Information Data Set (OECD SIDS). Initial Assessment Report for SIAM 16. Paris, France, 2003. Available online: http://webnet.oecd.org/hpv/ui/handler.axd?id=e696b85b-60f2-45ba-ad7b-4f1a47c83c1c (accessed on 24 January 2016).
  98. “2-Methylpentane” in TOXNET (Toxicology Data Network). U.S. National Library of Medicine: Bethesda, MD, USA, 2016. Available online: http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/sis/search/a?dbs+hsdb:@term+@DOCNO+1125 (accessed on 1 February 2016).
  99. Toxicological Profile for Benzene. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2007. Available online: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ToxProfiles/tp3.pdf (accessed on 10 May 2016).
  100. Warnhoff, E.W. The curiously intertwined Histories of Benzene and Cyclohexane. J. Chem. Ed. 1996, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Zhang, F.F.; van Rijnman, T.; Kim, J.S.; Cheng, A. On Present Methods of Hydrogenation of Aromatic Compound, 1945 to Present Day; Lunds Tekniska Hogskola: Lund, Sweden, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  102. Aschmann, S.M.; Arey, J.; Atkinson, R. Products and mechanism of the reaction of OH radicals with 2,3,4-trimethylpentane in the presence of NO. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 1, 5038–5045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. “Propane” in TOXNET (Toxicology Data Network). U.S. National Library of Medicine: Bethesda, MD, USA, 2015. Available online: https://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/sis/search2/f?./temp/~2IKC7A:1 (accessed on 17 May 2016).
  104. Tuazon, E.C.; Alvarado, A.; Aschmann, S.M.; Atkinson, R.; Arey, J. Products of the gas-phase reactions of 1,3-butadiene with OH and NO3 radicals. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 33, 3586–3595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Weiss, E.B. United Nations’ Audiovisual Library of International Low: Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer & Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer. Available online: http://legal.un.org/avl/ha/vcpol/vcpol.html (accessed on 18 January 2016).
  106. Government of Canada. Ozone-depleting Substances and Halocarbon Alternatives Regulations. In Can. Gaz.; 2015; 149. Available online: http://www.gazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p1/2015/2015-03-21/html/reg1-eng.php (accessed on 18 January 2016). [Google Scholar]
  107. McCulloch, A.; Midgley, P.M.; Ashford, P. Releases of refrigerant gases (CFC-12, HCFC-22 and HFC-134a) to the atmosphere. Atmos. Environ. 2003, 37, 889–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. “Ethane” in TOXNET (Toxicology Data Network). U.S. National Library of Medicine: Bethesda, MD, USA, 2014. Available online: https://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/sis/search2/f?./temp/~UXlGqe:1 (accessed on 17 May 2016).
  109. Howe-Grant, M. (Ed.) Chlorocarbons, hydrocarbons (chloroform). In Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 4th ed.; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1991; Volume 5.
  110. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Screening Information Data Set (OECD SIDS). UNEP Chemicals 2003: Record for Chloromethane. Available online: http://www.chem.unep.ch/irptc/sids/OECDSIDS/CLMETHANE.pdf (accessed on 21 January 2016).
  111. EPA Technology Transfer Network—Air Toxics Web Site 2015. Methyl Bromide (Bromomethane). Available online: http://www3.epa.gov/airtoxics/hlthef/methylbr.html (accessed on 25 January 2016).
  112. International Joint Commission (IJC). Canada-United States Air Quality Agreement. 1991. Available online: http://www.ijc.org/en_/Air_Quality_Agreement (accessed on 23 January 2016).
  113. Environment and Climate Change Canada. CEPA Environmental Registry. 2015. Available online: http://www.ec.gc.ca/lcpe-cepa/ (accessed on 25 January 2016).
  114. Environment and Climate Change Canada. Management of Toxic Substances. 2013. Available online: http://www.ec.gc.ca/toxiques-toxics/ (accessed on 25 January 2016).
  115. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Toxicological Profile for 1,4-Dichlorobenzene. Public Health Service. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Atlanta, GA, USA, 1998. Available online: http://www.bvsde.paho.org/bvstox/i/fulltext/toxprofiles/1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE.pdf (accessed on 11 February 2016).
  116. Guenther, A.T.; Karl, P.H.; Wiedinmyer, C.; Palmer, P.I.; Geron, C. Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature (MEGAN). Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2006, 6, 3181–3210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Borbon, A.; Fontaine, H.; Veillerot, M.; Locoge, N.; Galloo, J.C.; Guillermo, R. An investigation into the traffic-related fraction of isoprene at an urban location. Atmos. Environ. 2001, 35, 3749–3760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Guenther, A.T.; Hewitt, N.; Erickson, D.; Fall, R.; Geron, C.; Graedel, T.; Harley, P.; Klinger, L.; Lerdau, M.; Mckay, W.A.; et al. A global model of natural volatile organic compound emissions. J. Geophys. Res. 1995, 100, 8873–8892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. National Toxicology Program. Isoprene, in Report on Carcinogens, 13th ed.National Institutes of Health: Bethesda, MD, USA, 2014. Available online: http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/roc/content/profiles/isoprene.pdf (accessed on 16 May 2016).
  120. Budavari, S. “8034. Propylene” in The Merck Index, 12th ed.; Budavari, S., Ed.; Merck & Co.: Kenilworth, NJ, USA, 1996; pp. 1348–1349. [Google Scholar]
  121. Chemicals: Propylene. SABIC Americas, Inc. SABIC Technology Center: Houston, TX, USA. Available online: http://www.sabic.com/corporate/en/productsandservices/chemicals/propylene (accessed on 15 January 2016).
  122. Spectrum Laboratories: Chemical Fact Sheet. Florida-Spectrum Environnemental Services: Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA. Available online: http://www.speclab.com/compound/c110827.htm (accessed on 10 February 2016).
  123. TOXNET (Toxicological Data Network). HSDB: CYCLOHEXANE. U.S. National Library of Medicine: Bethesda, MD, USA. Available online: http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/sis/search2/r?dbs+hsdb:@term+@rn+110-82-7 (accessed on 10 February 2016).
  124. UNEP Chemicals. Screening Information Dataset. Existing Chemicals Database (OECD): Alfa Olefins CAS N°: 592-41-6, 111-66-0, 872-05-9, 112-41-4, 1120-36-1. Available online: http://www.chem.unep.ch/irptc/sids/OECDSIDS/AOalfaolefins.pdf (accessed on 19 January 2016).
  125. Scottish Environmental Protection Agency. Scottish pollutant Release Inventory 2012: Ethyl toluene—All Isomers. Available online: http://apps.sepa.org.uk/spripa/Pages/SubstanceInformation.aspx?pid=53 (accessed on 16 January 2016).
  126. Chapter 5.15: Trichloroethylene. WHO Regional Office for Europe: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2000. Available online: http://www.euro.who.int/_data/assets/pdf_file/0003/123069/AQG2ndEd_5_15Trichloroethylene.pdf (accessed on 10 May 2016).
  127. Toxicology Data Network (TOXNET). 1,2-Diethylbenzene. 2000. Available online: http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/sis/search/a?dbs+hsdb:@term+@DOCNO+4081 (accessed on 10 May 2016). [Google Scholar]
  128. Li, Z.; Singh, S.; Woodward, W.; Dang, L. Kinetics study of OH radical reactions with n-octane, n-nonane, and n-decane at 240–340 K using the relative rate/discharge flow/mass spectrometry technique. J. Phys. Chem. A 2006, 110, 12150–12157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Scott, C.S.; Cogliano, V.J. Trichloroethylene Health Risks-State of the Science. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2000. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1637768/pdf/envhper00311-0013.pdf (accessed on 26 January 2016). [Google Scholar]
  130. Haile, C.L. Chlorinated Hydrocarbons in the Lake Ontario Ecosystem (IFYGL); U.S. EPA National Environmental Research Center: Corvallis, OR, USA, 1975.
  131. Durham, R.W.; Oliver, B.G. History of Lake Ontario contamination from the Niagara River by sediment radiodating and chlorinated hydrocarbon analysis. J. Great Lakes Res. 1983, 9, 160–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Eisenreich, S.J.; Looney, B.B.; Thorton, J.D. Airborn organic contaminants in the Great Lakes ecosystem. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1981, 23, 57–62. [Google Scholar]
  133. International Joint Commission (IJC). Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement—2012. Available online: http://www.ijc.org/en_/Great_Lakes_Water_Quality (accessed on 23 January 2016).
  134. Health Canada. Priority Substances List Assessment Report for Trichlorobenzenes. Cat. No. En40–215/25E. 2013. Available online: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/pubs/contaminants/psl1-lsp1/trichlorobenzenes/index-eng.php (accessed on 26 January 2016).
  135. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Locating and Estimating Air Emission from Sources of Chlorobenzenes (Revised). Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. Research Triangle Park (NC) 1994; EPA-454/R-93–044. Available online: http://www.epa.gov/ttnchie1/le/chlorbnz.pdf (accessed on 21 January 2016).
  136. Beck, U.; Löser, E. Chlorinated Benzenes and other Nucleus-Chlorinated Aromatic Hydrocarbons. In Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  137. Anderson, T.A.; Beauchamp, J.J.; Walton, B.T. Organic chemicals in the environment. Fate of volatile and semivolatile organic chemicals in soil: Abiotic versus biotic losses. J. Environ. Qual. 1991, 20, 420–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Chu, I.; Villeneuve, D.C.; Secours, V.E.; Becking, G.C.; Valli, V.E. Trihalomethanes: I. Toxicity of trihalomethanes: The acute and subacute toxicity of chloroform, bromodichloromethane, chlorodibromomethane and bromoform in rats. J. Environ. Sci. Health 1982, B17, 205–224. [Google Scholar]
  139. Hrudey, S.E. Chlorination disinfection by-products, public health risk tradeoffs and me. Water Res. 2009, 43, 2057–2092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Environment Canada & Health Canada. Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999. Priority Substances List Assessment Report: Chloroform, Cat. No. En40-215/56E. 2001, pp. 13–19. Available online: http://publications.gc.ca/collections/Collection/En40-215-56E.pdf (accessed on 11 February 2016).
  141. Health Canada. Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality: Guideline Technical Document—Trihalomethanes. 2006. Available online: http://healthycanadians.gc.ca/publications/healthy-living-vie-saine/water-trihalomethanes-eau/index-eng.php (accessed on 26 January 2016).
  142. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule: Final Rule. Fed. Regist. 2006, 71, 395–406. [Google Scholar]
  143. International Programme on Chemical Safety. Disinfectants and disinfectant by-products. Environmental Health Criteria 216. World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  144. UNEP 2000, International Programme on Chemical Safety. Environmental Health Criteria 216: Disinfectants and Disinfectant By-Products. Available online: http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc216.htm (accessed on 25 January 2016).
  145. World Chlorine Council. Drinking Water Chlorination. 2008. Available online: http://www.worldchlorine.org/wpcontent/themes/brickthemewp/pdfs/WCC_Policy_Paper_Water_Chlorination.pdf (accessed on 25 January 2016).
  146. Robins, G.A.; Deyo, B.G.; Temple, M.R.; Stuart, J.D.; Lacy, M.J. Soil-gas surveying for subsurface gasoline contamination using total organic vapor detection instruments Part 1: Theory and laboratory experimentation. Ground Water Monit. Remediat. 1990, 10, 122–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Urano, K.; Kawamoto, K.; Abe, Y.; Otake, M. Chlorinated organic compounds in urban air in Japan. Sci. Total Environ. 1988, 74, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Williams, D.T.; LeBel, G.L.; Benoit, F.M. Disinfection by-products in Canadian drinking water. Chemosphere 1997, 34, 299–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Chang, C.C.; Lo, S.J.; Lo, J.G.; Wang, J.L. Analysis of methyl tert-butyl ether in the atmosphere and implications as an exclusive indicator of automobile exhaust. Atmos. Environ. 2003, 37, 4747–4755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Reactivity Research Working Group’s Atmospheric Availability and Environmental Fate Subgroup. Workshop on Combining Environmental Fate and Air Quality Modeling. Research Triangle Park (NC). 2000. Available online: http://www.narsto.org/sites/narsto-dev.ornl.gov/files/Appendix_F_Vol%26Fate.pdf (accessed on 11 January 2016). [Google Scholar]
  151. Wolf, J.L.; Richters, S.; Pecher, J.; Zeuch, T. Pressure dependent mechanistic branching in the formation pathways of secondary organic aerosol from cyclic-alkene gas-phase ozonolysis. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 10952–10964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Mackay, D.; Matsugu, R.S. Evaporation rates of liquid hydrocarbon spills on land and water. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 1973, 51, 434–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Yuan, B.; Shao, M.; de Gouw, J.; David, D.; Parrish, D.D.; Lu, S.; Wang, M.; Zeng, L.; Zhang, Q.; Song, Y.; et al. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in urban air: How chemistry affects the interpretation of positive matrix factorization (PMF) analysis. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2012, 117, 1984–2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Toxics 04 00011 g001 1024
Figure 1. Toronto, Canada: population density and locations of four monitors used in the study.
Figure 1. Toronto, Canada: population density and locations of four monitors used in the study.
Toxics 04 00011 g001
Table
Table 1. Alkanes and alkenes appearing in the “evaporative” and “exhaust” sources.
Table 1. Alkanes and alkenes appearing in the “evaporative” and “exhaust” sources.
VOC *Known Sources/OriginsUsed in/asAtmospheric Chemistry & Half-Life CID ** & Refs.
EthyleneVegetation (natural plant hormone), refinery gasesPetrochemical and chemical industries (used to produce ethylene oxide, ethylene dichloride, ethylbenzene and polyethylene), refrigeration, welding gasReacts with photochemically-produced hydroxyl radicals half-life time counted in days.6325
[90,91]
1-butene/isobutene (isobutylene)Refineries, reactions of ethylene and butanesProduction of octane enhancers: ETBE (ethyl tert-butyl ether) and MTBE (methyl tert-butyl ether)Reacts with hydroxyl radicals, with a half-life of several hours, and with ozone molecules, a half-life of about a day.8255
[92,93,94]
IsobutaneEvaporations from gasoline or wastewatersRefineries to enhance the octane content of gasolineReacts with hydroxyl and nitrate radicals; half-lives are a week and half a year, resp.6360
[95]
2-methyl-2-butene (amylene)Isolation from C5 fraction by steam stripping, byproduct of deep catalytic crackingProduction of gasoline blending components MTBE and tert-amyl methyl ether (TAME)Reacts with photochemically-produced hydroxyl radicals (half-life time counted in hours), with ozone and with nitrate radicals (half-life times counted in minutes).10553
[96]
m and p-XyleneLeaks and evaporations from fuelsFuelsHydroxyl radicals make it degrade by half in less than 20 h.7929
[97]
Isopentane (2-methylbutane)Petroleum, natural gas, evaporations from fuel tanksGasoline componentReacts with photochemically produced hydroxyl radicals, half-life of 4 or 5 days.6556
[31,95]
PentanePetroleumGasoline, petroleum industryReacts with photochemically produced hydroxyl radicals, half-life of 3 to 4 days.8003
[31,95,98]
BenzeneEscapes from petrochemical industry (where benzene is produced via catalytic reformatting) automobile service stations, exhaust from motor vehiclesProduction of ethylbenzene, styrene, cumene, cyclohexane solvent in paints, varnishes, lacquer thinners, production of rubbers, lubricants, dyes, detergents, drugs, explosives, and pesticides gasoline productsHalf-life of reaction with hydroxyl radicals is estimated to be several days, much longer for reactions with ozone and other radicals. Can be deposited on the ground by rain or snow.241
[99]
2,2-dimethylbutane (neohexane)
2,3-dimethylbutane (diisopropyl)		Gasoline vapors, alkylation of ethylene and isobutane recovered from refinery gasesHigh octane fuels, production of solvents, glues, coatings, and paintsDegrades in the atmosphere by reaction with hydroxyl radicals (half-life: less than a week) and with nitrate radicals (the half-life is less than a year).6403
6589
[95]
2-methylpentane (isohexane)Natural petroleum seepages, fugitive emissions or spills, motor vehicle exhaustPetrochemicals and numerous industries worldwide as solvent, raw material, fuel, lubricantDegrades by half in reactions with hydroxyl radicals in 3 days or faster when photochemical smog is created.7892
[98]
CyclohexaneExhaust benzene reacting with hydrogen, evaporations from fuels, industrial wastesFuels, petrochemical and chemical industriesDegrades in the atmosphere by reaction with hydroxyl radicals, half-life of about 2 days.8078
[95,100,101]
CyclopentaneEvaporations from fuelsGasoline (more than 4%)Degrades in the atmosphere by reaction with hydroxyl radicals, half-life of about 2 days9253
[93]
Heptane
2,4-dimethylpentane
2-methylhexane
3-methylhexane		High-octane gasoline, exhaust alkanes reacting with OH radicalsHigh-octane gasoline (up to 6%)Reacts with photochemically produced hydroxyl radicals, half-life of 2 or 3 days.89002
7907
11582
11507
[31,95]
2,3,4-trimethylpentane
2,2-dimethylhexane
2,5-dimethylhexane		Combustion of gasolineAviation industry, production of specialty gasolineReacts with hydroxyl radicals, half-life of approximately 2 days.11269
11551
11592
[95,102]
PropaneWide usage as fuel by industry and consumers Fuels, gasoline productsHalf-life of reactions with hydroxyl radicals is 2 weeks.6334
[103]
1,3-butadienePetroleum refining, petroleum usage, industrial wastesManufacture of polymers, synthetic rubber, plastics, and resinsDegrades by reaction with hydroxyl radicals, ozone molecules, and nitrate radicals, half-lives being some hours, up to one day.7845
[5,104]
* Volatile Organic Compound; ** Compound Identification Number.
Table
Table 2. Profiles of the “inert source” at the four monitoring stations in Toronto.
Table 2. Profiles of the “inert source” at the four monitoring stations in Toronto.
CAS *VOC#60413#60418#60427#60429
InertConcentrationInertConcentrationInertConcentrationInertConcentration
74-84-0Ethane803.18483.92803.87763.18
74-85-1Ethylene371.62332.57552.25591.93
74-98-6Propane603.23293.97773.37744.00
74-99-71-Propyne320.06--330.08430.07
115-07-1Propylene130.5490.90300.79230.67
106-97-8Butane363.2425.54423.74-3.83
106-99-01,3-Butadiene320.09100.16-0.13110.11
75-28-5Isobutane251.76252.26641.62441.77
115-11-71-Butene/Isobutene−40.37100.69230.49180.42
78-78-4Isopentane102.53104.14292.9972.92
71-43-2Benzene400.8571.31251.05500.92
75-83-22,2-Dimethylbutane120.11260.19290.13160.12
67-66-3Chloroform570.10390.12--240.11
71-55-61,1,1-Trichloroethane610.13410.23--350.14
74-83-9Bromomethane500.09630.11--190.08
74-87-3Chloromethane881.15781.17951.17551.15
74-95-3Dibromomethane530.04800.06740.04150.04
75-00-3Chloroethane300.04100.13420.84--
75-09-2Dichloromethane170.6590.651041.2181.01
75-45-6Freon22560.90170.90811.79561.01
75-69-4Freon11861.68731.68822.74681.71
75-71-8Freon12922.70672.70800.68692.74
76-13-1Freon113930.64--770.13660.64
76-14-2Freon114840.14650.17−210.15560.14
79-01-6Trichloroethylene10.26180.43--30.30
106-46-71,4-Dichlorobenzene00.08630.93---0.10
107-06-21,2-Dichloroethane--330.06--230.05
* Chemical Abstracts Service registry; Note: Bold-faced are profiles’ percentage values.
Table
Table 3. Profiles of the “stable” source at three locations: stations #60413, #60418, and #60429.
Table 3. Profiles of the “stable” source at three locations: stations #60413, #60418, and #60429.
CASVOC#60413#60418#60429
InertConcentrationInertConcentrationInertConcentration
115-07-1Propylene−20.54-0.90270.67
106-97-8Butane-3.24−35.54543.83
106-99-01,3-butadiene-0.09140.16200.11
75-28-5Isobutane−381.7602.26391.77
115-11-71-butene/Isobutene−50.37120.69210.42
78-79-5Isoprene190.21400.18−50.13
78-78-4Isopentane−222.53−54.14292.92
463-82-12,2-dimethylpropane--420.05--
590-35-22,2-dimethylpentane--250.05-0.03
591-49-11-methylcyclohexene--920.03--
100-42-5Styrene-0.24420.24--
75-83-22,2-dimethylbutane10.1130.19200.12
79-29-82,3-dimethylbutane−120.18−20.37190.22
589-81-13-methylheptane-0.10310.20-0.14
589-43-52,4-dimethylhexane--250.12-0.07
592-13-22,5-dimethylhexane-0,05130.10-0.06
638-04-0cis-1,3-dimethylcyclohexane-0.06220.10-0.08
111-84-2Nonane−110.16−160.48240.22
1120-21-4Undecane−130.2680.51190.36
112-40-3Dodecane20.19280.25120.27
98-82-8iso-propylbenzene170.03200.0740.04
135-01-31,2-diethylbenzene--270.04--
56-23-5Carbontetrachloride270.59720.64-0.61
67-66-3Chloroform320.10450.12-0.11
71-55-61,1,1-trichloroethane650.13790.23-0.14
74-83-9Bromomethane580.09880.11-0.08
74-87-3Chloromethane321.15571.17-1.15
74-95-3Dibromomethane710.04930.06-0.04
75-00-3Chloroethane280.04−20.13--
75-45-6Freon2260.90131.41261.01
75-69-4Freon11281.68261.84291.71
75-71-8Freon12282.70253.10302.74
76-13-1Freon113310.64--290.64
76-14-2Freon114450.144645270.14
79-01-6Trichloroethylene50.26470.17820.30
107-06-21,2-dichloroethane--580.06260.05
127-18-4Tetrachloroethylene−20.33--261.01
Table
Table 4. Inert gases characterizing the inert/stable background of urban air pollution.
Table 4. Inert gases characterizing the inert/stable background of urban air pollution.
VOCKnown Sources/Origins Used in/asAtmospheric Chemistry & Half-LifeCID & Refs.
CarbontetrachlorideFugitive releases from specialized industrial applications Cleaning agent, synthesis of nylon, chlorination processesExtremely slowly reacts with hydroxyl radicals, half-life is hundreds of years.5943
[106]
Freon-11
Freon-12
Freon-113
Freon-114		Use as refrigerants and propellantsCommercial and industrial refrigeration, appliances and many other customer products, as sprays (currently phased out)Extremely slow reactions with hydroxyl radicals, half-life counted in hundreds of years6389
6391
6428
6429
[107]
EthaneNatural gas, gasoline combustion, cracking of hydrocarbons , liquefaction of coal, biodegradation processesFuels and fuel additives, intermediate in chemical industry, paints, plasticizers , textiles, foams, many consumer productsSlow photo-oxidation, half-life around 2 months6324
[108]
ChloroformAtmospheric photodegradation of trichloroethylenes, indirectly: through reactions of chlorine with organic chemicals, mainly as a by-product during the addition of chlorine to drinking water and wastewaters for disinfectionSolvent, production of Freon-22, compound is popular as an extractant, dry cleaning agent, fumigant ingredient, rubber production, feedstock for polytetrafluoroethylene, ethylene dichloride, and fluorinated ethylene-propylene resinDegrades by reaction with hydroxyl radicals; half-life of 5 months6212
[109]
Chloromethane (methyl chloride)
Bromomethane		Oceans, production and use as pesticide and fumigant, natural petroleum seepages, fugitive emissions or spills, motor vehicle exhaustIntermediates in chemical industriesSlowly degrades in the atmosphere by reactions with hydroxyl radicals half-life: around 10 months and over 1 year, respectively6327
6323
[110,111]
Dichloromethane (methylene chloride)
Dibromomethane 		Contaminated surface water and groundwater, hazardous waste sitesCommon solvents and reagents, blowing agents, paint strippers and degreasers, in food industry (and formerly in preparation of pesticides and fumigants)Half-life of the reaction with hydroxyl radicals is several months.6344
3024
[31,112,113,114]
TetrachloroethyleneContaminated groundwaterSolvent, dry cleaning agent, transformer insulating fluid, in automotive and metalworking industries, desulfurization of coalHalf-life of the reaction with hydroxyl radicals is several months.31373
[9]
1,2-dichloroethaneExclusively volatilization from around locations of industrial manufacturesChemical intermediate in soaps, lead scavenger, solventReacts with hydroxyl radicals, degrading by half in 2 months.11
[62]
1,4-DichlorobenzeneDirect releases to the air from fumigant and deodorants, indirectly: industrial wastewater treatmentSolvent, intermediate for the manufacture of dyes, 2,5-dichloroaniline, pharmaceutical, and agricultural productsReaction with atmospheric hydroxyl radicals has a half-life of 50 days.4685
[115]
Table
Table 5. VOCs profiling the polymer, plastics, and metalworking industries.
Table 5. VOCs profiling the polymer, plastics, and metalworking industries.
VOCKnown Sources/OriginsUsed in/asAtmospheric Chemistry & Half-Life CID & Refs.
EthylbenzeneBurning of coal, gas, and oil, direct releases to the air from industrial applicationsIntermediate for the production of styrene, component of automotive and aviation fuelsHalf-life of reactions with hydroxyl radicals is 2 to 3 days. (Sunlight and other chemicals break down ethylbenzene into components of smog.)7500
[6]
Styrene Polymer and plastic industriesMaking polystyrene, styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR), and styrene-butadiene latex (SBL)Photodegrades in the atmosphere with a half-life of 7–16 h.7501
[87,88]
IsopreneVegetation (intense source), fossil fuels, polymer industryMaking cis-1,4-polyisoprene (synthetic rubber), petrochemical processes Half-life of reactions: with nitric oxide–0.5 h, with hydroxyl radicals–3 h, with ozone–19 h6557
[116,117,118,119]
2-methylhexane
3-methylhexane		Organic synthesis processes, traffic (see Table 1)SolventsHalf-life of the reactions with hydroxyl radicals is about 2 days.11582
11507
[31,95]
IsobutaneFugitive releases from industrial processes, but primarily production and usage of high-octane gasoline (see Table 1)Refrigeration systems, propellant for aerosol cans and in foam production (as an ozone friendly gas)Reacts with hydroxyl and nitrate radicals; half-lives are a week and half a year, resp.6360
[95]
2-methyl-2-buteneNearby point sources, but mostly traffic (see Table 1)Intermediate in chemical industryIndirect photolysis mediated by hydroxyl radicals and ozone, with a half-live at most some hours10553
[96]
PentaneEvaporations from solvent and refrigerant blends, manufacturing of petroleum (see Table 1) General laboratory solvent, polymerization reactions, primary blowing agent in the production of polystyrene foam, refrigerantReacts with photochemically produced hydroxyl radicals, half-life 3 to 4 days.8003
[31,95,98]
m and p-XyleneReleases from printing, rubber, plastic, and leather industriesPrecursor to terephthalic acid and dimethyl terephthalate, monomer in polyethylene terephthalate (PET)Reacts with hydroxyl radicals, degrades by half in less than 20 h.7929
[97]
PropyleneFugitive releases from ethylene production , petrochemical industry, and numerous polymer, plastics, and metalworking industriesChemical and plastic products: detergents, automotive brake fluids, fibers, polyurethane for foams, films,, ABS resins, automotive trim parts, also production of polypropylene, acrylonitrile, propylene glycols, cumene, butyraldehydes, and acroleinDegrades in the atmosphere by reaction with hydroxyl radicals with a half-life of 15 h.8252
[120,121]
CyclohexaneEscapes from production of nylon precursors, but mainly exhaust and evaporations from fuels (see Table 1)Solvent in chemical industry , intermediate in production of adipic acid and caprolactamDegrades in the atmosphere by reaction with hydroxyl radicals, half-life of about 2 days.8078
[93,97,98,122,123]
CyclopentaneEscapes from the manufacture of synthetic resins, rubber adhesives, polyurethane insulating foam, pharmaceuticals but mainly evaporations from fuels (see Table 1)Domestic appliances (replacing freon-11), advanced lubricants (extremely low volatility), pharmaceutical products.Degrades in the atmosphere by reaction with hydroxyl radicals, half-life of about 2 days9253
[31,93]
1-hexeneFugitive releases from chemical, pharmaceutical, and plastic industriesIntermediate in the manufacture of : flavors, perfumes, dyes, oxo alcohols, alkyldimethylamines, surfactants , plastics (e.g., polyethylenes), synthetic fatty acids, lube oil additives, linear mercaptans, alkenyl succinic anhydrides, epoxides, and leather treating compoundsDegrades in the atmosphere by reaction with hydroxyl radicals and ozone molecules; half-lives of these reactions are of several hours to one day11597
[124]
2-ethyltoluene
3-ethyltoluene
4-ethyltoluene		Fugitive releases from chemical plants, but mostly petroleum refineries, petrol stations and facilities, also vehicle exhaust Solvents in the manufacture of plastics, coatings, printing materials and inks, cleaning products, and in pesticidesAtmospheric photodegradation half-life: less than 2 days11903
12100
12160
[125]
p-cymene-Solvent, production of synthetic resins, disinfectants, dyestuff, perfume, and some medicinesThe half-life of the reaction with hydroxyl radicals is about 1 day. 7463
[31]
Trichloroethylene-Degreasing operations, In production of plastics, appliances, jewelry, automobile, plumbing fixtures, textiles, paper, glass, In printing industriesThe half-life of the reaction with hydroxyl radicals varies from 1 day to several weeks (decreasing with northern latitudes)6575
[8,126]
1,2-diethylbenzene
1,3-diethylbenzene
1,4-diethylbenzene		Ethylbenzene production (byproducts)Manufacturing naphthalene and some plasticsReact with UV radiation and hydroxyl radicals; the half-lives are estimated to be 1 to 2 days.8657
8864
7734
[127]
2-pentenes, cis- and trans--Specialized solvents in organic synthesis, polymerization inhibitors, manufacture of petroleum resins and amyl alcoholsHalf-life of their reaction with hydroxyl radicals—several hours, with ozone—about one hour5326160
5326161
Nonane
Decane
Undecane
Dodecane		Refining of petroleum, hydrogenation of 1-nonene, isolation of paraffins from petroleum distillates and selective separation by molecular sievesSolvents in organic synthesis, petroleum/jet fuel research, manufacturing paraffin products rubber products, detergents distillation chasersAtmospheric half-life is estimated to be about 2 days.8141
15600
14257
8282
[31,128]
Table
Table 6. Profiling point source A and the traffic background at three stations of increasing distance from the source.
Table 6. Profiling point source A and the traffic background at three stations of increasing distance from the source.
CASVOCStation #60413Station #60418Station #60427
EvaporationsExhaustAConcentrationEvaporationsExhaustAConcentrationEvaporationsExhaustConcentration
109-66-0Pentane-46191.56454952.3554331.74
693-89-01-Methylcyclopentene50-430.021826-0.06---
108-87-2Methylcyclohexane4640210.15841-0.2653370.15
100-41-4Ethylbenzene5160190.543062-0.99-450.64
108-38-3m and p-Xylene7260211.633564-3.0253441.95
111-65-9Octane-33340.132136570.2447400.15
592-27-82-Methylheptane22-270.111549540.2244260.13
589-53-74-Methylheptane--360.041612400.0945250.05
589-81-13-Methylheptane--260.1015-580.2044260.12
638-04-0cis-1,3-Dimethylcyclohexane20-340.06547660.1013320.06
592-13-22,5-Dimethylhexane17-210.052150-0.1051200.07
565-75-32,3,4-Trimethylpentane--220.103323290.2413320.17
111-84-2Nonane1927540.161941-0.4836500.18
98-82-8iso-Propylbenzene436220.0315--0.0750350.04
103-65-1n-Propylbenzene-38-0.101846-0.2347450.13
95-63-61,2,4-Trimethylbenzene3846380.422153-1.14-530.60
108-67-81,3,5-Trimethylbenzene5837470.121744-0.3546500.18
526-73-81,2,3-Trimethylbenzene26-520.111311130.36-510.14
611-14-32-Ethyltoluene11-430.111559-0.2844480.15
620-14-43-Ethyltoluene15-410.252257160.5954450.35
622-96-84-Ethyltoluene13-400.131849190.3153420.18
1120-21-4Undecane5124780.2617--0.5124710.38
112-40-3Dodecane−127760.196−11-0.2511620.22
106-46-71,4-Dichlorobenzene4338-0.08122-0.9340520.20
Table
Table 7. Profiles of point sources B and C detected at station #60413, shown with the traffic profiles “Evaporations” and “Exhaust.”
Table 7. Profiles of point sources B and C detected at station #60413, shown with the traffic profiles “Evaporations” and “Exhaust.”
CASVOCEvaporationsExhaustBCConcentration
75-28-5Isobutane632755−31.76
78-79-5Isoprene−5521240.21
109-66-0Pentane-462221.56
107-83-52-Methylpentane34482370.78
110-82-7Cyclohexane-5016100.12
108-88-3Toluene58864463.62
108-08-72,4-Dimethylpentane41482070.08
591-76-42-Methylhexane3-43130.36
589-34-43-Methylhexane--3580.41
100-42-5Styrene-1744290.24
108-38-3m and p-Xylene726018141.63
56-23-5Carbontetrachloride--2710.59
67-66-3Chloroform-8-1540.10
79-01-6Trichloroethylene301415450.26
127-18-4Tetrachloroethylene21-52300.33
Table
Table 8. Profiles of point sources D and E detected at station #60413, shown with the traffic background.
Table 8. Profiles of point sources D and E detected at station #60413, shown with the traffic background.
CASVOCEvaporationsExhaustDEConcentration
115-07-1Propylene63-36−10.90
78-79-5Isoprene19845120.18
71-43-2Benzene32305731.31
4050-45-7trans-2-hexene33-2030.06
108-88-3Toluene316436106.05
108-08-72,4-himethylpentane36551840.16
100-41-4Ethylbenzene3062-50.99
100-42-5Styrene1722-20.24
108-38-3m and p-xylene35643273.02
111-84-2Nonane194121600.48
98-82-8iso-propylbenzene15-5180.07
103-65-1n-propylbenzene184612260.23
95-63-61,2,4-trimethylbenzene21533501.14
108-67-81,3,5-trimethylbenzene174415370.35
526-73-81,2,3-trimethylbenzene13110670.36
496-11-7Indane19174300.12
611-14-32-ethyltoluene155910420.28
620-14-43-ethyltoluene22575310.59
622-96-84-ethyltoluene18496310.31
99-87-6p-cymene−7-5600.11
124-18-5Decane6-21051.71
105-05-51,4-diethylbenzene11300430.25
135-01-31,2-diethylbenzene−1-7420.04
141-93-51,3-diethylbenzene9-8440.08
15869-94-03,6-dimethyloctane7-−1810.09
104-51-8n-butylbenzene625 480.10
135-98-8sec-butylbenzene2-5780.07
538-93-2iso-butylbenzene2-7590.05
1120-21-4Undecane17-6870.51
112-40-3Dodecane6−1186−20.25
75-00-3Chloroethane2−634240.13
Table
Table 9. Profiles of two industrial sources remotely detected at stations #60418, #60427, and #60429.
Table 9. Profiles of two industrial sources remotely detected at stations #60418, #60427, and #60429.
CASVOC#60418#60427#60429
FConcentrationFGConcentrationGConcentartion
115-07-1Propylene-0.902640.79-0.67
106-99-01,3-Butadiene-0.1623-0.13-0.11
115-11-71-Butene/Isobutene-0.691930.49-0.42
590-18-1cis-2-Butene−60.22-220.14490.13
624-64-6trans-2-Butene−20.25--0.16520.15
78-79-5Isoprene-0.18-350.15-0.13
78-78-4Isopentane-4.14-322.99-2.92
109-66-0Pentane52.3532-1.74-1.97
109-67-11-Pentene200.1732-0.10-0.10
287-92-3Cyclopentane170.286260.18340.19
563-46-22-Methyl-1-butene-0.19-380.16460.15
513-35-92-Methyl-2-butene-0.3714220.17630.16
563-45-13-Methyl-1-butene-0.96-260.04360.04
627-20-3cis-2-Pentene----0.08450.08
646-04-8trans-2-Pentene----0.15520.14
75-83-22,2-Dimethylbutane-0.19-240.13-0.12
79-29-82,3-Dimethylbutane-0.37-220.24-0.22
107-83-52-Methylpentane-1.4544-1.00-0.94
110-82-7Cyclohexane430.2233-0.15-0.15
592-41-61-Hexene-0.1542150.08100.08
108-88-3Toluene196.0538-3.94-4.28
108-08-72,4-Dimethylpentane-0.1642-0.11-0.10
108-38-3m and p-Xylene-3.0240-1.95-1.91
111-65-9Octane570.2424-0.15-0.19
592-27-82-Methylheptane540.22-−100.1330.15
589-53-74-Methylheptane400.09-−100.0540.06
589-81-13-Methylheptane580.20-−110.1210.14
589-43-52,4-Dimethylhexane540.1237−90.0800.07
592-13-22,5-Dimethylhexane-0.10-−300.0750.06
638-04-0cis-1,3-Dimethylcyclohexane660.10--0.0660.08
540-84-12,2,4-Trimethylpentane260.64-160.46120.37
565-75-32,3,4-Trimethylpentane290.24-00.17--
111-84-2Nonane-0.4817-0.18-0.22
108-67-81,3,5-Trimethylbenzene-0.3558-0.18-0.17
526-73-81,2,3-Trimethylbenzene130.365480.1490.13
496-11-7Indane230.124590.07100.06
3522-94-92,2,5-Trimethylhexane220.0525110.03120.03
124-18-5Decane-1.7114−330.35-0.38
141-93-51,3-Diethylbenzene−40.0844−120.04100.04
104-51-8n-Butylbenzene-0.1063-0.04-0.04
112-40-3Dodecane-0.2550-0.22-0.27
75-09-2Dichloromethane231.10-630.84-1.01

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Porada, E.; Szyszkowicz, M. UNMIX Methods Applied to Characterize Sources of Volatile Organic Compounds in Toronto, Ontario. Toxics 2016, 4, 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics4020011

AMA Style

Porada E, Szyszkowicz M. UNMIX Methods Applied to Characterize Sources of Volatile Organic Compounds in Toronto, Ontario. Toxics. 2016; 4(2):11. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics4020011

Chicago/Turabian Style

Porada, Eugeniusz, and Mieczysław Szyszkowicz. 2016. "UNMIX Methods Applied to Characterize Sources of Volatile Organic Compounds in Toronto, Ontario" Toxics 4, no. 2: 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics4020011

APA Style

Porada, E., & Szyszkowicz, M. (2016). UNMIX Methods Applied to Characterize Sources of Volatile Organic Compounds in Toronto, Ontario. Toxics, 4(2), 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics4020011

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop