Next Article in Journal
Mangrove-Associated Fungi: A Novel Source of Potential Anticancer Compounds
Next Article in Special Issue
Sporothrix schenckii Cell Wall Proteins-Stimulated BMDCs Are Able to Induce a Th1-Prone Cytokine Profile In Vitro
Previous Article in Journal
Therapy of Skin, Hair and Nail Fungal Infections
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ecological Determinants of Sporotrichosis Etiological Agents
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JoF
Volume 4
Issue 3
10.3390/jof4030100
jof-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Immunity and Treatment of Sporotrichosis

by
Laura Cristina García Carnero
,
Nancy Edith Lozoya Pérez
,
Sandra Elizabeth González Hernández
and
José Ascención Martínez Álvarez
*
Departamento de Biología, División de Ciencias Naturales y Exactas, Campus Guanajuato, Universidad de Guanajuato, Noria Alta s/n, col. Noria Alta, C.P., Guanajuato Gto. 36050, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2018, 4(3), 100; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof4030100
Submission received: 18 July 2018 / Revised: 18 August 2018 / Accepted: 19 August 2018 / Published: 20 August 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sporothrix and Sporotrichosis)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Species of the Sporothrix complex are the etiological agents of sporotrichosis, an important subcutaneous mycosis with several clinical forms and an increasing incidence around the world that affects humans and other mammals. The immunological mechanisms involved in the prevention and control of this mycosis are not entirely understood. Many reports have suggested that cell-mediated immunity has an essential role in the development of the disease, being the primary response controlling it, while only recent data supports that the humoral response is essential for the appropriate control. This mycosis is a challenge for diagnosis since the culture and isolation of the organism are time-consuming and complicated; reasons that have led to the study of fungus antigenic molecules capable of generating a detectable humoral response. The treatment for this disease includes the use of several antifungal drugs like itraconazole, amphotericin B, caspofungin, fluconazole, and the combination between them among others such as the extract of Vismia guianensis.

1. Sporotrichosis

Sporotrichosis is a fungal infection with a worldwide distribution that is prevalent mainly in tropical and subtropical regions and predominates in South Africa, America (Brazil, Peru, Colombia, Guatemala, Mexico, and the United States), Asia (Japan, China, India) and Oceania, but is rarely found in Europe [1,2]. It presents a wide range of clinical manifestations, from localized to disseminated infections including lymphocutaneous, extracutaneous, and disseminated. A total of 95% of cases are cutaneous lymphatic sporotrichosis, spreading through the lymph nodes affecting mainly the face and upper and lower limbs. The cutaneous fixed form (30% of sporotrichosis cases) occurs by ulcerative or verrucous nodules with well-defined borders, most probably due to the good immune response of the host. The cutaneous disseminated form represents only 8% of cases, and is mainly associated with immunosuppressive processes or diseases such as diabetes, lymphomas, HIV-AIDS, treatments with systemic corticosteroids, and chronic alcoholism [3]. Alternative forms of extracutaneous sporotrichosis have increased in recent years and they involve the lungs, the osteoarticular system, and the central nervous system [2,4,5]. Systemic and disseminated infections are present in immunocompromised individuals, affecting several organs [6]. These clinical manifestations depend on different factors such as the immune response of the host, the virulence of the strain, the amount of inoculum, and the depth of inoculation [7]. In humans, like in other mammals, the route of entry is cutaneous by traumatic injury with contaminated material by the fungus or transmission by bites or scratches from infected animals [8]. Recently, a complex of different species that cause sporotrichosis have been proposed based on molecular and morphological analysis [9,10].

2. Sporothrix schenckii Complex

Species of the Sporothrix complex are thermodimorfic fungi, with a saprophytic phase that grows at 25 °C as a mycelium, and a parasitic phase that grows at 35–37 °C as a “cigar-shaped” yeast-like morphology. The Sporothrix complex show differences in geographic distribution, frequency, ecological niche, and virulence of the members of this genus. Species of this complex have been reported as agents of sporotrichosis in animals and humans and are known as the clinical clade: S. schenckii sensu stricto, Sporothrix brasiliensis, Sporothrix globosa, and Sporothrix luriei, Sporothrix mexicana, Sporothrix pallida (Sporothrix albicans), and Sporothrix chilensis are environmental isolates but can behave as opportunistic pathogens in immunosuppressed individuals [9]. S. schenckii and S. globosa have been isolated from humans, animals, and soils containing cellulose, organic matter, grasses, woods, leaves, and branches, following a route of infection through the contaminated material [9,11,12]. High virulence has been reported in S. brasiliensis, a species associated with zoonotic transmission through scratches or bites from animals infected with this fungus [13]. The virulence level in a murine model has shown that S. brasiliensis is the most virulent species, followed by S. schenckii, and then S. globosa [14]. In Brazil, S. brasiliensis has a high prevalence in cats, and interestingly, the same genotypes were observed in both human and cats [15].
Several molecular methods for the identification of the different Sporothrix species were applied, and these were aimed at different targets such as the protein-coding genes calmodulin (CAL), β-tubulin (Bt2) and chitin-synthase 1 (CHS1), the 18S rDNA, and the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) [1,16] (Table 1) [9,17,18,19,20,21,22]. The DNA data from three different loci (CAL, Bt2, and CHS) of Sporothrix were analyzed and used to group the isolates into six putative cryptic species with a degree of geographical specificity. These results are supported by the suggestion that different species of Sporothrix exist, based on the analysis of the ITS region sequences from clinical and environmental samples [19]. Later on, different Sporothrix strains were characterized and three new species were differentiated based on the CAL sequence, S. globosa, S. brasiliensis, and S. mexicana. The CAL sequence has been reported as the best marker and more phylogenetically informative locus [9], and is now considered as a standard for the molecular identification of Sporothrix [23].

3. Virulence Factors of Sporothrix spp.

The virulence factors related to the Sporothrix schenckii complex are probably related to the clinical manifestations of the mycosis, but are not well known. Some of the reported molecules and mechanisms that act as virulence factors are glycoproteins, secreted proteins, extracellular vesicles, melanin, ergosterol peroxide, and the dimorphism of the fungus [16,24,25,26,27].
Dimorphism is the ability of some fungi to exhibit a phenotypic duality that leads to a cellular differentiation process, which might be related to pathogenicity. A hybrid dimorphism-regulating histidine kinase that may be involved in the dimorphic transition was reported in Sporothrix (SsDRK1). In other dimorphic fungal pathogens, this protein regulates the expression of virulence genes and pathogenicity in vivo [16,26,28]. Thermotolerance is another fundamental virulence factor for the survival of the fungus in the host [29]. Environmental strains of Sporothrix cannot adapt to the temperature of the host body, and therefore cannot produce infection [16]. Melanin, also referred to as “fungal armor”, is an important virulence factor not only for Sporothrix, but also for many pathogenic fungi. This pigment in the cell increases fungal survival in the host, given that it makes the cell more resistant to phagocytosis and killing by macrophages and neutrophils. Both morphologies of Sporothrix are able to produce melanin through the 1,8-dihydroxynaphthalene (DHN) and l-DOPA pathways. In S. brasiliensis, S. schenckii, and S. globosa, a third l-tyrosine (pyomelanin) pathway was observed in the stationary phase of mycelium and yeast [30,31]. This component has been reported to protect from nitrogen derived oxidants and the antifungal Amphotericin B [26,29]. Several vesicle-associated proteins have been reported in Sporothrix. Extracellular cell wall glucanase is a protein transported by vesicles that contributes to the fungal virulence by inducing macrophages and other host cells lysis due to the remodeling of their surface [25]. Superoxide dismutase (SOD), another cell wall protein, contributes to the growth and survival of the pathogen under conditions of oxidative stress, just like inside macrophages, and its presence has been reported in Sporothrix [26]. Certain proteases such as Proteinase I play an essential role in the interaction of this fungus with the host cells, given that it is associated with the ability of Sporothrix to invade the cutaneous tissues [16,32]. Adhesins are an important virulence factor in every pathogenic fungus, in the case of Sporothrix, they are in charge of mediating the binding of yeast to the dermal matrix and to fibronectin. The main adhesin reported during sporotrichosis is a glycoprotein of 70 kDa, known as Gp70. In addition, this protein plays a crucial role in modulating the host immune response, is highly immunogenic, and its detected by all sera of infected mice [33].
All of the factors mentioned earlier are required for Sporothrix virulence and are also used for evasion of the host immune system. The knowledge of these virulence factors opens the possibility of understanding the differences in the virulence that exists between the Sporothrix species, as is the case for 9 out of 60 proteins differentially expressed in S. brasiliensis with respect to S. schenckii: aminopeptidase I, extracellular cell wall glucanase, Mn-superoxide dismutase, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), heat shock 70-kDa protein 1/8, hydroxymethyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) lyase, acetyl-CoA hydrolase, progesterone binding protein, and rhamnolipid biosynthesis 3-oxoacyl-(acyl-carrier-protein) reductase, where all of these are involved in the evasion of the host immune system [25]. Others exoantigens such as secreted proteins of 46, 60, 90, and 110 kDa are commonly secreted by S. schenckii, S. brasiliensis, and S. globosa [34].

4. Host Immune Response

4.1. Cellular Response

As has been mentioned already, the S. schenckii complex is composed of closely related fungi that cause sporotrichosis. These organisms are an interesting model to study the biochemical, genetic, molecular, and physiological basis of cell differentiation and morphogenesis. Differences in terms of the disease evolution have been reported in experimental models of sporotrichosis and in different Sporothrix clinical isolates [35,36]. Moreover, some studies have indicated that the immune response of the host determines the degree of invasion [37]. However, the mechanisms of evasion by the pathogen and control of the infection by the host are not yet clear.
In order for the pathogen-host interaction to be carried out, the fungus needs to overcome the host first defense line, which involves the skin and mucous membranes, as shown in Figure 1. The innate immune response plays a key role in establishing an anti-Sporothrix protective response [38]. Phagocytosis by macrophages and neutrophils as well as the production of reactive oxygen species are mechanisms by which cells of S. schenckii are eliminated [39].
The cell wall (CW) of the pathogen plays a very important role because it contains the main points of contact with the host, which reacts with a mixed Th1/Th17 immune response able to confer resistance through the secretion of cytokines like IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-17A, that activate macrophages and neutrophils for fungal clearance. It has been reported that the CD4+ T cells provide host resistance by the secretion of the previously mentioned cytokines in other fungal infections such as candidiasis, aspergillosis, paracoccidioidomycosis, and coccidioidomycosis. Macrophages can be activated by IFN-β secretion during the Th1 response, considered the most important cytokine in sporotrichosis infection, given that it is able to confer protection by fungal killing. IL-17A is produced by Th17 cells and is involved in the repair and activation of epithelial barriers. Th17 cells are also crucial for the control of natural killer (NK) cells and antifungal defense [40,41,42,43].
The innate immune system allows for the rapid recognition of a broad spectrum of pathogens through the use of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), and an effective immune response depends on macrophages that recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) [44]. Only a few characteristics of the PAMPs from the Sporothrix surface are known, for example, the cell wall lipids that are components with an important role in the pathogenesis of the fungus, which were found to inhibit the phagocytosis process increasing the stimulation of NO and TNF-α [45]. In other pathogens such as P. brasiliensis, the lipid components may play a role in the innate immunity against infection using Toll-dependent and independent mechanisms to control macrophage activation [46].
Other components such as ergosterol peroxide, cell-wall compounds (alkali-insoluble fraction and lipid extract), secreted fungal proteins, and exoantigens have the capacity to activate the innate immune system, produce the activation of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (H2O2 and NO), and also activate the adaptive immune response in order to produce cytokines from the Th1 and Th2 profiles [47,48]. Ergosterol peroxide protects S. schenckii by helping to evade reactive oxygen species (ROS) during phagocytosis [37], a process mediated by macrophages; cells that in addition to secreting enzymes, complement components, coagulation factors, cytokines, ROS, and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) produce a powerful mediator of the inflammation and immune response, nitric oxide (NO). NO participates (in vitro) in S. schenckii destruction by macrophages and, contributes in vivo to the immunosuppression and balance of cytokines in early stages of sporotrichosis [49]. In addition, a role for NO has also been described in infection by Histoplasma capsulatum [50]. Activated bronchoalveolar and peritoneal macrophages kill yeast cells of H. capsulatum by a mechanism dependent on hydrogen peroxide and products of the nitric oxide synthase (NOS) pathway, whereas fungistasis depends only on products of the NOS pathway [50]. In Cryptococcus neoformans, the phenoloxidase enzyme system contributes to protect the fungus against nitrogen and oxygen-derived oxidative antimicrobial molecules produced by immune cells [51]. In Paracoccidioides brasiliensis, it was observed that NO is important for fungus clearance and contributes to the development of the immunosuppression observed during the course of the disease [52].
S. schenckii yeasts are capable of activating the complement, both of the classical and alternative pathways, the latter independently of the presence of antibodies [53,54]. Phagocytosis of conidia, but not yeasts, by macrophages indicates that the two morphologies are recognized by different receptors on the surface of the immune cells [55]. The participation of these receptors in primary immune cells has been analyzed, demonstrating that they are also relevant during the interaction of Sporothrix with the host. The interaction of S. schenckii and S. brasiliensis (conidia, germlings, and yeasts) with human peripheral blood monocyte cells (hPBMCs) is also dependent of TLR2, confirming that this receptor is relevant in both the murine and human response against these pathogens [56]. Animals lacking TLR2 produce lower levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-2, and IL-10, addressing the importance of this receptor during the immune recognition of S. schenckii [55]. In addition, interaction experiments between hPBMCs with Sporothrix demonstrated a decrease of TLR4 participation when compared with the results in a murine model; most likely due to the nature of human and animal immune cells [56]. The participation of the receptors Dectin-1 and mannose receptor (MR) has also been reported [57].
Dectin-1 is a receptor described as relevant for the production of cytokines during the interaction of S. schenckii sensu stricto, and S. brasiliensis with hPBMCs, given that most of the β-1,3 glucans required to trigger Dectin-1 dependent signaling are already accessible on the surface of the cell [56]. The role of MR has been described as of greater importance for the phagocytosis of S. schenckii sensu stricto. It has a minor contribution to the stimulation of cytokines by yeasts and germlings, while the conidia morphotype stimulates the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines via the same receptor [55,56].
After S. schenckii recognition, NLRP3 (nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptor pyrin domain-containing 3), a receptor recently described, plays a critical role in combating this mycosis by mediating the Th response and linking the innate and adaptive immune responses [58].
Several antigenic peptides in the CW of Sporothrix have been described, and these are able to induce (in vitro) proliferation in T cells sensitized with S. brasiliensis. Among them are the ZR3 peptide, which is a sequence of an importin protein, the ZR4 peptide that comes from a hypothetical protein, and the ZR8, which is a peptide of the Gp70 glycoprotein [59]. The mentioned glycoprotein has been reported as the major adhesin in the CW and as the immunodominant molecule in sporotrichosis [60]. ZR3, ZR4, and ZR8 all induce high cell proliferation, but only ZR3 is able to induce the systemic production of high levels of IL-17A and IFN-γ. However, ZR8 is able to promote higher levels of IFN-γ, IL-17A, IFN-β, and IL-1β with a higher number of neutrophils in the lesions, and increases CD4+ T cells in the lymph nodes (with increased levels of IFN-β) and spleen with a higher number of neutrophils in the lesions, suggesting a Th1/Th17 immune response profile [59]. It is well known that the main mechanism for antibody protection is opsonization of the pathogen by the Fc gamma receptor (FcγR) [61]. This receptor mediates several macrophage functions such as the stimulation of cytokine secretion and activation of the respiratory burst. It was observed that when Sporothrix is phagocytosed in the presence of Ab against the Gp70 glycoprotein, the macrophages’ fungicidal ability is increased, with higher levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 [61].

4.2. Humoral Response

In the past and for a long time, cell-mediated immunity was considered to be the fundamental mechanism of the host response against pathogenic fungi, and the protective role of humoral immunity was poorly understood. Recently, the participation of antibodies in host defense against fungal infection has been described and includes several mechanisms: agglutination of fungal cells, opsonization and enhancement of phagocytosis, inhibition of fungal cells attachment, complement activation and mediated lysis, neutralization of immunoregulatory molecules, Fc-mediated cytokine release, and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) [62,63]. However, antibodies that do not confer protection or that even enhance the infection can be generated [64,65]. In addition, there are several factors that can affect the function of these antibodies such as isotype and concentration [64,66].
Despite the progress in the knowledge of the humoral response against pathogenic fungi, little is known about the antibody-mediated response against clinically relevant Sporothrix species [65,66], but it appears to participate in the induction of partially protective immunity and control of sporotrichosis in experimentally infected mice [64,65]. Cellular and humoral immune responses are important to achieve a protective state. The Th2 response is characterized by the presence of IL-4 and IL-13, which triggers T cell differentiation into the Th2 lineage with a decrease of the Th1 response and an increase of antibody production [7,32,67,68].
Due to its location, composition, and immunogenicity, the Sporothrix cell wall represents the major structure involved in the host–parasite interplay [65,68], and several cell wall proteins and secretory molecules expressed during infection have been reported as highly immunogenic and able to induce a protective response (Figure 1) [62,65].
A 2D-immunoblotting analysis was used for the identification of some antigenic proteins from the CW. With antibodies raised against the whole cell, two major immunogenic antigens were detected in the yeast morphology: the 60 and 70 kDa proteins. On the other hand, five major antigens were detected in the mycelial morphology of 48, 55, 66, 67, and 70 kDa. The 70 kDa protein, believed to be Gp70, was the main antigenic molecule present in both morphologies [69]. In addition, the antibodies against these antigenic components were accompanied with the production of cytokines characteristic of the Th1 and Th2 responses, high levels of IFN-γ and TNF-α, and an increased phagocytic index [63,66,70].
The antibody production that might be involved in the humoral response in experimental sporotrichosis in mice has been evaluated. The progress of the infection was monitored by organ culture, which revealed that fungal load increased in the first week post infection and decreased 14 days after infection. The higher fungal load at the initial phase of the infection suggests that resistance to S. schenckii does not depend on the capacity of the host to eliminate the pathogen, but instead is dependent on an acquired immunity developed with time. IgG antibodies against Gp70 or against soluble antigens were detected with a high concentration 14 days after infection and was maintained during the whole process. Isotyping of these antibodies showed the presence of IgG1 and IgG3, which could explain an important mechanism for antigen neutralization, since IgG1 and IgG3 are involved in opsonization and neutralization of Sporothrix yeasts by increasing macrophage efficiency, and therefore, decreasing colony forming units (CFUs) in organs [71]. These results might suggest that specific antibodies against this molecule participate in the control of the mycosis. With the production of the monoclonal antibody IgG1 against Gp70 (mAb P6E7) it was demonstrated that a protective response against experimental sporotrichosis could be established as shown in Figure 1, since mice passively immunized with the antibody (before, during, and after infection) had a significant reduction of fungal load in the spleen and liver, and it did not develop more severe forms of the disease [63,66,70]. The same response was observed in T-cell deficient mice (nude), given that the antibodies were able to control the infection in the absence of a T-cell response most likely through two mechanisms: an increase of the cell-mediated immunity and IFN-γ production; and/or inhibition of the yeast adhesion to the host tissue and extracellular matrix by the antibodies [32,70]. In addition, the fungicidal ability of macrophages is increased when the fungus is phagocytosed in the presence of mAb P6E7 or immune inactivated serum, with the observation that macrophages need at least 72 h to efficiently kill the yeast. This former mechanism was more evident in the case of mAb, indicating that the activation of macrophages by P6E7-opsonized yeast is late when compared with the immune serum-opsonized yeast, and therefore other factors in the immune serum, apart from anti-Gp70 antibodies, could participate in macrophage activation. Pro-inflammatory cytokines were analyzed, and the results showed a high production of TNF-α and IL-1β when the fungus was opsonized by the serum or mAb P6E7. With these results, it can be speculated that antibody-mediated phagocytosis may be essential for macrophage killing and production of TNF-α, and therefore the control of sporotrichosis [61].
The presence of IgG, IgM, and IgA antibody isotypes against Sporothrix mycelial exoantigens in serum from patients has also been described during sporotrichosis. These antibodies remained detectable during the treatment of the disease in most of the patients, but decreased over treatment time. It is important to mention that during treatment, the antibody levels differed depending on the clinical form; lower optical density (OD) values for IgM and IgA were detected with the fixed cutaneous and lymphocutaneous forms while no difference was observed in patients with disseminated cutaneous and extracutaneous forms [64]. This could be explained by the fungal load; in more severe cases, a higher fungal burden leads to continuous antigen presentation and therefore continuous antibody production. The presence of these antibodies during sporotrichosis has an important role in the pathogenesis of the disease since IgM has been shown to activate the complement by the classical pathway, and IgA participates in the case of mucosal involvement [64].
It has been previously reported that a specific immune response and resistance to infection can be developed after a previous infection or active immunization with Sporothrix cell wall proteins (CWP) or whole cells [62]. After immunization, antibodies against several fungal antigens can be detected, with Gp70 the best characterized [67]. Based on this, a vaccine using CWP was developed and tested in a mouse model. Immunization with aluminum hydroxide-adsorbed S. schenckii cell wall protein (AH + CWP100) induced specific IgG1 and IgG2a antibodies against CWP. IgG2 participates in several mechanisms including complement fixation and binding to Fcγ receptors to stimulate phagocytosis and ADCC in mice [62].
There is a lack of information about feline sporotrichosis and the antigenic molecules involved in the mycosis. Therefore, the antigens expressed, either by S. schenckii or S. brasiliensis, recognized by sera from cats naturally infected were detected. Cross-reactivity between the two species was found, recognizing the same antigens also identified by the human IgG response. The main molecules recognized by cats’ antibodies are Gp60 and Gp70 from S. brasiliensis and S. schenckii, respectively. No association between the severity and distribution of the lesions and the number or type of antigens recognized by the sera was found [72].
The antibody-mediated immunity was considered to be irrelevant in the host defense against Sporothrix, but experimental methods have been able to establish a fundamental role for humoral response in the prevention, control, and treatment of sporotrichosis.

5. Treatment

Sporotrichosis treatment depends on several factors including the clinical manifestation, the immune status of the host, and the causal species of Sporothrix. In antifungal susceptibility testing, the species from the Sporothrix complex respond differently to antifungals. Some reports of in vitro activity of antifungal agents against Sporothrix spp. have been evaluated, but the same effect has not always been observed in vivo, and only a few studies have correlated the therapeutic response and the susceptibility generated in vitro. It has been suggested that a combination of different antifungals could generate a favorable response [73]. In 2017, some of the antifungal agents were classified based on the susceptibility observed in species of the complex (Table 2). Potassium iodide and/or itraconazole (ITC) are the initial treatment for fixed cutaneous and lymphocutaneous sporotrichosis. It has been reported that terbinafine has activity against S. schenckii sensu stricto [74], and is considered as the second-line treatment for lymphocutaneous and cutaneous sporotrichosis. Amphotericin B is used in the disseminated, systemic, pulmonary, and osteoarticular forms [75]. A study of the activity in vitro against S. brasiliensis showed that recently isolated species between 2011 to 2012 had greater resistance to amphotericin B and ITC when compared with old isolates from 2004; the same was observed in 34% of recent isolates for posaconazole. Although terbinafine has been suggested as a potent antifungal against S. brasiliensis, more studies are needed [76].
Due to the differences in the antifungal susceptibility between species, the long period of time for the treatment, the high cost, and the collateral effects in the host, among other reasons, alternative therapies are required to treat infections by Sporothrix spp. Although ITC is the first choice to treat sporotrichosis [7], other drugs and the combination of these have been used to eradicate the fungus. Diphenyl diselenide (PhSe)2, alone or in combination with ITC, has demonstrated an efficient in vitro activity against S. brasiliensis [77], which is quite convenient given that (PhSe)2 shows less toxicity for mammal cells [78]. A case of canine sporotrichosis caused by S. brasiliensis was successfully cured using a combination of ITC plus β-1,3 glucan, the last one used as an immunomodulator [79]. Another compound used to treat sporotrichosis caused by S. schenckii ATCC 16345 was the ethanolic extract of Vismia guianensis, a tropical plant. The combination of the extracts plus ITC reduced the fungal load in the spleen of male Balb/c mice [80].
Regarding other treatment options, an in vitro assay based on photodynamic inactivation that produces ROS has been proven to be effective because it was demonstrated that it provokes a growth inhibition of the Sporothrix complex members, as was seen in conidia irradiated with laser light (energy dose of 28 J/cm2) in combination with different doses of methylene blue (0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 μg/mL). The species evaluated were S. schenckii sensu stricto, S. albicans, S. brasiliensis, S. globosa, and S. mexicana. This offers an alternative treatment to sporotrichosis, especially when caused by resistant-strains to antifungals. There is a report of a successful clinical case of a 65-year-old patient suffering recalcitrant cutaneous sporotrichosis, treated by the application of phototherapy (37 J/cm2 using the Aktilite lamp) with the administration of 1% methylene blue in the lesion, and in combination with low and intermittent doses of ITC, that allowed the clinical cure [81]. However, in vivo studies are required to demonstrate the effectiveness of this treatment [82].
As mentioned before, melanin, an important cell wall component for Sporothrix virulence, is another target to eliminate the fungus since the inhibition of the synthesis pathways of this component by tricyclazole increases the susceptibility of S. brasiliensis and S. schenckii against terbinafine; showing an alternative for the design of new antifungals that interfere in the synthesis of melanin, which can be applied as a combination therapy with other drugs [83]. In addition, S. schenckii, S. brasiliensis, S. globosa, and S. mexicana have the ability to produce a strong in vitro biofilm, which has sensitivity to amphotericin B and caspofungin [84].
There are studies focused on the generation of vaccines as antifungal therapies for sporotrichosis. In recent years, the participation of proteins present in the Sporothrix cell wall able to generate an immune response by the host that could be an alternative to obtain an immunoprotective effect has been evaluated. As mention previously, the monoclonal antibody against cell wall Gp70 glycoprotein has been used as a therapeutic vaccine in mice infected with highly virulent strains of S. schenckii and S. brasiliensis, obtaining a decrease in the fungal burden on the analyzed organs [63].
Recently, the immunoprotective effect of a recombinant phage with a peptide epitope (KPVQHALLTPLGLDR) of the Gp70 glycoprotein was demonstrated in mice infected with S. globosa, inducing a favorable cellular and humoral response for the control of the infection [85]. Finally, regarding the same alternative, the synthesized peptide from Gp70 glycoprotein (LKFLALASVISATSA) called ZR8 as mentioned previously, could be a candidate for vaccines against subcutaneous sporotrichosis. The peptide promotes increased CD4+ T cells and higher levels of cytokines (IFN-γ, IL-17A, and IL-1β) in mice infected with the yeast cells of S. brasiliensis. These recent advances are a new strategy for a possible vaccine for the treatment of sporotrichosis [59].

6. Conclusions

Over the last few years, significant progress has been made on the knowledge and understanding of the host immune interaction with the pathogenic species of Sporothrix. Much of the immune response during sporotrichosis is still undiscovered, but many virulence factors and PAMPs of the fungus are already known, information that has helped us to control the infection thus far. However, recent reports of hypervirulent strains prove the emergent importance of this fungus. The study of several immunogenic antigens, molecules, and the mechanism of the host immune cells can provide further development of new diagnostic tools, treatment protocols, and prevention strategies.

Author Contributions

All the authors collaborated equally in the preparation, analysis, writing, and revision of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received funding from the Universidad de Guanajuato.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the working team of the Fungi Physiology Laboratory of the Department of Biology of the University of Guanajuato, especially Patricia Ponce Noyola and Alberto Flores Martínez.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bonifaz, A.; Vázquez-González, D. Diagnosis and treatment of lymphocutaneous sporotrichosis: What are the options? Curr. Fungal Infect. Rep. 2013, 7, 252–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chakrabarti, A.; Bonifaz, A.; Gutierrez-Galhardo, M.C.; Mochizuki, T.; Li, S. Global epidemiology of sporotrichosis. Med. Mycol. 2014, 53, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Fonseca-Reyes, S.; López Maldonado, F.J.; Miranda-Ackerman, R.C.; Vélez-Gómez, E.; Álvarez-Iñiguez, P.; Velarde-Rivera, F.A.; Ascensio-Esparza, E.P. Extracutaneous sporotrichosis in a patient with liver cirrhosis. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2007, 24, 41–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ramírez, F.A.; Herrera, A.V.; Bahena, M.T.; Barrera, A.A.; Cedillos, C.A.M.; Bonifaz, A. Caso clínico Esporotricosis cutánea fija en un adolescente causada por. Dermatol. Rev. Mex. 2010, 54, 295–299. [Google Scholar]
  5. Takenaka, M.; Yoshizaki, A.; Utani, A.; Nishimoto, K. A survey of 165 sporotrichosis cases examined in Nagasaki prefecture from 1951 to 2012. Mycoses 2014, 57, 294–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Callens, S.F.J.; Kitetele, F.; Lukun, P.; Lelo, P.; Van Rie, A.; Behets, F.; Colebunders, R. Pulmonary Sporothrix schenckii infection in a HIV positive child. J. Trop. Pediatr. 2006, 52, 144–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Barros, M.B.D.L.; de Almeida Paes, R.; Schubach, A.O. Sporothrix schenckii and Sporotrichosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2011, 24, 633–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Bonifaz, A.; Tirado-Sánchez, A. Cutaneous Disseminated and Extracutaneous Sporotrichosis: Current Status of a Complex Disease. J. Fungi 2017, 3, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Marimon, R.; Cano, J.; Gené, J.; Sutton, D.A.; Kawasaki, M.; Guarro, J. Sporothrix brasiliensis, S. globosa, and S. mexicana, three new Sporothrix species of clinical interest. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2007, 45, 3198–3206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Oliveira, M.M.E.; Santos, C.; Sampaio, P.; Romeo, O.; Almeida-Paes, R.; Pais, C.; Lima, N.; Zancopé-Oliveira, R.M. Development and optimization of a new MALDI-TOF protocol for identification of the Sporothrix species complex. Res. Microbiol. 2015, 166, 102–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Lopes-bezerra, L.M.; Schubach, A.; Costa, R.O. Sporothrix schenckii. An. Acad. Bras. Cienc. 2006, 78, 293–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Oliveira, M.M.E.; Almeida-Paes, R.; Gutierrez-Galhardo, M.C.; Zancope-Oliveira, R.M. Molecular identification of the Sporothrix schenckii complex. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2014, 31, 2–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Almeida-Paes, R.; de Oliveira, M.M.E.; Freitas, D.F.S.; do Valle, A.C.F.; Zancopé-Oliveira, R.M.; Gutierrez-Galhardo, M.C. Sporotrichosis in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Sporothrix brasiliensis Is Associated with Atypical Clinical Presentations. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2014, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Arrillaga-Moncrieff, I.; Capilla, J.; Mayayo, E.; Marimon, R.; Mariné, M.; Gené, J.; Cano, J.; Guarro, J. Different virulence levels of the species of Sporothrix in a murine model. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2009, 15, 651–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Rodrigues, A.M.; de Melo Teixeira, M.; de Hoog, G.S.; Schubach, T.M.P.; Pereira, S.A.; Fernandes, G.F.; Bezerra, L.M.L.; Felipe, M.S.; de Camargo, Z.P. Phylogenetic analysis reveals a high prevalence of Sporothrix brasiliensis in feline sporotrichosis outbreaks. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2013, 7, e2281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Carlos, I.Z. Sporotrichosis: New Developments and Future Prospects; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 1–185. ISBN 9783319119113. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kano, R.; Nakamura, Y.; Watanabe, S.; Tsujimoto, H.; Hasegawa, A.; Chitinsynthase, O. Identi® cation of Sporothrix schenckii based on sequences of the chitin synthase 1 gene Identi® zierung von Sporothrix schenckii mittels Sequenzierung des. Mycoses 2001, 265, 261–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hu, S.; Chung, W.H.; Hung, S.I.; Ho, H.C.; Wang, Z.W.; Chen, C.H.; Lu, S.C.; Kuo, T.T.; Hong, H.S. Detection of Sporothrix schenckii in Clinical Samples by a Nested PCR Assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003, 41, 1414–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Marimon, R.; Gené, J.; Cano, J.; Trilles, L.; Dos Santos Lazéra, M.; Guarro, J. Molecular phylogeny of Sporothrix schenckii. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2006, 44, 3251–3256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. De Oliveira, M.M.E.; Sampaio, P.; Almeida-Paes, R.; Pais, C.; Gutierrez-Galhardo, M.C.; Zancope-Oliveira, R.M. Rapid identification of Sporothrix species by T3B fingerprinting. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2012, 50, 2159–2162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Rodrigues, A.M.; Najafzadeh, M.J.; De Hoog, G.S.; De Camargo, Z.P. Rapid identification of emerging human-pathogenic Sporothrix species with rolling circle amplification. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. De Beer, Z.W.; Harrington, T.C.; Vismer, H.F.; Wingfield, B.D.; Wingfield, M.J. Phylogeny of the Ophiostoma stenoceras-Sporothrix schenckii complex. Mycologia 2003, 95, 434–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Rudramurthy, S.M.; Chakrabarti, A. Sporotrichosis: Update on Diagnostic Techniques. Curr. Fungal Infect. Rep. 2017, 11, 134–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Almeida-paes, R.; Marques, M.; Oliveira, E. De Sporotrichosis; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 25–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rossato, L.; Moreno, F.; Jamalian, A.; Stielow, B.; Almeida, R.; de Hoog, S.; Freeke, J. Proteins Potentially Involved in Immune Evasion Strategies in Sporothrix brasiliensis Elucidated by Ultra-High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry. mSphere 2018, 3, e00514-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Téllez, M.D.; Batista-Duharte, A.; Portuondo, D.; Quinello, C.; Bonne-Hernández, R.; Carlos, I.Z. Sporothrix schenckii complex biology: Environment and fungal pathogenicity. Microbiology 2014, 160, 2352–2365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Ruiz-Baca, E.; Toriello, C.; Perez-Torres, A.; Sabanero-Lopez, M.; Villagomez-Castro, J.C.; Lopez-Romero, E. Isolation and some properties of a glycoprotein of 70 kDa (Gp70) from the cell wall of Sporothrix schenckii involved in fungal adherence to dermal extracellular matrix. Med. Mycol. 2009, 47, 185–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. López-Romero, E.; Reyes-Montes, M.; Pérez-Torres, A.; Ruiz-Baca, E.; Villagómez-Castro, J.C.; Mora-Montes, H.M.; Flores-Carreón, A.; Toriello, C. Sporothrix schenckii complex and sporotrichosis, an emerging health problem. Future Microbiol. 2011, 6, 85–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Almeida-Paes, R.; de Oliveira, L.C.; Oliveira, M.M.E.; Gutierrez-Galhardo, M.C.; Nosanchuk, J.D.; Zancopé-Oliveira, R.M. Phenotypic Characteristics Associated with Virulence of Clinical Isolates from the Sporothrix Complex. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Romero-Martinez, R.; Wheeler, M.; Guerrero-Plata, A.; Rico, G.; Torres-Guerrero, H. Biosynthesis and functions of melanin in Sporothrix schenckii. Infect. Immun. 2000, 68, 3696–3703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Teixeira, P.A.C.; De Castro, R.A.; Ferreira, F.R.L.; Cunha, M.M.L.; Torres, A.P.; Penha, C.V.L.Y.; Rozental, S.; Lopes-Bezerra, L.M. L-DOPA accessibility in culture medium increases melanin expression and virulence of Sporothrix schenckii yeast cells. Med. Mycol. 2010, 48, 687–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Alba-Fierro, C.A.; Pérez-Torres, A.; Toriello, C.; Romo-Lozano, Y.; López-Romero, E.; Ruiz-Baca, E. Molecular Components of the Sporothrix schenckii Complex that Induce Immune Response. Curr. Microbiol. 2016, 73, 292–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Castro, R.A.; Kubitschek-Barreira, P.H.; Teixeira, P.A.C.; Sanches, G.F.; Teixeira, M.M.; Quintella, L.P.; Almeida, S.R.; Costa, R.O.; Camargo, Z.P.; Felipe, M.S.S.; et al. Differences in Cell Morphometry, Cell Wall Topography and Gp70 Expression Correlate with the Virulence of Sporothrix brasiliensis Clinical Isolates. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e75656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Fernandes, G.F.; dos Santos, P.O.; Rodrigues, A.M.; Sasaki, A.A.; Burger, E.; de Camargo, Z.P. Characterization of virulence profile, protein secretion and immunogenicity of different Sporothrix schenckii sensu stricto isolates compared with S. globosa and S. brasiliensis species. Virulence 2013, 4, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Brito, M.M.S.; Conceição-Silva, F.; Morgado, F.N.; Raibolt, P.S.; Schubach, A.; Schubach, T.P.; Schäffer, G.M.V.; Borba, C.M. Comparison of virulence of different Sporothrix schenckii clinical isolates using experimental murine model. Med. Mycol. 2007, 45, 721–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Nobre, M.D.O.; Antunes, T.D.Á.; De Faria, R.O.; Cleff, M.B.; Fernandes, C.G.; Muschner, A.C.; Meireles, M.C.A.; Ferreiro, L. Differences in virulence between isolates of feline Sporotrichosis. Mycopathologia 2005, 160, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Carlos, I.Z.; Sassá, M.F.; Da Graça Sgarbi, D.B.; Placeres, M.C.P.; Maia, D.C.G. Current research on the immune response to experimental sporotrichosis. Mycopathologia 2009, 168, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Martínez-Álvarez, J.A.; Pérez-García, L.A.; Flores-Carreón, A.; Mora-Montes, H.M. The immune response against Candida spp. and Sporothrix schenckii. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2014, 31, 62–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Mora-Montes, H.M.; da Silva Dantas, A.; Trujillo-Esquivel, E.; de Souza Baptista, A.R.; Lopes-Bezerra, L.M. Current progress in the biology of members of the Sporothrix schenckii complex following the genomic era. FEMS Yeast Res. 2015, 15, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Kajiwara, H.; Saito, M.; Ohga, S.; Kajiwara, H.; Saito, M.; Ohga, S.; Uenotsuchi, T. Impaired Host Defense against Sporothrix schenckii in Mice with Chronic Granulomatous Disease Impaired Host Defense against Sporothrix schenckii in Mice with Chronic Granulomatous Disease. Infect. Immun. 2004, 72, 5073–5079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Bozza, S.; Gaziano, R.; Spreca, A.; Bacci, A.; Montagnoli, C.; di Francesco, P.; Romani, L. Dendritic cells transport conidia and hyphae of Aspergillus fumigatus from the airways to the draining lymph nodes and initiate disparate Th responses to the fungus. J. Immunol. 2002, 168, 1362–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Horwath, M.C.; Fecher, R.A.; Deepe, G. Histoplasma capsulatum, lung infection and immunity. Future Microbiol. 2016, 967–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Uenotsuchi, T.; Takeuchi, S.; Matsuda, T.; Urabe, K.; Koga, T.; Uchi, H.; Nakahara, T.; Fukagawa, S.; Kawasaki, M.; Kajiwara, H.; et al. Differential induction of Th1-prone immunity by human dendritic cells activated with Sporothrix schenckii of cutaneous and visceral origins to determine their different virulence. Int. Immunol. 2006, 18, 1637–1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Janeway, C.A.; Medzhitov, R. Innate Immune Recognition. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2002, 20, 197–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Carlos, I.Z.; Sgarbi, D.B.G.; Santos, G.C.; Placeres, M.C.P. Sporothrix schenckii lipid inhibits macrophage phagocytosis: Involvement of nitric oxide and tumour necrosis factor-alpha. Scand. J. Immunol. 2003, 57, 214–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Loures, F.V.; Stroeder, H.; Almeida, I.; Calich, V.L.G. Paracoccidioides brasiliensis lipids modulate macrophage activity via Toll-dependent or independent mechanisms. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 2012, 66, 58–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Da Graça Sgarbi, D.B.; Da Silva, A.J.R.; Carlos, I.Z.; Silva, C.L.; Angluster, J.; Alviano, C.S. Isolation of ergosterol peroxide and its reversion to ergosterol in the pathogenic fungus Sporothrix schenckii. Mycopathologia 1997, 139, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Remer, K.A.; Brcic, M.; Jungi, T.W. Toll-like receptor-4 is involved in eliciting an LPS-induced oxidative burst in neutrophils. Immunol. Lett. 2003, 85, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fernandes, K.S.S.; Neto, E.H.; Brito, M.M.S.; Silva, J.S.; Cunha, F.Q.; Barja-Fidalgo, C. Detrimental role of endogenous nitric oxide in host defence against Sporothrix schenckii. Immunology 2008, 123, 469–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Brummer, E.; Division, D.A. Antifungal mechanisms of activated murine bronchoalveolar or peritoneal macrophages for Histoplasma capsulatum. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 1995, 102, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Wang, Y.; Casadevall, A. Susceptibility of melanized and nonmelanized Cryptococcus neoformans to nitrogen- and oxygen-derived oxidants. Infect. Immun. 1994, 62, 3004–3007. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  52. Bocca, L.; Hayashi, E.E.; Pinheiro, G.; Furlanetto, B.; Campanelli, P.; Cunha, F.Q.; Figueiredo, F. Treatment of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis-infected mice with a nitric oxide inhibitor prevents the failure of cell-mediated immune response. J. Immunol. 1998, 161, 3056–3063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Scott, E.N.; Muchmore, H.G.; Fine, D.P. Activation of the alternative complement pathway by Sporothrix schenckii. Infect. Immun. 1986, 51, 6–9. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  54. Torinuki, W.; Tagami, H. Complement activation by Sporothrix schenckii. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 1985, 277, 332–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Guzman-Beltran, S.; Perez-Torres, A.; Coronel-Cruz, C.; Torres-Guerrero, H. Phagocytic receptors on macrophages distinguish between different Sporothrix schenckii morphotypes. Microbes Infect. 2012, 14, 1093–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Martínez-álvarez, J.A.; Pérez-García, L.A.; Mellado-Mojica, E.; López, M.G.; Martínez-Duncker, I.; Lópes-Bezerra, L.M.; Mora-Montes, H.M. Sporothrix schenckii sensu stricto and Sporothrix brasiliensis are differentially recognized by human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Sassá, M.F.; Saturi, A.E.T.; Souza, L.F.; Ribeiro, L.C.D.A.; Sgarbi, D.B.D.G.; Carlos, I.Z. Response of macrophage Toll-like receptor 4 to a Sporothrix schenckii lipid extract during experimental sporotrichosis. Immunology 2009, 128, 301–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Gonçalves, A.C.; Ferreira, L.S.; Manente, F.A.; de Faria, C.M.Q.G.; Polesi, M.C.; de Andrade, C.R.; Zamboni, D.S.; Carlos, I.Z. The NLRP3 inflammasome contributes to host protection during Sporothrix schenckii infection. Immunology 2017, 151, 154–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. De Almeida, J.R.F.; Jannuzzi, G.P.; Kaihami, G.H.; Breda, L.C.D.; Ferreira, K.S.; De Almeida, S.R. An immunoproteomic approach revealing peptides from Sporothrix brasiliensis that induce a cellular immune response in subcutaneous sporotrichosis. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 4192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Ruiz-baca, E.; Villagómez-castro, J.C.; Mora-montes, H.M. Sporothrix schenckii complex and sporotrichosis, an emerging health problem. Future Microbiol. 2011, 6, 85–102. [Google Scholar]
  61. De Lima Franco, D.; Nascimento, R.C.; Ferreira, K.S.; Almeida, S.R. Antibodies against Sporothrix schenckii enhance TNF-α production and killing by macrophages. Scand. J. Immunol. 2012, 75, 142–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Portuondo, D.; Batista-Duharte, A.; Ferreira, L.S.; Martínez, D.T.; Polesi, M.C.; Duarte, R.A.; de Paula E Silva, A.C.; Marcos, C.M.; Almeida, A.M.; Carlos, I.Z. A cell wall protein-based vaccine candidate induce protective immune response against Sporothrix schenckii infection. Immunobiology 2016, 221, 300–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. De Almeida, J.R.F.; Kaihami, G.H.; Jannuzzi, G.P.; De Almeida, S.R. Therapeutic vaccine using a monoclonal antibody against a 70-kDa glycoprotein in mice infected with highly virulent Sporothrix schenckii and Sporothrix brasiliensis. Med. Mycol. 2014, 53, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Almeida-Paes, R.; Pimenta, M.A.; Monteiro, P.C.F.; Nosanchuk, J.D.; Zancopé-Oliveira, R.M. Immunoglobulins G, M, and A against Sporothrix schenckii exoantigens in patients with sporotrichosis before and during treatment with itraconazole. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2007, 14, 1149–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Rodrigues, A.M.; Kubitschek-Barreira, P.H.; Fernandes, G.F.; de Almeida, S.R.; Lopes-Bezerra, L.M.; de Camargo, Z.P. Immunoproteomic analysis reveals a convergent humoral response signature in the Sporothrix schenckii complex. J. Proteom. 2015, 115, 8–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Almeida, S.R. Therapeutic monoclonal antibody for sporotrichosis. Front. Microbiol. 2012, 3, 2010–2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Lopes-Bezerra, L.M.; Mora-Montes, H.M.; Zhang, Y.; Nino-Vega, G.; Rodrigues, A.M.; De Camargo, Z.P.; De Hoog, S. Sporotrichosis between 1898 and 2017: The evolution of knowledge on a changeable disease and on emerging etiological agents. Med. Mycol. 2018, 56, S126–S143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Alba-fierro, C.A.; Pérez-torres, A.; López-romero, E.; Cuéllar-cruz, M.; Ruiz-baca, E. Revista Iberoamericana de Micología Cell wall proteins of Sporothrix schenckii as immunoprotective agents. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2014, 31, 86–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Ruiz-Baca, E.; Mora-Montes, H.M.; López-Romero, E.; Toriello, C.; Mojica-Marín, V.; Urtiz-Estrada, N. 2D-immunoblotting analysis of Sporothrix schenckii cell wall. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2011, 106, 248–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Nascimento, R.C.; Espíndola, N.M.; Castro, R.A.; Teixeira, P.A.C.; Penha, C.V.L.; Lopes-Bezerra, L.M.; Almeida, S.R. Passive immunization with monoclonal antibody against a 70-kDa putative adhesin of Sporothrix schenckii induces protection in murine sporotrichosis. Eur. J. Immunol. 2008, 38, 3080–3089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Nascimento, R.C.; Almeida, S.R. Humoral immune response against soluble and fractionate antigens in experimental sporotrichosis. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 241–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Rodrigues, A.M.; Fernandes, G.F.; Araujo, L.M.; Della Terra, P.P.; dos Santos, P.O.; Pereira, S.A.; Schubach, T.M.P.; Burger, E.; Lopes-Bezerra, L.M.; de Camargo, Z.P. Proteomics-based characterization of the humoral immune response in sporotrichosis: Toward discovery of potential diagnostic and vaccine antigens. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2015, 9, e0004016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Ottonelli Stopiglia, C.D.; Magagnin, C.M.; Castrillón, M.R.; Mendes, S.D.C.; Heidrich, D.; Valente, P.; Scroferneker, M.L. Antifungal susceptibilities and identification of species of the Sporothrix schenckii complex isolated in Brazil. Med. Mycol. 2014, 52, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Meinerz, A.R.M.; Nascente, P.D.S.; Schuch, L.F.D.; Cleff, M.B.; Santin, R.; Brum, C.D.S.; Nobre, M.D.O.; Meireles, M.C.A.; Mello, J.R.D.B. Suscetibilidade in vitro de isolados de Sporothrix schenckii frente à terbinafina e itraconazol. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2007, 40, 60–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Kauffman, C.A.; Bustamante, B.; Chapman, S.W.; Pappas, P.G. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Sporotrichosis: 2007 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2007, 45, 1255–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Borba-Santos, L.P.; Rodrigues, A.M.; Gagini, T.B.; Fernandes, G.F.; Castro, R.; De Camargo, Z.P.; Nucci, M.; Lopes-Bezerra, L.M.; Ishida, K.; Rozental, S. Susceptibility of Sporothrix brasiliensis isolates to amphotericin B, azoles, and terbinafine. Med. Mycol. 2015, 53, 178–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Poester, V.R.; Mattei, A.S.; Mendes, J.F.; Klafke, G.B.; Ramis, I.B.; Sanchotene, K.O.; Xavier, M.O. Antifungal activity of diphenyl diselenide alone and in combination with itraconazole against Sporothrix brasiliensis. Med. Mycol. 2018, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. De Bem, A.F.; Portella, R.D.L.; Farina, M.; Perottoni, J.; Paixão, M.W.; Nogueira, C.W.; Rocha, J.B.T. Low toxicity of diphenyl diselenide in rabbits: A long-term study. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2007, 101, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Guterres, K.A.; de Matos, C.B.; Da Gama Osório, L.; Schuch, I.D.; Cleff, M.B. The Use of (1–3) β-Glucan Along with Itraconazole Against Canine Refractory Sporotrichosis. Mycopathologia 2014, 177, 217–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Oliveira, A.H.; de Oliveira, G.G.; Carnevale Neto, F.; Portuondo, D.F.; Batista-Duharte, A.; Carlos, I.Z. Anti-inflammatory activity of Vismia guianensis (Aubl.) Pers. extracts and antifungal activity against Sporothrix schenckii. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2017, 195, 266–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Gilaberte, Y.; Aspiroz, C.; Alejandre, M.C.; Andres-Ciriano, E.; Fortuño, B.; Charlez, L.; Revillo, M.J.; Hamblin, M.R.; Rezusta, A. Cutaneous Sporotrichosis Treated with Photodynamic Therapy: An in Vitro and in Vivo Study. Photomed. Laser Surg. 2014, 32, 54–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Mario, D.A.N.; Denardi, L.B.; Pereira, D.I.B.; Santurio, J.M.; Alves, S.H. In vitro photodynamic inactivation of Sporothrix schenckii complex species. Med. Mycol. 2014, 52, 770–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Almeida-Paes, R.; Figueiredo-Carvalho, M.H.G.; Brito-Santos, F.; Almeida-Silva, F.; Oliveira, M.M.E.; Zancopé-Oliveira, R.M. Melanins protect Sporothrix brasiliensis and Sporothrix schenckii from the antifungal effects of terbinafine. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0152796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Brilhante, R.S.N.; De Aguiar, F.R.M.; Da Silva, M.L.Q.; De Oliveira, J.S.; De Camargo, Z.P.; Rodrigues, A.M.; Pereira, V.S.; Serpa, R.; De Souza Collares Maia Castelo-Branco, D.; Correia, E.E.M.; et al. Antifungal susceptibility of Sporothrix schenckii complex biofilms. Med. Mycol. 2018, 56, 297–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Chen, F.; Jiang, R.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, M.; Zhang, X.; Dong, S.; Shi, H.; Wang, L. Recombinant Phage Elicits Protective Immune Response against Systemic S. globosa Infection in Mouse Model. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 42024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jof 04 00100 g001 550
Figure 1. Host immune response against Sporothrix spp. (1) Infection with Sporothrix occurs by the traumatic inoculation of yeasts, conidia, or hyphae. Once the fungus crosses the primary barriers of the immune system, (2) components of the pathogen trigger the innate immune response including cells and molecules to attack the invader. (3) Several molecules of the fungus active T cells by being presented as antigens (i.e., peptides of Gp70). (4) Protective antibodies against the fungus are generated. All of this is for the clearance of the pathogen. MNC: Mononuclear cells. PMNC: Polymorphonuclear cells. NK: Natural Killer cells. Black arrows: infection sequence. Red arrows: increased production and participation during infection. Orange arrow: increased secretion during infection.
Figure 1. Host immune response against Sporothrix spp. (1) Infection with Sporothrix occurs by the traumatic inoculation of yeasts, conidia, or hyphae. Once the fungus crosses the primary barriers of the immune system, (2) components of the pathogen trigger the innate immune response including cells and molecules to attack the invader. (3) Several molecules of the fungus active T cells by being presented as antigens (i.e., peptides of Gp70). (4) Protective antibodies against the fungus are generated. All of this is for the clearance of the pathogen. MNC: Mononuclear cells. PMNC: Polymorphonuclear cells. NK: Natural Killer cells. Black arrows: infection sequence. Red arrows: increased production and participation during infection. Orange arrow: increased secretion during infection.
Jof 04 00100 g001
Table
Table 1. Several molecular studies for Sporothrix species identification.
Table 1. Several molecular studies for Sporothrix species identification.
GeneTechniqueResult
CHS1PCRDoes not distinguish among species
18S rRNAPCRDoes not distinguish among species
ITSSequence analysisDistinguishes among species
CAL, Bt2, and CHSMultilocus sequence analysisDistinguishes among species
CalmodulinPartial gene sequencingDistinguishes among species
T3B primerPCR fingerprintingDistinguishes among species
Calmodulin digested with HhaIPCR-RFLPDoes not distinguish between S. mexicana and S. pallida
CAL intronsPCRDistinguishes among species
CalmodulinPCR-based rolling circle amplificationDistinguishes among species
Table
Table 2. Drugs evaluated in vitro for Sporothrix species.
Table 2. Drugs evaluated in vitro for Sporothrix species.
Sporothrix ComplexGood *Moderate *Low *
S. brasiliensisItraconazole, posaconazole, terbinafine, and potassium iodideAmphotericin BCaspofungin, voriconazole, fluconazole and flucytosine
S. schenckiiAmphotericin B, posaconazole and terbinafineItraconazoleVoriconazole, fluconazole and echinocandins
S. globosaTerbinafineFluconazole and voriconazoleItraconazole
S. mexicanaTerbinafine, ketoconazoleAmphotericin BPosaconazole
* Activity antifungal reported.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

García Carnero, L.C.; Lozoya Pérez, N.E.; González Hernández, S.E.; Martínez Álvarez, J.A. Immunity and Treatment of Sporotrichosis. J. Fungi 2018, 4, 100. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof4030100

AMA Style

García Carnero LC, Lozoya Pérez NE, González Hernández SE, Martínez Álvarez JA. Immunity and Treatment of Sporotrichosis. Journal of Fungi. 2018; 4(3):100. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof4030100

Chicago/Turabian Style

García Carnero, Laura Cristina, Nancy Edith Lozoya Pérez, Sandra Elizabeth González Hernández, and José Ascención Martínez Álvarez. 2018. "Immunity and Treatment of Sporotrichosis" Journal of Fungi 4, no. 3: 100. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof4030100

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop