Next Article in Journal
Luteodorsum huanglongense (Gomphaceae, Gomphales), a New Genus and Species of Gomphoid Fungus from the Loess Plateau, Northwest China
Next Article in Special Issue
Cutaneous Fungal Infections Caused by Dermatophytes and Non-Dermatophytes: An Updated Comprehensive Review of Epidemiology, Clinical Presentations, and Diagnostic Testing
Previous Article in Journal
Filamentous Fungi Are Potential Bioremediation Agents of Semi-Synthetic Textile Waste
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Etiology, Predisposing Factors, Clinical Features and Diagnostic Procedure of Otomycosis: A Literature Review

by
Mila Bojanović
1,2,
Marko Stalević
3,
Valentina Arsić-Arsenijević
4,
Aleksandra Ignjatović
1,5,
Marina Ranđelović
1,5,
Milan Golubović
2,
Emilija Živković-Marinkov
1,2,
Goran Koraćević
1,2,
Bojana Stamenković
1,6 and
Suzana Otašević
1,5,*
1
Medical Faculty, University of Niš, 18000 Niš, Serbia
2
University Clinical Center Niš, 18000 Niš, Serbia
3
Medical Faculty, University of Priština in Kosovska Mitrovica, 38220 Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia
4
Medical Faculty, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
5
Public Health Institute Niš, 18000 Niš, Serbia
6
Institute For Treatment and Rehabilitation “Niška Banja”, 18205 Niš, Serbia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2023, 9(6), 662; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9060662
Submission received: 12 May 2023 / Revised: 1 June 2023 / Accepted: 6 June 2023 / Published: 13 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hot Topics in Superficial Fungal Infections)

Abstract

:
Otomycosis (OM) is a superficial fungal infection of the external auditory canal (EAC) with a worldwide prevalence ranging from 9% to 30%. Commonly, otomycoses are caused by Aspergillus (A.) niger complex and Candida spp. Other causative agents are yeasts of the genera Cryptococcus spp., Rhodotorula spp., Geotrichum candidum, dermatophytes (Trichophyton mentagrophytes), and non-dermatophytes molds (Fusarium spp., Penicillium spp., Mucorales fungi). The widest range of different species causing OM are found in the territories of Iran, India, China, Egypt, Mexico, and Brazil. Fungal infection of the EAC varies from mild to severe forms. It can be acute, subacute, or chronic, and is often unilateral, while the bilateral form is more common in immunocompromised patients. From an epidemiological point of view, tropical and subtropical climates are the most significant risk factor for the development of otomycosis. Other predisposing conditions include clothing habits, EAC hygiene practices, long-term antibiotic therapy, diabetes, and immunodeficiency. Since it is often difficult to distinguish otomycosis from an infection of a different origin, laboratory-based evidence, including standard procedures (microscopy and cultivation), is essential for diagnosis. For the treatment of this superficial fungal infection, there are no official therapeutic guidelines and protocols. However, many antifungals for local application, such as polyene, imidazoles, and allylamines, can be applied, as well as systemic antimycotics (triazoles) in severe forms of infection.

1. Introduction

Otomycosis is a common superficial fungal infection that affects the external auditory canal (EAC). The infection may present as acute, subacute, or chronic, and is typically unilateral, with the bilateral form being more common in immunocompromised patients. The infection is present globally, with prevalence ranging from 9% to 30% in patients with the signs and symptoms of EAC infection [1,2,3]. The most common causative agents of otomycosis are molds of the genus Aspergillus and yeasts of the genus Candida, particularly Aspergillus (A.) niger complex and Candida (C.) albicans [4].
Recent molecular methods and analyses have revealed 28 different species of black molds within the Aspergillus niger complex, with A. tubingensis being the most common cause of otomycosis, followed by A. niger. Although rare, the species A. welwitschiae, A. awamori and A. foetidus have also been reported as the cause of this infection [5]. Accurate molecular identification of these black fungi is crucial for the development of rapid diagnostic tests for Aspergillus otomycosis, and for determining appropriate treatment for different species within this complex. Apart from the molds mentioned, species of A. flavus complex are also commonly isolated, while A. terreus, A. fumigatus, A. versicolor, and A. luchuensis are less frequent culprits [6]. In the last year, A. sydowii was identified as a potential human pathogen in immunocompromised patients, with two reported cases in which the fungi were molecularly identified from the EAC material obtained during tympanomastoidectomy [7].
In addition to C. albicans, C. parapsilosis has been established as a common cause of otomycosis, particularly in Europe, where its prevalence is high. Other Candida species such as C. lustaniae, C. guilliermondii, C. famata, C. tropicalis, C. krusei, and C. glabrata have also been isolated and identified as etiological agents of the EAC infection, although with relatively low incidence [8]. Moreover, C. auris, an emerging and highly virulent fungal pathogen, has been detected as a colonizer of EAC skin and a potential cause of the infection. This is of major concern due to its multi-drug resistance and potential for dissemination [9].
Sporadically, otomycosis caused by yeasts of the genera Cryptococcus, Rhodotorulla spp. and Geotrichum candidum has also been reported [10]. Furthermore, EAC skin infection caused by fungi of the dermatophyte group (Trichophyton mentagrophytes) could easily occur during dermatophytosis via autoinfection.
The external ear canal provides an ideal environment for the growth and reproduction of molds, and there has been an increase in cases of otomycosis caused by different species of non-dermatophyte molds, not only in immunodeficient but also in immunocompetent patients.
A large number of fungal genera are found in nature, and one proposed classification divides infections caused by these non-dermatophyte molds into two broad groups: those caused by Aspergillus species, and those caused by non-Aspergillus molds. Non-Aspergillus infections can be caused by Mucorales fungi, hyalohyphomycetes (bright pigmented fungi), and phaeohyphomycetes (dark pigmented or dematiaceous fungi). In the group of non-dermatophyte molds, fungi of the genera Penicillium [10], Scopulariopsis, Chrysosporium [11], Fusarium [12], Alternaria, [12], Paecilomyces [13], Auerobasidium spp., Acremonium spp. [14], and species of the Mucorales group [10] are reported to be the cause of this infection [1,15]. Additionally, very unusual cases of otomycosis caused by Saksenaea vasiformis, a species of the order Mucorales [16], and Scedosporium apiospermum in an immunocompetent patient [17] have recently been published.
This narrative review aims to highlight the significant characteristics of otomycosis by reviewing the literature on the etiological–mycological, clinical and epidemiological features, diagnostic procedures, and previous experiences related to the treatment of this disease. Given the high prevalence of otomycosis worldwide and the lack of official and recommended treatments or diagnostic procedures, accurate identification of the causative agents is of the utmost importance in designing appropriate treatment strategies.

2. Materials and Methods

The databases Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched as the primary sources of articles on the topic of superficial fungal EAC infection, using key terms such as “otomycosis”, “mycotic otitis externa” “epidemiology”, “causative agents”, “fungal species”, “diagnostics”, and “treatment”. Additionally, Google Scholar was searched, and the references of identified articles were hand-searched. To eliminate duplicate articles and articles that were not related, the search results were initially checked based on the title and abstract by one of the reviewers (AI). A more detailed review of the title, abstract, and subsequently the full text of retrieved articles was carried out by two independent reviewers (AI and MS). Disagreements were resolved through discussion. The protocol for this review has not been previously registered or published.
One reviewer extracted the following data: continent, country, number of patients, gender, age, causative agents, diagnostic procedures, clinical examination findings, treatment, and risk factors for otomycosis. The data extracted from the selected studies were presented, tabulated, and compared narratively. Pooling the studies statistically was not possible because of the heterogeneity in study designs, patient characteristics, and outcomes. The purpose of a narrative review is to identify research gaps within a specific area and provide a comprehensive summary of the evidence related to a research problem. This provides a general and accurate guide to what is already known about this subject and creates a framework for further research. However, in the undertaking of a narrative review, we should be aware of selection bias.

3. Pathogenesis of Otomycosis

The external auditory canal is has a hollow cylinder-like shape; it is approximately 2–2.5 cm in length, enclosed by the tympanic membrane on its proximal end. Its other end is unobstructed and directly exposed to the external environment [18]. The inner surface of the canal is lined with skin, which also covers the outer side of the eardrum and continues onto the surface of the auricle. Intact skin acts as a mechanical barrier, preventing the penetration of microorganisms from the external environment. It also contains modified apocrine sweat glands that secrete cerumen, which has hydrophobic properties and prevents water retention in the ear canal. Cerumen forms a protective layer on the skin’s surface and exhibits antimicrobial properties due to its low pH, creating unfavorable conditions for pathogen development [19,20].
The surface of healthy EAC skin harbors various microbial species, including Staphylococcus spp., Corynebacterium spp., Bacillus spp., Streptococcus spp., Gram-negative bacilli (e.g., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli), as well as fungi, predominantly of the Aspergillus and Candida species [21]. The saprophytic nature of these microorganisms can become pathogenic if the balance between bacterial and fungal growth is disrupted, especially if non-specific and specific body defense mechanisms are compromised [22,23].
Factors contributing to the development of otomycosis are categorized into environmental and host-derived. The warm and humid climate of tropical and subtropical regions is the most significant external risk factor, so it is not surprising that highest prevalence of otomycosis is recorded in these areas [24,25]. Host-derived risk factors include the specific anatomical features of the EAC, excessive cerumen secretion, local trauma of the ear canal, use of hearing aids with an occlusive mold, and immunocompromised health status. Otomycosis can also occur secondary to previous bacterial infection of EAC treated with topical antibacterial drugs. Additionally, the disease may result from autoinoculation (autoinfection) of the canal in patients with untreated dermatomycosis [20,25].

4. Clinical Presentation

Inflammation of the external auditory canal is characterized by an inflammatory process that affects the skin and subcutaneous tissue of the canal, with the potential to extend to the eardrum and auricle in severe cases [26]. The clinical presentation of this inflammation can vary from mild to severe forms that can threaten the patient’s life. In practice, there is a difference between localized and diffuse inflammation, which can be acute or chronic. Etiologically, inflammation can be of non-infectious or infectious nature. Non-infectious inflammation can be attributed to either a local cause, such as contact or allergic dermatitis, or to a systemic disease, such as seborrheic dermatitis or psoriasis [22,27,28]. One consideration is that skin diseases such as allergic or seborrheic dermatitis, as well as psoriasis, can create a conducive environment for the development of secondary infections caused by bacteria or, less commonly, fungi. Susceptibility to secondary infection may also be attributed to the yet insufficiently clarified pathogenic potential of certain fungi in initiating the infection. Bacteria have been identified as the most common cause of infectious inflammation, with a prevalence of up to 90%. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus are the most commonly found species, with a prevalence of 22–62% and 11–34%, respectively [29]. Fungi can also cause the inflammation of EAC, known as otomycosis.
Otomycosis is typically a benign and superficial infection, often asymptomatic in the early stages and not considered life-threatening. However, in certain situations, the infection may become recurrent due to the ideal environment for fungal growth provided by the EAC. It is important to note that the infection can spread and potentially affect the middle ear in approximately 10% of cases [30,31]. In severe cases, the infection can also spread to the surrounding soft tissues, including the parotid gland, and rarely, it may extend to the mastoid bone, temporomandibular joint, and skull base, potentially affecting the VII (facial), IX (glossopharyngeal), X (vagus), XI (accessory), or XII (hypoglossal) cranial nerves [32]. However, it should be noted that the most serious cases of otomycosis, with perforation of the tympanic membrane, involvement of the middle ear, or the entire temporal bone, are predominantly associated with immunodeficiency conditions [33].
Bone invasion or tissue damage generally does not occur in Aspergillus infection. In patients with Candida infection, the early stage of the infection is characterized mainly by exudation, and in the later stages, granulomatous inflammation becomes predominant (29). Species of the Mucorales genus can potentially penetrate blood vessels, causing thrombi, tissue infarction and leukocyte infiltration [34].
Infection is typically associated with a range of symptoms, including itching, otorrhea, and the sensation of ear canal blockage. Pain, which can vary in severity, headache, and tinnitus are also common. EAC edema and redness, desquamation of the epithelium, and impaired hearing are often clinical findings present in patients with otomycosis [1,35,36].

5. Diagnostic Procedure

Otomycosis diagnosis is primarily based on a patient’s history and clinical presentation, as well as an otoscopic examination of the ear canal and eardrum. However, additional tests such as microbiological analysis or histological examinations may be necessary to confirm the diagnosis and determine the causative organism, especially in severe or chronic cases of otomycosis. Imaging studies may also be used in rare cases to assess the extent of the infection or rule out other potential causes of symptoms [32,37].
Otomycosis is often difficult to distinguish from infections of different origins, especially in the case of diffuse external otitis. The particular challenge in diagnosis arises when there are mixed infections, where bacterial species such as S. aureus, Pseudomonas spp., coagulase-negative Staphylococci, or Klebsiella spp. are present along with fungi in the sampled material [38].
Laboratory-based evidence for otomycosis diagnosis is obtained using conventional methods. Microscopic examination is an easy, low-cost, and fast method that is irreplaceable for detecting fungi in patient material. Wet mount (native or with chloralactophenol or KOH) is still a convenient technique for screening and direct microscopy examination, providing prompt detection of fungal blastoconidia–yeast and pseudohyphal–hyphal forms in patient material [39]. Still, these methods have limitations, such as lower sensitivity, an inability to distinguish the species of causative agents, and difficulty in differentiating contaminants from infectious agents.
Cultivation, isolation, and identification of the fungus from the sampled material remain the gold standard for accurate diagnosis [12]. However, it is important to emphasize the necessity of serial mycological examinations (up to 3) for the accurate interpretation of cultivation-based mycological findings, in order to differentiate fungal causative agents from fungal microbiota, or transitory fungal flora. These are superior but time-consuming procedures that enable the determination of genetic and biochemical characteristics, identification of etiological agents, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
For microbiological examination, it is important to conduct both bacteriological and mycological analyses. Cultivation of infectious agents includes selective media for the isolation of bacteria, yeast, and molds. Sabouraud agar with the addition of dextrose or maltose (SDA) and antibacterial drugs that prevent bacterial growth and cycloheximide (Actidion®) to suppress mold growth are used as selective media for isolating yeast in vitro. The optimal cultivation time of yeast is 48–72 h, at 37 °C in an aerobic atmosphere. Considering that Candida spp. is the dominant cause of otomycosis, the use of Candida-chromogenic media has been recommended, allowing the differentiation of species of the genus Candida based on the discoloration of the colonies, even in the primary isolate. Chromogenic selective media allow the differentiation of three Candida species during primo-isolation, where C. albicans forms green colonies, C. tropicalis forms blue, and C. krusei forms pink colonies with a rough appearance [4]. The importance of these media is heightened by the fact that they allow for diagnosing mixed infections caused by different Candida species, which is impossible on other media. During mycological analyses, it is important to provide optimal conditions for molds as well. This includes media that contain a higher concentration of carbohydrates and antibacterial drugs, but without action. Moreover, the optimal cultivation time for molds is 7–14 days, at 26–28 °C in an aerobic atmosphere (some mold species grow only at this temperature) [40,41]. If the protocols for culturing fungi, especially molds, are not followed, a certain number of patients may receive a misdiagnosis from the microbiological examination.
Differentiation of yeasts is possible based on tests used to determine the distinctive phenotypic characteristics of different species, using assimilation or other biochemical tests, even automated systems (VITEK®-automated system) in more advanced laboratories. Numerous commercial tests for differentiating yeast species and genera, as well as in vitro testing the antifungal susceptibility, are available to many laboratories [Fungifast (ELITech Microbiology Reagents, Puteaux, France) and FungitestTM (BioRad, Marnes-la-Coquette, France), or Integral System YEASTS Plus (Liofilchem®, Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy)] [4].
Non-dermatophyte molds are identified by their macroscopic and microscopic characteristics during their saprophytic growth phase on nutrient media. However, this identification method requires expert knowledge, which is a significant limitation.
To overcome the limitations and disadvantages of conventional methods, scientists and researchers are working on developing non-culture methods that will reduce the time between sampling to results. One promising method is MALDI-TOF-MS (matrix-assisted laser desorption and ionisation–time of flight–mass spectrometry, which can currently identify approximately 800 yeast species and 3000 mold species, based on saved reference spectra) [42]. In addition, molecular techniques have also been explored. One study analyzed black Aspergilli isolates from otomycosis patients using molecular analyses, and identified a high diversity of species within the Aspergillus niger complex. By determining molecular targets for identification, this approach may enable the development of rapid molecular testing for otomycosis [5]. Another study analyzed partial β-tubulin gene sequences of Aspergillus molds, and found that A. niger and A. tubingensis were less susceptible to antifungal drugs compared to other species. Prompt and accurate identification of the infective agents can facilitate the timely selection of the most effective antimycotics [43].
Machine learning specifically trained neural network models also promise prompt and accurate diagnosis of otomycosis caused by Aspergillus spp. and Candida spp. [44]. Machine learning has been applied to medical imaging, for example, through radiological and microscopic images of inflammation cells [45], as well as histological images. It has also been used to recognize and differentiate bacteria and helminthic eggs. Previous studies have shown that macroscopic or microscopic classification of one fungal genus, such as Aspergillus spp. [45] and Leuchorrea spp. [46], yielded good results using convolutional neural networks (CNNs), but only when the genus was already determined. Recently, a study aimed to develop software for automatic, fast, and efficient diagnosis of otomycosis using an otoendoscopic image gallery to train a neural network model [44]. The authors reported an average accuracy of 92.42%, and suggested that this system could be used in the diagnosis of otomycosis.

6. Treatment

The lack of official therapeutic guidelines and protocols has led to disagreement among experts on the optimal treatment for fungal infections. Moreover, the treatment duration is also undefined. Thus, careful consideration of the evidence, patient factors, and clinical judgment are crucial in determining the most appropriate approach [40,47]. Many authors believe it is necessary to identify the causative agent and choose the most effective antimycotic based on the previously determined specific sensitivity. However, other authors suggest that it is advisable to select an appropriate treatment based on the general effectiveness and characteristics of the drug, regardless of the pathogen type [35,48].
In France, nystatin is recommended as the first-line local treatment of otomycosis, typically used in combination with oxytetracycline, polymyxin B, and dexamethasone for up to 15 days [47]. Although this polyene has a wide spectrum of activity against both yeasts and molds, there are inconsistent opinions in the literature about its effectiveness against Aspergillus spp., one of the dominant causative agents in otomycosis [35,40]. On the other hand, in the USA, clotrimazole, as topical imidazole, is considered the drug of choice for the treatment of uncomplicated otomycosis [27]. Accordingly, recent research conducted in India suggests that 1% clotrimazole cream applied topically may effectively treat otomycosis [49]. However, some studies with smaller sample sizes do not classify clotrimazole as a first-choice drug due to its lesser effectiveness against Aspergillus-otomycosis [32,40,50].
Other antifungal agents, such as miconazole, bifonazole, isoconazole [51] and ciclopiroxolamine, can also be used for the treatment of otomycosis. However, in vitro studies and treatment monitoring have shown that these antifungals have an unequal effect on yeasts and molds, with miconazole being less effective against various species of the genus Candida [4,47]. Some studies have also reported good in vitro effectiveness of efinaconazole, lanoconazole, and luliconazole against Aspergillus species, but lower susceptibilities of ravuconazole were observed against A. tubingensis and A. niger, which are the most prevalent causative agents of otomycosis [43]. In a study conducted last year comparing the clinical efficacy of sertaconazole with other imidazoles, satisfactory effects were reported in patients with otomycoses, yet there was no significant difference observed compared to treatment with miconazole and clotrimazole [31].
A recent survey conducted in Russia involving over 300 patients with fungal ear infection recommended mandatory mycological control in addition to clinical examination to assess the effectiveness of therapy [52]. The results of this study revealed that terbinafine, naftifine, and chlornitrophenol were the most effective in local treatment for mold-induced otomycosis, while clotrimazole or allylamines (terbinafine and naftifine) were found to be the best choice for Candida otomycosis. It was noted that local antifungal treatments should be applied for at least 3–4 weeks with constant laboratory monitoring. Similar findings were reported in a study conducted in Serbia with an analogous design, which showed that nystatin and naftifine yielded better results in the treatment of patients with Aspergillus-otomycosis compared to clotrimazole [40].
These results support the potential effectiveness of allylamines, such as terbinafine and naftifine, in the treatment of otomycosis caused by yeasts or molds, as was also suggested in a recent study by Ting-Hua Yang, who demonstrated the non-toxicity of terbinafine to the inner ear end organs at a dosage of 0.4 mg [53].
Although various antiseptics, acidifying agents, and medications containing anti-infective agents with corticosteroids have been investigated for the treatment of otomycosis, there is insufficient evidence to support their increased efficacy compared to antimycotic drugs, as reported by Khrystyna Herasym in 2016 [54]. Moreover, extensive ear canal debridement followed by topical antifungal medications is recommended for patients with a noninvasive form of infection.
Another important fact is that antifungal ointments have distinct advantages over liquid formulations. Creams, due to their higher viscosity, remain longer on the skin’s surface and are considered safer for use in patients with perforated eardrums, as there is a lower chance of the drug entering the middle ear [55]. One recommendation for liquid formulations of antimycotics is to soak cotton wool or gauze pads in the solution and leave them in the ear canal for 5–10 min, 2–4 times a day [52]. In addition to all the described treatment modalities, it is crucial to restore the physiological conditions in the ear canal by avoiding excessive use of topical medications and protecting the ear canal from further damage, which can disrupt local homeostasis [25].
Systemic antimycotics, such as triazole antifungal drugs (fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole), may be used in severe forms of otomycosis, or when previous local therapy has been ineffective [48]. These drugs are effective against infections caused by fungi of the genera Candida and Aspergillus, and are essential in the treatment of complex forms of the disease, especially when there are complications such as mastoiditis and meningitis [56].
However, an investigation of in vitro antifungal susceptibility demonstrated that non-albicans Candida species, as causative agents of otomycosis, might have varying sensitivity in a dose-dependent manner to fluconazole (MIC = 32 mg/mL). Moreover, it was proven that C. krusei, besides fluconazole, also had lower sensitivity to itraconazole (MIC = 0.5 mg/mL) [4]. This highlights the importance of identifying specific causative agents and conducting susceptibility testing to guide the appropriate choice of systemic antifungal therapy in severe cases of otomycosis.

7. Epidemiology

From an epidemiological perspective, it can be stated that the climatic conditions of tropical and subtropical regions, characterized by long summers and rainy seasons, are the most common risk factors for the occurrence of otomycosis. A wide spectrum of different species and genera of fungi causing otomycosis has been isolated and identified in these areas. Specifically, numerous yeast and mold species have been identified in Asia [2,57,58], Africa [10], Central America [12], and South America [59] (Table 1, Figure 1). Surveys conducted in Europe have not noted any seasonal influence [4].
The age and gender distribution of patients with otomycosis exhibits inconsistent findings across various reports. Some studies have stated that men are more frequently affected than women [4,24], but this is not uniform in all surveys [1,14]. Similarly, the fact that people between the ages of 25 and 45 are most often affected [1,10,12,24] is accompanied by findings that the prevalence of the disease increases with ageing [4].
Risk factors for EAC fungal infection include factors that damage the mechanical barrier of the EAC skin. In this group, frequent use of headphones [40], using hard objects to scratch the ear [11,15], and injuries to the skin [24] are dominant factors. Besides damage to the skin as a mechanical barrier, factors that disturb the EAC skin microbiota and affect the reduction of cerumen [21,24] can also impair non-specific resistance. Overuse of chemicals such as soaps, shampoos, boric acid, povidone–iodine, hydrogen peroxide, and other antiseptics, as well as excessive use of antibacterial ear drops, can disrupt the balance of the microbiota in the EAC. This disruption often leads to a reduction in the number of bacteria, which in turn can result in the overgrowth of fungi and increased risk of fungal infections [2,15,40]. Additionally, the use of coconut oil [11] and mustard oil [2] as an alternate treatment or for alleviating symptoms and signs of infection has been identified as a possible risk factor for otomycosis. Furthermore, clothing habits such as wearing head coverings, e.g., a turban or veil [6,61], have been highlighted as risk factors in areas where traditional clothing is common or recommended. Frequent swimming, recreationally or professionally, as well as the use of saunas and other spa treatments, can also predispose a person to this infection.
Lastly, preexisting diseases and conditions such as diabetes [1,14], immunosuppressive therapy [63], prolonged systemic antibiotic treatment [63], a history of otologic procedures [14], retroviral infection [1], sinonasal and nasopharyngeal malignancy [1], and mastoid cavity after surgical procedures [14] may predispose a person to the development of this infection. In premature newborns, intubation, artificial ventilation, and respiratory distress have also been identified as significant risk factors for fungal infection of the EAC [63].

8. Conclusions

Similarly to other superficial fungal infections, otomycosis is generally a benign condition that does not threaten life. However, frequent cases of chronicity, the high prevalence of these infections, reductions in the quality of life of affected individuals, and rare complications (such as perforation of the tympanic membrane or disseminated infection involving bones, nerves, and even the central nervous system) indicate the need for a new strategy for diagnosis and treatment.
Based on our knowledge and the results of the conducted studies, the following highlights emerge. (i) In cases of chronic external auditory canal inflammation, laboratory analyses are recommended. (ii) Microbiological examination, in addition to bacteriological analysis, should include mycological analysis, which encompasses procedures for isolating both yeasts and molds. (iii) For accurate interpretation of the results, serial cultures (up to three) may be necessary to differentiate between pathogenic and saprophytic fungi. (iv) Treatment selection, including the choice of antimycotics and method of application, should be based on specific fungal causative agents. However, systemic antifungal drugs should only be considered for cases involving immunodeficiency. Official protocols and recommendations regarding diagnosis and treatment can significantly assist in selecting the most effective medication and treatment duration.
Avoidance or reduction is recommended for certain risk factors, including activities such as frequent recreational or professional swimming, the use of saunas and other spa treatments, alternate treatment application, and clothing habits, as they have the potential to damage the mechanical barrier or microbiota of the skin in the EAC, leading to a reduction in cerumen production. Meanwhile, preexisting diseases and conditions such as diabetes, immunosuppressive therapy, prolonged systemic antibiotic treatment, and a history of otologic procedures can serve as potential predictors for the development of EAC fungal infections.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: S.O. and M.B.; methodology, literature review: A.I., M.R., E.Ž.-M., G.K., B.S.; validation: A.I. and M.S.; writing—review and editing: V.A.-A.; writing—original draft preparation: M.B.; supervision: V.A.-A. and S.O.; visualization: M.S. and M.G.; funding acquisition: V.A.-A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by The Science Fund of the Republic of Serbia, Grant No: 7754282—Prediction, prevention and patient’s participation in diagnosis of selected fungal infections (FI): implementation of a novel method for obtaining tissue specimens, “FungalCaseFinder”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fasunla, J.; Ibekwe, T.; Onakoya, P. Otomycosis in western Nigeria. Mycoses 2008, 51, 67–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Agarwal, P.; Devi, L.S. Otomycosis in a Rural Community Attending a Tertiary Care Hospital: Assessment of Risk Factors and Identification of Fungal and Bacterial Agents. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2017, 11, Dc14–Dc18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mofatteh, M.R.; Naseripour Yazdi, Z.; Yousefi, M.; Namaei, M.H. Comparison of the recovery rate of otomycosis using betadine and clotrimazole topical treatment. Braz. J. Otorhinolaryngol. 2018, 84, 404–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tasić-Otašević, S.; Golubović, M.; Đenić, S.; Ignjatović, A.; Stalević, M.; Momčilović, S.; Bojanović, M.; Arsić-Arsenijević, V. Species distribution patterns and epidemiological characteristics of otomycosis in Southeastern Serbia. J. De Mycol. Médicale 2020, 30, 101011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kamali Sarvestani, H.; Seifi, A.; Falahatinejad, M.; Mahmoudi, S. Black aspergilli as causes of otomycosis in the era of molecular diagnostics, a mini-review. J. Mycol. Med. 2022, 32, 101240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Aneja, K.R.; Sharma, C.; Joshi, R. Fungal infection of the ear: A common problem in the north eastern part of Haryana. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2010, 74, 604–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Buonafina-Paz, M.D.; Santos, F.A.; Leite-Andrade, M.C.; Alves, A.I.; Bezerra, J.D.; Leal, M.C.; Robert, E.; Pape, P.L.; Lima-Neto, R.G.; Neves, R.P. Otomycosis caused by the cryptic and emerging species Aspergillus sydowii: Two case reports. Future Microbiol. 2022, 17, 1437–1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Değerli, K.; Ecemiş, T.; Günhan, K.; Başkesen, T.; Kal, E. Agents of otomycosis in Manisa region, Turkey, 1995–2011. Mikrobiyol. Bul. 2012, 46, 79–84. [Google Scholar]
  9. Abastabar, M.; Haghani, I.; Ahangarkani, F.; Rezai, M.S.; Taghizadeh Armaki, M.; Roodgari, S.; Kiakojuri, K.; Al-Hatmi, A.M.S.; Meis, J.F.; Badali, H. Candida auris otomycosis in Iran and review of recent literature. Mycoses 2019, 62, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Ali, K.; Hamed, M.A.; Hassan, H.; Esmail, A.; Sheneef, A. Identification of Fungal Pathogens in Otomycosis and Their Drug Sensitivity: Our Experience. Int. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2018, 22, 400–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Prasad, S.C.; Kotigadde, S.; Shekhar, M.; Thada, N.D.; Prabhu, P.; D’ Souza, T.; Prasad, K.C. Primary otomycosis in the Indian subcontinent: Predisposing factors, microbiology, and classification. Int. J. Microbiol. 2014, 2014, 636493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Alarid-Coronel, J.; Celis-Aguilar, E.; Escobar-Aispuro, L.; Muñoz-Estrada, V. Otomycosis in immunocompetent patients: Clinical and mycological features. Our experience with 40 cases. Clin. Otolaryngol. 2018, 43, 373–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. García-Agudo, L.; Aznar-Marín, P.; Galán-Sánchez, F.; García-Martos, P.; Marín-Casanova, P.; Rodríguez-Iglesias, M. Otomycosis due to filamentous fungi. Mycopathologia 2011, 172, 307–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ho, T.; Vrabec, J.T.; Yoo, D.; Coker, N.J. Otomycosis: Clinical features and treatment implications. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2006, 135, 787–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rawat, S.; Saxena, N.; Chad, A.; Garg, N.; Sharma, K. Cinicomycological study of otomycosis with antifungal drug susceptibility testing of Candida isolates using disk diffusion method in Kota region, Rajasthan. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 2017, 6, 3356–3366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Trabelsi, H.; Neji, S.; Hadrich, I.; Sellami, M.; Khemakhem, N.; Sellami, H.; Makni, F.; Hammami, B.; Ayadi, A. Unusual case of otomycosis caused by Saksenaea vasiformis. Med. Mycol. Case Rep. 2020, 27, 68–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Baumgartner, B.J.; Rakita, R.M.; Backous, D.D. Scedosporium apiospermum otomycosis. Am. J. Otolaryngol. 2007, 28, 254–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kelly, K.E.; Mohs, D.C. The external auditory canal. Anatomy and physiology. Otolaryngol. Clin. N. Am. 1996, 29, 725–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Linstrom, J.C.; Lucente, F.E. Infections of the External Ear. In Head & Neck Surgery–Otolaryngology, 4th ed.; Bailey, B.J., Johnson, J.T., Newlands, S.D., Eds.; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: New York, NY, USA, 2006; pp. 1988–2000. [Google Scholar]
  20. Roland, P.S.; Marple, B.F. Disorders of the external auditory canal. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 1997, 8, 367–378. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  21. Lum, C.L.; Jeyanthi, S.; Prepageran, N.; Vadivelu, J.; Raman, R. Antibacterial and antifungal properties of human cerumen. J. Laryngol. Otol. 2009, 123, 375–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Clark, W.B.; Brook, I.; Bianki, D.; Thompson, D.H. Microbiology of otitis externa. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 1997, 116, 23–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Edward, Y.; Irfandy, D. Otomycosis. J. Kesehat. Andalas 2012, 1, 101–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Abdelazeem, M.; Gamea, A.; Mubarak, H.; Elzawawy, N. Epidemiology, causative agents, and risk factors affecting human otomycosis infections. Turk. J. Med. Sci. 2015, 45, 820–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Anwar, K.; Gohar, M.S. Otomycosis; clinical features, predisposing factors and treatment implications. Pak. J. Med. Sci. 2014, 30, 564–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Rosenfeld, R.M.; Brown, L.; Cannon, C.R.; Dolor, R.J.; Ganiats, T.G.; Hannley, M.; Kokemueller, P.; Marcy, S.M.; Roland, P.S.; Shiffman, R.N.; et al. Clinical practice guideline: Acute otitis externa. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2006, 134, S4–S23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sander, R. Otitis externa: A practical guide to treatment and prevention. Am. Fam. Physician 2001, 63, 927–936, 941–922. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Beers, S.L.; Abramo, T.J. Otitis externa review. Pediatr. Emerg. Care 2004, 20, 250–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wiegand, S.; Berner, R.; Schneider, A.; Lundershausen, E.; Dietz, A. Otitis Externa. Dtsch. Arztebl. Int. 2019, 116, 224–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Roohi, B.; Nemati, S.; Alipour, A.; Faeli, L.; Mayahi, S.; Haghani, I.; Shalchizadeh, M.; Darini, A.; Al-Hatmi, A.M.S.; Abastabar, M.; et al. Otomycosis: The foremost aetiological agent causing otitis externa and the antifungal susceptibility pattern in North-Western Iran. Mycoses 2023, 66, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nemati, S.; Gerami, H.; Faghih Habibi, A.; Kazemnejad, E.; Shabani, N.; Aghsaghloo, V.; Montazeri, S. Sertaconazole versus Clotrimazole and Miconazole Creams in the Treatment of Otomycosis: A Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. Iran. J. Otorhinolaryngol. 2022, 34, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Vennewald, I.; Klemm, E. Otomycosis: Diagnosis and treatment. Clin. Dermatol. 2010, 28, 202–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Viswanatha, B.; Naseeruddin, K. Fungal infections of the ear in immunocompromised host: A review. Mediterr. J. Hematol. Infect Dis. 2011, 3, e2011003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wu, S.; Cheng, Y.; Lin, S.; Liu, H. A Comparison of Antifungal Drugs and Traditional Antiseptic Medication for Otomycosis Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Surg. 2021, 8, 739360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Munguia, R.; Daniel, S.J. Ototopical antifungals and otomycosis: A review. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2008, 72, 453–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Panigrahi, M.; Paty, B.P.; Parida, B.; Padhi, S.; Kumari Sahu, S.; Narasimham, M.V.; Mohanty, I. Clinicomycological Study of Otomycosis with Antifungal Susceptibility Testing Of Fungal Isolates. IOSR-JDMS 2019, 18, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Patterson, T.F.; Thompson, G.R., 3rd; Denning, D.W.; Fishman, J.A.; Hadley, S.; Herbrecht, R.; Kontoyiannis, D.P.; Marr, K.A.; Morrison, V.A.; Nguyen, M.H.; et al. Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Aspergillosis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2016, 63, e1–e60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Kumar, A. Fungal spectrum in Otomycosis patients. JK Sci. 2005, 7, 152–155. [Google Scholar]
  39. Otašević, S.; Momčilović, S.; Stojanović, N.M.; Skvarč, M.; Rajković, K.; Arsić-Arsenijević, V. Non-culture based assays for the detection of fungal pathogens. J. De Mycol. Médicale 2018, 28, 236–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bojanović, M.; Ignjatović, A.; Stalević, M.; Arsić-Arsenijević, V.; Ranđelović, M.; Gerginić, V.; Stojanović-Radić, Z.; Stojković, O.; Živković-Marinkov, E.; Otašević, S. Clinical Presentations, Cluster Analysis and Laboratory-Based Investigation of Aspergillus Otomycosis-A Single Center Experience. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rawson, T.M.; Fatania, N.; Abdolrasouli, A. UK standards for microbiology investigations of ear infection (SMI B1) are inadequate for the recovery of fungal pathogens and laboratory diagnosis of otomycosis: A real-life prospective evaluation. Mycoses 2022, 65, 490–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chen, X.-F.; Hou, X.; Xiao, M.; Zhang, L.; Cheng, J.-W.; Zhou, M.-L.; Huang, J.-J.; Zhang, J.-J.; Xu, Y.-C.; Hsueh, P.-R. Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) Analysis for the Identification of Pathogenic Microorganisms: A Review. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Hagiwara, S.; Tamura, T.; Satoh, K.; Kamewada, H.; Nakano, M.; Shinden, S.; Yamaguchi, H.; Makimura, K. The Molecular Identification and Antifungal Susceptibilities of Aspergillus Species Causing Otomycosis in Tochigi, Japan. Mycopathologia 2019, 184, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Mao, C.; Li, A.; Hu, J.; Wang, P.; Peng, D.; Wang, J.; Sun, Y. Efficient and accurate diagnosis of otomycosis using an ensemble deep-learning model. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2022, 9, 951432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Milanović, M.; Milosavljević, A.; Randjelovic, M. Visualization of microscopic morphological characteristics used for determination of infectious molds. In Proceedings of the 65th National Conference on Electronics, Telecommunication, Computing, Automatic Control and Nuclear Engineering (ETRAN 2021), Ethno Village Stanisici, Republic of Srpska, 8–10 September 2021; ETRAN Society: Belgrade, Serbia, 2021; pp. 528–533. [Google Scholar]
  46. Zhang, J.; Lu, S.; Wang, X.; Du, X.; Ni, G.; Liu, J.; Liu, L.; Liu, Y. Automatic identification of fungi in microscopic leucorrhea images. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A. Opt. Image Sci. Vis. 2017, 34, 1484–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chappe, M.; Vrignaud, S.; de Gentile, L.; Legrand, G.; Lagarce, F.; Le Govic, Y. Successful treatment of a recurrent Aspergillus niger otomycosis with local application of voriconazole. J. Mycol. Med. 2018, 28, 396–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lee, A.; Tysome, J.R.; Saeed, S.R. Topical azole treatments for otomycosis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2021, 5, Cd009289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chavan, R.P.; Ingole, S.M.; Kanchewad Resident, G.S. Single Topical Application of 1% Clotrimazole Cream in Otomycosis. Indian J. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2023, 75, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Antunes, J.; Mendes, N.; Adónis, C.; Freire, F. Treatment of otomycosis with clotrimazole: Results accordingly with the fungus isolated. Acta Otolaryngol. 2022, 142, 664–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gülüstan, F.; Abakay, M.A.; Demir, E. Efficacy of topical isoconazole nitrate in the treatment of otomycosis. Am. J. Otolaryngol. 2021, 42, 102961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Kryukov, A.I.; Kunelskaya, N.L.; Kunel’skaya, V.Y.; Ivoilov, A.Y.; Turovskiy, A.B.; Shadrin, G.B.; Machulin, A.I. Otomycosis: The modern view of etiology and management. Vestn. Otorinolaringol. 2018, 83, 48–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yang, T.H.; Young, Y.H. Eradicating Otomycosis with Terbinafine Solution: Basic and Clinical Investigation. Audiol. Neurotol. 2019, 24, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Herasym, K.; Bonaparte, J.P.; Kilty, S. A comparison of Locacorten-Vioform and clotrimazole in otomycosis: A systematic review and one-way meta-analysis. Laryngoscope 2016, 126, 1411–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Koltsidopoulos, P.; Skoulakis, C. Otomycosis With Tympanic Membrane Perforation: A Review of the Literature. Ear Nose Throat J. 2020, 99, 518–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Hoenigl, M.; Salmanton-García, J.; Walsh, T.J.; Nucci, M.; Neoh, C.F.; Jenks, J.D.; Lackner, M.; Sprute, R.; Al-Hatmi, A.M.S.; Bassetti, M.; et al. Global guideline for the diagnosis and management of rare mould infections: An initiative of the European Confederation of Medical Mycology in cooperation with the International Society for Human and Animal Mycology and the American Society for Microbiology. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, e246–e257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Kazemi, A.; Majidinia, M.; Jaafari, A.; Ayatollahi Mousavi, S.A.; Zarei Mahmoudabadi, A.; Alikhah, H. Etiologic Agents of Otomycosis in the North-Western Area of Iran. Jundishapur. J. Microbiol. 2015, 8, e21776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Jia, X.; Liang, Q.; Chi, F.; Cao, W. Otomycosis in Shanghai: Aetiology, clinical features and therapy. Mycoses 2012, 55, 404–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Pontes, Z.B.; Silva, A.D.; Lima Ede, O.; Guerra Mde, H.; Oliveira, N.M.; Carvalho Mde, F.; Guerra, F.S. Otomycosis: A retrospective study. Braz. J. Otorhinolaryngol. 2009, 75, 367–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Ismail, M.T.; Al-Kafri, A.; Ismail, M. Otomycosis in Damascus, Syria: Etiology and clinical features. Curr. Med. Mycol. 2017, 3, 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Ozcan, K.M.; Ozcan, M.; Karaarslan, A.; Karaarslan, F. Otomycosis in Turkey: Predisposing factors, aetiology and therapy. J. Laryngol. Otol. 2003, 117, 39–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kurnatowski, P.; Filipiak, A. Otomycosis: Prevalence, clinical symptoms, therapeutic procedure. Mycoses 2001, 44, 472–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Dorko, E.; Jenca, A.; Orencák, M.; Virágová, S.; Pilipcinec, E. Otomycoses of candidal origin in eastern Slovakia. Folia Microbiol. 2004, 49, 601–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Distribution of otomycosis causative agents.
Figure 1. Distribution of otomycosis causative agents.
Jof 09 00662 g001
Table 1. Species distribution, clinical manifestations, and risk factors for otomycosis.
Table 1. Species distribution, clinical manifestations, and risk factors for otomycosis.
Country
(Sample Size *)
Identified Fungal Species **Reported Signs and Symptoms ***Predisposing Factors ***References
Asia
Japan
(29 patients)
A. niger, A. terreus, A. fumigatusN/AN/AHagiwara, S. et al. [43]
China
(108 patients)
A. niger, C. albicans, A. terreus, A. flavus, C. lustaniae, A. fumigatus, C. parapsilosis, C. famata, Cryptococcus laurentii, C. guilliermondii, A. versicolor, Fusarium solaniPruritus, Otorrhea, Ear fullness, Hearing loss, Otalgia, TinnitusN/AJia, X. et al. [58]
India
(30 patients)
A. niger, A. flavus,
C. tropicalis
Pruritus, Otalgia, Ear fullness, Hearing loss, OtorrheaEar pricking with hard objects, Use of oil ear drops, Swimming or pond baths, Diabetes, ImmunodeficiencyPanigrahi, M. et al. [36]
India
(350 patients)
A. niger, A. flavus, A. fumigatus, C. albicans, C. krusei, C. tropicalis, Penicillium spp., Mucor spp.,
Trichophyton mentagrophyte
Hearing loss, Ear fullness, Pruritus, Otalgia, Otorrhea, TinnitusEar pricking with hard objects, Use of oil ear dropsAgarwal, P. et al. [2]
India
(100 patients)
A. niger, A. flavus, A. fumigatus, C. albicans,
C. tropicalis, C. glabrata,C. kefyr, Penicilium spp.,
Geotrichum spp., Scopulariopsis spp.
Pruritus, Otalgia, Ear blockage, Tinnitus, Hearing loss, OtorrheaUse of oil ear drops, Use of antibiotic or wax-dissolving ear drops, Ear pricking with hard objects, Diabetes, SwimmingRawat, S. et al. [15]
India
(100 patients)
A. niger, A. fumigatus, A. flavus, Penicillium spp.,
C. albicans, Rhizospus spp.,
Chrysosporium spp.
Pruritus, Ear fullness,
Otorrhea, Otalgia, Tinnitus
Use of oil ear drops, Ear pricking with hard objects, Use of antibiotic ear dropsPrasad, S.C. et al. [11]
Pakistan
(180 patients)
N/AHearing loss, Pruritus, Otalgia, Otorrhea, TinnitusN/AAnwar, K. et al. [25]
Iran
(129 patients)
A. niger, A. flavus, A. fumigatus, C. albicans,
Penicillium spp., Dermatophytes, C. tropicalis, Fusarium spp., Rhizopus spp., Eurotium spp.
Pruritus, Ear fullness, Otorrhea, OtalgiaEar pricking with hard objects, DiabetesKazemi, A. et al. [57]
Syria
(70 patients)
A. niger, C. albicans,A. versicolor, A. fumigatus,
A. flavus, Penicillium spp.
Otorrhea, Otalgia, Hearing lossN/AIsmail, M.T. et al. [60]
Turkey
(87 patients)
A. niger, A. fumigatus,
A. flavus, A. terreus, C. albicans, C. tropicalis, C. kefyr
Pruritus, Otalgia, Hearing loss, Tinnitus, OtorrheaWearing a traditional head covering, Swimming in the pool/sea, Spa baths, Itching on other body parts, Long-term antibiotic treatment, Rainy weather seasonOzcan, K.M. et al. [61]
Turkey
(544 patients)
A. niger, C. tropicalis,
A. fumigatus, C. albicans,
A. terreus, A. flavus,
C. parapsilosis, C. glabrata,
Penicillium spp., C. kefyr,
C. guilliermondii, C. krusei,
Trichophyton spp.,
Geotrichum candidum
N/AN/ADeğerli, K. et al. [8]
Africa
Egypt
(110 patients)
A. niger, A. flavusPruritus, Otalgia, Hearing loss, OtorrheaEar canal trauma, Swimming, Use of antibiotic ear drops, Absent cerumen, Summer seasonAbdelazeem, M. et al. [24]
Egypt
(102 patients)
A. niger, A. flavus, C. famata,
A. terreus, C. parapsilosis,
C. utiliz, Rhizopus stolonifer,
C. guilliermondii, C. krusei,
Cryptococcus laurentii,
Penicillium duclauxi
Pruritus, Otalgia, Otorrhea, Hearing loss, TinnitusN/AAli, K. et al. [10]
Nigeria
(378 patients)
A. niger, A. fumigatus, C. albicans, A. flavusPruritus, Otalgia, Tinnitus, Ear fullness, Hearing loss, OtorrheaEar pricking with hard objects, Long-term use of oral antibiotics, Use of antibiotic ear drops, Diabetes, Sino-nasal and nasopharyngeal malignancy, Retroviral infectionFasunla, J. et al. [1]
Central America
Mexico
(40 patients)
A. niger, C. albicans,
C. glabrata, Fusarium spp.,
A. terreus, A. flavus, Alternaria spp.
Pruritus, Hearing loss, Otorrhea, OtalgiaN/AAlarid-Coronel, J. et al. [12]
North America
USA
(132 patients)
Aspergillus spp. Candida spp. Aureobasidium spp.
Acremonium spp.
Otalgia, Otorrhea, Hearing loss, Ear fullness, Pruritus, TinnitusDiabetes, History of otologic procedures, Mastoid cavity after surgical procedureHo, T. et al. [14]
South America
Brasil
(20 patients)
C. albicans, C. parapsilosis,
A. niger, A. flavus,
A. fumigatus, C. tropicalis,
Trichosporon asahii, Scedosporium apiospermum
Pruritus, Otalgia, Otorrhea, Hearing loss
Chronic otitis, Long-term antibiotic treatment, Absent cerumen, Ear pricking with hard objectsPontes, Z.B. et al. [59]
Europe
Poland
(96 patients)
C. parapsilosis, C. albicans,
A. niger, A. flavus,
Penicillium spp., C. guilliermondii, C. tropicalis, C. glabrata,
C. humicola, C. krusei,
A. candidus, Geotrichum candidum,
Rhodotorula rubra
Pruritus, Otorrhea, Ear fullness, Hearing loss, Tinnitus, Otalgia, EAC swelling and redness, HeadacheN/AKurnatowski, P. et al. [62]
Slovakia
(40 patients)
C. albicans, C. parapsilosis,
C. tropicalis, C. krusei,
C. gulliermondii
Burning sensation in the ear, Pruritus, Ear fullness, Hearing loss, Otalgia, Otorrhea, Tinnitus, Headache, NauseaSwimming pool and sauna usage, Diabetes, Immunosuppressive therapy, Long-term antibiotic treatmentDorko, E. et al. [63]
Spain
(390 patients)
C. parapsilosis, A. flavus, C. albicans, A. niger, A. fumigatus, A. candidus,
A. terreus, C. glabrata, C. tropicalis, Paecilomyces variotii
Pruritus, Otalgia, Hearing lossN/AGarcía-Agudo, L. et al. [13]
Russia
(331 patients)
A. niger, A. flavus, A. fumigatus, Candida spp.N/AN/AKryukov, A.I. et al. [52]
Serbia
(292 patients)
A. niger, C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, A. flavus,
A. fumigatus, C. krusei,
C. guilliermondii, C. glabrata,
C. tropicalis
N/AN/ATasić-Otašević, S. et al. [4]
Serbia
(30 patients)
A. niger, A. flavusN/AUse of antibiotic ear drops, Use of EAC hygiene pro-ducts, Headphone usage, Frequent ORL examinations and rinsing of EAC, Corticosteroid ear drop usage, Predisposing diseasesBojanović, M. et al. [40]
* Number of patients diagnosed with otomycosis, ** Sorted by number of isolates, *** Sorted by frequency of occurrence, N/A Not Available.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bojanović, M.; Stalević, M.; Arsić-Arsenijević, V.; Ignjatović, A.; Ranđelović, M.; Golubović, M.; Živković-Marinkov, E.; Koraćević, G.; Stamenković, B.; Otašević, S. Etiology, Predisposing Factors, Clinical Features and Diagnostic Procedure of Otomycosis: A Literature Review. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 662. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9060662

AMA Style

Bojanović M, Stalević M, Arsić-Arsenijević V, Ignjatović A, Ranđelović M, Golubović M, Živković-Marinkov E, Koraćević G, Stamenković B, Otašević S. Etiology, Predisposing Factors, Clinical Features and Diagnostic Procedure of Otomycosis: A Literature Review. Journal of Fungi. 2023; 9(6):662. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9060662

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bojanović, Mila, Marko Stalević, Valentina Arsić-Arsenijević, Aleksandra Ignjatović, Marina Ranđelović, Milan Golubović, Emilija Živković-Marinkov, Goran Koraćević, Bojana Stamenković, and Suzana Otašević. 2023. "Etiology, Predisposing Factors, Clinical Features and Diagnostic Procedure of Otomycosis: A Literature Review" Journal of Fungi 9, no. 6: 662. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9060662

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop