Shoot Induction, Multiplication, Rooting and Acclimatization of Black Turmeric (Curcuma caesia Roxb.): An Important and Endangered Curcuma Species
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Plant Materials
2.2. Shoot Induction of C. caesia as Affected by Basal Medium Formulations
2.3. Effect of Different Concentrations of Cytokinins and Auxins on Shoot Multiplication of C. caesia
2.4. Effect of Basal Medium Strength and Different Concentrations of Indole-3-Acetic Acid (IAA) on Root Induction of C. caesia Plantlets
2.5. Acclimatization of C. caesia Plantlets as Affected by Different Potting Mediums
2.6. Statistical Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Shoot Induction of C. caesia as Affected by Basal Medium Formulations
3.2. Effect of Different Concentrations of Cytokinins on Shoot Multiplication of C. caesia
3.3. Enhancement of Shoot Multiplication by Supplementation of 15 μM of BAP with Different Concentrations of Auxins
3.4. Effect of Basal Medium Strength and Different Concentrations of Indole-3-Acetic Acid (IAA) on Root Induction of C. caesia
3.5. Acclimatization of C. caesia as Affected by Different Potting Mediums
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Fozia, I.; Fouzia, H.; Baqir, S.N.; Iqbal, A.; Sabahat, J.; Syed, M.F.H. Studies on antibacterial activity of some traditional medicinal plants used in folk medicine. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 2012, 25, 669–674. [Google Scholar]
- Amalraj, V.A.; Velayudhan, K.C.; Muralidharan, V.K. A note on the anomalous flowering behaviour in Curcuma caesia (Zingiberaceae). J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 1989, 86, 278–279. [Google Scholar]
- Borah, A.; Paw, M.; Gogoi, R.; Loying, R.; Sarma, N.; Munda, S.; Pandey, S.K.; Lal, M. Chemical composition, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-microbial and in vitro cytotoxic efficacy of essential oil of Curcuma caesia Roxb. leaves: An endangered medicinal plant of North East India. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 129, 448–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, A.; Gautam, S.S. Volatile constituents of Curcuma caesia Roxb. rhizome from North India. Nat. Acad. Sci. Lett. 2020, 43, 607–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, S.; Sahoo, B.C.; Ray, A.; Jena, S.; Dash, M.; Nayak, S.; Kar, B.; Sahoo, S. Intraspecific chemical variability of essential oil of Curcuma caesia (Black Turmeric). Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2021, 46, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paliwal, P.; Pancholi, S.S.; Patel, R.K. Pharmacognostic parameters for evaluation of the rhizomes of Curcuma caesia. J. Adv. Pharm. Technol. Res. 2011, 2, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karmakar, I.; Dolai, N.; Suresh, K.R.B.; Kar, B.; Roy, S.N.; Haldar, P.K. Antitumor activity and antioxidant property of Curcuma caesia against Ehrlich’s ascites carcinoma bearing mice. Pharm. Biol. 2013, 51, 753–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaur, R.; Kaur, B.; Suttee, A.; Kalsi, V. Comparative assessment of in vitro antimicrobial activity of Curcuma caesia Roxb. and Curcuma amada Roxb. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2018, 11, 94–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rai, N.; Shukla, T.P.; Loksh, K.R.; Karole, S. Synthesized silver nanoparticle loaded gel of Curcuma caesia for effective treatment of acne. J. Drug Deliv. Ther. 2020, 10, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chandran, H.; Meena, M.; Barupal, T.; Sharma, K. Plant tissue culture as a perpetual source for production of industrially important bioactive compounds. Biotechnol. Rep. 2020, 26, e00450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, T.; Khan, M.A.; Karam, K.; Ullah, N.; Mashwani, Z.U.R.; Nadhman, A. Plant in vitro culture technologies; A promise into factories of secondary metabolites against COVID-19. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zuraida, A.R. Improved in vitro propagation of Curcuma caesia, a valuable medicinal plant. J. Trop. Agric. Food Sci. 2013, 41, 273–281. [Google Scholar]
- Jose, S.; Thomas, T.D. High-frequency callus organogenesis, large-scale cultivation and assessment of clonal fidelity of regenerated plants of Curcuma caesia Roxb., an important source of camphor. Agrofor. Syst. 2015, 89, 779–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, W.R.; Singh, H.B.; Devi, S.S.; Singh, W.N.; Singh, N.M.; Devi, Y.P. Conservation of Curcuma caesia by in vitro techniques. Helix 2015, 2, 708–713. [Google Scholar]
- Sarma, I.; Deka, A.C. Conservation of Curcuma caesia Roxb.-A critically endangered species via in vitro plant regeneration from organogenic callus. Asian J. Conserv. Biol. 2020, 9, 151–155. [Google Scholar]
- Sarma, I.; Deka, A.C.; Sarma, T.C. A protocol for rapid clonal propagation and microrhizome production of Curcuma caesia Roxb (Zingiberaceae): A critically endangered medicinal plant of North East India. Indian J. Agric. Res. 2021, 55, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neha, B.; Tiwari, K.L.; Jadhav, S.K. Effect of explant type in development of in vitro micropropagation protocol of an endangered medicinal plant: Curcuma caesia Roxb. Biotechnology 2014, 13, 22–27. [Google Scholar]
- Shahinozzaman, M.; Ferdous, M.; Faruq, M.; Azad, M.; Amin, M. Micropropagation of black turmeric (Curcuma caesia Roxb.) through in vitro culture of rhizome bud explants. J. Cent. Eur. Agric. 2013, 14, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murashige, T.; Skoog, F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 1962, 15, 473–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gamborg, O.L.; Miller, R.; Ojima, K. Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp. Cell Res. 1968, 50, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lloyd, G.; McCown, B. Commercially-feasible micropropagation of mountain laurel, Kalmia latifolia, by use of shoot-tip culture. Comb. Proc. Int. Plant Propag. Soc. 1980, 30, 421–427. [Google Scholar]
- Chowdhury, S.; Pal, K.; Chakraborty, M.; Chakraborty, S.; Mandal, S.; Pandit, M.S.; Sahana, N. Conservation and in vitro propagation of an endangered wild turmeric (Curcuma caesia Roxb.) species from Sub-Himalayan Terai region of West Bengal. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2020, 9, 2132–2140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferrari, M.P.; dos Santos, Q.M.; de Andrade, M.M.; Trettel, J.R.; Magalhães, H.M. Growth regulators, sucrose and potassium in the growth and biochemical activity of Curcuma longa L. micropropagated. Sci. Agrar. Paranaensis 2020, 1, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jena, S.; Ray, A.; Sahoo, A.; Sahoo, S.; Dash, B.; Kar, B.; Nayak, S. Rapid plant regeneration in industrially important Curcuma zedoaria revealing genetic and biochemical fidelity of the regenerants. 3 Biotech 2020, 10, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Parida, R.; Nayak, S. Rapid in vitro leaf biomass production of genetically stable Curcuma aromatica-An under exploited medicinal plant. J. Biol. Act. Prod. Nat. 2021, 11, 497–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saad, A.I.; Elshahed, A.M. Plant tissue culture media. Rec. Adv. Plant In Vitro Cult. 2012, 30–40. [Google Scholar]
- Phillips, G.C.; Garda, M. Plant tissue culture media and practices: An overview. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Plant 2019, 3, 242–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fong, Y.M.; Sani, H.B. Studies on micropropagation of Curcuma caesia Roxb. (Kunyit Hitam). Int. J. Innov. Sci. Eng. Technol. Technol. 2019, 6, 101–106. [Google Scholar]
- Sethy, R.; Kullu, B. Micropropagation of ethnomedicinal plant Calotropis sp. and enhanced production of stigmasterol. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2022, 149, 147–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riahi, L.; Chograni, H.; Ben Rejeb, F.; Ben Romdhane, M.; Masmoudi, A.S.; Cherif, A. Efficient in vitro regeneration of the endangered species Artemisia arborescens L. through direct organogenesis and impact on secondary metabolites production. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 2022, 63, 439–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Majumder, S.; Biswas, A.; Rahman, M.M. In vitro propagation and cytological analysis of Boerhaavia diffusa L.—An important medicinal plant species of Bangladesh. Am. J. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 1347–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kadapatti, S.S.; Murthy, H.N. Rapid plant regeneration, analysis of genetic fidelity, and neoandrographolide content of micropropagated plants of Andrographis alata (Vahl) Nees. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2021, 19, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khajuria, A.K.; Bisht, N.S.; Bhagat, N. In vitro organogenesis and plant regeneration of Thymus serpyllum L.: An important aromatic medicinal plant. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Plant 2020, 56, 652–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaspar, T.; Kevers, C.; Penel, C.; Greppin, H.; Reid, D.M.; Thorpe, T.A. Plant hormones and plant growth regulators in plant tissue culture. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Plant 1996, 32, 272–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sultana, K.W.; Das, S.; Chandra, I.; Roy, A. Efficient micropropagation of Thunbergia coccinea Wall. and genetic homogeneity assessment through RAPD and ISSR markers. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hailu, T.; Haileselassie, T.; Feyissa, T. In Vitro regeneration of Korarima (Aframomum corrorima (Braun) PCM Jansen): A threatened spice and medicinal herb from Ethiopia. Scientifica 2022, 2022, 8237723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farooq, I.; Qadri, Z.A.; Rather, Z.A.; Nazki, I.T.; Banday, N.; Rafiq, S.; Masoodi, K.Z.; Noureldeen, A.; Mansoor, S. Optimization of an improved, efficient and rapid in vitro micropropagation protocol for Petunia hybrida Vilm. Cv. “Bravo”. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 3701–3709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kudikala, H.; Jogam, P.; Sirikonda, A.; Mood, K.; Allini, V.R. In vitro micropropagation and genetic fidelity studies using SCoT and ISSR primers in Annona reticulata L.: An important medicinal plant. Vegetos 2020, 33, 446–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gajula, H.; Kumar, V.; Vijendra, P.D.; Rajashekar, J.; Sannabommaji, T.; Basappa, G.; Anuradha, C.M. In vitro regeneration of Psoralea corylifolia Linn.: Influence of polyamines during in vitro shoot development. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Plant 2022, 58, 103–113. [Google Scholar]
- Dhiman, N.; Devi, K.; Bhattacharya, A. Development of low cost micropropagation protocol for Nardostachys jatamansi: A critically endangered medicinal herb of Himalayas. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2021, 140, 468–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cartabia, A.; Sarropoulou, V.; Grigoriadou, K.; Maloupa, E.; Declerck, S. In vitro propagation of Alkanna tinctoria Tausch.: A medicinal plant of the Boraginaceae family with high pharmaceutical value. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 182, 114860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chauhan, R.; Shirkot, P. Micropropagation of endangered medicinal plant Bacopa monnieri (L.) Pennell. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2020, 9, 1614–1620. [Google Scholar]
- Sriskanda, D.; Liew, Y.X.; Khor, S.P.; Merican, F.; Subramaniam, S.; Chew, B.L. An efficient micropropagation protocol for Ficus carica cv. Golden Orphan suitable for mass propagation. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2021, 38, 102225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Basal Medium | Shoot Induction (%) | No. of Shoot | Shoot Length (cm) | No. of Leaves | Leaves Fresh Weight (g) | Leaves Dry Weight (g) | Root Induction (%) | No. of Root | Root Length (cm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSB5 | 100 a | 2.70 a | 7.88 a | 5.33 a | 0.179 a | 0.018 a | 100 a | 8.40 a | 3.34 a |
MS | 93.33 a | 1.50 b | 5.53 b | 3.00 b | 0.105 b | 0.008 b | 86.67 b | 3.85 b | 2.19 a |
WPM | 83.33 b | 1.37 b | 4.86 b | 2.97 b | 0.085 c | 0.006 b | 80 b | 3.67 b | 2.02 a |
Cytokinin (μM) | Shoot Induction (%) | No. of Shoot | Length of Shoot (cm) | No. of Leaves | Leaves Fresh Weight (g) | Leaves Dry Weight (g) | Callus Induction (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control | 93.33 a | 1.20 d | 8.96 d | 4.10 e | 0.109 f | 0.017 f | 0 c | |
BAP | 5 | 96.67 a | 1.97 b | 9.54 c | 5.73 b | 0.248 cd | 0.025 b | 0 c |
10 | 100 a | 2.07 b | 10.10 b | 5.73 b | 0.277 bc | 0.025 b | 0 c | |
15 | 100 a | 2.77 a | 10.86 a | 7.00 a | 0.343 a | 0.029 a | 0 c | |
20 | 96.67 a | 1.97 b | 7.94 e | 4.30 de | 0.195 e | 0.018 ef | 0 c | |
Kin | 5 | 96.67 a | 1.37 cd | 9.22 cd | 4.63 d | 0.242 d | 0.020 de | 0 c |
10 | 100 a | 1.27 cd | 9.63 c | 4.13 d | 0.240 d | 0.022 cd | 0 c | |
15 | 100 a | 1.47 c | 11.10 a | 5.03 c | 0.285 b | 0.022 cd | 0 c | |
20 | 100 a | 1.47 c | 10.14 a | 5.10 c | 0.246 cd | 0.024 bc | 0 c | |
2-iP | 5 | 80 b | 1.20 d | 4.76 f | 3.03 f | 0.109 f | 0.008 g | 23.22 a |
10 | 60 c | 0.70 e | 3.84 g | 1.53 g | 0.089 f | 0.009 g | 16.67 b | |
15 | 36.67 d | 0.47 f | 2.20 h | 1.01 h | 0.037 g | 0.004 h | 16.67 b | |
20 | 30 e | 0.43 f | 1.84 h | 1.17 gh | 0.040 g | 0.005 h | 3.33 c |
PGR | Conc (μM) | Shoot Induction (%) | No. of Shoot | Shoot Length (cm) | No. of Leaves | Leaves Fresh Weight (g) | Leaves Dry Weight (g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control | 0 | 100 a | 2.57 c | 10.00 b | 5.90 f | 0.294 e | 0.022 ef |
IBA | 2 | 100 a | 2.97 b | 9.19 c | 7.13 de | 0.311 d | 0.023 de |
4 | 100 a | 3.00 b | 9.74 bc | 7.37 cd | 0.362 b | 0.028 b | |
6 | 100 a | 3.53 a | 10.81 a | 9.57 a | 0.486 a | 0.039 a | |
8 | 100 a | 3.53 a | 9.58 bc | 8.10 b | 0.320 d | 0.026 bc | |
NAA | 2 | 100 a | 3.27 ab | 8.00 de | 7.00 e | 0.254 g | 0.020 f |
4 | 100 a | 3.40 a | 8.57 d | 7.57 c | 0.333 c | 0.025 cd | |
6 | 100 a | 3.20 ab | 7.68 e | 6.83 e | 0.295 e | 0.021 ef | |
8 | 100 a | 3.30 ab | 8.13 de | 7.00 e | 0.278 f | 0.022 def |
Strength | IAA (μM) | Number of Roots | Length of Roots (cm) |
---|---|---|---|
Full | 0 | 4.40 de | 3.85 e |
2.5 | 5.87 b | 4.39 c | |
5 | 6.13 a | 5.37 a | |
7.5 | 4.20 ef | 3.38 f | |
10 | 3.20 h | 1.79 h | |
Half | 0 | 3.60 g | 2.81 g |
2.5 | 4.27 def | 2.59 g | |
5 | 5.13 c | 4.88 b | |
7.5 | 4.53 d | 4.15 cd | |
10 | 4 f | 4.01 de |
Medium | Survival (%) |
---|---|
Day 14 | |
Cocopeat + peatmoss | 77.78 a |
Perlite + peatmoss | 61.11 b |
Vermiculite + peatmoss | 44.43 c |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Haida, Z.; Sinniah, U.R.; Nakasha, J.J.; Hakiman, M. Shoot Induction, Multiplication, Rooting and Acclimatization of Black Turmeric (Curcuma caesia Roxb.): An Important and Endangered Curcuma Species. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 740. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8080740
Haida Z, Sinniah UR, Nakasha JJ, Hakiman M. Shoot Induction, Multiplication, Rooting and Acclimatization of Black Turmeric (Curcuma caesia Roxb.): An Important and Endangered Curcuma Species. Horticulturae. 2022; 8(8):740. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8080740
Chicago/Turabian StyleHaida, Zainol, Uma Rani Sinniah, Jaafar Juju Nakasha, and Mansor Hakiman. 2022. "Shoot Induction, Multiplication, Rooting and Acclimatization of Black Turmeric (Curcuma caesia Roxb.): An Important and Endangered Curcuma Species" Horticulturae 8, no. 8: 740. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8080740