Next Article in Journal
Assessing the Impact of Variety, Irrigation, and Plant Distance on Predatory and Phytophagous Insects in Chili
Next Article in Special Issue
In Vitro Propagation of Pyracantha angustifolia (Franch.) C.K. Schneid.
Previous Article in Journal
Characterization of the Residue (Endocarp) of Acrocomia aculeata and Its Biochars as a Potential Source for Soilless Growing Media
Previous Article in Special Issue
In Vitro Propagation of Caper (Capparis spinosa L.): A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Shoot Induction, Multiplication, Rooting and Acclimatization of Black Turmeric (Curcuma caesia Roxb.): An Important and Endangered Curcuma Species

Department of Crop Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2022, 8(8), 740; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8080740
Submission received: 12 July 2022 / Revised: 11 August 2022 / Accepted: 12 August 2022 / Published: 17 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue In Vitro Technology and Micropropagated Plants)

Abstract

:
Curcuma caesia Roxb., commonly known as Kali Haldi or black turmeric, is one of the important species in the genus Curcuma. This species has been classified as one of the endangered Curcuma species due to the drastic decrement of this plant in its natural habitat. C. caesia has been overharvested for various purposes, including bioactive compound extraction to fulfill the pharmaceutical industry demand. Hence, this study was conducted to establish a protocol for the propagation of C. caesia via plant tissue culture techniques. In the shoot induction stage, three basal medium formulations, including Murashige and Skoog (MS medium), the combination of Murashige and Skoog macronutrients and B5 micronutrients (MSB5 medium) and woody plant medium (WPM medium) supplemented with 15 μM of 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP), were used. The results found that the MSB5 medium was the most suitable basal medium formulation for shoot induction of C. caesia. In the subsequent experiment, different types of cytokinin, including BAP, kinetin and 2-iP at concentrations of 5, 10, 15 and 20 μM, were fortified in the MSB5 medium for shoot multiplication. The shoot multiplication was further enhanced by supplementing the MSB5 medium with indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) or 1-napthaleneacetic acid (NAA) at the concentrations of 2, 4, 6 and 8 μM. The results showed that a combination of 15 μM of BAP and 6 μM of IBA significantly increased the shoot multiplication with 100% shoot induction, 3.53 shoots/explant, 10.81 cm of shoot length, 9.57 leaves, 0.486 g of leaves fresh weight and 0.039 g of leaves dry weight. After the multiplication, the rooting stage was carried out by altering the basal medium strength into half and full strength and supplementing with 2.5, 5, 7.5 and 10 μM of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA). The full strength of MSB5 medium supplemented with 5 μM of IAA exhibited the highest number of roots and length of roots, with 6.13 roots and 5.37 cm, respectively. After the rooting stage, the plantlets were successfully acclimatized in the potting medium with the combination of cocopeat and peatmoss, and the ratio of 1:1 was found to produce the highest survival rate with 77.78%. In conclusion, the protocol established in this study could be useful for large-scale raw material production, either for conservation or bioactive compound extraction.

1. Introduction

Curcuma caesia Roxb. belongs to the family Zingiberaceae and genus Curcuma. This species is well known in India as Kali Haldi and is commonly called Indian Black Turmeric in other countries. C. caesia has been used since ancient times for the treatment of various ailments and diseases in the Indian community. The C. caesia extract is used for the treatment of asthma, cancer, inflammation, epilepsy, fever and allergies [1,2]. In addition, the rhizomes and leaves of C. caesia were found to contain essential oils such as camphor, eucalyptol, tropolone, ledol and camphene, which are responsible for the aromatic odor [3,4,5]. In the numerous pharmacological studies on C. caesia, the extracts of C. caesia possess anticancer, anti-asthmatic, anti-acne, anti-inflammatory and anti-microbial properties [6,7,8,9].
As the pharmaceutical industry keeps growing, the demand for plant raw materials has increased for the extraction of various bioactive compounds. Therefore, there is an urgent need to look for an alternative method for the large-scale production of plant raw materials to fulfill the growing demand from the industry. To date, micropropagation or in vitro propagation is a plant tissue culture technique that has many advantages in producing high amounts of plantlets in a short time, and this technique can also be used for the production of bioactive compounds [10,11]. In addition, the plant tissue culture technique is very useful for the conservation of endangered plant species, including C. caesia, which has a drastically reduced population due to overharvesting activity [3]. Previously, several studies related to C. caesia micropropagation, including regenerating the plant via direct and indirect organogenesis, have been conducted [12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. The studies involved the alteration of basal medium formulation, cytokinin and auxin [12,13,14,15,16,17,18].
Hence, the aim of this study was to develop an improved protocol for micropropagation of C. caesia as affected by basal medium formulation, plant growth regulators, basal medium strength and potting medium for acclimatization.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials

Curcuma caesia Roxb. fresh rhizomes were obtained from the nursery located in Muar, Johor, Malaysia (Coordinates: 2.06° N, 102.58° E). The sprouted shoots (approximately 5 cm) were cut and brought to the laboratory for sterilization processes. The sterilization process was conducted by placing the shoots under running tap water for 30 min to eliminate the soils, debris and contaminants. Then, the shoots were transferred to the bottle jar containing 70% commercial bleach (Clorox®, Oakland, CA, USA) and shaken for 20 min. The shoots were rinsed with autoclaved distilled water three times and excised into approximately 1 ± 0.5 cm.

2.2. Shoot Induction of C. caesia as Affected by Basal Medium Formulations

For the shoot induction experiment, shoots were inoculated onto the three formulations of basal medium, namely MS medium [19], MSB5 medium (combination of macronutrients and micronutrients formulated by Murashige and Skoog [15] and vitamins formulated by Gamborg et al. [20]) and Woody Plant Medium (WPM medium) formulated by Lloyd and McCown [21]. All the chemicals used were analytical grade (R&M Chemical, Malaysia; Sigma-Aldrich, USA). All the basal medium formulations were supplemented with 30 g/L of sucrose, 3 g/L of gelrite and 5 μM of BAP. The pH of the basal mediums was adjusted to 5.75 prior to autoclave (Hirayama, Japan). The basal medium was poured into the 250 mL conical flasks, with each flask containing 50 mL of basal medium. All basal mediums were autoclaved at the temperature of 121°C for 20 min at a pressure of 1.06 kg cm−2. For each conical flask, one aseptic microshoot was inoculated onto the basal medium and data were collected after six weeks of inoculation. All cultures were kept in the culture room under 16 h of light and 8 h of dark using LED white light with an irradiation of 45 µmol m−2 s−1 at a temperature of 25 ± 2 °C.

2.3. Effect of Different Concentrations of Cytokinins and Auxins on Shoot Multiplication of C. caesia

After shoot induction, the multiplication experiment was conducted by supplementing the basal medium with cytokinin, including BAP, kinetin and 2-iP, at the concentrations of 5, 10, 15 and 20 μM. After eight weeks of incubation, the data were recorded. In the subsequent experiment, the shoot multiplication was further enhanced by combining 15 μM of BAP with auxin (IBA and NAA) at the concentrations of 2, 4, 6 and 8 μM. The data were collected after eight weeks of inoculation.

2.4. Effect of Basal Medium Strength and Different Concentrations of Indole-3-Acetic Acid (IAA) on Root Induction of C. caesia Plantlets

For root induction, healthy plantlets at eight weeks old, which were maintained on the MSB5 medium supplemented with 15 μM of BAP and 6 μM of IBA, were used. The rooting medium used was full and half strength of MSB5 medium supplemented with IAA at the concentrations of 2.5, 5, 7.5 and 10 μM. The plantlets were exposed to rooting medium for four weeks, and the data were collected after four weeks of inoculation.

2.5. Acclimatization of C. caesia Plantlets as Affected by Different Potting Mediums

The acclimatization was conducted by transferring the healthy plantlets with at least two leaves and well rooted (more than 1.5 cm long) into the potting medium. The potting medium used was a combination of cocopeat and peatmoss, perlite and peatmoss and vermiculite and peatmoss at the ratio of 1:1 for all potting medium combinations. The data were recorded after two weeks of transplantation.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

All the experiments were conducted in a completely randomized design with three replications and ten explants for each replication (n = 30). The Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used for data analysis, and Duncan’s Multiple Test (DMRT) was used for means separation. The analysis was performed using Statistical Analysis System (SAS ver. 9.4, Cary, NC, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Shoot Induction of C. caesia as Affected by Basal Medium Formulations

In this experiment, the shoot induction was significantly affected by different formulations of the basal medium. The MSB5 medium formulation significantly produced the highest percentage of shoot induction with 100%, followed by MS medium and WPM medium with 93.33 and 83.33%, respectively (Table 1). The MSB5 medium also significantly produced the highest number of shoots, length of shoot and number of leaves, with 2.70 shoots, 7.88 cm and 5.33 leaves (Figure 1). Meanwhile, there was no significant difference between MS medium and WPM medium formulations on number of shoots, length of shoot and number of leaves. For the biomass of leaves, the highest fresh and dry weight of leaves were accumulated from the MSB5 medium formulation with 0.179 and 0.018 g, respectively.
By conducting the plant tissue culture technique, finding the most suitable basal medium formulation is a crucial step for producing healthy plantlets. Since a long time ago, numerous basal medium formulations have been established for propagating various species. In micropropagation of Curcuma species, MS medium is the most frequently used for propagating C. longa, C. zedoaria, C. aromatica and also C. caesia [22,23,24,25], in contrast with this study, which found that MSB5 medium formulation was more efficient than MS medium formulation. The high efficiency of MSB5 medium formulation as compared to MS medium might be due to higher vitamin concentrations in the MSB5 formulation that lead to increased plant growth. Based on the MSB5 medium composition, the pyridoxine HCl and nicotinic acid concentrations were two-fold higher, and thiamine HCl concentration was 100-fold higher than the MS medium vitamin formulations. According to Saad and Elshahed [26], vitamins such as thiamine HCl, nicotinic acid and pyridoxine HCL at low concentrations are required by plants as a catalyst for various metabolic processes. In addition, the amount needed varies by plant species as some plants are able to synthesize their own vitamins [27].

3.2. Effect of Different Concentrations of Cytokinins on Shoot Multiplication of C. caesia

Based on the previous experiment, the MSB5 medium formulation was found to be the most suitable basal medium for C. caesia. In this experiment, the shoots were multiplied by using different concentrations of cytokinin (Table 2). After eight weeks of inoculations, the treatments of 10 and 15 μM BAP and 10, 15 and 20 μM kinetin were recorded at 100% of shoot induction. The lowest percentage of shoot induction was significantly produced by the treatment of 20 μM of 2-iP with 30% of induction. The treatment of 15 μM of BAP significantly produced the highest number of shoots and number of leaves, with 2.77 shoots and 7.00 leaves, respectively. Meanwhile, the highest length of shoots was exhibited by the treatments of 15 μM of BAP, 15 and 20 μM of kinetin with 10.86, 11.10 and 10.14 cm, respectively (Figure 2). As the highest number of shoots and number of leaves were produced from the treatment of 15 μM of BAP, the leaves biomass accumulation was also recorded from the same treatment with 0.343 and 0.029 g of fresh and dry leaves. In this experiment, callus formation was observed in all treatments of 2-iP. The treatment of 5 μM of 2-iP significantly produced the highest callus induction percentage and callus fresh weight with 23.22% and 0.425 g, respectively (Figure 3). In contrast, no callus formation was observed in other treatments.
Based on the results of this experiment, 15 μM of BAP was more prominent than the other treatments. Among the BAP, kinetin and 2-iP treatment, BAP was the most superior, followed by kinetin and 2-iP. The finding was in agreement with Fong and Sani [28], which found that BAP was more effective for shoot production of C. caesia compared to kinetin and TDZ. In addition, the efficiency of BAP was also reported on other species, including Calotropis procera [29], Artemisia arborescens [30], Boerhaavia diffusa [31] and Andrographis alata [32]. The suitability of BAP over other types of cytokinin in shoot multiplication might be due to the ability of the plant to metabolize BAP more readily as nucleotides, and ribosides stability is present naturally in BAP [33].

3.3. Enhancement of Shoot Multiplication by Supplementation of 15 μM of BAP with Different Concentrations of Auxins

The supplementation of cytokinins in the previous experiment found that 15 μM of BAP was the most prominent in the multiplication of C. caesia. Hence, the shoot multiplication was further enhanced by supplementing 15 μM of BAP with different concentrations of auxins. By supplementing the MSB5 medium with auxins, 100% of shoot induction was obtained in all the treatments (Table 3). In terms of the number of shoots, the treatment of 6 and 8 μM of IBA produced the highest number of shoots, with 3.53 shoots. However, the number of shoots recorded was statistically non-significant with all NAA treatments. However, the highest length of shoots was significantly exhibited by the treatment of 6 μM of IBA with 10.81 cm. In addition, the same treatment also produced the highest number of leaves and leaves biomass accumulation with 9.57 leaves, 0.486 g of leaves fresh weight and 0.039 g of leaves dry weight, respectively. This experiment showed that the application of cytokinin and auxin produced a positive effect on C. caesia growth.
In plant tissue culture, supplementation of auxin in the basal medium is frequently used for the rooting stage. However, the addition of auxin can also be conducted for the enhancement of shoot multiplication as the synergistic effect between the auxin and cytokinin will enhance the cell division and elongation of the shoot [34,35]. Several studies have reported that the combination of auxin and cytokinin significantly increased plant growth. A study by Hailu et al. [36] found that the combination of BAP and IBA significantly increased the shoot induction percentage, number of leaves and number of shoots of Aframomum corrorima. Besides that, the synergistic effect between auxin and cytokinin on shoot growth was also reported on Petunia hybrida [37]. The integration of auxin and cytokinin is important to support plant growth and development [38]. The increased plant growth might be due to the different nutrient uptakes, translocation rates, metabolic processes and ability of plants to regulate the level of plant hormones [39].

3.4. Effect of Basal Medium Strength and Different Concentrations of Indole-3-Acetic Acid (IAA) on Root Induction of C. caesia

In micropropagation of Zingiberaceae plant species, including those from the genus Curcuma, the roots are commonly produced simultaneously with the shoots. However, the number of roots produced per shoot is not enough to support the plantlets during acclimatization. Hence, the rooting stage was conducted to produce adequate amounts of roots for high survival rates during acclimatization. In this study, the shoots were initially cultured on the MSB5 medium supplemented with 15 μM of BAP and 6 μM of IBA for the first eight weeks. After that, the healthy plantlets with more than two leaves and growth of more than 5 cm were separated from the clumps and inoculated individually on rooting medium. The results in Table 4 showed that full-strength MSB5 medium supplemented with 5 μM of IAA significantly produced the highest number of roots and length of roots, with 6.13 roots and 5.37 cm, respectively. Meanwhile, the treatment of full-strength MSB5 medium supplemented with 10 μM of IAA significantly produced the lowest number of roots and length of roots, with 3.20 roots and 1.79 cm, respectively. In this study, full-strength MSB5 fortified with 5 μM of IAA gave the best results for adventitious root formation of C. caesia (Figure 4). The suitability of full-strength basal medium over half-strength medium might be due to a sufficient amount of nutrients to stimulate the root formation. Meanwhile, IAA, which is a frequently used auxin for root induction, alongside IBA, was reported to produce a good rooting response in Nardostachys jatamansi and Alkanna tinctoria [40,41].

3.5. Acclimatization of C. caesia as Affected by Different Potting Mediums

Acclimatization is an important step in the micropropagation of commercially important plants. After the rooting stage, the healthy plantlets with at least two leaves, more than 5 cm in plant height, more than 1.5 cm in root length and without any morphology abnormalities were acclimatized on different potting mediums. Among the combination of cocopeat, perlite and vermiculite with peatmoss, cocopeat significantly produced the highest percentage of plantlet survival, with 77.78%, followed by perlite (61.11%) and vermiculite (44.43%) after two weeks of acclimatization (Table 5) (Figure 5). The higher survival percentage of plantlets in the combination of cocopeat and peatmoss could be due to the higher porosity and air space between the cocopeat and peatmoss, which provided better aeration for the roots to grow and, consequently, produced a higher survival percentage compared to the other treatments. The efficiency of cocopeat as a potting medium for acclimatization was reported on Bacopa monnieri and Ficus carica [42,43].

4. Conclusions

An efficient protocol for micropropagation of C. caesia was established in this study with the aim to mass produce the raw materials of C. caesia in a short time for the conservation of wild populations of this species. The basal medium formulation and plant growth regulators were tested, and results showed that the MSB5 medium supplemented with 15 μM BAP and 6 μM of IBA was the optimum formulation for shoot induction and multiplication of C. caesia. At the rooting stage, full-strength MSB5 medium supplemented with 5 μM IAA was the best concentration for the root formation, and acclimatization was successfully carried out using the potting medium of cocopeat with peatmoss (1:1). Hence, the protocol developed in this study could be used for the large-scale production of C. caesia.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Z.H. and M.H.; methodology, Z.H.; software, Z.H.; validation, Z.H., U.R.S., J.J.N. and M.H.; formal analysis, Z.H.; investigation, Z.H.; data curation, Z.H.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.H.; writing—review and editing, Z.H., U.R.S., J.J.N. and M.H.; supervision, U.R.S., J.J.N. and M.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to thank the Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, for providing facilities and materials for conducting this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fozia, I.; Fouzia, H.; Baqir, S.N.; Iqbal, A.; Sabahat, J.; Syed, M.F.H. Studies on antibacterial activity of some traditional medicinal plants used in folk medicine. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 2012, 25, 669–674. [Google Scholar]
  2. Amalraj, V.A.; Velayudhan, K.C.; Muralidharan, V.K. A note on the anomalous flowering behaviour in Curcuma caesia (Zingiberaceae). J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 1989, 86, 278–279. [Google Scholar]
  3. Borah, A.; Paw, M.; Gogoi, R.; Loying, R.; Sarma, N.; Munda, S.; Pandey, S.K.; Lal, M. Chemical composition, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-microbial and in vitro cytotoxic efficacy of essential oil of Curcuma caesia Roxb. leaves: An endangered medicinal plant of North East India. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 129, 448–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kumar, A.; Gautam, S.S. Volatile constituents of Curcuma caesia Roxb. rhizome from North India. Nat. Acad. Sci. Lett. 2020, 43, 607–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Singh, S.; Sahoo, B.C.; Ray, A.; Jena, S.; Dash, M.; Nayak, S.; Kar, B.; Sahoo, S. Intraspecific chemical variability of essential oil of Curcuma caesia (Black Turmeric). Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2021, 46, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Paliwal, P.; Pancholi, S.S.; Patel, R.K. Pharmacognostic parameters for evaluation of the rhizomes of Curcuma caesia. J. Adv. Pharm. Technol. Res. 2011, 2, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Karmakar, I.; Dolai, N.; Suresh, K.R.B.; Kar, B.; Roy, S.N.; Haldar, P.K. Antitumor activity and antioxidant property of Curcuma caesia against Ehrlich’s ascites carcinoma bearing mice. Pharm. Biol. 2013, 51, 753–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kaur, R.; Kaur, B.; Suttee, A.; Kalsi, V. Comparative assessment of in vitro antimicrobial activity of Curcuma caesia Roxb. and Curcuma amada Roxb. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2018, 11, 94–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rai, N.; Shukla, T.P.; Loksh, K.R.; Karole, S. Synthesized silver nanoparticle loaded gel of Curcuma caesia for effective treatment of acne. J. Drug Deliv. Ther. 2020, 10, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chandran, H.; Meena, M.; Barupal, T.; Sharma, K. Plant tissue culture as a perpetual source for production of industrially important bioactive compounds. Biotechnol. Rep. 2020, 26, e00450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Khan, T.; Khan, M.A.; Karam, K.; Ullah, N.; Mashwani, Z.U.R.; Nadhman, A. Plant in vitro culture technologies; A promise into factories of secondary metabolites against COVID-19. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zuraida, A.R. Improved in vitro propagation of Curcuma caesia, a valuable medicinal plant. J. Trop. Agric. Food Sci. 2013, 41, 273–281. [Google Scholar]
  13. Jose, S.; Thomas, T.D. High-frequency callus organogenesis, large-scale cultivation and assessment of clonal fidelity of regenerated plants of Curcuma caesia Roxb., an important source of camphor. Agrofor. Syst. 2015, 89, 779–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Singh, W.R.; Singh, H.B.; Devi, S.S.; Singh, W.N.; Singh, N.M.; Devi, Y.P. Conservation of Curcuma caesia by in vitro techniques. Helix 2015, 2, 708–713. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sarma, I.; Deka, A.C. Conservation of Curcuma caesia Roxb.-A critically endangered species via in vitro plant regeneration from organogenic callus. Asian J. Conserv. Biol. 2020, 9, 151–155. [Google Scholar]
  16. Sarma, I.; Deka, A.C.; Sarma, T.C. A protocol for rapid clonal propagation and microrhizome production of Curcuma caesia Roxb (Zingiberaceae): A critically endangered medicinal plant of North East India. Indian J. Agric. Res. 2021, 55, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Neha, B.; Tiwari, K.L.; Jadhav, S.K. Effect of explant type in development of in vitro micropropagation protocol of an endangered medicinal plant: Curcuma caesia Roxb. Biotechnology 2014, 13, 22–27. [Google Scholar]
  18. Shahinozzaman, M.; Ferdous, M.; Faruq, M.; Azad, M.; Amin, M. Micropropagation of black turmeric (Curcuma caesia Roxb.) through in vitro culture of rhizome bud explants. J. Cent. Eur. Agric. 2013, 14, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Murashige, T.; Skoog, F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 1962, 15, 473–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gamborg, O.L.; Miller, R.; Ojima, K. Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp. Cell Res. 1968, 50, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lloyd, G.; McCown, B. Commercially-feasible micropropagation of mountain laurel, Kalmia latifolia, by use of shoot-tip culture. Comb. Proc. Int. Plant Propag. Soc. 1980, 30, 421–427. [Google Scholar]
  22. Chowdhury, S.; Pal, K.; Chakraborty, M.; Chakraborty, S.; Mandal, S.; Pandit, M.S.; Sahana, N. Conservation and in vitro propagation of an endangered wild turmeric (Curcuma caesia Roxb.) species from Sub-Himalayan Terai region of West Bengal. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2020, 9, 2132–2140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ferrari, M.P.; dos Santos, Q.M.; de Andrade, M.M.; Trettel, J.R.; Magalhães, H.M. Growth regulators, sucrose and potassium in the growth and biochemical activity of Curcuma longa L. micropropagated. Sci. Agrar. Paranaensis 2020, 1, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jena, S.; Ray, A.; Sahoo, A.; Sahoo, S.; Dash, B.; Kar, B.; Nayak, S. Rapid plant regeneration in industrially important Curcuma zedoaria revealing genetic and biochemical fidelity of the regenerants. 3 Biotech 2020, 10, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Parida, R.; Nayak, S. Rapid in vitro leaf biomass production of genetically stable Curcuma aromatica-An under exploited medicinal plant. J. Biol. Act. Prod. Nat. 2021, 11, 497–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Saad, A.I.; Elshahed, A.M. Plant tissue culture media. Rec. Adv. Plant In Vitro Cult. 2012, 30–40. [Google Scholar]
  27. Phillips, G.C.; Garda, M. Plant tissue culture media and practices: An overview. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Plant 2019, 3, 242–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fong, Y.M.; Sani, H.B. Studies on micropropagation of Curcuma caesia Roxb. (Kunyit Hitam). Int. J. Innov. Sci. Eng. Technol. Technol. 2019, 6, 101–106. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sethy, R.; Kullu, B. Micropropagation of ethnomedicinal plant Calotropis sp. and enhanced production of stigmasterol. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2022, 149, 147–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Riahi, L.; Chograni, H.; Ben Rejeb, F.; Ben Romdhane, M.; Masmoudi, A.S.; Cherif, A. Efficient in vitro regeneration of the endangered species Artemisia arborescens L. through direct organogenesis and impact on secondary metabolites production. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 2022, 63, 439–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Majumder, S.; Biswas, A.; Rahman, M.M. In vitro propagation and cytological analysis of Boerhaavia diffusa L.—An important medicinal plant species of Bangladesh. Am. J. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 1347–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kadapatti, S.S.; Murthy, H.N. Rapid plant regeneration, analysis of genetic fidelity, and neoandrographolide content of micropropagated plants of Andrographis alata (Vahl) Nees. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2021, 19, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Khajuria, A.K.; Bisht, N.S.; Bhagat, N. In vitro organogenesis and plant regeneration of Thymus serpyllum L.: An important aromatic medicinal plant. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Plant 2020, 56, 652–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gaspar, T.; Kevers, C.; Penel, C.; Greppin, H.; Reid, D.M.; Thorpe, T.A. Plant hormones and plant growth regulators in plant tissue culture. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Plant 1996, 32, 272–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sultana, K.W.; Das, S.; Chandra, I.; Roy, A. Efficient micropropagation of Thunbergia coccinea Wall. and genetic homogeneity assessment through RAPD and ISSR markers. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Hailu, T.; Haileselassie, T.; Feyissa, T. In Vitro regeneration of Korarima (Aframomum corrorima (Braun) PCM Jansen): A threatened spice and medicinal herb from Ethiopia. Scientifica 2022, 2022, 8237723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Farooq, I.; Qadri, Z.A.; Rather, Z.A.; Nazki, I.T.; Banday, N.; Rafiq, S.; Masoodi, K.Z.; Noureldeen, A.; Mansoor, S. Optimization of an improved, efficient and rapid in vitro micropropagation protocol for Petunia hybrida Vilm. Cv. “Bravo”. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 3701–3709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kudikala, H.; Jogam, P.; Sirikonda, A.; Mood, K.; Allini, V.R. In vitro micropropagation and genetic fidelity studies using SCoT and ISSR primers in Annona reticulata L.: An important medicinal plant. Vegetos 2020, 33, 446–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gajula, H.; Kumar, V.; Vijendra, P.D.; Rajashekar, J.; Sannabommaji, T.; Basappa, G.; Anuradha, C.M. In vitro regeneration of Psoralea corylifolia Linn.: Influence of polyamines during in vitro shoot development. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Plant 2022, 58, 103–113. [Google Scholar]
  40. Dhiman, N.; Devi, K.; Bhattacharya, A. Development of low cost micropropagation protocol for Nardostachys jatamansi: A critically endangered medicinal herb of Himalayas. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2021, 140, 468–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cartabia, A.; Sarropoulou, V.; Grigoriadou, K.; Maloupa, E.; Declerck, S. In vitro propagation of Alkanna tinctoria Tausch.: A medicinal plant of the Boraginaceae family with high pharmaceutical value. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 182, 114860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chauhan, R.; Shirkot, P. Micropropagation of endangered medicinal plant Bacopa monnieri (L.) Pennell. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2020, 9, 1614–1620. [Google Scholar]
  43. Sriskanda, D.; Liew, Y.X.; Khor, S.P.; Merican, F.; Subramaniam, S.; Chew, B.L. An efficient micropropagation protocol for Ficus carica cv. Golden Orphan suitable for mass propagation. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2021, 38, 102225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Establishment of C. caesia microshoots in MS medium, MSB5 medium and WPM medium after six weeks of inoculation. Scale bar represents 1 cm of actual size.
Figure 1. Establishment of C. caesia microshoots in MS medium, MSB5 medium and WPM medium after six weeks of inoculation. Scale bar represents 1 cm of actual size.
Horticulturae 08 00740 g001
Figure 2. Shoot multiplication of C. caesia in MSB5 medium supplemented with 15 µM BAP at eight weeks after inoculation. Scale bar represents 1 cm of actual size.
Figure 2. Shoot multiplication of C. caesia in MSB5 medium supplemented with 15 µM BAP at eight weeks after inoculation. Scale bar represents 1 cm of actual size.
Horticulturae 08 00740 g002
Figure 3. (a) Callus produced from the treatment MSB5 medium supplemented with 15 µM BAP and 5 µM 2-iP at eight weeks after inoculation. (b) Regenerated shoot (in circle) from the treatment MSB5 medium supplemented with 15 µM BAP and 5 µM 2-iP at eight weeks after inoculation. Scale bars represent 1 cm of actual size.
Figure 3. (a) Callus produced from the treatment MSB5 medium supplemented with 15 µM BAP and 5 µM 2-iP at eight weeks after inoculation. (b) Regenerated shoot (in circle) from the treatment MSB5 medium supplemented with 15 µM BAP and 5 µM 2-iP at eight weeks after inoculation. Scale bars represent 1 cm of actual size.
Horticulturae 08 00740 g003
Figure 4. Regeneration of adventitious roots of C. caesia in the full strength of MSB5 medium supplemented with 5 μM of IAA.
Figure 4. Regeneration of adventitious roots of C. caesia in the full strength of MSB5 medium supplemented with 5 μM of IAA.
Horticulturae 08 00740 g004
Figure 5. Plantlet during acclimatization in the potting medium of cocopeat and peatmoss.
Figure 5. Plantlet during acclimatization in the potting medium of cocopeat and peatmoss.
Horticulturae 08 00740 g005
Table 1. Shoot induction of C. caesia as affected by different formulations of basal medium.
Table 1. Shoot induction of C. caesia as affected by different formulations of basal medium.
Basal MediumShoot Induction (%)No. of ShootShoot Length
(cm)
No. of LeavesLeaves Fresh Weight
(g)
Leaves Dry Weight
(g)
Root Induction
(%)
No. of RootRoot Length
(cm)
MSB5100 a2.70 a7.88 a5.33 a0.179 a0.018 a100 a8.40 a3.34 a
MS93.33 a1.50 b5.53 b3.00 b0.105 b0.008 b86.67 b3.85 b2.19 a
WPM83.33 b1.37 b4.86 b2.97 b0.085 c0.006 b80 b3.67 b2.02 a
Data were collected after six weeks of incubation. Means (n = 30) followed by the same letter within the columns were not significantly different at p < 0.05 using Duncan’s Multiple Range Test.
Table 2. Effect of different concentrations of cytokinins in MSB5 medium on shoot multiplication of C. caesia.
Table 2. Effect of different concentrations of cytokinins in MSB5 medium on shoot multiplication of C. caesia.
Cytokinin
(μM)
Shoot Induction
(%)
No. of ShootLength of Shoot
(cm)
No. of LeavesLeaves Fresh Weight
(g)
Leaves Dry Weight
(g)
Callus Induction
(%)
Control93.33 a1.20 d8.96 d4.10 e0.109 f0.017 f0 c
BAP596.67 a1.97 b9.54 c5.73 b0.248 cd0.025 b0 c
10100 a2.07 b10.10 b5.73 b0.277 bc0.025 b0 c
15100 a2.77 a10.86 a7.00 a0.343 a0.029 a0 c
2096.67 a1.97 b7.94 e4.30 de0.195 e0.018 ef0 c
Kin596.67 a1.37 cd9.22 cd4.63 d0.242 d0.020 de0 c
10100 a1.27 cd9.63 c4.13 d0.240 d0.022 cd0 c
15100 a1.47 c11.10 a5.03 c0.285 b0.022 cd0 c
20100 a1.47 c10.14 a5.10 c0.246 cd0.024 bc0 c
2-iP580 b1.20 d4.76 f3.03 f0.109 f0.008 g23.22 a
1060 c0.70 e3.84 g1.53 g0.089 f0.009 g16.67 b
1536.67 d0.47 f2.20 h1.01 h0.037 g0.004 h16.67 b
2030 e0.43 f1.84 h1.17 gh0.040 g0.005 h3.33 c
Data were collected after eight weeks of incubation. Means (n = 30) followed by the same letter within the columns were not significantly different at p < 0.05 using Duncan’s Multiple Range Test.
Table 3. Effect of 15 μM of BAP with auxins in the MSB5 medium on enhancement of shoot multiplication of C. caesia.
Table 3. Effect of 15 μM of BAP with auxins in the MSB5 medium on enhancement of shoot multiplication of C. caesia.
PGRConc
(μM)
Shoot Induction (%)No. of ShootShoot Length
(cm)
No. of LeavesLeaves Fresh Weight
(g)
Leaves Dry Weight
(g)
Control0100 a2.57 c10.00 b5.90 f0.294 e0.022 ef
IBA2100 a2.97 b9.19 c7.13 de0.311 d0.023 de
4100 a3.00 b9.74 bc7.37 cd0.362 b0.028 b
6100 a3.53 a10.81 a9.57 a0.486 a0.039 a
8100 a3.53 a9.58 bc8.10 b0.320 d0.026 bc
NAA2100 a3.27 ab8.00 de7.00 e0.254 g0.020 f
4100 a3.40 a8.57 d7.57 c0.333 c0.025 cd
6100 a3.20 ab7.68 e6.83 e0.295 e0.021 ef
8100 a3.30 ab8.13 de7.00 e0.278 f0.022 def
Data were collected after eight weeks of incubation. Means (n = 30) followed by the same letter within the columns were not significantly different at p < 0.05 using Duncan’s Multiple Range Test.
Table 4. Effect of MSB5 medium strength and IAA on root induction of C. caesia plantlets.
Table 4. Effect of MSB5 medium strength and IAA on root induction of C. caesia plantlets.
StrengthIAA (μM)Number of RootsLength of Roots (cm)
Full04.40 de3.85 e
2.55.87 b4.39 c
56.13 a5.37 a
7.54.20 ef3.38 f
103.20 h1.79 h
Half03.60 g2.81 g
2.54.27 def2.59 g
55.13 c4.88 b
7.54.53 d4.15 cd
104 f4.01 de
Data were collected after twelve weeks of incubation. Means (n = 24) followed by the same letter within the columns were not significantly different at p < 0.05 using Duncan’s Multiple Range Test.
Table 5. Effect of potting medium on acclimatization of C. caesia plantlets.
Table 5. Effect of potting medium on acclimatization of C. caesia plantlets.
MediumSurvival (%)
Day 14
Cocopeat + peatmoss77.78 a
Perlite + peatmoss61.11 b
Vermiculite + peatmoss44.43 c
Data were collected after two weeks of acclimatization. Means (n = 18) followed by the same letter within the columns were not significantly different at p < 0.05 using Duncan’s Multiple Range Test.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Haida, Z.; Sinniah, U.R.; Nakasha, J.J.; Hakiman, M. Shoot Induction, Multiplication, Rooting and Acclimatization of Black Turmeric (Curcuma caesia Roxb.): An Important and Endangered Curcuma Species. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 740. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8080740

AMA Style

Haida Z, Sinniah UR, Nakasha JJ, Hakiman M. Shoot Induction, Multiplication, Rooting and Acclimatization of Black Turmeric (Curcuma caesia Roxb.): An Important and Endangered Curcuma Species. Horticulturae. 2022; 8(8):740. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8080740

Chicago/Turabian Style

Haida, Zainol, Uma Rani Sinniah, Jaafar Juju Nakasha, and Mansor Hakiman. 2022. "Shoot Induction, Multiplication, Rooting and Acclimatization of Black Turmeric (Curcuma caesia Roxb.): An Important and Endangered Curcuma Species" Horticulturae 8, no. 8: 740. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8080740

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop