Next Article in Journal
Effect of Photoperiod and Gibberellin on the Bolting and Flowering of Non-Heading Chinese Cabbage
Next Article in Special Issue
Variations in Essential Oil Composition and Chemotype Patterns of Wild Thyme (Thymus) Species in the Natural Habitats of Hungary
Previous Article in Journal
Interaction of Culture Medium and Artificial Light Type on Pigmentation of Micro-Propagated Opuntia Plants
Previous Article in Special Issue
Phytochemical Profile and Biological Activities of Extracts Obtained from Young Shoots of Blackcurrant (Ribes nigrum L.), European Blueberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.), and Mountain Cranberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi, Especially Rhizophagus intraradices as a Biostimulant, Improve Plant Growth and Root Columbin Levels in Tinospora sagittata

1
College of Horticulture and Gardening, Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434025, China
2
Shiyan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shiyan 442000, China
3
Department of Biology, College of Science, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Biological Science, College of Science, University of Jeddah, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Horticulturae 2023, 9(12), 1350; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9121350
Submission received: 28 November 2023 / Revised: 14 December 2023 / Accepted: 16 December 2023 / Published: 18 December 2023

Abstract

:
Tinospora sagittata is a columbin-rich medicinal plant, but its columbin levels are reduced under artificial cultivation conditions. The objective of this study was to analyze the effects of inoculations with Diversispora versiformis (Dv), Funneliformis mosseae (Fm), Rhizophagus intraradices (Ri), and mixed inoculation (Dv + Fm + Ri) (Mix) on growth performance, root morphology, leaf photosynthetic physiology, and root columbin levels in T. sagittata. These arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) were able to colonize the roots, as evidenced by a root mycorrhizal colonization rate ranging from 17% to 48% and soil hyphal lengths ranging from 17.51 cm/g to 32.02 cm/g, with the Mix treatment being the greatest. AMF inoculations improved plant height (16–151%), leaf number (119–283%), shoot (37–211%), and root biomass (22–318%) to varying extents, with Ri and Mix treatments being the most prominent. AMF-treated plants presented relatively greater root total length, projected area, surface area, volume, and average diameter, especially those treated with Ri and Mix. AMF inoculations also significantly improved the leaf nitrogen balance index, transpiration rate, and stomatal conductance, while the photosynthesis rate and chlorophyll index varied by AMF species, along with a decrease in intercellular CO2 levels. Root columbin levels ranged from 0.524 mg/g to 5.389 mg/g, and AMF inoculation significantly increased root columbin levels by 228–928%, with Ri being the most significant. Root columbin levels were significantly positively correlated with soil hyphal length, root total length, root projected area, root surface area, root volume, and root average diameter, but not root AMF colonization rate. This study demonstrates for the first time that AMF, especially Ri, can be employed as a biostimulant to promote growth as well as root columbin levels in T. sagittata, where AMF-triggered improvement in root morphology is an important reason for promoting root columbin levels.

1. Introduction

Tinospora sagittata (Oliv.) Gagnep. is an ancient and valuable medicinal plant, whose tuberous roots are used in medicine for the treatment of inflammation and have anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial properties [1,2]. T. sagittata contains a large number of secondary metabolites, including alkaloids, terpenoids, and flavonoids [3,4,5]. Among them, columbin is one of the plant’s active constituents [6,7,8], and it belongs to the phenolic acid family, with a benzene ring and an alcohol group in its chemical structure; it has a bitter taste and antioxidant activity, and is thought to have a variety of biological activities, such as anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, hepatoprotective, and anti-tumor effects [9,10]. Columbin, primarily in the roots of T. sagittata, exhibits analgesic, antiviral, and antipathogenic microbial pharmacological properties [3,11]. As a result of T. sagittata being a key source of columbin, its demand has increased, resulting in overexploitation of wild resources and deterioration of the soil environment, as well as a decrease in biomass production and columbin levels in T. sagittata [12]. Therefore, artificial cultivation is an important way to achieve sustainable and high-quality development. It is urgent to improve plant growth and increase columbin levels in T. sagittata.
Many medicinal plants inhabit arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) in their rhizosphere [13,14]. Zubek and Błaszkowski investigated the mycorrhizal colonization and communities of 31 medicinal plants at Jagiellonian University, Poland, and found that 30 plants could form arbuscular mycorrhizae (23 arum-type, 5 paris-type, and 2 intermediate-type), and 15 AMF species were identified [15]. In the southern part of Shannxi, China, six AMF species (Acaulospora scrobiculata, Glomus constrictum, G. fasciculatum, G. albidum, G. multicaule, and Gigaspora gigantean) were found in eight medicinal plants [16]. These fungal communities contribute to host growth and adaptation to the native environment and are thus important for understanding the soil microbial environment [16]. AMF are obligate biotrophic fungi capable of colonizing approximately 80% of vascular plant roots to form mycorrhizal symbioses, allowing nutrients and water to be transported from AMF to the host plant and carbohydrates to be transported from the host plant to AMF [17,18]. The extraradical mycelial network generated by AMF on the surface of host roots aids in nutrient exchange and signaling communication between plants [19]. At the same time, they can influence the growth, stress resistance, and levels of medicinal constituents in medicinal plants [14]. AMF are widely inhabited in a variety of medicinal plants and thus play an important role in the growth and development of medicinal plants through the mycelium network, secrete organic acids into the rhizosphere, increase nutrient acquisition, and enhance photosynthetic capacity [20]. Huang et al. [21] reported that inoculation with Glomus mosseae and G. versiforme distinctly increased biomass production, leaf gas exchange, nutrient (N, P, and K) acquisition, as well as artemisinin concentration in stems, branches, and leaves of potted Artemisia annu. AMF colonization dramatically boosted root glycyrrhizic acid and glycyrrhizin levels in Glycyrrhiza uralensia under soil drought conditions [22]. Inoculation with AMF also significantly increased root biomass and polydatin and resveratrol levels in Polygonum cuspidatum plants, which was associated with up-regulated expression of relevant genes in the resveratrol synthesis pathway [23,24]. This promoting effect was observed at low phosphorus levels in soil [25]. Therefore, AMF are essential for promoting the growth and secondary metabolite levels of medicinal plants, especially under unfavorable environmental conditions. Other studies, however, have reported a decrease in aromatic alcohol concentration in basil [26], as well as ursolic acid and oleanolic acid in Ocimum gratissimum after AMF inoculation [27]. Interestingly, early inoculation of AMF significantly increased camptothecin content in Camptotheca acuminata plants, but later inoculation of AMF promoted biomass accumulation but not camptothecin content [28]. This suggests that the effect of AMF on plant secondary metabolites is quite complex.
Since AMF are able to act as a fungal stimulant, affecting the growth and secondary metabolites of medicinal plants, we therefore hypothesized that AMF have a regulatory effect on the growth, physiological activity, and columbin of T. sagittata plants. Three AMF species were applied to potted T. sagittata plants to analyze changes in growth, leaf photosynthetic physiology, and root columbin levels, thus revealing the potential role of AMF in T. sagittata.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. AMF Inoculum Preparation

The experiment consisted of three AMF species used in this study: Funneliformis mosseae (Nicol. & Gerd.) Gerdemann & Trappe, Rhizophagus intraradices (N.C. Schenck & G.S. Sm.) C. Walker & A. Schüßler, and Diversispora versiformis (P. Karst.) Oehl, G.A. Silva & Sieverd. These fungi were provided by the Institute of Root Biology, Yangtze University. These AMF strains were trapped in potted Trifolium repens for 11 weeks, and the roots and growth substrates were harvested as fungal inoculum containing mycorrhizalized root segments and spores, with approximately 25, 22, and 20 spores/g for F. mosseae, R. intraradices, and D. versiformis, respectively.

2.2. Plant Culture

Seeds of T. sagittata were provided by the Shiyan Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Shiyan, China). The seeds were surface sterilized with 75% ethanol and germinated in autoclaved sands at 26–28 °C on 15 April 2022. Six weeks later, 4-leaf-old T. sagittata seedlings with consistent growth were transplanted in plastic containers (upper diameter 20.5 cm, down diameter 10.7 cm, and height 12.7 cm). The pots were pre-filled with an autoclaved (121 °C, 0.11 MPa, 2 h) mixture of soil and sand at a ratio of 2:1 (v:v) to eliminate indigenous AMF spores. AMF inoculation was carried out at a dose of 150 g inoculum/pot at the time of seedling transplanting. The non-AMF treatment also received 150 g of autoclaved inoculum plus 2 mL of 25 µm fungal filtrates. All the plants were grown under environmentally controlled conditions, with a light flux density of 907 μmol/m2/s, day and night temperatures of 28 °C/23 °C (16 h/8 h), and a relative humidity of 64%. The plants received no additional chemical fertilizers during the experiment. The plants were grown from 28 May 2022 to 12 September 2022 under these conditions.

2.3. Experimental Design

The experiment consisted of five treatments: (i) inoculation with D. versiformis (Dv); (ii) inoculation with F. mosseae (Fm); (iii) inoculation with R. intraradices (Ri); (iv) inoculation with a mixture of Ri, Fm, and Dv (1:1:1, m/m) (Mix); and (v) inoculation without AMF (non-AMF). Each treatment was replicated eight times, for a total of 40 pots.

2.4. Determination of Plant Growth and Root Mycorrhizal Colonization Rate

Before harvesting the plants, the height and number of leaves were determined. The treated plants were then divided into shoots and roots, and their fresh weights were weighed. All the roots were scanned with an Epson’s scanner (V700), and the scanned root figures were analyzed with WinRHIZO software (version 2007b) to determine root length, surface area, volume, projected area, and average diameter.
Root segments of 1–2 cm length were collected and stained for root mycorrhizae using trypan blue (0.05%, w/v) staining [29] before being examined microscopically. Approximately 2 cm long root segments were incubated in a 10% KOH solution at 90 °C for 80 min, decolorized for 3 min in a 10% hydrogen peroxide solution, acidified in 2% hydrochloric acid for 5 min, and finally stained in 0.05% trypan blue in a lactophenol solution for 2 min. Mycorrhizal colonization rate (%) was the percentage of mycorrhizal colonization root segment lengths versus total observed root segment lengths. Soil hyphal density was determined by the method described by Bethlenfalvay and Ames [30], staining the hyphae with trypan blue (0.05%, w/v).

2.5. Determination of Leaf Photosynthetic Properties

On the day of harvest, the chlorophyll index (Chl) and nitrogen balance index (Nbi) were determined in the 4th leaf at the top using a portable plant polyphenol chlorophyll meter (Dualex Scientific+). Leaf gas exchange parameters, including net photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr), stomatal conductance (Gs), and intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), were measured in the 4th leaf at the top at 9:00 and 10:00 a.m. by using a Li-6400 portable photosynthesizer (Li-COR).

2.6. Determination of Columbin Levels in Roots

High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to determine the columbin level in the roots. The 0.2 g of dried samples (1 mm in size) was mixed with 20 mL of 70% methanol under ultrasonication for 20 min, and the solution was then fixed to 25 mL using 70% methanol. The fixed solution was filtered via a 0.22 µm membrane for HPLC analysis. This HPLC was a Shimadzu LC-20AT (Tokyo, Japan) with a Venusil XBP C18 column (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μm). The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile and ddH2O (40:60, v/v), the detection wavelength was 210 nm, the flow rate was 1.0 mL/min, and the column temperature was 30 °C. The linear gradient elution was as follows: 0–10 min, 15–20%; 10–23 min, 20–25%; 23–27 min, 25–43%; 27–36 min, 43–50%; 36–47 min, 50–68%; 47–65 min, 68–78%.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

One-way analysis of variance, multiple comparisons, and correlations was performed using SAS® software (9.1.3v) (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Origin Software (2021v) was used for plotting.

3. Results

3.1. Changes in Mycorrhizal Status

No mycorrhizal colonization or soil mycelium was seen in the roots of plants inoculated with non-AMF, while mycorrhizal colonization was observed in the roots of all inoculated plants, with root AMF colonization rates ranging from 17% to 48% and soil hyphal length ranging from 17.51 cm/g to 32.02 cm/g (Figure 1a,b). Of these, the root mycorrhizal colonization and soil hyphal length of the Mix-inoculated plants were the highest among inoculated treatments, whereas the Dv-inoculated plants had the lowest.

3.2. Changes in Plant Growth Behavior

Inoculation with AMF showed different changes in plant growth performance (Figure 2a–e). Compared with the non-AMF inoculation, inoculation with Ri, Fm, Dv, and Mix significantly increased plant growth variables by 151%, 73%, 16%, and 136% in plant height (Figure 2b), 210%, 130%, 37%, and 211% in shoot biomass (Figure 2d), and 74%, 100%, 22%, and 318% in root biomass (Figure 2e). In addition, Ri, Fm, and Mix, but not Dv, also significantly increased leaf number by 246%, 119%, and 283%, respectively, compared with the non-AMF (Figure 2c).

3.3. Changes in Root Morphological Variables

AMF treatments significantly affected root morphology variables (Figure 3a), as evidenced by an increase in root total length (Figure 3b), projected area (Figure 3c), surface area (Figure 3d), average diameter (Figure 3e), and volume (Figure 3f) by 100%, 38%, 39%, 43%, and 184% in Ri versus non-AMF conditions, and by 28%, 25%, 19%, 40%, and 97% under mix versus non-AMF conditions, respectively. Fm treatment also significantly increased root length, surface area, average diameter, and volume by 20%, 18%, 22%, and 146%, respectively, compared with non-AMF treatment. Dv treatment only significantly increased root volume and average diameter by 83% and 28%, respectively, compared to non-AMF treatment.

3.4. Changes in Chlorophyll Index, Nitrogen Balance Index, and Gas Exchange in Leaves

Ri, Fm, Dv, and Mix inoculation significantly increased Nbi by 183%, 110%, 108%, and 148%, respectively, compared with non-AMF inoculation (Figure 4a). Except for Dv inoculation, which did not significantly affect Chl, Ri, Fm, and Mix inoculation significantly increased Chl by 22%, 20%, and 55%, respectively, compared with non-AMF treatment (Figure 4b).
Leaf gas exchange was also affected by AMF inoculations. Ri, Fm, Dv, and Mix inoculation significantly increased leaf Pn by 4%, 6%, 10%, and 23%, respectively, at the same time as leaf Tr by 129%, 66%, 40%, and 70%, respectively, as well as leaf Gs by 70%, 90%, 40%, and 100%, respectively, compared with non-AMF treatment (Figure 4d–f). Dv and Mix inoculation significantly increased leaf Pn by 10% and 23%, respectively, compared with non-AMF treatment (Figure 4e). In addition, Ri, Fm, Dv, and Mix inoculation significantly reduced leaf Ci by 18%, 26%, 15%, and 32%, respectively, compared with non-AMF inoculation (Figure 4c).

3.5. Changes in Columbin Concentrations in Roots

Root columbin was found in both standard (Figure 5a) and root (Figure 5b) samples using HPLC. Ri, Fm, Dv, and Mix treatments significantly increased columbin concentrations in roots by 928%, 467%, 228%, and 320%, respectively, compared with non-AMF treatments (Figure 6a). In addition, soil hyphal length, but not root mycorrhizal colonization rate, significantly (p < 0.01) and positively correlated with root columbin concentrations (Figure 6b). Root columbin concentrations were also significantly (p < 0.01) positively correlated with root total length, root projected area, root surface area, root average diameter, and root volume, respectively (Table 1).

4. Discussion

This study showed that several AMF species colonized the roots of T. sagittata plants, with Mix inoculation having the highest root mycorrhizal colonization rate and soil hyphal length among the inoculated treatments and Dv treatment having the lowest. This suggests that mycorrhizal status in the roots and soil of T. sagittata plants is dependent on the AMF species, indicating compatibility between AMF and the host plant [31,32,33]. This result has also been reported on other plants, such as Polygonum cuspidatum, Citrus sinensis, Camellia oleifera, and Vicia villosa [21,34,35,36]. Indeed, differences in mycorrhizal status reveal a high degree of specificity and complex phenotypic characterization among mycorrhizal fungi [37].
The improvement of plant growth by AMF is partly attributed to the improved root morphology of the host, thus favoring nutrient and water uptake by the host [38]. In the present study, the root morphology of T. sagittata plants underwent significant improvement after AMF inoculation, as evidenced by the fact that both Ri and Mix treatments significantly increased root total length, projected area, surface area, volume, and average diameter, whereas Fm treatment significantly increased root surface area, average diameter, and volume, along with an increase in root volume and average diameter under Dv treatment. A similar result was also reported on Polygonum cuspidatum inoculated with Fm, Serendipita indica, and Fm + S. indica, as well as Vicia villosa inoculated with Diversispora spurca, Fm, S. indica, and Ri [21,36]. The growth performance of T. sagittata plants also showed differential changes after different AMF inoculations, with the Ri and Mix treatments showing significant improvement in growth and the Dv treatment being the worst. The response in root morphology and plant growth to AMF inoculation was almost identical to their mycorrhizal status. Sometimes, along with the increase in root mycorrhizal colonization, the growth of host plants such as Panax notaginseng showed a trend of first increasing and then gradually decreasing [39]. In fact, AMF improves plant growth and root morphology by increasing the levels of auxins, cytokinins, and polyamines in the host [40,41]. In addition, the function of AMF on the host is not exclusively measured in terms of improved plant growth and nutrient acquisition but should be determined by the phenotypic response of AMF and the host together with the symbiotic function of AMF [37].
AMF establish a well-developed mycorrhizal extraradical hyphal network on plant roots, thus increasing contact areas between roots and the soil [24]. It would promote nutrient (e.g., Fe and Mg) uptake in mycorrhizal plants, therefore increasing chlorophyll synthesis and photosynthetic efficiency in plants [42]. AMF also govern the efficiency of light energy utilization [36]. This study showed that, with the exception of Dv, all AMF inoculations significantly increased Chl, demonstrating that AMF may increase chlorophyll synthesis by promoting the levels of mineral elements, but this is dependent on the AMF species. As a result, AMF-inoculated plants can produce more photosynthetic products that can be allocated to various pools, including the mycorrhizal carbon pool, which continues to sustain mycorrhizal growth and functions [43]. Such a virtuous cycle provides for the functionality of arbuscular mycorrhizae. All AMF treatments increased Nbi, suggesting that AMF promote N accumulation in the host because mycorrhizal hyphae take up N directly [44], and AMF accelerate the glutamine synthase/glutamate synthase cycle for amino acid accumulation [45]. In addition, AMF inoculation significantly altered leaf gas exchange in T. sagittata plants, as evidenced by an increase in Tr and Gs as well as a decrease in Ci after all AMF inoculations, plus a significant increase in Pn triggered by Dv and Mix. It demonstrated that AMF-modulated improvement in leaf gas exchange is dependent on the AMF species. AMF increased host plants’ Pn, which is attributed to an increase in chlorophyll levels, photosynthetic activity of the chloroplasts, and the efficiency of light energy conversion [46].
Earlier studies have shown that AMF affect plant secondary metabolism and the accumulation of its products [47,48]. Mandal et al. [49] reported that AMF inoculation promoted artemisinin accumulation by up-regulating 1-deoxyxylulose 5-phosphate synthase (DXS) and 1-deoxyxylulouse 5-phosphate reductoisomerase (DXR) gene expression in Artemisia annua leaves and increasing glandular hair density and structure for the reservoir capacity. The inoculated patchouli plants had higher levels of total phenols and flavonoids than the uninoculated group [50]. The present study showed that AMF inoculation significantly increased root columbin concentrations in T. sagittata plants by 228% to 928%. This is in agreement with the findings of Liang et al. [51], who observed that the levels of hinesol and β-eudesmol increased in Atractylodes lancea plants inoculated with Glomus etunicatum, G. tortuosum, and G. mosseae. Among the tested AMF species, the effect of Ri was significantly greater than that of other AMF inoculations, implying that Ri is superior to mixed AMF treatment. However, Ri-inoculated T. sagittata plants did not present the highest root AMF colonization rate, but they had the highest root total length, projected area, surface area, average diameter, and volume. In contrast, mixed AMF-treated plants showed the highest root AMF colonization rate, but their root morphological variables were relatively lower than Ri-treated plants. We also observed that root columbin levels did not show a significantly positive correlation with root AMF colonization rate, but they were significantly (p < 0.01) positively correlated with root morphological variables (e.g., total length, projected area, surface area, volume, and diameter). This implies that it is not the root AMF colonization rate but the improvement of root morphology modulated by AMF that determines root columbin levels. The combination of Fm and Piriformospora indica raised root polydatin in Polygonum cuspidatum more than their single inoculation [24]. In addition, Zhou et al. [52] reported the diverse changes in alkaloid content of amur cork (Phellodendron amurense) seedlings after inoculation with G. mosseae, G. etunicatum, and G. intraradices, with G. mosseae having the most prominent effect on berberine and jatrorrhizine levels and G. intraradices having the most prominent effect on palmatine levels. This suggested the variable effects of single versus combined AMF treatments on plant secondary metabolite levels. Wagg et al. [53] proposed that combinations of AMF with great functional variability can play a more mycorrhizal role than a single arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus with a single function. However, it is unclear how AMF increased root columbin concentrations. Columbin is a furanolactone diterpene, and its synthesis pathway is still unclear. However, AMF can affect terpenoid synthesis by regulating C partitioning and gene expression of key enzymes in the terpene synthesis pathway [54]. At the same time, AMF are also involved in the transport and accumulation of terpenoids. Mycorrhiza-triggered changes in secondary metabolite levels may be due to mycorrhiza’s improved uptake of plant mineral elements such as P and the regulation of carbohydrate distribution, as well as the expression of genes associated with the pathway of secondary metabolite synthesis [55]. Inoculation with AMF under field conditions is more effective in increasing plant growth and thus terpene content than potted experiments that allowed plant root growth and nutrients to be limited [56]. Therefore, AMF are more valuable for T. sagittata plants in the field.

5. Conclusions

This study confirmed that AMF inoculations improved the growth, root morphology, and leaf photosynthetic physiology of T. sagittata plants to varying degrees and also significantly increased root columbin levels, especially by 928% following Ri inoculation. This demonstrated the role of Ri as a dominant AMF strain in increasing root columbin levels. AMF inoculation, especially Ri, provides a feasible way to increase root columbin levels in T. sagittata plants in artificial cultivation. As medicinal plants are authentic in nature, it is also necessary to focus on screening the indigenous dominant AMF strains in their growing environment, in combination with soil and climate conditions, to comprehensively carry out AMF inoculation in medicinal plants.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.-S.W.; Data curation, L.-L.M. and F.-Q.X.; Investigation, L.-L.M. and F.-Q.X.; Methodology, L.-L.M.; Resources, Z.-Z.Z. and Q.-S.W.; Supervision, Q.-S.W.; Writing—original draft, L.-L.M.; Writing—review and editing, M.D.A., M.A.T. and Q.-S.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors extend their appreciation to the Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2023R355), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the data supporting the findings of this study are included in this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to the Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2023R355), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, G.; Ma, H.; Hu, S.; Xu, H.; Yang, B.; Yang, Q.; Xue, Y.; Cheng, L.; Jiang, J.; Zhang, J.; et al. Clerodane-type diterpenoids from tuberous roots of Tinospora sagittata (Oliv.) Gagnep. Fitoterapia 2016, 110, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Singh, N.; Kumar, A.; Gupta, P.; Kailash, C.; Mukesh, S.; Rakesh, M.; Anuradha, D. Evaluation of antil-eishmanial potential of Tinospora sinensis against experi-mental visceral leishmaniasis. Parasitol. Res. 2008, 102, 561–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Cheng, C.M.; Dai, Y.; Huang, X.Z.; Zhu, Y.; Dai, J.H.; Liu, X.F.; Wang, J. Chemical constituents from roots of Tinospora sagittata var. yunnanensis. Chin. Tradit. Herb. Drugs 2010, 41, 689–692. [Google Scholar]
  4. Atta-ur-Rahman; Ahmad, S. A furanoid diterpene, 10 α-hydroxycolumbin, from Tinospora malabarica. Phytochemistry 1988, 27, 1882–1884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lu, L.J.; Wu, Q.H.; Zhou, Y.F.; Ren, C.X.; Zhu, X.L.; Yan, Y.H.; Wei, M.; Liu, S.B.; Zhou, T.; Pei, J. Research progress on chemical composition and pharmacological effects of Tinosporae radix and predictive analysis on quality marker. Chin. Tradit. Herb. Drugs 2022, 53, 6245–6257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, H.B.; Hu, J.; Chen, J.C.; Qin, M.H. Chemical constituents of Tinospora craveniana. Nat. Prod. Res. Dev. 2005, 17, 3. [Google Scholar]
  7. Yuan, S.H.; Fang, J.M.; Tu, Q.M.; Tu, Z.L.; Nie, G.; Chen, L. Chemical constituents and antimicrobial effect of Tinospora sagittata (Oliv). Chin. Pharm. J. 2010, 45, 733–735. [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhou, X.X.; Shu, Y.; Shu, S.; Wang, C.H.; Yang, X.; Zhan, Z.L. Research progress on the chemical constituents and pharmacological effects of Tinosporae radix and other medicinal plants in the same genus. Mod. Chin. Med. 2023, 25, 1135–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, X.H.; Hu, Z.L.; Shi, Q.S.; Zeng, H.W.; Shen, Y.H.; Jin, H.Z.; Zhang, W.D. Anti-inflammatory and anti-nociceptive activities of compounds from Tinospora sagittata (Oliv.) Gagnep. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2010, 33, 981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, R.W.; David, L.G.; Myers, S.P.; Leach, D.N. Anti-inflammatory activity of Chinese medicinal vine plants. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2003, 85, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Huang, X.Z.; Cheng, C.M.; Dai, Y.; Fu, G.M.; Guo, J.M.; Yin, Y.; Liang, H. A novel 18-norclerodane diterpenoid from the roots of Tinospora sagittata var. yunnanensis. Molecules 2010, 15, 8360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Yang, L.M. Theory and technology frontiers of ecological planting of Chinese medicinal materials. J. Jilin Agric. Univ. 2020, 42, 355–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mahobiya, D.; Kulkarni, P. Biodiversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi associated with cultivated medicinal plants. Adv. Plant Sci. 2018, 24, 125–128. [Google Scholar]
  14. Sun, R.T.; Zhang, Z.Z.; Zhou, N.; Srivastava, A.K.; Kuca, K.; Abd-Allah, E.F.; Hashem, A.; Wu, Q.S. A review of the interaction of medicinal plants and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the rhizosphere. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobo. 2021, 49, 12454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zubek, S.; Błaszkowski, J. Medicinal plants as hosts of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and dark septate endophytes. Phytochem. Rev. 2009, 8, 571–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mi, F.Z. Vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal (VAM) fungi in relation to 8 kinds of medical plants in Shangluo of Shannxi. Shannxi For. Sci. Technol. 2012, 5, 37–39. [Google Scholar]
  17. Wang, Y.; Zou, Y.N.; Shu, B.; Wu, Q.S. Deciphering molecular mechanisms regarding enhanced drought tolerance in plants by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Sci. Hortic. 2023, 308, 111591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yan, Q.X.; Li, X.Y.; Xiao, X.F.; Chen, J.Z.; Liu, J.M.; Lin, C.H.; Guan, R.T. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improve the growth and drought tolerance of Cinnamomum migao by enhancing physio-biochemical responses. Ecol. Evol. 2022, 12, e9091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, X.Q.; Cheng, S.; Aroca, R.; Zou, Y.N.; Wu, Q.S. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi induce flavonoid synthesis for mitigating oxidative damage of trifoliate orange under water stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2022, 204, 105089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, X.F.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, R.H.; Yu, J.; Gu, W.; Li, R.; Cao, G.H.; He, S. Effect and mechanism of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in herbs. Chin. J. Exp. Trad. Med. Form. 2020, 26, 217–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Huang, J.H.; Tan, J.F.; Jie, H.K.; Zeng, R.S. Effects of inoculating arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on Artemisia annua growth and its officinal components. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2011, 22, 1443–1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xie, W.; Hao, Z.P.; Zhou, X.F.; Jiang, X.L.; Xu, L.J.; Wu, S.L.; Zhao, A.H.; Zhang, X.; Chen, B.D. Arbuscular mycorrhiza facilitates the accumulation of glycyrrhizin and liquiritin in Glycyrrhiza uralensis under drought stress. Mycorrhiza 2018, 28, 285–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sun, R.T.; Feng, X.C.; Zhang, Z.Z.; Zhou, N.; Feng, H.D.; Liu, Y.M.; Hashem, A.; Al-Arjani, A.F.; Abd_Allah, E.F.; Wu, Q.S. Root endophytic fungi regulate changes in sugar and medicinal compositions of Polygonum cuspidatum. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 818909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sun, R.T.; Zhang, Z.Z.; Feng, X.C.; Zhou, N.; Feng, H.D.; Liu, Y.M.; Harsonowati, W.; Hashem, A.; Abd_Allah, E.F.; Wu, Q.S. Endophytic fungi accelerate leaf physiological activity and resveratrol accumulation in Polygonum cuspidatum by up-regulating expression of associated genes. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sun, R.T.; Zhang, Z.Z.; Liu, M.Y.; Feng, X.C.; Zhou, N.; Feng, H.D.; Hashem, A.; Abd-Allah, E.F.; Harsonowati, W.; Wu, Q.S. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and phosphorus supply accelerate main medicinal component production of Polygonum cuspidatum. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 1006140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Prasad, A.; Kumar, S.; Khaliq, A.; Pandey, A. Heavy metals and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi can alter the yield and chemical composition of volatile oil of sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). Biol. Fert. Soils 2011, 47, 853–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, J.L.; Liu, C.; Dong, Q.; Yao, W.; Wu, C. Effects of Piriformospora indica inoculation on gas exchange, biomass accumulation and contents of secondary metabolites of Ocimum gratissimum. Acta. Agric. Jiangxi 2021, 33, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yu, Y. Corresponding Analysis on Camptothecin Content and Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Formation in Camptotheca acuminata Seedlings. Master’s Thesis, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, China, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  29. Phillips, J.M.; Hayman, D.S. Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1970, 55, 158–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bethlenfalvay, G.J.; Ames, R.N. Comparison of two methods for quantifying extraradical mycelium of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Soil. Soc. Am. J. 1987, 51, 834–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, H.; Zuo, Y.L.; He, X.L.; Hou, Y.T.; Li, M.; Li, B.K. Plant identity and soil variables shift the colonization and species composition of dark septate endophytes associated with medicinal plants in a northern farmland in China. Appl. Soil. Ecol. 2021, 167, 104042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jia, H.M.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, S.H.; Yan, Z.Y.; Liu, M. Effects of AM fungi on growth and rhizosphere soil enzyme activities of Salvia miltiorrhiza. Acta. Pratacul. Sin. 2020, 29, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yang, W.W.; Guo, D.Q.; Cao, W.G.; Pan, X.J.; Xue, Y.B.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, N. Effects of 27 strains of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation on physiology and biochemistry and major components of terpenoids in potted Saussurea costus. Chin. J. Trop. Crops. 2020, 41, 1822–1830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Watanarojanaporn, N.; Boonkerd, N.; Wongkaew, S.; Prommanop, P.; Teaumroong, N. Selection of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for citrus growth promotion and Phytophthora suppression. Sci. Hortic. 2011, 128, 423–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chen, W.; Ye, T.; Sun, Q.; Niu, T.; Zhang, J. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus alleviates anthracnose disease in tea seedlings. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 13, 1058092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ramia, J.; Bernd, K.K.; Jens, D.; Rainer, G.J. Impact of pea growth and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the decomposition of 15 N-labeled maize residues. Biol. Fert. Soils 2012, 48, 547–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ravnskov, S.; Larsen, J. Functional compatibility in cucumber mycorrhizas in terms of plant growth performance and foliar nutrient composition. Plant Biol. 2016, 18, 816–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Zhu, X.C.; Song, F.B.; Liu, S.Q.; Liu, T.D. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus on photosynthesis and water status of maize under high temperature stress. Plant Soil. 2011, 346, 189–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zeng, Y.; Guo, L.P.; Wang, J.Y.; Cui, X.M.; Yang, G.; Wang, Y.Y.; Huang, L.Q. Relationship between intensity of the mycorrhizal colonisation in root system and biomass or saponins content of Panax notoginseng. Mod. Chin. Med. 2015, 17, 1253–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Xie, L.Y.; Zhang, Y.; Xiong, B.Q.; Gan, B.C. Effect of polyamine on growth and development of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and host plant in symbiotic culture condition. Chin. J. Ecol. Agric. 2009, 17, 1216–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cosme, M.; Wurst, S. Interactions between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, rhizobacteria, soil phosphorus and plant cytokinin deficiency change the root morphology, yield and quality of tobacco. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2013, 57, 436–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gao, Y.L.; Li, J.M.; Yan, M. Effects of AMF inoculation on the growth and chlorophyll fluorescence of Sorghum bicolor × S. sudanense in coal wastes. Guihaia 2016, 36, 539–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Baslam, M.; Esteban, R.; García-Plazaola, J.I.; Goicoechea, N. Effectiveness of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) for inducing the accumulation of major carotenoids, chlorophylls and tocopherol in green and red leaf lettuces. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 3119–3128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Jin, H.; Pfeffer, P.E.; Douds, D.D.; Piotrowski, E.; Lammers, P.J.; Shachar-Hill, Y. The uptake, metabolism, transport and transfer of nitrogen in an arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. New. Phytol. 2005, 168, 301–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Xie, M.M.; Chen, S.M.; Zou, Y.N.; Srivastava, A.K.; Rahman, M.M.; Wu, Q.S.; Kuča, K. Effects of Rhizophagus intraradices and Rhizobium trifolii on growth and N assimilation of white clover. Plant Growth. Regul. 2021, 93, 311–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Li, X.M.; Wang, J.J. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on photosynthesis and antioxidant enzyme activity of osmanthus seedlings under nickel stress. Jiangsu Agric. Sci. 2019, 47, 223–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zeng, Y.; Guo, L.; Chen, B.D.; Hao, Z.P.; Wang, J.Y.; Huang, L.Q.; Yang, G.; Cui, X.M.; Yang, L.; Wu, Z.X.; et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis and active ingredients of medicinal plants: Current research status and prospectives. Mycorrhiza 2013, 23, 253–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Wu, Q.S.; Silva, F.S.B.; Hijri, M.; Kapoor, R. Editorial: Arbuscular mycorrhiza-mediated augmentation of plant secondary metabolite production. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 13, 1150900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mandal, S.; Upadhyay, S.; Wajid, S.; Ram, M.; Jain, D.C.; Singh, V.P.; Abdin, M.Z.; Kapoor, R. Arbuscular mycorrhiza increase artemisinin accumulation in Artemisia annua by higher expression of key biosynthesis genes via enhanced jasmonic acid levels. Mycorrhiza 2015, 25, 345–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Thangavel, S.; Nisha, M.C.; Sevanan, R. Effect of indigenous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on some growth parameters and phytochemical constituents of Pogostemon patchouli Pellet. Maejo Int. J. Sci. Technol. 2009, 3, 222–234. [Google Scholar]
  51. Liang, X.F.; Tang, M.J.; Lu, L.X.; Zhao, X.Y.; Dai, C.C. Effects of three arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) species on the growth, physiology, and major components of essential oil of Atractylodes lancea. J. Ecol. 2018, 37, 1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhou, Z.Q.; Hu, Y.N.; Peng, Y.L.; Sun, M.L.; Zhang, Y.H.; Liu, T. Effects of three arbuscular mycorrhizas on different provenances of amur cork Seedings. Bull. Bot. Res. 2015, 35, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wagg, C.; Barendregt, C.; Jansa, J.; van der Heijden, M.G. Complementarity in both plant and mycorrhizal fungal communities are not necessarily increased by diversity in the other. J. Ecol. 2015, 103, 1233–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hazzoumi, Z.; Moustakime, Y.; Joutei, K.A. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and water stress on ultrastructural change of glandular hairs and essential oil compositions in Ocimum gratissimum. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2017, 4, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Xie, W.; Hao, Z.P.; Guo, L.P.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, S.B.; Wang, Y.S.; Chen, B.D. Research advances in terpenoids synthesis and accumulation in plants as influenced by arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Biotechnol. Bull. 2020, 36, 49–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Berruti, A.; Lumini, E.; Balestrini, R.; Bianciotto, V. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi as natural biofertilizers: Let’s benefit from past successes. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 6, 1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Changes in root mycorrhizal colonization rate (a) and soil hyphal length (b) in Tinospora sagittata plants after inoculation with different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Different letters on the bar indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences. Abbreviations: Ri: inoculation with Rhizophagus intraradices; Fm: inoculation with Funneliformis mosseae; Dv: inoculation with Diversispora versiformis; Mix: inoculation with a mixture of R. intraradices, F. mosseae, and D. versiformis.
Figure 1. Changes in root mycorrhizal colonization rate (a) and soil hyphal length (b) in Tinospora sagittata plants after inoculation with different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Different letters on the bar indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences. Abbreviations: Ri: inoculation with Rhizophagus intraradices; Fm: inoculation with Funneliformis mosseae; Dv: inoculation with Diversispora versiformis; Mix: inoculation with a mixture of R. intraradices, F. mosseae, and D. versiformis.
Horticulturae 09 01350 g001
Figure 2. Changes in growth performance (a), height (b), leaf number (c), shoot biomass (d), and root biomass (e) in Tinospora sagittata plants after inoculation with different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Different letters on the bar indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences.
Figure 2. Changes in growth performance (a), height (b), leaf number (c), shoot biomass (d), and root biomass (e) in Tinospora sagittata plants after inoculation with different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Different letters on the bar indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences.
Horticulturae 09 01350 g002
Figure 3. Changes in root growth (a), root total length (b), projected area (c), surface area (d), average diameter (e), and volume (f) in Tinospora sagittata plants after inoculation with different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Different letters on the bar indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences.
Figure 3. Changes in root growth (a), root total length (b), projected area (c), surface area (d), average diameter (e), and volume (f) in Tinospora sagittata plants after inoculation with different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Different letters on the bar indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences.
Horticulturae 09 01350 g003
Figure 4. Changes in leaf nitrogen balance index (Nbi) (a), chlorophyll index (Chl) (b), intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) (c), transpiration rate (Tr) (d), photosynthetic rate (Pn) (e), and stomatal conductance (Gs) (f) in Tinospora sagittata plants after inoculation with different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Different letters on the bar indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences.
Figure 4. Changes in leaf nitrogen balance index (Nbi) (a), chlorophyll index (Chl) (b), intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) (c), transpiration rate (Tr) (d), photosynthetic rate (Pn) (e), and stomatal conductance (Gs) (f) in Tinospora sagittata plants after inoculation with different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Different letters on the bar indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences.
Horticulturae 09 01350 g004
Figure 5. HPLC chromatogram of the standard sample (a) and root sample (b). Here, the red arrow represents the columbin.
Figure 5. HPLC chromatogram of the standard sample (a) and root sample (b). Here, the red arrow represents the columbin.
Horticulturae 09 01350 g005
Figure 6. Changes in root columbin concentrations in Tinospora sagittata plants after inoculation with different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (a) and their correlation with mycorrhizal status (b). Different letters on the bar indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences.
Figure 6. Changes in root columbin concentrations in Tinospora sagittata plants after inoculation with different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (a) and their correlation with mycorrhizal status (b). Different letters on the bar indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences.
Horticulturae 09 01350 g006
Table 1. The correlation coefficient between root columbin concentrations and root morphological variables.
Table 1. The correlation coefficient between root columbin concentrations and root morphological variables.
Root Total LengthRoot Projected AreaRoot Surface AreaRoot VolumeRoot Average Diameter
Root columbin0.92 **0.73 **0.87 **0.89 **0.64 **
** p < 0.01.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Meng, L.-L.; Xu, F.-Q.; Zhang, Z.-Z.; Alqahtani, M.D.; Tashkandi, M.A.; Wu, Q.-S. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi, Especially Rhizophagus intraradices as a Biostimulant, Improve Plant Growth and Root Columbin Levels in Tinospora sagittata. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 1350. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9121350

AMA Style

Meng L-L, Xu F-Q, Zhang Z-Z, Alqahtani MD, Tashkandi MA, Wu Q-S. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi, Especially Rhizophagus intraradices as a Biostimulant, Improve Plant Growth and Root Columbin Levels in Tinospora sagittata. Horticulturae. 2023; 9(12):1350. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9121350

Chicago/Turabian Style

Meng, Lu-Lu, Fu-Qi Xu, Ze-Zhi Zhang, Mashael Daghash Alqahtani, Manal A. Tashkandi, and Qiang-Sheng Wu. 2023. "Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi, Especially Rhizophagus intraradices as a Biostimulant, Improve Plant Growth and Root Columbin Levels in Tinospora sagittata" Horticulturae 9, no. 12: 1350. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9121350

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop