Next Article in Journal
Organic Spintronics: A Theoretical Investigation of a Graphene-Porphyrin Based Nanodevice
Next Article in Special Issue
Anomalous Pressure Effects on the Electrical Conductivity of the Spin Crossover Complex [Fe(pyrazine){Au(CN)2}2]
Previous Article in Journal
Successes and Challenges: Inhaled Treatment Approaches Using Magnetic Nanoparticles in Cystic Fibrosis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Field-Induced Single-Ion Magnet Phenomenon in Hexabromo- and Hexaiodorhenate(IV) Complexes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Magnetochemistry
Volume 6
Issue 2
10.3390/magnetochemistry6020026
magnetochemistry-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Spin Cross-Over (SCO) Anionic Fe(II) Complexes Based on the Tripodal Ligand Tris(2-pyridyl)ethoxymethane

by
Emmelyne Cuza
1,
Samia Benmansour
2,
Nathalie Cosquer
1,
Françoise Conan
1,
Sébastien Pillet
3,
Carlos J. Gómez-García
2 and
Smail Triki
1,*
1
Univ Brest, CNRS, CEMCA, 6 Avenue Le Gorgeu, C.S, 93837–29238 Brest CEDEX 3, France
2
Instituto de Ciencia Molecular (ICMol), Departamento de Química Inorgánica, Universidad de Valencia, C/Catedrático José Beltrán 2, 46980 Paterna, Spain
3
Laboratoire de Cristallographie, Résonance Magnétique et Modélisations, UMR 7036, Boulevard des Aiguillettes, BP239 54506 Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Magnetochemistry 2020, 6(2), 26; https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry6020026
Submission received: 23 May 2020 / Revised: 4 June 2020 / Accepted: 5 June 2020 / Published: 7 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Magnetochemistry)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Reactions of Fe(II) with the tripodal chelating ligand 1,1,1-tris(2-pyridyl)ethoxymethane (py3C-OEt) and (NCE)− co-ligands (E = S, Se, BH3) give a series of mononuclear complexes formulated as [Fe(py3C-OEt)2][Fe(py3C-OEt)(NCE)3]2·2CH3CN, with E = S (1) and BH3 (2). These compounds are the first Fe(II) spin cross-over (SCO) complexes based on the tripodal ligand tris(2-pyridyl)ethoxymethane and on the versatile co-ligands (NCS)− and (NCBH3)−. The crystal structure reveals discrete monomeric isomorph structures formed by a cationic [Fe(py3C-OEt)2]2+ complex and by two equivalent anionic [Fe(py3C-OEt)(NCE)3]− complexes. In the cations the Fe(II) is facially coordinated by two py3C-OEt tripodal ligands whereas in the anion the three nitrogen atoms of the tripodal ligand are facially coordinated and the N-donor atoms of the three (NCE)− co-ligands occupy the remaining three positions to complete the distorted octahedral environment of the Fe(II) centre. The magnetic studies show the presence of gradual SCO for both complexes: A one-step transition around 205 K for 1 and a two-step transition for compound 2, centered around 245 K and 380 K.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

In the last decade, spin cross-over (SCO) complexes are undoubtedly the most studied molecular systems among switchable materials thanks to their several potential applications, in particular, for the development of new generation electronic devices such as memories, molecular sensors and displays [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. These complexes can be reversibly switched from high-spin (HS) state to the low-spin (LS) state by external physical stimuli such as temperature, pressure, or light irradiation. Even if this spin change can occur in general for some complexes based on transition metal ions with d4-d7 electronic configurations, the Fe(II) octahedral complexes, with d6 electronic configuration, remain, by far, the most investigated systems during recent decades [11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. While almost all the SCO materials reported up today are either cationic or neutral [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17], the number of anionic complexes exhibiting the SCO phenomenon is relatively limited compared to the several hundreds of examples of neutral and cationic complexes reported every year. To the best of our knowledge, all the anionic SCO complexes are based on Fe(III) [18,19,20,21,22,23] or Fe(II) [24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. For those based on Fe(II), three different systems have been studied. The first system, reported in 2003 [24], concerns a series of Fe(II) complexes of chemical formula [FeIIH3LMe][FeIILMe]X (X− = ClO4−, BF4−, PF6−, AsF6−, SbF6−), based on the hexadentante neutral ligand H3LMe (tris[2-(((2-methylimidazol-4-yl)methylidene)amino)ethyl]amine) and on the deprotonated (LMe)3− anionic form forming a supramolecular 2D-array composed by [FeIIH3LMe]2+ cations and [FeIILMe]− anions, both exhibiting SCO. This system can be viewed as interacting anionic and cationic Fe(II) SCO species in a two-dimensional structure. The second example, reported more recently [25], concerns a trinuclear complex [FeII3(μ-L)6(H2O)6]6−, based on the bridging anionic ligand 4-(1,2,4-triazol-4-yl)ethanedisulfonate) (L), exhibiting a SCO transition above room temperature with a large hysteresis loop (>85 K). The first example of the third system was reported in 2012 by T. Ishida et al. [26] as the first SCO example based on the rigid tetrakis(2-pyridyl)methane (py4C) ligand (see Scheme 1a, R = py). In this example, the Fe(II) ion in the mononuclear anionic complex, [Fe(py4C)(NCS)3]−, is surrounded by the py4C tripodal ligand acting as tridentate through the nitrogen atoms of three pyridyl groups and by three thiocyanate anions acting as terminal co-ligands (see Scheme 1b, R = py). As a result of this work and thanks to the chemical flexibility of the tripodal py3C-R ligand that allows chemical modifications by changing the R groups (see Scheme 1a), the same group has reported in 2015 the two first SCO anionic complexes with [Me4N]+ as counter-ion: [Me4N][Fe(py3C-OH)(NCS)3]·(1-PrOH)0.5·(H2O)2 [27] and [Me4N][Fe(py3C-Me)(NCS)3]·(H2O) [28], exhibiting gradual SCO at 282 and 330 K, respectively. After annealing at 400 K, the first salt led to the new phase: [Me4N][Fe(py3C-OH)(NCS)3]·(H2O) that presents an abrupt transition with a thermal hysteretic behavior and a significant heating-rate dependence [27,28]. With the objective to understand the effect of the counter-ion and of the functional group of the organic ligand, Ishida et al. have completed their series with two other examples: [(Ph)4P][Fe(py3C-Me)(NCS)3] [29] and [Me4N][Fe((py)3C-n-C18H37)(NCS)3] [30], exhibiting similar mononuclear structures and gradual SCO at 290 and 186 K, respectively.
In addition to these SCO salts based on the anionic [Fe(py3C-R)(NCS)3]− complexes (Scheme 1b), other related systems with different structural features have also been investigated. This concerns the dinuclear [{Fe(py3C-OH)(NCS)(μ-NCS)}2]·(PrOH)2 complex reported in 2015 by T. Ishida as the first SCO complex with a FeN5S coordination sphere, in which two [Fe(py3COH)(NCS)] units are doubly bridged by two end-to-end (NCS)− co-ligands [31] (Scheme 1c, R = OH). More recently, some of us have reported a second dinuclear example, [{Fe(py3C-OC6H5)(NCS)(μ-NCS)}2], based on a similar tripodal ligand (see Scheme 1c, R = OC6H5), with a double μ-κN:κS-SCN bridge in a head-to-tail configuration [32]. However, the magnetic studies of this compound revealed the presence of ferromagnetic interactions (JFeFe = +1.08 cm−1) and the absence of any SCO transition. These two uncommon dinuclear complexes with similar molecular structures exhibiting very different magnetic properties allowed us to perform experimental and theoretical magneto-structural studies that revealed that the large Npy-FeII distances and bent N-bound terminal κN-SCN ligands favour the HS state of the FeII ions, while short Ntripodal-FeII distances and almost linear Fe-N-C angles favour the LS state, allowing the SCO behaviour [32]. At the same time, we have enriched these uncommon polynuclear systems with a new Fe(II) 1-D coordination polymer, [{Fe(py3-OMe)(NCS)(μ-NCS)}n], based on a similar tripodal ligand (see Scheme 1a: R = OMe) and thiocyanato ligand acting as a μ-κN: κS-SCN single bridge in a head-to-tail configuration, for which the magnetic studies showed an abrupt and complete HS/LS transition at 199 K [33].
In view of the above observations and in order to further investigate the effect of the functional group of the tripodal ligand and that of the anionic co-ligand, on the structural features and on the SCO characteristics (e.g., transition temperatures, cooperativity and presence of the LIESST effect), we have developed an extensive synthetic work including: (i) Several functionalizations of the py3C-R tripodal ligand by varying the size and the flexibility of the R functional group and (ii) other different anionic co-ligands such as (NCSe)− and (NCBH3)− or more sophisticated ones such as cyanocarbanion units involving several coordinating nitrile groups, and for which the geometry allows them to act as either terminal or multi-bridging co-ligands. In the present work, we report the syntheses, structural characterization, variable temperature infrared spectroscopy and magnetic properties of the two isomorph compounds: [Fe(py3C-OEt)2][Fe(py3C-OEt)(NCE)3]2·2CH3CN, with E = S (1) and BH3 (2) that are the first Fe(II) spin SCO systems involving the tripodal ligand tris(2-pyridyl)ethoxymethane (py3C-OEt) and (NCS)− and (NCBH3)− as versatile co-ligands.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Syntheses

The synthesis of tris(pyridin-2-yl)ethoxymethane (py3C-OEt) was carried out in two different steps, following previous published procedures [34,35] with slight modifications: (i) The reaction of one equivalent of 2-bromopyridine in the presence of n-BuLi at −80 °C in THF led to 2-Pyridyllithium. The resulting solution was then treated with one equivalent of 2,2′-dipyridyl ketone leading to a white powder which was characterized as tris(pyridin-2-yl)methanol (py3COH) after purification with a chemical yield of 88%, significantly higher than that reported in references 34–35 (See detailed synthesis and Figures S1–S3 in SI); (ii) the second step consists of a reaction in dimethylformamide under N2 atmosphere at 0 °C of tris(pyridin-2-yl)ethoxymethane in the presence of sodium hydride and iodoethane, leading to a white powder which was characterized as tris(pyridin-2-yl)ethoxymethane (py3C-OEt) with a chemical yield of 85% (See detailed synthesis and Figures S4–S6). Compounds 1 and 2 were obtained as orange and red single crystals, respectively, by mixing a solution of the NCE− co-ligand E = S (1) and BH3 (2) with a solution of FeCl2 and tris(pyridin-2-yl)ethoxymethane at −32 °C.

2.2. Description of the Structure

According to the spin state derived from the colour at room temperature and to the magnetic properties detailed below, for the two compounds 1 and 2, the crystal structure of [Fe(py3C-OEt)2][Fe(py3C-OEt)(NCS)3]2·2CH3CN (1) was determined at 293 K and 100 K, while the structure of [Fe(py3C-OEt)2][Fe(py3C-OEt)(NCBH3)3]2·2CH3CN (2) was determined at 200 K. The unit cell parameters, crystal and refinement data, and the pertinent bond distances and angles are summarized in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively, for both compounds.
The crystallographic structural parameters (chemical formula, space group, cell parameters) clearly reveal that both compounds, [Fe(py3C-OEt)2][Fe(py3C-OEt)(NCE)3]2·2CH3CN (E = S (1) and BH3 (2)) are isomorph and, therefore, we can expect that main structural differences should arise from the slight differences of their chemical formulae ((NCS)− for 1 and (NCBH3)− for 2). The asymmetric unit of both structures contains one [Fe(py3C-OEt)2]2+ cation (Fe2 ion) centred on a crystallographic inversion centre, one [Fe(py3C-OEt)(NCE)3]− anion (Fe1 ion) and an acetonitrile solvent molecule, both located on general positions (Figure 1 and Figure S7). The Fe(II) ions in both complex units are hexa-coordinated by six N atoms: in the [Fe(py3C-OEt)2]2+ cations, the Fe(II) ion (Fe2) is facially coordinated by two crystallographically equivalent (py3C-OEt) tripodal ligands, through the six nitrogen atoms arising from the three pyridyl groups of each tridentate ligand (N7, N8, N9, and N7(i), N8(i), N9(i)), while the Fe(II) ion (Fe1) of the anionic complex, [Fe((py3C-OEt)(NCS)3)]−, is surrounded by the three nitrogen atoms (N4, N5, N6) arising from the three pyridyl groups of the tripodal ligand and from the three (NCE)− anions acting as terminal κN-SCN terminal co-ligands (N1, N2, N3) to complete the distorted octahedral environment of the iron(II) ion (Figure 1). Examination of the Fe-N bond distances and N-Fe-N bonds angles (see below) allows us to describe the metal environment as distorted FeN6 octahedrons in both anionic and cationic complexes in the two compounds (1 and 2). The three Fe2-N bond distances (Table 2) in the [Fe(py3C-OEt)2]2+ cationic units observed for compounds 1 and 2 (Fe2-N7, Fe2-N8 and Fe2-N9) are quite similar and did not show any significant differences with temperature as indicated by the averaged <d(Fe2-N)> values depicted in Table 2 (<Fe2-N>:1.974(3) and 1.968(3) Å for 1 at 293 and 100 K, respectively, and 1.969(4) Å at 200 K for 2). This low distortion of the coordination sphere with respect to the Oh symmetry in compound 1 (293 and 100 K) and 2 (200 K) is clearly confirmed by almost similar values of their corresponding angular distortion parameter (∑) [36] depicted in Table 2 (18.4 and 17.4° for 1 at 293 and 100 K, respectively, and 19.7° for 2). In contrast, the six Fe1-N bond distances in the anionic complex of compound 1 at 293 K show significant differences (Table 2). Thus, the three Fe1-N distances from the N atoms (N1, N2 and N3) of the terminal κN-SCN ligands (2.083(4), 2.086(4) and 2.110(4) Å) are shorter than the bond distances of the nitrogen atoms (N4, N5 and N6) of the tridentate rigid tripodal ligand (2.237(3), 2.180(3), 2.191(3) Å). This deformation of the coordination sphere is further confirmed by the bond angles that deviate considerably from the ideal values (the cis angles range from 79.16° to 94.90° whereas the trans angles are in the range 167.52° to 174.87°) and by the relatively high values of the distortion parameter (Σ = 62.2°) [36]. At low temperature (100 K), this strong distortion is clearly reduced as shown by the six Fe1-N almost equivalent bond distances and by a much lower distortion parameter (Σ = 15.4°). Similarly, the anionic complex [Fe(py3C-OEt)(NCBH3)3]− part of compound 2 at 200 K, displays equivalent Fe1-N bond distances (1.943–1.978 Å) and low distortion parameter (Σ = 16.2°) which are almost similar to those observed for the cationic units [Fe(py3C-OEt)2]2+ of 1 and 2. (Σ = 17.4–19.7°).
Finally, it is worthy to note that the different coordination spheres described above can be highlighted according to the values of the Fe-N distances and of the distortion parameters which are known to be highly sensitive to the spin state of metal ion. Indeed, the spin state (high-spin (HS) or low-spin (LS)) of each Fe(II) ion can be assigned according to the average value of the Fe-N bond distances (<Fe-N>LS ≈ 2.0 Å; <Fe-N>HS ≈ 2.2 Å) and to the value of the distortion parameters since high degree of distortion of the FeN6 octahedron is indicative of HS configuration [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,36]. Ultimately, the <Fe-N> values (1.974(3) and 1.968(3) Å for 1 at 293 and 100 K, respectively, and 1.969(4) Å for 2 at 200 K) and the relatively low Σ parameters (18.4° for 1 at 293 K, 17.4° for 1 at 100 K and 19.7° for 2) observed for the cationic complexes [Fe(py3C-OEt)2]2+ in both compounds are characteristic of the LS state. In contrast, the much more distorted coordination sphere observed for the anionic complex in 1 at 293 K (<Fe-N> = 2.148(4) Å, Σ = 62.2°, θ = 111.0°), associated with its lower distortions (Σ = 15.4°, θ = 40.5°) and to significant contraction (<Fe-N> = 1.959(3) Å) at 100 K, reveal the presence of a SCO in compound 1 (see discussion below).

2.3. Variable Temperature Magnetic Properties and Infrared Spectroscopy

In line with the structural conclusions above mentioned, variable temperature susceptibility measurements were performed in the temperature range 2–400 K for 1 and 2–500 K for 2. The thermal variation of the product of the molar magnetic susceptibility times the temperature (χmT) are shown in Figure 2 for both complexes.
The χmT values per formula (two Fe(II) ions) at 400 K for compound 1 (≈6.7 cm3 K mol−1) and at 500 K for compound 2 (≈6.9 cm3 K mol−1) are the expected spin only values for two isolated metal ions with S = 2 and g ≈ 2.1 and indicate the presence of two magnetically isolated Fe(II) ions in the HS state (S = 2) [11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Upon cooling, the χmT value of 1 remains almost constant down to approximately 245 K where it shows a quite abrupt decrease reaching a plateau of ca. 0.65 cm3 K mol−1 below 150 K, corresponding to a residual HS fraction of ca. 10%. This behaviour indicates the presence of an incomplete HS to LS transition at T1/2 = 205 K, as also revealed by the thermochromism observed in the single crystals (orange at 293 K and red below 150 K). The χmT product of 2 shows an abrupt decrease from 500 K until approximately 360 K and then decreases in a much more gradual way reaching a value of 0.04 cm3 K mol−1 at ca. 180 K that remains constant below this temperature, indicating the presence of a complete and gradual HS to LS two-step-like transition centred at around 245 K and 380 K. For both complexes the magnetic properties were measured in both cooling and warming modes, but no significant hysteretic effects were detected. We have also performed photomagnetic studies of both samples by irradiating the samples with a green laser at 10 K for several hours without detecting any noticeable increase of the magnetic moment in both samples.
To confirm the Fe(II) spin state at high and low temperatures, the presence of the incomplete HS to LS transition for 1 with a residual HS fraction of ca. 10% in the LS region (see Figure 2) and the presence of an almost complete spin transition for 2, we have performed infrared spectroscopy in the 2150–2200 cm−1 range corresponding to the fundamental stretching vibration of the NCS and NCBH3 moieties. It is well known that the intensity of these stretching vibrations is very sensitive to the spin state of the metal ion [37,38,39,40,41,42,43]. According to the thermal dependences of the χmT products depicted in Figure 2 for the two complexes, we have studied the NCS stretching vibrations for 1 at 300 and 150 K, and the NCBH3 vibrations at 500 and 170 K for 2. The final infrared spectra in the region of the C-N frequency for the HS and LS of each compound are depicted in Figure 3.
Both complexes, show a clear evolution of the ν(CN) modes with temperature, in agreement with the presence of the SCO: At 300 K, complex 1 presents three strong vibration modes around 2063, 2070 and 2087 cm−1(see Figure 3a, red band), while at 150 K, corresponding to the LS region (see Figure 2), three strong bands, characteristic of the LS state, appear at higher wavenumbers (2109, 2112 and 2124 cm−1), in addition to the persistence of the three bands observed at 300 K, but with lower intensities (Figure 3a, blue band). This spectrum confirms the predominance of the LS state at 150 K and the persistence at low temperature of the three weak HS characteristic bands, confirms the presence of a significant HS fraction at 150 K, in agreement with the magnetic studies.
For complex 2, the infrared spectrum at 500 K shows a large strong band around 2183 cm−1 characteristic of the HS spin state, in agreement with the magnetic studies (see Figure 3b, red band), while at 170 K a strong band appears around 2204 cm−1 (see Figure 3b, blue band) which should be attributed to the LS state as revealed by the magnetic studies. The temperature dependence of the infrared spectrum of complex 2 does not show significant persistence of the strong characteristic bands of the HS state at low temperature, confirming the complete nature of the HS to LS transition in compound 2.

2.4. Magneto-Spectroscopic and Structural Relationships

Based on the transition temperatures derived from the magnetic studies above and on the temperature regions of the SCO transition in 1 and 2, the crystal structure of 1 has been determined at 293 and 100 K, corresponding, respectively to the HS and LS states; while the crystal structure of 2 has been only studied at 200 K to characterize the LS state since the HS state, expected above 500 K, could not be reached by our single crystal X-ray equipment. However, this lack of high temperature structural data is compensated by the infrared studies performed in the temperature range 100–500 K since it is well known that the infrared spectroscopy is a very useful tool for the characterization of the HS and LS states [37,38,39,40,41,42,43]. Therefore, the average value of the Fe-L distances (Fe-N) and the distortion parameter (Σ ) derived from the X-ray single crystal structural data [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,36], as well as the thermal evolution of the infrared vibration bands, which are highly sensitive to the Fe(II) spin state, will be used in this section to confirm the spin state on the Fe(II) centres.
Table 1 lists the average values of the Fe-N bond lengths and that of the Σ and θ distortion parameters for all the Fe(II) centres of the three structures (structure of 1 at 293 and 100 K, and structure of 2 at 200 K). Similarly, it is noteworthy that each structure involves two iron(II) centres, the first one (Fe1), from the anionic complex [Fe(py3C-OEt)(NCE)3]− (E = S (1), BH3 (2)), and the second one (Fe2) from the cationic complex [Fe(py3C-OEt)2]2+. The average values of the Fe-N (<d(Fe-N)>) bonds of the coordination sphere of the cation (1.973(2) Å and 1.963(2) Å for 1 at 100 and 300 K, respectively and 1.970(3) Å for 2 at 200 K) as well as the corresponding value of the [Fe(py3C-OEt)(NCS)3]− anion in 1 at 100 K (1.958(3) Å) are very similar and agree with the LS state nature of the Fe2 centres in all cationic complexes and in the anionic unit of 1 at 100 K, as also confirmed by the relatively low value of the Σ distortion parameter (in the range 15.1–19.1°) [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,29]. Thus, among all the metal centres, only the Fe1 ion from the anionic complex [Fe(py3C-OEt)(NCS)3]− of 1 at 293 K displays higher average <d(Fe-N)> value (2.146(3) Å) and more important distortion (Σ = 62.2°, θ = 111.0°) which are in good agreement with the corresponding values observed for the HS Fe(II) ion in a FeN6 distorted octahedral environment [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,36] and with the magnetic data.
The crystal structural characterization shows that the two complexes display discrete mononuclear structures which differ only in the three ancillary ligands (Figure 1). The overall crystal packing is assisted by intricate C-H···S hydrogen bonds for 1, which are very similar in compound 2 through C-H···B interactions (Figure S8a), together with π-π interactions between the [Fe(py3C-OEt)(NCE)3]− anionic complexes (Figure S8b). As shown in Figure S9, no significant strong intermolecular interactions are really dominant in the crystal packing, suggesting the absence of any significant cooperative effects as revealed by the gradual switching behaviours and the lack of hysteresis shown in Figure 2. However, the two compounds differ markedly by their overall transition temperatures since compound 1 exhibits a one-step transition centred at 205 K; while complex 2 displays higher transition temperatures with a two-step behaviour at around 245 K and 380 K. This observation led us to examine the Fe-N-CS bond angles in the two complexes. According to one of our recent experimental and theoretical magneto-structural work on SCO systems involving NCS units as ancillary co-ligands, some of us suggested that the bent configuration of the N-bound terminal thiocyanato ligand promotes a weaker ligand field on the Fe(II) ion than the linear one [32,33]. Examination of the Fe-N-CS angles summarized in Table 3 for the three crystal structures, clearly shows that the Fe-N-C(S) angles observed for complex 1 at 293 K present the higher deviation (<Fe-N-C> = 166.7(4)°) with respect to the linearity, with similar trend between the Fe-N-C(S) angles observed for 1 at 100 K (<Fe-N-C> = 171.7(3)°) and the Fe-N-C(B) angles observed for 2 at 200 K (<Fe-N-C> = 174.0(4)°). These structural observations suggest the following classification of the ligand field strength (1 (HS, 293 K) < 1 (LS, 100 K) < 2 (LS, 200 K)) [32,33], and confirms, as expected, that the ligand field is stronger in complex 2 involving the NCBH3− ancillary co-ligand, in agreement with its higher transition temperature derived from the magnetic studies [44].
As mentioned above, the infrared spectroscopy has been used in the present work to know more on the thermal evolution of the HS and LS state of both compounds. According to the chemical nature of the two compounds, their spin can be, in principle, studied using either stretching vibration of NCS and NCBH3 moieties or those of the Fe-N bonds. However, we have decided to focus our efforts on the thermal dependence of the infrared spectra of the stretching vibration of NCS and NCBH3 moieties (2150–2200 cm−1 in the case of complexes 1 and 2). That choice was justified by the fact that each compound is composed of two different Fe(II) complexes: [Fe(py3C-OEt)2]2+ cationic complexes involving only LS Fe(II) centres, and [Fe(py3C-OEt)(NCS)3]− (E = S (1) and BH3 (2)) anionic complexes exhibiting thermal spin transition; this should allow clearer discrimination of the three possible spin state configurations (HS or LS single spin state, and HS/LS mixed spin state). Thus, for each compound, we have recorded the infrared spectra in the vicinity of the SCO transitions from 300 to 150 K for 1 (Figure 4a) and from 500 to 170 K for 2 (Figure 4b).
For 1, the intensity of the three ν(NCS) vibrational bands observed at 2063, 2070 and at 2087 cm−1, characteristic of the HS state, gradually decrease with decreasing the temperature from 300 to 150 K. As discussed above, even at 150 K, the three infrared bands persist (Figure 4a), suggesting the presence of a residual Fe(II) HS state, in agreement with the magnetic studies. As the intensity decreases, three other bands, characteristic of the LS state, appear at higher wavenumbers (2109, 2112 and 2124 cm−1) whose intensities gradually increase with decreasing the temperature. Similar trend was observed for the ν(NCB) vibrational bands of compound 2 (Figure 4b); the intensity of characteristic band of the HS state, observed at 2183 cm−1, decreases with decreasing the temperature from 500 to 170 K, while a new band, characteristic of the LS state, appears at higher wavenumbers (2204 cm−1). To better assign each vibrational band to the corresponding spin state and to study the global consistency of the experimental data of the thermal dependence of the infrared spectroscopy in both compounds, we have correlated the results of the thermal dependence of the χmT product derived from magnetic measurements and those of the thermal evolution of the intensity of the infrared bands for both compounds. The data, summarized in Figure 5, show an excellent correlation between the thermal evolution of the χmT product and the intensity of one of the HS characteristic bands (2063 cm−1 for 1 and 2183 cm−1 for 2), showing a significant change in the temperature region where the thermal spin transition occurs in the magnetic data for both compounds.
Finally, it is important to note that one of the more intriguing observations in this contribution concerns the SCO behaviour observed for compound 2 that shows two-step transition centred around 245 K and 380 K, while compound 1 exhibits a residual HS fraction of ca. 10% below 150 K. This unexpected behaviour was also confirmed by the temperature dependence of the infrared spectra as clearly shown in Figure 5b for which the data derived from the infrared studies (thermal variation of the intensity of the infrared band observed at 2063 cm−1) perfectly fits with the two steps for 2 and the residual fraction for 1 revealed by the magnetic data.
Juxtaposition of the two-step behaviour (500–320 K and 320–200 K, see Figure 5b) of compound 2 with that observed for complex 1 in the temperature range of 260–160 K (see transition region in Figure 5a) reveals that the profile of the χmT vs. T portion in the range 500–320 K (first step of 2) is close to that of 1 (see temperature range 260–100 K). Such juxtaposition, clearly depicted in Figure 6a, corresponds to that expected for two isomorph complexes for which the magnetic behaviours should only be differentiated by their transition temperatures, according to their ancillary co-ligands (NCS− for 1 and NCBH3− for 2) that promotes different ligand field energies. We can therefore conclude that the first step observed for 2 in the range 500–320 K may be related to the isomorph crystal structures described above for both complexes, while the second step may be induced by unexpected structural changes.
To shed light on the presence of such second step, we have performed additional X-ray experiments at room temperature near the centre of the second step observed for 2: (i) The single crystal structure could not be determined correctly at 293 K because of the low diffraction power of the single crystals due to the low crystallinity of the sample. This was confirmed by the powder X-ray diffraction recorded on crushed single crystals which does not give a well-resolved X-ray diffraction pattern (see Figure 6b and Figure S10). The main diffraction peaks identified from the simulated diffraction pattern fits perfectly with the observed ones, while no other strong peaks are observed in the experimental pattern, which confirms first the purity of the powder sample and that no additional crystalline phase coexist, which could have corresponded to the second transition step. On the contrary, the observed diffraction pattern shows strong broad diffuse scattered signal, which is most probably the signature of an amorphous phase, which can be at the origin of to the second step. A different process is demonstrated by the powder X-ray diffraction for compound 1. In this case, the simulated and measured diffraction patterns match perfectly without any diffuse signal, ruling out the possibility of an additional amorphous phase. In that case, the residual fraction is present in the well crystalline phase, and contributes to the derived single crystal structure. As a matter of fact, the Fe-N and <d(Fe-N)> bond distances are systematically slightly higher for compound 1 at 100 K, by comparison with compound 2 at 200 K (see Table 2).

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Starting Materials

Organic starting compounds, iron salts, and solvents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and Acros Organic. Deuterated solvents were purchased from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories. Dried solvents were prepared by refluxing for one day under nitrogen over appropriate drying agents (sodium and benzophenone for tetrahydrofuran (THF), calcium hydride for methanol, barium oxide under vacuum for dimethylformamide (DMF), sodium for ethanol), others solvents used were dried through drying column. All the ligand syntheses were carried out under nitrogen atmosphere by using a dual manifold vacuum/nitrogen line and standard Schlenk techniques.

3.2. Syntheses of Tris(pyridin-2-yl)methanol (py3C-OH) and Tris(pyridin-2-yl)ethoxymethane (py3C-OEt)

The syntheses were performed following the previous published procedures [34,35] with slight modifications which induce more significant yields.

3.2.1. Synthesis of Tris(pyridin-2-yl)methanol (py3C-OH)

A solution containing 2-bromopyridine (6.32 g; 3.8 mL; 40.0 mmol) and 50 mL of distilled THF was cooled to −80 °C under nitrogen atmosphere. Then n-BuLi (20.0 mL, 50.0 mmol) was added dropwise leading to a bright red solution. After stirring for 15 min at −80 °C, a solution of 2,2′-dipyridyl ketone (7.36 g, 40.0 mmol), which was dissolved beforehand in 50 mL of THF, was slowly added to avoid an increase of the temperature. The resulting marine blue solution was then stirred at −80 °C until the coloration became deep purple, and stirred again for 2 h at room temperature (see Scheme S1). The reaction was quenched with 30 mL methanol, and warmed to room temperature. The final solution was filtered to remove the white precipitate and 100 mL of water was added. The aqueous phase was extracted with 200 mL of dichloromethane, dried over magnesium sulfate, and evaporated using a rotary evaporator. The brown oil resulting compound was purified using 5 mL of acetone and left in the freezer overnight at −28 °C, to obtain a white powder (9.26 g, 35.2 mmol, yield 88%). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, δ (ppm)) of py3C-OH at 25 °C: 7.20 (3H, CH aromatic, q, 3JH-H = 5 Hz, H3), 7.68 (3H, CH aromatic, td, H4), 7.75 (3H, CH aromatic, q, 3JH-H = 8 Hz, H5), 8.46 (3H, CH aromatic, 3JH-H = 5 Hz, td, H2). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz, δ (ppm)) of py3COH at 25 °C: 81.27 (C7), 121.36 (C3), 122.01 (C5) 135.46 (C4), 146.87 (C2), 161.99 (C6).

3.2.2. Synthesis Tris(pyridin-2-yl)ethoxymethane (py3C-OEt)

Under Nitrogen atmosphere, in a 50 mL flask was dissolved tris(pyridyl)methanol (400 mg, 1.52 mmol) in 4 mL of distilled N,N’-dimethylformamide. Then sodium hydride was quickly and carefully added (180 mg, 7.50 mmol) and the mixture was stirred for 30 min at 0 °C before adding dropwise 1-iodoethane (249 mg, 165 μL, 1.60 mmol). After stirring for 5 h at room temperature, the reaction was quenched with 20 mL of acetone/methanol (1:1) solution (see Scheme S2). Then a volume of 10 mL of water was added before evaporating the organic phase with a rotary evaporator. The crude product was extracted with dichloromethane and purified in a 1:4 mixture of acetone: Pentane, one night in the freezer. The molecule was obtained as a white powder (375 mg, 1.2 mmol, 85%). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, δ (ppm)) of py3C-OEt at 25 °C: 1.24 (3H, CH3, t, 3JH-H = 7.2 Hz, H10), 3.37 (2H, CH2, q, 3JH-H= 7.2 Hz, H9), 7.13 (3H, CH aromatic ring, q, 3JH-H = 8 Hz, H3), 7.65 (3H, CH aromatic ring, q, 3JH-H = 8 Hz, H5), 7.73 (3H, CH aromatic ring, d, 3JH-H = 8 Hz, H4), 8.57 (2H, CH aromatic ring, d, 3JH-H = 4.8 Hz, H2). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz, δ (ppm)) of py3C-OEt at 25 °C: 15.56 (C10), 60.67 (C9), 88.11 (C7), 122.03 (C3), 123.61 (C5) 136.16 (C4), 148.63 (C2), 161.84 (C6).

3.3. Synthesis of [Fe(py3C-OEt)2][Fe(py3C-OEt)(NCE)3]2·2CH3CN (E = S (1), NCBH3 (2))

In 5 mL of distilled methanol were dissolved tri(pyridin-2-yl)ethoxymethane (50.0 mg, 0.17 mmol), iron(II) chloride salt (20.0 mg, 0.16 mmol) and a few mg of ascorbic acid. The resulting solution was stirred for 15 min at room temperature and then a solution of acetonitrile (5 mL) containing 0.69 mmol of (C2H5N)(NCE) was added. The resulting solution was stirred for 30 min and then filtered and placed quickly at −32 °C. After a few days, orange and red prismatic single crystals of 1 and 2, respectively, were recovered. Anal. Calcd. (%) for [Fe(py3C-OEt)2][Fe(py3C-OEt)(NCS)3]2·2CH3CN (C82H74Fe3N20O4S6), 1: C, 55.8; H, 4.2; N, 15.9; Found (%): C, 55.4; H, 4.0; N, 15.3. IR data (ν/cm−1) for the freshly filtered sample: 410w, 423w, 477w, 500w, 513w, 530w, 659m, 726w, 758w, 886w, 1011m, 1086w, 1108m, 1143m, 1205w, 1252w, 1291w, 1389w, 1434m, 1462s, 1593m, 2060s, 2244w, 2871w, 2901w, 2972.11w, 3076w, 3442br. Anal. Calcd. (%) for [Fe(py3C-OEt)2][Fe(py3C-OEt)(NCBH3)3]2·2CH3CN (C82H92Fe3N20O4B6), 2: C, 59.4; H, 5.6; N; 16.9. Found (%): C, 59.0; H, 5.4; N, 16.3. IR data (ν/cm−1) for the freshly filtered sample: 467w, 491w, 481w, 512m, 530m, 558w, 591w, 616w, 684w, 743w, 759s, 774s, 798s, 863m, 871m, 890w, 900w, 946w, 1012 m, 1067w, 1087s, 1109w, 1123s, 1135w, 1142m, 1163s, 1205m, 1248w, 1298m, 1394w, 1439s, 1460s, 1595m, 2168m, 2219w, 2312s 2329m, 2919w, 2982w, 3071w), 3105w.

3.4. Characterization of the Materials

Elemental analyses were performed by the “Service Central d’Analyses du CNRS”, Gif-sur-Yvette, France. Room temperature infrared spectra of ligands and complexes were recorded on a platinum ATR Vertex 70 BRUKER spectrometer in the range 4000–400 cm−1. 1H et 13C NMR spectra were recorded using BRUKER DRX 300 MHz, Advance 400 MHz and Advance III HD 500 MHz equipment (University of Brest). All chemical shifts are defined in ppm and determined by using the rightful deuterated solvent as a reference.

3.5. Magnetic Measurements

Magnetic susceptibility measurements were carried out in the temperature range 2–400 K for 1 and in the range 2–500 K for 2 with an applied magnetic field of 0.1 T, on polycrystalline samples of both compounds (with masses of 11.634 mg for 1 and 4.065 mg for 2) with a Quantum Design MPMS-XL-5 SQUID susceptometer (San Diego, CA, USA) using a sample space oven for compound 2 (in the range 300–500 K). Consecutive cooling and warming scans at a scan rate of 2 K min−1 showed identical behaviours without any noticeable hysteresis. The susceptibility data were corrected for the sample holders previously measured using the same conditions and for the diamagnetic contributions of the salt as deduced by using Pascal’s constant tables [45]. The photomagnetic studies were performed by cooling the samples down to 10 K at a rate of 1 K min−1 and then irradiating them with a green Diode Pumped Solid State Laser DPSS-532-20 from Chylas (λ = 532 nm, power = 20 mW) coupled via an optical fibre to the cavity of the SQUID magnetometer.

3.6. Crystallographic Data Collection and Refinement

The crystallographic studies were performed at room temperature and at 100 K for 1, and at 200 K for 2, using an Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur κ-CCD diffractometer equipped with a graphite monochromated MoKα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å). The full sphere data collections were performed using 1.0° ω-scans with different exposure times per frame (225 s for 1 at 293 K, 45 s for 1 at 100 K, and 175 s for 2 at 200 K). Data collection and data reduction were done with the CRYSALIS-CCD and CRYSALIS-RED programs on the full set of data [46]. The crystal structures were solved by direct methods and successive Fourier difference syntheses, and were refined on F2 by weighted anisotropic full-matrix least-square methods [47]. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically and the hydrogen atoms were calculated and included as isotropic fixed contributors to Fc. All other calculations were performed with standard procedures (OLEX2) [48]. Crystal data, structure refinement, and collection parameters are listed in Table 1.
X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) data were collected for both compounds on polycrystalline samples filled into 0.7 mm glass capillaries that were mounted and aligned on a Empyrean PANalytical powder diffractometer, at 45 kV, 40 mA using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54177 Å). A total of four scans were collected for each sample, at room temperature in the 2θ range of 5–40°. The isostructurality of the samples prepared was confirmed with the experimental and simulated powder X-ray diffractograms (Figure S10).
CCDC-1998534-1998536 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for compounds 1 (293 K and 100 K) and 2 (200 K), respectively. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center at www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.

4. Conclusions

Two novel SCO Fe(II) complexes: [Fe(py3C-OEt)2][Fe(py3C-OEt)(NCE)3]2·2CH3CN, with E = S (1), NCBH3 (2), based on the tris(2-pyridyl)ethoxymethane (py3C-OEt) tripodal ligand and the two ancillary NCS− and NCBH3− co-ligands, have been prepared. Complex 1 has been structurally characterized at room temperature (293 K) and at 100 K, while complex 2 has been only characterized at 200 K. Both compounds display almost similar molecular structures composed by similar cationic complex ([Fe(py3C-OEt)2]2+) and anionic complex ([Fe(py3C-OEt)(NCE)3]−, with E = S (1), NCBH3 (2)). Even if they display isomorph crystallographic structures, the magnetic studies revealed two different SCO behaviours without hysteretic effects: For complex 1, the thermal variation of the χmT product showed an incomplete gradual HS–LS transition at T1/2 = 205 K with residual fraction of the HS spin of ca. 10%., while complex 2 exhibits a complete and gradual HS to LS two-step-like transition centred around 245 K and 380 K. These magnetic data are in good agreement with the variable temperature infrared spectroscopy performed in the 2150–2200 cm−1 range corresponding to the fundamental stretching vibration of NCS (1) and NCBH3 (2) moieties. Furthermore, the thermal dependence of the intensity of the stretching vibration of NCS and NCBH3 moieties (2150–220 cm−1 in the case of complexes 1 and 2) showed a clear correlation, including the intriguing two-step behaviour for complex 2, with the thermal dependences of the χmT product derived from magnetic measurements for each complex. Finally, additional X-ray experiments at room temperature, where the second step of 2 is centred, revealed low diffraction power probably due to the low crystallinity of the sample, in agreement with the powder X-ray diffraction recorded on crushed single crystals that show a low crystallinity diffraction pattern.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2312-7481/6/2/26/s1, Scheme S1: Synthesis of tris(pyridin-2-yl)methanol (py3C-OH), Scheme S2: Synthesis of tris(pyridin-2-yl)ethoxymethane (py3C-OEt), Figure S1: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, δ (ppm)) of py3C-OH at 25 °C, Figure S2: 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz, δ (ppm)) of py3C-OH at 25 °C, Figure S3: IR spectrum of py3C-OH at 25 °C, Figure S4: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, δ (ppm)) of py3C-OEt at 25 C, Figure S5: 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz, δ (ppm)) of py3C-OEt at 25°C, Figure S6: IR of py3C-OEt at 25 °C, Figure S7: Molecular structure of 1-2 showing the asymmetric unit and the Fe(II) environments of the anionic ([Fe(py3C-OEt)(NCE)3]−) and cationic ([Fe(py3C-OEt)2]2+) moieties, Figure S8: Projection of the crystal packing in the ac plane (a) and π-π contact motif (b) of 1 (similar in 2), Figure S9: 3D Hirshfeld surface maps and fingerprint plots of the intermolecular interactions around the [Fe(py3C-OEt)(NCE)3]− anions for compounds 1 and 2, Figure S10: Experimental and simulated XRPD patterns for compounds 1 and 2, Table S1: Crystal data and structural refinement parameters for complexes [Fe(py3C-OEt)2][Fe(py3C-OEt)(NCE)3]2·2CH3CN (E = S (1), BH3 (2)), Table S2: Bond lengths and bond angles of compounds 1 and 2.

Author Contributions

E.C. synthesized the ligand and the complexes with supervision of S.T.; and recorded and analyzed the infrared spectra with supervision of N.C. and S.P.; F.C. supervised the organic syntheses and interpreted the NMR spectra; E.C. analyzed the crystal data of the metal complexes with supervision of S.P.; S.B. performed the X-ray power diffraction and helped with the single crystal structures determination; C.J.G.-G. performed and interpreted the magnetic measurements; S.T. supervised the experimental work and wrote the manuscript on which all the authors have contributed. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the French CNRS (MITI Project), the “Université de Brest” (IBSAM institute), the Région Bretagne (EC), the Generalidad Valenciana (Prometeo2019/076 project) and the Spanish MINECO (Project CTQ2017-87201-P AEI/FEDER, EU).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kumar, K.S.; Ruben, M. Emerging trends in spin crossover (SCO) based functional materials and devices. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2017, 346, 176–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Matsuda, M.; Isozaki, H.; Tajima, H. Reproducible on-off switching of the light emission from the electroluminescent device containing a spin crossover complex. Thin Solid Films 2008, 517, 1465–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Benaicha, B.; Van Do, K.; Yangui, A.; Pittala, N.; Lusson, A.; Sy, M.; Bouchez, G.; Fourati, H.; Gómez-García, C.J.; Triki, S.; et al. Interplay between Spin-Crossover and Luminescence in a Multifunctional Single Crystal Iron (II) complex: Towards a New Generation of Molecular Sensors. Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 6791–6798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Paraïso, T.K.; Wouters, M.; Léger, Y.; Morier-Genoud, F.; Deveaud-Plédran, B. Multistability of a coherent spin ensemble in a semiconductor microcavity. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 655–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Coronado, E.; Galán-Mascarós, J.R.; Monrabal-Capilla, M.; García-Martínez, J.; Pardo-Ibáñez, P. Bistable Spin-Crossover Nanoparticles Showing Magnetic Thermal Hysteresis near Room Temperature. Adv. Mater. 2007, 19, 1359–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sato, O. Dynamic molecular crystals with switchable physical properties. Nat. Chem. 2016, 8, 644–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shalabaeva, V.; Ridier, K.; Rat, S.; Manrique-Juarez, M.D.; Salmon, L.; Séguy, I.; Rotaru, A.; Molnár, G.; Bousseksou, A. Room temperature current modulation in large area electronic junctions of spin crossover thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2018, 112, 013301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dugay, J.; Giménez-Marqués, M.; Kozlova, T.; Zandbergen, H.W.; Coronado, E.; van der Zant, H.S.J. Spin Switching in Electronic Devices Based on 2D Assemblies of Spin-Crossover Nanoparticles. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 1288–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Prins, F.; Monrabal-Capilla, M.; Osorio, E.A.; Coronado, E.; van der Zant, H.S.J. Room-Temperature Electrical Addressing of a Bistable Spin-Crossover Molecular System. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 1545–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rueckes, T.; Kim, K.; Joselevich, E.; Tseng, G.Y.; Cheung, C.-L.; Lieber, C.M. Carbon Nanotube-Based Nonvolatile Random Access Memory for Molecular Computing. Science 2000, 289, 94–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Halcrow, M.A. (Ed.) Spin-Crossover Materials, Properties and Applications; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  12. Pittala, N.; Thétiot, F.; Triki, S.; Boukheddaden, K.; Chastanet, G.; Marchivie, M. Cooperative 1D Triazole-Based Spin Crossover FeII Material with Exceptional Mechanical Resilience. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 490–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Phan, H.; Hrudka, J.J.; Igimbayeva, D.; Lawson Daku, L.M.; Shatruk, M. A Simple Approach for Predicting the Spin State of Homoleptic Fe(II) Tris-diimine Complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 6437–6447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Pittala, N.; Thétiot, F.; Charles, C.; Triki, S.; Boukheddaden, K.; Chastanet, G.; Marchivie, M. An unprecedented trinuclear FeII triazole-based complex exhibiting a concerted and complete sharp spin transition above room temperature. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 8356–8359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Milin, E.; Patinec, V.; Triki, S.; Bendeif, E.-E.; Pillet, S.; Marchivie, M.; Chastanet, G.; Boukheddaden, K. Elastic Frustration Triggering Photoinduced Hidden Hysteresis and Multistability in a Two-Dimensional Photoswitchable Hofmann-Like Spin-Crossover Metal-Organic Framework. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 55, 11652–11661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Shatruk, M.; Phan, H.; Chrisostomo, B.A.; Suleimenova, A. Symmetry-breaking structural phase transitions in spin crossover complexes. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2015, 289–290, 62–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Atmani, A.; El Hajj, F.; Benmansour, S.; Marchivie, M.; Triki, S.; Conan, F.; Patinec, V.; Handel, H.; Dupouy, G.; Gómez-García, C.J. Guidelines to design new spin crossover materials. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2010, 254, 1559–1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Phonsri, W.; Macedo, D.S.; Lewis, B.A.I.; Wain, D.F.; Murray, K.S. Iron(III) Azadiphenolate Compounds in a New Family of Spin Crossover Iron(II)–Iron(III) Mixed-Valent Complexes. Magnetochemistry 2019, 5, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Floquet, S.; Boillot, M.-L.; Rivière, E.; Varret, F.; Boukheddaden, K.; Morineau, D.; Négrier, P. Spin transition with a large thermal hysteresis near room temperature in a water solvate of an iron(III) thiosemicarbazone complex. New J. Chem. 2003, 27, 341–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Floquet, S.; Guillou, N.; Négrier, P.; Rivière, E.; Boillot, M.-L. The crystallographic phase transition for a ferric thiosemicarbazone spin crossover complex studied by X-ray powder diffraction. New J. Chem. 2006, 30, 1621–1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Cook, C.; Habib, F.; Aharen, T.; Clérac, R.; Hu, A.; Murugesu, M. High-Temperature Spin Crossover Behavior in a Nitrogen-Rich FeIII Based System. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 52, 1825–1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Takahashi, K.; Kawamukai, K.; Okai, M.; Mochida, T.; Sakurai, T.; Ohta, H.; Yamamoto, T.; Einaga, Y.; Shiota, Y.; Yoshizawa, K. A New Family of Anionic FeIII Spin Crossover Complexes Featuring a Weak-Field N2O4 Coordination Octahedron. Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 1253–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Phonsri, W.; Lewis, B.A.I.; Jameson, G.N.L.; Murray, K.S. Double spin crossovers: A new double salt strategy to improve magnetic and memory properties. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 14031–14034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yamada, M.; Ooidemizu, M.; Ikuta, Y.; Osa, S.; Matsumoto, N.; Iijima, S.; Kojima, M.; Dahan, F.; Tuchagues, J.-P. Interlayer Interaction of Two-Dimensional Layered Spin Crossover Complexes [FeIIH3LMe][FeIILMe]X (X− = ClO4−, BF4−, PF6−, AsF6−, and SbF6−; H3LMe = Tris[2-(((2-methylimidazol-4-yl)methylidene)amino)ethyl]amine). Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 8406–8416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Gómez, V.; Sáenz de Pipaón, C.; Maldonado-Illescas, P.; Waerenborgh, J.C.; Martin, E.; Benet-Buchholz, J.; Galán-Mascarós, J.-R. Easy Excited-State Trapping and Record High TTIESST in a Spin-Crossover Polyanionic Fe(II) Trimer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 11924–11927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hirosawa, N.; Oso, Y.; Ishida, T. Spin crossover and light-induced excited spin-state trapping observed for an iron (II) complex chelated with tripodal tetrakis (2-pyridyl) methane. Chem. Lett. 2012, 41, 716–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yamasaki, M.; Ishida, T. Spin-crossover thermal hysteresis and light-induced effect on iron (II) complexes with tripodal tris (2-pyridyl) methanol. Polyhedron 2015, 85, 795–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yamasaki, M.; Ishida, T. Heating-rate dependence of spin-crossover hysteresis observed in an iron (II) complex having tris (2-pyridyl) methanol. J. Mater. Chem. C 2015, 3, 7784–7787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ishida, T.; Kaneto, T.; Yamasaki, M. An iron(II) complex tripodally chelated with 1,1,1-tris(pyridine-2-yl)ethane showing room-temperature spin-crosssover behaviour. Acta Cryst. 2016, C72, 797–801. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kashiro, A.; Some, K.; Kobayashi, Y.; Ishida, T. Iron(II) and 1,1,1-Tris(2-pyridyl)nonadecane Complex Showing an Order–Disorder-Type Structural Transition and Spin-Crossover Synchronized over Both Conformers. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58, 7672–7676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yamasaki, M.; Ishida, T. First Iron(II) Spin-crossover Complex with an N5S Coordination Sphere. Chem. Lett. 2015, 44, 920–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mekuimemba, C.D.; Conan, F.; Mota, A.J.; Palacios, M.A.; Colacio, E.; Triki, S. On the Magnetic Coupling and Spin Crossover Behavior in Complexes Containing the Head-to-Tail [FeII2(μ-SCN)2] Bridging Unit: A Magnetostructural Experimental and Theoretical Study. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 57, 2184–2192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Nebbali, K.; Mekuimemba, C.D.; Charles, C.; Yefsah, S.; Chastanet, G.; Mota, A.J.; Colacio, E.; Triki, S. One-Dimensional Thiocyanato-Bridged Fe(II) Spin Crossover Cooperative Polymer With Unusual FeN5S Coordination Sphere. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 57, 12338–12346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. White, D.L.; Faller, J.W. Preparation and Reactions of the C3v Ligand Tris(2-pyridyl)methane and Its Derivatives. Inorg. Chem. 1982, 21, 3119–3122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jonas, R.T.; Stack, T.D.P. Synthesis and Characterization of a Family of Systematically Varied Tris(2-pyridyl)methoxymethane Ligands: Copper(I) and Copper(II) Complexes. Inorg. Chem. 1998, 37, 6615–6629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Guionneau, P.; Marchivie, M.; Bravic, G.; Létard, J.-F.; Chasseau, D. Structural Aspects of Spin Crossover. Example of the [FeIILn(NCS)2] Complexes. Top. Curr. Chem. 2004, 234, 97–128. [Google Scholar]
  37. Sorai, M.; Seki, S. Phonon coupled cooperative low-spin 1A1 ↔ high-spin 5T2 transition in [Fe(phen)2(NCS)2] and [Fe(phen)2(NCSe)2] crystals. J. Pbys. Chm. Solids 1974, 35, 555–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Brehm, G.; Reiher, M.; Le Guennic, B.; Leibold, M.; Schindler, S.; Heinemann, F.W.; Schneider, S. Investigation of the low-spin to high-spin transition in a novel [Fe(pmea)(NCS)2] complex by IR and Raman spectroscopy and DFT calculations. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2006, 37, 108–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Park, Y.; Jung, Y.M.; Sarker, S.; Lee, J.-J.; Lee, Y.; Lee, K.; Oh, J.J.; Joo, S.-W. Temperature-dependent infrared spectrum of (Bu4N)2[Ru(dcbpyH)2(NCS)2] on nanocrystalline TiO2 surfaces. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2010, 94, 857–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Varma, V.V.; Fernandes, J.-R. An Infrared Spectroscopic Study of the Low-Spin-High-spin transition in in FexMn1-x(Phen)2(NCS)2: A Composition-Induced Change in the Order of the Spin-State Transition. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1990, 167, 367–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sankar, G.; Thomas, J.M.; Varma, V.; Kulkani, G.U.; Rao, C.N.R. An investigation of the first-order spin-state transition in the Fe(Phen)2(NCS)2 EXAFS and infrared spectroscopy. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1996, 251, 79–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Smit, E.; de Waal, D.; Heyns, A.M. The spin-transition complexes [Fe(Htrz)3](ClO4)2 and [Fe(NH2trz)3](ClO4)2 I. FT-IR spectra of a low pressure and a low temperature phase transition. Mater. Res. Bull. 2000, 35, 1697–1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Durand, P.; Pillet, S.; Bendeif, E.-E.; Carteret, C.; Bouazaoui, M.; El Hamzaoui, H.; Capoen, B.; Salmon, L.; Hébert, S.; Ghanbaja, J.; et al. Room temperature bistability with wide thermal hysteresis in a spin crossover silica nanocomposite. J. Mater. Chem. C 2013, 1, 1933–1942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Arroyave, A.; Lennartson, A.; Dragulescu-Andrasi, A.; Pedersen, K.S.; Piligkos, S.; Stoian, S.A.; Greer, S.M.; Pak, C.; Hietsoi, O.; Phan, H.; et al. Spin Crossover in Fe(II) Complexes with N4S2 Coordination. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 55, 5904–5913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Bain, G.A.; Berry, J.F. Diamagnetic corrections and Pascal’s constants. J. Chem. Educ. 2008, 85, 532–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. CRYSALIS-CCD 170, CRYSALIS-RED 170; Oxford-Diffraction: Oxfordshire, UK, 2002.
  47. Sheldrick, A. SHELX97. Program for Crystal Structure Analysis; University of Gottingen: Gottingen, Germany, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  48. Dolomanov, O.V.; Bourhis, L.J.; Gildea, R.J.; Howard, J.A.K.; Puschmann, H. OLEX2: A complete structure, refinement and analysis program. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2009, 42, 339–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Magnetochemistry 06 00026 sch001 550
Scheme 1. (a) Selected functionalized tris(2-pyridyl)methane (py3CR) ligands and examples of tridentate coordination modes observed in anionic (b) and neutral (c) Fe(II) complexes.
Scheme 1. (a) Selected functionalized tris(2-pyridyl)methane (py3CR) ligands and examples of tridentate coordination modes observed in anionic (b) and neutral (c) Fe(II) complexes.
Magnetochemistry 06 00026 sch001
Magnetochemistry 06 00026 g001 550
Figure 1. View of the anionic [Fe(py3C-OEt)(NCBH3)3]− and the dication [Fe(py3C-OEt)2]2+ complexes in [Fe(py3C-OEt)2][Fe(py3C-OEt)(NCBH3)3]2·2CH3CN (2) showing the atom labelling scheme and the coordination environment of the two Fe(II) ions (Fe1 and Fe2). Similar structure for [Fe(py3C-OEt)2][Fe(py3C-OEt)(NCS)3]2·2CH3CN (1). Codes of equivalent positions: (a) = −x, −y, −z.
Figure 1. View of the anionic [Fe(py3C-OEt)(NCBH3)3]− and the dication [Fe(py3C-OEt)2]2+ complexes in [Fe(py3C-OEt)2][Fe(py3C-OEt)(NCBH3)3]2·2CH3CN (2) showing the atom labelling scheme and the coordination environment of the two Fe(II) ions (Fe1 and Fe2). Similar structure for [Fe(py3C-OEt)2][Fe(py3C-OEt)(NCS)3]2·2CH3CN (1). Codes of equivalent positions: (a) = −x, −y, −z.
Magnetochemistry 06 00026 g001
Magnetochemistry 06 00026 g002 550
Figure 2. Thermal variation of the χmT product for complexes 1 and 2 in the cooling (blue dots) and warming (red dots) scans.
Figure 2. Thermal variation of the χmT product for complexes 1 and 2 in the cooling (blue dots) and warming (red dots) scans.
Magnetochemistry 06 00026 g002
Magnetochemistry 06 00026 g003 550
Figure 3. Infrared spectra for compounds 1 (a) and 2 (b) in the 2150–2200 cm−1 region, showing the principal bands that are temperature sensitive.
Figure 3. Infrared spectra for compounds 1 (a) and 2 (b) in the 2150–2200 cm−1 region, showing the principal bands that are temperature sensitive.
Magnetochemistry 06 00026 g003
Magnetochemistry 06 00026 g004 550
Figure 4. Temperature dependences of the infrared spectra in the temperature region 300–150 K, for compound 1 (a) and in the temperature region 500–170 K for 2 (b).
Figure 4. Temperature dependences of the infrared spectra in the temperature region 300–150 K, for compound 1 (a) and in the temperature region 500–170 K for 2 (b).
Magnetochemistry 06 00026 g004
Magnetochemistry 06 00026 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) Temperature dependences of the χmT product and of the relative absorbance of the ν(CN) band observed at 2063 cm−1 (●) for compound 1. (b) Temperature dependences of the χmT product and of the relative absorbance of the ν(CN) band observed at 2183 cm−1 (●) for compound 2.
Figure 5. (a) Temperature dependences of the χmT product and of the relative absorbance of the ν(CN) band observed at 2063 cm−1 (●) for compound 1. (b) Temperature dependences of the χmT product and of the relative absorbance of the ν(CN) band observed at 2183 cm−1 (●) for compound 2.
Magnetochemistry 06 00026 g005
Magnetochemistry 06 00026 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) Temperature dependences of the χmT product of 1 (black solid line) and 2 (blue dashed line) showing similar behaviours above 320 K, when the transition temperatures are not taken into account; (b) observed and calculated X-ray powder diffraction patterns for compound 2.
Figure 6. (a) Temperature dependences of the χmT product of 1 (black solid line) and 2 (blue dashed line) showing similar behaviours above 320 K, when the transition temperatures are not taken into account; (b) observed and calculated X-ray powder diffraction patterns for compound 2.
Magnetochemistry 06 00026 g006
Table
Table 1. Crystal data and structure refinement of complexes [Fe(py3C-OEt)2][Fe(py3C-OEt)(NCE)3]2·2CH3CN (E = S (1), BH3 (2)).
Table 1. Crystal data and structure refinement of complexes [Fe(py3C-OEt)2][Fe(py3C-OEt)(NCE)3]2·2CH3CN (E = S (1), BH3 (2)).
12
Temperature/K293100200
ColorOrangeRedRed
FormulaC82H74Fe3N20O4S6C82H92Fe3N20O4B6
F. Wt.1763.521654.16
Space groupP-1P-1
Crystal systemTriclinicTriclinic
A/Å11.6683(5)11.432(5)11.6827(8)
B/Å11.9026(7)11.829(5)12.0204(10)
C/Å17.1711(9)16.857(5)16.9162(11)
A/°78.192(5)78.072(5)78.389(6)
Β/°88.279(4)88.037(5)87.805(6)
Γ/°66.544(5)65.879(5)65.767(7)
V/Å32137.9(2)2032.4(14)2119.3(3)
Z111
ρcalc/g cm−31.3701.4411.296
2θ range (deg)6.834–58.8566.527–58.8246.508–58.484
Total reflections18,91826,67215,809
Unique reflections/Rint9830/0.04589534/0.07229657/0.0701
Data with I > 2σ(I)598869165051
Nvar523523550
R1 a on I > 2σ(I)/wR2 b (all)0.0692/0.20530.0605/0.17520.0823/0.2752
GooF c on F21.0281.0660.997
Δρmax (eÅ−3)/Δρmin (eÅ−3)0.892/−0.7032.110/−1.0471.177/−1.490
a R1 = Σ|Fo-Fc|/Fo); b wR2= [Σ((ω(Fo2-Fc2))2/(ωFo2)2)]1/2; c GooF = [(Σ(ω(Fo2-Fc2))2/(Nobs-Nvar)]1/2.
Table
Table 2. Fe-N bond lengths (Å) and ∑ and θ distortion parameters (°) for compounds 1 and 2.
Table 2. Fe-N bond lengths (Å) and ∑ and θ distortion parameters (°) for compounds 1 and 2.
12
293 K100 K200 K
Fe1-N12.083(4)1.949(3)1.944(4)
Fe1-N22.086(4)1.956(3)1.954(4)
Fe1-N32.110(4)1.965(3)1.943(5)
Fe1-N42.237(3)1.987(3)1.978(4)
Fe1-N52.180(3)1.948(3)1.943(4)
Fe1-N62.191(3)1.952(3)1.945(4)
<d(Fe-N)>2.148(4)1.959(3)1.951(5)
∑62.215.416.2
θ111.040.544.6
Fe2-N72.003(3)1.989(3)1.998(4)
Fe2-N81.962(3)1.960(3)1.947(4)
Fe2-N91.957(3)1.954(3)1.963(4)
<d(Fe-N)>1.974(3)1.968(3)1.969(4)
∑18.417.419.7
θ43.443.446.0
Σ is the sum of the deviation from 90° of the 12 cis angles of the FeN6 octahedron; Θ is the sum of the deviation from 60° of the 24 trigonal angles of the projection of the FeN6 octahedron onto its trigonal faces [36].
Table
Table 3. Fe-N-C bond angles (°) arising from the bent N-bound terminal κN-ECN coordination mode (E = S (1), BH3 (2)).
Table 3. Fe-N-C bond angles (°) arising from the bent N-bound terminal κN-ECN coordination mode (E = S (1), BH3 (2)).
12
293 K100 K200 K
Fe1-N1-C1165.7(4)171.0(3)172.5(4)
Fe1-N2-C2159.7(4)168.5(3)174.1(4)
Fe1-N3-C3174.7(4)175.7(3)175.3(4)

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cuza, E.; Benmansour, S.; Cosquer, N.; Conan, F.; Pillet, S.; Gómez-García, C.J.; Triki, S. Spin Cross-Over (SCO) Anionic Fe(II) Complexes Based on the Tripodal Ligand Tris(2-pyridyl)ethoxymethane. Magnetochemistry 2020, 6, 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry6020026

AMA Style

Cuza E, Benmansour S, Cosquer N, Conan F, Pillet S, Gómez-García CJ, Triki S. Spin Cross-Over (SCO) Anionic Fe(II) Complexes Based on the Tripodal Ligand Tris(2-pyridyl)ethoxymethane. Magnetochemistry. 2020; 6(2):26. https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry6020026

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cuza, Emmelyne, Samia Benmansour, Nathalie Cosquer, Françoise Conan, Sébastien Pillet, Carlos J. Gómez-García, and Smail Triki. 2020. "Spin Cross-Over (SCO) Anionic Fe(II) Complexes Based on the Tripodal Ligand Tris(2-pyridyl)ethoxymethane" Magnetochemistry 6, no. 2: 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry6020026

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop