Next Article in Journal
Measurement of Mechanical Behavior of 11B-Enriched MgB2 Wire Using a Pulsed Neutron Source
Previous Article in Journal
Stress Evaluation Method by Neutron Diffraction for HCP-Structured Magnesium Alloy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Collective Acceleration of Helium Ions from Its Residual Atmosphere in a Luce Diode

National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, 30, Lenina Ave, 634050 Tomsk, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Quantum Beam Sci. 2023, 7(4), 33; https://doi.org/10.3390/qubs7040033
Submission received: 31 July 2023 / Revised: 29 August 2023 / Accepted: 19 October 2023 / Published: 24 October 2023

Abstract

:
The collective acceleration of helium ions from its residual atmosphere in the Luce diode was studied at helium pressures from 0.13 to 0.23 Pa. The energy of accelerated ions was determined from the drift velocity of the virtual cathode accelerating the ions. The number of 4He was determined by radioactivities of 13N and 30P induced in h-BN and Al targets via the nuclear reactions 10B(α,n)13N and 27Al(α,n)30P. The efficiency of capturing 4He ions in collective acceleration from the residual helium atmosphere was estimated as 0.25%. With increasing helium pressure above 0.15 Pa, the energy of the main ion group noticeably decreased to 0.46 MeV/amu compared to the acceleration from a usual residual atmosphere (~0.6 MeV/amu); however, the probability of ion acceleration to a specific energy of up to 1.57 MeV/amu increased significantly. Such increases in the ion energy were accompanied by the appearance of the signal of the second virtual cathode 7–9 ns after the appearance of the first virtual cathode.

1. Introduction

The acceleration of helium ions is interesting for the excitation of a number of thermonuclear reactions in astrophysics [1,2,3] and in an inertial confinement fusion implosion [4], as well as for the production of short-lived radionuclides for radiopharmaceuticals, especially to produce 18F via the reactions 16O(3He,p)18F (Eth ≈ 3.8 MeV) and 16O(3He,n)18Ne (Q > 0) [5,6]. Helium is characterized by the highest single ionization potential, 24.59 eV [7], which reduces the number of its ions in the implementation of collective methods of ion acceleration, for example, by electron rings from the residual atmosphere of the accelerating chamber [8,9,10]. In [8], an electron ring of (5–8) × 1012 electrons, accelerated in a falling magnetic field with a gradient of 10 G/cm in a length of 40 cm, was able to capture and accelerate 5 × 109 ions of 4He to an energy of ~30 MeV. A smaller number of electrons in the rings (~1012) produced a number of the collectively accelerated 4He ions of just 108 [9]. Up to 1010 alpha particles were observed under injecting an intense relativistic electron beam into a decreasing pressure profile of helium gas in a 7 kG external magnetic field [10].
The collective acceleration of helium ions in more compact Plutto–Luce diodes [11,12,13] is possible both from the residual gas atmosphere [14,15] and due to synchronized pulsed helium puffing into the near-anode space, as in [10]. It was shown in [14] that the average number of 12C ions captured by the virtual cathode (VC) in acceleration for an h-BN anode insert was 4.8 × 1012 per shot, which, with the expected number of carbon atoms per 15 cm path, is about 2.8 × 1014, and is translated into the efficiency of capture in the acceleration of 12C ions from the residual atmosphere as 1.7%. When accelerating from the residual atmosphere of deuterium, the number of accelerated deuterons strongly depended on the deuterium pressure in the chamber and, at its pressure of 0.177 Pa, reached an average of 5 × 1011 per shot [15]. Since the number of deuterium atoms at such a pressure on the path of 9 cm is estimated as 5 × 1014, the efficiency of the direct capture of deuterons into collective acceleration by the VC on the path of its movement was an order of magnitude less than that of 12C ions—about 0.1%.
Due to the intermediate value of the mass of 4He ions, it is reasonable to assume that at a close concentration of helium ions in the residual gas, the number of 4He ions captured by the virtual cathode in the collective acceleration can be higher than the number of deuterons, but lower than the number of carbon ions. On the other hand, taking into account the almost two times higher single ionization potential for 4He compared to 2H and 12C, it should be borne in mind that at the same concentrations of 4He and 2H atoms in the residual atmosphere, the concentrations of their ions are expected in favor of deuterium ions; therefore, generally speaking, a larger number of 4He ions captured in the acceleration compared to 2H is not guaranteed.
During the collective acceleration of ions from the residual helium atmosphere, it is also interesting to determine the effect of this medium on the energy of accelerated ions, since, being three times lighter than 12C ions, 4He ions create a three-fold lower load on the mover—a VC, which can be expressed in an increase in the probability of the acceleration of ions to much higher energies than are usually observed, since the helium pumped through the chamber can substantially reduce the usual components—hydrocarbons and water vapor—from its residual atmosphere. On the other hand, the peak of ionization losses in helium is significantly shifted towards lower specific ion energy compared to the residual hydrocarbon atmosphere [15]. Therefore, bearing in mind the possibility of the autoregulation of the virtual cathode acceleration due to its achievement of velocities equivalent to the ion energy, at which the peak values of ionization losses are reached [16], it is reasonable to assume that the specific energies of helium ions as a whole can be significantly lower than when accelerating from an ordinary atmosphere. The collective acceleration from the residual helium atmosphere is also of interest for clarifying the contribution of surface contamination of the anode by hydrocarbons and water vapor to the collective acceleration of protons.
Thus, the objectives of this work were to experimentally determine and compare the efficiency of helium ion capture into collective acceleration by a VC in a Luce diode with the efficiency of a deuteron capture, as well as to measure the VC drift velocity to determine the specific energy of collectively accelerated 4He ions. The peak of ionization losses of ions in helium is shifted to the region of lower energy by 15–20% compared to the losses in the residual atmosphere of air and hydrocarbons; therefore, with the collective acceleration of ions in the residual atmosphere of helium, the specific energy of accelerated ions, under the assumption of a decisive influence on the collective acceleration of ionization losses, is expected to be substantially reduced. To test this assumption, experiments were carried out on the collective acceleration of 4He ions from its residual atmosphere at a pressure in the range of 0.13–0.23 Pa, combining a radioactivation analysis and Virtual Cathode Time-of-Flight spectrometry (VC-ToF) examined in [17].

2. Materials and Methods

The experimental setup based on a Luce diode mode of accelerator TEMP-4M described in [14,15,17] is shown in Figure 1. Anode inserts with holes of Ø12 mm were made of conventional polyethylene (8 mm thick) and porous Al2O3 ceramics (10 mm thick). The end face of a tungsten cathode of Ø4 mm and 20 mm long was flush with the outer side of the anode inserts. Boron nitride (h-BN) plates with sizes of 7 × 7 × 0.2 cm and Al foils with thickness of 100 μm used as targets were placed axially with the cathode and anode at the distance of 25 cm from the latter. To determine the efficiency of capturing helium ions into the collective acceleration, three additional series of 10 shots were taken at a distance of 9 cm from the Al2O3 anode to the h-BN targets.
Before the whole series of experiments was conducted with the inlet of helium into the working chamber, a 2.5 L He buffer chamber was evacuated with a fore-vacuum scroll pump to a pressure of about 1 Pa through the VT1 valve, after which gaseous helium was let into it through a vacuum valve VT2 to a pressure ranging from 15 to 40 kPa, depending on the required pressure in the working chamber of the accelerator ranging from 0.12 to 0.23 Pa.
By opening the vacuum valve VT3 separating the working chamber of the accelerator and the buffer one, helium was admitted through a 10 m long capillary with an inner channel diameter of 0.6 mm into the working chamber of the accelerator until the required pressure of helium was established in it, the control of which was carried out by an ionization sensor of the PMI-10-2 type, coupled with a controller of the Meradat-VIT19IT2 type. The end of the capillary was placed near the target, while the atmosphere intake of the working chamber by the vacuum pump was located closer to the anode, which could create a helium pressure gradient along the ion acceleration axis in the direction from the target to the anode. In this work, a working chamber of large diameter (Ø50 cm) was used; therefore, reliable control of the pressure gradient was not feasible, and thus was not carried out.
After setting the required pressure for 1 min, a series of 10 shots was made for about 60 s, recording the prompt signals for each shot. The time of 60 s was enough for the pressure of the residual atmosphere in the working chamber to not noticeably change for most modes, except for the one performed at the highest pressure (0.23 Pa). On the other hand, ten shots was a large enough number to average the energy and the number of accelerated helium ions in each mode under study. Immediately after a series of shots, the helium pressure in the working chamber was measured again, after which the chamber was opened in order to transfer the irradiated h-BN plate or Al foil to measure the induced activity of 13N (9.965 min) or 30P (2.498 min) with a lead screened Canberra High-Purity Germanium detector. In total, seven series of 10 shots each were carried out at helium pressures of the residual atmosphere of 0.13–0.23 Pa to determine the virtual cathode drift velocity.
Signals from the five VC-ToF electron detectors (E1–E5) as well as signals of the diode voltage and electric current were registered by the digital oscilloscope Tektronix MSO58LP 1 GHz 625 GS/s digital oscilloscope (8 channels). In all the following temporal graphs, the zero point for time is matched at the start of voltage applied to the diode, which was set at about 240 kV by controlling the voltage of the double forming line (Blumlein) [14,15,17]. By measuring current signals of electrons emitted from the virtual cathode normally to the diode axis, the VC-ToF spectrometry described in [17] was used to determine the drift velocity (and energy) of ions incident on the h-BN plates. The energy of 4He ions was determined from the speed of the VC and obtained by measuring the VC-ToF signals from the fourth and fifth sensors which were placed at 14.65 and 18.8 cm distances from the anode, respectively.
An average number of 4He ions in the series nHe was determined by the number of 13N and 30P nuclei NR induced in the corresponding h-BN or Al target via the nuclear reactions 10B(α,n)13N (Q > 0, Coulomb barrier VC ≈ 1.9 MeV [18]) and 27Al(α,n)30P (Eth ≈ 3.03 MeV, VC ≈ 2.6 MeV [18]), using a simple equation as follows:
nHe = NR/Y
The yields of thick BN or Al(Y) targets, expressed as fractions of 13N or 30P nuclei generated per bombarding the 4He ion, were borrowed from the energy dependences of the yields of thick reaction targets in [19] (detail please see Supplementary Materials) for each specific energy of the 4He ion. The number of nuclei NR (13N and 30P) induced in the BN or Al targets, respectively, was determined from the activity of these radionuclides in targets AR (Bq) and normalized to the end of their irradiation, using the following expression:
NR = AR
where decay constants of the radionuclides λ (s−1) are defined as 0.6932/T1/2, while T1/2(13N) = 597.9 s and T1/2(30P) = 149.88 s.
The activities of radionuclides AR are determined from the intensity of the total absorption peaks I511 of 511 keV annihilation γ-quanta recorded by a Ge detector with an efficiency ε = 0.06 (6%), according to the following expression:
AR = I511/ε·f
where f is a fraction of 511 keV γ-rays per decay of 13N and 30P (f = 2).
The nuclear reaction 27Al(α,n)30P was used to estimate the fraction of 4He ions accelerated to energies above 3.034 MeV. It is possible to estimate the fraction of 4He ions with an energy of more than 6.1 MeV by the threshold nuclear reaction 14N(α,n)17F (Eth = 6.088 MeV) using a target made of a nitride of a medium or heavy element, for example, TiN, when the second element does not create interference when measuring low-level 17F activities (T1/2 = 64.5 s), while the nuclear reactions 10B(α,n)13N or 27Al(α,n)30P produce interfering positron emitters in targets made of boron or aluminum nitrides with more than two orders of magnitude higher yields than the shorter-lived radionuclide 17F, which is produced from Nitrogen [19].

3. Results

3.1. Efficiency of Helium Capture in Collective Acceleration

Measurements of the activity of the 7Be radionuclide induced by protons via the reaction 10B(p,α)7Be in h-BN plates placed at 9 cm distance from Al2O3 anodes showed that when helium was admitted into the chamber, the number of protons collectively accelerated per shot was 3–4 times less than during acceleration from the usual residual atmosphere. This indicates a fairly effective “washout” of hydrocarbons and water vapor by helium from the working chamber, even of such a large volume. At a residual helium atmosphere pressure of up to 0.13 Pa, the average number of helium ions per shot for the main group with an energy of 500 keV/amu was 7.9 × 1011, while the average number of protons was almost two orders of magnitude higher: up to 5 × 1013 with the polyethylene anode inserts. The number of helium atoms on the 9 cm path of a VC (with a cross section of 1 cm2) to a target at a helium pressure of 0.13 Pa is estimated as 3.18 × 1014, which translates into the efficiency of the helium captured in collective acceleration as 0.25%. This is 2.5 times higher than the estimate for the efficiency of a capture of deuterons in a collective acceleration from the residual deuterium atmosphere at its pressure of 0.13 Pa—0.1% [15], but 6.8 times lower than the efficiency for 12C ions—1.7% [14]. This result is consistent with the expectations justified in the Section 1.

3.2. Specific Energy of 4He Ions in Individual Shots

Table 1 shows the values of the 4He ion energy (keV), determined from the VC drift velocity in the seven series of 10 shots in each taken at 25 cm distance from the anode to target. An asterisk indicates higher energy values that were not taken into account in the calculation of the average energy for each series.
Below is a line-by-line histogram of the specific energy distribution of 4He ions, collectively accelerated in these 7 successive series of 10 shots (according to Table 1), where the numbers give the value of the specific ion energy (keV/amu) for each of these 70 shots, and underlined below are the values for two series made with an Al2O3 anode, when the He pressure was 0.16 and 0.23 Pa.
  • 153 185 196 201 228 228 235 235 235
  • 260 269 269 269 278 288 288 310 310 310 322 322 322
  • 362 362 377 377 392 392 409 427 427 427 447 447 447
  • 467 489 489 489 513 513 513 513 538 538 538 538
  • 565 565 565 594 594 594 626
  • 660 660 660 698 698 738 738 738 738
  • 782 782
  • 1005 1153
  • 1570 1570 1570
Of particular note were three cases of acceleration of 4He ions with an increased specific energy of 1570 keV/amu or 6.28 MeV as well as two cases with energies of 1005 and 1153 keV/amu or 4.02 and 4.61 MeV, respectively. The same maximum energy of 6.28 MeV coming from the same time-of-flight of 2.4 ns looks more like a limitation for our VC-ToF spectrometer to measure the highest VC/ion velocities. On the whole, it can be observed that the specific energy of the main group of 4He ions collectively accelerated from the residual helium atmosphere with a pressure in the range of 0.13–0.23 Pa is indeed significantly shifted compared to the acceleration of protons [14] and deuterons in the normal residual atmosphere [15], when an averaged value of the ion specific energy was about 600 keV/amu. For the main group of 4He ions, the average value was 457 ± 175 keV/amu within the range of 153–782 keV/amu for 65 shots (without five shots with the higher energy values). Meanwhile, the average value (for the main group) for two series with the Al2O3 anode insert was close—470 ± 181 keV/amu within the range of 235–782 keV/amu for 18 shots (without two shots with the higher energy values).
This fact also testifies in favor of the assumption that the composition of the residual atmosphere has a decisive influence on the energy of collectively accelerated ions. On the other hand, with the collective acceleration of ions from the residual helium atmosphere, the probability of the acceleration of 4He ions to an increased energy (6.28 MeV) noticeably increased. This increase can be attributed, firstly, to the lower load on the virtual cathode from 12C ions “washed out” by helium from the residual atmosphere, and, secondly, due to the possibly increased Ar and Kr impurities in helium compared to the usual residual atmosphere. All cases of acceleration up to an energy of 1153 keV/amu and above were related to a series performed at a helium pressure of at least 0.16 Pa. In any case, it is obvious that the study of the influence of inert gas additions to the residual atmosphere of the working chamber may have prospects for elucidating the features of the collective acceleration of higher-energy groups of ions.
Figure 2 shows the decay curve of 30P activity induced by 10 shots at a helium pressure of 0.13 Pa in an Al target placed at distance of 25 cm from the anode. The number of recorded counts in the peak of annihilation γ-quanta with an energy of 511 keV from 30P during the measurement time T1/2 (2.498 min) was determined at the end of irradiation as 32, which provides the number of 30P nuclei induced in the target by ten shots as 32 × 2/0.06 = 1067, where 0.06 is the efficiency of the registration of annihilation γ-quanta by the Ge detector. When the 27Al(α,n)30P reaction yields 10−9 at an energy of α-particles of 3.5 MeV [19], this number of 30P nuclei is translated into ~1011 α-particles per shot.

3.3. Acceleration Dynamics of Helium Ions from Its Residual Atmosphere

Figure 3 and Figure 4 compare VC-ToF signals for the acceleration of 4He ions to 447 and 1570 keV/amu-specific energies.
It can be observed that the main difference in the acceleration to a tripled energy is the manifestation in the positions of the first (2.5 cm from the anode) and second VC sensors (6.5 cm from the anode) of three VC signals, of which the first two are comparable in terms of area, and the third, although it looks several times weaker, is clearly distinguished, while in the case of an acceleration to ordinary energy, 447 keV/amu, single VC signals are observed in the positions of the first and second sensors. The possibility of the appearance of a series of up to four consecutive virtual cathodes during the injection of a tubular electron beam (1 MeV) with Ø8 cm and a direct current of 9 kA from the side of a narrow section of a monotonically expanding drift conical tube was predicted by modeling in [20]. In our case, the chamber was cylindrical and had a large diameter (50 cm), which suggested the appearance of only one VC. However, pumping helium through the drift space of electron and ion bunches suggests the existence of a pressure gradient of the residual helium atmosphere along the acceleration axis from the target to the anode, which could contribute to an increase in the probability of the appearance of several VCs during one pulse.
When accelerating to the increased energy (Figure 4), at the positions of the third (10.6 cm from the anode) and fourth (14.65 cm from the anode) VC sensors, the first two VC signals merge into one signal, two times wider than the individual VC signals in position of the second sensor; moreover, this VC signal moves from the position of the third sensor to the fourth one at a speed of approximately 0.88 cm/ns (4.05 cm/4.6 ns), which is equivalent to a specific energy of 400 keV/amu (1.6 MeV). However, in the position of the fifth VC sensor (after 4.15 cm of the way to the target), the VC signal consists of three components, and its first component travels the distance from the fourth to the fifth sensor in 2.4 ns, which is equivalent to a velocity of 1.73 cm/ns and a specific energy of 1570 keV/amu (6.28 MeV). Similar patterns and dynamics of VC signals were typical not only for two other cases of ion acceleration to a specific energy of at least 1570 keV/amu, but also for two cases of ion acceleration to specific energies of 1005 and 1153 keV/amu—see Figure 5.
Table 2 presents the interval between the signals BK1 and BK2, which are measured by the detectors E1, E2, E3, E4 and E5. It can be observed that the interval between VK1 and VK2 is reduced to a minimum (≤0.7 ± 0.3 ns) at the position of the detector E5, which means that VK2 catches up with VK1 as it approaches the virtual cathode detectors E4 and E5.

4. Discussion

Compared to the dynamics of a virtual cathode in a conventional residual atmosphere, described in detail in [21] and showing that the VC signals are recorded by the first (E1) and last (E5) detectors for about 25 and 46 ns (after the start of voltage supply to the diode), respectively (see Figure 6 in [21]), in the residual He atmosphere, the VC signals on these detectors appear much later, by 38 and 65 ns (see Figure 3 here). The start time of the acceleration process was defined by the dynamics of the diode current as τ0 ≈ 21 ns [21], which leaves about 4 ns for the VC to move from the anode to the position of the E1 detector (located at a distance of 2.5 cm from the anode) in the usual residual atmosphere, and about 16 ns in the residual atmosphere of He, i.e., 4 times more. Such a delay in the appearance of the VC signal at the first detector (E1) indicates that the time of electron charge neutralization by ions in the residual atmosphere of He is several times longer than in the usual residual atmosphere, and is mainly composed of hydrogen and carbon compounds. This difference is probably due to the highest single ionization potential of 4He (24.59 eV) compared to all other elements, which is about 2 times higher than the corresponding ionization potentials of 1H (13.598 eV) and 12C (11.26 eV).
Such a sharp change in the acceleration dynamics of the virtual cathode in the residual helium atmosphere is most likely to be attributed to the fact that the amounts of protons and 12C ions captured in the collective acceleration decrease many times even in the case of using polyethylene anode inserts containing hydrogen and carbon. It was shown in [22] that the number of protons collectively accelerated due to the adsorption and ionization of water vapor and hydrocarbons of the residual atmosphere of the vacuum chamber on the surface of the anode dielectric insert is comparable to the number of protons formed directly from the material of the anode dielectric insert made of polyethylene. The results of this work also indicate that it is the surface contamination of the anode surface, and not the anode material itself, that is the main source of collectively accelerated protons, while the main source for 12C ions is the residual atmosphere itself, as was shown in [14,23]. For this reason, the helium inlet into the working chamber appears to be an effective technique for removing excessive amounts of protons and 12C ions from the residual atmosphere of the working chamber in cases where this is necessary, for example, when accelerating deuterons or α-particles.
Such dynamics of VC-ToF signals during the acceleration of 4He ions to energies increased by a factor of 2–3 can be explained as follows:
(1)
In some shots, during the passage of electron bunches through the anode hole into the drift space, not one, but two (or even three) VCs are sequentially formed on the outer cut of the anode hole with an interval of 7–9 ns. It should be noted here that at this stage of research there is no certainty that the detected sequences of two or three typical VC signals really represent two or three virtual cathodes corresponding to them, although the possibility of the appearance of a sequence of several VCs was shown for a chamber with increasing diameter [20].
(2)
In such cases, the very first VC (VC1) is electrostatically repulsed by the second VC (VC2) from the anode space before it has time to extract from the near-anode plasma a number of protons comparable to the portion that is usually extracted by single VC, while the VC2 extracts from the near-anode plasma a portion of protons comparable to the usual 5 × 1013 protons, but even with a slightly higher average initial energy, since these protons were already partially drawn from the surface by the VC1 anode.
(3)
Electron bunches oscillating between virtual cathodes and the cathode of the Luce diode and thus accelerating VCs are predominantly reflected from the VC2, which thus shields VC1; therefore, the oscillating electrons only partially transfer the energy to VC1, transferring the energy to a much greater extent to VC2. Thus, VC2 accelerates faster and catches up with VC1, even despite their mutual electrostatic repulsion that accelerates VC1 before it reaches the target if the latter is set at a sufficiently large distance (Z ≥ 10 cm).
(4)
At the point of mutual approach of these two VCs (Z ≥ 10 cm), VC1 is the least loaded with protons, which it partially captures from the near-anode plasma (e.g., ≤0.5 × 1013); with even lower efficiency from the residual atmosphere, both VCs could be loaded nearly equally with 4He ions (≤2.5 × 1011).
(5)
At the point of the closest approach of VC2 and VC1, they mutually repel each other, as a result of which the less inertial VC1 acquires a significant translational momentum, accelerating the ions (including protons) captured by it to an increased energy, and VC2 slows down to the extent determined by the mass ratio ions in these conditional electron-ion bunches.
(6)
With an increase in the distance between these two VCs, the mutual repulsion between them weakens, which, together with a decrease in ionization losses by accelerated ions, leads to a drift of both VCs and ion bunches captured and accelerated by them, while the acceleration and, ultimately, the drift velocity of the leading VC1 and bunch of protons and 4He ions accelerated by it is determined to the greatest extent by the number of protons accelerated by the second virtual cathode; thus, it is a random variable from shot to shot.
It is reasonable to assume that the number of protons captured in the VC1 acceleration from the near-anode plasma is the smaller, the shorter the pause between VC1 and VC2, while a smaller number of protons are accelerated to a higher energy, which is shown in [15,17,21]. Thus, the acceleration of 4He ions in the residual helium atmosphere agrees with the data of [21] which showed that the group of high-energy protons is represented by outrunning bunches, while the main group of protons is represented by a retarding bunch. A continuation of the study of the collective acceleration of 4He ions from the residual helium atmosphere is seen in research of the addition of Ar and Kr s to the pumped helium; it is also worth investigating possible effects in the formation of inert gas gradients in both directions along the ion acceleration axis—from the target to the anode, and vice versa—from the anode to the target. To do this, it is desirable to significantly reduce the diameter of the drift tube and ensure that the pressure of the residual atmosphere is measured both near the target and near the anode hole. Intrinsic magnetic fields of relativistic electron flows affect the formation and dynamics of a virtual cathode [24]; therefore, further development of this research involves measuring the signals of the azimuthal component of such magnetic fields with differential sensors, comparing these signals with the signals of the spectrometer used in this work.

5. Conclusions

The efficiency of capturing 4He ions in a collective acceleration from the residual helium atmosphere at a pressure of 0.13 Pa in the Luce diode has been estimated as 0.25%, which is noticeably higher than when accelerating deuterons from the residual deuterium atmosphere at the same pressure—0.1% [15], but 6.8 times lower than the efficiency for 12C ions—1.7% [14]. Under acceleration from the residual helium atmosphere, the energy of the main group of ions (0.47 MeV/amu) noticeably decreases compared to acceleration from the usual residual atmosphere, e.g., 0.6 MeV/amu, on average, for 10 series of 10 shots each, and performed at pressures of the usual residual atmosphere in the range of 0.03–0.21 Pa, as calculated from Table 1 in [23]. The same value (0.6 MeV/a.m.u.) was determined in [15] for the acceleration of deuterons from the residual atmosphere of the deuterium at pressures of 0.04 and 0.12 Pa—see Table 2 in [15]. However, the probability of ion acceleration to a specific energy of two to three times higher than that of the main group, up to 1.57 MeV/amu, increases noticeably with the increasing helium pressure above 0.15 Pa. It was found that such an increase in the ion energy is accompanied by the appearance of the signal of the second virtual cathode 7–9 ns after the appearance of the signal of the first virtual cathode. A simple explanation has been proposed for the acceleration of ions to an increased energy with such a rapid appearance of the second virtual cathode.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/qubs7040033/s1, The paper refers on [19] as supplementary files for yields of nuclear reactions 10B(a,n)13N and 27Al(a,n)30P taken from Figure 16 and Figure 49, respectively, in the attached paper by Murata et al. [19]. The yield plots in the above Figures were carefully digitized using Origin Pro 2022 Software to determine the reaction yields for each measured alpha particle energy.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.R.; Data curation, V.R.; Formal analysis, V.R.; Funding acquisition, G.R.; Investigation, V.R. and M.Z.; Methodology, V.R. and M.Z.; Project administration, G.R.; Resources, G.R.; Supervision, V.R. and G.R.; Validation, V.R. and M.Z.; Visualization, V.R.; Writing—original draft, V.R.; Writing—review and editing, V.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by a grant Russian Science Foundation № 23-19-00614, https://rscf.ru/en/project/23-19-00614/ (accessed on 20 October 2023).

Data Availability Statement

Data will be available on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liu, Q.; Febbraro, M.; deBoer, R.; Aguilar, S.; Boeltzig, A.; Chen, Y.; Couder, M.; Gorres, J.; Weaver, J.; Macon, K.; et al. Low energy cross section measurement of the 10B(α,n)13N reaction and its impact on neutron production in 1st generation stars. Phys. Rev. C 2020, 101, 025808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Van der Zwan, L.; Geiger, K.W. The 10B(α,n)13N,13N* cross section for α-energies from 1.0 to 5 MeV. Nucl. Phys. A 1973, 216, 188–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Prior, R.M.; Spraker, M.C.; France, R.H.; Stave, S.; Ahmed, M.; Karwowski, H.; Mueller, J.M.; Myers, L.S.; Weller, H.R. The total cross sections of the 11B(α,n)14N and the 10B(α,n)13N reactions between 2 and 6 MeV. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 2017, 28, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lonardoni, D.; Sauppe, J.P.; Batha, S.H.; Birge, N.; Bredeweg, T.; Freeman, M.; Geppert-Kleinrath, V.; Gooden, M.E.; Hayes, A.C.; Huang, H.; et al. First measurement of the 10B(α,n)13N reaction in an inertial confinement fusion implosion at the National Ignition Facility: Initial steps toward the development of a radiochemistry mix diagnostic. Phys. Plasmas 2022, 29, 052709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bishop, A.; Satyamurthy, N.; Bida, G.; Phelps, M.; Barrio, J.R. Production of [18F]F2 using the 16O(3He,p)18F reaction. Nucl. Med. Biol. 1996, 23, 385–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sadat, S.K.; Adlparvar, S.; Sheibani, S.; Elahi, M.; Safarien, A.; Farhangi, S.; Dabirzadeh, A.A.; Khalaj, M.M.; Vosoughi, Y.; Moslehi, A.; et al. Production of 16O(3He,p)18F and 20Ne(d,α)18F Short-Lived Radioisotopes with a Plasma Focus. J. Fusion Energy 2011, 30, 459–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kaufman, M.J.; Trowbridge, C.G. The Ionization Energy of Helium. J. Chem. Educ. 1999, 76, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sarantsev, V.P.; Rashevskii, V.P.; Kaminskii, A.K.; Mironov, V.I.; Fartushnyi, V.P.; Sergeev, A.P.; Novikov, V.G.; Tyutyunnikov, S.I.; Kaminskaya, A.M. Experiments on acceleration of a particles by the collective method. Sov. Phys. JETP 1971, 33, 1067–1069. [Google Scholar]
  9. Schumacher, U.; Andelfinger, C.; Ulrich, M. Collective acceleration of protons and helium ions in the Garching ERA. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 1975, 22, 989–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mako, F.; Fisher, A.; Rostoker, N.; Tzach, D.; Roberson, C.W. Collective Ion Acceleration Controlled by a Gas Gradient. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 1979, 26, 4199–4201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Belensov, P.E. Comments on the article “Collective acceleration of ions by systems with a virtual cathode”. Physics-Uspekhi 2004, 47, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Luce, J.S.; Sahlin, H.; Crites, T.R. Collective acceleration of intense ion beams in vacuum. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 1973, 20, 336–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dubinov, A.E.; Kornilova, I.Y.; Selemir, V.D. Collective ion acceleration in systems with a virtual cathode. Physics-Uspekhi 2002, 45, 1109–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ryzhkov, V.A.; Pyatkov, I.N.; Remnev, G.E. Selective determination of collectively accelerated 12C ion bunches by neutron time-of-flight spectrometry. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 2022, 1036, 166871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ryzhkov, V.A.; Pyatkov, I.N.; Remnev, G.E. Collective acceleration of deuterons from the residual chamber atmosphere in a Luce diode. Vacuum 2022, 202, 111212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ziegler, J.F.; Ziegler, M.D.; Biersack, J.P. SRIM—The stopping and range of ions in matter (2010). Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 2010, 268, 1818–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ryzhkov, V.A.; Pyatkov, I.N.; Remnev, G.E. Control of virtual cathode dynamics under collective acceleration of protons in a Luce diode. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 2022, 1042, 167436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bass, R. Nuclear Reactions with Heavy Ions; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1980; pp. 326–332. [Google Scholar]
  19. Murata, T.; Matsunobu, H.; Shibata, K. Evaluation of the (a,xn) Reaction Data for JENDL/AN-2005. JAEA-Research 2006-052; 2006. Available online: https://jopss.jaea.go.jp/pdfdata/JAEA-Research-2006-052.pdf (accessed on 14 July 2023).
  20. Dubinov, A.E.; Tarakanov, V.P. Simulated Formation of a Virtual Cathode Chain in a Conical Drift Tube. Tech. Phys. Lett. 2019, 45, 754–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ryzhkov, V.A.; Pyatkov, I.N.; Remnev, G.E. Time-resolved γ-spectrometer to promptly control number and energy of protons collectively accelerated as different bunches. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 2021, 998, 165190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ryzhkov, V.A.; Remnev, G.E.; Pyatkov, I.N.; Zhuravlev, M.V. Contribution of Residual Atmosphere Gases to the Flux of Collectively Accelerated Protons in a Luce Diode. Tech. Phys. Lett. 2020, 46, 361–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ryzhkov, V.A.; Remnev, G.E.; Pyatkov, I.N.; Zhuravlev, M.V. Effect of the residual atmosphere pressure on collective acceleration of ions in the Luce diode. Vacuum 2021, 187, 110081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kurkin, S.A.; Koronovskiy, A.A.; Khramov, A.E. Specific features of virtual cathode formation and dynamics with allowance for the magnetic self-fields of a relativistic electron beam. Plasma Phys. Rep. 2013, 39, 296–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Scheme of the experimental setup: E1–E5 detectors of electrons emitted by virtual cathodes normally to the diode axis; VC—virtual cathode; VT1–VT3—vacuum valves.
Figure 1. Scheme of the experimental setup: E1–E5 detectors of electrons emitted by virtual cathodes normally to the diode axis; VC—virtual cathode; VT1–VT3—vacuum valves.
Qubs 07 00033 g001
Figure 2. Decay curve of 30P activity induced in Al target.
Figure 2. Decay curve of 30P activity induced in Al target.
Qubs 07 00033 g002
Figure 3. VC-ToF signals for ion acceleration to 447 keV/amu: number 1–5 indicate VC-ToF-signals of E1–E5 detectors, respectively.
Figure 3. VC-ToF signals for ion acceleration to 447 keV/amu: number 1–5 indicate VC-ToF-signals of E1–E5 detectors, respectively.
Qubs 07 00033 g003
Figure 4. VC-ToF signals for ion acceleration to 1570 keV/amu: number 1–5 indicate VC-ToF-signals of E1–E5 detectors, respectively.
Figure 4. VC-ToF signals for ion acceleration to 1570 keV/amu: number 1–5 indicate VC-ToF-signals of E1–E5 detectors, respectively.
Qubs 07 00033 g004
Figure 5. VC-ToF signals for ion acceleration to 1153 keV/amu: number 1–5 indicate VC-ToF-signals of E1–E5 detectors, respectively.
Figure 5. VC-ToF signals for ion acceleration to 1153 keV/amu: number 1–5 indicate VC-ToF-signals of E1–E5 detectors, respectively.
Qubs 07 00033 g005
Table 1. Energies of 4He ions (keV) in the series: vertical columns 1–7 represent different series and horizontal lines 1–10 represent individual shots of the series.
Table 1. Energies of 4He ions (keV) in the series: vertical columns 1–7 represent different series and horizontal lines 1–10 represent individual shots of the series.
AnodePolyethyleneAl2O3
p, Pa0.130.140.160.170.20.160.23
# shots\series1234567
1295217089123128215216364612 *
2279221529406280 *144817883128
31708156815082260128812401288
4264012401152178823769404020 *
52792156874025046280 *14482376
61868195619561076205210402952
72052111212881076295229521076
8195626406280 *21526121152940
9215222601708124080426402376
1091220521508784178820522260
Mean Eα, keV *2182182613011779171916892050
±S.D. *, keV628474403789756681845
Table 2. Parameters of shots with the highest energies of α-particles: Δτ(i) is time between VC1 and VC2 measured by VC(i); Δτ4–5 is time-of-flight of VC1 between 4th and 5th VC detectors.
Table 2. Parameters of shots with the highest energies of α-particles: Δτ(i) is time between VC1 and VC2 measured by VC(i); Δτ4–5 is time-of-flight of VC1 between 4th and 5th VC detectors.
Series-
Shot
p,
Pa
Δτ(1),
ns
Δτ(2),
ns
Δτ(3),
ns
Δτ(4),
ns
Δτ(5),
ns
Δτ4–5,
ns
Eα, MeV/amu
#3-80.164.84.53.52.2≤0.52.41.57
#4-20.174.74.74.71.5≤0.52.41.57
#5-50.26.783.20.80.92.41.57
#7-10.235.833.61.20.52.81.153
#7-40.2365.22.91.31.231.005
Mean0.25.65.13.61.4≤0.72.61.37
±S.D.0.030.91.90.70.50.30.30.27
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ryzhkov, V.; Zhuravlev, M.; Remnev, G. Collective Acceleration of Helium Ions from Its Residual Atmosphere in a Luce Diode. Quantum Beam Sci. 2023, 7, 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/qubs7040033

AMA Style

Ryzhkov V, Zhuravlev M, Remnev G. Collective Acceleration of Helium Ions from Its Residual Atmosphere in a Luce Diode. Quantum Beam Science. 2023; 7(4):33. https://doi.org/10.3390/qubs7040033

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ryzhkov, Vladislav, Mikhail Zhuravlev, and Gennady Remnev. 2023. "Collective Acceleration of Helium Ions from Its Residual Atmosphere in a Luce Diode" Quantum Beam Science 7, no. 4: 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/qubs7040033

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop