Next Article in Journal
Control of Communicable Diseases in Human and in Animal Populations: 70th Anniversary of the Year of the Birth of Professor Rick Speare (2 August 1947–5 June 2016)
Previous Article in Journal
Revered but Poorly Understood: A Case Report of Dendroaspis polylepis (Black Mamba) Envenomation in Watamu, Malindi Kenya, and a Review of the Literature
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Low Microfilaremia Levels in Three Districts in Coastal Ghana with at Least 16 Years of Mass Drug Administration and Persistent Transmission of Lymphatic Filariasis

1
Department of Parasitology, Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Legon-Accra, Ghana
2
Department of Epidemiology, Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Legon-Accra, Ghana
3
Neglected Tropical Diseases Programme, Ghana Health Service, Accra, Ghana
4
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2018, 3(4), 105; https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed3040105
Submission received: 23 August 2018 / Revised: 20 September 2018 / Accepted: 22 September 2018 / Published: 26 September 2018

Abstract

:
Ghana has been implementing mass drug administration (MDA) of ivermectin and albendazole for the elimination of lymphatic filariasis (LF) since the year 2000, as part of the Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis (GPELF). It was estimated that 5–6 years of treatment would be sufficient to eliminate the disease. Tremendous progress has been made over the years, and treatment has stopped in many disease endemic districts. However, despite the successful implementation of MDA, there are districts with persistent transmission. In this study we assessed the epidemiology of LF in three adjoining districts that have received at least 16 years of MDA. The assessments were undertaken one year after the last MDA. 1234 adults and 182 children below the age of 10 years were assessed. The overall prevalence of circulating filarial antigen in the study participants was 8.3% (95% CI: 6.9–9.9), with an estimated microfilaria prevalence of 1.2%. The microfilarial intensity in positive individuals ranged from 1 to 57 microfilariae/mL of blood. Higher antigen prevalence was detected in males (13.0%; 95% CI: 10.3–16.2) compared to females (5.5%; 95% CI: 4.1–7.2). The presence of infection was also highest in individuals involved in outdoor commercial activities, with the risks of infection being four- to five-fold higher among farmers, fishermen, drivers and artisans, compared to all other occupations. Using bednets or participating in MDA did not significantly influence the risk of infection. No children below the age of 10 years were found with infection. Detection of Wb123 antibodies for current infections indicated a prevalence of 14.4% (95% CI: 8.1–23.0) in antigen-positive individuals above 10 years of age. No antibodies were detected in children 10 years or below. Assessment of infection within the An. gambiae vectors of LF indicated an infection rate of 0.9% (95% CI: 0.3–2.1) and infectivity rate of 0.5% (95% CI: 0.1–1.6). These results indicate low-level transmission within the districts, and suggest that it will require targeted interventions in order to eliminate the infection.

1. Introduction

Lymphatic filariasis (LF) is a common parasitic disease of major public health importance in tropical and subtropical countries, which are economically less endowed. About 90% of all lymphatic filariasis is caused by Wuchereria bancrofti, one of the three parasitic filarial nematodes [1]. These parasites are transmitted through the bite of infective mosquitoes of various genera. In highly endemic areas the disease may result in the disfiguring of the limbs and enlargement of the scrotum (hydrocele).
Owing to the availability of tools, the Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic filariasis (GPELF) was launched in 2000, with the aim of eliminating the disease as a public health problem by the year 2020 [2]. Albendazole (ALB) in combination with ivermectin (IVM) or diethylcarbamazine (DEC) were the main drugs available for the large-scale control of LF [3]. However, a combination of all three drugs—ivermectin + diethylcarbamazine + albendazole (IDA)—was recently approved for use in settings where LF is not co-endemic with onchocerciasis or loiasis [4]. The treatment strategy relies on the assumption that if the microfilaria (mf) reservoir in the human host is reduced below a certain threshold, transmission of W. bancrofti by anopheline vectors could be interrupted [5]. By this strategy it was estimated that five to six rounds of mass drug administration (MDA) will be required to eliminate the disease. Ghana is one of the first countries to have started the implementation of the GPELF in 2000 [6]. Being co-endemic for onchocerciasis, the recommended treatment regimen is IVM + ALB given once a year. These drugs mostly target mf in the blood, with limited macrofilaricidal and sterilization effect on the adult worms [7]. Recent studies, however, suggest that administering ALB twice a year has macrofilaricidal activity [8]. In Ghana, despite several years of treatment activities, districts with persistent transmission have been identified [9,10], necessitating the search for alternative and improved strategies for the control of LF. Alternative and effective treatment regimens and strategies have been recommended in order to achieve the LF elimination goals, such as, treatment to be given at shorter intervals or at increased dosage [3,7,11]. Thus, a cluster-randomized study was initiated in 2017, with the aim of assessing the impact of twice-yearly treatment with IVM + ALB in communities with persistent transmission in Ghana [12]. Following the baseline parasitological surveys, the data was analyzed to better understand the epidemiology of LF in the study areas. The information from this baseline analysis will help to implement targeted interventions, including adequate community sensitization required to achieve maximum impact, as well as monitoring the effects of the interventions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethical Approval and Consent

Approval for the study was received from the Ghana Health Service Ethics Review Committee (GHS-ERC: 04112/2016) and the NMIMR IRB (CPN 062/16-17) with Federal Wide Assurance Registration (FWA 00001824). Community consent was sought for the study at community durbars, during which the aims of the study, procedures, risks, and benefits were explained to community leaders and members. Written informed consent was received from all study participants. For participants below the age of 18 years parental consent was sought, with written assent from children 12–17 years.

2.2. Study Design

The study was undertaken as part of a cluster randomized survey previously described [12]. The baseline parasitological study was conducted in selected LF endemic communities with a history of at least 16 years of MDA. Following community entry, study participants were recruited and enrolled into the study. Each participant was interviewed through a questionnaire, administered to obtain data on age, sex, occupation, place of residence, use of treated bednet, and participation in MDA. Each participant also provided daytime finger-prick blood, which was tested for W. bancrofti antigen by the rapid method. Antigen-positive individuals were followed up for night-blood samples, for the identification of mf by microscopy and detection of W. bancrofti L3 larval stage antigen-specific IgG4 antibodies by ELISA. Filter paper blood spots were obtained from all child participants aged 5–10 years old and tested for ELISA. Mosquitoes were also collected from some of the communities and dissected to ascertain infection/infectivity with W. bancrofti.

2.3. Study Sites and Participants

The study was conducted in 18 LF endemic villages in the Ahanta West, Nzema East and Ellembele Districts in the Western Region of Ghana. The Ahanta West and Ellembele districts share borders with the Nzema East district, and have the same ecology. The main occupations in the districts are farming and fishing. The Nzema East and Ellembele districts started MDA in 2002 while the Ahanta West district started in 2001. Details of the study districts, communities and sample size calculation were previously described [12].
Study sites were selected following a review of the Neglected Tropical Disease Programme (NTDP) sentinel and spot check site monitoring data, as well as recommendation from the District Health Management Team (DHMT). The sample size determination took into consideration the null hypothesis that an additional MDA is not more effective than the standard single dose per annum treatment, and the alternate hypothesis that an additional MDA is more effective than the standard single dose. With prevalence between sites ranging from 1% to 18%, the sample size was determined assuming an effect size of 0.4, power of 0.80, 37% non-response rate (determined from a previous study). Thus, 80 participants were targeted from each community, with a total of 1440 participants for the entire study.

2.4. Demographic Data Collection

A computer-assisted personal interviewing (CAPI) using Census and Survey Processing System (CSPro) was employed to obtain data on age, sex, occupation, place of residence, use of treated bednet, and participation in MDA.

2.5. Blood Sample Collection and Analyses

Daytime finger-prick blood was collected from all study participants and tested for W. bancrofti antigen using the Filaria Test Strip (FTS) [13]. Filter paper blood spots were prepared for all participating children 5–10 years old.
Two milliliters of night-blood was collected from each W. bancrofti antigen-positive individuals into EDTA tubes for the identification of mf using the nucleopore filtration method [14]. Briefly, 1 mL of blood was transferred into a test tube containing 9 mL of 3% acetic acid, and the mixture filtered through a 25 mm diameter Nucleopore Track-Etch filter membrane with pore size 5 µm. The membrane was placed with the top down on a clean glass slide, and examined under a light microscope for the identification of mf. The intensity of infection was estimated as mf per mL (mf/mL) of blood.
All collected filter paper blood spots from children and night-blood samples were tested for the detection of IgG4 antibodies specific for W. bancrofti L3 larval stage antigen [15], using the Wb123 ELISA and following the manufacturer’s protocol [16].

2.6. Mosquito Collection and Dissection for W. bancrofti

Mosquitoes were collected in six of the study communities, where antigen-positive individuals were identified. Two communities were selected in each study district. In each community, ten houses were randomly selected and mosquitoes were collected from houses, using the pyrethrum spray method [17]. In each community, the collection was done in the morning, from 5 a.m. to 8 a.m. The collected mosquitoes were identified using morphological identification keys [18], and subsequently dissected for identification of W. bancrofti larval stages. Briefly, mosquitoes were individually placed on a labeled glass slide, separated into head, thorax, and abdomen, and gently teased apart in a drop of saline solution. The dissected parts were observed under the microscope for any W. bancrofti larval stages (L1–L3).

2.7. Data Analysis

The data was combined for all districts since they shared borders and were similar in terms of ecology, occupation, and language. The data collected was analyzed using STATA (Version 15) and MedCalc Software (Version 18.6). Prevalences were estimated as percentages, with 95% confidence intervals. The chi-square test was used in the comparison of proportions. Statistical significance was estimated at p value ≤ 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Demographic Characteristics of the Populations

1462 individuals consented to participate in the study. Out of these, 560 (38.3%) were males (median: 29 years; mean: 31.11 years; SD ± 19.62) and 902 (61.7%) females (median: 34 years; mean: 35.66 years; SD ± 19.54). The age range of study participants was 5–99 years, with a median of 32 years and a mean of 33.9 years (SD ± 19.7). The occupations with the highest proportion of the study participants were farming (26.7%) and schooling (26.5%), followed by trading (12.6%) and fishing (12.4%). Working as a health professional was the least proportion (0.6%) whilst 4.7% were unemployed (Table 1).
The majority of study participants 889/1462 (60.81%) reported staying in the community all their life. Of the participants who did not live in the community all their life, 9/573 (1.57%) had been in the community for less than 1 year while the remaining 564/573 (98.43%) had been in the community for more than 1 year. 1020/1462 (68.8%) participants reported owning a mosquito net and 753/1462 (51.5%) reported sleeping under a mosquito net. 109/196 (55.6%) of children 10 years or below reported sleeping under a mosquito net. 1293/1462 (88.44%) participants reported ever participating in the MDA, while 169/1462 (11.56%) never took part in the MDA. Table 2 presents the distribution of study participants and the number of years they have participated in MDA. 31.3% of participants could not recall the number of times they participated in the MDA. 56.9% took part in the MDA five times or less.

3.2. Wuchereria bancrofti Antigen Prevalence by FTS

Overall, there was antigen prevalence of 8.3% (95% CI: 6.9–9.9; N = 1418) in the study communities. The prevalence in Ahanta West, Ellembele and Nzema East districts was 10.6% (95% CI: 8.0–13.8), 4.5% (95% CI: 2.8–6.7) and 9.9% (95% CI: 7.4–13.0) respectively. The highest W. bancrofti antigen prevalence was recorded in Akonu (20.0%) followed by Achonwa (16.3%), Miemia (13.8%) and Domunli (13.9%). The prevalence in remaining villages ranged from 0 to 11.3% (Figure 1).
Overall, 70/538 (13.0%; 95% CI: 10.3–16.2) males and 48/878 (5.5%; 95% CI: 4.1–7.2) females were positive for W. bancrofti antigen. Distribution of antigen-positive participants among age groups revealed the majority of infections in the 21 to 60 years categories (Figure 2). Only two participants (1.8%) in the 5–10 years category were identified with W. bancrofti antigen, and they were both 10 years of age. There were statistically significant differences in the levels of infection between gender (χ2 = 24.1; p < 0.0001).
Bivariate analysis of antigenemia with bednet usage revealed that 9.4% (95% CI: 7.2–12.0) of those who did not use bednets were positive for antigen, with 8.5% (95% CI: 6.6–10.7) of the users also being positive. In terms of participation in MDA, 5.0% (95% CI: 2.2–9.6) of respondents who indicated that they did not participate in the most current MDA were positive for antigen whilst 8.8% (95% CI: 7.3–10.5) of respondents who took part in MDA were found to be positive for antigen. No statistically significant relationship was found between antigen positivity and the use of bednet and participation in MDA (Table 3). There was however a significant association with occupation. For the four occupations with the highest infection prevalence, the risks of infection significantly increased nearly four- to five-fold, compared to all other occupations (Table 4). Of these four occupations, 58.3% (N = 662) of individuals involved were females and 41.7% were males. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression indicated that gender and age are important factors in determining the presence or absence of the infection (Table 5). Females were 47% less likely to be infected than males. Also, the odds of being infected increases by 2% as a person advances in age.

3.3. Prevalence and Intensity of Microfilaria

Ninety-seven (97) of 117 antigen-positive individuals were available for night-blood collection. Of these only 14 tested positive for mf. The mean intensity was 11 mf/mL of blood, with a range of 1–57 mf/mL of blood. Table 6 presents the prevalence and intensity of mf in the study districts. No significant differences (p = 0.55) were observed in the mf prevalence between males and females.
Mf prevalence = ( b a ) × ( d c ) × 100, where a = the number of individuals in the community examined for CFA, b = number of those examined for CFA being positive, c = number of CFA positives examined for mf, and d = number of those examined for mf being positive.

3.4. Prevalence of W. bancrofti IgG4 Antibodies

Blood samples from 279 participants composed of 97 antigen-positive individuals (above 10 years of age) and 182 children (aged 5 to 10 years) were subjected to Wb123 ELISA test to detect the presence of IgG4 antibodies specific to the third larval stage of W. bancrofti. The antibody prevalence among antigen positive individuals above 10 years was 14.4%. No antibodies were detected in children 5–10 years (Table 7).

3.5. W. bancrofti Infection and Infectivity Rates in An. gambiae

The An. gambiae sensu lato collected from selected communities were dissected and observed under the microscope for W. bancrofti larval stages (L1, L2 and L3). The results (Table 8) indicate an overall infection (presence of any stage of parasite) rate of 0.9% (95% CI: 0.3–2.1). Infection was only observed in Achonwa (2.2%) and Ndatiem (0.8%). The overall infectivity (presence of L3 only) rate was 0.5% (95% CI: 0.1–1.6).

4. Discussion

This paper presents the baseline epidemiological situation of LF in 18 communities in three endemic districts in Ghana that have received 16 to 18 years of MDA without interrupting transmission, prior to randomization and assignment to treatment groups for the evaluation of a twice-yearly treatment regimen with IVM + ALB. In this study, 1462 participants consented and provided demographic information, of which 1418 provided day blood samples for antigen testing using the FTS. The overall antigen prevalence in all the study districts was 8.3%, which is far above the minimum 2% level, below which transmission could be said to have been interrupted [20,21]. Similarly, the district level antigen prevalences were also higher than the recommended level.
The mf levels, on the other hand, were lower than expected. The overall mf prevalence was 1.2%, which was just slightly higher than the 1% level recommended for the interruption of transmission [20,21]. However, except for the mf prevalence in Ahanta West that was above the threshold (1.6%), both Nzema East and Ellembele had lower mf prevalence of 0.5% and 0.8%, respectively. While the mf prevalence might qualify Nzema East and Ellembele to proceed to carry out transmission assessment surveys (TAS) in children [20], the levels of antigen prevalence do not. The high antigen prevalence could be due to residual adult antigen from resolved infections, with studies reporting the circulation of antigen in the blood for up to three years after treatment [22].
In this study, antigen prevalence increased with age, with similar trends reported in other studies [23,24]. This increase in antigen prevalence with age can be attributed to the increasing exposure of the population to W. bancrofti infection. Higher antigen prevalence was also observed in males compared to females. This is consistent with studies, which showed a lower mean prevalence of infection in females than in males [25,26]. Higher prevalence with increased risks of infection was also observed in people involved in outdoor commercial activities such as farmers, fishermen, and drivers. Earlier studies in Ghana attributed infections to the occupational activities [27,28], with activities such as farming and fishing exposing individuals to mosquito bites [29,30]. Individuals involved in outdoor activities, and especially males, may therefore represent high-risk groups that could be targeted during MDAs, in order to reduce the prevalence of infection in LF endemic areas.
The presence of antigen-positive but mf-negative individuals could be due to very low levels of mf circulating in the blood or infections where adults worms do not produce mf [31]. This could be a result of the sterilization effect of albendazole on adult worms [8,32], especially with repeated treatment.
The assessment of Wb123 antibodies for the detection of early exposure to infection [15] indicated that 14.4% of antigen-positive adults were infected. Incidentally, antibodies were only detected in individuals found with mf. Given that antibodies may persist in the blood stream for years, it is impossible to determine if the presence of antibodies in individuals with mf is due to recent infections. The mf prevalence observed could be due to low compliance to MDA as only 8.6% of the population reported receiving at least five rounds of MDA. Since IVM and ALB, administered once a year, have mainly microfilaricidal effects with limited macrofilaricidal effect, any lapse in treatment will result in a large number of mf circulating in the blood, thus perpetuating the transmission cycle. As a result of the low compliance, adult worms in infected individuals may continue to produce mf, leading to the high prevalence observed among antigen-positive individuals.
The use of the Wb123 as a new tool for assessment in post-MDA monitoring is promising [15,33]. While none of the children below the age of 10 years were found infected, it is important to note that the study was not designed to assess infection in children, as undertaken during transmission assessment surveys. Further studies and guidelines to implementation for the Wb123 will be required [34].
The generally low mf levels observed in the study population raise questions about the importance of low-level transmission, especially in communities that have received several years of treatment. The importance of vector-parasite interaction therefore comes to play. In our study communities, the main LF vectors belong to the Anopheles gambiae complex, with An. melas being a major vector [35,36]. Mansonia species have also been reported in the districts, with both An. melas and Mansonia spp. reported to exhibit the vector-parasite process of limitation [37,38], thus facilitating disease transmission at low mf levels in the community. The dissection of An. gambiae collected from some of the study communities revealed the presence of L3 infective stage larvae, an indication of active transmission. The exophilic nature of the vector species in the study communities also implies that transmission may occur outdoors, and may explain why individuals involved in outdoor commercial activities are at higher risks of infection. Despite these findings, there are limitations to the mosquito infection data as these did not take into consideration a sample size and the power required to make meaningful deductions. From the results, it can be observed that W. bancrofti larvae were not identified in communities where low mosquito numbers were collected, implying that larger sample sizes will be required in such communities. However, collecting a large enough mosquito sample size would have required significant financial inputs, which unfortunately was not possible due to the funding available for the study. Nonetheless, the collection of mosquitoes in all communities was based on the same methods in the same month. As such, the numbers of mosquitoes collected could reflect the transmission potential in the communities.
This study provides information on the persistent LF transmission in three districts of Ghana that have received at least 16 years of MDA. Earlier studies in selected communities in the study areas indicated that mf load and antigen prevalence in infected individuals decreases after treatment and gradually increases within six months [10]. Thus, administering ivermectin and albendazole to infected individuals twice in the year may help accelerate LF elimination in these settings [10]. However, compliance to MDA was found to be low. Qualitative assessments indicated that while community members were aware of the purpose of the MDA, factors such as personal attitudes, the health system, absence of overt disease, social structure, and fear of adverse effects of drugs affected the compliance to the MDA [39]. Considering the importance of low-level transmission in these settings, it may be useful to target interventions at high-risk individuals such as males, farmers, and fishermen in order to increase compliance in individuals most likely to serve as reservoirs of infection.
This study also emphasizes the need for comprehensive assessments in communities with persistent transmission, using a combination of assessment tools in human and vector populations. The parasitological, immunological and xenomonitoring assessments all revealed the presence of infection and transmission of the disease. Taken together, the results indicate the need for a thorough epidemiological understanding in communities with persistent LF transmission, in order to plan appropriate/tailored control interventions and achieve the LF elimination goals.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: D.K.d.S., C.S.A., S.A.A., S.K.D., I.A., N.-K.B., D.A.B.; Data curation: D.K.d.S., K.M.S.; Formal analysis: D.K.d.S., I.A.L., K.M.S.; Funding acquisition: D.K.d.S.; Investigation: D.K.d.S., J.O., C.S.A., S.A.A., I.A.L., E.D., F.A.M., S.K.D., S.O., D.O., J.H.N.O., K.M.S., O.A., I.A., B.M.; N.-K.B.; Methodology: D.K.d.S., J.O., C.S.A., E.D., D.A.B.; Project administration: D.K.d.S., C.S.A., S.A.A.; Resources: D.K.d.S., O.A., B.M., N.-K.B.; Supervision: D.K.d.S., J.O.; C.S.A., S.A.A., D.A.B.; Writing—original draft: D.K.d.S.; Writing—review and editing: D.K.d.S., J.O., C.S.A., S.A.A., I.A.L., E.D., F.A.M., S.K., S.O., D.O., J.H.N.O., K.M.S., O.A., S.K.D., I.A.; B.M.; N.-K.B., D.A.B.

Funding

This project is part of the EDCTP2 programme supported by the European Union, through grant number 98595 to D.K.d.S. The funding source has no role in the design of the study, in the collection, analysis and interpretation of the data, or in the publication of the study results.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the regional and district health management teams for their support towards the study. The support of the NTDP is acknowledged in the implementation of the study. We are also grateful to the community drug distributors, chiefs, elders, and participants in the study communities.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. WHO. Global Programme To Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis: Progress Report, 2016. Weekly Epidemiological Record; WTO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 589–608. [Google Scholar]
  2. WHO. Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis: Progress Report, 2014. Weekly Epidemiological Record/Health Section of the Secretariat of the League of Nations; WTO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 489–504. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bockarie, M.J.; Deb, R.M. Elimination of lymphatic filariasis: Do we have the drugs to complete the job? Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2010, 23, 617–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. WHO. Guideline—Alternative Mass Drug Administration Regimens to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis; WTO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  5. Webber, R. Can anopheline-transmitted filariasis be eradicated? J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1991, 94, 241–244. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Biritwum, N.K.; de Souza, D.K.; Marfo, B.; Odoom, S.; Alomatu, B.; Asiedu, O.; Yeboah, A.; Hervie, T.E.; Mensah, E.O.; Yikpotey, P.; et al. Fifteen years of programme implementation for the elimination of lymphatic filariasis in Ghana: Impact of MDA on immunoparasitological indicators. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2017, 11, e0005280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Simonsen, P.E.; Magesa, S.M.; Dunyo, S.K.; Malecela-Lazaro, M.N.; Michael, E. The effect of single dose ivermectin alone or in combination with albendazole on Wuchereria bancrofti infection in primary school children in Tanzania. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2004, 98, 462–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Pion, S.D.S.; Chesnais, C.B.; Weil, G.J.; Fischer, P.U.; Missamou, F.; Boussinesq, M. Effect of 3 years of biannual mass drug administration with albendazole on lymphatic filariasis and soil-transmitted helminth infections: A community-based study in Republic of the Congo. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, 763–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Biritwum, N.K.; Yikpotey, P.; Marfo, B.K.; Odoom, S.; Mensah, E.O.; Asiedu, O.; Alomatu, B.; Hervie, E.T.; Yeboah, A.; Ade, S.; et al. Persistent ‘hotspots’ of lymphatic filariasis microfilaraemia despite 14 years of mass drug administration in Ghana. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2016, 110, 690–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kanamitie, J.N.; Ahorlu, C.S.; Otchere, J.; Aboagye-Antwi, F.; Kwansa-Bentum, B.; Boakye, D.A.; Biritwum, N.K.; Wilson, M.D.; de Souza, D.K. 12-month longitudinal parasitological assessment of lymphatic filariasis-positive individuals: Impact of bi-annual treatment with ivermectin and albendazole. Trop. Med. Int. Health 2017, 22, 1451–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Rebollo, M.P.; Bockarie, M.J. Can lymphatic filariasis be eliminated by 2020? Trends Parasitol. 2017, 33, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. De Souza, D.K.; Ahorlu, C.S.; Adu-Amankwah, S.; Otchere, J.; Mensah, S.K.; Larbi, I.A.; Mensah, G.E.; Biritwum, N.K.; Boakye, D.A. Community-based trial of annual versus biannual single-dose ivermectin plus albendazole against Wuchereria bancrofti infection in human and mosquito populations: Study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial. Trials 2017, 18, 448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Weil, G.J.; Curtis, K.C.; Fakoli, L.; Fischer, K.; Gankpala, L.; Lammie, P.J.; Majewski, A.C.; Pelletreau, S.; Won, K.Y.; Bolay, F.K.; et al. Laboratory and field evaluation of a new rapid test for detecting Wuchereria bancrofti antigen in human blood. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2013, 89, 11–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Dickerson, J.W.; Eberhard, M.L.; Lammie, P.J. A technique for microfilarial detection in preserved blood using nuclepore filters. J. Parasitol. 1990, 76, 829–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Steel, C.; Golden, A.; Kubofcik, J.; LaRue, N.; de Los Santos, T.; Domingo, G.J.; Nutman, T.B. Rapid Wuchereria bancrofti-specific antigen Wb123-based IgG4 immunoassays as tools for surveillance following mass drug administration programs on lymphatic filariasis. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2013, 20, 1155–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. InBios. Available online: http://www.inbios.com/filaria-detect-igg4-elisa-usa/ (accessed on 8 July 2016).
  17. WHO. Malaria Entomology and Vector Control: Learner’s Guide; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  18. Gillies, M.T.; De Meillon, B. The Anophelinae of Africa South of the Sahara (Ethiopian Zoographical Region); South African Institute for Medical Research: Johannesburg, South Africa, 1968; p. 343. [Google Scholar]
  19. Simonsen, P.E.; Derua, Y.A.; Magesa, S.M.; Pedersen, E.M.; Stensgaard, A.S.; Malecela, M.N.; Kisinza, W.N. Lymphatic filariasis control in Tanga region, Tanzania: Status after eight rounds of mass drug administration. Parasit. Vector. 2014, 7, 507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. WHO. Monitoring and Epidemiological Assessment of Mass Drug Administration in the Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis: A Manual for National Elimination Programmes; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2011; pp. 1–79. [Google Scholar]
  21. WHO. Lymphatic Filariasis: A Handbook for National Elimination Programmes; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  22. Eberhard, M.L.; Hightower, A.W.; Addiss, D.G.; Lammie, P.J. Clearance of Wuchereria bancrofti antigen after treatment with diethylcarbamazine or ivermectin. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1997, 57, 483–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Owusu, I.O.; de Souza, D.K.; Anto, F.; Wilson, M.D.; Boakye, D.A.; Bockarie, M.J.; Gyapong, J.O. Evaluation of human and mosquito based diagnostic tools for defining endpoints for elimination of Anopheles- transmitted lymphatic filariasis in Ghana. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2015, 109, 628–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gass, K.; Beau de Rochars, M.V.; Boakye, D.; Bradley, M.; Fischer, P.U.; Gyapong, J.; Itoh, M.; Ituaso-Conway, N.; Joseph, H.; Kyelem, D.; et al. A multicenter evaluation of diagnostic tools to define endpoints for programs to eliminate bancroftian filariasis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2012, 6, e1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Brabin, L. Sex differentials in susceptibility to lymphatic filariasis and implications for maternal child immunity. Epidemiol. Infect. 1990, 105, 335–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Rao, R.U.; Samarasekera, S.D.; Nagodavithana, K.C.; Goss, C.W.; Punchihewa, M.W.; Dassanayaka, T.D.M.; Ranasinghe, U.S.B.; Mendis, D.; Weil, G.J. Comprehensive assessment of a hotspot with persistent bancroftian filariasis in coastal Sri Lanka. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2018, 99, 735–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Dunyo, S.K.; Appawu, M.; Nkrumah, F.K.; Baffoe-Wilmot, A.; Pedersen, E.M.; Simonsen, P.E. Lymphatic filariasis on the coast of Ghana. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1996, 90, 634–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dzodzomenyo, M.D.; Dunyo, S.K.; Ahorlu, C.K.; Coker, W.Z.; Appawu, M.A.; Pedersen, E.M.; Simonsen, P. Bancroftian filariasis in an irrigation project community in southern Ghana. Trop. Med. Int. Health 1999, 4, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Aboagye-Antwi, F.; Kwansa-Bentum, B.; Dadzie, S.K.; Ahorlu, C.K.; Appawu, M.A.; Gyapong, J.; Wilson, M.D.; Boakye, D.A. Transmission indices and microfilariae prevalence in human population prior to mass drug administration with ivermectin and albendazole in the Gomoa District of Ghana. Parasites Vectors 2015, 8, 562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Appawu, M.A.; Dadzie, S.K.; Wilmot-Baffoe, A.; Wilson, M.D. Lymphatic filariasis in Ghana: Entomological investigation of transmission dynamics and intensity in communities served by irrigation systems in the Upper East Region of Ghana. Trop. Med. Int. Health 2001, 6, 511–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Lammie, P.J.; Hightower, A.W.; Eberhard, M.L. Age-specific prevalence of antigenemia in a Wuchereria bancrofti-exposed population. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1994, 51, 348–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Pani, S.; Subramanyam Reddy, G.; Das, L.; Vanamail, P.; Hoti, S.; Ramesh, J.; Das, P. Tolerability and efficacy of single-dose albendazole, diethylcarbamazine citrate (DEC) or co-administration of albendazole with DEC in the clearance of Wuchereria bancrofti in asymptomatic microfilaraemic volunteers in Pondicherry, south India: A hospital-based study. Filaria J. 2002, 1, 1. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Steel, C.; Golden, A.; Stevens, E.; Yokobe, L.; Domingo, G.J.; de los Santos, T.; Nutman, T.B. Rapid point-of-contact tool for mapping and integrated surveillance of Wuchereria bancrofti and Onchocerca volvulus infection. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2015, 22, 896–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. De Souza, D.K.; Offei Owusu, I.; Otchere, J.; Adimazoya, M.; Frempong, K.K.; Ahorlu, C.S.; Boakye, D.A.; Wilson, M.D. An evaluation of Wb123 antibody ELISA in individuals treated with ivermectin and albendazole, and implementation challenges in Africa. Pan Afr. Med. J. 2017, 27, 65. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. De Souza, D.; Kelly-Hope, L.; Lawson, B.; Wilson, M.; Boakye, D. Environmental factors associated with the distribution of Anopheles gambiae s.s in Ghana; an important vector of lymphatic filariasis and malaria. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e9927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Opoku, M.; Minetti, C.; Kartey-Attipoe, W.D.; Otoo, S.; Otchere, J.; Gomes, B.; de Souza, D.K.; Reimer, L.J. An assessment of mosquito collection techniques for xenomonitoring of anopheline-transmitted lymphatic filariasis in Ghana. Parasitology 2018, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Amuzu, H.; Wilson, M.; Boakye, D. Studies of Anopheles gambiae s.l (Diptera: Culicidae) exhibiting different vectorial capacities in lymphatic filariasis transmission in the Gomoa District, Ghana. Parasites Vectors 2010, 3, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ughasi, J.; Bekhard, H.; Coulibaly, M.; Adabie-Gomez, D.; Gyapong, J.; Appawu, M.; Wilson, M.; Boakye, D. Mansonia africana and Mansonia uniformis are vectors in the transmission of Wuchereria bancrofti lymphatic filariasis in Ghana. Parasites Vectors 2012, 5, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Ahorlu, C.S.K.; Koka, E.; Adu-Amankwah, S.; Otchere, J.; de Souza, D.K. Community perspectives on persistent transmission of lymphatic filariasis in three hotspot districts in Ghana after 15 rounds of mass drug administration: A qualitative assessment. BMC Public Health 2018, 18, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Prevalence of W. bancrofti antigen among study participants as categorized by communities.
Figure 1. Prevalence of W. bancrofti antigen among study participants as categorized by communities.
Tropicalmed 03 00105 g001
Figure 2. Prevalence of W. bancrofti antigen among participants by age groups.
Figure 2. Prevalence of W. bancrofti antigen among participants by age groups.
Tropicalmed 03 00105 g002
Table 1. Occupational distribution of study participants.
Table 1. Occupational distribution of study participants.
OccupationFrequency (%)
Health professional9 (0.6)
Teaching19 (1.3)
Driving23 (1.6)
Retired/aged38 (2.6)
Unemployed69 (4.7)
Artisanship80 (5.5)
Fishing181 (12.4)
Trading184 (12.6)
Students387 (26.5)
Farming390 (26.7)
Others80 (5.5)
Table 2. Distribution of participants by number of years in mass drug administration (MDA) participation.
Table 2. Distribution of participants by number of years in mass drug administration (MDA) participation.
Years ParticipationNo. of Participants (%)
Do not know451 (31.34)
1164 (11.40)
2217 (15.08)
3195 (13.55)
4118 (8.20)
5124 (8.62)
635 (2.43)
721 (1.46)
820 (1.39)
914 (0.97)
1040 (2.78)
111 (0.07)
122 (0.14)
13-
141 (0.07)
158 (0.56)
1626 (1.81)
17+2 (0.14)
Table 3. Bivariate analysis of factors associated with lymphatic filariasis. ** p < 0.01.
Table 3. Bivariate analysis of factors associated with lymphatic filariasis. ** p < 0.01.
LF Outcome
Positive (%)Negative (%) χ 2 p-Value
Bednet Use
No56 (9.4)542 (90.6)0.330.56
Yes62 (8.5)671 (91.5)
MDA Treatment
No8 (5.0)153 (95.0)2.680.10
Yes110 (8.8)1145 (91.2)
Occupation
Artisanship9 (13.8)56 (86.2)55.090.001 **
Driving4 (19.0)17 (81.0)
Farming54 (14.2)326 (85.8)
Fishing23 (13.1)153 (86.9)
Hairdressing1 (7.7)12 (92.3)
Health profession0 (0)8 (100)
Retired from working2 (5.6)34 (94.4)
Studying7 (1.9)369 (98.1)
Teaching2 (10.5)17 (89.5)
Trading8 (4.6)167 (95.4)
Unemployed5 (7.4)63 (92.6)
Other3 (3.8)76 (96.2)
Table 4. Relative risk of the four main occupations with highest infection prevalence compared to all other occupations.
Table 4. Relative risk of the four main occupations with highest infection prevalence compared to all other occupations.
OccupationRelative Risk95% CIp-Value
Artisanship3.81.9–7.80.0002
Driving5.32.0–13.70.0006
Farming3.92.5–6.1<0.0001
Fishing3.62.1–6.1<0.0001
Table 5. Logistic regression estimates of the risk factors of LF infection.
Table 5. Logistic regression estimates of the risk factors of LF infection.
UnivariateMultivariate
FactorOR (95 CI)p-ValueOR (95 CI)p-Value
Age1.02 (1.01–1.02)0.0001.02 (0.01–1.03)0.000
Gender0.53 (0.38–0.73)0.0000.47 (0.34–0.66)0.000
Using a mosquito net1.24 (0.90–1.73)0.1871.23 (0.89–1.72)0.216
Occupation1.00 (0.99–1.00)0.3211.00 (0.99–1.00)0.158
Time in community0.84 (0.61–1.17)0.3030.95 (0.68–1.33)0.765
Participation in MDA1.26 (0.75–2.24)0.4101.14 (0.67–2.07)0.643
District0.99 (0.81–1.20)0.8911.06 (0.39–2.86)0.904
Village1.00 (0.98–1.02)0.8441.00 (0.91–1.10)0.976
Table 6. Prevalence of microfilaria and mean intensity of infection among study participants by district.
Table 6. Prevalence of microfilaria and mean intensity of infection among study participants by district.
DistrictNo. TestedNo. +ve for mfMf Prevalence in % *95% CIRange of Mf Intensity (mf/mL)
Ahanta West41819.5 (1.6)8.8–34.91–43
Nzema East43511.6 (0.5)3.9–25.11–57
Ellembelle1317.7 (0.8)0.2–36.02
Total971414.4 (1.2)8.1–23.01–57
* Values in () estimated based on the Simonsen’s formula [19] with.
Table 7. Prevalence of W. bancrofti IgG4 antibodies by age group.
Table 7. Prevalence of W. bancrofti IgG4 antibodies by age group.
W. bancrofti IgG4 Antibodies Detection Outcome
Age Range (Years)Negative n (%)Positive n (%)95% CI
5–10182 (100)0 (0.0)0.0–2.0
>10 *83 (85.6)14 (14.4)8.1–23.0
* For those above 10 years, IgG4 antibodies were assessed only in antigen-positive individuals.
Table 8. W. bancrofti infection and infectivity rates in An. gambiae in selected study communities.
Table 8. W. bancrofti infection and infectivity rates in An. gambiae in selected study communities.
CommunitiesNo. AnalyzedNo. with Any Stage Larvae (L1, L2, L3)Infection Rate (95% CI)No. with L3 Larvae OnlyInfectivity Rate (95% CI)
Achonwa13832.2 (0.5–6.2)21.5 (0.2–5.1)
Akatekyi6600.0 (0.0–5.4)00.0 (0.0–5.4)
Domunli2000.0 (0.0–16.8)00.0 (0.0–16.8)
Old Bakanta3000.0 (0.0–11.6)00.0 (0.0–11.6)
Bobrama4300.0 (0.0–8.2)00.0 (0.0–8.2)
Ndatiem25420.8 (0.1–2.8)10.4 (0.01–2.2)
Total55150.9 (0.3–2.1)30.5 (0.1–1.6)

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

De Souza, D.K.; Otchere, J.; Ahorlu, C.S.; Adu-Amankwah, S.; Larbi, I.A.; Dumashie, E.; McCarthy, F.A.; King, S.A.; Otoo, S.; Osabutey, D.; et al. Low Microfilaremia Levels in Three Districts in Coastal Ghana with at Least 16 Years of Mass Drug Administration and Persistent Transmission of Lymphatic Filariasis. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2018, 3, 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed3040105

AMA Style

De Souza DK, Otchere J, Ahorlu CS, Adu-Amankwah S, Larbi IA, Dumashie E, McCarthy FA, King SA, Otoo S, Osabutey D, et al. Low Microfilaremia Levels in Three Districts in Coastal Ghana with at Least 16 Years of Mass Drug Administration and Persistent Transmission of Lymphatic Filariasis. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease. 2018; 3(4):105. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed3040105

Chicago/Turabian Style

De Souza, Dziedzom K., Joseph Otchere, Collins S. Ahorlu, Susan Adu-Amankwah, Irene A. Larbi, Edward Dumashie, Frances A. McCarthy, Sandra A. King, Samson Otoo, Dickson Osabutey, and et al. 2018. "Low Microfilaremia Levels in Three Districts in Coastal Ghana with at Least 16 Years of Mass Drug Administration and Persistent Transmission of Lymphatic Filariasis" Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease 3, no. 4: 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed3040105

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop