Next Article in Journal
Derivatization Strategies in Flavor Analysis: An Overview over the Wine and Beer Scenario
Previous Article in Journal
Diverse Biological Activities of 1,3,4-Thiadiazole Scaffold
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Facile Solvent-Free Mechanochemical Synthesis of UI3 and Lanthanoid Iodides

Department of Chemistry, University of Cologne, Greinstraße 6, 50939 Cologne, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Chemistry 2022, 4(4), 1672-1678; https://doi.org/10.3390/chemistry4040108
Submission received: 17 October 2022 / Revised: 28 November 2022 / Accepted: 29 November 2022 / Published: 7 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Radiochemistry)

Abstract

:
Lewis base-free lanthanoid (Ln) and actinoid (An) iodides are difficult to obtain, as standard protocols describe syntheses in solutions of donor solvents which are ultimately hard to remove. We have now established a mechanochemical approach towards the synthesis of Lewis base-free f-block metal iodides with excellent yields. In particular, we describe herein the synthesis of EuI2 as an example of a divalent lanthanoid iodide, of CeI3 as an example of a trivalent lanthanoid iodide, and of UI3 as the most important actinoid iodide. Each can be obtained in high yield with minimal work-up, presenting the most efficient and simple synthetic route to access these materials to date.

1. Introduction

The chemistry of low-valent actinoid (An) and lanthanoid (Ln) complexes has propelled in recent years, leading to seminal work concerning single molecule magnetism [1,2,3,4,5], small molecule activation [6,7,8,9], new computational approaches [10,11,12,13], and an increased interest in spectroscopic properties regarding fluorescent upconversion [14,15,16] and molecular reporters [17,18]. Material that is classified as nuclear waste has proven to be a valuable source to chemists and physicists to further our understanding of f-electrons [19], chemical bonding [20,21], and coordination [22]. The importance of f-element research has been demonstrated in breakthrough articles covering novel oxidation states, small molecule activation, catalysis and single molecule magnets, and may therefore benefit from easily accessible starting materials. [23,24,25,26,27,28,29] Oftentimes—in contrast to chloride and fluoride salts of lanthanoids and actinoids—iodides make valuable starting materials for coordination chemistry, as they combine well with potassium salts of organic ligands in salt metatheses, precipitating KI. However, the relevant starting materials, (i.e., mainly the divalent or trivalent metal iodides) for these investigations are often hard to access through solution-based or traditional solid-state syntheses, involving long reaction times or the unavoidable coordination of solvent molecules from the synthesis or work-up. These may sometimes impede reactivity, trigger side reactions or interfere with spectroscopic measurements [30]. In spite of this, the synthesis of f-block metal iodides which are coordinated to Lewis bases such as THF (e.g., [SmI2(thf)n], n = 2–5; [31] [LaI3(thf)4] [32], [UI3(thf)4] [33]), is well established and refined to an elegant art [34]. However, acquiring base-free derivatives remains a largely tedious and unappealing enterprise due to: the inability of removing pre-coordinating Lewis bases, their preparation in liquid ammonia (e.g., EuI2) [35], use of toxic materials (e.g., HgI2) [36,37], extended reaction times (e.g., seven days to one month for UI3) [38], and attempted dehydration of readily available hydrates (LnI3(H2O)x) [39]. Mechanochemical synthesis of metal iodides is a practical approach to access otherwise difficult to obtain materials [40,40,41] and several new techniques [42,43] and protocols [44,45] have been established quite recently. Although mechanochemical synthesis is used across a wide variety of metal classes, this technique is considerably underdeveloped in the realms of the f-block series [46,47,48,49,50], let alone for targeting iodides. Herein, we present a facile, quick, and high yielding mechanochemical synthesis of lanthanoid and actinoid iodides. Considering both the commercial unavailability of uranium iodides, and the high prices for purchasing base-free lanthanoid iodides—not to mention the benefits of the base-free halides over solvates [32] and difficulties associated with Lewis base co-ligands in chemical transformations [51,52], spectroscopic analysis [30], and overall complex stability [53,54]—this clean, simple method of synthesising base-free f-block metal iodides provides a new way of accessing these materials.
In this study, we present Eu and Ce as two examples for this chemistry, however, Table S1 of the Supplementary Materials provides an overview regarding syntheses involving other elements of the lanthanoid series, yet they could not be fully characterised.

2. Materials and Methods

The oscillating ball mill apparatus was purchased from Retsch (400 MM), along with the milling containers (inner layer being either tungsten carbide or steel in 15 or 25 mL volume). Powder X-ray diffraction was performed using a P-XRD Stoe Stadi-P equipped with a Mythen 1 K detector and measured from 0 to 60° in 1° steps and 120 s exposure time in Debye-Scherrer geometry using Mo-Kα1 radiation.
There are a few general ball milling considerations to ensure high yields and short reaction times for lanthanoid and actinoid iodides. For instance, a tungsten carbide container is necessary as the analogous synthesis in a steel mill appears to give alternative products. In an instance where an excess of metal is used, metal chunks can be removed through a metal sieve after reaction occurs. In the instance when excess iodine and non-granulated lanthanoid metal (e.g., chips) are used, prior to the actual mechanochemical reaction, it is recommended to mill the mixture at 16 Hz for approximately 20-30 min to break up the metal pieces. By milling at 16 Hz for this duration, no indication of a reaction was observed when the container was opened. The size of the milling container relative to the sample size must also be considered, and it is recommended that a 15 mL container be used for a targeted yield of about 2.0 g. Avoiding the use of an overly large excess of iodine is recommended in order to avoid hindering the overall obtained yield of the product. It is recommended that the container be sealed tightly (preferably with one layer of Teflon tape around the screw).

3. Results

For the 4f elements, milling the metal with an appropriate amount of iodine for a given frequency and duration (Scheme 1) readily affords either the lanthanoid diiodide EuI2 or the lanthanoid triiodide CeI3.
The mixing of lanthanoid metal Ln (Ln = Ce, Eu) with an excess of iodide in an oscillating ball mill produces the respective iodide as a fine powder within less than 90 min (Scheme 2). The excess iodine can be easily removed under vacuum (0.03 mbar) with gentle heating (120 °C), affording the dry powders of CeI3 or EuI2 in essentially quantitative yields. Yield loss is only due to losses upon removal from the container, and the material can be directly used for further synthetic purposes.
The materials could be identified by powder X-ray crystallography, though due to the method of synthesis, the samples obtained from the milling container were naturally of poor crystallinity. For CeI3 additional tempering was required to obtain material with a higher degree of crystallinity (Figure 1).
For EuI2, remarkably, the material obtained contained both known phases for EuI2 (Figure 2).
Remarkably, the mechanochemical synthesis could be extended beyond the 4f elements to the 5f elements, and the synthesis of UI3 was performed using a similar approach (Scheme 3). Initially, the material is milled followed by brief tempering of over 225 °C overnight, with the best results in terms of crystallinity at 500 °C, giving UI3 as large single crystals in essentially quantitative yield. This approach is remarkably quick, and supersedes the previous milestone of 7 days.
The differences for UI3 over the 4f elements were as follows: the synthesis was carried out using clean uranium turnings and 1.5 equivalents of I2. The material was transferred into a steel milling vessel, cooled in liquid nitrogen to −196 °C, and the material was milled for 60 min at 30 Hz. This process of cooling and milling was performed six times. The isolated jet-black powder was pressed into a pellet and transferred into a quartz ampoule, sealed under vacuum, and heated to 500 °C for 24 h, resulting in a total work-up time of two days from start to finish. The purity of the UI3 was analysed using PXRD (Figure 3) and was further confirmed using 1H-NMR spectroscopy on the THF adduct UI3(thf)4 in C6D6, resulting in two resonances at 10.76 ppm and 6.15 ppm for the THF H atoms.

4. Discussion

In light of the aforementioned results, we also probed the potential synthesis of a range of other divalent and trivalent lanthanoid iodides. A detailed overview of these can be found in Table S1 of the SI listing conditions and yields for the respective iodides. A detailed description and photos have been provided in the supporting information. However, as it has been difficult for us to obtain high quality powder diffraction data for these materials, they are not further discussed within this work.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion we present a fast, facile, high-yielding mechanochemical synthesis of Lewis base-free f-block metal iodides. The lanthanoid iodides can thus be synthesised in the solid state in less than 90 min with minimal work-up. Considering the importance of EuI2 and CeI3 as important precursors for coordination chemistry and spectroscopic investigations [57,58,59,60,61], this synthetic method provides a practical pathway to valuable starting materials. In addition, we have shown that uranium (III) iodide can be easily and quickly obtained in single crystalline form using the same approach followed by heating overnight at >225 °C. The results herein show the potential of mechanochemical techniques for f-block chemistry, which is poorly developed, and future work will entail synthetic expansion beyond precursors towards direct complex synthesis.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting information containing further experimental details can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/chemistry4040108/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.W. and M.Z.; methodology, D.W. and M.Z.; software, D.W. and M.Z.; validation, D.W. and M.Z.; formal analysis, D.W. and M.Z.; investigation, D.W., M.Z., D.B., J.S., S.E. and P.B.; resources, M.S.W.; data curation, D.W., M.Z. and D.B.; writing—original draft preparation, D.W. and M.Z.; writing—review and editing, D.W. and M.Z.; visualization, D.W. and M.Z.; supervision, D.W. and M.Z.; project administration, D.W., M.Z. and M.S.W.; funding acquisition, M.S.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Original data are available upon request from the University of Cologne.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Alexander Weiz for his initial support in the setup of the equipment and the experiments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mougel, V.; Chatelain, L.; Pécaut, J.; Caciuffo, R.; Colineau, E.; Griveau, J.-C.; Mazzanti, M. Uranium and Manganese Assembled in a Wheel-Shaped Nanoscale Single-Molecule Magnet with High Spin-Reversal Barrier. Nat. Chem. 2012, 4, 1011–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Chatelain, L.; Walsh, J.P.S.; Pécaut, J.; Tuna, F.; Mazzanti, M. Self-Assembly of a 3d-5f Trinuclear Single-Molecule Magnet from a Pentavalent Uranyl Complex. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 13434–13438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chilton, N.F.; Goodwin, C.A.P.; Mills, D.P.; Winpenny, R.E.P. The First Near-Linear Bis(Amide) f-Block Complex: A Blueprint for a High Temperature Single Molecule Magnet. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 101–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Guo, F.-S.; Day, B.M.; Chen, Y.-C.; Tong, M.-L.; Mansikkamäki, A.; Layfield, R.A. A Dysprosium Metallocene Single-Molecule Magnet Functioning at the Axial Limit. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 11445–11449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Goodwin, C.A.P.; Ortu, F.; Reta, D.; Chilton, N.F.; Mills, D.P. Molecular Magnetic Hysteresis at 60 Kelvin in Dysprosocenium. Nature 2017, 548, 439–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Evans, W.J.; Fang, M.; Zucchi, G.; Furche, F.; Ziller, J.W.; Hoekstra, R.M.; Zink, J.I. Isolation of Dysprosium and Yttrium Complexes of a Three-Electron Reduction Product in the Activation of Dinitrogen, the (N2)3− Radical. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 11195–11202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Formanuik, A.; Ortu, F.; Beekmeyer, R.; Kerridge, A.; Adams, R.W.; Mills, D.P. White Phosphorus Activation by a Th(III) Complex. Dalton Trans. 2016, 45, 2390–2393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Langeslay, R.R.; Fieser, M.E.; Ziller, J.W.; Furche, F.; Evans, W.J. Expanding Thorium Hydride Chemistry Through Th2+, Including the Synthesis of a Mixed-Valent Th4+ /Th3+ Hydride Complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 4036–4045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Falcone, M.; Chatelain, L.; Scopelliti, R.; Živković, I.; Mazzanti, M. Nitrogen Reduction and Functionalization by a Multimetallic Uranium Nitride Complex. Nature 2017, 547, 332–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Schreckenbach, G.; Shamov, G.A. Theoretical Actinide Molecular Science. Acc. Chem. Res. 2010, 43, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kefalidis, C.E.; Castro, L.; Perrin, L.; Rosal, I.D.; Maron, L. New Perspectives in Organolanthanide Chemistry from Redox to Bond Metathesis: Insights from Theory. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 2516–2543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kaltsoyannis, N. Seventeen-Coordinate Actinide Helium Complexes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 7066–7069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Tanti, J.; Lincoln, M.; Kerridge, A. Decomposition of D- and f-Shell Contributions to Uranium Bonding from the Quantum Theory of Atoms in Molecules: Application to Uranium and Uranyl Halides. Inorganics 2018, 6, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Nonat, A.; Chan, C.F.; Liu, T.; Platas-Iglesias, C.; Liu, Z.; Wong, W.-T.; Wong, W.-K.; Wong, K.-L.; Charbonnière, L.J. Room Temperature Molecular up Conversion in Solution. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Chen, S.; Weitemier, A.Z.; Zeng, X.; He, L.; Wang, X.; Tao, Y.; Huang, A.J.Y.; Hashimotodani, Y.; Kano, M.; Iwasaki, H.; et al. Near-Infrared Deep Brain Stimulation via Upconversion Nanoparticle–Mediated Optogenetics. Science 2018, 359, 679–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Hasegawa, Y.; Kitagawa, Y.; Nakanishi, T. Effective Photosensitized, Electrosensitized, and Mechanosensitized Luminescence of Lanthanide Complexes. NPG Asia Mater. 2018, 10, 52–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Sørensen, T.J.; Kenwright, A.M.; Faulkner, S. Bimetallic Lanthanide Complexes That Display a Ratiometric Response to Oxygen Concentrations. Chem. Sci. 2015, 6, 2054–2059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Su, Y.; Yu, J.; Li, Y.; Phua, S.F.Z.; Liu, G.; Lim, W.Q.; Yang, X.; Ganguly, R.; Dang, C.; Yang, C.; et al. Versatile Bimetallic Lanthanide Metal-Organic Frameworks for Tunable Emission and Efficient Fluorescence Sensing. Commun. Chem. 2018, 1, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Maron, L.; Eisenstein, O. Do f Electrons Play a Role in the Lanthanide−Ligand Bonds? A DFT Study of Ln(NR2)3; R = H, SiH3. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 7140–7143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gregson, M.; Lu, E.; Mills, D.P.; Tuna, F.; McInnes, E.J.L.; Hennig, C.; Scheinost, A.C.; McMaster, J.; Lewis, W.; Blake, A.J.; et al. The Inverse-Trans-Influence in Tetravalent Lanthanide and Actinide Bis(Carbene) Complexes. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. La Pierre, H.S.; Rosenzweig, M.; Kosog, B.; Hauser, C.; Heinemann, F.W.; Liddle, S.T.; Meyer, K. Charge Control of the Inverse Trans-Influence. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 16671–16674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Kaltsoyannis, N. Does Covalency Increase or Decrease across the Actinide Series? Implications for Minor Actinide Partitioning. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 52, 3407–3413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Barluzzi, L.; Giblin, S.R.; Mansikkamäki, A.; Layfield, R.A. Identification of Oxidation State +1 in a Molecular Uranium Complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 18229–18233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. MacDonald, M.R.; Bates, J.E.; Ziller, J.W.; Furche, F.; Evans, W.J. Completing the Series of +2 Ions for the Lanthanide Elements: Synthesis of Molecular Complexes of Pr2+, Gd2+, Tb2+, and Lu2+. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 9857–9868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Langeslay, R.R.; Fieser, M.E.; Ziller, J.W.; Furche, F.; Evans, W.J. Synthesis, Structure, and Reactivity of Crystalline Molecular Complexes of the {[C5H3(SiMe3)2]3Th}1− Anion Containing Thorium in the Formal +2 Oxidation State. Chem. Sci. 2015, 6, 517–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Fox, A.R.; Bart, S.C.; Meyer, K.; Cummins, C.C. Towards Uranium Catalysts. Nature 2008, 455, 341–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. La Pierre, H.S.; Scheurer, A.; Heinemann, F.W.; Hieringer, W.; Meyer, K. Synthesis and Characterization of a Uranium(II) Monoarene Complex Supported by δ Backbonding. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 7158–7162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Guo, F.-S.; Day, B.M.; Chen, Y.-C.; Tong, M.-L.; Mansikkamäki, A.; Layfield, R.A. Magnetic Hysteresis up to 80 Kelvin in a Dysprosium Metallocene Single-Molecule Magnet. Science 2018, 362, 1400–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Arnold, P.L.; Stevens, C.J.; Bell, N.L.; Lord, R.M.; Goldberg, J.M.; Nichol, G.S.; Love, J.B. Multi-Electron Reduction of Sulfur and Carbon Disulfide Using Binuclear Uranium(III) Borohydride Complexes. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 3609–3617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Evans, W.J.; Kozimor, S.A.; Ziller, J.W.; Fagin, A.A.; Bochkarev, M.N. Facile Syntheses of Unsolvated UI3 and Tetramethylcyclopentadienyl Uranium Halides. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 3993–4000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Girard, P.; Namy, J.L.; Kagan, H.B. Divalent Lanthanide Derivatives in Organic Synthesis. 1. Mild Preparation of Samarium Iodide and Ytterbium Iodide and Their Use as Reducing or Coupling Agents. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 2693–2698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Izod, K.; Liddle, S.T.; Clegg, W. A Convenient Route to Lanthanide Triiodide THF Solvates. Crystal Structures of LnI3(THF)4 [Ln = Pr] and LnI3(THF)3.5 [Ln = Nd, Gd, Y]. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 43, 214–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Clark, D.L.; Sattelberger, A.P.; Bott, S.G.; Vrtis, R.N. Lewis Base Adducts of Uranium Triiodide: A New Class of Synthetically Useful Precursors for Trivalent Uranium Chemistry. Inorg. Chem. 1989, 28, 1771–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Windorff, C.J.; Dumas, M.T.; Ziller, J.W.; Gaunt, A.J.; Kozimor, S.A.; Evans, W.J. Small-Scale Metal-Based Syntheses of Lanthanide Iodide, Amide, and Cyclopentadienyl Complexes as Analogues for Transuranic Reactions. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 11981–11989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Krings, M.; Wessel, M.; Dronskowski, R. EuI2, a Low-Temperature Europium(II) Iodide Phase. Acta Crystallogr. C 2009, 65, i66–i68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Asprey, L.B.; Keenan, T.K.; Kruse, F.H. Preparation and Crystal Data for Lanthanide and Actinide Triiodides. Inorg. Chem. 1964, 3, 1137–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Corbett, J.D.; Simon, A. Lanthanum Triiodide (and Other Rare Earth Metal Triiodides). In Inorganic Syntheses; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1984; pp. 31–36. ISBN 978-0-470-13253-1. [Google Scholar]
  38. Carmichael, C.D.; Jones, N.A.; Arnold, P.L. Low-Valent Uranium Iodides: Straightforward Solution Syntheses of UI3 and UI4 Etherates. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 8577–8579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hazin, P.N.; Huffman, J.C.; Bruno, J.W. Synthetic and Structural Studies of Pentamethylcyclopentadienyl Complexes of Lanthanum and Cerium. Organometallics 1987, 6, 23–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wilke, M.; Casati, N. Insight into the Mechanochemical Synthesis and Structural Evolution of Hybrid Organic–Inorganic Guanidinium Lead(II) Iodides. Chem. Eur. J. 2018, 24, 17701–17711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Wilke, M.; Casati, N. A New Route to Polyoxometalates via Mechanochemistry. Chem. Sci. 2022, 13, 1146–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Katsenis, A.D.; Puškarić, A.; Štrukil, V.; Mottillo, C.; Julien, P.A.; Užarević, K.; Pham, M.-H.; Do, T.-O.; Kimber, S.A.J.; Lazić, P.; et al. In Situ X-Ray Diffraction Monitoring of a Mechanochemical Reaction Reveals a Unique Topology Metal-Organic Framework. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Beedle, A.E.M.; Mora, M.; Davis, C.T.; Snijders, A.P.; Stirnemann, G.; Garcia-Manyes, S. Forcing the Reversibility of a Mechanochemical Reaction. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 3155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Tan, D.; García, F. Main Group Mechanochemistry: From Curiosity to Established Protocols. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 2274–2292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Ingner, F.J.L.; Giustra, Z.X.; Novosedlik, S.; Orthaber, A.; Gates, P.J.; Dyrager, C.; Pilarski, L.T. Mechanochemical Synthesis of (Hetero)Aryl Au(I) Complexes. Green Chem. 2020, 22, 5648–5655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Alanko, G.A.; Butt, D.P. Mechanochemical Synthesis of Uranium Sesquisilicide. J. Nucl. Mater. 2014, 451, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Woen, D.H.; Kotyk, C.M.; Mueller, T.J.; Ziller, J.W.; Evans, W.J. Tris(Pentamethylcyclopentadienyl) Complexes of Late Lanthanides Tb, Dy, Ho, and Er: Solution and Mechanochemical Syntheses and Structural Comparisons. Organometallics 2017, 36, 4558–4563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Fatila, E.M.; Maahs, A.C.; Hetherington, E.E.; Cooper, B.J.; Cooper, R.E.; Daanen, N.N.; Jennings, M.; Skrabalak, S.E.; Preuss, K.E. Stoichiometric Control: 8- and 10-Coordinate Ln(Hfac)3(Bpy) and Ln(Hfac)3(Bpy)2 Complexes of the Early Lanthanides La–Sm. Dalton Trans. 2018, 47, 16232–16241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wegner, W.; Jaroń, T.; Grochala, W. Preparation of a Series of Lanthanide Borohydrides and Their Thermal Decomposition to Refractory Lanthanide Borides. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 744, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Woen, D.H.; White, J.R.K.; Ziller, J.W.; Evans, W.J. Mechanochemical C–H Bond Activation: Synthesis of the Tuckover Hydrides, (C5Me5)2Ln(μ-H)(μ-H1:H5-CH2C5Me4)Ln(C5Me5) from Solvent-Free Reactions of (C5Me5)2Ln(μ-Ph)2BPh2 with KC5Me5. J. Organomet. Chem. 2019, 899, 120885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Szostak, M.; Procter, D.J. Beyond Samarium Diiodide: Vistas in Reductive Chemistry Mediated by Lanthanides(II). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 9238–9256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Procter, D.J.; Flowers, R.A.; Skrydstrup, T. Organic Synthesis Using Samarium Diiodide; RSC Publishing: London, UK, 2009; ISBN 978-1-84755-110-8. [Google Scholar]
  53. Boisson, C.; Berthet, J.C.; Lance, M.; Nierlich, M.; Ephirtikhine, M. Novel Ring-Opening Reaction of Tetrahydrofuran Promoted by a Cationic Uranium Amide Compound. Chem. Commun. 1996, 18, 2129–2130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Avens, L.R.; Bott, S.G.; Clark, D.L.; Sattelberger, A.P.; Watkin, J.G.; Zwick, B.D. A Convenient Entry into Trivalent Actinide Chemistry: Synthesis and Characterization of AnI3(THF)4 and An[N(SiMe3)2]3 (An = U, Np, Pu). Inorg. Chem. 1994, 33, 2248–2256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Rudel, S.S.; Deubner, H.L.; Scheibe, B.; Conrad, M.; Kraus, F. Facile Syntheses of Pure Uranium(III) Halides: UF3, UCl3, UBr3, and UI3. Z. Für Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2018, 644, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bärnighausen, H.; Schulz, N. Die Kristallstruktur der monoklinen Form von Europium(II)jodid EuJ2. Acta Crystallogr. B 1969, 25, 1104–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Simler, T.; Feuerstein, T.J.; Yadav, R.; Gamer, M.T.; Roesky, P.W. Access to Divalent Lanthanide NHC Complexes by Redox-Transmetallation from Silver and CO2 Insertion Reactions. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 222–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Silantyeva, L.I.; Ilichev, V.A.; Shavyrin, A.S.; Yablonskiy, A.N.; Rumyantcev, R.V.; Fukin, G.K.; Bochkarev, M.N. Unexpected Findings in a Simple Metathesis Reaction of Europium and Ytterbium Diiodides with Perfluorinated Mercaptobenzothiazolates of Alkali Metals. Organometallics 2020, 39, 2972–2983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bannister, R.D.; Levason, W.; Light, M.E.; Reid, G. Tertiary Phosphine Oxide Complexes of Lanthanide Diiodides and Dibromides. Polyhedron 2018, 154, 259–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Casely, I.J.; Liddle, S.T.; Blake, A.J.; Wilson, C.; Arnold, P.L. Tetravalent Cerium Carbene Complexes. Chem. Commun. 2007, 47, 5037–5039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gregson, M.; Lu, E.; McMaster, J.; Lewis, W.; Blake, A.J.; Liddle, S.T. A Cerium(IV)–Carbon Multiple Bond. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 13016–13019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Reaction scheme for the mechanochemical synthesis of divalent and trivalent lanthanoid iodides.
Scheme 1. Reaction scheme for the mechanochemical synthesis of divalent and trivalent lanthanoid iodides.
Chemistry 04 00108 sch001
Scheme 2. Details for the syntheses of CeI3 and EuI2.
Scheme 2. Details for the syntheses of CeI3 and EuI2.
Chemistry 04 00108 sch002
Figure 1. PXRD (full range, left; enhanced, right) of CeI3 (black) versus the calculated isostructural UI3 (red) [55].
Figure 1. PXRD (full range, left; enhanced, right) of CeI3 (black) versus the calculated isostructural UI3 (red) [55].
Chemistry 04 00108 g001
Figure 2. PXRD (full range, left; enhanced, right) of EuI2 (black) showing two distinct crystallographic phases (orthorhombic, red [35], and monoclinic, green [56]).
Figure 2. PXRD (full range, left; enhanced, right) of EuI2 (black) showing two distinct crystallographic phases (orthorhombic, red [35], and monoclinic, green [56]).
Chemistry 04 00108 g002
Scheme 3. Solid state synthesis of UI3.
Scheme 3. Solid state synthesis of UI3.
Chemistry 04 00108 sch003
Figure 3. PXRD of UI3 and calculated peak data [48].
Figure 3. PXRD of UI3 and calculated peak data [48].
Chemistry 04 00108 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Werner, D.; Badea, D.; Schönzart, J.; Eimermacher, S.; Bätz, P.; Wickleder, M.S.; Zegke, M. Facile Solvent-Free Mechanochemical Synthesis of UI3 and Lanthanoid Iodides. Chemistry 2022, 4, 1672-1678. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemistry4040108

AMA Style

Werner D, Badea D, Schönzart J, Eimermacher S, Bätz P, Wickleder MS, Zegke M. Facile Solvent-Free Mechanochemical Synthesis of UI3 and Lanthanoid Iodides. Chemistry. 2022; 4(4):1672-1678. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemistry4040108

Chicago/Turabian Style

Werner, Daniel, Désirée Badea, Jasmin Schönzart, Sophia Eimermacher, Philipp Bätz, Mathias S. Wickleder, and Markus Zegke. 2022. "Facile Solvent-Free Mechanochemical Synthesis of UI3 and Lanthanoid Iodides" Chemistry 4, no. 4: 1672-1678. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemistry4040108

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop