Skip to Content
  • 2.5
    Impact Factor
  • 3.2
    CiteScore
  • 21 days
    Submission to First Decision
  • 3 days
    Acceptance to Publication

Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology

Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology is a peer-reviewed, open access journal on functional morphology and kinesiology research dealing with the analysis of structure, function, development, and evolution of cells and tissues of the musculoskeletal system and the whole body related to the movement exercise-based approach, published quarterly online by MDPI.
  • Open Access— free for readers, with article processing charges (APC) paid by authors or their institutions.
  • High Visibility: indexed within  ESCI (Web of Science), Scopus, PubMed, PMC, FSTA, and other databases.
  • Journal Rank: JCR - Q2 (Sport Sciences) / CiteScore - Q2 (Anatomy)
  • Rapid Publication: manuscripts are peer-reviewed and a first decision is provided to authors approximately 20.1 days after submission; acceptance to publication is undertaken in 2.6 days (median values for papers published in this journal in the first half of 2026).
  • Recognition of Reviewers: Reviewers whose reports are timely and of high quality receive an APC discount voucher for a future publication in an MDPI journal. Become a reviewer.

Get Alerted

Add your email address to receive forthcoming issues of this journal.

All Articles (1,943)

  • Review
  • Open Access

Background and Objectives: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury prevention research in pediatric and adolescent athletes frequently relies on biomechanical assessments of landing and cutting tasks. However, interpretation of developmental biomechanics is complicated by changes in body size, neuromuscular control, and biological maturation during growth. This systematic methodological review evaluated whether youth ACL biomechanics studies adequately account for growth and maturation in study design, task prescription, biomechanical normalization, modeling assumptions, and statistical analysis. Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science were searched through July 2026. Eligible studies included participants ≤19 years performing ACL-relevant landing, cutting, change-of-direction, pivoting, or deceleration tasks with quantitative biomechanical or neuromuscular outcomes. Data were extracted regarding maturity assessment, task scaling, normalization, modeling assumptions, and statistical treatment of developmental variables. Results: Fifty-four reports met eligibility criteria. Forty-three reports (79.6%) evaluated landing tasks exclusively, seven (13%) evaluated cutting and change of direction tasks exclusively, and four (7.4%) evaluated both landing and cutting tasks. Cross-sectional/observational designs were most common (28/54; 51.9%), followed by intervention/repeated-measures (16/54; 29.6%) and longitudinal/cohort studies (10/54; 18.5%). Formal biological-maturity assessment with a specified method was documented in 25 reports (46.3%). Two additional reports (3.7%) described a formal or group maturity classification but did not identify the method. Nine reports (16.7%) used age/development groupings only, and 18 (33.3%) reported no formal maturity assessment. Variability was observed in task prescription, normalization, and reporting of growth-related statistical methods. Conclusions: Youth ACL biomechanics research is not consistently growth-aware. Future studies should integrate maturity assessment, task scaling, biomechanical normalization, and developmentally appropriate statistical approaches to improve interpretation and reproducibility.

PRISMA flow diagram depicting study selection process.
  • Review
  • Open Access

Artificial Intelligence in Exercise Prediction, Monitoring, and Personalization: A Systematic Review

  • Nebojša Čokorilo,
  • Tamara Matijević and
  • Ivan Milojković
  • + 1 author

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly applied to physiological prediction, physical activity monitoring, and personalized exercise prescription. However, evidence regarding its practical effectiveness remains heterogeneous. This systematic review examined applications of AI, machine learning (ML), and deep learning (DL) in exercise-related prediction, monitoring, and personalization among adults. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, PubMed and Scopus were searched for studies published between 2015 and 2025, with Google Scholar used as a supplementary source. Eligibility followed PICO: adults aged 18 years or older (P); AI, ML, or DL applications for exercise prediction, monitoring, or personalization (I); conventional or non-personalized approaches, where applicable (C); and predictive accuracy and physiological, functional, or behavioral exercise outcomes (O). Findings were synthesized descriptively. Results: Ten studies were included: four examined physiological or energy-expenditure prediction, two investigated activity-related behavioral outcomes, two evaluated training-response classification or recommendation generation, and two assessed AI-personalized exercise interventions. Predictive models demonstrated promising performance in specific applications, although validation procedures and populations varied substantially. The intervention studies reported greater perceived exercise intensity and satisfaction in one trial and improvements in selected measures of balance, flexibility, and strength in another. Conclusions: AI-based approaches show potential for supporting exercise assessment, monitoring, and individualized decision-making. However, evidence regarding their superiority over conventional exercise prescription remains limited by the small number of intervention studies, methodological heterogeneity, and insufficient external validation. Further well-designed, long-term intervention studies are needed to establish their comparative effectiveness and practical benefits.

PRISMA flow diagram of the study selection process.
  • Article
  • Open Access

Background and Objectives: Non-specific low back pain (LBP) is multifactorial. Fascia of the thoracolumbar and lumbogluteal system showing stacking fascia—a layered, hyperechoic ultrasound appearance—may be an under-recognized peripheral source; routine imaging assesses the disc, vertebra, and nerve root but not these tissues. The objective is to describe a multi-point ultrasound-guided fascia hydrorelease (US-FHR) protocol, based on our clinical experience, for LBP in which involvement of the fascia is suspected from the history, the physical findings, and stacking fascia on ultrasound, after excluding red flags and clear radiculopathy. Methods: Narrative synthesis of targeted literature searches and our clinical experience; no formal consensus process or new prospective dataset. Results: Fourteen release points are described with rationale, technique, safety notes, and an ultrasound still. Conclusions: The diagnostic steps and their correspondences with the release points are based largely on our clinical experience and have not been validated. US-FHR is proposed not as a stand-alone treatment but as one element of multimodal care, in which the period of pain relief is used to resume active exercise. It is offered as the basis for prospective validation studies, distinct from the single-site thoracolumbar fascia (TLF) pilot NCT06818175.

Referred-pain diagram—posterior views with referral zones (purple): (a) T9; (b) T10; (c) T11. The anatomical base illustration was generated with Manus 1.6 (Manus AI) and checked and edited by H. Horigome; the referral zones were drawn by hand by H. Horigome based on the experimental referral data of Feinstein et al. [42] and are not reproduced from the original figures.
  • Review
  • Open Access

Changes in the Isokinetic Strength Profile in Soccer Players Following Fatigue: A Systematic Review

  • Alberto Encarnación-Martínez,
  • Rubén Bruna-Lázaro and
  • Antonio García-Gallart
  • + 1 author

Background: Soccer demands repeated high-intensity, powerful actions, which increase the risk of lower-limb injuries as fatigue accumulates in the working muscles. The hamstrings-to-quadriceps (H:Q) ratio is widely used to assess knee strength balance. Several studies have reported that fatigue can significantly decrease the H:Q ratio. Therefore, the objective of the present systematic review was to analyze the effect of simulated soccer-induced fatigue on the conventional and functional isokinetic H:Q ratios in soccer players. Methods: Eligibility required injury-free soccer players aged ≥ 18 years, 45- or 90-min running-based simulated soccer protocols, and pre-post H:Q data; injured samples and reports lacking relevant outcomes were excluded. MEDLINE (via PubMed), Web of Science, and SPORTDiscus were searched from inception to 6 April 2026. The following keywords were used: “soccer,” “muscle fatigue,” “hamstrings,” “H:Q ratio,” “isokinetic strength.” Quality was assessed using the 12-item National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute tool for uncontrolled before–after studies. Findings were synthesized narratively. Results: Ten studies (155 participants) met the inclusion criteria, all assessing the H:Q ratio before and after a simulated soccer protocol. Most studies reported a significant decrease in the functional ratio of the dominant leg after different simulated soccer protocols. Conclusions: Simulated soccer-induced fatigue can reduce the H:Q ratios, but these changes reflect altered knee strength balance rather than direct evidence of increased injury risk. Future studies should use more advanced, field-simulated soccer protocols or real competitions to evaluate the H:Q ratio and whether its changes are associated with injury risk and develop rehabilitation strategies focused on delaying fatigue.

Search process flow diagram.

Highly Accessed Articles

News & Conferences

Latest Issues

Open for Submission

Journal Sections

XFacebookLinkedIn
J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol. - ISSN 2411-5142