Factors Determining the Behavioral Intention of Using Food Delivery Apps during COVID-19 Pandemics
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Food Delivery Apps (FDAs)
1.2. Effects of COVID-19 on Online Delivery Business
2. Materials and Methods
UTAUT Model
3. Results
3.1. Participants Demographics
3.2. Model Results
4. Discussions
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Zhou, T. Understanding mobile Internet continuance usage from the perspectives of UTAUT and flow. Inf. Dev. 2011, 27, 207–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Androniceanu, A. Social responsibility, an essential strategic option for a sustainable development in the field of bio-economy. Amfiteatru Econ. 2020, 52, 503–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Androniceanu, A. Major structural changes in the EU policies due to the problems and risks caused by COVID-19. Adm. Manag. Public 2020, 34, 137–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Statista Reports. Revenue Forecast for the Online Food Delivery Market Worldwide from 2017 to 2024. 2019. Available online: https://www.statista.com/forecasts/891078/online-food-delivery-revenue-by-segment-worldwide (accessed on 12 January 2021).
- IMARC Group. Global Online Food Delivery Market to Reach US$ 164.5 Billion by 2024; IMARC Group: Sheridan, WY, USA, 2020; Available online: https://www.imarcgroup.com/global-online-food-delivery-market (accessed on 8 December 2020).
- Zinecker, M.; Doubravský, K.; Balcerzak, A.P.; Pietrzak, M.B.; Dohnal, M. The Covid-19 Disease and Policy Response to Mitigate the Economic Impact in the EU: An Exploratory Study Based on Qualitative Trend Analysis. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pardal, P.; Dias, R.; Šuleř, P.; Teixeira, N.; Krulický, T. Integration in Central European capital markets in the context of the global COVID-19 pandemic. Equilib. Q. J. Econ. Econ. Policy 2020, 15, 627–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dias, R.; Teixeira, N.; Machova, V.; Pardal, P.; Horak, J.; Vochozka, M. Random walks and market efficiency tests: Evidence on US, Chinese and European capital markets within the context of the global Covid-19 pandemic. Oeconomia Copernic. 2020, 11, 585–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kufel, T. ARIMA-based forecasting of the dynamics of confirmed Covid-19 cases for selected European countries. Equilib. Q. J. Econ. Econ. Policy 2020, 15, 181–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, B.; Bragazzi, N.L.; Li, Q.; Tang, S.; Xiao, Y.; Wu, J. An updated estimation of the risk of transmission of the novel coronavirus (2019-nCov). Infect. Dis. Model. 2020, 5, 248–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilder-Smith, A.; Freedman, D.O. Isolation, quarantine, social distancing and community containment: Pivotal role for old-style public health measures in the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) outbreak. J. Travel Med. 2020, 27, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kuc-Czarnecka, M. COVID-19 and digital deprivation in Poland. Oeconomia Copernic. 2020, 11, 415–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Korzeb, Z.; Niedziółka, P. Resistance of commercial banks to the crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of Poland. Equilib. Q. J. Econ. Econ. Policy 2020, 15, 205–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, M.; Mamun, A.A.; Mohiuddin, M.; Nawi, N.C.; Zainol, N.R. Cashless transactions: A study on intention and adoption of e-Wallets. Sustainability 2021, 13, 831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dabija, D.-C.; Bejan, B.M.; Tipi, N. Generation X Versus Millennials Communication Beahviour on Social Media when Purchasing Food Versus Tourist Services. Mark. Trade 2018, 21, 191–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pop, R.-A.; Săplăcan, Z.; Dabija, D.-C.; Alt, M.-A. The impact of social media influencers on travel decisions: The role of trust in consumer decision journey. Curr. Issues Tour. 2021, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rakuten Insight. Impact of COVID-19 o Consumer Behaviour 2020. Available online: https://insight.rakuten.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/RI_Impact_of_COVID_19_Report.pdf (accessed on 8 December 2020).
- Setboonsarng, C. Thai Siam Commercial Bank Launches Food Delivery App Amid Competition Reuters 2020. Available online: https://www.reuters.com/article/siam-comm-bank-food-delivery-idUSKBN27B0LY (accessed on 25 January 2020).
- Roh, M.; Park, K. Adoption of O2O food delivery services in South Korea: The moderating role of moral obligation in meal preparation. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2019, 47, 262–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zandi, G.; Shahzad, I.; Farrukh, M.; Kot, S. Supporting Role of Society and Firms to COVID-19 Management among Medical Practitioners. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaveesuk, S.; Chaiyasoonthorn, W.; Khalid, B. Understanding the Model of User Adoption and Acceptance of Technology by Thai Farmers: A Conceptual Framework. In Proceedings of the 2020 2nd International Conference on Management Science and Industrial Engineering, Osaka, Japan, 7–9 April 2020; pp. 279–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yeo, V.C.S.; Goh, S.-K.; Rezaei, S. Consumer experiences, attitude and behavioral intention toward online food delivery (OFD) services. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2017, 35, 150–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, M.; Bonn, M.A.; Li, J.J. Differences in perceptions about food delivery apps between single-person and multi-person households. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2019, 77, 108–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ray, A.; Dhir, A.; Bala, P.K.; Kaur, P. Why do people use food delivery apps (FDA)? A uses and gratification theory perspective. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2019, 51, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cepel, M.; Gavurova, B.; Dvorsky, J.; Belas, J. The impact of the COVID-19 crisis on the perception of business risk in the SME segment. J. Int. Stud. 2020, 13, 248–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Y.; Bacao, F. What factors determining customer continuingly using food delivery apps during 2019 novel coronavirus pandemic period? Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2020, 91, 102683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chaveesuk, S.; Khalid, B.; Chaiyasoonthorn, W. Understanding Stakeholders Needs for Using Blockchain Based Smart Contracts in Construction Industry of Thailand: Extended TAM Framework. In Proceedings of the 2020 13th International Conference on Human System Interaction (HSI), Tokyo, Japan, 6–8 June 2020; pp. 137–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, C.; Mirosa, M.; Bremer, P. Review of Online Food Delivery Platforms and their Impacts on Sustainability. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elvandari, C.D.R.; Sukartiko, A.C.; Nugrahini, A.D. Identification of Technical Requirement for Improving Quality of Local Online Food Delivery Service in Yogyakarta. J. Ind. Inf. Technol. Agric. 2018, 1, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Arunmas, P. New Discount Scheme to Ease Hardships. Available online: https://www.bangkokpost.com/business/2062775/new-discount-scheme-to-ease-hardships. (accessed on 5 February 2021).
- Kuzmenko, O.; Vasylieva, T.; Vojtovič, S.; Chygryn, O.; Snieška, V. Why do regions differ in vulnerability to COVID-19? Spatial nonlinear modeling of social and economic patterns. Econ. Sociol. 2020, 13, 318–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaiyasoonthorn, W.; Khalid, B.; Chaveesuk, S. Success of Smart Cities Development with Community’s Acceptance of New Technologies. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Information Communication and Management, Prague, Czech Republic, 23–26 August 2019; pp. 106–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, M.-F.; Luh, Y.-H.; Huang, Y.-H.; Chang, Y.-C. Young Generation’s Mobile Payment Adoption Behavior: Analysis Based on an Extended UTAUT Model. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2021, 16, 618–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sair, S.A.; Danish, R.Q. Effect of performance expectancy and effort expectancy on the mobile commerce adoption intention through personal innovativeness among Pakistani consumers. Pak. J. Commer. Soc. Sci. 2018, 12, 501–520. [Google Scholar]
- Skoumpopoulou, D. Factors that affect the acceptance of new technologies in the workplace: A cross case analysis between two universities. Int. J. Educ. Dev. Using Inf. Commun. Technol. 2018, 14, 209–222. [Google Scholar]
- Sathye, S.; Prasad, B.; Sharma, D.; Sharma, P.; Sathye, M. Factors influencing the intention to use of mobile value-added services by women-owned microenterprises in Fiji. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries. 2018, 84, e12016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Alaimo, L.S.; Fiore, M.; Galati, A. How the Covid-19 Pandemic Is Changing Online Food Shopping Human Behaviour in Italy. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Furneaux, B. Task-Technology Fit Theory: A Survey and Synopsis of the Literature. In Information Systems Theory Explaining and Predicting Our Digital Society, 1st ed.; Springer Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; Volume 28, pp. 87–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spies, R.; Grobbelaar, S.; Botha, A. A Scoping Review of the Application of the Task-Technology Fit Theory. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Springer Science and Business Media LLC: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; Volume 12066, pp. 397–408. [Google Scholar]
- Riana, D.; Hidayanto, A.N.; Hadianti, S.; Napitupulu, D. Integrative Factors of E-Health Laboratory Adoption: A Case of Indonesia. Future Internet 2021, 13, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teo, T.; Zhou, M. Explaining the intention to use technology among university students: A structural equation modeling approach. J. Comput. High. Educ. 2014, 26, 124–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rashid, N.A.A.; Mokhlis, S.; Yaakop, A.Y. The Antecedents of Consumer Behavioral Intention in Social Commerce. Adv. Sci. Lett. 2017, 23, 3111–3114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saprikis, V.; Avlogiaris, G.; Katarachia, A. Determinants of the Intention to Adopt Mobile Augmented Reality Apps in Shopping Malls among University Students. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2020, 16, 491–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, D.N.; Nguyen-Phuoc, D.Q.; Johnson, L.W. Effects of perceived safety, involvement and perceived service quality on loyalty intention among ride-sourcing passengers. Transportation 2021, 48, 369–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venkatesh, V.; Thong, J.Y.L.; Xu, X. Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. MIS Q. 2012, 36, 157–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Martín, H.S.; Herrero, Á. Influence of the user’s psychological factors on the online purchase intention in rural tourism: Integrating innovativeness to the UTAUT framework. Tour. Manag. 2012, 33, 341–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Escobar-Rodríguez, T.; Carvajal-Trujillo, E. Online drivers of consumer purchase of website airline tickets. J. Air Transp. Manag. 2013, 32, 58–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahbaz, M.; Gao, C.; Zhai, L.; Shahzad, F.; Hu, Y. Investigating the adoption of big data analytics in healthcare: The moderating role of resistance to change. J. Big Data 2019, 6, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ponte, E.B.; Carvajal-Trujillo, E.; Escobar-Rodríguez, T. Influence of trust and perceived value on the intention to purchase travel online: Integrating the effects of assurance on trust antecedents. Tour. Manag. 2015, 47, 286–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F., Jr.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; Anderson, R.E.; Tatham, R.L. Multivariant Data Analysis; Pearson International Edition: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmed, R.R.; Romeika, G.; Kauliene, R.; Streimikis, J.; Dapkus, R. ES-QUAL model and customer satisfaction in online banking: Evidence from multivariate analysis techniques. Oeconomia Copernic. 2020, 11, 59–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Popa, I.D.; Dabija, D.-C. Developing the Romanian Organic Market: A Producer’s Perspective. Sustainability 2019, 11, 467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Szczepańska-Woszczyna, K. Management Theory, Innovation, and Organisation: A Model of Managerial Competencies; Routledge: Milton Park, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
Estimates | CR | AVE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Performance Expectancy | PE3 | 0.723 | ||
PE2 | 0.898 | |||
PE1 | 0.821 | 0.7281 | 0.72199 | |
Effort Expectancy | EE3 | 0.721 | ||
EE2 | 0.821 | |||
EE1 | 0.823 | 0.8727 | 0.7281 | |
Social Influence | SI3 | 0.898 | ||
SI2 | 0.723 | |||
SI1 | 0.834 | 0.8781 | 0.6332 | |
Timeliness | TM3 | 0.882 | ||
TM2 | 0.872 | |||
TM1 | 0.723 | 0.7894 | 0.7792 | |
Task-Technology Fit | TT1 | 0.836 | ||
TT2 | 0.792 | 0.8393 | 0.6892 | |
TT3 | 0.872 | |||
Behavioral Intention to Use | BIU1 | 0.632 | ||
BIU2 | 0.723 | |||
BIU3 | 0.628 | 0.6728 | 0.5289 | |
Perceived Trust | PT1 | 0.881 | ||
PT2 | 0.755 | 0.6922 | 0.5287 | |
PT3 | 0.729 | |||
Perceived Safety | PS1 | 0.792 | ||
PS2 | 0.729 | 0.8745 | 0.7278 |
N | Percentage | ||
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 192 | 48 |
Female | 210 | 52 | |
Age | Below 21 | 121 | 30 |
21–30 | 217 | 54 | |
31–40 | 36 | 9 | |
Above 40 | 28 | 7 | |
Education level | High School | 24 | 6 |
Bachelor’s Degree | 265 | 66 | |
Master’s Degree | 81 | 20 | |
PhD | 32 | 8 | |
Frequency of use | 0–3 times per week | 76 | 55 |
Above 3 times per week | 121 | 45 | |
Total | 402 | 100 |
Relationship | Beta (β) | S.E | CR | p-Value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIU | ← | EE | 0.311 | 0.013 | 10.957 | *** |
BIU | ← | SI | 0.207 | 0.012 | 7.744 | *** |
BIU | ← | TT | 0.491 | 0.016 | 14.694 | *** |
BIU | ← | PE | 0.106 | 0.011 | 4.289 | *** |
BIU | ← | PS | 0.305 | 0.014 | 9.744 | *** |
BIU | ← | TM | 0.563 | 0.015 | 16.338 | *** |
BIU | ← | PT | 0.444 | 0.013 | 14.324 | *** |
Hypothesis | Relationship | Beta (β) | p-Value | Accepted/Rejected | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hypothesis 2 (H2) | BIU | ← | EE | 0.311 | *** | Accepted |
Hypothesis 3 (H3) | BIU | ← | SI | 0.207 | *** | Accepted |
Hypothesis 5 (H5) | BIU | ← | TTF | 0.491 | *** | Accepted |
Hypothesis 1 (H1) | BIU | ← | PE | 0.106 | *** | Accepted |
Hypothesis 7 (H7) | BIU | ← | PS | 0.305 | *** | Accepted |
Hypothesis 4 (H4) | BIU | ← | TM | 0.563 | *** | Accepted |
Hypothesis 6 (H6) | BIU | ← | PT | 0.444 | *** | Accepted |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Muangmee, C.; Kot, S.; Meekaewkunchorn, N.; Kassakorn, N.; Khalid, B. Factors Determining the Behavioral Intention of Using Food Delivery Apps during COVID-19 Pandemics. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2021, 16, 1297-1310. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16050073
Muangmee C, Kot S, Meekaewkunchorn N, Kassakorn N, Khalid B. Factors Determining the Behavioral Intention of Using Food Delivery Apps during COVID-19 Pandemics. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research. 2021; 16(5):1297-1310. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16050073
Chicago/Turabian StyleMuangmee, Chaiyawit, Sebastian Kot, Nusanee Meekaewkunchorn, Nuttapon Kassakorn, and Bilal Khalid. 2021. "Factors Determining the Behavioral Intention of Using Food Delivery Apps during COVID-19 Pandemics" Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 16, no. 5: 1297-1310. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16050073
APA StyleMuangmee, C., Kot, S., Meekaewkunchorn, N., Kassakorn, N., & Khalid, B. (2021). Factors Determining the Behavioral Intention of Using Food Delivery Apps during COVID-19 Pandemics. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16(5), 1297-1310. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16050073