Next Article in Journal
Use of Corn Silk Meal in Broiler Diet: Effect on Growth Performance, Blood Biochemistry, Immunological Responses, and Growth-Related Gene Expression
Previous Article in Journal
Development and Validation of Equations for Predicting the Metabolizable Energy Value of Double-Low Rapeseed Cake for Growing Pigs
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 11
Issue 4
10.3390/ani11041169
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Isomer-Specific Effects of cis-9,trans-11- and trans-10,cis-12-CLA on Immune Regulation in Ruminal Epithelial Cells

by
Chunlei Yang
1,
Binna Zhu
1,
Shijie Ye
1,
Zhengwei Fu
1,* and
Jinjun Li
2,*
1
College of Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, China
2
Institute of Food Sciences, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2021, 11(4), 1169; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11041169
Submission received: 4 February 2021 / Revised: 8 April 2021 / Accepted: 15 April 2021 / Published: 19 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Physiology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The significant contribution of rumen microbiota to the balance of the innate immunity of rumen epithelium has been extensively verified. As the natural rumen microbial metabolites, information regarding the immunoprotective effects of different conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) isomers on ruminal epithelial cells (RECs) is limited. In this study, the 100 μM trans-10,cis-12-CLA exerted better anti-inflammatory effects than the cis-9,trans-11-CLA by significantly downregulating the expression of genes related to inflammation, cell proliferation and migration in RECs upon lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation. The trans-10,cis-12-CLA, but not cis-9,trans-11-CLA, significantly suppressed the biological signals of gene ontology (GO) terms’ response to lipopolysaccharide, the regulation of signal transduction and cytokine production and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways NF-κB, chemokine, NOD-like receptor, Hippo, PI3K-Akt, TGF-β and Rap1 signaling in RECs upon LPS stimulation. Furthermore, pretreatment with trans-10,cis-12-CLA significantly reduced the expression of lipogenic genes and the biosynthesis of the unsaturated fatty acid pathway in RECs compared with the LPS group, however, cis-9,trans-11-CLA exhibited the opposite results. These results suggest the distinct isomer differences of CLA in the regulation of inflammatory responses and adipocytokine signaling in RECs and will provide important references for determining their target use in the future.

Abstract

In this study, we used transcriptomics and qPCR to investigate the potential immunoprotective effects of different conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) isomers, the natural rumen microbial metabolites, on lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammation of ruminal epithelial cells (RECs) in vitro. The results showed that 100 μM trans-10,cis-12-CLA exerted higher anti-inflammatory effects than cis-9,trans-11-CLA by significantly downregulating the expression of genes related to inflammation, cell proliferation and migration in RECs upon LPS stimulation. Transcriptomic analyses further indicated that pretreatment with trans-10,cis-12-CLA, but not cis-9,trans-11-CLA, significantly suppressed the biological signals of GO terms’ response to LPS, the regulation of signal transduction and cytokine production and KEGG pathways NF-κB, chemokine, NOD-like receptor, Hippo, PI3K-Akt, TGF-β and Rap1 signaling in RECs upon LPS stimulation. Furthermore, pretreatment with trans-10,cis-12-CLA significantly reduced the expression of lipogenic genes and the biosynthesis of the unsaturated fatty acid pathway in RECs compared with the LPS group, however, cis-9,trans-11-CLA exhibited the opposite results. These results suggest the distinct isomer differences of CLA in the regulation of inflammatory responses and adipocytokine signaling in RECs and will provide important references for determining their target use in the future.

1. Introduction

The ruminal epithelium not only plays a significant role in nutrient absorption and metabolism but also serves as an important barrier to protect hosts against stimuli, such as pathogens and toxins [1]. The accumulated lipopolysaccharide (LPS) derived from the lysis of Gram-negative bacteria within the rumen, especially in ruminal disorders, always presents great challenges for the ruminal epithelium [2]. The interaction of the ruminal epithelium and microbiota plays a key role in sustaining the balance of the inflammatory response and immune tolerance in the rumen [3]. Microbial metabolites have been reported to exert important roles in the integrity of ruminal epithelium, expression of tight junctions, renewal of epithelial cells and immune-response-related signals [4,5].
Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) is a type of natural ruminal microbial metabolite that forms during the biohydrogenation process within the rumen [6]. It is a mixture of positional and geometrical isomers of linoleic acid with conjugated double bonds, and cis-9,trans-11-CLA and trans-10,cis-12-CLA are the most studied bioactive isomers [7]. Various beneficial effects have been found in CLA, such as anticarcinogenic, antiobesogenic, anti-inflammatory and immune-enhancement effects [8,9]. However, which CLA isomer is responsible for the observed benefits is sometimes controversial, with species-, tissue- and cell-type-dependent specific effects reported [10,11,12,13]. In the study of Su et al. [14], the isomers cis-9,trans-11-CLA impaired intestinal epithelial barrier function in both mice and IPEC-J2 cells, whereas trans-10,cis-12-CLA did not. However, in the study of Jaudszus et al. [15], cis-9,trans-11-CLA significantly reduced the release of inflammatory cytokines in stimulated human bronchial epithelial cells and exerted better anti-inflammatory effects than trans-10,cis-12-CLA. Furthermore, after comparing the effects of CLA isomers on adipose tissue, muscle and liver of mice, Della Casa et al. [13] found that tran-10,cis-12-CLA effectively reduced fat masses in adipose tissue and increased fatty acid oxidation in muscle but also induced liver steatosis, conversely, cis-9,trans-11-CLA had no relevant effects on adipose tissue and liver, but it enhanced muscular cell differentiation. Dietary supplementation of ruminants with CLA is a well-known nutrition strategy, which allows the improvement of milk quality and whole-body energy utilization, and the mitigation of the proinflammatory response associated with oxidative stress around the calving period in dairy cows. However, most findings result from a mixture of CLA isomers due to commercial availability [16,17,18], therefore, the information regarding isomer-specific effects on the immunity of rumen are limited. Factors including dietary starch or polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) content, ruminal pH and bacterial activity are suggested to be important regulators driving the abundance of different CLA isomers in rumen, and more trans-10,cis-12-CLA can be produced when high-grain diets are supplied [6,19]. Therefore, a better understanding of how these specific CLA isomers play a role in regulating inflammatory responses in ruminal epithelium can provide more information for their target enrichment or use in the management of ruminant health.
The function of CLA as a signal to regulate various physiological processes is mostly involved in modulating the expression and activity of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), given its high similarity with the PPARγ ligand [20]. PPARs are members of the nuclear receptor subfamily that exerts pleiotropic effects by affecting the expression of gene networks involved in inflammation, metabolism of lipids and carbohydrates, homeostasis and cell-cycle regulation [21]. Furthermore, CLA isomers have been found to possess the ability to affect lipid metabolism, cell survival and apoptosis, which are considered to be closely associated with inflammatory signaling cascades [20,22,23,24,25]. However, many of the mechanisms are still not fully clarified, and isomer-specific effects are also present [26,27]. RNA plays an important role in various biological processes, and RNA sequencing has emerged as an in-depth study model to explore gene changes and alternative splicing in various cell populations and to detect novel transcripts [28]. Thus, to better understand the potential protective effects of different CLA isomers on ruminal epithelial cells and to elucidate the related regulatory mechanisms, we used the transcriptome sequencing method to investigate the changed gene expression and functions in RECs under inflammatory conditions with either cis-9,trans-11-CLA or trans-10,cis-12-CLA pretreatment. We hypothesized that different CLA isomers may protect RECs against inflammation differently.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Treatments

The immortalized ruminal epithelial cell line RECs was cultured in DMEM (Gibco, New York, USA) containing 2% FBS, 1% penicillin/streptomycin and 1% epithelial cell additive at 37 °C with 5% CO2, as described previously [29]. When REC monolayers reached 70–80% confluency, the cells were treated without (control group, CON) or with 0.1 μg/mL LPS (from Escherichia coli O111:B4, Sigma-Aldrich, Shanghai, China) for 3 h [29] after pretreatment with 50 or 100 μM cis-9,trans-11- (c-9,t-11-CLA+LPS group, c-9,t-11-CLA+LPS) or trans-10,cis-12-CLA (t-10,c-12-CLA+LPS group, t-10,c-12-CLA+LPS) (purity ≥ 96.0%, Sigma-Aldrich, Shanghai, China) for 24 h or not (LPS group, LPS). Six treatments were contained and each treatment had 4 replicates.

2.2. RNA Isolation and Real-Time PCR (qPCR) Analysis

Total RNA was extracted from all the treated RECs with RNA PURE KIT (Aidlab Biotechnologies Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was then synthesized using the PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit (Takara, Dalian, China). qPCR was subsequently performed in an ABI 7500 (Life Technologies, Singapore) with SYBR green using procedures described previously [29]. The results were normalized to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and tyrosine 3-monooxygenase/tryptophan 5-monooxygenase activation protein zeta (YWHAZ) expression using the 2^−∆∆Ct method. The primers were designed using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool [BLAST; National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), Bethesda, MD, USA] and are presented in Table S1.

2.3. Transcriptome Sequencing

After RNA extraction, RNA purity and concentration were measured by a NanoPhotometer spectrophotometer (IMPLEN, Westlake Village, CA, USA) and Qubit RNA assay kit with a Qubit 2.0 fluorometer (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), respectively. RNA integrity was determined by the RNA Nano 6000 assay kit with the Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). A total of 3 μg RNA per sample was utilized for library preparation using the NEBNext Ultra RNA library prep kit for Illumina (NEB, Ipswich, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Paired-end sequencing (150 bp) was performed via the Illumina HiSeq 2000 instrument, and a minimum depth of 40 million reads per sample was obtained. The RNA sequencing work was supported by the Beijing Novogene Biological Information Technology Co., Ltd.

2.4. Data Processing and Analysis

The raw data were processed with quality control and mapped to the reference genome and reference gene annotations of Ovis aries (ftp://ftp.ensembl.org/pub/release-95/fasta/ovis_aries/ and ftp://ftp.ensembl.org/pub/release-95/gtf/ovis_aries/) using Hisat2v.2.0.5 (accessed on 12 September 2020). The expected number of fragments per kilobase of transcript sequence per million base pairs sequenced (FPKM) of each gene was calculated based on the length of the gene and read count mapped to this gene and was used for the evaluation of the gene expression level. The differential gene expression among the CON, LPS, c-9,t-11-CLA+LPS and t-10,c-12-CLA+LPS groups was analyzed using the DESeq2 R package (1.16.1), and the resulting p-values were adjusted (padj) using Benjamini and Hochberg’s approach to control the false discovery rate. Genes with padj < 0.05 and fold change (FC) > 1.5 were considered differentially expressed genes (DEGs) [30].

2.5. Functional Analysis of the DEGs

To better annotate the biological functions of the DEGs, gene ontology (GO) enrichment and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis of the DEGs was performed using the GOseq R package and KOBAS software, respectively. The GO and KEGG terms with a p-value < 0.05 were considered significantly enriched for the DEGs. The protein–protein interaction (PPI) networks for the DEGs were analyzed using the STRING v.10.5 database (http://string-db.org/) (accessed on 12 September 2020) to better understand the relationships between the proteins and genes identified. The hub genes (degree > 5) in the networks were analyzed by Cytoscape.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The data for qPCR analysis were presented as the means ± SEM. The unpaired Student’s t-test was used for comparisons between two groups. p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Optimization of the Concentrations of cis-9,trans-11- and trans-10,cis-12-CLA

The qPCR results for measuring the production of the proinflammatory factors IL-6 and NF-κB in RECs after exposure to LPS for 3 h of pretreatment with cis-9,trans-11- or trans-10,cis-12-CLA for 24 h at concentrations of 50 and 100 μM, respectively, indicated that the regulation of CLA isomers on the gene expression of IL-6 and NF-κB in RECs was concentration-dependent. Pretreatment with 50 μM cis-9,trans-11- or trans-10,cis-12-CLA did not significantly affect IL-6 and NF-κB gene expression in RECs upon LPS stimulation. However, pretreatment with 100 μM trans-10,cis-12-CLA significantly reduced the gene expression of IL-6 and NF-κB in RECs upon LPS stimulation (p < 0.05), while pretreatment with 100 μM cis-9,trans-11-CLA significantly reduced the gene expression of NF-κB in RECs upon LPS stimulation (p < 0.05) (Figure 1). Therefore, pretreatment with 100 μM cis-9,trans-11 or trans-10,cis-12-CLA for 24 h exhibited better protective results against inflammation in RECs and was selected for further transcriptomics analysis.

3.2. Overview of the RNA Sequencing Among Different Treatments

An average of 50.33 ± 7.93 million raw reads were obtained per sample among all the treatments. After performing data quality, 50.07 ± 7.86 million clean reads were obtained with the contamination, and low-quality reads were removed. Greater than 85.20% of the clean sequencing reads per sample were successfully mapped to the reference genome of Ovis aries. After the calculation of FPKM of each sample, a similar gene expression distribution among all the treatments was obtained. After novel genes were removed, 628 genes were significantly upregulated, and 322 genes were downregulated with LPS treatment compared with the expression levels in the CON group (FC > 1.5, padj < 0.05) (Figure 2a,b). One hundred and sixteen genes were significantly upregulated, and 50 genes were downregulated in the c-9,t-11-CLA+LPS group compared with the LPS group (FC > 1.5, padj < 0.05) (Figure 2a,b). For the treatment of t-10,c-12-CLA+LPS, 199 genes were significantly upregulated, and 323 genes were downregulated compared with the LPS group (FC > 1.5, padj < 0.05) (Figure 2a,b). Specifically, 19 overlapping genes were significantly upregulated with LPS treatment and downregulated with c-9,t-11-CLA+LPS treatment, and 162 overlapping genes were significantly upregulated with LPS treatment and downregulated with t-10,c-12-CLA+LPS treatment (FC > 1.5, padj < 0.05) (Figure 2a). In addition, 16 of the overlapping genes were shared between c-9,t-11-CLA+LPS vs. LPS downregulation and t-10,c-12-CLA+LPS vs. LPS downregulation; these genes were upregulated with LPS stimulation (FC > 1.5, padj < 0.05) (Figure 2a). Fourteen and 36 overlapping genes were significantly upregulated by treatment with c-9,t-11-CLA+LPS and t-10,c-12-CLA+LPS compared with the LPS group and downregulated by LPS treatment compared with the CON group, respectively (FC > 1.5, padj < 0.05) (Figure 2b).

3.3. trans-10,cis-12-CLA Exhibited a Better Effect on Preventing Inflammatory Responses in RECs upon LPS Stimulation than cis-9,trans-11-CLA

According to the hierarchical cluster analysis of the overlapping DEGs that were downregulated in the c-9,t-11-CLA+LPS or t-10,c-12-CLA+LPS group and upregulated in the LPS group, a clear separation of the CON and t-10,c-12-CLA+LPS groups from the LPS and c-9,t-11-CLA+LPS groups was observed (Figure 3a). The qPCR results further confirmed that pretreatment with t-10,c-12-CLA significantly reduced the expression of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β and TNF-α, chemokines CX3CL1 and CCL20, members of the TNF receptor superfamily CD40, intercellular cell adhesion molecule ICAM-1, interferon regulatory factor IRF1 and receptor-interacting serine/threonine kinase 2 (RIPK2) upon LPS stimulation (p < 0.05) and prevented stimulus-induced increases in cell proliferation and migration. Specifically, the gene expression of CDK17, WNT10A and MMP13 was significantly reduced upon LPS stimulation (p < 0.05) (Figure 3b). However, pretreatment with c-9,t-11-CLA only significantly suppressed the expression of IL-1β, CX3CL1 and ICAM-1 upon LPS stimulation (Figure 3b).
The GO and KEGG analysis of the overlapping DEGs further confirmed that pretreatment with t-10,c-12-CLA significantly downregulated the inflammatory-related biological processes of the response to LPS and cytokine, regulation of receptor activity, signal transduction and cytokine production, leukocyte activation and immune system processes, positive regulation of I-κB kinase/NF-κB signaling, molecular functions of cytokine, chemokine and G-protein-coupled receptor binding, chemoattractant activity and cellular components of cell surface and plasma membrane (p < 0.05) (Figure 4), as well as the pathways of TNF, NF-κB, chemokine, NOD-like receptor signaling and cytokine–cytokine receptor interaction, which were significantly upregulated upon LPS stimulation (p < 0.05) (Figure 5). In addition, the stimulus-induced increase in cell proliferation and migration-related biological processes of the regulation of cell proliferation and cell–cell adhesion, the molecular function of fibroblast growth factor-activated receptor activity (Figure 4), and the pathways of Hippo, PI3K-Akt, TGF-β, Rap1 signaling and focal adhesion (Figure 5) were also significantly downregulated by pretreatment with t-10,c-12-CLA compared with the LPS group (p < 0.05). However, the GO terms and KEGG pathways that were significantly downregulated by pretreatment with c-9,t-11-CLA compared with LPS stimulation were less related to inflammatory regulation, and only the TNF signaling pathway was significantly enriched (p < 0.05) (Figure S1).

3.4. cis-9,trans-11-CLA and trans-10,cis-12-CLA Affected TLR4 and PPARγ Signaling in an Isomer-Specific Manner

TLR4 is the most well-known receptor of LPS on epithelial cells. Stimulation of RECs with LPS significantly increased the gene expression level of TLR4, but pretreatment with 100 μM t-10,c-12-CLA significantly reversed this effect (p < 0.05) (Figure 6a). The gene expression of TICAM1, which is a Toll-like receptor adaptor molecule, was also significantly reduced by pretreatment with 100 μM t-10,c-12-CLA upon LPS stimulation (p < 0.05) (Figure 6a). However, pretreatment with 100 μM c-9,t-11-CLA yielded no significant effects on the expression of TLR4 and TICAM1 in RECs, which was consistent with its minor anti-inflammatory effects on RECs. The expression of PPARγ, which is involved in suppressing inflammatory responses, was significantly increased by pretreatment with either c-9,t-11-CLA or t-10,c-12-CLA compared with the LPS group (p < 0.05) (Figure 6b). PPI analysis of the DEGs among the t-10,c-12-CLA+LPS and LPS groups further indicated that TLR4, PPARγ, IL-6, TNF-α, IL-1β, CD40, ICAM-1, NF-κB, IRF1, CCL20 and CX3CL1 were identified as hub genes (degree > 5) and showed close interactions (Figure 6c).

3.5. cis-9,trans-11-CLA and trans-10,cis-12-CLA Affected Adipocytokine Signaling in an Isomer-Specific Manner

The qPCR results indicated that pretreatment with c-9,t-11- and t-10,c-12-CLA both significantly upregulated the expression level of carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1A (CPT1A) in RECs upon LPS stimulation (p < 0.05) (Figure 7a). Although t-10,c-12-CLA significantly downregulated the expression of the genes encoding stearoyl-CoA desaturase (SCD) and fatty acid desaturase 2 (FADS2), c-9,t-11-CLA significantly upregulated the expression of the genes encoding SCD, FADS2 and sterol regulatory element binding transcription factor 1 (SREBF1) compared with the LPS group (p < 0.05) (Figure 7a). KEGG and GO analyses further indicated that the DEGs that were downregulated in the t-10,c-12-CLA+LPS group, compared to the LPS group, were significantly enriched in the pathways of fatty acid metabolism and biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids (Figure 5), whereas the DEGs that were upregulated in the c-9,t-11-CLA+LPS group were significantly enriched in the signals of molecular functions of stearoyl-CoA 9-desaturase and acyl-CoA desaturase activity (Figure 8a), as well as the pathways of fatty acid metabolism and the biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids (Figure 8b). PPI analysis of the DEGs regarding adipocytokine and inflammatory cytokine signals further identified SREBF1, PPARγ, TLR4, IL-6, TNF-α, IL-1β and CCL20 as hub genes (degree > 5), which also showed close interactions (Figure 7b).

4. Discussion

Dietary supplementation of CLA for ruminants has been regarded as a regular nutrition strategy due to the various benefits of CLA in vivo, but most of them are a mixture of both CLA isomers due to commercial availability [16,17,18]. Information about the isomer-specific effects of CLA on the physiology and immunity of rumen are limited. However, a growing number of studies have indicated that each isomer sometimes exerts different physiological and immunoregulatory effects, with species-, tissue- and cell-type-dependent effects reported [10,11,12]. In the study of Dipasquale et al. [31], the trans-10,cis-12-CLA was reported to exert a more balanced and efficient protective effect on bovine mammary epithelial cells against LPS stimulation than cis-9,trans-11-CLA. However, in the study of Jaudszus [15], cis-9,trans-11-CLA showed better anti-inflammatory effects in stimulated human bronchial epithelial cells than trans-10,cis-12-CLA. The 2 isomers of CLA even showed contradictory immunomodulatory effects on bovine peripheral blood mononuclear cells and mammary gland epithelial cells [32,33]. We demonstrated that supplementation with 100 μM trans-10,cis-12-CLA inhibited the production of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α; chemokines CX3CL1 and CCL20; members of the TNF receptor superfamily CD40; interferon regulatory factor IRF1; and intercellular cell adhesion molecule ICAM-1 in RECs, in contrast, cis-9,trans-11-CLA only suppressed the production of IL-1β, CX3CL1 and ICAM-1 upon LPS stimulation. As the major component of the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria, LPS can induce many intracellular inflammatory responses, including the expression and release of proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines, interferon and cell adhesion molecules [34]. Therefore, the 100 μM trans-10,cis-12-CLA exhibited better protective effects on RECs against LPS-induced inflammation compared with the cis-9,trans-11-CLA in the present study, but in vivo studies should be performed to support these findings in the future.
LPS stimulation results in the initiation of many intracellular inflammation-related signaling pathways [35]. In the present study, our results found that trans-10,cis-12-CLA pretreatment suppressed the TNF, NF-κB and chemokine signaling pathways and the cytokine–cytokine receptor interaction in RECs induced by LPS stimulation. Evidence indicates that the physiological connections between proinflammatory cytokines and NF-κB largely contribute to inflammation and the immune response and can regulate each other to a certain extent. For example, TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6 are inducers of cytoplasmic NF-κB activation and lead to its subsequent translocation into the nucleus, where it further stimulates the expression and release of proinflammatory cytokines, thereby aggravating inflammatory responses [36,37]. The ability of NF-κB to regulate the transcription of ICAM-1, thereby enhancing vascular adhesion and the activation of inflammatory cells, as well as inducing chemokine-signaling that can potently attract and recruit more T cells and monocytes to the inflammatory site, has also been proven [38,39]. Therefore, CLA may protect RECs against LPS-induced inflammation by inhibiting the NF-κB-mediated transcriptional induction of proinflammatory cytokines, adhesion molecules and chemokine signaling.
In addition, we observed that pretreatment with trans-10,cis-12-CLA suppressed the LPS-induced increase in REC proliferation and migration, whereas cis-9,trans-11-CLA did not exhibit this effect. The isomer-specific effect was also found in the study of Lee et al. [40], in which trans-10,cis-12-CLA suppressed cell proliferation and induced apoptosis in human colorectal cancer, whereas cis-9,trans-11-CLA showed no such effect. The qPCR and transcriptome results further indicated that the inhibitory effects were based on the mechanisms of downregulating the mRNA expression of CDK17, WNT10A and MMP13, as well as the molecular function of fibroblast growth factor-activated receptor activity; pathways of Hippo, PI3K-Akt, TGF-β, Rap1 signaling and focal adhesion in RECs, which are positively involved in cell proliferation and migration [41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49]. Accumulating evidence suggests that inflammatory mediators, especially cytokines, such as TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6, play important roles in regulating the initiation and progression of cell proliferation, survival, migration and apoptosis via their effects on epithelial signaling pathways, such as signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and NF-κB [25,50]. For example, the activation of NF-κB can promote epithelial cell survival and proliferation by stimulating the transcription of proliferation-regulating genes, such as cyclin D1 and c-Myc [51], as well as genes involved in cell migration and invasion, such as MMP2 and MMP9 [52]. Therefore, trans-10,cis-12-CLA might mediate transcriptome reprogramming of RECs to prevent stimulus-induced cell proliferation and migration.
In innate immunity, the specific host pathogen recognition receptors (PRRs) that consist of an array of sensors in the plasma, plasma membranes and host cytosol are often responsible for recognizing conserved pathogen-associated molecular patterns, including LPS [53]. Toll receptors (TLRs) and NOD-like receptors (NLRs) are two types of PRRs that localize at the cell surface or within endosomes and the intracellular cytosol, respectively [54]. TLR4 is the major recognition receptor of LPS, and the significant role of TLR4-mediated intracellular signaling as an inducer of various transcription factors, including NF-κB, AP1, STAT1 and IRFs, which are involved in the initiation and regulation of inflammatory responses, has been extensively verified [55]. Emerging evidence has found that NLR-mediated signaling is another significant factor involved in inflammatory responses upon LPS stimulation [56]. For example, the NLR Nod2 plays an essential role in the activation of NF-κB and MAPK signaling pathways and robust production of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines in neutrophils in response to bacterial infection [57]. LPS stimulation can also induce the activation of the NLR-family pyrin domain-containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome, leading to pro-IL-1β expression and IL-1β maturation [58]. Simultaneously, the cooperation of Nod1 and Nod2 with TLRs shapes the host response to bacterial stimuli [59]. In the present study, the TLR4 expression, induction of NLRs and NF-κB signaling pathways and the expression of RIPK2, which is recruited by the Nod1 and Nod2 receptors and contributes to NF-κB-mediated inflammatory signaling [60], were significantly upregulated in RECs after LPS stimulation and were significantly downregulated by pretreatment with trans-10,cis-12-CLA upon LPS stimulation. Simultaneously, TLR4 exhibited a close correlation with NF-κB as well as proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines, interferon and cell adhesion molecules, according to PPI analysis, indicating that the protective effects of CLA on RECs against inflammation induced by LPS stimulation likely occur through the NLR or TLR4-NF-κB-mediated signaling pathway.
The PPARγ-dependent pathway is one of the most well-known immune regulation mechanisms of CLA due to the high similarity of CLA with PPAR ligands [20]. The important role of PPARγ in the control of the inflammatory response is largely dependent on its ability to suppress the activities of many transcription factors, such as NF-κB, STAT and AP1 that are involved in the immune process [61]. In the present study, RECs pretreated with either trans-10,cis-12-CLA or cis-9,trans-11-CLA expressed more PPARγ following stimulation with LPS, which is consistent with previous findings [31,62]. Jaudszus [15] also found that, when treated stimulated bronchial epithelial cells with CLA, IL-8 production was significantly decreased and mediated by the activation of PPARγ given that the effect was restored when blocking the activity of PPARγ with its selective antagonist was used. Our study revealed that PPARγ expression exhibited a close correlation with the expression of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, CCL20 and TLR4. Many studies have suggested that the activation of PPARγ can attenuate LPS-induced TLR4 expression and decrease the expression of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines [63,64,65]. Therefore, CLA also exhibited potent anti-inflammatory effects on RECs though PPARγ-dependent downregulation of inflammatory responses.
In addition to the direct regulatory effects of CLA on inflammatory processes, we also observed the significant role of CLA in lipid metabolism. Accumulating evidence suggests that lipid metabolism and inflammatory responses are coordinately regulated at multiple levels within the body [66]; for example, the promotion of fatty acid oxidation (FAO) positively correlated with the relief of inflammation via AMPK or PPARδ-dependent signaling [24], and endothelial loss of FAO stimulated the dysfunction of endothelial cells with barrier disruption and leukocyte infiltration by increasing endothelial oxidative stress [67]. In the present study, pretreatment with trans-10,cis-12-CLA or cis-9,trans-11-CLA significantly promoted the gene expression of CPT1A, which is a rate-limiting enzyme of the FAO process [68], which was consistent with a previous study that demonstrated the positive role of CLA in FAO [23]. The interplay among the expression of CPT1A, PPARγ and inflammatory cytokines according to the PPI analysis in our study indicated the anti-inflammatory effects of CLA, which probably occur through a PPAR-dependent FAO shift mechanism. Zhao et al. [69] also found that the activated PPARγ signaling pathway could drive the FAO process in dendritic cells by upregulating CPT1A expression, and the FAO shift suppressed IL-6 and IL-12 expression. Simultaneously, our study found that pretreatment with trans-10,cis-12-CLA reduced the expression of genes involved in lipogenesis, including SCD and FADS2, whereas cis-9,trans-11-CLA exerted the opposite effects. Although CLA is known to be involved in milk fat depression in ruminants [70], the potential effect of CLA isomers on increasing the synthesis of unsaturated fatty acids in milk and the expression of SCD in mammary glands that are involved in unsaturated fatty acid synthesis was also observed in the study of Shi et al. [71]. Harvatine et al. [72] also found that the CLA-induced milk fat depression of dairy cows was characterized by an energy-partitioning feather with the increased expression of lipogenic factors SREBF1, PPARγ and SCD in adipose tissue. Therefore, the potential effect of CLA on lipid metabolism might be both tissue- and isomer-specific. Given the significant role of fatty acid profiles in inflammatory processes, further studies should be performed to explore how different CLA isomers connect adipocytokine and inflammation signals.

5. Conclusions

Our in vitro results demonstrated that trans-10,cis-12-CLA and cis-9,trans-11-CLA affected inflammatory responses and adipocytokine signaling in RECs in a distinct isomer-specific manner. The 100 μM trans-10,cis-12-CLA showed better anti-inflammatory effects than cis-9,trans-11-CLA and may protect RECs against LPS-induced inflammation by activating PPARγ, inhibiting NLRs or TLR4-NF-κB signaling and upregulating the expression of genes involved in the FAO process (Figure 9). As a frequently used feed additive for ruminants, most of the reported benefits of CLA are derived from the mixture of CLA isomers. The present study indicated that each isomer of CLA exerts different biological functions on ruminal epithelium; these results not only provide additional insight to better determine the mechanisms regarding the protective innate immunity of different CLA isomers in the ruminal epithelium and the potential interaction of rumen microbes with innate immune cells in the ruminal epithelium, but also offer important references for determining the practical target use of these dietary fatty acids in animal nutrition to prevent inflammation-related diseases within the rumen. However, in vivo studies are required to confirm these findings.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ani11041169/s1, Figure S1: Effect of cis-9,trans-11-CLA pretreatment on the GO terms (A) and KEGG pathways (B) in RECs upon LPS stimulation, Table S1: Primers used in mRNA abundance analysis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.Y. and Z.F.; methodology, C.Y., B.Z. and S.Y.; data curation, C.Y., B.Z. and S.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, C.Y.; writing—review and editing, C.Y., Z.F. and J.L.; supervision, Z.F.; project administration, C.Y. and J.L.; funding acquisition, C.Y. and J.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (grant number LY21C170001) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 31702133).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The sequences obtained in study were deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under accession number PRJNA679354.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the funding from the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province and the National Natural Science Foundation of China.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aschenbach, J.R.; Zebeli, Q.; Patra, A.K.; Greco, G.; Amasheh, S.; Penner, G.B. Symposium review: The importance of the ruminal epithelial barrier for a healthy and productive cow. J. Dairy Sci. 2019, 102, 1866–1882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Monteiro, H.F.; Faciola, A.P. Ruminal acidosis, bacterial changes, and lipopolysaccharides. J. Anim. Sci. 2020, 98, skaa248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jiao, J.; Zhou, C.; Guan, L.L.; McSweeney, C.S.; Tang, S.; Wang, M.; Tan, Z. Shifts in host mucosal innate immune function are associated with ruminal microbial succession in supplemental feeding and grazing goats at different ages. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhan, K.; Gong, X.; Chen, Y.; Jiang, M.; Yang, T.; Zhao, G. Short-chain fatty acids regulate the immune responses via G protein-coupled receptor 41 in bovine rumen epithelial cells. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Malmuthuge, N.; Liang, G.; Guan, L.L. Regulation of rumen development in neonatal ruminants through microbial metagenomes and host transcriptomes. Genome. Biol. 2019, 20, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Ferlay, A.; Bernard, L.; Meynadier, A. Malpuech- Brugère. Production of trans and conjugated fatty acids in dairy ruminants and their putative effects on human health: A review. Biochimie 2017, 141, 107–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Bruen, R.; Fitzsimons, S.; Belton, O. Atheroprotective effects of conjugated linoleic acid. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2017, 83, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Viladomiu, M.; Hontecillas, R.; Bassaganya-Riera, J. Modulation of inflammation and immunity by dietary conjugated linoleic acid. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2016, 785, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Garibay-Nieto, N.; Queipo-García, G.; Alvarez, F.; Bustos, M.; Villanueva, E.; Ramírez, F.; León, M.; Laresgoiti-Servitje, E.; Duggirala, R.; Macías, T.; et al. Effects of conjugated linoleic acid and metformin on insulin sensitivity in obese children: Randomized clinical trial. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2017, 102, 132–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, H.; Liu, T.; Wang, J.; Qi, Y.; Ge, D.; Guan, S. Isomer-specific effects of conjugated linoleic acid on proliferative activity of cultured neural progenitor cells. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2011, 358, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ahn, I.S.; Choi, B.H.; Ha, J.H.; Byun, J.M.; Shin, H.G.; Park, K.Y.; Do, M.S. Isomer-specific effect of conjugated linoleic acid on inflammatory adipokines associated with fat accumulation in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. J. Med. Food 2006, 9, 307–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Nicod, N.; Parker, R.S.; Giordano, E.; Maestro, V.; Davalos, A.; Visioli, F. Isomer-specific effects of conjugated linoleic acid on HDL functionality associated with reverse cholesterol transport. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2015, 26, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Della Casa, L.; Rossi, E.; Romanelli, C.; Gibellini, L.; Iannone, A. Effect of diets supplemented with different conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) isomers on protein expression in C57/BL6 mice. Genes. Nutr. 2016, 11, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Su, H.; Zhao, W.; Zhang, F.; Song, M.; Liu, F.; Zheng, J.; Ling, M.; Yang, X.; Yang, Q.; He, H.; et al. cis 9, trans 11, but not trans 10, cis 12 CLA isomer, impairs intestinal epithelial barrier function in IPEC-J2 cells and mice through activation of GPR120-[Ca2+] and the MLCK signaling pathway. Food Funct. 2020, 11, 3657–3667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Jaudszus, A.; Foerster, M.; Kroegel, C.; Wolf, I.; Jahreis, G. Cis-9,trans-11-CLA exerts anti-inflammatory effects in human bronchial epithelial cells and eosinophils: Comparison to trans-10,cis-12-CLA and to linoleic acid. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2005, 1737, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sordillo, L.M. Nutritional strategies to optimize dairy cattle immunity. J. Dairy Sci. 2016, 99, 4967–4982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shokryzadan, P.; Rajion, M.A.; Meng, G.Y.; Boo, L.J.; Ebrahimi, M.; Royan, M.; Sahebi, M.; Azizi, P.; Abiri, R.; Jahromi, M.F. Conjugated linoleic acid: A potent fatty acid linked to animal and human health. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 2737–2748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zongo, K.; Krishnamoorthy, S.; Moses, J.A.; Yazici, F.; Çon, A.H.; Anandharamakrishnan, C. Total conjugated linoleic acid content of ruminant milk: The world status insights. Food Chem. 2021, 334, 127555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Peterson, D.G.; Kelsey, J.A.; Bauman, D.E. Analysis of variation in cis-9, trans-11 conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) in milk fat of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2002, 85, 2164–2172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Yuan, G.; Chen, X.; Li, D. Modulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR γ) by conjugated fatty acid in obesity and inflammatory bowel disease. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 1883–1895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mirza, A.Z.; Althagafi, I.I.; Shamshad, H. Role of PPAR receptor in different diseases and their ligands: Physiological importance and clinical implications. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 166, 502–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Sharma, I.; Singh, D. Conjugated linoleic acids attenuate FSH- and IGF1-stimulated cell proliferation; IGF1, GATA4, and aromatase expression; and estradiol-17β production in buffalo granulosa cells involving PPARγ, PTEN, and PI3K/Akt. Reproduction 2012, 144, 373–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Lehnen, T.E.; da Silva, M.R.; Camacho, A.; Marcadenti, A.; Lehnen, A.M. A review on effects of conjugated linoleic fatty acid (CLA) upon body composition and energetic metabolism. J. Int. Soc. Sports Nutr. 2015, 12, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Jung, T.W.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, H.C.; Bang, J.S.; Abd El-Aty, A.M.; Hacımüftüoğlu, A.; Shin, Y.K.; Jeong, J.H. METRNL attenuates lipid-induced inflammation and insulin resistance via AMPK or PPARδ-dependent pathways in skeletal muscle of mice. Exp. Mol. Med. 2018, 50, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Silva, J.R.; Burger, B.; Kühl, C.M.C.; Candreva, T.; Dos Anjos, M.B.P.; Rodrigues, H.G. Wound healing and Omega-6 fatty acids: From inflammation to repair. Mediat. Inflamm. 2018, 2018, 2503950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. den Hartigh, L.J. Conjugated linoleic acid effects on cancer, obesity, and atherosclerosis: A review of pre-clinical and human trials with current perspectives. Nutrients 2019, 11, 370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Shen, W.; McIntosh, M.K. Nutrient regulation: Conjugated linoleic acid’s inflammatory and browning properties in adipose tissue. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2016, 36, 183–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rai, M.F.; Tycksen, E.D.; Sandell, L.J.; Brophy, R.H. Advantages of RNA-seq compared to RNA microarrays for transcriptome profiling of anterior cruciate ligament tears. J. Orthop. Res. 2018, 36, 484–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yang, C.; Lan, W.; Ye, S.; Zhu, B.; Fu, Z.J.F.i.P. Transcriptomic analyses reveal the protective immune regulation of conjugated linoleic acids in sheep ruminal epithelial cells. Front. Physiol. 2020, 11, 588082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zeng, C.; Motta-Ribeiro, G.C.; Hinoshita, T.; Lessa, M.A.; Winkler, T.; Grogg, K.; Kingston, N.M.; Hutchinson, J.N.; Sholl, L.M.; Fang, X.; et al. Lung atelectasis promotes immune and barrier dysfunction as revealed by transcriptome sequencing in female sheep. Anesthesiology 2020, 133, 1060–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Dipasquale, D.; Basiricò, L.; Morera, P.; Primi, R.; Tröscher, A.; Bernabucci, U. Anti-inflammatory effects of conjugated linoleic acid isomers and essential fatty acids in bovine mammary epithelial cells. Animal 2018, 12, 2108–2114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Renner, L.; Kersten, S.; Duevel, A.; Schuberth, H.J.; Dänicke, S. Effects of cis-9,trans-11 and trans-10,cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid, linoleic acid, phytanic acid and the combination of various fatty acids on proliferation and cytokine expression of bovine peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Nutrients 2013, 5, 2667–2683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Basiricò, L.; Morera, P.; Dipasquale, D.; Tröscher, A.; Serra, A.; Mele, M.; Bernabucci, U. Conjugated linoleic acid isomers strongly improve the redox status of bovine mammary epithelial cells (BME-UV1). J. Dairy Sci. 2015, 98, 7071–7082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Jung, J.Y.; Woo, S.M.; Kim, W.J.; Lee, B.N.; Nör, J.E.; Min, K.S.; Choi, C.H.; Koh, J.T.; Lee, K.J.; Hwang, Y.C. Simvastatin inhibits the expression of inflammatory cytokines and cell adhesion molecules induced by LPS in human dental pulp cells. Int. Endod. J. 2017, 50, 377–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Yang, J.; Zhao, Y.; Shao, F. Non-canonical activation of inflammatory caspases by cytosolic LPS in innate immunity. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2015, 32, 78–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Verhelst, K.; Carpentier, I.; Beyaert, R. Regulation of TNF-induced NF-κB activation by different cytoplasmic ubiquitination events. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2011, 22, 277–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Siddiqui, I.; Erreni, M.; Kamal, M.A.; Porta, C.; Marchesi, F.; Pesce, S.; Pasqualini, F.; Schiarea, S.; Chiabrando, C.; Mantovani, A.; et al. Differential role of Interleukin-1 and Interleukin-6 in K-Ras-driven pancreatic carcinoma undergoing mesenchymal transition. Oncoimmunology 2017, 7, e1388485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Numata, T.; Ito, T.; Maeda, T.; Egusa, C.; Tsuboi, R. IL-33 promotes ICAM-1 expression via NF-kB in murine mast cells. Allergol. Int. 2016, 65, 158–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Bhaskar, S.; Sudhakaran, P.R.; Helen, A. Quercetin attenuates atherosclerotic inflammation and adhesion molecule expression by modulating TLR-NF-κB signaling pathway. Cell. Immunol. 2016, 310, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lee, S.H.; Yamaguchi, K.; Kim, J.S.; Eling, T.E.; Safe, S.; Park, Y.; Baek, S.J. Conjugated linoleic acid stimulates an anti-tumorigenic protein NAG-1 in an isomer specific manner. Carcinogenesis 2006, 27, 972–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Hydbring, P.; Malumbres, M.; Sicinski, P. Non-canonical functions of cell cycle cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Bio. 2016, 17, 280–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Zhang, Z.; Guo, Q.; Tian, H.; Lv, P.; Zhou, C.; Gao, X. Effects of WNT10A on proliferation and differentiation of human dental pulp cells. J. Endod. 2014, 40, 1593–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Liu, S.; Huang, M.; Chen, Z.; Chen, J.; Chao, Q.; Yin, X.; Quan, M. FTO promotes cell proliferation and migration in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma through up-regulation of MMP13. Exp. Cell Res. 2020, 389, 111894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Sung, J.Y.; Shin, S.W.; Ahn, Y.S.; Chung, K.C. Basic fibroblast growth factor-induced activation of novel CREB kinase during the differentiation of immortalized hippocampal cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 13858–13866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Song, Y.; Fu, J.; Zhou, M.; Xiao, L.; Feng, X.; Chen, H.; Huang, W. Activated Hippo/Yes-associated protein pathway promotes cell proliferation and anti-apoptosis in endometrial stromal cells of endometriosis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016, 101, 1552–1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wei, L.; Yi, Z.; Guo, K.; Long, X. Long noncoding RNA BCAR4 promotes glioma cell proliferation via EGFR/PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. J. Cell. Physiol. 2019, 234, 23608–23617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, Y.; Alexander, P.B.; Wang, X.F. TGF-β family signaling in the control of cell proliferation and survival. Cold. Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2017, 9, a022145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Banerjee, R.; Henson, B.S.; Russo, N.; Tsodikov, A.; D’Silva, N.J. Rap1 mediates galanin receptor 2-induced proliferation and survival in squamous cell carcinoma. Cell. Signal. 2011, 23, 1110–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Bo, H.; He, J.; Wang, X.; Du, R.; Bei, H.; Chen, J.; Wang, J.; Wu, F.; Zhang, W.; Chen, Q. Danggui Buxue Tang promotes the adhesion and migration of bone marrow stromal cells via the focal adhesion pathway in vitro. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2019, 231, 90–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Landén, N.X.; Li, D.; Ståhle, M. Transition from inflammation to proliferation: A critical step during wound healing. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2016, 73, 3861–3885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Han, S.W.; Roman, J. Fibronectin induces cell proliferation and inhibits apoptosis in human bronchial epithelial cells: Pro-oncogenic effects mediated by PI3-kinase and NF-kappa B. Oncogene 2006, 25, 4341–4349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Zhang, J.F.; Wang, P.; Yan, Y.J.; Li, Y.; Guan, M.W.; Yu, J.J.; Wang, X.D. IL-33 enhances glioma cell migration and invasion by upregulation of MMP2 and MMP9 via the ST2-NF-κB pathway. Oncol. Rep. 2017, 38, 2033–2042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Kumar, H.; Kawai, T.; Akira, S. Pathogen recognition by the innate immune system. Int. Rev. Immunol. 2011, 30, 16–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Franchi, L.; Warner, N.; Viani, K.; Nuñez, G. Function of Nod-like receptors in microbial recognition and host defense. Immunol. Rev. 2009, 227, 106–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Kawai, T.; Akira, S. Toll-like receptors and their crosstalk with other innate receptors in infection and immunity. Immunity 2011, 34, 637–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Biswas, G.; Bilen, S.; Kono, T.; Sakai, M.; Hikima, J. Inflammatory immune response by lipopolysaccharide-responsive nucleotide binding oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptors in the Japanese pufferfish (Takifugu rubripes). Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2016, 55, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Jeong, Y.; Kang, M.; Lee, S.; Kim, C.; Kim, J.; Kim, T.; Kim, D.; Kim, D.; Núñez, G.; Park, J. Nod2 and Rip2 contribute to innate immune responses in mouse neutrophils. Immunology 2014, 143, 269–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Yu, X.; Lan, P.; Hou, X.; Han, Q.; Lu, N.; Li, T.; Jiao, C.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, C.; Tian, Z. HBV inhibits LPS-induced NLRP3 inflammasome activation and IL-1β production via suppressing the NF-κB pathway and ROS production. J. Hepatol. 2017, 66, 693–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Selvanantham, T.; Escalante, N.K.; Cruz Tleugabulova, M.; Fiévé, S.; Girardin, S.E.; Philpott, D.J.; Mallevaey, T. Nod1 and Nod2 enhance TLR-mediated invariant NKT cell activation during bacterial infection. J. Immunol. 2013, 191, 5646–5654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Hrdinka, M.; Schlicher, L.; Dai, B.; Pinkas, D.M.; Bufton, J.C.; Picaud, S.; Ward, J.A.; Rogers, C.; Suebsuwong, C.; Nikhar, S.; et al. Small molecule inhibitors reveal an indispensable scaffolding role of RIPK2 in NOD2 signaling. EMBO J. 2018, 37, e99372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Daynes, R.A.; Jones, D.C. Emerging roles of PPARs in inflammation and immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2002, 2, 748–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Reynolds, C.M.; Draper, E.; Keogh, B.; Rahman, A.; Moloney, A.P.; Mills, K.H.G.; Loscher, C.E.; Roche, H.M. A conjugated linoleic acid-enriched beef diet attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation in mice in part through PPARγ-mediated suppression of Toll-like receptor 4. J. Nutr. 2009, 139, 2351–2357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Dasu, M.R.; Park, S.; Devaraj, S.; Jialal, I. Pioglitazone inhibits Toll-like receptor expression and activity in human monocytes and db/db mice. Endocrinology 2009, 150, 3457–3464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Eun, C.S.; Han, D.S.; Lee, S.H.; Paik, C.H.; Chung, Y.W.; Lee, J.; Hahm, J.S. Attenuation of colonic inflammation by PPARgamma in intestinal epithelial cells: Effect on Toll-like receptor pathway. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2006, 51, 693–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Qu, R.N.; Qu, W. Metformin inhibits LPS-induced inflammatory response in VSMCs by regulating TLR4 and PPAR-γ. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2019, 23, 4988–4995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Di Cara, F.; Sheshachalam, A.; Braverman, N.E.; Rachubinski, R.A.; Simmonds, A.J. Peroxisome-mediated metabolism is required for immune response to microbial infection. Immunity 2017, 47, 93–106.e107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Kalucka, J.; Bierhansl, L.; Conchinha, N.V.; Missiaen, R.; Elia, I.; Brüning, U.; Scheinok, S.; Treps, L.; Cantelmo, A.R.; Dubois, C.; et al. Quiescent endothelial cells upregulate fatty acid β-oxidation for vasculoprotection via redox homeostasis. Cell Metab. 2018, 28, 881–894.e813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Raud, B.; Roy, D.G.; Divakaruni, A.S.; Tarasenko, T.N.; Franke, R.; Ma, E.H.; Samborska, B.; Hsieh, W.Y.; Wong, A.H.; Stüve, P.; et al. Etomoxir actions on regulatory and memory T cells are independent of Cpt1a-mediated fatty acid oxidation. Cell Metab. 2018, 28, 504–515.e507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Zhao, F.; Xiao, C.; Evans, K.S.; Theivanthiran, T.; DeVito, N.; Holtzhausen, A.; Liu, J.; Liu, X.; Boczkowski, D.; Nair, S.; et al. Paracrine Wnt5a-β-Catenin signaling triggers a metabolic program that drives dendritic cell tolerization. Immunity 2018, 48, 147–160.e147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Urrutia, N.; Ying, Y.; Harvatine, K.J. The effect of conjugated linoleic acid, acetate, and their interaction on adipose tissue lipid metabolism in nonlactating cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2017, 100, 5058–5067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Shi, H.; Zhang, T.; Li, C.; Wang, J.; Huang, J.; Li, Z. trans-10,cis-12-Conjugated linoleic acid affects expression of lipogenic genes in mammary glands of lactating dairy goats. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 9460–9467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Harvatine, K.J.; Perfield, J.W.; Bauman, D.E. Expression of enzymes and key regulators of lipid synthesis is upregulated in adipose tissue during CLA-induced milk fat depression in dairy cows. J. Nutr. 2009, 139, 849–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Animals 11 01169 g001 550
Figure 1. Gene expression of proinflammatory cytokines in ruminal epithelial cells (RECs) upon lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation with pretreatment with 50 or 100 μM of different conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) isomers. The cells were treated without (CON) or with 0.1 μg/mL LPS for 3 h after pretreatment with 50 or 100 μM cis-9,trans-11-CLA (c-9,t-11-CLA+LPS) or trans-10,cis-12-CLA (t-10,c-12-CLA+LPS) for 24 h or not (LPS). a–d Bars that share different superscript letters are significantly different from each other (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Gene expression of proinflammatory cytokines in ruminal epithelial cells (RECs) upon lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation with pretreatment with 50 or 100 μM of different conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) isomers. The cells were treated without (CON) or with 0.1 μg/mL LPS for 3 h after pretreatment with 50 or 100 μM cis-9,trans-11-CLA (c-9,t-11-CLA+LPS) or trans-10,cis-12-CLA (t-10,c-12-CLA+LPS) for 24 h or not (LPS). a–d Bars that share different superscript letters are significantly different from each other (p < 0.05).
Animals 11 01169 g001
Animals 11 01169 g002 550
Figure 2. Venn diagrams of the known differentially expressed genes (DEGs) according to the comparisons of different treatments. (a) The DEGs that were downregulated by the pretreatment of either cis-9,trans-11-conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) or trans-10,cis-12-CLA and upregulated during LPS stimulation. (b) The DEGs that were upregulated by the pretreatment of either cis-9,trans-11-CLA or trans-10,cis-12-CLA and downregulated during lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation. The cutoff values of the differential expression criteria were fold change (FC) > 1.5 and padj < 0.05.
Figure 2. Venn diagrams of the known differentially expressed genes (DEGs) according to the comparisons of different treatments. (a) The DEGs that were downregulated by the pretreatment of either cis-9,trans-11-conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) or trans-10,cis-12-CLA and upregulated during LPS stimulation. (b) The DEGs that were upregulated by the pretreatment of either cis-9,trans-11-CLA or trans-10,cis-12-CLA and downregulated during lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation. The cutoff values of the differential expression criteria were fold change (FC) > 1.5 and padj < 0.05.
Animals 11 01169 g002
Animals 11 01169 g003 550
Figure 3. Effect of pretreatment with different conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) isomers on preventing inflammatory responses in lipopolysaccharide (LPS) −stimulated ruminal epithelial cells (RECs). (a) Hierarchical clustering analysis of the overlapping differentially expressed genes (DEGs) that were downregulated by CLA isomer pretreatment and upregulated during LPS stimulation. The color code represents genes expressed at low (blue) and high (red) levels. (b) Gene expression levels of inflammation−related factors among the different groups. a−d Bars that share different superscript letters are significantly different from each other (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Effect of pretreatment with different conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) isomers on preventing inflammatory responses in lipopolysaccharide (LPS) −stimulated ruminal epithelial cells (RECs). (a) Hierarchical clustering analysis of the overlapping differentially expressed genes (DEGs) that were downregulated by CLA isomer pretreatment and upregulated during LPS stimulation. The color code represents genes expressed at low (blue) and high (red) levels. (b) Gene expression levels of inflammation−related factors among the different groups. a−d Bars that share different superscript letters are significantly different from each other (p < 0.05).
Animals 11 01169 g003
Animals 11 01169 g004 550
Figure 4. Effect of trans-10,cis-12-conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) pretreatment on the gene ontology (GO) terms in ruminal epithelial cells (RECs) upon lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) used for functional annotation were significantly downregulated in the t-10,c-12-CLA+LPS group and upregulated in the LPS group.
Figure 4. Effect of trans-10,cis-12-conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) pretreatment on the gene ontology (GO) terms in ruminal epithelial cells (RECs) upon lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) used for functional annotation were significantly downregulated in the t-10,c-12-CLA+LPS group and upregulated in the LPS group.
Animals 11 01169 g004
Animals 11 01169 g005 550
Figure 5. Effect of trans-10,cis-12-conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) pretreatment on the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways in ruminal epithelial cells (RECs) upon lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) used for functional annotation were significantly downregulated in the t-10,c-12-CLA+LPS group and upregulated in the LPS group. The circle size indicates the number of enriched genes, and the circle color indicates the padj value.
Figure 5. Effect of trans-10,cis-12-conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) pretreatment on the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways in ruminal epithelial cells (RECs) upon lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) used for functional annotation were significantly downregulated in the t-10,c-12-CLA+LPS group and upregulated in the LPS group. The circle size indicates the number of enriched genes, and the circle color indicates the padj value.
Animals 11 01169 g005
Animals 11 01169 g006 550
Figure 6. Protective effects of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) isomers on ruminal epithelial cells (RECs) upon lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation with regard to TLR4- and PPARγ-related signaling. The gene expression levels of TLR4 and TICAM1 (a) and PPARγ (b) among the different groups. a–d Bars that share different superscript letters are significantly different from each other (p < 0.05). (c) Protein–protein interaction (PPI) network of TLR4 and PPARγ with differentially expressed genes (DEGs) that are related to inflammatory responses. The node size and color represent the number of degrees and the clustering coefficient (blue indicates low values, red indicates high values), respectively, and the edge represents the interaction (the thicker edge indicates the lower betweenness).
Figure 6. Protective effects of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) isomers on ruminal epithelial cells (RECs) upon lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation with regard to TLR4- and PPARγ-related signaling. The gene expression levels of TLR4 and TICAM1 (a) and PPARγ (b) among the different groups. a–d Bars that share different superscript letters are significantly different from each other (p < 0.05). (c) Protein–protein interaction (PPI) network of TLR4 and PPARγ with differentially expressed genes (DEGs) that are related to inflammatory responses. The node size and color represent the number of degrees and the clustering coefficient (blue indicates low values, red indicates high values), respectively, and the edge represents the interaction (the thicker edge indicates the lower betweenness).
Animals 11 01169 g006
Animals 11 01169 g007 550
Figure 7. Effects of pretreatment with different conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) isomers on the expression of genes related to lipid metabolism in ruminal epithelial cells (RECs). (a) Gene expression levels of SCD, FADS2, SREBF1 and CPT1A among different groups. a–d Bars that share different superscript letters are significantly different from each other (p < 0.05). (b) Protein–protein interaction (PPI) network of the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) involved in lipid metabolism and inflammatory responses. The node size and color represent the number of degrees and the clustering coefficient (blue indicates low values, red indicates high values), respectively, and the edge represents the interaction (the thicker edge indicates the lower betweenness).
Figure 7. Effects of pretreatment with different conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) isomers on the expression of genes related to lipid metabolism in ruminal epithelial cells (RECs). (a) Gene expression levels of SCD, FADS2, SREBF1 and CPT1A among different groups. a–d Bars that share different superscript letters are significantly different from each other (p < 0.05). (b) Protein–protein interaction (PPI) network of the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) involved in lipid metabolism and inflammatory responses. The node size and color represent the number of degrees and the clustering coefficient (blue indicates low values, red indicates high values), respectively, and the edge represents the interaction (the thicker edge indicates the lower betweenness).
Animals 11 01169 g007
Animals 11 01169 g008 550
Figure 8. The gene ontology (GO) terms (a) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways (b) for the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) that were significantly upregulated in the c-9,t-11-conjugated linoleic acid (CLA)+lipopolysaccharide (LPS) group compared with the LPS group. The circle size indicates the number of enriched genes, and the circle color indicates the padj value.
Figure 8. The gene ontology (GO) terms (a) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways (b) for the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) that were significantly upregulated in the c-9,t-11-conjugated linoleic acid (CLA)+lipopolysaccharide (LPS) group compared with the LPS group. The circle size indicates the number of enriched genes, and the circle color indicates the padj value.
Animals 11 01169 g008
Animals 11 01169 g009 550
Figure 9. Proposed mechanisms involved in the protective effects of trans-10,cis-12-conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) on alleviating the inflammatory response in ruminal epithelial cells (RECs) upon lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation. The anti-inflammatory effects of trans-10,cis-12-CLA on LPS-induced inflammation in RECs may be mediated by the activation of PPARγ, the inhibition of the Nod-like receptor or TLR4-NF-κB-mediated inflammatory responses. Simultaneously, trans-10,cis-12-CLA enhanced the expression of genes involved in fatty acid oxidation in RECs, which may also be related to the anti-inflammatory effects.
Figure 9. Proposed mechanisms involved in the protective effects of trans-10,cis-12-conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) on alleviating the inflammatory response in ruminal epithelial cells (RECs) upon lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation. The anti-inflammatory effects of trans-10,cis-12-CLA on LPS-induced inflammation in RECs may be mediated by the activation of PPARγ, the inhibition of the Nod-like receptor or TLR4-NF-κB-mediated inflammatory responses. Simultaneously, trans-10,cis-12-CLA enhanced the expression of genes involved in fatty acid oxidation in RECs, which may also be related to the anti-inflammatory effects.
Animals 11 01169 g009
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, C.; Zhu, B.; Ye, S.; Fu, Z.; Li, J. Isomer-Specific Effects of cis-9,trans-11- and trans-10,cis-12-CLA on Immune Regulation in Ruminal Epithelial Cells. Animals 2021, 11, 1169. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11041169

AMA Style

Yang C, Zhu B, Ye S, Fu Z, Li J. Isomer-Specific Effects of cis-9,trans-11- and trans-10,cis-12-CLA on Immune Regulation in Ruminal Epithelial Cells. Animals. 2021; 11(4):1169. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11041169

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Chunlei, Binna Zhu, Shijie Ye, Zhengwei Fu, and Jinjun Li. 2021. "Isomer-Specific Effects of cis-9,trans-11- and trans-10,cis-12-CLA on Immune Regulation in Ruminal Epithelial Cells" Animals 11, no. 4: 1169. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11041169

APA Style

Yang, C., Zhu, B., Ye, S., Fu, Z., & Li, J. (2021). Isomer-Specific Effects of cis-9,trans-11- and trans-10,cis-12-CLA on Immune Regulation in Ruminal Epithelial Cells. Animals, 11(4), 1169. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11041169

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop