Critical Factors for Predicting Users’ Acceptance of Digital Museums for Experience-Influenced Environments
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Digital Museum
2.2. User Experience
3. Research Model and Hypotheses
3.1. Reflection Stage: Satisfaction (SAT) and Continuance Intention (CI)
3.2. Interaction Stage: Perceived Usefulness (PU), Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU), Perceived Playfulness (PP)
3.3. Expectation Stage: Confirmation (CON) and Media Richness (MR)
3.4. Proposed Theoretical Model
4. Data and Methodology
4.1. Stimulus Websites
4.2. Sample and Data Collection
4.3. Analysis of Reliability and Convergent Validity
4.4. Model and Hypotheses Testing
5. Results and Discussion
6. Conclusions and Suggestions
6.1. Academic Value
6.2. Practical Value
6.3. Limitations and Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Construct | Indicator | Description | References |
---|---|---|---|
Confirmation (CON) | CON1 | My experience with using the digital museum (DM) was better than what I expected. | Bhattacherjee [5] |
CON2 | The service level or system quality provided by the DM was better than what I expected. | ||
CON3 | Overall, most of my expectations from using the DM were confirmed. | ||
Media richness (MR) | MR1 | The DM can provide me instant feedback upon my requests. | Hung and Chen [48] |
MR2 | The DM presents information about objects in different formats (e.g., text, picture, video, audio, animation, and 3D virtual environment). | ||
MR3 | The DM provides accurate information in pictures, texts, and numbers. | ||
Perceived playfulness (PP) | PP1 | When interacting with the DM, I do not realize the time elapsed. | Moon and Kim [40] |
PP2 | When interacting with the DM, I am not aware of any noise. | ||
PP3 | When interacting with the DM, I often forget the work I must do. | ||
Perceived ease of use (PEOU) | PEOU1 | My interaction with the DM is clear and understandable. | Venkatesh [49] |
PEOU2 | Interacting with the DM does not require a lot of my mental effort. | ||
PEOU3 | I find it easy to get the DM to do what I want it to do. | ||
Perceived usefulness (PU) | PU1 | Using the DM improves my academic or research performance. | Davis [38] |
PU2 | Using the DM improves the efficiency of my access to resources. | ||
PU3 | Using the DM can get what I want knowledge or information. | ||
Satisfaction (SAT) | SAT1 | I am satisfied with the performance of the DM. | Hsu and Chiu [50] |
SAT2 | I am pleased with the experience of using the DM. | ||
SAT3 | My decision to use the DM was a wise one. | ||
Continuance Intention (CI) | CI1 | I intend to continue using DMs rather than discontinue their use. | Bhattacherjee [5] Roca et al. [51] |
CI2 | My intentions are to continue using DMs rather than use any alternative means. | ||
CI3 | I will frequently use DMs to acquire knowledge in the future | ||
CI4 | I intend to increase my use of DMs to acquire knowledge in the future. |
References
- Hung, S.Y.; Chen, C.C.; Hung, H.M.; Ho, W.W. Critical Factors Predicting the Acceptance of Digital Museums: User and System Perspectives. J. Electron. Commer. Res. 2013, 14, 240–243. [Google Scholar]
- Kabassi, K. Evaluating websites of museums: State of the art. J. Cult. Herit. 2017, 24, 184–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, S.; Xu, S.; Wu, G. Earth Science Digital Museum (ESDM): Toward a new paradigm for museums. Comput. Geosci. 2006, 32, 793–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hein, H.S. The Museum in Transition: A Philosophical Perspective; Smithsonian Institution: Washington, DC, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Bhattacherjee, A. Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Q. 2001, 25, 351–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, C.-C.; Liang, C.; Yan, C.-F.; Tseng, J.-S. The impact of college students’ intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on continuance intention to use English mobile learning systems. Asia Pac. Educ. Res. 2013, 22, 181–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joo, S.; Choi, N. Understanding users’ continuance intention to use online library resources based on an extended expectation-confirmation model. Electron. Library. 2016, 34, 554–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, L.; Bai, X. An empirical study on continuance intention of mobile social networking services: Integrating the IS success model, network externalities and flow theory. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 2014, 26, 168–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ch’ng, E.; Cai, S.; Leow, F.-T.; Zhang, T.E. Adoption and use of emerging cultural technologies in China’s museums. J. Cult. Herit. 2019, 37, 170–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Negash, S.; Ryan, T.; Igbaria, M. Quality and effectiveness in web-based customer support systems. Inf. Manag. 2003, 40, 757–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhang, X. Study on the Definition of Digital Museum From the Social Development and the User Requirements. Southeast Cult. 2011, 4, 97–100. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Tong, F. Design of user experience elements of “Pocket Museum”. J. Nanjing Arts Inst. Fine Arts Des. 2016, 4, 126–133. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Tong, F. Digital Narrative: Research on Museum Design in the Context of New Technology. J. Nanjing Arts Inst. Fine Arts Des. 2020, 4, 165–171. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Guo, J.; Wang, G. The new value of museum APP service based on user needs. View Publ. 2014, 4, 73–75. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Z. “Self-Cognition” in the Construction of Digital Museums—A Study Based on the “Collection of Famous Paintings in the Palace Museum”. Open J. Soc. Sci. 2018, 6, 293–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cunliffe, D.; Kritou, E.; Tudhope, D. Usability evaluation for museum web sites. Mus. Manag. Curatorship 2001, 19, 229–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skov, M.; Ingwersen, P. Museum Web search behavior of special interest visitors. Libr. Inf. Sci. Res. 2014, 36, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anderson, G. Reinventing the Museum: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives on the Paradigm Shift; Rowman Altamira: Lanham, MD, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Lopatovska, I. Museum website features, aesthetics, and visitors’ impressions: A case study of four museums. Mus. Manag. Curatorship 2015, 30, 191–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skov, M.; Ingwersen, P. Exploring information seeking behaviour in a digital museum context. In Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Information Interaction in Context, London, UK, 14–17 October 2008; pp. 110–115. [Google Scholar]
- Pallud, J.; Straub, D.W. Effective website design for experience-influenced environments: The case of high culture museums. Inf. Manag. 2014, 51, 359–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Billinghurst, M. Usability Testing of Augmented/Mixed Reality Systems. ACM SIGGRAPH ASIA 2008 Courses. 2008, pp. 1–13. Available online: https://ininet.org/usability-testing-of-augmented--mixed-reality-systems.html (accessed on 10 October 2021).
- Kabassi, K.; Maravelakis, E. Walkthrough evaluation of a VR museum for the physical environment. In Proceedings of the 2015 6th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications (IISA), Corfu, Greece, 6–8 July 2015; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Sylaiou, S.; Mania, K.; White, M.; Karoulis, A. Presence-centred Usability Evaluation of a Virtual Museum. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2010, 68, 243–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ellenbogen, K.; Falk, J.; Goldman, K.H. 13 Understanding the Motivations of Museum Audiences. Mus. Inform. People Inf. Technol. Mus. 2008, 2, 187. [Google Scholar]
- Marty, P.F. Museum websites and museum visitors: Before and after the museum visit. Mus. Manag. Curatorship 2007, 22, 337–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Marty, P.F. Museum websites and museum visitors: Digital museum resources and their use. Mus. Manag. Curatorship 2008, 23, 81–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jörgensen, C. Unlocking the museum: A manifesto. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2004, 55, 462–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gutowski, P.; Kłos-Adamkiewicz, Z. Development of e-service virtual museum tours in Poland during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2020, 176, 2375–2383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- King, E.; Smith, M.P.; Wilson, P.F.; Williams, M.A. Digital Responses of UK Museum Exhibitions to the COVID-19 Crisis, March–June 2020. Curator Mus. J. 2021, 64, 487–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, B.; Kim, J. Changes and Challenges in Museum Management after the COVID-19 Pandemic. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021, 7, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vyas, D.; van der Veer, G.C. APEC: A Framework for Designing Experience. Spaces Places & Exp. HCI 2005. pp. 1–4. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Dhaval-Vyas-7/publication/251990033_APEC_A_Framework_for_Designing_Experience/links/00b7d5364397f9a1b4000000/APEC-A-Framework-for-Designing-Experience.pdf (accessed on 10 October 2021).
- Mahlke, S. Factors influencing the experience of website usage. In Proceedings of the CHI’02 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 20–25 April 2002; pp. 846–847. [Google Scholar]
- Nascimento, R.; Limeira, C.D.; de Pinho, A.L.S.; Santa Rosa, J.G. Emotion, affectivity and usability in interface design. In Proceedings of the International Conference of Design, User Experience, and Usability, Crete, Greece, 22–27 June 2014; pp. 339–346. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, W.-S. Perceived fit and satisfaction on web learning performance: IS continuance intention and task-technology fit perspectives. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2012, 70, 498–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, R.-T. Exploring the moderating role of self-management of learning in mobile English learning. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 2014, 17, 255–267. [Google Scholar]
- Beaudry, A.; Pinsonneault, A. The other side of acceptance: Studying the direct and indirect effects of emotions on information technology use. MIS Q. 2010, 34, 689–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Davis, F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989, 13, 319–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Thong, J.Y.; Hong, S.-J.; Tam, K.Y. The effects of post-adoption beliefs on the expectation-confirmation model for information technology continuance. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2006, 64, 799–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moon, J.-W.; Kim, Y.-G. Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Inf. Manag. 2001, 38, 217–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Padilla-Meléndez, A.; del Aguila-Obra, A.R.; Garrido-Moreno, A. Perceived playfulness, gender differences and technology acceptance model in a blended learning scenario. Comput. Educ. 2013, 63, 306–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, C.S.; Wu, S.; Tsai, R.J. Integrating perceived playfulness into expectation-confirmation model for web portal context. Inf. Manag. 2005, 42, 683–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sundjaja, A.M.; Gaol, F.L.; Abdinagoro, S.B.; Abbas, B.S. The behavior of online museum visitors on Facebook fan page of the museum in Indonesia. Binus Bus. Rev. 2017, 8, 237–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhang, D.; Chen, Y.; Wang, M. Factors Influencing the Continuous Use of Short Video Platform:Based on SEM and fsQCA. Mod. Commun. 2020, 42, 133–140. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Wang, D.; Tao, B.; Zheng, G. Research on the Factors Influencing the Continuous Use Behavior of VR Library Users Based on Expectation and Confirmation Theory. Mod. Inf. 2020, 40, 111–120. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Daft, R.L.; Lengel, R.H. Information Richness. A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organization Design. Available online: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA128980.pdf (accessed on 10 October 2021).
- Lee, M.K.; Cheung, C.M.; Chen, Z. Understanding user acceptance of multimedia messaging services: An empirical study. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2007, 58, 2066–2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.-M.; Chen, M.-Y.; Mo, S.-S. How do we inspire people to contact aboriginal culture with Web2.0 technology? Comput. Educ. 2015, 86, 71–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venkatesh, V. Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Inf. Syst. Res. 2000, 11, 342–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hsu, M.-H.; Chiu, C.-M. Predicting electronic service continuance with a decomposed theory of planned behaviour. Behav. Inf. Technol. 2004, 23, 359–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roca, J.C.; Chiu, C.-M.; Martínez, F.J. Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2006, 64, 683–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nunnally, J.C. Psychometric Theory; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1967. [Google Scholar]
- Kaiser, H.F. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 1974, 39, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Norusis, M.J. SPSS for Windows: Base System User’s Guide, Release 5.0; SPSS Inc.: Chicago, IL, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
- Chin, W.W. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Mod. Methods Bus. Res. 1998, 295, 295–336. [Google Scholar]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walsh, D.; Hall, M.M.; Clough, P.; Foster, J. Characterising online museum users: A study of the National Museums Liverpool museum website. Int. J. Digit. Libr. 2020, 21, 75–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Sample | Category | Number | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 108 | 41.2% |
Female | 154 | 58.8% | |
Age | 18–25 | 145 | 55.3% |
26–34 | 84 | 32.5% | |
35–54 | 28 | 10.7% | |
55–64 | 5 | 1.9% | |
Education | High school | 14 | 5.4% |
Bachelor’s degree | 145 | 55.3% | |
Master’s degree | 86 | 32.8% | |
Doctoral degree | 17 | 6.5% | |
Occupation | Cultural enthusiast | 76 | 29% |
Researcher | 52 | 19.9% | |
Student | 134 | 51.1% |
Construct | Item | Cronbach α | KMO | Bartlett Sphere Test | Factor Loadings | AVE | CR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CON | CON1 | 0.847 | 0.704 | 0.000 | 0.790 | 0.661 | 0.853 |
CON2 | 0.874 | ||||||
CON3 | 0.764 | ||||||
MR | MR1 | 0.747 | 0.688 | 0.000 | 0.749 | 0.503 | 0.750 |
MR2 | 0.647 | ||||||
MR3 | 0.719 | ||||||
PP | PP1 | 0.842 | 0.693 | 0.000 | 0.752 | 0.659 | 0.852 |
PP2 | 0.880 | ||||||
PP3 | 0.796 | ||||||
PEOU | PEOU1 | 0.778 | 0.686 | 0.000 | 0.796 | 0.539 | 0.778 |
PEOU2 | 0.731 | ||||||
PEOU3 | 0.736 | ||||||
PU | PU1 | 0.782 | 0.685 | 0.000 | 0.805 | 0.560 | 0.790 |
PU2 | 0.747 | ||||||
PU3 | 0.672 | ||||||
SAT | SAT1 | 0.792 | 0.707 | 0.000 | 0.728 | 0.563 | 0.794 |
SAT2 | 0.769 | ||||||
SAT3 | 0.757 | ||||||
CI | CI1 | 0.853 | 0.779 | 0.000 | 0.778 | 0.602 | 0.858 |
CI2 | 0.737 | ||||||
CI3 | 0.838 | ||||||
CI4 | 0.758 |
Construct | CON | MR | PP | PEOU | PU | SAT | CI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CON | 0.813 | ||||||
MR | 0.587 | 0.709 | |||||
PP | 0.541 | 0.511 | 0.812 | ||||
PEOU | 0.573 | 0.610 | 0.598 | 0.734 | |||
PU | 0.544 | 0.674 | 0.535 | 0.645 | 0.748 | ||
SAT | 0.598 | 0.586 | 0.603 | 0.698 | 0.672 | 0.750 | |
CI | 0.573 | 0.561 | 0.656 | 0.614 | 0.607 | 0.652 | 0.776 |
Common Indices | CMIN/DF | RMSEA | CFI | NNFI | TLI | IFI | SRMR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Judgment criteria | <3 | <0.10 | >0.9 | >0.9 | >0.9 | >0.9 | <0.1 |
Value | 2.277 | 0.070 | 0.924 | 0.911 | 0.911 | 0.925 | 0.054 |
IV | ← | IV | Unstd | S.E. | Unstd./S.E. | p-Value | Std. | R2 | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CI | ← | SAT | 0.420 | 0.145 | 2.904 | 0.004 | 0.348 | 0.696 | H1 is Valid |
PP | 0.350 | 0.084 | 4.189 | 0.000 | 0.334 | H2 is Valid | |||
PU | 0.280 | 0.124 | 2.259 | 0.024 | 0.244 | H3 is Valid | |||
SAT | ← | PEOU | 0.812 | 0.104 | 7.781 | 0.000 | 0.799 | 0.865 | H4 is Valid |
CON | 0.161 | 0.074 | 2.174 | 0.030 | 0.177 | H7 is Valid | |||
PP | ← | PEOU | 0.685 | 0.115 | 5.946 | 0.000 | 0.586 | 0.567 | H5 is Valid |
CON | 0.229 | 0.093 | 2.470 | 0.014 | 0.218 | H8 is Valid | |||
PEOU | ← | CON | 0.217 | 0.089 | 2.429 | 0.015 | 0.241 | 0.673 | H9 is Valid |
MR | 0.596 | 0.107 | 5.556 | 0.000 | 0.631 | H10 is Valid | |||
PU | ← | PEOU | 0.480 | 0.127 | 3.779 | 0.000 | 0.448 | 0.818 | H6 is Valid |
MR | 0.511 | 0.125 | 4.085 | 0.000 | 0.505 | H11 is Valid | |||
CON | ← | MR | 0.749 | 0.086 | 8.703 | 0.000 | 0.711 | 0.506 | H12 is Valid |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wu, Y.; Jiang, Q.; Ni, S.; Liang, H. Critical Factors for Predicting Users’ Acceptance of Digital Museums for Experience-Influenced Environments. Information 2021, 12, 426. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12100426
Wu Y, Jiang Q, Ni S, Liang H. Critical Factors for Predicting Users’ Acceptance of Digital Museums for Experience-Influenced Environments. Information. 2021; 12(10):426. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12100426
Chicago/Turabian StyleWu, Yue, Qianling Jiang, Shiyu Ni, and Hui’e Liang. 2021. "Critical Factors for Predicting Users’ Acceptance of Digital Museums for Experience-Influenced Environments" Information 12, no. 10: 426. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12100426
APA StyleWu, Y., Jiang, Q., Ni, S., & Liang, H. (2021). Critical Factors for Predicting Users’ Acceptance of Digital Museums for Experience-Influenced Environments. Information, 12(10), 426. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12100426