Next Article in Journal
Numerical Study on the Impact of Gap between Sheets on the Quality of Riveted Single-Strap Butt Joints
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Low Magnetic Field on Biomimetic Deposition of Hydroxyapatite on Titanium and BIOLINE Stainless Steel
Previous Article in Journal
Microstructure and Oxidation Behavior of Nb-Si-Based Alloys for Ultrahigh Temperature Applications: A Comprehensive Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effective Detoxification of Aflatoxin B1 and Ochratoxin A Using Magnetic Graphene Oxide Nanocomposite: Isotherm and Kinetic Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Green Synthesis of Metal and Metal Oxide Nanoparticles Using Different Plants’ Parts for Antimicrobial Activity and Anticancer Activity: A Review Article

1
School of Chemistry, Faculty of Basic Scieneces and Mathematics, Minhaj University Lahore, Lahore 54700, Pakistan
2
Department of Allied Health Sciences, Superior University Lahore, Lahore 54700, Pakistan
3
Department of Chemistry, Forman Christian College Lahore, Lahore 54700, Pakistan
4
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, King Khalid University, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2021, 11(11), 1374; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11111374
Submission received: 19 August 2021 / Revised: 10 October 2021 / Accepted: 12 October 2021 / Published: 9 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Collection Advanced Surface Coating of Nanoparticles)

Abstract

:
Nanotechnology emerged as a scientific innovation in the 21st century. Metallic nanoparticles (metal or metal oxide nanoparticles) have attained remarkable popularity due to their interesting biological, physical, chemical, magnetic, and optical properties. Metal-based nanoparticles can be prepared by utilizing different biological, physical, and chemical methods. The biological method is preferred as it provides a green, simple, facile, ecofriendly, rapid, and cost-effective route for the green synthesis of nanoparticles. Plants have complex phytochemical constituents such as carbohydrates, amino acids, phenolics, flavonoids, terpenoids, and proteins, which can behave as reducing and stabilizing agents. However, the mechanism of green synthesis by using plants is still highly debatable. In this report, we summarized basic principles or mechanisms of green synthesis especially for metal or metal oxide (i.e., ZnO, Au, Ag, and TiO2, Fe, Fe2O3, Cu, CuO, Co) nanoparticles. Finally, we explored the medical applications of plant-based nanoparticles in terms of antibacterial, antifungal, and anticancer activity.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Technology and science are moving at the highest rate for developing green technology. Nanotechnology is one of the most interesting topics utilized to produce and employ materials having interatomic structural characteristics. Nanotechnology emerged as scientific innovation in the 21st century. Nanoparticles can be defined as particles having the size in the range of 1–100 nm and exhibited dimensions on a scale of one-billionth of a meter [1,2,3]. Nanoparticles are advanced materials in technology and science and have various applications in agriculture [4,5], medical [6], electronic [7], chemical [8], and pharmaceutical [9] fields. The biosynthesis of nanoparticles with desired morphology (shape, size, and crystalline nature) has been one of the basic aims in chemistry that can be utilized for various applications, e.g., catalysis, biomedical, lower-cost electrode, and biosensor [10,11,12]. Except for their unique chemical and physical properties, nanoparticles behaved as a bridge between molecular or atomic structure and bulk materials. Thus, they are the best candidate for many important applications such as biotechnology, trace substance identifications, medical, and electrochemistry [13,14,15,16]. Different synthetic approaches have been used for the fabrication of nanoparticles with desired the morphology and size. Although these approaches have resulted in superior nanoparticles, still a basic understanding of the improved fabricating process is required that could be utilized at the commercial and industrial levels. To achieve nanoparticles of desired morphology, two different basic approaches of synthesis (such as bottom-up and top-down methods) have been studied in the existing literature, shown in Figure 1. Conventionally, nanoparticles are synthesized through a diverse range of preparation methods such as ball milling, sputtering, lithographic techniques, and etching [17]. The utilization of the bottom-up approach (in which nanoparticles are prepared from simpler substances) also involves various protocols such as sol–gel process, molecular/atomic condensation, chemicals’ vapor deposition, laser pyrolysis, and spray pyrolysis, shown in Figure 1 [18]. New fields, i.e., green synthetic methods, are attaining remarkable attention in current development and research on materials science. Mainly, green synthesis of nanoparticles, prepared through regulation, clean-up, control, and remediation processes will uplift their ecofriendliness. Some fundamental principles of bio-synthesis can therefore be described by various components such as reduction of pollution, utilization of non-toxic solvent, prevention of waste, and renewable feed-stock [19]. Biosynthesis is essential to avoid the formation of harmful by-products through an environmentally friendly and sustainable approach. Biosynthesis of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles has been adopted to accommodate several biological entities such as plant extracts, bacteria, and algae. Among the existing green approaches of preparation for metal and metal oxide nanoparticles, using the plant is a rapid, easy, and simple process to synthesize nanoparticles at a large level as compared to algae-, fungi-, and bacteria-based prepared nanoparticles The prepared green nanomaterials have a great application in the pharmaceutical industry such as novel pharmaceuticals preparation, drug delivery personification procedures, and synthesis of functional nanodevices [20].
Here, we summarized the current research on the biosynthesis of metallics and their oxide nanoparticles with their advantages as compared to physical and chemical synthetic approaches. Additionally, we also described the essential role of various biological components (amino acid, carbohydrate, flavonoid, terpenoid, protein, and polyphenol) and solvent systems in the synthesis of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles. The objective of this review was to promote green synthesis, which is simple, cost-effective, and ecofriendly, so the novelty of this review article lies in explaining the recently reported (2019–2021) green synthetic methods of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles from plants and their capacity as antimicrobial and antibacterial agents.

2. Green Chemistry and Sustainable Principle

Green chemistry for sustainable development has been reported for less than 15 years [21]. Sustainable development can be termed as the development that accounts for and includes the needs of presently fulfilling and the capability of incoming generations [22]. Sustainable development has unique importance for industrial chemistry because it is concerned with pollution and the use of natural sources [23]. Chemistry has been considered a toxic branch of science, and, normally, the word chemical is associated with toxicity and hazards [24]. Generally, there are many methods to reduce risk by using protection, which is known as protective gear. When these methods fail, the risk of toxicity and hazards is increased. Due to high toxicity and hazards, the outcome can be more harmful, like injuries and deaths [25,26]. Therefore, safe, sustainable methods and procedures help to decrease toxicity and hazard to reduce the danger of accidents and damages [27,28].

3. Synthesis of Metal and Metal Oxide Nanoparticles Using Plants

In biological synthesis (using different organisms such as plants, bacteria, fungi, algae, and actinomycetes) of metal or metal oxide nanoparticles, ecofriendly accepted “green chemistry” ideas have been employed [29]. Biological synthesis of nanoparticles via biological organisms is summarized as a green substitute for the synthesis of nanoparticles having desired properties. In biological synthesis, both types of organisms (i.e., unicellular and multicellular) are permitted to react [30]. Plants are well-known chemical factories of nature that are inexpensive and ecofriendly. Plants have shown remarkable potential in heavy metals’ detoxification and collection, by which environmental contamination and pollutants’ problems can be resolved because the traces of these heavy metals are also hazardous. There are many benefits for nanoparticles’ synthesis via plant extract as compared to other biosyntheses such as by bacteria, fungi, actinomycetes, and algae [31]. One advantage of plant-mediated NPs is that the kinetics for this method are sufficiently higher than other biological methods. Different parts of plants, i.e., leaf, stem, seed, fruit, and roots, have been extensively used for the biosynthesis of nanoparticles because of the presence of remarkable phytochemicals [32]. For the synthesis of nanoparticles, specific parts of the plant are washed with tap or distilled water, after squeezing, filtering, and adding respective salt solutions, whose nanoparticles we wish to synthesize. The color of the solution begins to change, thus revealing the synthesis of nanoparticles, which we can separate easily.

4. Role of Capping Agents in the Synthesis of Metal and Metal Oxide Nanoparticles

Capping agents play an essential role in the synthesis of nanoparticles’ formation. The main role of the capping agent is to stabilize and functionalize the nanoparticles. By using a capping agent, we can impart the useful or desired properties to nanoparticles by controlling size and protecting the surface area and morphology. Various surfactants have been used as a capping agent for changing the desired morphology of nanoparticles, but these surfactants are very tough to remove. Moreover, these surfactants are toxic to our ecosystems [33]. Due to these limitations, there is a need to use ecofriendly capping agents and develop a green route at a commercial and non-commercial level for nanoparticles’ formation.

5. Role of Phytochemicals in the Synthesis of Metal and Metal Oxide Nanoparticles

The biosynthesis of nanoparticles compromises three main ingredients, e.g., solvent medium, reducing agents, and stabilizing agents [34,35,36]. To prepare plant-mediated nanoparticles, the photo component of plant extract serves as a reducing and stabilizing agent. Now, researchers have focused on plant-mediated nanoparticles’ biosynthesis due to more advantages over conventional physical and chemical synthetic procedures [37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44].

5.1. Role of Amino Acid in Green Synthesis of Nanoparticles

Synthesis of nanoparticles using bio-molecules has recently attained much interest because of their non-hazardous nature and because they do not involve harsh methods. Amino acid serves as an excellent capping and reducing agent to prepare nanoparticles having a specific structure. Maruyama and coworkers prepared gold nanoparticles with a size range of 4–7 nm by amino acid as a capping agent. There are 20 different types of amino acids. Among these different types, they used L-histidine, which reduced tetraauric acid to gold nanoparticles. The concentration of amino acid (L-histidine) affects the size of nanoparticles. The size of nanoparticles is decreased with an increase in the concentration of amino acids [45]. Qing-Hua Xu reported a single-step formation of gold nanoparticles by using two amino acids (glutamic and histidine) [46]. Meghana Ramani synthesized ZnO nanoparticles of different shapes and sizes by using three types of amino acids such as l-glutamine, l-alanine, and l-threonine. These amino acids played an important role as a capping agent. The surface modification of ZnO nanoparticles due to a capping agent was confirmed by FTIR spectroscopy [47].

5.2. Role of Protein in Green Synthesis of Nanoparticles

In the biosynthesis of nanoparticles, the vital role of proteins cannot be ignored. Proteins can offer a vital role of reduction, by which they donate e (electron) to the Ag+ ion that leads to the synthesis of silver nanoparticles. Recent studies report the potential role of proteins in the formation of silver nanoparticles by using Capsicum annum [48]. The absorption spectra of UV-Vis (ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy) showed a strong absorption peak at 210 nm, which the authors attributed to the existence of a peptide bond. While the peak was around 280 nm, the UV-Vis absorption spectrum showed the existence of amino acids, e.g., phenylalanine and tyrosine, that tend to react with silver ion. In another study, casein was utilized as a stabilizing and reducing agent in the synthesis of silver nanoparticles [49]. For the confirmation of the role of protein in the process of formation of nanoparticles, sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) analysis of leaf extracts of Olax scandens and concentrated supernatants of O. scandens-based silver nanoparticles was performed. The results illustrated that some low-molecular-weight peptide bonds present in the extract of leaf were absent in the obtained nanoparticles. Such proteins of low-molecular-weight have been utilized in biosynthesis phenomena. NPs unite with proteins and form a dynamic nanoparticle-protein corona [50]. Similar results were studied in the soya been-mediated synthesis of gold nanoparticles [51].

5.3. Role of Carbohydrates or Saccharides in Green Synthesis of Nanoparticles

The recent study also showed the role of carbohydrates of saccharides in the synthesis of nanoparticles. Raveendran and coworkers utilized sugar and starch as nanoparticles-reducing or -stabilizing agents, respectively. In another study, glucose and hemicellulose were utilized for the synthesis of nanoparticles [52,53]. Polysaccharides are the major class of carbohydrates’ molecules with repeating units of mono- and disaccharides that linked each other by a glycosidic bond. Polysaccharides served as a capping agent in the synthesis of nanoparticles. These are the advantages of polysaccharides as a reducing agent:
  • Low cost
  • Stable
  • Safe
  • Nontoxic
  • Hydrophilic
The green synthesis is performed in the presence of water as a solvent, therefore removing the use of a toxic solvent [54,55]. One of the unique characteristics of polysaccharides is that they sharply accelerate the kinetics of sol-gel methods because of their catalytic effect [56]. Shu-Juan Bao reported an eco-friendly, bio-mimetic method for the synthesis of TiO2 nanomaterials. Polysaccharides not only have been found to modify the size, shape, and structure of TiO2 but have induced various phases; rutile phase has been achieved in the presence of chitosan and the anatase phase has been achieved in the presence of starch.
Dextran is a branched polysaccharide that consists of many glucose molecules with a chain of different lengths. Gold nanoparticles were synthesized using natural honey that served as a reducing agent. Fructose in the honey was considered to serve as a reducing agent, while proteins were responsible for the stabilization of nanoparticles [57]. Gold nanoparticles were synthesized using amino cellulose that acted as capping as well as reducing agents.

5.4. Role of Phenolics Acid in Green Synthesis of Nanoparticles

Phenolic acid is a very essential phytochemical that belongs to the polyphenols’ family. It is composed of two important functional groups, i.e., carboxylic acid and phenolic ring. Various types of phenolic acid, i.e., ellagic acid, caffeic acid, protocatechuic acid, and gallic acid, are reported as reducing agents for the preparation of metal nanoparticles [58]. It is reported that silver nanoparticles can be prepared upon the formation of a transitional complex of Ag+ with gallic acid. Consequently, through oxidation phenomena, it converts to quinine that forms silver nanoparticles [59,60].

5.5. Role of Flavonoid in Green Synthesis of Nanoparticles

Flavonoid is the component of plants’ pigment that compromises a class of secondary metabolites because of their diversity and biological synthesis in plants [61]. Up until now, 7000 different flavonoid molecules have been reported. Flavonoids can be present in various forms, e.g., flavonol, isoflavones, anthocyanidins, flavones, flavanones, and flavan3-ol. Flavonoids are considered a basic bio-reducing agent of plant extract and their reducing ability is due to their ability to donate hydrogen ions or electrons [62]. Various articles have been published on the electron or hydrogen ion-releasing capability of flavonoids utilized for the preparation of nanoparticles [63,64,65]. Thus, flavonoids in an extract of the plant are currently utilized as a necessary tool for the primary assessment of untapped plants for the preparation of nanoparticles [66]. In another report, it was reported the production of free hydrogen ions during keto-enol conversion of flavonoids, e.g., rosmarinic acid and luteolin can be intended to reduce silver ions for the synthesis of silver nanoparticles [67]. In another report, it was reported hydrogen ions of flavonoids during the reduction of metal salt can oxidize to the carbonyl group [68]. In an extract of Ocimum basilicum, the transformation of enol- to keto- is a key factor in the biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles [69].

5.6. Role of Terpenoids in Green Synthesis of Nanoparticles

Terpenoids or isoprenoids are very important phytochemical that belongs to naturally synthesized terpenes. They are derivatives of essential oil, which are a mixture of secondary metabolites induced by plants. Previous studies have described the importance of these metabolites in the preparation of silver nanoparticles [70]. It was reported that two important terpenoids, e.g., sesquiterpenoids and monoterpenoids, are basic constituents for the silver nanoparticles’ synthesis [71]. Various reports showed the importance of essential oil of different plants’ species in the synthesis of silver nanoparticles such as Cocos nucifera [72], rosemary [73], Ricinus communis [74], and Anacardium occidentale [75].

6. Synthesis of Metal or Metal Oxides’ Nanoparticles by Using Plants

In this review article, we summarized the basic principles or mechanisms of the green synthesis method, especially for metal or metal oxide (i.e., ZnO, Au, Ag, TiO2, Fe, Fe2O3, Cu, CuO, Co) nanoparticles.

6.1. Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles

Recently, Zinc oxide nanoparticles have emerged as one of the most significant metal oxide nanoparticles due to carrying specific differences in morphology (size, shape, and crystalline nature), applications, low toxicity, economic benefits, and bio-compatibility [76,77,78]. Zinc oxide nanoparticles can be prepared from various parts of a plant such as a leaf, Stem, root, flower, seed, and fruit.

6.1.1. Synthesis of ZnO Nanoparticles Using Leaf: (2019–2021)

To date, numerous leaves’ extracts have been used for the synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles, as shown in Table 1.
Walnut aqueous leaf extract was utilized for the bio-synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles with a size range of 15 to 40 nm and evaluated against E. coli (ZOI = 7 to 9 mm) and S. aureus (Gram-positive bacterial stain) [79]. Demissie, Meron Girma, et al. reported Lippia adoensis aqueous leaf extract inspired preparation of ZnO nanoparticles and investigated against Staphylococcus aureus (ZOI = 6–14 mm), Enterococcus faecalis (ZOI = 6–10 mm), Escherichia coli (ZOI = 6–12 mm), and Klebsiella pneumoniae (ZOI = 6–12 mm) [80]. Cayratia pedata-based ZnO nanoparticles were also synthesized by Jayachandran et al. The mechanism of Cayratia pedata-based nanoparticles’ synthesis is shown in Figure 2 [81].
Piper betle aqueous leaf extract was applied for the synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles with an average size of 112 nm. S. aureus (ZOI = 2–3 mm) and E. coli (ZOI = 1–4 mm) are main causes of surgical site infection (SSI). Globally, SSI accounts for 2.5% to 41.9%, and an even higher rate in developing countries. Surgical site infection affects not only the health of patients but also the development of the country. The anti-bacterial agents are a significantly effective solution to lower this rate and Piper betle-mediated ZnO nanoparticles were proven to show excellent antibacterial activity against S. aureus and E. coli [82]. Becium grandiflorum was reported for the biosynthesis of ZnO nanoparticles and evaluated antimicrobial activity against S. aureus (ZOI = 7 mm), E. coli (ZOI = 6 mm), K. pneumonia (ZOI = 8 mm), and P. aeruginosa (ZOI = 11mm) bacteria, shown in Figure 3. Methyl blue dye from an aqueous solution was effectively removed by synthesized ZnO nanoparticles [83].
In another study, ZnO nanoparticles were prepared from aqueous leaf extract of Achyranthes aspera and evaluated for antibacterial activity against S. gallinarum and S. enteritidis using the agar wall diffusion method. The author also observed that Achyranthes aspera-mediated ZnO nanoparticles showed zone of inhibition (ZOI) of 31 mm against S. enteritidis and S. gallinarum showed 30 mm [84]. Spherical-shaped ZnO nanoparticles with a size range of 30–55 nm were fabricated using an aqueous leaf extract of Arthrospira platensis. The results showed that antimicrobial activities of Arthrospira platensis-mediated nanoparticles were dose-dependent. Their application as an anti-microbial agent was studied and formed clear zones of 24.1 ± 0.3, 21.1 ± 0.06, 19.1 ± 0.3, 19.9 ± 0.1, and 21.6 ± 0.6 mm, at 200 ppm against B. subtilis, S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, E. coli, and C. albicans, respectively. These antibacterial activities were reduced as synthesized ZnO concentration decreased. ZnO nanoparticles showed significantly higher cytotoxic efficacy against cancerous cells than normal cell lines [85]. Hexagonal-shaped ZnO nanoparticles with a crystallite size of 17 nm were produced from ethanol leaf extract of Sambucus ebulus. The synthesized ZnO nanoparticles showed acceptable photo-catalytic degradation of Methylene blue dye. Sambucus ebulus-mediated ZnO nanoparticles explain efficient antioxidant and antibacterial activity [86]. Droepenu, Eric Kwabena, et al. reported the biosynthesis of ZnO nanoparticles using Anacardium occidentale and tested against S. aureus (ZOI = 1.06 ± 0.14 mm), E. aquaticum (ZOI = 1.99 ± 0.11 mm), K. pneumoniae (ZOI = 2.08 ± 0.03 mm), E. coli (ZOI = 1.49 ± 0.09 mm), and A. baumanii (ZOI = 2.99 ± 0.01 mm) [87].
From 2020 to 2019, several publications reported ZnO nanoparticles synthesized using leaf extract of various plants, e.g., Eucalyptus globulus Labill [88], Cassia fistula and Melia azadarach [89], Euphorbia hirta [90], saffron leaf [91], Azadirachta Indica [92], Aquilegia pubiflora [93], Broccoli extract [94], Costus igneus [95], Pandanus odorifer [96], and Solanum torvum [97].

6.1.2. Synthesis of ZnO Nanoparticles Using Roots and Root Hairs (2020–2021)

Roots and roots’ extracts are also well established for the synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles. To date, different roots’ extracts have been used for the synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles, as shown in Table 2. In 2021, the synthesis of spherical ZnO nanoparticles with an average size of 11.34 nm using Rubus Fairholmianus root (Dimethyl sulfoxide) extract was reported and tested against S. aureus (MIC = 157.22 μg/mL) [98]. In another study, aqueous root hair extract of Phoenix dactylifera was utilized for the synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles with a size range of 30.87 to 47.89 nm. ZnO nanoparticles were found to be 45% more cytotoxic than well-known chemotherapeutic drugs (doxorubicin). Especially Triple-negative breast cancer cells were found to be weaker to Phoenix dactylifera-mediated nanoparticles than doxorubicin. Phoenix dactylifera-mediated were observed to be 82.26% cytotoxic to lungs cancer cells. Phoenix dactylifera-mediated ZnO nanoparticles exhibited promising antibacterial action against K. pneumoniae (ZOI = 2.4 cm), S. aureus (ZOI = 3.0 cm), Salmonella typhi (ZOI = 2.8 cm), and E. coli (ZOI = 2.7 cm) [99]. Liu, Di, et al. reported Raphanus sativus-mediated ZnO nanoparticles exhibited antibacterial activity against S. aureus (ZOI = 21.23 ± 1.16 mm) and E. Faecalis (ZOI = 11.23 ± 0.58 mm) [100]. Recently, Sphagneticola trilobata L was also reported to synthesize ZnO nanoparticles, which were mainly irregular in shape [101]. Moringa oleifera was applied for the formation of hexagonal-shaped ZnO nanoparticles with a size of ~25 nm. The prepared ZnO nanoparticles were tested for their antibacterial action against B. Subtilis (ZOI = 12.5 mm) and E. coli (ZOI = 11.6 cm) [102].

6.1.3. Synthesis of ZnO Nanoparticles Using Stem and Stem Bark: (2019–2021)

Biosynthesis of ZnO nanoparticles using stem or stem bark has gained immense attention recently. Synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles using stem and stem bark is shown in Table 3. Amygdalus scoparia-mediated ZnO nanoparticles were synthesized by Jobie, Fatemeh Norouzi, et al., who investigated their antibacterial action against B. subtilis (ZOI = 25 mm), S. aureus (ZOI = 28 mm), S. typhimurium (ZOI = 21 mm), E. coli (ZOI = 28 mm), E. aerogenes (ZOI = 22 mm), K. aerogenes (ZOI = 21 mm), P. oryzae (ZOI = 18 mm), C. glabrata (ZOI = 16 mm), F. thapsinum (ZOI = 16 mm), C. albicans (ZOI = 16 mm), F. semitectum (ZOI = 18 mm), and C. neoformans (ZOI = 18 mm). Synthesized ZnO nanoparticles exhibited excellent photocatalytic activity, shown in Figure 4.
Prepared ZnO nanoparticles exhibited an excellent inhibitory effect on cancer line cells, whereas they had no hazardous effect on normal line cells. Amygdalus scoparia-mediated ZnO-cured diabetic rats illustrated an excellently higher level of insulin and lower alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and blood glucose as compared to a Streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic group and other cured groups [103]. Cinnamomum verum bark was reported for the formation of ZnO nanoparticles and tested against S. aureus (MIC = 125 μg/mL) and E. coli (MIC = 62.5 μg/mL) [104]. Hexagonally shaped ZnO nanoparticles were synthesized by using aqueous root extract of Mussaenda frondosa with a size range of 5–20 nm, and its antimicrobial efficiency was evaluated against S. aureus (ZOI = 21.51 mm), B. subtilis (ZOI = 19.13 mm), and P. aeruginosa (ZOI = 20.31 mm). This study reported photocatalytic activity and biological applications such as antidiabetic, anticancerous, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial activity [105]. Albizia lebbeck aqueous stem bark extracts were utilized for the formation of ZnO nanoparticles and tested against S. aureus (ZOI = 4.50 ± 0.30 mm), B. cereus (ZOI = 8.83 ± 0.42 mm), S. typhi (ZOI = 91.3 ± 0.41mm), K. pneumoniae (ZOI = 7.30 ± 0.29 mm), and E. coli (ZOI = 10.57 ± 0.320 mm). The Albizia lebbeck stem bark extracts-mediated ZnO nanoparticles exhibited strong antioxidant and cytotoxicity against breast cancer cell lines [106].

6.1.4. Synthesis of ZnO Nanoparticles Using Flower Extract: (2019–2021)

Flowers were also used in the biosynthesis of ZnO nanoparticles, as shown in Table 4. Biological synthesis of flake-structured ZnO nanoparticles was achieved by using Cassia auriculata. The prepared ZnO nanoparticles were used against various bacterial strains to evaluate their antimicrobial efficiency against S. pneumonia, S. aureus, E. coli, and K. pneumonia (the size of the zone observed ranged from 18 mm to 25 mm against the abovementioned pathogens) and anticancer agent against MG-63 cell. The cell adhesion assay was carried out to investigate the anticancer efficiency of Cassia auriculata-mediated ZnO nanoparticles against MG-63 cells [107]. In another study, the antimicrobial efficacy of Punica granatum flower-mediated ZnO nanoparticles was assessed against S. diarizonae (ZOI = 10.00 mm), B. cereus (ZOI = 12.33 ± 0.58 mm), S. aureus (ZOI = 10.50 ± 0.87 mm), P. aeruginosa (ZOI = 10.00 ± 1.00 mm), S. pneumonia (ZOI = 14.00 ± 1.00 mm), K. pneumonia (ZOI = 11.00 ± 1.00 mm), E. faecalis (ZOI = 9.67 ± 0.58 mm), S. typhi (ZOI = 8.67 ± 1.15 mm), E. coli (ZOI = 10.00 ± 1.00 mm), L. monocytogenes (ZOI = 14.33 ± 0.58 mm), E. faecium (ZOI = 15.83 ± 0.76 mm), A. hydrophila (ZOI = 13.83 ± 0.29 mm), and M. catarrhalis (ZOI = 12.00 ± 1.00 mm) [108]. Moringa Oleifera aqueous flower extract was used for the production of ZnO nanoparticles with a size of 13.2 nm [109]. Matricaria chamomilla L promoted the preparation of ZnO nanoparticles with an average size of 62 nm, reported by Ogunyemi, Solabomi Olaitan, et al. [110]. Hexagonally and Triangularly shaped ZnO nanoparticles with size range 30 to 40 nm synthesized by using the flower of Syzygium aromaticum were reported by Lakshmeesha, Thimappa Ramachandrappa, et al. [111].

6.1.5. Synthesis of ZnO Nanoparticles Using Seed (2020–2019)

The aqueous seed extract of the different plants has been widely used as a reducing and capping agent for the biosynthesis of ZnO nanoparticles, as shown in Table 5. Ware, Umavathi, Saraswathi, et al. reported the ecofriendly synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles using seed extract of Parthenium hysterophorus with a size of 10 nm [112]. In another study, Lettuce aqueous seed extract was utilized as a reducing agent for the formation of ZnO nanoparticles with an average size of 50 nm, and its effect on the process of seed germination was investigated [113]. Ngom, I. et al. reported the formation of ZnO nanoparticles using seed extract of Moringa Oleifera [114]. Longan aqueous seed extract was employed for the production of pure hexagonal-phase ZnO nanoparticles with a size range of 10–100 nm. The photocatalytic activity of Longan seed-mediated ZnO nanoparticles was evaluated through de-colorization of Orange II, methylene blue (MB), and methyl orange [115]. Trigonella foenum-graecum aqueous seed extract was also successfully applied for the biosynthesis of irregular spherical and flake-shaped ZnO nanoparticles with a size range of 70 nm to 90 nm. The photocatalytic activity of trigonal Trigonella foenum-graecum-mediated ZnO nanoparticles was evaluated through de-colorization of methylene blue [116].

6.1.6. Synthesis of ZnO Nanoparticles Using Fruit and Fruit Peel: (2019–2021)

ZnO nanoparticles synthesized using fruit and fruit extract are shown in Table 6. Khan, Mujahid, et al. reported the synthesis of hexagonal ZnO nanoparticles with an average size of 58 nm using an aqueous extract of Passiflora foetida fruit peels. Passiflora foetida-based ZnO nanoparticles showed remarkable efficiency toward Rhodamine B and MB dye (91.06%) and MB dye (93.25%), respectively [117]. Aqueous fruit extracts of Myristica fragrans were used to prepare elliptical- and spherical-shaped ZnO nanoparticles with a mean size of 41.23 nm and tested against E. coli (ZOI = 15 ± 1.54 mm), K. pneumoniae (ZOI = 27 ± 1.73 mm), P. aeruginosa (ZOI = 17 ± 1.66 mm), and S. aureus (ZOI = 21 ± mm). Prepared nanoparticles exhibited excellent larvicidal activity against Aedes aegypti. Similarly, significant leishmanicidal activity was also examined against amastigote and promastigote parasites. The biologically prepared ZnO nanoparticles exhibited excellent antioxidant and biocompatible nanoparticles. Photocatalytic activities of prepared ZnO nanoparticles were evaluated through decolorizations of methylene blue [118]. Hexagonal ZnO nanoparticles with an average size of 33.1 ± 11.7 nm were derived from aqueous peel extract of citrus sinensis and tested against E. coli and S. aureus. The toxicity of citrus sinensis-based ZnO nanoparticles toward human umbilical vein endothelial cells was dose-dependent. The feasibility of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) increased when reacted with 6.25 mg/L of prepared ZnO nanoparticles. However, feasibility lowered sharply, to around 20%, when the concentration of prepared ZnO nanoparticles increased to 25 mg/L or higher. It showed that prepared ZnO nanoparticles enhance the growth of HUVECs at low concentrations [119]. Aqueous fruit extract of orange was utilized for the formation of spherical ZnO nanoparticles with a size range of 10–20 nm and was evaluated against E. coli and S. aureus [120]. In another study, ZnO nanoparticles were prepared using the fruit of Ailanthus altissima with a size range of 5–18 nm and tested against E. coli and S. aureus [121].

6.2. Gold Nanoparticles

Among the various metal and metal oxide nanoparticles, gold nanoparticles have specific morphology (size, shape, and crystalline nature), controlled geometry, and stable nature [122]. Gold nanoparticles are utilized in light-harvesting assemblies, electronics, molecular switches, and sensing [123,124,125,126]. Gold nanoparticles are also utilized in the diagnosis, detection, and cure of various diseases [127,128]. Gold nanoparticles, with their multiple properties, gained attention and their features can be modified by altering the shape, size, and aspect ratio. Gold nanoparticles are proven to be exclusive in biomedical applications. They are used as a tool for early cancer diagnosis, heart diseases, and the presence of infectious agents. The non-toxic and biocompatible nature of gold nanoparticles makes them a good candidate for drug and gene delivery. They can modify their surface with antibodies and other drug molecules. They carry drugs that are released at the target site selectively [129,130]. Gold nanoparticles are also explored for gene delivery due to their optimal properties. It is reported that, for the enhancement of the genetic material of any plant, the DNA coated with gold nanoparticles is injected into the plant cell and results in transformation [131]. Gold nanoparticles, due to their biochemical inertness and their unique optical-electronical properties, are also broadly applied in analytical sciences. Sensory probes, conductors, electronic chips, photovoltaics, and fuel cells are advanced technical applications of gold nanoparticles. Gold nanoparticles are widely used in fluorescence, surface plasmon resonance, lateral flow immunochromatographic assay (LFICA), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and SERS immunoassays of biomolecules (Elahi, N.). The current advancement in imaging techniques such as Computed tomography, X-ray, and SERS is also based on the high-density resolution of gold nanoparticles. [132]. They are also found in many chemical reactions as a catalyst.

6.2.1. Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles from Plant

Gold nanoparticles can be prepared from various parts of the plant such as leaf, Stem, root, flower, seed, and fruit. Synthesis and the mechanism of formation of gold nanoparticles using plant are illustrated in Figure 5 and Figure 6, respectively.

6.2.2. Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles Using Leaves: (2019–2021)

Leaves’ extracts are used to synthesize gold nanoparticles, as shown in Table 7. In 2021, gold nanoparticles were derived from aqueous leaf extract of Lantana camara, Populus alba, and Hibiscus arboreus with a size of ~16.3 ± 0.7 nm. The antibacterial activity of prepared gold nanoparticles was tested against E. coli and S. aureus (MIC value = 100 µg/mL). The bio-synthesized gold nanoparticles were also utilized for the degradation of MB and CR dye [134]. In another report, Limnophila rugosa was used for the production of spherical-shaped gold nanoparticles with a mean particles’ size distribution of 122 nm. Limnophila rugosa-capped gold nanoparticles showed tremendous catalytic activity in the reduction of different nitrophenols, e.g., 4-nitrophenol, 3-nitrophenol, and 1,4-nitrophenol [135]. Olajire, A.A. et al., reported the biological synthesis of spherical gold nanoparticles with a mean size of 18.85 ± 6.74 nm by utilizing aqueous leaf extract of Ananas comosus. Low-density polyethylene with 1% gold nanoparticles exhibited a degradation efficacy of 90% after 240 h [136]. Recently, a single-step and eco-friendly biosynthesis of gold nanoparticles was reported by El-Borady et al., utilizing leaf of Phragmites australis. The results exhibited the production of spherical-shaped gold nanoparticles with about 18 nm diameter. Phragmites australis-based gold nanoparticles showed tremendous anticancer efficiency with an IC50. Prepared gold nanoparticles also exhibited good quenching for 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl free radical with scavenging % equal to 10.26. Phragmites australis-based gold nanoparticles also showed excellent photocatalytic activity, as they completely degraded the MB in just 60 s. Mentha Longifolia-mediated nanoparticles had tremendous anti-breast cancer efficiency against HS319.T, MCF7, and UACC-3133 cell lines [137]. An environmentally friendly method for the biological formation of gold nanoparticles was developed by Shah, Sumaira, et al., using ethanol leaf extract of Sageretia theazans. The biological activity of Sageretia theazans-based gold nanoparticles was evaluated against S. aureus, K. pneumonia, and B. subtilis. The antioxidant efficiency was investigated with DPPH scavenging activity; the maximum scavenging efficiency was observed at 100 µg/mL [138]. In another report, gold nanoparticles were bio-synthesized by reducing gold metal ions upon interlinking with aqueous leaf extract of Coriandrum sativum. TEM was utilized to calculate the size range of spherical gold nanoparticles, which was in the range of being 32.96 ± 5.25 nm [139]. In another study, an instantaneous, single-step, inexpensive, ecofriendly production of gold nanoparticles via aqueous leaf extract Persicaria salicifolia was reported by Hosny, Mohamed, et al., resulting in the production of violet-colored, spherical-shaped gold nanoparticles with diameters between 5 and 23 nm. The cytotoxicity study of Persicaria salicifolia-mediated gold nanoparticles using sulforhodamine-B assay showed tremendous cell capability in inhibiting the proliferation and growth of breast cancer cells (MCF7 cell line). Additionally, prepared gold nanoparticles showed antioxidant activity [140]. In 2021, gold nanoparticles were biosynthesized through the mixing of aqueous leaf extract of Curcumae Kwangsiensis with a size of ~8–25 nm. Gold nanoparticles showed tremendous antioxidant properties toward common free radicals, e.g., DPPH. Prepared gold nanoparticles had excellent anti-ovarian cancer activity against Sw-626, SK-0V, and P cell lines [141]. In another study, the aqueous extract Centaurea behen was utilized for the simple and environmental production of gold nanoparticles. For testing of the cytotoxicity effect of C. behen extract and gold nanoparticles, an MTT test was performed. C. behen-mediated gold nanoparticles revealed the cytotoxicity against THP-1 cell line. The IC50 for prepared nanoparticles was measured for about 25 µg/mL, whereas C. behen extract could not achieve the IC50. Similarly, for testing of antioxidant property of gold nanoparticles, a DPPH test was performed. Gold nanoparticles revealed maximum DPPH scavenging efficiency of 14% [142]. Padalia, Hemali, et al., reported the biosynthesis of gold nanoparticles utilizing Ziziphus nummularia and their anticancer and antioxidant activities. TEM exhibited the biosynthesized gold nanoparticles to be 11–12 nm in size and spherical. The biosynthesized particles exhibited dose-dependent cytotoxicity toward the human breast cell line, fibroblast normal cell line, and breast cancer cell line. The biologically prepared gold nanoparticles showed excellent antioxidant activity toward ABTS (IC50 = 690 μg/mL), DPPH (IC50 = 520 μg/mL), and (IC50 = 330 μg/mL) [143].
In 2019–2020, several publications reported gold nanoparticles synthesized using leaf extract of various plants, e.g., Jasminum auriculatum [144], Vitex negundo [145], Pongamia pinnata [146], Lactuca indica [147], Croton Caudatus [148], Sansevieria roxburghiana [149], Simarouba glauca [150], Alcea rosea [151], Bauhinia pupurea [152], Coleus aromaticus [153], and Annona muricata [154].

6.2.3. Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles Using Root Extracts: (2021–2019)

The seed extract of the different plants has been widely used as a reducing and capping agent for the biosynthesis of gold nanoparticles, as shown in Table 8. Licorice aqueous root extract was utilized for the formation of circular gold nanoparticles with a size range of 2.647 nm to 16.25 nm and tested toward P. aeruginosa (ZOI = 25 ± 0.17), E. coli (ZOI = 29 ± 0.35), S. aureus (ZOI = 26 ± 0.29), S. typhi (ZOI = 26 ± 0.15), B. subtilis (ZOI = 25 ± 0. 15), P. citrinum (ZOI = 19 ± 0.21), A. niger (ZOI = 17 ± 0.29), Candida albicans (ZOI = 14 ± 0.21), F. oxysporum (ZOI = 18 ± 0.33), and A. flavus (ZOI = 16 ± 0.15). Licorice-based gold nanoparticles exhibited antioxidant activity toward DPPH and ABTS. The cytotoxicity of prepared particles was examined by utilizing the MTT approach against liver (HePG-2) and breast cancer (MCF-7) cell lines [155]. In another research, the author adopted an environmentally friendly and sustainable method to synthesize gold nanoparticles by utilizing Phragmites australis aqueous root extract. The cytotoxicity of prepared particles was examined by utilizing an MTT approach against human lung cancer cells (A549 cell line). Antioxidant efficiency was less than 10%. The prepared gold nanoparticles showed excellent efficiency in removing methyl orange and methyl blue [156]. In 2020, spherical gold nanoparticles were derived by a green method utilizing Codonopsis pilosula with the size of 20 ± 3.2 nm and tested against E. coli (ZOI = 7.0 ± 0.42 mm), B. subtilis (ZOI = 12.0 ± 0.85 mm), and S. aureus (ZOI = 17.0 ± 1.2 mm) [157]. Zhang, Tipeng, et al. prepared the gold nanoparticles using Euphorbia fischeriana aqueous root extract with the size of 20–60 nm [158]. In 2019, Paeonia moutan methanol root extract was used to synthesize gold nanoparticles. The cytotoxicity of prepared particles was examined by utilizing an MTT approach against the murine microglial (BV2) cells. Paeonia moutan-mediated gold nanoparticles hindered the inflammation in murine microglial (BV2) [159].

6.2.4. Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles Using Stem Extracts: (2021–2019)

Recently, Brassica oleracea var. Acephala cv galega was utilized to biosynthesize spherical gold nanoparticles with an average diameter of 25.08 ± 3.73 nm, as shown in Table 9. Additionally, the antioxidant assay was carried out in the root extract after the formation of gold nanoparticles [160]. Khoshnamvand, M. et al., reported the synthesis of gold nanoparticles by utilizing Apium graveolens aqueous stem extract. The prepared particles could be utilized as a catalyst for the reduction of 4-nitophenol [161]. Gold nanoparticles were biosynthesized utilizing the stem of Angelica aiges by a green approach. Prepared particles degraded the Malachite and eosin dye [162].

6.2.5. Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles Using Flower Extracts: (2021–2019)

In 2021, saffron stigma-mediated gold nanoparticles were produced by Alhumaydhi, Fahad A., et al. and tested against E. coli, as shown in Table 10 [163]. In 2020, spherical gold nanoparticles were derived from Clitoria ternatea, having particles size of 18.16 nm [164]. Musa acuminata ethanol and aqueous extract were utilized for the biosynthesis of gold nanoparticles, having a size range of 12.6–15.7 nm and evaluated against K. pneumoniae (ZOI = 12 mm), P. aeruginosa (ZOI = 9 mm), E. faecalis (ZOI = 10 mm), S. typhi (ZOI = NO), E. coli (ZOI = 7), S. aureus (ZOI = 11 mm), and P. mirabilis (ZOI = 12 mm). Prepared gold nanoparticles exhibited antioxidant activity toward DPPH [165]. Perveen, Kahkashan, et al. reported the biosynthesis of gold nanoparticles utilizing Elettaria cardamomum and their anticancer and antioxidant activities are shown in Table 11. TEM exhibited the biosynthesized gold nanoparticles to be 16.63 nm in size and spherical [166].

6.3. Silver Nanoparticles

The synthesis of silver nanoparticles has gained remarkable attention due to their application in climate change, contamination [167], anti-microbial activities [168,169], information storage [170], bio-medical applications [171], energy generation [172], clean water technology [173], catalysis [174], biological sensors [175,176], optoelectronics [177], Lithium-ion batteries [178], and DNA sequencing [179]. Silver nanoparticles have vast applications in biomedicine due to their unique biological properties depending on their structure and size. Silver nanoparticles possess a very wide-spectrum, high antimicrobial activity [180]. They effectively kill microbes at a very low concentration [181]. Silver nanoparticles from free radicals alter the properties of microbial membranes and ultimately cause damage. Silver nanoparticles interact with microbial DNA and inhibit microbial activities [182]. Medical applications of silver nanoparticles are not only limited to antimicrobial treatments but they are also extended to bone healing [183], wound healing, vaccine development, the anti-diabetic effect [184], etc. Recent studies also proved silver nanoparticles as efficient candidates against various cancers. The surface-to-volume ratio of silver nanoparticles affects anticancer activity. Strong anticancer activities of silver particles are reported when size is reduced to even Angstrom [185]. It is also used in the treatment to control multi-drug-resistant microorganisms [186]. Silver nanoparticles are also used as a tool in dentistry [187,188]. Apart from biomedical applications, silver nanoparticles are widely used in various analytical techniques because of their unique physicochemical properties. They play an important role in biosensor and imaging technologies [189]. Many analytical techniques are also using silver nanoparticles in instrumentation [190]. They are used as fillers in biomaterials. Silver nanoparticles’ films have been recently used as an alternative food packaging material [191]. There are various methods, such as Supercritical Fluid Synthesis, Laser Ablation, Laser Pyrolysis, Ball Milling, Ultrasonic Synthesis, etc., that have been used for the synthesis of silver nanoparticles. Recently, the biological synthesis of silver nanoparticles by using biological organisms such as plants, fungi, algae, and bacteria as capping and reducing agents and their anti-microbial activity has been studied. The different biological molecules such as tannins, ketones, flavonoids, protein, and aldehydes are responsible for the synthesis of silver nanoparticles by oxidation of Ag+ to Ag0.

6.3.1. Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles

Silver nanoparticles can be prepared from various parts of the plant such as leaf, stem, root, flower, seed, and fruit.

6.3.2. Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Leaf Extracts: (2019–2020)

To date, numerous leaves’ extracts have been used for the synthesis of silver nanoparticles, as shown in Table 11 and Table 12. Rauf, Abdur, et al. reported the formation of AgNPs using Mentha longifolia aqueous leaves’ extracts. The round oval morphology of silver nanoparticles with a mean size of 10.23 ± 2 nm was revealed by TEM. Mentha longifolia-based silver nanoparticles showed tremendous antibacterial effect toward S. aureus (ZOI = 12 ± 0.03 mm), B. subtilis (ZOI = 10 ± 0.01 mm), and K. pneumonia (ZOI = 0) and antioxidant activities [192]. In another research, the biological fabrication of silver nanoparticles was explained by Ocimum Americanum, with a particle size of 48.25 nm. The biologically prepared silver nanoparticles showed anti-bacterial activity against S. aureus (ZOI = 18.33 ± 0.33 mm), P. aeruginosa (ZOI = 17.66 ± 0.66 mm), V. cholera (ZOI = 15.66 ± 0.88 mm), Aeromonas sp (ZOI = 13. 33 ± 0.33 mm), Bacillus sp (ZOI = 16.33 ± 0.33 mm), and E. coli (ZOI = 7.66 ± 0.33 mm). The anti-oxidant activity was examined by H2O2 and DPPH. Silver nanoparticles showed excellent photocatalytic degradation of Eosin dye [193]. By utilizing Clerodendrum inerme as both a capping and reducing agent, Khan, Shakeel Ahmad, et al., synthesized silver nanoparticles and evaluated them for various biological activities, e.g., anti-mycotic, i.e., A. niger (ZOI = 17 mm) and A. flavus (ZOI = 22 mm), and antibacterial, i.e., B. subtilis (ZOI = 15 mm) and S. aureus (ZOI = 14 mm), activities. The antioxidant and cytotoxic activities of prepared gold nanoparticles were also examined by utilizing DPPH free radical scavenging (78.8 ± 0.19%) and the MTT process [194]. In another study, Salvia officinalis hexane, ethyl acetate, and ethanol leaf extract were utilized in the formation of AgNPs. The biologically produced silver nanoparticles exhibited less cytotoxicity toward the HeLa cells’ line and exhibited excellent anti-plasmodial efficiency (IC50 = 3.6 lg/mL) [195]. A rapid and eco-friendly approach for preparing spherical silver nanoparticles with size of 27–36 nm by utilizing Alstonia venenata was performed. The larvicidal efficiency on early-third-instar larvae was sufficiently higher for silver nanoparticles as compared to extract. The larvicidal activity was tested toward Culex quinquefasciatus with IC50 equivalent to 14.50 lg/mL, Anopheles stephensi with IC50 equivalent to 12.28 lg/mL, and Aedes aegypti with IC50 equivalent to 13.49 lg/mL [196]. Previous work reported the bio-fabrication of spherical silver nanoparticles with a diameter of 20–40 nm, utilizing Sida retusa and tested toward S. aureus (ZOI = 17 mm), B. subtilis (ZOI = 14 mm), E. coli (ZOI = 15 mm), and S. typhi (ZOI = 15 mm). [197]. In 2021, Singh, Surya P., et al. reported the formation of AgNPs from Carica papaya aqueous leaf extract and its anticancer activity toward various human cancer cells. The cytotoxic commotion was performed toward various human cell and non-tumorigenic keratinocytes’ cells. Cure of DU145 cell with C. papaya-mediated silver nanoparticles (0.5–5.0 μg/mL) for 1 or 2 days decreased the total cell number by 21–36% [198]. In another research, the author achieved silver nanoparticles with particles’ sizes of 35 ± 2 nm and 30 ± 3 nm using Carissa carandas aqueous leaf extract. Biologically synthesized silver nanoparticles exhibited excellent anti-oxidant activity through DPPH assay. Prepared silver nanoparticles also showed remarkable ant-bacterial activity toward human pathogenic bacteria, e.g., E. faecalis (ZOI = 7.0 ± 0.0 mm), S. flexneri (ZOI = 8.0 ± 1.0 mm), S. typhimurium (ZOI = 8.0 ± 1.0 mm), and gonococci spp (ZOI = 6.0 ± 0.0 mm) [199]. Malva parviflora ethanol and waterleaf extract were utilized to synthesize spherical silver nanoparticles. The biologically synthesized silver nanoparticles inhibited the growth of F. oxysporum (81%), A. alternate (82%), H. rostratum (89%), and F. solani (81%) [200]. Ziziphus nummularia aqueous leaf extract was utilized to synthesize silver nanoparticles. These silver nanoparticles exhibited efficient anti-microbial commotion against S. aureus, C. rubrum, S. typhimurium, P. aeruginosa, C. neoformans, C. albicans, and C. glabrata. Silver nanoparticles also exhibited good DPPH activity (IC50 = 520 mg/mL) and ABTS activity (IC50 = 55 mg/mL) [201]. A previous study confirmed for first time the capability of Otostegia persica for the bio-synthesis of silver nanoparticles. These particles exhibited excellent anti-oxidant activity compared to the Otostegia persica leaf extract. These particles also showed potential anti-bacterial activity toward S. pyogenes (ZOI = 14 ± 0.4 mm), S. aureus (ZOI = 16 ± 0.1 mm), B. subtilis (ZOI = 15 ± 0.3 mm), P. aeruginosa (ZOI = 21 ± 0.5 mm), S. typhi (ZOI = 19 ± 0.4 mm), and E. coli (ZOI = 17 ± 0.1 mm) [202]. In another study, Abdallah, Basem M., et al. aimed to produce silver nanoparticles from Lotus lalambensis aqueous leaf extract and their anticandidal activity toward C. albicans (MIC = 125 μg/mL) [203]. Spherical silver nanoparticles were produced utilizing Symplocos racemosa. Anti-microbial activity of biologically prepared silver nanoparticles was studied on P. aeruginosa (ZOI = 22 mm) [204]. Silver nanoparticles were biosynthesized by an environmentally friendly hydrothermal approach using Aloe vera aqueous leaf extract, used to evaluate antibacterial potency against P. aeruginosa (ZOI = 14.00 ± 1.00 mm), S. aureus (ZOI = 21.00 ± 1.00 mm), E. coli (ZOI = 20.00 ± 2.00 mm), and Enterobacter sp (ZOI = 32.00 ± 2.00 mm [205]. In another report, Seerangaraj, Vasantharaj, et al. aimed to biosynthesize spherical silver nanoparticles with particles’ size of 55.65 nm by utilizing Ruellia tuberosa. Biologically prepared silver nanoparticles exhibited cytotoxic potency against A549 lunger cancer line with IC50 = 68 μg/mL. These silver nanoparticles were also degraded the Coomassie brilliant blue and crystal violet [206]. Sharma, Yashika, et al. evaluated the anti-chikungunya potency of Psidium guajava aqueous leaf extract and the biologically prepared silver nanoparticles [207]. Ekennia, Anthony C., et al. reported the formation of spherical silver nanoparticles using Euphorbia sanguinea and its photocatalytic degradation of CR (90% within 1 h) [208].
In the period of 2019–2020, several publications reported Silver nanoparticles synthesized using leaf extract of various plants, e.g., Borago officinalis [209], Tragopogon collinus [210], Melia azedarach [211], Mentha aquatica [212], Ziziphus joazeiro [213], Elytraria acaulis [214], Hyptis suaveolens [215], Caesalpinia pulcherrima [216], Gomphrena globosa [217], Plumbago auriculata [218], Cucumis prophetarum [219], Polygonatum graminifolium [220], Cocos nucifera [221], Mimosa albida [222], Capparis zeylanica [223], Holoptelea integrifolia [224], Annona Reticulatal [225], Combretum erythrophyllum [226], Berberis vulgaris [227], Catharanthus roseus [228], Ganonerion polymorphum [229], Premna integrifolia L [230], and Piper betle [231].

6.3.3. Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Root Extracts: (2021–2020)

Roots are also well established for the synthesis of silver nanoparticles, as shown in Table 13. In 2021, Gul, Anadil, et al. bio-synthesized spherical silver nanoparticles utilizing Ricinus communis methanolic root extract with an average size of 29 nm and used them to evaluate against E. coli (73%), K. pneumonia (60%), S. aureus (56%), S. pneumonia (60%), A. niger (77%), and A. alternate (75%). The results illustrated that the prepared nanoparticles exhibited remarkable efficiency toward Urease (IC50 = 36.81 ± 0.05 μg/mL) and Xanthine (IC50 = 3.60 ± 0.04 μg/mL) [232]. In another report, spherical silver nanoparticles with average size of 20.49 nm were prepared by utilizing Duchesnea indica and tested toward E. coli (MIC = 0.53 mg/mL), S. typhi (MIC = 0.01 mg/mL), A. alternata (MIC = 0.51 mg/mL), and M. canis (MIC = 0.53 mg/mL) [233]. Arshad, Hammad, et al. reported a simpler, quicker, and ecofriendly approach to prepare silver nanoparticles by utilizing Salvadora persica aqueous root extract and tested them toward S. epidermidis ATCC12228 (MIC = 0.39 µg/mL) and E. coli (MIC = 0.19 µg/mL) [234]. In another report, Tripathi, Deepika, et al. examined the cytotoxic efficiency of Asparagus officinalis-mediated silver nanoparticles toward a cervical cancer cell line (SiHa) [235]. In 2020, silver nanoparticles were prepared through an inexpensive and ecofriendly approach by utilizing Astragalus tribuloides Delile. The resultant silver nanoparticles showed excellent anti-oxidant properties compared to the extract. The resultant silver nanoparticles were also used to evaluate bacterial activity toward S. aureus, S. flexneri, E. coli, and B. cereus [236]. In another research, an environmental process was used for the preparation of silver nanoparticles by Berberis asiatica aqueous root extract and tested against S. typhimurium (ZOI = 7 mm), E. coli (ZOI = 11 mm), S. aureus (ZOI = 12 mm), and K. pneumoniae (ZOI = 6 mm) [237].

6.3.4. Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Stem and Stem Bark Extracts: (2019–2021)

Biosynthesis of ZnO nanoparticles using stem or stem bark has gained immense attention nowadays, as shown in Table 14. In 2021, the author reported an environmentally friendly preparation of silver nanoparticles using Grewia lasiocarpa aqueous stem extract. The spherical shape of bio-synthesized nanoparticles was shown by SEM and HR-TEM. The prepared silver nanoparticles exhibited cytotoxicity toward HeLa (IC50 > 1 μg/mL). The prepared silver nanoparticles were also used to evaluate bacterial activity against S. aureus (MIC = 15.67 ± 2.08 µg/mL) [238]. Euphorbia nivulia was utilized to prepare spherical silver nanoparticles with a size of 20–90 nm and tested against K. pneumoniae (MIC = 23.5 ± 0.5 µg/mL), B. cereus (MIC = 27 ± 1 µg/mL), S. aureus (MIC = 24.5 ± 1.5µg/mL), P. aeruginosa (MIC = 30.5 ± 0.5 µg/mL), B. subtilis (MIC = 29 ± 1 µg/mL), and C. albicans (MIC = 26 ± 1 µg/mL) [239]. In another study, silver nanoparticles were derived from Boswellia dalzielii aqueous stem extract. The anti-oxidant activity of prepared silver nanoparticles was tested using DPPH (TEAC = 300.91) [240]. A biosynthesis of spherical silver nanoparticles with an average size of 19 nm was performed utilizing Piper chaba aqueous stem extract. The prepared silver nanoparticles efficiently catalyzed the degradation of MB and reduction of 4-nitrpphenol [241]. In 2020, Akintelu, Sunday Adewale, et al. tested the anti-microbial commotion of Garcinia kola-based silver nanoparticles against E. faecalis (ZOI = 2 mm), B. cereus (ZOI = 4 mm), C. sporogenes (ZOI = 6 mm), and E. coli (ZOI = 10 mm) [242]. In another report, Dawodu, Folasegun A., et al. explained a quicker, inexpensive process for the preparation of silver nanoparticles with a mean size of ~25 nm by utilizing Vigna unguiculata aqueous stem extract [243].

6.3.5. Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Seed Extracts: (2019–2021)

The seed extract of the different plants has been widely used as a reducing and capping agent for the biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles, as shown in Table 15. In 2021, Awad, Manal A., et al. explained a green approach of biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles utilizing Trigonella foenum-graecum and tested it against B. cereus (ZOI = 10,0.9 mm), E. coli (ZOI = 14 ± 2.0 mm), and S. aureus (ZOI = 5.0 ± 2.0 mm) [244]. Morinda citrifolia was utilized to prepare spherical silver nanoparticles with an average size of 3 nm and used to evaluate bacterial activity toward S. aureus (ZOI = 9.81 mm) and E. coli (ZOI = 10.63 mm) [245]. In another work, round silver nanoparticles were derived from Mangifera indica aqueous seed extract and tested against B. cereus (ATCC11778), K. pneumonia (NMCIM2719), S. aureus (ATCC29737), P. aeruginosa (ATCC9027), C. rubrum (ATCC14898), E. coli (NCIM2931), S. typhimurium (ATCC23564), C. neoformans (ATCC34664), C. albicans (ATCC2091), and C. glabrata (NCIM3438) [246]. The formation of spherical nanoparticles with an average of 22 nm utilizing Annona squamosa L. was reported by Jose, Vimala, et al. The bio-synthesized silver nanoparticles showed excellent catalytic activity against degradation of Coomassie brilliant blue dye [247]. Saygi, Kadriye Ozlem, et al. reported Rosa canina aqueous seed extract-inspired biosynthesis of spherical and rod shape silver nanoparticles with a mean size of 150 nm [248]. In another study, an advanced approach for the synthesis of silver nanoparticles utilizing Nigella sativa aqueous seed extract was reported by Chand, Kishore, et al. The prepared silver nanoparticles showed good photocatalytic activity on the degradation of Congo red [249]. Perveen, Rehana, et al., described a facile and green process for the preparation of silver nanoparticles by utilizing Moringa oleifera seed polysaccharide. The conclusion drawn from the above study was that prepared silver nanoparticles were spherically shaped. Moringa oleifera-mediated silver nanoparticles can enhance wound contraction and tissue growth wall [250]. Khan, Ibrahim, et al., reported the eco-friendly, facile, and rapid biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles utilizing Bunium persicum alcohol/methanol seed extract with a mean size range of 35 to 70 nm. Bunium persicum-mediated silver nanoparticles inhibited Urease and tyrosinase [251]. de Carvalho Bernardo, Wagner Luís, et al. reported a facile and rapid preparation of silver nanoparticles utilizing Syzygium cumini ethanol seed extract and tested against F. nucleatum (MIC = NO), A. naeslundii (MIC = 125 µg/mL), S. aureus (MIC = 125 µg/mL), S. mutans (MIC = 250 µg/mL), S. epidermidis (MIC = 31.2 µg/mL), V. dispar (MIC = 62.5 µg/mL), and S. oralis (MIC = 31.2 µg/mL) [252]. Encapsulated silver nanoparticles were bio-synthesized by biogenic synthesis utilizing Vitis vinifera with a size range of 10–50 nm [253].
From 2020 to 2019, several publications were reported in which silver nanoparticles were synthesized using seed extract of various plants such as Ginger and Nigella sativa [254], Cuminum cyminum L. [255], Punica granatum [256], Salvia hispanica L [257], Avicennia marina [258], and Tectona grandis [259].

6.3.6. Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Flower Extracts:(2021)

Flowers were also used in the biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles, as shown in Table 16. In 2021, biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles with a mean size of 7.6 nm was conducted utilizing Avera lanata. The DPPH radical scavenging analysis showed the antioxidant activity of prepared silver nanoparticles [260]. A rapid, facile, sustainable, and controlled process was reported for the synthesis of silver nanoparticles by utilizing Fraxinus excelsior aqueous and ethanolic flower extract. The prepared silver nanoparticles can be used as an environmentally friendly material for the coloration of woven glass fabrics [261]. Aravind, M., et al. derived silver nanoparticles with an average size of 40 nm utilizing jasmine aqueous extract (flower) and tested them against S. aureus and E. coli. The abovementioned prepared silver nanoparticles degraded the MB [262].

6.4. Titanium Oxide Nanoparticles

Titania (existing as TiO2 nanoparticles) constitutes specific thermal, magnetic, optical, and electric properties. Normally, Titanium oxide existed in three forms e.g., brookite crystalline polymorphs’ form, anatase form, and rutile form. The most important applications of TiO2 are photocatalytic degradation and splitting [263], electronic and electrochromic [264], sensing instruments [265], and photovoltaic cells [266]. Among all other metal nanoparticles’ oxide, titanium oxide nanoparticles showed distinctive morphologies (size, shape, and texture) and surface chemistry. It is utilized in the preparation of papers, foodstuff, tints, cosmetics, and medicine [267]. Colloidal titanium oxide nanoparticles are utilized in the degradation of hazardous chemicals in water [268,269]. Conventionally, titanium oxide nanoparticles are prepared using chemical and physical techniques, e.g., chemical precipitation, chemical vapor deposition, sol-gel, and hydrothermal [270]. All these conventional approaches require high pressure, temperature, and toxic chemicals [271]. However, environmentally friendly, rapid, and inexpensive methods are required to prepare nanoparticles on a larger scale with lesser toxicity [272]. This could be only possible by utilizing biological extract (plants, bacteria, algae, and fungi) through green chemistry.

Synthesis of Titanium Oxide Nanoparticles from Leaves, Roots, Flowers, Seeds, and Fruit Peel Extracts: (2019–2021)

Among the biological extracts, plants are considered as one of the most favorable agents for the preparation of titanium oxide nanoparticles, as shown in Table 17. Various types of phytochemicals (phenol, amino acid, carbohydrate, and flavonoid) in plants regulate the biosynthesis of titanium oxide nanoparticles through stabilization and reduction processes [273]. The reaction starts strenuously when a titanium salt (precursor) is mixed with plant extract and color change (light-green to dark) shows the first sign of biosynthesis of titanium oxide, as shown in Figure 7 [274]. Synthesis of titanium oxide nanoparticles using various parts of plant is shown in Table 18.

6.5. Copper and Copper Oxide Nanoparticles

Among all metal or metal oxide nanoparticles, copper oxide nanoparticles get more interest due to their multiple applications [289]. Copper oxide is a p-type semiconductor having a narrow bandgap of 1.7 eV. [290]. Biomedical applications of copper oxide nanoparticles involved antifouling, antioxidant, anti-microbial targeted drug delivery, and antibiotics. Copper oxide nanoparticles also have applications in other fields of science such as gas sensors, environmental remediation, nanocomposites’ synthesis, magneto-resistant material, textiles, high-temperature superconductor, and conducting material [291,292,293,294]. Various physiochemical methods have been extensively used to prepare copper oxide nanoparticles [295]. However, these methods have some flaws, e.g., releasing different hazardous chemicals, time consuming, and high cost. Thus, there is a need for a simple, quicker, eco-friendly, and inexpensive method to prepare nanoparticles with phase selectivity, purity, and homogeneity in morphology [296]. Biological synthesized copper oxide nanoparticles exhibited excellent anti-microbial activity [297]. Green approaches have led to developing a simple, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly process for the biosynthesis of nanoparticles [298].

Synthesis of Copper and Copper Oxide Nanoparticles Using Leaves, Seeds, Flower, and Fruit Peel Extracts: (2019–2021)

Plants create various secondary metabolites and consist of phytochemicals, which are excellent bioresources for the fabrication of copper and copper oxide nanoparticles (Table 18). The most favorable phytochemicals in plants are flavonoids and phenols, present in various parts of the plant, i.e., stems, leaves, fruits, seeds, and flowers. These phenolic phytochemicals have ketone and hydroxyl groups, taking part in the iron chelation and subsequently describing an excellent antioxidant activity [299]. Nanoparticles synthesized through this green approach increase instability, fend off the deformation and agglomeration of nanoparticles, and increase the phenomena of adsorption of phytochemicals on the nanoparticles’ surface, which increase the reaction rate of nanoparticles [300]. One of the common approaches in preparing copper and copper oxide nanoparticles is mixing a stoichiometric concentration of plant extract to a stoichiometric concentration of copper salt, heating the nano solution to a suitable temperature, with contentious stirring (shown in Figure 8). The mechanism of formation of copper oxide nanoparticles is shown in Figure 9.

6.6. Iron or Iron Oxide Nanoparticles

The structure of nanoparticles contains the magnetic core and their combinations, which have magnetic features in the presence of a textan erior magnetic field. Various types of iron oxide nanoparticles, each with its peculiar properties, magnetic behavior, formulas, and applications. The magnetic behavior is because of the motion of electrons [319]. Depending on the response to an external magnetic field, there are six types of material: super magnetic, ferromagnetic, diamagnetic, paramagnetic, antiferromagnetic, and ferrimagnetic. Due to the presence of one electron in the third sub-shell of intermediate metals, e.g., cobalt, iron, and nickel, which is in the absence of an external magnetic field, ferromagnetism behavior is produced [320]. Magnetic property is also exhibited by Ferromagnetic material. Paramagnetic and magnetic phenomena are also reported among magnetic materials. Because of the superparamagnetic feature of the magnetic nanocatalyst, these nanoparticles have been utilized in various fields. These nanoparticles consist of gadolinium, nickel, cobalt, iron metal, and metal oxide, e.g., Fe2O3 [321]. Among different types of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles, iron and iron oxide nanoparticles have exhibited high efficiency in various biomedical and industrial applications. There are eight types of iron oxide nanoparticles, among which magnetite, hematite, and maghemite have very useful applicants. Each of these three oxides has specific catalytic, magnetic, and biochemical properties. Hematite is extensively utilized in pigments, catalysts, and catalysis. It is also a reagent for the preparation of magnetite and maghemite, which have been kept in sight for various applications.

Synthesis of Iron and Iron Oxide Nanoparticles from Leaf, Flower, Seed, and Fruit Extracts: (2019–2021)

Different and cost-efficient synthesis processes have been used by utilizing plants, as shown in Table 19. Synthesis of iron or iron oxides nanoparticles using plants are showed in Figure 10. Arjaghi, Shayan Khalili, et al. synthesized the spherical iron oxide nanoparticles with a size range of 20–70 nm by utilizing Ramalina sinensis [322]. In another report, Chlorophytum comosum aqueous leaf extract was utilized for the biosynthesis of iron nanoparticles with a size of 100 nm and tested against P. aeruginosa, E. faecalis, E. coli, and S. aureus. The prepared iron nanoparticles showed Methyl orange degradation (77% after 7 h) [323]. Jamzad, Mina, et al. carried out an experiment to derive spherical and hexagonal iron oxide nanoparticles utilizing Laurus nobilis and tested them against E. coli (ZOI = No), L. monocytogenes (ZOI = 12 mm), S. aureus (ZOI = No), P. spinulosum (ZOI = 14 mm), and A. aspergillus (ZOI = 13 mm) [324]. In 2020, Bhuiyan, Md Shakhawat Hossen, et al. reported the biosynthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles by utilizing Carica papaya aqueous leaf extract and tested them against S. aureus (ZOI = 14 mm), Klebsiella spp (ZOI = 9 mm), and E. coli (ZOI = 9 mm). The prepared iron oxide nanoparticles were tested against BHK-21 and Hela cell lines [325]. Vitta, Yosmery, et al. achieved iron nanoparticles from Eucalyptus robusta aqueous leaf extract and tested their antimicrobial commotion against S. aureus (ZOI = 1.15 ± 0.05 mm), B. subtilis (ZOI = 3.60 ± 0.40 mm), P. aeruginosa (ZOI = 29 ± 0.03 mm), and E. coli (ZOI = 1.10 ± 0.10 mm) [326]. In 2019, iron oxide nanoparticles with an average size of 52.78 nm were synthesized utilizing Ruellia tuberosa aqueous leaf extract and tested against K. pneumoniae (ZOI = 12 mm) and E. coli (ZOI = 17 mm) [327]. In 2021, Avicennia marine aqueous flower extract was utilized to synthesize iron oxide nanoparticles with an average size of 30–100 nm [328]. Semi-spherical Iron oxide nanoparticles with a size range of 25 to 55 nm were prepared through a green process utilizing Punica granatum seed. The prepared iron oxide nanoparticles exhibited efficient degradation toward reactive blue (95.08% after 56 min) [329]. An eco-friendly biosynthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles utilizing Borassus flabellifer ethanol seed coat extract was reported by Sandhya et al. and was tested against B. subtilis, E. coli, S. aureus, C. albicans, and A. niger [330]. Aziz, Wisam J., et al. reported the biosynthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles by utilizing Iraqi grapes’ aqueous extract and tested against E. coli (ZOI = 19 mm) and S. aureus (ZOI = 18 mm) [331]. Rostamizadeh, Elham, et al. fabricated the iron oxide nanoparticles by utilizing Cornelian cherry aqueous extract [332].

6.7. Cobalt and Cobalt Oxide Nanoparticles

Cobalt is a transition (d-block) metal that has useful effects on human health [333,334]. It is an essential part of Cobalamin (Vitamin B12), which is helpful in the cure of anemia as it excites the production of red blood cells [334]. Cobalt has unique catalytic, electrical, and optical properties that make it favorable for a vast range of applications involving catalysts, nano-electronic devices, and nano-sensors [335]. Cobalt can show variable oxidation states, e.g., CO4+, CO3+, and CO2+, that make it favorable to be utilized in various fields [336]. Now, cobalt nanoparticles have attracted remarkable interest because they are cheaper than other metal or metal oxide nanoparticles and exhibit various properties, e.g., magnetic and electrical, because of their huge surface area [337,338].

Synthesis of Cobalt or Cobalt Oxide Nanoparticles Using Plants

Synthesis of cobalt and cobalt oxide nanoparticles by a green approach utilizing plants, in general, includes washing or drying the plants’ part (leaves, root, stem, flower, seed, and fruit), as shown in Table 20. The plant materials (fresh or powder) are boiled with water and the resultant extract is filtered. Phytochemical properties are because of the presence of biomolecules in plant extracts, e.g., vitamin, phenol, protein, carbohydrate, flavonoid, and more. Adding cobalt salt to plant extract reduces and stabilizes the cobalt ion to prepare cobalt and cobalt oxide nanoparticles [339].

7. Antibacterial Activities of Metal and Metal Oxide Nanoparticles

Research is going on and a vast amount of literature exists on the antimicrobial activity of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles. The silver nanoparticles excellently discompose the polymer sub-units of the cell membrane in micro-organisms. The plant-mediated silver nanoparticles consequently rupture the cell membrane, destroying the protein synthesis mechanism in the bacteria [346]. The higher concentration of silver nanoparticles has rapid membrane permeability, as compared to a lower concentration, and subsequently breaks the cell wall of bacteria, as shown in Figure 11 [347]. The highest conductivity was seen in Rhizophora apiculate-reduced silver nanoparticles, which exhibited a lower number of a bacterial colony in the experimental plate than the silver nitrate-treated cells, which may be because of a larger surface area and smaller size of nanoparticles. These two factors increase the permeability across the cell membrane and cell destruction [348]. The green-synthesized silver nanoparticles were prepared using Citrus sinensis peel extract and evaluated for antibacterial activity toward S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, and E. coli [349].

8. Antifungal Activity

The fungicidal mechanism of plant-mediated metal and metal oxide nanoparticles has greater potential as compared to commercial antibiotics, e.g., amphotericin. The plant-mediated silver nanoparticles have clearly exhibited the membrane breakage in Candida sp. and damage in fungal components (intercellular) and, consequently, cell function was destroyed [350]. Most commercial drugs have limited clinical applications and have more adverse effects. Consequently, the commercial antifungal agents induce side effects, e.g., liver damage and renal failure and nausea, diarrhea, and body temperature increased after utilizing the drugs. The cell wall of fungi is made up of protein and fatty acid. The plant-mediated silver nanoparticles have promising activity toward spore-producing fungus and efficiently damage the fungal growth. In the fungal cell membrane composition and structure, significant changes were seen by interacting it with metal and metal oxide nanoparticles [351].

9. Anticancer Activity

Cancer is an uncontrollable cell proliferation, having extensive changes of enzymatic parameters and bio-chemicals, which is the universal behavior of cancer cells. The overexposure of cellular growth will be triggered, and the cell cycle mechanism in cancerous cells will be arrested by utilizing plant-based nanoparticles [352]. The plant-based metal or metal oxide nanoparticles have excellent effects on different cancer cell lines, e.g., Hela, Hep 2, and HCT 116 cell lines. To date, various works reported that plant-mediated nanoparticles have the ability to control cancer cell growth. The bettered cytotoxic effect is because of secondary metabolites and some other non-metal composition in the prepared medium [353,354]. The bio-synthesized silver nanoparticles triggered the cell cycle and enzymes in the bloodstream [355]. Furthermore, the plant-derived nanoparticles control the formation of free radicals from the cell. Free radicals normally are the cause of cell proliferation and harm normal cell function. The moderate quantity of gold nanoparticles is the cause of the apoptosis mechanism in tumor cells (malignant cells) [356]. The metal and metal oxide nanoparticles have proven their application in medical science to diagnose and cure different types of cancer cells. The plant-mediated nanoparticles are advanced and revolutionized to cure the malignant deposits without disturbing the normal cell line.

10. Challenge and Future Perspectives of Plant-Mediated Metal and Metal Oxide Nanoparticles

To date, various plants’ extracts have been investigated for the preparation of metal or metal oxide nanoparticles and have been excellently used in a wide range of applications due to their huge abundance in nature. Recently, plant extracts have been investigated for their effectiveness in the formation of nanoparticles, which are based on the compositions of diverse phytochemicals and plant sources. However, the specific phytochemicals causing the reduction, capping, and stabilization of nanoparticles in the green synthesis mechanism are still not completely understood. Thus, further studies are required to understand these details. A suggested approach that might be able to describe the responsible phytochemicals serving as stabilizing and reducing candidates involves isolation protocols of the pure compound to identify specific phytochemicals. Additionally, the composition of phytochemicals in plant extract can be determined through various analytical techniques, e.g., ICP-AES (Inductively coupled plasma—atomic emission spectroscopy), HPLC (High Pressure Liquid Chromatography), NMR (Nuclear magnetic resonance), and GC-MS (gas chromatography-Mass spectroscopy) and various quantitative and qualitative chemical processes can be utilized to know the variety of phytochemicals through Coomassie blue assays, phenol-sulfuric acid assays, and colorimetric assays. The main challenge may be in knowing the basic profile of bio-molecules needed for serving as reducing agents of metal ions. Despite the various benefits of plant extracts, there are many other hindrances that should be accounted for before they can be applied practically, e.g., structure, control of shape, size, monodispersity, and crystallinity of plant-mediated nanoparticles. This template morphology is also connected to the phytochemicals that exist in the plant extract. Additionally, some other factors affect the morphology of nanoparticles such as metal ion concentration, reaction temperature, plant extract concentration, and pH. Furthermore, as described, the capability to attain a high yield of nanoparticles is also influenced, as is the reduction power of the plant.
The stability of plant-mediated nanoparticles is another important parameter to consider. It is very necessary to ensure that plant-mediated nanoparticles can remain stable for a long time without any changes in morphology. Another condition that should be discussed is an estimation of toxicity and biocompatibility of plant-mediated nanoparticles to human health and the ecosystem, which are still not described efficiently and are frequently reported.
More integrated, detailed, and systematic research work is still needed to fully define the human and ecological toxicity profile of plant-mediated nanoparticles to develop a stable system for the preparation of nanoparticles with well-defined size, morphology, and efficient homogeneity.

11. Conclusions

Biosynthesis of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles has been advanced and is a highly attractive research field of science over the last decades. Thus, knowledge of green chemistry and the use of green routes for the synthesis of nanoparticles is increasing day by day in order to get an environmentally friendly process. Various types of natural extracts (such as plants, fungi, algae, and bacteria) have been utilized for the preparation of nanoparticles. Among all the above mentioned sources, plants have been considered to possess remarkable efficiency as capping, reducing, and stabilizing agents for the preparation of nanoparticles with desired morphology due to the presence of Phytomolecules. This review delivers an excellent platform to researchers or the scientific community to gain diverse information related to detailing green synthesis of metal or metal oxide nanoparticles using multiple plant parts. Fundamentally, the greener production of metal or metal oxide nanoparticles using plant extracts has different biological applications such as anticancer, anti-microbial, and antifungal activity.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.I. and A.B.; methodology, E.G. and A.N.; software, S.H.; validation, R.S., S.S.A. and R.A.; formal analysis, H.Z. and R.S.; investigation, S.S.A.; resources, E.G. and R.A.; data curation, I.I.; writing—original draft preparation, I.I. and A.B.; writing—review and editing, H.Z. and A.N.; visualization, S.H.; supervision, Y.N.; project administration, Y.N.; funding acquisition, I.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The author from King Khalid University is thankful for support of Deanship Scientific grant under the project No. RGP.2/156/42.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable for this article.

Acknowledgments

All authors acknowledge the School of Chemistry, Minhaj University Lahore for providing platform for this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interest or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Abbreviation

S. aureusStaphylococcus aureus
E. coliEscherichia coli
B. SubtilisBacillus subtilis
P. aeruginosaPseudomonas aeruginosa
C. AlbicansCandida albicans
E. faecalisEnterococcus faecalis
B. cereusBacillus cereus
K. PneumoniaeKlebsiella pneumoniae
S. typhiSalmonella typhi
P. mirabilisProteus mirabilis

References

  1. Auffan, M.; Rose, J.; Bottero, J.-Y.; Lowry, G.V.; Jolivet, J.-P.; Wiesner, M.R. Towards a definition of inorganic nanoparticles from an environmental, health and safety perspective. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2009, 4, 634–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Narayanan, K.B.; Sakthivel, N. Biological synthesis of metal nanoparticles by microbes. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2010, 156, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Surendra, T.V.; Roopan, S.M.; Khan, M.R. Biogenic approach to synthesize rod shaped Gd2O3 nanoparticles and its optimization using response surface methodology-Box–Behnken design model. Biotechnol. Prog. 2019, 35, e2823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sabir, S.; Arshad, M.; Chaudhari, S.K. Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles for Revolutionizing Agriculture: Synthesis and Applications. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Ditta, A.; Arshad, M.; Ibrahim, M. Nanoparticles in Sustainable Agricultural Crop Production: Applications and Perspectives. In Nanotechnology and Plant Sciences; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 55–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sukumaran, P.; Poulose, E.K. Silver nanoparticles: Mechanism of antimicrobial action, synthesis, medical applications, and toxicity effects. Int. Nano Lett. 2012, 2, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  7. Lee, Y.; Choi, J.-R.; Lee, K.J.; E Stott, N.; Kim, D. Large-scale synthesis of copper nanoparticles by chemically controlled reduction for applications of inkjet-printed electronics. Nanotechnology 2008, 19, 415604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Naoki, T.; Yonezawa, T. Bimetallic nanoparticles—novel materials for chemical and physical applications. New J. Chem. 1998, 22, 1179–1201. [Google Scholar]
  9. Reddy, L.H.; Arias, J.L.; Nicolas, J.; Couvreur, P. Magnetic Nanoparticles: Design and Characterization, Toxicity and Biocompatibility, Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Applications. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 5818–5878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Antonyraj, C.A.; Jeong, J.; Kim, B.; Shin, S.; Kim, S.; Lee, K.-Y.; Cho, J.K. Selective oxidation of HMF to DFF using Ru/γ-alumina catalyst in moderate boiling solvents toward industrial production. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2012, 19, 1056–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Neville, F.; A Pchelintsev, N.; Broderick, M.J.F.; Gibson, T.; A Millner, P. Novel one-pot synthesis and characterization of bioactive thiol-silicate nanoparticles for biocatalytic and biosensor applications. Nanotechnology 2009, 20, 055612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Staniland, S.S. Magnetosomes: Bacterial biosynthesis of magnetic nanoparticles and potential biomedical applications. Nanotechnol. Life Sci. Online 2007, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  13. Luo, X.; Luo, X.; Morrin, A.; Killard, A.J.; Smyth, M.R. Application of nanoparticles in electrochemical sensors and biosensors. Electroanal. Int. J. Devoted Fundam. Pract. Asp. Electroanal. 2006, 18, 319–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Murthy, S.K. Nanoparticles in modern medicine: State of the art and future challenges. Int. J. Nanomed. 2007, 2, 129–141. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wen, Z.-Q.; Li, G.; Ren, D. Detection of Trace Melamine in Raw Materials Used for Protein Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Using Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS) with Gold Nanoparticles. Appl. Spectrosc. 2011, 65, 514–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xia, Y.; Yang, H.; Campbell, C.T. Nanoparticles for catalysis. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 1671–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cao, G.; Wang, Y. Nanostructures and Nanomaterials: Synthesis, Properties Applications; Imperial College Press: London, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  18. Fazal-ur-Rehman, M.; Qayyum, I.; Ibrahim, M.S. Nanotechnology: An innovation in scientific research and technology. Curr. Sci. 2019, 5, 48–59. [Google Scholar]
  19. Tshoko, S. Spectroelectrochemical Graphene-Silver/Zinc Oxide Nanoparticulate Phenotype Biosensors for Ethambutol and Pyrazinamide. Master’s Thesis, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  20. El Shafey, A.M. Green synthesis of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles from plant leaf extracts and their applications: A review. Green Process. Synth. 2020, 9, 304–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Clark, J.H.; Macquarrie, D.J. Handbook of Green Chemistry and Technology; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  22. Robert, K.W.; Parris, T.M.; Leiserowitz, A.A. What is sustainable development? Goals, indicators, values, and practice. Environ. Sci. Policy Sustain. Dev. 2005, 47, 8–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Omer, A.M. Energy, environment and sustainable development. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2008, 12, 2265–2300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wilson, M.P.; Schwarzman, M.R. Toward a new US chemicals policy: Rebuilding the foundation to advance new science, green chemistry, and environmental health. Environ. Health Perspect. 2009, 117, 1202–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Crowl, D.A.; Louvar, J.F. Chemical Process Safety: Fundamentals with Applications; Pearson Education: London, UK, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  26. Anastas, P.; Eghbali, N. Green chemistry: Principles and practice. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 301–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Centi, G.; Perathoner, S. From green to sustainable industrial chemistry. In Sustainable Industrial Chemistry; Cavani, F., Centi, G., Perathoner, S., Trifiró, F., Eds.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  28. Al Ansari, M.S. A review of optimal designs in relation to supply chains and sustainable chemical processes. Mod. Appl. Sci. 2012, 6, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pal, G.; Rai, P.; Pandey, A. Green synthesis of nanoparticles: A greener approach for a cleaner future. In Green Synthesis, Characterization and Applications of Nanoparticles; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 1–26. [Google Scholar]
  30. Mohanpuria, P.; Rana, N.K.; Yadav, S.K. Biosynthesis of nanoparticles: Technological concepts and future applications. J. Nanoparticle Res. 2007, 10, 507–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hulkoti Nasreen, I.; Taranath, T.C. Biosynthesis of nanoparticles using microbes—a review. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2014, 121, 474–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Iravani, S. Green synthesis of metal nanoparticles using plants. Green Chem. 2011, 13, 2638–2650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gittins, D.I.; Bethell, D.; Schiffrin, D.J.; Nichols, R. A nanometre-scale electronic switch consisting of a metal cluster and redox-addressable groups. Nature 2000, 408, 67–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Sumera; Anwar, A.; Ovais, M.; Khan, A.; Raza, A. Docetaxel-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles: A novel drug delivery system. IET Nanobiotechnology 2017, 11, 621–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Awan, U.A.; Ali, S.; Rehman, M.; Zia, N.; Naz, S.S.; Ovais, M.; Raza, A. Stable and reproducible synthesis of gold nanorods for biomedical applications: A comprehensive study. Iet Nanobiotechnology 2018, 12, 182–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Emmanuel, R.; Saravanan, M.; Ovais, M.; Padmavathy, S.; Shinwari, Z.K.; Prakash, P. Antimicrobial efficacy of drug blended biosynthesized colloidal gold nanoparticles from Justicia glauca against oral pathogens: A nanoantibiotic approach. Microb. Pathog. 2017, 113, 295–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Khalil, A.T.; Ovais, M.; Ullah, I.; Ali, M.; Shinwari, Z.K.; Khamlich, S.; Maaza, M. Sageretia thea (Osbeck.) mediated synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles and its biological applications. Nanomedicine 2017, 12, 1767–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mashwani, Z.-U.; Khan, M.A.; Khan, T.; Nadhman, A. Applications of plant terpenoids in the synthesis of colloidal silver nanoparticles. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2016, 234, 132–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mukherjee, S.; Sushma, V.; Patra, S.; Barui, A.K.; Bhadra, M.P.; Sreedhar, B.; Patra, C.R. Green chemistry approach for the synthesis and stabilization of biocompatible gold nanoparticles and their potential applications in cancer therapy. Nanotechnology 2012, 23, 455103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Mukherjee, S.; Vinothkumar, B.; Prashanthi, S.; Bangal, P.R.; Sreedhar, B.; Patra, C.R. Potential therapeutic and diagnostic applications of one-step in situ biosynthesized gold nanoconjugates (2-in-1 system) in cancer treatment. RSC Adv. 2012, 3, 2318–2329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mukherjee, S.; Debabrata, C.; Rajesh, K.; Sujata, P. Potential theranostics application of bio-synthesized silver nanoparticles (4-in-1 system). Theranostics 2014, 4, 316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Mukherjee, S.; Dasari, M.; Priyamvada, S.; Kotcherlakota, R.; Bollu, V.S.; Patra, C.R. A green chemistry approach for the synthesis of gold nanoconjugates that induce the inhibition of cancer cell proliferation through induction of oxidative stress and their in vivo toxicity study. J. Mater. Chem. B 2015, 3, 3820–3830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mukherjee, S.; Sau, S.; Madhuri, D.; Bollu, V.S.; Madhusudana, K.; Sreedhar, B.; Banerjee, R.; Patra, C.R. Green synthesis and characterization of monodispersed gold nanoparticles: Toxicity study, delivery of doxorubicin and its bio-distribution in mouse model. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2016, 12, 165–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zohra, T.; Ovais, M.; Khalil, A.T.; Qasim, M.; Ayaz, M.; Shinwari, Z.K. Extraction optimization, total phenolic, flavonoid contents, HPLC-DAD analysis and diverse pharmacological evaluations of Dysphania ambrosioides (L.) Mosyakin & Clemants. Nat. Prod. Res. 2018, 33, 136–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Maruyama, T.; Fujimoto, Y.; Maekawa, T. Synthesis of gold nanoparticles using various amino acids. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2015, 447, 254–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Polavarapu, L.; Xu, Q.H. A single-step synthesis of gold nanochains using an amino acid as a capping agent and characterization of their optical properties. Nanotechnology 2008, 19, 075601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ramani, M.; Ponnusamy, S.; Muthamizhchelvan, C.; Marsili, E. Amino acid-mediated synthesis of zinc oxide nanostructures and evaluation of their facet-dependent antimicrobial activity. Colloids Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 2014, 117, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Li, S.; Shen, Y.; Xie, A.; Yu, X.; Qiu, L.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Q. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Capsicum annuum L. extract. Green Chem. 2007, 9, 852–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ashraf, S.; Abbasi, A.Z.; Pfeiffer, C.; Hussain, S.Z.; Khalid, Z.M.; Gil, P.R.; Parak, W.J.; Hussain, I. Protein-mediated synthesis, pH-induced reversible agglomeration, toxicity and cellular interaction of silver nanoparticles. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces 2013, 102, 511–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Parveen, R.; Shamsi, T.N.; Fatima, S. Nanoparticles-protein interaction: Role in protein aggregation and clinical implications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 94, 386–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Shukla, R.; Nune, S.K.; Chanda, N.; Katti, K.; Mekapothula, S.; Kulkarni, R.R.; Welshons, W.V.; Kannan, R.; Katti, K.V. Soybeans as a phytochemical reservoir for the production and stabilization of biocompatible gold nanoparticles. Small 2008, 4, 1425–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Raveendran, P.; Fu, J.; Wallen, S.L. Completely “green” synthesis and stabilization of metal nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 13940–13941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhao, X.; Xia, Y.; Li, Q.; Ma, X.; Quan, F.; Geng, C.; Han, Z. Microwave-assisted synthesis of silver nanoparticles using sodium alginate and their antibacterial activity. Colloids Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2014, 444, 180–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Akhlaghi, S.P.; Peng, B.; Yao, Z.; Tam, K.C. Sustainable nanomaterials derived from polysaccharides and amphiphilic compounds. Soft Matter 2013, 9, 7905–7918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Duan, H.; Wang, D.; Li, Y. Green chemistry for nanoparticle synthesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 5778–5792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Boury, B.; Plumejeau, S. Metal oxides and polysaccharides: An efficient hybrid association for materials chemistry. Green Chem. 2014, 17, 72–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Philip, D. Biosynthesis of Au, Ag and Au–Ag nanoparticles using edible mushroom extract. Spectrochim. Acta Part A: Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2009, 73, 374–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ali, M.; Khan, T.; Fatima, K.; Ali, Q.U.A.; Ovais, M.; Khalil, A.T.; Ullah, I.; Raza, A.; Shinwari, Z.K.; Idrees, M. Selected hepatoprotective herbal medicines: Evidence from ethnomedicinal applications, animal models, and possible mechanism of actions. Phytother. Res. 2018, 32, 199–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Edison, T.J.I.; Sethuraman, M.G. Instant green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Terminalia chebula fruit extract and evaluation of their catalytic activity on reduction of methylene blue. Process. Biochem. 2012, 47, 1351–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kumar, K.M.; Mandal, B.K.; Sinha, M.; Krishnakumar, V. Terminalia chebula mediated green and rapid synthesis of gold nanoparticles. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2012, 86, 490–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Winkel-Shirley, B. Flavonoid biosynthesis. A colorful model for genetics, biochemistry, cell biology, and biotechnology. Plant Physiol. 2001, 126, 485–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Zhou, Y.; Lin, W.; Huang, J.; Wang, W.; Gao, Y.; Lin, L.; Li, Q.; Lin, L.; Du, M. Biosynthesis of Gold Nanoparticles by Foliar Broths: Roles of Biocompounds and Other Attributes of the Extracts. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2010, 5, 1351–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Lee, J.; Kim, H.Y.; Zhou, H.; Hwang, S.; Koh, K.; Han, D.-W.; Lee, J. Green synthesis of phytochemical-stabilized Au nanoparticles under ambient conditions and their biocompatibility and antioxidative activity. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 13316–13326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Mittal, A.K.; Kumar, S.; Banerjee, U.C. Quercetin and gallic acid mediated synthesis of bimetallic (silver and selenium) nanoparticles and their antitumor and antimicrobial potential. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014, 431, 194–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Moulton, M.C.; Braydich-Stolle, L.K.; Nadagouda, M.N.; Kunzelman, S.; Hussain, S.M.; Varma, R.S. Synthesis, characterization and biocompatibility of green” synthesized silver nanoparticles using tea polyphenols. Nanoscale 2010, 2, 763–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Raghunandan, D.; Basavaraja, S.; Mahesh, B.; Balaji, S.; Manjunath, S.Y.; Venkataraman, A. Biosynthesis of Stable Polyshaped Gold Nanoparticles from Microwave-Exposed Aqueous Extracellular Anti-malignant Guava (Psidium guajava) Leaf Extract. NanoBiotechnology 2009, 5, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ahmad, N.; Sharma, S.; Alam, K.; Singh, V.; Shamsi, S.; Mehta, B.; Fatma, A. Rapid synthesis of silver nanoparticles using dried medicinal plant of basil. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces 2010, 81, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ghoreishi, S.M.; Behpour, M.; Khayatkashani, M. Green synthesis of silver and gold nanoparticles using Rosa damascena and its primary application in electrochemistry. Phys. E Low Dimens. Syst. Nanostructures 2011, 44, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Singh, J.; Dutta, T.; Kim, K.H.; Rawat, M.; Samddar, P.; Kumar, P. ‘Green’synthesis of metals and their oxide nanoparticles: Applications for environmental remediation. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2018, 16, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Vilas, V.; Philip, D.; Mathew, J. Catalytically and biologically active silver nanoparticles synthesized using essential oil. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2014, 132, 743–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Song, J.Y.; Kim, B.S. Rapid biological synthesis of silver nanoparticles using plant leaf extracts. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2009, 32, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kumari, M.M.; Philip, D. Facile one-pot synthesis of gold and silver nanocatalysts using edible coconut oil. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2013, 111, 154–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. González-Rivera, J.; Duce, C.; Ierardi, V.; Longo, I.; Spepi, A.; Tiné, M.R.; Ferrari, C. Fast and Eco-friendly Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles using Rosemary Essential Oil as Renewable Reducing Agent. ChemistrySelect 2017, 2, 2131–2138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Da Silva, E.C.; Da Silva, M.G.A.; Meneghetti, S.M.P.; Machado, G.; Alencar, M.A.R.C.; Hickmann, J.M.; Meneghetti, M.R. Synthesis of colloids based on g.old nanoparticles dispersed in castor oil. J. Nanoparticle Res. 2008, 10, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Sheny, D.; Mathew, J.; Philip, D. Synthesis characterization and catalytic action of hexagonal gold nanoparticles using essential oils extracted from Anacardium occidentale. Spectrochim. Acta Part A: Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2012, 97, 306–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Jiang, J.; Pi, J.; Cai, J. The Advancing of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles for Biomedical Applications. Bioinorg. Chem. Appl. 2018, 2018, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Rajeshkumar, S.; Kumar, S.V.; Ramaiah, A.; Agarwal, H.; Lakshmi, T.; Roopan, S.M. Biosynthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles using Mangifera indica leaves and evaluation of their antioxidant and cytotoxic properties in lung cancer (A549) cells. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2018, 117, 91–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Madhumitha, G.; Elango, G.; Roopan, S.M. Biotechnological aspects of ZnO nanoparticles: Overview on synthesis and its applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 100, 571–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Saemi, R.; Taghavi, E.; Jafarizadeh-Malmiri, H.; Anarjan, N. Fabrication of green ZnO nanoparticles using walnut leaf extract to develop an antibacterial film based on polyethylene–starch–ZnO NPs. Green Process. Synth. 2021, 10, 112–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Demissie, M.G.; Sabir, F.K.; Edossa, G.D.; Gonfa, B.A. Synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles using leaf extract of lippiaadoensis (koseret) and evaluation of its antibacterial activity. J. Chem. 2020, 2020, 7459042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Jayachandran, A.; Aswathy, T.R.; Nair, A.S. Green synthesis and characterization of zinc oxide nanoparticles using Cayratiapedata leaf extract. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 2021, 26, 100995. [Google Scholar]
  82. Thi Tran, Q.M.; Thi Nguyen, H.A.; Doan, V.D.; Tran, Q.H.; Nguyen, V.C. Biosynthesis of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Using Aqueous Piper betle Leaf Extract and Its Application in Surgical Sutures. J. Nanomater. 2021, 2021, 8833864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Hagos, K.M. Synthesis and characterization of ZnO nanoparticles using aqueous extract of Becium grandiflorum for antimicrobial activity and adsorption of methylene blue. Appl. Water Sci. 2021, 11, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  84. Saeed, S.; Nawaz, S.; Nisar, A.; Mehmood, T.; Tayyab, M.; Nawaz, M.; Firyal, S.; Bilal, M.; Mohyuddin, A.; Ullah, A. Effective fabrication of zinc-oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles using Achyranthes aspera leaf extract and their potent biological activities against the bacterial poultry pathogens. Mater. Res. Express 2021, 8, 035004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. El-Belely, E.F.; Farag, M.; Said, H.A.; Amin, A.S.; Azab, E.; Gobouri, A.A.; Fouda, A. Green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs) using Arthrospira platensis (Class: Cyanophyceae) and evaluation of their biomedical activities. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Alamdari, S.; Ghamsari, M.S.; Lee, C.; Han, W.; Park, H.-H.; Tafreshi, M.J.; Afarideh, H.; Ara, M.H.M. Preparation and Characterization of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Using Leaf Extract of Sambucus ebulus. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Droepenu, E.K.; Asare, E.A.; Wee, B.S.; Wahi, R.B.; Ayertey, F.; Kyene, M.O. Biosynthesis, characterization, and antibacterial activity of ZnO nanoaggregates using aqueous extract from Anacardium occidentale leaf: Comparative study of different precursors. Beni Suef Univ. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2021, 10, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Barzinjy, A.A.; Azeez, H.H. Green synthesis and characterization of zinc oxide nanoparticles using Eucalyptus globulus Labill. leaf extract and zinc nitrate hexahydrate salt. SN Appl. Sci. 2020, 2, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Naseer, M.; Aslam, U.; Khalid, B.; Chen, B. Green route to synthesize Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles using leaf extracts of Cassia fistula and Melia azadarach and their antibacterial potential. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Ahmad, W.; Kalra, D. Green synthesis, characterization and anti microbial activities of ZnO nanoparticles using Euphorbia hirta leaf extract. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2020, 32, 2358–2364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Rahaiee, S.; Ranjbar, M.; Azizi, H.; Govahi, M.; Zare, M. Green synthesis, characterization, and biological activities of saffron leaf extract-mediated zinc oxide nanoparticles: A sustainable approach to reuse an agricultural waste. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2020, 34, e5705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Rahaiee, S.; Ranjbar, M.; Azizi, H.; Govahi, M.; Zare, M. Synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles by two different methods comparison of their structural, antibacterial, photocatalytic and optical properties. Nano Express 2020, 1, 010007. [Google Scholar]
  93. Jan, H.; Shah, M.; Usman, H.; Khan, A.; Muhammad, Z.; Hano, C.; Abbasi, B.H. Biogenic synthesis and characterization of antimicrobial and anti-parasitic zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles using aqueous extracts of the Himalayan columbine (Aquilegia pubiflora). Front. Mater. 2020, 7, 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Osuntokun, J.; Onwudiwe, D.C.; Ebenso, E.E. Green synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles using aqueous Brassica oleracea L. var. italica and the photocatalytic activity. Green Chem. Lett. Rev. 2019, 12, 444–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Vinotha, V.; Iswarya, A.; Thaya, R.; Govindarajan, M.; Alharbi, N.S.; Kadaikunnan, S.; Khaled, J.M.; Al-Anbr, M.N.; Vaseeharan, B. Synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles using insulin-rich leaf extract: Anti-diabetic, antibiofilm and anti-oxidant properties. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2019, 197, 111541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Hussain, A.; Oves, M.; Alajmi, M.F.; Hussain, I.; Amir, S.; Ahmed, J.; Rehman, T.; El-Seedi, H.R.; Ali, I. Biogenesis of ZnO nanoparticles using Pandanus odorifer leaf extract: Anticancer and antimicrobial activities. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 15357–15369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Ezealisiji, K.M.; Siwe-Noundou, X.; Maduelosi, B.; Nwachukwu, N.; Krause, R.W.M. Green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles using Solanum torvum (L) leaf extract and evaluation of the toxicological profile of the ZnO nanoparticles–hydrogel composite in Wistar albino rats. Int. Nano Lett. 2019, 9, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Rajendran, N.; George, B.; Houreld, N.; Abrahamse, H. Synthesis of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Using Rubus fairholmianus Root Extract and Their Activity against Pathogenic Bacteria. Molecules 2021, 26, 3029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Naser, R.; Abu-Huwaij, R.; Al-Khateeb, I.; Abbas, M.M.; Atoom, A.M. Green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles using the root hair extract of Phoenix dactylifera: Antimicrobial and anticancer activity. Appl. Nanosci. 2021, 11, 1747–1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Liu, D.; Liu, L.; Yao, L.; Peng, X.; Li, Y.; Jiang, T.; Kuang, H. Synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles using radish root extract for effective wound dressing agents for diabetic foot ulcers in nursing care. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2019, 55, 101364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Shaik, A.M.; David Raju, M.; Rama Sekhara Reddy, D. Green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles using aqueous root extract of Sphagneticolatrilobata Lin and investigate its role in toxic metal removal, sowing germination and fostering of plant growth. Inorg. Nano Met. Chem. 2020, 50, 569–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Espenti, C.S.; Krishna, A.G.R.; Reddy, Y.V.R. Green biosynthesis of ZnO nanomaterials and their anti-bacterial activity by using Moringa Oleifera root aqueous extract. SN Appl. Sci. 2020, 2, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Jobie, F.N.; Ranjbar, M.; Moghaddam, A.H.; Kiani, M. Green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles using Amygdalus scoparia Spach stem bark extract and their applications as an alternative antimicrobial, anticancer, and anti-diabetic agent. Adv. Powder Technol. 2021, 32, 2043–2052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Ansari, M.A.; Murali, M.; Prasad, D.; Alzohairy, M.A.; Almatroudi, A.; Alomary, M.N.; Udayashankar, A.C.; Singh, S.B.; Asiri, S.M.M.; Ashwini, B.S.; et al. Cinnamomum verum Bark Extract Mediated Green Synthesis of ZnO Nanoparticles and Their Antibacterial Potentiality. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Jayappa, M.D.; Ramaiah, C.K.; Kumar, M.A.P.; Suresh, D.; Prabhu, A.; Devasya, R.P.; Sheikh, S. Green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles from the leaf, stem and in vitro grown callus of Mussaendafrondosa L.: Characterization and their applications. Appl. Nanosci. 2020, 10, 3057–3074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Umar, H.; Kavaz, D.; Rizaner, N. Biosynthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles using Albizia lebbeck stem bark, and evaluation of its antimicrobial, antioxidant, and cytotoxic activities on human breast cancer cell lines. Int. J. Nanomed. 2019, 14, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Seshadri, V.D. Zinc oxide nanoparticles from Cassia auriculata flowers showed the potent antimicrobial and in vitro anticancer activity against the osteosarcoma MG-63 cells. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 4046–4054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Ifeanyichukwu, U.L.; Fayemi, O.E.; Ateba, C.N. Green Synthesis of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles from Pomegranate (Punica granatum) Extracts and Characterization of Their Antibacterial Activity. Molecules 2020, 25, 4521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Ngom, I.; Ngom, B.; Sackey, J.; Khamlich, S. Biosynthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles using extracts of Moringa Oleifera: Structural & optical properties. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 36, 526–533. [Google Scholar]
  110. Ogunyemi, S.O.; Abdallah, Y.; Zhang, M.; Fouad, H.; Hong, X.; Ibrahim, E.; Masum, M.M.I.; Hossain, A.; Mo, J.; Li, B. Green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles using different plant extracts and their antibacterial activity against Xanthomonas oryzaepv. oryzae. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2019, 47, 341–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  111. Lakshmeesha, T.R.; Kalagatur, N.K.; Mudili, V.; Mohan, C.D.; Rangappa, S.; Prasad, B.D.; Ashwini, B.S.; Hashem, A.; Alqarawi, A.A.; Malik, J.A.; et al. Biofabrication of zinc oxide nanoparticles with Syzygiumaromaticum flower buds extract and finding its novel application in controlling the growth and mycotoxins of Fusarium graminearum. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Umavathi, S.; Mahboob, S.; Govindarajan, M.; Al-Ghanim, K.A.; Ahmed, Z.; Virik, P.; Al-Mulhm, N.; Subash, M.; Gopinath, K.; Kavitha, C. Green synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles for antimicrobial and vegetative growth applications: A novel approach for advancing efficient high quality health care to human wellbeing. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 28, 1808–1815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Rawashdeh, R.Y.; Harb, A.M.; AlHasan, A.M. Biological interaction levels of zinc oxide nanoparticles; lettuce seeds as case study. Heliyon 2020, 6, e03983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Shabaani, M.; Rahaiee, S.; Zare, M.; Jafari, S.M. Green synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles using loquat seed extract; Biological functions and photocatalytic degradation properties. LWT 2020, 134, 110133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Chankaew, C.; Tapala, W.; Grudpan, K.; Rujiwatra, A. Microwave synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles using longan seeds biowaste and their efficiencies in photocatalytic decolorization of organic dyes. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 17548–17554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Alshehri, A.A.; Malik, M.A. Biogenic fabrication of ZnO nanoparticles using Trigonella foenum-graecum (Fenugreek) for proficient photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue under UV irradiation. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2019, 30, 16156–16173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Khan, M.; Ware, P.; Shimpi, N. Synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles using peels of Passiflora foetida and study of its activity as an efficient catalyst for the degradation of hazardous organic dye. SN Appl. Sci. 2021, 3, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Faisal, S.; Jan, H.; Shah, S.A.; Shah, S.; Khan, A.; Akbar, M.T.; Rizwan, M.; Jan, F.; Wajidullah; Akhtar, N.; et al. Green Synthesis of Zinc Oxide (ZnO) Nanoparticles Using Aqueous Fruit Extracts of Myristica fragrans: Their Characterizations and Biological and Environmental Applications. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 9709–9722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Gao, Y.; Xu, D.; Ren, D.; Zeng, K.; Wu, X. Green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles using Citrus sinensis peel extract and application to strawberry preservation: A comparison study. LWT 2020, 126, 109297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Thi, T.U.D.; Nguyen, T.T.; Thi, Y.D.; Thi, K.H.T.; Phan, B.T.; Pham, K.N. Green synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles using orange fruit peel extract for antibacterial activities. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 23899–23907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Awwad, A.M.; Amer, M.W.; Salem, N.M.; Abdeen, A.O. Green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs) using Ailanthus altissima fruit extracts and antibacterial activity. Chem. Int. 2020, 6, 151–159. [Google Scholar]
  122. Grace, A.N.; Pandian, K. Antibacterial efficacy of aminoglycosidic antibiotics protected gold nanoparticles—A brief study. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2007, 297, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Drechsler, U.; Erdogan, B.; Rotello, V.M. Nanoparticles: Scaffolds for Molecular Recognition. Chem. A Eur. J. 2004, 10, 5570–5579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Lee, J.-S. Recent progress in gold nanoparticle-based non-volatile memory devices. Gold Bull. 2010, 43, 189–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. van der Molen, S.J.; Liao, J.; Kudernac, T.; Agustsson, J.S.; Bernard, L.; Calame, M.; van Wees, B.J.; Feringa, B.L.; Schoönenberger, C. Light-controlled conductance switching of ordered metal-molecule-metal devices. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 76–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Mackowski, S. Hybrid nanostructures for efficient light harvesting. J. Physics Condens. Matter 2010, 22, 193102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Khan, A.; Rashid, R.; Murtaza, G.; Zahra, A. Gold Nanoparticles: Synthesis and Applications in Drug Delivery. Trop. J. Pharm. Res. 2014, 13, 1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Rocha-Rocha, O.; Cortez-Valadez, M.; Calderón-Ayala, G.; Martínez-Nuñez, C.; Pedroza-Montero, M.; Flores-Acosta, M. Confined clustering of AuCu nanoparticles under ambient conditions. Phys. Lett. A 2019, 383, 125985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Aminabad, N.S.; Farshbaf, M.; Akbarzadeh, A. Recent Advances of Gold Nanoparticles in Biomedical Applications: State of the Art. Cell Biophys. 2018, 77, 123–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Hu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Ding, T.; Liu, J.; Zhao, H. Multifunctional Gold Nanoparticles: A Novel Nanomaterial for Various Medical Applications and Biological Activities. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Jiang, P.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, L.; Ji, C.; Chen, D.; Nie, L. Applications of Gold Nanoparticles in Non-Optical Biosensors. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  132. Madkour, L.H. Applications of gold nanoparticles in medicine and therapy. Pharm. Pharmacol. Int. J. 2018, 6, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Nadeem, M.; Abbasi, B.H.; Younas, M.; Ahmad, W.; Khan, T. A review of the green syntheses and anti-microbial applications of gold nanoparticles. Green Chem. Lett. Rev. 2017, 10, 216–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  134. Guliani, A.; Kumari, A.; Acharya, A. Green synthesis of gold nanoparticles using aqueous leaf extract of Populus alba: Characterization, antibacterial and dye degradation activity. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 6, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  135. Le, V.T.; Ngu, N.N.Q.; Chau, T.P.; Nguyen, T.D.; Nguyen, V.T.; Nguyen, T.L.H.; Cao, X.T.; Doan, V.D. Silver and Gold Nanoparticles from Limnophila rugosa Leaves: Biosynthesis, Characterization, and Catalytic Activity in Reduction of Nitrophenols. J. Nanomater. 2021, 2021, 5571663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Olajire, A.; Mohammed, A. Bio-directed synthesis of gold nanoparticles using Ananas comosus aqueous leaf extract and their photocatalytic activity for LDPE degradation. Adv. Powder Technol. 2021, 32, 600–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. El-Borady, O.M.; Fawzy, M.; Hosny, M. Antioxidant, anticancer and enhanced photocatalytic potentials of gold nanoparticles biosynthesized by common reed leaf extract. Appl. Nanosci. 2021, 3, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  138. Li, S.; Al-Misned, F.A.; El-Serehy, H.A.; Yang, L. Green synthesis of gold nanoparticles using aqueous extract of Mentha Longifolia leaf and investigation of its anti-human breast carcinoma properties in the in vitro condition. Arab. J. Chem. 2020, 14, 102931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Shah, S.; Shah, S.A.; Faisal, S.; Khan, A.; Ullah, R.; Ali, N.; Bilal, M. Engineering novel gold nanoparticles using Sageretiathea leaf extract and evaluation of their biological activities. J. Nanostruct. Chem. 2021, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  140. Jiao, Y.; Wang, X.; Chen, J.-H. Biofabrication of AuNPs using Coriandrum sativum leaf extract and their antioxidant, analgesic activity. Sci. Total. Environ. 2021, 767, 144914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Hosny, M.; Fawzy, M. Instantaneous phytosynthesis of gold nanoparticles via Persicaria salicifolia leaf extract, and their medical applications. Adv. Powder Technol. 2021, 8, 2891–2904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Chen, J.; Li, Y.; Fang, G.; Cao, Z.; Shang, Y.; Alfarraj, S.; Alharbi, S.A.; Li, J.; Yang, S.; Duan, X. Green synthesis, characterization, cytotoxicity, antioxidant, and anti-human ovarian cancer activities of Curcumae kwangsiensis leaf aqueous extract green-synthesized gold nanoparticles. Arab. J. Chem. 2021, 14, 103000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Abdoli, M.; Arkan, E.; Shekarbeygi, Z.; Khaledian, S. Green synthesis of gold nanoparticles using Centaurea behen leaf aqueous extract and investigating their antioxidant and cytotoxic effects on acute leukemia cancer cell line (THP-1). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2021, 129, 108649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Padalia, H.; Chanda, S. Antioxidant and Anticancer Activities of Gold Nanoparticles Synthesized Using Aqueous Leaf Extract of Ziziphus nummularia. BioNanoScience 2021, 11, 281–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Balasubramanian, S.; Kala, S.M.J.; Pushparaj, T.L. Biogenic synthesis of gold nanoparticles using Jasminum auriculatum leaf extract and their catalytic, antimicrobial and anticancer activities. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2020, 57, 101620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Sunayana, N.; Uzma, M.; Dhanwini, R.P.; Govindappa, M.; Prakash, H.S.; Raghavendra, B.V. Green Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles from Vitex negundo Leaf Extract to Inhibit Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Inflammation Through In Vitro and In Vivo. J. Clust. Sci. 2019, 31, 463–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Khatua, A.; Priyadarshini, E.; Rajamani, P.; Patel, A.; Kumar, J.; Naik, A.; Saravanan, M.; Barabadi, H.; Prasad, A.; Ghosh, L.; et al. Phytosynthesis, Characterization and Fungicidal Potential of Emerging Gold Nanoparticles Using Pongamia pinnata Leave Extract: A Novel Approach in Nanoparticle Synthesis. J. Clust. Sci. 2019, 31, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Vo, T.-T.; Dang, C.-H.; Doan, V.-D.; Dang, V.-S.; Nguyen, T.-D. Biogenic Synthesis of Silver and Gold Nanoparticles from Lactuca indica Leaf Extract and Their Application in Catalytic Degradation of Toxic Compounds. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2019, 30, 388–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Kumar, P.V.; Kala, S.M.J.; Prakash, K. Green synthesis of gold nanoparticles using Croton Caudatus Geisel leaf extract and their biological studies. Mater. Lett. 2018, 236, 19–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Kumar, I.; Mondal, M.; Meyappan, V.; Sakthivel, N. Green one-pot synthesis of gold nanoparticles using Sansevieria roxburghiana leaf extract for the catalytic degradation of toxic organic pollutants. Mater. Res. Bull. 2019, 117, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Thangamani, N.; Bhuvaneshwari, N. Green synthesis of gold nanoparticles using Simarouba glauca leaf extract and their biological activity of micro-organism. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2019, 732, 136587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Khoshnamvand, M.; Ashtiani, S.; Huo, C.; Saeb, S.P.; Liu, J. Use of Alcea rosea leaf extract for biomimetic synthesis of gold nanoparticles with innate free radical scavenging and catalytic activities. J. Mol. Struct. 2018, 1179, 749–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Vijayan, R.; Joseph, S.; Mathew, B. Anticancer, antimicrobial, antioxidant, and catalytic activities of green-synthesized silver and gold nanoparticles using Bauhinia purpurea leaf extract. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2018, 42, 305–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Boomi, P.; Ganesan, R.; Poorani, G.; Prabu, H.G.; Ravikumar, S.; Jeyakanthan, J. Biological synergy of greener gold nanoparticles by using Coleus aromaticus leaf extract. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 99, 202–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Al-Radadi, N.S. Facile one-step green synthesis of gold nanoparticles (AuNp) using licorice root extract: Antimicrobial and anticancer study against HepG2 cell line. Arab. J. Chem. 2020, 14, 102956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Hosny, M.; Fawzy, M.; El-Borady, O.M.; Mahmoud, A.E.D. Comparative study between Phragmites australis root and rhizome extracts for mediating gold nanoparticles synthesis and their medical and environmental applications. Adv. Powder Technol. 2021, 32, 2268–2279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Doan, V.D.; Huynh, B.A.; Nguyen, T.D.; Cao, X.T.; Nguyen, V.C.; Nguyen, T.L.H.; Nguyen, H.T.; Le, V.T. Biosynthesis of silver and gold nanoparticles using aqueous extract of Codonopsispilosula roots for antibacterial and catalytic applications. J. Nanomater. 2020, 2020, 8492016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Zhang, T.; Dang, M.; Zhang, W.; Lin, X. Gold nanoparticles synthesized from Euphorbia fischeriana root by green route method alleviates the isoprenaline hydrochloride induced myocardial infarction in rats. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2019, 202, 111705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Xue, J.; Liu, T.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Seshadri, V.; Mohan, S.K.; Ling, L. Neuroprotective effect of biosynthesised gold nanoparticles synthesised from root extract of Paeonia moutan against Parkinson disease—In vitro & In vivo model. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2019, 200, 111635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. González-Ballesteros, N.; Vidal-González, J.; Rodríguez-Argüelles, M.C. Wealth from by-products: An attempt to synthesize valuable gold nanoparticles from Brassica oleracea var. acephala cv. Galega stems. J. Nanostructure Chem. 2021, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Khoshnamvand, M.; Hao, Z.; Huo, C.; Liu, J. Photocatalytic degradation of 4-nitrophenol pollutant and in vitro antioxidant assay of gold nanoparticles synthesized from Apium graveolens leaf and stem extracts. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 17, 2433–2442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Chokkalingam, M.; Rupa, E.J.; Huo, Y.; Mathiyalagan, R.; Anandapadmanaban, G.; Ahn, J.C.; Park, J.K.; Lu, J.; Yang, D.C. Photocatalytic degradation of industrial dyes using Ag and Au nanoparticles synthesized from Angelica gigas ribbed stem extracts. Optik 2019, 185, 1213–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Alhumaydhi, F.A.; Khan, I.; Rauf, A.; Qureshi, M.N.; Aljohani, A.S.M.; Khan, S.A.; Khalil, A.A.; A El-Esawi, M.; Muhammad, N. Synthesis, characterization, biological activities, and catalytic applications of alcoholic extract of saffron (Crocus sativus) flower stigma-based gold nanoparticles. Green Process. Synth. 2021, 10, 230–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Chan, J.Z.; Ali, R.R.; Shameli, K.; Salleh, M.S.N.; Lee, K.X.; Isa, E.M. Green Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles using Aqueous Extract of ClitoriaTernatea Flower. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; IOP Publishing: London, UK, 2020; Volume 808. [Google Scholar]
  165. Valsalam, S.; Agastian, P.; Esmail, G.A.; Ghilan, A.-K.M.; Al-Dhabi, N.A.; Arasu, M.V. Biosynthesis of silver and gold nanoparticles using Musa acuminata colla flower and its pharmaceutical activity against bacteria and anticancer efficacy. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2019, 201, 111670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Rajan, A.; Rajan, A.R.; Philip, D. Elettaria cardamomum seed mediated rapid synthesis of gold nanoparticles and its biological activities. OpenNano 2017, 2, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Srinivas, M.; Venkata, R.C.; Kakarla, R.R.; Shetti, N.P.; Reddy, M.S.; Anjanapura, V.R. Novel Co and Ni metal nanostructures as efficient photocatalysts for photodegradation of organic dyes. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 125502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Shan, G.; Surampalli, R.Y.; Tyagi, R.D.; Zhang, T.C. Nanomaterials for environmental burden reduction, waste treatment, and nonpoint source pollution control: A review. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. China 2009, 3, 249–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Savithramma, N.; Rao, M.L.; Rukmini, K.; Devi, P.S. Antimicrobial activity of silver nanoparticles synthesized by using medicinal plants. Int. J. ChemTech Res. 2011, 3, 1394–1402. [Google Scholar]
  170. Pan, D.; Caruthers, S.D.; Hu, G.; Senpan, A.; Scott, M.J.; Gaffney, P.J.; Wickline, S.A.; Lanza, G.M. Ligand-Directed Nanobialys as Theranostic Agent for Drug Delivery and Manganese-Based Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Vascular Targets. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 9186–9187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  171. Hullmann, A. Measuring and assessing the development of nanotechnology. Scientometrics 2007, 70, 739–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Maheshwari, P.V.; Gupta, N.V. Advances of nanotechnology in healthcare. Int. J. Pharm Tech Res. 2012, 4, 1221–1227. [Google Scholar]
  173. Savage, N.; Diallo, M.S. Nanomaterials and water purification: Opportunities and challenges. J. Nanoparticle Res. 2005, 7, 331–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Kamat, P.V. Photophysical, photochemical and photocatalytic aspects of metal nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 7729–7744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Mirkin, C.A.; Letsinger, R.L.; Mucic, R.C.; Storhoff, J.J. A DNA-based method for rationally assembling nanoparticles into macroscopic materials. Nature 1996, 382, 607–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Han, M.; Gao, X.; Su, J.Z.; Nie, S. Quantum-dot-tagged microbeads for multiplexed optical coding of biomolecules. Nature Bio. 2001, 19, 631–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Boncheva, M.; Gracias, D.; Jacobs, H.O.; Whitesides, G.M. Biomimetic self-assembly of a functional asymmetrical electronic device. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2002, 99, 4937–4940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  178. Mishra, A.; Mehta, A.; Basu, S.; Malode, S.J.; Shetti, N.P.; Shukla, S.S.; Nadagouda, M.N.; Aminabhavi, T.M. Electrode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Mater. Sci. Energy Technol. 2018, 1, 182–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Cao, Y.; Jin, R.; Mirkin, C.A. DNA-modified core− shell Ag/Au nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 7961–7962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Barillo, D.J.; Marx, D.E. Silver in medicine: A brief history BC 335 to present. Burns 2014, 40, S3–S8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Hong, X.; Wen, J.; Xiong, X.; Hu, Y. Shape effect on the antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles synthesized via a microwave-assisted method. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 23, 4489–4497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Akbarzadeh, A.; Kafshdooz, L.; Razban, Z.; Tbrizi, A.D.; Rasoulpour, S.; Khalilov, R.; Kavetskyy, T.; Saghfi, S.; Nasibova, A.N.; Kaamyabi, S.; et al. An overview application of silver nanoparticles in inhibition of herpes simplex virus. Artif. Cells, Nanomedicine, Biotechnol. 2017, 46, 263–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Cohan, R.A.; Shoari, A.; Baghbani-Arani, F.; Shandiz, S.A.S.; Khosravy, M.S.; Janani, A.; Bigdeli, R.; Bashar, R.; Asgary, V. Green synthesis and evaluation of silver nanoparticles as adjuvant in rabies veterinary vaccine. Int. J. Nanomed. 2016, 11, 3597–3605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  184. Saratale, G.D.; Saratale, R.G.; Benelli, G.; Kumar, G.; Pugazhendhi, A.; Kim, D.-S.; Shin, H.-S. Anti-diabetic Potential of Silver Nanoparticles Synthesized with Argyreia nervosa Leaf Extract High Synergistic Antibacterial Activity with Standard Antibiotics Against Foodborne Bacteria. J. Clust. Sci. 2017, 28, 1709–1727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Elsupikhe, R.F.; Shameli, K.; Ahmad, M.B. Sonochemical method for the synthesis of silver nanoparticles in κ-carrageenan from silver salt at different concentrations. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2015, 41, 8515–8525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  186. Akter, S.; Lee, S.-Y.; Siddiqi, M.Z.; Balusamy, S.R.; Ashrafudoulla; Rupa, E.J.; Huq, A. Ecofriendly Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles by Terrabacter humi sp. nov. and Their Antibacterial Application against Antibiotic-Resistant Pathogens. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 9746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Bapat, R.A.; Chaubal, T.V.; Joshi, C.P.; Bapat, P.R.; Choudhury, H.; Pandey, M.; Gorain, B.; Kesharwani, P. An overview of application of silver nanoparticles for biomaterials in dentistry. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2018, 91, 881–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Chávez-Andrade, G.M.; Tanomaru-Filho, M.; Bernardi, M.I.B.; Leonardo, R.D.T.; Faria, G.; Guerreiro-Tanomaru, J.M. Antimicrobial and biofilm anti-adhesion activities of silver nanoparticles and farnesol against endodontic microorganisms for possible application in root canal treatment. Arch. Oral Biol. 2019, 107, 104481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Yamamoto, Y.S.; Ishikawa, M.; Ozaki, Y.; Itoh, T. Fundamental studies on enhancement and blinking mechanism of surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) and basic applications of SERS biological sensing. Front. Phys. 2013, 9, 31–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Abdolmohammad-Zadeh, H.; Azari, Z.; Pourbasheer, E. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer between carbon quantum dots and silver nanoparticles: Application to mercuric ion sensing. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2020, 245, 118924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Affes, S.; Maalej, H.; Aranaz, I.; Kchaou, H.; Acosta, N.; Heras; Nasri, M. Controlled size green synthesis of bioactive silver nanoparticles assisted by chitosan and its derivatives and their application in biofilm preparation. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 236, 116063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Rauf, A.; Ahmad, T.; Khan, A.; Maryam; Uddin, G.; Ahmad, B.; Mabkhot, Y.N.; Bawazeer, S.; Riaz, N.; Malikovna, B.K.; et al. Green synthesis and biomedicinal applications of silver and gold nanoparticles functionalized with methanolic extract of Mentha longifolia. Artif. Cells Nanomedicine, Biotechnol. 2021, 49, 194–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Manikandan, D.B.; Sridhar, A.; Sekar, R.K.; Perumalsamy, B.; Veeran, S.; Arumugam, M.; Karuppaiah, P.; Ramasamy, T. Green fabrication, characterization of silver nanoparticles using aqueous leaf extract of Ocimumamericanum (Hoary Basil) and investigation of its in vitro antibacterial, antioxidant, anticancer and photocatalytic reduction. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 104845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Khan, S.A.; Shahid, S.; Lee, C.S. Green synthesis of gold and silver nanoparticles using leaf extract of clerodendruminerme; characterization, antimicrobial, and antioxidant activities. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Okaiyeto, K.; Hoppe, H.; Okoh, A. Plant-Based Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Aqueous Leaf Extract of Salvia officinalis: Characterization and its Antiplasmodial Activity. J. Clust. Sci. 2020, 32, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  196. Esan, V.; Mahboob, S.; Al-Ghanim, K.A.; Elanchezhiyan, C.; Al-Misned, F.; Ahmed, Z.; Govindarajan, M. Novel biogenic synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Alstonia venenata leaf extract: An enhanced mosquito larvicidal agent with negligible impact on important eco-biological fish and insects. J. Clust. Sci. 2021, 32, 489–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Sooraj, M.P.; Nair, A.S.; Vineetha, D. Sunlight-mediated green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Sida retusa leaf extract and assessment of its antimicrobial and catalytic activities. Chem. Pap. 2020, 75, 351–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Singh, S.P.; Mishra, A.; Shyanti, R.K.; Singh, R.P.; Acharya, A. Silver nanoparticles synthesized using Carica papaya leaf extract (AgNPs-PLE) causes cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in human prostate (DU145) cancer cells. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2021, 199, 1316–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Singh, R.; Hano, C.; Nath, G.; Sharma, B. Green Biosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Leaf Extract of Carissa carandas L. and Their Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activity against Human Pathogenic Bacteria. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Al-Otibi, F.; Perveen, K.; Al-Saif, N.A.; Alharbi, R.I.; Bokhari, N.A.; Albasher, G.; Al-Otaibi, R.M.; Al-Mosa, M.A. Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using Malva parviflora and their antifungal activity. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 2229–2235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Padalia, H.; Chanda, S. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Ziziphus nummularia leaf extract and evaluation of their antimicrobial, antioxidant, cytotoxic and genotoxic potential (4-in-1 system). Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2021, 49, 354–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Sharifi-Rad, M.; Pohl, P.; Epifano, F. Phytofabrication of Silver Nanoparticles (AgNPs) with Pharmaceutical Capabilities Using Otostegia persica (Burm.) Boiss. Leaf Extract. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Abdallah, B.M.; Ali, E.M. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using the Lotus lalambensis Aqueous Leaf Extract and Their Anti-Candidal Activity against Oral Candidiasis. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 8151–8162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Panda, M.K.; Dhal, N.K.; Kumar, M.; Mishra, P.M.; Behera, R.K. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles and its potential effect on phytopathogens. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 35, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Anju, T.R.; Parvathy, S.; Veettil, M.V.; Rosemary, J.; Ansalna, T.H.; Shahzabanu, M.M.; Devika, S. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles from Aloe vera leaf extract and its antimicrobial activity. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 43, 3956–3960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Seerangaraj, V.; Sathiyavimal, S.; Shankar, S.N.; Nandagopal, J.G.T.; Balashanmugam, P.; Al-Misned, F.A.; Shanmugavel, M.; Senthilkumar, P.; Pugazhendhi, A. Cytotoxic effects of silver nanoparticles on Ruellia tuberosa: Photocatalytic degradation properties against crystal violet and coomassie brilliant blue. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Sharma, Y.; Kawatra, A.; Sharma, V.; Dhull, D.; Kaushik, S.; Yadav, J.P.; Kaushik, S. In-vitro and in-silico evaluation of the anti-chikungunya potential of Psidium guajava leaf extract and their synthesized silver nanoparticles. VirusDisease 2021, 32, 260–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Ekennia, A.C.; Uduagwu, D.N.; Nwaji, N.N.; Olowu, O.J.; Nwanji, O.L.; Ejimofor, M.; Sonde, C.U.; Oje, O.O.; Igwe, D.O. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using leaf extract of Euphorbia sanguine: An in vitro study of its photocatalytic and melanogenesis inhibition activity. Inorg. Nano Met. Chem. 2021, 9, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Hazaa, M.; Alm-Eldin, M.; Ibrahim, A.E.; Elbarky, N.; Salama, M.; Sayed, R.; Sayed, W. Biosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles using Borago officinslis leaf extract, characterization and larvicidal activity against cotton leaf worm, Spodoptera littoralis (Bosid). Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci. 2021, 41, 145–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Seifipour, R.; Nozari, M.; Pishkar, L. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles using Tragopogon Collinus Leaf Extract and Study of Their Antibacterial Effects. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2020, 30, 2926–2936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Jebris, S.; Jenana, R.K.B.; Dridi, C. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Melia azedarach leaf extract and their antifungal activities: In vitro and in vivo. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2020, 248, 122898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Nouri, A.; Yaraki, M.T.; Lajevardi, A.; Rezaei, Z.; Ghorbanpour, M.; Tanzifi, M. Ultrasonic-assisted green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Mentha aquatica leaf extract for enhanced antibacterial properties and catalytic activity. Colloid Interface Sci. Commun. 2020, 35, 100252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Guimarães, M.L.; da Silva, F.A.G.; da Costa, M.M.; de Oliveira, H.P. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Ziziphus joazeiro leaf extract for production of antibacterial agents. Appl. Nanosci. 2020, 10, 1073–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Rangayasami, A.; Kannan, K.; Joshi, S.; Subban, M. Bioengineered silver nanoparticles using Elytraria acaulis (L.f.) Lindau leaf extract and its biological applications. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2020, 27, 101690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Lateef, A.; Oladejo, S.M.; Akinola, P.O.; Aina, D.A.; Beukes, L.S.; Folarin, B.I.; Gueguim-Kana, E.B. Facile synthesis of silver nanoparticles using leaf extract of Hyptissuaveolens (L.) Poit for environmental and biomedical applications. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; IOP Publishing: London, UK, 2020; Volume 805. [Google Scholar]
  216. Moteriya, P.; Chanda, S. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles from Caesalpinia pulcherrima leaf extract and evaluation of their antimicrobial, cytotoxic and genotoxic potential (3-in-1 system). J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2020, 30, 3920–3932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Tamilarasi, P.; Meena, P. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs) using Gomphrena globosa (Globe amaranth) leaf extract and their characterization. Mater. Today: Proc. 2020, 33, 2209–2216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Govindan, L.; Anbazhagan, S.; Altemimi, A.B.; Lakshminarayanan, K.; Kuppan, S.; Pratap-Singh, A.; Kandasamy, M. Efficacy of Antimicrobial and Larvicidal Activities of Green Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles Using Leaf Extract of Plumbago auriculata Lam. Plants 2020, 9, 1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  219. Hemlata; Meena, P.R.; Singh, A.P.; Tejavath, K.K. Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using cucumisprophetarum aqueous leaf extract and their antibacterial and antiproliferative activity against cancer cell lines. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 5520–5528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  220. Rawat, V.; Sharma, A.; Bhatt, V.P.; Singh, R.P.; Maurya, I.K. Sunlight mediated green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Polygonatum graminifolium leaf extract and their antibacterial activity. Mater. Today: Proc. 2020, 29, 911–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Uddin, A.K.M.R.; Siddique, A.B.; Rahman, F.; Ullah, A.K.M.A.; Khan, R. Cocos nucifera Leaf Extract Mediated Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles for Enhanced Antibacterial Activity. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2020, 30, 3305–3316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Pilaquinga, F.; Amaguaña, D.; Morey, J.; Moncada-Basualto, M.; Pozo-Martínez, J.; Olea-Azar, C.; Fernández, L.; Espinoza-Montero, P.; Jara-Negrete, E.; Meneses, L.; et al. Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Aqueous Leaf Extract of Mimosa albida (Mimosoideae): Characterization and Antioxidant Activity. Materials 2020, 13, 503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  223. Nilavukkarasi, M.; Vijayakumar, S.; Kumar, S.P. Biological synthesis and characterization of silver nanoparticles with Capparis zeylanica L. leaf extract for potent antimicrobial and anti proliferation efficiency. Mater. Sci. Energy Technol. 2020, 3, 371–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Kumar, V.; Singh, S.; Srivastava, B.; Bhadouria, R.; Singh, R. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using leaf extract of Holoptelea integrifolia and preliminary investigation of its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antidiabetic and antibacterial activities. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 103094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Parthiban, E.; Manivannan, N.; Ramanibai, R.; Mathivanan, N. Green synthesis of silver-nanoparticles from Annona reticulata leaves aqueous extract and its mosquito larvicidal and anti-microbial activity on human pathogens. Biotechnol. Rep. 2018, 21, e00297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Jemilugba, O.T.; Sakho, E.H.M.; Parani, S.; Mavumengwana, V.; Oluwafemi, O.S. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Combretum erythrophyllum leaves and its antibacterial activities. Colloid Interface Sci. Commun. 2019, 31, 100191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Behravan, M.; Panahi, A.H.; NaghiZadeh, A.; Ziaee, M.; Mahdavi, R.; Mirzapour, A. Facile green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Berberis vulgaris leaf and root aqueous extract and its antibacterial activity. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 124, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Ahmad, S.; Tauseef, I.; Haleem, K.S.; Khan, K.; Shahzad, M.; Ali, M.; Sultan, F. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles using leaves of Catharanthus roseus and their antimicrobial activity. Appl. Nanosci. 2019, 10, 4459–4464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Doan, V.D.; Nguyen, T.D.; Nguyen, T.L.H.; Nguyen, H.T. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using aganonerionpolymorphum leaves extract and evaluation of their antibacterial and catalytic activity. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 1150g1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Singh, C.; Kumar, J.; Kumar, P.; Chauhan, B.S.; Tiwari, K.N.; Mishra, S.K.; Doan, V.D.; Nguyen, T.D.; Nguyen, T.L.H.; Nguyen, H.T.; et al. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using aqueous leaf extract of Premna integrifolia (L.) rich in polyphenols and evaluation of their antioxidant, antibacterial and cytotoxic activity. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2019, 33, 359–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  231. Khan, S.; Singh, S.; Gaikwad, S.; Nawani, N.; Junnarkar, M.; Pawar, S.V. Optimization of process parameters for the synthesis of silver nanoparticles from Piper betle leaf aqueous extract, and evaluation of their antiphytofungal activity. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 27, 27221–27233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  232. Gul, A.; Fozia; Shaheen, A.; Ahmad, I.; Khattak, B.; Ahmad, M.; Ullah, R.; Bari, A.; Ali, S.S.; Alobaid, A.; et al. Green Synthesis, Characterization, Enzyme Inhibition, Antimicrobial Potential, and Cytotoxic Activity of Plant Mediated Silver Nanoparticle Using Ricinus communis Leaf and Root Extracts. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  233. Ilahi, I.; Khuda, F.; Sahibzada, M.U.K.; Alghamdi, S.; Ullah, R.; Zakiullah; Dablool, A.S.; Alam, M.; Khan, A.; Khalil, A.A.K. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles using root extract of Duchesnea indica and assessment of its biological activities. Arab. J. Chem. 2021, 14, 103110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Arshad, H.; Sami, M.A.; Sadaf, S.; Hassan, U. Salvadora persica mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their antimicrobial efficacy. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  235. Tripathi, D.; Modi, A.; Smita, S.S.; Narayan, G.; Pandey-Rai, S. Biomedical potential of green synthesized silver nanoparticles from root extract of Asparagus officinalis. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 2021, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Sharifi-Rad, M.; Pohl, P.; Epifano, F.; Álvarez-Suarez, J.M. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Astragalus tribuloides delile. root extract: Characterization, antioxidant, antibacterial, and anti-inflammatory activities. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 2383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Dangi, S.; Gupta, A.; Gupta, D.K.; Singh, S.; Parajuli, N. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using aqueous root extract of Berberis asiatica and evaluation of their antibacterial activity. Chem. Data Collect. 2020, 28, 100411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Akwu, N.A.; Naidoo, Y.; Singh, M.; Nundkumar, N.; Daniels, A.; Lin, J. Two Temperatures Biogenic Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles from Grewia lasiocarpa E. Mey. ex Harv. Leaf and Stem Bark Extracts: Characterization and Applications. BioNanoScience 2021, 11, 142–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Devi, N.S.; Padma, Y.; Raju, R.R.V. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles through reduction with Euphorbia nivulia Buch.-Ham., stem bark extract: Characterization and antimicrobial activity. J. Pharmacogn. Phytother. 2021, 13, 60–67. [Google Scholar]
  240. Adebayo, I.A.; Usman, A.I.; Shittu, F.B.; Ismail, N.Z.; Arsad, H.; Muftaudeen, T.K.; Samian, M.R. Boswellia dalzielii-mediated silver nanoparticles inhibited acute myeloid leukemia (AML) Kasumi-1 cells by inducing cell cycle arrest. Bioinorg. Chem. Appl. 2020, 2020, 8898360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Mahiuddin; Saha, P.; Ochiai, B. Green Synthesis and Catalytic Activity of Silver Nanoparticles Based on Piper chaba Stem Extracts. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  242. Akintelu, S.A.; Olugbeko, S.C.; Folorunso, F.A.; Oyebamiji, A.K.; Folorunso, A.S. Characterization and Pharmacological Efficacy of Silver Nanoparticles Biosynthesized Using the Bark Extract of Garcinia Kola. J. Chem. 2020, 2020, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Dawodu, F.A.; Onuh, C.U.; Akpomie, K.G.; Unuabonah, E.I. Synthesis of silver nanoparticle from Vigna unguiculata stem as adsorbent for malachite green in a batch system. SN Appl. Sci. 2019, 1, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  244. Awad, M.A.; Hendi, A.A.; Ortashi, K.M.; Alzahrani, B.; Soliman, D.; Alanazi, A.; Alenazi, W.; Taha, R.M.; Ramadan, R.; El-Tohamy, M.; et al. Biogenic synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Trigonella foenum-graecum seed extract: Characterization, photocatalytic and antibacterial activities. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2021, 323, 112670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Morales-Lozoya, V.; Espinoza-Gómez, H.; Flores-López, L.Z.; Sotelo-Barrera, E.L.; Núñez-Rivera, A.; Cadena-Nava, R.D.; Alonso-Nuñez, G.; Rivero, I.A. Study of the effect of the different parts of Morinda citrifolia L. (noni) on the green synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their antibacterial activity. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 537, 147855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Donga, S.; Chanda, S. Facile green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Mangifera indica seed aqueous extract and its antimicrobial, antioxidant and cytotoxic potential (3-in-1 system). Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2021, 49, 292–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Jose, V.; Raphel, L.; Aiswariya, K.S.; Mathew, P. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Annona squamosa L. seed extract: Characterization, photocatalytic and biological activity assay. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2021, 44, 1819–1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  248. Saygi, K.O.; Usta, C. Rosa canina waste seed extract-mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles and the evaluation of its antimutagenic action in Salmonella typhimurium. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2021, 266, 124537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Chand, K.; Jiao, C.; Lakhan, M.N.; Shah, A.H.; Kumar, V.; Fouad, D.E.; Chandio, M.B.; Maitlo, A.A.; Ahmed, M.; Cao, D. Green synthesis, characterization and photocatalytic activity of silver nanoparticles synthesized with Nigella Sativa seed extract. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2020, 763, 138218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Mehwish, H.M.; Liu, G.; Rajoka, M.S.R.; Cai, H.; Zhong, J.; Song, X.; Xia, L.; Wang, M.; Aadil, R.M.; Inam-Ur-Raheem, M.; et al. Therapeutic potential of Moringa oleifera seed polysaccharide embedded silver nanoparticles in wound healing. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 184, 144–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  251. Khan, I.; Bawazeer, S.; Rauf, A.; Qureshi, M.N.; Muhammad, N.; Al-Awthan, Y.S.; Bahattab, O.; Maalik, A.; Rengasamy, K.R. Synthesis, biological investigation and catalytic application using the alcoholic extract of Black Cumin (BuniumPersicum) seeds-based silver nanoparticles. J. Nanostruct. Chem. 2021, 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  252. de Carvalho Bernardo, W.L.; Boriollo, M.F.G.; Tonon, C.C.; da Silva, J.J.; Cruz, F.M.; Martins, A.L.; Höfling, J.F.; Spolidorio, D.M.P. Antimicrobial effects of silver nanoparticles and extracts of Syzygiumcumini flowers and seeds: Periodontal, cariogenic and opportunistic pathogens. Arch. Oral Biol. 2021, 125, 105101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Kara, Z.; Sabır, A.; Koç, F.; Sabır, F.K.; Avcı, A.; Koplay, M.; Doğan, O. Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis by Grape Seeds (Vitis vinifera L.) Extract and Rooting Effect on Grape Cuttings. Erwerbs-Obstbau 2021, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  254. Alkhathlan, A.H.; AL-Abdulkarim, H.A.; Khan, M.; Khan, M.; AlDobiy, A.; Alkholief, M.; Alshamsan, A.; Alkhathlan, H.Z.; Siddiqui, M.R.H. Ecofriendly Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Aqueous Extracts of Zingiber officinale (Ginger) and Nigella sativa L. Seeds (Black Cumin) and Comparison of Their Antibacterial Potential. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. Dinparvar, S.; Bagirova, M.; Allahverdiyev, A.M.; Abamor, E.S.; Safarov, T.; Aydogdu, M.; Aktaş, D. A nanotechnology-based new approach in the treatment of breast cancer: Biosynthesized silver nanoparticles using Cuminum cyminum L. seed extract. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2020, 208, 111902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Muthu, K.; Rajeswari, S.; Akilandaeaswari, B.; Nagasundari, S.M.; Rangasamy, R. Synthesis, characterisation and photocatalytic activity of silver nanoparticles stabilised by Punica granatum seeds extract. Mater. Technol. 2020, 36, 684–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Hernández-Morales, L.; Espinoza-Gómez, H.; Flores-López, L.Z.; Sotelo-Barrera, E.L.; Núñez-Rivera, A.; Cadena-Nava, R.D.; Alonso-Núñez, G.; Espinoza, K.A. Study of the green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using a natural extract of dark or white Salvia hispanica L. seeds and their antibacterial application. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 489, 952–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Naidu, K.S.B.; Murugan, N.; Adam, J.K. Biogenic synthesis of silver nanoparticles from avicennia marina seed extract and its antibacterial potential. Bionanoscience 2019, 9, 266–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Rautela, A.; Rani, J.; Das, M.D. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles from Tectona grandis seeds extract: Characterization and mechanism of antimicrobial action on different microorganisms. J. Anal. Sci. Technol. 2019, 10, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  260. Palithya, S.; Gaddam, S.A.; Kotakadi, V.S.; Penchalaneni, J.; Golla, N.; Krishna, S.B.N.; Naidu, C.V. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using flower extracts of Aervalanata and their biomedical applications. Part. Sci. Technol. 2021, 10, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Hasan, K.F.; Horváth, P.G.; Horváth, A.; Alpár, T. Coloration of woven glass fabric using biosynthesized silver nanoparticles from Fraxinus excelsior tree flower. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2021, 126, 108477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Aravind, M.; Ahmad, A.; Ahmad, I.; Amalanathan, M.; Naseem, K.; Mary, S.M.M.; Parvathiraja, C.; Hussain, S.; Algarni, T.S.; Pervaiz, M.; et al. Critical green routing synthesis of silver NPs using jasmine flower extract for biological activities and photocatalytical degradation of methylene blue. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 9, 104877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. Narkevica, I.; Stradina, L.; Stipniece, L.; Jakobsons, E.; Ozolins, J. Electrophoretic deposition of nanocrystalline TiO 2 particles on porous TiO 2-x ceramic scaffolds for biomedical applications. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2017, 37, 3185–3193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. Pant, B.; Park, M.; Park, S.-J. TiO2 NPs Assembled into a Carbon Nanofiber Composite Electrode by a One-Step Electrospinning Process for Supercapacitor Applications. Polymers 2019, 11, 899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  265. Irshad, M.A.; Nawaz, R.; Rehman, M.Z.U.; Imran, M.; Ahmad, J.; Ahmad, S.; Inam, A.; Razzaq, A.; Rizwan, M.; Ali, S. Synthesis and characterization of titanium dioxide nanoparticles by chemical and green methods and their antifungal activities against wheat rust. Chemosphere 2020, 258, 127352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  266. Mollavali, M.; Falamaki, C.; Rohani, S. Efficient light harvesting by NiS/CdS/ZnS NPs incorporated in C, N-co-doped-TiO2 nanotube arrays as visible-light sensitive multilayer photoanode for solar applications. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2018, 43, 9259–9278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. Julkapli, N.M.; Bagheri, S.; Hamid, S.B.A. Recent Advances in Heterogeneous Photocatalytic Decolorization of Synthetic Dyes. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  268. Ziental, D.; Czarczynska-Goslinska, B.; Mlynarczyk, D.T.; Glowacka-Sobotta, A.; Stanisz, B.; Goslinski, T.; Sobotta, L. Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles: Prospects and Applications in Medicine. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  269. Pirkanniemi, K.; Sillanpää, M. Heterogeneous water phase catalysis as an environmental application: A review. Chemosphere 2002, 48, 1047–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  270. Valencia, S.; Vargas, X.; Rios, L.; Restrepo, G.; Marín, J.M. Sol–gel and low-temperature solvothermal synthesis of photoactive nano-titanium dioxide. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2012, 251, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  271. Chen, Y.-F.; Tsai, H.-Y.; Wu, T.-S. Anti-Inflammatory and Analgesic Activities from Roots ofAngelica pubescens. Planta Medica 1995, 61, 2–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  272. Jayaseelan, C.; Rahuman, A.A.; Roopan, S.M.; Kirthi, A.V.; Venkatesan, J.; Kim, S.K.; Iyappan, M.; Siva, C. Biological approach to synthesize TiO2 nanoparticles using Aeromonas hydrophila and its antibacterial activity. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2013, 107, 82–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  273. Mittal, A.K.; Bhaumik, J.; Kumar, S.; Banerjee, U.C. Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles: Elucidation of prospective mechanism and therapeutic potential. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014, 415, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  274. Khan, M. Preparation, Characterization and Applications of Polyaniline Impregnated Silica Gel for the Identification and Separation of Some Important Organics. Ph.D. Dissertation, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  275. Ahmad, W.; Jaiswal, K.K.; Soni, S. Green synthesis of titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles by using Mentha arvensis leaves extract and its antimicrobial properties. Inorg. Nano Metal Chem. 2020, 50, 1032–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  276. Narayanan, M.; Devi, P.G.; Natarajan, D.; Kandasamy, S.; Devarayan, K.; Alsehli, M.; Elfasakhany, A.; Pugazhendhi, A. Green synthesis and characterization of titanium dioxide nanoparticles using leaf extract of Pouteria campechiana and larvicidal and pupicidal activity on Aedes aegypti. Environ. Res. 2021, 200, 111333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  277. Narayanan, M.; Vigneshwari, P.; Natarajan, D.; Kandasamy, S.; Alsehli, M.; Elfasakhany, A.; Pugazhendhi, A. Synthesis and characterization of TiO2 NPs by aqueous leaf extract of Coleus aromaticus and assess their antibacterial, larvicidal, and anticancer potential. Environ. Res. 2021, 200, 111335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  278. Zubair, M.; Husain, F.M.; Qais, F.A.; Alam, P.; Ahmad, I.; Albalawi, T.; Ahmad, N.; Alam, M.; Baig, M.H.; Dong, J.J.; et al. Bio-fabrication of titanium oxide nanoparticles from Ochradenusarabicus to obliterate biofilms of drug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from diabetic foot infections. Appl. Nanosci. 2021, 11, 375–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  279. Ahmad, W.; Singh, A.; Jaiswal, K.K.; Gupta, P. Green Synthesis of Photocatalytic TiO2 Nanoparticles for Potential Application in Photochemical Degradation of Ornidazole. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2020, 31, 614–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  280. Thakur, B.; Kumar, A.; Kumar, D. Green synthesis of titanium dioxide nanoparticles using Azadirachta indica leaf extract and evaluation of their antibacterial activity. South Afr. J. Bot. 2019, 124, 223–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  281. Kaur, H.; Kaur, S.; Singh, J.; Rawat, M.; Kumar, S. Expanding horizon: Green synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles using Carica papaya leaves for photocatalysis application. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 095034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  282. Rajkumari, J.; Magdalane, C.M.; Siddhardha, B.; Madhavan, J.; Ramalingam, G.; Al-Dhabi, N.A.; Arasu, M.V.; Ghilan, A.; Duraipandiayan, V.; Kaviyarasu, K. Synthesis of titanium oxide nanoparticles using Aloe barbadensis mill and evaluation of its antibiofilm potential against Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2019, 201, 111667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  283. Bavanilatha, M.; Yoshitha, L.; Nivedhitha, S.; Sahithya, S. Bioactive studies of TiO2 nanoparticles synthesized using Glycyrrhiza glabra. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2019, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  284. Aravind, M.; Amalanathan, M.; Mary, M.S.M. Synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles by chemical and green synthesis methods and their multifaceted properties. SN Appl. Sci. 2021, 3, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  285. Sagadevan, S.; Lett, J.A.; Vennila, S.; Prasath, P.V.; Kaliaraj, G.S.; Fatimah, I.; Léonard, E.; Mohammad, F.; Al-Lohedan, H.A.; Alshahateet, S.F.; et al. Photocatalytic activity and antibacterial efficacy of titanium dioxide nanoparticles mediated by Myristica fragrans seed extract. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2021, 771, 138527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  286. Mathew, S.S.; Sunny, N.E.; Shanmugam, V. Green synthesis of anatase titanium dioxide nanoparticles using Cuminum cyminum seed extract; effect on Mung bean (Vigna radiata) seed germination. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2021, 126, 108485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  287. Perveen, K.; Husain, F.M.; Qais, F.A.; Khan, A.; Razak, S.; Afsar, T.; Alam, P.; Almajwal, A.M.; Abulmeaty, M. Microwave-Assisted Rapid Green Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles Using Seed Extract of Trachyspermumammi: ROS Mediated Biofilm Inhibition and Anticancer Activity. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  288. Isacfranklin, M.; Yuvakkumar, R.; Ravi, G.; Kumar, P.; Saravanakumar, B.; Velauthapillai, D.; Alahmadi, T.A.; Alharbi, S.A. Biomedical application of single anatase phase TiO2 nanoparticles with addition of Rambutan (Nephelium lappaceum L.) fruit peel extract. Appl. Nanosci. 2020, 11, 699–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  289. Krishnan, B.; Mahalingam, S. Improved surface morphology of silver/copper oxide/bentonite nanocomposite using aliphatic ammonium based ionic liquid for enhanced biological activities. J. Mol. Liq. 2017, 241, 1044–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  290. Rafea, M.A.; Roushdy, N. Determination of the optical band gap for amorphous and nanocrystalline copper oxide thin films prepared by SILAR technique. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2008, 42, 015413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  291. Ren, G.; Hu, D.; Cheng, E.W.; Vargas-Reus, M.A.; Reip, P.; Allaker, R.P. Characterisation of copper oxide nanoparticles for antimicrobial applications. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2009, 33, 587–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  292. Verma, N.; Kumar, N. Synthesis and biomedical applications of copper oxide nanoparticles: An expanding horizon. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 5, 1170–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  293. Chang, M.-H.; Liu, H.-S.; Tai, C.Y. Preparation of copper oxide nanoparticles and its application in nanofluid. Powder Technol. 2011, 207, 378–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  294. Devi, H.S.; Singh, T.D. Synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles by a novel method and its application in the degradation of methyl orange. Adv. Electron. Electr. Eng. 2014, 4, 83–88. [Google Scholar]
  295. Vasantharaj, S.; Sathiyavimal, S.; Saravanan, M.; Senthilkumar, P.; Gnanasekaran, K.; Shanmugavel, M.; Manikandan, E.; Pugazhendhi, A. Synthesis of ecofriendly copper oxide nanoparticles for fabrication over textile fabrics: Characterization of antibacterial activity and dye degradation potential. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B: Biol. 2018, 191, 143–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  296. Rehana, D.; Mahendiran, D.; Kumar, R.S.; Rahiman, A.K. Evaluation of antioxidant and anticancer activity of copper oxide nanoparticles synthesized using medicinally important plant extracts. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 89, 1067–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  297. Obaid, M.A.; Harbi, K.H.; Abd, A.N. Study the effect of antibacterial on the chemically prepared copper oxide. Mater. Today: Proc. 2021, 47, 6006–6010. [Google Scholar]
  298. Singh, A.; Singh, N.; Hussain, I.; Singh, H. Effect of biologically synthesized copper oxide nanoparticles on metabolism and antioxidant activity to the crop plants Solanum lycopersicum and Brassica oleracea var. botrytis. J. Biotechnol. 2017, 262, 11–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  299. Singh, S.; Kumar, N.; Kumar, M.; Jyoti; Agarwal, A.; Mizaikoff, B. Electrochemical sensing and remediation of 4-nitrophenol using bio-synthesized copper oxide nanoparticles. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 313, 283–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  300. Nasrollahzadeh, M.; Sajadi, S.M.; Rostami-Vartooni, A.; Hussin, S.M. Green synthesis of CuO nanoparticles using aqueous extract of Thymus vulgaris L. leaves and their catalytic performance for N-arylation of indoles and amines. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2016, 466, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  301. Yatish, K.; Prakash, R.M.; Ningaraju, C.; Sakar, M.; GeethaBalakrishna, R.; Lalithamba, H. Terminalia chebula as a novel green source for the synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles and as feedstock for biodiesel production and its application on diesel engine. Energy 2020, 215, 119165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  302. Ramzan, M.; Obodo, R.; Mukhtar, S.; Ilyas, S.; Aziz, F.; Thovhogi, N. Green synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles using Cedrus deodara aqueous extract for antibacterial activity. Mater. Today: Proc. 2020, 36, 576–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  303. Sathiyavimal, S.; Vasantharaj, S.; Veeramani, V.; Saravanan, M.; Rajalakshmi, G.; Kaliannan, T.; Al-Misned, F.A.; Pugazhendhi, A. Green chemistry route of biosynthesized copper oxide nanoparticles using Psidium guajava leaf extract and their antibacterial activity and effective removal of industrial dyes. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  304. Elakkiya, V.T.; Meenakshi, R.V.; Kumar, P.S.; Karthik, V.; Shankar, K.R.; Sureshkumar, P.; Hanan, A. Green synthesis of copper nanoparticles using Sesbania aculeata to enhance the plant growth and antimicrobial activities. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  305. Mali, S.C.; Dhaka, A.; Githala, C.K.; Trivedi, R. Green synthesis of copper nanoparticles using CelastruspaniculatusWilld. leaf extract and their photocatalytic and antifungal properties. Biotechnol. Rep. 2020, 27, e00518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  306. Andualem, W.W.; Sabir, F.K.; Mohammed, E.T.; Belay, H.H.; Gonfa, B.A. Synthesis of Copper Oxide Nanoparticles Using Plant Leaf Extract of Catha edulis and Its Antibacterial Activity. J. Nanotechnol. 2020, 2020, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  307. Chandraker, S.K.; Lal, M.; Ghosh, M.K.; Tiwari, V.; Ghorai, T.K.; Shukla, R. Green synthesis of copper nanoparticles using leaf extract of Ageratum houstonianum Mill. and study of their photocatalytic and antibacterial activities. Nano Express 2020, 1, 010033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  308. Ghosh, M.K.; Sahu, S.; Gupta, I.; Ghorai, T.K. Green synthesis of copper nanoparticles from an extract of Jatropha curcas leaves: Characterization, optical properties, CT-DNA binding and photocatalytic activity. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 22027–22035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  309. Rafique, M.; Shafiq, F.; Gillani, S.S.A.; Shakil, M.; Tahir, M.B.; Sadaf, I. Eco-friendly green and biosynthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles using Citrofortunella microcarpa leaves extract for efficient photocatalytic degradation of Rhodamin B dye form textile wastewater. Optik 2020, 208, 164053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  310. Mali, S.C.; Raj, S.; Trivedi, R. Biosynthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles using Enicostemmaaxillare (Lam.) leaf extract. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 2019, 20, 100699. [Google Scholar]
  311. Ahmed, A.; Usman, M.; Liu, Q.-Y.; Shen, Y.-Q.; Yu, B.; Cong, H.-L. Plant mediated synthesis of copper nanoparticles by using Camelia sinensis leaves extract and their applications in dye degradation. Ferroelectrics 2019, 549, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  312. Singh, P.; Singh, K.R.; Singh, J.; Das, S.N.; Singh, R.P. Tunable electrochemistry and efficient antibacterial activity of plant-mediated copper oxide nanoparticles synthesized by Annona squamosa seed extract for agricultural utility. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 18050–18060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  313. Jahagirdar, A.S.; Shende, S.; Gade, A.; Rai, M. Bioinspired Synthesis of Copper Nanoparticles and its Efficacy on Seed Viability and Seedling Growth in Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.). Curr. Nanosci. 2020, 16, 246–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  314. Venkatramanan, A.; Ilangovan, A.; Thangarajan, P.; Saravanan, A.; Mani, B. Green Synthesis of Copper Oxide Nanoparticles (CuO NPs) From Aqueous Extract of Seeds of Eletteria Cardamomum and Its Antimicrobial Activity against Pathogens. Curr. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 304–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  315. Buazar, F.; Sweidi, S.; Badri, M.; Kroushawi, F. Biofabrication of highly pure copper oxide nanoparticles using wheat seed extract and their catalytic activity: A mechanistic approach. Green Process. Synth. 2019, 8, 691–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  316. Roy, K.; Ghosh, C.K.; Sarkar, C.K. Selective amino acid detection by green synthesized copper nanoparticles prepared using basil (Ocimumtenuiflorum) flower extract. Microsyst. Technol. 2021, 27, 353–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  317. Veisi, H.; Karmakar, B.; Tamoradi, T.; Hemmati, S.; Hekmati, M.; Hamelian, M. Biosynthesis of CuO nanoparticles using aqueous extract of herbal tea (Stachys Lavandulifolia) flowers and evaluation of its catalytic activity. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  318. Siddiqui, V.U.; Ansari, A.; Chauhan, R.; Siddiqi, W.A. Green synthesis of copper oxide (CuO) nanoparticles by Punica granatum peel extract. Mater. Today: Proc. 2020, 36, 751–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  319. Ramimoghadam, D.; Bagheri, S.; Hamid, S.B.A. Progress in electrochemical synthesis of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2014, 368, 207–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  320. Teja, A.S.; Koh, P.Y. Synthesis, properties, and applications of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Prog. Cryst. Growth Charact. Mater. 2009, 2, 22–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  321. Faraji, M.; Yamini, Y.; Rezaee, M. Magnetic nanoparticles: Synthesis, stabilization, functionalization, characterization, and applications. J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 2010, 7, 1–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  322. Arjaghi, S.K.; Alasl, M.K.; Sajjadi, N.; Fataei, E.; Rajaei, G.E. Green Synthesis of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles by RS Lichen Extract and its Application in Removing Heavy Metals of Lead and Cadmium. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2021, 199, 763–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  323. Ardakani, L.S.; Alimardani, V.; Tamaddon, A.M.; Amani, A.M.; Taghizadeh, S. Green synthesis of iron-based nanoparticles using Chlorophytum comosum leaf extract: Methyl orange dye degradation and antimicrobial properties. Heliyon 2021, 7, e06159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  324. Jamzad, M.; Bidkorpeh, M.K. Green synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles by the aqueous extract of Laurus nobilis L. leaves and evaluation of the antimicrobial activity. J. Nanostructure Chem. 2020, 10, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  325. Bhuiyan, S.H.; Miah, M.Y.; Paul, S.C.; Das Aka, T.; Saha, O.; Rahaman, M.; Sharif, J.I.; Habiba, O. Ashaduzzaman Green synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticle using Carica papaya leaf extract: Application for photocatalytic degradation of remazol yellow RR dye and antibacterial activity. Heliyon 2020, 6, e04603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  326. Vitta, Y.; Figueroa, M.; Calderon, M.; Ciangherotti, C. Synthesis of iron nanoparticles from aqueous extract of Eucalyptus robustaSm and evaluation of antioxidant and antimicrobial activity. Mater. Sci. Energy Technol. 2020, 3, 97–103. [Google Scholar]
  327. Vasantharaj, S.; Sathiyavimal, S.; Senthilkumar, P.; LewisOscar, F.; Pugazhendhi, A. Biosynthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles using leaf extract of Ruellia tuberosa: Antimicrobial properties and their applications in photocatalytic degradation. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2019, 192, 74–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  328. Lohrasbi, S.; Kouhbanani, M.A.J.; Beheshtkhoo, N.; Ghasemi, Y.; Amani, A.M.; Taghizadeh, S. Green Synthesis of Iron Nanoparticles Using Plantago major Leaf Extract and Their Application as a Catalyst for the Decolorization of Azo Dye. BioNanoScience 2019, 9, 317–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  329. Karpagavinayagam, P.; Vedhi, C. Green synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles using Avicennia marina flower extract. Vacuum 2018, 160, 286–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  330. Bibi, I.; Nazar, N.; Ata, S.; Sultan, M.; Ali, A.; Abbas, A.; Jilani, K.; Kamal, S.; Sarim, F.M.; Khan, M.I.; et al. Green synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles using pomegranate seeds extract and photocatalytic activity evaluation for the degradation of textile dye. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2019, 8, 6115–6124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  331. Sandhya, J.; Kalaiselvam, S. Biogenic synthesis of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles using inedible borassus flabellifer seed coat: Characterization, antimicrobial, antioxidant activity and in vitro cytotoxicity analysis. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 7, 015045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  332. Aziz, W.J.; Abid, M.A.; Kadhim, D.A.; Mejbel, M.K. Synthesis of iron oxide (β-fe2o3) nanoparticles from Iraqi grapes extract and its biomedical application. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; IOP Publishing: London, UK, 2020; Volume 881. [Google Scholar]
  333. Rostamizadeh, E.; Iranbakhsh, A.; Majd, A.; Arbabian, S.; Mehregan, I. Green synthesis of Fe2O3 nanoparticles using fruit extract of Cornus mas L. and its growth-promoting roles in Barley. J. Nanostructure Chem. 2020, 10, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  334. Iravani, S.; Varma, R.S. Sustainable synthesis of cobalt and cobalt oxide nanoparticles and their catalytic and biomedical applications. Green Chem. 2020, 22, 2643–2661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  335. Yu, Y.; Mendoza-Garcia, A.; Ning, B.; Sun, S. Cobalt-substituted magnetite nanoparticles and their assembly into ferrimagnetic nanoparticle arrays. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 3090–3094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  336. Raveau, B.; Seikh, M.M. Charge ordering in cobalt oxides: Impact on structure, magnetic and transport properties. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2015, 9, 1385–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  337. Liu, J.; Wang, Z.; Yan, X.; Jian, P. Metallic cobalt nanoparticles imbedded into ordered mesoporous carbon: A non-precious metal catalyst with excellent hydrogenation performance. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 505, 789–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  338. Su, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Jiang, H.; Shen, J.; Yang, X.; Zou, W.; Chen, J.; Li, C. Cobalt nanoparticles embedded in N-doped carbon as an efficient bifunctional electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction and evolution reactions. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 15080–15089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  339. Diallo, A.; Beye, A.; Doyle, T.; Park, E.; Maaza, M. Green synthesis of Co3O4nanoparticles viaAspalathus linearis: Physical properties. Green Chem. Lett. Rev. 2015, 8, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  340. Memon, S.A.; Hassan, D.; Buledi, J.A.; Solangi, A.R.; Memon, S.Q.; Palabiyik, I.M. Plant material protected cobalt oxide nanoparticles: Sensitive electro-catalyst for tramadol detection. Microchem. J. 2020, 159, 105480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  341. Khan, M.A.; Ali, F.; Faisal, S.; Rizwan, M.; Hussain, Z.; Zaman, N.; Afsheen, Z.; Uddin, M.N.; Bibi, N. Exploring the therapeutic potential of Hibiscus rosa sinensis synthesized cobalt oxide (Co3O4-NPs) and magnesium oxide nanoparticles (MgO-NPs). Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 5157–5167. [Google Scholar]
  342. Khadhim, A.I.; Kadhim, R.E. Synthesis of Cobalt Nanoparticles Biologically by Conocarpus erectus L. Aqueous Leaves Extract. Ann. Rom. Soc. Cell Biol. 2021, 25, 5361–5372. [Google Scholar]
  343. Raeisi, M.; Alijani, H.Q.; Peydayesh, M.; Khatami, M.; Baravati, F.B.; Borhani, F.; Šlouf, M.; Soltaninezhad, S. Magnetic cobalt oxide nanosheets: Green synthesis and in vitro cytotoxicity. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2021, 44, 1423–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  344. Akhlaghi, N.; Najafpour-Darzi, G.; Younesi, H. Facile and green synthesis of cobalt oxide nanoparticles using ethanolic extract of Trigonella foenumgraceum (Fenugreek) leaves. Adv. Powder Technol. 2020, 31, 3562–3569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  345. Hafeez, M.; Shaheen, R.; Akram, B.; Abdin, Z.U.; Haq, S.; Mahsud, S.; Ali, S.; Khan, R.T. Green synthesis of cobalt oxide nanoparticles for potential biological applications. Mater. Res. Express 2020, 7, 025019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  346. Iqbal, J.; Abbasi, B.A.; Batool, R.; Khalil, A.T.; Hameed, S.; Kanwal, S.; Ullah, I.; Mahmood, T. Biogenic synthesis of green and cost effective cobalt oxide nanoparticles using Geranium wallichianum leaves extract and evaluation of in vitro antioxidant, antimicrobial, cytotoxic and enzyme inhibition properties. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 115407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  347. Sondi, I.; Salopek-Sondi, B. Silver nanoparticles as antimicrobial agent: A case study on E. coli as a model for Gram-negative bacteria. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004, 275, 177–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  348. Kasthuri, J.; Kathiravan, K.; Rajendiran, N. Phyllanthin-assisted biosynthesis of silver and gold nanoparticles: A novel biological approach. J. Nanoparticle Res. 2008, 11, 1075–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  349. Ansari, M.A.; Khan, H.M.; Khan, A.A. Evaluation of antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles against MSSA and MSRA on isolates from skin infections. Biol. Med. 2011, 3, 141–146. [Google Scholar]
  350. Kaviya, S.; Santhanalakshmi, J.; Viswanathan, B.; Muthumary, J.; Srinivasan, K. Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using citrus sinensis peel extract and its antibacterial activity. Spectrochim. Acta Part A: Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2011, 79, 594–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  351. Logeswari, P.; Silambarasan, S.; Abraham, J. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles using plants extract and analysis of their antimicrobial property. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2015, 19, 311–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  352. Gardea-Torresdey, J.L.; Parsons, J.G.; Gomez, E.; Peralta-Videa, J.; Troiani, H.E.; Santiago, P.; Yacaman, M.J. Formation and Growth of Au Nanoparticles inside Live Alfalfa Plants. Nano Lett. 2002, 2, 397–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  353. Akhtar, M.S.; Panwar, J.; Yun, Y.-S. Biogenic Synthesis of Metallic Nanoparticles by Plant Extracts. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2013, 1, 591–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  354. Raghunandan, D.; Ravishankar, B.; Sharanbasava, G.; Mahesh, D.B.; Harsoor, V.; Yalagatti, M.S.; Bhagawanraju, M.; Venkataraman, A. Anti-cancer studies of noble metal nanoparticles synthesized using different plant extracts. Cancer Nanotechnol. 2011, 2, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  355. Das, S.; Das, J.; Samadder, A.; Bhattacharyya, S.S.; Das, D.; Khuda-Bukhsh, A.R. Biosynthesized silver nanoparticles by ethanolic extracts of Phytolacca decandra, Gelsemium sempervirens, Hydrastis canadensis and Thuja occidentalis induce differential cytotoxicity through G2/M arrest in A375 cells. Colloids Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 2013, 101, 325–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  356. Alt, V.; Bechert, T.; Steinrücke, P.; Wagener, M.; Seidel, P.; Dingeldein, E.; Domann, E.; Schnettler, R. An in vitro assessment of the antibacterial properties and cytotoxicity of nanoparticulate silver bone cement. Biomaterials 2004, 25, 4383–4391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Top-up and bottom-down synthetic methods of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles.
Figure 1. Top-up and bottom-down synthetic methods of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles.
Coatings 11 01374 g001
Figure 2. The mechanism of Cayratia pedata-based nanoparticles’ synthesis (reused from Ref. [81], an Open Access Article, (CC BY NC AD)).
Figure 2. The mechanism of Cayratia pedata-based nanoparticles’ synthesis (reused from Ref. [81], an Open Access Article, (CC BY NC AD)).
Coatings 11 01374 g002
Figure 3. Antimicrobial activities of ZnO NPs against (a) Staphylococcus aureus, (b) Staphylococcus epidermidis, (c) Pseudomonas aeruginosa, (d) Escherichia coli, and (e) Klebsiella pneumonia (reused from Ref. [83], an Open Access Article, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)).
Figure 3. Antimicrobial activities of ZnO NPs against (a) Staphylococcus aureus, (b) Staphylococcus epidermidis, (c) Pseudomonas aeruginosa, (d) Escherichia coli, and (e) Klebsiella pneumonia (reused from Ref. [83], an Open Access Article, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)).
Coatings 11 01374 g003
Figure 4. Synthesized ZnO nanoparticles exhibited excellent photocatalytic activity. Reused with permission from [103].
Figure 4. Synthesized ZnO nanoparticles exhibited excellent photocatalytic activity. Reused with permission from [103].
Coatings 11 01374 g004
Figure 5. Schematic synthesis of gold nanoparticles using plants’ parts.
Figure 5. Schematic synthesis of gold nanoparticles using plants’ parts.
Coatings 11 01374 g005
Figure 6. Mechanism for synthesis of gold nanoparticles using a plant. Reused from [133], an Open Access Article, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0).
Figure 6. Mechanism for synthesis of gold nanoparticles using a plant. Reused from [133], an Open Access Article, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0).
Coatings 11 01374 g006
Figure 7. Schematic of green synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles using plants. XRD (X-Ray Diffraction Analysis), SEM (Scanning Electron Microscope), FTIR (Fourier transform infrared), UV-Vis (Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy), EDX (Energy Dispersive X-Ray Analysis), TEM (transmission electron microscopy).
Figure 7. Schematic of green synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles using plants. XRD (X-Ray Diffraction Analysis), SEM (Scanning Electron Microscope), FTIR (Fourier transform infrared), UV-Vis (Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy), EDX (Energy Dispersive X-Ray Analysis), TEM (transmission electron microscopy).
Coatings 11 01374 g007
Figure 8. Schematic of green synthesis of Cu/CuO nanoparticles using plants.
Figure 8. Schematic of green synthesis of Cu/CuO nanoparticles using plants.
Coatings 11 01374 g008
Figure 9. Mechanism of formation of copper oxide nanoparticles.
Figure 9. Mechanism of formation of copper oxide nanoparticles.
Coatings 11 01374 g009
Figure 10. Schematic of green synthesis of Fe and Fe2O3 nanoparticles using plants. UV-Vis (Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy), FTIR (Fourier transform infrared), TEM (transmission electron microscopy), EDAX (Energy Dispersive X-Ray Analysis), XRD (X-Ray Diffraction Analysis), and AFM (Atomic Force Microscopy).
Figure 10. Schematic of green synthesis of Fe and Fe2O3 nanoparticles using plants. UV-Vis (Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy), FTIR (Fourier transform infrared), TEM (transmission electron microscopy), EDAX (Energy Dispersive X-Ray Analysis), XRD (X-Ray Diffraction Analysis), and AFM (Atomic Force Microscopy).
Coatings 11 01374 g010
Figure 11. Mechanism of antibacterial activity of metal or metal oxide nanoparticles. MNPs means metal nanoparticles, MONPs means metal oxide nanoparticles, and ROS means Reactive oxygen species.
Figure 11. Mechanism of antibacterial activity of metal or metal oxide nanoparticles. MNPs means metal nanoparticles, MONPs means metal oxide nanoparticles, and ROS means Reactive oxygen species.
Coatings 11 01374 g011
Table 1. Synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles from leaf extract.
Table 1. Synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles from leaf extract.
Sr. NoReducing Agent Part of PlantSize ShapeBiological ActivitiesYear of PublicationRef.
1Walnut leaf Leaf 15–40 nmTriangular E. coli (ZOI = 7–9 mm) and S. aureus 2021[79]
2Lippia adoensisLeaf22.6–26.8 nmPredominantly sphericalS. aureus (ZOI = 6–14 mm), E. faecalis (ZOI = 6–10 mm), E. coli (ZOI = 6–12 mm) and K. pneumonia (ZOI = 6–12 mm)2021[80]
3Cayratia pedataLeaf52.24 nm.-Utilized in the immobilization of the enzyme (Glucose oxidase)2021[81]
4Piper betleLeaf112 nmHexagonal shape and sphericalS. aureus (ZOI = 2–3 mm) and E. coli
(ZOI = 1–4 mm)
2021[82]
5Becium grandiflorumLeaf20 nm-S. aureus (ZOI = 7 mm) E. coli, (ZOI = 6 mm), K. pneumonia (ZOI = 8 mm), and P. aeruginosa (ZOI = 11 mm)
Degradation of methylene blue (69% degraded after 200 min)
2021[83]
6Achyranthes asperaLeaf28.63–61.42 nmHexagonal S. gallinarum (MIC ≥ 0.195 mg ± 0.00) and S. enteritidis (MIC ≥ 0.390mg ± 0.00)2021[84]
7Arthrospira platensisLeaf30–55 nmSpherical subtilis (ZOI = 24.1 ± 0.3 mm), S. aureus (ZOI = 21.1 ± 0.06 mm), P. aeruginosa (ZOI = 19.1 ± 0.3 mm), E. coli (ZOI = 19.9 ± 0.1 mm), and C. albicans (ZOI = 21.6 ± 0.6 mm)
Showed significantly high cytotoxic efficacy against cancerous cell
2021[85]
8Sambucus ebulusLeaf17 nm Hexagonalcereus, S. aureus, and E. coli
Photo-catalytic degradation of Methylene blue ((80% degraded after 200 min)
2020[86]
9Anacardium occidentaleLeaf107.03 ± 1.54 nm and 206.58 ± 1.86 nmSpherical S. aureus (ZOI = 1.06 ± 0.14 mm), E. aquaticum (ZOI = 1.99 ± 0.11 mm), K. pneumoniae (ZOI = 2.08 ± 0.03 mm), E. coli (ZOI = 1.49 ± 0.09 mm), and A. baumanii (ZOI = 2.99 ± 0.01 mm)2021[87]
10Eucalyptus globulus Labill.Leaf27–35 nm--2020[88]
11Cassia fistula and Melia azadarachLeaf3–68 nm-Cassia fistula
E. coli (ZOI = 21 ± 0.68 mm at 10 µL) and (ZOI = 44 ± 3.00 mm at 200 µL) and S. aureus (ZOI = 14 ± 0.54 mm at 10 µL) and (ZOI = 32 ± 2.30 mm at 200 µL)
Melia azadarach
E. coli (ZOI = 20 ± 0.56 mm at 10 µL) and (ZOI = 40 ± 0.48 mm at 200 µL) and S. aureus (ZOI = 21 ± 0.68 mm at 10 µL and (ZOI = 38 ± 0.55 mm at 200 µL)
2020[89]
12Euphorbia hirtaLeaf5–20 nm in diameter --2020[90]
13saffron leafLeafLess than 50 nm in diameter SphericalAt 25 (μg/disc) Concen of ZnOPs
S. Typhimurium (ZOI = 12 ± 0.27 mm), L. monocytogenes (ZOI = -), and E. faecalis (ZOI = 11 ± 0.39 mm).
At 50 (μg/disc) Concen of ZnOPs
S. Typhimurium (ZOI = 23 ± 0.29 mm), L. monocytogenes (ZOI = -), and E. faecalis (ZOI = 14 ± 0.30 mm).
At 50 (μg/disc) Concen of ZnOPs
S. Typhimurium (ZOI = 26 ± 0.27 mm), L. monocytogenes (ZOI = -), and E. faecalis (ZOI = 18 ± 0.39 mm).
Free radical scavenging activity was reported in DPPH and FRAP (64%).
Degradation of methylene blue (69% degraded after 200 min).
2020[91]
14Azadirachta IndicaLeaf25.97 nmHexagonalE. coli (ZOI = 9.3 mm),
Degradation of methylene blue (Degraded 35.5%. 45.7%, 63.9%, 72.1%, and 80.2% at 40, 80, 120, 160, and 200 min, respectively).
2020[92]
15Aquilegia pubifloraLeaf34.23 nmSpherical or ellipticalaeruginosa (ZOI = 10.3 ± 0.19 mm) and F. solani (ZOI = 13 ± 14 mm)
Antiparasitic potential.
2020[93]
16Broccoli extractLeaf4–17 nmHexagonalCatalytic activity against methylene blue (74%) and phenol red (71%). 2019[94]
17Costus igneusLeaf26.55 nmHexagonalAt 40 (μg/mL) Concen of ZnOPs
S. mutans (ZOI = 2.83 ± 0.15 mm), L. fusiformis (ZOI = 4.73 ± 0.25 mm), P. vulgaris (ZOI = 4.13 ± 0.14 mm), and V. parahaemolyticus (ZOI = 4.2 ± 0.1 mm).
At 50 (μg/mL) Concen of ZnOPs
S. mutans (ZOI = 4.83 ± 0.15 mm), L. fusiformis (ZOI = 6.6 ± 0.1 mm), P. vulgaris (ZOI = 5.3 ± 0.2 mm), and V. parahaemolyticus (ZOI = 5.13 ± 0.17 mm).
At 70 (μg/mL) Concen of ZnOPs
S. mutans (ZOI = 5.86 ± 0.18 mm), L. fusiformis (ZOI = 8.53 ± 0.20 mm), P. vulgaris (ZOI = 6.33 ± 0.15 mm), and V. parahaemolyticus (ZOI = 6.56 ± 0.11 mm).
Antidiabetic activity.
Free radical scavenging activity was reported in DPPH (75%)
2019[95]
18Pandanus odoriferLeaf90 nmSphericalB. subtilis (ZOI = 26 mm) and Gram-negative E. coli (ZOI = 24 mm).2019[96]
19Solanum torvumLeaf34–40 nmSphericalDecreased serum uric acid level.
Could affect hepatic and renal performance in rats.
2019[97]
Table 2. Different roots and root hairs’ extracts have been used for the synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles.
Table 2. Different roots and root hairs’ extracts have been used for the synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles.
Sr. NoReducing Agent Part of PlantSize ShapeBiological ActivitiesYear of PublicationRef.
1Rubus FairholmianusRoot11.44 nmSphericalS. aureus (MIC = 157.22 μg/mL)2021[98]
2Phoenix dactyliferaRoot hair30.87–47.89 nm-K. pneumoniae (ZOI = 2.4 cm), S. aureus (ZOI = 3.0 cm), Salmonella typhi (ZOI = 2.8 cm), E. coli (ZOI = 2.7 cm), and P. aeruginosa (ZOI = 1.6 cm)
Anticancer cytotoxicity
2021[99]
3Raphanus sativusRoot15 and 25 nmHexagonalS. aureus (ZOI = 21.23 ± 1.16 mm) and E. faecalis (ZOI = 11.23 ± 0.58 mm)2020[100]
4Sphagneticola trilobata LRoot-Irregular-2020[101]
5Moringa oleiferaRoot~25 nmHexagonalB. Subtilis (ZOI = 12.5 mm) and E. coli (ZOI = 11.6 cm)2020[102]
Table 3. Synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles using stem and stem bark.
Table 3. Synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles using stem and stem bark.
Sr. NoReducing AgentPart of PlantSizeShapeBiological ActivitiesYear of PublicationRef.
1Amygdalus scopariaStem--At 100 (μg/mL) Concen of ZnOPs
B. Subtilis (ZOI = 25 mm), S. aureus (ZOI = 28 mm), S. typhimurium (ZOI = 21 mm), E. coli (ZOI = 28 mm), E. aerogenes (ZOI = 22 mm), K. aerogenes (ZOI = 21 mm), P. oryzae (ZOI = 18 mm), C. glabrata (ZOI = 16 mm), F. thapsinum (ZOI = 16 mm), C. albicans (ZOI = 16 mm), F. semitectum (ZOI = 18 mm), and C. neoformans (ZOI = 18 mm)
Exhibited excellent photocatalytic activity
Exhibited excellent inhibitory effect on cancer line
2021[103]
2Cinnamomum verumStem bark-Hexagonalaureus (MIC = 125 μg/mL) and E. coli (MIC = 62.5 μg/mL)2020[104]
3Mussaenda frondoseStem bark5–20 nmHexagonalS. aureus (ZOI = 21.51 mm), B. subtilis (ZOI = 19.13 mm), and P. aeruginosa (ZOI = 20.31 mm).
Photocatalytic activity and biological applications such as antidiabetic, anticancerous, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial activity
2020[105]
4Albizia lebbeckStem bark--Tested against S. aureus (ZOI = 4.50 ± 0.30 mm), B. cereus (ZOI = 8.83 ± 0.42 mm), S. typhi (ZOI = 91.3 ± 0.41mm), K. pneumonia (ZOI = 7.30 ± 0.29 mm), and E. coli (ZOI = 10.57 ± 0.320).
Free radical scavenging activity was reported in H2O2 (IC50 0f 48.5, 48.7, and 60.2 μg/mL for 0.1 M, 0.05 M, and 0.05 M, respectively) and cytotoxicity against breast MD-MB and MCF-7 cancer cell lines
2019[106]
Table 4. Synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles using flowers.
Table 4. Synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles using flowers.
Sr. NoReducing Agent Part of PlantSize ShapeBiological ActivitiesYear of PublicationRef.
1Cassia auriculataFlower -Flake structuredS. pneumonia, S. aureus, E. coli, and K. pneumonia (the size of zone observed ranged from 18 mm to 25 mm against the abovementioned pathogens)
Anticancer agent against MG-63 cells (15 and 20 μg)
2021[107]
2Punica granatumFlower-Irregular shapedAt 100 (μg/mL) Concen of ZnOPs
S. diarizonae (ZOI = 10.00 mm), B. cereus (ZOI = 12.33 ± 0.58 mm), S. aureus (ZOI = 10.50 ± 0.87 mm), P. aeruginosa (ZOI = 10.00 ± 1.00 mm), S. pneumonia (ZOI = 14.00 ± 1.00 mm), K. pneumonia (ZOI = 11.00 ± 1.00 mm), E. faecalis (ZOI = 9.67 ± 0.58 mm), S. typhi (ZOI = 8.67 ± 1.15 mm), E. coli (ZOI = 10.00 ± 1.00 mm), L. monocytogenes (ZOI = 14.33 ± 0.58 mm), E. faecium (ZOI = 15.83 ± 0.76 mm), A. hydrophila (ZOI = 13.83 ± 0.29 mm), and M. catarrhalis (ZOI = 12.00 ± 1.00 mm)
2020[108]
3Moringa Oleifera-13.2 nm --2020[109]
4Matricaria chamomillaLFlower62.4 nm-Pv. Oryzae (ZOI = 2.2 cm)2019[110]
5Syzygium aromaticumFlower30–40 nmTriangular and hexagonal Potential application in agriculture and food industries2019[111]
Table 5. Synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles using Seed.
Table 5. Synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles using Seed.
Sr. NoReducing Agent Part of PlantSize ShapeBiological ActivitiesYear of PublicationRef.
1Parthenium hysterophorusSeed 10 nm Hexagonal-2020[112]
2LettuceSeed 50 nm -Effect on the process of seed germination2020[113]
3Eriobotrya japonicaSeed50 nm--2020[114]
4Longan seedSeed10–100 nm Hexagonal Evaluated through de-colorization of Orange II (70%), methylene blue (MB 90%), and methyl orange (80%)2019[115]
5Trigonella foenum-graecumSeed70–90 nmIrregular spherical and flakePotential application in agriculture and food industries2019[116]
Table 6. Synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles using Fruit and Fruit peel.
Table 6. Synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles using Fruit and Fruit peel.
Sr. NoReducing Agent Part of PlantSize ShapeBiological ActivitiesYear of PublicationRef.
1Passiflora foetidaFruit peel58 nmHexagonalShowed remarkable efficiency toward Rhodamine B (91.06%) and MB dye (93.25%)2021[117]
2Myristica fragransFruit41.23 nmSphericalE. coli (ZOI = 15 ± 1.54 mm), K. pneumoniae (ZOI = 27 ± 1.73 mm), P. aeruginosa (ZOI = 17 ± 1.66 mm), and S. aureus (ZOI = 21 ± mm)
Exhibited excellent larvicidal activity against Aedes aegypti
Leishmanicidal activity was also examined against amastigote and promastigote parasite
2021[118]
3Citrus sinensisFruit peel33.1 ± 11.7HexagonalE. coli and S. aureus.
Toxicity toward human umbilical vein endothelial
2020[119]
4OrangeFruit10–20 nmSpherical-2020[120]
5Ailanthus altissimaFruit5–18 nm -E. coli and S. aureus2019[121]
Table 7. Synthesis of Gold nanoparticles using leaf extracts.
Table 7. Synthesis of Gold nanoparticles using leaf extracts.
Sr. NoReducing Agent Part of PlantSize ShapeBiological ActivitiesYear of PublicationRef.
1Lantana camara, Populus alba, and Hibiscus arboreusLeaf~16.3 ± 0.7 nm-E. coli and S. aureus (MIC value of ~100 µg/mL.)
For the degradation of MB and CR dye
2021[134]
2Limnophila rugosaLeaf122 nm SphericalTremendous catalytic activity in the reduction of different nitrophenols 2021[135]
3Ananas comosusLeaf18.85 ± 6.74 nmSphericalExhibited a degradation efficacy of 90% after 240 hrs2021[136]
4Phragmites australisLeaf18 nmSphericalShowed tremendous anticancer efficiency.
Exhibited good quenching for 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl free radical with scavenging % equal to 10.26.
Excellent photocatalytic activity, as they completely degraded the MB in just 60 sec.
2021[137]
5Mentha longifoliaLeaf36.4 nmSphericalTremendous anti-breast cancer efficiency against HS319.T (IC50 = 224 ± 0 µg/mL), MCF7 (IC50 = 264 ± 0 µg/mL) and UACC-3133 (IC50 = 201 ± 0 µg/mL) cell lines2021[138]
6Sageretia theazansLeaf36 and 13 nm.-S. aureus (ZOI = 10 ± 0.54 mm), K. pneumonia (ZOI = 12 ± 0.2 mm), and B. subtilis (ZOI = 6 ± 0.4 mm).
The antioxidant efficiency was investigated with DPPH scavenging activity, the maximum scavenging efficiency was observed at 100 µg/mL
2021[139]
7Coriandrum sativumLeaf32.96 ± 5.25 nmSpherical-2021[139]
8Persicaria salicifoliaLeaf5 and 23 nmSphericaInhibiting the proliferation and growth of breast cancer cells (MCF7 cell line).
Showed antioxidant activity
2021[140]
9Curcumae kwangsiensisLeaf~8–25 nmSphericalShowed tremendous antioxidant property toward common free radical, e.g., BHT (IC50 = 153 µg/mL).
Excellent anti-ovarian cancer activity against Sw-626 (IC50 = 166 µg/mL), SK-0V (IC50 = 204 µg/mL), and PA1 cell lines (IC50 = 153 µg/mL)
2021[141]
10 Centaurea behenLeaf50 nmSphericalRevealed cytotoxicity against THP-1 cell line.
The IC50 for prepared nanoparticles was measured at about 25 µg/mL.
Revealed maximum DPPH scavenging efficiency of 14%
2021[142]
11Ziziphus nummulariaLeaf11–12 nmSphericalExcellent antioxidant activity toward ABTS (IC50 = 690 μg/mL), DPPH (IC50 = 520 μg/mL), and SO (IC50 = 330 μg/mL).2021[143]
12Jasminum auriculatumLeaf8–37 nmSphericalE. coli, K. pneumonia, S. pyogenes, S. aureus, and Candida (fungus).
Showed excellent Antimicrobial commotion toward
Inhibitory effect in the proliferation of the human cervical cancer cell line (IC50 = 104 μg/mL).
2020[144]
13Vitex negundoLeafBelow 100 nmSpherical rod-shapedB. Subtilis (ZOI = 14 ± 0.7 mm), P. aeruginosa (ZOI = 13 ± 0.6 mm), S. aureus (ZOI = 12 ± 0.7 mm), and E. coli (ZOI = 23 ± 0.6 mm).
Exhibited tremendous antioxidant activities against H2O2 (78%) scavenging, Nitric oxide scavenging (83%), and DPPH (79%).
Exhibited tremendous anti-inflammatory activity.
2020[145]
14Pongamia pinnataLeaf10–25 nm-Tested against oomycetes SR1(MIC80 = 1.6) and BP1120 (MIC80 = 0.8)2020[146]
15Lactuca indicaLeaf13.5 nmSphericalExhibited remarkable degradation of methyl orange (2.05 × 10−3) and 4-nitrophenol (1.3 × 10−3).2019[147]
16Croton CaudatusLeaf20 and 50 nmSpherical-2019[148]
17Sansevieria roxburghianaLeaf-Spherical, hexagonal, rod, and decahedralDegradation of MB (49.62%), bromothymol blue 88.16%), acridine orange (40.44), phenol red (85.88), and Congo red (93.09).2019[149]
18Simarouba glaucaLeaf-Prism and sphericalAt 2.7 mL Gold solution
S. aureus (ZOI = 2.0 mm), B. subtilis (ZOI = 1.0 mm), E. coli (ZOI = 0.6 mm), P. vulgaris (ZOI = 0.2 mm), K. pneumonia (ZOI = No), and S. mutans (ZOI = 1.6 mm).
2019[150]
19 Alcea roseaLeaf4–95 nmTriangular, spherical, hexagonal, and pentagonalExhibited anti-oxidant commotion against ABTS (47.16 to 64.82%) and DPPH (15.95 to 51.53%)2019[151]
20Bauhinia pupureaLeaf Hexagonal, nanorod, and triangularB. Subtilis, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus,
Anticancer effects toward Lung carcinoma cell A549 (IC50 = 36.39 μg/mL).
Exhibited high antioxidant efficiency against DPPH (IC50 = 27.21 μg/mL).
2019[152]
21Coleus aromaticusLeaf--epidermis (ZOI = 27 mm) and E. coli (ZOI = 22 mm)
Cytotoxicity toward liver cell (HepG2) cell line
2019[153]
22Annona muricataLeaf25.5 nmSpherical mono-dispersedS. aureus (40%), E. faecalis (46%), K. pneumonia (52%), and C. sporogeneses (54%),
flaws (31%), C. albicans (42%), F. oxysporum (50%), and P. camemberti (66%).
2019[154]
Table 8. Synthesis of Gold nanoparticles using root extracts.
Table 8. Synthesis of Gold nanoparticles using root extracts.
Sr. NoReducing AgentPart of PlantSizeShapeBiological ActivitiesYear of PublicationRef.
1LicoriceRoot2.647–16.25 nmCircularP. aeruginosa (ZOI = 25 ± 0.17), E. coli (ZOI = 29 ± 0.35), S. aureus (ZOI = 26 ± 0.29), S. typhi (ZOI = 26 ± 0.15), B. subtilis (ZOI = 25 ± 0. 15), P. citrinum (ZOI = 19 ± 0.21), A. niger (ZOI = 17 ± 0.29), Candida albicans (ZOI = 14 ± 0.21), F. oxysporum (ZOI = 18 ± 0.33), and A. flavus (ZOI = 16 ± 0.15).
Antioxidant activity toward DPPH and ABTS.
2021[155]
2Phragmites australisRoot--Cytotoxicity toward human lung cancer cells (A549 cell line).
Antioxidant efficiency was less than 10%
2021[156]
3Codonopsis pilosulaRoot20 ± 3.2 nmSphericalE. coli (ZOI = 7.0 ± 0.42 mm), B. subtilis (ZOI = 12.0 ± 0.85 mm), and S. aureus (ZOI = 17.0 ± 1.2 mm).2020[157]
4Euphorbia fischerianaRoot20–60--2019[158]
5Paeonia moutanRoot25.08 ± 3.73 nm-Hindered the inflammation in murine microglial (BV2)2019[159]
Table 9. Synthesis of Gold nanoparticles using stem extracts.
Table 9. Synthesis of Gold nanoparticles using stem extracts.
Sr. NoReducing Agent Part of PlantSize ShapeBiological ActivitiesYear of PublicationRef.
1Brassica oleracea var. Acephala cv galegaStem25.08 ± 3.73 nmSphericalThe antioxidant assay was carried out in the root extract after the formation of gold nanoparticles 2021[160]
2Apium graveolensStem--Utilized as a catalyst for reduction of 4-nitophenol2020[161]
3Angelica aigesStem--Degraded the Malachite (67%) and eosin dye (64%)2019[162]
Table 10. Synthesis of Gold nanoparticles using flower and seed extracts.
Table 10. Synthesis of Gold nanoparticles using flower and seed extracts.
Sr. NoReducing Agent Part of PlantSize ShapeBiological ActivitiesYear of PublicationRef.
1SaffronFlower---2021[163]
2ClitoriaTernateaFlower18.6 nmSpherical-2020[164]
3Musa acuminataFlower12.6–15.7 nm-K. pneumonia (ZOI = 12 mm), P. aeruginosa (ZOI = 9 mm), E. faecalis (ZOI = 10 mm), S. typhi (ZOI = NO), E. coli (ZOI = 7), S. aureus (ZOI = 11 mm), and P. mirabilis (ZOI = 12 mm).
Exhibited antioxidant activity toward DPPH (IC50 = 390 μg for ethanol and 460 μg aqueous)
2019[165]
4Elettaria cardamomumSeed16.6 nm- -[166]
Table 11. Synthesis of Silver nanoparticles using leaf extracts (2021).
Table 11. Synthesis of Silver nanoparticles using leaf extracts (2021).
Sr. NoReducing Agent Part of PlantSize ShapeBiological ActivitiesYear of PublicationRef.
1Mentha longifoliaLeaf10.23 ± 2 nmRound ovalAt 2.0 (μg/mL) Concen of AgNPs
S. aureus (ZOI = 12 ± 0.03 mm), B. subtilis (ZOI = 10 ± 0.01 mm), and K. pneumonia (ZOI = 0).
2021[192]
2Ocimum americanumLeaf48.25 nm-At 100 (μg/mL) Concen of AgNPs
S. aureus (ZOI = 18.33 ± 0.33 mm), P. aeruginosa (ZOI = 17.66 ± 0.66 mm), V. cholera (ZOI = 15.66 ± 0.88 mm), Aeromonas sp (ZOI = 13. 33 ± 0.33 mm), bacillus sp (ZOI = 16.33 ± 0.33 mm), and E. coli (ZOI = 7.66 ± 0.33 mm)
Anti-oxidant activity was examined by H2O2 (58.71%) and DPPH (75%).
Photocatalytic degradation of Eosin dye (91.17%)
2021[193]
3Clerodendrum inermeLeaf--A. niger (ZOI = 17 mm), A. flavus (ZOI = 22 mm), and antibacterial i.e., B. subtilis (ZOI = 15 mm) and S. aureus (ZOI = 14 mm) The anti-oxidant and cytotoxic activities were also examined by utilizing DPPH free radical scavenging and MTT process (78.8 ± 0.19%) 2020[194]
4Salvia officinalisLeaf41 nmSphericalExhibited less cytotoxicity toward HeLa cells’ line and exhibited excellent anti-plasmodial efficiency (IC50 = 3.6 lg/mL)2021[195]
5Alstonia venenataLeaf27–36 nmSphericalThe larvicidal efficiency on early-third-instar larvae was sufficiently higher for silver nanoparticles as compared to extract. The larvicidal activity was tested toward Culex quinquefasciatus with IC50 equivalent to 14.50 lg/mL, Anopheles stephensi with IC50 equivalent to12.28 lg/mL, and Aedes aegypti with equivalent to LC5013.49 lg/mL2021[196]
6Sida retusaLeaf20–40 nm.SphericalS. aureus (ZOI = 17 mm),
B. subtilis (ZOI = 14 mm),
E. coli (ZOI = 15 mm), and S. typhi (ZOI = 15 mm)
2021[197]
7Carica papayaLeaf--Anticancer activity toward various human cancer cells. The cytotoxic commotion was performed toward various human cells and non-tumorigenic keratinocytes’ cells. Cure of DU145 cell with papaya-mediated silver nanoparticles (0.5–5.0 μg/mL) for 1 or 2 days decreased the total cell number by 21–36%2021[198]
8Carissa carandasLeaf35 ± 2 nm at 25 °C and 30 ± 3 nm at 60-E. faecalis (ZOI = 7.0 ± 0.0 mm), S. flexneri (ZOI = 8.0 ± 1.0 mm), S. typhimurium (ZOI = 8.0 ± 1.0 mm), and gonococci spp (ZOI = 6.0 ± 0.0 mm)
Exhibited excellent antioxidant activity through DPPH assay (IC50 = 68.12 ± 1.27).
2021[199]
9Malva parvifloraLeaf50.6 nmSphericalInhibited the growth of F. oxysporum (81%), A. alternate (82%), H. rostratum (89%), and F. solani (81%). 2021[200]
10Ziziphus nummulariaLeaf25.6 nmOval and SphericalExhibited good DPPH activity (IC50 = 520 mg/mL) and ABTS activity (IC50 = 55 mg/mL)2021[201]
11Otostegia persicaLeaf36.5 ± 2.0 nmSphericalS. pyogenes (ZOI = 14 ± 0.4 mm), S. aureus (ZOI = 16 ± 0.1 mm), B. subtilis (ZOI = 15 ± 0.3 mm), P. aeruginosa (ZOI = 21 ± 0.5 mm), S. typhi (ZOI = 19 ± 0.4 mm), and E. coli (ZOI = 17 ± 0.1 mm)
Exhibited excellent anti-oxidant activity (84%) compared to Otostegia persica leaf extract (64%).
2021[202]
12Lotus lalambensisLeaf--C. albicans (MIC = 125 μg/mL)2021[203]
13Symplocos racemosaLeaf--P. aeruginosa (ZOI = 22 mm)2021[204]
14Aloe veraLeaf--P. aeruginosa (ZOI = 14.00 ± 1.00 mm), S. aureus (ZOI = 21.00 ± 1.00 mm), E. coli (ZOI = 20.00 ± 2.00 mm), and Enterobacter sp (ZOI = 32.00 ± 2.00 mm)2021[205]
15Ruellia tuberosa.Leaf55.65 nmSphericalCytotoxic potency against A549 lung cancer line with IC50 = 68 μg/mL.
Degraded the Coomassie brilliant blue and crystal violet absorbance (peaks of the degraded CV and CBB were recorded at 586 and 590 nm)
2021[206]
16Psidium guajavaLeaf--Anti-chikungunya potency2021[207]
17Euphorbia sanguineaLeaf--Photocatalytic degradation of CR (90% within 1 h)2021[208]
Table 12. Synthesis of Silver nanoparticles using leaf extracts (2019–2020).
Table 12. Synthesis of Silver nanoparticles using leaf extracts (2019–2020).
Sr. NoReducing AgentPart of PlantSizeShapeBiological ActivitiesYear of PublicationRef.
1Borago officinalisLeaf40 nmIrregularThe bio-synthesized silver nanoparticles were hazardous to Spodoptera littoralis2020[209]
2Tragopogon collinusLeaf7 nm-At 6000 (μg/mL) Concen of AgNPs
S. aureus (ZOI = 2 mm) and E. coli (ZOI = 4 mm)
At 7000 (μg/mL) Concen of AgNPs
S. aureus (ZOI = 5 mm) and E. coli (ZOI = 7 mm)
At 8000 (μg/mL) Concen of AgNPs
S. aureus (ZOI = 10 m) and E. coli (ZOI = 8 mm)
2020[210]
3Melia azedarachLeaf18–30 nmSphericalVerticillium dahlia2020[211]
4Mentha aquaticaLeaf41 nmSphericalP. aeruginosa (MIC = 2.2μg/mL), E. coli (MIC = 58μg/mL), B. cereus (MIC = 20), and
S. aureus (MIC = 198μg/mL)
2020[212]
5Ziziphus joazeiro. Leaf--E. coli ATCC 25922
and S. aureus ATCC 25923
2020[213]
6Elytraria acaulisLeaf5–100 nmCuboidS. typhi (ZOI = 11.5 ± 2.5 mm), S. Epidermis (ZOI = 14.3 ± 1.7 mm), E. coli (ZOI = 11.2 ± 1.6 mm), and B. subtilis (ZOI = 12.0 ± 2.4 mm).
Anti-oxidant activity toward DPPH (84.47%) and ABTS (85.25%)
Cytotoxic commotion was performed against A549 cell line (IC50 = 79.6 µg/mL)
2020[214]
7Hyptis suaveolensLeaf29.19–52.27 nm-Scavenged H2O2 (54.21–70.11%) and DPPH (77.75–83.19)
Stopped coagulation of blood
2020[215]
8Caesalpinia pulcherrimaLeaf9 nmSphericalCytotoxicity toward HeLa cell line (IC50 = 4.44 mg/mL)2020[216]
9Gomphrena globosaLeaf-Sphericalsubtilis (ZOI = 40 mm), P. aeruginosa (ZOI = 38 mm), M. luteus (ZOI = 48 mm), E. coli (ZOI = 53 mm), and K. pneumonia (ZOI = 39 mm)2020[217]
10 Plumbago auriculataLeaf20 to 500 nm-At 5 (μg/mL) Concen of AgNPs
S. aureus (ZOI = 10 ± 1.5 mm), B. subtilis (ZOI = 8 ± 0.5 mm), K. pneumonia (ZOI = 11 ± 0.5 mm), and E. coli (ZOI = 10 ± 0.8 mm),
At 10 (μg/mL) Concen of AgNPs
S. aureus (ZOI = 10 ± 0.8 mm), B. subtilis (ZOI = 10 ± 1.7 mm), K. pneumonia (ZOI = 11 ± 0.8 mm), and E. coli (ZOI = 10 ± 0.6 mm),
At 15 (μg/mL) Concen of AgNPs
S. aureus (ZOI = 8 ± 0.7 mm), B. subtilis (ZOI = 8 ± 0.9 mm), K. pneumonia (ZOI = 12 ± 1.0 mm), and E. coli (ZOI = 12 ± 1.0 mm),
At 20 (μg/mL) Concen of AgNPs
S. aureus (ZOI = 10 ± 1.5 mm), B. subtilis (ZOI = 8 ± 1.0 mm), K. pneumonia (ZOI = 14 ± 1.7 mm), and E. coli (ZOI = 12 ± 2.5 mm),
Inhibited the growth of Culex quinquefasciatus (45.1 µg/mL) and Aedes aegypti
2020[218]
11Cucumis prophetarumLeaf30–50 nm -At 20 (μg/mL) Concen of AgNPs
S. typhi (ZOI = 15 ± 0.2 mm) and S. aureus (ZOI = 11 ± 0.4 mm)
At 50 (μg/mL) Concen of AgNPs
S. typhi (ZOI = 17 ± 0.5 mm) and S. aureus (ZOI = 14 ± 0.3 mm)
At 75 (μg/mL) Concen of AgNPs
S. typhi (ZOI = 20 ± 0.6 mm) and S. aureus (ZOI = 18 ± 0.4 mm)
Anti-oxidant activity toward DPPH (IC50 = 29.2 µg/mL) and ABTS (IC50 = 34.5µg/mL)
2020[219]
12Polygonatum graminifoliumLeaf3–15 nmSphericalE. coli (ZOI = 27 mm) and S. aureus (ZOI = 16 mm)2020[220]
13Cocos nuciferaLeaf14.2 nmCubicE. coli (ZOI = 16.0 ± 0.11 mm), B. subtilis (ZOI = 10.0 ± 0.05 mm), S. aureus (ZOI = 12.0 ± 0.06 mm), and S. typhimurium (ZOI = 13.0 ± 0.12 mm), 2020[221]
14Mimosa albidaLeaf6.5 nm ± 3.1 nm-Exhibited anti-oxidant activity (IC50 = 7563 ± 967) 2020[222]
15Capparis zeylanicaLeaf-SphericalS. Paratyphi (ZOI = 18 mm), S. dysenteriae (ZOI = 19 mm), S. epidermidis (ZOI = 22 mm), E. faecalis (ZOI = 20 mm), A. niger (ZOI = 21 mm), and C. albicans (ZOI = 20 mm) 2020[223]
16Holoptelea integrifoliaLeaf32–38 nm.SphericalShowed antioxidant activities toward DPPH (74.59 ± 3.08%)
Showed antiinflammatory (binding constant 2.60 ± 0.05 × 104) and antidiabetic (86.66 ± 5.03%) activities.
2019[224]
17Annona reticulatalLeaf-CubicP. Aeruginosa (MIC = 62.5 μg/mL), E. coli (MIC = 62.6 μg/mL), S. aureus (MIC = 31.5 μg/mL), B. cereus (MIC = 125 μg/mL), and C. albicans (MIC = 62.5 μg/mL)2019[225]
18Combretum erythrophyllumLeaf13.62 nmSphericalS. Epidermidis (ZOI = 12 mm), P. vulgaris (ZOI = 11 mm), S. aureus (ZOI = 15 mm), and E. coli (ZOI = 12 mm) 2019[226]
19Berberis vulgarisLeaf30–70 nmSphericalS. aureus and E. coli2019[227]
20Catharanthus roseusLeaf--P. Aeruginosa (ZOI = 6 mm), S. dysenteriae (ZOI = 8 mm), S. aureus (ZOI = 8 mm), and B. anthracis (ZOI = 12 mm),2019[228]
21Ganonerion polymorphumLeaf20–60 nm Hexagonal and SphericalB. Cereus (99.75%) and E. coli (99.94%) 2019[229]
22Premna integrifoliaLLeaf9–35 nmSphericalE. faecalis (MIC = 60 μg/mL), V. parahaemolyticus (MIC = 10 μg/mL), S. dysenteriae (MIC = 20 μg/mL), S. aureus (MIC = 30 μg/mL), and S. flexneri (MIC = 70 μg/mL)
Showed anti-oxidant activity (IC50 = 524.19 ± 2.63 µg/mL) and cytotoxic to cancer cell line (SiHa).
2019[230]
23Piper betleLeaf6–14 nmSphericalAt 1000 (μg/mL) Concen of AgNPsF. Solani (ZOI = 3.13 ± 0.25 mm) and A. brassicae (ZOI = 67. 21 ± 3.15 mm)2019[231]
Table 13. Synthesis of Silver nanoparticles using root extracts.
Table 13. Synthesis of Silver nanoparticles using root extracts.
Sr. NoReducing Agent Part of PlantSize ShapeBiological ActivitiesYear of PublicationRef.
1Ricinus communisRoot29 nmSphericalE. coli (73%), K. pneumonia (60%), S. aureus (56%), S. pneumonia (60%), A. niger (77%), and A. alternate (75%)
Exhibited remarkable efficiency toward Urease (IC50 = 36.81 ± 0.05 μg/mL) and Xanthine (IC50 = 3.60 ± 0.04 μg/mL)
2021[232]
2Duchesnea indicaRoot20.49 nmSphericalE. coli (MIC = 0.53 mg/mL), S. typhi (MIC = 0.01 mg/mL), A. alternate (MIC = 0.51 mg/mL), and M. canis (MIC = 0.53 mg/mL)2021[233]
3Salvadora persicaRoot37.5 nmRod and SphericalS. epidermidis ATCC12228 (MIC = 0.39 µg/mL) and E. coli (MIC = 0.19 µg/mL)2021[234]
4Asparagus officinalisRoot--Cytotoxic toward cervical cancer cell line (SiHa) (IC50 = 44 lg mL−1)2021[235]
5Astragalus tribuloides DelileRoot34.2 ± 8.0 nmSphericalS. aureus (ZOI = 18 mm), S. flexneri (ZOI = 27 mm), E. coli (ZOI = 24 mm), and B. cereus (ZOI = 16 mm)
Excellent anti-oxidant (64% property higher than extract (47%)
2020[236]
6Berberis asiaticaRoot14 nmSphericalS. typhimurium (ZOI = 7 mm), E. coli (ZOI = 11 mm), S. aureus (ZOI = 12 mm), and K. pneumonia (ZOI = 6 mm)2020[237]
Table 14. Synthesis of Silver nanoparticles using stem and stem bark extracts.
Table 14. Synthesis of Silver nanoparticles using stem and stem bark extracts.
Sr. NoReducing AgentPart of PlantSizeShapeBiological ActivitiesYear of PublicationRef.
1Grewia lasiocarpaStem barkdiameter between 38.3 and 46.7 nmSphericalS. aureus (MIC = 15.67 ± 2.08 µg/mL).
Exhibited cytotoxicity toward HeLa (IC50 = > 1 μg/mL).
2021[238]
2Euphorbia nivuliaStem bark20–90 nmSphericalK. pneumoniae (MIC = 23.5 ± o.5 µg/mL), B. cereus (MIC = 27 ± 1 µg/mL), S. aureus (MIC = 24.5 ± 1.5 µg/mL), P. aeruginosa (MIC = 30.5 ± 0.5 µg/mL), B. subtilis (MIC = 29 ± 1 µg/mL), and C. albicans (MIC = 26 ± 1 µg/mL)2021[239]
3Boswellia dalzieliiStem2 nm to 101 nm-Anti-oxidant activity of prepared silver nanoparticles was tested using DPPH (TEAC = 300.91)2020[240]
4Piper chabaStem 19 nm SphericalDegradation of MB and reduction of 4-nitrppheno2020[241]
5Garcinia kolaStem --E. faecalis (ZOI = 2 mm), B. cereus (ZOI = 4 mm), C. sporogenes (ZOI = 6 mm), and E. coli (ZOI = 10 mm)2020[242]
6Vigna unguiculataStem~25 nm--2019[243]
Table 15. Synthesis of Silver nanoparticles using seed extracts.
Table 15. Synthesis of Silver nanoparticles using seed extracts.
Sr. NoReducing Agent Part of PlantSize ShapeBiological ActivitiesYear of PublicationRef.
1Trigonella foenum-graecumSeed--B. cereus (ZOI = 10 mm), E. coli (ZOI = 14 mm), and S. aureus (ZOI = 5.0 mm)2021[244]
2Morinda citrifoliaSeed3 nmSphericalS. aureus (ZOI = 9.81 mm) and E. coli (ZOI = 10.63 mm)2021[245]
3Mangifera indicaSeed--B. cereus (ATCC11778) (K. pneumonia (NMCIM2719), S. aureus (ATCC29737), P. aeruginosa (ATCC9027), C. rubrum (ATCC14898), E. coli (NCIM2931), S. typhimurium (ATCC23564), C. neoformans (ATCC34664), C. albicans (ATCC2091), and C. glabrata (NCIM3438)2021[246]
4Annona squamosa L.Seed22 nmSphericalShowed excellent catalytic activity against degradation of Coomassie brilliant blue dye2021[247]
5Rosa caninaSeed150 nmRod and Spherical-2021[248]
6Nigella sativaSeed--Showed good photocatalytic activity on degradation of Congo red (Degraded 96%, 97%, and 98.5%, at 0.2, 0.15, and 1.3 min, respectively).2021[249]
7Moringa oleiferaSeed-SphericalEnhanced wound contraction and tissue growth wall2021[250]
8Bunium persicumSeed35 to 70 nm-Inhibited Urease and tyrosinase2021[251]
9Syzygium cuminiSeed--F. nucleatum (MIC = NO), A. naeslundii (MIC = 125 µg/mL), S. aureus (MIC = 125 µg/mL), S. mutans (MIC = 250 µg/mL), S. epidermidis (MIC = 31.2 µg/mL), V. dispar (MIC = 62.5 µg/mL), and S. oralis (MIC = 31.2 µg/mL)2021[252]
10Vitis viniferaSeed10–50 nm--2021[253]
11Gingerand Nigella sativaSeed~12–8 nm-P. Aeruginosa and E. coli2020[254]
12Cuminum cyminum L.Seed~100 nmSphericalEffective against human breast cancer cells (IC50 = 1.25 µg/mL)2020[255]
13Punica granatumSeed10 to 35 nmSpherical-2020[256]
14Salvia hispanicaL.Seed7 nmSphericalS. aureus (ZOI = 14.9 mm) and E. coli (ZOI = 18.5 mm)2019[257]
15Avicennia marinaSeed5–10 nm-pneumoniae ATCC 700,603 (ZOI = 12.5 ± 0.01 mm), E. faecalis ATCC 5129 (ZOI = No), S. aureus ATCC 43,300 (ZOI = 3.25 ± 0.02 mm),
P. aeruginosa ATCC 27,853 (ZOI = 12.5 ± 0.05 mm), and E. coli ATCC 35,218 (ZOI = 6.25 ± 0.05 mm)
2019[258]
16Tectona grandisSeed10–30 nm-B. cereus (ZOI = 12 mm), E. coli (ZOI = 17 mm), and S. aureus (ZOI = 16 mm)2019[259]
Table 16. Synthesis of Silver nanoparticles using flower extracts.
Table 16. Synthesis of Silver nanoparticles using flower extracts.
Sr. NoReducing AgentPart of PlantSize ShapeBiological ActivitiesYear of PublicationRef.
1Avera lanataFlower7.6 nm-DPPH radical scavenging analysis showed antioxidant activity of prepared silver nanoparticles (IC50 = 50.08 ± 3.34)2021[260]
2Fraxinus excelsiorFlower--Used as environmentally friendly material for the coloration of woven glass fabrics2021[261]
3JasmineFlower40 nm-Prepared silver nanoparticles degraded the MB (78% after 120 min).2021[262]
Table 17. Synthesis of Titanium Oxide nanoparticles from leaves, roots, flowers, seeds, and fruit peel extracts.
Table 17. Synthesis of Titanium Oxide nanoparticles from leaves, roots, flowers, seeds, and fruit peel extracts.
Sr. NoReducing Agent Part of PlantSize ShapeBiological ActivitiesYear of PublicationRef.
1Mentha arvensisLeaf20–70 nmSphericalAt 10 (μg/mL) Concen of AgNPs
P. Vulgaris (ZOI = 25 mm), E. coli (ZOI = 20 mm), S. aureus (ZOI = 21 mm), A. niger (ZOI = No), A. fumigates (ZOI = 6 mm), and A. cuboid (ZOI = No)
2021[275]
2Pouteria campechianaLeaf-SphericalExhibited larvicidal activity toward Aedes aegypti2021[276]
3Coleus aromaticusLeaf12–33 nmHexagonalS. boydii (ZOI = 30 mm) and E. faecalis (ZOI = 33 mm)
Larvicidal activity toward fourth stages of instars’ larvae of Aedes aegypti.
Cytotoxic activity toward HeLa cell line
2021[277]
4OchradenusarabicusisLeaf20–40 nm-S. aureus (MIC = 31.25 µg/mL) and P. aeruginosa (MIC = 128 µg/mL)2021[278]
5Aegle marmelosLeaf150 nmSphericalRemoved ornidazole from wastewater.2020[279]
6Azadirachta indicaLeaf25–87 nmSphericalB. subtilis (MIC = 25 μg/mL), E. coli (MIC = 10.42 μg/mL), K. pneumoniae (MIC = 16.66 μg/mL), and S. typhi (MIC = 10.42 μg/mL).2019[280]
7Carica papayaLeaf20 nmSphericalPhotocatalytic activity (91.19%) against degradation of RO-4 dye2019[281]
8Aloe barbadensisLeaf~20 nmSphericalAnti-biofilm activity toward P. aeruginosa (ZOI = 30.69 ± 3.78 mm)2019[282]
9Glycyrrhiza glabraRoot 69 nmSphericalCytotoxicity toward HEP2 and vero cell line2019[283]
10JasmineFlower31–42 nmSphericalExhibited excellent degradation toward methylene blue dye (92% after 120 min).2021[284]
11Myristica fragransSeed --Showed degradation against Congo red (99% after 45 min) and methylene blue (97% after 60 min).2021[285]
12Cuminum cyminumSeed 15.17 nm--2021[286]
13Trachyspermum ammiSeed16.63 nmSpherical and spheroidal-2021[287]
14Bixa orellanaSeed13 ± 2 nmSpherical-2019[288]
15Nephelium lappaceumL.Fruit peel70–90 nm-Cytotoxicity was tested against MDA-MB-231 (death rate of cell = 73.65 µg/mL)2019[288]
Table 18. Synthesis of copper and copper oxide nanoparticles using leaves, seeds, flowers, and fruit peel extracts.
Table 18. Synthesis of copper and copper oxide nanoparticles using leaves, seeds, flowers, and fruit peel extracts.
Sr. NoReducing AgentPart of PlantSize Cu/CuO NPsShapeBiological ActivitiesYear of PublicationRef.
1Terminalia chebulaLeaf100 nmCuORod-like shape Applications on diesel engine.2021[301]
2Cedrus deodaraLeaf100 nmCuOSphericalS. aureus (MIC = 25 lg∕mL) and E. coli (MIC = 150 lg∕mL) 2021[302]
3Psidium guajavaLeaf40–150 nm CuOOvalepidermis (ZOI = 1.8 mm), E. coli (ZOI = 2 mm), S. pneumoniae (ZOI = 1.4 mm), and P. aeruginosa (ZOI = 3 mm)2021[303]
4Sesbania aculeataLeaf-Cu-C. lunata (ZOI = 22 mm) and Phoma destructiva (ZOI = 23 mm) [304]
5Celastrus paniculatusLeaf2–10 nmCuOSphericalF. Oxysporum (maximum mycelial inhibition = 76.29 mm)2020[305]
6Catha edulisLeaf-CuOSphericalK. Pneumonia (ZOI = 29 ± 0.03 mm), E. coli (ZOI = 32 ± 0.02 mm), S. aureus (ZOI = 22 ± 0.01 mm), and S. pyogenes (ZOI = 24 ± 0.02 mm)2020[306]
7Ageratum houstonianumMillLeaf~80 nmCuCubic, rectangular, hexagonalE. coli (ZOI = 12.43 ± 0.233 mm).
Photocatalytic property of prepared particles was tested toward an azo dye Congo red (40%).
2020[307]
8Jatropha curcasLeaf10 ± 1 and 12 ± 1 nmCu-Photocatalytic activity toward methylene blue (70%) 2020[308]
9Citrofortunella microcarpaLeaf-CuO-Photocatalytic activity against Rhodamin B (98%)2020[309]
10Enicostemma axillareLeaf330 nmCuO--2019[310]
11Camelia sinensisLeaf60 ± 6 nmCUSphericalPhotocatalytic degradation (83.7%) of prepared copper nanoparticles was tested by utilizing bromophenol blue2019[311]
12Annona squamosaSeed-CuOSphericalMicrobacterium testaceum (ZOI = 17 mm) and E. coli (ZOI = 21 mm)2021[312]
13Azadirachta indicaSeed41 ± 21 nmCuO-Positive effect on nutrition, growth, and enhanced seed germination2020[313]
14Elettaria cardamomSeed1–100 nmCuO--2020[314]
15WheatSeed22 ± 1.5 nmCuOSphericalDescribed catalytic activity toward 4-nitrophenol removal (97.6% after 5 days)2019[315]
16Ocimum tenuiflorumFlower5–10 nmCu SphericalAmino acid detection2019[316]
17Stachys LavandulifoliaFlower20–25 nm CuOSpherical-2021[317]
18Punica granatumFruit peel38.50 nm CuO--2020[318]
Table 19. Synthesis of Iron and Iron oxide nanoparticles from Leaf, flower, seed, and fruit extracts.
Table 19. Synthesis of Iron and Iron oxide nanoparticles from Leaf, flower, seed, and fruit extracts.
Sr. NoReducing Agent Part of PlantSizeIron/Iron Oxide NPsShapeBiological ActivitiesYear of PublicationRef.
1Romalina sinensisLeaf20–70 nmIron OxideSpherical-2021[322]
2Chlorophytum comosumLeaf100 nmIron-P. aeruginosa, E. faecalis, E. coli, and S. aureus.
The prepared iron nanoparticles showed Methyl orange degradation (77% after 7 h)
2021[323]
3Laurus nobilisLeaf8.03 ± 8.99 nmIron OxideSpherical and hexagonalE. coli (ZOI = No), L. monocytogenes (ZOI = 12 mm), S. aureus (ZOI = No), P. spinulosum (ZOI = 14 mm), and A. aspergillus (ZOI = 13 mm)2020[324]
4Carica papayaLeaf-Iron Oxide-S. aureus (ZOI = 14 mm), Klebsiella spp (ZOI = 9 mm), and E. coli (ZOI = 9 mm).
Exhibited against BHK-21 and Hela cell lines
2020[325]
5Eucalyptus robustaLeaf-Iron-S. aureus (ZOI = 1.15 ± 0.05 mm), B. subtilis (ZOI = 3.60 ± 0.40 mm), P. aeruginosa (ZOI = 29 ± 0.03 mm), and E. coli (ZOI = 1.10 ± 0.10 mm)2020[326]
6Ruellia tuberosaLeaf52.78 nmIron Oxide-K. pneumonia (ZOI = 12 mm) and E. coli (ZOI = 17 mm)2019[327]
7Avicennia marineFlower30–100 nmIron oxide Honeycomb-2021[328]
8Punica granatumSeed25–55nmIron oxideSemi sphericalExhibited efficient degradation toward reactive blue (95.08% after 56 min)2019[329]
9BorassusflabelliferSeed10–40 nmIron oxideHexagonalAt 50 (μg/mL) Concen of Fe2O3NPs
B. subtilis (ZOI = 18 mm), E. coli (ZOI = 14 mm), S. aureus (ZOI = 11 mm), C. albicans (ZOI = 9 mm), and A. niger (ZOI = 9 mm)
At 100 (μg/mL) Concen of Fe2O3NPs
C. subtilis (ZOI = 24 mm), E. coli (ZOI = 14 mm), S. aureus (ZOI = 18 mm), C. albicans (ZOI = 10 mm), and A. niger (ZOI = 11 mm)
At 500 (μg/mL) Concen of Fe2O3NPs
B. subtilis (ZOI = 26 mm), E. coli (ZOI = 23 mm), S. aureus (ZOI = 20 mm), C. albicans (ZOI = 13 mm), and A. niger (ZOI = 15 mm)
2020[330]
10Iraqi grapesFruit29–37 nmIron oxide-E. coli (ZOI = 19 mm) and S. aureus (ZOI = 18 mm)2020[331]
11Cornelian cherryFruit20–40 nmIron oxideSpherical-2020[333]
Table 20. Synthesis of cobalt or cobalt oxide nanoparticles using plants.
Table 20. Synthesis of cobalt or cobalt oxide nanoparticles using plants.
Sr. NoReducing AgentPart of PlantSizeCobalt/Cobalt Oxide NPsShapeBiological Activities Year of PublicationRef.
1Hibiscus rosa sinensisLeaf-Co3O4-P. aeruginosa (ZOI = 20 ± 1.47 mm), E. coli (ZOI = 16 ± 1.61 mm), and Proteus vulgaris (ZOI = 21 ± 1.32 mm)2021[340]
2Conocarpus erectus LLeaf4.9 nmCoSpherical-2021[341]
3Citrus medicaLeaf100 nm Co3O4-Degradation of methyl orange (90% after 1 h)2021[342]
4Foenum-graceum L.Leaf13.2 nmCo3O4Quasi-spherical -2020[343]
5Populus ciliataLeaf-Co3O4-At 2(mg/mL) Concen of CoNPs
B. Lichenifermis (ZOI = 14.1 ± 0.4 mm), E. coli (ZOI = 1.10 ± 0.5 mm), B. subtilis (ZOI = 19.7 ± 0.4 mm), and K. pneumonia (ZOI = 12.8 ± 0.2 mm)
At 4(mg/mL) Concen of CoNPs
B. Lichenifermis (ZOI = 19.2 ± 1.2 mm), E. coli (ZOI = 15.1 ± 0.6 mm), B. subtilis (ZOI = 21.2 ± 0.5 mm), and K. pneumonia (ZOI = 17.8 ± 0.9 mm)
At 2(mg/mL) Concen of CoNPs
B. Lichenifermis (ZOI = 22.5 ± 0.9 mm), E. coli (ZOI = 16.0 ± 0.8 mm), B. subtilis ZOI = 24.5 ± 1.3 mm), and K. pneumonia (ZOI = 20.4 ± 0.7 mm)
2020[344]
6Selinum wallichianumLeaf-Co--2019[345]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bukhari, A.; Ijaz, I.; Gilani, E.; Nazir, A.; Zain, H.; Saeed, R.; Alarfaji, S.S.; Hussain, S.; Aftab, R.; Naseer, Y. Green Synthesis of Metal and Metal Oxide Nanoparticles Using Different Plants’ Parts for Antimicrobial Activity and Anticancer Activity: A Review Article. Coatings 2021, 11, 1374. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11111374

AMA Style

Bukhari A, Ijaz I, Gilani E, Nazir A, Zain H, Saeed R, Alarfaji SS, Hussain S, Aftab R, Naseer Y. Green Synthesis of Metal and Metal Oxide Nanoparticles Using Different Plants’ Parts for Antimicrobial Activity and Anticancer Activity: A Review Article. Coatings. 2021; 11(11):1374. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11111374

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bukhari, Aysha, Irfan Ijaz, Ezaz Gilani, Ammara Nazir, Hina Zain, Ramsha Saeed, Saleh S. Alarfaji, Sajjad Hussain, Rizwana Aftab, and Yasra Naseer. 2021. "Green Synthesis of Metal and Metal Oxide Nanoparticles Using Different Plants’ Parts for Antimicrobial Activity and Anticancer Activity: A Review Article" Coatings 11, no. 11: 1374. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11111374

APA Style

Bukhari, A., Ijaz, I., Gilani, E., Nazir, A., Zain, H., Saeed, R., Alarfaji, S. S., Hussain, S., Aftab, R., & Naseer, Y. (2021). Green Synthesis of Metal and Metal Oxide Nanoparticles Using Different Plants’ Parts for Antimicrobial Activity and Anticancer Activity: A Review Article. Coatings, 11(11), 1374. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11111374

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop