Next Article in Journal
Analysis on Blast Fungus-Responsive Characters of a Flavonoid Phytoalexin Sakuranetin; Accumulation in Infected Rice Leaves, Antifungal Activity and Detoxification by Fungus
Next Article in Special Issue
Immobilization of Brassica oleracea Chlorophyllase 1 (BoCLH1) and Candida rugosa Lipase (CRL) in Magnetic Alginate Beads: An Enzymatic Evaluation in the Corresponding Proteins
Previous Article in Journal
Anti-Inflammatory and Antiplatelet Activities of Plasma Are Conserved Across Twelve Mammalian Species
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chitosan-Coated Magnetic Nanoparticles Prepared in One-Step by Precipitation in a High-Aqueous Phase Content Reverse Microemulsion
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 19
Issue 8
10.3390/molecules190811395
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Size Control of Magnetite Nanoparticles in Excess Ligands as a Function of Reaction Temperature and Time

by
Masafumi Nakaya
1,*,
Ryo Nishida
2 and
Atsushi Muramatsu
1
1
Institute of Multidisciplinary Research for Advanced Materials, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8577, Japan
2
School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8579, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2014, 19(8), 11395-11403; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules190811395
Submission received: 31 May 2014 / Revised: 7 July 2014 / Accepted: 22 July 2014 / Published: 4 August 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bio and Nanomaterials Based on Fe3O4)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The novel synthesis of monodisperse magnetite Fe3O4 nanoparticles of varying sizes using a solventless synthetic method was developed. Iron salt was treated in excess oleylamine and oleic acid as ligands. The effect of the reaction temperature and time on the particle size was investigated and the particle sizes were easily tuned from 5.3 to 20.4 nm by changing the reaction temperature and time.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Chemically synthesized superparamagnetic magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles have many attractive features, including their ease of synthesis, narrow size distribution, chemical stability, and high dispersibility in various solvents [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. In addition, Fe3O4 nanoparticles exhibit high biocompatibility [9,10,11,12]. Therefore, they have potential uses in the biomedical field, including as contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [13,14,15,16,17,18], drug delivery systems [19,20,21], and hyperthermia agents [22,23,24]. In order for that potential to come to fruition, size control is crucial because their magnetic properties strongly depend on size. In general, ferri- and ferromagnetic properties appear in particles larger than 30 nm [6]. However, particles smaller than 30 nm are desired in the biomedical field to facilitate superparamagnetism. In addition, even in particles smaller than 30 nm, the magnetic properties strongly depend on the size [8,24]. Therefore, controlling the size of Fe3O4 nanoparticles is imperative in controlling the properties for various applications in the biomedical field.
In conventional synthetic procedures utilized to obtain superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles with tunable sizes, seed-mediated growth is a very simple way to promote growth [3,4]. However, seed-mediated growth tends to broaden the size distribution because of a generation of nucleation in each step of the growth reaction. Hyeon et al. reported a synthetic method to control the size of iron oxide nanoparticles by changing the reaction temperature. The procedure can easily control the size of the nanoparticles and prepare the particles in large quantities, however, the crystal structure changed with the reaction temperature [7]. In order to control the crystal structure, it is better that the reaction be carried out under mild condition [25,26,27,28].
As one of the methods to prepare nanoparticles under mild conditions, we have examined the effect of complexation between metal ions and ligands [29,30]. Complexation is effective for suppressing nucleation and supplying metal ions slowly to growth. In order to form the complex efficiently, the metal salts are preferably dissolved and reacted in an excess amount of ligands without using conventional solvents, such as 1-octadecene, di-n-octylether, and benzyl ether. When using such organic solvents, the ratio of ligands to metal is low to form complexes efficiently. Here, we report a novel synthetic procedure for preparing Fe3O4 nanoparticles of various sizes by using a solventless synthesis, where oleylamine and oleic acid were used as ligands. In order to control particle sizes, the effect of reaction temperature and time was investigated.

2. Results and Discussion

The relationship between the reaction conditions and particle sizes of the resulting nanoparticles is summarized in Table 1.
Table
Table 1. Summary of the relationship between the reaction conditions and the particle sizes of the resulting nanoparticles.
Table 1. Summary of the relationship between the reaction conditions and the particle sizes of the resulting nanoparticles.
Reaction temperature (°C)Reaction time (h)
136
2005.3 ± 0.6 nm
2508.2 ± 0.6 nm
2806.6 ± 1.0 nm13.0 ± 0.9 nm19.5 ± 1.7 nm
30020.4 ± 2.2 nm
In order to understand the effect of reaction temperature on particle size, we obtained transmission electron microscope (TEM) images of the as-synthesized nanoparticles. The relationship between the reaction conditions and particle sizes of the resulting nanoparticles is summarized in Table 1. Figure 1 shows the TEM images of the nanoparticles as a function of reaction temperature. When the reaction temperature was 200 °C, the resulting nanoparticles exhibited spherical shapes with a particle size of 5.3 ± 0.6 nm, notably the minimum size observed in this study (Figure 1a). When the reaction temperature was increased to 250 °C, 280 °C, and 300 °C, the size of the spherical particles increased to 8.2 ± 0.6 nm, 13.0 ± 0.9 nm, and 20.4 ± 2.2 nm, respectively (Figure 1b–d). The particle size tended to increase with increased reaction temperatures. In our previous study, the iron ions in an excess amount of ligands formed complexes with oleylamine and oleic acid [29]. Through stable complex formation, nucleation was suppressed. In order to promote the decomposition of the stable iron complex, a higher reaction temperature was required. When 1,2-hexadecanediol was not added into the reaction solution, larger Wüstite phase particles were obtained [30]. 1,2-Hexadecanediol worked to suppress the growth of the particles larger than 20 nm by promotion of the nucleation number.
Molecules 19 11395 g001 550
Figure 1. TEM images of (a) 5.3 ± 0.6 nm (200 °C); (b) 8.2 ± 0.6 nm (250 °C); (c) 13.0 ± 0.9 nm (280 °C); and (d) 20.4 ± 2.2 nm (300 °C) Fe3O4 nanoparticles. (Scale bar: 50 nm).
Figure 1. TEM images of (a) 5.3 ± 0.6 nm (200 °C); (b) 8.2 ± 0.6 nm (250 °C); (c) 13.0 ± 0.9 nm (280 °C); and (d) 20.4 ± 2.2 nm (300 °C) Fe3O4 nanoparticles. (Scale bar: 50 nm).
Molecules 19 11395 g001
The crystal structures of the as-synthesized nanoparticles were determined by X-ray diffraction (XRD). Figure 2 shows the XRD patterns of the resulting nanoparticles as a function of reaction temperature. When the reaction temperature was 200 °C, the observed peaks were small and broad (Figure 2a). Notably, 200 °C was too low of a temperature to improve the crystallinity, therefore, the peaks were not clear. However, when the reaction temperature was higher than 250 °C, the patterns corresponding to the Fe3O4 phase could be observed clearly (Figure 2b–d). The peak width narrowed slightly because the crystallinity and particle size improved with increasing temperatures [31,32]. The differences in the XRD patterns between Fe3O4 and γ-Fe2O3 phases are small. In order to determine the structure of the Fe3O4 phase, the coexistence of Fe2+ and Fe3+ in the particles must be demonstrated.
Molecules 19 11395 g002 550
Figure 2. XRD patterns of (a) 5.3 ± 0.6 nm (200 °C); (b) 8.2 ± 0.6 nm (250 °C); (c) 13.0 ± 0.9 nm (280 °C); and (d) 20.4 ± 2.2 nm (300 °C) Fe3O4 nanoparticles.
Figure 2. XRD patterns of (a) 5.3 ± 0.6 nm (200 °C); (b) 8.2 ± 0.6 nm (250 °C); (c) 13.0 ± 0.9 nm (280 °C); and (d) 20.4 ± 2.2 nm (300 °C) Fe3O4 nanoparticles.
Molecules 19 11395 g002
In order to determine the valence of iron in the nanoparticles, the near-infrared absorption of the nanoparticles was measured. Adjacent Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions in the phase lead to electron transitions assigned to intervalence charge transfer (IVCT) transitions in the near-infrared (NIR) region [33,34]. However, the Fe3+ transition in the UV-Vis yields essentially the same spectrum in the presence or absence of nearby Fe2+ [34]. Therefore, the absorption spectra in the Vis-NIR region from 600 to 1,400 nm were used. Figure 3 shows the Vis-NIR spectra of the resulting nanoparticles in n-hexane (concentration: 0.005 wt%). The broad absorption in the NIR region demonstrated coexistence of Fe3+ and Fe2+ in the nanoparticles. These results support that the XRD patterns (Figure 2) shows magnetite, not maghemite.
Molecules 19 11395 g003 550
Figure 3. Vis-NIR spectra of (a) 5.3 ± 0.6 nm (200 °C); (b) 8.2 ± 0.6 nm (250 °C); (c) 13.0 ± 0.9 nm (280 °C); and (d) 20.4 ± 2.2 nm (300 °C) Fe3O4 nanoparticles.
Figure 3. Vis-NIR spectra of (a) 5.3 ± 0.6 nm (200 °C); (b) 8.2 ± 0.6 nm (250 °C); (c) 13.0 ± 0.9 nm (280 °C); and (d) 20.4 ± 2.2 nm (300 °C) Fe3O4 nanoparticles.
Molecules 19 11395 g003
Next, we moved to an investigation of the effect of reaction time on particle size and structure. The relationship between the reaction conditions and particle sizes of the resulting nanoparticles is summarized in Table 1. Figure 4 shows the TEM images of the as-synthesized Fe3O4 nanoparticles as a function of reaction time. The reaction temperature was maintained at 280 °C for 1, 3, and 6 h. The mean diameter of the nanoparticles was 6.6 ± 1.0 nm, 13.0 ± 0.9 nm, and 19.5 ± 1.7 nm after 1 h, 3 h, and 6 h, respectively. Longer reaction times led to increase particle growth with narrow size distribution. However, when the reaction time was longer than 6 h, nanoparticles larger than 20 nm were not obtained.
Molecules 19 11395 g004 550
Figure 4. TEM images of (a) 6.6 ± 1.0 nm (1 h); (b) 13.0 ± 0.9 nm (3 h); and (c) 19.5 ± 1.7 nm (6 h) Fe3O4 nanoparticles. (Scale bar: 50 nm).
Figure 4. TEM images of (a) 6.6 ± 1.0 nm (1 h); (b) 13.0 ± 0.9 nm (3 h); and (c) 19.5 ± 1.7 nm (6 h) Fe3O4 nanoparticles. (Scale bar: 50 nm).
Molecules 19 11395 g004
Figure 5 shows the XRD patterns of the Fe3O4 nanoparticles as a function of reaction time. The patterns corresponding to the Fe3O4 phase were clearly observed in all nanoparticles. A slight decrease in peak width was observed with extended reaction time. This phenomenon depended on the particle growth and corresponded well with the TEM results. In addition, the absorbance in the NIR region derived from Fe3+–Fe2+ IVCT was observed in all nanoparticles (Figure 6). As such, a portion of the Fe3+ ions were reduced to Fe2+ and the coexistence of Fe3+ and Fe2+ ions in the nanoparticles was maintained regardless of reaction time. The particle size increased and the Fe3O4 phase was maintained with longer reaction times.
Molecules 19 11395 g005 550
Figure 5. XRD patterns of (a) 6.6 ± 1.0 nm (1 h); (b) 13.0 ± 0.9 nm (3 h); and (c) 19.5 ± 1.7 nm (6 h) Fe3O4 nanoparticles.
Figure 5. XRD patterns of (a) 6.6 ± 1.0 nm (1 h); (b) 13.0 ± 0.9 nm (3 h); and (c) 19.5 ± 1.7 nm (6 h) Fe3O4 nanoparticles.
Molecules 19 11395 g005
Molecules 19 11395 g006 550
Figure 6. Vis-NIR spectra of (a) 6.6 ± 1.0 nm (1 h); (b) 13.0 ± 0.9 nm (3 h); and (c) 19.5 ± 1.7 nm (6 h) Fe3O4 nanoparticles.
Figure 6. Vis-NIR spectra of (a) 6.6 ± 1.0 nm (1 h); (b) 13.0 ± 0.9 nm (3 h); and (c) 19.5 ± 1.7 nm (6 h) Fe3O4 nanoparticles.
Molecules 19 11395 g006

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Apparatus and Reagents

Iron(III) acetylacetonate was purchased from Kanto Chemical (Tokyo, Japan). 1,2-hexadecanediol and oleylamine (purity > 70%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Oleic acid (purity > 85%) was purchased from Tokyo Chemical Industry (Tokyo, Japan). All the reagents except oleylamine were used as received. Oleylamine was used after distillation under reduced pressure. The sizes and shapes of the resulting nanoparticles were observed by TEM (Hitachi H-7650, Tokyo, Japan, operated at 100 kV). The crystal structures were identified by XRD (Rigaku Ultima IV, Tokyo, Japan, operated at 40 kV-40 mA, Cu source). The nature of the Fe ions was determined by the absorbance in the Vis-NIR region of the sample using a Hitachi U-4100 instrument.

3.2. Synthesis of Fe3O4 Nanoparticles

Fe3O4 nanoparticles were prepared by the following synthetic procedure, which was based on our previous study [29]: the reaction was carried out in the 100 mL three-necked round-bottom flask equipped with a condenser and a thermometer. The heating was carried out by a heating mantle. Iron acetylacetonate (III) (1 mmol) and 1,2-hexadecanediol (3.0 mmol) as Fe3+ reducing agent were added into a mixture of oleic acid (15 mmol) and distilled oleylamine (15 mmol). The solution was maintained at 130 °C for 30 min with vigorous stirring under a reduced atmosphere (ca. 200 Pa) for dissolution and removal of impurities such as water molecules and organic molecules with low boiling temperatures. In this phase, the solution color was dark brown. Then, the solution was heated to reaction temperatures of 200 °C, 250 °C, 280 °C, and 300 °C for 1 h, 3 h, and 6 h under a nitrogen atmosphere (1 atm.). The solution color changed to black. Finally, the solution was left to cool to room temperature by remove of the heat source. When the solution becomes hard or loses fluidity after cooling to room temperature, the resulting solidified solution was dissolved by adding 10 mL n-hexane before the following precipitation process. The iron oxide nanoparticles were precipitated by the addition of ethanol (70~80 mL) and were subsequently subjected to centrifugation (3000 g, 10 min). The precipitated nanoparticles were redispersed into n-hexane.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the growth of Fe3O4 nanoparticles in excess ligands was investigated. An excess ratio of ligands to metal ions can suppress nucleation via complexation with iron ions and slowly promote particle growth. The particle sizes depended strongly on the reaction temperature due to its effect on the activity of the iron complexes, in addition to the reaction time due to the allowed growth time. By changing the reaction temperature and time, monodisperse Fe3O4 nanoparticles with tunable sizes from 5.3 nm to 20.4 nm were successfully prepared.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the JSPS KAKENHI Grant-in-Aid for young Scientists (B) (No.24750121, Masafumi Nakaya).

Author Contributions

MN designed research, performed research, analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. RN performed research, analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. AM helped to perform research and draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rockenberger, J.; Scher, E.C.; Alivisatos, A.P. A new nonhydrolytic single-precursor approach to surfactant-capped nanocrystals of transition metal oxides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 11595–11596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hyeon, T. Chemical synthesis of magnetic nanoparticles. Chem. Commun. 2003, 8, 927–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sun, S.; Zeng, H. Size-Controlled Synthesis of Magnetite Nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 8204–8205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sun, S.; Zeng, H.; Robinson, D.B.; Raoux, S.; Rice, P.M.; Wang, S.X.; Li, G. Monodisperse MFe2O4 (M = Fe, Co, Mn) nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 273–279. [Google Scholar]
  5. Casula, M.F.; Jun, Y.-W.; Zaziski, D.J.; Chan, E.M.; Corrias, A.; Alivisatos, A.P. The concept of delayed nucleation in nanocrystal growth demonstrated for the case of iron oxide nanodisks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 1675–1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kim, D.; Lee, N.; Park, M.; Kim, B.H.; An, K.; Hyeon, T. Synthesis of uniform ferrimagnetic magnetite nanocubes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 454–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Park, J.; An, K.; Hwang, Y.; Park, J.-G.; Noh, H.-J.; Kim, J.-Y.; Park, J.-H.; Hwang, N.-M.; Hyeon, T. Ultra-large-scale syntheses of monodisperse nanocrystals. Nat. Mater. 2004, 3, 891–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lee, N.; Choi, Y.; Lee, Y.; Park, M.; Moon, W.K.; Choi, S.H.; Hyeon, T. Water-dispersible ferrimagnetic iron oxide nanocubes with extremely high r2 relaxivity for highly sensitive in vivo MRI of tumors. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 3127–3131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lu, A.-H.; Salabas, E.L.; Schüth, F. Magnetic nanoparticles: Synthesis, protection, functionalization, and application. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 1222–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Huber, D.L. Synthesis, properties, and applications of iron nanoparticles. Small 2005, 1, 482–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bulte, J.W.; Kraitchman, D.L. Iron oxide MR contrast agents for molecular and cellular imaging. NMR Biomed. 2004, 17, 484–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jun, Y.-W.; Lee, J.-H.; Cheon, J. Chemical design of nanoparticle probes for high-performance magnetic resonance imaging. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 5122–5135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Na, H.B.; Song, I.C.; Hyeon, T. Inorganic nanoparticles for MRI contrast agents. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 2133–2148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xie, J.; Liu, G.; Eden, H.S.; Ai, H.; Chen, X. Surface-engineered magnetic nanoparticle platforms for cancer imaging and therapy. Acc. Chem. Res. 2011, 44, 883–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Srinvivas, M.; Armtzen, E.H.J.G.; Bulte, J.W.M.; Heerschap, A.; de Vries, I.J.M.; Figdor, C.G. Imaging of cellular therapies. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2010, 62, 1080–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lee, N.; Hyeon, T. Designed synthesis of uniformly sized iron oxide nanoparticles for efficient magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 2575–2589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cheng, K.; Peng, S.; Xu, C.; Sun, S. Porous hollow Fe3O4 nanoparticles for targeted delivery and controlled release of cisplatin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 10637–10644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Piao, Y.; Kim, J.; Na, H.B.; Kim, D.; Baek, J.S.; Ko, M.K.; Lee, J.H.; Shokouhimehr, M.; Hyeon, T. Wrap–bake–peel process for nanostructural transformation from β-FeOOH nanorods to biocompatible iron oxide nanocapsules. Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, 242–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, B.; Xu, C.; Xie, J.; Yang, Z.; Sun, S. pH controlled release of chromone from chromone-Fe3O4 nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 14436–14437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lee, J.-H.; Jang, J.-T.; Choi, J.-S.; Moon, S.H.; Noh, S.-H.; Kim, J.-W.; Kim, J.-G.; Kim, I.-S.; Park, K.I.; Cheon, J. Exchange-coupled magnetic nanoparticles for efficient heat induction. Nat. Nanotech. 2011, 6, 418–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fortin, J.-P.; Wilhelm, J.-P.C.; Servais, J.; Ménager, C.; Bacri, J.-C.; Gazeau, F. Size-sorted anionic iron oxide nanomagnets as colloidal mediators for magnetic hyperthermia. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 2628–2635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hao, R.; Xing, R.; Xu, Z.; Hou, Y.; Gao, S.; Sun, S. Synthesis, Functionalization, and biomedical applications of multifunctional magnetic nanoparticles. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 2729–2742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gao, J.; Gu, H.; Xu, B. Multifunctional magnetic nanoparticles: Design, synthesis, and biomedical applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 1097–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Khandhar, A.P.; Ferguson, R.M.; Krishnan, K.M. Monodispersed magnetite nanoparticles optimized for magnetic fluid hyperthermia: Implications in biological systems. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 109, 07B310. [Google Scholar]
  25. Xu, R.; Wang, Y.; Jia, G.; Xu, W.; Liang, S.; Yin, D. Zinc blende and wurtzite cadmium sulfide nanocrystals with strong photoluminescence and ultrastability. J. Cryst. Growth 2007, 299, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Silva, L.A.; Ryu, S.Y.; Choi, J.; Choi, W.; Hoffmann, M.R. Photocatalytic hydrogen production with visible light over Pt-interlinked hybrid composites of cubic-phase and hexagonal-phase CdS. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 12069–12073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kanehara, M.; Arakawa, H.; Honda, T.; Saruyama, M.; Teranishi, T. Large-scale synthesis of high-quality metal sulfide semiconductor quantum dots with tunable surface-plasmon resonance frequencies. Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 9230–9238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nakaya, M.; Tanaka, I.; Muramatsu, A. Preparation of manganese doped cadmium sulfide nanoparticles in zincblende phase and their magnetic properties. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2012, 12, 9003–9006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nakaya, M.; Kanehara, M.; Teranishi, T. One-pot synthesis of large FePt nanoparticles from metal salts and their thermal stability. Langmuir 2006, 22, 3485–3487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nakaya, M.; Nishida, R.; Muramatsu, A. Preparation of wüstite nanoparticles by a solventless synthetic procedure. Chem. Lett. 2013, 42, 863–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Murray, C.B.; Kagan, C.R.; Bawendi, M.G. Synthesis and characterization of monodisperse nanocrystals and close-packed nanocrystals assemblies. Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 2000, 30, 545–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Shevchenko, E.V.; Talapin, D.V.; Schnablegger, H.; Konorwski, A.; Festin, Ö.; Svedlindh, P.; Haase, M.; Weller, H. Study of nucleation and growth in the organometallic synthesis of magnetic alloy nanocrystals: The role of nucleation rate in size control of CoPt3 nanocrystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 9090–9101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fontijn, W.F.J.; van der Zaag, P.J.; Devillers, M.A.C.; Brabers, V.A.M.; Metselaar, R. Optical and magneto-optical polar Kerr spectra of Fe3O4 and Mg2+- or Al3+-substituted Fe3O4. Phys. Rev. B 1997, 56, 5432–5442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tang, J.; Myers, M.; Bosnick, K.A.; Brus, L.E. Magnetite Fe3O4 nanocrystals: Spectroscopic observation of aqueous oxidation kinetics. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 7501–7506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  • Sample Availability: Samples of the magnetite nanoparticles are available from the authors.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nakaya, M.; Nishida, R.; Muramatsu, A. Size Control of Magnetite Nanoparticles in Excess Ligands as a Function of Reaction Temperature and Time. Molecules 2014, 19, 11395-11403. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules190811395

AMA Style

Nakaya M, Nishida R, Muramatsu A. Size Control of Magnetite Nanoparticles in Excess Ligands as a Function of Reaction Temperature and Time. Molecules. 2014; 19(8):11395-11403. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules190811395

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nakaya, Masafumi, Ryo Nishida, and Atsushi Muramatsu. 2014. "Size Control of Magnetite Nanoparticles in Excess Ligands as a Function of Reaction Temperature and Time" Molecules 19, no. 8: 11395-11403. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules190811395

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop