Next Article in Journal
Anti-Inflammatory Activity Comparison among Scropoliosides—Catalpol Derivatives with 6-O-Substituted Cinnamyl Moieties
Previous Article in Journal
Antihypertensive Effects of Artemisia scoparia Waldst in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats and Identification of Angiotensin I Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 20
Issue 11
10.3390/molecules201119655
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis, Characterization and Biological Evaluation of Some Quinoxaline Derivatives: A Promising and Potent New Class of Antitumor and Antimicrobial Agents

by
Aisha R. Al-Marhabi
1,2,
Hebat-Allah S. Abbas
2,3,* and
Yousry A. Ammar
4
1
Department of Chemistry, University College in Qunfudah, Umm Al Qura University, Qunfudah 21955, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, King Khalid University, Abha 9004, Saudi Arabia
3
Department of Photochemistry, National Research Centre, Dokki 12622, Egypt
4
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University, Cairo 11884, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2015, 20(11), 19805-19822; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules201119655
Submission received: 13 August 2015 / Revised: 22 October 2015 / Accepted: 26 October 2015 / Published: 3 November 2015
(This article belongs to the Section Bioorganic Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In continuation of our endeavor towards the development of potent and effective anticancer and antimicrobial agents; the present work deals with the synthesis of some novel tetrazolo[1,5-a]quinoxalines, N-pyrazoloquinoxalines, the corresponding Schiff bases, 1,2,4-triazinoquinoxalines and 1,2,4-triazoloquinoxalines. These compounds were synthesized via the reaction of the key intermediate hydrazinoquinoxalines with various reagents and evaluated for anticancer and antimicrobial activity. The results indicated that tetrazolo[1,5-a]quinoxaline derivatives showed the best result, with the highest inhibitory effects towards the three tested tumor cell lines, which were higher than that of the reference doxorubicin and these compounds were non-cytotoxic to normal cells (IC50 values > 100 μg/mL). Also, most of synthesized compounds exhibited the highest degrees of inhibition against the tested strains of Gram positive and negative bacteria, so tetrazolo[1,5-a]quinoxaline derivatives show dual activity as anticancer and antimicrobial agents.

1. Introduction

Cancer is one of the most serious clinical problems, particularly in developed countries, despite advances in biomedical research and technology. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the incidence of this disease is about 6 million cases per year [1,2,3]. Cancer cannot be defined as a single disease, but rather a collection of diseases [4]. Accordingly, we need to design new compounds having anticancer and antimicrobial activity at the same time. Quinoxaline derivatives display a broad spectrum of biological activities including antimicrobial [5,6,7], antiviral [8], antiinflammatory [9,10], anticancer [11,12,13,14], antimalarial [15], antitubercular, antileishmanial and kinase inhibitors [16,17,18,19]. Some quinoxaline derivatives have a cytotoxic effect on human cancer cell lines [20] and they constitute useful intermediates in organic synthesis and medicinal chemistry [21,22,23,24]. In addition, quinoxaline moiety constitutes part of the chemical structure of various antibiotics such as echinomycin, levomycin and actinoleutin that are known to inhibit the growth of Gram positive bacteria [25]. Outside medicine quinoxaline derivatives have also found applications in efficient electron luminescent materials [26], organic semiconductors [27], dyes [28], chemically controllable switches [29], building blocks for the synthesis of anion receptors, cavitands and dehydoannulenes [30,31]. They also serve as useful rigid subunits in macrocyclic receptors in molecular recognition [32]. Hydrazine quinoxalines and their cyclic analogues were reported as antimicrobial, anticonvulsant, analgesic, antiinflammatory, antiplatelet, antitubercular and antitumor [33] agents. Tetrazoloquinoxalines have been reported for their antibacterial, antifungal or algicidal [34] activities. The above findings gave us the idea for the design and synthesis of new compounds containing bromoquinoxaline derivatives and their in vitro evaluation for antitumor and antimicrobial activity.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Chemistry

The synthesis of the target compounds is depicted in Scheme 1, Scheme 2, Scheme 3 and Scheme 4. The starting compound, 6-bromo-2,3-dicloroquinoxaline (1) was prepared in good yield as described in the literature [35,36,37] by the reaction of 4-bromo-o-phenylenediamine with oxalic acid in hydrochloric acid to give 6-bromo-1,4-dihydroquinoxaline-2,3-dione, followed by the chlorination of the latter compound with phosphorus oxychloride in the presence of DMF as the catalyst. Dichloroquinoxaline derivative 1 is a good precursor for the synthesis of different new heterocyclic compounds with the hope of obtaining some biologically active substituted quinoxaline derivatives. Its reactivity toward many types of nucleophilic reagents enables studying the effect of bromine atom on the reactivity of two chlorine atoms. Thus, when dichloroquinoxaline derivative 1 reacted with one mole of hydrazine hydrate in absolute ethanol, 6-bromo-2-chloro-3-hydrazinylquinoxaline (3) was produced, however our attempts to synthesize 6-bromo-3-chloro-2-hydrazinylquinoxaline (2) failed as shown in Scheme 1. This indicated that the chlorine atom in the 3-position was more reactive than the one in the 2-position and presumed to be preferentially substituted from the consideration of the (-R) effect of the bromine atom in compound 1, which is the factor responsible for the formation of compound 3. The structure of compound 3 was evidenced by its spectroscopic and elemental analysis data. Its IR spectrum showed strong bands at 3415, 3250 and 3146 cm−1 indicating the presence of the HNNH2 group and its 1H-NMR spectrum exhibited the characteristic a broad D2O exchangeable singlets at δ 5.00 and 9.16 ppm due to the NH2 and NH protons, respectively.
The hydrazine analogue 3 was used as the key compound to facilitate the synthesis of some bioactive compounds. Thus, treatment of 3-hydrazinyl derivative 3 with sodium nitrite in acetic acid at 0 °C afforded the tetrazoloquinoxaline 4 in 75% yield, but it was not formed via the reaction of dichloroquinoxaline derivative 1 with one mole of sodium azide as shown in Scheme 1. The new ring system of tetrazolo derivative 4 was in equilibrium with the corresponding 3-azido tautomer 4′ [38], what was confirmed by the disappearance of the HNNH2 bands and a characteristic N3 group absorption band at 2242 cm−1 in the IR spectrum; 1H-, 13C-NMR and mass spectra were in accordance with its structure. Nucleophilic replacement of the chlorine atom of tetrazolo derivative 4 was performed by refluxing with cyclic secondary amines, namely pipridine or morpholine in acetonitrile and anhydrous K2CO3 furnishing the corresponding 8-bromo-(4-substituted amino)tetrazolo[1,5-a]quinoxalines 5a,b (Scheme 1). The ring system in derivatives 5a,b was in tautomeric equilibrium with the azido derivatives 5′a,b. The analytical and spectral data were in agreement with the proposed structures. Considering the IR spectrum of compound 5b as an example, the bands that appear at 2925, 2865 cm−1 represent aliphatic C-H and the band at 2241 cm−1 the N3 group. 1H-NMR spectrum showed multiple signals at δ 3.82 and 4.28 ppm corresponding to aliphatic 2N-CH2 and 2O-CH2 protons of morpholine, respectively. The N-pyrazolo derivative 6 was obtained in good yield when compound 3 was allowed to react with a active methylene compound (acetylacetone) in ethanol containing a few drops of piperidine as shown in Scheme 2. The structure of compound 6 was elucidated on the basis of its spectral and analytical data. The IR spectrum revealed the absence of the characteristic bands of a HNNH2 group and its 1H-NMR spectrum revealed singlets at δ 2.01, 2.20 and 5.98 ppm due to the presence of 2 × CH3 protons and a CH-pyrazole proton, respectively. The 13C-NMR spectral data displayed characteristic signals at 13.85 ppm and 14.02 ppm for the two methyls and 107.83 ppm for CH-pyrazole while its mass spectrum showed a molecular ion peak at m/z 336 (M+,44%), which was in agreement with the proposed structure. In addition, the reaction of compound 3 with sodium azide in ethanol led to the formation in good yield of hydrazinyltetrazoloquinoxaline 7, which was found to be in tautomeric equilibrium with the azido derivative 7′ (Scheme 2). The structure of compound 7 was elucidated on the basis of elemental analysis and spectral data which were an agreement with the proposed structure. Furthermore, to get a new Schiff base that was expected to be biologically active, heating 3-hydrazinyl derivative 3 with p-chlorobenzaldehyde in ethanol containing a few drops of glacial acetic acid furnished the corresponding Schiff base 8 as shown in Scheme 2. The structure was characterized by the disappearance of the NH2 bands in its IR spectrum, 1H-NMR spectrum showed a singlet at δ 8.64 ppm due to the presence of a CH=N- azomethine proton.
6-Bromo-2,3-dihydrazinylquinoxaline (9) was formed via two routes. First, via hydrazinolysis of 2,3-dichloroquinoxaline derivative 1 with two moles of hydrazine hydrate by refluxing in ethanol. The second route involveh the reaction of 3-hydrazinyl derivative 3 with another mole of hydrazine hydrate (Scheme 3). The structure of compound 9 was elucidated on the basis of elemental analysis and spectral data and its mass spectrum showed a molecular ion peak at m/z 268 (M+, 43%).
Molecules 20 19655 g001 550
Scheme 1. General methods for the preparation of compounds 3–5a,b. Reagents and conditions: (i) hydrazine hydrate 90% (1.5 mol)/EtOH/0 °C, stirring; (ii) NaNO2/AcOH/H2O/0–5 °C, stirring; (iii) NaN3/EtOH, reflux; and (iv) piperidine or morpholine/CH3CN/K2CO3, reflux.
Scheme 1. General methods for the preparation of compounds 3–5a,b. Reagents and conditions: (i) hydrazine hydrate 90% (1.5 mol)/EtOH/0 °C, stirring; (ii) NaNO2/AcOH/H2O/0–5 °C, stirring; (iii) NaN3/EtOH, reflux; and (iv) piperidine or morpholine/CH3CN/K2CO3, reflux.
Molecules 20 19655 g001
Molecules 20 19655 g002 550
Scheme 2. General methods for the preparation of compounds 6–8. Reagents and conditions: (i) Acetylacetone/piperidine/EtOH,reflux; (ii) NaN3/EtOH,reflux; and (iii) p-chlorobenzaldehyde/EtOH/AcOH, reflux.
Scheme 2. General methods for the preparation of compounds 6–8. Reagents and conditions: (i) Acetylacetone/piperidine/EtOH,reflux; (ii) NaN3/EtOH,reflux; and (iii) p-chlorobenzaldehyde/EtOH/AcOH, reflux.
Molecules 20 19655 g002
Molecules 20 19655 g003 550
Scheme 3. General methods for the preparation of compounds 9–11. Reagents and conditions: (i) hydrazine hydrate 90% (2.5 mol)/EtOH, reflux; (ii) hydrazine hydrate 90% (1.5 mol)/EtOH, reflux; (iii) NaNO2 AcOH/H2O/0–5 °C; stirring and (iv) NaN3 (2 mol)/EtOH, reflux.
Scheme 3. General methods for the preparation of compounds 9–11. Reagents and conditions: (i) hydrazine hydrate 90% (2.5 mol)/EtOH, reflux; (ii) hydrazine hydrate 90% (1.5 mol)/EtOH, reflux; (iii) NaNO2 AcOH/H2O/0–5 °C; stirring and (iv) NaN3 (2 mol)/EtOH, reflux.
Molecules 20 19655 g003
The hydrazine analogue 9 was used as the key intermediate for the synthesis of some different heterocyclic compounds. Thus, treatment of dihydrazinylquinoxaline derivative 9 with one mole of nitrous acid at 0 °C led to the formation of the ditetrazoloquinoxaline 11 in good yield, while mono-tetrazolo[1,5-a]quinoxaline 10 was not obtained. Compound 11 was furnished via treatment of the 2,3-dichloroquinoxaline derivative 1 with two moles of sodium azide in ethanol as shown in Scheme 3. Compound 11 was found to be in tautomeric equilibrium with the 2,3-diazido derivative 11′. Its IR spectrum revealed the absence of the characteristic HNNH2 group band and its mass spectrum showed a molecular ion peak at m/z 290 (M+; 7%). Heating of compound 9 with an α-haloketone, namely chloroacetone, in the presence of a few drops of acetic acid in DMF resulted in the formation of the corresponding di-[1,2,4]triazinoquinoxaline derivative 12 as shown in Scheme 4. The structure of compound 12 was confirmed by spectral data. The 1H-NMR spectrum revealed a singlet at δ 9.3 ppm due to CH-triazine and a broad singlet (D2O exchangeable) at δ 10.75 ppm due to the NH groups.
Molecules 20 19655 g004 550
Scheme 4. General methods for the preparation of compounds 12–17. Reagents and conditions: (i) Chloroacetone/DMF/AcOH, reflux; (ii) triethyl orthoformate/EtOH/AcOH, reflux; (iii) acetylacetone (1 mol)/EtOH/piperidine, reflux; (iv) acetylacetone (2 mol)/EtOH/NaOEt, reflux; (v) acetylacetone (1 mol)/EtOH/piperidine, reflux; (vi) ethyl cyanoacetate (2 mol)/EtOH/NaOEt, reflux; and (vii) ethyl acetoacetate (2 mol)/EtOH/NaOEt, reflux.
Scheme 4. General methods for the preparation of compounds 12–17. Reagents and conditions: (i) Chloroacetone/DMF/AcOH, reflux; (ii) triethyl orthoformate/EtOH/AcOH, reflux; (iii) acetylacetone (1 mol)/EtOH/piperidine, reflux; (iv) acetylacetone (2 mol)/EtOH/NaOEt, reflux; (v) acetylacetone (1 mol)/EtOH/piperidine, reflux; (vi) ethyl cyanoacetate (2 mol)/EtOH/NaOEt, reflux; and (vii) ethyl acetoacetate (2 mol)/EtOH/NaOEt, reflux.
Molecules 20 19655 g004
The formation of the di-[1,2,4]triazoloquinoxaline derivative 13 was achieved upon the reaction of compound 9 with triethyl orthoformate in ethanol in the presence of a few drops of acetic acid (Scheme 4). The 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 13 revealed the disappearance of the HNNH2 signals and appearance of a singlet signal at δ 8.55 ppm due to the CH-triazole proton. Furthermore, in the reaction of compound 9 with one mole of acetylacetone in ethanol containing a few drops of piperidine, the N-pyrazolo derivative 14 was produced (Scheme 4). The IR spectrum of compound 14 showed the characteristic HNNH2 group bands at 3448, 3277 and 3191 cm−1, and its 1H-NMR spectrum revealed singlets at δ 2.01 and 2.20 ppm due to the presence of 2 × CH3 protons and a singlet at δ 6.05 ppm due to the presence of the CH-pyrazole proton. The 13C-NMR spectral data displayed characteristic signals at δ 13.86, 13.94 for the 2two methyl groups and 109.51 ppm for CH-pyrazole. On the other hand, upon heating the dihydrazino compound 9 with two moles of an active methylene (β-diketone) compound, namely acetylacetone or ethyl cyanoacetate or/and ethyl acetoacetate, in ethanolic sodium ethoxide solution, the N-pyrazolo derivatives 15–17 were produced (Scheme 4). For example, the structure of compound 15 was confirmed by the absence of the characteristic HNNH2 group bands in its IR spectrum. Its structure was evidenced by its 1H- and 13C-NMR, mass spectra and elemental analysis data. Moreover, compound 15 was confirmed chemically by the reaction of the N-pyrazolo derivative 14 with another mole of acetylacetone (Scheme 4).

2.2. Pharmacological Screening

2.2.1. In Vitro Anticancer Screening

The in vitro cytotoxic activity of the newly synthesized compounds against human breast cell line (MCF7), non-small cell lung cancer NCIH460, CNS cancer SF-268 and WI 38 (normal fibroblast cells) were evaluated using doxorubicin as the reference drug according to the method reported by Skehan et al. [39]. The IC50 of the synthesized compounds compared to the reference drug is shown in Table 1.
Table
Table 1. Cytotoxic activity in (IC50, μg/mL) by the newly synthesized compounds against human cancer cell lines and normal cells.
Table 1. Cytotoxic activity in (IC50, μg/mL) by the newly synthesized compounds against human cancer cell lines and normal cells.
Compound No.IC50 (μg/mL)
MCF-7NCI-H460SF-268WI 38
336.02 ± 7.33 c26.74 ± 2.18 b30.64 ± 2.39 b32.16 ± 6.54
40.02 ± 0.006 a0.01 ± 0.004 a0.06 ± 0.003 anon-cytotoxic
5a0.01 ± 0.001 a0.02 ± 0.006 a0.02 ± 0.008 anon-cytotoxic
5b0.02 ± 0.002 a0.01 ± 0.002 a0.06 ± 0.008 anon-cytotoxic
622.41 ± 10.4 b30.48 ± 10.8 b26.51 ± 2.87 b28.25 ± 0.87
726.4 ± 2.10 b12.42 ± 3.01 b10.63 ± 2.83 bnon-cytotoxic
842.16 ± 2.46 c26.60 ± 2.63 b35.32 ± 12.81 c10.59 ± 5.51
937.07 ± 7.34 c16.37 ± 2.32 b38.94 ± 2.63 c30.62 ± 6.21
111.18 ± 1.03 a2.83 ± 0.53 a2.86 ± 4.92 a56.85 ± 4.05
1235.22 ± 4.18 c34.03 ± 6.05 c22.10 ± 2.81 b22.97 ± 8.2
1337.64 ± 6.72 c36.05 ± 5.23 c29.35 ± 7.01 c18.62 ± 1.21
1430.32 ± 3.86 b38.32 ± 2.35 c42.06 ± 5.58 c58.70 ± 8.65
1528.42 ± 5.80 b22.73 ± 8.12 b30.24 ± 2.04 b18.16 ± 4.03
1612.82 ± 1.46 b22.95 ± 0.46 b49.85 ± 8.64 c30.03 ± 2.36
1721.23 ± 0.14 b15.81 ± 0.10 b21.33 ± 2.12 b21.40 ± 2.02
DMSO0000
Doxorubicin0.04 ± 0.0080.09 ± 0.0080.09 ± 0.007non-cytotoxic
MCF-7 (breast adenocarcinoma); NCI-H460 (non-small cell lung cancer); SF-268 (CNS cancer); WI 38 (Normal fibroblast cells); Doxorubicin (anticancer positive control); DMSO (solvent, negative control); a highly active, b moderately active, c weakly active.
From the results presented in Table 1, it is evident that some of the compounds were active against the three human cancer cell lines. Compounds 4, 5a and 5b displayed high cytotoxic activity against the tested cell lines (most of IC50 the values ranged from 0.01 ± 0.001 to 0.06 ± 0.008 μg/mL) and these compounds were non-cytotoxic on the normal cells (IC50 values >100 μg/mL) and exhibited better cytotoxicity against most of cancer cell lines than doxorubicin. Moreover, compound 11 exhibited high growth inhibitory activity on the various cancer panel cell lines (IC50 values ranged from 1.18 ± 1.03 to 2.86 ± 4.92 μg/mL) with high cytotoxicity on normal cells (IC50 values ranged from 56.85 ± 4.05 μg/mL). In addition, the compounds 3, 6–9 and 12–17, exhibited a moderate to weak cytotoxicity against all cancer cell lines (IC50 values ranged from 10.63 ± 2.83 to 42.16 ± 2.46 μg/mL) with cytotoxic effects on the human normal cell (IC50 values ranged from non-cytotoxic to 58.70 ± 8.65 μg/mL) compared with doxorubicin.

2.2.2. Antimicrobial Activity

All the newly synthesized compounds were evaluated for their in vitro antimicrobial activities against Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus faecalis as examples of Gram positive bacteria, Escherichia coli, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Salmonella typhimurium as examples of Gram negative bacteria and Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus fumigatus and Candida albicans as examples of fungal strains.
The disk diffusion method was used for determination of the antimicrobial activity using ampicillin, gentamicin and amphotericin B as reference drugs. The results were recorded for each compounds as the average diameter as inhibition zones (IZ) of bacterial or fungal growth around the discs in mm as shown in Table 2. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) measurements were determined for the compounds as shown in Table 3.

Antibacterial Activity

According to the obtained results (Table 2 and Table 3), it is clear that most compounds showed significant activity against all types of bacterial strains. Compounds 4, 5a and 9–13 were found to be highly active against Gram positive and negative bacteria (IZ = 17–31 mm and MIC values ranged from 0.98 to >125 μg/mL).
3-Hydrazinyl quinoxaline 3 showed moderate activity towards Gram positive and negative bacteria (IZ = 13–15 mm and MIC values ranged from 0.98 to 125 μg/mL). Likewise, compounds 5b and 14–17 showed weak activity against most strains of Gram positive and negative bacteria (IZ = 9–12 mm and MIC values ranged from 1.95 to 125 μg/mL).

Antifungal Activity

From the IZ data recorded in Table 2 and Table 3 most of the compounds showed no significant antifungal activity, except compounds 4, 5a, 5b and 9. Compound 4 displayed high antifungal activity towards C. albicans (IZ = 20 mm and MIC = 3.9 μg/mL) and it was moderately active against A. flavus (IZ = 13 mm), while the compounds 5a, 5b and 9 showed weak activity against A. fumigatus and C. albicans (IZ = 5–13 mm and MIC values ranged from 0.98 to 62.5 μg/mL).
Table
Table 2. Inhibition zone in (mm) as a criterion of antimicrobial activity of the newly synthesized compounds.
Table 2. Inhibition zone in (mm) as a criterion of antimicrobial activity of the newly synthesized compounds.
Compound No.Inhibition Zone Diameter (IZ) (mm)
Gram Positive BacteriaGram Negative BacteriaFungi
Bacillus subtilisStaphylococcus aureusStreptococcus faecalisEscherichia coliNeisseria gonorrhoeaePseudomonas aeruginosaSalmonella typhimuriumAspergillus flavusAspergillus fumigatusCandida albicans
315141413141413RRR
420261817212117131020
5a1311913R1114R1212
5b17171111R1013R129
611911111198RRR
71110111010109RRR
8991011997RRR
928272729283117R511
1119171515R1418RRR
1218191817R2018RRR
1317162017R1917RRR
1412121212121210RRR
151099109910RRR
1610121110111110RRR
17781011685RRR
DMSO0000000000
Ampicillin202219-------
Gentamicin---20181723---
Amphotericin B-------172319
Highly active (IZ ≥ 17 mm); moderately active (IZ = 13–16 mm); weakly active (IZ ≤ 12 mm); R (IZ = 0 mm); Ampicillin (antibacterial positive control for Gram positive bacteria); Gentamicin (antibacterial positive control for Gram negative bacteria); Amphotericin B (antifungal control); DMSO (solvent, negative control).
Table
Table 3. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) in (μg/mL) showing antimicrobial activities of the tested compounds compared with the reference drugs.
Table 3. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) in (μg/mL) showing antimicrobial activities of the tested compounds compared with the reference drugs.
Compound No.Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) (µg/mL)
Gram positive BacteriaGram Negative BacteriaFungi
Bacillus subtilisStaphylococcus aureusStreptococcus faecalisEscherichia coliPseudomonas aeruginosaSalmonella typhimuriumAspergillus fumigatusCandida albicans
31.953.915.633.91251.95--
40.983.90.983.9>1250.98-3.9
5a31.2562.562.512512531.2531.2562.5
5b1.951.953.91.95>1251.951.953.9
90.981.950.981.951250.980.980.98
100.980.980.983.91251.95--
110.987.8162.562.51257.81--
131.957.8162.57.811253.9--
141.951.951.953.91251.95--
161.951.9531.253.91251.95--

3. Experimental Section

3.1. General Information

All melting points are uncorrected and were taken in open capillary tubes using the Stuart Digital Melting Point SMP10 (Stuart, Staffordshire, UK). Elemental analysis data (in accord with the calculated values) were performed by Vario, Elementar apparatus (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). IR spectra were recorded on a Thermo Nicolet (Thermo Scientific, Madison, WI, USA) using KBr disks. The NMR spectra (500/125 MHz) were determined by using a Bruker NMR spectrometer (Rheinstetten, Muchen, Germany). Chemical shifts are expressed in δ (ppm) downfield from TMS as an internal standard. Mass spectra were recorded at 70 ev EI Ms-QP 1000 EX (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Monitoring of the reactions and checking the purity of the compounds was performed by TLC on silica gel-precoated aluminium sheets (Fluorescent indicator 254 nm, Fluka, Muchen, Germany) and the spots were detected by exposure to UV lamp at λ 254/366 nm for a few seconds or under iodine vapor. Silica gel 60 (Merck, Munchen, Germany) was used for column chromatography. Biological evaluation of the newly synthesized products was performed by a research group of the National Cancer Institute at Cairo University, Egypt.

3.1.1. 6-Bromo-2-chloro-3-hydrazinylquinoxaline (3)

To a solution of compound 1 (0.28 g, 1 mmol) in absolute ethanol (50 mL), hydrazine hydrate 90% (0.07 mL, 1.5 mmol) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred in an ice bath at 0 °C for 2 h. After completion of the reaction, the precipitate that formed was filtered, dried and the crude product was further purified by a silica gel column chromatography (chloroform) to give the product. Yield: 61%; (red-brown powder): mp 201–203 °C; IR (KBr) νmax in cm−1: 3415, 3250, 3146 (NH2, NH), 1598 (C=N); 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 5.00 (s, br, 2H, NH2; exchangeable with D2O), 7.37–7.79 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 9.16 (s, br, 1H, NH; exchangeable with D2O); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 124.68, 129.67, 130.02, 134.78, 138.98, 140.60 (6Ar-C), 145.22, 145.85, (2C=N); MS (m/z), 64 (M+ − C4H4BrClN3; 100%), 272 (M+; 5%), 273 (M+ + 1; 21%), 274 (M+ + 2; 17%), 275 (M+ + 3; 3%), 276 (M+ + 4; 5%). Anal. Calcd. for C8H6BrClN4 (273.52): C, 35.13; H, 2.21; N, 20.48%. Found: C, 34.97; H, 2.45; N, 20.34%.

3.1.2. 8-Bromo-4-chlorotetrazolo[1,5-a]quinoxaline (4)

A solution of sodium nitrite (0.07 g, 1 mmol) in the least amount of water was added dropwise to an ice-cold solution of compound 3 (0.27 g, 1 mmol) in acetic acid (30 mL) kept in an ice bath at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was allowed to stand overnight at room temperature, then it was poured into water (100 mL). The precipitate that formed was filtered, dried and purified by a silica gel column chromatography (chloroform) to give the product. Yield: 75%; (pale brown powder): mp 199–201 °C; IR (KBr) νmax in cm−1: 2242 (N3), 1603 (C=N); 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 8.13–8.82 (m, 3H, Ar-H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 121.70, 125.82, 129.83, 131.82, 132.57, 133.20 (6Ar-C), 143.26, 143.74 (2C=N); MS (m/z), 63 (M+ − C4H4BrClN4; 98%), 257 (M+ − CN; 100%), 283 (M+; 9%), 284 (M+ + 1; 2%), 285 (M+ + 2; 11%), 286 (M+ + 3; 1%), 287 (M+ + 4; 3%). Anal. Calcd. for C8H3BrClN5 (284.50): C, 33.77; H, 1.06; N, 24.62 %. Found: C, 33.86; H, 1.29; N, 24.51%.

3.1.3. General Procedure for Synthesis of 8-Bromo-4-(substituted amino)tetrazolo[1,5-a]quinoxaline (5a,b)

Amine (1 mmol) was dissolved in acetonitrile (50 mL). Anhydrous potassium carbonate (2.0 g) was added to the mixture, which was refluxed for 1 h, then compound 4 (0.28 g, 1 mmol) was added and the mixture was further refluxed for 2 h. After completion of the reaction, the reaction mixture was filtrered to remove the potassium carbonate, then the excess of acetonitrile was evaporated under reduced pressure and residue obtained was dried and purified by a silica gel column chromatography to give the product.

8-Bromo-4-(piperidin-1-yl)tetrazolo[1,5-a]quinoxaline (5a)

The compound 5a was obtained from the reaction of piperidine and purified by a silica gel column chromatography (chloroform as eluent). Yield: 72%; (orange powder): mp 122–123 °C; IR (KBr) νmax in cm−1: 2934, 2850 (aliphatic C-H), 2246 (N3), 1598 (C=N); 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 1.72 (m, 6H, 3CH2), 3.88 (m, 4H, 2N-CH2), 7.59–8.39 (m, 3H, Ar-H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 22.36, 24.01, 25.60 (3CH2), 46.84 (2N-CH2), 121.93, 122.36, 126.58, 127.69, 128.62, 132.37 (6Ar-C), 139.16, 144.97 (2C=N); MS (m/z), 248 (M+ − piperidine; 97%), 250 (M+ − C2H2N4; 100%), 332 (M+; 20%), 333 (M+ + 1; 5%), 334 (M+ + 2; 20%). Anal. Calcd. for C13H13BrN6 (333.19): C, 46.86; H, 3.93; N, 25.22%. Found: C, 46.97; H, 4.12; N, 25.41%.

8-Bromo-4-(morpholin-4-yl)tetrazolo[1,5-a]quinoxaline (5b)

Compound 5b was obtained from the reaction of morpholine and purified by a silica gel column chromatography (5:0.2, chloroform/methanol as eluent). Yield: 84%; (orange powder): mp 144–146 °C; IR (KBr) νmax in cm−1: 2925, 2865 (aliphatic C-H), 2241 (N3), 1602 (C=N); 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 3.82 (m, 4H, 2N-CH2), 4.28 (m, 4H, 2O-CH2), 7.62–8.43 (m, 3H, Ar-H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 46.30 (2N-CH2), 65.94, 66.33 (2O-CH2), 120.96, 122.56, 127.21, 127.93, 132.51, 136.16 (6Ar-C), 145.35, 145.69 (2C=N); MS (m/z), 248 (M+ − morpholine; 99%), 250 (M+ − C2H4N4; 100%), 334 (M+; 17%), 335 (M+ + 1; 3%), 336 (M+ + 2; 16%). Anal. Calcd. for C12H11BrN6O (335.16): C, 43.00; H, 3.31; N, 25.07%. Found: C, 43.18; H, 3.52; N, 25.30%.

3.1.4. 6-Bromo-2-chloro-3-(3,5-dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)quinoxaline (6)

To a solution of compound 3 (0.27 g, 1 mmol) in absolute ethanol (50 mL), acetylacetone (0.10 mL, 1 mmol) and few drops of piperidine were added. The reaction mixture was refluxed for 6 h. After completion of the reaction, the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure and residue obtained was purified by a silica gel column chromatography (5:0.3, petroleum ether (60–80)/ethyl acetate as eluent) to give the product. Yield: 73%; (brown powder): mp 81–83 °C; IR (KBr) νmax in cm−1: 2948, 2842 (aliphatic C-H), 1603 (C=N); 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 2.01, 2.20 (2s, 6H, 2CH3), 5.98 (s, 1H, CH-pyrazole), 8.10–8.40 (m, 3H, Ar-H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 13.85, 14.02 (2CH3), 107.83 (CH-pyrazole), 118.65, 127.67, 127.93, 129.28, 135.40, 137.41 (7Ar-C), 149.35, 149.90, 150.74 (3C=N); MS (m/z), 301 (M+ − Cl; 100%), 336 (M+; 44%), 337 (M+ + 1; 12%), 338 (M+ + 2; 58%), 339 (M+ + 3, 10%), 340 (M+ + 4; 14%). Anal. Calcd. for C13H10BrClN4 (337.60): C, 46.25; H, 2.99; N, 16.60%. Found: C, 46.10; H, 2.83; N, 16.49%.

3.1.5. 7-Bromo-4-hydrazinyltetrazolo[1,5-a]quinoxaline (7)

To a solution of compound 3 (0.27 g, 1 mmol) in absolute ethanol (50 mL), sodium azide (0.06 g, 1 mmol) was added and the reaction mixture was refluxed for two days. After completion of the reaction, the reaction mixture was filtered, then the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure and residue obtained was dried and crystallized from benzene to give the product. Yield: 98%; (brown powder): mp 237–239 °C; IR (KBr) νmax in cm−1: 3380, 3355, 3180 (NH2, NH), 2130 (N3), 1594 (C=N); 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 4.97 (s, br, 2H, NH2; exchangeable with D2O); 7.59–8.29 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 9.84 (s, br, 1H, NH; exchangeable with D2O); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 124.68, 129.67, 130.02, 134.78, 138.98, 140.60 (6Ar-C), 145.22, 145.85 (2C=N); MS (m/z), 130 (M+ − C5H5N6; 100%), 279 (M+; 4%), 280 (M+ + 1; 2%), 281 (M+ + 2; 3%). Anal. Calcd. for C8H6BrN7 (280.08): C, 34.31; H, 2.16; N, 35.01%. Found: C, 34.45; H, 2.14; N, 35.20%.

3.1.6. 6-Bromo-2-chloro-3-[2-(4-chlorobenzylidene)hydrazinyl]quinoxaline (8)

A mixture of compound 3 (0.27 g, 1 mmol) and p-chlorobenzaldehyde (0.14 g, 1 mmol) in absolute ethanol (50 mL) and few drops of concentrated glacial acetic acid was refluxed for 3 h. After completion of the reaction, the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure and residue obtained was purified by a silica gel column chromatography (2:1, chloroform/petroleum ether (60–80)) to give the product. Yield: 89%; (orange powder): mp 187–189 °C; IR (KBr) νmax in cm−1: 3146 (NH), 1616 (C=N); 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 7.54–8.05 (m, 7H, Ar-H), 8.64 (s, br, 1H, CH=N-), 11.26 (s, br, 1H, NH; exchangeable with D2O); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 117.66, 123.48, 128.38, 128.60, 128.73, 128.92, 129.25, 130.11, 133.45, 141.52 (12Ar-C), 145.38, 146.56 (2C=N), 156.82 (CH=N-); MS (m/z), 259 (M+ − C4H3Cl2N; 100%), 394 (M+; 8%), 395 (M+ + 1; 5%), 396 (M+ + 2; 12%), 397 (M+ + 3; 4%), 398 (M+ + 4; 5%). Anal. Calcd. for C15H9BrCl2N4 (396.07): C, 45.49; H, 2.29; N, 14.15%. Found: C, 45.67; H, 2.08; N, 14.02.

3.1.7. 6-Bromo-2,3-dihydrazinylquinoxaline (9)

Method A: To a solution of compound 1 (0.28 g, 1 mmol) in absolute ethanol (50 mL), hydrazine hydrate 90% (0.13 mL, 2.5 mmol) was added and the reaction mixture was refluxed for 6 h. After completion of the reaction, the reaction mixture was cooled and the precipitate that formed was filtered, dried and crystallized from dioxane to give the product; yield: 98%.
Method B: To a solution of compound 3 (0.27 g, 1 mmol) in absolute ethanol (50 mL), hydrazine hydrate 90% (0.07 mL, 1.5 mmol) was added and the reaction mixture was refluxed for 6 h. After completion of the reaction, the reaction mixture was cooled and the precipitate that formed was filtered, dried and crystallized from dioxane to give the product; yield: 78%.
(Pale brown powder): mp over 300 °C; IR (KBr) νmax in cm−1: 3386, 3260, 3172, 3124 (NH2, NH), 1605 (C=N); 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 4.58 (s, br, 4H, 2NH2; exchangeable with D2O), 7.42–7.60 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 8.60, 8.67 (2s, br, 2H, 2NH; exchangeable with D2O); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 127.00, 129.44, 129.48, 131.26, 135.09, 137.07 (6Ar-C), 142.45, 146.57 (2C=N); MS (m/z), 196 (M+ − C2H6N3; 100%), 268 (M+; 43%), 269 (M+ + 1; 6%), 270 (M+ + 2; 43%). Anal. Calcd. for C8H9BrN6 (269.10): C, 35.71; H, 3.37; N, 31.23%. Found: C, 35.95; H, 3.50; N, 31.09%.

3.1.8. 9-Bromoditetrazolo[1,5-a:5′,1′-c]quinoxaline (11)

Method A: A solution of sodium nitrite (0.07 g, 1 mmol) in the least amount of water was added dropwise to an ice-cold solution of compound 9 (0.27 g, 1 mmol) in acetic acid (30 mL) kept in an ice bath at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was allowed to stand overnight at room temperature, then it was poured into water (100 mL). The precipitate that formed was filtered, dried, crystallized from methanol and purified by a silica gel column chromatography (chloroform) to give the product; yield: 34%.
Method B: To a solution of compound 1 (0.28 g, 1 mmol) in absolute ethanol (50 mL), sodium azide (0.12 g, 2 mmol) was added and the reaction mixture was refluxed for two days. After completion of the reaction, the reaction mixture was cooled and the precipitate that formed was filtered, washed with a little amount of ethanol, dried and crystallized from methanol to give the product; yield: 85%.
(Brown powder): mp 229–231 °C; IR (KBr) νmax in cm−1: 2155 (N3), 1608 (C=N); 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 8.26–9.01 (m, 3H, Ar-H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 119.61, 120.27, 122.00, 123.33, 123.59, 133.93 (6Ar-C), 140.37, 140.59 (2C=N); MS (m/z), 103 (M+ − C6H3N8, 100%), 290 (M+; 7%), 291 (M+ + 1; 1%), 292 (M+ + 2; 7%). Anal. Calcd. for C8H3BrN8 (291.07): C, 33.01; H, 1.04; N, 38.50%. Found: C, 32.87; H, 1.23; N, 38.69%.

3.1.9. 7-Bromo-4,11-dimethyl-2,13-dihydrobis[1,2,4]triazino[4,3-a:3',4'-c]quinoxaline (12)

A mixture of compound 9 (0.27 g, 1 mmol) with chloroacetone (0.16 g, 2 mmol) in DMF (30 mL) and drops of glacial acetic acid (0.2 mL) was heated in 90 °C for 10 h. The solid that precipitated upon cooling was filtered off and crystallized from ethanol to give the product. Yield: 81%; (brown powder): mp over 300 °C; IR (KBr) νmax in cm−1: 3310, 3291 (2NH), 2971, 2918 (aliphatic C-H), 1605 (C=N); 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 2.33 (s, 6H, 2CH3), 8.03–8.36 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 9.25 (s, 2H, CH-triazine), 10.03 (s, br, 2H, 2NH; exchangeable with D2O); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 13.23, 13.87 (2CH3), 109.21 (2CH-triazine), 117.26, 123.65, 126.98, 127.43, 129.54, 131.54, 135.32, 138.00 (8Ar-C), 149.82, 149.93 (2C=N); MS (m/z), 344 (M+; 100%), 345 (M+ + 1; 23%), 346 (M+ + 2; 98%). Anal. Calcd. for C14H13BrN6 (345.20): C, 48.71; H, 3.80; N, 24.35%. Found: C, 48.52; H, 3.71; N, 24.54%.

3.1.10. 9-Bromo-di-1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-a:5′,1′-c]quinoxaline (13)

A mixture of compound 9 (0.27 g, 1 mmol) and triethyl orthoformate (0.38 mL, 2.3 mmol) in ethanol (30 mL) and drops of acetic acid (0.1 mL) was heated in 90 °C for 10 h. The solid that precipitated upon cooling was filtered off and crystallized from acetic acid to give the product. Yield: 81%; (brownish powder): mp over 300 °C; IR (KBr) νmax in cm−1: 1618 (C=N); 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 7.98–8.16 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 8.55 (s, 2H, 2CH-triazole); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 110.6 (2CH-triazole), 121.36, 123.63, 127.29, 128.43, 134.42, 142.65 (6Ar-C), 147.81, 149.02 (2C=N); MS (m/z), 288 (M+; 100%), 289 (M+ + 1; 14%), 290 (M+ + 2; 96%). Anal. Calcd. for C10H5BrN6 (289.09): C, 41.55; H, 1.74; N, 29.07%. Found: C, 41.68; H, 1.81; N, 28.94%.

3.1.11. 6-Bromo-3-(3,5-dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)-2-hydrazinyl quinoxaline (14)

To a solution of compound 9 (0.27 g, 1 mmol) in absolute ethanol (50 mL), acetylacetone (0.11 mL, 1.1 mmol) and few drops of piperidine were added. The reaction mixture was refluxed for 15 h. After completion of the reaction, the reaction mixture was filtered, then the solution was allowed to stand overnight at room temperature. The precipitate that formed was filtered, dried and crystallized from ethanol to give the product. Yield: 50%; (orange powder): mp 164–166 °C; IR (KBr) νmax in cm−1: 3448, 3277, 3191 (NH2, NH), 2976, 2924 (aliphatic C-H), 1601 (C=N); 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 2.01, 2.20 (2s, 6H, 2CH3), 4.93 (s, br, 2H, NH2; exchangeable with D2O), 6.05 (s, 1H, CH-pyrazole), 8.01–8.43 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 8.96 (s, br, 1H, NH; exchangeable with D2O); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 13.86, 13.94 (2CH3), 109.51 (CH-pyrazole), 117.21, 125.12, 125.41, 127.18, 134.65, 136.34, 138.85 (7Ar-C), 147.07, 149.82, 149.91 (3C=N); MS (m/z), 64 (M+ − C9H11BrN5; 100%), 301 (M+ − NHNH2; 14%), 302 (M+ +1 − NHNH2; 26%), 303 (M+ + 2 − NHNH2; 15%). Anal. Calcd. for C13H13BrN6 (333.19): C, 46.86; H, 3.93; N, 25.22%. Found: C, 47.02; H, 3.80; N, 25.04%.

3.1.12. 6-Bromo-2,3-bis(3,5-dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)quinoxaline (15)

Method A: To a solution of compound 9 (0.27 g, 1 mmol) in absolute ethanol (50 mL), acetylacetone (0.20 mL, 2 mmol) and few drops of piperidine were added. The reaction mixture was refluxed for 3 h. After completion of the reaction, the reaction mixture was filtered, then the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure and residue obtained was dried and crystallized from chloroform to give the product; yield: 75%.
Method B: To a solution of compound 14 (0.33 g, 1 mmol) in absolute ethanol (50 mL), acetylacetone (0.10 mL, 1 mmol) and few drops of piperidine were added. The reaction mixture was refluxed for 6 h. After completion of the reaction, the reaction mixture was filtered, then the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure and residue obtained was dried and crystallized from chloroform to give the product; yield: 62%.
(Yellow-brown powder): mp 96–98 °C; IR (KBr) νmax in cm−1: 2955 (aliphatic C-H), 1600 (C=N); 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 2.12, 2.27, 2.28 (3s, 12H, 4CH3), 6.27 (s, 2H, 2CH-pyrazole), 7.43–7.68 (m, 3H, Ar-H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 11.47, 13.20, 21.66, 22.03 (4CH3), 104.37, 107.22 (2CH-pyrazole), 124.43, 130.21, 130.42, 134.47, 138.10, 139.85, 141.52, 141.66 (8Ar-C), 142.49, 142.94, 143.42, 149.27 (4C=N); MS (m/z), 396 (M+; 89%), 397 (M+ + 1; 100%), 398 (M+ + 2; 91%). Anal. Calcd. for C18H17BrN6 (397.27): C, 54.42; H, 4.31; N, 21.15%. Found: C, 54.31; H, 4.17; N, 21.04%.

3.1.13. 6-Bromo-2,3-bis(3-amino-1H-pyrazol-5(4H)-one)quinoxaline (16)

To a warmed ethanolic sodium ethoxide solution [prepared by dissolving sodium metal (0.02 g, 1 mmol) in absolute ethanol (30 mL)] was added compound 9 (0.27 g, 1 mmol) and ethyl cyanoacetate (0.22 mL, 2 mmol). The mixture was stirred under reflux for 12 h, the reaction mixture was allowed to cool to room temperature, then poured into cold water (100 mL) and neutralized with acetic acid. The solid product was filtered off, washed with water, ethanol, dried and crystallized from ethanol to give the product. Yield: 35%; (pale brown crystals): mp 232–233 °C; IR (KBr) νmax in cm−1: 3319, 3298 (NH2), 1695 (C=O), 1618 (C=N); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 3.95 (s, 4H, 2CH2-pyrazole), 8.08–8.24 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 11.2 (s, br, 4H, 2NH2; exchangeable with D2O); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 75.32 (2CH2-pyrazole), 121.98, 126.14, 128,10, 130.32, 134.65, 142.68 (6Ar-C), 153.23, 153.28, 159.62, 159.69 (4C=N), 169.06, 169.12 (2C=O); MS (m/z), 402 (M+; 64%), 403 (M+ + 1; 11%), 404 (M+ + 2; 65%). Anal. Calcd. for C14H11BrN8O2(403.19): C, 41.70; H, 2.75; N, 27.79%. Found: C, 41.82; H, 2.62; N, 27.94%.

3.1.14. 6-Bromo-2,3-bis(3-methyl-1H-pyrazol-5(4H)-one)quinoxaline (17)

A solution of compound 9 (0.27 g, 1 mmol) and ethyl acetoacetate (0.26 mL, 2 mmol) in sodium ethoxide solution [prepared by dissolving sodium metal (0.02 g, 1 mmol) in absolute ethanol (30 mL)] was heated under reflux with stirring for 4 h. The reaction mixture was allowed to cool and poured into cold water (100 mL) and neutralized by acetic acid, whereby a solid was precipitated, which was filtered off and crystallized from chloroform. Yield: 43%; (pale brown crystals): mp 152–154 °C; IR (KBr) νmax in cm−1: 1698 (C=O), 1621 (C=N); 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 2.33 (s, 6H, 2CH3), 3.84 (s, 4H, 2CH2-pyrazole), 7.89–8.06 (m, 3H, Ar-H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 16.31, 16.38 (2CH3), 71.25 (2CH2-pyrazole), 123.74, 126.87, 128.53, 129.98, 131.34, 141.18 (6Ar-C), 152.36, 152.41, 158.12, 158.19 (4C=N), 169.10, 169.21 (2C=O); MS (m/z), 400 (M+; 79%), 401 (M+ +1; 20%), 402 (M+ + 2; 80%). Anal. Calcd. for C16H13BrN6O2(401.22): C, 47.90; H, 3.27; N, 20.95%. Found: C, 48.02; H, 3.16; N, 21.13%.

3.2. Pharmacological Evaluation

3.2.1. Anticancer Activity

Cell Cultures

The newly synthesized compounds were evaluated in vitro against three human cancer cell lines; which are MCF-7 (breast adenocarcinoma), NCI-H460 (non-small cell lung cancer) and SF-268 (CNS cancer), and WI 38 (normal fibroblast cells) were used in this study. MCF-7 was obtained from the European Collection of Cell Cultures (ECACC, Salisbury, UK) but NCI-H460, SF-268 and WI 38 were kindly provided by the National Cancer Institute (NCI, Cairo, Egypt). They grow as monolayer and routinely maintained RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 5% heat inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2 mM glutamine and antibiotics (penicillin 100 U/mL, streptomycin 100 µg/mL), at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Exponentially growing cells were obtained by plating 1.5 × 105 cells/mL for MCF-7 and SF-268, and 0.75 × 104 cells/mL for NCI-H460 followed by 24 h of incubation. The effect of the vehicle solvent (DMSO) on the growth of these cell lines was evaluated in all experiments by exposing untreated control cells to the maximum concentration (0.5%) of DMSO used in each assay.

Cancer Cell Growth Assay

The effect of compounds on the in vitro growth of human tumor cell lines were evaluated according to the procedure adopted by the National Cancer Institute (NCI, Austin, TX, USA) in the “In vitro Anticancer Drug Discovery Screen” that uses the protein-binding dye sulforhodamine B (SRB) to assess cell growth [39]. In the assay protocol, all cells were incubated at 37 °C under humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Briefly, exponentially cells growing in 96-well plates were then exposed for 48 h to five serial concentrations of each compound, starting from a maximum concentration of 150 μg/mL. Following this exposure period adherent cells were fixed, washed and stained. The bound stain was solubilized and the absorbance was measured at 492 nm in a plate reader (Bio-Tek Instruments Inc., Power wave XS, Winston, NC, USA). For each test compound and cell line, a dose response curve was obtained and the inhibitory concentration of 50% (IC50), corresponding to the concentration of the compounds that inhibited 50% of the net cell growth was calculated as described elsewhere [40]. Doxorubicin was used as a positive control and tested in the same manner.

3.2.2. Antimicrobial Activity

Preparation of Microbial Suspensions

Antimicrobial activities were carried out against highly pathogenic strains; three strains of Gram positive bacteria (Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus faecalis), four strains of Gram negative bacteria (Escherichia coli, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Salmonella typhimurium) and three fungi strains (Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus fumigatus and Candida albicans) isolated from primary agar plates. Antimicrobial activity of the tested samples was determined using a modified Kriby-Bauer disk diffusion method [41]. Briefly, 100 µL of the test bacteria/fungi were grown in 10 mL of fresh media until they reached a count approximately 108 cells/mL for bacteria or 105 cells/mL for fungi [42]. 100 µL of microbial suspension was spread onto agar plates corresponding to the broth in which they were maintained. The inoculated plates of bacterial strains were incubated at 35–37 °C for 24–48 h, while the inoculated plates of fungal strains such as A. flavus and A. fumigatus were incubated at 25 °C for 48 h and yeast as C. albicans was incubated at 30 °C for 24–48 h [41].

Determination of Antimicrobial Activity by Disk Diffusion Method

The agar disk diffusion (qualitative) method was used in this investigation for determination of the preliminary antibacterial and antifungal activities. The agar used was Mueller-Hinton agar plates that are rigorously tested for composition and pH. Further the depth of the agar in the plate is a factor to be considered in the disk diffusion method.
Reference drugs: ampicillin was used as a standard antibacterial drug for Gram positive bacteria, gentamicin as a standard antibacterial drug for Gram negative bacteria and amphotericin B as antifungal standard drug. In addition, standard filter disks impregnated with 10 µL of DMSO as solvent which showed no zone of inhibition and acts as a negative control.
Bacterial and fungal strains were spread onto the surface of the agar plates using sterile cotton swabs. For evaluation of antibacterial activities, blank paper disks (Schleicher & Schuell, Alicante, Spain) with a diameter of 8.0 mm were saturated with 10 μL of tested concentration of the stock solutions. Disks were dried and then placed onto inoculated agar plates. The plates of bacterial strains were reincubated at 35–37 °C for 24–48 h, while the plates of fungal strains such as A. flavus and A. fumigatus were reincubated at 25 °C for 48 h and yeast as C. albicans was reincubated at 30 °C for 24–48 h as mentioned above. After incubation, plates were observed for antimicrobial activities by determining the diameters of inhibition zones (IZ) of bacterial or fungal growth around the disks of the samples in (mm) by slipping calipers of the Clinical and Laboratory Standared Institute CLSI [42]. For an accurate analysis, tests were run in triplicate for each strain to avoid any error as described in Table 2.
Disk diffusion method for filamentous fungi testing by using approved standard method (M02-A11) developed by the CLSI for evaluating the susceptibilities of filamentous fungi to antifungal agents [43]. Disk diffusion method for yeasts developed by using approved standard method (M44-A2) by the CLSI [44]. Agar-based methods such as disk diffusion can be good alternatives because they are simpler and faster than broth-based methods [45].

Determination of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)

In this study, MIC (quantitative method) was used for evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of tested compounds. Screening was evaluated in vitro using the Broth dilution method according to CLSI [45]. All the bacteria were incubated and activated at 30 °C for 24 h inoculation into nutrient broth and the fungi were incubated in malt extract broth for 48 h. The compounds were dissolved in DMSO and then diluted using cautiously adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth. Two-fold serial concentrations dilution method (0.98, 1.95, 3.9, 7.81, 15.63, 31.25, 62.5, 125 µg/mL) of the some compounds were employed to determine the (MIC). In each case triplicate tests were performed and the average was taken as the final reading. The tubes were then inoculated with the test organisms, grown in their suitable broth at 37 °C for 24 h for tested microorganisms (1 × 108 CFU/mL for bacteria and 1 × 106 CFU/mL of fungi), each 5 mL received 0.1 mL of the above inoculum and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The lowest concentration showing no growth was taken as the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC); shown in Table 3.

4. Conclusions

The objective of this work was to design and synthesize new compounds with anticancer and antimicrobial properties at the same time. The anticancer evaluation of the newly synthesized quinoxaline derivatives showed that among the tested compounds 8-bromo-4-chlorotetrazolo[1,5-a]quinoxaline (4), 8-bromo-4-(piperidin-1-yl)tetrazolo[1,5-a]quinoxaline (5a), 8-bromo-4-(morpholin-4-yl)tetrazolo[1,5-a]quinoxaline (5b) and 9-bromoditetrazolo[1,5-a:5',1'-c]quinoxaline (11) showed the best result, exhibiting the highest inhibitory effects towards the three tumor cell lines, which were higher than that of the reference doxorubicin and these compounds were non-cytotoxic on the normal cells (IC50 values >100 μg/mL). In addition, compounds 4, 5a, 5b, 9 and 11–13 exhibited the highest degrees of inhibition against the strains of Gram positive and negative bacteria. Such high activity of 4, 5a, 5b and 11 was may be due to the presence of a tetrazolo ring combined with a quinoxaline moiety.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology for supporting this research.

Author Contributions

The listed authors contributed to this work as follows: Hebat-Allah S. Abbas and Yousry A. Ammar provided the concepts of the work, interpreted the results and prepared the manuscript, and Aisha R. Al-Marhabi carried out the experimental work and interpreted the results. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sawadogo, W.R.; Boly, R.; Cerella, C.; Teiten, M.H.; Dicato, M. A survey of marine natural compounds and their derivatives with anti-cancer activity reported in 2012. Molecules 2015, 20, 7097–7142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. IARC. Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worlwide; International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  3. WHO. Global Status Report on Noncommunicable Diseases 2010; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2011; pp. 11–15. [Google Scholar]
  4. Işikdağ, I.; Özkay, Y.; Incesu, Z. Synthesis and anticancer activity of some bisquinoxaline derivatives. Turk J. Pharm. Sci. 2011, 8, 179–188. [Google Scholar]
  5. Jaso, A.; Zarranz, B.; Aldana, I.; Monge, A. Synthesis of new quinoxaline-2-Carboxylate 1,4-dioxide derivatives as anti-Mycobacterium tuberculosis agents. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 2019–2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ali, M.M.; Ismail, M.M.F.; El-Gaby, M.S.; Ammar, Y.A. Synthesis and antimicrobial activities of some novel quinoxalinone derivatives. Molecules 2000, 5, 864–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wadavrao, S.B.; Ghogare, R.S.; Narsaiah, A.V. A simple and efficient protocol for the synthesis of quinoxalines catalyzed by pyridine. Org. Commun. 2013, 6, 23–30. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ismail, M.M.F.; Nofal, S.M.; Ibrahim, M.K.; El-Zahaby, H.S.A.; Ammar, Y.A. 3-Ethoxy-carbonylmethylenequinoxaline-2-one in heterocyclic synthesis (part 2): Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of new 6,7-dimethyl quinoxalines as potential nonulcerogenic, anti-inflamatory and analgesic agents. Afinidad 2006, 63, 689–696. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ismail, M.M.F.; Ammar, Y.A; Ibrahim, M.K.; El-Zahaby, H.S.A. Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of novel quinoxalines as potential nonulcerogenic, anti-inflammatory and analgesic agents. Arzneimittelforschung 2004, 55, 738–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Rodrigues, F.A.R.; Bomfima, I.D.S.; Cavalcanti, B.C.; Pessoa, C.D.Ó.; Wardell, J.L.; Wardell, S.M.; Pinheiro, A.C.; Kaiser, C.R.; Nogueira, T.C.M.; Low, J.N.; et al. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of (E)-2-(2-arylhydrazinyl)quinoxalines, a promising and potent new class of anticancer agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2014, 24, 934–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Ismail, M.M.F.; Amin, K.M.; Noaman, E.; Soliman, D.H.; Ammar, Y.A. New quinoxaline-1,4-di-N-oxides: Anticancer and hypoxia-selective therapeutic agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 45, 2733–2738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Amin, K.M.; Ismail, M.M.F.; Noaman, E.; Soliman, D.H.; Ammar, Y.A. New quinoxaline-1,4-di-N-oxides (part 1): Hypoxia-selective cytotoxine and anticancer agents derived from quinoxaline-1,4-di-N-oxides. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006, 14, 6917–6923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Farrag, A.A.; Ammar, Y.A.; El-Sehemi, A.G.; Thabet, H.Kh.; Hassan, N.A.; Samy, A.Kh. Synthesis and pharmacological screening of novel sulfamoylphenyl carbamoylquinoxaline derivatives as anti-inflammatory, analgesic and antitumour agets. J. Chem. Res. 2011, 163, 163–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Suresh, M.; Lavanya, P.; Sudhakar, D.; Vasu, K.; Rao, C.V. Synthesis and biological activity of 8-chloro-[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-a]quinoxalines. J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 2010, 2, 497–504. [Google Scholar]
  15. Noolvi, M.N.; Patel, H.M.; Bhardwaj, V.; Chauhan, A. Synthesis and in vitro antitumor activity of substituted quinazoline and quinoxaline derivatives: Search for anticancer agent. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 46, 2327–2346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hassam, S.Y. Synthesis, antibacterial and antifungal activity of some new pyrazoline and pyrazole derivatives. Molecules 2013, 18, 2683–2711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Mielcke, T.R.; Mascarello, A.; Fillipi-Chiela, E.; Zanin, R.F.; Lenz, G.; Leal, P.C.; Chiaradia, L.D.; Yunes, R.A.; Nunes, R.J.; Battastinie, A.M.O.; et al. Activity of novel quinoxaline-derived chalcones on in vitro glioma cell proliferation. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 48, 255–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Wu, P.; Su, Y.; Liu, X.; Yan, J.; Ye, Y.; Zhang, L.; Xu, J.; Weng, S.; Li, Y.; Liu, T.; et al. Discovery of novel morpholino–quinoxalines as PI3Kα inhibitors by pharmacophore-based screening. Med. Chem. Comm. 2012, 3, 659–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Seitz, L.E.; Suling, W.J.; Reynold, R.C. Synthesis and antimycobacterial activity of pyrazine and quinoxaline derivatives. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 5604–5606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Kim, Y.B.; Kim, Y.H.; Park, J.Y.; Kim, S.K. Synthesis and biological activity of new quinoxaline antibiotics of echinomycin analogues. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 541–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Aravind, K.; Ganesh, A.; Ashok, D. Microwave assisted synthesis, characterization and antibacterial activity of quinoxaline derivatives. J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 2013, 5, 48–52. [Google Scholar]
  22. Sajjadifar, S.; Nezhad, E.R. Qinoxaline III. synthesis of quinoxaline derivatives over highly efficient and reusable bronsted acidic ionic liquids. Int. J. ChemTech Res. 2013, 5, 2041–2050. [Google Scholar]
  23. Thomas, K.R.J.; Velusamy, M.; Lin, J.T.; Chuen, C.H.; Tao, Y.T. Chromophore-labeled qquinoxaline derivatives as efficient electroluminescent materials. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 1860–1866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Toshima, K.; Takano, R.; Ozawa, T.; Matsumara, S. Molecular design and evaluation of quinoxaline-carbohydrate hybrids as novel and efficient photo-induced GG-selective DNA cleaving agents. Chem. Commun. 2002, 3, 212–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dailey, S.; Feast, W.J.; Peace, R.J.; Sage, I.C.; Till, S.; Wood, E.L. Synthesis and device characterization of side-chain polymer electron transport materials for organic semiconducting applications. J. Mater. Chem. 2001, 11, 2238–2243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kumar, A.; Kumar, S.; Saxena, A.; De, A.; Mozumdar, S. Ni-nanoparticles: An efficient catalyst for the synthesis of quinoxalines. Catal. Commun. 2008, 9, 778–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Moustafa, O.S.; Badr, M.Z.A.; El-Emary, T.I. New fused quinoxalines: Synthesis and reactions of pyrimidothienoquinoxaline and oxadizolylthieno-quinoxalines. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2002, 23, 567–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Crossley, M.J.; Johnston, L.A. Laterally-extended porphyrin systems incorporating a switchable unit. Chem. Commun. 2002, 21, 1122–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sessler, J.L.; Maeda, H.; Mizuno, T.; Lynch, V.M.; Furuta, H. Quinoxaline-oligopyrroles: improved pyrrole-based anion receptors. Chem. Commun. 2002, 21, 862–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sascha, O.; Rudiger, F. Quinoxalinodehydroannulenes: A novel class of carbon-rich materials. Synlett 2004, 9, 1509–1513. [Google Scholar]
  31. Islami, M.R.; Hassani, Z. One-pot and efficient protocol for synthesis of quinoxaline derivatives. Arkivoc 2008, 15, 280–287. [Google Scholar]
  32. Wagle, S.; Adhikari, A.V.; Kumari, N.S. Synthesis of some new 4-styryltetrazolo[1,5-a]quinoxaline and 1-substituted-4-styryl[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-a]quinoxaline derivatives as potent anticonvulsants. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 44, 1135–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kim, H.S.; Kim, T.E.; Kurasawa, Y. Synthesis of 1,3,4-Thiadiazino[5,6-b] quinoxalines with Antimicrobial Activity. J. Korean Chem. Soc. 2001, 45, 325–333. [Google Scholar]
  34. Natarajan, U.; Kaliappan, I.; Singh, N.K. A facile design and efficient synthesis of schiff’s bases of tetrazolo[1,5-a]quinoxalines as potential anti-inflammatory and anti-microbial agents. Pharm. Chem. 2010, 2, 159–167. [Google Scholar]
  35. Suryawanshi, M.R.; Kulkarni, V.M.; Mahadik, K.R.; Bhosale, Sh.H. Synthesis, pharmacological evaluation and QSAR study of 2-aryl-1H-[1,3,4]oxadiazino[5,6-b] quinoxalines as antidepressants. Arch. Appl. Sci. Res. 2011, 3, 380–391. [Google Scholar]
  36. Podsiad1y, R.; Szymczak, A.M.; Podemska, K. The synthesis of novel, visible-wavelength, oxidizable polymerization sensitizers based on the 8-halogeno-5,12-dihydroquinoxalino[2,3-b]quinoxaline skeleton. Dyes Pigm. 2009, 82, 365–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Khalil, Z.H.; Geies, A.A. Synthesis and reactions of some thieno[2,3-d]pyrimidine derivatives. Phosphorus Sulfur Silicon 1991, 60, 223–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Skehan, P.; Storeng, R.; Scudiero, D.; Monks, A.; McMahon, J.; Vistica, D.; Warren, J.T.; Bokesch, H.; Kenne, S.; Boyd, M.R. New colorimetric cytotoxicity assay for anticancer-drug screening. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1990, 82, 1107–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Monks, A.; Scudiero, D.; Skehan, P.; Shoemaker, R.; Paul, K.; Vistica, D.; Hose, C.; Langley, J.; Cronise, P.; Vaigro-Wolff, A; et al. Feasibility of a high-flux anticancer drug screen using a diverse panel of cultured human tumor cell lines. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1991, 83, 757–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Bauer, A.W.; Kirby, W.M.; Sherris, J.C.; Turck, M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1966, 45, 493–496. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  41. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty-Fourth Informational Supplement. CLSI Document M100-S24; CLSI: Wayne, PA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  42. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Testing, Approved 11th ed.; CLSI Document M02-A11; CLSI: Wayne, PA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  43. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Method for Antifungal Disk Diffusion Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts, Approved Guideline-2nd ed.; CLSI Document M44-A2; CLSI: Wayne, PA, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  44. Liebowitz, L.D.; Ashbee, H.R.; Evans, E.G.; Chong, Y.; Mallatova, N.; Zaidi, M.; Gibbs, D.; Global Antifungal surveillance group. A two year global evaluation of the susceptibility of Candida species to fluconazole by disk diffusion. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2001, 40, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically, Approved-Standard 9th ed.; CLSI Document M07-A9; CLSI: Wayne, PA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Al-Marhabi, A.R.; Abbas, H.-A.S.; Ammar, Y.A. Synthesis, Characterization and Biological Evaluation of Some Quinoxaline Derivatives: A Promising and Potent New Class of Antitumor and Antimicrobial Agents. Molecules 2015, 20, 19805-19822. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules201119655

AMA Style

Al-Marhabi AR, Abbas H-AS, Ammar YA. Synthesis, Characterization and Biological Evaluation of Some Quinoxaline Derivatives: A Promising and Potent New Class of Antitumor and Antimicrobial Agents. Molecules. 2015; 20(11):19805-19822. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules201119655

Chicago/Turabian Style

Al-Marhabi, Aisha R., Hebat-Allah S. Abbas, and Yousry A. Ammar. 2015. "Synthesis, Characterization and Biological Evaluation of Some Quinoxaline Derivatives: A Promising and Potent New Class of Antitumor and Antimicrobial Agents" Molecules 20, no. 11: 19805-19822. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules201119655

APA Style

Al-Marhabi, A. R., Abbas, H. -A. S., & Ammar, Y. A. (2015). Synthesis, Characterization and Biological Evaluation of Some Quinoxaline Derivatives: A Promising and Potent New Class of Antitumor and Antimicrobial Agents. Molecules, 20(11), 19805-19822. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules201119655

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop