Next Article in Journal
Comparison of Two Species of Notopterygium by GC-MS and HPLC
Previous Article in Journal
(−)-Tarchonanthuslactone Exerts a Blood Glucose-Increasing Effect in Experimental Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Design, Synthesis and Insecticidal Activity of Novel Phenylurea Derivatives

College of Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Molecules 2015, 20(3), 5050-5061; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules20035050
Submission received: 28 February 2015 / Revised: 14 March 2015 / Accepted: 17 March 2015 / Published: 19 March 2015
(This article belongs to the Section Organic Chemistry)

Abstract

:
A series of novel phenylurea derivatives were designed and synthesized according to the method of active groups linkage and the principle of aromatic groups bioisosterism in this study. The structures of the novel phenylurea derivatives were confirmed based on ESI-MS, IR and 1H-NMR spectral data. All of the compounds were evaluated for the insecticidal activity against the third instars larvae of Spodoptera exigua Hiibner, Plutella xyllostella Linnaeus, Helicoverpa armigera Hubner and Pieris rapae Linne respectively, at the concentration of 10 mg/L. The results showed that all of the derivatives displayed strong insecticidal activity. Most of the compounds presented higher insecticidal activity against S. exigua than the reference compounds tebufenozide, chlorbenzuron and metaflumizone. Among the synthesized compounds, 3b, 3d, 3f, 4b and 4g displayed broad spectrum insecticidal activity.

1. Introduction

Benzoylphenyl ureas (BPUs), acting as insect growth regulators (IGRs) and affecting the larval stages of most insects by blocking or inhibiting the synthesis of chitin, have been rapidly developed since the first benzoylphenylurea, diflubenzuron, was commercialized in 1972 [1,2]. BPUs have attracted considerable attention for decades for their unique mode of action coupled with a high degree of activity on target pests and low toxicity to non-target organisms [3,4]. More than 20 BPUs have been developed as IGRs, such as chlorfluazuron, flufenoxuron, triflumuron and chlorbenzuron [5].
Diacylhydrazines have been another of the most important classes of insect growth regulators since the discovery of the N-tert-butyl-N,N'-diacylhydrazines in the mid-1980s by Rohm and Haas Co. [6,7]. They affect the ecdysone receptor and lead to lethal premature molting. For their unique mode of action with high insecticidal selectivity, lower toxicity to vertebrates and simple structure, diacylhydrazines have attracted considerable attention [8,9]. Among nonsteroidal ecdysone agonists, N-tert-butyl-N'-(4-ethylbenzoyl)-3,5-dimethylbenzoylhydrazine (tebufenozide) was the first introduced to market [10,11]. At present, a series of diacylhydrazines, such as methoxyfenozide, halofenozide and chromafenozide have already been widely applied as pesticides in the agrochemical field.
Metaflumizone, which was discovered by Nihon Nohyaku in the early 1990s, is a novel sodium channel blocker insecticide. It belongs to the new class of semicarbazone insecticides and its structure contains an acylhydrazone moiety. It provides good control of most of the economically important lepidopterous pests and other orders pests including Siphonaptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera and Coleoptera. Meanwhile, it presents low risk to non-target organisms as well as humans and the environment. Moreover, insect strains which were resistant to the organophosphates, imidacloprid and carbamates have not showed cross-resistance to metaflumizone. Therefore, metaflumizone has a great potential in Integrated Pest Management(IPM) strategy and resistance management [12,13,14].
Figure 1. Design of the skeleton of phenylurea derivatives.
Figure 1. Design of the skeleton of phenylurea derivatives.
Molecules 20 05050 g001
An abundance of insects belonging to the order Lepidoptera, such as the diamondback moth (Helicoverpa armigera Hubner), beet armyworm (Spodoptera exigua Hiibner), cabbage caterpillar (Pieris rapae Linne) and cotton bollworm (Plutella xyllostella Linnaeus) etc., are among the most damaging pests for crops all over the world. Because they cause enormous agricultural production losses, various insecticides have been used to control Lepidoptera pests. These insecticides brought great benefits, but they have caused negative effects such as toxicity to non-target organisms, including mammals, and environmental pollution. Moreover insecticide resistance has strengthened yearly [15]. Therefore, researchers have to develop novel, low toxicity, highly efficient, friendly environmental insecticides.
In view on the facts above, we sought to incorporate a phenylurea unit with an aromatic diacylhydrazine and acylhydrazone moiety, respectively, according to the method of active groups linkage and the principle of aromatic groups bioisosterism (Figure 1), and eighteen such phenylurea derivatives were then designed and synthesized (Scheme 1). Moreover the new compounds’ insecticidal activities against the third instars larvae of diamondback moth, beet armyworm, cabbage caterpillar and cotton bollworm, were evaluated. We expected that by this approach the combination of the critical components could further strengthen the biological activity of phenylurea derivatives.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of phenylurea derivatives.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of phenylurea derivatives.
Molecules 20 05050 g002

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Chemistry

As indicated in Scheme 1, eighteen phenylurea derivatives 3a3i, 4a4i were successfully synthesized. The raw materials 3-aminobenzoic acid ethyl ester and a substituted phenyl isocyanate (Ar-NCO) were dissolved in toluene and refluxed to give ethyl 3-(3-substituted phenylureido) benzoates 1a1m. Then with alcohol as solvent, 3-(3-substituted phenylureido)benzohydrazides 2a2m were produced by the reaction of compounds 1a1m with hydrazine hydrate. Subsequently, compounds 2a2m reacted with 2-chloronictinoyl chloride in tetrahydrofuran at room temperature to provide phenylurea derivatives, N'-[3-(3-substituted phenylureido)benzoyl]-N-(2-chloro)nicotino-hydrazides 3a3i. Meanwhile, compounds 2a2m also reacted with 2-(4-nitrilo)benzyl-1-(3-trifluoromethyl)phenyl ketones in tetrahydrofuran at room temperature to give others phenylurea derivatives, N-substituted phenylureido benzoyl-1-(3-trifluoromethyl)phenyl-2-(4-cyano) phenyl ethanone hydrazones 4a4i. The structures of all the phenylurea derivatives were confirmed by 1H-NMR, IR, ESI-MS and MP (Scheme 1).

2.2. Insecticidal Activities

As displayed in Table 1, all of the phenylurea derivatives 3a3i, 4a4i indicated strong insecticidal activities against the third instars larval of beet armyworm at the concentration of 10 mg/L. Most of the synthesized compounds showed higher insecticidal activity than the references chlorbenzuron, tebufenozide and metaflumizone at the 72 h time point. Among the synthesized compounds, the mortality of the compounds 3g, 3i, 4d and 4e exceeded 90% at 72 h. Moreover the mortality of compound 4g reached 100%. Meanwhile the data of Table 1 shows that the mortality of the compounds indicated a positive correlation with administration time.
Table 1. Insecticidal activities of the phenylurea derivatives against the third instars larval of beet armyworm (Concentration of 10 mg/L).
Table 1. Insecticidal activities of the phenylurea derivatives against the third instars larval of beet armyworm (Concentration of 10 mg/L).
CompoundMortality (%)CompoundMortality (%)
24 h48 h72 h24 h48 h72 h
3a12.5045.8383.334a25.0041.6787.50
3b8.3337.5087.504b12.5037.5075.00
3c4.1737.5083.334c20.8345.8379.17
3d12.5045.8387.504d50.0070.8391.67
3e16.6750.0087.504e41.6775.0095.83
3f8.3341.6787.504f41.6766.6787.50
3g20.8366.6795.834g45.8375.00100.0
3h8.3341.6783.334h16.6737.5079.17
3i16.6762.5091.674i20.8345.8383.33
Tebufenozide4.1720.8341.67Chlorbenzuron12.5016.6745.83
Metaflumizone37.5066.6775.00
The data in Table 2 showed the mortality of the phenylurea derivatives 3a3i, 4a4i against the third instars larval of diamondback moth (P. xyllostella), cotton bollworm (H. armigera) and cabbage worm (P. rapae) at the concentration of 10 mg/L after 72 h. The data presented that all the phenylurea derivatives showed strong insecticidal activity against diamondback moth, cotton bollworm and cabbage worm. Among the synthesized compounds, 3b, 3d, 3f, 4b and 4g displayed broad spectrum insecticidal activity.
Table 2. Insecticidal activities of phenylurea derivatives (Concentration of 10 mg/L, 72 h).
Table 2. Insecticidal activities of phenylurea derivatives (Concentration of 10 mg/L, 72 h).
CompoundMortality(%)
P. xyllostellaH. armigeraP. rapae
3a87.5091.6791.67
3b91.6795.8395.83
3c87.5091.6791.67
3d91.6795.8395.83
3e91.6787.5095.83
3f95.8391.6795.83
3g83.3383.33100.0
3h83.3387.5091.67
3i95.8383.33100.0
4a79.1787.5091.67
4b91.6795.8395.83
4c83.3379.1787.50
4d79.1787.50100.0
4e75.0087.50100.0
4f87.5091.6787.50
4g91.6795.83100.0
4h91.6787.5087.50
4i83.3379.1787.50
Tebufenozide83.3383.3387.50
Chlorbenzuron87.5079.1783.33
Metaflumizone66.6737.5075.00

3. Experimental Section

3.1. General Procedures

1H-NMR spectra were obtained at 500 MHz using an AM-500 spectrometer in DMSO-d6 solution (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany). The melting points were determined on WRS-1A type melting point apparatus (Shanghai, China) and uncorrected. IR spectra were measured on a Nicolet IR-200 spectrophotometer (Thermo Electron, Madison, WI, USA) using KBr disks. A Micromass Q-TOF spectrometer (Waters Crop., Manchester, UK) was used to record HR-ESI-MS data. Pre-coated silica gel plates were used for analytical thin layer chromatography (TLC) and spots were visualized with UV (254 nm).Yields were not optimized.

3.2. General Procedure for the Preparation of 1a1m

3-Aminobenzoic acid ethyl ester (50 mmol) was dissolved in toluene (30 mL).With ice-water bath cooling, a substituted phenyl isocyanate (Ar-NCO) (50 mmol) dissolved in toluene (30 mL), was added dropwise. With the water bath, the mixture was reacted at a temperature of 25 °C, for 5 h, and then heated to reflux for 2 h. After cooling to room temperature, the reaction mixture was filtered under vacuum and dried to produce ethyl 3-(3-substituted phenylureido)benzoates 1a1m, in yields ranging from 85% to 95%.

3.3. General Procedure for the Preparation of 2a2m

Ethyl 3-(3-substituted phenylureido)benzoates 1a1m (20 mmol) and 80% hydrazine hydrate (100 mmol) were dissolved in ethanol (100 mL). The mixture was stirred and heated under reflux for 4 h. After cooling to room temperature, the reaction mixture was filtered under vacuum. The solid residue was washed with ice-water (50 mL), to give 3-(3-substituted phenylureido)benzohydrazides 2a2m in yields ranging from 80% to 95%.

3.4. General Procedure for the Preparation of 3a3i

3-(3-Substituted phenylureido)benzohydrazides 2a2m (4.42 mmol) was dissolved in dried tetrahydrofuran (50 mL) in a 250 mL round bottom flask. With ice water bath cooling, 2-chloronictinoyl chloride (5.7 mmol) dissolved in dried tetrahydrofuran (50 mL), was added into the flask dropwise. The mixture was reacted at room temperature for 17 h, then it was distilled under reduced pressure to remove the tetrahydrofuran. The solid residue was recrystallized from DMF and water (volume ratio, 1:1) to give the target compounds, N'-[3-(3-substituted phenylureido)benzoyl]-N-(2-chloro)nicotinohydrazides 3a3i, with yields ranging from 50% to 70%.

3.5. General Procedure for the Preparation of 4a4i

3-(3-substituted phenylureido)benzohydrazides 2a2m (2 mmol) and 2-(4-nitrilo)benzyl-1-(3-trifluoromethyl)phenyl ketones (2 mmol) were dissolved in a mixture of methanol (15 mL) and n-hexane (2 mL) in a 100 mL round bottom flask and heated to 60 °C with a water bath. After adding three drops of trifluoroacetic acid, the mixture was stirred and reacted for 6 h. The reaction mixture was filtered while hot and the solid obtained was washed with 15 mL methanol, then dried to give the target compounds, N-(3-substituted phenylureido)benzoyl-1-(3-trifluoromethyl)phenyl-2-(4-cyano)-phenyl ethanone hydrazones 4a4i, in yields ranging from 60% to 75%. All eighteen phenylurea derivatives 3a3i, 4a4i were novel and the physical and spectral data for these compounds are listed below.
N'-[3-(3-(2-Methyl)phenyl)ureido]benzoyl-N-(2-chloro)nicotinohydrazide (3a): Yellow solid, yield 63.6%, m.p.203.0~203.9 °C. 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6) δ: 10.68, 10.60 (each s, H, -CONHNHCO-), 9.24 (s, 1H, NH), 8.55 (dd, J = 4.8, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.96–8.02 (overlap, 4H), 7.84 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.68 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.58 (dd, J = 7.4, 4.9 Hz, 1H), 7.52 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.42 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.19 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.15 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.96 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 2.25 (s, 3H, -CH3). IR (KBr): ν 3281, 3148, 3027, 1643, 1588, 1561, 1455, 1334, 1295, 1244, 1182, 994, 752, 693 cm−1.
N'-[3-(3-(2-Fluoro)phenyl)ureido]benzoyl-N-(2-chloro)nicotinohydrazide (3b): Gray white solid, yield 60.7%, decomposed before melting. HR-ESI-MS m/z: 428.0908 [M+H]+ (calcd. for C20H17ClFN5O3, 428.0926). 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6) δ: 10.64 (s, 2H, -CONHNHCO-), 9.29(s, 1H, NH), 8.62 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H), 8.55 (dd, J = 4.8, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 8.16 (dt, J = 8.2, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 8.00 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H), 7.98 (dd, J = 7.6, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.67 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.58 (dd, J = 7.5, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 7.55 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.44 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.24 (ddd, J = 11.5, 8.2, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 7.15 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.03 (ddt, J = 7.3, 5.2, 1.5 Hz, 1H). IR (KBr): ν 3566, 3394, 3297, 3211, 3078, 3011, 1647, 1588, 1561, 1491, 1451, 1405, 1299, 1252, 1193, 806, 752, 646 cm−1.
N'-[3-(3-(2,4-Difluoro)phenyl)ureido]benzoyl-N-(2-chloro)nicotinohydrazide (3c): Gray white solid, yield 58.3%, m.p. 184.2~185.9 °C. HR-ESI-MS m/z: 446.0808 [M+H]+ (calcd. for C20H15ClF2N5O3, 446.0826). 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6) δ: 10.68, 10.60 (each s, 1H, -CONHNHCO-), 9.21 (s, 1H, NH), 8.56 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H), 8.55 (dd, J = 4.8, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 8.09 (dt, J = 9.2, 6.1 Hz, 1H), 7.98 (s, 1H), 7.95 (s, 1H), 7.66 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.57 (dd, J = 7.5, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 7.55 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.43 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.33 (ddd, J = 11.6, 8.9, 2.8 Hz, 1H), 7.06 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H). IR (KBr): ν 3539, 3304, 3172, 3035, 1721, 1663, 1600, 1553, 1432, 1401, 1190, 1139, 1096, 845, 802, 740 cm−1.
N'-[3-(3-(3,4-Difluoro)phenyl)ureido]benzoyl-N-(2-chloro)nicotinohydrazide (3d): Yellow solid, yield 52.5%, m.p. 214.9~215.2 °C. HR-ESI-MS m/z: 446.0829 [M+H]+ (calcd. for C20H15ClF2N5O3, 446.0826). 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6) δ: 10.67, 10.59 (each s, 1H, -CONHNHCO-), 8.97 (s, 2H, -NHCONH-), 8.55 (dd, J = 4.8, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.96–8.02 (overlap, 2H), 7.64–7.70 (overlap, 2H), 7.58 (dd, J = 7.5, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 7.55 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.43 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.36 (d, J = 10.4 Hz, 1H), 7.15 (m, 1H). IR (KBr): ν 3344, 3249, 3091, 1685, 1648, 1561, 1515, 1490, 1436, 1403, 1208, 905, 860, 748, 673 cm−1.
N'-[3-(3-(3,4-Dichloro)phenyl)ureido]benzoyl-N-(2-chloro)nicotinohydrazide (3e): Gray white solid, yield 54.9%, m.p. 194.2~194.7 °C. HR-ESI-MS m/z: 478.0235 [M+H]+ (calcd. for C20H15Cl3N5O3, 478.0235). 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6) δ: 10.68, 10.60 (each s, 1H, -CONHNHCO-), 9.06, 9.02 (each s, 1H, -NHCONH-), 8.55 (dd, J = 4.8, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 8.01 (s, 1H), 7.99 (dd, J = 7.5, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 7.91 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 7.66 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.58 (dd, J = 7.6, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 7.56 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H) 7.53 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.43 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.35 (dd, J = 8.8, 2.4 Hz, 1H). IR (KBr): ν 3277, 3236, 3093, 3010, 1653, 1581, 1536, 1473, 1401, 1378, 1292, 1223, 1132, 906, 808, 748 cm−1.
N'-[3-(3-(3,5-Dichloro)phenyl)ureido]benzoyl-N-(2-chloro)nicotinohydrazide (3f): Gray white solid, yield 65.6%, m.p. 223.6~224.5 °C. HR-ESI-MS m/z: 478.0235 [M+H]+ (calcd. for C20H15Cl3N5O3, 478.0235). 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6) δ: 10.68, 10.60 (each s, 1H, -CONHNHCO-), 9.12, 9.11 (each s, 1H, -NHCONH-), 8.56 (dd, J = 4.8, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 8.01 (s, 1H), 7.99 (dd, J = 7.5, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.95 (s, 1H), 7.66 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.54–7.60 (overlap, 3H), 7.45 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.17 (t, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H). IR (KBr): ν 3362, 3308, 3168, 1725, 1659, 1604, 1584,1538, 1484, 1392, 1304, 1281, 1246, 1195, 1100, 1063, 820, 739, 665 cm−1.
N'-[3-(3-(4-Ditrifluoromethylmethyl)phenyl)ureido]benzoyl-N-(2-chloro)nicotinohydrazide (3g): white powder, yield 62.4%, m.p. 196.76~198.1 °C. 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6) δ: 10.64 (s, 2H, -CONHNHCO-), 9.45 (s, 1H, NH), 8.55 (dd, J = 4.8, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 8.24 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 8.22 (s, 1H), 8.02 (s, 1H), 7.99 (dd, J = 7.5, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.69 (dd, J = 7.9, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.58 (dd, J = 7.5, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 7.55 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.43–7.49 (overlap, 3H), 2.35 (s, 3H, -PhCH3). IR (KBr): ν 3254, 3005, 1662, 1613, 1584, 1533, 1401, 1306, 1272, 1218, 1178, 1135, 1106, 977, 888, 811, 754 cm−1.
N'-[3-(3-(2-Trifluoromethyl)phenyl)ureido]benzoyl-N-(2-chloro)nicotinohydrazide (3h): Yellow solid, yield 68.7%, m.p. 199.3~199.6 °C. HR-ESI-MS m/z: 478.0889 [M+H]+ (calcd. for C21H16ClF3N5O3, 478.0888). 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6) δ: 10.66, 10.62 (each s, 1H, -CONHNHCO-), 9.58 (s, 1H, NH), 8.55 (dd, J = 4.8, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 8.13 (s, 1H), 7.94–8.02 (m, overlap, 2H), 7.62–7.72 (m, overlap, 3H), 7.53–7.60 (m, overlap, 2H), 7.434 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.30 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H). IR (KBr): ν 3572, 3435, 3303, 3216, 3083, 3012, 1652, 1590, 1544, 1507, 1453, 1407, 1316, 1279, 1179, 1109, 1059, 1038, 905, 806, 764, 690, 648 cm−1.
N'-[3-(3-(4-Trifluoromethoxyl)phenyl)ureido]benzoyl-N-(2-chloro)nicotinohydrazide (3i): white powder, yield 59.1%, m.p. 233.6~234.4 °C. HR-ESI-MS m/z: 494.0839 [M+H]+ (calcd. for C21H16ClF3N5O4, 494.0837). 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6) δ: 10.67, 10.60 (s, 1H, -CONHNHCO-), 8.99, 8.97 (each s, 1H, -NHCONH-), 8.55 (dd, J = 4.8, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.97–8.02 (m, overlap, 2H), 7.94 (s, 1H), 7.67 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.58 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 7.54 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.43 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.30 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H). IR (KBr): ν 3373, 3299, 3182, 3033, 2929, 2855, 1723, 1660, 1611, 1590, 1507, 1478, 1399, 1279, 1154, 1096, 827, 744, 682, 636 cm−1.
N-[3-(3-(2-Methyl)phenyl)ureido]benzoyl-1-(3-trifluoromethyl)phenyl-2-(4-cyano)phenylethanone hydrazone (4a): White powder, yield 70.0%, m.p. 208.3~208.7 °C. HR-ESI-MS m/z: 556.195 [M+H]+ (calcd for C31H25F3N5O2, 556.1955). 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6) δ: 11.34 (s, 1H, PhCONH-), 9.24 (s, 1H, ‑NHCONH-), 8.17 (s, 1H), 8.07 (s, 1H), 7.96 (s, 1H), 7.91 (s, 1H), 7.83 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.77 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.73 (s, 1H), 7.55–7.70 (overlap, 2H), 7.38–7.45 (overlap, 3H), 7.34 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.12–7.22 (overlap, 2H), 6.96 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 4.60 (s, 2H, -CH2-), 2.24 (s, 3H, -CH3). IR (KBr):ν 3336, 3307, 3216, 3050, 2958, 2229, 1652, 1590, 1548, 1486, 1432, 1349, 1258, 1171, 1117, 1080, 893, 764, 702, 644, 545 cm−1.
N-[3-(3-(2-Fluoro)phenyl)ureido]benzoyl-1-(3-trifluoromethyl)phenyl-2-(4-cyano)phenylethanone hydrazone (4b): White powder, yield 63.4%, m.p. 239.0~239.6 °C. HR-ESI-MS m/z: 560.1706 [M+H]+ (calcd for C30H22F3N5O2, 560.1704). 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6) δ: 11.34 (s, 1H, PhCONH-), 9.27, 8.59 (each s, 1H, -NHCONH-), 8.15 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 8.07 (s, 1H), 7.92 (s, 1H), 7.77 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.72 (s, 1H), 7.63 (s, 2H), 7.35–7.45 (m, overlap, 4H), 7.25 (dd, J = 10.7, 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.15 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.01 (dd, J = 12.6, 6.2 Hz, 1H), 4.60 (s, 2H, -CH2-). IR (KBr): ν 3328, 3257, 3104, 2925, 2224, 1723, 1669, 1590, 1544, 1519, 1436, 1295, 1129, 1071, 752, 694, 553 cm−1.
N-[3-(3-(2,4-Difluoro)phenyl)ureido]benzoyl-1-(3-trifluoromethyl)phenyl-2-(4-cyano)phenylethanone hydrazone (4c): White powder, yield 67.5%, m.p. 243.6~243.7 °C. HR-ESI-MS m/z: 578.1612 [M+H]+ (calcd for C30H21F5N5O2, 578.1610).1H-NMR (DMSO-d6) δ: 11.33 (s, 1H, PhCONH-), 9.21, 8.54 (each s, 1H, -NHCONH-), 8.17 (s, 1H), 8.02–8.12 (overlap, 2H), 7.91 (s, 1H), 7.77 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.73 (s, 1H), 7.63 (s, 2H), 7.35–7.45 (overlap, 4H), 7.30 (m, 1H), 7.06 (t, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 4.60 (s, 2H, -CH2-). IR (KBr): ν 3535, 3308, 3257, 3187,2577, 1678, 1565, 1397, 1186, 1131, 1096, 1064, 842, 744, 611 cm−1.
N-[3-(3-(3,4-Difluoro)phenyl)ureido]benzoyl-1-(3-trifluoromethyl)phenyl-2-(4-cyano)phenylethanone hydrazone (4d): White powder, yield 69.6%, m.p. 243.2~243.5 °C. HR-ESI-MS m/z: 578.1606 [M+H]+ (calcd for C30H21F5N5O2, 578.1610). 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6) δ: 11.32 (s, 1H, PhCONH-), 8.96, 8.94 (each s, 1H, -NHCONH-), 8.17 (s, 1H), 8.06 (s, 1H), 7.90 (s, 1H), 7.77 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.73 (s, 1H), 7.59–7.70 (m, overlap, 3H), 7.30–7.45 (m, overlap, 5H), 7.14 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 4.60 (s, 2H, -CH2-). IR (KBr): ν3336, 3316, 3258, 3101, 2226, 1718, 1663, 1593, 1550, 1510, 1432, 1209, 1131, 1072, 1022, 869, 689, 552 cm−1.
N-[3-(3-(3,4-Dichloro)phenyl)ureido]benzoyl-1-(3-trifluoromethyl)phenyl-2-(4-cyano)phenylethanone hydrazone (4e): White powder, yield 72.4%, m.p. 245.4~245.8 °C. HR-ESI-MS m/z: 610.1021 [M+H]+ (calcd. for C30H21Cl2F3N5O2, 610.1019).1H-NMR (DMSO-d6) δ: 11.33 (s, 1H, PhCONH-), 9.07, 9.05 (each s, 1H, -NHCONH-), 8.18 (s, 1H), 8.06 (s, 1H), 7.92 (s, 1H), 7.89 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 7.77 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.73 (s, 1H), 7.64 (s, 2H), 7.52 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.31–7.45 (m, overlap, 5H), 4.60 (s, 2H, -CH2-). IR (KBr): ν 3325, 3299, 3096, 3033, 2228, 1716, 1659, 1590, 1518, 1473, 1430, 1378, 1326, 1289, 1192, 1132, 1069, 854, 811, 745, 691, 545 cm−1.
N-[3-(3-(2,6-Dimethyl)phenyl)ureido]benzoyl-1-(3-trifluoromethyl)phenyl-2-(4-cyano)phenyl ethanone hydrazone (4f): White powder, yield 70.4%, m.p. 240.1~240.3 °C. 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6) δ: 11.31 (s, 1H, PhCONH-), 8.96 (s, 1H, -NHCONH-), 8.16 (s, 1H), 8.06 (s, 1H), 7.91 (s, 1H), 7.77 (s, 1H), 7.75 (s, 1H), 7.73 (s, 1H), 7.56–7.69 (overlap, 2H), 7.39 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.36 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.31 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.05–7.11 (overlap, 3H), 4.58 (s, 2H, -CH2-), 2.20 (s, 6H, -CH3). IR (KBr): ν 3295, 3159, 3004, 2227, 1655, 1640, 1607,1595,,1487, 1342, 1307, 1266, 1241, 1176, 800, 770, 745 cm−1.
N-[3-(3-(3-Trifluoromethyl)phenyl)ureido]benzoyl-1-(3-trifluoromethyl)phenyl-2-(4-cyano)phenyl ethanone hydrazone (4g): White powder, yield 68.7%, m.p. 220.0~221.2 °C. HR-ESI-MS m/z: 610.1669 [M+H]+ (calcd. for C31H22F6N5O2, 610.1672). 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6) δ: 11.33 (s, 1H, PhCONH-), 9.08, 9.01 (each s, 1H, -NHCONH-), 8.18 (s, 1H), 8.07 (s, 1H), 8.03 (s, 1H), 7.93 (s, 1H), 7.77 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.73 (s, 1H), 7.61–7.70 (overlap, 2H), 7.59 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.52 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.35–7.45 (m, overlap, 4H), 7.32 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 4.60 (s, 2H, -CH2-). IR (KBr): ν3336, 3261, 3207, 3093, 2225, 1717, 1663, 1596, 1553, 1514, 1491, 1444, 1330, 1295, 1252, 1197, 1154, 1115, 1068, 869, 795, 752, 693, 670, 552 cm−1.
N-[3-(3-(3-Fluoro)phenyl)ureido]benzoyl-1-(3-trifluoromethyl)phenyl-2-(4-cyano)phenylethanone hydrazone (4h): Yellow powder, yield 62.5%, m.p. 231.7~231.9 °C. HR-ESI-MS m/z: 560.1706 [M+H]+ (calcd. for C30H22F4N5O2, 560.1704). 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6) δ: 11.33 (s, 1H, PhCONH-), 8.94 (s, 2H, -NHCONH-), 8.17, 8.07, 7.91 (each s, 1H), 7.77 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.73, 7.65 (each s, 1H), 7.50 (d, J = 11.8 Hz, 1H), 7.35–7.45 (m, overlap, 4H), 7.31 (dd, J = 15.3, 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.14 (d, J = 7.8 Hz), 6.79 (dt, J = 8.4, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 4.60 (s, 2H, -CH2-). IR (KBr): ν3340, 3311, 3257, 3145, 3100, 2224, 1714, 1664, 1511, 1490, 1436, 1308, 1196, 1071, 1017, 897, 872, 752, 690, 557 cm−1.
N-[3-(3-(3-Bromo)phenyl)ureido]benzoyl-1-(3-trifluoromethyl)phenyl-2-(4-cyano)phenyl ethanone hydrazone (4i): White powder, yield 61.8%, m.p. 232.4~232.8 °C. HR-ESI-MS m/z: 620.0906 [M+H]+(calcd. for C30H22BrF3N5O2, 620.0903).1H-NMR (DMSO-d6) δ: 11.33 (s, 1H, PhCONH-), 8.97, 8.93 (each s, 1H, -NHCONH-), 8.18, 8.07, 7.92 (each s, 1H), 7.86 (s, 1H), 7.77 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.74 (s, 1H), 7.64 (s, 2H), 7.39–7.44 (m, overlap, 3H), 7.37 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.33 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.25 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.16 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 4.60 (s, 2H, -CH2-). IR (KBr): ν3336, 3303, 3265, 3104, 2224, 1723, 1656, 1590, 1536, 1515, 1478, 1428, 1300, 1196, 1129, 1071, 1017, 993, 901, 856, 752, 694, 553 cm−1.

3.6. Bioassay for Insecticidal Activities

Wheat leaf discs (0.5 cm × 0.5 cm) were treated with 5 μL solutions made from 5 mg of test sample dissolved in 500 mL of acetone. Tebufenozide, chlorbenzuron and metaflumizone were used as positive controls and acetone was used as negative control. The third instars larvae of beet armyworm were fed with the discs. Cohorts of 24 beet armyworms were treated each time and bioassays were replicated three times. After 24 h, 48 h and 72 h, the numbers of knocked down larvae (symptoms: the larvae were narcotized, the bodies were very soft and immobilized, and response disappeared completely) were recorded respectively [16,17].
Bioassay for insecticidal activities against cotton bollworm, diamondback moth and cabbage worm was performed according to the above method. The third instars larvae of cotton bollworm, diamondback moth and cabbage worm were fed with the discs instead, respectively. The numbers of knocked down larvae after 72 h were recorded. The experiments showed that the mortality of acetone as negative controls was 0%.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, eighteen phenylurea derivatives 3a3i, 4a4i have been designed and synthesized according to the method of active groups linkage and the principle of aromatic groups bioisosterism. The insecticidal activities of these novel phenylurea derivatives against the third instars larvae of S. exigua, H. armigera, P. xyllostella and P. rapae were evaluated, at a concentration of 10 mg/L. The bioassay results showed that all of the synthesized compounds displayed high insecticidal activity. Most of them presented higher insecticidal activity against S. exigua than the reference compounds tebufenozide, chlorbenzuron and metaflumizone. Among the synthesized compounds, 3b, 3d, 3f, 4b and 4g displayed broad spectrum insecticidal activity. The results above have encouraged us to further explore novel phenylurea derivatives as insecticidal agents and this will be reported in future work.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be accessed at: https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/20/03/5050/s1.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Wheat Innovation Team of Modern Agricultural Industry Technology System of Shandong Province and High Level Talents Fund of Qingdao Agricultural University (No. 6631110).

Author Contributions

Jialong Sun designed the research; Jialong Sun and Yuanming Zhou performed the research and analyzed the data; Yuanming Zhou wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, J.; Tang, X.H.; Ishaaya, I.; Cao, S.; Wu, J.J.; Yu, J.L.; Li, H.; Qian, X.H. Synthesis and insecticidal activity of heptafluoroisopropyl-containing benzoylphenylurea structures. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 2736–2740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Oberlander, H.; Silhacek, D.L. Mode of action of insect growth regulators in lepidopteran tissue culture. Pestic. Sci. 1998, 54, 300–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sun, R.F.; Zhang, Y.L.; Bi, F.C.; Wang, Q.M. Design, synthesis, and bioactivity study of novel benzoylpyridazyl ureas. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 6356–6361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Sun, R.F.; Lu, M.Y.; Chen, L.; Li, Q.S.; Song, H.B.; Bi, F.C.; Huang, R.Q.; Wang, Q.M. Design, synthesis, bioactivity, and structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies of novel benzoylphenylureas containing oxime ether group. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 11376–11391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sun, R.F.; Liu, Y.X.; Zhang, Y.L.; Xiong, L.X.; Wang, Q.M. Design and synthesis of benzoylphenylureas with fluorinated substituents on the aniline ring as insect growth regulators. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 2471–2477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Wing, K.D. RH-5849, a nonsteroidal ecdysone agonist: Effects on adrosophila cell line. Science 1988, 241, 467–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Sun, R.F.; Zhang, Y.L.; Chen, L.; Li, Y.Q.; Li, Q.S.; Song, H.B.; Huang, R.Q.; Bi, F.C.; Wang, Q.M. Design, synthesis, and insecticidal activities of new N-benzoyl-N'-phenyl-N'-sulfenylureas. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 3661–3668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zhao, P.L.; Li, J.; Yang, G.F. Synthesis and insecticidal activity of chromanone and chromone analogues of diacylhydrazines. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2007, 15, 1888–1895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Sawada, Y.; Yanai, T.; Nakagawa, H.; Tsukamoto, Y.; Yokoi, S.; Yanagi, M.; Toya, T.; Sugizaki, H.; Kato, Y.; Shirakura, H.; et al. Synthesis and insecticidal activity of benzoheterocyclic analogues of N'-benzoyl-N-(tert-butyl) benzohydrazide: Part 1. Design of benzoheterocyclic analogues. Pest Manag. Sci. 2003, 59, 25–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Dhadialla, T.S.; Jansson, R.K. Non-steroidal ecdysone agonists: new tools for IPM and insect resistance management. Pestic. Sci. 1999, 55, 357–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, H.; Yang, Z.K.; Fan, Z.J.; Wu, Q.J.; Zhang, Y.J.; Mi, A.; Wang, S.X.; Zhang, Z.C.; Song, H.B.; Liu, F. Synthesis and insecticidal activity of N-tert-butyl-N,N'-diacylhydrazines containing 1,2,3-thiadiazoles. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 628–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Chatterjee, N.S.; Gupta, S.; Varghese, E. Degradation of metaflumizone in soil: Impact of varying moisture, light, temperature, atmospheric CO2 level, soil type and soil sterilization. Chemosphere 2013, 90, 729–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Salgado, V.L.; Hayashi, J.H. Metaflumizone is a novel sodium channel blocker insecticide. Vet. Parasitol. 2007, 150, 182–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hempel, K.; Hess, F.G.; Bogi, C.; Fabian, E.; Hellwig, J.; Fegert, I. Toxicological properties of metaflumizone. Vet. Parasitol. 2007, 150, 190–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Li, Y.Q.; Qin, Y.G.; Yang, N.; Sun, Y.F.; Yang, X.L.; Sun, R.F.; Wang, Q.M.; Ling, Y. Studies on insecticidal activities and action mechanism of novel benzoylphenylurea candidate NK-17. PLoS One 2013, 8, e66251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Mao, C.H.; Wang, Q.M.; Huang, R.Q.; Bi, F.C.; Chen, L.; Liu, Y.X.; Shang, J. Synthesis and insecticidal evaluation of novel N-oxalyl derivatives of tebufenozide. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 6737–6741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Zhang, J.W.; Hu, Z.; Li, S.K.; Wu, W.J. Synthesis and insecticidal activities of new ester-derivatives of Celangulin-V. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12, 9596–9604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  • Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds 3a3i, 4a4i are available from the authors.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, J.; Zhou, Y. Design, Synthesis and Insecticidal Activity of Novel Phenylurea Derivatives. Molecules 2015, 20, 5050-5061. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules20035050

AMA Style

Sun J, Zhou Y. Design, Synthesis and Insecticidal Activity of Novel Phenylurea Derivatives. Molecules. 2015; 20(3):5050-5061. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules20035050

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Jialong, and Yuanming Zhou. 2015. "Design, Synthesis and Insecticidal Activity of Novel Phenylurea Derivatives" Molecules 20, no. 3: 5050-5061. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules20035050

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop