2.1. Components of Chicory
Moisture was significantly higher in the non-pesticide groups compared to the pesticide-treated groups (
Table 1), and among the non-pesticide group, treatment with chemical fertilizer was beneficial for raising the moisture content in the chicory plants. As revealed by two-way ANOVA, the moisture content was affected by the fertilizer treatment as well as the pesticide availability (
Table 2) indicating an interaction between pesticide and fertilizer. The amount of ash content varied, depending on the pesticide availability and fertilizer treatment; however, no interaction between pesticide and fertilizer was observed (
Table 2). Chicory plants treated with chemical as well as eco-developed fertilizer showed significantly higher amount of ash, regardless of pesticide availability. Shier
et al. [
28] reported that conventional farming conditions improve moisture contents compared to organic farming. Shier’s and our results suggests that pesticide and fertilizer have an impact on ash and moisture availability, and moreover among the three different fertilizers tested, chemical fertilizer enhances the ash and moisture contents compared to organic (eco and org) fertilizers.
Table 1.
Moisture and ash composition of chicory.
Table 1.
Moisture and ash composition of chicory.
Groups | Nutrients (g/100 g) |
---|
Moisture | Ash |
---|
NP | eco | 6.51 ± 0.03 b | 16.20 ± 0.31 a,b |
org | 6.97 ± 0.22 b | 15.63 ± 0.09 b |
che | 7.92 ± 0.13 a | 16.70 ± 0.19 a |
LP | eco | 5.43 ± 0.12 ns | 16.77 ± 0.00 x |
org | 5.76 ± 0.07 | 16.26 ± 0.09 y |
che | 5.70 ± 0.16 | 16.77 ± 0.20 x |
Table 2.
ANOVA of Means Square for moisture, ash, phytochemical compound in chicory.
Table 2.
ANOVA of Means Square for moisture, ash, phytochemical compound in chicory.
| Moisture | Ash | Total Polyphenols | Total Flavonoids | Reducing Power | DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity | ABTS+ Radical Scavenging Activity |
---|
Pesticide (P) | 6.78 ** | 0.54 * | 842.69 * | 112.50 ns | 0.051 * | 141.64 ** | 1.79 ns |
Fertilizer (F) | 0.70 ** | 0.66 * | 409.59 * | 26.39 ns | 0.030 * | 147.38 ** | 0.32 ns |
P × F | 0.39 * | 0.10 ns | 1361.58 ** | 3912.5 ** | 0.129 ** | 176.26 ** | 0.2 ns |
2.2. Antioxidant Content (Total Polyphenols and Flavonoids) of Chicory
Pesticide and fertilizer had a direct effect as well as interaction effect on the amount of polyphenols in chicory; indicating that the total polyphenols content depends on the availability of pesticide and the type of fertilizer used. The NP-che group (162.14 mg GAE/g) showed the highest amount of polyphenols, followed by NP-org (127.05 mg GAE/g) and NP-eco (123.19 mg GAE/g). While in the pesticide group, the total polyphenol content was highest in LP-eco (136.88 mg GAE/g), followed by LP-org (118.28 mg GAE/g) and LP-che (116.18 mg GAE/g) (
Figure 1a). Under pesticide-free conditions the total flavonoids content in chicory cultivated with chemical fertilizer [NP-che (276.67 mg QE/g)] was higher compared to eco-developed and organic fertilizer [NP-eco (226.67 mg QE/g) and NP-org (238.33 mg QE/g)]. It was observed that in presence of pesticide, the eco-developed fertilizer yields highest level of flavonoids [LP-eco (258.33 mg QE/g)] (
Figure 1b). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are chemically reactive molecules that damages organs by attacking lipids, proteins, and even DNA under conditions of oxidative stress [
29]. Consumption of leafy vegetables containing high antioxidant averts many chronic diseases by acting as a scavengers and reducing agents that remove free radicals while being oxidized itself and thereby protecting the cells [
30,
31,
32,
33]. Thus vegetable with phenolic compounds advocates its quality. Therefore there is always a quest for devising methods for improving the phenolic content in the vegetables. So far studies for improving phenolic profiles in vegetables using different fertilizer treatment led to different results.
Figure 1.
(a) Total polyphenol content of chicory; (b) Total flavonoid content of chicory. All values are expressed as means ± standard deviation. Values with different letters denotes statistical difference (p < 0.05). Letters a, b are used to denote comparisons within NP groups; letters x, y are used to denote comparisons within LP group. NP: non-pesticide group, LP: low-pesticide group. eco: eco-developed fertilizer, org: organic ferilizer, che: chemical fertilizer.
Figure 1.
(a) Total polyphenol content of chicory; (b) Total flavonoid content of chicory. All values are expressed as means ± standard deviation. Values with different letters denotes statistical difference (p < 0.05). Letters a, b are used to denote comparisons within NP groups; letters x, y are used to denote comparisons within LP group. NP: non-pesticide group, LP: low-pesticide group. eco: eco-developed fertilizer, org: organic ferilizer, che: chemical fertilizer.
Some studies have reported that organic fertilizers had a better impact on plant phenolic composition than chemical fertilizers [
34], while others showed no significant difference in total phenolic content between organic and chemical fertilizer treated groups [
15]. However, some studies have suggested that chemical fertilizers improve the phenolic content [
21,
28]. It was also noticed that pesticide treatment affects the phenolic content of the plant [
35]. As the phenolic compounds in the vegetable are considerably influenced by cultivar, season, and other environmental factors, therefore apart from the types of fertilizers, our results might be also influenced by the availability of pesticides.
2.3. Antioxidant Capacity of Chicory
We measured the reducing power and free radical quenching capacity of chicory by measuring the quenching of DPPH and ABTS
+ radicals. The two-way ANOVA showed significant results, indicating that both the fertilizers and pesticide had a direct and an interaction effect (P × F) on the reducing power and DPPH radical scavenging activity. The reducing power of extracts from chicory grown in the absence of pesticide showed results conflicting to that of extracts from chicory grown in pesticide-treated soil (
Figure 2a). In absence of pesticide, chemical fertilizer-treated group (NP-che) showed the highest reducing power. However, in the presence of pesticide, plants treated with eco-developed fertilizer (LP-eco) gave the highest reducing power. Moreover, this matched the levels of total polyphenols and flavonoids.
Figure 2.
(a) Reducing power of chicory; (b) DPPH radical scavenging activity. All values are expressed as means ± standard deviation. Values with different letters denote statistical differences (p < 0.05). Letters a–c are used to denote comparisons within NP groups; letters x–z are used to denote comparisons within LP group. NP: non-pesticide group, LP: low-pesticide group. eco: eco-developed fertilizer, org: organic fertilizer, che: chemical fertilizer. Sample concentration: 1 mg∙mL−1.
Figure 2.
(a) Reducing power of chicory; (b) DPPH radical scavenging activity. All values are expressed as means ± standard deviation. Values with different letters denote statistical differences (p < 0.05). Letters a–c are used to denote comparisons within NP groups; letters x–z are used to denote comparisons within LP group. NP: non-pesticide group, LP: low-pesticide group. eco: eco-developed fertilizer, org: organic fertilizer, che: chemical fertilizer. Sample concentration: 1 mg∙mL−1.
Higher DPPH radical scavenging activity (
Figure 2b) was observed in the chicory cultivated with chemical fertilizer without pesticide (NP-che: 61.63%). Extracts of chicory grown in pesticide-treated soil with eco-developed fertilizer followed by chemical fertilizer (LP-eco: 48.47% and LP-che: 51.67%) had higher DPPH radical scavenging activity compared to organic fertilizer. We thus observed that the DPPH radical scavenging activity was influenced by pesticide and/or fertilizer. Even though there was no significant direct or interaction effect, it was worth noting that the ABTS
+ radical scavenging activity of chicory extracts was similar to that of Trolox which was used as a positive control (
Table 3).
Some of the phenolics in chicory may act as antioxidants, and the antioxidant capacity of these phenolics is due to the hydrogen donating ability of hydroxyl groups in their structure [
32]. These hydroxyl groups reduce radicals, therefore higher phenolics lead to higher antioxidant capacity [
36]. Our data agree with the Velioglu
et al. study [
37] in which they reported that total phenolic and antioxidant activities are strongly associated each other. Accordingly, higher content of antioxidants was observed in chicory cultivated with chemical fertilizer in the absence of pesticide or grown using eco-developed fertilizer in presence of pesticide promoted raise in the antioxidants such as total polyphenols and flavonoids leading to higher antioxidant activities in these groups.
Table 3.
ABTS+ radical scavenging activity, total carotenoids and vitamins in chicory.
Table 3.
ABTS+ radical scavenging activity, total carotenoids and vitamins in chicory.
Groups | ABTS+ Radical Scavenging Activity (%) | Total Carotenoids (mg/100 g) | Vitamin C (mg/100 g) | Folic Acid (mg/100 g) |
---|
NP | eco | 98.84 ± 0.20 ns | 120.37 ± 5.46 a | 98.34 ± 12.42 ns | 110.03 ± 15.07 ns |
org | 98.69 ± 0.23 | 114.97 ± 12.0 b | 98.15 ± 3.76 | 103.23 ± 6.99 |
che | 98.46 ± 0.07 | 84.49 ± 6.00 c | 96.89 ± 1.72 | 98.70 ± 24.03 |
LP | eco | 98.37 ± 0.34 ns | 108.02 ± 2.18 x | 664.25 ± 25.92 ns | 119.06 ± 15.88 ns |
org | 97.64 ± 1.56 | 90.28 ± 0.00 y | 666.46 ± 2.23 | 105.51 ± 11.87 |
che | 98.08 ± 0.33 | 81.79 ± 0.00 z | 634.10 ± 42.76 | 79.52 ± 18.52 |
2.4. Total Carotenoids and Vitamins of Chicory
The total carotenoids and Vitamin C levels are shown in
Table 3. The levels of total carotenoids were significantly higher in extracts of chicory grown with eco-developed fertilizer in the presence or absence of pesticide. The results for total carotenoids by two-way ANOVA showed significant effects of pesticide and fertilizer (
Table 4) however no interaction between pesticide and fertilizer was observed for the outcome of total carotenoids, thus indicating that total carotenoid content differs depending on the addition of pesticide and the three different types of fertilizer but not on the interaction between pesticide and fertilizer. The levels of ascorbic acid were not changed by the types of fertilizer but were changed significantly with pesticide treatment (
Table 4) as an about six-fold increase in vitamin C was observed in the pesticide group compared to the non-pesticide treated group. Plants synthesis vitamin C in response to chemical induced stress, one study showed that potato tubers treated with pesticide had higher level of vitamin C than control in order to cope the pesticide induced stress [
38]. Therefore in this study also chicory plant cultivated in presence of pesticide to combat the pesticide induced stress, which was not observed as a result of fertilizer treatment. There was no significant difference observed in the folic acid levels among the groups; however, the folic acid level was higher in the eco-developed fertilizer group, irrespective of pesticide (
Table 3) regardless of the presence or absence of pesticide.
Table 4.
ANOVA of means square for total carotenoids, vitamins, HepG2 cells viability, weight and length in chicory.
Table 4.
ANOVA of means square for total carotenoids, vitamins, HepG2 cells viability, weight and length in chicory.
| Total Carotenoids | Vitamin C | Folic Acid | HepG2 Cells Viability | Weight | Length |
---|
Pesticide (P) | 526.36 * | 1396831.35 ** | 189767.55 ** | 118.76 ns | 12012.50 ** | 174.22 ** |
Fertilizer (F) | 985.39 * | 532.98 ns | 30.94 ns | 769.34 ** | 938.29 ns | 20.22 ns |
P × F | 121.51 ns | 449.21 ns | 983.45 ns | 342.27 * | 281.17 ns | 0.89 ns |
2.5. Weights and Length of Chicory
The weight and length of the chicory plant is shown in
Table 5. There was no significant difference observed in the weight or length of chicory plant with respect to fertilizer treatments. However, it was noticed that, the growth of the plant was influenced by the availability of pesticide (
Table 4) while no interaction between pesticide and fertilizer was observed. The size of the chicory plant without pesticide treatment was smaller, whereas the size of the chicory plant grown with pesticide was bigger.
Ascorbic acid plays an important role not only as an antioxidant, but also in growth and development. Rashida
et al. [
39] and Esteban
et al. [
40] reported that ascorbic acid significantly increased along with fruit growth and development regardless of cultivars. As we observed that pesticide influenced the Vitamin C level, therefore it could be possible that high level of vitamin C might triggered the growth of the plant in response of the chemical stress induced by the pesticide [
38,
41,
42,
43].
Table 5.
Weight and length of chicory.
Table 5.
Weight and length of chicory.
Groups | Weight (g) | Length (cm) |
---|
NP | eco | 58.33 ± 22.68 ns | 45.67 ± 4.93 ns |
org | 70.67 ± 2.52 | 49.00 ± 3.00 |
che | 69.67 ± 7.77 | 69.67 ± 1.53 |
LP | eco | 100.33 ± 0.12 ns | 52.33 ± 2.52 ns |
org | 138.00 ± 22.72 | 55.67 ± 1.15 |
che | 115.33 ± 6.03 | 52.00 ± 2.65 |
2.6. Inhibitory Effect of Chicory on HepG2 Cells
The human hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2) inhibitory effect of chicory was investigated
in vitro using HepG2 cells (
Figure 3). The HepG2 cells were cultured for 24 h with extracts from chicory grown with different types of fertilizers in the presence or absence of pesticide. The direct effects of pesticide and fertilizer on HepG2 cells viability were significant, but no interaction was observed. The eco-developed fertilizer had an obvious inhibitory effect on HepG2 cells, both in the absence and presence of pesticide; however, the group with low pesticide and organic fertilizer also had a marked effect on the inhibition of HepG2 cell growth. In the absence of pesticide, the inhibition rate of NP-eco compared with the control was 28.91% while for LP-eco and LP- org it was 55.37% and 44.22% respectively.
These results indicate that the eco-developed fertilizer had a potent anti-proliferative effect against HepG2 cell. One of the reasons for the inhibitory effect could be due to content of carotenoids and vitamin C. It has been reported that carotenoids, a natural fat-soluble pigments that have isoprenoid polyenes, are effective against cancer development and act as chemopreventive agents [
44]. Moreover, vitamin C is well known for its antioxidant activity, which is correlated with reduced risk of cancer development. However, the anticancer activity does not result for a single effect, but combined effects of several components found in vegetables and fruits [
45]. Therefore, carotenoids and vitamin C could potentially inhibit cell growth by enhancing levels of antioxidants and the clearance of ROS in cancer cells.
Figure 3.
Viability of HepG2 cells cultured with different chicory extracts for 24 h. All values are expressed as means ± standard deviation. Values with different letters denote statistical difference (p < 0.05). Letters a–d are used to denote comparisons within NP groups; letter x–z is used to denote comparisons within LP group. NP: non-pesticide group, LP: low-pesticide group. eco: eco-developed fertilizer, org: organic fertilizer, che: chemical fertilizer. Sample concentration: 1 mg∙mL−1.
Figure 3.
Viability of HepG2 cells cultured with different chicory extracts for 24 h. All values are expressed as means ± standard deviation. Values with different letters denote statistical difference (p < 0.05). Letters a–d are used to denote comparisons within NP groups; letter x–z is used to denote comparisons within LP group. NP: non-pesticide group, LP: low-pesticide group. eco: eco-developed fertilizer, org: organic fertilizer, che: chemical fertilizer. Sample concentration: 1 mg∙mL−1.