Next Article in Journal
Oral Intake of Carboxymethyl-Glucan (CM-G) from Yeast (Saccharomyces uvarum) Reduces Malondialdehyde Levels in Healthy Men
Next Article in Special Issue
Preparation of Thermo-Responsive Poly(ionic liquid)s-Based Nanogels via One-Step Cross-Linking Copolymerization
Previous Article in Journal
A Combined Molecular Docking/Dynamics Approach to Probe the Binding Mode of Cancer Drugs with Cytochrome P450 3A4
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Eco-Friendly Synthesis of a New Class of Pyridinium-Based Ionic Liquids with Attractive Antimicrobial Activity

Department of Chemistry, Taibah University, Al-Madina Al-Mounawara 30002, Saudi Arabia
Molecules 2015, 20(8), 14936-14949; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules200814936
Submission received: 16 June 2015 / Revised: 30 July 2015 / Accepted: 5 August 2015 / Published: 14 August 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ionic Liquids in Organic Synthesis)

Abstract

:
The present study reports a green synthesis of a new family of ionic liquids (ILs) based on functionalized 4-dimethylaminopyridinium derivatives. The structures of 23 newly synthesized ILs (224) were confirmed by FT-IR, 1H-, 13C-, 11B-, 19F-, and 31P-NMR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry. The antimicrobial activity of all novel ILs was tested against a panel of bacteria and fungi. The results prove that all tested ILs are effective antibacterial and antifungal agents, especially 4-(dimethylamino)-1-(4-phenoxybutyl)pyridinium derivatives 5 and 19.

1. Introduction

Ionic liquids (ILs) have received increased attention in recent years due to their outstanding and unique properties, such as negligible vapor pressure, non-volatility, non-flammability, excellent thermal stability, and high electrical conductivity [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. Generally, ILs are defined as organic salts with a melting point below 100 °C that contain an organic cation combined with various anions, such as halides or fluorinated anions [8]. An extensive range of applications of ILs has been reported based on the above-cited characteristics. For example, as an alternative solvent of volatile organic compounds [9,10], as media for the electrodeposition of metals [11], catalysts and biocatalysts [12,13,14], potential corrosion inhibitors [15,16], and in food chemical science [17]. Additionally, the antimicrobial activity of various families of ILs against both environmental and clinically important microorganisms has been studied by different research groups [18,19].
In our previous research, we investigated green procedures, including microwave and ultrasound irradiation, to provide a clean synthesis of ILs compared with their conventional preparation. The reduction in reaction times and the increase in the product yields were the most important advantages from using these eco-friendly technologies [20,21].
Continuing our interest in the design and synthesis of potential antimicrobial agents based on ionic liquids [22,23], we herein present an interesting preparation of a new series of ILs based on 4-(dimethylamino)pyridinium derivatives. All newly-synthesized ILs were screened for their antibacterial and antifungal activity against eight pathogenic strains.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Chemistry

ILs 224 were synthesized under ultrasound irradiation, as shown in Scheme 1 and Scheme 2.
Scheme 1. N-alkylation of 4-dimethylaminopyridine under ultrasonic irradiation conditions. RX/toluene, 80 °C, 5 h. R = –(CH2)2OH for 1; –(CH2)3OH for 2; –(CH2)2OCH3 for 3; –(CH2)2OCH2CH3 for 4; –(CH2)4OPh for 5; –(CH2)3CN for 6; X = Cl, Br.
Scheme 1. N-alkylation of 4-dimethylaminopyridine under ultrasonic irradiation conditions. RX/toluene, 80 °C, 5 h. R = –(CH2)2OH for 1; –(CH2)3OH for 2; –(CH2)2OCH3 for 3; –(CH2)2OCH2CH3 for 4; –(CH2)4OPh for 5; –(CH2)3CN for 6; X = Cl, Br.
Molecules 20 14936 g001
Scheme 2. Anion metathesis under ultrasonic irradiation conditions (US): MY, dichloromethane, 70 °C, 45 min. M = Na, K.
Scheme 2. Anion metathesis under ultrasonic irradiation conditions (US): MY, dichloromethane, 70 °C, 45 min. M = Na, K.
Molecules 20 14936 g002
To the best of our knowledge, all are novel ILs except 4-(dimethylamino)-1-(2-hydroxyethyl)pyridinium bromide 1 [24]. Initially, the nucleophilic alkylation of 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) with various functionalized alkyl halides in toluene was carried out under ultrasound irradiation for 5 h at 80 °C, and afforded the desired ILs 16 in 79%–85% yield as solids (Table 1).
Table 1. Alkylation and anion metathesis using ultrasound irradiation.
Table 1. Alkylation and anion metathesis using ultrasound irradiation.
Ionic LiquidRXYield (%) for the N-Alkylation aMYYield (%) for the Anion Metathesis b
1HO(CH2)2Br82
7 NaBF497
8 KPF698
9 NaOOCCF396
2HO(CH2)3Br85
10 NaBF497
11 KPF699
12 NaOOCCF397
3CH3O(CH2)2Br81
13 NaBF494
14 KPF692
15 NaOOCCF394
4CH3CH2O(CH2)2Cl79 94
16 NaBF493
17 KPF695
18 NaOOCCF392
5PhO(CH2)4Br83 93
19 NaBF494
20 KPF694
21 NaOOCCF393
6NC(CH2)3Cl78
22 NaBF492
23 KPF693
24 NaOOCCF392
a Time (5 h), temperature (80 °C) in toluene; b Time (45 min), temperature (70 °C) in dichloromethane.
In the second step, three fluorine-containing anions were introduced to obtain low melting point ILs. This metathesis reaction consisted of a halide anion exchange using sodium tetrafluoroborate, potassium hexafluorophosphate or sodium trifluoroacetate under ultrasonic irradiation (Scheme 2).
The desired ionic liquids 724 were synthesized by reacting the mixture of 4-dimethylaminopyridinium ILs 16 and different metal salts in a closed vessel exposed to ultrasound irradiation for 45 min at 70 °C. The excellent yields for this step are summarized in Table 1.
The structures of ILs 16 were confirmed by 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, FT-IR, and LCMS. The 1H-NMR spectrum contained a singlet around δH 3.20 ppm corresponding to the six protons for N(CH3)2. The protons of the different methylene groups (CH2) of all the ILs were observed at their usual chemical shifts. In addition, the signals of the pyridinium protons appeared as two doublets around δH 7 and 8 ppm. For IL 5, more aromatic protons for the phenyl group were observed as a multiplet at δH 6.89–6.93 ppm. It is also important to note the disappearance of the singlet around δH 5.1 ppm for the OH proton in the spectra of ILs 1 and 2, as the NMR solvent was D2O.
All of the 13C-NMR spectra of ILs 16 showed the CH2 and CH3 signals at their usual chemical shifts. For example, the signals for the N(CH3)2, (OCH2), and (NCH2) carbons of IL 2 appeared at δC 39.6, 54.6, and 57.9 ppm, respectively. Furthermore, the aromatic carbons and the C=N gave signals between δC 107–158 ppm.
The IR spectra of ILs 1 and 2 showed a major absorption band at 3213 cm−1, indicating the presence of hydroxyl group (OH). In addition, the FT-IR spectra of ILs 15 contained peaks around 1160 cm−1, which is consistent with the presence of a C–O bond belonging to an ether or hydroxyl group. To support the NMR evidence, the band at 2247 cm−1 (characteristic of a cyano group), clearly confirms the structure of IL 6.
The structures of ILs 724 were also fully characterized. The 1H- and 13C-NMR spectra were essentially the same as those recorded for the parent ILs 16, and the 11B-, 19F-, and 31P-NMR were also recorded to confirm the success of the metathesis reactions for these compounds. All peaks related to B or F in BF4 appeared around δB −1 ppm and δF −148 ppm. The 31P-NMR and 19F-NMR spectra contained a septuplet at δP −131 to −157 ppm related to PF6, and a doublet around δF −69 to −71 ppm related to PF6. Finally, the presence of CF3COO was also confirmed by the 19F NMR, and gave a peak around δF −73 ppm.

2.2. Antimicrobial Activity

As mentioned, one of the aims of the current work was to test the antibacterial and antifungal activities of all newly-synthesized ILs. ILs 124 were screened in vitro for their antibacterial activity against a panel of bacteria and fungi. These were two Gram-positive bacteria (Streptococcus pneumonia and Bacillus subtilis) and two Gram-negative bacteria (Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli) using an agar diffusion method with Mueller-Hinton agar medium for the bacteria [25]. The ILs 124 were also screened against four fungal strains (Aspergillus fumigates, Syncephalastrum racemosum, Geotrichum candidum, and Candida albicans) using an agar diffusion method with Sabouraud’s agar medium for the fungi [26].
The mean values for inhibition zone diameter summarized in Table 2 show that, except IL 4, 710 and 2224, which did not show any antimicrobial activity against all the tested bacterial and fungal strains, all ILs displayed good to excellent antibacterial activities against the growth of all selected bacteria compared with the standards Amphotericin B, ampicillin and Gentamicin.
Table 2. Antimicrobial activities (inhibition zone; diameter in mm) of ILs 124 against four fungi and four bacteria.
Table 2. Antimicrobial activities (inhibition zone; diameter in mm) of ILs 124 against four fungi and four bacteria.
CompdAntifungal Activity Antibacterial Activity
A. fumigatusS. racemosumG. candidumC. albicansS. pneumoniaeB. subtilisP. aeruginosaE. coli
111.913.214.411.611.213.615.816.2
219.320.417.715.616.518.715.218.4
312.213.113.910.811.612.310.110.9
4NANANANANANANANA
523.422.328.126.323.227.422.323.2
611.112.112.910.312.412.910.211.9
7NANANANANANANANA
8NANANANANANANANA
9NANANANANANANANA
10NANANANANANANANA
1114.315.917.313.118.320.114.616.2
1221.320.222.119.620.421.317.320.6
1318.319.618.217.318.119.615.217.3
1416.317.819.216.717.418.317.220.9
15NANANANANANANANA
1618.319.321.215.718.419.216.717.3
1716.318.219.414.617.318.215.314.6
1818.219.615.613.914.516.213.316.5
1924.223.329.227.324.628.324.224.9
2016.318.220.114.319.320.416.220.3
2115.316.919.213.418.216.815.917.5
22NANANANANANANANA
23NANANANANANANANA
24NANANANANANANANA
Amphotericin B20.417.326.322.0------------
Ampicillin------------20.826.7------
Gentamicin------------------16.118.3
The results also clearly reveal that S. racemosum and P. aeruginosa are susceptible to the action of all tested ILs. Furthermore, IL 5 (4-(dimethylamino)-1-(4-phenoxybutyl)pyridinium bromide) and IL 19 (4-(dimethylamino)-1-(4-phenoxybutyl)pyridinium tetrafluoroborate) exhibited spectacular antibacterial activities against all tested microorganisms at a concentration of 1 mg/mL.

Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)

Based on the excellent results obtained in the inhibition zone test, it seemed appropriate to evaluate the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC), which is the highest dilution of the compound that shows a clear fluid with no development of turbidity. For this, eight ILs were selected based on their activity, and the results are summarized in Table 3.
Table 3. Antimicrobial activity expressed as MIC (μg/mL).
Table 3. Antimicrobial activity expressed as MIC (μg/mL).
CompdAntifungal Activity Antibacterial Activity
A. fumigatus S. racemosum G. candidum C. albicans S. pneumoniae B. subtilis P. aeruginosa E. coli
23.93.97.8131.2515.633.962.57.81
50.980.980.240.490.980.491.950.98
121.953.90.983.93.91.9515.631.95
137.813.97.8115.637.813.912515.63
1431.257.813.915.6315.637.8115.631.95
167.813.91.9562.57.810.4931.257.81
190.490.980.490.490.490.240.490.24
2031.257.813.91253.93.931.253.9
Amphotericin B3.915.630.490.98------------
Ampicillin------------3.90.49------
Gentamicin------------------31.257.81
From the MIC values obtained, all compounds exhibited antibacterial activity of varying degrees as well as spectrum. In general and as expected, all tested ILs (2, 5, 12, 13, 14, 16, 19, and 20) possessed similar antibacterial activities.
IL 5 (4-(dimethylamino)-1-(4-phenoxybutyl)pyridinium bromide) and IL 19 (4-(dimethylamino)-1-(4-phenoxybutyl)pyridinium tetrafluoroborate) exhibited particularly impressive antimicrobial activities in the series against all tested bacteria and fungi, with MIC values significantly lower than those of the standard controls. The excellent antibacterial activity of ILs 5 and 19 confirm our recently published results and allows us to unambiguously attribute this to the presence of the butylphenoxy group [20].
However, in this case, exchanging the halides (Br or Cl) with fluorinated anions (BF4, PF6 or CF3CO2) did not cause any obvious trends in the activity, and different activities were observed depending on the bacteria or fungi and the ionic liquid tested.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Apparatus

All new compounds were characterized by 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR and IR spectroscopy, and LCMS. 1H-NMR (400 MHz) and 13C-NMR (100 MHz) spectra were measured in DMSO and D2O at room temperature. Chemical shifts (δ) were reported in ppm, with tetramethylsilane (TMS) as an internal standard (Bruker, Faellanden, Switzerland). The LCMS spectra were measured with a Micromass LCT mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn Germany). IR spectra were recorded on a KBr disc with a Shimadzu 8201 PC FT-IR spectrophotometer (νmax in cm−1) (Shimadzu Scientific Instruments INC, Canby, OR, USA). The elemental analyses were given by using the 2400 Series II CHNS/O Elemental Analyzer (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA). Ultrasound-assisted reactions were performed with a high-intensity ultrasonic processor SUB Aqua 5 Plus-Grant with a temperature controller (750 W), microprocessor controlled-2004. The ultrasonic frequency of the cleaning bath used is 25 KHz (Grant Scientific, Cambridgeshire, UK).

3.2. Synthesis

General procedures for the synthesis of imidazolium halides (16). To a solution of 4-dimethylaminopyridine (2 g, 0.0163 mol) in 20 mL of toluene, was added the appropriate alkyl halide (1.1 eq) at room temperature. The mixture was placed in a closed vessel and exposed to ultrasound irradiation for 5 h at 80 °C using a sonication bath. The completion of the reaction was marked by the separation of oil or a solid from the initially obtained clear and homogenous mixture of 4-dimethylaminopyridine and alkyl halide in toluene. The product was isolated by extraction or filtration to remove the unreacted starting materials and solvent. Subsequently, the pyridinium IL was washed with (3 × 20 mL) of ethyl acetate followed by drying under reduced pressure.
General procedure for the methathesis reaction of (16) leading to compounds (724) under ultrasound irradiation. The quaternary salt (0.3 g, 1 eq) was dissolved in in 10 mL of dichloromethane to obtain a clear solution. To this was added (1 eq) of sodium tetrafluoroborate, potassium hexafluorophosphate or sodium trifluoroacetate. The mixture were placed in a closed vessel and exposed to irradiation for 45 min at 70 °C using a sonication bath. The cooled reaction mixture was filtered through Celite to remove the solid metal halide. Evaporation of the dichloromethane quantitatively afforded the desired ionic liquids.

3.3. Characterization

4-(Dimethylamino)-1-(2-hydroxyethyl)pyridinium bromide (1). This compound was obtained as white solid (3.26 g); mp 148–150 °C, 1H-NMR (D2O, 400 MHz,): δ = 3.20 (s, 6H), 3.94 (t, 2H), 4.24 (t, 2H), 6.90 (d, 2Ar-H), 8.01 (d, 2Ar-H); 13C-NMR (D2O, 100 MHz,): δ = 39.5 (2CH3), 59.3 (CH2), 60.5 (CH2), 107.6 (CH), 141.7 (CH), 156.6 (C); IR (KBr) νmax 3213 (O–H), 3161 (C–H, sp2), 1566 (C=C), 1161 (C–N), 1157 (C–O), LCMS (M-Br) 167.2 found for C9H15N2O+; (Found: C, 43.66%; H, 6.05%; N, 11.40%. Calc. for C9H15BrN2O (247.13); C, 43.74%; H, 6.12%; N, 11.34%).
4-(Dimethylamino)-1-(3-hydroxypropyl)pyridinium bromide (2). This compound was obtained as white solid (3.63 g); mp 112–114 °C, 1H-NMR (D2O, 400 MHz,): δ = 2.09 (quintet, 3H), 3.20 (s, 6H), 3.62 (t, 2H), 4.24 (t, 2H), 6.89 (d, 2H), 8.03 (d, 2H); 13C-NMR (D2O, 100 MHz,): δ = 32.3 (CH2), 39.6 (2CH3), 54.6 (CH2), 57.9 (CH2), 107.7 (CH), 141.6 (CH), 156.4 (C); IR (KBr) νmax 3212 (O–H), 3160 (C–H, sp2), 1565 (C‚C), 1163 (C–N), 1158 (C–O); LCMS (M-Br) 181.2 found for C10H17N2O+; (Found: C, 46.04%; H, 6.49%; N, 10.68%. Calc. for C10H17BrN2O (261.16); C, 45.99%; H, 6.56%; N, 10.73%).
4-(Dimethylamino)-1-(2-methoxyethyl)pyridinium bromide (3). This compound was obtained as white solid (3.46 g); mp 184–186 °C, 1H-NMR (DMSO, 400 MHz,): δ = 1.11 (t, 3H), 3.25 (s, 3H), 3.67 (t, 2H), 3.87 (t, 2H), 4.29 (t, 2H), 6.88 (d, 2H), 8.00 (d, 2H); 13C-NMR (DMSO, 100 MHz,): δ = 39.6 (2CH3), 56.2 (CH2), 58.1 (CH3) 70.4 (CH2), 107.3 (CH), 142.2 (CH), 155.9 (C); ); IR (KBr) νmax 3159 (C–H, sp2), 1563 (C=C), 1161 (C–N), 1156 (C–O); LCMS (M-Br) 181.2 found for C10H17N2O+; (Found: C, 45.91%; H, 6.51%; N, 10.80%. Calc. for C10H17BrN2O (261.16); C, 45.99%; H, 6.56%; N, 10.73%).
4-(Dimethylamino)-1-(2-ethoxyethyl)pyridinium chloride (4). This compound was obtained as brown solid; mp >280 °C (decomp) (2.98 g); 1H-NMR (D2O, 400 MHz,): δ = 3.17 (s, 3H), 3.20 (s, 6H), 3.55 (q, 2H), 4.34 (t, 2H), 7.00 (d, 2H), 8.20 (d, 2H); 13C-NMR (D2O, 100 MHz,): δ = 14.1 (CH3), 39.5 (2CH3), 56.9 (CH2), 66.8 (CH2), 68.4 (CH2), 107.5 (CH), 141.7 (CH), 156.5 (C); ); IR (KBr) νmax 3160 (C–H, sp2), 1565 (C=C), 1163 (C–N), 1158 (C–O); LCMS (M-Cl) 195.3 found for C11H19N2+; (Found: C, 57.19%; H, 8.35%; N, 12.22%. Calc. for C11H19ClN2O (230.73); C, 57.26%; H, 8.30%; N, 12.14%).
4-(Dimethylamino)-1-(4-phenoxybutyl)pyridinium bromide (5). This compound was obtained as brown solid (4.77 g); mp 98–100 °C, 1H-NMR (DMSO, 400 MHz,): δ = 1.68 (quintet, 2H), 1.93 (quintet, 2H), 3.218 (s, 6H), 3.98 (t, 2H), 4.29 (t, 2H), 6.89–6.93 (m, 5Ar-H 7.05 (d, 2Ar-H), 8.40 (d, 2Ar-H); 13C-NMR (DMSO, 100 MHz,): δ = 25.2 (CH2), 27.2 (CH2), 39.7 (2CH3), 56.2 (CH2), 66.6 (CH2), 107.5 (CH), 114.4 (CH), 120.5 (CH), 129.4 (CH), 142.0 (CH), 155.8 (C), 158.4 (C); IR (KBr) νmax 3131 (C–H Ar), 1599–1469 (C=C), 1166 (C–N), 1079 (C–O) cm−1; LCMS (M-Br) 271.4 found for C17H23N2O+; (Found: C, 58.07%; H, 6.54%; N, 8.04%. Calc. for C17H23BrN2O (351.28); C, 58.12%; H, 6.60%; N, 7.97%).
1-(3-Cyanopropyl)-4-(dimethylamino)pyridinium chloride (6). This compound was obtained as white solid; mp 78–80 °C (2.88 g), 1H-NMR (D2O, 400 MHz,): δ = 2.25 (quintet, 2H), 2.61 (t, 2H), 3.22 (s, 6H), 4.27 (t, 2H), 6.92 (d, 2Ar-H), 8.06 (d, 2Ar-H); 13C-NMR (D2O, 100 MHz,): δ = 13.7 (CH2), 25.7 (CH2), 39.5 (2CH3), 56.1 (CH2), 107.9 (CH), 120.4 (C), 141.4 (CH), 156.6 (C); IR (KBr) νmax 3131 (C–H Ar), 2247 (C–N), 1597–1471 (C=C), 1169 (C–N)cm−1; LCMS (M-Cl) 190.2 found for C11H16N3+; (Found: C, 58.46%; H, 7.06%; N, 18.71%. Calc. for C11H16ClN3 (225.72); C, 58.53%; H, 7.145%; N, 18.62%).
4-(Dimethylamino)-1-(2-hydroxyethyl)pyridinium tetrafluoroborate (7). This compound was obtained as yellow solid; mp 62–63 °C (0.29 g), 1H-NMR (DMSO, 400 MHz,): δ = 3.18 (s, 6H), 3.71 (m, 2H), 4.24 (t, 2H), 5.09 (s, 1H), 7.02 (d, 2Ar-H), 8.25 (d, 2Ar-H); 13C-NMR (DMSO, 100 MHz,): δ = 39.7 (2CH3), 58.9 (CH2), 60.0 (CH2), 107.3 (CH), 142.4 (CH), 155.9 (C); 19F-NMR (DMSO, 376.5 MHz): δ = −148.30; 11B-NMR (DMSO, 128 MHz): δ = −1.27; IR (KBr) νmax 3214 (O–H), 3162 (C–H, sp2), 1568 (C=C), 1162 (C–N), LCMS (M-Br) 167.2 found for C9H15N2O+; (Found: C, 42.63%; H, 6.03%; N, 10.94%. Calc. for C9H15BF4N2O (254.03); C, 42.55%; H, 5.95%; N, 11.03%).
4-(Dimethylamino)-1-(2-hydroxyethyl)pyridinium hexafluorophosphate (8). This compound was obtained as white solid; mp 66–68 °C (0.37 g), 1H-NMR (DMSO, 400 MHz,): δ = 3.18 (s, 6H), 3.71 (m, 2H), 4.24 (t, 2H), 5.09 (s, 1H), 7.02 (d, 2Ar-H), 8.25 (d, 2Ar-H); 13C-NMR (DMSO, 100 MHz,): δ = 39.7 (2CH3), 58.9 (CH2), 60.0 (CH2), 107.3 (CH), 142.4 (CH), 155.9 (C); 19F-NMR (DMSO, 376.5 MHz): δ = −71.11, −69.18 (d); 31P-NMR (DMSO, 162 MHz): δ = −157.34–−130.99 (sept); IR (KBr) νmax 3210 (O–H), 3159 (C–H, sp2), 1563 (C=C), 1160 (C–N), LCMS (M-PF6) 167.2 found for C9H15N2O+; (Found: C, 34.55%; H, 4.76%; N, 9.04%. Calc. for C9H15F6N2OP (312.19); C, 34.62%; H, 4.84%; N, 8.97%).
4-(Dimethylamino)-1-(2-hydroxyethyl)pyridinium trifluoroacetate (9). This compound was obtained as white solid; mp 86–88 °C (0.32 g), 1H-NMR (DMSO, 400 MHz,): δ = 3.19 (s, 6H), 3.73 (m, 2H), 4.24 (t, 2H), 5.23 (s, 1H), 7.04 (d, 2Ar-H), 8.26 (d, 2Ar-H); 13C-NMR (DMSO, 100 MHz,): δ = 39.6 (2CH3), 59.0 (CH2), 60.1 (CH2), 107.3 (CH), 142.5 (CH), 155.9 (C);19F-NMR (DMSO, 376.5 MHz): δ = −73.49; IR (KBr) νmax 3213 (O–H), 3161 (C–H, sp2), 1564 (C=C), 1158 (C–N), LCMS (M-CF3CO2) 167.2 found for C9H15N2O+; (Found: C, 47.04%; H, 5.23%; N, 10.08%. Calc. for C11H15F3N2O3 (280.24); C, 47.14%; H, 5.39%; N, 10.00%).
4-(Dimethylamino)-1-(3-hydroxypropyl)pyridinium tetrafluoroborate (10). This compound was obtained as oil (0.29 g), 1H-NMR (DMSO, 400 MHz,): δ = 1.93 (quintet, 3H), 3.20 (s, 6H), 3.41 (t, 2H), 4.25 (t, 2H), 7.05 (d, 2H), 8.31 (d, 2H); 13C-NMR (DMSO, 100 MHz,): δ = 33.1 (CH2), 39.7 (2CH3), 54.2 (CH2), 56.9 (CH2), 107.6 (CH), 141.2 (CH), 155.8 (C); 19F-NMR (DMSO, 376.5 MHz): δ = −148.36; 11B NMR (DMSO, 128 MHz): δ = −1.27; IR (NaCl) νmax 3216 (O–H), 3167 (C–H, sp2), 1566 (C=C), 1166 (C–N), 1153 (C–O), LCMS (M-BF4) 181.2 found for C10H17N2O+; (Found: C, 44.92%; H, 6.30%; N, 10.53%. Calc. for C10H17BF4N2O (268.06); C, 44.81%; H, 6.39%; N, 10.45%).
4-(Dimethylamino)-1-(3-hydroxypropyl)pyridinium hexafluorophosphate (11). This compound was obtained as white semi-solid (0.37 g), 1H-NMR (DMSO, 400 MHz,): δ = 1.92 (quintet, 3H), 3.19 (s, 6H), 3.40 (t, 2H), 4.23 (t, 2H), 7.02 (d, 2H), 8.24 (d, 2H); 13C-NMR (DMSO, 100 MHz,): δ = 33.1 (CH2), 39.7 (2CH3), 54.2 (CH2), 56.9 (CH2), 107.6 (CH), 141.2 (CH), 155.8 (C); 19F-NMR (DMSO, 376.5 MHz): δ = −71.10, −69.22 (d); 31P-NMR (DMSO, 162 MHz): δ = −157.35–−131.00 (sept); IR (NaCl) νmax 3211 (O–H), 3160 (C–H, sp2), 1565 (C=C), 1164 (C–N), 1152 (C–O),LCMS (M-PF6) 181.2 found for C10H17N2O+; (Found: C, 36.73%; H, 5.16%; N, 8.67%. Calc. for C10H17F6N2OP (326.22); C, 36.82%; H, 5.25%; N, 8.59%).
4-(Dimethylamino)-1-(3-hydroxypropyl)pyridinium trifluoroacetate (12). This compound was obtained as oil (0.32 g), 1H-NMR (DMSO, 400 MHz,): δ = 1.91 (quintet, 3H), 3.19 (s, 6H), 3.39 (t, 2H), 4.26 (t, 2H), 7.03 (d, 2H), 8.32 (d, 2H); 13C-NMR (DMSO, 100 MHz,): δ = 33.1 (CH2), 39.7 (2CH3), 54.1 (CH2), 56.9 (CH2), 107.6 (CH), 142.2 (CH), 155.8 (C); 19F-NMR (DMSO, 376.5 MHz): δ = −73.56; IR (NaCl) νmax 3209 (O–H), 3164 (C–H, sp2), 1562 (C=C), 1162 (C–N), 1150 (C–O); LCMS (M-CF3CO2) 181.2 found for C10H17N2O+; (Found: C, 49.06%; H, 5.73%; N, 9.61%. Calc. for C12H17F3N2O3 (294.27); C, 48.98%; H, 5.82%; N, 9.52%).
4-(Dimethylamino)-1-(2-methoxyethyl)pyridinium tetrafluoroborate (13). This compound was obtained as white solid (0.29 g); mp 98–100 °C, 1H-NMR (DMSO, 400 MHz,): δ = 3.19 (s, 6H), 3.24 (s, 3H), 3.67 (t, 2H), 4.34 (t, 2H), 7.02 (d, 2H), 8.23 (d, 2H); 13C-NMR (DMSO, 100 MHz,): δ = 39.6 (2CH3), 56.2 (CH2), 58.1 (CH3) 70.4 (CH2), 107.4 (CH), 142.3 (CH), 155.9 (C); 19F-NMR (DMSO, 376.5 MHz): δ = −148.33; 11B NMR (DMSO, 128 MHz): δ = −1.26; IR (NaCl) νmax 3161 (C–H, sp2), 1563 (C=C), 1163 (C–N), 1156 (C–O) LCMS (M-BF4) 181.2 found for C10H17N2O+; (Found: C, 44.84%; H, 6.33%; N, 10.51%. Calc. for C10H17BF4N2O (268.06); C, 44.81%; H, 6.39%; N, 10.45%).
4-(Dimethylamino)-1-(2-methoxyethyl)pyridinium hexafluorophosphate (14). This compound was obtained as white solid; mp 80–82 °C (0.34 g), 1H-NMR (DMSO, 400 MHz,): δ = 3.17 (s, 6H), 3.25 (s, 3H), 3.67 (t, 2H), 4.34 (t, 2H), 7.00 (d, 2H), 8.20 (d, 2H); 13C-NMR (DMSO, 100 MHz,): δ = 39.6 (2CH3), 56.2 (CH2), 58.1 (CH3) 70.4 (CH2), 107.3 (CH), 142.2 (CH), 155.9 (C); 19F-NMR (DMSO, 376.5 MHz): δ = −71.10, −69.21 (d); 31P-NMR (DMSO, 162 MHz): δ = −157.31–−130.99 (sept); IR (NaCl) νmax 3159 (C–H, sp2), 1564 (C=C), 1161 (C–N), 1158 (C–O); LCMS (M-PF6) 181.2 found for C10H17N2O+; (Found: C, 36.74%; H, 5.19%; N, 8.66%. Calc. for C10H17F6N2OP (326.22); C, 36.82%; H, 5.25%; N, 8.59%).
4-(Dimethylamino)-1-(2-methoxyethyl)pyridinium trifluoroacetate (15). This compound was obtained as oil (0.31 g), 1H-NMR (DMSO, 400 MHz,): δ = 3.18 (s, 6H), 3.23 (s, 3H), 3.66 (t, 2H), 4.39 (t, 2H), 7.05 (d, 2H), 8.30 (d, 2H); 13C-NMR (DMSO, 100 MHz,): δ = 39.7 (2CH3), 56.0 (CH2), 58.1 (CH3) 70.5 (CH2), 107.4 (CH), 142.4 (CH), 155.9 (C); 19F-NMR (DMSO, 376.5 MHz): δ = −74.34; IR (NaCl) νmax 3158 (C–H, sp2), 1560 (C=C), 1160 (C–N), 1158 (C–O); LCMS (M-CF3CO2) 181.2 found for C10H17N2O+; (Found: C, 49.06%; H, 5.74%; N, 9.59%. Calc. for C12H17F3N2O3 (294.27); C, 48.98%; H, 5.82%; N, 9.52%).
4-(Dimethylamino)-1-(2-ethoxyethyl)pyridinium tetrafluoroborate (16). This compound was obtained as oil (0.34 g), 1H-NMR (DMSO, 400 MHz,): δ = 1.04 (t, 3H), 3.18 (s, 3H), 3.43 (q, 2H), 3.70 (t, 2H), 4.33 (t, 2H), 7.01 (d, 2H), 8.20 (d, 2H); 13C-NMR (DMSO, 100 MHz,): δ = 14.7 (CH3), 39.5 (2CH3), 56.4 (CH2), 65.5 (CH2), 68.2 (CH2), 107.3 (CH), 142.2 (CH), 156.5 (C); 19F-NMR (DMSO, 376.5 MHz): δ = −148.35; 11B NMR (DMSO, 128 MHz): δ = −1.20; IR (NaCl) νmax 3161 (C–H, sp2), 1564 (C=C), 1160 (C–N), 1158 (C–O); LCMS (M-BF4) 195.3 found for C11H19N2O+; (Found: C, 46.76%; H, 6.71%; N, 7.01%. Calc. for C11H19BF4N2O (282.09); C, 46.84%; H, 6.79%; N, 9.93%).
4-(Dimethylamino)-1-(2-ethoxyethyl)pyridinium hexafluorophosphate (17). This compound was obtained as oil (0.42 g), 1H-NMR (DMSO, 400 MHz,): δ = 1.05 (t, 3H), 3.19 (s, 3H), 3.43 (q, 2H), 3.70 (t, 2H), 4.33 (t, 2H), 7.02 (d, 2H), 8.21 (d, 2H); 13C-NMR (DMSO, 100 MHz,): δ = 14.7 (CH3), 39.6 (2CH3), 56.4 (CH2), 65.5 (CH2), 68.2 (CH2), 107.3 (CH), 142.3 (CH), 155.9 (C); 19F-NMR (DMSO, 376.5 MHz): δ = −71.13, −69.24 (d); 31P-NMR (DMSO, 162 MHz): δ = −157.34–−130.99 (sept); IR (NaCl) νmax 3158 (C–H, sp2), 1564 (C=C), 1160 (C–N), 1157 (C–O); LCMS (M-PF6) 195.3 found for C11H19N2O+; (Found: C, 38.77%; H, 5.57%; N, 8.32%. Calc. for C11H19F6N2OP (340.25); C, 38.83%; H, 5.63%; N, 8.23%).
4-(Dimethylamino)-1-(2-ethoxyethyl)pyridinium trifluoroacetate (18). This compound was obtained as oil (0.36 g), 1H-NMR (DMSO, 400 MHz,): δ = 1.05 (t, 3H), 3.20 (s, 3H), 3.45 (q, 2H), 3.71 (t, 2H), 4.37 (t, 2H), 7.05 (d, 2H), 8.28 (d, 2H); 13C-NMR (DMSO, 100 MHz,): δ = 13.7 (CH3), 39.6 (2CH3), 55.3 (CH2), 64.5 (CH2), 67.2 (CH2), 106.3 (CH), 141.3 (CH), 154.9 (C); 19F-NMR (DMSO, 376.5 MHz): δ = −73.57; IR (NaCl) νmax 3160 (C–H, sp2), 1564 (C=C), 1162 (C–N), 1159 (C–O); LCMS (M-CF3CO2) 195.3 found for C11H19N2O+; (Found: C, 50.56%; H, 6.13%; N, 9.16%. Calc. for C13H19F3N2O3 (308.30); C, 50.65%; H, 6.21%; N, 9.09%).
4-(Dimethylamino)-1-(4-phenoxybutyl)pyridinium tetrafluoroborate (19). This compound was obtained as white solid (0.28 g); mp 106–107 °C, 1H-NMR (DMSO, 400 MHz,): δ = 1.68 (quintet, 2H), 1.94 (quintet, 2H), 3.18 (s, 6H), 3.98 (t, 2H), 4.26 (t, 2H), 6.90–7.04 (m, 5Ar-H), 7.27 (d, 2Ar-H), 8.34 (d, 2Ar-H); 13C-NMR (DMSO, 100 MHz,): δ = 25.2 (CH2), 27.2 (CH2), 39.7 (2CH3), 56.3 (CH2), 66.6 (CH2), 107.6 (CH), 114.4 (CH), 120.5 (CH), 129.4 (CH), 141.9 (CH), 155.8 (C), 158.4 (C); 19F-NMR (DMSO, 376.5 MHz): δ = −148.34; 11B NMR (DMSO, 128 MHz): δ = −1.22; IR (KBr) νmax 3132 (C–H Ar), 1600–1471 (C=C), 1164 (C–N), 1081 (C–O) cm−1; LCMS (M-BF4) 271.4 found for C17H23N2O+; (Found: C, 57.07%; H, 6.41%; N, 7.89%. Calc. for C17H23BF4N2O (358.18); C, 57.01%; H, 6.47%; N, 7.82%).
4-(Dimethylamino)-1-(4-phenoxybutyl)pyridinium hexafluorophosphate (20). This compound was obtained as white solid (0.33 g); mp 128–130 °C, 1H-NMR (DMSO, 400 MHz,): δ = 1.68 (quintet, 2H), 1.93 (quintet, 2H), 3.18 (s, 6H), 3.97 (t, 2H), 4.29 (t, 2H), 6.89–7.06 (m, 5Ar-H), 7.26 (d, 2Ar-H), 8.40 (d, 2Ar-H); 13C-NMR (DMSO, 100 MHz,): δ = 25.2 (CH2), 27.2 (CH2), 39.7 (2CH3), 56.2 (CH2), 66.6 (CH2), 107.5 (CH), 114.4 (CH), 120.5 (CH), 129.4 (CH), 142.0 (CH), 155.8 (C), 158.4 (C); 19F-NMR (DMSO, 376.5 MHz): δ = −71.10, −69.21 (d); 31P-NMR (DMSO, 162 MHz): δ = −157.31–−130.96 (sept); IR (KBr) νmax 3131 (C–H Ar), 1598–1471 (C=C), 1165 (C–N), 1079 (C–O) cm−1; LCMS (M-PF6) 271.4 found for C17H23N2O+; (Found: C, 48.97%; H, 5.50%; N, 6.81%. Calc. for C17H23F6N2OP (416.34); C, 49.04%; H, 5.57%; N, 6.73%).
4-(Dimethylamino)-1-(4-phenoxybutyl)pyridinium trifluoroacetate (21). This compound was obtained as oil (0.30 g), 1H-NMR (DMSO, 400 MHz,): δ = 1.69 (quintet, 2H), 1.94 (quintet, 2H), 3.18 (s, 6H), 3.98 (t, 2H), 4.24 (t, 2H), 6.90–6.94 (m, 5Ar-H), 7.27 (d, 2Ar-H), 8.30 (d, 2Ar-H); 13C-NMR (DMSO, 100 MHz,): δ = 24.1 (CH2), 26.0 (CH2), 39.6 (2CH3), 53.7 (CH2), 55.1 (CH2), 106.5 (CH), 113.2 (CH), 119.3 (CH), 128.4 (CH), 140.8 (CH), 154.6 (C), 157.2 (C); 19F-NMR (DMSO, 376.5 MHz): δ = −73.58; IR (NaCl) νmax 3130(C–H Ar), 1601–1473 (C=C), 1165 (C-N), 1080 (C-O) cm−1; LCMS (M-CF3CO2) 271.4 found for C17H23N2O+; (Found: C, 59.25%; H, 5.57%; N, 7.37%. Calc. for C19H23F3N2O3 (384.39); C, 59.37%; H, 6.03%; N, 7.29%).
1-(3-Cyanopropyl)-4-(dimethylamino)pyridinium tetrafluoroborate (22). This compound was obtained as white solid (0.33 g); mp 120–121 °C, 1H-NMR (DMSO, 400 MHz,): δ = 2.12 (quintet, 2H), 2.56 (t, 2H), 3.19 (s, 6H), 4.22 (t, 2H), 7.04 (d, 2Ar-H), 8.26 (d, 2Ar-H); 13C-NMR (DMSO, 100 MHz,): δ = 13.3 (CH2), 25.8 (CH2), 39.5 (2CH3), 55.4 (CH2), 107.7 (CH), 119.5 (C), 141.9 (CH), 155.9 (C); 19F-NMR (DMSO, 376.5 MHz): δ = −148.41; 11B NMR (DMSO, 128 MHz): δ = −1.27; IR (KBr) νmax 3131 (C-H Ar), 2251 (CN), 1598–1469 (C=C), 1170 (C–N) cm−1LCMS (M-BF4) 190.2 found for C11H16N3+; (Found: C, 47.60%; H, 5.74%; N, 15.23%. Calc. for C11H16 F4N3 (277.07); C, 47.68%; H, 5.82%; N, 15.17%).
1-(3-Cyanopropyl)-4-(dimethylamino)pyridinium hexafluorophosphate (23). This compound was obtained as white solid (0.41 g); mp 121–122 °C, 1H-NMR (DMSO, 400 MHz,): δ = 2.12 (quintet, 2H), 2.56 (t, 2H), 3.19 (s, 6H), 4.22 (t, 2H), 7.04 (d, 2Ar-H), 8.26 (d, 2Ar-H); 13C-NMR (DMSO, 100 MHz,): δ = 13.4 (CH2), 25.8 (CH2), 39.7 (2CH3), 55.5 (CH2), 107.7 (CH), 119.5 (C), 142.0 (CH), 156.0 (C); 19F-NMR (DMSO, 376.5 MHz): δ = −71.12, −69.23 (d); 31P-NMR (DMSO, 162 MHz): δ = −157.36–−131.02 (sept); IR (KBr) νmax 3130 (C–H Ar), 2246 (CN), 1599–1471 (C=C), 1169 (C-N)cm−1; LCMS (M-PF6) 190.2 found for C11H16N3+; (Found: C, 39.35%; H, 4.74%; N, 12.61%. Calc. for C11H16F6N3P (335.23); C, 39.41%; H, 4.81%; N, 12.53%).
1-(3-Cyanopropyl)-4-(dimethylamino)pyridinium trifluoroacetate (24). This compound was obtained as oil (0.37 g), NMR (DMSO, 400 MHz,): δ = 2.12 (quintet, 2H), 2.57 (t, 2H), 3.19 (s, 6H), 4.24 (t, 2H), 7.06 (d, 2Ar-H), 8.31 (d, 2Ar-H); 13C-NMR (DMSO, 100 MHz,): δ = 13.3 (CH2), 25.9 (CH2), 39.7 (2CH3), 55.4 (CH2), 107.7 (CH), 119.6 (C), 142.0 (CH), 156.0 (C); 19F-NMR (DMSO, 376.5 MHz): δ = −73.45; IR (NaCl) νmax 3132 (C–H Ar), 2247 (CN), 1597–1476 (C=C), 1168 (C–N) cm−1; LCMS (M-CF3CO2) 190.2 found for C11H16N3+; (Found: C, 51.55%; H, 5.25%; N, 13.94%. Calc. for C13H16F3N3O2 (303.28); C, 51.48%; H, 5.32%; N, 13.86%).

3.4. Determination of Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations

Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using the broth microdilution method based on recommended protocolemployed by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [27]. Tested compounds were dissolved in sterile, distilled water and diluted to a final concentration of 512 µg/mL in Mueller-Hinton broth (Becton Dickinson, USA) [28]. Two-fold, serially-diluted test compounds were dispensed into each of the 96 wells of a standard microdilution plates. The direct colony suspension method was used for inoculum preparation. Bacterial suspension was prepared by direct transfer of colonies from 24 h agar plates to Mueller Hinton broth. Bacterial suspensions were adjusted using bacterial counting chamber to contain approximately 1 × 108 CFU/mL. A 50 µL volume of each bacterial suspension was mixed with 50 µL serially diluted tested compound in 96 microdilution plate according to the microdilution method [26]. Uninoculated wells were prepared as control samples. Plates were incubated at 35 °C for 24 h. The minimum (inhibitory) bactericidal concentration was defined as the lowest concentration of test compound producing no visible growth. Confirmation for MIC was achieved by transfer of aliquots from wells containing no growth on to nutrient agar plates and tested for colony formation upon subculturing. Given values of obtained MIC values are means of three independent experiments.

4. Conclusions

In summary, new functionalized 4-dimethylaminopyridinium-based ionic liquids (ILs) were synthesized using eco-friendly, ultrasound-assisted reactions which afforded many advantages, such as the reduction of reaction time and increase in yields. The MIC results show that the ILs studied display excellent antimicrobial activity, especially ILs 5 and 19. Their activities are greatly improved by the presence of the butylphenoxy group.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data (1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, 11B-NMR, 19F-NMR, and 31P-NMR) associated with this article are available at: https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/20/08/14936/s1.

Acknowledgement

We are grateful to M. M. Elaasser, Director of Regional Center for Mycology and Biotechnology (RCMB), Alazhar University, Cairo, Egypt, for carrying out the antibacterial and antifungal activities.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Earle, M.J.; Esperanca, J.M.S.; Gilea, M.A.; Lopes, J.N.C.; Rebelo, L.P.N.; Magee, J.W.; Seddon, K.R.; Widegren, J.A. The distillation and volatility of ionic liquids. Nature 2006, 439, 831–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Yang, J.Z.; Gui, J.S.; Lv, X.M.; Zhang, G.Q.; Li, H.W. Study on properties of ionic liquid BMIBF4. Acta Chim. Sin. 2005, 63, 577–580. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ui, K.; Yamamoto, K.; Ishikawa, K.; Minami, T.; Takeuchi, K.; Itagaki, M.; Watanabe, K.; Koura, N. Development of non-flammeable lithium secondary battery with room-temperature ionic liquid electrolyte: Performance of electroplated Al film negative electrode. J. Power Sources 2008, 183, 347–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kubota, K.; Nohira, T.; Goto, T.; Hagiwara, R. Novel inorganic ionic liquids possessing low melting temperatures and wide electro-chemical windows: Binary mixtures of alkali bis(fluorosulfonyl) amides. Electrochem. Commun. 2008, 10, 1886–1888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ahrens, S.; Peritz, A.; Strassner, T. Tunable arylalkyl ionic liquids (TAAILs): The next generation of ionic liquids. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2009, 48, 7908–7910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Marisa, C.B.; Russell, G.E.; Richard, G.C. Non-haloaluminate room-temperature ionic liquids in electrochemistry—A review. Chem. Phys. Chem. 2004, 5, 1106–1120. [Google Scholar]
  7. Anderson, J.L.; Armstrong, D.W. High-stability ionic liquids, a new class of stationary phases for gas chromatography. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 4851–4858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Docherty, K.M.; Kulpa, C.F., Jr. Toxicity and antimicrobial activity of imidazolium and pyridinium ionic liquids. Green Chem. 2005, 7, 185–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Procuranti, B.; Myles, L.; Gathergood, N.; Connon, S.J. Pyridinium ion catalysis of carbonyl protection reactions. Synthesis 2009, 23, 4082–4086. [Google Scholar]
  10. Myles, L.; Gore, R.; Spulak, M.; Gathergood, N.; Connon, S.J. Highly recyclable, imidazolium derived ionic liquids of low antimicrobial and antifungal toxicity: A new strategy for acid catalysis. Green Chem. 2010, 12, 1157–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Endres, F. Ionic liquids: Solvents for the electrodeposition of metals and semiconductors. Chem. Phys. Chem. 2002, 3, 144–154. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhang, Q.H.; Zhang, S.G.; Deng, Y.Q. Recent advances in ionic liquid catalysis. Green Chem. 2011, 13, 2619–2637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ferlin, N.; Courty, M.; Gatard, S.; Spulak, M.; Quilty, B.; Beadham, I.; Ghavre, M.; Haiß, A.; Kümmerer, K.; Gathergood, N.; et al. Biomass derived ionic liquids: Synthesis from natural organic acids, characterization, toxicity, biodegradation and use as solvents for catalytic hydrogenation processes. Tetrahedron 2013, 69, 6150–6161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Moniruzzaman, M.; Nakashima, K.; Kamiya, N.; Goto, M. Recent advances of enzymatic reactions in ionic liquids. Biochem. Eng. J. 2010, 48, 295–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Messali, M. A green microwave-assisted synthesis, characterization and comparative study of new pyridazinium-based ionic liquids derivatives towards corrosion of mild steel in acidic environment. J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 2011, 2, 174–185. [Google Scholar]
  16. Messali, M.; Bousskri, A.; Anejjar, A.; Salghi, R.; Hammouti, B. Electrochemical Studies of New Pyridazinium-Based Ionic Liquid, (1–4-Nitro Phenyl-1-ethanone) Pyridazinium bromide, On Carbon Steel Corrosion in Hydrochloric Acid Medium. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2015, 10, 4532–4551. [Google Scholar]
  17. Biswas, A.; Shogren, R.L.; Stevenson, D.G.; Willett, J.L.; Bhowmik, P.K. Ionic liquids as solvents for biopolymers: Acylation of starch and zein protein. Carbohydr. Polym. 2006, 66, 546–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pernak, J.; Sobaszkiewicz, K.; Mirska, I. Anti-microbial activities of ionic liquids. Green Chem 2003, 5, 52–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Carson, L.; Chau, P.K.W.; Earle, M.J.; Gilea, M.A.; Gilmore, B.F.; Gorman, S.P.; McCann, M.T.; Seddon, K.R. Antibiofilm activities of 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride ionic liquids. Green Chem. 2009, 11, 492–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Messali, M. An efficient and green sonochemical synthesis of some new eco-friendly functionalized ionic liquids. Arab. J. Chem. 2014, 7, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Messali, M.; Ahmed, S.A. A green microwave-assisted synthesis of new pyridazinium-based ionic liquids as an environmentally friendly alternative. Green Sustain. Chem. 2011, 1, 70–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Messali, M.; Aouad, M.R.; El-Sayed, W.S.; Ali, A.A.; Ben Hadda, T.; Hammouti, B. New eco-friendly 1-alkyl-3-(4-phenoxybutyl) imidazolium-based ionic liquids derivatives: A green ultrasound-assisted Synthesis, characterization, antimicrobial activity and POM analyses. Molecules 2014, 19, 11741–11759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Messali, M.; Aouad, M.R.; Ali, A.A.; Ben Hadda, T.; Hammouti, B. Synthesis, characterization, and POM analyses of novel bioactive imidazolium-based ionic liquids. Med. Chem. Res. 2015, 24, 1387–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Katritzky, A.R.; Mokrosz, M.J. The preparation of some 1-vinylpyridinium salts. Heterocycles 1984, 22, 505–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID). Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of antibacterial agents by agar dilution. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2000, 6, 509–515. [Google Scholar]
  26. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically Approved StandardM7-A5, 5th ed.; NCCLS: Wayne, PA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  27. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Document M26-A. In Methods of Determining Bactericidal Activity of Antimicrobial Agents for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically; Approved Guideline; CLSI: Wayne, PA, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  28. Nomura, H.; Isshiki, Y.; Sakuda, K.; Sakuma, K.; Kondo, S. The Antibacterial Activity of Compounds Isolated from Oakmoss against Legionella pneumophila and Other Legionella spp. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2012, 35, 1560–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds 124 are available from the authors.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Messali, M. Eco-Friendly Synthesis of a New Class of Pyridinium-Based Ionic Liquids with Attractive Antimicrobial Activity. Molecules 2015, 20, 14936-14949. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules200814936

AMA Style

Messali M. Eco-Friendly Synthesis of a New Class of Pyridinium-Based Ionic Liquids with Attractive Antimicrobial Activity. Molecules. 2015; 20(8):14936-14949. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules200814936

Chicago/Turabian Style

Messali, Mouslim. 2015. "Eco-Friendly Synthesis of a New Class of Pyridinium-Based Ionic Liquids with Attractive Antimicrobial Activity" Molecules 20, no. 8: 14936-14949. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules200814936

APA Style

Messali, M. (2015). Eco-Friendly Synthesis of a New Class of Pyridinium-Based Ionic Liquids with Attractive Antimicrobial Activity. Molecules, 20(8), 14936-14949. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules200814936

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop