Next Article in Journal
Structural Characterization of Flavonoid Glycoconjugates and Their Derivatives with Mass Spectrometric Techniques
Next Article in Special Issue
Enantioselective Analytical- and Preparative-Scale Separation of Hexabromocyclododecane Stereoisomers Using Packed Column Supercritical Fluid Chromatography
Previous Article in Journal
Proteomic Analysis of Tung Tree (Vernicia fordii) Oilseeds during the Developmental Stages
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enantioseparation Using Cellulose Tris(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) as Chiral Stationary Phase for HPLC: Influence of Molecular Weight of Cellulose
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Application of Homochiral Alkylated Organic Cages as Chiral Stationary Phases for Molecular Separations by Capillary Gas Chromatography

Department of Chemistry, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2016, 21(11), 1466; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21111466
Submission received: 16 September 2016 / Revised: 22 October 2016 / Accepted: 28 October 2016 / Published: 8 November 2016

Abstract

:
Molecular organic cage compounds have attracted considerable attention due to their potential applications in gas storage, catalysis, chemical sensing, molecular separations, etc. In this study, a homochiral pentyl cage compound was synthesized from a condensation reaction of (S,S)-1,2-pentyl-1,2-diaminoethane and 1,3,5-triformylbenzene. The imine-linked pentyl cage diluted with a polysiloxane (OV-1701) was explored as a novel stationary phase for high-resolution gas chromatographic separation of organic compounds. Some positional isomers were baseline separated on the pentyl cage-coated capillary column. In particular, various types of enantiomers including chiral alcohols, esters, ethers and epoxides can be resolved without derivatization on the pentyl cage-coated capillary column. The reproducibility of the pentyl cage-coated capillary column for separation was investigated using nitrochlorobenzene and styrene oxide as analytes. The results indicate that the column has good stability and separation reproducibility after being repeatedly used. This work demonstrates that molecular organic cage compounds could become a novel class of chiral separation media in the near future.

1. Introduction

The separation of chiral compounds is one of the most interesting and challenging tasks in the field of separation science [1], because enantiomers show identical chemical and physical properties in an achiral environment. Chromatographic techniques such as high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), gas chromatography (GC), supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC), thin layer chromatography (TLC), and capillary electrochromatography (CEC) are still the most convenient and cost-effective approaches to obtain optically pure compounds [2]. Among them, HPLC and capillary GC are the most reliable and commonly employed analytical techniques for the separation of enantiomers [3,4]. Compared to other chromatographic techniques, capillary GC possesses the advantages of high-resolution, high-efficiency, sensitivity, fast analysis and absence of liquid mobile phases. Therefore, it is very necessary to continue developing novel chiral materials as stationary phases with high resolution and excellent enantioselectivity capable of separating a wide variety of chiral compounds in GC.
In recent years, porous materials containing some unusual properties such as diverse compositions and structures, high surface areas, ordered porosity, good chemical stability, tunable pore size and so on, have attracted significant attention in many areas, including gas adsorption and storage, catalysis, separation, etc. In general, porous materials can be designed and synthesized by using two main synthetic strategies: extended networks and discrete organic cage molecules. To date, there are various kinds of chiral porous network materials, such as metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14], porous organic frameworks (POFs) [15,16] and inorganic mesoporous materials [17,18], which have been used as chiral chromatographic stationary phases for separation of enantiomers. Unlike network materials, porous organic cages (POCs) are composed of discrete molecules with intermolecular forces rather than covalent or coordination bonds [19]. In past few years, many shape-persistent POCs have been designed and explored for various areas (e.g., gas adsorption, molecular separation, heterogeneous catalysis, and sensing) by several research groups [20,21,22,23,24]. In 2008, an imine-linked [4+6] tetrahedral cage has been synthesized through imine condensation of 1,3,5-triformylbenzene and (R,R)-1,2-cyclohexanediamine by Gawronski et al. [25], but the crystal structure of the tetrahedral cage was not studied. Subsequently, Cooper and co-workers reported a series of new POCs obtained through the condensation of 1,3,5-triformylbenzene or tris(4-formylphenyl)amine with various diamines [26,27,28,29]. Surprisingly, these cage molecules can self-assemble into crystalline materials with permanent porosity through weak intermolecular forces and separate rare gases and some organic molecules [30,31]. An important advantage of POCs is their good solubility in common organic solvents, which makes them suitable for use as separation media in capillary GC. In February 2015, our group first proved useful commercially of a homochiral POC in GC enantioseparations and applied China’s patent [32]. Subsequently, the application of POCs in GC chiral separation has been further developed. Recently, several homochiral POCs (e.g., CC3-R [33,34], CC9 [35] and CC10 [36]) useful as capillary GC stationary phases for enantioselective separation of enantiomers have been reported by the Cooper group and our group. These POCs-based stationary phases exhibited excellent chiral recognition ability toward a wide range of chiral compounds.
Cooper and co-workers reported the syntheses of homochiral alkylated organic cages functionalised with twelve n-hexyl, n-pentyl, isohexyl or n-octyl tails by a one-step [6+4] condensation of the corresponding (S,S)-1,2-functionalised-1,2-diamines with 1,3,5-triformylbenzene in chloroform for 72 h at 60 or 65 °C using trifluoroacetic acid as the catalyst [37]. Herein we report the use of a homochiral pentyl cage diluted with polysiloxane (OV-1701) as chiral stationary phase for high-resolution capillary GC separation. The pentyl cage-coated capillary column exhibits good selectivity and chiral recognition ability towards a wide variety of racemates belonging to different classes such as chiral alcohols, esters, ethers and epoxides, especially for chiral alcohols. Besides, the pentyl cage-based capillary column also offers good performance for the separation of positional isomers.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Characterization of the Synthesized Pentyl Cage and the Pentyl Cage-Coated Capillary Column

NMR data analysis (Figures S1 and S2, Supplementary Materials) demonstrates that the pentyl cage was successfully synthesized. The corresponding TGA curve reveals that the pentyl cage is at least stable up to 290 °C, indicating its suitability for use in GC (Figure 1a). The inner surface of the pentyl cage-coated capillary column was characterized by SEM. Figure 1b shows the SEM image of the inner wall on the fabricated column. As can be seen from SEM image, a thin and uniform coating with about 260 nm thickness was formed on the inner wall of the capillary column.
Column efficiency of the pentyl cage-coated capillary column was measured by using n-dodecane as analyte at 120 °C. The number of theoretical plates of the capillary column was 3510 plates∙m−1, further indicating the good coating performance of the pentyl cage.
McReynolds constants are used to evaluate the polarity of a stationary phase. The polarity of pentyl cage-coated capillary column was determined using benzene, 1-butanol, 2-pentanone, 1-nitropropane, and pyridine as probe compounds (Table 1). The McReynolds constants of the five selected analytes represent various stationary phase characteristics (e.g., dispersion forces, hydrogen-bonding ability, electron donor and acceptor ability, dipolar and acidic character, etc.) interacting with the analytes. Squalane was used as a standard nonpolar stationary phase, and the McReynolds constants of pentyl cage-coated capillary column were compared to those of squalane. The average of the five McReynolds constants is 130.6, revealing a moderate polarity of the pentyl cage-coated capillary column.

2.2. Separation of Positional Isomers on the Pentyl Cage-Coated Capillary Column

High-resolution separation of positional isomers is of significant importance in the chemical industry and environmental analysis [38]. However, it is a challenging task to separate some positional isomers owing to their similar physical and chemical properties. So far, capillary GC is one of the most efficient methods for the separation of various positional isomers. To investigate the separation properties of the pentyl cage-coated capillary column, some positional isomers were selected as test solutes. The pentyl cage-coated capillary column offered good separation of some isomer mixtures, including dichlorobenzene, dibromobenzene, nitrochlorobenzene, and nitrobromobenzene. Molecular structures of these isomers are shown in Figure S3 (Supplementary Materials). The chromatograms and results of separation of isomer mixtures on pentyl cage-coated capillary column are shown in Figure 2 and Table 2, respectively. As can be seen from Figure 2, baseline separation of all isomers were achieved on the pentyl cage-coated capillary column. Interestingly, the elution sequence of all isomers followed an increasing order of para-isomer < ortho-isomer < meta-isomer, rather than the order of their boiling points (e.g., meta-dibromobenzene (218 °C) < para-dibromobenzene (219 °C) < ortho-dibromobenzene (225 °C)). All the meta-isomers eluted much later than the ortho- and para-isomers on the pentyl cage-coated capillary column, indicating higher selectivity and stronger retention behavior toward meta-isomers than the ortho- and para-isomers. This experimental result is in agreement with previously reported data for POCs-based chiral stationary phases such as CC3-R, CC9 and CC10 when used for GC separation of positional isomers [34,35,36]. The main reason for this can probably be attributed to the meta-substituted aryl face geometry of the building unit (1,3,5-triformylbenzene) which was employed for the synthesis of the pentyl cage and the abovementioned POCs (CC3-R, CC9 and CC10). In other words, the molecular geometry of meta-substituted isomers will better match with pentyl cage molecules, resulting in longer retention times for meta-isomers than those of ortho- and para-isomers on the pentyl cage-coated capillary column.

2.3. Separation of Enantiomers on the Pentyl Cage-Coated Capillary Column

As a new class of chiral materials, homochiral POCs have been attracting attention because of their potential applications in enantioselective separation [33,34,35,36]. To investigate the chiral resolution ability of the pentyl cage, a great deal of enantiomers were analyzed without derivatization on the pentyl cage-coated capillary column. We found that this column exhibited good chiral separation performance toward various types of enantiomers, including alcohols, esters, ethers and epoxides, especially for chiral alcohols. Figure S4 (Supplementary Materials) shows the molecular structures of the enantiomers. The retention factor (k1) for the first eluted enantiomers, separation factor (α) and resolution (Rs) are listed in Table 3. The resolution chromatograms of enantiomers are given in Figure 3. The chromatograms show baseline or at least 80% valley separation for all enantiomers except for 2-phenyl-1-propanol, 1-(2-naphthyl)ethanol, ethyl 3-hydroxybutyrate and γ-valerolactone. Notably, a high-resolution gas chromatographic enantioseparation of trans-stilbene oxide (Rs = 4.94) was achieved on the pentyl cage-coated capillary column.
The pentyl cage has a tetrahedral cage structure with twelve n-pentyl tails formed by imine condensation between four 1,3,5-triformylbenzene molecules and six (S,S)-1,2-pentyl-1,2-diamino-ethanes (Figure S5, Supplementary Materials). It is very difficult to completely understand the chiral recognition mechanisms for enantioseparation on a chiral stationary phase because the influence of the chiral microenvironment on the chiral properties of chromatographic systems is complicated [39]. Many different classes of enantiomers can be separated on the pentyl cage-coated capillary column. There is no doubt that only one retention mechanism cannot explain all these chiral chromatographic resolution results. Therefore, chiral recognition may depend on multimodal enantioselective retention mechanisms existing in the pentyl cage, which may involve chiral steric fits, van der Waals forces, hydrogen-bondings, dispersion forces, dipole-dipole interactions and π-π interactions, etc. For instance, the pentyl cage-coated capillary column offered good resolution for chiral alcohols, suggesting chiral discrimination mainly ascribable to a specific interaction between the hydroxyl group of chiral alcohols and the nitrogen atom in the imine of pentyl cage, and other interactions also affect the chiral recognition. In addition, other enantiomers such as esters, ethers and epoxides, which either contain no hydrogen bonding groups or contain only hydrogen bonding acceptor groups and/or have permanent dipole moments, were also resolved [34]. Consequently, dipole-dipole interactions as well as other interactions, including van der Waals forces, dispersion forces and π-π interactions between enantiomers and pentyl cage, are most responsible for chiral recognition.

2.4. The Reproducibility of the Pentyl Cage-Coated Capillary Column for Separation

Separation reproducibility of the pentyl cage-coated capillary column was investigated using nitrochlorobenzene and styrene oxide as examples. The reproducible chromatograms of nitrochlorobenzene and styrene oxide, separated before and after the columns have been subjected to 100, 300, and more than 500 injections (Figure 4). From Figure 4, no significant changes in retention time and recognition ability were observed, indicating good stability and reproducibility of the pentyl cage-coated capillary column for GC separation.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Reagents and Materials

All chemicals and reagents used were at least of analytical grade. All racemates were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), Adamas-beta (Shanghai, China) or TCI (Tokyo, Japan). The positional isomers (dichlorobenzenes, dibromobenzenes, nitrochlorobenzene, and nitrobromo-benzenes) were obtained from Aladdin Chemistry Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Hexanal, (R,R)-1,2-bis(2-hydroxyphenyl)-1,2-diaminoethane and 1,3,5-triformylbenzene were acquired from Acros (Geel, Belgium) and Sigma-Aldrich. Chloroform, dichloromethane, toluene, methanol, diethyl ether and acetone were from Tianjin Fengchuan Fine Chemical Research Institute (Tianjin, China). Trifluoroacetic acid was purchased from Alfa Aesar (Shanghai, China). The untreated fused-silica capillary column (0.25 mm inner diameter) was purchased from Yongnian Chromatogram Apparatus Co. Ltd. (Yongnian County, Hebei, China).

3.2. Instrumentations

A Shimadzu GC-2014C system (Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID), split injection port and capillary control unit was employed for all GC separations. The data acquisition was performed on a N-2000 chromatography data system (Zhida Information Engineering Co. Ltd., Zhejiang University, China). High purity N2 (99.999%) was used as the carrier gas. 1H- and 13C-NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker DRX 500 NMR ultrashield spectrometer (Karlsruhe, Germany). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were carried out on a FEI Quanta FEG 650 scanning electron microscope (Hillsboro, OR, USA). Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed on a ZRY-1P simultaneous thermal analyzer (Shanghai, China) from room temperature to 800 °C at a ramp rate of 10 °C∙min−1.

3.3. Synthesis of (S,S)-N,N’-bis(Salicylidene)-1,2-pentyl-1,2-diaminoethane

(S,S)-N,N’-bis(Salicylidene)-1,2-pentyl-1,2-diaminoethane was synthesized according to a previous literature report [37] (Scheme 1). Hexanal (2.46 mL, 20.50 mmol) was added to a solution of (R,R)-1,2-bis(2-hydroxyphenyl)-1,2-diaminoethane (2.0 g, 8.2 mmol) in toluene (50 mL) at room temperature. Subsequently, the resulting solution was refluxed overnight with a Dean-Stark trap. After removal of the solvent under reduced pressure, the resulting viscous yellow oil was purified by precipitation using methanol. Finally, a yellow solid (1.98 g, yield 59%) was obtained. 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 13.48 (br s, 2H), 8.28 (s, 2H), 7.29 (ddd, 3JHH = 9 Hz, 4JHH = 1 Hz 2H), 7.23 (dd, 3JHH = 9 Hz, 4JHH = 1 Hz, 2H), 6.98 (d, 3JHH = 6 Hz, 2H), 6.85 (ddd, 3JHH = 6 Hz, 4JHH = 1 Hz, 2H), 3.32–3.28 (m, 2H), 1.69 (m, 4H), 1.29 (m, 12H), 0.88 (t, 3JHH = 6 Hz, 6H). 13C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 164.8, 161.3, 132.2, 131.3, 118.5, 118.5, 117.1, 73.7, 32.5, 31.6, 25.9, 22.6, 14.0.

3.4. Synthesis of (S,S)-1,2-Pentyl-1,2-diaminoethane

(S,S)-1,2-pentyl-1,2-diaminoethane was synthesized according to a previous literature procedure [37] (Scheme 2). (S,S)-N,N’-bis(Salicylidene)-1,2-pentyl-1,2-diaminoethane (2.6 mmol) was dissolved in 12 mL of THF, then a mixture of 0.78 mL of 37% HCl solution and 12 mL of THF was added and stirred at ambient temperature for 24 h. Subsequently, the mixture was diluted with 50 mL of diethyl ether and extracted three times with 15 mL of water. The water phase was basified using NaOH 1.0 M, extracted three times with 30 mL of dichloromethane and dried over dry Na2SO4. (S,S)-1,2-Pentyl-1,2-diaminoethane (0.31g, yield 57.9%) was obtained as a red liquid and used without further purification. 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 2.59 (bs, 2H), 1.47–1.32 (m, 16H), 1.12 (bs, 4H), 0.93 (t, 3JHH = 7 Hz, 6H). 13C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 55.2, 34.8, 32.0, 26.2, 22.7, 14.1.

3.5. Synthesis of Homochiral Pentyl Cage

The pentyl cage was synthesized according to a previous reference [37] (Scheme 3). Typically, a mixture of (S,S)-1,2-pentyl-1,2-diaminoethane (0.145 g, 0.73 mmol) dissolved in 3.3 mL of CHCl3 and 1,3,5-triformylbenzene (0.06 g, 0.40 mmol) dissolved in 2.3 mL CHCl3 was prepared, and trifluoroacetic acid (0.01 mL, 0.13 mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred at 60 °C for 72 h. Then, the solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the crude purified by precipitation from acetone. Finally, crystals were grown by diffusing acetone in a solution of the pentyl cage in dichloromethane (0.060 g, yield 60%). 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 8.08 (s, 12H), 7.90 (s, 12H), 3.36–3.35 (d, 3JHH = 8 Hz, 12H), 1.80–1.64 (m, 24H), 1.27–1.10 (m, 72H), 0.87 (t, 3JHH = 6 Hz, 36H). 13C-NMR (CDCl3): δ 159.35, 136.62, 129.57, 75.41, 31.80, 26.10, 22.58, 14.12.

3.6. Capillary Pretreatment and Preparation of the Pentyl Cage-Coated Capillary Column

A fused-silica capillary column (15 m long × 0.25 mm i.d.) was pretreated according to the following method prior to coating: the column was firstly rinsed with 1.0 M NaOH for 3 h, deionized water for 1 h, 0.1 M HCl for 1 h and again using deionized water for a period of time to ensure the washing was neutral. Finally, the capillary was dried via a nitrogen purge for 6 h at 120 °C. Pentyl cage-coated capillary column was fabricated by a static method [34]. A mixture of a 1 mL solution of pentyl cage (3 mg∙mL−1) in dichloromethane and 1 mL solution of polysiloxane OV-1701 (4.5 mg∙mL−1) in dichloromethane was used to produce a pentyl cage-coated capillary column. The coating process was as follows: after the column was filled up with the stationary phase solution, one end of capillary column was sealed and the other end was connected to a vacuum system to gradually remove the solvent at 36 °C under vacuum to form a uniform film of the stationary phase on the inner surface of the capillary column. Finally, the pentyl cage-coated column was conditioned from 30 °C to 200 °C at a heating rate of 2 °C∙min−1 and held at 200 °C for 3 h under a flow of nitrogen.

4. Conclusions

A homochiral pentyl cage with a tetrahedral cage structure was obtained by an imine condensation reaction of (S,S)-1,2-pentyl-1,2-diaminoethane and 1,3,5-triformylbenzene. We have then fabricated a pentyl cage-coated capillary GC column via a static method. The pentyl cage-coated capillary column exhibited good selectivity and recognition ability for the GC separation of positional isomers and racemates. This results demonstrate that POCs-based chiral stationary phase are promising chiral selectors for enantioseparation in GC.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be accessed at: https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/21/11/1466/s1.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation (No. 21275126, 21365024) and the Yunnan Province’s Basic Research Program (No. 2013FB035) of China.

Author Contributions

Shengming Xie performed the preparation of the chiral stationary phase and drafted the manuscript; Junhui Zhang and Nan Fu synthesized the pentyl cage; Bangjin Wang characterized the pentyl cage and chiral stationary phase; Cong Hu performed the chromatographic data collection and the data analysis; Liming Yuan designed and supervised the research work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

HPLChigh performance liquid chromatography
GCgas chromatography
SFCsupercritical fluid chromatography
TLCthin layer chromatography
CECcapillary electrochromatography
MOFsmetal-organic frameworks
POFsporous organic frameworks
POCsporous organic cages
FIDflame ionization detector
SEMscanning electron microscopy
TGAthermogravimetric analysis

References

  1. Kumar, A.P.; Park, J.H. Zirconia-based stationary phases for chiral separation: Mini review. Anal. Lett. 2012, 45, 15–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Francotte, E.R. Enantioselective chromatography as a powerful alternative for the preparation of drug enantiomers. J. Chromatogr. A 2001, 906, 379–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lee, G.R.; Hyun, M.H. Liquid chromatographic resolution of fendiline and its analogues on a chiral stationary phase based on (+)-(18-Crown-6)-2,3,11,12-tetracarboxylic Acid. Molecules 2014, 19, 21386–21397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhang, X.L.; Wang, L.T.; Dong, S.Q.; Zhang, X.; Wu, Q.; Zhao, L.; Shi, Y.P. Nanocellulose derivative/silica hybrid core-shell chiral stationary phase: Preparation and enantioseparation performance. Molecules 2016, 21, 561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Xie, S.M.; Zhang, Z.J.; Wang, Z.Y.; Yuan, L.M. Chiral metal-organic frameworks for high-resolution gas chromatographic separations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 11892–11895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Xie, S.M.; Zhang, M.; Fei, Z.X.; Yuan, L.M. Experimental comparison of chiral metal-organic framework used as stationary phase in chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2014, 1363, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Liu, H.; Xie, S.M.; Ai, P.; Zhang, J.H.; Zhang, M.; Yuan, L.M. Metal-organic framework Co(D-Cam)1/2(bdc)1/2(tmdpy) for improved enantioseparations on a chiral cyclodextrin stationary phase in gas chromatography. ChemPlusChem 2014, 79, 1103–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nuzhdin, A.L.; Dybtsev, D.N.; Bryliakov, K.P.; Talsi, E.P.; Fedin, V.P. Enantioselective chromatographic resolution and one-pot synthesis of enantiomerically pure sulfoxides over a homochiral Zn-organic framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 12958–12959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Tanaka, K.; Muraoka, T.; Hirayama, D.; Ohnish, A. Highly efficient chromatographic resolution of sulfoxides using a new homochiral MOF-silica composite. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 8577–8579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Zhang, M.; Pu, Z.J.; Chen, X.L.; Gong, X.L.; Zhu, A.X.; Yuan, L.M. Chiral recognition of a 3D chiral nanoporous metal-organic framework. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 5201–5203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Kuang, X.; Ma, Y.; Su, H.; Zhang, J.; Dong, Y.B.; Tang, B. High-performance liquid chromatographic enantioseparation of racemic drugs based on homochiral metal-organic framework. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 1277–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhang, M.; Zhang, J.H.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, B.J.; Xie, S.M.; Yuan, L.M. Chromatographic study on the high performance separation ability of a homochiral [Cu2(D-Cam)2(4,4′-bpy)]n based-column by using racemates and positional isomers as test probes. J. Chromatogr. A 2014, 1325, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Fei, Z.X.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, J.H.; Yuan, L.M. Chiral metal-organic framework used as stationary phases for capillary electrochromatography. Anal. Chim. Acta 2014, 830, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fei, Z.X.; Zhang, M.; Xie, S.M.; Yuan, L.M. Capillary electrochromatographic fast enantioseparation based on a chiral metal-organic framework. Electrophoresis 2014, 35, 3541–3548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Qian, H.L.; Yang, C.X.; Yan, X.P. Bottom-up synthesis of chiral covalent organic frameworks and their bound capillaries for chiral separation. Nat. Commun. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Dong, J.Q.; Liu, Y.; Cui, Y. Chiral porous organic frameworks for asymmetric heterogeneous catalysis and gas chromatographic separation. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 14949–14952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Zhang, J.H.; Xie, S.M.; Zhang, M.; Zi, M.; He, P.G.; Yuan, L.M. Novel inorganic mesoporous material with chiral nematic structure derived from nanocrystalline cellulose for high-resolution gas chromatographic separations. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 9595–9602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zhang, J.H.; Zhang, M.; Xie, S.M.; He, P.G.; Yuan, L.M. A novel inorganic mesoporous material with a nematic structure derived from nanocrystalline cellulose as the stationary phase for high performance liquid chromatography. Anal. Methods 2015, 7, 3448–3453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xie, S.M.; Yuan, L.M. Recent progress of chiral stationary phases for separation of enantiomers in gas chromatography. J. Sep. Sci. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Acharyya, K.; Mukherjee, S.; Mukherjee, P.S. Molecular marriage through partner preferences in covalent cage formation and cage-to-cage transformation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 554–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Zhang, G.; Mastalerz, M. Organic cage compounds-from shape-persistency to function. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 1934–1947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Jin, Y.H.; Wang, Q.; Taynton, P.; Zhang, W. Dynamic covalent chemistry approaches toward macrocycles, molecular cages, and polymers. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 1575–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Klotzbach, S.; Beuerle, F. Shape-controlled synthesis and self-sorting of covalent organic cage compounds. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 10356–10360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lee, S.; Yang, A.; Moneypenny, T.P., II; Moore, J.S. Kinetically trapped tetrahedral cages via alkyne metathesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 2182–2185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Skowronek, P.; Gawronski, J. Chiral iminospherand of a tetrahedral symmetry spontaneously assembled in a [6+4] cyclocondensation. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 4755–4758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Jones, J.T.A.; Hasell, T.; Wu, X.; Bacsa, J.; Jelfs, K.E.; Schmidtmann, M.; Chong, S.Y.; Adams, D.J.; Trewin, A.; Schiffman, F.; et al. Modular and predictable assembly of porous organic molecular crystals. Nature 2011, 474, 367–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Jelfs, K.E.; Wu, X.; Schmidtmann, M.; Jones, J.T.A.; Warren, J.E.; Adams, D.J.; Cooper, A.I. Large self-assembled chiral organic cages: Synthesis, structure, and shape persistence. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 10653–10656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Jelfs, K.E.; Eden, E.G.B.; Culshaw, J.L.; Shakespeare, S.; Pyzer-Knapp, E.O.; Thompson, H.P.G.; Bacsa, J.; Day, G.M.; Adams, D.J.; Cooper, A.I. In silico design of supramolecules from their precursors: Odd-even effects in cage-forming reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 9307–9310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Hasell, T.; Culshaw, J.L.; Chong, S.Y.; Schmidtmann, M.; Little, M.A.; Jelfs, K.E.; Pyzer-Knapp, E.O.; Shepherd, H.; Adams, D.J.; Day, G.M.; et al. Controlling the crystallization of porous organic cages: Molecular analogs of isoreticular frameworks using shape-specific directing solvents. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 1438–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Mitra, T.; Jelfs, K.E.; Schmidtmann, M.; Ahmed, A.; Chong, S.Y.; Adams, D.J.; Cooper, A.I. Molecular shape sorting using molecular organic cages. Nat. Chem. 2013, 5, 276–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Chen, L.J.; Reiss, P.S.; Chong, S.Y.; Holden, D.; Jelfs, K.E.; Hasell, T.; Little, M.A.; Kewley, A.; Briggs, M.E.; Stephenson, A.; et al. Separation of rare gases and chiral molecules by selective binding in porous organic cages. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13, 954–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yuan, L.M.; Zhang, J.H. A capillary Column Based on Chiral Porous Organic Cage for Separation of Optical Isomers. China Patent 201510050956.7, 2 February 2015. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kewley, A.; Stephenson, A.; Chen, L.J.; Briggs, M.E.; Hasell, T.; Cooper, A.I. Porous organic cages for gas chromatography separations. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 3207–3210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, J.H.; Xie, S.M.; Chen, L.; Wang, B.J.; He, P.C.; Yuan, L.M. Homochiral porous organic cage with high selectivity for the separation of racemates in gas chromatography. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 7817–7824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Xie, S.M.; Zhang, J.H.; Fu, N.; Wang, B.J.; Chen, L.; Yuan, L.M. A chiral porous organic cage for molecular recognition using gas chromatography. Anal. Chim. Acta 2016, 903, 156–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Zhang, J.H.; Xie, S.M.; Wang, B.J.; He, P.G.; Yuan, L.M. Highly selective separation of enantiomers using a chiral porous organic cage. J. Chromatogr. A 2015, 1426, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Giri, N.; Davidson, C.E.; Melaugh, G.; Del Popolo, M.G.; Jones, J.T.A.; Hasell, T.; Cooper, A.I.; Horton, P.N.; Hursthouse, M.B.; James, S.L. Alkylated organic cages: From porous crystals to neat liquids. Chem. Sci. 2012, 3, 2153–2157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Peng, J.L.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, X.H.; Qi, M.L. High-resolution separation performance of poly(caprolactone)diol for challenging isomers of xylenes, phenols and anilines by capillary gas chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2016, 1466, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Yamamoto, C.; Yashima, E.; Okamoto, Y. Structural analysis of amylose tris(3, 5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) by NMR relevant to its chiral recognition mechanism in HPLC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 12583–12589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds racemates and positional isomers are available from the authors.
Figure 1. (a) TGA of pentyl cage; (b) SEM image of the thickness of stationary phase coating in part of the pentyl cage-coated capillary column.
Figure 1. (a) TGA of pentyl cage; (b) SEM image of the thickness of stationary phase coating in part of the pentyl cage-coated capillary column.
Molecules 21 01466 g001
Figure 2. GC chromatograms using the pentyl cage-coated capillary column for separation of positional isomers: (a) o-, m-, and p-dibromobenzene under a N2 flow rate of 13.8 cm∙s−1 at 90 °C; (b) o-, m-, and p-dibromobenzene under a N2 flow rate of 13.8 cm∙s−1 at 110 °C; (c) o-, m-, and p-nitrochlorobenzene under a N2 flow rate of 14.9 cm∙s−1 at 115 °C; (d) o-, m-, and p-nitrobromobenzene under a N2 flow rate of 14.9 cm∙s−1 at 120 °C.
Figure 2. GC chromatograms using the pentyl cage-coated capillary column for separation of positional isomers: (a) o-, m-, and p-dibromobenzene under a N2 flow rate of 13.8 cm∙s−1 at 90 °C; (b) o-, m-, and p-dibromobenzene under a N2 flow rate of 13.8 cm∙s−1 at 110 °C; (c) o-, m-, and p-nitrochlorobenzene under a N2 flow rate of 14.9 cm∙s−1 at 115 °C; (d) o-, m-, and p-nitrobromobenzene under a N2 flow rate of 14.9 cm∙s−1 at 120 °C.
Molecules 21 01466 g002
Figure 3. GC chromatograms on the pentyl cage-coated capillary column for separation of racemates: (a) styrene oxide; (b) trans-stilbene oxide; (c) 1,2-epoxybutane; (d) 1,2-epoxyhexane; (e) 1-bromo-2,3-epoxypropane; (f) n-butyl glycidyl ether; (g) 1-methoxy-2-hydroxypropane; (h) 1-methoxy-2-butanol; (i) 3-butyn-2-ol; (j) 1-phenylethanol; (k) 1-phenyl-1-propanol; (l) 4-chlorophenethylalcohol; (m) 2-phenyl-1-propanol; (n) 1-naphthylethanol; (o) 1-(2-naphthyl)ethanol; (p) methyl 3-hydroxybutyrate, (q) ethyl 3-hydroxybutyrate; (r) γ-valerolactone. The separation conditions are shown in Table 3.
Figure 3. GC chromatograms on the pentyl cage-coated capillary column for separation of racemates: (a) styrene oxide; (b) trans-stilbene oxide; (c) 1,2-epoxybutane; (d) 1,2-epoxyhexane; (e) 1-bromo-2,3-epoxypropane; (f) n-butyl glycidyl ether; (g) 1-methoxy-2-hydroxypropane; (h) 1-methoxy-2-butanol; (i) 3-butyn-2-ol; (j) 1-phenylethanol; (k) 1-phenyl-1-propanol; (l) 4-chlorophenethylalcohol; (m) 2-phenyl-1-propanol; (n) 1-naphthylethanol; (o) 1-(2-naphthyl)ethanol; (p) methyl 3-hydroxybutyrate, (q) ethyl 3-hydroxybutyrate; (r) γ-valerolactone. The separation conditions are shown in Table 3.
Molecules 21 01466 g003
Figure 4. Reproducible chromatograms on the pentyl cage-coated capillary column for the separation of (a) o-, m-, and p-nitrochlorobenzene at 115 °C under a N2 flow rate of 14.9 cm∙s−1; (b) styrene oxide at 110 °C under a N2 linear velocity of 10.8 cm∙s−1 (1) Chromatograms obtained before the column were repeatedly used; (2), (3) and (4) chromatograms obtained after the columns have been subjected to 100, 300, and more than 500 injections, respectively.
Figure 4. Reproducible chromatograms on the pentyl cage-coated capillary column for the separation of (a) o-, m-, and p-nitrochlorobenzene at 115 °C under a N2 flow rate of 14.9 cm∙s−1; (b) styrene oxide at 110 °C under a N2 linear velocity of 10.8 cm∙s−1 (1) Chromatograms obtained before the column were repeatedly used; (2), (3) and (4) chromatograms obtained after the columns have been subjected to 100, 300, and more than 500 injections, respectively.
Molecules 21 01466 g004
Scheme 1. Synthesis of (S,S)-N,N’-bis(salicylidene)-1,2-pentyl-1,2-diaminoethane. Reagents and Conditions: (i) Toluene, Dean-Stark apparatus.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of (S,S)-N,N’-bis(salicylidene)-1,2-pentyl-1,2-diaminoethane. Reagents and Conditions: (i) Toluene, Dean-Stark apparatus.
Molecules 21 01466 sch001
Scheme 2. Synthesis of (S,S)-1,2-pentyl-1,2-diaminoethane. Reagents and Conditions: (i) THF/HCl 37% solution, ambient temperature for 24 h; (ii) NaOH 1M.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of (S,S)-1,2-pentyl-1,2-diaminoethane. Reagents and Conditions: (i) THF/HCl 37% solution, ambient temperature for 24 h; (ii) NaOH 1M.
Molecules 21 01466 sch002
Scheme 3. Synthesis of pentyl cage. Reagents and Condition: (i) TFA, CHCl3, 60 °C, 72 h.
Scheme 3. Synthesis of pentyl cage. Reagents and Condition: (i) TFA, CHCl3, 60 °C, 72 h.
Molecules 21 01466 sch003
Table 1. McReynolds constants of the pentyl cage-coated capillary column at 120 °C.
Table 1. McReynolds constants of the pentyl cage-coated capillary column at 120 °C.
X′Y′Z′U′S′Av.
37185102203126130.6
X′, Y′, Z′, U′ and S′ refer to benzene, 1-butanol, 2-pentanone, 1-nitropropane, and pyridine, respectively.
Table 2. Separation factor (α) and resolution (Rs) for separation of positional isomers on the pentyl cage-coated capillary column.
Table 2. Separation factor (α) and resolution (Rs) for separation of positional isomers on the pentyl cage-coated capillary column.
IsomersT (°C)Separation Factor (α)Resolution (Rs)
α1α2Rs1Rs2
Dichlorobenzene901.241.102.511.51
Dibromobenzene1101.231.122.831.57
Nitrochlorobenzene1151.141.672.919.59
Nitrobromobenzene1201.081.601.9910.30
Table 3. Separation of racemates on the pentyl cage-coated capillary column.
Table 3. Separation of racemates on the pentyl cage-coated capillary column.
RacematesT (°C)k1αRsv [a] (cm∙s−1)
Styrene oxide1103.241.071.5910.8
trans-Stilbene oxide1785.761.154.9411.9
1,2-Epoxybutane503.151.100.8611.0
1,2-Epoxyhexane1103.281.071.6910.7
1-Bromo-2,3-epoxypropane854.241.030.9410.8
n-Butyl glycidyl ether951.631.050.8412.5
1-Methoxy-2-hydroxypropane782.011.091.0112.0
1-Methoxy-2-butanol823.301.141.5712.3
3-Butyn-2-ol673.011.111.3011.9
1-Phenylethanol1205.061.061.5611.8
1-Phenyl-1-propanol1254.951.091.6913.6
1-(4-Chlorophenyl)ethanol1355.891.031.1812.3
2-Phenyl-1-propanol1305.771.030.5713.0
1-Naphthylethanol1756.571.082.2010.2
1-(2-Naphthyl)ethanol1756.501.030.5811.4
Methyl 3-hydroxybutyrate903.61.091.0111.2
Ethyl 3-hydroxybutyrate1003.421.060.7110.3
γ-Valerolactone1153.041.030.1512.4
[a] v is the linear velocity of the N2 carrier gas.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xie, S.; Zhang, J.; Fu, N.; Wang, B.; Hu, C.; Yuan, L. Application of Homochiral Alkylated Organic Cages as Chiral Stationary Phases for Molecular Separations by Capillary Gas Chromatography. Molecules 2016, 21, 1466. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21111466

AMA Style

Xie S, Zhang J, Fu N, Wang B, Hu C, Yuan L. Application of Homochiral Alkylated Organic Cages as Chiral Stationary Phases for Molecular Separations by Capillary Gas Chromatography. Molecules. 2016; 21(11):1466. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21111466

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xie, Shengming, Junhui Zhang, Nan Fu, Bangjin Wang, Cong Hu, and Liming Yuan. 2016. "Application of Homochiral Alkylated Organic Cages as Chiral Stationary Phases for Molecular Separations by Capillary Gas Chromatography" Molecules 21, no. 11: 1466. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21111466

APA Style

Xie, S., Zhang, J., Fu, N., Wang, B., Hu, C., & Yuan, L. (2016). Application of Homochiral Alkylated Organic Cages as Chiral Stationary Phases for Molecular Separations by Capillary Gas Chromatography. Molecules, 21(11), 1466. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21111466

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop