Next Article in Journal
Peripheral and Cerebral Resistance Arteries in the Spontaneously Hypertensive Heart Failure Rat: Effects of Stilbenoid Polyphenols
Next Article in Special Issue
Hydrogen Atomic Positions of O–H···O Hydrogen Bonds in Solution and in the Solid State: The Synergy of Quantum Chemical Calculations with 1H-NMR Chemical Shifts and X-ray Diffraction Methods
Previous Article in Journal
Chemical Composition, Antioxidant, Antimicrobial and Cytotoxic Activities of Essential Oil from Premna microphylla Turczaninow
Previous Article in Special Issue
Intramolecular Hydrogen Bonds in Conformers of Quinine and Quinidine: An HF, MP2 and DFT Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Looking Inside the Intramolecular C−H∙∙∙O Hydrogen Bond in Lactams Derived from α-Methylbenzylamine

by
Sandra Mejía
,
Julio M. Hernández-Pérez
*,
Jacinto Sandoval-Lira
* and
Fernando Sartillo-Piscil
*
Centro de Investigación de la Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, and Centro de Química de la Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, 14 Sur Esq. San Claudio, San Manuel. C. P. 72570 Puebla, Mexico
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2017, 22(3), 361; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22030361
Submission received: 2 February 2017 / Revised: 22 February 2017 / Accepted: 24 February 2017 / Published: 28 February 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Intramolecular Hydrogen Bonding 2017)

Abstract

:
Recently, strong evidence that supports the presence of an intramolecular C−H···O hydrogen bond in amides derived from the chiral auxiliary α-methylbenzylamine was disclosed. Due to the high importance of this chiral auxiliary in asymmetric synthesis, the inadvertent presence of this C−H···O interaction may lead to new interpretations upon stereochemical models in which this chiral auxiliary is present. Therefore, a series of lactams containing the chiral auxiliary α-methylbenzylamine (from three to eight-membered ring) were theoretically studied at the MP2/cc-pVDZ level of theory with the purpose of studying the origin and nature of the C−Hα···O interaction. NBO analysis revealed that rehybridization at C atom of the C−Hα bond (s-character at C is ~23%) and the subsequent bond polarization are the dominant effect over the orbital interaction energy n(O)→σ*C−Hα (E(2) < 2 kcal/mol), causing an important shortening of the C−Hα bond distance and an increment in the positive charge in the Hα atom.

1. Introduction

With the vast theoretical and experimental contributions coming from the laboratories of Desiraju [1,2,3], Steiner [4,5], and Scheiner [6,7] regarding the existence of C−H···O hydrogen bonding within a wide range of synthetic and naturally occurring compounds, this “weak” interaction has become a well-accepted axiom. Indeed, today its relevance and importance in chemistry is fundamental to the interpretation and understanding of molecular conformation (either in solution or in the solid state [8]) and of chemical transformations in solution. Although this interaction does not usually exceed 3 kcal/mol [9,10], it plays a crucial role in favoring crystallization [11,12], conformational equilibrium [13,14] or inducing selectivity [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. In this context, a recent report which describes the role of the intramolecular C−Hα···O contact of chiral lactams (derived from the α-methylbenzylamine) in their spatial arrangement—both in solution and in solid state [23]—have attracted our attention, especially because this chiral auxiliary is frequently employed in asymmetric synthesis [24]. Consequently, the current theoretical study of a set of cyclic amides derived from α-methylbenzylamine attempts to further advance towards the understanding of the origin and the nature of this C−Hα···O hydrogen bonding.

2. Results and Discussion

If we assumed the presence of a C−Hα···O hydrogen contact, then a bicycle-type molecular structure, as shown in Figure 1, must be formed. Therefore, a set of non-substituted lactams derived from α-methylbenzylamine, going from three to eight-membered rings (16) were modeled.
To corroborate the presence of a C−Hα···O hydrogen bond in lactams 16, molecular geometry analysis, NBO analysis, C−Hα stretching, and electron density analysis were used.

2.1. Energy and Geometrical Parameters

Similar to previous work [23], two minima were observed for lactams 16: the closed structure a and the open structure b (Figure 2). These geometries were characterized by the dihedral angle Φ given by the H(1), C(2), N(3), and C(4) atoms. The closed geometry a has values Φ near to 0.0°, suggesting C-Hα···O bond formation, whereas in the open conformation b, the Φ angle is near to 180°, indicating the lack of Hα···O contact. Subsequently, the geometry of lactams depicted in Figure 1 were optimized in both closed and open forms, and their energy differences were determined (see Supplementary File: Tables S1–S12). The relative energies (ΔE = Eclosed − Eopen) were corrected by zero point energies, and the results are shown in Table 1.
As expected, the aziridinone 1 does not reach the closed conformation (Φ angle of 33.415°) because of its very strained geometry. The positive value of ΔE = 1.20 kcal/mol indicates that the open geometry (Φ = 166.71°) is the preferred conformation. A similar result was observed for β-lactam 2, although the energy difference between the closed (Φ = 28.003°) and open (Φ = 163.10°) forms is smaller (ΔE = 0.34 kcal/mol), again indicating a preferred open conformation. As the ring size increases from five to seven atoms (35), the closed geometries show dihedral angles closer to zero (20.410° to 8.575°) and the ΔE values are shifted from positive to negative, ranging from −2.19 to −4.04 kcal/mol. It is clear that the largest lactams prefer the closed geometry. However, the eight-membered lactam 6 has an energy difference of only −2.90 kcal/mol, even when the closed geometry has an almost planar dihedral angle Φ = 3.847°. It should be mentioned that due to the high conformational flexibility of 6, a third minimum structure 6c (E-conformer with 14.98 kcal/mol) was detected (see Figure 3). Given the geometry features and the high energy of conformer 6c, it was decided not to include it in the current study.
The following parameters of the closed structures 1 to 6 were additionally studied: C−Hα distance, Hα···O distance, donor and acceptor atoms distance, and the C−Hα···O angle. These parameters were compared to the geometric criteria summarized by Steiner [2] for classifying hydrogen bonds.
As shown in Table 2, aziridinone 1 presents the longest Hα···O and C2···O distances (3.3600 and 3.3501 Å, respectively) with a C−Hα···O angle of 79.97° indicating lack of directionality. Along with the high energy of the closed geometry, this rules out the possibility of an intramolecular hydrogen bonding. For lactams 2 and 3, their Hα···O bond distance (2.7605 and 2.3449 Å, respectively), C2···O distance (3.1269 and 2.8585 Å, respectively), and C−Hα···O bond angle (98.85° and 106.37°, respectively) indicate that C−Hα···O are getting closer to being identified as weak hydrogen bonds [2]. For the larger lactams 4, 5, and 6, the Hα···O bond distance (from 2.1785 to 2.1390 Å) and the C2···O distance (from 2.7425 to 2.7340 Å) become even shorter, while the C−Hα···O bond angle increases from 109.07° to 111.09°. These data are in concordance with a weak C−Hα···O interaction.
An interesting trend observed in Table 2 is that as the ring size increases, the C−Hα and C2···O distances shorten. These structural changes attenuate the n(O)→σ*C−Hα orbital interaction, which in turn affects the C−Hα stretching. This behavior is observed in hydrogen bonds wherein the electronegativity of the donor atom X (e.g., C2) and the H are similar. Such interactions have been called “improper” or “blue-shifting” hydrogen bonds [25,26].

2.2. NBO Analysis

The red and blue shifting of hydrogen bonds is attributed to a pair of correlated effects; namely, the n(Y)→σ*X−H orbital interaction and rehybridization at the X atom with a concomitant polarization of the X−H bond [27,28,29,30]. According to Alabugin et al. [27], as the electronegativity of Z increases (Z = CH3, NH2, OH, F), so does the polarization of a C−Z bond, whereas the s-character in the carbon-centered hybrid atomic orbital of the C−Z bond is reduced. This is a direct consequence of Bent’s rule, [31] and can be observed not only in C−H bonds, but also in Si−H, S−H, and N−H bonds [32,33,34]. In the hyperconjugation, the acceptor Y donates a lone pair to the C−H bond σ* orbital, causing its lengthening and weakening, with the subsequent red-shifting of the stretching frequency. Depending on which effect dominates upon hydrogen bonding, the C−H bond will become shorter (rehybridization) or larger (hyperconjugation). To evaluate these effects in the closed lactams 2 to 6, we used NBO analysis [35,36], and the results are displayed in Table 3. The open conformer of lactam 4 was also calculated as a reference point.
For lactams 36, the s-character on the carbon donor and the C−Hα bond polarization increased (compared to that of open conformer 4b). Furthermore, the C−Hα bond distance and the hydrogen and carbon charges are highly correlated; for instance, as the hydrogen charges become more positive and the carbon charges becomes less positive, the C−Hα distance shortens (see Figure 4a).
With regard to the hyperconjugation effect, the NBO calculation for β-lactam 2 did show a negligible orbital overlap n(O)→σ*(C−Hα) (E(2) = 0.11 kcal/mol), which excludes the C−Hα···O hydrogen bonding. This is expected, since the geometric parameters already pointed in this direction. Cyclic amide 3 has a n(O)→σ*(C−Hα) orbital interaction of 0.75 kcal/mol that suggests a weak orbital overlap, which stems from a poor C−Hα directionality (the closed conformer 3 is deviated 20.41° from the planarity). The hyperconjugative energy for lactams 4 (i.e., the energy associated to the n(O)→σ*(C−Hα) interaction, see Figure 4b), 5, and 6 are in the same order of magnitude: 1.26, 1.29, and 1.60 kcal/mol, respectively (see Table 3). These hyperconjugative energies, along with the low orbital populations σ*(C−H), are characteristic of an improper hydrogen bonding [25,26].

2.3. Analysis of the C−Hα Stretching

Since the blue-shifting of vibrational frequencies originates from the strong repulsion between the hydrogen atom and the acceptor, as well as the attraction between the donor and the acceptor atoms [37], it is expected to find these vibrational frequencies in the systems studied herein. Thereupon, the fundamental stretching frequencies of C−Hα bond for lactams 26 in both conformations (open and closed)—and consequently their corresponding relative infrared shift (RIS)—were calculated. The results are displayed in Table 4.
In all cases, blue-shift frequencies are observed for the closed conformers a, which is in accordance with the presence of the C−Hα···O interaction. According to the RIS values of 0.99% to 2.37%, the C−Hα···O bond gets stronger as the ring size increases; nevertheless, it remains within the range of weak hydrogen bonding, which is <10% [4,5,6]. It should be noted that the RIS of β-lactam 2 is only 0.99%; therefore, it can be disregarded as evidence of a C−Hα···O contact, and similarly for lactam 3, for which showed a RIS value of 1.59%. These results are in agreement with a poor n(O)→σ*(C−Hα) orbitaloverlap.
The correlation between the donor–acceptor distance (C2···O in Table 2) and the relative infrared shift (%RIS in Table 4) for lactams 26 is more clearly recognized in Figure 5.

2.4. Analysis Based in Quantum Theory of Atoms in Molecules

Analysis based on topological properties of the electron density (ρ(r)) is an additional tool for the study of hydrogen bonding. In the Quantum Theory of Atoms in Molecules (QTAIM) introduced by Bader [38], the analysis of critical points provides important information about interatomic interactions. At a critical point, the gradient of the electron density vanishes, and they are classified into four groups: maxima in ρ(r) are related to nuclei, minima are associated with cage critical points, and saddle points are connected with ring or bond critical points. The bond critical points (BCP) represent the minimum in ρ(r) along the bonding direction, pointing out a chemical interaction. Koch and Popelier [39] have suggested some criteria to characterize hydrogen bonds, such as values of electron density, ρ(r) = 0.002–0.040 a.u., and its Laplacian, ∇2ρ(r) = 0.024–0.139 a.u.
The values of ρ(r) and its Laplacian in BCP for lactams 4 to 6 are shown in Table 5. While lactam 3 does not exhibit a BCP, larger lactams 4, 5, and 6 indeed show a BCP for the C−Hα···O interaction, whose values are within the stablished range [20]. Since the C−Hα···O bond is present in lactams 46, a bicyclic structure is formed. Consequently, ring critical points inside the second cycle were found for the corresponding lactams.
In spite of lactam 3 showed some features that might be associated to the existence of a hydrogen bond, such as %RIS = 1.59 and the presence of the C−Hα bond polarization, the absence lack of BCP suggests an extremely weak hydrogen bond.

4. Materials and Methods

In this study, the MP2/cc-pVDZ level of theory was used. Geometries were fully optimized, and minima were confirmed through vibrational analysis. All calculations were carried out using Gaussian 09 [40]. The topological analysis of the electron density was carried out using DensToolKit program [41].

5. Conclusions

The theoretical study reported here states that the dominant effect that originates the C−Hα···O hydrogen bonding in cyclic amides, derived from α-methylbenzylamine, is the polarization of the C−Hα bond, which is reflected in the increment of the s-character at C atom (it increases from 22.05% to 22.87%). As the distance of the C−Hα bond shortens, the charge at the H atom increases, favoring this “improper” hydrogen bonding.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online. Tables S1–S12: xyz coordinates of the optimized geometry and MP2/cc-pVDZ energy of all structure study.

Acknowledgments

The authors thankfully acknowledge the computer resources, technical expertise and support provided by the Laboratorio Nacional de Supercómputo del Sureste de México through the grant number O-2016/026. JMHP and FSP are grateful to Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (BUAP-VIEP). S.M. thank CONACYT for graduate scholarships (581648). Authors also thank Juan Manuel Solano-Altamirano for revision of the manuscript.

Author Contributions

Sandra Mejía and Jacinto Sandoval-Lira performed the calculations. Julio M. Hernández-Pérez and Fernando Sartillo-Piscil planned the project. Julio M. Hernández-Pérez, Jacinto Sandoval-Lira, and Fernando Sartillo-Piscil wrote the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Desiraju, G.R.; Steiner, T. The Weak Hydrogen Bond in Structural Chemistry and Biology; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  2. Desiraju, G.R. Crystal Gazing: Structure Prediction and Polymorphism. Science 1997, 278, 404–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Desiraju, G.R. The C−H···O Hydrogen Bond: Structural Implications and Supramolecular Design. Acc. Chem. Res. 1996, 29, 441–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Steiner, T. The Hydrogen Bond in the Solid State. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 48–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Steiner, T. Influence of C−H···O Interactions on the Conformation of Methyl Groups Quantified from Neutron Diffraction Data. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 433–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sheiner, S. Hydrogen Bonding: A Theoretical Perspective; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  7. Scheiner, S. Weak H-bonds. Comparisions of CH···O to NH···O proteins and PH···N to direct P···N interactions. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 13860–13872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Grabowski, S.J. Analysis of Hydrogen Bonds in Crystals. Crystals 2016, 6, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Parthasarathi, R.; Subramanian, V.; Sathyamurthy, N. Hydrogen Bonding without Borders: An Atoms-in-Molecules Perspective. J. Phys. Chem. A 2006, 110, 3349–3351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Scheiner, S.; Kar, T.; Gu, Y. Strength of the C-H···O Hydrogen Bond of Amino Acid Residues. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 9832–9837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Shaw, N.; Cheng, C.; Tempel, W.; Chang, J.; Ng, J.; Wang, X.-Y.; Perrett, S.; Rose, J.; Rao, Z.; Wang, B.-C.; Liu, Z.-J. (NZ) CH···O Contacts assist crystallization of a ParB-like nuclease. BMC Struct. Biol. 2007, 7, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Scheiner, S. Dissection of the Factors Affecting Formation of a CH···O H-Bond. A Case Study. Crystals 2015, 5, 327–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jones, C.R.; Baruah, P.K.; Thompson, A.L.; Scheiner, S.; Smith, M.D. Can a C–H···O Interaction Be a Determinant of Conformation? J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 12064–12071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Rodríguez-Soria, V.; Sanchez, M.; Quintero, L.; Sartillo-Piscil, F. The 5-exo-trig radical cyclization reaction under reductive and oxidative conditions in the synthesis of optically pure GABA derivatives. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 10809–10815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Corey, E.J.; Rohde, J.J. The application of the formyl CH···O hydrogen bond postulate to the understanding of enantioselective reactions involving chiral boron lewis acids and aldehydes. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 37–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Corey, E.J.; Rohde, J.J.; Fischer, A.; Azimioara, M.D. A hypothesis for conformational restriction in complexes of formyl compounds with boron Lewis acids. Experimental evidence for formyl CH···O and CH···F hydrogen bonds. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 33–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rodríguez-Soria, V.; Quintero, L.; Sartillo-Piscil, F. A novel stereoselective tin-free radical protocol for the enantioselective synthesis of pyrrolidinones and its application to the synthesis of biologically active GABA-derivatives. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 2750–2754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rodríguez-Soria, V.; Quintero, L.; Sartillo-Piscil, F. Stereoselective 5-exo-trig radical cyclization in the enantioselective synthesis of Pregabalin. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 4305–4308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sandoval-Lira, J.; Hernández-Pérez, J.M.; Sartillo-Piscil, F. Radical 1,4-phenyl migration favored by C-H···O interaction. A theoretical investigation. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53, 6689–6693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fuentes, L.; Quintero, L.; Cordero-Vargas, A.; Eustaquio, C.; Terán, J.L.; Sartillo-Piscil, F. The amide bond rotation controlled by an unusual C–H···O hydrogen bonding that favors the 1,4-phenyl radical migration. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011, 52, 3630–3632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Alkayar, Z.T.; Adams, H.; Coldham, I. Regiochemical and Stereochemical Studies of the Intramolecular Dipolar Cycloaddition of Nitrones Derived from Quaternary Aldehydes. Synlett 2016, 27, 447–449. [Google Scholar]
  22. Alabugin, I.V.; Gilmore, K. Finding the right path: Baldwin “Rules for Ring Closure” and stereoelectronic control of cyclizations. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 11246–11250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sandoval-Lira, J.; Fuentes, L.; Quintero, L.; Höpfl, H.; Hernández-Pérez, J.M.; Terán, J.L.; Sartillo-Piscil, F. The Stabilizing Role of the Intramolecular C-H···O Hydrogen Bond in Cyclic Amides Derived From α-Methylbenzylamine. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 80, 4481–4490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Jaen, J.C.; Hart, A.C. (S)-α-Methylbenzylamine. In Encyclopedia of Reagents for Organic Synthesis; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hobza, P.; Havlas, Z. Blue-Shifting Hydrogen Bonds. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 4253–4264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Jorly, J.; Eluvathingal, D.J. Red-, Blue-, or No-Shift in Hydrogen Bonds: A Unified Explanation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 4620–4632. [Google Scholar]
  27. Alabugin, I.V.; Manoharan, M.; Peabody, S.; Weinhold, F. Electronic basis of improper hydrogen bonding: A subtle balance of hyperconjugation and rehybridization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 5973–5987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Alabugin, I.V.; Bresch, S.; Manoharan, M. Hybridization Trends for Main Group Elements and Expanding the Bent’s Rule beyond Carbon: More than Electronegativity. J. Phys. Chem. A 2014, 118, 3663–3677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Alabugin, I.V.; Bresch, S.; Passos dos Gomes, G. Orbital hybridization: A key electronic factor in control of structure and reactivity. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2014, 28, 147–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jyothish, J.; Jose, A.; Jemmis, E.D. Continuum in the X-Z---Y weak bonds: Z = main group elements. J. Comput. Chem. 2016, 37, 270–279. [Google Scholar]
  31. Bent, H.A. An Appraisal of Valence-bond Structures and Hybridization in Compounds of the First-row elements. Chem. Rev. 1961, 61, 275–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, X.; Liu, L.; Schlegel, H.B. On the Physical Origin of Blue-Shifted Hydrogen Bonds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 9639–9647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Fan, J.M.; Liu, L.; Guo, Q.-X. Substituent effects on the blue-shifted hydrogen bonds. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2002, 365, 464–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yang, Y. Coexistence of S–H···O and N–H···O Blue-shifted Hydrogen Bonds in a Small System: HSO···HNO. Chem. Lett. 2008, 37, 1070–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Reed, A.E.; Weinhold, F. Natural bond orbital analysis of near hartree-fock water dimer. J. Chem. Phys. 1983, 78, 4066–4073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Reed, A.E.; Weinhold, F.; Curtiss, L.A.; Pochatko, D.J. Natural bond orbital analysis of molecular interactions: Theoretical studies of binary complexes of HF, H2O, NH3, N2, O2, F2, CO and CO2 with HF, H2O, and NH3. J. Chem. Phys. 1986, 84, 5687–5705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Weng, X.; Su, P.; Wu, W.; Mo, Y. Red-Shifting versus Blue-Shifting Hydrogen Bonds: Perspective from Ab Initio Valence Bond Theory. J. Phys. Chem. A 2016, 120, 2749–2756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Bader, R.F.W. Atoms in Molecules, A Quantum Theory; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  39. Koch, U.; Popelier, P.L.A. Characterization of C-H-O Hydrogen Bonds on the Basis of the Charge Density. J. Phys. Chem. A 1995, 99, 9747–9754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Petersson, G.A.; et al. Gaussian 09, Revision B.01; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  41. Solano-Altamirano, J.M.; Hernández-Pérez, J.M. DensToolKit: A comprehensive open-source package for analyzing the electron density and its derivative scalar and vector fields. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2015, 196, 362–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  • Sample Availability: Not available.
Figure 1. Systems studied.
Figure 1. Systems studied.
Molecules 22 00361 g001
Figure 2. The dihedral angle Φ is formed by atoms H(1), C(2), N(3), and C(4). (a) Closed, when Φ presents values near 0.0°; and (b) open, when Φ presents values near 180°.
Figure 2. The dihedral angle Φ is formed by atoms H(1), C(2), N(3), and C(4). (a) Closed, when Φ presents values near 0.0°; and (b) open, when Φ presents values near 180°.
Molecules 22 00361 g002
Figure 3. Observed conformers of lactam 6, and their relative energies.
Figure 3. Observed conformers of lactam 6, and their relative energies.
Molecules 22 00361 g003
Figure 4. (a) Correlation of population of charges for H and C in the C−Hα bond with the C−Hα distance (charge of H in blue and for C in red); (b) NBO plots illustrate the overlap of the n(o) orbital and the σ*(C−Hα) orbital in the conformer 4a.
Figure 4. (a) Correlation of population of charges for H and C in the C−Hα bond with the C−Hα distance (charge of H in blue and for C in red); (b) NBO plots illustrate the overlap of the n(o) orbital and the σ*(C−Hα) orbital in the conformer 4a.
Molecules 22 00361 g004
Figure 5. Correlation of %RIS for C−H bond with C2···O distance donor–acceptor. %RIS = 813.64Exp(−2.153*distance), R2 = 0.9806.
Figure 5. Correlation of %RIS for C−H bond with C2···O distance donor–acceptor. %RIS = 813.64Exp(−2.153*distance), R2 = 0.9806.
Molecules 22 00361 g005
Table 1. Dihedral angles and relative energies of open and close conformer.
Table 1. Dihedral angles and relative energies of open and close conformer.
LactamΦ, Open (°)Φ, Closed (°)ΔE (kcal/mol)
1166.7133.4151.20
2163.1028.0030.34
3156.2420.410−2.19
4166.569.837−2.11
5156.398.575−4.04
6157.023.847−2.90
Table 2. Geometrical parameters of closed structures.
Table 2. Geometrical parameters of closed structures.
LactamOH (Å)C−H (Å)C2...O (Å)C−H...O (°)
13.36001.11053.350179.97
22.76051.10423.126998.85
32.34491.10232.8585106.37
42.17851.09992.7425109.07
52.19331.10002.7655109.71
62.13901.09952.7340111.09
Table 3. C−H Distance and NBO analysis in closed conformers. The data for 4 open (4b) is used as reference.
Table 3. C−H Distance and NBO analysis in closed conformers. The data for 4 open (4b) is used as reference.
LactamC−Hα (Å)s-Character % at C2Polarization of C−Hα BondCharge (u.a.)Population σ*(C−Hα)E(2) (kcal/mol)
% C% Hat Cat Hα
4b1.104620.9960.4339.570.016150.205630.01615-
21.104222.0562.01037.9900.016940.238530.016940.11
31.102322.4962.75037.3500.017810.250870.017810.75
41.099922.8763.39036.6100.018890.263080.018891.26
51.100022.7563.19036.8100.018260.259050.018261.29
61.099522.7663.44036.5600.018880.263740.018881.60
Table 4. Calculated frequencies of the fundamental C−Hα stretching, and their corresponding relative infrared shifts (%RIS).
Table 4. Calculated frequencies of the fundamental C−Hα stretching, and their corresponding relative infrared shifts (%RIS).
LactamConformers aConformers b
ν (cm−1)ν (cm−1)%RIS
23105.263074.690.99
33123.343074.321.59
43145.593078.072.19
53145.033078.422.16
63147.573074.812.37
Table 5. Values of electron density and Laplacian of electron density in the C−Hα···O bond critical point.
Table 5. Values of electron density and Laplacian of electron density in the C−Hα···O bond critical point.
Lactamρ (BCP)2ρ(r) (BCP)
40.02260.0843
50.02190.0816
60.02410.0870

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mejía, S.; Hernández-Pérez, J.M.; Sandoval-Lira, J.; Sartillo-Piscil, F. Looking Inside the Intramolecular C−H∙∙∙O Hydrogen Bond in Lactams Derived from α-Methylbenzylamine. Molecules 2017, 22, 361. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22030361

AMA Style

Mejía S, Hernández-Pérez JM, Sandoval-Lira J, Sartillo-Piscil F. Looking Inside the Intramolecular C−H∙∙∙O Hydrogen Bond in Lactams Derived from α-Methylbenzylamine. Molecules. 2017; 22(3):361. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22030361

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mejía, Sandra, Julio M. Hernández-Pérez, Jacinto Sandoval-Lira, and Fernando Sartillo-Piscil. 2017. "Looking Inside the Intramolecular C−H∙∙∙O Hydrogen Bond in Lactams Derived from α-Methylbenzylamine" Molecules 22, no. 3: 361. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22030361

APA Style

Mejía, S., Hernández-Pérez, J. M., Sandoval-Lira, J., & Sartillo-Piscil, F. (2017). Looking Inside the Intramolecular C−H∙∙∙O Hydrogen Bond in Lactams Derived from α-Methylbenzylamine. Molecules, 22(3), 361. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22030361

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop