Next Article in Journal
Herb–Drug Interaction Potential of Anti-Borreliae Effective Extracts from Uncaria tomentosa (Samento) and Otoba parvifolia (Banderol) Assessed In Vitro
Previous Article in Journal
Small Polar Molecules: A Challenge in Marine Chemical Ecology
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 24
Issue 1
10.3390/molecules24010136
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Selection of Reference Genes for qRT-PCR Analysis in Lentinula edodes after Hot-Air Drying

by
Shuangshuang Gao
1,
Gangzheng Wang
2,
Zhicheng Huang
1,
Xiaoyu Lei
1,
Yinbing Bian
2,
Ying Liu
1,* and
Wen Huang
1,*
1
College of Food Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China
2
Institute of Applied Mycology, Plant Science and Technology College, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2019, 24(1), 136; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24010136
Submission received: 3 November 2018 / Revised: 24 December 2018 / Accepted: 25 December 2018 / Published: 31 December 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Chemical Biology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Volatile sulfur compounds gradually develop in Lentinula edodes after hot-air drying, and many genes are involved in the generation of these sulfur compounds. The expression stability of reference genes may vary in a particular experimental treatment when analyzing their expressions by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). In this study, the expression profile of 17 candidate genes was assessed in L. edodes under treatment at 50 °C for 0, 1, 2, and 3 h, and the expression stability of each reference gene was analyzed by three statistical algorithms, including geNorm, NormFinder, and BestKeeper. Results indicated that the two optimal reference genes for mycelium and fruiting body were CAC and DAHP as well as CAC and NUP, respectively. Additionally, CAC and DAHP were found to be the two most stable reference genes across the mycelium and fruiting body set. Our results will provide a genetic foundation for further research on the metabolism genes of sulfur compounds in L. edodes.

1. Introduction

Lentinula edodes (shiitake mushroom), an edible mushroom well known for its nutritional and pharmacological values as well as the bioconversion of agricultural wastes, ranks only second to Agaricus bisoporus in production and cultivation in the word [1,2]. The unique characteristics of dried L. edodes mushrooms have been highly prized since ancient times, due to their higher amount of nutrients and greater umami flavor than fresh mushrooms [3,4]. The L. edodes mushrooms can be dried by hot air, freezing, vacuum, and microwave. Hot-air drying (HAD) is widely used because of low cost and easy operation as well as obvious improvement of the content of sulfur compounds essential for the unique aroma of L. edodes [3,5]. However, the molecular mechanism for the hot-air drying of L. edodes remains unclear. Therefore, exploring the transcript changes after this process on the basis of RNA-seq may facilitate the understanding of this mechanism. For the sake of its high sensitivity and good repeatability as well as wide dynamic quantification range [6,7], qRT-PCR (quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction) is widely used to analyze and verify the expression patterns and levels of genes regulating the metabolism of sulfur compounds after the drying process.
However, the accuracy of qRT-PCR is dramatically affected by various technical factors, such as the quality of RNA, efficiency of RNA reverse transcription, specificity and amplification of primers, and gene expression normalization [8,9,10]. The purpose of normalization is to minimize the effect of nonbiological variation on gene expression. Currently, the application of one or more reference genes, whose expression levels should remain basically unchanged in any experiment conditions, different test tissues, and cells, is the common normalization method in qRT-PCR analysis [11,12,13]. The use of unstable reference genes can generate a negative effect on the result of the relative expression analysis [14]. An increasing number of reports have demonstrated that the expression of any housekeeping genes is stable in specific tissues and under certain experimental conditions [15,16,17,18], suggesting that the screening of proper reference genes for normalization is pivotal to guarantee the accuracy and reliability of results.
Several studies have been performed on the selection and evaluation of stable reference genes under different conditions, such as different development stages and nutrient conditions as well as abiotic stresses in Morchella [19], Ganoderma lucidum [20,21,22], Volvariella volvacea [23,24], and L. edodes [25,26]. Nevertheless, the information about the reference genes used for qRT-PCR normalization of the hot-air-dried L. deodes is rather limited. Recently, the RNA-seq between fresh mushroom and mushroom dried by hot air at 50 °C for 3 h was performed in our laboratory (unpublished data).
In this study, we aimed to detect the reference genes that are stably expressed in the hot-air-dried L. edodes. Seventeen candidate reference genes were selected from our in-house L. edodes transcriptome data. Three different algorithms (geNorm, NormFinder, and Bestkeeper) were used to evaluate the expression stability of the reference genes after L. edodes drying. The reference genes selected in this study could provide a genetic basis for understanding the regulatory mechanism of mushroom drying on sulfurous aroma metabolism in L. edodes.

2. Results

2.1. Selection of Candidate Genes with Stable Expression Using RNA-seq Data

Based on the FPKM value, 10 genes with an absolute log2-fold value of 1 were selected. Meanwhile, another seven housekeeping genes reported in the literature were also tested. All 17 selected genes contained conserved domains and were mapped to protein database (Supplementary Table S1). The full-length sequences of candidate reference genes were obtained from the genome database of L. edodes (http://legdb.chenlianfu.com/) and used for the following primer design. The standard curves were generated from 10-fold serial cDNA dilutions by qRT-PCR, and the threshold cycle (Ct) was used to normalize for each standard curve. Amplification efficiency (E) was measured as 10−1/slope − 1 and expressed in percentage. All the primers showed high amplification E values from 91.2% to 109.5%, and high linear correlation coefficients (R2) from 0.984 to 1.000. Characteristics of candidate reference genes used in this study are presented in Table 1. The melting curve results revealed the candidate genes as a single peak except for the Actin gene (Supplementary Figure S1). Actin melting curve showed a smaller shoulder, with a 750 bp secondary PCR product (data not shown). The amplicon size, PCR efficiency, and minimum and maximum threshold cycle (Ct) values were observed across fresh L. edodes mycelium. The standard curves (Supplementary Table S2) were used to calculate PCR efficiency.

2.2. Expression Profiles of Candidate Reference Genes

Data from three technical repetitions of three biological replicates (a total of nine Ct values) were averaged and used for further analysis. The mean Ct values of mycelia were 19.17 for EF and 29.01 for UT, with the mean value of 12 genes in the range of 25 to 30. The EF, GAPDH, ACT, CAC, and E3 were highly expressed and their Ct values were smaller than 25. Moreover, the top five with the minimum relative variation were PK, DAHP, GAPDH, EF, and CAC (Figure 1A). While the mean Ct values of fruiting bodies were 18.41 for EF and 26.01 for AP2A, the remaining 15 genes had a mean Ct value between 20 and 25, and the top five with the smallest relative variation were CAC, DAHP, NUP, RPL2, and PI4K (Figure 1B). A comparison of set A and B showed that the mean Ct values of all the 17 candidate reference genes were higher in mycelium than in fruiting body. Obviously, the Ct value of most of the candidate reference genes showed a greater relative variation in set C than in set A or set B (Figure 1C).
The mean Ct values of the candidate reference genes are shown on the y-axis, and the 17 candidate reference genes are shown on the X-axis. Error bars represent SD values. Figure 1A shows the mycelium data set, with the mean Ct value of each candidate reference gene being the arithmetic mean value of four different mycelial samples; 1B, the fruiting body data set, with the mean Ct value of each candidate reference gene being the arithmetic mean value of four different fruiting body samples; 1C, the all-sample data set, with the mean Ct value of each candidate reference gene being the arithmetic mean value of eight samples.

2.3. geNorm Analysis

The geNorm software calculates the gene expression stability (M) of a reference gene and excludes the gene with the highest M value, allowing ranking of the tested genes according to their expression stability. When the threshold value of M is larger than 1.5, the candidate reference genes are not accepted. To determine the optimal number of reference genes in a special experimental condition, the geNorm software can also be used to calculate the pairwise variation (V) by applying a cutoff value of 0.150.
Figure 2 shows the expression stability of the candidate genes for fruiting body and mycelium under high-temperature stress over different time periods. For set A, CAC and DAHP were most stable, while MSH3 was clearly less consistently expressed (Figure 2A). For set B, CAC and NUP were most stable, while AP2A was the least stable gene (Figure 2B). For the total sample data set, RPL2 and RCL1 were indicated as the most stable genes, while UT and MSH3 were indicated as the least stable ones (Figure 2C). It can be seen that CAC was the most stable gene in both fruiting body and mycelium, but it was less stable in set C. While RPL2 and RCL1 were indicated as the genes with the most stable expression in set C, they were ranked at the third and fourth position in set A and B, respectively. Overall, the M values of all candidate genes were less than 1.5, indicating that all the candidate reference genes could be accepted in the three sample data sets of L. edodes.
The evaluation of pairwise variation under each experiment condition is presented in Figure 2D. According to a Vn/Vn+1 cutoff value of 0.150 for pairwise variations, the first n reference genes are sufficient for accurate normalization. In this article, the highest pairwise variation values for any gene pair were 0.051 for set A, 0.062 for set B, and 0.148 for set C, indicating that the optimal number of reference genes was two genes in all three sample sets of L. edodes, with CAC and DAHP for mycelium, CAC and NUP for fruiting body, and RPL2 and RCL1 for the entire data set.

2.4. NormFinder Analysis

NormFinder, which takes into account the intragroup and the intergroup variation, also calculates an M index. Table 2 shows the ranking of the candidate reference genes by NormFinder. For mycelium, NUP, CAC, RPL2, RPL28, and RCL1 were predicted as the top five stable genes with the M values of 0.066, 0.138, 0.142, 0.147, and 0.158, respectively. MSH3 showed the lowest stability value not only in geNorm but also in NormFinder. For fruiting body, RCL1, MSH3, DAHP, E3, and NUP were estimated as the most stable genes with the stability values of 0.059, 0.096, 0.100, 0.102, and 0.123, respectively. AP2A showed the least stability again. For total sample set, RCL1, RPL2, NUP, E3, and RPL28 were determined as the most stable genes.

2.5. BestKeeper Analysis

BestKeeper, a program that can analyze up to 10 reference genes, was used to evaluate the expression stability of the 10 potential reference genes, including all the top five most stable genes determined by both geNorm and NormFinder. The BestKeeper analysis results are shown in Table 3. In the analysis, the two requirements of SD [±Ct] < 1 and SD [±x-fold] < 2 were strictly followed when determining the stability of the selected genes [27], and the gene with the lowest SD was considered as the one with the most stable expression. For mycelium and fruiting body, all the analyzed genes passed this filter, and after calculation of all samples, satisfactory parameters were only obtained for CAC and DAHP. Another indicator for higher gene expression stability is the r value close to 1 [27], and the minimum r value was 0.891, demonstrating that the correlation coefficients for stability were high for all the 10 genes.

2.6. Validation of Reference Genes

The reliability of the candidate reference genes was evaluated by analyzing the relative expression levels of the heat shock protein 40 kD (DnaJ) and lipoxygenase (LOX) in L. edodes under the treatment of 50 ℃ for 0, 1, 2, and 3 h (Figure 3).
The heat treatment results indicated that CAC and DAHP were the most stable reference genes, and MSH3 was the least stable one in mycelium. In Figure 3A, it can be seen that the relative expression levels of DnaJ obtained by normalizing against CAC, DAHP, or CAC+DAHP showed obvious differences from those obtained by normalizing against ACT or MSH3. The relative expression levels of LOX showed significant changes only when normalized against MSH3 at 2 h (Figure 3B).
The above results indicated CAC and NUP were the most stable reference genes, and AP2A was the least stable one in fruiting body. In Figure 3C, the relative expression levels of DnaJ showed a similar trend when normalized against CAC, NUP, or CAC+NUP in contrast to an increasing trend from 1 to 3 h when normalized against ACT or AP2A. In Figure 3D, every group showed an upward trend. In the case of 3 h, the expression levels of LOX showed a 6.86-fold upregulation when normalized against the two stable genes CAC+NUP in contrast to an overestimated 211.64-fold upregulation when normalized against the least stable gene AP2A.

2.7. Application of Selected Reference Genes for qRT-PCR Analysis of Heat-Regulated Genes

In order to investigate the effective of reference genes CAC, DAHP, and NUP for qRT-PCR analysis in L. edodes after hot-air drying, we determined the expression levels of four heat-regulated genes (Le01Gene04167, Le01Gene02680, Le01Gene11038, and Le01Gene02954) [28] and two flavor genes in the generation of sulfur compounds (Le01Gene02830 and Le01Gene03297) [29].
As shown in Figure 4A, the expression levels of Le01Gene04167 and Le01Gene03297 in mycelia were stable during 5 h of hot-air drying. The expression levels of Le01Gene02680, Le01Gene11038, and Le01Gene02830 had no obvious change at 0.5, 1, and 1.5 h of hot-air drying, whereas the three genes’ expression levels significantly decreased at 2, 3, 4, and 5 h. In addition, the expression levels of Le01Gene02954 encoding the heat shock protein 98 increased during 5 h of hot-air drying. In the fruiting body (Figure 4B), the relative expression of Le01Gene04167 was kept at a similar level during 7 h of hot-air drying. However, the expression levels of three heat-regulated genes Le01Gene02680, Le01Gene11038, and Le01Gene02954 increased during 7 h of hot-air drying. Moreover, the expression levels of the two flavor genes Le01Gene02830 and Le01Gene03297 displayed no obvious change at 1, 2, and 3 h while their expression levels significantly increased at 4, 5, 6, and 7 h.

3. Discussion

The stability of internal reference genes is a prerequisite for the reliability of qRT-PCR results. In early reports, several housekeeping genes such as Actin and GAPDH as well as TUB were selected as the internal reference genes because of their functions involved in the basic cytoskeleton of organelles and basic biochemical metabolic processes of organisms [15,16]. In later studies, the expression levels of the housekeeping genes were found unstable under abiotic and biotic stress [26,30], suggesting the importance of reliable reference genes for qRT-PCR analysis. The stability of reference genes was evaluated under different development stages, nutrient conditions, and abiotic stresses in G. lucidum, V. volvacea, L. edodes, and Pleurotus ostreatus [21,24,26,31]. In the present study, we focused on the reference genes for shiitake mushroom in the early stage of the hot-air drying process. As a complex environmental factor, hot-air drying stress was reported to affect the global gene expression in commercial baker’s yeast [32]. When ripe strawberries were heat-treated in an oven (3 h at 45 °C), the expression of key genes controlling cell wall remodeling was found to be changed [33]. In addition, many heat shock proteins have been found in shiitake mushrooms during heat stress [28].
In this study, 17 candidate reference genes, including 7 reported in the literature, were obtained from the in-house transcriptome data and analyzed by geNorm, NormFinder, and BestKeeper. Firstly, the amplification specificities of 17 candidate reference genes were evaluated by the melting curves and agarose gel electrophoresis. A single product was observed in the melting curves and gel electrophoresis, and the R2 values of all the 17 candidate reference genes were greater than 0.98, indicating a reliable linear relationship between the respective Ct values and the log values of the initial gene copy numbers. The E values met the requirement of 90% to 110%. These results suggested the high specificity and amplification efficiency of the 17 candidate reference genes.
Actin and GAPDH as well as EF are involved in cytoskeleton biosynthesis and fundamental metabolism of organisms and should be stably expressed in physiological states and cells [34,35]. Nevertheless, Actin was ranked in the 11th (0.570) and 10th (0.486) place, and EF and GAPDH in the 14th (0.708 and 0.686) and 15th (0.770 and 0.946) place by geNorm and NormFinder analyses among the 17 candidate reference genes, respectively, indicating that these three housekeeping genes were relatively less stable after hot-air drying of the shiitake mushroom, which was consistent with several previous reports. Under heat stress and different development stages as well as various nutrient conditions, Actin and GAPDH as well as EF were unstably expressed in L. edodes [25,26]. In many plants such as cucumber and potato, Actin genes were found to be inconstant under salinity stress [16,36]. For gene expression normalization in rice diurnal/circadian, Actin and GAPDH as well as EF were also unstably expressed [37].
According to the results of geNorm and NormFinder, two genes (RCL1 and RPL2) encoding 18S rRNA biogenesis protein RCL1 and ribosomal protein L2 exhibited the highest stability. RPL4 encoding ribosomal protein L4 was the most stably expressed gene and recommended as the best reference gene for qRT-PCR analysis under different nutrient conditions in G. lucidum and L. edodes [20,25]. Besides, RPL4 was considered as the best reference gene in different tissues for G. lucidum [20]. As good housekeeping genes with constitutive expression in organism, RPL13 and RPL9 encoding the ribosomal protein were selected as the most stable reference genes for gene expression analysis in tested organs from chickens and mice, respectively [38,39]. Nevertheless, no reports are available about the use of the 18S rRNA biogenesis protein RCL1 as the reference gene. This is probably the first report of RCL1 as the most stable reference gene for gene expression analysis after the shiitake mushroom hot-air drying as determined by geNorm and NormFinder. Meanwhile, the BestKeeper analysis showed the SD values of RCL1 and RPL4 between L. edodes mycelium and fruiting body were greater than 1.0, demonstrating that both of them were not suitable reference genes for normalization in different development stages.
Bestkeeper analysis showed an SD value of less than 1.0 for DAHP and CAC, displaying their high stability as the pair of reference genes for normalization under experimental conditions for L. edodes mycelium and fruiting body. Similarly, CAC encoding clathrin adaptor complex has been proven to be the best reference gene for gene expression normalization in zucchini, coffee, banana, tomato, buckwheat, and Brassica juncea studies [13,40,41,42,43,44]. To our best knowledge, this is also the first report of DAHP as a reference gene, which encodes DAHP synthetase, an important enzyme in the shikimate pathway [45].
For normalization at a different heat treatment time of mycelium, CAC/DAHP was the best pair of reference genes as determined by geNorm, while CAC/NUP was the most ideal pair of reference genes as determined by NormFinder. As indicated by BestKeeper analysis, both the SD value of CAC/DAHP and the r value of DAHP were the smallest. Based on the integrated data, we suggest CAC/DAHP as the best pair of reference genes for normalization of qRT-PCR data in mycelium.
For normalization of a different heat treatment time of fruiting body, the CAC/NUP primer pair showed good performance as determined by geNorm, but with a different ranking position when evaluated by NormFinder, which ranked CAC/NUP in the eighth and fifth place, and RCL1/MSH3 as the top two most stable genes. However, CAC/NUP achieved a higher ranking than RCL1/MSH3 in BestKeeper. Besides, the differences between maximum and minimum Ct values of CAC, NUP, RCL1, and MSH3 genes were 0.89, 0.97, 1.14, and 1.23, respectively. The overall results indicated that CAC/NUP could be a better pair of reference genes than RCL1/MSH3 for normalization of qRT-PCR data in fruiting body.
The reliability of the proposed reference genes was tested using the two most stable genes, the least stable one, and the widely used ACT as reference genes to normalize the relative expression of genes versus high temperature. In this study, Vn/Vn + 1 was V2/V3 < 0.150 (Figure 2D) in three data sets, indicating that two reference genes are enough as a standardized factor. Moreover, the normalization of qRT-PCR data using the best two (CAC/NUP in fruiting body and CAC/DAHP in mycelium) either individually or jointly resulted in similar and reliable results. To ensure high-quality data, we suggest the use of two reference genes for normalization.
The DnaJ and LOX genes were tested under the indicated conditions due to their crucial role for survival and flavor, respectively [46,47]. Compared with AP2A and ACT, the use of CAC and NUP individually or jointly led to opposite trends of DnaJ or large gaps of LOX in fruiting body (Figure 3C,D). In mycelium, when normalized with different reference genes, inconsistent results were obtained (Figure 3A, 3B). These results highlight that the use of unsuitable reference genes can compromise the normalization of qRT-PCR data.
Given that all qPCR assays are performed with proper controls, we believe that accurate and reliable qRT-PCR analysis results of L. edodes under high temperature can be obtained by using the reference genes reported in this study. Collectively, CAC/DAHP, CAC/NUP, and CAC/DAHP were determined as the primer pairs with stable expression in mycelium set, fruiting body set, and all-sample set, respectively. According to the application results of CAC, DAHP, and NUP, our results indicated that the selected reference genes were able to be used for qRT-PCR analysis in L. edodes after hot-air drying. This study has laid a genetic foundation for further research on the molecular mechanism of the special shiitake flavor change after hot-air wind drying.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Organisms, Growth Conditions, and Sample Harvest

The L. edodes strain WX1 (ACCC 50926) was maintained and cultivated in Mushroom Science and Education Center, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China. Samples of fruiting body were harvested at mature stage when its inner membrane started to crack naturally. Then, the fresh fruiting body samples were dried by hot air at 50 °C for 0, 1, 2, and 3 h. Similarly, the mycelial samples of L. edodes were incubated at 25 °C for 10 days and then treated as described for fruiting body. All samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C for further use. All samples were collected in three biological repetitions.

4.2. RNA Isolation, Quality Control, cDNA Synthesis

The total RNA was extracted from samples using a Spin Column Fungal Total RNA Purification Kit (Sangon Biotechnologies, Shanghai, China). RNA concentration and quantity were determined using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA), and the RNA samples with only one single peak at 260 nm and the OD260/OD280 ratio between 1.8 and 2.2 were used for further analysis. Then, the integrity of RNA was checked by electrophoresis on 1% agarose gel, and the 28S, 18S, and 5S subunit bands were clear (Supplementary Figure S2). Finally, 20 μL cDNA was prepared using 1 μg of total RNA with the HiScript II Q RT SuperMix for qPCR (+gDNA wiper) kit (Vazyme Biotech, Nanjing, China), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Before qRT-PCR analysis, the cDNA was diluted five times with double-distilled water and stored at −20 °C.

4.3. Selection of the Reference Genes Using RNA-seq Data and Primer Design

Novel candidates were selected from L. edodes based on DEG profiles of the two samples (fresh fruiting body samples were dried by hot air at 50 ℃ for 0 and 3 h) from our in-house transcriptome data. Genes that were nondifferentially expressed (false discovery rate <0.01 and an absolute log2-fold change) were chosen randomly. These genes were annotated with the genome database of L. edodes (http://legdb.chenlianfu.com/) [29] and subsequently used in primer design. Additionally, seven housekeeping genes reported in previous studies were included for analysis [25,26].
The primer design principle was as follows: the size of the target fragment was between 100 and 300 bp, the optimal length of primer was at 20 ± 3 bp, the content of G+C ranged from 40% to 60%, and the primers could cross one intron at least. All primers were synthesized by the Tianyi Huiyuan Biotech Co., Ltd. The primer pairs (Table 1) were designed using Primer Premier 5.0 with an amplification product length ranging from 113 bp to 263 bp. The presence of a single PCR product was verified by 2% (m/w) agarose gel electrophoresis before qRT-PCR. The amplification reaction of each pair of primers was performed in a total volume of 20 μL consisting of 10 μL of 2 × Taq Master Mix (Vazyme Biotech, Nanjing, China), 5 μL of 1.6 μM primer mixture, 3 μL of 1:5 diluted cDNA, and 2 μL of ddH2O, under the conditions of an initial denaturation for 5 min at 95 °C, 40 cycles of 30 s at 95 °C, annealing at 50 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 20 s, followed by maintaining at 72 °C for 10 min. The size of the primer amplification product was consistent with the target fragment, with a single and clear band present under agarose gel electrophoresis, and such primers were selected for subsequent analysis.

4.4. Evaluation of Amplification Efficiency of Candidate Reference Genes

Using fresh L. edodes mycelium for comparison, the primer pairs were amplified to detect PCR product using cDNA as the template. The amplification efficiency of candidate genes was calculated referring to the method of Zhao et al. [26]. The initial cDNA was diluted to 100, 10−1, 10−2, and 10−3. Standard curves contained 4 points using 10-fold dilution series. Amplification efficiencies (E) and correlation coefficients (R2 values) were checked from standard curves, with each repeated three times.

4.5. qRT-PCR Amplification

qRT-PCR analyses were performed on a CFX Connect Real-Time system (Bio-Rad, USA) with AceQ® qPCR SYBR® Green Master Mix (Vazyme Biotech, Nanjing, China). Each qRT-PCR experiment was repeated with three technical replicates. PCR amplification was performed with 1 μL of 1:5 diluted cDNA, 5 μL of absolute AceQ® qPCR SYBR® Green Master Mix (2×), 2.5 μL of 1.6 μM primer mixture, and 1.5 μL of ddH2O. All PCRs were run with an initial denaturation for 5 min at 95 °C, 40 cycles of 30 s at 95 °C, annealing at 60 °C for 30 s, extension at 72 °C for 20 s, and melting at 60–95 °C. The specificity of each qRT-PCR reaction was tested using a melting curve, and the presence of a single PCR product was verified by 2% (m/w) agarose gel electrophoresis.

4.6. Data Processing and Statistical Analysis

The qRT-PCR was performed on cDNA from WX1 fruiting body and mycelium under hot-air treatment and the Ct values were recorded. Three sample data sets (A, B, and C) comprising varying combinations of the eight samples (Supplementary Table S3) were used for geNorm and NormFinder analysis, and the ten relatively stable genes were selected for BestKeeper analysis.

4.7. Validation of Reference Genes

To confirm the effectiveness of the selected reference genes for data normalization, the expression levels of heat shock protein 40 (DnaJ) and lipoxygenase (LOX) were examined in eight different samples. The data were normalized using the two most stable genes and the least stable reference gene. The qRT-PCR amplification conditions were the same as those described above. The relative expression levels of the three genes were calculated by the 2−ΔΔCt method.

Supplementary Materials

The Supplementary Materials are available online.

Author Contributions

S.G., Y.L., and W.H. conceived and designed the experiments. S.G., Z.H., and X.L. prepared the experiment materials. S.G. carried out the experiments and analyzed the data. S.G., G.Z., and Y.L. wrote the manuscript. Y.B., Y.L., and W.H. provided intellectual input and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (31601434), the Major Projects of Technological Innovation of Hubei Province (2017ABA148), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2016T90701).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Philippoussis, A.; Diamantopoulou, P.; Israilides, C. Productivity of agricultural residues used for the cultivation of the medicinal fungus Lentinula edodes. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 2007, 59, 216–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Finimundy, T.C.; Dillon, A.J.P.; Henriques, J.A.P.; Ely, M.R. A review on general nutritional compounds and pharmacological properties of the Lentinula edodes mushroom. Food. Nut. Sci. 2014, 5, 1095–1105. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hiraide, M.; Miyazaki, Y.; Shibata, Y. The smell and odorous components of dried shiitake mushroom, Lentinula edodes I: relationship between sensory evaluations and amounts of odorous components. J. Wood. Sci. 2004, 50, 358–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jasinghe, V.J.; Perera, C.O. Ultraviolet irradiation: The generator of Vitamin D2 in edible mushrooms. Food. Chem. 2006, 95, 638–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tian, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Huang, J.; Zeng, H.; Zheng, B. Effects of different drying methods on the product quality and volatile compounds of whole shiitake mushrooms. Food. Chem. 2016, 197, 714–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pfaffl, M.W.; Hageleit, M. Validities of mRNA quantification using recombinant RNA and recombinant DNA external calibration curves in real-time RT-PCR. Biotechnol. Lett. 2001, 23, 275–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Engel, H.; Kueppers, C.; Koenig, M.; Loeffert, D. Successful gene expression analysis by multiplex, real-time, one-step RT-PCR, irrespective of the targets amplified. Biotechniques 2007, 43, 230–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Angela Pérez-Novo, C.; Claeys, C.; Speleman, F.; Van Cauwenberge, P.; Bachert, C.; Vandesompele, J. Impact of RNA quality on reference gene expression stability. Biotechniques 2005, 39, 52–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bustin, S.A. Why the need for qPCR publication guidelines?—The case for MIQE. Methods 2010, 50, 217–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Edmunds, R.C.; McIntyre, J.K.; Luckenbach, J.A.; Baldwin, D.H.; Incardona, J.P. Toward enhanced MIQE compliance: Reference residual normalization of qPCR gene expression data. J. Biomol. Tech. 2014, 25, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Huggett, J.; Dheda, K.; Bustin, S.; Zumla, A. Real-time RT-PCR normalisation; strategies and considerations. Genes. Immun. 2005, 6, 279–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. VanGuilder, H.D.; Vrana, K.E.; Freeman, W.M. Twenty-five years of quantitative PCR for gene expression analysis. Biotechniques 2008, 44, 619–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Obrero, Á.; Die, J.V.; Román, B.; Gómez, P.; Nadal, S.; González-Verdejo, C.I. Selection of reference genes for gene expression studies in zucchini (Cucurbita pepo) using qPCR. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2011, 59, 5402–5411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Dheda, K.; Huggett, J.F.; Chang, J.S.; Kim, L.U.; Bustin, S.A.; Johnson, M.A.; Rook, G.A.W.; Zumla, A. The implications of using an inappropriate reference gene for real-time reverse transcription PCR data normalization. Anal. biochem. 2005, 344, 141–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Czechowski, T.; Stitt, M.; Altmann, T.; Udvardi, M.K.; Scheible, W.R. Genome-wide identification and testing of superior reference genes for transcript normalization in Arabidopsis. Plant. Physiol. 2005, 139, 5–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Nicot, N.; Hausman, J.F.; Hoffmann, L.; Evers, D. Housekeeping gene selection for real-time RT-PCR normalization in potato during biotic and abiotic stress. J. Exp. Bot. 2005, 56, 2907–2914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Zhang, Y.J.; Zhu, Z.F.; Lu, R. Selection of control genes in transcription analysis of gene expression. Prog. Biochem. Biophys. 2007, 34, 546–550. [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhao, Y.; Luo, J.; Xu, S.; Wang, W.; Liu, T.; Han, C.; Chen, Y.; Kong, L. Selection of reference genes for gene expression normalization in Peucedanum praeruptorum dunn under abiotic stresses, hormone treatments and different tissues. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0152356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, Q.; Liu, W.; Cai, Y.; Lan, A.-F.; Bian, Y. Validation of Internal Control Genes for Quantitative Real-Time PCR Gene Expression Analysis in Morchella. Molecules 2018, 23, 2331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xu, J.; Xu, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Luo, H.; Qian, J.; Ji, A.; Hu, Y.; Sun, W.; Wang, B.; Song, J.; et al. Identification and evaluation of reference genes for qRT-PCR normalization in Ganoderma lucidum. Curr. Microbiol. 2014, 68, 120–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, Y.N.; Lu, X.X.; Ren, A.; Shi, L.; Jiang, A.L.; Yu, H.S.; Zhao, M.W. Identification of reference genes and analysis of heat shock protein gene expression in lingzhi or reishi medicinal mushroom, Ganoderma lucidum, after exposure to heat stress. Int. J. Med. Mushrooms. 2017, 19, 1029–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lu, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, M. Selection of reliable reference genes for qRT-PCR during methyl jasmonate, salicylic acid and hydrogen peroxide treatments in Ganoderma lucidum. World. J. Microb. Biot. 2018, 34, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Tao, Y.; Van Peer, A.F.; Huang, Q.; Shao, Y.; Zhang, L.; Xie, B.; Jiang, Y.; Zhu, J.; Xie, B. Identification of novel and robust internal control genes from Volvariella volvacea that are suitable for qRT-PCR in filamentous fungi. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 29236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Qian, J.; Gao, Y.; Wáng, Y.; Wu, Y.; Wāng, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, H.; Bao, D.; Xu, J.; Bian, X. Selection and Evaluation of Appropriate Reference Genes for qRT-PCR Normalization of Volvariella volvacea Gene Expression under Different Conditions. Biomed. Res. Int. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Xiang, Q.; Li, J.; Qin, P.; He, M.; Yu, X.; Zhao, K.; Zhang, X.; Ma, M.; Chen, Q.; Chen, X.; et al. Identification and evaluation of reference genes for qRT-PCR studies in Lentinula edodes. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0190226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhao, X.; Yang, H.; Chen, M.; Song, X.; Yu, C.; Zhao, Y.; Wu, Y. Reference gene selection for quantitative real-time PCR of mycelia from Lentinula edodes under high-temperature stress. Biomed. Res. Int. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Pombo, M.A.; Zheng, Y.; Fei, Z.; Martin, G.B.; Rosli, H.G. Use of RNA-seq data to identify and validate RT-qPCR reference genes for studying the tomato-Pseudomonas pathosystem. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 44905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, G.Z.; Ma, C.J.; Luo, Y.; Zhou, S.S.; Zhou, Y.; Ma, X.L.; Cai, Y.L.; Yu, J.J.; Bian, Y.B.; Gong, Y.H. Proteome and transcriptome reveal involvement of heat shock proteins and indoleacetic acid metabolism process in Lentinula edodes thermotolerance. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 50, 1617–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, L.F.; Gong, Y.H.; Cai, Y.L.; Liu, W.; Zhou, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Xu, Z.Y.; Liu, Y.; Lei, X.Y.; Wang, G.Z.; et al. Genome sequence of the edible cultivated mushroom Lentinula edodes (Shiitake) reveals insights into lignocellulose degradation. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0160336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Die, J.V.; Román, B.; Nadal, S.; González-Verdejo, C.I. Evaluation of candidate reference genes for expression studies in Pisum sativum under different experimental conditions. Planta 2010, 232, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Castanera, R.; López-Varas, L.; Pisabarro, A.G.; Ramírez, L. Validation of reference genes for transcriptional analyses in Pleurotus ostreatus by using reverse transcription-quantitative PCR. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 4120–4129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Nakamura, T.; Mizukami-Murata, S.; Ando, A.; Murata, Y.; Takagi, H.; Shima, J. Changes in gene expression of commercial baker’s yeast during an air-drying process that simulates dried yeast production. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2008, 106, 405–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Langer, S.E.; Oviedo, N.C.; Marina, M.; Burgos, J.L.; Martínez, G.A.; Civello, P.M.; Villarreal, N.M. Effects of heat treatment on enzyme activity and expression of key genes controlling cell wall remodeling in strawberry fruit. Plant Physiol. Bioch. 2018, 130, 334–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Løvdal, T.; Lillo, C. Reference gene selection for quantitative real-time PCR normalization in tomato subjected to nitrogen, cold, and light stress. Anal. Biochem. 2009, 387, 238–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Petriccione, M.; Mastrobuoni, F.; Zampella, L.; Scortichini, M. Reference gene selection for normalization of RT-qPCR gene expression data from Actinidia deliciosa leaves infected with Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 16961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wan, H.; Zhao, Z.; Qian, C.; Sui, Y.; Malik, A.A.; Chen, J. Selection of appropriate reference genes for gene expression studies by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction in cucumber. Anal. Biochem. 2010, 399, 257–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jain, N.; Vergish, S.; Khurana, J.P. Validation of house-keeping genes for normalization of gene expression data during diurnal/circadian studies in rice by RT-qPCR. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 3203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Thorrez, L.; Deun, K.V.; Tranchevent, L.; Lommel, L.V.; Engelen, K.; Marchal, K.; Moreau, Y.; Mechelen, I.V.; Schuit, F. Using ribosomal protein genes as reference: A tale of caution. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e1854. [Google Scholar]
  39. Mitra, T.; Bilic, I.; Hess, M.; Liebhart, D. The 60s ribosomal protein L13 is the most preferable reference gene to investigate gene expression in selected organs from turkeys and chickens, in context of different infection models. Vet. Res. 2016, 47, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cruz, F.; Kalaoun, S.; Nobile, P.; Colombo, C.; Almeida, J.; Barros, L.M.G.; Romano, E.; Grossi-de-Sá, M.F.; Vaslin, M.; Alves-Ferreira, M. Evaluation of coffee reference genes for relative expression studies by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Mol. Breed. 2009, 23, 607–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chen, L.; Zhong, H.Y.; Kuang, J.F.; Li, J.G.; Lu, W.J.; Chen, J.Y. Validation of reference genes for RT-qPCR studies of gene expression in banana fruit under different experimental conditions. Planta 2011, 234, 377–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Expósitorodríguez, M.; Borges, A.A.; Borgespérez, A.; Pérez, J.A. Selection of internal control genes for quantitative real-time RT-PCR studies during tomato development process. BMC Plant Biol. 2008, 8, 1. [Google Scholar]
  43. Demidenko, N.V.; Logacheva, M.D.; Penin, A.A. Selection and validation of reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR in Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) based on transcriptome sequence data. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e19434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Chandna, R.; Augustine, R.; Bisht, N.C. Evaluation of candidate reference genes for gene expression normalization in Brassica juncea using real time quantitative RT-PCR. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e36918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Balachandran, N.; Heimhalt, M.; Liuni, P.; To, F.; Wilson, D.J.; Junop, M.S.; Berti, P.J. Potent inhibition of 3-deoxy-D-arabinoheptulosonate-7-phosphate (DAHP) synthase by DAHP oxime, a phosphate group mimic. Biochemistry 2016, 55, 6617–6629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Cheetham, M.E.; Caplan, A.J. Structure, function and evolution of DnaJ: Conservation and adaptation of chaperone function. Cell. Stress. Chaperon. 1998, 3, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Combet, E.; Henderson, J.; Eastwood, D.C.; Burton, K.S. Eight-carbon volatiles in mushrooms and fungi: Properties, analysis, and biosynthesis. Mycoscience 2006, 47, 317–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 24 00136 g001 550
Figure 1. Variation in qRT-PCR values of candidate reference genes.
Figure 1. Variation in qRT-PCR values of candidate reference genes.
Molecules 24 00136 g001
Molecules 24 00136 g002 550
Figure 2. Expression stability and ranking of candidate reference genes determined by geNorm. (A) mycelium data set; (B) fruiting body data set; (C) all-sample data set; (D) pairwise variation (Vn/Vn + 1) for the optimal number of reference genes.
Figure 2. Expression stability and ranking of candidate reference genes determined by geNorm. (A) mycelium data set; (B) fruiting body data set; (C) all-sample data set; (D) pairwise variation (Vn/Vn + 1) for the optimal number of reference genes.
Molecules 24 00136 g002
Molecules 24 00136 g003 550
Figure 3. Validation of the selected reference genes. Relative expression of DnaJ and LOX in mycelium (A, B) and fruiting body (C, D). In mycelium, CAC and DAHP were the most stable candidate reference genes, and MSH3 was the least stable candidate reference gene. In fruiting body, CAC and NUP were the most stable candidate reference genes, and AP2A was the least stable candidate reference gene. ACT, commonly used as endogenous control, was also adopted. Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).
Figure 3. Validation of the selected reference genes. Relative expression of DnaJ and LOX in mycelium (A, B) and fruiting body (C, D). In mycelium, CAC and DAHP were the most stable candidate reference genes, and MSH3 was the least stable candidate reference gene. In fruiting body, CAC and NUP were the most stable candidate reference genes, and AP2A was the least stable candidate reference gene. ACT, commonly used as endogenous control, was also adopted. Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).
Molecules 24 00136 g003
Molecules 24 00136 g004 550
Figure 4. Relative expression of different genes during hot-air drying. Mycelia was treated with 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, and 5 h (A). Fruiting body was treated with 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 h (B).
Figure 4. Relative expression of different genes during hot-air drying. Mycelia was treated with 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, and 5 h (A). Fruiting body was treated with 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 h (B).
Molecules 24 00136 g004
Table
Table 1. Description of the candidate reference genes.
Table 1. Description of the candidate reference genes.
GeneSymbolPrimer Sequence (5′–3′)Length (bp)E (%)R2Min CtMax Ct
WD40 proteinWD40AGTCCGACAAATCCATCAG13897.80.99023.8133.84
CAATAACCCTCAGACACCC
Phosphatidylinositol 4-kinasePI4KTATCCGAACGGTTACTGG198109.50.99023.8132.98
AATTGAGGACGACGCTTT
Urea transporterUTAGAGGGTAATCAGAATGGAA153104.90.98426.6435.96
TTTGTAGTCGAAGTAGGGTG
MutS Homolog 3MSH3GAACCGAGGAGTAAGATTGT24491.20.99224.9535.33
TGTTCGTAGCCGAGTGG
Ribosomal protein L28RPL28CAAATGCGTGGATAGCG22395.70.99822.2232.44
CCAAGCAAGTTCCGATGT
Clathrin adaptor complexes medium subunitCACCACCTTCCCTTTCCACTG13593.60.99422.2132.70
TTTGCTCCTTTACCACCA
NucleoporinNUPAACAGTCTAACTTCGGTGCG19399.40.99823.0032.97
CCTGTCGTTGCCTCCTCA
Ubiquitin–protein ligase E3E3TAAACGGCGGACAAATGC263100.80.99821.2231.05
ACGACCTACAGGCGAAAT
DAHP synthetaseDAHPCCTTTGTCTGGACCTTCTG11397.00.99922.1232.25
CGAGCCTTTACTCCTTCAC
Protein kinasePKTCGGATTCTTTACCTACTGG128104.30.99722.6132.18
CATGGATGGCACTTCACA
Ras-related protein Rab-7aRAB7AACTCGTTCGCTGTATGCC171100.00.99723.0332.86
GCTGTCCAGACTCCCTATGA
18S rRNA biogenesis protein RCL1RCL1TGCCGTTCGTGTAAATC17697.10.98723.7433.78
ACAAAGCAGAGGTGGTAGA
Ribosomal protein L2RPL2AACGAGGACAAGGAAGCC166102.20.99623.3433.10
CCAGGCAATGTTCTCAGTC
ActinACTCCCATCTTTCCGTCCACT24298.80.99818.2228.25
TTCTGACCCATCCCAACC
Adaptor-related protein complex 2 subunit alphaAP2ACGATGAGGATTTGGGAGT178101.50.99823.4433.25
CAGCCAGGGTGAAGGTAC
Elongation factorEFTTCCCAGGCTGATTGTG17697.81.00016.4626.54
ATCGGTCCTCGCTCCAT
Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate ehydrogenaseGAPDHCATCCCTTCTTCAACTGG24096.80.99817.7027.89
AAATCGGTGGAGACAACA
Table
Table 2. Ranking of candidate reference genes according to NormFinder.
Table 2. Ranking of candidate reference genes according to NormFinder.
RankingMyceliumFruiting BodyTotal
GeneStability ValueGeneStability ValueGeneStability Value
1NUP0.066RCL10.059RCL10.039
2CAC0.138MSH30.096RPL20.058
3RPL20.142DAHP0.100NUP0.077
4RPL280.147E30.102E30.082
5RCL10.158NUP0.123RPL280.123
6DAHP0.159RPL20.136CAC0.218
7E30.164WD400.140RAB7A0.237
8WD400.179CAC0.149WD400.332
9PK0.202GAPDH0.153PI4K0.415
10RAB7A0.205RAB7A0.176ACT0.486
11AP2A0.239ACT0.251DAHP0.512
12PI4K0.248RPL280.256PK0.587
13ACT0.278EF0.280AP2A0.611
14GAPDH0.300PI4K0.281EF0.686
15EF0.321PK0.555GAPDH0.946
16UT0.358UT0.591MSH31.068
17MSH30.415AP2A0.726UT1.742
Two best genesNUP/CAC RCL1/MSH3 RCL1/RPL2
Table
Table 3. Ranking of candidate reference genes according to BestKeeper.
Table 3. Ranking of candidate reference genes according to BestKeeper.
RankingMyceliumFruiting BodyTotal
GeneSD
[±Cq]		SD
[±x-fold]		rGeneSD
[±Cq]		SD
[±x-fold]		rGeneSD
[±Cq]		SD
[±x-fold]		r
1DAHP0.521.430.993CAC0.281.211.000DAHP0.581.490.953
2CAC0.581.500.979WD400.281.220.966CAC0.911.870.995
3RPL20.611.520.990RPL20.301.230.992RPL21.072.100.998
4RPL280.671.590.967NUP0.331.260.995RCL11.142.210.997
5RCL10.681.600.987RCL10.341.270.996E31.222.340.984
6NUP0.741.670.993DAHP0.351.280.929RPL281.242.370.99
7E30.751.680.938RAB7A0.361.280.934NUP1.282.430.999
8WD400.891.850.992RPL280.391.310.891RAB7A1.482.780.995
9RAB7A0.901.870.987MSH30.491.410.955WD401.623.080.997
10MSH30.981.970.966E30.561.470.955MSH32.525.730.989

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gao, S.; Wang, G.; Huang, Z.; Lei, X.; Bian, Y.; Liu, Y.; Huang, W. Selection of Reference Genes for qRT-PCR Analysis in Lentinula edodes after Hot-Air Drying. Molecules 2019, 24, 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24010136

AMA Style

Gao S, Wang G, Huang Z, Lei X, Bian Y, Liu Y, Huang W. Selection of Reference Genes for qRT-PCR Analysis in Lentinula edodes after Hot-Air Drying. Molecules. 2019; 24(1):136. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24010136

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gao, Shuangshuang, Gangzheng Wang, Zhicheng Huang, Xiaoyu Lei, Yinbing Bian, Ying Liu, and Wen Huang. 2019. "Selection of Reference Genes for qRT-PCR Analysis in Lentinula edodes after Hot-Air Drying" Molecules 24, no. 1: 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24010136

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop