Next Article in Journal
Pollution and Health Risk Assessments of Potentially Toxic Elements in Soil and Sediment Samples in a Petrochemical Industry and Surrounding Area
Previous Article in Journal
Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate Prevents Acute Gout by Suppressing NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation and Mitochondrial DNA Synthesis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 24
Issue 11
10.3390/molecules24112140
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antifungal Effect of Magnolol and Honokiol from Magnolia officinalis on Alternaria alternata Causing Tobacco Brown Spot

by
Ya-Han Chen
1,2,†,
Mei-Huan Lu
1,3,†,
Dong-Sheng Guo
1,
Ying-Yan Zhai
1,
Dan Miao
2,
Jian-Ying Yue
2,
Chen-Hong Yuan
1,
Ming-Min Zhao
2,* and
De-Rong An
1,*
1
College of Plant Protection and State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
2
College of agriculture, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Huhhot 010018, China
3
Microbial Resources of Research Center, Microbiology Institute of Shaanxi, Xian 710043, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally.
Molecules 2019, 24(11), 2140; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24112140
Submission received: 5 May 2019 / Revised: 29 May 2019 / Accepted: 30 May 2019 / Published: 6 June 2019
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this study, two phenol compounds, magnolol and honokiol, were extracted from Magnolia officinalis and identified by LC-MS, 1H- and 13C-NMR. The magnolol and honokiol were shown to be effective against seven pathogenic fungi, including Alternaria alternata (Fr.) Keissl, Penicillium expansum (Link) Thom, Alternaria dauci f.sp. solani, Fusarium moniliforme J. Sheld, Fusarium oxysporum Schltdl., Valsa mali Miyabe & G. Yamada, and Rhizoctonia solani J.G. Kühn, with growth inhibition of more than 57%. We also investigated the mechanisms underlying the potential antifungal activity of magnolol and honokiol. The results showed that they inhibited the growth of A. alternata in a dose-dependent manner. Moreover, magnolol and honokiol treatment resulted in distorted mycelia and increased the cell membrane permeability of A. alternata, as determined by conductivity measurements. These results suggest that magnolol and honokiol are potential antifungal agents for application against plant fungal diseases.

1. Introduction

Magnolia officinalis is an important herb in traditional Chinese and Japanese medicine for treating conditions such as gastrointestinal disorders, thrombotic stroke, allergic disease, typhoid fever, anxiety, and nervous disturbance [1]. M. officinalis contains a diverse group of biologically active compounds, including magnolol, honokiol, 4-O-methylhonokiol, obovatol, and other neolignan compounds [2,3]. Magnolol and honokiol are the two major secondary metabolites found in the ethanolic extracts of Chinese M. officinalis at concentrations of 1.25% and 1.81%, respectively [4,5]. Several reports showed that magnolol and honokiol possess antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, antifungal, anti-cancer, proapoptotic, and anti-osteoclastogenetic activities [3,6,7,8,9,10,11]. For example, they exhibit potent antifungal activity against human fungal pathogens, such as Trichophyton mentagrophytes, Candida albicans, and Cryptococcus neoformans [4,5,6,12,13,14].
Tobacco is an important economic plant worldwide for cigarette production. Alternaria alternata (Fr.) Keissl is the causal agent of tobacco brown spot, which is one of the most harmful diseases of tobacco, causing huge crop losses around the world [15,16,17]. In China, the annual incidence area of A. alternata is about 100,000 hm2, leading to economic losses [8]. Infection of A. alternata leads to the appearance of small yellowish-brown round spots on the tobacco leaves. Initially, the spots are blade-shaped and then change into a larger circle [18], which could significantly affect the quantity and quality of tobacco [19,20,21]. To control this disease, chemical reagents, for example, dimetachlone, have been widely used in the field [20]. However, chemical agents have the potential to develop fungicide resistance in plant pathogens and cause environmental pollution, resulting in serious health risks to animals and human beings. Indeed, many countries have restricted the application of chemical fungicides to control plant diseases [22]. Therefore, the plant-derived fungicides are promising alternatives, since they are mostly non-phytotoxic, systematic, readily biodegradable, and environmentally safe.
In recent years, many studies have reported the antifungal activity of plant-derived fungicides against A. alternata. Plumbagin, a type of naphthoquinone, isolated from leaves of Nepenthes ventricosa, inhibited the growth of A. alternata [23]. Jing et al. have found that eugenol, an essential oil from the buds of Syringa oblata Lindl, exhibited the complete inhibition of mycelial growth of A. alternata, suggesting its potential application as a fungicide [21].
The extracts of M. officinalis showed potent antifungal activity against many plant pathogenic fungi. However, its antifungal activity against A. alternata has not been reported. Here, we identify two compounds, magnolol and honokiol, from M. officinalis. We found that these two active compounds have the potential to inhibit mycelium growth effectively and to increase cell membrane permeability of A. alternata. Their antifungal effects on Penicillium expansum (Link) Thom, Alternaria dauci f.sp. solani, Fusarium moniliforme J. Sheld, Fusarium oxysporum Schltdl., Valsa mali Miyabe & G. Yamada, and Rhizoctonia solani J.G. Kühn were also investigated in vitro.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Identification of Magnolol and Honokiol from M. officinalis

The purities of compounds magnolol and honokiol were identified using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). As shown in Figure 1, their purities were higher than 98%. The structures of magnolol and honokiol were then confirmed by 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR (Figure 2), and HP-MS spectra (Figure 3), respectively. Their spectral data were identical to that of the previously reported literature [24,25,26].
Magnolol (5,5′-diallyl-2,2′-dihydroxybiphenyl): colorless solid; 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CD3OD): δ (ppm) 3.35 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 4H), 4.86 (s, 2H), 5.02–5.10 (m, 4H), 5.95–6.03 (m, 2H), 6.88 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.04–7.06 (m, 4H); 13C-NMR (125 MHz, CD3OD): δ (ppm) 40.3, 115.5, 117.4, 127.6, 129.7, 132.6, 133.1, 139.3, 153.2; HR-MS (ESI): m/z calcd for C18H18O2 ([M + H]+) 267.1378, found 267.1382.
Honokiol (5,5′-diallyl-2,4′-dihydroxybiphenyl): colorless solid; 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CD3OD): δ (ppm) 3.30 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 2H), 3.41 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 4.86 (s, 2H), 5.00–5.11 (m, 4H), 5.93–6.09 (m, 2H), 6.79–7.26 (m, 6H); 13C-NMR (125 MHz, CD3OD): δ (ppm) 35.3, 40.4, 115.3, 115.5, 116.8, 127.3, 128.7, 129.1, 129.9, 131.4, 131.5, 131.9, 132.5, 138.4, 139.5, 153.2, 155.5; HR-MS (ESI): m/z calcd for C18H18O2 ([M + H]+) 267.1378, found 267.1373.
Given the fact that usage of synthetic and mechanical fungicides have associated adverse effects, it is important to develop environmentally friendly and biodegradable botanical fungicides to produce green and safe food products for animal and human consumption [22].

2.2. Antifungal Activity of Magnolol and Honokiol against A. alternata

Magnolol and honokiol inhibited the mycelial growth of A. alternata in a dose-dependent manner (Table 1). The mycelial growth was noticeably reduced at higher concentrations of magnolol and honokiol, indicating that magnolol and honokiol had an inhibitory effect on A. alternata. The growth inhibition of A. alternata was 77% and 91% in the presence of 0.1 mg/mL of magnolol and honokiol, respectively. The antifungal activity of carbendazim was much higher than that of magnolol and honokiol (Table 1), when used at concentration with 0.001 mg/mL. At concentrations greater than or equal to 3 mg/mL, magnolol completely inhibited the growth of A. alternata, whereas greater than or equal to 1 mg/mL of honokiol completely inhibited growth. In addition, we found that there was a significant positive correlation between the concentration of magnolol and honokiol, and the inhibitory effects on mycelial growth of A. alternata.
To the best of our knowledge, the antifungal activity of magnolol and honokiol against A. alternata in vitro has not yet been reported. However, several studies have been conducted to evaluate their antifungal and antibacterial activities. For instance, magnolol and honokiol could effectively inhibit the growth of Pyricularia oryzae, Phytophthora infestans, Puccinia recondita, and Colletotrichum capsici in plants [15].
Carbendazim is a systemic fungicide with both protective and curative activities against a wide range of fungal diseases [27]. Its antifungal activity was much higher than that of magnolol and honokiol (Table 1), when used at concentrations of 0.001 mg/mL. However, it has been reported that carbendazim, an endocrine disrupter, has mutagenic and teratogenic effects on mammals at low doses [28].
The mycelial radial growth inhibition rates were 77% and 91% for magnolol and honokiol, respectively, when the concentration of each was 0.1 mg/mL. Moreover, the antifungal activity was much higher than eugenol (0.1 mg/mL), which showed 11% inhibition of mycelial growth. On the basis of the present results, which are also in agreement with the reported by Edris and Farrag (2003), eugenol was completely inactive on Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib), Rhizopus stolonifer (Ehrenb. exFr) Vuill and Mucor sp. (Fisher), but mixing eugenol and linalool in a ratio similar to their concentrations in the original oil was found to enhance the antifungal properties oil indicating a synergistic effect [29].
Concentrations greater than or equal to 3 mg/mL of magnolol completely inhibited the growth of A. alternata, whereas greater than or equal to 1 mg/mL of honokiol completely inhibited the growth. However, no toxicity tests were done on other eukaryotic cells. Concentrations higher than 0.1 mg/mL are too high to show selective toxicity. We evaluated the growth inhibition up to 0.1 mg/mL of both magnolol and honokiol, which caused 77% inhibition in fungal colonies, and this inhibition is sufficient and close to the MIC80 (the minimum inhibitory concentration 80% of microbial growth) value of the antifungal activity of natural products with good results.

2.3. Synergistic Effect of Magnolol and Honokiol

In order to examine the synergistic effect of a combination of two compounds on the mycelial growth of A. alternata, we combined two compounds at different ratios and tested their effect with in vitro assays (Table 2). The results showed that the mycelial growth inhibition was higher than the other six volume ratios, with a radial growth inhibition of 91%, under the condition of the volume ratio of magnolol and honokiol (0:1). When the volume ratio of magnolol and honokiol was 1:4, a growth inhibition of 89% of mycelial growth was inhibited. When the volume ratio was 1:0, the growth inhibition was only 77%. The results showed that there was not any synergic effect of these two compounds.

2.4. Growth Inhibition and the Effect on Morphology

At 7 days post-inoculation, we measured the diameter of the colonies of A. alternata on PDA (potato dextrose agar) plates containing 0.1 mg/mL magnolol or honokiol (Figure 4b,c). We observed an apparent decrease in colony size in the PDA plate containing either magnolol (Figure 4b) or honokiol (Figure 4c) when compared with the control PDA plate (Figure 4a). Subsequently, the effect of magnolol and honokiol on the inhibition of hyphae development was also evaluated by examining the morphology of A. alternata using scanning electron microphotography (SEM). Figure 4d–f show the micrographs of mycelia from SEM analysis. Our results indicate that, in the control plate, fungal hyphae appeared normal and cylindrical with a smooth surface (Figure 4d). However, treatment of magnolol and honokiol led to morphological changes in the hyphae of A. alternata. In particular, the mycelia were curly, distorted, aggregated, and partly squashed, when grown in the presence of magnolol (Figure 4e). In the case of honokiol treatment, shrunken and distorted mycelia of A. alternata were observed (Figure 4f).
These results are consistent with the previous study that many changes occur in the morphology of fungal hyphae after treatment with chemical fungicides, chitosan, and natural botanicals [27,28,29]. We assume that the mycelium changes may generally occur because of increased permeability of cells, which resulted in the leakage of small molecular substances, ions, lesions, and disturbances in cell metabolism [30]. The marked leakage of cytoplasmic material is commonly used as an indication of gross and irreversible damage of the cytoplasmic and plasma membranes [30,31,32,33].

2.5. Effects of Magnolol and Honokiol on Cell Membrane Permeability of A. alternata

To address whether both magnolol and honokiol could inhibit the hyphae growth by affecting the cell membrane permeability of A. alternata, we tested the effect of magnolol (0.1 mg/mL) and honokiol (0.1 mg/mL) on the cell membrane permeability of A. alternata for a period of 0–5 h (Figure 5). We showed that the cell membrane permeability was significantly increased (P < 0.05) when A. alternata was grown on a PDA plate containing magnolol and honokiol at different time points. The conductivity of the A. alternata suspensions after treatment with magnolol for 1 h was 167.34 S/cm, which is much higher than that of the control, 102.77 S/cm. The conductivity of the fungal suspension after treatment with honokiol was 192.81 S/cm.
These findings indicate that the antifungal activity of magnolol and honokiol may be associated with the irreversible damage to the cytoplasmic membranes of A. alternata, which results in ion leakage from the cells and an imbalance in osmotic pressure of the intra- and extra-cellular membranes.

2.6. The Inhibitory Efficiency of Magnolol and Honokiol on Six Phytopathogens

To confirm whether magnolol and honokiol inhibit pathogenic fungi, their antifungal activity was tested on six fungal pathogens, and the results are shown in Table 3. We found that the magnolol (0.1 mg/mL) was effective against P. expansum (Link) Thom, A. dauci f.sp. Solani, F. moniliforme J. Sheld, F. oxysporum Schltdl, V. mali Miyabe & G. Yamada, and R. solani J.G. Kühn, with 80, 70, 79, 76, 100, and 57% growth inhibition, respectively. The honokiol (0.1 mg/mL) treatment had potent inhibitory effect on the above pathogens with the growth inhibition of 81, 80, 82, 89, 100, and 68%, respectively.
These findings are in good agreement with the antifungal activity of magnolol and honokiol on Pyricularia oryzae, Phytophthora infestans, Puccinia recondita, and Colletotrichum capsici [15]. Thus, we conclude that magnolol and honokiol are potential antifungal agents against the plant fungal diseases.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemicals and Media

Acetonitrile (CH3CN) and pyridine were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (San Francisco, CA, USA). Tween-20 was from Coolaber technology Co. LTD (Beijing, China). Glucose and agar were from Shanghai Bioindustrial Engineering Co. Ltd (Shanghai, China) to prepare the PDA (potato dextrose agar) medium. Methanol, petroleum ether, quicklime, and hydrochloric acid were supplied from Sinopharm Group Co. LTD (Beijing, China). Chloroform was from Sulebao Technology Co. LTD (Beijing, China). Eugenol was purchased from Mckuin Biological Co. LTD (Shanghai, China). All chemicals were of analytical grade. Carbendazim was from Zhongxun Agrochemicals Co. LTD (Jiangxi, China). M. officinalis bark was purchased from the Jihetang Pharmacy (Yangling, China) and has been identified by Professor Xiaoqian Mu at Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shanxi, China.

3.2. Fungal Strains

A. alternata (Fr.) Keissl, R. solani J.G. Kühn, F. moniliforme J. Sheld, A. dauci f.sp. Solani, and P. expansum (Link) Thom were obtained from Microbiology Institute of Shaanxi, Shaanxi Province, China. V. mali Miyabe & G. Yamada was provided by the State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shanxi, China. F. oxysporum Schltdl. was provided by the Laboratory of Phytopathology, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Huhhot Inner Mongolia, China. All fungi were grown on PDA medium at 25 ± 2 °C.

3.3. Isolation and Purification of Active Compounds and Structure Analysis

The stem bark of M. officinalis was rolled up into a column, brown and spicy (Figure 6). With the method of alkali-extraction and acid-precipitation, 100 g of dried bark was ground into powder by a disintegrator XL600B (Xiaobao Electric Co. LTD, Yongkang, China), and extracted three times with 90% methanol. The resulting crude extract (1500 mL) was dried to a paste and then incubated with two times quicklime for 24 h. After washing three times using five times diluted hydrochloric acid, the extract paste was concentrated. After the concentrating step, the extract was dissolved in chloroform and isolated with three volumes of alkaline water (0.5% NaOH solution). The crystals were filtered out from the solution by adjusting the pH value to 7. After drying at a low temperature, the solution that was filtered from the crystal with petroleum for 1 h was naturally cooled to room temperature, and the final product was analyzed by a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). The structures were identified by 1H and 13C-NMR spectra. 1H and 13C-NMR spectra were obtained with Bruker Avance III 500 MHz (Bruker Corporation, Karlsruhe, Germany). HPMS were recorded on a Triple TOF 5600+ system (AB SCIEX Co. LTD, Framingham, MA, USA). The high-performance liquid chromatography was performed on an Agilent 1260 liquid chromatography system (Agilent Technologies Co. LTD, Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with a Zorbax SB-C18 column, particle size 5 μm, dimension 150 mm × i.d. 9.4 mm, flow rate 7 mL min−1.

3.4. Antifungal Activity of Magnolol and Honokiol on A. alternata

Magnolol and honokiol were dissolved in DMSO (1000 mg/mL) and diluted to the required concentration with Tween-20 and distilled water (1:1000 v/v). Antifungal activities of magnolol and honokiol were tested against A. alternata in vitro according to the agar dilution method [34]. Magnolol and honokiol (5 mL) were added to sterilized Petri dishes (90 mm diameter) in concentrations of 0.001, 0.005, 0.01, 0.10, 1.00, 3.00, 5.00, and 7.00 mg/mL, and eugenol (0.1 g/mL) and carbendazim (0.001 g/mL),then were mixed with PDA medium (15 mL). As the control, PDA dishes were added with the same volume of Tween-20 and distilled water (1:1000 v/v). A 6 mm diameter disc of A. alternata mycelia was inoculated into the center of the plate. After incubation for 7 days at 25 ± 2 °C, the colony diameter was measured. Each treatment was performed in triplicate. To calculate the percentage of mycelial growth inhibition (MGI), the following formula was used: mycelium inhibition (%) = [(Dc − Dt)/Dc] × 100, where Dc (cm) is the mean colony diameter for the control Petri dishes, and Dt (cm) is the mean colony diameter for the treatment Petri dishes.

3.5. Synergistic Effect Test

Synergistic effect of magnolol and honokiol was tested against A. alternata. Magnolol and honokiol (0.1 mg/mL each) were mixed at volume ratios of 1:0, 1:1, 1:4, 1:9, 9:1, 4:1, and 0:1 in a total volume of 5 mL and added to sterilized Petri dishes (90 mm diameter) containing PDA medium (15 mL) and Tween-20 (1:1000 v/v). A 6 mm diameter disc of A. alternata mycelia was inoculated into the center of the plate. After incubation for 7 days at 25 ± 2 °C, the colony diameter was measured. Each treatment was performed in triplicate.

3.6. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Analysis

A. alternata incubated on PDA containing magnolol (0.1 mg/mL) and honokiol (0.1 mg/mL) for 7 days were used for SEM analysis. Slices of 7 × 5 × 3 mm segments were cut from the plates and washed three times using normal saline. After keeping the mycelium in 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 2 h at 4 °C, samples were washed with 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) four times. The samples were dehydrated in ethanol sequentially with 30, 50, 70, and 90% ethanol for 20 min each wash, and the final wash was absolute ethyl alcohol for 30 min. Mycelium was observed under a scanning electron microscope after drying. All mycelium samples were viewed with a Nova NanoSEM 450 (FEI Co. LTD, Hillsboro, OR, USA) at 5.00 kV of magnification.

3.7. Cell Membrane Permeability Test

The cell membrane permeability test of A. alternata was performed, as described previously by Lee et al. [35]. A. alternata suspension was incubated in a PDB (potato dextrose broth) medium and rotated with 160 rpm at 25 °C for 48 h. Magnolol (0.1 mg/mL) and honokiol (0.1 mg/mL) were then added to the suspension, 5 mL of which were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 15 min. The supernatant conductivity was tested by a conductometer at the start of the measurement (0 h) and then every 1 h, up to 6 h. Each sample was repeated three times.

3.8. Antifungal Activity Test

Effects of magnolol and honokiol on the mycelial growth of A. alternata (Fr.) Keissl, P. expansum (Link) Thom, F. moniliforme J. Sheld, F. oxysporum Schltdl., V. mali Miyabe & G. Yamada, and R. solani J.G. Kühn were measured. Different ratios of magnolol and honokiol in a total volume of 5 mL were added to sterilized Petri dishes (90 mm diameter) as indicated in Table 2 and mixed with PDA medium (15 mL). The same volume of distilled water was added to control PDA dishes instead of magnolol and honokiol. A 6 mm diameter disc of pathogens mycelia was inoculated into the center of the plate. After incubation for 7 days at 25 ± 2 °C. The colony diameter was measured as described in Section 3.4 Each treatment was repeated three times.

3.9. Statistical Analysis

All data were presented as the mean ± SD by measuring four independent replicates. The data were analyzed using a Data Processing System 15.10 (Hefei, China). The significance of the statistical differences between four means was determined using Duncan′s new complex range method at the 5% level.

4. Conclusions

In this study, magnolol and honokiol were purified from M. officinalis and identified by 1H- and 13C-NMR and HP-MS. Magnolol and honokiol showed antifungal activity against A. alternata and other phytopathogenic fungi assayed in this study. The antifungal activity can be associated with the hyphal distortion that resulted from the disruption of the cell membrane integrity. Therefore, magnolol and honokiol could be potentially used as antifungal agents against plant fungal pathogens.

Author Contributions

Y.-H.C., M.-H.L. and D.-S.G. isolated and purified of active compounds and analyzed the structure; D.M. tested synergistic effect; Y.-Y.Z. tested scanning electron microscopy (SEM); J.-Y.Y. and C.-H.Y. analyzed effects of magnolol and honokiol on cell membrane permeability and the inhibitory against 6 fungal pathogens; D.-R.A. and M.-M.Z. designed the experiments and supervised the study. M.-M.Z. and Y.-H.C. wrote the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Demonstration and Application of Control Technology of Plant Pests and Diseases in Shaanxi Province (No. K4030218261), Research and Application of Green Control and Prevention Technology of Cordyceps Chinensis Based on Entomogenous Fungi (No. 110201601023) and Start-up Funding of High-level Talent Researcher in Inner Mongolia Agricultural University (No. NDGCC2016-23).

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Delong Wang for analyses the data of compound structure. We thank the Instrument Shared Platform of Northwest A&F University, the People′s Republic of China, for the LC-MS and NMR.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

References

  1. Lei, Z.Q. The wet medicine. In The Chinese Materia Medica, 1st ed.; Shanghai Science and Technology Press: Shanghai, China, 1995; p. 128. [Google Scholar]
  2. Choi, J.H.; Ha, J.; Park, J.H.; Lee, J.Y.; Lee, Y.S.; Park, H.J. Costunolide triggers apoptosis in human leukemia U937 cells by depleting intracellular thiols. Cancer Sci. 2002, 93, 1327–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kang, J.S.; Lee, K.H.; Han, M.H.; Lee, H.; Ahn, J.M.; Han, S.B.; Han, G.; Lee, K.; Park, S.K.; Kim, H.M. Antiinflammatory activity of methanol extract isolated from stem bark of Magnolia kobus. Phytother. Res. 2008, 22, 883–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kong, C.W.; Tsai, K.; Chin, J.H.; Chan, W.L.; Hong, C.Y. Magnolol attenuates peroxidative damage and improves survival of rats with sepsis. Shock 2000, 13, 24–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lee, J.W.; Lee, Y.K.; Lee, B.J.; Nam, S.Y.; Lee, S.I.; Kim, Y.H.; Kim, K.H.; Oh, K.W.; Hong, J.T. Inhibitory effect of ethanol extract of Magnolia officinalis and 4-O-methylhonokiol on memory impairment and neuronal toxicity induced by beta-amyloid. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2009, 95, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Hattori, M.; Bae, K.H.; Tsunezuka, M.; Namba, T. Studies on dental caries prevention by traditional Chinese medicines (part I): Screening of crude drugs for antibacterial action against streptococcus mutans. Jpn. J. Pharmacogn. 1981, 35, 295–302. [Google Scholar]
  7. Tan, Z.X.; Yang, L.X. Biological control of tobacco brown spot disease: Present and future. Acta Tab. Sin. 2005, 11, 34–38. [Google Scholar]
  8. Tachikawa, E.; Takahashi, M.; Kashimoto, T. Effects of extract and ingredients isolated from Magnolia obovata thunberg on catecholamine secretion from bovine adrenal chromaffin cells. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2000, 60, 433–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. LaMondia, J.A. Outbreak of brown spot of tobacco caused by Alternaria alternata in Connecticut and Massachusetts. Plant Dis. 2001, 85, 230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, M.C.; Lee, C.F.; Huang, W.H.; Chou, T.C. Magnolol suppresses hypoxia-induced angiogenesis via inhibition of HIF-1alpha/VEGF signaling pathway in human bladder cancer cells. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2013, 85, 1278–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chuang, T.C.; Hu, S.C.; Cheng, Y.T.; Shao, W.S.; Wu, K.; Fang, G.S.; Ou, C.C.; Wang, V. Magnolol down-regulates HER2 gene expression, leading to inhibition of HER2-mediated metastatic potential in ovarian cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 2011, 311, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sun, L.M.; Liao, K.; Liang, S.; Yu, P.-H.; Wang, D.-Y. Synergistic activity of magnolol with azoles and its possible antifungal mechanism against, Candida albicans. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 118, 826–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lee, Y.J.; Lee, Y.M.; Lee, C.K.; Jung, J.K.; Han, S.B.; Hong, J.T. Therapeutic applications of compounds in the Magnolia family. Pharmacol. Ther. 2011, 130, 157–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bang, K.H.; Kim, Y.K.; Min, B.S.; Na, M.K.; Rhee, Y.H.; Lee, J.P.; Bae, K.H. Antifungal activity of magnolol and honokiol. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2000, 23, 46–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Choi, N.H.; Choi, G.J.; Min, B.S.; Jang, K.S.; Choi, Y.H.; Kang, M.S.; Park, M.S.; Choi, J.E.; Bae, B.K.; Kim, J.C. Effects of neolignans from the stem bark of Magnolia obovata on plant pathogenic fungi. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 106, 2057–2063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Liu, X.M.; Li, D.Z. Researching advance of tobacco brown spot caused by Alternaria alternata. J. Northeast Agric. Univ. 2000, 1, 80–85. [Google Scholar]
  17. Yi, L.; Xiao, C.G. Advances in studies on control of tobacco brown spot. Plant Prot. 2003, 5, 10–14. [Google Scholar]
  18. Li, S.Y.; Guan, B.Q.; Wei, F.J. The major disease of tobacco. In Technical Guide for Tobacco Production, 1st ed.; China Agriculture Press: Beijing, China, 2010; pp. 169–170. [Google Scholar]
  19. Chen, C.R.; Tan, R.; Qu, W.M.; Wu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Urade, Y.; Huang, Z.L. Magnolol, a major bioactive constituent of the bark of Magnolia officinalis, exerts antiepileptic effects via the GABA/benzodiazepine receptor complex in mice. Br. J Pharmacol. 2011, 164, 1534–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Chen, J.; Li, L.Y.; Gao, M.; Ma, G.H.; Chen, G.K.; Yu, Q.T. Indoor screening and field trial of fungicides against tobacco brown spot. Chin. Tob. Sci. 2017, 38, 73–77. [Google Scholar]
  21. Jing, C.L.; Zhao, J.; Han, X.B.; Huang, R.H.; Cai, D.S.; Zhang, C.S. Essential oil of Syringa oblata Lindl. as a potential biocontrol agent against tobacco brown spot caused by Alternaria alternata. Crop Prot. 2018, 104, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mi, Y.Y.; Byeong, J.C.; Jin, C.K. Recent trends in studies on botanical fungicides in agriculture. Plant Pathol. J. 2013, 29, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  23. Shin, K.S.; Lee, S.; Cha, B. Antifungal activity of plumbagin purified from leaves of Nepenthes ventricosa x maxima against phytopathogenic fungi. Plant Pathol. 2007, 23, 113–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kijjoa, A.; Pinto, M.M.M.; Tantisewie, B.; Herz, W. A biphenyl type neolignan and biphenyl ether from Magnolia henryi. Phytochemistry 1989, 28, 1284–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ho, K.Y.; Tsai, C.C.; Chen, C.P.; Huang, J.S.; Lin, C.C. Antimicrobial activity of honokiol and magnolol isolated from Magnolia officinalis. Phytother. Res. 2001, 15, 139–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wang, X.; Wang, Y.Q.; Geng, Y.L.; Li, F.W.; Zheng, C.C. Isolation and purification of honokiol and magnolol from cortex Magnoliae officinalis by high-speed counter-current chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2004, 1036, 171–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Boudina, A.; Emmelin, C.; Baaliouamer, A.; Grenier-Loustalot, M.F.; Chovelon, J.M. Photochemical behaviour of carbendazim in aqueous solution. Chemosphere 2003, 50, 649–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Holtman, M.A.; Kobayashi, D.Y. Identification of Rhodococcus erythropolis isolates capable of degrading the fungicide carbendazim. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1997, 47, 578–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Edris, A.E.; Farrag, E.S. Antifungal activity of peppermint and sweet basil essential oils and their major aroma constituents on some plant pathogenic fungi from the vapor phase. Nahrung 2003, 47, 117–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tyagi, A.K.; Malik, A. Antimicrobial potential and chemical composition of Mentha piperita oil in liquid and vapour phase against food spoiling microorganisms. Food Control 2011, 22, 1707–1714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhou, H.; Tao, N.; Jia, L. Antifungal activity of citral, octanal and α-terpineol against Geotrichum citri-aurantii. Food Control 2014, 37, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Elsherbiny, E.A.; Amin, B.H.; Baka, Z.A. Efficiency of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) peels extract as a high potential natural tool towards Fusarium dry rot on potato tubers. Postharvest Biol Tec. 2016, 111, 256–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bajpai, V.K.; Sharma, A.; Baek, K.H. Antibacterial mode of action of Cudrania tricuspidata fruit essential oil, affecting membrane permeability and surface characteristics of food-borne pathogens. Food Control 2013, 32, 582–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Paul, S.; Dubey, R.C.; Maheswari, D.K.; Kang, S.C. Trachyspermum ammi (L.) fruit essential oil influencing on membrane permeability and surface characteristics in inhibiting food-borne pathogens. Food Control 2011, 22, 725–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Shao, X.; Cheng, S.; Wang, H.; Yu, D.; Mungai, C. The possible mechanism of antifungal action of tea tree oil on Botrytis cinerea. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2013, 114, 1642–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.
Molecules 24 02140 g001 550
Figure 1. The HPLC chromatogram of magnolol and honokiol. (a) Magnolol; (b) honokiol.
Figure 1. The HPLC chromatogram of magnolol and honokiol. (a) Magnolol; (b) honokiol.
Molecules 24 02140 g001
Molecules 24 02140 g002 550
Figure 2. Sample and structure of the compound identified as magnolol and honokiol. (a) Magnolol; (b) honokiol.
Figure 2. Sample and structure of the compound identified as magnolol and honokiol. (a) Magnolol; (b) honokiol.
Molecules 24 02140 g002
Molecules 24 02140 g003 550
Figure 3. The identification of magnolol and honokiol by high-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS) chromatogram. (a,b) Magnolol; (c,d) honokiol.
Figure 3. The identification of magnolol and honokiol by high-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS) chromatogram. (a,b) Magnolol; (c,d) honokiol.
Molecules 24 02140 g003
Molecules 24 02140 g004 550
Figure 4. Observation of hyphae morphology of A. alternata by electron microphotography. The colony of A. alternata on PDA plates is shown in (a–c): (a). Control PDA plate; (b). PDA plate containing magnolol (0.1 mg/mL); (c). PDA plate containing honokiol (0.1 mg/mL). Hyphae morphology of A. alternata on the PDA plate is shown in (d–f): (d). Control PDA plate; (e). PDA plate containing the magnolol (0.1 mg/mL); (f). PDA plate containing honokiol (0.1mg/mL).
Figure 4. Observation of hyphae morphology of A. alternata by electron microphotography. The colony of A. alternata on PDA plates is shown in (a–c): (a). Control PDA plate; (b). PDA plate containing magnolol (0.1 mg/mL); (c). PDA plate containing honokiol (0.1 mg/mL). Hyphae morphology of A. alternata on the PDA plate is shown in (d–f): (d). Control PDA plate; (e). PDA plate containing the magnolol (0.1 mg/mL); (f). PDA plate containing honokiol (0.1mg/mL).
Molecules 24 02140 g004
Molecules 24 02140 g005 550
Figure 5. Effects of magnolol and honokiol on the extracellular conductivity of A. alternata, CK:PDB medium containing the same volume of Tween-20 and distilled water (1:1000 v/v).
Figure 5. Effects of magnolol and honokiol on the extracellular conductivity of A. alternata, CK:PDB medium containing the same volume of Tween-20 and distilled water (1:1000 v/v).
Molecules 24 02140 g005
Molecules 24 02140 g006 550
Figure 6. The sample of M. officinalis bark.
Figure 6. The sample of M. officinalis bark.
Molecules 24 02140 g006
Table
Table 1. Inhibition of magnolol and honokiol at the different concentration on mycelial growth of A. alternata.
Table 1. Inhibition of magnolol and honokiol at the different concentration on mycelial growth of A. alternata.
Concentration (mg/mL)Mycelial Growth Inhibition (%)
MagnololHonokiolEugenolCarbendazim
000--
0.0017 ± 3.189 ± 0.81-58 ± 4.64
0.00516 ± 3.9820 ± 2.29-
0.0123 ± 2.8826 ± 1.63--
0.177 ± 2.0991 ± 1.5611 ± 4.02-
190 ± 3.02100 *--
3100 *100 *--
5100 *100 *--
7100 *100 *--
Values are presented as mean ± SD. (-) not tested. * significantly different at P < 0.05 level by Duncan′s new multiple range test.
Table
Table 2. The synergistic effect of magnolol and honokiol on A. alternata.
Table 2. The synergistic effect of magnolol and honokiol on A. alternata.
The Volume Ration of Magnolol (0.1 mg/mL) and Honokiol (0.1 mg/mL)Mycelial Growth Inhibition (%)
1:077 ± 2.09
1:184 ± 3.85
1:489 ± 2.77 *
1:988 ± 1.19
9:187 ± 1.74
4:180 ± 2.11
0:191 ± 1.56
Values are presented as mean ± SD. * significantly different at P < 0.05 level by Duncan′s new multiple range test.
Table
Table 3. The inhibitory efficiency of magnolol and honokiol against six phytopathogens.
Table 3. The inhibitory efficiency of magnolol and honokiol against six phytopathogens.
PathogenMycelial Growth Inhibition Rate (%)
MagnololHonokiol
(0.1 mg/mL)(0.1 mg/mL)
P. expansum (Link) Thom80 ± 3.95 *81± 0.23
Alternaria dauci f.sp. solani70 ± 5.2680 ± 9.23 *
F. moniliforme J. Sheld79 ± 0.6982 ±0.69 *
F. oxysporum Schltdl.76 ± 1.54 *89 ± 1.55
V. mali Miyabe & G. Yamada100 *100 *
R. solani J.G. Kühn57 ± 2.7468 ± 1.89
Values are presented as mean ± SD. * significantly different at P < 0.05 level by Duncan′s new multiple range test.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, Y.-H.; Lu, M.-H.; Guo, D.-S.; Zhai, Y.-Y.; Miao, D.; Yue, J.-Y.; Yuan, C.-H.; Zhao, M.-M.; An, D.-R. Antifungal Effect of Magnolol and Honokiol from Magnolia officinalis on Alternaria alternata Causing Tobacco Brown Spot. Molecules 2019, 24, 2140. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24112140

AMA Style

Chen Y-H, Lu M-H, Guo D-S, Zhai Y-Y, Miao D, Yue J-Y, Yuan C-H, Zhao M-M, An D-R. Antifungal Effect of Magnolol and Honokiol from Magnolia officinalis on Alternaria alternata Causing Tobacco Brown Spot. Molecules. 2019; 24(11):2140. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24112140

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Ya-Han, Mei-Huan Lu, Dong-Sheng Guo, Ying-Yan Zhai, Dan Miao, Jian-Ying Yue, Chen-Hong Yuan, Ming-Min Zhao, and De-Rong An. 2019. "Antifungal Effect of Magnolol and Honokiol from Magnolia officinalis on Alternaria alternata Causing Tobacco Brown Spot" Molecules 24, no. 11: 2140. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24112140

APA Style

Chen, Y. -H., Lu, M. -H., Guo, D. -S., Zhai, Y. -Y., Miao, D., Yue, J. -Y., Yuan, C. -H., Zhao, M. -M., & An, D. -R. (2019). Antifungal Effect of Magnolol and Honokiol from Magnolia officinalis on Alternaria alternata Causing Tobacco Brown Spot. Molecules, 24(11), 2140. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24112140

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop