Next Article in Journal
Validation of an LC-MS/MS Method for the Quantification of Caffeine and Theobromine Using Non-Matched Matrix Calibration Curve
Previous Article in Journal
Interaction with Blood Proteins of a Ruthenium(II) Nitrofuryl Semicarbazone Complex: Effect on the Antitumoral Activity
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Two New Flavonoids from the Nuts of Areca catechu

Molecules 2019, 24(16), 2862; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24162862
by Mengfei Yuan †, Yunlin Ao †, Nan Yao, Jing Xie, Dongmei Zhang, Jian Zhang *, Xiaoqi Zhang * and Wencai Ye
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Molecules 2019, 24(16), 2862; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24162862
Submission received: 22 July 2019 / Revised: 5 August 2019 / Accepted: 6 August 2019 / Published: 7 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Natural Products Chemistry)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper describes two new flavonoids and nine known compounds identified from Areca nuts. The results are clearly showed and should be accepted for publication.

 

Only a unique suggestion :

Authors should insert the family name in the introduction as well as in the abstract.

Author Response

Answer:  Thank you very much for your suggestion. We have added the family name in the introduction as well as in the abstract in present manuscript.

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript written by Yuan et al. describes the identification of two new flavonoids, calquiquelignan M and calquiquelignan N, from the nuts of Areca catechu. Their manuscript is concise and well organized. The authors evaluated cytotoxicity of the compounds isolated from the plant; however, there are no data in the manuscript. The authors are required to add a table about the cytotoxicity data of the compounds to MCF-7 cells, HepG2 cells, and A-549 cells. The authors are also required to compare their cytotoxicity data with previous papers reporting the cytotoxicity of the known compounds (compound 3 to 8).

Minor point

Line149: Replace "exposure" with "preculture".

Author Response

Answer: Thank you very much for your comment and suggestion. We have added the table about the cytotoxicity data of the compounds to MCF-7 cells, HepG2 cells, and A-549 cells in the manuscript. By searching the literature, we found there are no reported about the cytotoxicity of compounds 4, 5, 7, and 8, and compound 6 showed certain cytotoxicity against HepG2 cells.

Answer: Line 149 (now is Line 152), "exposure" was revised as "preculture" in present manuscript.

Reviewer 3 Report

The manuscript is clear, well organized, and reports some interesting results. However, the authors should insert a section discussing the results obtained. In addition, they should include a table of the toxicological test results comparing those obtained at the different concentrations tested in the various cell lines. Finally, the manuscript’s English grammar and style should be revised by a native speaker. 

Author Response

Answer: Thank you very much for your comment and suggestion. We have added the Conclusions section and the table about the cytotoxicity data of the compounds to MCF-7 cells, HepG2 cells, and A-549 cells in the manuscript. The present manuscript also has been revised by a native speaker.

Back to TopTop