Next Article in Journal
Overcharging Effect in Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectra of Daunomycin-Tuftsin Bioconjugates
Next Article in Special Issue
A Single-Turnover Kinetic Study of DNA Demethylation Catalyzed by Fe(II)/α-Ketoglutarate-Dependent Dioxygenase AlkB
Previous Article in Journal
New Sesquiterpenoids from the Fermented Broth of Termitomyces albuminosus and Their Anti-Acetylcholinesterase Activity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Molecular Imaging Probes Based on Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitors (MMPIs)

Departamento de Química y Bioquímica, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad San Pablo-CEU, CEU Universities, Urbanización Montepríncipe, Alcorcón, 28925 Madrid, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2019, 24(16), 2982; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24162982
Submission received: 25 July 2019 / Revised: 12 August 2019 / Accepted: 13 August 2019 / Published: 16 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Structure and Function of Metalloenzymes)

Abstract

:
Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are a family of zinc- and calcium-dependent endopeptidases which are secreted or anchored in the cell membrane and are capable of degrading the multiple components of the extracellular matrix (ECM). MMPs are frequently overexpressed or highly activated in numerous human diseases. Owing to the important role of MMPs in human diseases, many MMP inhibitors (MMPIs) have been developed as novel therapeutics, and some of them have entered clinical trials. However, so far, only one MMPI (doxycycline) has been approved by the FDA. Therefore, the evaluation of the activity of a specific subset of MMPs in human diseases using clinically relevant imaging techniques would be a powerful tool for the early diagnosis and assessment of the efficacy of therapy. In recent years, numerous MMPIs labeled imaging agents have emerged. This article begins by providing an overview of the MMP subfamily and its structure and function. The latest advances in the design of subtype selective MMPIs and their biological evaluation are then summarized. Subsequently, the potential use of MMPI-labeled diagnostic agents in clinical imaging techniques are discussed, including positron emission tomography (PET), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and optical imaging (OI). Finally, this article concludes with future perspectives and clinical utility.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Molecular imaging is a rapidly emerging multidisciplinary field that can visualize physiological or pathological processes inside the body at the cellular or molecular level. Molecular imaging plays an important role in noninvasive earlier diagnosis, the accurate detection of diseases or dysfunctions, treatment follow-ups, personalized treatments, and it is also useful in drug development and discovery processes [1]. There are several modalities available for clinical imaging purposes, including positron emission tomography (PET), single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), X-ray computed tomography imaging (CT), optical imaging (OI) by either bioluminescence or fluorescence, and ultrasound (US). Each imaging modality has advantages and disadvantages in aspects, such as spatial resolution, penetration depth and sensitivity which are collected in Table 1 [2]. In recent years, many efforts have been made to improve the imaging instruments and advanced image reconstruction techniques to obtain high resolution images that disclose even tiny lesions and gather accurate quantification of pathological processes. Both academia and the pharmaceutical industry are making a great effort to develop novel molecular imaging probes. The ideal molecular imaging probe must bind to its target with enough affinity, have optimal circulation time inside the body, rapidly clear from the tissues and present high metabolic stability. There are numerous molecular imaging agents available both for preclinical and clinical applications, based on small molecules, peptides, affibodies, aptamers, antibodies and nanoparticles [2]. Among these agents, small molecule-based probes remain promising candidates for clinical applications, because they have favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles, generally have short circulation times, and are rapidly cleared from the body, thereby reducing the possibility of off-target toxicity. The design and development of molecular imaging probes are unlikely be successful unless the molecular target is well defined, and its biological role is well characterized. According to this requirement, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are highly validated molecular targets for the development of both therapeutics and diagnostic agents [3,4,5,6]. MMPs are frequently found to be overexpressed or highly activated in numerous human diseases, including cancer, atherosclerosis, stroke, arthritis, cardiovascular diseases, periodontal disease, respiratory tract disorders, glomerulonephritis, abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion, inflammatory bowel disease, neurodegeneration, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, multiple sclerosis and liver fibrosis [7,8,9,10,11]. MMPs represent valuable targets for the development of new therapeutic and diagnostic tools. Owing to the important role of MMPs in many human diseases, several MMP inhibitors (MMPIs) have been developed as novel therapeutics and a few of them namely, Marimastat, BB-1101, Rebimastat, Prinomastat, RO-32-3555, Ilomastat, CGS-27023A, Batimastat, Tanomastat, among others have entered in advanced stages of clinical trials. However, many MMPIs have failed in the last phases of clinical trials mainly due to musculoskeletal toxicity, joint pain and swelling, as well as bone marrow suppression and venous thromboembolism. These side-effects could be due to the high concentrations of inhibitors required for the therapy [3,4,5,6]. However, they may be useful for the development of imaging probes because even low concentrations of tracers would be enough to image the activated MMPs in preclinical and clinical use (e.g., in a preclinical model).
Hence, radio-/fluorophore- labeled small molecule MMPIs could be useful for the detection of activated MMPs by means of molecular imaging techniques, such as SPECT, PET and OI. In recent years, numerous labelled MMPIs imaging agents have emerged. This review summarizes the MMP-based imaging probes for diseases listed above. The labelled MMPIs imaging agents based on the specific disease application and on their structure have been organized. An intensive broad discussion has been made on the synthetic methods including the yield, purity, overall synthesis time and specific activity of the probes, in vitro MMP isoform selective binding affinity, in vitro imaging, in vivo biodistribution, metabolic stability assessment, and in vivo preclinical to human clinical imaging applications. This review specifically covers the development of small-molecule PET, SPECT and OI probes but does not include MRI imaging probes, which have been reviewed elsewhere [3,4,5,6]. The experimental details on the radiosynthesis of MMPIs in Table 2 have been summarized. This review does not cover the MMP activatable probes. This work widens and updates previous reviews [6] reported in the literature which focused only on one disease [4,5] or one enzyme [3].

1.1. Classifications and Structures of Matrix Metalloproteinases

During the last 40 years, MMPs have become an attractive pharmacological target due to their relationship with several diseases, especially in cancer invasion and metastasis [12]. The main role of these zinc-dependent endopeptidases lies not only in their ability to remodel the extracellular matrix (ECM) by degrading the connective tissue, but also in their involvement in contact cell regulation [13]. The normal function of these enzymes is related to tissue homeostasis by maintaining the complex ECM and preserving its biochemical and mechanical properties. Therefore, a dysregulation in MMP activity could lead to both the development and cancer progression, as well as other diseases such as atherosclerosis, osteoarthritis, pulmonary and cardiovascular diseases [14]. The entire MMP genome includes 24 distinct genes encoding for more than 26 members. These have been classified based on the substrate type (collagenases, gelatinases, stromelysins, matrilysins, membrane-type MMPs and others) or by their structure [15]. Structurally distinct MMPs such as MMP-2, -7, -8, -9, -12 and -13 have been targeted with MMPIs labelled as diagnostic agents [6]. MMPs are synthesized and secreted as preproenzymes (zymogens) apart from MMP-8 and MMP-9 that are present in neutrophils and located inside granulomas. The activation process typically occurs extracellularly by proteolytic cleavage by serine proteinases or even by other MMPs. Commonly, MMPs are multi-domain proteins, which contain a signal sequence that targets the peptide for secretion; a propeptide responsible for the inactivation; a catalytic domain; a linker domain (also called a hinge region); and a hemopexin-like domain [16]. The propeptide is made up by the PRCGXPD motif that can inhibit the enzyme by a Cys-Zn2+ chelation that occludes the active site. Apart from the auto inhibition by tissue inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases (TIMPs) and the general plasma proteinase inhibitor, α2-macroglobulin can also regulate MMPs activity [17]. The MMP catalytic domain consists of a globular domain formed by approximately 170 amino acids where five central β-sheets are wrapped around four α-helixes. These metalloenzymes contain two zinc ions: One is part of the catalytic site and is coordinated by three histidines contained in the well conserved zinc-binding motif (HEXXHXXGXXH); the second exerts structural functions and its absence is linked to an autoinhibition allosteric process [18]. Furthermore, at least 2 or 3 calcium ions having structural functions are present depending on the 3D-crystal structure. Furthermore, the general structure presents five β-sheets (βI–βV) and three α-helixes (αA, αB and αC) within the N-terminal subdomain. The catalytic site is located in the αB (Figure 1). By linking αB and αC, a notable Ω-loop is found, presenting a variety of lengths and amino acid compositions depending on the type of MMP. The Ω-loop has become one of the paradigms in MMP drug discovery, as it is the least conserved fragment within the catalytic domain that can offer different ligand selectivity [19]. There are several hydrophobic pockets described in the catalytic domain of MMPs which are designated by a primed or unprimed S subsite. As described by Babine and Bender [20,21], the subsites on the left side of the Zn2+ ion are designated without a prime S (S1, S2, S3..), while those present on the right side are primed (S1´, S2´, S3´…) and the numbers refer to the residue numbers present on the substrate that occupy the pockets being the first ones cleaved by the MMP and 2 and 3 the adjacent.
The S1’ pocket is a highly hydrophobic cavity formed by the Ω-loop. Although this subsite is present in all MMPs, its volume and plasticity varies depending on the nature of the Ω-loop, giving rise to a MMP classification according to the size of the S1’ pocket: Small (MMP-1, MMP-7, MMP-20, MMP-22), medium (MMP-2, MMP-8, MMP-9, MMP-12, MMP-14, MMP-16), and large (MMP-3, MMP-10, MMP-13) [22]. The S1’ pocket is the major hydrophobic cavity near the active site and has attracted major attention in the design of selective MMP inhibitors because of its variation in size and depth [23]. Furthermore, another side pocket has been described, the S1’*, which extends beyond the S1’ pocket, and its accessibility depends also on the position and conformation of the Ω-loop. The presence of this extra pocket has been only mentioned in some MMPs, such as MMP-8 and MMP-13 [24,25]. In addition to the S1’ and S1’* pockets, the S1, S2, S3 and S2′, S3’ subsites can also offer some degree of selectivity [21].

1.2. MMPs as Biomarkers in Cancer, Atherosclerosis, Osteoarthritis, Pulmonary and Cardiovascular Diseases

Although the knowledge that MMP overexpression has an influence in the risks and prognosis of several types of cancer and other diseases is not new, the application of MMPs as biomarkers is relatively recent. An ideal biomarker presents the capacity to be measured and evaluated as an indicator of the biological process of the target. Therefore, a biomarker should be accurate, non-invasive, sensitive, non-expensive and easy to perform [26]. The recently developed biomarkers are deficient in specificity and sensibility when they are applied in a single combination, so nowadays biomarker combination is one of the strategies to overcome these weaknesses [27].
Currently, MMPs are being explored as biomarkers in several fields such as diagnosis, monitoring and treatment efficacy in different diseases. In this line, their application in cancer, atherosclerosis, osteoarthritis, and pulmonary and cardiovascular diseases has been remarkable. This novel approach comes mainly because the overexpression of MMPs in these diseases is specific and elevated. Moreover, these enzymes are available in the extracellular media, which means the biomarker molecule does not need to cross the cell membrane. An extensive review made by Huang et al. [28] summarized how MMP-9 can be explored as a potential biomarker, and also how this MMP is overexpressed in several types of tumors such as colorectal carcinoma, breast, pancreatic, ovarian, cervical, osteosarcoma non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB). This makes MMP-9 a preferential candidate for the early detection of these types of tumors. The elevated MMP-9 expression in those tumors compared with healthy controls can be detected due to the recent development of experimental analytical techniques such as proteomic analysis, immunohistochemical studies, immunochemistry assays and tandem mass spectrometry [29,30,31]. The augmented levels of MMP-9 can be detected in plasma or blood samples, showing triple protein levels compared to healthy patients. The study carried out by Zajkowska et al. [29] showed that patients with cervical cancer in stages III and IV present MMP-9 plasma levels of 3344.44 ng/mL and 325.80 ng/mL, respectively, with almost three times more compared to healthy patients which present with normal levels of 166.00 ng/mL. De Chiara et al. [32] measured the MMP-9 levels in blood samples and found them to be triple (302.92 ng/mL) for NSCLC patients than in healthy controls (136.14 ng/mL). By tissue sampling, the overexpression of MMP-9 has also been detected by immunohistochemical assays using micro-RNA and labelled IgG in different types of cancer such as colorectal carcinoma, and breast cancer. Moreover, this overexpression has been linked to metastatic processes [30,31]. In the case of GCTB, the resection after surgery was the only available option to get the samples in order to measure the MMP-9 mRNA expression in peripheral tissue, confirming the overexpression in this type of cancer. These published diagnostic screenings in MMP-9 present as the main drawback the lack of tumor localization for blood samples and the inconvenience of the biopsy sampling. This gives an idea of the potential of MMP-9 as a biomarker.
Further, MMP-2, -7, -11, and -12, have been reported to be involved in cell growth and metastasis processes. In this line, MMP-12 overexpression has been linked to the grade and stage of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in tissue sampling [33]. This protease has also been connected with the exposure to tobacco smoke and with gefitinib-resistant NSCLC that leads to a poor prognosis [34,35]. Related to its implication in the effects of the exposure to cigarette smoke, MMP-12 is a key enzyme in diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and has been proposed as an early biomarker due to its elevated levels in tissue sampling [36,37].
MMP-11 has promoted the occurrence and development of malignant tumors such as breast [38], gastric [39], colorectal (CRC) [40], and lung cancer [41]. Similarly, MMP-7 overexpression has been correlated with the incidence of gastric cancer. The growth/differentiation factor 15 overexpression was also linked with this type of cancer, showing almost more than ten times the protein level compared with healthy patients [42]. MMP-7 has been described to play critical roles in the development and progression of other malignant tumors including CRC [43,44] and triple-negative breast cancer [45], amongst others. In conclusion, MMP-7 has been designated as a tumor suppressor. MMP-2 has been involved in the migration and invasion of ovarian, colorectal, bladder and breast cancer, where the increased activity and expression of these enzymes have been described [46,47,48,49]. Additionally, a remarkable synergic effect between Cullin1 and MMP-2 in CRC prompt diagnosis has been proposed by Deng et al. An extensive study with 470 patients showed that protein levels were significantly upregulated in CRC tissues compared to the healthy ones [50]. However, the overexpression of MMP-2 has been linked with poor prognosis in patients with epithelial ovarian and lung cancers [51,52].
On the other hand, MMPs have also been involved in the development and progression of atherosclerosis, which is correlated with cardiovascular diseases, such as a stroke and ischemic heart diseases, two of the top worldwide causes of death. The activity of these proteases promotes the loss of collagen, elastin, and other ECM proteins, inducing the necrotic core of atherosclerotic plaque, which finally could end in myocardial infarction or a stroke [10]. It has been shown that increased levels of MMP-9 are present in specific risk groups, like obese people that present a profile for early atherosclerosis development [53]. Furthermore, Rohde et al. demonstrated that MMP-9 serum levels were increased in patients with definite carotid atherosclerotic disease compared with normal patients; and also, that only MMP-9 levels were increased in contrast with other proposed biomarkers such as MMP-1 and MMP-3 [54]. A study carried out by Nilsson et al. [55] using a cohort of 1500 patients, and measuring the plasma levels of MMP-1, -3, -7, -10, and -12, demonstrated that MMP-7 and MMP-12 were elevated in type 2 diabetes, which is related to atherosclerosis and coronary events. Another meta-study carried out by Zhong et al. [56] in which the serum levels of MMP-1 and TIMP were evaluated in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), demonstrated that elevated mRNA levels of MMP-1 and decreased circulating levels of TIMP2 were significantly associated with AF risk.
Osteoarthritis (OA) is also one of the diseases linked to MMP overexpression due to their implication in the breakdown of articular cartilage in synovial joint tissues. Many publications have linked OA to the overexpression of MMPs in the affected tissue, especially MMP-1, -2, -9 and -13 [57,58]. MMP-1 is proposed as an early OA biomarker due to its increased concentrations in the synovial fluid in the early stage of OA compared to decreased levels when OA continues progressing [59]. Remarkably, MMP-13 has raised interest in clinical studies, as it is overexpressed in the cartilage of patients with OA and is identified as a target protein in the signaling pathways implicated in the regulation of cartilage breakdown [60,61]. MMP-3 has also been proposed as an OA biomarker together with other pro-inflammatory enzymes due to its markedly up-regulation in this disease [62].

2. MMPIs Labelled Imaging Agents for Cancer

2.1. CGS 27023 and CGS 29566 Based MMPIs Labelled Imaging Probes

Several MMPIs such as Batimastat, Marimastat, Tanomastat, Prinomastat (AG-3340), Rebimastat, CGS 25966A, and CGS 27023A have entered human trials. Among these, CGS 27023A presents both good pharmacokinetics and IC50 in the nanomolar range for several MMP isoforms.
Inspired by the MMP inhibitory activity of CGS 27023A, Zheng et al. [63] designed a number of 11C or 18F labeled analogs such as [11C]1, [18F]2 and [11C]3. These are the first MMPI radiotracers described in the literature [63]. Later on, the same research group reported analogs [11C]4–[11C]8, as radiolabeled MMPIs [64]. However, no reports of in vivo applications of [11C]4–[11C]8 have been found. Further, based on CGS 25966A, Zheng et al. [65] reported simple synthetic methods for [11C]9 and its isomer [11C]10. The novel no-carrier-added radioiodinated MMPIs [123I]11, [125I]12, [123I]13 and [125I]14 were prepared by radioiodination of their precursors with [123I]NaI or [125I]NaI (Scheme 1) [66]. Preliminary in vitro data showed affinities towards MMP-2 and MMP-9 in the lower nanomolar range comparable to those of the parent compound CGS 27023A. In vivo biodistribution using [125I]14 in CL57 B/6 mice for 65 min p.i. showed rapid blood and plasma clearance and low retention in normal tissues. This is indicative of the suitability of these radiotracers for imaging MMP activity in vivo. However, in vivo studies using animal models that represent diseases with known MMP overexpression (e.g., tumor: Lewis lung carcinoma bearing mice; atherosclerotic plaques: apolipoprotein E-deficient mice) are needed to support their observation. Wagner et al. described a series of [18F]-labeled compounds ([18F]1520) (Scheme 2) [67]. Compound [18F]16 presented 43-fold increased potency compared to the parent compound CGS 27023A. Neither of these two compounds presented a tissue-specific accumulation in wild type (WT) mice, which can be considered an advantage in the study of MMP dysregulation. Therefore, compounds [18F]15 and [18F]16 could be useful for the in vivo imaging of activated MMPs in inflammation, cancer or atherosclerosis.
The same group reported a fully automated robust and reproducible radiosynthesis for [18F]15 with reasonable yields, whereas compound [18F]17 was synthesized in a one-step radiosynthesis with moderate radiochemical yield. Despite the latter presenting a high lipophilicity (experimental log D = 1.85), the initial PET in vivo studies in WT mice (C57/BL6) showed neither unspecific accumulation of [18F]17 in the heart or carotid regions, nor accumulation of radioactivity in the bones due to tracer decomposition. Compound [18F]18 was obtained in its two enantiomerically pure (R)- and (S)-isomers, and both demonstrated to be potent fluorinated inhibitors of MMP-2 and MMP-9 [68]. Remarkably, the (S)-enantiomer was even more active than the (R)-isomer in contrast to CGS 25966. Unfortunately, (S)-[18F]18 is metabolically unstable in WT mice, which hinders further clinical development of this tracer. Triazole-containing unlabeled precursors of compounds [18F]19 and [18F]20 [69], possess increased hydrophilicity compared to CGS 25966A (clog D values ranging from 0.60 to 2.25) and nanomolar inhibition potencies for MMP-2, MMP-8, MMP-9, and MMP-13 (see Table 2) [70].
Compound [18F]19 showed an excellent serum stability in vitro, up to 120 min, and a rapid clearance through the hepatic and renal clearance routes without presenting unspecific binding to non-excretion organs. Although these results indicate that [18F]19 is a promising MMP-targeted radiotracer, there is a lack of murine disease models characterized by the up-regulated levels of the activated MMPs to carry out PET/CT preclinical studies. Compound [18F]20 exhibited excellent serum stability and rapid renal clearance. Despite no defluorination or nonspecific accumulation of [18F]20 in non-excretory organs were observed in vivo, the biodistribution and metabolism studies in ICR (CD1) WT mice showed mainly polar metabolites of [18F]20 [70].

2.2. Fluorescent Probes for Cancer

Faust et al. developed a hydroxamate based Cyanine5.5 labelled fluorescence imaging probe for MMPs [71]. Starting from CGS 27023A and CGS 25966A, they synthesized compound 21 after a 11 steps synthetic route. Before conjugating Cy5.5, the parent compound showed complete inhibition of MMP-2/-9 activities in vitro, both for purified MMP-2/-9 (active and pro-form) and MMP-2/-9 containing cell culture supernatants. However, as expected, the fluorescent probe 21 lost the nanomolar potency of its unlabeled precursor. In situ zymography studies were conducted cryostat sections of A-673 (rhabdomyosarcoma), HT1080 (fibrosarcoma), and BT-20 (breast cancer) xenograft (CD-1 nude mice), showing high, weak and low MMP-2 and -9 activities, respectively. The MMP positive tumor cryostat sections specifically showed a higher signal with compound 21 while MMP negative tumors were not targeted. Thus, compound 21 (Scheme 3) may be used for a sensitive imaging of MMP activity in various tumours.
Waschkau et al. [72] studied the in vivo applications of 21 using four different tumor xenografts: A-673, HT-1080, MDA-MB 231, and BT-20 tumors. They all showed different levels of MMP-2 and -9 expression, as indicated by the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) immunohistochemical analysis. The in vivo dynamic pharmacokinetic studies demonstrated that 21 was quickly cleared from the circulation. The ex-vivo biodistribution of 21 at 6 h p.i. showed a significant uptake in the tumor, kidney, lung and liver. After 24 h, the fluorescence intensity in most of the tissues was reduced by approximately 50%, while at 72 h, 21 was completely eliminated from all organs. The time-course near infrared fluorescence (NIRF) image in all the above four xenografts showed that the maximum tumor-to-background ratio values were observed between 45 min and 6 h. Then, the tumor-to-background ratio values were progressively reduced at 24 h and were almost negligible at 72 h in A-673 and HT-1080 tumors, proving its ability to visualize MMP specific activity in vivo.
Interestingly, they compared 21 with commercially available macromolecule-based MMP-activatable probes, MMPSenseTM 680 and MMPSenseTM 750 FAST. The activatable probes require a long circulation time (24 h or longer) which is potentially incompatible with human applications. However, 21 gave high NIRF intensities for MMP-positive tumors 30 min after injection and was eliminated from all the organs at 72 h, which makes it applicable to in vivo experiments. Further, they revealed that the dual probe approach by injecting MMPSenseTM 750 FAST and 21 enabled the imaging of MMP-positive A-673 tumors at different time windows. For instance, 21 signals in A-673 tumors were clearly detectable at 30 min and retained up to 6 h, but MMPSenseTM 750 FAST signal was detectable only at 6 h. Therefore, compound 21 could be useful for non-invasively image tumoral MMP-2/-9 expression patterns. This non-peptidic low-molecular-weight fluorescent probe may be clinically translated for endoscopic or surgical procedures.

2.3. MMP Inhibitor Imaging Probes with Carboxylic Acid as Zing Binding Group (ZBG)

Furumoto et al. [73] designed and developed 18F-labeled carboxylic acid-based MMPIs [18F]2224 for PET cancer imaging. The precursors were synthesized in four steps starting from the D-isomer of the corresponding amino acid. Although compound [18F]22 was chemically unstable and thus unsuitable for biological applications, compounds [18F]23 and [18F]24 (Scheme 4) were isolated in moderate radiochemical yields, and their biological evaluation was reported by the same authors [74].
A biodistribution study in the Ehrlich tumor-bearing mice showed that the accumulation of [18F]24 in tumor was higher than in other organs, except for the liver, small intestine, and bone. When [18F]25, a methyl ester of [18F]24, was used as a prodrug, the uptake in liver at 30 min p.i. decreased by half and the tumor uptake increased by 2.4 times, compared with [18F]24. A radio-thin-layer chromatographic analysis of [18F]25 demonstrated that it can be easily converted to the parent drug in vivo and thus accumulated in the tumor tissue. Therefore, [18F]25 could be considered a prodrug of [18F]24. Whole body autoradiography using [18F]25 showed tumor-specific accumulation of radioactivity, with higher accumulation in the bone and intestine. However, the increase of the uptake in the bone was time-dependent, suggesting the accumulation of free 18F anion, released from the terminal alkyl chain of [18F]25. These results suggest that the prodrug strategy could be useful, however the release of free [18F] should be avoided.
Structurally related compound [11C]26 has been studied as a potential PET cancer tracer [75]. The biodistribution and micro-PET studies in breast cancer animal models, such as MCF-7 transfected with IL-1α implanted athymic mice, and MDA-MB-435 implanted athymic mice confirmed that the localization of [11C]26 in the tumor was mediated by non-specific processes (Figure 2).

2.4. Biphenyl Sulfonamide Based MMPIs Labelled Imaging Probes

Oltenfreiter et al. developed a series of radioiodinated carboxylic and hydroxamic acids [123I]2730 (Scheme 5) [76,77,78].
The in vitro zymography and enzyme assays showed IC50 in the nanomolar range on gelatinases and high selectivity for MMP-2 (see Table 2). The in vivo biodistribution in NMRI white mice and in A549 lung carcinoma bearing athymic mice [78] showed that [123I]27 and [123I]28 have the potential to be used as SPECT tumor imaging agents.
The biodistribution evaluation in A549-tumor bearing athymic mice showed good tumor uptake for compound [123I]29, but not so good for compound [123I]30 [79]. A metabolite analysis by plasma HPLC after 2h revealed no degradation of [123I]29, but compound [123I]30 presented 30% of the metabolites, and 65.4% of the intact compound. However, 91.8% of the accumulated activity in the tumor was produced by the intact compound and only 8.1% by the metabolite. The in vivo evaluation revealed that these MMPIs could have potential as tumor imaging agents, but further research is necessary.
Qi-Huang Zheng et al. reported the synthesis of a series of biphenyl sulfonamide based MMPI radiotracers, [11C]3137, for the evaluation as potential PET cancer imaging agents [80]. Despite exhibiting strong inhibitory activity on MMP-13, no in vivo imaging data have been reported for these compounds.
The same authors reported the synthesis of [11C] labeled MMP inhibitors [11C]38 and [11C]39 for the evaluation as PET cancer imaging agents [81]. Compound S-38 is a potent MMPI for several MMP subtypes with IC50 ranging from 0.003 to 7.2 μM. The in vitro biological data showed that both [11C]38 and structurally related compound [11C]9 possessed favorable pharmacokinetics making them eligible for in vivo studies. However, even though [11C]38 had good biodistribution in breast cancer animal models, the tumors were invisible in micro PET imaging studies.
Kuhnast et al. reported the synthesis and labelling by methylation with [11C]CH3I of a N-sulfonylamino acid derivative to obtain compound [11C]39 [82]. This compound is a selective and highly potent MMP-2 and MMP-9 inhibitor. Compound [11C]39 exhibited a strong inhibitory effectiveness for gelatinases (110 nM for MMP-2 and 200 nM for MMP-9). In vivo studies in normal mice demonstrated favorable pharmacokinetics and [11C]39 was found to be rapidly excreted and stable up to 30 min post injection. Thus, compound [11C]39 seems to be a suitable compound for PET imaging of MMPs activity. However, the evaluation of this derivate in tumor bearing mice is needed to further validate its applicability. Digilio et al. reported the synthesis of 18F labelled arylsulfones [18F]40 and [18F]41 based on the nanomolar activity and selectivity of their non-radioactive counterparts (Scheme 6) [83].
Tracer [18F]40 was selected to study the uptake of radioactivity in a human glioblastoma mouse model as this compound presented the best MMP inhibition profile and efficiency of radiosynthesis. The biodistribution of [18F]40 was dominated by liver uptake, gastrointestinal tract uptake and hepatobiliary clearance. When compared to [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), compound [18F]40 exhibited an excellent tumor uptake and demonstrated to be specific (Figure 3).

2.5. Barbiturate Based MMPIs Labelled Imaging Probes

Breyholz et al. described a barbiturate-based MMPI radiotracer [125I]42 (Scheme 7) for the noninvasive in vivo visualization of activated MMPs using SPECT or PET imaging modalities [84]. The corresponding non-labeled compound showed some selectivity towards MMP-2 and -9 (IC50 MMP-2 = 7 nM; MMP-9 = 2 nM).
The same group reported the structurally related [18F]43 radiotracer [85]. The unlabeled analogous showed nanomolar MMP inhibition potencies with higher selectivity for MMP-9 against MMP-2 (MMP-2, IC50 = 23 nM; MMP-9, IC50 = 7 nM). Preliminary biodistribution studies indicated that there was no tissue specific accumulation in WT C57/BL6 mice and demonstrated favorable pharmacokinetic behavior corresponding to the physical half-life of the positron emitter. Small-animal PET images of the coronal whole-body showed that the tracer uptake in non-target organs was low over all the time points and showed rapid clearance through the renal and hepatobiliary route. Thus, these barbiturate-based MMP-targeted radiotracers may be applicable in noninvasive in vivo imaging of MMP-2 and MMP-9-associated diseases by means of PET.
A second generation of radio fluorinated barbiturate-based MMP tracers containing a triazole linker was described (Scheme 8) [86].
The in vivo biodistribution studies of [18F]44 in WT mice showed a high level of radioactivity in the liver, and a slower liver clearance and faster kidney clearance than the more hydrophobic [18F]43. Hence, the alteration of the chemical structure by introducing a mini-PEG and a triazole unit in [18F]44 led to a favorable pharmacokinetic behavior for in vivo PET-imaging. However, preclinical PET/CT studies in disease models with known MMP up-regulation (e.g., tumor, Lewis lung carcinoma bearing mice; atherosclerotic plaques, apolipoprotein E-deficient mice) should be assessed [87]. There are also examples of barbiturate MMP inhibitors labelled with [68Ga]45 [88].
More recently Wagner et al. developed the more hydrophilic radioiodinated barbiturate-based MMP tracers [123I]46-[124I]47. These compounds presented high inhibitory potency (IC50 (MMP-2) = 29 nM, IC50 (MMP-9) = 1.3 nM) [88].
In 2008, Faust et al. reported Cy5.5 labeled barbiturate based MMPIs as fluorescence photoprobes for imaging MMPs [89]. They designed a convergent 10 step synthetic route to obtain non-hydroxamate MMP inhibitor 48, which showed high affinity (IC50 value: 48 nM for MMP-2) measured by a fluorogenic assay using commercially available MMP-substrates and the purified enzyme. Fluorescence microscopy studies using highly (A-673, rhabdomyosarcoma) and moderate (HT-1080, fibrosarcoma) MMP-2 expressing cell lines showed efficient binding of 48 to the MMP-2 positive cells while no binding to MMP-2 negative cells (MCF-7, breast cancer cells). Pre-dosing experiments using 50 μM of the unlabeled barbiturate successfully blocked the binding of the Cy 5.5-labeled ligand 48 and showed specific uptake of the tracer. Therefore Cy 5.5 labeled tracer 48 (Scheme 9) may be a promising candidate for sensitive MMP detection in vivo.

2.6. Marimastat Based MMPIs Labelled Imaging Probes

Overall, a series of labelled Marimastat derivatives for in vivo PET imaging of MMP in cancer [90,91] have been described. First, FITC conjugated Marimastat (49) (Scheme 10) was reported to image MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells stably transfected with MMP-14 by fluorescence.
Later, a one-step synthesis of stable [18F]aryltrifluoroborate-50 under mild conditions by the use of a stable arylboronic acid as a captor of aqueous [18F]fluoride was reported. This facile method avoids tedious multistep syntheses or harsh fluorination conditions.
Syngeneic 67NR murine mammary carcinoma or 67NR/CMV luciferase derived primary tumor in Balb/C mice were used for in vivo PET imaging. After the injection of [18F]50 to tumor-bearing mice and PET image acquisition, a low but detectable and specific uptake in the primary tumor was observed. However, in mice injected with higher concentration of [18F]50 or control-ArBF3 lacking the Marimastat moiety, no tumor localization was observed, with clearance only to the liver, bladder, and submaxillary salivary gland. As a specificity control, tumor-bearing mice were blocked with an unlabeled marimastat prior to the tracer injection. The pre-blocked mice had clearly reduced uptake with similarly sized tumors. The time-activity curve analysis revealed that [18F]50 accumulated in the tumor after 60 min. Overall, the PET imaging and the time-activity curve analyses showed specific 18F-labeling of the tumor as well as the bladder, liver, stomach, and gut.

2.7. Tripeptide Hydroxamic Acid Labelled with 18F as Imaging Probes for MMPs

Elsinga and colleagues synthesized [18F]51 (Scheme 11) by the direct acylation of the corresponding unlabeled inhibitor with N-succinimidyl-4-[18F]fluorobenzoate [92].
The resulting radiotracer [18F]51 was evaluated in human bronchial epithelium 16HBE cells and breast cancer MCF-7 cells showing rather low binding to these cell lines. Specificity studies showed that cellular binding was reduced by 36.6% and 27.5% in MCF-7 and 16HBE cells, respectively, after co-incubation with the unlabeled counterpart.
The in vivo kinetics of [18F]51 were examined in a HT1080 fibrosarcoma tumor bearing mice. In microPET scans, HT1080 tumors exhibited a low and homogeneous uptake of the tracer, suggesting that tracer binding was not only to membrane-bound disintegrin and metalloproteinase (ADAMs) but also to the extracellular MMPs. The tumors of mice injected with [18F]51 showed specific uptake confirmed by blocking studies. The ex vivo biodistribution showed a rapid excretion through the kidneys and the liver. The metabolite assays indicated that the parent tracer represented 23.2 ± 7.3% (n = 2) of the total radioactivity in plasma after one and half hours after treatment. The autoradiography of a tumor slice confirmed the regular uptake on the tumor. A high kidney uptake was observed in the microPET/CT images. The change of the tumor to plasma ratio was statistically significant in contrast to the change of the tumor to muscle ratio. Therefore, the binding of [18F]51 in the HT1080 xenograft mice was target mediated. Compound [18F]51 may be suitable for the visualization/quantification of diseases overexpressing simultaneously MMPs and ADAMs.

2.8. Thiirane Based MMPIs Labelled Imaging Probes

Wagner et al. reported 18F-fluorine labeled radiotracers based on SB-3CT, a slow-binding and mechanism-based MMP-2 and -9 inhibitor [93]. Inspired by the selectivity and activity of SB-3CT, they synthesized non-radiolabeled analogues and evaluated their MMP inhibition profile showing Ki values ranging from 20.9 nM to 815 nM. These values are comparable to SB-3CT but they were non-selective inhibitors, with mixed kinetics and attractive residence times for MMP-2. However, this compound was unstable in human and mouse serum. The in vivo biodistribution studies revealed a rapid hepatobiliary elimination of the thiirane [18F]52 (Scheme 12) and its metabolites in C57BL/6 mice and therefore, it is not suitable for PET imaging and further in vivo evaluations in MMP associated mouse models of disease.

3. MMPIs Labelled Imaging Agents for Atherosclerosis, Myocardial Infarction and Aneurysm

3.1. CGS27023A Based MMPIs Labelled Imaging Probes

CGS27023 is a broad spectrum MMP inhibitor used by Schafers et al. to develop [123I]53 for in vivo imaging of MMP activity [94], and by Hartung et al. for the development of [125I]54 and [124I]55 for autoradiography and PET studies in apoE−/− mice, respectively [95].
The cold compound 53 yielded nanomolar IC50 values for MMP inhibition (298 and 153 nM for MMP-2 and MMP-9, respectively) making it suitable for radioligand synthesis for in vivo imaging of these MMPs activities. Upon pretreatment with non-labeled compound 53, compound [123I]53 was able to specifically image MMP activity in vivo in the MMP-rich vascular lesions that develop after carotid artery ligation and a cholesterol-rich diet in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice, using WT C57/BL6 mice as the control. Additionally, compound [123I]53 presented no uptake in thoracic cavity and the brain and was mainly excreted through the renal and hepatic pathways.
Compound [125I]54 presented no specific uptake in the ligated carotid arteries and the results did not improve upon pretreatment with the non–labeled compound. Compound [124I]55 presented a specific uptake in the ligated carotid arteries which was significantly higher in mice injected with [124I]55 alone than in mice pretreated with an excess of unlabeled MMPI (Figure 4).
Although additional studies are needed to test the potential of this approach as a novel noninvasive clinical diagnostic tool for the management of human MMP-related cardiovascular diseases, these results prove that imaging of MMP activity in vivo is feasible using radiolabeled MMPIs in vascular lesions.

3.2. Macrocyclic Hydroxamate Based MMPIs Labelled Imaging Probes

The activation of MMPs after myocardial infarction (MI) contributes to adverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling. This remodeling process gives rise to LV dysfunction and progressive heart failure. The radiolabeled compounds [111In]56, [111In]57 and [99mTc]58 were studied by Sinusas et al. [96], while Narula et al. developed the labelled tracer [99mTc]59 (Scheme 13) [97].
[111In]56 showed specific uptake by microautoradiography in surgically induced MI in C57BL/6 mice, using [111In]57 as a negative control. Further, gamma well counting demonstrated a 3- to 4-fold increase uptake in the same animal model. The same authors demonstrated, by using a model of carotid aneurysm in apolipoprotein E deficient mice, that R-[111In]56 is a useful radiotracer to noninvasively predict the propensity of an aneurysm to expand (Figure 5) [98].
The micro-SPECT/CT imaging studies with analogous [99mTc]58 radiotracer demonstrated a 5-fold increase of myocardial uptake. Additionally, tracer [99mTc]58 showed specific uptake in atherosclerotic lesions in apolipoprotein E (ApoE−/−) mice deficient in the low-density-lipoprotein receptor (LDLR−/−) (Figure 6). After treating abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) mouse models with [99mTc]59, the SPECT/CT images showed that [99mTc]59 displayed a maximum tracer uptake (Figure 7). Although further validation is required, [99mTc]59-based molecular imaging might improve patient AAA management, as well as other disorders associated with MMP activity dysregulation.

3.3. N-Sulfonylamino Acid Based Mmpis Labelled Imaging Probes

Radiotracers [18F]60, [3H]61 and [123I]62 (Scheme 14) have been studied by Selivanova et al. [100], Müller et al. [101] and Windhorst et al. [102] for the detection of MMPs in human atherosclerosis plaques. Both compounds [18F]60 and [3H]61 were evaluated by in vitro autoradiography which showed that they presented specific uptake in vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques.
[123I]62 presented a high selectivity for MMP-2/-9 over MMP-1. The biodistribution and autoradiography studies of [123I]62 showed an uptake in atheroprone mice, which is a clear indicator of the suitability of this compound for SPECT imaging. However, metabolite detection studies should be carried out.

4. MMPIs Labelled Imaging Agents for Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis (EAE) and Multiple Sclerosis (MS)

MMP-2 and MMP-9 are important for the induction of neuroinflammatory symptoms in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) in a multiple sclerosis (MS) mouse model [103].
Compound 21 and [18F]15, which were mentioned before as cancer probes, were also studied for EAE and MS. The injection of 21 in EAE mice showed an uptake at higher severities. Blocking studies demonstrated its specific uptake in EAE tissues (Figure 8).
They synthesized [18F]15 using the method previously described by Wagner et al. [104] and used it for translational PET imaging in MS patients. A total of five patients with known or suspected relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) presenting acute neurological symptoms participated in a [18F]15-PET study (Figure 9). All patients with the up-regulation of activated MMP-9 in cerebrospinal fluid samples exhibited a higher uptake of [18F]15 into the brain (Figure 9).

5. MMPIs Labelled Imaging Agents for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), and Osteo Arthritis (OA)

MMP-13 is overexpressed in the cartilage of patients with OA. The unlabeled Compound 63 (Scheme 15) is a picomolar MMP-13 inhibitor (IC50 = 0.07 nM) with high selectivity towards other MMPs and ADAMs [105]. Interestingly, [18F]63 exhibited excellent serum stability, and favorable in vivo biodistribution, which may be useful for PET imaging in RA and OA.
Selective and potent MMP-13 inhibitors 6466 were synthesized by Hugenberg et al. and successful radiolabeling was performed with 11C, 18F, and 68Ga, respectively [106]. Although [11C]64 and [18F]65 showed moderate metabolic stability, the more hydrophilic [68Ga]66 showed an enhanced blood retention time in biodistribution studies. Nearly no elimination of the [68Ga]66 tracer-associated activity from the liver was detected, which lead the authors to assume that the tracer somehow accumulates in the liver, due to the metabolism. They concluded that radiolabeled selective MMP-13 inhibitors-based PET tracers could enable earlier and more specific diagnosis of several MMP-13 related diseases, such as OA and RA.

6. MMPIs Labelled Imaging Agents for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Lung Inflammation

The synthesis and application of [18F]45 in cancer was described by Elsinga and colleagues as described before [92]. In 2015, they studied its utility in COPD [107]. Dynamic microPET studies in air or cigarette smoke (CS) exposed BALB/c mice showed a 2-fold increased the uptake in mice exposed to CS compared to air exposed mice (Figure 10).
Temma et al. developed [18F]67 (Scheme 16) for MMPs-targeted PET [108]. Non-radiolabeled 67 exhibited IC50 in the nanomolar range (MMP-2 = 4.4, MMP-9 = 8.1, MMP-12 = 1.5, MMP-13 = 4.1 nM). The in vivo and ex vivo PET confirmed a 2-fold increased accumulation in the CS exposed lungs compared to normal mice (Figure 11).
A macrocyclic hydroxamate based radiotracer [99mTc]59 was mentioned before for its utility in early vascular imaging and AAA [109,110]. Further, in vivo and ex vivo studies of [99mTc]59 in murine models of COPD demonstrated its higher uptake in lung tissue.
Sadeghi et al. [111] developed fluorescent probes (6973) (Scheme 17) to image active MMP-12 in inflammation and aneurysm. Among these probes, 70 (Ki = 6.1 nM) and 71 (Ki = 3.4 nM) presented the higher potency and selectivity towards MMP-12. Animals injected with 71 showed the highest signal in previously implanted sterile polyvinyl material (sponges) harvested for 60 min and a specific aneurysmal carotid artery when compared to a non-specific (scramble) control probe in WT mice.
Mukai and col. [112] described 74 (Scheme 18), a dibenzofuran sulfonamide-based MMPI. Interestingly, due to the specific interactions with the S1’ pocket, compound 74 exhibited more than a 150-fold activity for MMP-12 over MMP-8 and -13. Moreover, it prevented lung inflammation induced by recombinant human MMP-12 in C57BL/6 mice [113]. Inspired by these results, Mukai and colleagues designed and synthesized novel MMP-12-targeted dibenzofuran radiolabelled compounds with a variety of linker structures such as carbamate, amide, and sulfonamide. Among these, the best results were obtained for the carbamate linker present in compound [125I]75 (IC50 = 8.5 nM).
Wagner and colleagues designed and synthesized a series of dibenzofuran unlabeled sulfonamides 7678 [36]. These compounds revealed excellent inhibitory activities (IC50 values: 0.0004−0.19 nM) and high selectivity (≥25 fold) for MMP-12 and to date, they are the most potent MMP-12 inhibitors described in the literature.
Preliminary biodistribution and PET studies in C57BL/6 mice showed that the corresponding radiotracers [18F]7678 exhibited no specific uptake in non-excretion organs, indicating them as promising MMP-12 based PET imaging agents.

7. Summary and Future Perspectives

In summary, in last two decades, several fluorescent-labelled or radio-labelled MMPIs have been developed as imaging agents for different diseases. Remarkably, pilot-clinical studies of [18F]15 in MS patients described by Wagner et al. form an excellent basis for the feasibility of MMPI probes toward clinical trials [104]. A combined in vitro and in vivo evaluation revealed that molecular imaging probes based on MMPIs could have potential as validated imaging agents, but further research is necessary to reach clinical application. Although biodistribution studies of certain MMPI radiotracers in wild type mice have been described, further extensive SPECT/PET preclinical studies with proper controls in murine disease models (at least 5 mice per group), metabolite formation, stability studies, and toxicity studies are essential to confirm their clinical utility.
The clinical translation of MMPs for PET or SPECT imaging as well as other prognostic and diagnostic biomarkers, requires time and is very costly. Therefore, it is crucial to select the candidates that have the highest possibilities of success to be translated into the clinic, based not only in the abovementioned preclinical models and pharmacokinetic studies, but also on economic perspectives.

8. Conclusions

The overexpression of different MMPs has been associated with a number of relevant diseases such as cancer, atherosclerosis, stroke, arthritis, cardiovascular diseases, periodontal disease, respiratory tract disorders, glomerulonephritis, abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion, inflammatory bowel disease, neurodegeneration, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, multiple sclerosis and liver fibrosis. In recent years, many MMPIs have been developed as novel therapeutics for these disorders, with some of them having entered clinical trials. More recently, numerous MMPIs labeled imaging agents have emerged as powerful tools for the early diagnosis and assessment of the efficacy of currently approved therapies. The structure-based design of highly selective MMPIs broadens the possibilities of succeeding in the development of clinically useful imaging tools. This knowledge, gathered by a wide number of research groups, would undoubtedly allow the validation of specific MMPs as relevant biomarkers in different diseases.
This review summarizes the main achievements in the field of MMPIs imaging probes and constitutes an important contribution to support further research in this area. Our research group has designed, in the last years, highly potent and selective inhibitors of MMP-2, while avoiding other MMPs, including the highly homologous gelatinase MMP-9 [114,115,116,117,118]. The structure based drug design on MMP-13 carried out by the authors has also provided very interesting and highly selective inhibitors [119]. All these compounds constitute an important starting point for the development of imaging probes. Based on this experience, the authors are currently outlining the design strategies to obtain 18F marked analogues for PET and fluorochrome derivatives for fluorescent detection.
As highlighted in this review, a combination of medicinal chemistry and chemical biology tools has become essential for the detection of diseases in the early stages remarkably improving the treatments. MMPs have demonstrated to be relevant biomarkers for several of the most prevalent diseases. Although many contributions have been reported to date, a deeper knowledge of the involvement of these metalloenzymes will afford, in the near future, small molecule candidates as molecular imaging probes which can be useful in the clinical practice.

Author Contributions

B.d.P.-T. an A.R. jointly conceptualized the article and supervised writing. The review work was performed by L.R. Writing and draft preparation was carried out by L.R., I.O., B.D.G., J.M.Z. and C.C. Review, organanization and editing of the final version was carried out by L.R., I.O. and B.D.G.

Funding

This research was funded by MINECO/FEDER, UE, grant number RTI2018-093539-B-I00. L.R. was supported by Marie-Curie Individual Fellowship (DUALITY 746225).

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by project RTI2018-093539-B-I00 (MINECO/FEDER, UE). L.R. was supported by a Marie-Curie Individual Fellowship (DUALITY 746225). B.D.G. also thanks the Spanish MINECO for a FPU fellowship.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ko, Y.J.; Kim, W.J.; Kim, K.; Kwon, I.C. Advances in the strategies for designing receptor-targeted molecular imaging probes for cancer research. J. Control. Release 2019, 305, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Pysz, M.A.; Gambhir, S.S.; Willmann, J.K. Molecular imaging: Current status and emerging strategies. Clin. Radiol. 2010, 65, 500–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lebel, R.; Lepage, M. A comprehensive review on controls in molecular imaging: Lessons from MMP-2 imaging. Contrast Media Mol. Imaging 2014, 9, 187–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. De Haas, H.J.; Arbustini, E.; Fuster, V.; Kramer, C.M.; Narula, J. Molecular imaging of the cardiac extracellular matrix. Circ. Res. 2014, 114, 903–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lenglet, S.; Thomas, A.; Chaurand, P.; Galan, K.; Mach, F.; Montecucco, F. Molecular imaging of matrix metalloproteinases in atherosclerotic plaques. Thromb. Haemost. 2012, 107, 409–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Wiele, C.V.; Oltenfreiter, R. Update: Imaging Probes Targeting Matrix Metalloproteinases. Cancer Biother. Radiopharm. 2006, 21, 409–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Winer, A.; Adams, S.; Mignatti, P. Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitors in Cancer Therapy: Turning Past Failures into Future Successes. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2018, 17, 1147–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Djuric, T.; Zivkovic, M. Overview of MMP Biology and Gene Associations in Human Diseases. Role Matrix Met. Hum. Body Pathol. 2017, 1, 3–33. [Google Scholar]
  9. Wells, J.M.; Parker, M.M.; Oster, R.A.; Bowler, R.P.; Dransfield, M.T.; Bhatt, S.P.; Cho, M.H.; Kim, V.; Curtis, J.L.; Martinez, F.J.; et al. Elevated circulating MMP-9 is associated with increased exacerbation risk in COPD: Results from SPIROMICS and COPDGene. JCL Insight 2018, 3, 123614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Johnson, J.L. Metalloproteinases in atherosclerosis. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2017, 816, 93–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Li, H.; Wang, D.; Yuan, Y.; Min, J. New insights on the MMP-13 regulatory network in the pathogenesis of early osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2017, 19, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Shay, G.; Lynch, C.C.; Fingleton, B. Moving targets: Emerging roles for MMPs in cancer progression and metastasis. Matrix Biol. 2015, 44–46, 200–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Bonnans, C.; Chou, J.; Werb, Z. Remodelling the extracellular matrix in development and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014, 15, 786–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Walker, C.; Mojares, E.; del Río Hernández, A. Role of Extracellular Matrix in Development and Cancer Progression. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kapoor, C.; Vaidya, S.; Wadhwan, V.; Hitesh; Kaur, G.; Pathak, A. Seesaw of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). J. Cancer Res. Ther. 2016, 12, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Jackson, B.C.; Carpenter, C.; Nebert, D.W.; Vasiliou, V. Update of human and mouse forkhead box (FOX) gene families. Hum. Genom. 2010, 4, 345–352. [Google Scholar]
  17. Nagase, H.; Visse, R.; Murphy, G. Structure and function of matrix metalloproteinases and TIMPs. Cardiovasc. Res. 2006, 69, 562–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Wetmore, D.R.; Hardman, K.D. Roles of the propeptide and metal ions in the folding and stability of the catalytic domain of stromelysin (matrix metalloproteinase 3). Biochemistry 1996, 35, 6549–6558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pirard, B. Insight into the structural determinants for selective inhibition of matrix metalloproteinases. Drug Discov. Today 2007, 12, 640–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Babine, R.E.; Bender, S.L. Molecular Recognition of Protein−Ligand Complexes Applications to Drug design. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 1359–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gupta, S.P.; Patil, V.M. Specificity of Binding with Matrix Metalloproteinases. In Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitors; Gupta, S.P., Ed.; Springer: Basel, Switzerland, 2012; Volume 103, pp. 35–56. [Google Scholar]
  22. Fabre, B.; Ramos, A.; de Pascual-Teresa, B. Targeting Matrix Metalloproteinases: Exploring the Dynamics of the S1′ Pocket in the Design of Selective, Small Molecule Inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 10205–10219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Serra, P.; Bruczko, M.; Zapico, J.M.; Puckowska, A.; Garcia, M.A.; Martin-Santamaria, S.; Ramos, A.; de Pascual-Teresa, B. MMP-2 Selectivity in Hydroxamate-Type Inhibitors. Curr. Med. Chem. 2012, 19, 1036–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Pochetti, G.; Gavuzzo, E.; Campestre, C.; Agamennone, M.; Tortorella, P.; Consalvi, V.; Gallina, C.; Hiller, O.; Tschesche, H.; Tucker, P.A.; et al. Structural insight into the stereoselective inhibition of MMP-8 by enantiomeric sulfonamide phosphonates. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 923–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Engel, C.K.; Pirard, B.; Schimanski, S.; Kirsch, R.; Habermann, J.; Klingler, O.; Schlotte, V.; Weithmann, K.U.; Wendt, K.U. Structural Basis for the Highly Selective Inhibition of MMP-13. Chem. Biol. 2005, 12, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Bennett, M.R.; Devarajan, P. Characteristics of an Ideal Biomarker of Kidney Diseases. In Biomarkers of Kidney Disease; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011; pp. 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  27. Meisner, A.; Parikh, C.R.; Kerr, K.F. Biomarker combinations for diagnosis and prognosis in multicenter studies: Principles and methods. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 2019, 28, 969–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Huang, H. Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) as a Cancer Biomarker and MMP-9 Biosensors: Recent Advances. Sensors 2018, 18, 3249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Zajkowska, M.; Zbucka-Krętowska, M.; Sidorkiewicz, I.; Lubowicka, E.; Będkowska, G.E.; Gacuta, E.; Szmitkowski, M.; Ławicki, S. Human Plasma Levels of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor, Matrix Metalloproteinase 9, and Tissue Inhibitor of Matrix Metalloproteinase 1 and Their Applicability as Tumor Markers in Diagnoses of Cervical Cancer Based on ROC Analysis. Cancer Control 2018, 25, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Reiner, A.T.; Tan, S.; Agreiter, C.; Auer, K.; Bachmayr-Heyda, A.; Aust, S.; Pecha, N.; Mandorfer, M.; Pils, D.; Brisson, A.R.; et al. EV-Associated MMP9 in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Is Preferentially Localized to Annexin V-Binding EVs. Dis. Markers 2017, 2017, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yousef, E.M.; Tahir, M.R.; St-Pierre, Y.; Gaboury, L.A. MMP-9 expression varies according to molecular subtypes of breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2014, 14, 609–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Blanco-Prieto, S.; Barcia-Castro, L.; Páez de la Cadena, M.; Rodríguez-Berrocal, F.J.; Vázquez-Iglesias, L.; Botana-Rial, M.I.; Fernández-Villar, A.; De Chiara, L. Relevance of matrix metalloproteases in non-small cell lung cancer diagnosis. BMC Cancer 2017, 17, 823–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Han, F.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, L.; Hao, Q. The overexpression and predictive significance of MMP-12 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2017, 213, 1519–1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Oliveira da Silva, C.; Monte-Alto-Costa, A.; Renovato-Martins, M.; Viana Nascimento, F.; dos Santos Valença, S.; Lagente, V.; Pôrto, L.; Victoni, T. Time Course of the Phenotype of Blood and Bone Marrow Monocytes and Macrophages in the Lung after Cigarette Smoke Exposure In Vivo. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Xiao, X.; He, Z.; Cao, W.; Cai, F.; Zhang, L.; Huang, Q.; Fan, C.; Duan, C.; Wang, X.; Wang, J.; et al. Oridonin inhibits gefitinib-resistant lung cancer cells by suppressing EGFR/ERK/MMP-12 and CIP2A/Akt signaling pathways. Int. J. Oncol. 2016, 48, 2608–2618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Butsch, V.; Börgel, F.; Galla, F.; Schwegmann, K.; Hermann, S.; Schäfers, M.; Riemann, B.; Wünsch, B.; Wagner, S. Design, (Radio)Synthesis, and in Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation of Highly Selective and Potent Matrix Metalloproteinase 12 (MMP-12) Inhibitors as Radiotracers for Positron Emission Tomography. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 61, 4115–4134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kraen, M.; Frantz, S.; Nihlén, U.; Engström, G.; Löfdahl, C.G.; Wollmer, P.; Dencker, M. Matrix Metalloproteinases in COPD and atherosclerosis with emphasis on the effects of smoking. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0211987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Fernandez-Garcia, B.; Eiró, N.; Marín, L.; González-Reyes, S.; González, L.O.; Lamelas, M.L.; Vizoso, F.J. Expression and prognostic significance of fibronectin and matrix metalloproteases in breast cancer metastasis. Histopathology 2014, 64, 512–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kou, Y.-B.; Zhang, S.-Y.; Zhao, B.-L.; Ding, R.; Liu, H.; Li, S. Knockdown of MMP11 Inhibits Proliferation and Invasion of Gastric Cancer Cells. Int. J. Immunopathol. Pharmacol. 2013, 26, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Han, H.-B.; Gu, J.; Zuo, H.-J.; Chen, Z.-G.; Zhao, W.; Li, M.; Ji, D.-B.; Lu, Y.-Y.; Zhang, Z.-Q. Let-7c functions as a metastasis suppressor by targeting MMP11 and PBX3 in colorectal cancer. J. Pathol. 2012, 226, 544–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yang, H.; Jiang, P.; Liu, D.; Wang, H.-Q.; Deng, Q.; Niu, X.; Lu, L.; Dai, H.; Wang, H.; Yang, W. Matrix Metalloproteinase 11 Is a Potential Therapeutic Target in Lung Adenocarcinoma. Mol. Ther. Oncolytics 2019, 14, 82–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Lu, L.; Ma, G.-Q.; Liu, X.-D.; Sun, R.-R.; Wang, Q.; Liu, M.; Zhang, P.-Y. Correlation between GDF15, MMP7 and gastric cancer and its prognosis. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2017, 21, 535–541. [Google Scholar]
  43. Yu, B.; Liu, X.; Chang, H. MicroRNA-143 inhibits colorectal cancer cell proliferation by targeting MMP7. Minerva Med. 2017, 108, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  44. Polistena, A.; Cucina, A.; Dinicola, S.; Stene, C.; Cavallaro, G.; Ciardi, A.; Orlando, G.; Arena, R.; D’Ermo, G.; Cavallaro, A.; et al. MMP7 expression in colorectal tumours of different stages. In Vivo 2014, 28, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Han, B.; Zhou, B.; Qu, Y.; Gao, B.; Xu, Y.; Chung, S.; Tanaka, H.; Yang, W.; Giuliano, A.E.; Cui, X. FOXC1-induced non-canonical WNT5A-MMP7 signaling regulates invasiveness in triple-negative breast cancer. Oncogene 2018, 37, 1399–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Xu, W.; Xu, H.; Fang, M.; Wu, X.; Xu, Y. MKL1 links epigenetic activation of MMP2 to ovarian cancer cell migration and invasion. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017, 487, 500–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Xu, H.; Li, M.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, F.; Li, X.; Wang, L.; Fan, Q. S100A4 participates in epithelial-mesenchymal transition in breast cancer via targeting MMP2. Tumor Biol. 2016, 37, 2925–2932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Peres, R.; Furuya, H.; Pagano, I.; Shimizu, Y.; Hokutan, K.; Rosser, C.J. Angiogenin contributes to bladder cancer tumorigenesis by DNMT3b-mediated MMP2 activation. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 43109–43123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Zhu, X.H.; Wang, J.M.; Yang, S.S.; Wang, F.F.; Hu, J.L.; Xin, S.N.; Men, H.; Lu, G.F.; Lan, X.L.; Zhang, D.; et al. Down-regulation of DAB2IP promotes colorectal cancer invasion and metastasis by translocating hnRNPK into nucleus to enhance the transcription of MMP2. Int. J. Cancer 2017, 141, 172–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Deng, J.; Chen, W.; Du, Y.; Wang, W.; Zhang, G.; Tang, Y.; Qian, Z.; Xu, P.; Cao, Z.; Zhou, Y. Synergistic efficacy of Cullin1 and MMP-2 expressions in diagnosis and prognosis of colorectal cancer. Cancer Biomark. 2017, 19, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jia, H.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, F.; Zhou, D. Prognostic value of MMP-2 for patients with ovarian epithelial carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2017, 295, 689–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hsieh, N.; Huang, C.; Li, C.; Wang, I.; Lee, M. MED28 and forkhead box M1 (FOXM1) mediate matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP2)-dependent cellular migration in human nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 2019, 234, 11265–11275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Andrade, C.; Bosco, A.; Sandrim, V.; Silva, F. MMP-9 Levels and IMT of Carotid Arteries are Elevated in Obese Children and Adolescents Compared to Non-Obese. Arq. Bras. Cardiol. 2017, 108, 198–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Silvello, D.; Narvaes, L.B.; Albuquerque, L.C.; Forgiarini, L.F.; Meurer, L.; Martinelli, N.C.; Andrades, M.E.; Clausell, N.; Santos, K.G.; Rohde, L.E. Serum levels and polymorphisms of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) in carotid artery atherosclerosis: Higher MMP-9 levels are associated with plaque vulnerability. Biomarkers 2014, 19, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Goncalves, I.; Bengtsson, E.; Colhoun, H.M.; Shore, A.C.; Palombo, C.; Natali, A.; Edsfeldt, A.; Dunér, P.; Fredrikson, G.N.; Björkbacka, H.; et al. Elevated Plasma Levels of MMP-12 Are Associated with Atherosclerotic Burden and Symptomatic Cardiovascular Disease in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2015, 35, 1723–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Liu, Y.; Xu, B.; Wu, N.; Xiang, Y.; Wu, L.; Zhang, M.; Wang, J.; Chen, X.; Li, Y.; Zhong, L. Association of MMPs and TIMPs With the Occurrence of Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Can. J. Cardiol. 2016, 32, 803–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Zeng, G.Q.; Chen, A.B.; Li, W.; Song, J.H.; Gao, C.Y. High MMP-1, MMP-2, and MMP-9 protein levels in osteoarthritis. Genet. Mol. Res. 2015, 14, 14811–14822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Burrage, P.S. Matrix Metalloproteinases: Role in Arthritis. Front. Biosci. 2006, 11, 529–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Hwang, I.-Y.; Youm, Y.-S.; Cho, S.-D.; Choi, S.-W.; Bae, M.-H.; Park, S.-J.; Kim, H.-W. Synovial fluid levels of TWEAK and matrix metalloproteinase 1 in patients with osteoarthritis, and associations with disease severity. J. Orthop. Surg. 2018, 26, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Takaishi, H.; Kimura, T.; Dalal, S.; Okada, Y.; D’Armiento, J. Joint Diseases and Matrix Metalloproteinases: A Role for MMP-13. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2008, 9, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Chen, Y.-T.; Hou, C.-H.; Hou, S.-M.; Liu, J.-F. The Effects of Amphiregulin Induced MMP-13 Production in Human Osteoarthritis Synovial Fibroblast. Mediators Inflamm. 2014, 2014, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Casagrande, D.; Stains, J.P.; Murthi, A.M. Identification of shoulder osteoarthritis biomarkers: Comparison between shoulders with and without osteoarthritis. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 2015, 24, 382–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zheng, O.-H.; Hutchins, G.D.; Mock, B.H.; Winkle, W.L. MMP Inhibitor radiotracer [11C]methyl-CGS 27023A: A new pet breast cancer imaging agent. J. Label. Compd. Radiopharm. 2001, 44, S104–S106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Fei, X.; Zheng, Q.-H.; Hutchins, G.D.; Liu, X.; Stone, K.L.; Carlson, K.A.; Mock, B.H.; Winkle, W.L.; Glick-Wilson, B.E.; Miller, K.D.; et al. Synthesis of MMP inhibitor radiotracers [11C]methyl-CGS 27023A and its analogs, new potential PET breast cancer imaging agents. J. Label. Compd. Radiopharm. 2002, 45, 449–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Fei, X.; Zheng, Q.-H.; Liu, X.; Wang, J.-Q.; Stone, K.L.; Miller, K.D.; Sledge, G.W.; Hutchins, G.D. Synthesis of MMP inhibitor radiotracer [11C]CGS 25966, a new potential pet tumor imaging agent. J. Label. Compd. Radiopharm. 2003, 46, 343–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kopka, K.; Breyholz, H.-J.; Wagner, S.; Law, M.P.; Riemann, B.; Schröer, S.; Trub, M.; Guilbert, B.; Levkau, B.; Schober, O.; et al. Synthesis and preliminary biological evaluation of new radioiodinated MMP inhibitors for imaging MMP activity in vivo. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2004, 31, 257–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Wagner, S.; Breyholz, H.-J.; Law, M.P.; Faust, A.; Höltke, C.; Schröer, S.; Haufe, G.; Levkau, B.; Schober, O.; Schäfers, M.; et al. Novel Fluorinated Derivatives of the Broad-Spectrum MMP Inhibitors N-Hydroxy-2(R)-[[(4-methoxyphenyl)sulfonyl](benzyl)- and (3-picolyl)-amino]-3-methyl-butanamide as Potential Tools for the Molecular Imaging of Activated MMPs with PET. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 5752–5764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Hugenberg, V.; Behrends, M.; Wagner, S.; Hermann, S.; Schäfers, M.; Kolb, H.C.; Szardenings, K.; Walsh, J.C.; Gomez, L.F.; Kopka, K.; et al. Synthesis, radiosynthesis, in vitro and first in vivo evaluation of a new matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor based on γ-fluorinated α-sulfonylaminohydroxamic acid. EJNMMI Radiopharm. Chem. 2018, 3, 10–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Hugenberg, V.; Breyholz, H.-J.; Riemann, B.; Hermann, S.; Schober, O.; Schäfers, M.; Gangadharmath, U.; Mocharla, V.; Kolb, H.; Walsh, J.; et al. A New Class of Highly Potent Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitors Based on Triazole-Substituted Hydroxamates: (Radio)Synthesis and in Vitro and First In Vivo Evaluation. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 4714–4727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Hugenberg, V.; Riemann, B.; Hermann, S.; Schober, O.; Schäfers, M.; Szardenings, K.; Lebedev, A.; Gangadharmath, U.; Kolb, H.; Walsh, J.; et al. Inverse 1,2,3-Triazole-1-yl-ethyl Substituted Hydroxamates as Highly Potent Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitors: (Radio)synthesis, in Vitro and First In Vivo Evaluation. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 56, 6858–6870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Faust, A.; Waschkau, B.; Waldeck, J.; Höltke, C.; Breyholz, H.-J.; Wagner, S.; Kopka, K.; Schober, O.; Heindel, W.; Schäfers, M.; et al. Synthesis and Evaluation of a Novel Hydroxamate Based Fluorescent Photoprobe for Imaging of Matrix Metalloproteinases. Bioconjug. Chem. 2009, 20, 904–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Waschkau, B.; Faust, A.; Schäfers, M.; Bremer, C. Performance of a new fluorescence-labeled MMP inhibitor to image tumor MMP activity in vivo in comparison to an MMP-activatable probe. Contrast Media Mol. Imaging 2013, 8, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Furumoto, S.; Iwata, R.; Ido, T. Design and synthesis of fluorine-18 labeled matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors for cancer imaging. J. Label. Compd. Radiopharm. 2002, 45, 975–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Furumoto, S.; Takashima, K.; Kubota, K.; Ido, T.; Iwata, R.; Fukuda, H. Tumor detection using 18F-labeled matrix metalloproteinase-2 inhibitor. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2003, 30, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zheng, Q.-H.; Fei, X.; DeGrado, T.R.; Wang, J.-Q.; Lee Stone, K.; Martinez, T.D.; Gay, D.J.; Baity, W.L.; Mock, B.H.; Glick-Wilson, B.E.; et al. Synthesis, biodistribution and micro-PET imaging of a potential cancer biomarker carbon-11 labeled MMP inhibitor (2R)-2-[[4-(6-fluorohex-1-ynyl)phenyl]sulfonylamino]-3-methylbutyric acid [11C]methyl ester. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2003, 30, 753–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Oltenfreiter, R.; Staelens, L.; Lejeune, A.; Dumont, F.; Frankenne, F.; Foidart, J.-M.; Slegers, G. New radioiodinated carboxylic and hydroxamic matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor tracers as potential tumor imaging agents. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2004, 31, 459–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Oltenfreiter, R.; Staelens, L.; Hillaert, U.; Heremans, A.; Noël, A.; Frankenne, F.; Slegers, G. Synthesis, radiosynthesis, in vitro and preliminary in vivo evaluation of biphenyl carboxylic and hydroxamic matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) inhibitors as potential tumor imaging agents. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2005, 62, 903–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Oltenfreiter, R.; Staelens, L.; Labied, S.; Kersemans, V.; Frankenne, F.; Noël, A.; Van de Wiele, C.; Slegers, G. Tryptophane-Based Biphenylsulfonamide Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitors as Tumor Imaging Agents. Cancer Biother. Radiopharm. 2005, 20, 639–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Oltenfreiter, R.; Staelens, L.; Kersemans, V.; Cornelissen, B.; Frankenne, F.; Foidart, J.-M.; Van de Wiele, C.; Slegers, G. Valine-based biphenylsulphonamide matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors as tumor imaging agents. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2006, 64, 677–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Fei, X.; Zheng, Q.-H.; Liu, X.; Wang, J.-Q.; Sun, H.B.; Mock, B.H.; Stone, K.L.; Miller, K.D.; Sledge, G.W.; Hutchins, G.D. Synthesis of radiolabeled biphenylsulfonamide matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors as new potential PET cancer imaging agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2003, 13, 2217–2222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zheng, Q.-H.; Fei, X.; Liu, X.; Wang, J.-Q.; Lee Stone, K.; Martinez, T.D.; Gay, D.J.; Baity, W.L.; Miller, K.D.; Sledge, G.W.; et al. Comparative studies of potential cancer biomarkers carbon-11 labeled MMP inhibitors (S)-2-(4′-[11C]methoxybiphenyl-4-sulfonylamino)-3-methylbutyric acid and N-hydroxy-(R)-2-[[(4′-[11C]methoxyphenyl)sulfonyl]benzylamino]-3-methylbutanamide. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2004, 31, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Kuhnast, B.; Bodenstein, C.; Wester, H.J.; Weber, W. Carbon-11 labelling of anN-sulfonylamino acid derivative: A potential tracer for MMP-2 and MMP-9 imaging. J. Label. Compd. Radiopharm. 2003, 46, 539–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Casalini, F.; Fugazza, L.; Esposito, G.; Cabella, C.; Brioschi, C.; Cordaro, A.; D’Angeli, L.; Bartoli, A.; Filannino, A.M.; Gringeri, C.V.; et al. Synthesis and Preliminary Evaluation in Tumor Bearing Mice of New 18 F-Labeled Arylsulfone Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitors as Tracers for Positron Emission Tomography. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 56, 2676–2689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Breyholz, H.-J.; Schäfers, M.; Wagner, S.; Höltke, C.; Faust, A.; Rabeneck, H.; Levkau, B.; Schober, O.; Kopka, K. C-5-Disubstituted Barbiturates as Potential Molecular Probes for Noninvasive Matrix Metalloproteinase Imaging. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 3400–3409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Breyholz, H.-J.; Wagner, S.; Faust, A.; Riemann, B.; Höltke, C.; Hermann, S.; Schober, O.; Schäfers, M.; Kopka, K. Radiofluorinated Pyrimidine-2,4,6-triones as Molecular Probes for Noninvasive MMP-Targeted Imaging. Chem. Med. Chem. 2010, 5, 777–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Schrigten, D.; Breyholz, H.-J.; Wagner, S.; Hermann, S.; Schober, O.; Schäfers, M.; Haufe, G.; Kopka, K. A New Generation of Radiofluorinated Pyrimidine-2,4,6-triones as MMP-Targeted Radiotracers for Positron Emission Tomography. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Claesener, M.; Schober, O.; Wagner, S.; Kopka, K. Radiosynthesis of a 68Ga labeled matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor as a potential probe for PET imaging. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2012, 70, 1723–1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Breyholz, H.-J.; Kopka, K.; Schäfers, M.; Wagner, S. Syntheses of Radioiodinated Pyrimidine-2,4,6-Triones as Potential Agents for Non-Invasive Imaging of Matrix Metalloproteinases. Pharmaceuticals 2017, 10, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Faust, A.; Waschkau, B.; Waldeck, J.; Höltke, C.; Breyholz, H.-J.; Wagner, S.; Kopka, K.; Heindel, W.; Schäfers, M.; Bremer, C. Synthesis and Evaluation of a Novel Fluorescent Photoprobe for Imaging Matrix Metalloproteinases. Bioconjug. Chem. 2008, 19, 1001–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Auf dem Keller, U.; Bellac, C.L.; Li, Y.; Lou, Y.; Lange, P.F.; Ting, R.; Harwig, C.; Kappelhoff, R.; Dedhar, S.; Adam, M.J.; et al. Novel Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitor [18F]Marimastat-Aryltrifluoroborate as a Probe for In vivo Positron Emission Tomography Imaging in Cancer. Cancer Res. 2010, 70, 7562–7569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Li, Y.; Ting, R.; Harwig, C.W.; auf dem Keller, U.; Bellac, C.L.; Lange, P.F.; Inkster, J.A.H.; Schaffer, P.; Adam, M.J.; Ruth, T.J.; et al. Towards kit-like 18F-labeling of marimastat, a noncovalent inhibitor drug for in vivo PET imaging cancer associated matrix metalloproteases. MedChemComm 2011, 2, 942–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Matusiak, N.; Castelli, R.; Tuin, A.W.; Overkleeft, H.S.; Wisastra, R.; Dekker, F.J.; Prély, L.M.; Bischoff, R.P.H.; van Waarde, A.; Dierckx, R.A.J.O.; et al. A dual inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases and a disintegrin and metalloproteinases, [18F]FB-ML5, as a molecular probe for non-invasive MMP/ADAM-targeted imaging. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2015, 23, 192–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Hohn, M.; Chang, M.; Meisel, J.E.; Frost, E.; Schwegmann, K.; Hermann, S.; Schäfers, M.; Riemann, B.; Haufe, G.; Breyholz, H.-J.; et al. Synthesis and Preliminary In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation of Thiirane-Based Slow-Binding MMP Inhibitors as Potential Radiotracers for PET Imaging. ChemistrySelect 2018, 3, 11729–11736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Schäfers, M.; Riemann, B.; Kopka, K.; Breyholz, H.-J.; Wagner, S.; Schäfers, K.P.; Law, M.P.; Schober, O.; Levkau, B. Scintigraphic Imaging of Matrix Metalloproteinase Activity in the Arterial Wall In Vivo. Circulation 2004, 109, 2554–2559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Hartung, D.; Schäfers, M.; Fujimoto, S.; Levkau, B.; Narula, N.; Kopka, K.; Virmani, R.; Reutelingsperger, C.; Hofstra, L.; Kolodgie, F.D.; et al. Targeting of matrix metalloproteinase activation for noninvasive detection of vulnerable atherosclerotic lesions. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2007, 34, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Su, H.; Spinale, F.G.; Dobrucki, L.W.; Song, J.; Hua, J.; Sweterlitsch, S.; Dione, D.P.; Cavaliere, P.; Chow, C.; Bourke, B.N.; et al. Noninvasive Targeted Imaging of Matrix Metalloproteinase Activation in a Murine Model of Postinfarction Remodeling. Circulation 2005, 112, 3157–3167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Ohshima, S.; Petrov, A.; Fujimoto, S.; Zhou, J.; Azure, M.; Edwards, D.S.; Murohara, T.; Narula, N.; Tsimikas, S.; Narula, J. Molecular Imaging of Matrix Metalloproteinase Expression in Atherosclerotic Plaques of Mice Deficient in Apolipoprotein E or Low-Density-Lipoprotein Receptor. J. Nucl. Med. 2009, 50, 612–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Razavian, M.; Zhang, J.; Nie, L.; Tavakoli, S.; Razavian, N.; Dobrucki, L.W.; Sinusas, A.J.; Edwards, D.S.; Azure, M.; Sadeghi, M.M. Molecular Imaging of Matrix Metalloproteinase Activation to Predict Murine Aneurysm Expansion In Vivo. J. Nucl. Med. 2010, 51, 1107–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  99. Toczek, J.; Ye, Y.; Gona, K.; Kim, H.-Y.; Han, J.; Razavian, M.; Golestani, R.; Zhang, J.; Wu, T.L.; Jung, J.-J.; et al. Preclinical Evaluation of RYM1, a Matrix Metalloproteinase–Targeted Tracer for Imaging Aneurysm. J. Nucl. Med. 2017, 58, 1318–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Selivanova, S.V.; Stellfeld, T.; Heinrich, T.K.; Müller, A.; Krämer, S.D.; Schubiger, P.A.; Schibli, R.; Ametamey, S.M.; Vos, B.; Meding, J.; et al. Design, Synthesis, and Initial Evaluation of a High Affinity Positron Emission Tomography Probe for Imaging Matrix Metalloproteinases 2 and 9. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 56, 4912–4920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Müller, A.; Krämer, S.D.; Meletta, R.; Beck, K.; Selivanova, S.V.; Rancic, Z.; Kaufmann, P.A.; Vos, B.; Meding, J.; Stellfeld, T.; et al. Gene expression levels of matrix metalloproteinases in human atherosclerotic plaques and evaluation of radiolabeled inhibitors as imaging agents for plaque vulnerability. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2014, 41, 562–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Hakimzadeh, N.; Pinas, V.A.; Molenaar, G.; De Waard, V.; Lutgens, E.; Van Eck-Smit, B.L.F.; De Bruin, K.; Piek, J.J.; Eersels, J.L.H.; Booij, J.; et al. Novel molecular imaging ligands targeting matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9 for imaging of unstable atherosclerotic plaques. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0187767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Gerwien, H.; Hermann, S.; Zhang, X.; Korpos, E.; Song, J.; Kopka, K.; Faust, A.; Wenning, C.; Gross, C.C.; Honold, L.; et al. Imaging matrix metalloproteinase activity in multiple sclerosis as a specific marker of leukocyte penetration of the blood-brain barrier. Sci. Transl. Med. 2016, 8, 364ra152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Wagner, S.; Faust, A.; Breyholz, H.-J.; Schober, O.; Schäfers, M.; Kopka, K. The MMP inhibitor (R)-2-(N-benzyl-4-(2-[18F]fluoroethoxy)phenylsulphonamido)-N-hydroxy-3-methylbutanamide: Improved precursor synthesis and fully automated radiosynthesis. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2011, 69, 862–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Kalinin, D.V.; Wagner, S.; Riemann, B.; Hermann, S.; Schmidt, F.; Becker-Pauly, C.; Rose-John, S.; Schäfers, M.; Holl, R. Novel Potent Proline-Based Metalloproteinase Inhibitors: Design, (Radio)Synthesis, and First In Vivo Evaluation as Radiotracers for Positron Emission Tomography. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 59, 9541–9559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Hugenberg, V.; Wagner, S.; Kopka, K.; Schäfers, M.; Schuit, R.C.; Windhorst, A.D.; Hermann, S. Radiolabeled Selective Matrix Metalloproteinase 13 (MMP-13) Inhibitors: (Radio)Syntheses and in Vitro and First In Vivo Evaluation. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 60, 307–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Matusiak, N.; van Waarde, A.; Rozeveld, D.; van Oosterhout, A.J.M.; Heijink, I.H.; Castelli, R.; Overkleeft, H.S.; Bischoff, R.; Dierckx, R.A.J.O.; Elsinga, P.H. MicroPET Evaluation of a Hydroxamate-Based MMP Inhibitor, [18F]FB-ML5, in a Mouse Model of Cigarette Smoke-Induced Acute Airway Inflammation. Mol. Imaging Biol. 2015, 17, 680–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Kondo, N.; Temma, T.; Aita, K.; Shimochi, S.; Koshino, K.; Senda, M.; Iida, H. Development of matrix metalloproteinase-targeted probes for lung inflammation detection with positron emission tomography. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1347–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Ye, Y.; Toczek, J.; Gona, K.; Kim, H.-Y.; Han, J.; Razavian, M.; Golestani, R.; Zhang, J.; Wu, T.L.; Ghosh, M.; et al. Novel Arginine-containing Macrocyclic MMP Inhibitors: Synthesis, 99mTc-labeling, and Evaluation. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 11647–11661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Golestani, R.; Razavian, M.; Ye, Y.; Zhang, J.; Jung, J.-J.; Toczek, J.; Gona, K.; Kim, H.-Y.; Elias, J.A.; Lee, C.G.; et al. Matrix Metalloproteinase–Targeted Imaging of Lung Inflammation and Remodeling. J. Nucl. Med. 2017, 58, 138–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Razavian, M.; Bordenave, T.; Georgiadis, D.; Beau, F.; Zhang, J.; Golestani, R.; Toczek, J.; Jung, J.-J.; Ye, Y.; Kim, H.-Y.; et al. Optical imaging of MMP-12 active form in inflammation and aneurysm. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 38345–38355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Hagimori, M.; Temma, T.; Kudo, S.; Sano, K.; Kondo, N.; Mukai, T. Synthesis of radioiodinated probes targeted toward matrix metalloproteinase-12. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2018, 28, 193–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Li, W.; Li, J.; Wu, Y.; Wu, J.; Hotchandani, R.; Cunningham, K.; McFadyen, I.; Bard, J.; Morgan, P.; Schlerman, F.; et al. A Selective Matrix Metalloprotease 12 Inhibitor for Potential Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): Discovery of (S)-2-(8-(Methoxycarbonylamino) dibenzo [b, d] furan-3-sulfonamido)-3-methylbutanoic acid (MMP408). J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52, 1799–1802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Zapico, J.M.; Serra, P.; García-Sanmartín, J.; Filipiak, K.; Carbajo, R.J.; Schott, A.K.; Pineda-Lucena, A.; Martínez, A.; Martín-Santamaría, S.; de Pascual-Teresa, B.; et al. Potent “Clicked” MMP2 Inhibitors: Synthesis, Molecular Modeling and Biological Exploration. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9, 4587–4599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Fabre, B.; Filipiak, K.; Zapico, J.M.; Díaz, N.; Carbajo, R.J.; Schott, A.K.; Martínez-Alcázar, M.P.; Suárez, D.; Pineda-Lucena, A.; Ramos, A.; et al. Progress towards water-soluble triazole-based selective MMP-2 inhibitors. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2013, 11, 6623–6641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Fabre, B.; Filipiak, K.; Coderch, C.; Zapico, J.M.; Carbajo, R.J.; Schott, A.K.; Pineda-Lucena, A.; de Pascual-Teresa, B.; Ramos, A. New clicked thiirane derivatives as gelatinase inhibitors: The relevance of the P1′ segment. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 17726–17735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Zapico, J.M.; Puckowska, A.; Filipiak, K.; Coderch, C.; de Pascual-Teresa, B.; Ramos, A. Design and synthesis of potent hydroxamate inhibitors with increased selectivity within the gelatinase family. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015, 13, 142–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Fabre, B.; Filipiak, K.; Díaz, N.; Zapico, J.M.; Suárez, D.; Ramos, A.; de Pascual-Teresa, B. An Integrated Computational and Experimental Approach to Gaining Selectivity for MMP-2 within the Gelatinase Subfamily. ChemBioChem 2014, 15, 399–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Pastor, M.; Zapico, J.M.; Coderch, C.; Maslyk, M.; Panchuk, R.; de Pascual-Teresa, B.; Ramos, A. From a MMP2/CK2 multitarget approach to the identification of potent and selective MMP13 inhibitors. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2019, 17, 916–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. MMP Catalytic subunit. A cartoon representation of the MMP-1 (PDB code 1CGF) showing the different α-helixes and β-sheets with the corresponding coordinated metal ions. The sticks highlight the active site with the three histidines and the catalytic glutamic acid.
Figure 1. MMP Catalytic subunit. A cartoon representation of the MMP-1 (PDB code 1CGF) showing the different α-helixes and β-sheets with the corresponding coordinated metal ions. The sticks highlight the active site with the three histidines and the catalytic glutamic acid.
Molecules 24 02982 g001
Scheme 1. Chemical structure for compounds CGS 25966A, CGS 27023A and 114.
Scheme 1. Chemical structure for compounds CGS 25966A, CGS 27023A and 114.
Molecules 24 02982 sch001
Scheme 2. Chemical structure for compounds 1520.
Scheme 2. Chemical structure for compounds 1520.
Molecules 24 02982 sch002
Scheme 3. Chemical structure for compound 21.
Scheme 3. Chemical structure for compound 21.
Molecules 24 02982 sch003
Scheme 4. Chemical structure for compounds 2226.
Scheme 4. Chemical structure for compounds 2226.
Molecules 24 02982 sch004
Figure 2. Micro-PET images of [11C]26 in a MCF-7 transfected with IL-1α implanted athymic mouse, and a MDA-MB-435 implanted mouse, after an initial 30 min uptake period. Reprinted with permission from [75] Copyright © 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figure 2. Micro-PET images of [11C]26 in a MCF-7 transfected with IL-1α implanted athymic mouse, and a MDA-MB-435 implanted mouse, after an initial 30 min uptake period. Reprinted with permission from [75] Copyright © 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Molecules 24 02982 g002
Scheme 5. Chemical structure for compounds 2741.
Scheme 5. Chemical structure for compounds 2741.
Molecules 24 02982 sch005
Scheme 6. Synthetic route for [18F]4041. Reagents and conditions: (a) (1)C2H4(OTs)2, [18F]K(K 222)F, 100 °C; (2) MeONa, 120 °C. (b) TFA, CH3CN, rt. (c) C2H4(OTs)2, K2CO3, CH3CN, 82 °C. (d) (1) [18F]K(K 222)F, 105 °C; (2) TFA, CH3CN, rt. (e) Chloroacetylchloride or bromoacetylbromide, DIPEA, DMF. (f) (1) [18F]K(K 222)F, 130 °C; (2) TFA, CH3CN, rt.
Scheme 6. Synthetic route for [18F]4041. Reagents and conditions: (a) (1)C2H4(OTs)2, [18F]K(K 222)F, 100 °C; (2) MeONa, 120 °C. (b) TFA, CH3CN, rt. (c) C2H4(OTs)2, K2CO3, CH3CN, 82 °C. (d) (1) [18F]K(K 222)F, 105 °C; (2) TFA, CH3CN, rt. (e) Chloroacetylchloride or bromoacetylbromide, DIPEA, DMF. (f) (1) [18F]K(K 222)F, 130 °C; (2) TFA, CH3CN, rt.
Molecules 24 02982 sch006
Figure 3. 18F PET images of the abdomen of nude mice subcutaneously grafted with a human U-87 MG glioblastoma. Red arrows show the tumor in different slices. (A) PET images obtained by sequential administration of [18F]40 (1a) (upper row) and [18F]FDG (bottom row), showing colocalization of tracer uptake. The [18F]40 (1a) scan was acquired 100 min post-tracer injection; [18F]FDG was injected immediately after completion of the [18F]40 (1a) scan and the image was acquired 45 min post-[18F]FDG injection. Both scans were static acquisitions (injected dose 7.4 MBq, acquisition time 30 min). (B) PET images obtained by sequential administration of [18F]40 (1a) (upper row) and [18F]FDG (bottom row), in a mouse that received 40 mg/kg of the broad-spectrum MMPI Ilomastat 30 min before injection of [18F]40 (1a). The timing scheme and injected doses are the same as in panel A. Reprinted with permission form [83] Copyright © 2013 American Chemical Society.
Figure 3. 18F PET images of the abdomen of nude mice subcutaneously grafted with a human U-87 MG glioblastoma. Red arrows show the tumor in different slices. (A) PET images obtained by sequential administration of [18F]40 (1a) (upper row) and [18F]FDG (bottom row), showing colocalization of tracer uptake. The [18F]40 (1a) scan was acquired 100 min post-tracer injection; [18F]FDG was injected immediately after completion of the [18F]40 (1a) scan and the image was acquired 45 min post-[18F]FDG injection. Both scans were static acquisitions (injected dose 7.4 MBq, acquisition time 30 min). (B) PET images obtained by sequential administration of [18F]40 (1a) (upper row) and [18F]FDG (bottom row), in a mouse that received 40 mg/kg of the broad-spectrum MMPI Ilomastat 30 min before injection of [18F]40 (1a). The timing scheme and injected doses are the same as in panel A. Reprinted with permission form [83] Copyright © 2013 American Chemical Society.
Molecules 24 02982 g003
Scheme 7. Chemical structure for compounds 4247.
Scheme 7. Chemical structure for compounds 4247.
Molecules 24 02982 sch007
Scheme 8. Synthetic route for [18F]44. Reaction conditions: (a) [18F]fluoride (potassium 222 cryptate), K2CO3, CH3CN, 84 °C, 15 min; (b) CuSO4·H2O, sodium ascorbate, DMF, rt, 8 min.
Scheme 8. Synthetic route for [18F]44. Reaction conditions: (a) [18F]fluoride (potassium 222 cryptate), K2CO3, CH3CN, 84 °C, 15 min; (b) CuSO4·H2O, sodium ascorbate, DMF, rt, 8 min.
Molecules 24 02982 sch008
Scheme 9. Chemical structure for compound 48.
Scheme 9. Chemical structure for compound 48.
Molecules 24 02982 sch009
Scheme 10. Chemical structure for compounds 4950.
Scheme 10. Chemical structure for compounds 4950.
Molecules 24 02982 sch010
Scheme 11. Chemical structure for compound 51.
Scheme 11. Chemical structure for compound 51.
Molecules 24 02982 sch011
Scheme 12. Chemical structure for compounds SB-3CT and [18F]52 and Ki values against several MMPs.
Scheme 12. Chemical structure for compounds SB-3CT and [18F]52 and Ki values against several MMPs.
Molecules 24 02982 sch012
Figure 4. The site of the ligated left common carotid artery (left panel) and a corresponding whole-body coronal slice (0.4 mm thick) through a left carotid lesion (right panel) 4 weeks after ligation and a HC diet in an apoE−/− mouse. The intense uptake of the radiolabeled broad spectrum MMP inhibitor [124I]55 in the left carotid lesion (arrow) 30 min after intravenous injection is visible using high-resolution small animal PET. Reprinted with permission from ref [95] Copyright © Springer-Verlag 2007.
Figure 4. The site of the ligated left common carotid artery (left panel) and a corresponding whole-body coronal slice (0.4 mm thick) through a left carotid lesion (right panel) 4 weeks after ligation and a HC diet in an apoE−/− mouse. The intense uptake of the radiolabeled broad spectrum MMP inhibitor [124I]55 in the left carotid lesion (arrow) 30 min after intravenous injection is visible using high-resolution small animal PET. Reprinted with permission from ref [95] Copyright © Springer-Verlag 2007.
Molecules 24 02982 g004
Scheme 13. Chemical structure for compounds 5659.
Scheme 13. Chemical structure for compounds 5659.
Molecules 24 02982 sch013
Figure 5. In vivo imaging of MMP activation in aneurysm. (A) An example of fused micro SPECT/CT images of mouse at 4 weeks after surgery to induce carotid aneurysm. The arrows point to aneurysmal left (L) and control right (R) carotid arteries. (B) The image-derived quantitative analysis of background-corrected [111In]56 (RP782) carotid uptake. The background-corrected tracer uptake in left carotid artery peaked at 4 weeks after surgery and was significantly higher than uptake in right carotid artery at every time point studied. n 5 16-18 in each group. * p = 0.01. ** p < 0.001. C 5 coronal slice; S 5 sagittal slice; T 5 transverse slice. Reprinted with permission from [98] copyright © 2010 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.
Figure 5. In vivo imaging of MMP activation in aneurysm. (A) An example of fused micro SPECT/CT images of mouse at 4 weeks after surgery to induce carotid aneurysm. The arrows point to aneurysmal left (L) and control right (R) carotid arteries. (B) The image-derived quantitative analysis of background-corrected [111In]56 (RP782) carotid uptake. The background-corrected tracer uptake in left carotid artery peaked at 4 weeks after surgery and was significantly higher than uptake in right carotid artery at every time point studied. n 5 16-18 in each group. * p = 0.01. ** p < 0.001. C 5 coronal slice; S 5 sagittal slice; T 5 transverse slice. Reprinted with permission from [98] copyright © 2010 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.
Molecules 24 02982 g005
Figure 6. In vivo micro-SPECT/ micro-CT transverse (A) and sagittal (B) zoomed and masked images of the 5 study groups. Compound [99mTc]58 uptake in atherosclerotic aortic lesions was identified noninvasively in arch and abdominal aorta by micro-SPECT aided by micro-CT; aortic arch calcification was detected by micro-CT. Ch 5 high-cholesterol-fed. Reprinted with permission from [97] copyright © 2009 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.
Figure 6. In vivo micro-SPECT/ micro-CT transverse (A) and sagittal (B) zoomed and masked images of the 5 study groups. Compound [99mTc]58 uptake in atherosclerotic aortic lesions was identified noninvasively in arch and abdominal aorta by micro-SPECT aided by micro-CT; aortic arch calcification was detected by micro-CT. Ch 5 high-cholesterol-fed. Reprinted with permission from [97] copyright © 2009 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.
Molecules 24 02982 g006
Figure 7. Compound [99mTc]59 (RYM1) imaging of AAA. (A,B) Examples of fused [99mTc]59 (RYM1) SPECT/CT images of animals from the low remodeling (A) and aneurysm (B) groups, classified on the basis of a visual in situ analysis of abdominal aorta. Transversal (left), coronal (middle), and sagittal (right) views are shown. Arrows point to areas of maximal tracer uptake in abdominal aorta. (C) Quantification of [99mTc]59 (RYM1) signal in area of maximal tracer uptake in suprarenal abdominal aorta in low remodeling and AAA groups. * p < 0.05. (D) Correlation between [99mTc]59 (RYM1) signal in vivo and MMP activity quantified by zymography ex vivo. AU 5 arbitrary units; cpv 5 counts per voxel; LR 5 low remodeling. Reprinted with permission from [99] copyright © 2017 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
Figure 7. Compound [99mTc]59 (RYM1) imaging of AAA. (A,B) Examples of fused [99mTc]59 (RYM1) SPECT/CT images of animals from the low remodeling (A) and aneurysm (B) groups, classified on the basis of a visual in situ analysis of abdominal aorta. Transversal (left), coronal (middle), and sagittal (right) views are shown. Arrows point to areas of maximal tracer uptake in abdominal aorta. (C) Quantification of [99mTc]59 (RYM1) signal in area of maximal tracer uptake in suprarenal abdominal aorta in low remodeling and AAA groups. * p < 0.05. (D) Correlation between [99mTc]59 (RYM1) signal in vivo and MMP activity quantified by zymography ex vivo. AU 5 arbitrary units; cpv 5 counts per voxel; LR 5 low remodeling. Reprinted with permission from [99] copyright © 2017 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
Molecules 24 02982 g007
Scheme 14. Chemical structure for compounds 6062.
Scheme 14. Chemical structure for compounds 6062.
Molecules 24 02982 sch014
Figure 8. Cy5.5-MMPI 21 tracer signal localizes at sites of perivascular cuffs and gelatinase activity in vivo. (A,B) Five hours after intravenous injection of 21 (4 nmol) in two score 3 EAE mice, the brains were sliced into thick sections (200 mm) and imaged by FRI; color-encoded near infrared fluorescence and white-light images were captured and matched (left images). The same brain slices were then analyzed by in situ zymography for detection of activated gelatinases and subsequently stained with pan-laminin to define vessel borders and with CD45 antibodies to visualize inflammatory infiltrates (right images). Scale bars, 100 mm. (C,D) FRI of thick EAE brain sections (200 mm) at 5 h after intravenous injection of (4 nmol). Overlay of color-encoded near-infrared fluorescence image with significant MMP activity (red) projected onto the white-light image. The same brain slice was subsequently immunofluorescently stained with CD45 antibody; blue signal. 4′,6-diamidino-2- phenylindole (DAPI) staining of nuclei. Two separate brains are shown in (C,D). Scale bars, 100 mm. Reprinted with permission from [103] Copyright © 2016, American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Figure 8. Cy5.5-MMPI 21 tracer signal localizes at sites of perivascular cuffs and gelatinase activity in vivo. (A,B) Five hours after intravenous injection of 21 (4 nmol) in two score 3 EAE mice, the brains were sliced into thick sections (200 mm) and imaged by FRI; color-encoded near infrared fluorescence and white-light images were captured and matched (left images). The same brain slices were then analyzed by in situ zymography for detection of activated gelatinases and subsequently stained with pan-laminin to define vessel borders and with CD45 antibodies to visualize inflammatory infiltrates (right images). Scale bars, 100 mm. (C,D) FRI of thick EAE brain sections (200 mm) at 5 h after intravenous injection of (4 nmol). Overlay of color-encoded near-infrared fluorescence image with significant MMP activity (red) projected onto the white-light image. The same brain slice was subsequently immunofluorescently stained with CD45 antibody; blue signal. 4′,6-diamidino-2- phenylindole (DAPI) staining of nuclei. Two separate brains are shown in (C,D). Scale bars, 100 mm. Reprinted with permission from [103] Copyright © 2016, American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Molecules 24 02982 g008
Figure 9. MMPI-PET [18F]15 and Gd-T1-MRI in MS patients before and after anti-inflammatory treatment. (A) [18F]15 and Gd-T1-MRI of patient #6 representing an acute attack of RRMS (EDSS 2.0) at baseline (top) and at 35 days after treatment (Tx) (methylprednisolone) (bottom); white dashed circles mark colocalization of the MMPI-PET signal and contrast enhancement in the MRI scan, which resolves by 35 days after treatment, correlating with a residual MMPI-PET signal. Left: Gd-T1-MRI. Middle: [18F]15 scan 30 to 60 min after injection co-registered to the Gd-T1-MRI scan. Right: An overlay of Gd-T1-MRI and (PET-MRI). (B) Patient #2 represents an acute attack of RRMS. Left: Single co-registered [18F]15 (30 to 60 min after injection) and Gd-T1-MRI slice at baseline (top) and 28 days after treatment (1 g of methylprednisolone, three times per day) (bottom). Right: Five consecutive PET (upper row) and corresponding MRI (bottom row) slices at baseline (top panel), 7 days after therapy (middle panel, PET only), and 28 days after therapy (bottom panel). Note the intense contrast enhancement in Gd-T1-MRI (maximum, white dashed circle #1) with spatially adjacent but not identical MP activity (black circle #1) at baseline. Reduced MMPI-PET signal at 7 days after therapy (black circle #2), and by 28 days after therapy, the MMPI-PET signal remains low (black circle #3), but the Gd-T1-MRI signal now colocalizes to the original MMP active area from the baseline scan. Reprinted with permission from [103] Copyright © 2016, American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Figure 9. MMPI-PET [18F]15 and Gd-T1-MRI in MS patients before and after anti-inflammatory treatment. (A) [18F]15 and Gd-T1-MRI of patient #6 representing an acute attack of RRMS (EDSS 2.0) at baseline (top) and at 35 days after treatment (Tx) (methylprednisolone) (bottom); white dashed circles mark colocalization of the MMPI-PET signal and contrast enhancement in the MRI scan, which resolves by 35 days after treatment, correlating with a residual MMPI-PET signal. Left: Gd-T1-MRI. Middle: [18F]15 scan 30 to 60 min after injection co-registered to the Gd-T1-MRI scan. Right: An overlay of Gd-T1-MRI and (PET-MRI). (B) Patient #2 represents an acute attack of RRMS. Left: Single co-registered [18F]15 (30 to 60 min after injection) and Gd-T1-MRI slice at baseline (top) and 28 days after treatment (1 g of methylprednisolone, three times per day) (bottom). Right: Five consecutive PET (upper row) and corresponding MRI (bottom row) slices at baseline (top panel), 7 days after therapy (middle panel, PET only), and 28 days after therapy (bottom panel). Note the intense contrast enhancement in Gd-T1-MRI (maximum, white dashed circle #1) with spatially adjacent but not identical MP activity (black circle #1) at baseline. Reduced MMPI-PET signal at 7 days after therapy (black circle #2), and by 28 days after therapy, the MMPI-PET signal remains low (black circle #3), but the Gd-T1-MRI signal now colocalizes to the original MMP active area from the baseline scan. Reprinted with permission from [103] Copyright © 2016, American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Molecules 24 02982 g009
Scheme 15. Chemical structure for compounds 6366.
Scheme 15. Chemical structure for compounds 6366.
Molecules 24 02982 sch015
Figure 10. In vivo [18F]45 microPET/CT images of a mouse exposed to cigarette smoke (CS) shown in a sagittal view. The right view indicates the ROIs (Regions Of Interest) drawn in the lung. The microPET images correspond to the sum of all the frames from 12 to 90 min p.i. of [18F]45. Reprinted with permission from [107] Copyright © World Molecular Imaging Society 2015.
Figure 10. In vivo [18F]45 microPET/CT images of a mouse exposed to cigarette smoke (CS) shown in a sagittal view. The right view indicates the ROIs (Regions Of Interest) drawn in the lung. The microPET images correspond to the sum of all the frames from 12 to 90 min p.i. of [18F]45. Reprinted with permission from [107] Copyright © World Molecular Imaging Society 2015.
Molecules 24 02982 g010
Scheme 16. Chemical structure 67.
Scheme 16. Chemical structure 67.
Molecules 24 02982 sch016
Figure 11. Transverse view of transmission CT and PET images at 50-60 min after injection of [18F]67 IPFP in the (A) Air and (B) CS groups. (C) Maximum intensity projection images of removed lungs (left) and heart (right) from the Air (upper) and CS (lower) groups. Reprinted with permission from [108] copyright © 2018, Springer Nature.
Figure 11. Transverse view of transmission CT and PET images at 50-60 min after injection of [18F]67 IPFP in the (A) Air and (B) CS groups. (C) Maximum intensity projection images of removed lungs (left) and heart (right) from the Air (upper) and CS (lower) groups. Reprinted with permission from [108] copyright © 2018, Springer Nature.
Molecules 24 02982 g011
Scheme 17. Chemical structure for compounds 6873.
Scheme 17. Chemical structure for compounds 6873.
Molecules 24 02982 sch017
Scheme 18. Chemical structure for compounds 7478.
Scheme 18. Chemical structure for compounds 7478.
Molecules 24 02982 sch018
Table 1. A comparison of various imaging modalities available for clinical imaging purposes.
Table 1. A comparison of various imaging modalities available for clinical imaging purposes.
PETSPECTMRICTUSOI
Spatial Resolution1–2 mm1–2 mm25–100 μm50–200 μm50–500 μm2–3 mm
Penetration Depthlimitlesslimitlesslimitlesslimitlessmm to cmcm
Time Resolutionsec–minminmin–hr.minsec–minsec–min
Principleγ-raysγ-raysRadio wavesx-raysHigh frequency Sound wavesVisible and Near infrared light
Sensitivityhighhighpoorhighpoorpoor
Probe Quantityngngμg-mg-μg–mgμg–mg
Probes18F, 11C, 68Ga, 64Cu99mTc, 123I, 125I, 111In, 177LuGd, SPIO, Fe3O4, MnOI2, Ba, Xe, KrmicrobubblesFluorescent dye and NIR dyes
RiskIonizing RadiationIonizing RadiationNo radiationIonizing RadiationNo radiationNo radiation
Table 2. The experimental details in the radiosynthesis of matrix metalloproteinases inhibitors (MMPIs) based imaging probes.
Table 2. The experimental details in the radiosynthesis of matrix metalloproteinases inhibitors (MMPIs) based imaging probes.
ProbeProbe TypeTotal Synthesis TimeRadio Chemical YieldRadio Chemical PurityActivity at the End of the Synthesislog P/log DIn Vitro Assay Results
(Cold or Hot Compound)
1
2
3
11C
18F
11C
20–25 min40–60%----
4811C20–25 min40–60%92–98%0.6–0.8 Ci/μmol--
9
10
11C
11C
-20–30%
15–25%
>99%
>95%
0.6–0.8 Ci/μmol
0.6–0.8 Ci/μmol
--
11
12
13
14
123I
125I
123I
125I
-6.1%
22.8%
41.7%
65.9%
>95%
>95%
>95%
>95%
237.3 Ci/μmol
2.1 Ci/μmol
237.2 Ci/μmol
2.2 Ci/μmol
-Unlabelled Inhibitor
MMP-2 = 2.5 nM
MMP-9 = 4.6 nM
Unlabelled Inhibitor
MMP-2 = 57.5 nM
MMP-9 = 257 nM
15



16
18F



18F
113 min



115 min
12.4%



45.6%
>97%



>95.5%
32–72 GBq/μmol



42–97 GBq/μmol
clog P = 4.04
clog D = 4.03


clog P = 2.54
clog D = 2.53
MMP-2 = 4 nM
MMP-8 = 2 nM
MMP-9 = 50 nM
MMP-13 = 11 nM
MMP-2 = 4 nM
MMP-8 = 2 nM
MMP-9 = 50 nM
MMP-13 = 11 nM
1718F160–180 min12.1%98.8%39 GBq/μmol-MMP-2 = 8 nM
MMP-8 = 0.9 nM
MMP-9 = 0.5 nM
MMP-13 = 0.9 nM
1818F95–11 min31–46%98%3.5 GBq/μmol18-(R)
clog D = 2.23

18-(S)
log D = 1.16
18-(R)
MMP-2 = 10.4 nM
MMP-9 = 0.5 nM
18-(S)
MMP-2 = 0.3 nM
MMP-9 = 0.1 nM
1918F110–120 min30%98%14–57 GBq/μmollog D = 0.60
clog D = 1.53
MMP-2 = 0.13 nM
MMP-8 = 0.02 nM
MMP-9 = 0.03 nM
MMP-13 = 0.006 nM
2018F97 min47&98%9–46 GBq/μmollog D = 2.25
clog D = 1.25
MMP-2 = 0.7 nM
MMP-8 = 0.4 nM
MMP-9 = 0.07 nM
MMP-13 = 0.05 nM
2611C15–20 min40–55%>99%0.6–0.8 Ci/μmol--
27


28
123I


123I
-55–65%


65–75%
>98%


>98%
> 50 Ci/μmol


> 58 Ci/μmol
-Unlabelled Inhibitor
MMP-2 = 9.3 nM
MMP-9 = 201 nM
MMP-2 = 0.6 nM
MMP-9 = 2.4 nM
29


30
123I


123I
-65–75%


55–65%
>98%


>98%
> 50 Ci/μmol


> 58 Ci/μmol
-Unlabelled Inhibitor
MMP-2 = 23 nM
MMP-9 = 429 nM
MMP-2 = 48 nM
MMP-9 = 740 nM
313711C20–25 min40–60%>95%0.6–0.8 Ci/μmol-Parent inhibitor
MMP-1 = 1.5 μM
MMP-2 = 0.003 μM
MMP-3 = 0.008 μM
MMP-7 = 7.2 μM
MMP-9 = 2.2 μM
MMP-13 = 0.006 μM
3811C20–25 min35–55%>99%0.6–0.8 Ci/μmol--
3911C40 min50–60% 11–26 GBq/μmol-MMP-2 = 110 nM
MMP-9 = 200 nM
40






41
18F






18F
70 min






60 min
10






3%
98






100
5 GBq/μmol






12 GBq/μmol
clog P = 4.44
clog D = 1.46





clog P = 3.76
clog D = 0.67
MMP-1 = 18,500 nM
MMP-2 = 16 nM
MMP-3 = 7100 nM
MMP-9 = 107 nM
MMP-12 = 44 nM
MMP-13 = 22 nM
MMP-12 = 1600 nM
MMP-1 = 6100 nM
MMP-2 = 61 nM
MMP-3 = 6800 nM
MMP-9 = 1500 nM
MMP-12 = 500 nM
MMP-13 = 220 nM
MMP-14 = 4600 nM
42125I 49%> 90%0.146 GBq/μmol (2.176 Ci/μmol)3.68MMP-2 = 7 nM
MMP-9 = 2 nM
4318F142 mi11.3%9823 GBq/μmolclog D = 2.88MMP-2 = 23 nM
MMP-8 = 138 nM
MMP-9 = 7 nM
MMP-13 = 207 nM
4418F140 min43%>97%11–20 GBq/μmol-MMP-2 = 58 nM
MMP-8 = 58 nM
MMP-9 = 27 nM
MMP-13 = 51 nM
4568Ga-87 %
Post-labelling

66 %
Pre-labelling
97 %
Post-labelling

76 %
Pre-labelling
---
46



47
123I



124I
28%



44%
95



93
0.2–6.3 GBq/μmol



0.4–14.0 GBq/μmol
clog P = 1.40



clog D = 0.92
MMP-2 = 29 nM
MMP-8 = 1170 nM
MMP-9 = 1.3 nM
MMP-13 = 362 nM
5118F3 h13–16%95%41–66 GBq/μmol-Precursor
FB-ML5
MMP-2 = 12.5 nM
MMP-9 = 31.5 nM
MMP-12 = 138.0 nM
53123I-41.7%95%16.2 GBq/μmol-MMP-2 = 298 nM
MMP-9 = 153 nM
6718F150 min1.3%99%1.5 TBq/μmol-MMP-2 = 4.4 nM
MMP-9 = 8.1 nM
MMP-12 = 1.5 nM
MMP-13 = 4.1 nM
5218F119 min37983–33
GBq/μmol
log D 1.65Precursor Ki,
MMP-2 = 103 nM
MMP-12 = 221 nM
MMP-9 = 2376 nM
MMP-13 = 530 nM
6018F-10–2095>90 GBq/μmol (>2.5 Ci/μmol)-MMP-2 = 1.8 nM
MMP-9 = 7.2 nM
62123I-38–63%98--MMP-1 = 910 nM
MMP-2 = 0.87 nM
MMP-9 = 1.95 nM
6318F105 min46.3990.7–33.2 GBq/μmollog D = 2.50

clog D = 1.18
MMP-2 = 5 nM
MMP-8 = 21 nM
MMP-9 = 108 nM
MMP-13 = 0.07 nM
64




65




66
11C29 min




75 min




74 min
36–50%




20–23%




73%
98%




98%




99
122–330 GBq/μmol
18–35 GBq/μmol

18–20 GBq/μmol
log D = 3.35




log D = 2.77




log D = −1.12
MMP-2 = >100 nM
MMP-8 = >100 nM
MMP-9 = >100 nM
MMP-13 = 56 nM
MMP-14 = >100 nM
MMP-2 = >100 nM
MMP-8 = >100 nM
MMP-9 = >100 nM
MMP-13 = 26 nM
MMP-14 = >100 nM
MMP-2 = >100 nM
MMP-8 = >100 nM
MMP-9 = >100 nM
MMP-13 = 1.8 nM
MMP-14 = >100 nM
75125I-91%98%5.1 GBq/μmol-MMP-12 = 8.5 nM
76




77




78
126 min




140 min




161 min
37%




43




22
99




99




99
3–59 GBq/μmol




7–57 GBq/μmol




3–68 GBq/μmol
log D = 0.48




log D = 0.00




log D = 0.63
MMP-2 = 81 nM
MMP-8 = 19 nM
MMP-9 = 2230 nM
MMP-12 = 0.19 nM
MMP-13 = 288 nM
MMP-2 = 35 nM
MMP-8 = 2 nM
MMP-9 = >10,000 nM
MMP-12 = 0.001 nM
MMP-13 = 16 nM
MMP-2 = 0.84 nM
MMP-8 = 0.18 nM
MMP-9 = 15.1 nM
MMP-12 = 0.0004 nM
MMP-13 = 3.2 nM

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rangasamy, L.; Di Geronimo, B.; Ortín, I.; Coderch, C.; Zapico, J.M.; Ramos, A.; de Pascual-Teresa, B. Molecular Imaging Probes Based on Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitors (MMPIs). Molecules 2019, 24, 2982. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24162982

AMA Style

Rangasamy L, Di Geronimo B, Ortín I, Coderch C, Zapico JM, Ramos A, de Pascual-Teresa B. Molecular Imaging Probes Based on Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitors (MMPIs). Molecules. 2019; 24(16):2982. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24162982

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rangasamy, Loganathan, Bruno Di Geronimo, Irene Ortín, Claire Coderch, José María Zapico, Ana Ramos, and Beatriz de Pascual-Teresa. 2019. "Molecular Imaging Probes Based on Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitors (MMPIs)" Molecules 24, no. 16: 2982. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24162982

APA Style

Rangasamy, L., Di Geronimo, B., Ortín, I., Coderch, C., Zapico, J. M., Ramos, A., & de Pascual-Teresa, B. (2019). Molecular Imaging Probes Based on Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitors (MMPIs). Molecules, 24(16), 2982. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24162982

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop