Next Article in Journal
Structure–Activity Relationship Study of Acyclic Terpenes in Blood Glucose Levels: Potential α-Glucosidase and Sodium Glucose Cotransporter (SGLT-1) Inhibitors
Previous Article in Journal
The Synthesis and Utility of Metal-Nitrosophenolato Compounds—Highlighting the Baudisch Reaction
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 24
Issue 22
10.3390/molecules24224019
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Brief Story on Prostaglandins, Inhibitors of their Synthesis, Hematopoiesis, and Acute Radiation Syndrome

by
Michal Hofer
*,
Zuzana Hoferová
and
Martin Falk
Department of Cell Biology and Radiobiology, Institute of Biophysics, v.v.i., Czech Academy of Sciences, Královopolská 135, 61265 Brno, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2019, 24(22), 4019; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24224019
Submission received: 27 September 2019 / Revised: 31 October 2019 / Accepted: 4 November 2019 / Published: 6 November 2019
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Prostaglandins and inhibitors of their synthesis (cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) were shown to play a significant role in the regulation of hematopoiesis. Partly due to their hematopoiesis-modulating effects, both prostaglandins and COX inhibitors were reported to act positively in radiation-exposed mammalian organisms at various pre- and post-irradiation therapeutical settings. Experimental efforts were targeted at finding pharmacological procedures leading to optimization of therapeutical outcomes by minimizing undesirable side effects of the treatments. Progress in these efforts was obtained after discovery of selective inhibitors of inducible selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors. Recent studies have been able to suggest the possibility to find combined therapeutical approaches utilizing joint administration of prostaglandins and inhibitors of their synthesis at optimized timing and dosing of the drugs which could be incorporated into the therapy of patients with acute radiation syndrome.

1. Introduction

Prostaglandins, as well as inhibitors of their synthesis, act in hematopoiesis through a spectrum of pleiotropic effects [1,2]. Therefore, there is no wonder that both groups of substances have appeared among those tested as potential modulators of radiation damage in mammals [3]. One of the proposed needs for the development of efficient and non-toxic modulators of radiation damage is that of the necessity to apply such drugs in connection with contingent radiation accidents or terrorist attacks [4,5,6].
The story indicated in the title began in the 1970s and 1980s. At that time, reports appeared informing nearly simultaneously about protective effects of either prostaglandins or inhibitors of their synthesis on ionizing radiation-induced acute radiation damage of the mammalian organism. The same period is characterized also by emerging studies on hematological effects of both the groups of substances mentioned [7,8].
Subsequent studies, especially of radiobiological and hematological targeting, brought new pieces of information about the contribution of prostaglandins and inhibitors of their synthesis to the regulation of hematopoiesis under normal and perturbed conditions. Some of these studies also uncovered new possibilities on how to enhance recovery following an exposure to sublethal or lethal radiation doses [9,10]. Significant progress in the methodological spectrum of the studies on the above topics was obtained when selective inhibitors of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), one of the enzymes of the prostaglandin synthesis pathway, appeared [2].
This article deals with the outlined story and shows where the story can be found at present.

2. Hematological Effects of Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2)

Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) was shown to dose-dependently inhibit mouse and human myeloid progenitor cell proliferation in semisolid culture assays [11,12]. The same finding was obtained during in vivo studies and a hypothesis was postulated that prostaglandins played an important role in the negative hematopoietic feedback control [2,13,14,15,16]. In a later study, the inhibitory effect of PGE2 on granulocyte–macrophage progenitor cells was shown to synergize with that of interferons and to be mediated by tumor necrosis factor [17].
In contrast to the inhibitory action of PGE2 on myeloid progenitor cells, this substance was repeatedly reported to stimulate proliferation of the erythroid progenitor cells [18,19,20,21,22]. The effect of PGE2 could be direct or mediated through factors released by T cells [23].
In vitro studies from 1982 have reported a stimulated production of cycling hematopoietic progenitor cells from a population of quiescent, non-cycling cells, most likely of stem cells from mouse or human bone marrow exposed to PGE2 [24]. Later findings from 1998 have shown an increased formation of both myeloid and erythroid progenitor cells from purified human blood CD34+ cells [25]. PGE2 has been reported to increase hematopoietic stem cell long-term-engraftment [26] and homing efficiency [27], to decrease their apoptosis [26,27], as well as to increase their entry into the cell cycle [26].
As shown above, PGE2 influences various components of the hematopoietic system in different directions. Therefore, the resulting hematological effects of PGE2 are manifestations of complex regulatory PGE2 actions. Consequently, hematological effects of PGE2 cannot be evaluated on a universal “good or bad” or “stimulatory or inhibitory” basis, but only from partial viewpoints and taking into account dosing and timing of the drug, evaluation time interval, the way of prostaglandin action (in vitro, ex vivo, in vivo) etc. Detailed analysis of methodological aspects of hematological studies on PGE2 and other eicosanoids, as well as of mechanisms of their effects, can be found in a separate review [1].

3. Concise Overview of Acute Radiation Syndrome

Acute radiation syndrome (radiation sickness) is caused by exposure of a mammalian organism to a high dose of penetrating, ionizing radiation over a short period of time [28]. Differences in cellular sensitivity to ionizing radiation underlie the classic division of the acute radiation syndrome into three syndromes characterized by the extent of radiation dose by which they are produced, namely hematopoietic (bone marrow) syndrome, gastrointestinal syndrome, and neurovascular syndrome [28]. In man, the hematopoietic radiation syndrome is caused by radiation doses between 2 and 6 Gy [28]. This syndrome is the most probable to appear, e.g., as a consequence of radiation accidents. When appropriately treated by hematological interventions, survival is possible [29]. If untreated, about half of all people exposed to a dose of more than 3.5 Gy will die within 60 days from infection and bleeding [30]. From the clinical importance of the hematopoietic radiation syndrome, the emphasis on hematological pharmacological intervention in this article can be deduced. The gastrointestinal syndrome is diagnosed between radiation doses of 6 to 10 Gy and survival is possible in the lower part of this dose range [29], but most of the patients succumb after irradiation with doses in this range within weeks of exposure [31]. The neurovascular syndrome (over 10 Gy in man) is absolutely lethal [28]; at doses in excess of 50 Gy victims will die within 48 h [32].
Radiosensitivity differs between various species [33]. Table 1 shows approximate values of LD50/30 (radiation dose that kills 50 per cent of irradiated individuals within 30 days after exposure) for X-ray whole-body irradiation of various mammalian species, including man (for man, the LD50/30 cannot be experimentally obtained and, therefore, the value shown was estimated [34]).
As follows from many data, in mouse, which is the experimental species most often used for radiobiological studies, the absolute radiation doses for the individual radiation syndromes are much higher in comparison with man [33].

4. Prostaglandins Act Radioprotectively

Much work on the topic of pharmacological modulation of radiation damage by prostaglandins was done by the group of Hanson et al. They showed that various prostaglandin derivatives, like 16,16-dimethyl PGE2 [9], or misoprostol, a prostaglandin E1 analog [35], protected intestinal stem cells from deleterious effects of ionizing radiation. Of interest was also their finding that the radioprotection by 16,16-dimethyl PGE2 was induced not only in the compartment of intestinal stem cells but also in that of the hematopoietic stem cells [36]. This finding is in agreement with those of hematologists [24,25].
A significantly increased survival in mice administered a pre-irradiation dose of 16,16-dimethyl PGE2 was also reported [37]; the authors stated that the administration of the drug extended the LD50/30 (the radiation dose killing 50 percent of the animals by day 30 after irradiation) from 9.39 Gy in the controls to 16.14 Gy in the mice treated with 16,16-dimethyl PGE2 [37]. Further research revealed that misoprostol (a normal tissue protector [35]) did not protect tumors from radiation injury and could, thus, achieve therapeutic gain [38]. Of interest can be the finding of Wang et al. [39] who found that total-body irradiation in the dose range for the hematopoietic radiation syndrome also induced an intestinal injury. Therefore, the radioprotective efficacy of prostaglandins on gastrointestinal tissues can also be beneficial following the radiation exposure within the range of that for the hematopoietic radiation syndrome.

5. Cyclooxygenases Carry out Prostaglandin Synthesis, Their Inhibition Can Be Selective

The formation of prostaglandins from arachidonic acid takes place in a series of steps; prostaglandin H synthase catalyzes the reduction of prostaglandin G2 to prostaglandin H2 [40]. Prostaglandin H synthase exists in two isoforms, namely cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1), which is expressed constitutively in a variety of tissues including the gastrointestinal tract, and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), which is inducible and responsible for the production of prostaglandins during inflammatory states [41,42,43,44]. Figure 1 summarizes the synthesis of prostaglandins and related prostanoids from arachidonic acid. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) inhibit the production of prostaglandins by blocking the access of arachidonic acid to the active site of the cyclooxygenases (COXs) [45]. Individual NSAIDs differ in their selectivity for COX-1 and COX-2 but this selectivity is never absolute for one of the COX isoforms [46]; e.g., meloxicam, whose effects will be discussed in detail later, has a six-fold selectivity for COX-2 [46] and it is classified among “COX-2-selective NSAIDs”, but sometimes among “COX-2-preferential NSAIDs” [47]. Experimental and clinical data demonstrated a reduced risk of the undesirable gastrointestinal side effects after administration of COX-2-selective inhibitors as compared with the effects induced by classical non-selective cyclooxygenase inhibitors, as an example, see Reference [48]. The importance of COX-1 for the gastrointestinal tissues was emphasized by Cohn et al. [49] who reported that PGE2 produced through COX-1 promoted crypt stem cell post-irradiation survival and proliferation. The selectivity of some of the COX inhibitors can be utilized in modulation of radiation damage in a mammalian organism, as discussed below.

6. Effects of Non-Selective COX Inhibitors in Sublethally and Lethally Irradiated Experimental Animals

Since the hematopoiesis-modulating effects of non-selective NSAIDs and the actions of these drugs in the radiation-damaged mammalian organism are discussed jointly in many studies, they will also be dealt with jointly here.
In 1982, indomethacin, a non-selective COX inhibitor, was reported to increase numbers of myeloid progenitor bone marrow cells [51]. Subsequent studies showed that prostaglandins [52] and non-selective NSAIDs [53,54] oppositely influenced production of cytokines by monocytes. Based on these findings it could be suggested that NSAIDs removed the prostaglandin-mediated negative feedback control (see Section 2) of some important hematopoietic compartments.
A number of studies were performed testing the effects of non-selective COX inhibitors on hematopoiesis suppressed by ionizing radiation. The results of these studies are presented in more detail in earlier reviews [2,55]. Briefly, non-selective COX inhibitors, like indomethacin, diclofenac, and flurbiprofen, were reported to enhance mouse hematopoiesis when administered singly before or after one-time-sublethal irradiation, in the course of fractionated irradiation [56,57,58], as well as when given concomitantly with immunomodulators [59,60,61] or chemical radioprotectors [62].
The desirable action of non-selective COX inhibitors did not result in an enhanced survival of experimental mice after their lethal radiation exposure. Reduced survival was found in lethally irradiated mice treated with non-selective COX inhibitors either before [63] or after irradiation [64]. Since non-selective COX inhibitors are known for inducing a high incidence and intensity of undesirable side effects on the gastrointestinal tissues [65,66] and since lethal radiation doses can induce, besides the bone marrow radiation syndrome, also the gastrointestinal radiation syndrome (see Section 3), it could be deduced that it was just the manifestations of the gastrointestinal radiation syndrome which were aggravated by non-selective COX inhibitors in lethally irradiated mice. Thus, possible use of these drugs in the treatment of the acute radiation syndrome in man has been found to be significantly restricted.

7. Effects of Selective COX-2 Inhibitors in Sublethally and Lethally Irradiated Experimental Animals

The first report on hematopoiesis-stimulating action of selective COX-2 inhibitors appeared in 1998 when the selective COX-2 inhibitor NS-398 was reported to increase numbers of total white blood cells and neutrophils in experimentally burned rats [67]. Further studies on COX-2-selective inhibitors of prostaglandin production connected meloxicam, another clinically available selective COX-2 inhibitor [68], with hematopoiesis and radiation. Meloxicam was found to stimulate hematopoiesis when given in a single dose before irradiation [69,70], or repeatedly after irradiation [69,71]. Details and discussion of these findings can be found in a separate review [2]. It could be deduced from these reports that the hematopoiesis-stimulating effects of the selective COX-2 inhibitors of prostaglandin synthesis retained those of the non-selective ones.
Contrary to the above mentioned aggravated survival of lethally irradiated mice following administration of non-selective COX inhibitors, promising results were obtained when mice exposed to lethal radiation does were given meloxicam, a COX-2 selective NSAID. A significantly increased post-irradiation survival was observed when a single meloxicam dose was administered either shortly (1 h) before or shortly after (1 h) radiation exposure [70,72]. Nevertheless, Jiao et al. [73] published their findings concerning a decreased survival of experimental mice if lethally irradiated animals were administered meloxicam repeatedly, namely seven times during the post-irradiation period. It follows from the observations obtained from survival experiments that dosing and timing of meloxicam in relation to the time of exposure is of crucial importance for obtaining a desirable outcome.

8. Summarization and Considerations on Hematological and Radiation-Modulating Effects of Selective COX-2 Inhibitor Meloxicam

Meloxicam is the only selective COX-2 inhibitor investigated in more detail from the point of view of testing its hematopoiesis-stimulating abilities in the situation of the acute radiation syndrome inducing radiation exposure. Therefore, this paragraph deals solely with meloxicam though it could be supposed very roughly that also other selective COX-2 inhibitors could act in relevant situations in a similar way.
Meloxicam’s primary use was especially that in the treatment of rheumatic disease and postoperative pain. It was stated that utilization of meloxicam in these indications was at least as effective as that of the non-selective COX inhibitors (non-selective NSAIDs) but it was accompanied by a more favorable gastrointestinal tolerability [74]. Due to the complexity of the acute radiation syndrome (see Section 3), these findings are highly relevant also from the point of view of the topics of this article.
As concerns mechanisms, its unquestionable hematopoiesis-stimulating action (see Section 7), the ability of meloxicam to stimulate endogenous production of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was revealed and described [70,71,72]. Certainly, also the previously postulated capability of meloxicam to remove the negative feedback control over the production of hematopoietic progenitor cells played by prostaglandins (see Section 6) is of importance in its hematopoiesis-stimulating action.
An intricate issue is that of the timing of meloxicam administration in connection with the attempts to modulate radiation damage in the context of survival experiments. Our group referred about successful improvement of post-irradiation survival when administering meloxicam in a single pre-irradiation dose 1 h before irradiation [70], or in a single post-irradiation dose 1 h after irradiation as a monotherapy [72], as well as in combination with an adenosine A3 receptor agonist IB-MECA [75]. We hypothesized that the success of the meloxicam administration nearly immediately after irradiation consisted in its ability to induce G-CSF production. Considered together with the proposal of Hérodin et al. stating that the therapeutic action of hematopoietic cytokines was most beneficial at their action very shortly following the radiation exposure [76,77]. A shift of the single meloxicam injection to the time interval of 24 h after irradiation turned out in nearly equal survival in meloxicam-treated and control mice and, thus, was unsuccessful [70]. Similarly unsuccessful was the extension of the dosing of meloxicam to daily dosing on days 1 to 9 after irradiation [72]. The later result was in accordance with that of Jiao et al. [73] who also tested repeated post-irradiation administration of meloxicam without the desirable effect of the drug on post-irradiation survival. It was hypothesized that the failure of the repeated post-irradiation meloxicam dosing could be due to its vascular [78] or hepatic [79] side effects manifesting at the repeated dosing and a serious post-irradiation stress. At the time interval of about the turn of the first decade of this century it seemed, thus, that the end of the story lay in the recommendation to employ the hematopoiesis-stimulating abilities of selective COX-2 inhibitors in the therapy of acute radiation syndrome in the form of its one-time application shortly after the radiation exposure.

9. Considerations Concerning Connecting Pharmacological Interventions with Prostaglandins and Inhibitors of Their Synthesis into One Treatment Scheme

The effects of prostaglandins and inhibitors of their synthesis on acute radiation syndrome are summarized in Figure 2.
A shift in the approach to the topic of this story appeared when dealing simultaneously with hematological and radiation-modulating effects of both prostaglandins and inhibitors of their synthesis. Hoggatt et al. [80] published an article where they presented and discussed the possibilities of how to increase the levels of important hematological parameters and the post-irradiation survival of lethally irradiated mice both by PGE2 and by the selective COX-2 inhibitor of prostaglandin synthesis, meloxicam. For PGE2, they suggest the treatment regimen of a single PGE2 dose at 6 or 24 h after lethal irradiation, for meloxicam that of four daily doses starting 6 or 48 h post-irradiation. As concerns hematological parameters, the authors counted blood platelets and three types of hematopoietic progenitor cells under the above dosing and timing regimens. All the treatment regimens using PGE2 or meloxicam showed significantly better survival and status of hematological parameters in comparison with the controls [80]. The PGE2 treatment regimen used is, in our opinion, the only one testing post-irradiation treatment with the drug and is in no contradiction to the previous observations on survival of lethally irradiated mice given a PGE2 analog before irradiation [37]. However, the enhanced survival following the treatment regimen of repeated post-irradiation doses of meloxicam reported by Hoggatt et al. [80] is in disagreement with the previously observed unchanged or decreased post-irradiation survival after repeated post-irradiation dosing of meloxicam reported by Hofer et al. [72] and Jiao et al. [73]. Consequently, we consider necessary to repeat the investigations on the issue of the profitability of various post-irradiation treatment regimens with meloxicam aimed to define and confirm the best treatment scheme.
Though the structure of the article by Hoggatt et al. [80] invited to make a further step, namely that of combining prostaglandins and inhibitors of their synthesis in the treatment of acute radiation syndrome, no findings have been published interconnecting the administration of prostaglandins and COX inhibitors in a suitable regimen in the course of one experiment. As follows from the previous paragraphs, both prostaglandins and COX inhibitors show hematopoiesis-stimulating and radiation damage-suppressing actions and they achieve their effects by different mechanisms, and following different timing and dosing schedules. Therefore, the idea of their interconnection into one treatment scheme is tempting. It has been repeatedly stated that one of the general approaches to the treatment of acute radiation syndrome aimed at reducing undesirable side effects of the therapy while enhancing the overall therapeutic outcome by combining two (or more) agents [81,82,83]. Combined administration of prostaglandins and inhibitors of their synthesis targeted at stimulation of hematopoiesis and survival enhancement in an irradiated mammalian organism would, thus, represent a promising way in the treatment of acute radiation syndrome and would mean an interesting completing of the story briefly described here.

10. Supplementary Note on COX-2-Deficient Mice, Hematopoiesis, and Myelosuppression

Studies examined in the Section 7, Section 8 and Section 9 have dealt with pharmacological inhibition of COX-2 which is acute, potentially not absolute, and may result in partial non-selective co-inhibition of cyclooxygenase-1 [46]. On the other hand, loss of COX-2 activity in COX-2-deficient (COX-2 knock-out, COX-2 KO) mice is life-long, complete, and absolutely selective. First information on behavior of hematopoiesis in COX-2 KO mice appeared in 1989; Lorenz et al. reported on delayed and deteriorated recovery of 5-fluorouracil-induced hematopoietic damage in COX-2 KO mice [84]. In our laboratory we have recently found, using a complex hematological analysis, that in non-treated mice, hematological parameters in COX-2 KO animals are either at the same level compared to wild-type controls or significantly higher in some instances (peripheral blood neutrophils, bone marrow granulocyte/macrophage progenitor cells) [85]. However, in mice with radiation-induced myelosuppression, the overall hematological picture was found to be distinctly worse in the COX-2 KO animals [85]. The latter finding was subsequently supported by the observation of significantly impaired post-irradiation survival of COX-2 KO mice [86]. A hypothesis was formulated that radiation-induced systemic inflammation was beneficial for the post-irradiation hematological recovery and that the inflammation is suppressed by the missing of the inducible COX-2 in COX-2 KO mice [85]. Hematological and radiobiological findings in the COX-2 KO mice with the chronic and absolute COX-2 absence do not have the potential of direct practical use in the clinical medicine. However, they contribute to the understanding of the role of prostaglandins and inhibition of their synthesis in hematopoiesis.

11. Conclusions

It can be concluded from the data summarized above that both prostaglandins and inhibitors of their synthesis possess the ability to influence positively acute radiation syndrome in a mammalian organism. The results of recent studies suggest that, at appropriate dosing and timing, administration of prostaglandins and inhibitors of their synthesis could be utilized in one pharmacological treatment regimen with the aim to strengthen the processes of post-irradiation regeneration.

Author Contributions

M.H. designed the manuscript and significantly participated in its writing. Z.H. contributed to writing of Section 8. (Summarization and considerations on hematological and radiation-modulating effects of the selective COX–2 inhibitor meloxicam). M.F. contributed to writing Section 3. (Concise overview of acute radiation syndrome).

Funding

This study was supported by Grant Agency of the Czech Republic (No. 19-09212S).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pelus, L.M.; Hoggatt, J. Pleiotropic effects of prostaglandin E2 in hematopoiesis; prostaglandin E2 and other eicosanoids regulate hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell function. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2011, 96, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hofer, M.; Pospíšil, M.; Hoferová, Z.; Weiterová, L.; Komůrková, D. Stimulatory action of cyclooxygenase inhibitors on hematopoiesis: A review. Molecules 2012, 17, 5615–5625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hofer, M.; Hoferová, Z.; Falk, M. Pharmacological modulation of radiation damage. Does it exist a chance for other substances than hematopoietic growth factors and cytokines? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Moulder, J.E. Post-irradiation approaches to treatment of radiation injuries in the context of radiological terrorism and radiation accidents: A review. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 2004, 80, 546–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pellmar, T.C.; Rockwell, S. Priority list of reserach areas for radiological nuclear threat countermeasures. Radiat. Res. 2005, 163, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dainiak, N. Medical management of acute radiation syndrome and associated infections in a high-casualty incident. J. Radiat. Res. 2018, 59, ii54–ii64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fehér, O.; Gidáli, J. Prostaglandin E2 as stimulator of haemopoietic stem cell proliferation. Nature 1974, 247, 550–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fontagné, J.; Adolphe, M.; Semichon, M.; Zizina, L.; Lechat, P. Effect of in vivo treatment with indomethacin on mouse granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming cells in culture (CFUc). Possible role of prostaglandins. Exp. Hematol. 1980, 8, 1157–1164. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hanson, W.R.; Thomas, C. 16,16-dimethyl prostaglandin E2 increases survival of murine intestinal stem-cells when given before photo radiation. Radiat. Res. 1983, 96, 393–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kozubík, A.; Pospíšil, M.; Netíková, J. The stimulatory effect of single-dose pre-irradiation administration of indomethacin and diclofenac on hematopoietic recovery in the spleen of gamma-irradiated mice. Stud. Biophys. 1989, 131, 93–101. [Google Scholar]
  11. Pelus, L.M.; Broxmeyer, H.E.; Kurland, J.I.; Moore, M.A. Regulation of macrophage and granulocyte proliferation. Specificities of prostaglandin E and lactoferrin. J. Exp. Med. 1979, 150, 277–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Pelus, L.M.; Broxmeyer, H.E.; Moore, M.A. Regulation of human myelopoiesis by prostaglandin E and lactoferrin. Cell Tissue Kinet. 1981, 14, 515–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kurland, J.I.; Moore, M.A.S. Modulation of hemopoiesis by prostaglandins. Exp. Hematol. 1977, 5, 357–373. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Kurland, J.I.; Broxmeyer, H.E.; Pelus, L.M.; Bockman, R.S.; Moore, M.A.S. Role of monocyte-macrophage-derived factor and prostaglandin E in the positive and negative feedback control of myeloid stem cell proliferation. Blood 1978, 52, 388–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kurland, J.I.; Bockman, R.S.; Broxmeyer, H.E.; Moore, M.A.S. Limitation of excessive myelopoiesis by intrinsic modulation of macrophage-derived prostaglandin-E. Science 1978, 199, 552–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gentile, P.; Byer, D.; Pelus, L.M. In vivo modulation of murine myelopoiesis following intravenous administration of prostaglandin E2. Blood 1983, 62, 1100–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pelus, L.M.; Ottmann, O.G.; Nocka, K.H. Synergistic inhibition of human bone marrow granulocyte-macrophage progenitor cells by prostaglandin E and recombinant interferon-alpha, -beta, and -gamma and an effect mediated by tumor necrosis factor. J. Immunol. 1988, 140, 479–484. [Google Scholar]
  18. Dukes, P.P.; Shore, N.A.; Hammond, D.; Ortega, J.A.; Datta, M.C. Enhancement of erythropoiesis by prostaglandins. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 1973, 82, 704–712. [Google Scholar]
  19. DeGowin, R.L.; Gibson, D.P. Prostaglandin-mediated enhancement of erythroid colonies by marrow stromal cells (MSC). Exp. Hematol. 1981, 9, 274–280. [Google Scholar]
  20. Lu, L.; Pelus, L.M.; Broxmeyer, H.E. Modulation of the expression of HLA-DR (Ia) antigens and the proliferation of human erythroid (BFU-E) and multipotential (CFU-GEMM) progenitor cells by prostaglandin E. Exp. Hematol. 1984, 12, 741–748. [Google Scholar]
  21. Lu, L.; Pelus, L.M.; Broxmeyer, H.E.; Moore, M.A.; Wachter, M.; Walker, D.; Platzer, E. Enhancement of the proliferation of human marrow eyrthroid (BFU-E) progenitor cells by prostaglandin E requires the participation of OKT8-positive T lymphocytes and is associated with the density expression of major histocompatibility complex class II antigens on BFU-E. Blood 1986, 68, 126–133. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Lu, L.; Pelus, L.M.; Piacibello, W.; Moore, M.A.; Hu, W.; Broxmeyer, H.E. Prostaglandin E acts at two levels to enhance colony formation in vitro by erythroid (BFU-E) progenitor cells. Exp. Hematol. 1987, 15, 765–771. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Nocka, K.H.; Ottman, O.G.; Pelus, L.M. The role of marrow accessory cell populations in the augmentation of human erythroid progenitor cell (BFU-E) proliferation by prostaglandin E. Leuk. Res. 1989, 13, 527–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pelus, L.M. Association between colony-forming units-granulocyte macrophage expression of Ia-like (HLA-DR) antigen and control of granulocyte and macrophage production. A new role for prostaglandin E. J. Clin. Investig. 1982, 70, 568–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dupuis, F.; Gachard, N.; Allegraud, A.; Praloran, V.; Denizot, Y. Prostaglandin E2 stimulates the growth of human blood CD34+ progenitors. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 1998, 55, 179–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hoggatt, J.; Singh, P.; Sampath, J.; Pelus, L.M. Prostaglandin E2 enhances hematopoietic stem cell homing, survival, and proliferation. Blood 2009, 113, 5444–5455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pelus, L.M.; Hoggatt, J.; Singh, P. Pulse exposure of haematopoietic grafts to prostaglandin E2 in vitro facilitates engraftment and recovery. Cell Prolif. 2011, 44 (Suppl. 1), 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Donnelly, E.H.; Nemhauser, J.B.; Smith, J.M.; Kazzi, Z.N.; Farfán, E.B.; Chang, A.S. Acute radiation syndrome: Assessment and management. South. Med. J. 2010, 103, 541–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Coleman, C.N.; Blakely, W.F.; Fike, J.R.; Mac Vittie, T.J.; Metting, N.F.; Mitchell, J.B.; Moulder, J.E.; Preston, R.J.; Seed, T.M.; Stone, H.B.; et al. Molecular and cellular biology of moderate-dose radiation and potential mechanisms of radiation protection: Report of a workshop at Bethesda, Maryland, 17–18 December 2001. Radiat. Res. 2003, 159, 812–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Waselenko, J.K.; MacVittie, T.J.; Blakely, W.F.; Pesik, N.; Wiley, A.L.; Dickerson, W.E.; Tsu, H.; Confer, D.L.; Coleman, C.N.; Seed, T.; et al. Strategic National Stockpile Working Group. Medical management of the acute radiation syndrome. Recommendations of the Strategic National Stockpile Radiation Working Group. Ann. Intern. Med. 2004, 40, 1037–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hall, E.J. Radiobiology for Radiologists, 5th ed.; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: New York, NY, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  32. Prasad, K.N. Handbook of Radiobiology, 5th ed.; CRC Press, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  33. Bond, V.P.; Fliedner, T.M.; Archambeau, J.O. Mammalian Radiation Lethality; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA; London, UK, 1965; p. 107. [Google Scholar]
  34. Bond, V.P.; Robertson, J.S. Vertebrate radiobiology (lethal actions and associated effects). Ann. Rev. Nucl. Sci. 1957, 7, 135–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Hanson, W.R. Radiation protection of the murine intestine by misoprotol, a prostaglandin-E1 analog, given alone or with WR-2721, is stereospecific. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fatty Acids 1988, 32, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Hanson, W.R.; Ainsworth, E.J. 16,16-dimethyl prostaglandin E2 induces radioprotection in murine intestinal and hematopoietic stem-cells. Radiat. Res. 1985, 103, 196–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Walden, T.L.; Patchen, M.; Snyder, J.L. 16,16-dimethyl prostaglandin E2 increases survival in mice following irradiation. Radiat. Res. 1987, 109, 440–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hanson, W.R.; Zhen, W.N.; Geng, L.; Hunter, N.; Milas, L. The prostaglandin E1 analog, misoprostol, a normal tissue protector, does not protect 4 murine tumors in-vivo from radiation injury. Radiat. Res. 1995, 142, 281–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Wang, J.; Shao, L.; Hendrickson, H.P.; Liu, L.; Chang, J.; Luo, Y.; SEng, J.; Pouliot, M.; Authier, S.; Zhou, D.; et al. Total body irradiation in the “hematopoietic” dose range induces substantial injury intestinal in jury in non-human primates. Radiat. Res. 2015, 184, 545–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Smith, W.L. The eicosanoids and their biochemical mechanisms of action. Biochem. J. 1989, 259, 315–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Frölich, J.C. A classification of NSAIDs according to the relative inhibition of cyclooxygenase isoenzymes. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 1997, 18, 30–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Marnett, L.J.; Rowlinson, S.W.; Goodwin, D.C.; Kalgutkar, A.S.; Lanzo, C.A. Arachidonic acid oxygenation by COX-1 and COX-2. Mechanisms of catalysis and inhibition. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 22903–22906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Simmons, D.L.; Botting, R.M.; Hla, T. Cyclooxygenase isoenzymes: The biology of prostaglandin synthesis and inhibition. Pharmacol. Rev. 2004, 56, 387–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Smith, W.L.; Urade, Y.; Jakobsson, P.-J. Enzymes of the cyclooxygenase pathways of prostanoid synthesis. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 5821–5865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Blain, H.; Jouzeau, J.Y.; Netter, P.; Jeandel, C. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) drugs with selective inhibitory activity on cyclooxygenase 2. Interest and future prospects. La Revue de Medecine Interne 2000, 21, 978–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Patrignani, P.; Patrono, C. Cyclooxygenase inhibitors: From pharmacology to clinical read-outs. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2015, 1851, 422–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Hoggatt, J.; Pelus, L.M. How beneficial is the use of NSAIDs in stem cell transplantation? Expert Opin. Pramacother. 2013, 14, 2453–2456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Lanas, A.; Panés, J.; Piqué, J.M. Clinical implications of COX-1 and/or COX-2 inhibition for the distal gastrointestinal tract. Curr. Phar. Des. 2003, 9, 2253–2266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Cohn, S.M.; Schloeman, S.; Tessner, T.; Seibert, K.; Stenson, W.F. Crypt stem cell survival in the mouse intestinal epithelium is regulated by prostaglandin synthesis through cyclooxygenase-1. J. Clin. Invetsig. 1997, 99, 1367–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Maruyama, T.; Nakai, H. Investigation of prostanoid synthesis. J. Synth. Org. Chem. Jpn. 2007, 65, 481–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Boorman, G.A.; Luster, M.I.; Dean, J.H.; Luebke, R.W. Effect of indomethacin on the bone marrow and immune system of the mouse. J. Clin. Lab. Immunol. 1982, 7, 119–126. [Google Scholar]
  52. Takahashi, H.K.; Iwagako, H.; Tamura, R.; Xue, D.; Sano, M.; Mori, S.; Yoshino, T.; Tanaka, N.; Nishibori, M. Unique regulation profile of prostaglandin E1 on mononuclear cells. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Therap. 2003, 307, 1188–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Chang, D.M.; Baptiste, P.; Chur, P.H. The effect of antirheumatic drugs on interleukin-1 (IL-1) activity and IL-1 inhibitor production by human monocytes. J. Rheumatol. 1990, 17, 1148–1157. [Google Scholar]
  54. Lozanski, G.; Ballou, S.P.; Kushner, I. Effect of flurbiprofen on cytokine production by human monocytes and U-937 and THP-1 cell lines. J. Rheumatol. 1992, 19, 921–926. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  55. Hofer, N.; Pospíšil, M. Stimulated recovery of perturbed hemartopoiesis by inhibition of prostaglandin production—Promising therapeutic strategy. Cent. Eur. J. Biol. 2006, 1, 584–593. [Google Scholar]
  56. Nishiguchi, I.; Furuta, Y.; Hunter, N.; Murray, D.; Milas, L. Radioprotection of haematopoietic tissue by indomethacin. Radiat. Res. 1990, 122, 188–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Pospíšil, M.; Netíková, J.; Kozubík, A.; Pipalová, I. Effect of indomethacin, diclofenac sodium and sodium salicylate on peripheral blood cell counts in sublethally gamma-irradiated mice. Strahlenther. Onkol. 1989, 165, 627–631. [Google Scholar]
  58. Hofer, M.; Pospíšil, M.; Pipalová, I.; Holá, J. Modulation of haemopoietic radiation response of mice by diclofenac in fractionated treatment. Physiol. Res. 1996, 45, 213–220. [Google Scholar]
  59. Hofer, M.; Pospíšil, M.; Viklická, Š.; Vacek, A.; Pipalová, I.; Bartoníčková, A. Hematopoietic recovery in repeatedly irradiated mice can be enhanced by a repeatedly administered combination of diclofenac and glucan. J. Leukoc. Biol. 1993, 53, 185–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Fedoročko, P.; Macková, N.O. Combined modality radioprotection: Enhancement of survival and hematopoietic recovery by the joint use of liposomal muramyl tripeptide phosphatidylethanolamine (MTP-PE) and indomethacin. Int. J. Immunopharmacol. 1996, 18, 329–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Fedoročko, P.; Macková, N.O. Radioprotective effects of combination of bronchovaxom, a macrophage activator, and indomethacin, an inhibitor of prostaglandin production: Relationships to myelopoiesis. Eur. J. Haematol. 1996, 56, 54–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kozubík, A.; Pospíšil, M.; Netíková, J. Possibilities of the combined use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and sulfhydryl compounds in radioprotection. Strahlenther. Onkol. 1991, 167, 186–190. [Google Scholar]
  63. Floersheim, G.L. Allopurinol, indomethacin and riboflavin enhance radiation lethality in mice. Radiat. Res. 1994, 139, 240–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Hofer, M.; Popsíšil, M.; Tkadleček, L.; Viklická, Š.; Pipalová, I. Low survival of mice following lethal gamma-irradiation after administration of inihibitors of prostaglandin synthesis. Physiol. Res. 1992, 41, 157–161. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  65. Wang, J.Y.; Yamasaki, S.; Takeuchi, K.; Okabe, S. Delayed healing of acetic acid-induced gastric ulcers in rats by indomethacin. Gastroenterology 1989, 96, 393–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Akarca, U.S. Gastrointestinal effects of selective and non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2005, 11, 1779–1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Shoup, M.; He, L.K.; Liu, H.; Shankar, R.; Gamelli, R. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor NS-398 improved survival and restores leukocyte counts in burn infection. J. Trauma Inj. Infect. Crit. Care 1998, 45, 215–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ogino, K.; Hatanaka, K.; Kawamura, M.; Ohno, T.; Harada, Y. Meloxicam inhibits prostaglandin E2 generation via cyclooxygenase 2 in the inflammatory site but not that via cyclooxygenase 1 in the stomach. Pharmacology 2000, 61, 244–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Hofer, M.; Pospíšil, M.; Znojil, V.; Holá, J.; Vacek, A.; Weiterová, L.; Štreitová, D.; Kozubík, A. Meloxicam, an inhibitor of cyclooxygenase-2, supports hematopoietic recovery in gamma-irradiated mice. Radiat. Res. 2006, 166, 556–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Hofer, M.; Pospíšil, M.; Holá, J.; Vack, A.; Štreitová, D.; Znojil, V. Inhibition of cyclooxygenase 2 in mice increases production of G-CSF and induces radioprotection. Radiat. Res. 2008, 170, 566–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hofer, M.; Pospíšil, M.; Znojil, V.; Holá, J.; Vacek, A.; Štreitová, D. Meloxicam, an inhibitor of cyclooxygenase-2, increases the level of serum G-CSF and might be usable as an auxiliary means in G-CSF therapy. Physiol. Res. 2008, 57, 307–310. [Google Scholar]
  72. Hofer, M.; Pospíšil, M.; Dušek, L.; Hoferová, Z.; Weiterová, L. A single dose of an inhibitor of cyclooxygenase 2, meloxicam, administered shortly after irradiation increases survival of lethally irradiated mice. Radiat. Res. 2011, 176, 269–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Jiao, W.; Kiang, J.G.; Cary, L.; Elliot, T.B.; Pellmar, T.C.; Lednay, G.D. COX-2 inhibitors are contraindicated for treatment of combined injury. Radiat. Res. 2009, 172, 686–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Del Tacca, M.; Colucci, R.; Fornal, M.; Blandizzi, C. Efficacy and tolerability of meloxicam, a COX-2 preferential nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug—A review. Clin. Drug Investig. 2002, 22, 799–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Hofer, M.; Pospíšil, M.; Dušek, L.; Hoferová, Z.; Komůrková, D. Agonist of the adenosine A3 receptor, IB-MECA, and inhibitor of cyclooxygenase-2, meloxicam, given alone or in a combination early after total body irradiation enhance survival of γ-irradiated mice. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 2014, 53, 211–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Hérodin, F.; Bourin, P.; Mayol, J.F.; Lataillade, J.J.; Drouet, M. Short-term injection of antiapoptotic cytokine combination soon after lethal γ-irradiation promotes survival. Blood 2003, 101, 2609–2616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Hérodin, F.; Drouet, M. Myeloprotection following cytotoxic dmage: The sooner, the better. Exp. Hematol. 2008, 36, 769–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Anning, P.B.; Coles, B.; Morton, J.; Wang, H.; Uddin, J.; Morrox, J.D.; Dey, S.K.; Marnett, L.J.; O’Donnell, V.B. Nitric oxide deficiency promotes vascular side effects of cyclooxygenase inhibitors. Blood 2006, 108, 4059–4062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Staerkel, P.; Horsmans, Y. Meloxicam-induced liver toxicity. Acta Gastro-Enterol. Belg. 1999, 62, 255–256. [Google Scholar]
  80. Hoggatt, J.; Singh, P.; Stilger, K.N.; Plett, P.A.; Sampson, C.H.; Chua, H.L.; Orschell, C.M.; Pelus, L.M. Recovery from hematopoietic injury by modulating prostaglandin E2 signaling post-irradiation. Blood Cells Mol. Dis. 2013, 50, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Weiss, J.F.; Kumar, K.S.; Walden, T.L.; Neta, R.; Landauer, M.R.; Clark, E.P. Advances in radioprotection through the use of combined agent regimens. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 1990, 57, 709–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Hoseinimehr, S.A. Trends in development of radioprotective agents. Drug Discov. Today 2007, 12, 794–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Hofer, M.; Hoferová, Z.; Depeš, D.; Falk, M. Combining pharmacological countermeasures to attenuate the acute radiation syndrome—A concise review. Molecules 2017, 22, 834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Lorenz, M.; Slaughter, H.S.; Wescott, D.M.; Carter, S.I.; Schnyder, B.; Dinchuk, J.E.; Car, B.D. Cyclooxygenase-2 is essential for normal recovery from 5-fluorouracil-induced myelotoxicity in mice. Exp. Hematol. 1989, 10, 1494–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Hofer, M.; Hoferová, Z.; Dušek, L.; Souček, K.; Gruzdev, A. Hematological profile of untreated or ionizing radiation exposed cyclooxygenase-2-deficient mice. Physiol. Res. 2017, 66, 673–676. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  86. Hofer, M.; Hoferová, Z.; Gruzdev, A.; Dušek, L.; Falk, M. Impaired post-irradiation survival of cyclooxygenase-2-deficient mice. Physiol. Res. 2018, 67, 809–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Molecules 24 04019 g001 550
Figure 1. Scheme of prostaglandin and related prostanoid synthesis from arachidonic acid; LTs—leukotrienes; PGI—prostaglandin I; TC—thromboxane; PGD—prostaglandin D; PGH—prostaglandin H; PGE—prostaglandin E; PGF—prostaglandin F; copied from [50].
Figure 1. Scheme of prostaglandin and related prostanoid synthesis from arachidonic acid; LTs—leukotrienes; PGI—prostaglandin I; TC—thromboxane; PGD—prostaglandin D; PGH—prostaglandin H; PGE—prostaglandin E; PGF—prostaglandin F; copied from [50].
Molecules 24 04019 g001
Molecules 24 04019 g002 550
Figure 2. Summarization of the effects of prostaglandins and inhibitors of their synthesis in acute radiation syndrome.
Figure 2. Summarization of the effects of prostaglandins and inhibitors of their synthesis in acute radiation syndrome.
Molecules 24 04019 g002
Table
Table 1. Approximate values of LD50/30 for various mammalian species irradiated with X-rays.
Table 1. Approximate values of LD50/30 for various mammalian species irradiated with X-rays.
SpeciesMouseRatDogMonkey (Macaca)RabbitGuinea PigHamsterPigGoatMan
LD50/30 (Gy)6.47.12.56.07.54.56.12.52.43.0 *
* estimated. Modified from Bond et al. [33].

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hofer, M.; Hoferová, Z.; Falk, M. Brief Story on Prostaglandins, Inhibitors of their Synthesis, Hematopoiesis, and Acute Radiation Syndrome. Molecules 2019, 24, 4019. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24224019

AMA Style

Hofer M, Hoferová Z, Falk M. Brief Story on Prostaglandins, Inhibitors of their Synthesis, Hematopoiesis, and Acute Radiation Syndrome. Molecules. 2019; 24(22):4019. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24224019

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hofer, Michal, Zuzana Hoferová, and Martin Falk. 2019. "Brief Story on Prostaglandins, Inhibitors of their Synthesis, Hematopoiesis, and Acute Radiation Syndrome" Molecules 24, no. 22: 4019. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24224019

APA Style

Hofer, M., Hoferová, Z., & Falk, M. (2019). Brief Story on Prostaglandins, Inhibitors of their Synthesis, Hematopoiesis, and Acute Radiation Syndrome. Molecules, 24(22), 4019. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24224019

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop