Next Article in Journal
Insights into Mechanisms of Electrochemical Drug Degradation in Their Mixtures in the Split-Flow Reactor
Next Article in Special Issue
Flavonoid Profile of the Genista tridentata L., a Species Used Traditionally to Treat Inflammatory Processes
Previous Article in Journal
Triterpenes and Aromatic Meroterpenoids with Antioxidant Activity and Neuroprotective Effects from Ganoderma lucidum
Previous Article in Special Issue
Phenolic Profiling of Flax Highlights Contrasting Patterns in Winter and Spring Varieties
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Review of Bark-Extract-Mediated Green Synthesis of Metallic Nanoparticles and Their Applications

1
Residency Department, “George Emil Palade” University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology of Târgu Mureș, 38 Gheorghe Marinescu Street, Târgu Mureș, 540139 Mureș, Romania
2
Department of Pharmaceutical Botany, “George Emil Palade” University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology of Târgu Mureș, 38 Gheorghe Marinescu Street, Târgu Mureș, 540139 Mureș, Romania
3
Department of General and Inorganic Chemistry, “George Emil Palade” University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology of Târgu Mureș, 38 Gheorghe Marinescu Street, Târgu Mureș, 540139 Mureș, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors share the first authorship.
Molecules 2019, 24(23), 4354; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24234354
Submission received: 1 November 2019 / Revised: 25 November 2019 / Accepted: 25 November 2019 / Published: 28 November 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioactive Phenolic and Polyphenolic Compounds)

Abstract

:
Nanoparticles are intensely studied because of their importance in diverse fields of biotechnology, especially in medicine. This paper highlights that waste bark can be a cheap source of biocompounds, with high recovery and functionalization potential in nanoparticle synthesis. Due to their biocompatibility and activity as antioxidant, antimicrobial, and anticancer agents, the green synthesis of metallic nanoparticles is of great importance. This review aims to bring together the diversity of synthesized metallic nanoparticles mediated by bark extracts obtained from different woody vascular plants, the phytoconstituents responsible for the reduction of metal salts, and the activity of metallic nanoparticles as diverse agents in combating the microbial, oxidant, and cancer activity. The literature data highlight the fact that metallic nanoparticles obtained from natural compounds are proven reducing agents with multiple activities. Thus, the activity of natural components in environmental protection and human health is confirmed.

1. Introduction

In recent years, nanobiotechnology has attracted considerable research, which has had an impact on all life forms [1]. Nanoparticles (NPs) have shown notable advances owing to a wide range of applications in biomedicine, sensors, antimicrobial agents, catalysts, electronics, optical fibers, agricultural, biolabeling, and other areas [2]. Due to their particle size, various shapes, and increased surface area, nanoparticles present very different properties than their bulk materials. The interest in NPs’ applicability in different fields, especially in biomedical science, is increasing with every new research study in this domain [3].
NPs can be prepared and stabilized by physical and chemical methods. Chemicals used in chemical synthesis are toxic and lead to non-ecofriendly by-products. This is the reason for the need for green synthesis of NPs without employing toxic chemicals [4]. However, with the rapid development of the timber industry, the use of biological methods to protect the environment has been proposed. An advancement in green synthesis of NPs was the use of biological entities such as microorganisms or plant extracts for the production of NPs in an eco-friendly manner [5,6]. The use of plant extracts in the production assembly of metallic NPs is rapid, eco-friendly, non-pathogenic, and economical. The reduction and stabilization of metallic ions can be achieved with a combination of biomolecules with medicinal values, such as enzymes, polysaccharides, tannins, phenolics, saponins, terpenoids, among others [4].
The green synthesis of nanoparticles has been improved in order to design new materials that are ecological, valuable, and stable [5,6]. In this context, bark extracts have excellent properties as bioreductants. This is mainly due to their content of phenolic compounds, from which NPs can be synthesized with controlled size and shape, greater stability, and more biocompatibility [7,8]. Thus, a work plan for obtaining nanoparticles mediated by bark extracts, their characterization, and their applicability was developed (Figure 1).
The aim of this review is to summarize the literature data (2012–2019) on metallic nanoparticles mediated by plant bark extracts, the nanoparticles’ characteristics, and to discuss their properties, including anticancer, antimicrobial, antioxidant, and other activities. The literature data used in this paper was collected via PubMed and Google Academic (2012–2019). The search terms were: metallic nanoparticles, bark extract, woody vascular plants, phytoconstituents, reducing agents, antioxidants, antimicrobial, and anticancer.

2. The Bark of Woody Vascular Plants—A Source of Phytoconstituents Responsible for Reduction of Metallic Ions in Nanoparticle Synthesis

In the timber industry, bark is considered a waste product used for combustion and as garden mulch. Some studies have developed a different process to remove valuable biocompounds from bark in order to produce high-tech, valuable materials [9,10,11]. The bark of woody vascular plants play important roles in plant protection because of their content of bioactive compounds with antimicrobial effects [12]. In a recent study, it was found that bark extracts may be a good source of reducing agents in synthesized metallic NPs [9].
Studies cited in this review established that regarding the composition of the majority of plant bark extracts, the bioactive compounds are polyphenols, alkaloids, terpenoids, carbohydrates, proteins, saponins, and vitamins (Table 1).
The polyphenols (Figure 2) are divided into sub-groups, such as phenolic acids (benzoic acid and cinnamic acid), flavonoids (flavan-3-ols, flavones, flavanones, and flavonols), anthocyanins, tannins, stilbenes (resveratrol), and lignans [13]. Majumdar et al. [14] showed the presence of phenolic compounds in the bark extract of Mimusops elengi L. (Sapotaceae) from a positive ferric chloride test. The phenolic compounds present in the bark extract of the plant can reduce Au (III) to Au (0), with concomitant oxidation of the phenolic compounds to the corresponding quinones. The stabilization of the gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) is done by the resulting quinone derivatives and other coordinating ligands present in the bark extract.
Terpenes (Figure 2) represent the biggest group of bioactive compounds found in plants, including monoterpenes (carvone, geraniol, d-limonene, peril alcohol), diterpenes (retinol and retinoic acid), triterpenes (boswellic acid, betulinic acid, lupeol, oleanolic acid, and ursolic acid), and tetraterpene (α-carotene, β-carotene, lutein, and lycopene). It has been found that this class of phytoconstituents act as a biological antioxidants [15,16].
For example, stem bark extract from Terminalia arjuna Wight and Arn (Combretaceae) showed phytoconstituents such as polyphenols, flavonoids, terpenoids, and reducing sugars [17]. The term reducing sugars refers to monosaccharides (glucose and fructose), along with some disaccharides, oligosaccharides, and polysaccharides [18]. Santos et al. [19] concluded that the reduction power is higher when the reducing sugars and phenolic compounds are present together in the plant extract. To better understand these compounds’ involvement, a mixed solution of pure glucose, fructose, gallic and ellagic acids, and isorhamnetin was tested, and the prompt formation of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) and gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) was observed. The NPs synthesized were more stable than those formed by an aqueous solution of polyphenols only.
In another study, it was shown that the Acacia leucophloea Roxb. (Fabaceae) stem bark extract contained aldehyde/ketone, aromatic, azo, and nitro compounds. These compounds act as reducing and stabilizing agents of the AgNPs. Interestingly, plants have the incredible ability to enclose nanoparticles, forming a membrane around them and stopping the nanoparticles from forming aggregates, and in doing so stabilize the solution [20].
Moyo et al. [21] reported that Afzelia quanzensis Welw. (Fabaceae) bark extract contains phytochemical functional groups (carboxyl, amine). Such functional groups that are specific for polyphenols and proteins are confirmed reducing agents for nanoparticle formation.
The role of the proteins as reducing agents is still being discussed, and in the context, Santos et al. [19] decided to verify the content of proteins in the bark extract of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. (Myrtiaceae) and the role of proteins in nanoparticle reduction. Through elemental analysis they found that the protein content of the E. globulus bark extract represented approximately 0.8 wt% of the total extract, which corresponded to a concentration of approximately 19.0 mg/mL of the aqueous extract. They affirmed that proteins with a low concentration could not participate in the nanoparticle synthesis. However, proteins have great importance when it comes to the stabilization of NPs due to the affinity of binding metals with the carbonyl group of amino acid residues of proteins [22].
Miri et al. [23] suggested that various sizes of AgNPs can be related to diverse reducing factors present in different parts of the plant, such as tannins, flavonoids, enzymes, and alkaloids. Some examples of alkaloids are well-known in the medical world and are represented by atropine, codeine, morphine, and nicotine [24].
Saponins are less common as reducing agents in metallic nanoparticle formation, but in a previous paper [25] these phytoconstituents were isolated from Trianthema decandra L. and obtained rapidly stable silver and gold nanoparticles.
The clear mechanism and the phytoconstituents responsible for metallic ion reduction in nanoparticle synthesis remains to be elucidated. It has been proposed (Table 1) that flavonoids, alkaloids, polyphenols, terpenoids, heterocyclic compounds, and polysaccharides have significant roles in metal salt reduction, and furthermore, act as capping and stabilizing agents for NP synthesis.

3. Characteristics of Metallic Nanoparticles Mediated by the Bark Extracts of Woody Plants

Silver nanoparticles mediated by bark extracts revealed dimensions of 10–100 nm and spherical shapes with face-centered-cubic (FCC) structures in almost all of the variants (Table 1). For example, the AgNPs mediated by Moringa oleifera Lam. (Moringaceae) bark extract revealed a spherical-pentagonal shape [26]. A spherical-oval shape was characteristic for AgNPs mediated by Toxicodendron vernicifluum (Stokes) F. Barkley bark extract [27].
Gold nanoparticles have dimensions of 3–98 nm (Table 1). The shape of the obtained nanoparticles is generally spherical. For example, the shapes of NPs reduced by Saraca indica L. (Fabaceae) bark extract were triangular, tetragonal, pentagonal, hexagonal, and spherical [28]. The ellipsoidal shape was characteristic for NPs extracted with Syzygium jambos (L.) Alston (Myrtaceae) stem bark extract [29] and a triangular shape was observed in AuNPs obtained with Terminalia arjuna Wigh and Arn (Combretaceae) bark extract [30].
Other metallic NPs mediated by bark extracts are: Palladium nanoparticles (PdNPs), with 12.6 nm dimensions, a spherical and quasi-spherical shape, and FCC structure; and copper nanoparticles (CuNPs), with ~20 nm dimensions and a spherical shape. As for the combination of silver and gold nanoparticles, studies showed dimensions of about 15–80 nm and hexagonal, elliptical, and spherical shapes. More details about nanoparticle types, sizes, and shapes, and the phytoconstituents responsible for reduction are revealed in Table 1.
Table 1. Synthesis of metallic nanoparticles mediated by the bark of woody plants.
Table 1. Synthesis of metallic nanoparticles mediated by the bark of woody plants.
Source of Bark: Scientific Name (Family)—Common NameNP TypeSize (nm)ShapePhytoconstituents Responsible for the ReductionReference
Acacia leucophloea Roxb. (Fabaceae)—White kabesakAg17–29SphericalAldehyde/ketone, aromatic, azo, and nitro compounds[20]
Afzelia quanzensis Welw. (Fabaceae)—Pod mahogany Ag 10–80 SphericalPhytochemical functional groups (carboxyl, amine)[21]
Albizia chevalieri Harms. (Fabaceae) Ag~30SphericalAlkaloids, terpenoids, flavonoids, and phenols[31]
Alstonia scholaris (L.) R.Br. (Apocynaceae)—Devil’s treeAg50FCC-[32]
Artocarpus elasticus Reinw. (Moraceae)—BendaAg19.74 ± 9.70 FCC Flavonoids, phenols[33]
Azadirachta indica A. Juss (Meliaceae)—Nimtree or Indian lillac Ag19.22Spherical-[34,35]
Berberis lycium Royle. (Berberidaceae)Ag10–100Spherical-[36]
Butea monosperma (Lam.) Laum. (Fabaceae)—Flame-of-the-forest Ag35FCCCarboxylic acid group[37]
Cassia fistula L. (Fabaceae)—Golden treeAu55.2–98.4-Reducing sugars and terpenoids, secondary metabolites, such as lupeol, β-sitosterol, and hexacosanol[38]
Cinnamomum cassia L. J. Presl (Lauraceae)—Chinese cinnamonAg25–55SphericalPhenol, aldehydes, ketones, carboxylic acids, alkyl halides, aromatic groups[39]
Cinnamomum zeylanicum J. Presl (Lauraceae)—True cinnamonAg
Au
~11.77
~46.48
Spherical-[40]
Coccinia grandis L.Voigt (Curcubitaceae)—ivy gourdAu20Spherical-[41]
Cochlospermum religiosum (L.) Alston (Bixaceae)—Silk-cotton treeAg20–35SphericalCarbohydrate, polyphenols, and protein molecules[42]
Crataeva nurvala Buch.-Ham (Capparaceae)—VarunaAg15.2 ± 1.01sphericalLupeol, lupenone, hexadecanoic ester, methyl ester[43]
Dillenia indica L. (Dilleniaceae)—Elephant appleAg15–35Sphericalflavonol, flavonoids, phenolic compounds, stigmasterol, glycosides, and sulfates of flavonoid[44]
Diospyros montana Roxb. (Ebenaceae)—Bombay ebonyAg28--Amides, phenol, nitrogen, and aromatic compounds[45,46]
Elaeodendron croceum Thunb. DC. (Celastraceae)—Saffron woodAg12.6–41.4sphericalAmino acids, proteins, polysaccharides, alkaloids, polyphenols, terpenoids or triterpenes, tannins, saponins, and vitamins[4,47,48,49]
Eucalyptus globulus Labill. (Myrtiaceae)—Southern blue gum Ag
Au
21 ± 4
52 ± 16
FCC Phenolic compounds, particularly galloyl derivatives, glucose and fructose, hydrolyzable tannins[19]
Eucommia ulmoides Oliv. (Eucommiaceae)—Hardy rubber treeAu15–40Spherical FCC -[50]
Pd12.6Spherical and quasi-spherical with FCCPolyphenols, phytosterol, flavonoids, alkaloids, triterpenoids, aminoacids, and proteins[51]
Eysenhardtia polystachya Ort. Sarg. (Fabaceae)—Kidneywood treeAg10–12SphericalArylnaphthalenes, chalcones, flavonoids, and dihydrochalcones[52]
Fagus sylvatica L. (Fagaceae)—BeechAg32spherical Tannins and polyphenols[9,11]
Ficus benghalensis var. krishnae (Moraceae)—Krishna butter cupAg15–28SphericalPhenols, flavonoids, tannins, terpenoids, proteins, alkaloids, saponins, and vitamines[53,54]
Ficus benghalensis (Moraceae)—Banyan tree
Azadirachta indica A. Juss (Meliaceae)—Nimtree or Indian lilac
Ag40–50SphericalFlavonoids, terpenoids, and phenols[55]
Garcinia mangostana L. (Clusiaceae)—MangosteenAg12–15SphericalPolyphenols[56]
Guazuma ulmifolia Lam. (Malvaceae)—Bay cedar Ag
Au
Ag–Au
10–15
20–25
10–20
SphericalTannins[57]
Holarrhena antidysenterica L. (Aponycaceae) Wall.—Tellicherry bark or conessi Ag32SphericalTerpenoids, alkaloids, flavonoids, and phenols[58]
Melia azedarach L. (Meliaceae)—Indian lilacAg30–45SphericalPhenolic compounds[59,60,61]
Ag
Ag–Au
4–30
15–80
Spherical, hexagonal, elliptical Triterpenoids, flavonoids, glycosides steroids, and carbohydrates[62]
Mimusops elengi L. (Sapotaceae)—Bullet woodAu9–14SphericalGallic acid, pinocembrin, quercetin, chlorogenic acid[14]
Moringa oleifera Lam. (Moringaceae)—MoringaAg40Spherical, pentagonTerpenoids, flavonoids, and polysaccharides[26]
Nerium oleander L. (Apocynaceae)—KarabiAu20–40SphericalFlavonoids, steroids, and other secondary metabolites[63]
Picea abies L. (Pinaceae)—SpruceAg44spherical or rarely polygonalCatechin, vanillic and gallic acids[10,64]
Pinus eldarica (Pinaceae)—Eldarica pineAg10–40SphericalCatechin, taxifolin, procyanidins, and phenolic acids[65]
Pongamia pinnata (L.) Pierre (Fabaceae)—Karum treeAg5–55SphericalPhenolic amides, piperine, polysaccharides, and other reducing sugars[66]
Prosopis juliflora Sw.DC. (Fabaceae)—MesquiteAg10–50SphericalFlavonoids, alkaloids, and other phenolic compounds[67]
Quercus sp. (Fagaceae)—Oak Ag--Tannic acid, glucose, gallic acid[68]
Salix alba L. (Salicaceae)—Willow tree Au~15SphericalTannins, alkanoids, flavonoids[69]
Saraca indica L. (Fabaceae)—Asoka tree Au15–23Triangular, polygonal, spherical Quercetin, epicatechin, catechin, leucopelargoni- din-3-O-p-D-glucoside, gallic acid, leucocyanidin[28]
Salvadora persica L. (Salvadoraceae)—Toothbrush treeAg50SphericalTannins, flavonoids, alkaloids, [23]
Shorea roxburghii D. Don (Dipterocarpaceae)Ag4–50SphericalPhenolic compounds[70]
Stereospermum suaveolens Roxb. DC (Bignoniaceae)Ag
Au
11.11
12.67
SphericalLignans, polyphenols[71]
Syzygium alternifolium (Wt.) Walp (Myrtiaceae) Ag4–48SphericalAscorbic acid[72]
Syzygium cumini L. (Myrtiaceae)—Black plumAg20–60SphericalPhenols, tannins, alkaloids, glycosides, amino acids, and flavones[73]
Syzygium jambos (L.) Alston (Myrtaceae)Ag
Au
3–10
4–11
Spherical, ellipsoidalSaccharides and phenolics[29]
Terminalia arjuna Wigh and Arn (Combretaceae)—Arjuna treeAg30–50SphericalPolyphenols and proteins[74]
Au3–70Spherical, triangular FCC Catechin, gallic acid, ellagic acid [30]
Cu~23SphericalPolyphenols (flavonoids), terpenoids, ketones, aldehydes[75]
Cu–Ag~20–30SphericalPolyphenols, flavonoids, terpenoids, and reducing sugars[17]
Terminalia cuneata Roth. (Combretaceae)—White murdahAg20–50SphericalHydrolyzable tannins, gallic acid, polyphenols[76]
Toxicodendron vernicifluum (Stokes) F. Barkley (Anacardiaceae)—Chinese Lacquer treeAg2–40Spherical, oval Amine, amide, phenolic, and alcoholic aromatics[27]
Zizyphus xylopyrus Retz. Willd (Rhamnaceae)—Kath berAg60–70Spherical-[77]
Note: Ag—silver nanoparticles; Au—gold nanoparticles; Ag–Au—combination between silver and gold nanoparticles; Cu—copper nanoparticles; Pd—palladium nanoparticles; FCC—face-centered-cubic structure.

4. Applications of Metallic NPs Mediated by Plant Bark Extracts

4.1. Antioxidant Activity

Phytochemicals present in plants are of great interest. Because of their antioxidant activity, they have beneficial effects on human health and can offer protection against oxidative stress [16]. Parashant et al. [78] revealed that the phenolic compounds present in plant extracts might have a great role in the green synthesis of nanoparticles due to their high antioxidant activity. It was observed that polyphenols are potent antioxidants that can neutralize free radicals because they either donate their electrons or their hydrogen atoms. The generation of free radicals is stopped because of inhibition of the precursors of free radicals or deactivation of active species. Most often, they act as direct radical scavengers of the lipid peroxidation chain reaction (chain breakers). Chain breakers donate an electron to the free radical, making the radical become more stable and interrupting the chain reactions [79,80].
There are many ways to demonstrate the antioxidant activity of certain compounds. One of the well-known methods is measuring the 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activity. This compound is a stable nitrogen-centered free radical and shows a characteristic absorption at 517 nm, whose color changes from violet to yellow upon reduction [81]. Yallapa et al. [75] showed that CuNPs obtained by Terminalia arjuna Wight and Arn (Combretaceae) bark extract has antioxidant activity. By donating its electron, it halted the activity of DPPH.
Total reducing power (antioxidant potential) was expressed as ascorbic acid equivalent (AAE) [82]. It was observed that antioxidant activity exhibited by metallic nanoparticles is attributed to polyphenols present in the plant extracts. Silver nanoparticles have more significant antioxidant activity than gold nanoparticles because of their susceptibility to losing electrons [83].

4.2. Antibacterial Activity

The mechanism of the antibacterial activity of metallic nanoparticles has been intensely investigated. After binding of NPs on the bacterial cell membrane through electrostatic interactions, the cell wall is disrupted. The intracellular processes, such as DNA, RNA, and protein synthesis, are also affected [84,85,86,87]. The bacteria’s cell membrane is negatively charged, and that may interact with the positively charged metal ion [88].
The synthesized NPs are highly toxic to bacteria when compared to fungus. It was demonstrated that they interact with proteins or possibly phospholipids associated with the proton pump of the bacterial cell wall [89]. That interaction between microorganisms and NPs was commented on by Dibrov et al. [90]. They found that the disruption of the membrane proton gradient could lead to cell death through perturbation of the cellular metabolism mechanisms.
Feng et al. [91] and Matsumura et al. [92] proposed that silver nanoparticles are attached to the cell membrane by sulfur-containing proteins. The AgNPs penetrate inside the bacteria and release silver ions, which interact with the thiol groups of many enzymes. Thus, most of the respiratory chain enzymes are inactivated, leading to the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which causes the self-destruction of the bacterial cell [54].
Ali et al. [43] found that AgNPs obtained by Crataeva nurvala Buch.-Ham (Capparaceae) bark extract were internalized inside the Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacterial cells, leading to cell death. The metallic nanoparticles can restrict the bacterial colonization and also inhibit the biofilm formation produced by bacterial quorum sensing activity (quorum sensing virulence factors responsible for multidrug resistance), a fact that is can be evidenced by confocal laser scanning microscopes.
Many studies have looked at the NP effects against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, the models for Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. Moreover, they have been studied because of the contrast between the cell wall structures of the two bacterial cell types. The cell walls of Gram-positive bacteria have a rigid layer of liner polysaccharide that does not exist in Gram-negative bacteria [93]. However, the principal component of the cell walls of both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria is a peptidoglycan consisting of linear polysaccharide chains crosslinked by short peptides [94]. The antibacterial activity was also revealed by Miri et al. [23]. The AgNPs obtained with Salvadora persica L. (Salvadoraceae) in Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus showed inhibition zones of 14 and 12 mm, respectively. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) results against studied bacteria were 100 and 400 μg/mL for Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, respectively. As an observation, in this study, it was found that the synthesized AgNPs not only inhibited the growth of Escherichia coli but also had a bactericidal effect.
The study by Arya et al. [67] showed that Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were susceptible to Prosopis juliflora Sw.DC. (Fabaceae)-obtained AgNPs. The small nanoparticles (10–55 nm) could easily enter into the bacterial cells and disturb their usual organization. This study revealed that the power of synthesized AgNPs is dose-dependent, and that they can also overcome the multidrug resistance problem.
Francis et al. [71] evaluated the antimicrobial effect of AgNPs and AuNPs obtained from Stereospermum suaveolens Roxb. DC (Bignoniaceae). They were evaluated using the disc diffusion method by adding 50 µL of the samples. It was observed that the effect of inhibition was more pronounced in the case of Gram-negative bacteria than Gram-positive bacteria because of their cell wall differences. Silver nanoparticles possessed a higher degree of microbial inhibition than the gold nanoparticles. This higher degree is because silver is a soft acid that preferably binds sulfur and phosphorus fragments in the cell, leading to DNA damage and cell death [25,93,95].
A study by Yallapa et al. [17] presented the antibacterial properties of AgNPs and CuNPs obtained with Terminalia arjuna Wight and Arn (Combretaceae) bark extract against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. The structural changes induced in the bacterial cell wall and the nuclear membrane led to cell death. All this was due to the extremely reactive action of silver and copper nanoparticles and because of the ease of binding to tissue proteins [96]. More metallic nanoparticles obtained with bark extract constituents and their antimicrobial activity are presented in Table 2.

4.3. Anticancer Activity

With a wide range of applications, including medical and therapeutic assistance, nanoparticles have been reported as having excellent anticancer activity. This is due to the involvement in the selective interruption of the mitochondrial respiratory chain, which results in the production of ROS. ROS species induce the expression of genes associated with DNA disruption and produces apoptosis of tumor cells [97]. Considering the size of metallic nanoparticles and sample concentration, it was observed that silver nanoparticles induce damage to a cancer cell in a dose- and size-dependent manner [98]. Higher doses of smaller size particles create more cytotoxic effects on the tumoral tissue. The tumoral cells present a characteristic acid pH, and metallic nanoparticles have an affinity for this specific environment. Because of this reason it is believed that treatment with these nanoparticles has the advantage of targeting the tumoral cells and minimizing side effects on the healthy cells [99,100].

4.4. Other Activities

One of the applications of nanoparticles is the deterioration of pollutants as nitroaromatic compounds and dyes. Because of the hazardous and toxic effect of the majority of organic compounds on humans, there are many studies about their removal from nature. Many industrial compounds, such as pharmaceuticals, pigments, dyes, plastics, pesticides, fungicides, explosive, and industrial solvents, contain these pollutant solvents [101]. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency concluded that of all the studied nitroaromatic compounds, 4-nitrophenol is a priority pollutant because it is very stable and resistant to biodegradation [101,102].
To study the catalytic activity of the synthesized gold nanoparticles using the extract of Mimusops elengi L. (Sapotaceae), two model reactions were carried out, both monitored by UV-visible spectroscopy: the reduction of 3-nitrophenol to 3-aminophenol and 4-nitrophenol to 4-aminophenol [14]. The catalytic activity of AuNPs was demonstrated. The reduction was observed over 300 s via UV spectroscopy, indicating completion of the reduction. Interestingly, with the addition of a double amount of AuNPs, the reaction was completed much faster (in 30 s), and the catalytic rate constant could not be calculated for this reduction reaction. The excellent catalytic activity was demonstrated in the reduction reaction of 4-nitrophenol in the same way [14].
One of the most harmful actions of dyes is that they form a foam on the surface of water. The foam blocks the diffusion of light and oxygen, with consequences on the biological phenomena of the aquatic medium. Another effect of these chemicals and dyes is that they are very poisonous and strongly oncogenic [103].
Because of the undesirable effect of the insecticides on human health and other non-targeted organisms, Velayutham et al. [104] noted the larvicidal effect of aqueous crude bark extract and synthesized AgNPs of Ficus racemosa L. (Moraceae). The highest mortality was found in synthesized AgNPs against the larvae Culex quinquefasciatus and Culex gelidus at the concentration of 25 mg/L. All tested samples showed that lethal effects and mortality were positively dose-dependent.
Daisy and Sapriya [38] concluded that AuNPs mediated by Cassia fistula bark extract have potential anti-diabetic properties. These NPs showed a glucose reduction in blood serum concentration, induced favorable changes in body weight, improved transaminase activity, achieved a better lipid profile, and reversed renal dysfunction to a greater extent.
Garcia Campoy et al. [52] found that AuNPs obtained with Eysenhardtia polystachya Ort. Sarg. (Fabaceae) bark extract promoted pancreatic β-cell survival, insulin secretion, and enhanced hyperglycemia and hyperlipidemia in glucose-induced diabetic zebrafish. These studies show promising results, but other studies may be needed to develop new methods for practical disease treatment. Other applications of metallic nanoparticles can be found in Table 2.
Table 2. Applications of nanoparticles mediated by the bark of woody plants.
Table 2. Applications of nanoparticles mediated by the bark of woody plants.
Source of Bark: Scientific Name (Family)—Common NameNP TypeActivityReference
Acacia leucophloea Roxb. (Fabaceae)—White kabesakAgAntibacterial activity against the common pathogens, such as Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus, Listeria monocytogenes, and Shigella flexneri[20]
Afzelia quanzensis Welw. (Fabaceae)—pod mahogany AgAntibacterial against Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus[21]
Albizia chevalieri Harms. (Fabaceae)AgAntibacterial against Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus;
Anticancer against MDA-MB231, MCF-7 breast cancer cell line, and HepG2 liver cancer cell line
[31]
Alstonia scholaris (L.) R.Br. (Apocynaceae)—Devil’s treeAgAntimicrobial activity against fungal species, and Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria[32]
Azadirachta indica A. Juss (Meliaceae)—Nimtree or Indian lillacAgLarvicidal against the larvae, pupae, and adults of malaria vector Anopheles stephensi and filariasis vector Culex quinquefasciatus[35]
Berberis lycium Royle. (Berberidaceae)AgAntimicrobial activities against both Gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli, Klebseilla pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa) and Gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis)[36]
Butea monosperma (Lam.) Laum. (Fabaceae)—Flame-of-the-forest AgAntibacterial activity against Gram-positive (Bacillus subtilis) and Gram-negative (Escherichia coli)[37]
Cassia fistula L. (Fabaceae)—Golden treeAuAntidiabetic: reduces serum blood glucose concentrations, induces favorable changes in body weight, improves transaminase activity, achieves a better lipid profile, and reverses renal dysfunction to a greater extent[38]
Cinnamomum cassia L. J. Presl (Lauraceae)—Chinese cinnamonAgNon-toxic against Vero cells
Antiviral activity against H7N3 influenza virus
[39]
Cinnamomum zeylanicum J.Presl (Lauraceae)—True cinnamonAg
Au
Antibacterial: EC50 value of 11 ± 1.72 mg/L
against Escherichia coli BL-21 strain
[40]
Coccinia grandis L.Voigt (Curcubitaceae)—ivy gourdAuIncreasing biocompatibility and bioavailability of N-acetylcysteine drug molecule that is used for cataract treatment, which was successfully encapsulated into AuNPs[41]
Cochlospermum religiosum (L.) Alston (Bixaceae)—Silk-cotton treeAgAntibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus, followed by Pseudomonas, Escherichia coli, Bacillus, and lowest activity toward Proteus
Antifungal against Aspergillus flavus, followed by Rhizopus, Fusarium, and Curvularia
[42]
Crataeva nurvala Buch.-Ham (Capparaceae)—VarunaAgAntibiofilm properties in Pseudomonas aeruginosa [43]
Dillenia indica L. (Dilleniaceae)—Elephant appleAgCatalytic degradation of 4-Nitrophenol, methylene blue;
radical scavenging activity
[44]
Diospyros montana Roxb. (Ebenaceae)—Bombay ebonyAgAntibacterial activity in vitro against Gram-positive (Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus) and Gram-negative (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella aerogenes); antioxidant activity[45,46]
Elaeodendron croceum Thunb. DC. (Celastraceae)—Saffron woodAgCytotoxic activity against the MDA-MB-231 cell line [47]
Eucommia ulmoides Oliv. (Eucommiaceae)—Hardy rubber treeAuExcellent performance for the catalytic decoloration of reactive yellow 179 and Congo red by NaBH4 in aqueous solution[50]
PdCatalytic activity for the electro-catalytic oxidation of hydrazine and the catalytic reducing degradation of p-Aminoazobenzene[51]
Eysenhardtia polystachya Ort. Sarg. (Fabaceae)—Kidneywood treeAgPromote pancreatic β-cell survival, insulin secretion
Enhances hyperglycemia and hyperlipidemia in glucose-induced diabetic zebrafish
[52]
Fagus sylvatica L. (Fagaceae)—BeechAgAntioxidant and antibacterial against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria[9]
Ficus benghalensis var. krishnae (Moraceae)—Krishna butter cupAgAntimicrobial activity against Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 29122), Escherichia coli (MTCC 45) and Salmonella typhimurium (MTCC 98)
Cytotoxicity on ovarian cancer cell lines (SKOV-3 cells)
[53,54]
Ficus benghalensis (Moraceae)—Banyan trees
Azadirachta indica A. Juss (Meliaceae)—Nimtree or Indian lilac
AgAntibacterial against Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacillus subtilis, and Vibrio cholerae
Antiproliferative against MG-63 ostheosarcoma cell line
[55]
Ficus racemosa L. (Moraceae)—Indian fig treeAgThe larvicidal activity results showed the highest mortality in synthesized AgNPs compared with the aqueous bark extract of F. racemosa[104]
Garcinia mangostana L. (Clusiaceae)—MangosteenAgAnticancer activity in lung cancer cells (A549)[56]
Guazuma ulmifolia Lam. (Malvaceae)—Bay cedarAg–AuAnticancer activity against HeLa cells
Antibacterial and antifungal activity
Catalityc activity against Congo red and 4-nitrophenol
[57]
Holarrhena antidysenterica L. (Aponycaceae) Wall.—Tellicherry bark or conessi AgLarvicidal activity against the larvae of Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus [58]
Melia azedarach L. (Meliaceae)—Indian lilacAgAntibacterial against Esherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae[59]
Ag
Ag–Au
Antibacterial against Bacillus cereus, Cronobacter sakazakii, Salmonella enterica, Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, Candida albicans[62]
Mimusops elengi L. (Sapotaceae)—Bullet woodAuEfficient catalyst for the reduction of 3-nitrophenol and 4-nitrophenol to their corresponding aminophenols in water at room temperature[14]
Moringa oleifera Lam. (Moringaceae)—MoringaAgAnticancer activity against HeLa cell type (human cervical carcinoma)[26]
Nerium oleander L. (Apocynaceae)—KarabiAuIn vitro anticancer activity of the stabilized AuNPs on MCF-7 cell lines;
catalytic activities demonstrated for borohydride reduction of 3- and 4-nitrophenols
[60]
Picea abies L. (Pinaceae)—SpruceAgAntioxidant and Antibacterial against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria[10]
Pongamia pinnata (L.) Pierre (Fabaceae)—Karum treeAgAntibacterial activity against Klebsiella planticola and Staphylococcus aureus[66]
Prosopis juliflora Sw.DC. (Fabaceae)—MesquiteAgAntibacterial activity against Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas Aeruginosa;
Anticancer activity against A549 cells (adenocarcinomic human alveolar basal epithelial cells);
photocatalytic degradation of 4-nitrophenol
[67]
Quercus sp. (Fagaceae)—Oak Ag Antibacterial effect against Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, Listeria monocytogenes ATCC 19111, Bacillus cereus ATCC 11778, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica Serovar typhimurium ATCC 13076 reference strains —cultures were isolated from food products[68]
Salix alba L. (Salicaceae)—Willow tree AuUsed in colorimetric detection of cysteine[69]
Saraca indica L. (Fabaceae)—Asoka tree AuCatalyst for the reduction of 4-nitrophenol to 4-aminophenol[28]
Salvadora persica L. (Salvadoraceae)—Toothbrush treeAgAntibacterial activity against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus [23]
Stereospermum suaveolens Roxb. DC (Bignoniaceae)Ag
Au
Anticancer activity against lung carcinoma cell lines A549
Antibacterial against Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacillus subtilis
Antifungal against Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus nidulans
[71]
Syzygium alternifolium (Wt.) Walp (Myrtiaceae) AgAntibacterial activity against Salmonella typhimurium, Proteus vulgaris, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Bacillus subtilis
Antifungal: highest inhibition zones are observed in Aspergillus flavus followed by Penicillium chrysogenum, Trichoderma harzianum, Alternaria solani, and Aspergillus Niger
[72]
Syzygium cumini L.(Myrtiaceae)—Black plumAgAntibacterial against Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus licheniformis[73]
Syzygium jambos (L.) Alston (Myrtaceae)Ag
Au
Antiplasmodial effect (AgNPs > AuNPs) against both chloroquine sensitive (3D7) and resistant (Dd2) strain of Plasmodium falciparum[29]
Terminalia arjuna Wigh and Arn (Combretaceae)—Arjuna tree AgAntibacterial against Escherichia coli [74]
AuReducing and capping agent; acetylcholinesterase and Butyrylcholinesterase inhibitory activities; excellent free radical scavenging and metal chelating activity, suitable for Alzheimer’s disease therapy.[30]
CuAntioxidant properties; Antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus and less effective against both Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Salmonella typhium;
Effective against Candida albicans, Trichophyton rubrum, Chrisosporium indicum
[75]
Cu–AgCytotoxic effect of biohybrid nanomaterials on different cell lines, MDA-MB-231 (poorly differentiated triple-negative breast cancer), HeLa (cervical cancer cells), SiHa (squamous cell carcinoma), and He-G2 (liver cancer cells), and non-toxic against Vero (normal epithelial cells); antibacterial activity against bacterial strains Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus[17]
Terminalia cuneata Roth. (Combretaceae)—White murdahAgCatalytic activity in the reduction of direct yellow-12[76]
Toxicodendron vernicifluum (Stokes) F.Barkley (Anacardiaceae)—Chinese Lacquer treeAgAnticancer activity in human lung cancer A549 cells Antibacterial activity against STEC (Shiga Toxina Escherichia Coli) and Helicobacter pylori[27]
Zizyphus xylopyrus Retz. Willd (Rhamnaceae)—Kath berAgAntimicrobial agents in water purification systems [77]
Ag—silver nanoparticles; Au—gold nanoparticles; Ag–Au—combination of silver and gold nanoparticles; Cu—copper nanoparticles; Pd—palladium nanoparticles.

5. Conclusions

The bark of woody vascular plants can be a source of phytoconstituents responsible for the reduction of metallic ions in nanoparticle synthesis. In this review, the presented metallic NPs mediated by bark extracts are rich in phytoconstituents responsible for the reduction of metal salts. The synthesis of NPs using crude plant bark extracts and purified compounds are novel substrates for industrial production.
In the future, plant bark has a wide potential for the synthesis of NPs in health care and commercial products. Implementing green synthesis methods with proven advantages has great potential. The yield of synthesized nanoparticles remains to be elucidated, and the synthesis parameters still require optimization. Furthermore, the lack of knowledge about chemical components responsible for the synthesis and stabilization process of NPs remains a challenge for researchers. It is important to understand how bioactive groups attach to the surface of NPs and which bioactive groups are involved in order to mediate NPs with higher efficacy. However, issues relating to the biomedical applications of NPs in vivo need to be developed. At the same time, considerable research on the biocompatibility and bioavailability of NPs is needed.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.T. and L.B.; writing—original draft preparation, E.B. and N.-A.C.; writing—review and editing, C.T. and L.B.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Endophytes: Toward a Vision in Synthesis of Nanoparticle for Future Therapeutic Agents. Int. J. Bio-Inorg. Hybrid. Nanomater. 2012, 1, 67–77.
  2. Hasna, A.S.; Rajiv, P.; Kamaraj, M.; Jagadeeswaran, P.; Sangeetha, G.; Rajeshwari, S. Plants: Green Route for Nanoparticle Synthesis. Int. Res. J. Biol. Sci. 2012, 1, 85–90. [Google Scholar]
  3. Iravani, S. Green Synthesis of Metal Nanoparticles Using Plants. Green Chem. 2011, 13, 2638–2650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ahmed, S.; Ahmad, M.; Swami, B.L.; Ikram, S. A Review on Plants Extract Mediated Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles for Antimicrobial Applications: A Green Expertise. J. Adv. Res. 2016, 7, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Akhtar, M.S.; Panwar, J.; Yun, Y.-S. Biogenic Synthesis of Metallic Nanoparticles by Plant Extracts. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2013, 1, 591–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kavitha, K.S.; Syed, B.; Rakshith, D.; Kavitha, H.U.; Yashwantha Rao, H.C.; Harini, B.P.; Satish, S. Plants as Green Source towards Synthesis of Nanoparticles. Int. Res. J. Biol. Sci. 2013, 2, 66–76. [Google Scholar]
  7. Rajan, R.; Chandran, K.; Harper, S.L.; Yun, S.-I.; Kalaichelvan, P.T. Plant Extract Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles: An Ongoing Source of Novel Biocompatible Materials. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2015, 70, 356–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ferreres, F.; Gomes, N.G.M.; Valentão, P.; Pereira, D.M.; Gil-Izquierdo, A.; Araújo, L.; Silva, T.C.; Andrade, P.B. Leaves and Stem Bark from Allophylus Africanus P. Beauv.: An Approach to Anti-Inflammatory Properties and Characterization of Their Flavonoid Profile. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2018, 118, 430–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tanase, C.; Berta, L.; Coman, A.N.; Roșca, I.; Man, A.; Toma, F.; Mocan, A.; Jakab-Farkas, L.; Biró, D.; Mare, A. Investigation of In Vitro Antioxidant and Antibacterial Potential of Silver Nanoparticles Obtained by Biosynthesis Using Beech Bark Extract. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Tanase, C.; Berta, L.; Coman, A.N.; Roșca, I.; Man, A.; Toma, F.; Mocan, A.; Nicolescu, A.; Jakab-Farkas, L.; Biró, D.; et al. Antibacterial and Antioxidant Potential of Silver Nanoparticles Biosynthesized Using the Spruce Bark Extract. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tanase, C.; Mocan, A.; Coșarcă, S.; Gavan, A.; Nicolescu, A.; Gheldiu, A.-M.; Vodnar, C.D.; Muntean, D.-L.; Crișan, O. Biological and Chemical Insights of Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) Bark: A Source of Bioactive Compounds with Functional Properties. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Alfredsen, G.; Solheim, H.; Slimestad, R. Antifungal Effect of Bark Extracts from Some European Tree Species. Eur. J. Res. 2008, 127, 387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Verica, D.-U.; Levaj, B.; Mrkic, V.; Bursać Kovačević, D.; Boras, M. The Content of Polyphenols and Carotenoids in Three Apricot Cultivars Depending on Stage of Maturity and Geographical Region. Food Chem. 2007, 102, 966–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Majumdar, R.; Bag, B.G.; Ghosh, P. Mimusops Elengi Bark Extract Mediated Green Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles and Study of Its Catalytic Activity. Appl. Nanosci. 2016, 6, 521–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Singh, B.; Sharma, R.A. Plant Terpenes: Defense Responses, Phylogenetic Analysis, Regulation and Clinical Applications. 3 Biotech 2015, 5, 129–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Prakash, D.; Kumar, N. Cost Effective Natural Antioxidants. In Nutrients, Dietary Supplements, and Nutriceuticals: Cost Analysis Versus Clinical Benefits; Gerald, J.K., Watson, R.R., Preedy, V.R., Eds.; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2011; pp. 163–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yallappa, S.; Manjanna, J.; Dhananjaya, B.L.; Vishwanatha, U.; Ravishankar, B.; Gururaj, H.; Niranjana, P.; Hungund, B.S. Phytochemically Functionalized Cu and Ag Nanoparticles Embedded in MWCNTs for Enhanced Antimicrobial and Anticancer Properties. Nano-Micro Lett. 2016, 8, 120–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pedreschi, F.; Mariotti, M.S.; Granby, K. Current Issues in Dietary Acrylamide: Formation, Mitigation and Risk Assessment. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2014, 94, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Santos, S.; Pinto, R.; Rocha, S.; Marques, P.; Neto, C.; Silvestre, A.; Freire, C. Unveiling the Chemistry behind the Green Synthesis of Metal Nanoparticles. ChemSusChem 2014, 7, 2704–2711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Murugan, K.; Senthilkumar, B.; Senbagam, D.; Al-Sohaibani, S. Biosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Acacia leucophloea Extract and Their Antibacterial Activity. Int. J. Nanomed. 2014, 9, 2431–2438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Moyo, M.; Gomba, M.; Nharingo, T. Afzelia quanzensis Bark Extract for Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles and Study of Their Antibacterial Activity. Int. J. Ind. Chem. 2015, 6, 329–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lin, Z.; Jianming, W.; Xue, R.; Yang, Y. Spectroscopic Characterization of Au3+ Biosorption by Waste Biomass of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2005, 61, 761–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Miri, A.; Dorani, N.; Darroudi, M.; Sarani, M. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Salvadora persica L. and Its Antibacterial Activity. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2016, 62, 46–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kabera, J. Plant Secondary Metabolites: Biosynthesis, Classification, Function and Pharmacological Classification, Function and Pharmacological Properties. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2014, 2, 377–392. [Google Scholar]
  25. Geethalakshmi, R.; Sarada, D.V.L. Characterization and Antimicrobial Activity of Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesized Using Saponin Isolated from Trianthema decandra L. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2013, 51, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Vasanth, K.; Ilango, K.; Ramasamy, M.; Agrawal, A.; Dubey, G.P. Anticancer Activity of Moringa oleifera Mediated Silver Nanoparticles on Human Cervical Carcinoma Cells by Apoptosis Induction. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2014, 117, 354–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Saravanakumar, K.; Chelliah, R.; MubarakAli, D.; Oh, D.-H.; Kathiresan, K.; Wang, M.-H. Unveiling the Potentials of Biocompatible Silver Nanoparticles on Human Lung Carcinoma A549 Cells and Helicobacter pylori. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dash, S.S.; Majumdar, R.; Sikder, A.K.; Bag, B.G.; Patra, B.K. Saraca indica Bark Extract Mediated Green Synthesis of Polyshaped Gold Nanoparticles and Its Application in Catalytic Reduction. Appl. Nanosci. 2014, 4, 485–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dutta, P.P.; Bordoloi, M.; Gogoi, K.; Roy, S.; Narzary, B.; Bhattacharyya, D.R.; Mohapatra, P.K.; Mazumder, B. Antimalarial Silver and Gold Nanoparticles: Green Synthesis, Characterization and In Vitro Study. Biomed. Pharm. 2017, 91, 567–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sivakumar, S.; Vijayan, S.R.; Pugazhendhi, A.; Benelli, G.; Archunan, G. Biogenic Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles from Terminalia arjuna Bark Extract: Assessment of Safety Aspects and Neuroprotective Potential via Antioxidant, Anticholinesterase, and Antiamyloidogenic Effects. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 25, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Khan, S.; Bello, B.; Khan, J.; Anwar, Y.; Mirza, M.; Qadri, F.; Farooq, A.; Adam, I.K.; Asiri, A.M.; Khan, S. Albizia chevalier Based Ag Nanoparticles: Anti-Proliferation, Bactericidal and Pollutants Degradation Performance. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2018, 182, 62–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Shetty, P.; Supraja, N.; Garud, M.; Prasad, T.N.V.K.V. Synthesis, Characterization and Antimicrobial Activity of Alstonia Scholaris Bark-Extract-Mediated Silver Nanoparticles. J. Nanostructure Chem. 2014, 4, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Abdullah, N.; Ahmad, M.; Kamyar, S. Biosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Artocarpus elasticus Stem Bark Extract. Chem. Cent. J. 2015, 9, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Nahak, G.; Sahu, R. In Vitro Antioxidative Acitivity of Azadirachta indica and Melia azedarach Leaves by DPPH Scavenging Assay. Nat. Sci. 2010, 8, 22–28. [Google Scholar]
  35. Soni, N.; Prakash, S. Silver Nanoparticles: A Possibility for Malarial and Filarial Vector Control Technology. Parasitol. Res. 2014, 113, 4015–4022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Mehmood, A.; Murtaza, G.; Bhatti, T.; Kausar, R.; Ahmed, M. Biosynthesis, Characterization and Antimicrobial Action of Silver Nanoparticles from Root Bark Extract of Berberis lycium Royle. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 29, 131–136. [Google Scholar]
  37. Pattanayak, S.; Mollick, M.M.R.; Maity, D.; Chakraborty, S.; Dash, S.K.; Chattopadhyay, S.; Roy, S.; Chattopadhyay, D.; Chakraborty, M. Butea monosperma Bark Extract Mediated Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles: Characterization and Biomedical Applications. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2017, 21, 673–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Daisy, P.; Saipriya, K. Biochemical Analysis of Cassia Fistula Aqueous Extract and Phytochemically Synthesized Gold Nanoparticles as Hypoglycemic Treatment for Diabetes Mellitus. Int. J. Nanomed. 2012, 7, 1189–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Fatima, M.; Zaidi, N.-U.-S.; Amraiz, D.; Afzal, F. In Vitro Antiviral Activity of Cinnamomum cassia and Its Nanoparticles Against H7N3 Influenza A Virus. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 26, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Soni, N.; Prakash, S. Green Nanoparticles for Mosquito Control. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 496362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Wang, Y.; Xia, R.; Hu, H.; Peng, T. Biosynthesis, Characterization and Cytotoxicity of Gold Nanoparticles and Their Loading with N-Acetylcarnosine for Cataract Treatment. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2018, 187, 180–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sasikala, A.; Linga Rao, M.; Savithramma, N.; Prasad, T.N.V.K.V. Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles from Stem Bark of Cochlospermum religiosum (L.) Alston: An Important Medicinal Plant and Evaluation of Their Antimicrobial Efficacy. Appl. Nanosci. 2015, 5, 827–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Ali, S.; Ansari, M.; Khan, H.; Jalal, M.; Mahdi, A.A.; Cameotra, S. Crataeva nurvala Nanoparticles Inhibit Virulence Factors and Biofilm Formation in Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa: Nanoparticles as an Antivirulent. J. Basic Microbiol. 2016, 57, 193–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Mohanty, A.; Jena, B.S. Innate Catalytic and Free Radical Scavenging Activities of Silver Nanoparticles Synthesized Using Dillenia indica Bark Extract. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 496, 513–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Devaraj, B.; Josebin, M.; Seerangaraj, V.; Veluswamy, B. Biosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Stem Bark Extracts of Diospyros montana and Their Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activities. J. Nanostructure Chem. 2018, 8, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Vasantharaj, S.; Sripriya, N.; Shanmugavel, M.; Manikandan, E.; Gnanamani, A.; Senthilkumar, P. Surface Active Gold Nanoparticles Biosynthesis by New Approach for Bionanocatalytic Activity. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2018, 179, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Odeyemi, S.; Mare, J.-A.; Edkins, A.; Afolayan, A. In Vitro and in Vivo Toxicity Assessment of Biologically Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles from Elaeodendron Croceum. J. Complement. Integr. Med. 2019, 16, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kulkarni, N.; Muddapur, U. Biosynthesis of Metal Nanoparticles: A Review. J. Nanotechnol. 2014, 2014, 510246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Logeswari, P.; Silambarasan, S.; Abraham, J. Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Plants Extract and Analysis of Their Antimicrobial Property. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2015, 19, 311–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Guo, M.; Li, W.; Yang, F.; Liu, H. Controllable Biosynthesis of Gold Nanoparticles from a Eucommia ulmoides Bark Aqueous Extract. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2015, 142, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Li, M.; Duan, L.; Liu, H. Biosynthesised Palladium Nanoparticles Using Eucommia ulmoides Bark Aqueous Extract and Their Catalytic Activity. IET Nanobiotechnol. 2015, 9, 349–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Garcia Campoy, A.H.; Perez Gutierrez, R.M.; Manriquez-Alvirde, G.; Muñiz Ramirez, A. Protection of Silver Nanoparticles Using Eysenhardtia polystachya in Peroxide-Induced Pancreatic β-Cell Damage and Their Antidiabetic Properties in Zebrafish. Int. J. Nanomed. 2018, 13, 2601–2612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Kanjikar, A.; Lingappa Hugar, A.; Londonkar, R. Characterization of Phyto-Nanoparticles from Ficus krishnae for Their Antibacterial and Anticancer Activities. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2017, 44, 377–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Nayagam, V.; Melchias, G.; Kumaravel, P. Ficus benghalensis Mediates Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles: The Green Approach Yields NPs that Are Its Anti-Bacterial and Anti-Oxidant. World J. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 4, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  55. Nayak, D.; Ashe, S.; Rauta, P.; Kumari, M.; Nayak, B. Bark Extract Mediated Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles: Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activity and Antiproliferative Response against Osteosarcoma. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2015, 58, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Zhang, X.; Xiao, C. Biofabrication of Silver Nanoparticles and Their Combined Effect with Low Intensity Ultrasound for Treatment of Lung Cancer. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2018, 181, 122–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Karthika, V.; Arumugam, A.; Gopinath, K.; Periyannan, K.; Govindarajan, M.; Alharbi, N.; Km, S.; Khaled, J.; Benelli, G. Guazuma ulmifolia Bark-Synthesized Ag, Au and Ag/Au Alloy Nanoparticles: Photocatalytic Potential, DNA/Protein Interactions, Anticancer Activity and Toxicity against 14 Species of Microbial Pathogens. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2017, 167, 189–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Kumar, D.; Kumar, G.; Agrawal, V. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Holarrhena antidysenterica (L.) Wall.Bark Extract and Their Larvicidal Activity against Dengue and Filariasis Vectors. Parasitol. Res. 2017, 117, 377–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Mehmood, A. Antibacterial Efficacy of Silver Nanoparticles Synthesized by a Green Method Using Bark Extract of Melia azedarach L. J. Pharm. Innov. 2014, 9, 238–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Li, S.; Deng, J.; Zhao, S. Minor phenolic constituents of chinaberry-tree (Melia azedarach). Zhong Cao Yao Chin. Tradit. Herb. Drugs 2000, 31, 86–89. [Google Scholar]
  61. Kumar, S.V.; Sanghai, D.B.; Rao, C.M.; Shreedhara, C.S. Histological and Physiochemical Standardization of Melia azedarach. Linn Bark. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2012, 2, S284–S289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Pani, A.; Lee, J.; Yun, S.-I. Autoclave Mediated One-Pot-One-Minute Synthesis of AgNPs and Au–Ag Nanocomposite from Melia azedarach Bark Extract with Antimicrobial Activity against Food Pathogens. Chem. Cent. J. 2016, 10, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Barai, A.; Paul, K.; Dey, A.; Manna, S.; Roy, S.; Bag, B.; Mukhopadhyay, C. Green Synthesis of Nerium oleander-Conjugated Gold Nanoparticles and Study of Its in Vitro Anticancer Activity on MCF-7 Cell Lines and Catalytic Activity. Nano Converg. 2018, 5, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Ignat, I.; Radu, D.; Volf, I.; Pag, A.; Popa, V. Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activities of Some Natural Polyphenols. Cellul. Chem. Technol. 2013, 47, 387–399. [Google Scholar]
  65. Iravani, S.; Zolfaghari, B. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Pinus eldarica Bark Extract. Biomed. Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 639725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Shanmugam, R. Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Fresh Bark of Pongamia pinnata and Characterization of Its Antibacterial Activity against Gram Positive and Gram Negative Pathogens. Resour.-Effic. Technol. 2016, 2, 30–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Arya, G.; Kumari, M.; Gupta, N.; Kumar, A.; Chandra, R.; Nimesh, S. Artificial Cells, Nanomedicine, and Biotechnology Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Prosopis juliflora Bark Extract: Reaction Optimization, Antimicrobial and Catalytic Activities. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2017, 46, 985–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Puiso, J.; Mačionienė, I.; Jonkuvienė, D.; Šalomskienė, J. Antimicrobial Activity of Silver Nanoparticles Synthesized Using Plant Extracts. Vet. Ir Zootech. 2014, 65, 61–67. [Google Scholar]
  69. Bahram, M.; Mohammadzadeh, E. Green Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles with Willow Tree Bark Extract: A Sensitive Colourimetric Sensor for Cysteine Detection. Anal. Methods 2014, 6, 6916–6924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Subramanian, R.; Subbramaniyan, P.; Raj, V. Antioxidant Activity of the Stem Bark of Shorea roxburghii and Its Silver Reducing Power. SpringerPlus 2013, 2, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Francis, S.; Koshy, E.; Mathew, B. Green Synthesis of Stereospermum suaveolens Capped Silver and Gold Nanoparticles and Assessment of Their Innate Antioxidant, Antimicrobial and Antiproliferative Activities. Bioprocess. Biosyst. Eng. 2018, 41, 939–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Yugandhar, P.; Haribabu, R.; Savithramma, N. Synthesis, Characterization and Antimicrobial Properties of Green-Synthesised Silver Nanoparticles from Stem Bark Extract of Syzygium alternifolium (Wt.). Walp. 3 Biotech 2015, 5, 1031–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Prasad, R.; Satyanarayana Swamy, V. Antibacterial Activity of Silver Nanoparticles Synthesized by Bark Extract of Syzygium cumini. J. Nanoparticles 2013, 2013, 431218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Ahmed, Q.; Gupta, N.; Kumar, A.; Nimesh, S. Antibacterial Efficacy of Silver Nanoparticles Synthesized Employing Terminalia arjuna Bark Extract. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2016, 45, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Yallappa, S.; Manjanna, J.; Sindhe, M.A.; Satyanarayan, N.D.; Pramod, S.N.; Nagaraja, K. Microwave Assisted Rapid Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Stable Copper Nanoparticles Using T. arjuna Bark Extract. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2013, 110, 108–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Edison, T.N.J.I.; Lee, Y.R.; Sethuraman, M.G. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Terminalia cuneata and Its Catalytic Action in Reduction of Direct Yellow-12 Dye. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2016, 161, 122–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Babu, S.; Devadiga, A.; Shetty, K.V.; Saidutta, M.B. Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Medicinal Zizyphus xylopyrus Bark Extract. Appl. Nanosci. 2014, 5, 755–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Prashanth, G.K.; Prashanth, P.A.; Bora, U.; Gadewar, M.; Nagabhushana, B.M.; Ananda, S.; Krishnaiah, G.M.; Sathyananda, H.M. In Vitro Antibacterial and Cytotoxicity Studies of ZnO Nanopowders Prepared by Combustion Assisted Facile Green Synthesis. Karbala Int. J. Mod. Sci. 2015, 1, 67–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Pietta, P.-G. Flavonoids as Antioxidants. J. Nat. Prod. 2000, 63, 1035–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Guo, J.-J.; Hsieh, H.-Y.; Hu, C.-H. Chain-Breaking Activity of Carotenes in Lipid Peroxidation: A Theoretical Study. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 15699–15708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Lin, H.-Y.; Chou, C.-C. Antioxidative Activities of Water-Soluble Disaccharide Chitosan Derivatives. Food Res. Int. 2004, 37, 883–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Phull, A.-R.; Abbas, Q.; Ali, A.; Raza, H.; Kim, S.J.; Zia, M.; Haq, I. Antioxidant, Cytotoxic and Antimicrobial Activities of Green Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles from Crude Extract of Bergenia ciliata. Future J. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 2, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ramamurthy, C.; Padma, M.; Samadanam, I.; Ramachandran, M.; Suyavaran, A.; Kumar, M.; Premkumar, K.; Thirunavukkarasu, C. The Extra Cellular Synthesis of Gold and Silver Nanoparticles and Their Free Radical Scavenging and Antibacterial Properties. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2012, 102C, 808–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Wang, Y.; He, X.; Wang, K.; Zhang, X.; Tan, W. Barbated Skullcup Herb Extract-Mediated Biosynthesis of Gold Nanoparticles and Its Primary Application in Electrochemistry. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2009, 73, 75–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Yudha, S.S.; Notriawan, D.; Angasa, E.; Suharto, T.; Hendri, J.; Nisina, Y. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Aqueous Rinds Extract of Brucea javanica (L.) Merr at Ambient Temperature. Mater. Lett. 2013, 97, 181–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Wijnhoven, S.; Peijnenburg, W.; Herberts, C.; Hagens, W.; Oomen, A.; Heugens, E.; Roszek, B.; Bisschops, J.; Gosens, I.; Van de meent, D.; et al. Nano-Silver—A Review of Available Data and Knowledge Gaps in Human and Environmental Risk Assessment. Nanotoxicology 2009, 3, 109–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Wang, Z.; Chen, J.; Yang, P.; Yang, W. Biomimetic Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles and Their Aggregates Using a Polypeptide Sequence. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2007, 21, 645–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Mirzajani, F.; Ghassempour, A.; Aliahmadi, A.; Esmaeili, M.A. Antibacterial Effect of Silver Nanoparticles on Staphylococcus Aureus. Res. Microbiol. 2011, 162, 542–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Savithramma, N.; Lingarao, M.; Ankanna, S.; Venkateswarlu, P. Screening of Medicinal Plants for Effective Biogenesis of Silver Nanoparticles and Efficient Antimicrobial Activity. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2012, 3, 1141–1148. [Google Scholar]
  90. Dibrov, P.; Dzioba, J.; Gosink, K.; Häse, C. Chemiosmotic Mechanism of Antimicrobial Activity of Ag+ in Vibrio Cholerae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2002, 46, 2668–2670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Feng, Q.; Wu, J.; Chen, G.-Q.; Cui, F.-Z.; Kim, T.; Kim, J. A Mechanistic Study of the Antibacterial Effect of Silver Ions On Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2000, 52, 662–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Matsumura, Y.; Yoshikata, K.; Kunisaki, S.; Tsuchido, T. Mode of Bactericidal Action of Silver Zeolite and Its Comparison with That of Silver Nitrate. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 4278–4281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Nazeruddin, G.M.; Prasad, N.R.; Prasad, S.R.; Shaikh, Y.I.; Waghmare, S.R.; Adhyapak, P. Coriandrum sativum Seed Extract Assisted in Situ Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticle and Its Anti-Microbial Activity. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2014, 60, 212–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Cooper, G. The Cell: A Molecular Approach, 2nd ed.; Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  95. Singh, R.; Shedbalkar, U.; Wadhwani, S.; Chopade, P.B. Bacteriagenic Silver Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Mechanism, and Applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 4579–4593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Sondi, I.; Salopek-Sondi, B. Silver Nanoparticles as Antimicrobial Agent: A Case Study on E. coli as a Model for Gram-Negative Bacteria. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004, 275, 177–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Asharani, P.V.; Hande, M.P.; Valiyaveettil, S. Anti-Proliferative Activity of Silver Nanoparticles. BMC Cell Biol. 2009, 10, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Zhang, X.-F.; Choi, Y.-J.; Han, J.W.; Kim, E.; Park, J.H.; Gurunathan, S.; Kim, J.-H. Differential Nanoreprotoxicity of Silver Nanoparticles in Male Somatic Cells and Spermatogonial Stem Cells. Int. J. Nanomed. 2015, 10, 1335–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Yu, M.; Park, J.; Jon, S. Targeting Strategies for Multifunctional Nanoparticles in Cancer Imaging and Therapy. Theranostics 2012, 2, 3–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Medhat, D.; Hussein, J.; El-naggar, M.; Attia, M.; Anwar, M.; Latif, Y.; Booles, H.; Morsy, S.; Farrag, A.R.; Khalil, W.; et al. Effect of Au-Dextran NPs as Anti-Tumor Agent against EAC and Solid Tumor in Mice by Biochemical Evaluations and Histopathological Investigations. Biomed. Pharm. 2017, 91, 1006–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Herrera-Melián, J.A.; Martín-Rodríguez, A.J.; Ortega-Méndez, A.; Araña, J.; Doña-Rodríguez, J.M.; Pérez-Peña, J. Degradation and Detoxification of 4-Nitrophenol by Advanced Oxidation Technologies and Bench-Scale Constructed Wetlands. J. Environ. Manag. 2012, 105, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Li, J.; Kuang, D.; Feng, Y.; Zhang, F.; Xu, Z.; Liu, M. A Graphene Oxide-Based Electrochemical Sensor for Sensitive Determination of 4-Nitrophenol. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 201–202, 250–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Wunder, S.; Lu, Y.; Albrecht, M.; Ballauff, M. Catalytic Activity of Faceted Gold Nanoparticles Studied by a Model Reaction: Evidence for Substrate-Induced Surface Restructuring. ACS Catal. 2011, 1, 908–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Velayutham, K.; Rahuman, A.A.; Rajakumar, G.; Roopan, S.M.; Elango, G.; Kamaraj, C.; Marimuthu, S.; Santhoshkumar, T.; Iyappan, M.; Siva, C. Larvicidal Activity of Green Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles Using Bark Aqueous Extract of Ficus racemosa against Culex quinquefasciatus and Culex gelidus. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2013, 6, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Green synthesis and biological activity of metallic nanoparticles mediated by bark extracts.
Figure 1. Green synthesis and biological activity of metallic nanoparticles mediated by bark extracts.
Molecules 24 04354 g001
Figure 2. General structures of bioactive compounds identified in the bark extracts: (a) benzoic phenolic acids; (b) cinnamic phenolic acids; (c) flavonoids; (d) lignans; (e) stilbenes; (f,g) alkaloids; (h) monoterpenes; (i) sesquiterpenes; (j) triterpenes and saponins.
Figure 2. General structures of bioactive compounds identified in the bark extracts: (a) benzoic phenolic acids; (b) cinnamic phenolic acids; (c) flavonoids; (d) lignans; (e) stilbenes; (f,g) alkaloids; (h) monoterpenes; (i) sesquiterpenes; (j) triterpenes and saponins.
Molecules 24 04354 g002

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Burlacu, E.; Tanase, C.; Coman, N.-A.; Berta, L. A Review of Bark-Extract-Mediated Green Synthesis of Metallic Nanoparticles and Their Applications. Molecules 2019, 24, 4354. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24234354

AMA Style

Burlacu E, Tanase C, Coman N-A, Berta L. A Review of Bark-Extract-Mediated Green Synthesis of Metallic Nanoparticles and Their Applications. Molecules. 2019; 24(23):4354. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24234354

Chicago/Turabian Style

Burlacu, Ema, Corneliu Tanase, Năstaca-Alina Coman, and Lavinia Berta. 2019. "A Review of Bark-Extract-Mediated Green Synthesis of Metallic Nanoparticles and Their Applications" Molecules 24, no. 23: 4354. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24234354

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop