Next Article in Journal
Production and Mechanical Characterisation of TEMPO-Oxidised Cellulose Nanofibrils/β-Cyclodextrin Films and Cryogels
Previous Article in Journal
Antiviral Activities of Quercetin and Isoquercitrin Against Human Herpesviruses
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 25
Issue 10
10.3390/molecules25102380
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Ras and Wnt Interaction Contribute in Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis

by
Shian-Ren Lin
1,
Ntlotlang Mokgautsi
2 and
Yen-Nien Liu
1,2,*
1
Graduate Institute of Cancer Biology and Drug Discovery, Collage of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11024, Taiwan
2
Ph.D. Program for Cancer Molecular Biology and Drug Discovery, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11024, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(10), 2380; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25102380
Submission received: 5 May 2020 / Revised: 15 May 2020 / Accepted: 16 May 2020 / Published: 20 May 2020
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most prevalent and malignant cancer types in men, which causes more than three-hundred thousand cancer death each year. At late stage of PCa progression, bone marrow is the most often metastatic site that constitutes almost 70% of metastatic cases of the PCa population. However, the characteristic for the osteo-philic property of PCa is still puzzling. Recent studies reported that the Wnt and Ras signaling pathways are pivotal in bone metastasis and that take parts in different cytological changes, but their crosstalk is not well studied. In this review, we focused on interactions between the Wnt and Ras signaling pathways during each stage of bone metastasis and present the fate of those interactions. This review contributes insights that can guide other researchers by unveiling more details with regard to bone metastasis and might also help in finding potential therapeutic regimens for preventing PCa bone metastasis.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction: Metastasis of Prostate Cancer (PCa)

Bone marrow is the most frequent metastatic site of PCa, which include 72.8% of all metastatic cases, at over three times higher than the second most frequent site [1]. Knowing the underlying mechanism of osteophilic nature in PCa metastasis is urgent for monitoring and preventing PCa bone metastasis. Interestingly, PCa metastasis could be divided into two types: osteoblastic and osteoclastic, and that is apparently triggered by different mechanism [2]. Which molecules or cells are key factors in choosing the bone metastasis type? These two questions have attracted the attention of researchers in cancer biology, in the hope that they can be applied to an early diagnosis of cancer metastasis.
Wnt signaling, either canonical or non-canonical, leads to PCa development, especially in castration-resistance PCa (CRPC) and metastasis [3]. The Ras superfamily includes Ras, Rho, and Ral, and it is known to be involved in almost all fundamental cytological activities [4]. Cumulative studies have unveiled that crosstalk between Wnt and Ras signaling is highly associated with the tumorigenesis and progression of various cancers, e.g., colorectal cancer and mucinous ovarian cancer [5,6,7]. In this review, we collected and discuss recent findings on the role of Ras/Wnt interactions in bone metastasis (BM) of PCa and try to emphasize their regulatory dynamics in different metastatic stages.

2. Mechanism of BM in PCa

The overall progression of PCa BM can be characterized into three main steps: cancer cell invasion and circulation, interaction with osteocytes, and homing toward bones [8]. The following section describes a recently published mechanism of PCa BM that is based on the above three steps.

2.1. Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) and Tumor Invasion

2.1.1. TGF-β/MAPK-Mediated EMT

During metastasis, PCa cells transform into mesenchymal-like cells, which helps cells to invade through the basal lamina and survive in the blood circulation without cell-cell interactions [9]. The EMT in PCa is activated by four mediators of snail, slug, twist, and Zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox 1 (ZEB1), while four signaling pathways play dominant roles here: the transforming growth factor (TGF) receptor (TGFR)/mothers against decapentaplegic homolog (Smads)/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling cascade, nuclear factor (NF)-κB signaling, and the receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) cascade [9]. Wa et al. reported that MAPK can also promote the EMT through inhibiting Rb phosphorylation, which is one of the main suppressors in cell cycle regulation [10]. Other signaling factors regulate the TGF-β-MAPK axis in PCa BM. Lue et al. described how MAPK is upregulated by heparin-binding epidermal growth factor (HB-EGF)-mediated signaling, in which the HB-EGF is cut from the PCa surface by the zinc transporter, ZIP6 (LIV-1), which stimulates matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2/9 upregulation in other PCa cells [11]. Interferon (INF)-induced transmembrane protein 3 (IFITM3), a highly expressed transmembrane protein in cancer cells, is believed to be associated with metastasis in various cancers, e.g., acute myeloid leukemia, hepatomas, and gliomas [12,13,14,15]. In PCa, IFITM3 promotes fibroblast growth factor (FGF) expression and promotes TGF-β production, which elicits the EMT in neighboring cells in a paracrine manner [16]. On the contrary, the TGF-β-mediated EMT can be retarded via microRNA (miR) regulation. miR-33a-5p reduces TGFR 1 expression, which affects its offset by increasing the ZEB1 copy number [17]. Moreover, the TGFR and Smad2/4 are suppressed by miR-505-3p and miR-19a-3p [10,18]. Those studies clearly depicted a regulatory network in TGF-β-mediated BM in PCa cells.

2.1.2. NF-κB Activation after Androgen Receptor (AR) Signaling Deprivation

NF-κB signaling pushes cancer metastasis in multiple directions, such as stimulating MMP expressions and regulating cell adhesion molecules, according to previous studies [19]. The tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α receptor (TNFR) promotes inhibitor of NF-κB (IκB) kinase (IKK) activity, which blocks the binding of IκB to NF-κB and releasing the active form of NF-κB [20]. Active NF-κB ultimately triggers hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1α expression and subsequently induces the EMT [21]. In addition to TNFR signaling, NF-κB can also be activated by TNF-related weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK)/TNFR superfamily member 12A (TNFRSF12A, also known as Fn14)-mediated IKK-β activation and downregulation of miR-210-3p-triggered suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 (SOCS1) and TNFAIP3-interacting protein 1 (TNIP1) [22,23]. Conversely, activated AR and its cofactor FOXA1 inhibits TWEAK/Fn14/IKK-β activation through directly binding to an androgen-binding element in TWEAK and the Fn14 promoter/enhancer in order to reduce TWEAK and Fn14 transcription [22]. After androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), some castration-sensitive PCa cells will transit into CRPC cells, which is the beginning of PCa metastasis [24,25]. Izumi and Mizokami summarized the characteristic of C-C motif ligand 5 (CCL5) in regulating AR expression, in which CCL5 downregulates AR expression [26]. The above studies not only evaluated the second central signaling axis in PCa BM, but also evaluated how CRPC is induced.

2.1.3. Contribution of PI3K/Akt/MAPK Signaling in EMT of PCa

The third signaling pathway that is involved in PCa BM is the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt signaling cascade, which originates from the activation of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). In general, the activation of EGF and VEGF receptors (EGFR and VEGFR) stimulates the Ras/Raf/MAPK kinase (MEK)/MAPK signaling cascade, which is involved in tumor progression or the PI3K/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) cascade that promotes cell growth and the EMT [27,28]. In PCa, EGF signaling accompanies alterations in miR-96 and miR-30 expression, which act contrary to each other. EGF signaling promotes miR-96 expression, which attends to the degradation of E26 transformation-specific variant 6 (ETV6, also known as TEL, a transcriptional repressor in regulating embryonic and hematopoietic cell proliferation) that blocks the expression of the TWIST1 oncogene [29,30,31,32]. Kao et al. reported that EGF signaling inhibits miR-30 expression, which directly reduces ETS-related gene (ERG) expressions [33]. In addition to EGF signaling, miR-30 can also be reduced by Src/STAT3, which is mediated by the VEGFR/NRP-1/c-Met/Mcl-1 cascade [33,34]. When tracing upstream of VEGF signaling in PCa metastasis, reprogramming of glucose metabolism was identified as a critical step for the EMT [35]. The core regulator of glucose metabolism, AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), triggers cell migration-inducing protein (CEMIP) overexpression through the AMPK/glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β)/β-catenin cascade for which CEMIP mediates VEGF and MMP-2 upregulation and subsequently results in anoikis resistance [36]. In addition to AMPK, VEGF expression can also be modulated by HIF-1α. The RTK signaling cascade promotes mTOR phosphorylation, which elevates HIF-1α expression [37]. Furthermore, HIF-1α triggers pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2) as a transcription factor that stimulates neuroendocrine markers, like oct4 and VEGF [38,39]. The EMT can be activated by PI3K/Akt- and MAPK-mediated mTOR activation, which promotes EMT and metastasis through the phosphorylation of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1 (EIF4EBP1) [40,41,42]. Bi et al. and Tang et al. demonstrated that miR-153 and miR-133a-3p are involved in PCa BM, in which miR-153 exacerbates the EMT through inhibiting phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), and miR-133a-3p acts inversely through reducing growth factor receptor expressions [41,43]. Those studies provided further insights into RTK signaling in the EMT, and not just in maintaining cell survival [44].

2.1.4. Other Minor EMT contributors

Other minor mediators that are discovered to be associated with PCa BM include KDM8, miR-145, and CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF). In the previous paragraph, we discussed the inhibitory characteristics of the AR in PCa metastasis. However, KDM8, an AR transcriptional enhancer, which can accompany with AR binding to the enhancer and promoter region of ATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 2 (ANCCA) and enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) gene, results in PCa metastasis, neuroendocrine differentiation, and growth promotion [45]. miR-145 is a tumor-suppressing microRNA in various cancers, including PCa, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, and breast cancer [46]. Reports from Guo et al., Ren et al., and Huang et al. showed that miR-145 is activated by p53 and it inhibits mesenchymal and cancer stem cell markers, like fibronectin, vimentin, cluster of differentiation 44 (CD44), and c-Myc via inhibiting two mediators: human enhancer of filamentation 1 (hEF1) and Krüppel-like factor 4 (KLF4) [47,48,49]. However, the AR and KLF4 form reciprocal feedback for promoting expression and that also results in the inhibition of PCa proliferation and metastasis [50]. KLF4 is a crucial regulator of normal cell proliferation and it can be a tumor suppressor or an oncogene, depending on the tissue, tumor type, or cancer stage [51,52,53]. miR-1 acts as a tumor suppressor that is involved in regulating BM, and miR-1 is tightly regulated by the AR [54]. Siu et al. demonstrated that KLF4 functions as a transcription factor to activate the AR-miR-1 signaling pathway to constrain the tumor-suppressive role of miR-1 [50]. CTCF, a downstream transcription activator of Smad and Myc signaling, contributes to slowing down metastasis in PCa through directly interacting with the miR-127-3p promoter, in which the downregulation of miR-127-3p accompanies proteasome subunit beta type-5 (PSMB5) elevation and subsequently leads to the activation of BM [55,56,57]. All of the above research draws a large picture of the regulatory mechanism of BM in PCa cells, and Figure 1 summarizes these signaling cascades. In the next section, we discuss how PCa cells interact with bone stromal cells and the function of PCa/osteocytes in BM.

2.2. PCa/Osteocyte Interactions

2.2.1. Surface Modulation of PCa during Circulation

Why do circulating PCa cells migrate to bone? This question can be answered by the interactions among osteocytes, bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs), and PCa cells. In the circulation, PCa cells need to against attack by immunocytes, especially natural killer (NK) cells [58]. Accordingly, tumor cells (not just PCa cells) express several surface markers or immunocyte regulatory factors to escape NK cells. With PCa cells, the stem cell marker, nanoG, was proven to help PCa cells to escape destruction by NK cells through downregulating intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (iCAMP1) [59]. Additionally, nanoG also triggers various cancer stem cell markers and chemokine receptors, such as C-X-C motif receptor 4 (CXCR4), CD133, aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (ALDH1), and insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding protein 1 (IGFBP1) [60]. Meanwhile, interferon (INF) regulatory factor 7 (IRF7, generally known as main regulator of interferon I response in innate immune response), is secreted by PCa cells, which can counteract NK cell activation through modulating IFN-β-mediated signaling [61,62].

2.2.2. Circulated PCa Interacts with Osteocytes

PCa cells are attracted to chemokines that are released from osteocytes and BMSCs and migrate toward the bone marrow [63]. In the meantime, PCa cells feedback protein signals to osteocytes that augments growth factors secretion from osteocytes and further trigger osteocyte differentiating into osteoblast (release growth factors and build a calcium-rich environment) or osteoclast (produce a niche for PCa homing) [64,65,66]. As PCa cells sense CCL5 and other chemokines, such as C-X-C motif chemokine 12 (CXCL12) produced by BMSCs and osteocytes, PCa cells stimulate osteocytes to secrete growth-derived factors 10 and 15 (GDF10 and GDF15) that can push PCa cells secreting early growth response 1 (EGR1) and parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP), two important factors for osteoclastogenesis [2,67,68]. Additionally, the transcription factor, Runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2, an essential factor in osteogenesis which is hyperactivated in PCa cells) is phosphorylated by the integrin avβ3/Smad5 cascade, CD44, and integrin avβ3/Src/rac1 signaling and activates CXCR7 and Akt, which upregulate NF-κB resulting in receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL) overexpression, which can induce osteoclastogenesis [69,70,71,72,73,74]. Different from osteoclastogenesis, the role of osteoblastogenesis is to help circulating PCa cells landing in the bone [75]. Therefore, interactions between circulating PCa cells and osteoblasts can cause cell adhesion molecule expressions [65]. These include kallikrein-related peptidase 4 (KLK4), which is the downstream signaling transducer of protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1) that can elevate MMP-1 expression leading to the release of thrombospondin 1 (TSP1, an osteoblast inducer) [76,77]. At the same time, osteoblasts secrete vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM1) and collagen, which help PCa cells adhering to osteoblasts with sonic hedgehog (Shh)/Gli/PTCH1 signaling activation, and those successfully landing directly increase alkaline phosphatase 2 (AKP2) expression and ultimately trigger bone rearrangement [78,79,80]. Those studies provided clear insights into PCa/osteocyte interactions and answered the question about the selective metastasis of PCa cells.

2.3. PCa Homing

As PCa cells land in bone marrow, a series of tissue changes occurs, including angiogenesis, the escape of PCa cells from dormancy, and niche formation [81]. In niche formation, BMSCs, osteoblasts, osteoclasts, hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), monocytes, and pericytes secrete growth factors, and calcium around PCa cells that help PCa cells remain dormant for self-renewal [65,82,83]. Growth factors that are enriched in the tumor microenvironment (TME) include TGF-β, Ca2+, hematopoietin, bone morphogenic proteins (BMPs), CXCL12, annexin A2 (ANXA2), and insulin-like growth factor (IGF) [2,82,84,85], among which TGF-β and BMPs play central roles in holding PCa cells in dormancy via the tyrosine-protein kinase receptor, UFO (Axl)/growth arrest specific 6 (Gas6) axis [86,87]. Localized PCa cells are reactivated when the growth suppressors (TGF-β and BMPs) are removed or growth conditions occur. The trigger for reactivation from dormancy is not exactly known; however, several hypotheses and phenomena were proposed. Giancotti provided a hypothesis in his review that presumes that the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) might be a possibility for reactivation from dormancy [88]. A review by Byrne et al. summarizes that castration causes bone loss and increased metastasis via hypoxia induction and vascular remodeling [89]. Furthermore, Miftakhova et al. reported that cyclin A1 coupled with aromatase (CYP19A1) enables PCa metastatic growth in bone marrow through manipulating androgen concentrations in the TME [90]. Barkan et al. found that dormant PCa cells are induced by a collagen-I-enriched condition, which implies the importance of integrin/extracellular matrix (ECM) interactions in reactivating dormant PCa cells [91]. Finally, Dai et al. reported that PCa cells excrete PKM2 toward BMSCs and adipocytes in bone marrow through exosomes to promote HIF-1α upregulation in BMSCs [92]. The upregulation of HIF-1α increases CXCL12 secretion and induces PCa cell proliferation and the Warburg effect [92]. These hypotheses and phenomena shed some light on understanding the detailed mechanisms of PCa BM.
In the above discussion, we collected and summarized recent knowledge of the mechanisms regulating PCa BM. In the following section, we discuss the impacts of the ras/MEK axis and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in PCa BM and their crosstalk.

3. Impact of Wnt and Ras Signaling in PCa BM

3.1. Ras Signaling

Ras signaling is known to be involved in the proliferation and metastasis of various cancers, including breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and lung cancer [93]. In breast cancer, Ras signaling mainly promotes metastasis through activating MEPK, STAT3, and PI3K, and then triggers the NF-κB-mediated EMT [94,95]. In PCa, Ras forms a huge signaling network for regulating BM for which the Ras/Raf/MEK/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)/Elk-1 signaling cascade is the central backbone [96]. Elk-1 is a transcription factor that directs gene expression of c-Myc and its co-transcription factor, Myc-associated zinc-finger (MAZ) [97,98]. MAZ upregulates Ras expression and then activates NF-κB through the RalGEF/Ral/NF-κB cascade and finally activates the EMT [97,99]. In addition, NF-κB is involved in the heterotrimer G-protein signaling network, which mediates cell adhesion signals through guanine nucleotide-binding protein subunit α-15 (GNA15), and Rho, which promotes CXCL5 expression [100,101]. Another important branch of the Ras-signaling network is the Ras/PI3K/Akt signaling cascade, which transduces signals from growth factor receptors and promotes PCa metastasis, as described in the previous section [102]. MAPK members, ERK1/2, are key downstream regulators of the Ras-signaling network [103]. In addition to Ras signaling, ERK1/2 also receive signals from sprout homolog 2 (SPRY2)/protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) and Ras-related protein 2B (Rap2B)/focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and activates Runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) or ETS/AP1 which are essential for PCa/osteocyte interactions [72,104,105,106,107]. Several activators were identified upstream of Ras. In addition to canonical signals from the EGF receptor (EGFR) through SHC/GRB2/SOS phosphorylation, other upstream activators contain ETV4 [108], Ras-related protein 25 (Rab25) through Src [109], RasGRP3, which naturally activates Ras via helping Ras-GDP release and that could be promoted by endothelin A receptor (ETAR) [110,111], E-selectin ligand 1 (ESL-1), which controls the rolling capacity of circulating PCa cells [112], miR-let-7c, which possibly promotes c-Myc [113,114,115], miR-407, which is secreted by cancer-associated fibroblasts that block Ras suppressor 1 (RSU-1) [116], Ras and a-factor-converting enzyme 1 (Rce1) by acting on prenylation that works on Ras anchoring [117,118], EZH2 by blocking disabled homolog 2-interacting protein (DAB2IP), a GTPase-activating protein that converts Ras-GTP to Ras-GDP, and stabilizes HIF-1α for the EMT [119,120,121], and the oxytocin receptor (OXTR) by coupling with the EGFR [122]. In contrast, to retard Ras signaling during PCa metastasis, only miR-145 [123] and phosphoprotein associated with glycosphingolipid-enriched microdomains 1 (PAG)/RasGAP [124] were identified. Summarizing those studies, we found a role of the Ras signaling network in PCa metastasis in activating NF-κB and MAPK members. In the next section, we continue discussing recent findings of Wnt signaling in BM of PCa.

3.2. Wnt/β-catenin

The Wnt signaling pathway is essential for prostate carcinogenesis, which is involved in the formation of the castration-resistant phenotype [3]. Recent studies further revealed that Wnt signaling also takes part in BM, especially in PCa/osteocyte interactions and the homing stage [3]. Wnt signaling can be categorized into canonical and non-canonical pathways, in which the canonical pathway passes signals through LDL receptor-related protein 6 (LRP6), Frizzled (FZD), β-catenin, and TCF/LEF transcription factors, while the non-canonical pathway uses phospholipase C (PKC), DAAM1, c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), and NFAT as messengers instead of β-catenin [125]. In PCa metastasis, canonical and non-canonical types of Wnt pathways have different roles. A series of studies on the regulatory role of dickkopfs-1 (DKK-1, a Wnt signaling inhibitor) in PCa metastasis reported that metastatic PCa cells secrete PTHrP toward osteocytes, which could decrease DKK-1 expression in PCa cells in a paracrine manner [126]. DKK-1 can block the intratumoral canonical Wnt/TCF signaling pathway through the Kremen receptor and decrease osteoblastogenesis [127,128]. Concurrently, DKK-1 further promotes tumor growth via non-canonical Wnt/JNK signaling [128]. Pontillo et al. reported that Wnt5a (a member of the Wnt family) promotes metastatic PCa cell dormancy via the non-canonical Wnt5a/ROR2/SIAH2 cascade [129]. Rabbani et al. extended the characterization of Wnt signaling to PCa metastasis, in which Wnt promotes PCa cells to undergo the EMT via an LRP5-mediated canonical pathway [130]. Those results indicate different characteristics of the canonical/non-canonical pathways of Wnt in PCa metastasis. Notably, the canonical and non-canonical pathways can cooperate for the same consequences by specific regulators. Vela et al. reported that the activation of Wnt5a promotes PCa metastasis through canonical and non-canonical activation of PITX2 [131].
In PCa/osteocyte interactions, Wnt signaling plays a role in transmitting signals between PCa cells and osteocytes. Noggin is a signaling protein that is involved in bone and neuron development [132]. PCa cells regulate the osteoclastogenesis/osteoblastogenesis balance by secreting noggin toward osteocytes, and this results in the Wnt inhibition of osteocytes [133]. Moreover, WNT1-inducible signaling pathway protein 1 (WISP1) is a downstream effector of Wnt signaling, which promotes osteoblastogenesis through upregulating osteocytic BMP2/4 and osteopontin expressions [80,134]. Sclerostin (SOST) is an osteocyte-derived glycoprotein that is known as a Wnt inhibitor and it is highly involved in osteoporosis [135]. In PCa metastasis, PCa cells inhibit SOST secretion and therefore promote Wnt signaling by osteoblasts. Increased osteoblastic Wnt signaling can activate long non-coding RNA MALAT1 expression in PCa cells through an unknown mechanism [136]. Beyond PCa/osteocyte interactions, Wnt signaling in metastasis can be modulated by p53, SETDB1, ERG, and TBX2. p53, a prominent tumor-suppressor gene that not only acts as a cell cycle keeper and apoptotic inducer in cell growth, but also reduces PCa metastasis through downregulating the expression of the Wnt receptor, FZD8 [137,138]. Transmembrane protease serine 2:v-ets erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog (TMPRSS2:ERG) gene fusion is common in PCa and it is critical for PCa development [139,140]. Chakravarthi et al. demonstrated that the role of TMPRSS2:ERG in PCa development is to elevate Wnt signaling through upregulating FZD4/8 expression [141]. T-box transcription factor 2 (TBX2) is associated with the EMT by modulating epithelial and mesenchymal cell marker expressions via elevating Wnt3a expression [142,143]. Histone-lysine N-methyltransferase (SETDB1) is known as an oncogene that adjusts gene expressions through histone methylation [144,145]. A proteomic study in different stages of PCa cell lines revealed a converse relationship between SETDB1 and Wnt signaling, which might be related to BM of PCa [146]. Those studies emphasized the importance of Wnt signaling in PCa BM, especially in PCa/osteocyte interactions. In the next section, we discuss recent findings about Ras/Wnt crosstalk in PCa metastasis.

4. How Ras/Wnt Crosstalk Affect PCa BM

In the above sections, we summarized recent information on the roles of Wnt and Ras signaling in PCa metastasis. This information elucidates that Wnt signaling and Ras signaling might be responsible for different cytological activities, whereas they could synergistically accelerate PCa tumor progression [147]. In fact, Ras and Wnt signaling act reciprocally in PCa/osteocyte interactions and the bone-homing stage, in which Ras signaling promotes osteoclast-specific factor expressions and Wnt signaling helps PCa cells to attach to osteoblasts [148]. Moreover, Browne and colleagues reported that Ras signaling upregulates DKK-1 expression, which inhibits Wnt3a expression and reduces osteoblastogenesis in the osteolytic phenotype of PCa tumors [149]. It is possible that Wnt signaling and Ras signaling cooperate for particular purposes. In research conducted by Chang et al., Wnt signaling helped circular PCa cells attach to osteoblasts via the secretion of WISP-1 in a paracrine manner. WISP-1 activates endothelin-1 (ET-1)/ET-1 receptor signaling, promotes MAPK signaling, and subsequently elevates α4β1 integrin expression, which is essential for PCa/osteoblast attachment [80].
In maintaining PCa stem cell homeostasis, mixed lineage kinase 3 (MLK-3), a MAPK member, promotes β-catenin’s interacts with KLF4 instead of TCF, and finally reduces EMT initiation [150,151,152]. When in circulation, PCa cells need to overcome nutrient limits, which might cause tumor necrosis. Therefore, PCa cells trigger macropinocytosis for nutrient scavenging and undergo metabolic reprogramming to overwhelm that scenario [36,153]. Macropinocytosis and metabolic reprogramming are Ras-dependent and they are mediated by AMPK activation and PTEN loss [153]. AMPK phosphorylates GSK3β at Ser9, which inactivates its activity and results in β-catenin retention [36]. Those reports reveal the diverse roles of Ras signaling and Wnt signaling in PCa metastasis.
Despite the diverse effects on PCa metastasis, Ras signaling and Wnt signaling are co-regulated by several upstream regulators. Rab25, a member of small GTPase that belongs to the Ras superfamily, is known as a direct activator of Ras signaling and Wnt signaling in various cancers, including hepatocellular carcinoma and non-small-cell lung cancer, but not yet in PCa [154,155]. In PCa, the Rab expression level was found to be positively interlocked with malignancy and recurrence after a radical prostatectomy [156]. It is expected that Rab also plays roles in upregulating Ras and Wnt signaling in PCa metastasis. Angiomotin (Amot) is a component of tight junctions that are important for maintaining apical/basal polarity in epithelial cells [157]. In various types of cancer, Amot promotes cell proliferation and alleviates metastasis through elevating MAPK expression and reducing β-catenin [157]. In PCa, Amot was proven to regulate cell growth via the Hippo/YAP signaling pathway, which is downstream of Wnt signaling [158]. Accordingly, Amot might contribute to co-regulating Ras and Wnt signaling in PCa cells. Chen et al. illustrated that miR-34a acts as a tumor suppressor in PCa through downregulating both TCF7 and BIRC5, which are Wnt and Ras signaling effectors, respectively [159], suggesting an interplay between WNT signaling and miR-34a expression in Ras-activated PCa. Other upstream regulators, like sphingosine kinase 1/2 (SK1/2) [160], the TMPRSS2:ERG fusion mutation [161], and ss5TMD4 [162], were demonstrated to modulate both Wnt and Ras signaling. In conclusion, these aforementioned studies emphasized the tight crosstalk between Ras and Wnt signaling in PCa metastasis and point to expected Ras/Wnt co-regulators that have been proven in other cancers. These mechanisms are critical for PCa metastasis, particularly in the osteoblastogenesis/osteoclastogenesis switch and EMT/proliferation switch.

5. Conclusions and Future Prospects

In this review, we elucidated the crosstalk between Wnt signaling and Ras signaling in BM of PCa cells, which is summarized in Figure 2. High interactions between Wnt and Ras signaling reveal the therapeutic possibility of PCa BM by modulating Wnt/Ras interactions. Overall, Ras signaling seems on the upstream of Wnt signaling and that guide PCa cell to local proliferation rather than EMT, instead of Wnt. However, during PCa homing, osteoblastogenesis that is triggered by Wnt-mediated signal protein release is essential for homing. Accordingly, it is merely impossible to identify which signaling molecules in Ras and Wnt are the overall key factors of PCa BM. Furthermore, compensation for Wnt and Ras signaling might be considered as one pathway for inhibition or reduction.
Moreover, the above studies all exhibited that the roles of Wnt and Ras signaling in PCa progression are not always concurrent. Sometimes they are antagonistic to each other. BM of PCa occurs through consecutive progression with different signaling modulators in which external growth factors are involved. What is the upstream modulator of Wnt and Ras in PCa progression? Recently, this question was partially answered. The dynamics of Wnt and Ras at each stage of PCa metastasis need to be clarified, and the details within each stage must be elucidated, in order to completely answer the question. Byne et al. have reviewed that castration-mediated osteoporosis might link to PCa BM which bone reformation might increase BM activity [89]. Detail mechanism regarding castration-mediated osteoporosis is not well-known but recent knowledge indicates that Wnt signaling is involved in osteoblast activity instead of osteoclast activity [163]. This information implies that castration might augment bone resorption and that upregulate Wnt signaling in osteocytes and further trigger BM. As more details of Wnt/Ras interactions become known, these developments can be used in order to develop additional preventive and therapeutic targets.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.-N.L.; investigation, S.-R.L. and N.M.; writing—original draft preparation, S.-R.L. and N.M.; writing—review and editing, Y.-N.L.; visualization, S.-R.L.; funding acquisition, Y.-N.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan [grant nos.: MOST107-2628-B-038-001 and MOST108-2628-B-038-001] and the National Health Research Institute of Taiwan [grant nos.: NHRI-EX108-10702BI and NHRI-EX109-10702BI] to Y.N.L.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Halabi, S.; Kelly, W.K.; Ma, H.; Zhou, H.; Solomon, N.C.; Fizazi, K.; Tangen, C.M.; Rosenthal, M.; Petrylak, D.P.; Hussain, M.; et al. Meta-Analysis Evaluating the Impact of Site of Metastasis on Overall Survival in Men With Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016, 34, 1652–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. D’Oronzo, S.; Coleman, R.; Brown, J.; Silvestris, F. Metastatic bone disease: Pathogenesis and therapeutic options: Up-date on bone metastasis management. J. Bone Oncol. 2019, 15, 004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Murillo-Garzon, V.; Kypta, R. WNT signalling in prostate cancer. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2017, 14, 683–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Goitre, L.; Trapani, E.; Trabalzini, L.; Retta, S.F. The Ras superfamily of small GTPases: The unlocked secrets. Methods Mol. Biol. 2014, 1120, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Jeong, W.J.; Ro, E.J.; Choi, K.Y. Interaction between Wnt/beta-catenin and RAS-ERK pathways and an anti-cancer strategy via degradations of beta-catenin and RAS by targeting the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway. NPJ Precis. Oncol. 2018, 2, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Lee, S.K.; Hwang, J.H.; Choi, K.Y. Interaction of the Wnt/beta-catenin and RAS-ERK pathways involving co-stabilization of both beta-catenin and RAS plays important roles in the colorectal tumorigenesis. Adv. Biol. Regul. 2018, 68, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Niiro, E.; Morioka, S.; Iwai, K.; Yamada, Y.; Ogawa, K.; Kawahara, N.; Kobayashi, H. Potential signaling pathways as therapeutic targets for overcoming chemoresistance in mucinous ovarian cancer. Biomed. Rep. 2018, 8, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Berish, R.B.; Ali, A.N.; Telmer, P.G.; Ronald, J.A.; Leong, H.S. Translational models of prostate cancer bone metastasis. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2018, 15, 403–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lo, U.G.; Lee, C.F.; Lee, M.S.; Hsieh, J.T. The Role and Mechanism of Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition in Prostate Cancer Progression. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Wa, Q.; Li, L.; Lin, H.; Peng, X.; Ren, D.; Huang, Y.; He, P.; Huang, S. Downregulation of miR19a3p promotes invasion, migration and bone metastasis via activating TGFbeta signaling in prostate cancer. Oncol. Rep. 2018, 39, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Lue, H.W.; Yang, X.; Wang, R.; Qian, W.; Xu, R.Z.; Lyles, R.; Osunkoya, A.O.; Zhou, B.P.; Vessella, R.L.; Zayzafoon, M.; et al. LIV-1 promotes prostate cancer epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and metastasis through HB-EGF shedding and EGFR-mediated ERK signaling. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e27720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhao, B.; Wang, H.; Zong, G.; Li, P. The role of IFITM3 in the growth and migration of human glioma cells. BMC Neurol. 2013, 13, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Liu, Y.; Lu, R.; Cui, W.; Pang, Y.; Liu, C.; Cui, L.; Qian, T.; Quan, L.; Dai, Y.; Jiao, Y.; et al. High IFITM3 expression predicts adverse prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Gene Ther. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Min, J.; Feng, Q.; Liao, W.; Liang, Y.; Gong, C.; Li, E.; He, W.; Yuan, R.; Wu, L. IFITM3 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma invasion and metastasis by regulating MMP9 through p38/MAPK signaling. FEBS Open Bio. 2018, 8, 1299–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Uhlen, M.; Zhang, C.; Lee, S.; Sjostedt, E.; Fagerberg, L.; Bidkhori, G.; Benfeitas, R.; Arif, M.; Liu, Z.; Edfors, F.; et al. A pathology atlas of the human cancer transcriptome. Science 2017, 357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Liu, X.; Chen, L.; Fan, Y.; Hong, Y.; Yang, X.; Li, Y.; Lu, J.; Lv, J.; Pan, X.; Qu, F.; et al. IFITM3 promotes bone metastasis of prostate cancer cells by mediating activation of the TGF-beta signaling pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Dai, Y.; Wu, Z.; Lang, C.; Zhang, X.; He, S.; Yang, Q.; Guo, W.; Lai, Y.; Du, H.; Peng, X.; et al. Copy number gain of ZEB1 mediates a double-negative feedback loop with miR-33a-5p that regulates EMT and bone metastasis of prostate cancer dependent on TGF-beta signaling. Theranostics 2019, 9, 6063–6079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tang, Y.; Wu, B.; Huang, S.; Peng, X.; Li, X.; Huang, X.; Zhou, W.; Xie, P.; He, P. Downregulation of miR5053p predicts poor bone metastasisfree survival in prostate cancer. Oncol. Rep. 2019, 41, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xia, Y.; Shen, S.; Verma, I.M. NF-kappaB, an active player in human cancers. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2014, 2, 823–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Wang, D.; Tindall, D.J. Androgen action during prostate carcinogenesis. Methods Mol. Biol. 2011, 776, 25–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. D’Ignazio, L.; Batie, M.; Rocha, S. Hypoxia and Inflammation in Cancer, Focus on HIF and NF-kappaB. Biomedicines 2017, 5, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Yin, J.; Liu, Y.N.; Tillman, H.; Barrett, B.; Hewitt, S.; Ylaya, K.; Fang, L.; Lake, R.; Corey, E.; Morrissey, C.; et al. AR-regulated TWEAK-FN14 pathway promotes prostate cancer bone metastasis. Cancer Res. 2014, 74, 4306–4317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Ren, D.; Yang, Q.; Dai, Y.; Guo, W.; Du, H.; Song, L.; Peng, X. Oncogenic miR-210-3p promotes prostate cancer cell EMT and bone metastasis via NF-kappaB signaling pathway. Mol. Cancer 2017, 16, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Alkhudair, N.A. Apalutamide: Emerging Therapy for Non-Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Saudi Pharm. J. 2019, 27, 368–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Sasaki, T.; Sugimura, Y. The Importance of Time to Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Nadir after Primary Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Hormone-Naive Prostate Cancer Patients. J. Clin. Med. 2018, 7, 565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Izumi, K.; Mizokami, A. Suppressive Role of Androgen/Androgen Receptor Signaling via Chemokines on Prostate Cancer Cells. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Miyamoto, Y.; Suyama, K.; Baba, H. Recent Advances in Targeting the EGFR Signaling Pathway for the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Shi, X.; Wang, J.; Lei, Y.; Cong, C.; Tan, D.; Zhou, X. Research progress on the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in gynecological cancer (Review). Mol. Med. Rep. 2019, 19, 4529–4535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Fararjeh, A.S.; Liu, Y.N. ZBTB46, SPDEF, and ETV6: Novel Potential Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Tsai, Y.C.; Chen, W.Y.; Siu, M.K.; Tsai, H.Y.; Yin, J.J.; Huang, J.; Liu, Y.N. Epidermal growth factor receptor signaling promotes metastatic prostate cancer through microRNA-96-mediated downregulation of the tumor suppressor ETV6. Cancer Lett. 2017, 384, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gaudet, P.; Livstone, M.S.; Lewis, S.E.; Thomas, P.D. Phylogenetic-based propagation of functional annotations within the Gene Ontology consortium. Brief. Bioinform. 2011, 12, 449–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Zhang, M.Y.; Churpek, J.E.; Keel, S.B.; Walsh, T.; Lee, M.K.; Loeb, K.R.; Gulsuner, S.; Pritchard, C.C.; Sanchez-Bonilla, M.; Delrow, J.J.; et al. Germline ETV6 mutations in familial thrombocytopenia and hematologic malignancy. Nat. Genet. 2015, 47, 180–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Kao, C.J.; Martiniez, A.; Shi, X.B.; Yang, J.; Evans, C.P.; Dobi, A.; deVere White, R.W.; Kung, H.J. miR-30 as a tumor suppressor connects EGF/Src signal to ERG and EMT. Oncogene 2014, 33, 2495–2503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Zhang, S.; Zhau, H.E.; Osunkoya, A.O.; Iqbal, S.; Yang, X.; Fan, S.; Chen, Z.; Wang, R.; Marshall, F.F.; Chung, L.W.; et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor regulates myeloid cell leukemia-1 expression through neuropilin-1-dependent activation of c-MET signaling in human prostate cancer cells. Mol. Cancer 2010, 9, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Cutruzzola, F.; Giardina, G.; Marani, M.; Macone, A.; Paiardini, A.; Rinaldo, S.; Paone, A. Glucose Metabolism in the Progression of Prostate Cancer. Front. Physiol. 2017, 8, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Zhang, P.; Song, Y.; Sun, Y.; Li, X.; Chen, L.; Yang, L.; Xing, Y. AMPK/GSK3beta/beta-catenin cascade-triggered overexpression of CEMIP promotes migration and invasion in anoikis-resistant prostate cancer cells by enhancing metabolic reprogramming. FASEB J. 2018, 32, 3924–3935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Fan, C.; Tang, Y.; Wang, J.; Xiong, F.; Guo, C.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Gong, Z.; Wei, F.; Yang, L.; et al. Role of long non-coding RNAs in glucose metabolism in cancer. Mol. Cancer 2017, 16, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Semenza, G.L. HIF-1 mediates metabolic responses to intratumoral hypoxia and oncogenic mutations. J. Clin. Investig. 2013, 123, 3664–3671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Hasan, D.; Gamen, E.; Abu Tarboush, N.; Ismail, Y.; Pak, O.; Azab, B. PKM2 and HIF-1alpha regulation in prostate cancer cell lines. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0203745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Siu, M.K.; Tsai, Y.C.; Chang, Y.S.; Yin, J.J.; Suau, F.; Chen, W.Y.; Liu, Y.N. Transforming growth factor-beta promotes prostate bone metastasis through induction of microRNA-96 and activation of the mTOR pathway. Oncogene 2015, 34, 4767–4776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Bi, C.W.; Zhang, G.Y.; Bai, Y.; Zhao, B.; Yang, H. Increased expression of miR-153 predicts poor prognosis for patients with prostate cancer. Medicine 2019, 98, e16705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Chang, L.; Graham, P.H.; Hao, J.; Bucci, J.; Cozzi, P.J.; Kearsley, J.H.; Li, Y. Emerging roles of radioresistance in prostate cancer metastasis and radiation therapy. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2014, 33, 469–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Tang, Y.; Pan, J.; Huang, S.; Peng, X.; Zou, X.; Luo, Y.; Ren, D.; Zhang, X.; Li, R.; He, P.; et al. Downregulation of miR-133a-3p promotes prostate cancer bone metastasis via activating PI3K/AKT signaling. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 37, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Regad, T. Targeting RTK Signaling Pathways in Cancer. Cancers 2015, 7, 1758–1784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, H.J.; Pochampalli, M.; Wang, L.Y.; Zou, J.X.; Li, P.S.; Hsu, S.C.; Wang, B.J.; Huang, S.H.; Yang, P.; Yang, J.C.; et al. KDM8/JMJD5 as a dual coactivator of AR and PKM2 integrates AR/EZH2 network and tumor metabolism in CRPC. Oncogene 2019, 38, 17–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Passos, G.A.; Pashaei, E.; Guzel, E.; Ozgurses, M.E.; Demirel, G.; Aydin, N.; Ozen, M. A Meta-Analysis: Identification of Common Mir-145 Target Genes that have Similar Behavior in Different GEO Datasets. PLoS ONE 2016, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ren, D.; Wang, M.; Guo, W.; Zhao, X.; Tu, X.; Huang, S.; Zou, X.; Peng, X. Wild-type p53 suppresses the epithelial-mesenchymal transition and stemness in PC-3 prostate cancer cells by modulating miR145. Int. J. Oncol. 2013, 42, 1473–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Huang, S.; Guo, W.; Tang, Y.; Ren, D.; Zou, X.; Peng, X. miR-143 and miR-145 inhibit stem cell characteristics of PC-3 prostate cancer cells. Oncol. Rep. 2012, 28, 1831–1837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Guo, W.; Ren, D.; Chen, X.; Tu, X.; Huang, S.; Wang, M.; Song, L.; Zou, X.; Peng, X. HEF1 promotes epithelial mesenchymal transition and bone invasion in prostate cancer under the regulation of microRNA-145. J. Cell. Biochem. 2013, 114, 1606–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Siu, M.K.; Suau, F.; Chen, W.Y.; Tsai, Y.C.; Tsai, H.Y.; Yeh, H.L.; Liu, Y.N. KLF4 functions as an activator of the androgen receptor through reciprocal feedback. Oncogenesis 2016, 5, e282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Liu, Y.N.; Abou-Kheir, W.; Yin, J.J.; Fang, L.; Hynes, P.; Casey, O.; Hu, D.; Wan, Y.; Seng, V.; Sheppard-Tillman, H.; et al. Critical and reciprocal regulation of KLF4 and SLUG in transforming growth factor beta-initiated prostate cancer epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Mol. Cell Biol. 2012, 32, 941–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Wei, D.; Gong, W.; Kanai, M.; Schlunk, C.; Wang, L.; Yao, J.C.; Wu, T.T.; Huang, S.; Xie, K. Drastic down-regulation of Kruppel-like factor 4 expression is critical in human gastric cancer development and progression. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 2746–2754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Dang, D.T.; Chen, X.; Feng, J.; Torbenson, M.; Dang, L.H.; Yang, V.W. Overexpression of Kruppel-like factor 4 in the human colon cancer cell line RKO leads to reduced tumorigenecity. Oncogene 2003, 22, 3424–3430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Liu, Y.N.; Yin, J.; Barrett, B.; Sheppard-Tillman, H.; Li, D.; Casey, O.M.; Fang, L.; Hynes, P.G.; Ameri, A.H.; Kelly, K. Loss of Androgen-Regulated MicroRNA 1 Activates SRC and Promotes Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis. Mol. Cell Biol. 2015, 35, 1940–1951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Fan, J.; Du, W.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Y.; Li, K.; Meng, Y.; Wang, J. Transcriptional downregulation of miR-127-3p by CTCF promotes prostate cancer bone metastasis by targeting PSMB5. FEBS Lett. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Zhang, S.; Li, B.; Tang, W.; Ni, L.; Ma, H.; Lu, M.; Meng, Q. Effects of connective tissue growth factor on prostate cancer bone metastasis and osteoblast differentiation. Oncol. Lett. 2018, 16, 2305–2311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Klenova, E.M.; Morse, H.C., 3rd; Ohlsson, R.; Lobanenkov, V.V. The novel BORIS + CTCF gene family is uniquely involved in the epigenetics of normal biology and cancer. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2002, 12, 399–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lorenzo-Herrero, S.; Lopez-Soto, A.; Sordo-Bahamonde, C.; Gonzalez-Rodriguez, A.P.; Vitale, M.; Gonzalez, S. NK Cell-Based Immunotherapy in Cancer Metastasis. Cancers 2018, 11, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Saga, K.; Park, J.; Nimura, K.; Kawamura, N.; Ishibashi, A.; Nonomura, N.; Kaneda, Y. NANOG helps cancer cells escape NK cell attack by downregulating ICAM1 during tumorigenesis. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 38, 416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Jeter, C.R.; Liu, B.; Liu, X.; Chen, X.; Liu, C.; Calhoun-Davis, T.; Repass, J.; Zaehres, H.; Shen, J.J.; Tang, D.G. NANOG promotes cancer stem cell characteristics and prostate cancer resistance to androgen deprivation. Oncogene 2011, 30, 3833–3845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Zhao, Y.; Chen, W.; Zhu, W.; Meng, H.; Chen, J.; Zhang, J. Overexpression of Interferon Regulatory Factor 7 (IRF7) Reduces Bone Metastasis of Prostate Cancer Cells in Mice. Oncol. Res. 2017, 25, 511–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhao, G.N.; Jiang, D.S.; Li, H. Interferon regulatory factors: At the crossroads of immunity, metabolism, and disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2015, 1852, 365–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Silvestris, F.; D’Oronzo, S.; Lovero, D.; Palmirotta, R.; Dammacco, F. Bone Metastases from Solid Tumors. In Oncogenomics; Dammacco, F., Silvestris, F., Eds.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2019; pp. 141–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Li, F.X.; Liu, J.J.; Xu, F.; Lin, X.; Zhong, J.Y.; Wu, F.; Yuan, L.Q. Role of tumor-derived exosomes in bone metastasis. Oncol. Lett. 2019, 18, 3935–3945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Esposito, M.; Guise, T.; Kang, Y. The Biology of Bone Metastasis. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2018, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Wong, S.K.; Mohamad, N.V.; Giaze, T.R.; Chin, K.Y.; Mohamed, N.; Ima-Nirwana, S. Prostate Cancer and Bone Metastases: The Underlying Mechanisms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Urata, S.; Izumi, K.; Hiratsuka, K.; Maolake, A.; Natsagdorj, A.; Shigehara, K.; Iwamoto, H.; Kadomoto, S.; Makino, T.; Naito, R.; et al. C-C motif ligand 5 promotes migration of prostate cancer cells in the prostate cancer bone metastasis microenvironment. Cancer Sci. 2018, 109, 724–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Wang, W.; Yang, X.; Dai, J.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Keller, E.T. Prostate cancer promotes a vicious cycle of bone metastasis progression through inducing osteocytes to secrete GDF15 that stimulates prostate cancer growth and invasion. Oncogene 2019, 38, 4540–4559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bai, Y.; Yang, Y.; Yan, Y.; Zhong, J.; Blee, A.M.; Pan, Y.; Ma, T.; Karnes, R.J.; Jimenez, R.; Xu, W.; et al. RUNX2 overexpression and PTEN haploinsufficiency cooperate to promote CXCR7 expression and cellular trafficking, AKT hyperactivation and prostate tumorigenesis. Theranostics 2019, 9, 3459–3475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Xu, S.; Zhou, W.; Ge, J.; Zhang, Z. Prostaglandin E2 receptor EP4 is involved in the cell growth and invasion of prostate cancer via the cAMPPKA/PI3KAkt signaling pathway. Mol. Med. Rep. 2018, 17, 4702–4712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Akech, J.; Wixted, J.J.; Bedard, K.; van der Deen, M.; Hussain, S.; Guise, T.A.; van Wijnen, A.J.; Stein, J.L.; Languino, L.R.; Altieri, D.C.; et al. Runx2 association with progression of prostate cancer in patients: Mechanisms mediating bone osteolysis and osteoblastic metastatic lesions. Oncogene 2010, 29, 811–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Ge, C.; Zhao, G.; Li, Y.; Li, H.; Zhao, X.; Pannone, G.; Bufo, P.; Santoro, A.; Sanguedolce, F.; Tortorella, S.; et al. Role of Runx2 phosphorylation in prostate cancer and association with metastatic disease. Oncogene 2016, 35, 366–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Gupta, A.; Cao, W.; Chellaiah, M.A. Integrin alphavbeta3 and CD44 pathways in metastatic prostate cancer cells support osteoclastogenesis via a Runx2/Smad 5/receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand signaling axis. Mol. Cancer 2012, 11, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Helo, S.; Manger, J.P.; Krupski, T.L. Role of denosumab in prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2012, 15, 231–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Wang, N.; Docherty, F.E.; Brown, H.K.; Reeves, K.J.; Fowles, A.C.; Ottewell, P.D.; Dear, T.N.; Holen, I.; Croucher, P.I.; Eaton, C.L. Prostate cancer cells preferentially home to osteoblast-rich areas in the early stages of bone metastasis: Evidence from in vivo models. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2014, 29, 2688–2696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Fuhrman-Luck, R.A.; Stansfield, S.H.; Stephens, C.R.; Loessner, D.; Clements, J.A. Prostate Cancer-Associated Kallikrein-Related Peptidase 4 Activates Matrix Metalloproteinase-1 and Thrombospondin-1. J. Proteome Res. 2016, 15, 2466–2478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Liu, X.; Yu, J.; Song, S.; Yue, X.; Li, Q. Protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1): A promising molecular target for cancer. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 107334–107345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Zunich, S.M.; Valdovinos, M.; Douglas, T.; Walterhouse, D.; Iannaccone, P.; Lamm, M.L. Osteoblast-secreted collagen upregulates paracrine Sonic hedgehog signaling by prostate cancer cells and enhances osteoblast differentiation. Mol. Cancer 2012, 11, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Kimura, Y.; Matsugaki, A.; Sekita, A.; Nakano, T. Alteration of osteoblast arrangement via direct attack by cancer cells: New insights into bone metastasis. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 44824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Chang, A.C.; Chen, P.C.; Lin, Y.F.; Su, C.M.; Liu, J.F.; Lin, T.H.; Chuang, S.M.; Tang, C.H. Osteoblast-secreted WISP-1 promotes adherence of prostate cancer cells to bone via the VCAM-1/integrin alpha4beta1 system. Cancer Lett. 2018, 426, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Hensel, J.; Thalmann, G.N. Biology of Bone Metastases in Prostate Cancer. Urology 2016, 92, 6–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Decker, A.M.; Jung, Y.; Cackowski, F.; Taichman, R.S. The role of hematopoietic stem cell niche in prostate cancer bone metastasis. J. Bone Oncol. 2016, 5, 117–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Funari, A.; Alimandi, M.; Pierelli, L.; Pino, V.; Gentileschi, S.; Sacchetti, B. Human Sinusoidal Subendothelial Cells Regulate Homing and Invasion of Circulating Metastatic Prostate Cancer Cells to Bone Marrow. Cancers 2019, 11, 763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Rieunier, G.; Wu, X.; Macaulay, V.M.; Lee, A.V.; Weyer-Czernilofsky, U.; Bogenrieder, T. Bad to the Bone: The Role of the Insulin-Like Growth Factor Axis in Osseous Metastasis. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 25, 3479–3485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Buijs, J.T.; Henriquez, N.V.; van Overveld, P.G.; van der Horst, G.; ten Dijke, P.; van der Pluijm, G. TGF-beta and BMP7 interactions in tumour progression and bone metastasis. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 2007, 24, 609–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Yumoto, K.; Eber, M.R.; Wang, J.; Cackowski, F.C.; Decker, A.M.; Lee, E.; Nobre, A.R.; Aguirre-Ghiso, J.A.; Jung, Y.; Taichman, R.S. Axl is required for TGF-beta2-induced dormancy of prostate cancer cells in the bone marrow. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 36520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Prunier, C.; Baker, D.; Ten Dijke, P.; Ritsma, L. TGF-beta Family Signaling Pathways in Cellular Dormancy. Trends Cancer 2019, 5, 66–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Giancotti, F.G. Mechanisms governing metastatic dormancy and reactivation. Cell 2013, 155, 750–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Byrne, N.M.; Summers, M.A.; McDonald, M.M. Tumor Cell Dormancy and Reactivation in Bone: Skeletal Biology and Therapeutic Opportunities. JBMR Plus 2019, 3, e10125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Miftakhova, R.; Hedblom, A.; Semenas, J.; Robinson, B.; Simoulis, A.; Malm, J.; Rizvanov, A.; Heery, D.M.; Mongan, N.P.; Maitland, N.J.; et al. Cyclin A1 and P450 Aromatase Promote Metastatic Homing and Growth of Stem-like Prostate Cancer Cells in the Bone Marrow. Cancer Res. 2016, 76, 2453–2464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Barkan, D.; El Touny, L.H.; Michalowski, A.M.; Smith, J.A.; Chu, I.; Davis, A.S.; Webster, J.D.; Hoover, S.; Simpson, R.M.; Gauldie, J.; et al. Metastatic growth from dormant cells induced by a col-I-enriched fibrotic environment. Cancer Res. 2010, 70, 5706–5716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Dai, J.; Escara-Wilke, J.; Keller, J.M.; Jung, Y.; Taichman, R.S.; Pienta, K.J.; Keller, E.T. Primary prostate cancer educates bone stroma through exosomal pyruvate kinase M2 to promote bone metastasis. J. Exp. Med. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Gentry, L.R.; Martin, T.D.; Reiner, D.J.; Der, C.J. Ral small GTPase signaling and oncogenesis: More than just 15minutes of fame. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1843, 2976–2988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Sears, R.; Gray, J.W. Epigenomic Inactivation of RasGAPs Activates RAS Signaling in a Subset of Luminal B Breast Cancers. Cancer Discov. 2017, 7, 131–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Wright, K.L.; Adams, J.R.; Liu, J.C.; Loch, A.J.; Wong, R.G.; Jo, C.E.B.; Beck, L.A.; Santhanam, D.R.; Weiss, L.; Mei, X.; et al. Ras Signaling Is a Key Determinant for Metastatic Dissemination and Poor Survival of Luminal Breast Cancer Patients. Cancer Res. 2015, 75, 4960–4972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. McCubrey, J.A.; Steelman, L.S.; Chappell, W.H.; Abrams, S.L.; Wong, E.W.; Chang, F.; Lehmann, B.; Terrian, D.M.; Milella, M.; Tafuri, A.; et al. Roles of the Raf/MEK/ERK pathway in cell growth, malignant transformation and drug resistance. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2007, 1773, 1263–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Yang, Q.; Lang, C.; Wu, Z.; Dai, Y.; He, S.; Guo, W.; Huang, S.; Du, H.; Ren, D.; Peng, X. MAZ promotes prostate cancer bone metastasis through transcriptionally activating the KRas-dependent RalGEFs pathway. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 38, 391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Patki, M.; Chari, V.; Sivakumaran, S.; Gonit, M.; Trumbly, R.; Ratnam, M. The ETS domain transcription factor ELK1 directs a critical component of growth signaling by the androgen receptor in prostate cancer cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 11047–11065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Moghadam, A.R.; Patrad, E.; Tafsiri, E.; Peng, W.; Fangman, B.; Pluard, T.J.; Accurso, A.; Salacz, M.; Shah, K.; Ricke, B.; et al. Ral signaling pathway in health and cancer. Cancer Med. 2017, 6, 2998–3013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Lim, W.K.; Chai, X.; Ghosh, S.; Ray, D.; Wang, M.; Rasheed, S.A.K.; Casey, P.J. Galpha-13 induces CXC motif chemokine ligand 5 expression in prostate cancer cells by transactivating NF-kappaB. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 18192–18206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Tong, L.; Tergaonkar, V. Rho protein GTPases and their interactions with NFkappaB: Crossroads of inflammation and matrix biology. Biosci. Rep. 2014, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Castellano, E.; Downward, J. RAS Interaction with PI3K: More Than Just Another Effector Pathway. Genes Cancer 2011, 2, 261–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Rodriguez-Berriguete, G.; Fraile, B.; Martinez-Onsurbe, P.; Olmedilla, G.; Paniagua, R.; Royuela, M. MAP Kinases and Prostate Cancer. J. Signal. Transduct. 2012, 2012, 169170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Kedage, V.; Selvaraj, N.; Nicholas, T.R.; Budka, J.A.; Plotnik, J.P.; Jerde, T.J.; Hollenhorst, P.C. An Interaction with Ewing’s Sarcoma Breakpoint Protein EWS Defines a Specific Oncogenic Mechanism of ETS Factors Rearranged in Prostate Cancer. Cell Rep. 2016, 17, 1289–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Di, J.; Cao, H.; Tang, J.; Lu, Z.; Gao, K.; Zhu, Z.; Zheng, J. Rap2B promotes cell proliferation, migration and invasion in prostate cancer. Med. Oncol. 2016, 33, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Mu, Y.; Li, L.; Hu, S.Q. Molecular inhibitory mechanism of tricin on tyrosinase. Spectrochim. Acta. A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2013, 107, 235–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Hollenhorst, P.C. RAS/ERK pathway transcriptional regulation through ETS/AP-1 binding sites. Small GTPases 2012, 3, 154–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Aytes, A.; Mitrofanova, A.; Kinkade, C.W.; Lefebvre, C.; Lei, M.; Phelan, V.; LeKaye, H.C.; Koutcher, J.A.; Cardiff, R.D.; Califano, A.; et al. ETV4 promotes metastasis in response to activation of PI3-kinase and Ras signaling in a mouse model of advanced prostate cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, E3506–3515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Kuwano, A.; Niwa, H.; Arai, K. New methods for isolation of keratolytic bacteria inducing intractable hoof wall cavity (Gidoh) in a horse; double screening procedures of the horn powder agar-translucency test and horn zymography. J. Equine Sci. 2017, 28, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Zeng, X.; Hu, Z.; Wang, Z.; Tao, J.; Lu, T.; Yang, C.; Lee, B.; Ye, Z. Upregulation of RASGRP3 expression in prostate cancer correlates with aggressive capabilities and predicts biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2014, 17, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Wozney, J.L.; Antonarakis, E.S. Growth factor and signaling pathways and their relevance to prostate cancer therapeutics. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2014, 33, 581–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Mahadevan, D.; Lines, S.; Hepple, S.; Winson, I.; Harries, W. Extended plantar limb (modified) chevron osteotomy versus scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus correction: A randomised controlled trial. Foot Ankle Surg. 2016, 22, 109–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Reis, S.T.; Timoszczuk, L.S.; Pontes-Junior, J.; Viana, N.; Silva, I.A.; Dip, N.; Srougi, M.; Leite, K.R. The role of micro RNAs let7c, 100 and 218 expression and their target RAS, C-MYC, BUB1, RB, SMARCA5, LAMB3 and Ki-67 in prostate cancer. Clinics 2013, 68, 652–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Nadiminty, N.; Tummala, R.; Lou, W.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Chen, X.; eVere White, R.W.; Kung, H.J.; Evans, C.P.; Gao, A.C. MicroRNA let-7c suppresses androgen receptor expression and activity via regulation of Myc expression in prostate cancer cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 1527–1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Leite, K.R.; Sousa-Canavez, J.M.; Reis, S.T.; Tomiyama, A.H.; Camara-Lopes, L.H.; Sanudo, A.; Antunes, A.A.; Srougi, M. Change in expression of miR-let7c, miR-100, and miR-218 from high grade localized prostate cancer to metastasis. Urol. Oncol. 2011, 29, 265–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Josson, S.; Gururajan, M.; Sung, S.Y.; Hu, P.; Shao, C.; Zhau, H.E.; Liu, C.; Lichterman, J.; Duan, P.; Li, Q.; et al. Stromal fibroblast-derived miR-409 promotes epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and prostate tumorigenesis. Oncogene 2015, 34, 2690–2699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Labbé, D.P.; Hardy, S.; Tremblay, M.L. Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases in Cancer. In Protein Phosphorylation in Health and Disease; Shenolikar, S., Ed.; Academic Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 253–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Huang, L.; Li, M.; Wang, D.; He, J.; Wu, W.; Zeng, Q.; Li, J.; Xiao, M.; Hu, J.; He, Y.; et al. Overexpressed Rce1 is positively correlated with tumor progression and predicts poor prognosis in prostate cancer. Hum. Pathol. 2016, 47, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Wang, B.; Huang, J.; Zhou, J.; Hui, K.; Xu, S.; Fan, J.; Li, L.; Wang, X.; Hsieh, J.T.; He, D.; et al. DAB2IP regulates EMT and metastasis of prostate cancer through targeting PROX1 transcription and destabilizing HIF1alpha protein. Cell. Signal. 2016, 28, 1623–1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Min, J.; Zaslavsky, A.; Fedele, G.; McLaughlin, S.K.; Reczek, E.E.; De Raedt, T.; Guney, I.; Strochlic, D.E.; Macconaill, L.E.; Beroukhim, R.; et al. An oncogene-tumor suppressor cascade drives metastatic prostate cancer by coordinately activating Ras and nuclear factor-kappaB. Nat. Med. 2010, 16, 286–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Kaur, B.; Khwaja, F.W.; Severson, E.A.; Matheny, S.L.; Brat, D.J.; Van Meir, E.G. Hypoxia and the hypoxia-inducible-factor pathway in glioma growth and angiogenesis. Neuro Oncol. 2005, 7, 134–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Zhong, M.; Boseman, M.L.; Millena, A.C.; Khan, S.A. Oxytocin induces the migration of prostate cancer cells: Involvement of the Gi-coupled signaling pathway. Mol. Cancer Res. 2010, 8, 1164–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Iscaife, A.; Reis, S.T.; Morais, D.R.; Viana, N.I.; da Silva, I.A.; Pimenta, R.; Bordini, A.; Dip, N.; Srougi, M.; Leite, K.R.M. Treating metastatic prostate cancer with microRNA-145. Apoptosis 2018, 23, 388–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Yu, W.; Wang, Y.; Gong, M.; Pei, F.; Zheng, J. Phosphoprotein associated with glycosphingolipid microdomains 1 inhibits the proliferation and invasion of human prostate cancer cells in vitro through suppression of Ras activation. Oncol. Rep. 2012, 28, 606–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Zhan, T.; Rindtorff, N.; Boutros, M. Wnt signaling in cancer. Oncogene 2017, 36, 1461–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Zhang, H.; Yu, C.; Dai, J.; Keller, J.M.; Hua, A.; Sottnik, J.L.; Shelley, G.; Hall, C.L.; Park, S.I.; Yao, Z.; et al. Parathyroid hormone-related protein inhibits DKK1 expression through c-Jun-mediated inhibition of beta-catenin activation of the DKK1 promoter in prostate cancer. Oncogene 2014, 33, 2464–2477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Clines, K.L.; Clines, G.A. DKK1 and Kremen Expression Predicts the Osteoblastic Response to Bone Metastasis. Transl. Oncol. 2018, 11, 873–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Thudi, N.K.; Martin, C.K.; Murahari, S.; Shu, S.T.; Lanigan, L.G.; Werbeck, J.L.; Keller, E.T.; McCauley, L.K.; Pinzone, J.J.; Rosol, T.J. Dickkopf-1 (DKK-1) stimulated prostate cancer growth and metastasis and inhibited bone formation in osteoblastic bone metastases. Prostate 2011, 71, 615–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Ordenes-Cavieres, G.; Pimentel, E.; Schmidt, J. Aqueous shunt versus trabeculectomy for treatment of glaucoma. Medwave 2018, 18, e7390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Rabbani, S.A.; Arakelian, A.; Farookhi, R. LRP5 knockdown: Effect on prostate cancer invasion growth and skeletal metastasis in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Med. 2013, 2, 625–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Vela, I.; Morrissey, C.; Zhang, X.; Chen, S.; Corey, E.; Strutton, G.M.; Nelson, C.C.; Nicol, D.L.; Clements, J.A.; Gardiner, E.M. PITX2 and non-canonical Wnt pathway interaction in metastatic prostate cancer. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 2014, 31, 199–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  132. Kang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Jin, P. Active DNA Demethylation in Neurodevelopment. In DNA Modifications in the Brain; Bredy, T., Ed.; Academic Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 43–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Secondini, C.; Wetterwald, A.; Schwaninger, R.; Thalmann, G.N.; Cecchini, M.G. The role of the BMP signaling antagonist noggin in the development of prostate cancer osteolytic bone metastasis. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e16078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  134. Nivison, M.P.; Meier, K.E. The role of CCN4/WISP-1 in the cancerous phenotype. Cancer Manag. Res. 2018, 10, 2893–2903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  135. McClung, M.R. Sclerostin antibodies in osteoporosis: Latest evidence and therapeutic potential. Ther. Adv. Musculoskelet. Dis. 2017, 9, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  136. Sebastian, A.; Hum, N.R.; Hudson, B.D.; Loots, G.G. Cancer-Osteoblast Interaction Reduces Sost Expression in Osteoblasts and Up-Regulates lncRNA MALAT1 in Prostate Cancer. Microarrays (Basel) 2015, 4, 503–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  137. Li, Q.; Ye, L.; Zhang, X.; Wang, M.; Lin, C.; Huang, S.; Guo, W.; Lai, Y.; Du, H.; Li, J.; et al. FZD8, a target of p53, promotes bone metastasis in prostate cancer by activating canonical Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Cancer Lett. 2017, 402, 166–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Chen, J. The Cell-Cycle Arrest and Apoptotic Functions of p53 in Tumor Initiation and Progression. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2016, 6, a026104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Zhou, F.; Gao, S.; Han, D.; Han, W.; Chen, S.; Patalano, S.; Macoska, J.A.; He, H.H.; Cai, C. TMPRSS2-ERG activates NO-cGMP signaling in prostate cancer cells. Oncogene 2019, 38, 4397–4411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Tomlins, S.A.; Laxman, B.; Varambally, S.; Cao, X.; Yu, J.; Helgeson, B.E.; Cao, Q.; Prensner, J.R.; Rubin, M.A.; Shah, R.B.; et al. Role of the TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion in prostate cancer. Neoplasia 2008, 10, 177–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Chakravarthi, B.; Chandrashekar, D.S.; Hodigere Balasubramanya, S.A.; Robinson, A.D.; Carskadon, S.; Rao, U.; Gordetsky, J.; Manne, U.; Netto, G.J.; Sudarshan, S.; et al. Wnt receptor Frizzled 8 is a target of ERG in prostate cancer. Prostate 2018, 78, 1311–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Du, W.L.; Fang, Q.; Chen, Y.; Teng, J.W.; Xiao, Y.S.; Xie, P.; Jin, B.; Wang, J.Q. Effect of silencing the TBox transcription factor TBX2 in prostate cancer PC3 and LNCaP cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 2017, 16, 6050–6058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  143. Nandana, S.; Tripathi, M.; Duan, P.; Chu, C.Y.; Mishra, R.; Liu, C.; Jin, R.; Yamashita, H.; Zayzafoon, M.; Bhowmick, N.A.; et al. Bone Metastasis of Prostate Cancer Can Be Therapeutically Targeted at the TBX2-WNT Signaling Axis. Cancer Res. 2017, 77, 1331–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  144. Karanth, A.V.; Maniswami, R.R.; Prashanth, S.; Govindaraj, H.; Padmavathy, R.; Jegatheesan, S.K.; Mullangi, R.; Rajagopal, S. Emerging role of SETDB1 as a therapeutic target. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2017, 21, 319–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Rodriguez-Paredes, M.; Martinez de Paz, A.; Simo-Riudalbas, L.; Sayols, S.; Moutinho, C.; Moran, S.; Villanueva, A.; Vazquez-Cedeira, M.; Lazo, P.A.; Carneiro, F.; et al. Gene amplification of the histone methyltransferase SETDB1 contributes to human lung tumorigenesis. Oncogene 2014, 33, 2807–2813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Li, Q.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Cui, Z.; Gong, L.; Qu, Z.; Zhong, Y.; Zhou, J.; Zhou, Y.; Gao, Y.; et al. Quantitative proteomic study of human prostate cancer cells with different metastatic potentials. Int. J. Oncol. 2016, 48, 1437–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  147. Pearson, H.B.; Phesse, T.J.; Clarke, A.R. K-ras and Wnt signaling synergize to accelerate prostate tumorigenesis in the mouse. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Li, L.; Ameri, A.H.; Wang, S.; Jansson, K.H.; Casey, O.M.; Yang, Q.; Beshiri, M.L.; Fang, L.; Lake, R.G.; Agarwal, S.; et al. EGR1 regulates angiogenic and osteoclastogenic factors in prostate cancer and promotes metastasis. Oncogene 2019, 38, 6241–6255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Browne, A.J.; Gobel, A.; Thiele, S.; Hofbauer, L.C.; Rauner, M.; Rachner, T.D. p38 MAPK regulates the Wnt inhibitor Dickkopf-1 in osteotropic prostate cancer cells. Cell Death Dis. 2016, 7, e2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  150. Xiong, X.; Schober, M.; Tassone, E.; Khodadadi-Jamayran, A.; Sastre-Perona, A.; Zhou, H.; Tsirigos, A.; Shen, S.; Chang, M.; Melamed, J.; et al. KLF4, A Gene Regulating Prostate Stem Cell Homeostasis, Is a Barrier to Malignant Progression and Predictor of Good Prognosis in Prostate Cancer. Cell Rep. 2018, 25, 3006–3020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  151. Gaudino, G.; Yang, H.; Carbone, M. HGF/Met Signaling Is a Key Player in Malignant Mesothelioma Carcinogenesis. Biomedicines 2014, 2, 327–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  152. Thylur, R.P.; Senthivinayagam, S.; Campbell, E.M.; Rangasamy, V.; Thorenoor, N.; Sondarva, G.; Mehrotra, S.; Mishra, P.; Zook, E.; Le, P.T.; et al. Mixed lineage kinase 3 modulates beta-catenin signaling in cancer cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 37470–37482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  153. Kim, S.M.; Nguyen, T.T.; Ravi, A.; Kubiniok, P.; Finicle, B.T.; Jayashankar, V.; Malacrida, L.; Hou, J.; Robertson, J.; Gao, D.; et al. PTEN Deficiency and AMPK Activation Promote Nutrient Scavenging and Anabolism in Prostate Cancer Cells. Cancer Discov. 2018, 8, 866–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  154. Wang, J.; Zhou, P.; Wang, X.; Yu, Y.; Zhu, G.; Zheng, L.; Xu, Z.; Li, F.; You, Q.; Yang, Q.; et al. Rab25 promotes erlotinib resistance by activating the beta1 integrin/AKT/beta-catenin pathway in NSCLC. Cell Prolif. 2019, 52, e12592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Wang, S.; Hu, C.; Wu, F.; He, S. Rab25 GTPase: Functional roles in cancer. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 64591–64599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  156. Hu, C.; Chen, B.; Zhou, Y.; Shan, Y. High expression of Rab25 contributes to malignant phenotypes and biochemical recurrence in patients with prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Cancer Cell. Int. 2017, 17, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Lv, M.; Shen, Y.; Yang, J.; Li, S.; Wang, B.; Chen, Z.; Li, P.; Liu, P.; Yang, J. Angiomotin Family Members: Oncogenes or Tumor Suppressors? Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2017, 13, 772–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Zeng, H.; Ortiz, A.; Shen, P.F.; Cheng, C.J.; Lee, Y.C.; Yu, G.; Lin, S.C.; Creighton, C.J.; Yu-Lee, L.Y.; Lin, S.H. Angiomotin regulates prostate cancer cell proliferation by signaling through the Hippo-YAP pathway. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 10145–10160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  159. Chen, W.Y.; Liu, S.Y.; Chang, Y.S.; Yin, J.J.; Yeh, H.L.; Mouhieddine, T.H.; Hadadeh, O.; Abou-Kheir, W.; Liu, Y.N. MicroRNA-34a regulates WNT/TCF7 signaling and inhibits bone metastasis in Ras-activated prostate cancer. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 441–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  160. Alshaker, H.; Wang, Q.; Brewer, D.; Pchejetski, D. Transcriptome-Wide Effects of Sphingosine Kinases Knockdown in Metastatic Prostate and Breast Cancer Cells: Implications for Therapeutic Targeting. Front. Pharmacol. 2019, 10, 303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Ratz, L.; Laible, M.; Kacprzyk, L.A.; Wittig-Blaich, S.M.; Tolstov, Y.; Duensing, S.; Altevogt, P.; Klauck, S.M.; Sultmann, H. TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion variants induce TGF-beta signaling and epithelial to mesenchymal transition in human prostate cancer cells. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 25115–25130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  162. Hormaechea-Agulla, D.; Jimenez-Vacas, J.M.; Gomez-Gomez, E.; Fernando, L.L.; Carrasco-Valiente, J.; Valero-Rosa, J.; Moreno, M.M.; Sanchez-Sanchez, R.; Ortega-Salas, R.; Gracia-Navarro, F.; et al. The oncogenic role of the spliced somatostatin receptor sst5TMD4 variant in prostate cancer. FASEB J. 2017, 31, 4682–4696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  163. Abu-Amer, Y. NF-kappaB signaling and bone resorption. Osteoporos. Int. 2013, 24, 2377–2386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Molecules 25 02380 g001 550
Figure 1. Molecular mechanism of bone metastasis in prostate cancer. Signaling regulators of (A) the nuclear factor (NF)-κB, transforming growth factor (TGF)-β, and (B) phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt signaling cascade whose is involved in bone metastasis of prostate cancer and which acts as promoters are labeled in gray and inhibitors are in black.
Figure 1. Molecular mechanism of bone metastasis in prostate cancer. Signaling regulators of (A) the nuclear factor (NF)-κB, transforming growth factor (TGF)-β, and (B) phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt signaling cascade whose is involved in bone metastasis of prostate cancer and which acts as promoters are labeled in gray and inhibitors are in black.
Molecules 25 02380 g001
Molecules 25 02380 g002 550
Figure 2. Diagram of Ras/Wnt interactions during prostate cancer (PCa) bone metastasis. The crosstalk from Ras to Wnt is marked in blue and vice versa in red.
Figure 2. Diagram of Ras/Wnt interactions during prostate cancer (PCa) bone metastasis. The crosstalk from Ras to Wnt is marked in blue and vice versa in red.
Molecules 25 02380 g002

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lin, S.-R.; Mokgautsi, N.; Liu, Y.-N. Ras and Wnt Interaction Contribute in Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis. Molecules 2020, 25, 2380. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25102380

AMA Style

Lin S-R, Mokgautsi N, Liu Y-N. Ras and Wnt Interaction Contribute in Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis. Molecules. 2020; 25(10):2380. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25102380

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lin, Shian-Ren, Ntlotlang Mokgautsi, and Yen-Nien Liu. 2020. "Ras and Wnt Interaction Contribute in Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis" Molecules 25, no. 10: 2380. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25102380

APA Style

Lin, S. -R., Mokgautsi, N., & Liu, Y. -N. (2020). Ras and Wnt Interaction Contribute in Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis. Molecules, 25(10), 2380. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25102380

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop