Next Article in Journal
Identification of Human Leukotriene A4 Hydrolase Inhibitors Using Structure-Based Pharmacophore Modeling and Molecular Docking
Previous Article in Journal
Reactions of Dihaloboranes with Electron-Rich 1,4-Bis(trimethylsilyl)-1,4-diaza-2,5-cyclohexadienes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 25
Issue 12
10.3390/molecules25122868
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Morphological and Structural Properties of Amino-Functionalized Fumed Nanosilica and Its Comparison with Nanoparticles Obtained by Modified Stöber Method

by
María C. Ruiz-Cañas
1,*,
Laura M. Corredor
2,
Henderson I. Quintero
2,
Eduardo Manrique
2 and
Arnold R. Romero Bohórquez
1,*
1
Grupo de Investigación en Química Estructural, Parque Tecnológico Guatiguará, Universidad Industrial de Santander, A.A. 678, Piedecuesta 681011, Colombia
2
Instituto Colombiano del Petróleo, ECOPETROL S.A., A.A. 4185, Piedecuesta 681017, Colombia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(12), 2868; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25122868
Submission received: 9 May 2020 / Revised: 5 June 2020 / Accepted: 6 June 2020 / Published: 22 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Nanochemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In industry, silica nanoparticles (NPs) are obtained by the fuming and the precipitation method. Fumed silica NPs are commonly used in the preparation of nanocomposites because they have an extremely low bulk density (160–190 kg/m3), large surface area (50–600 m2/g), and nonporous surface, which promotes strong physical contact between the NPs and the organic phase. Fumed silica has fewer silanol groups (Si–OH) on its surface than the silica prepared by the Stöber method. However, the number of –OH groups on the fumed silica surface can be increased by pretreating them with sodium hydroxide (NaOH) before further surface modification. In this study, the effectiveness of the NaOH pretreatment was evaluated on commercial fumed silica NPs with a surface area of 200 m2/g. The number of surface –OH groups was estimated by potentiometric titration. The pretreated fumed NPs, and the precipitated NPs (prepared by the Stöber method) were modified with 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES) to obtain A200S and nSiO2-APTES, respectively. The NPs were characterized using electron dispersive scanning (EDS), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), dynamic light scattering (DLS), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), X-ray diffraction (XRD), BET (Brunauer–Emmett–Teller) analysis, and ζ-potential. XRD confirmed the presence of the organo-functional group on the surface of both NPs. After the amino-functionalization, the ζ-potential values of the nSiO2 and A200 changed from −35.5 mV and −14.4 mV to +26.2 mV and +11.76 mV, respectively. Consequently, we have successfully synthesized functionalized NPs with interesting, specific surface area and porosity (pore volume and size), which can be attractive materials for chemical and energy industries.

1. Introduction

Research in nanotechnology over the past few years has resulted in different potential application areas for nanoparticles (NPs) [1,2,3,4,5,6]. The surface functionalization of NPs is often a precondition for applications where the interactions between components affect the stability of NPs or colloids [7,8]. The functionalization of NPs consists of the incorporation of reactive groups on the NPs surface [9,10,11,12,13], which become active sites to bind different molecules (i.e., polymers, composite materials, and elastomers) [14,15,16,17,18,19].
Different organic and inorganic compounds have been used to modify the surface of metal oxide NPs, including carboxylic acids [20,21], polymers [22,23,24,25,26], silanes [27,28,29], and organophosphorus molecules [12]. However, the silylation method using alkoxysilanes is the most commonly used because it leads to a much stronger interaction between the inorganic and organic phases of a nanohybrid or a nanocomposite [30]. Moreover, the silylation method may improve the stability of the NPs in an organic solvent or an aqueous solution by changing the surface charge or the nature of the NPs (from hydrophilic to hydrophobic) [31,32].
Silane coupling agents have a nonhydrolyzable organic group (R–Y), which is attached to the surface of the metal oxide NPs and acts as a reactive or a hydrophobic site. It also contains hydrolyzable groups on the silicon atom. The hydrolysable groups are typically alkoxy (i.e., methoxy, ethoxy) [33,34] or chlorine groups [35,36]. The modification of the NPs surface with alkoxysilanes comprises two steps. First, the hydrolysis of the coupling agent produces reactive organosilanols (RSi-OH) (Figure 1a) and alcohol as a byproduct. Second, the condensation of the organosilanols with the hydroxyl groups on the NPs surface (via Si–O–M covalent bond) occurs to give organofunctional (Figure 1b). The self-condensation of the silane coupling agent can also take place in this step (Figure 1c). Organofunctional groups include amine [33,34,37], acryloxy [38,39,40], epoxy [41], isocyanate [22], and thiol [42] groups. If the organofunctional group is reactive, it can be covalently attached to a polymer matrix through radical chain transfer, addition, and cyclization reactions. For non-reactive groups, the silane can only improve the compatibility with the polymer matrix due to their similar polarities [43]. For practical purposes, the conditions of functionalization, modification, and preparation of desirable materials should be carefully optimized.
Silica NPs are produced by two methods: fuming and precipitation. Fumed silica is synthesized by the pyrolysis of silicon tetrachloride (SiCl4) in a flame of oxygen–hydrogen (Equation (1)). Precipitated silica is produced by precipitation from silicates and inorganic acids (sol-gel process) [12]. When the sol-gel reaction occurs under alkaline conditions, this is referred to as the Stöber method. Fumed silica has fewer silanol groups (Si–OH) on its surface than the precipitated one because it is produced at high temperatures (>1500 °C). For this reason, fumed silica NPs must be pretreated with sodium hydroxide (NaOH) before any surface modification.
2 H 2 + O 2 +   SiCl 4   → ∆   SiO 2 + 4 HCl
This work aimed to determine the effectiveness of the NaOH treatment on the preparation of amino-functionalized silica NPs. The NaOH treatment was used to activate the surface of commercial fumed SiO2 NPs with a surface area of 200 m2/g. After the pretreatment, the fumed and precipitated silica NPs (prepared by the Stöber method) were modified with 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES). As stated in the literature, the APTES-modified silica NPs can be used in different fields, such as the preparation of hybrid materials [44,45,46], medicine [47,48,49,50], and many others [37,51,52]. Additionally, the APTES-SiO2 NPs studied in this work were successfully used to synthesize a SiO2-polyacrylamide (PAM) nanohybrid. The obtained nanohybrid exhibited better resistance to thermal degradation than the PAM [53].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Fumed silica NPs (A200) with a surface area of 200 m2/g were supplied by Evonik Industries AG (Essen, Germany). Tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS, 98%, Sigma-Aldrich, Louis, MO, USA), ethanol (EtOH, 96%, Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA), and ammonium hydroxide (28−30 wt% solutions of NH3 in water, Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) were used to synthesize the silica NPs by the Stöber method. The activation reaction was carried out with sodium hydroxide (NaOH, 97%, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), methanol (CH3OH, 99.9%, Merck, Germany), and acetic acid (C2H4O2, 100%, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Further, 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES, 99%, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used to functionalize the surface of the activated NPs.

2.2. Nanoparticle Synthesis

The silica NPs were synthesized by following the method described by Stöber and Fink [54,55]. For this procedure, 1 mL (4.48 mmol) of TEOS was added in 32.5 mL of an ammonium hydroxide/ethanol solution (1:25 ratio). This dispersion (pH 10) was stirred for 3 h at 90 °C. Then, the silica NPs were centrifugally separated from the dispersion and washed three times with deionized water. Finally, the NPs were dried in a conventional oven for 24 h at 90 °C and they were named nSiO2.

2.3. Activation Reaction of the Silica NPs

The fumed silica NPs (A200) were activated by modifying their surface with hydroxyl ions (–OH) (Figure 2). For this purpose, 4 g of fumed silica NPs were dispersed in 100 mL of a 1 M aqueous solution of NaOH. The dispersion was stirred using a magnetic stirrer in a water bath at a temperature between 60 and 70 °C for 24 h. The dispersing media was neutralized with acetic acid, and the activated silica NPs were recovered by centrifugation. The powder was washed three times with methanol and dried for 24 h at 120 °C. This procedure was performed based on the method proposed by Lin et al. [56]. The obtained NPs were named A200A.

2.4. Amino-Functionalization Reaction

All silica NPs were functionalized with 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES) (Figure 3), generating a chemically reactive system. This procedure was performed based on the method proposed by Chen et al. [57]. In this procedure, 4 g of silica NPs were dispersed in a solution containing 2 g of APTES and 100 mL of ethanol. The dispersion was stirred for 3 h at room temperature. After treatment, the NPs were separated by centrifugation and alternately washed with ethanol and water at least two times to remove excess reagents. Finally, the NPs were dried for 12 h at 60 °C to evaporate volatile solvents. The silanized fumed and nSiO2 NPs were named A200S and nSiO2-APTES, respectively

2.5. Determination of the Hydroxyl Group Content on the NPs Surface

The content of –OH groups on the surface of the NPs was estimated by using the titration method described by Kang et al. [58]. In this method, 2 g of treated silica NPs were added into a bottle containing 80 mL of a 0.05 N aqueous solution of NaOH. The bottle was capped and stirred using a magnetic stirrer for 24 h at room temperature. The NPs were separated by centrifugation, and 10 mL of the supernatant were taken for titration. The indicator was prepared by adding 0.5 g of phenolphthalein into 100 mL of a mixture of water and ethanol (50% v/v). Then, three drops of the phenolphthalein solution were added into 10 mL of the supernatant. This sample was titrated until neutralization (when the color of the solution changed from magenta to transparent) with a 0.05 N aqueous solution of HCl. The same procedure was carried out for a blank solution (0.05 N aqueous solution of NaOH without silica NPs). For determination of the hydroxyl group content on the NPs surface, the corresponding Equation (2) was employed. Each titration was repeated at least three times to confirm the reproducibility, with the uncertainty found to be of the order of 0.01 mM/g of the reported value.
X = ( B − A ) × 0.05 × C W
where X is the amount of -OH groups per unit weight of silica NPs (mM/g), A is the volume of HCl used to neutralize the sample containing NPs (mL), B is the volume of HCl used to neutralize the blank solution (mL). W is the amount of silica NPs used for the test and C is the ratio between the total volume of the solution (80 mL) and the aliquot volume (10 mL).

2.6. NPs Characterization

A field emission gun scanning electron microscope (FEG-SEM) operating at an acceleration voltage of 25 kV (FEGSEM, QUANTA FEG 650 model, Thermo-Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to determine the size and morphology of the NPs. Each sample was placed on metal stubs with carbon adhesive tape and coated with gold using a Quorum 150 ES coating equipment (Quorum Technologies Ltd., Lewes, UK). The FEG-SEM images were obtained from the Everhart Thornley (ETD) and the backscattering electron detectors. The elemental composition of the NPs was determined by using an energy-dispersive spectroscope (EDS, EDAX Apolo X, Ametek, Inc., Berwyn, PA, USA) operating at an acceleration voltage of 25 kV.
The degree of crystallinity of the NPs was determined by X-ray diffraction at 2θ from 2° to 70° (Bruker D-8 A25 DaVinci, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA). The patterns were recorded by a CuKα radiation source and a lynxEye detector at 0.6 mm divergence slit, 2.5° primary and secondary Soller slits, 40 kV accelerating voltage, and 40 mA current. The samples were loaded on polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) holders with a Si center using the zero-background technique.
Attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-IR-FT) using a Bruker Tensor 27 FTIR spectrometer with a platinum cell (Alpha, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) was used to perform the structural characterization of all NPs. The FTIR spectra were recorded from 600 to 4000 cm−1 with a resolution of 4 cm−1 (24 scans were taken every 30 s for each spectrum).
The ζ-potential measurements were performed by using a Zetasizer ZS90 (Malvern Instruments, Herrenberg, Germany) equipped with a high concentration flow cell. Then, 100 ppm of NPs were dispersed in distilled water and sonicated for 15 min before measurement. The average ζ-potential value was calculated from three sets of measurements analyzed by the Zetasizer software version 7.13, where each measure was the mean of 50 individual runs carried out at different positions (10 measurements in 5 positions) in the flow cell. This analysis had an uncertainty of 0.5 mV at 25 °C.
The hydrodynamic ratio of the NPs was determined by dynamic light scattering (DLS) analysis using a Zetasizer Nano ZS90 equipped with a 633 nm He-Ne laser (Malvern Instruments, Herrenberg, Germany) at an angle of 90° and 30 °C. For this test, 100 ppm of NPs were dispersed in deionized (DI) water. The dispersions were analyzed in a glass cell with a path length of 10 mm. The measurements were made at a 4.65 mm position from the cuvette wall using an automatic attenuator and equilibrium time of 180 s. Fifteen runs of 10 s were performed with three repetitions for each sample. The uncertainty in DLS results is 5.8 nm of the reported value. The software used to collect and analyze the data was the Zetasizer software version 7.13. The size distribution as a function of the intensity, the average diameter Z (Z-average), and the polydispersity index (PdI) were obtained from the autocorrelation function using the “general-purpose mode” for the monodispersed NPs.
A fundamental parameter in the characterization of porous solids is their specific surface area. These measurements were conducted by using an ASAP 2020 specific surface analyzer (Micromeritics, GA, USA). Before each test, the sample was vacuum degassed at 398.15 K for 6 h. The surface area was measured by the low temperature (77 K) adsorption of nitrogen and calculated by the Brunauer, Emmett, and Teller (BET) method. The pore size distribution was calculated using the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) method. The pore volume measurement allows estimating the degree of functionalization on the surface of the pores by comparing the pore volume of the functionalized with the non-functionalized NPs [59].
The thermal properties of the NPs were analyzed by thermogravimetry using a TA2050 TGA analyzer (TA Instruments, INC., New Castle, DE, USA). For the measurements, a mass of 5 mg of sample was heated from 25 to 800 °C at a nitrogen flow of 25 mL/min and a heating rate of 10 °C/min. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) allows for the determination of the organic matter content and the degree of functionalization in the NPs [60].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Determination of the –OH Groups Content on the NPs Surface

The content of the –OH groups on the NPs surface (A200, A200A, and nSiO2) was quantified by potentiometric titration and calculated using Equation (2). The content of –OH groups calculated was 0.07 mM/g, 1.90 mM/g, and 2.3 mM/g for A200, A200A, and nSiO2 NPs, respectively. This result showed that NaOH activated the A200 NPs surface by increasing the –OH content on their surface by 96%. In addition, the content of –OH groups of the A200A NPs (1.90 mM/g) is higher than that previously reported in the literature (1.1 mM/g) [56].

3.2. SEM—EDS Results

Figure 4 shows the micrographs of A200, A200A, A200S, and nSiO2-APTES NPs. The A200 NPs aggregated forming microspheres (Figure 4a,d) to reduce their high surface energy, resulting from their large surface-volume ratio. Moreover, the pretreatment with NaOH promoted the formation of aggregates, mainly as micron-size granules, due to the hydrogen bonding between the silanols on the surface (Figure 4b,e). The A200S NPs (Figure 4c,f) has an amorphous morphology and an average size of 60 nm. The nSiO2 –APTES have a near-spherical morphology and average size of 141 nm (Figure 4g–i) [53].
Figure 5 shows the EDS results of A200, A200S, and nSiO2-APTES. The presence of C and N on A200S NPs confirms the attachment of the APTES onto the NPs surface (Table 1).
The relative oxygen content on the surface of A200S NPs decreased from 53.80 wt% to 32.69 wt% as compared with the A200 NPs (Table 1). In addition, the functionalization of the NPs is confirmed with the presence of C and N in the A200S and nSiO2-APTES NPs surface. The relative content of Si on the surface of nSiO2-APTES (22.20 wt%) was lower as compared with the A200S (53.31 wt%) due to the high surface area of A200 and the presence of silica in the structure

3.3. X-ray Diffraction (XRD)

XRD spectra of A200 and A200S NPs are shown in Figure 6. The spectra of A200 NPs exhibit a broad halo peak centered at a 2θ value of 21°, which confirms the amorphous structure of the NPs [11]. Also, the broad peak around 42° confirms the amorphous structure in the samples, which means that the unmodified NPs (A200) is highly disordered compared with the modified one (A200S) [61,62]. Upon the amino-functionalization, this signal was shifted to higher 2θ values. This was attributed to the attachment of the organic functional groups onto the surface of NPs channels, which tends to reduce the scattering power (or scattering contrast) of the amorphous silicate wall [63,64,65].
Comparing A200S and nSiO2-APTES NPs (Figure 6 and Figure 7), a shift of the back of the main halo is observed (22° for A200S and 21° for nSiO2-APTES). This is attributed to an increment in the interplanar distance. The XRD results confirms that nSiO2-APTES NPs (spherical) have a different structure than the A200S NPs (amorphous).

3.4. FTIR-ATR Results

Figure 8 displays the FTIR spectra of the A200, A200A, and A200S NPs. The absorption bands at around 1100 cm−1 and 809 cm−1 are attributed to the stretching and bending vibration of the siloxane groups (Si–O–Si), respectively [66,67]. Compared to the unmodified NPs, two new adsorption bands at 3446 cm−1 and 1649 cm−1 are observed on the IR spectrum of the A200A NPs (Figure 8b), which are assigned to the stretching vibration of the silanol group (Si–OH) [68,69] and adsorbed water in the sample [70], respectively. These results confirm the presence of hydroxyl groups on the surface of the NPs. The A200 modification by APTES is evidenced with the bands at 2974 cm−1, and 959 cm−1 (Figure 8c). These bands are attributed to C–H stretching vibration, and the unhydrolyzed ethoxy moieties in the APTES, respectively [32,71,72,73]. Furthermore, the disappearance of the band at 3446 cm−1 confirms the surface modification of the NPs with APTES.
The FTIR spectra of APTES, n-SiO2, and n-SiO2-APTES (Figure 9) show typical bands with the spectra of the fumed NPs reported in Figure 8. The bands at around 1100 and 800 cm−1 are ascribed to asymmetric stretching and bending vibrations of the siloxane groups (Si–O–Si), respectively [69]. In the APTES spectra, the characteristic bands are 2974 cm−1 and 953.03 cm−1, which are assigned to C–H stretching vibration and –OCH2-CH3–vibration, respectively [32]. The SiO2-APTES NPs spectra show a new band at 949 cm−1, which is attributed to the unhydrolyzed ethoxy moieties in the APTES. These results confirm the presence of organic substitution in the modified silica [73].

3.5. Colloidal Stability (ζ-Potential)

The colloidal stability of NP dispersions is predicted by the magnitude of the ζ-potential. Dispersions with ζ-potential values greater than −30 mV or less than +30 mV are usually unstable due to interparticle attractions [74,75,76]. The ζ-potential values of all NPs dispersed in distilled water are presented in Figure 10. It is observed that only the n-SiO2 dispersion is stable, according to the DLVO theory. The higher degree of stability of nSiO2 dispersion, compared to the A200, is attributed to the dissociation of silanol groups on the NPs surface. The absolute ζ-potential value increase of the A200 NPs was consistently observed after the pretreatment with NaOH (from −14.4 to −27.6 mV). Upon the NPs amino-functionalization, the A200S and nSiO2-APTES potential changed to +11.76 mV and +26.2 mV, respectively. The latter can be directly related to the protonation of the amine group. This effect confirms that enough surface coverage with APTES was achieved. Both dispersions are unstable due to the hydrophobicity of the APTES grafted to the surface.

3.6. Hydrodynamic Radius by DLS Results

After the NaOH pretreatment, the average size of the A200 NPs increased from 164 to 295 nm (Figure 11). This increase is due to the NP aggregation through the hydrogen bonding between the silanols on the NPs surface. However, the increased stability of the NPs observed in the ζ-potential measurements suggests the formation of a hydration layer that stabilizes the aggregates. For A200S NPs, a broader particle size distribution is observed (high polydispersity). This is attributed to the formation of aggregates due to hydrophobic interactions between NPs, which is consistent with its low ζ-potential value. Similar behavior was observed for the nSiO2 and nSiO2–APTES NPs (Figure 12). However, these NPs showed a smaller hydrodynamic radius and less polydispersity than the fumed NPs. These characteristics make them more stable in aqueous solutions (higher absolute ζ-potential values).

3.7. BET Isotherms

The specific surface area and pore size of all NPs were calculated from N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms (Figure 13). According to the IUPAC classification [77], all NPs exhibited a type IV adsorption isotherm with a type H1 hysteresis loop very narrow in the relative pressure range of 0.8–1.0. This type of isotherm is characteristic of mesoporous materials, and it is characterized by a hysteresis curve caused by capillary condensation in mesopores with open cylindrical cavities [78,79,80]. According to the results of the BHJ method, all NPs have a pore size in the mesoporous range, between 20 and 500 Å.
The specific surface area of A200S NPs (125.13 ± 1.64 m2/g) is lower than that of the A200 NPs (174.18 ± 1.03 m2/g) due to the amino-functionalization of the NPs (Figure 13a,b). The surface area calculated for A200 NPs agrees with that reported by the manufacturer (Evonik) [81]. Additionally, the surface area of the A200S NPs (125.13 ± 1.64 m2/g) is higher than that of the nSiO2-APTES NPs (15.52 ± 0.63 m2/g) (Figure 13c) because the APTES can easily fill the uniform micropores and restrict the access of nitrogen into them [82].

3.8. TGA Results

The unmodified A200 show a slight weight loss of 1.4% between 100–800 °C (Figure 14), which was attributed to the surface dehydration and dehydroxylation [37]. By comparison, the first weight loss of the A200S NPs (24.3%) occurred below 100 °C, and it was assigned to the surface dehydration. The weight loss at temperatures above 100 °C is divided into two regions. The first weight-loss region occurs in the 100–350 °C range, and it can be attributed to the condensation of silanol groups of aminopropyl groups, and between them and the residual surface silanols on the NPs surface. The weight loss between 350 and 600 °C can be attributed to the thermal decomposition of the aminopropyl groups [32,83]. This result shows that the temperature for the decomposition of the aminopropyl groups on the NPs surface is much higher than the boiling point of the APTES (217 °C). The latter indicates that the aminopropyl groups are covalently attached to the SiO2 NPs and have higher thermal stability than the modifier. No weight loss was observed above 600 °C.
On the other hand, the weight loss of nSiO2-APTES and A200S NPs was 2.8% and 11.2% in the range of 350 and 600 °C, respectively. The latter indicates that the precipitated NPs have a smaller extent of functionalization with APTES than the fumed NPs. This behavior was attributed to the structural difference between them.

4. Summary and Conclusions

In this study, the activation and amino-functionalization of commercial fumed and precipitated silica NPs prepared by the Stöber method were evaluated. The NPs were characterized through XRD, FTIR, TGA, BET, SEM, and DLS. Additionally, the colloidal stability of the NPs in distilled water was predicted by ζ-potential. The increase of the content of –OH groups on the A200 NPs surface by pretreatment with NaOH (1.90 mM/g) was confirmed by potentiometric titration. The amino-functionalization of the NPs was confirmed by FTIR analysis. The comparative study of SEM, XRD nitrogen adsorption, and DLS results of A200S and nSiO2-APTES NPs showed that the precipitated NPs have a spherical shape, lower surface area, and larger particle size than the fumed ones. Upon the amino-functionalization of the NPs, the sign of the ζ-potential values changed (from negative to positive). Still, the stability of the dispersions did not improve due to the hydrophobic interactions between NPs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.M. and A.R.R.B.; Data curation, M.C.R.-C.; Funding acquisition, E.M.; Methodology, M.C.R.-C.; Project administration, A.R.R.B.; Supervision, H.I.Q. and A.R.R.B.; Writing—original draft, M.C.R.-C., L.M.C. and A.R.R.B.; Writing—review & editing, H.I.Q., L.M.C., E.M. and A.R.R.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Ecopetrol S.A. and the Universidad Industrial de Santander with a Master Cooperation Agreement No. 5222395; Act. 25.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Ecopetrol S.A. and the Universidad Industrial de Santander for the logistical and financial support (Master Cooperation Agreement No. 5222395 Act. 25). Special thanks to the Polymer Research Group (GIP), the Catalysis Research Center (CICAT), the Microscopy laboratory of the Guatiguará Technology Park, and the Structural Chemistry Research Group (GIQUE) for their technical assistance. A portion of this work was presented at the 32nd International Conference on Nanoscience, Nanotechnology, and Nanoengineering” held in Rome, Italy, on 18–19 November, 2019.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bindhu, M.; Umadevi, M. Silver and Gold Nanoparticles for Sensor and Antibacterial Applications. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2014, 128, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Alsaba, M.T.; Al Dushaishi, M.F.; Abbas, A.K. A Comprehensive Review of Nanoparticles Applications in the Oil and Gas Industry. J. Pet. Explor. Prod. Technol. 2020, 10, 1389–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Sun, X.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, G.; Gai, Z. Application of Nanoparticles in Enhanced Oil Recovery: A Critical Review of Recent Progress. Energies 2017, 10, 345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Bera, A.; Belhaj, H. Application of Nanotechnology by Means of Nanoparticles and Nanodispersions in Oil Recovery—A Comprehensive Review. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2016, 34, 1284–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ponmani, S.; William, J.K.M.; Samuel, R.; Nagarajan, R.; Sangwai, J.S. Formation and Characterization of Thermal and Electrical Properties of CuO and ZnO Nanofluids in Xanthan Gum. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Stark, W.J.; Stoessel, P.R.; Wohlleben, W.; Hafner, A. Industrial Applications of Nanoparticles. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 5793–5805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Haddada, M.; Blanchard, J.; Casale, S.; Krafft, J.; Vallee, A.; Methivier, C.; Boujday, S. Optimizing the Immobilization of Gold Nanoparticles on Functionalized Silicon Surfaces: Amine- vs Thiol- Terminated Silane. Gold Bull. 2013, 46, 335–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Milczarek, G.; Motylenko, M.; Sikorska, A.; Klapiszewski, Ł.; Wysokowski, M.; Bazhenov, V.; Piasecki, A.; Konował, E.; Ehrlich, H.; Jesionowski, T. Deposition of Silver Nanoparticles on Organically-Modified Silica in the Presence of Lignosulfonate. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 52476–52484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Vázquez-Velázquez, A.R.; Velasco-Soto, M.A.; Pérez-García, S.A.; Licea-Jiménez, L. Functionalization Effect on Polymer Nanocomposite Coatings Based on TiO2–SiO2 Nanoparticles with Superhydrophilic Properties. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Colloidal, F.; Particles, S. Adsorption of Cu ( II ) and Ni ( II ) Ions on Functionalized Colloidal Silica Particles Model Studies for Wastewater Treatment. Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Franche-Comté, Besançon, France, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zienkiewicz-Strzałka, M.; Deryło-Marczewska, A.; Kozakevych, R.B. Silica Nanocomposites Based on Silver Nanoparticles-Functionalization and PH Effect. Appl. Nanosci. 2018, 8, 1649–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Mallakpour, S.; Madani, M. A Review of Current Coupling Agents for Modification of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles. Prog. Org. Coatings 2015, 86, 194–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Herrera, A.P.; Ojeda, K.A.; Penaloza, A.D.; Rincón, A. Evaluation of Colloidal Stability, Kinematic Viscosity and Flash Point of B10 Diesel/Biodiesel Blends Using Nano-Structured Additives Based on Al2O3 and Oleic Acid. J. Cienc. Technol. Future 2017, 6, 71–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Dorigato, A.; D’Amato, M.; Pegoretti, A. Thermo-Mechanical Properties of High Density Polyethylene—Fumed Silica Nanocomposites: Effect of Filler Surface Area and Treatment. J. Polym. Res. 2012, 19, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rodríguez-Quirós, H.A.; Casanova-Yepes, H.F. Effect of the Functionalization of Silica Nanoparticles as a Reinforcing Agent on Dental Composite Materials. Rev. Fac. Ing. 2015, 1, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liberman, A.; Mendez, N.; Trogler, W.C.; Kummel, A.C. Synthesis and Surface Functionalization of Silica Nanoparticles for Nanomedicine. Surf. Sci. Rep. 2014, 69, 132–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Roy, S.; Dixit, C.K.; Woolley, R.; MacCraith, B.D.; Okennedy, R.; McDonagh, C. Novel Multiparametric Approach to Elucidate the Surface Amine-Silanization Reaction Profile on Fluorescent Silica Nanoparticles. Langmuir 2010, 26, 18125–18134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, J.F.; Chen, Y.; Facile, B.M. Functionalization of PDMS Elastomer Surfaces Using Thiolene Click Chemistry. Langmuir 2013, 29, 12432–12442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhu, D.; Han, Y.; Zhang, J.; Li, X.; Feng, Y. Enhancing Rheological Properties of Hydrophobically Associative Polyacrylamide Aqueous Solutions by Hybriding with Silica Nanoparticles. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014, 40876, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Corredor, L.M.; Hemmati-Sarapardeh, A.; Husein, M.M.; Dong, M.; Maini, B.B. Rheological Behavior of Surface Modified Silica Nanoparticles Dispersed in Partially Hydrolyzed Polyacrylamide and Xanthan Gum Solutions: Experimental Measurements, Mechanistic Understanding, and Model Development. Energy Fuels 2018, 32, 10628–10638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mahdavian, A.R.; Ashjari, M.; Makoo, A.B. Preparation of Poly (Styrene-Methyl Methacrylate)/SiO2 Composite Nanoparticles via Emulsion Polymerization. An Investigation into the Compatiblization. Eur. Polym. J. 2007, 43, 336–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wei, L.; Hu, N.; Zhang, Y. Synthesis of Polymer-Mesoporous Silica Nanocomposites. Materials (Basel) 2010, 3, 4066–4079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Xue, Z.; Foster, E.; Wang, Y.; Nayak, S.; Cheng, V.; Ngo, V.W.; Pennell, K.D.; Bielawski, C.W.; Johnston, K.P. Effect of Grafted Copolymer Composition on Iron Oxide Nanoparticle Stability and Transport in Porous Media at High Salinity. Energy Fuels 2014, 28, 3655–3665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Foster, E.L.; Xue, Z.; Roach, C.M.; Larsen, E.S.; Bielawski, C.W.; Johnston, K.P. Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Grafted with Sulfonated and Zwitterionic Polymers: High Stability and Low Adsorption in Extreme Aqueous Environments. ACS Macro Lett. 2014, 3, 867–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ponnapati, R.; Karazincir, O.; Dao, E.; Ng, R.; Mohanty, K.K.; Krishnamoorti, R. Polymer-Functionalized Nanoparticles for Improving Waterflood Sweep Efficiency: Characterization and Transport Properties. IEC Res. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50, 13030–13036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Corredor, L.M.; Husein, M.; Maini, B. Impact of PAM-Grafted Nanoparticles on the Performance of Hydrolyzed Polyacrylamide Solutions for Heavy Oil Recovery at Different Salinities. Submitt. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 9888–9899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tapia, J.F.D.; Lee, J.Y.; Ooi, R.E.H.; Foo, D.C.Y.; Tan, R.R. Optimal CO2 Allocation and Scheduling in Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) Operations. Appl. Energy 2016, 184, 337–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Corredor, L.M.; Aliabadian, E.; Husein, M.; Chen, Z.; Maini, B.; Sundararaj, U. Heavy Oil Recovery by Surface Modified Silica Nanoparticle/HPAM Nanofluids. Fuel 2019, 252, 622–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Prado, L.; Sriyai, M.; Ghislandi, M.; Barros, A.; Schulte, K. Surface Modification of TiO2 nanoparticles with Silane Coupling Agents. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2010, 21, 2238–2245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Corredor, L.M.; Husein, M.M.; Maini, B.B. A Review of Polymer Nanohybrids for Oil Recovery. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 272, 102018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pham, K.N.; Fullston, D.; Surface, K.S.-C. Charge Modification of Nano-Sized Silica Colloid. Aust. J. Chem. 2007, 60, 662–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rahman, I.A.; Jafarzadeh, M.; Sipaut, C.S. Synthesis of Organo-Functionalized Nanosilica via a Co-Condensation Modification Using γ-Aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES). Ceram. Int. 2009, 35, 1883–1888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Uyanik, M. Synthesis and Characterization of TiO2 Nanostars. Ph.D. Thesis, Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken, Germany, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  34. Nazir, T.; Afzal, A.; Siddiqi, H.M.; Ahmad, Z.; Dumon, M. Thermally and Mechanically Superior Hybrid Epoxy-Silica Polymer Films via Sol-Gel Method. Prog. Org. Coat. 2010, 69, 100–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fattahi, N.; Ramazani, A.; Kinzhybalo, V. Imidazole-Functionalized Fe3O4/Chloro-Silane Core-Shell Nanoparticles: An Efficient Heterogeneous Organocatalyst for Esterification Reaction. Silicon 2019, 11, 1745–1754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hubner, E.; Allgaier, J.; Meyer, M.; Pyckhout-hintzen, W.; Richter, D. Synthesis of Polymer/Silica Hybrid Nanoparticles Using Anionic Polymerization Techniques. Macromolecules 2010, 43, 856–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Shen, S.; Kiong Ng, W.; Chia, L.; Dong, Y.; Tan, R. Sonochemical Synthesis of (3-Aminopropyl) Triethoxysilane-Modified Monodispersed Silica Nanoparticles for Protein Immobilization. Mater. Res. Bull. 2011, 46, 1665–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yoon, D.H.; Jang, J.W.; Cheong, I.W. Synthesis of Cationic Polyacrylamide/Silica Nanocomposites from Inverse Emulsion Polymerization and Their Flocculation Property for Papermaking. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2012, 411, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Qu, R.; Ma, X.; Wang, M.; Sun, C.; Sun, X.; Sun, S.; Zhang, Y.; Yin, P. Homogeneous Preparation of Polyamidoamine Grafted Silica Gels and Their Adsorption Properties as Au3+ Adsorbents. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2014, 20, 4382–4392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jiang, R.; Kunz, H.R.; Fenton, J.M. Composite Silica/Nafion® Membranes Prepared by Tetraethylorthosilicate Sol-Gel Reaction and Solution Casting for Direct Methanol Fuel Cells. J. Memb. Sci. 2006, 272, 116–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tripathi, V.S.; Kandimalla, V.B.; Ju, H. Preparation of Ormosil and Its Applications in the Immobilizing Biomolecules. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2006, 114, 1071–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ulu, A.; Noma, S.A.A.; Koytepe, S.; Ates, B. Magnetic Fe3O4@MCM-41 Core–Shell Nanoparticles Functionalized with Thiol Silane for Efficient l-Asparaginase Immobilization. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2018, 46, 1035–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Lee, D.W.; Yoo, B.R. Advanced Silica/Polymer Composites: Materials and Applications. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2016, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Cao, J.; Song, T.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, S.; Wang, X.; Lv, F.; Jiang, L.; Sun, M. Application of Amino-Functionalized Nanosilica in Improving the Thermal Stability of Acrylamide-Based Polymer for Enhanced Oil Recovery. Energy Fuels 2018, 32, 246–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Cao, J.; Song, T.; Wang, X.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhao, M.; Miao, Y.; Zhang, J. Studies on the Rheological Properties of Amphiphilic Nanosilica and a Partially Hydrolyzed Polyacrylamide Hybrid for Enhanced Oil Recovery. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2019, 206, 146–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jafarzadeh, M.; Ab Rahman, I.; Sipaut, C.S. Synthesis of Silica-Polypyrrole Core-Shell Nanocomposite Using in Situ γ-Aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES)-Modified Nanosilica. Synth. Met. 2012, 162, 466–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yoncheva, K.; Popova, M.; Szegedi, A.; Mihaly, J.; Tzankov, B.; Lambov, N. Functionalized Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles for Oral Delivery of Budesonide. J. Solid State Chem. 2014, 211, 154–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Cheang, T.Y.; Tang, B.; Xu, A.W.; Chang, G.Q.; Hu, Z.J.; He, W.L.; Xing, Z.H.; Xu, J.B.; Wang, M.; Wang, S.M. Promising Plasmid DNA Vector Based on APTESmodified Silica Nanoparticles. Int. J. Nanomed. 2012, 7, 1061–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Yang, H.; Zheng, K.; Zhang, Z.; Shi, W.; Jing, S.; Wang, L.; Zheng, W.; Zhao, D.; Xu, J.; Zhang, P. Adsorption and Protection of Plasmid DNA on Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles Modified with Various Amounts of Organosilane. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2012, 369, 317–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wang, Y.; Sun, Y.; Wang, J.; Yang, Y.; Li, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Liu, C. Charge-Reversal APTES-Modified Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles with High Drug Loading and Release Controllability. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 17166–17175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Karim, A.H.; Jalil, A.A.; Triwahyono, S.; Sidik, S.M.; Kamarudin, N.H.N.; Jusoh, R.; Jusoh, N.W.C.; Hameed, B.H. Amino Modified Mesostructured Silica Nanoparticles for Efficient Adsorption of Methylene Blue. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2012, 386, 307–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Gu, H.; Guo, Y.; Wong, S.Y.; He, C.; Li, X.; Shim, V.P.W. Effect of Interphase and Strain-Rate on the Tensile Properties of Polyamide 6 Reinforced with Functionalized Silica Nanoparticles. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2013, 75, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ruiz-Cañas, M.C.; Quintero, H.I.; Corredor, L.M.; Manrique, E.; Romero Bohórquez, A.R. New Nanohybrid Based on Hydrolyzed Polyacrylamide and Silica Nanoparticles: Morphological, Structural and Thermal Properties. Polymers (Basel) 2020, 12, 1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Stober, W.; Fink, A. Controlled Growth of Monodispersed Silica Spheres in the Micron Size Range. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1968, 26, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Rahman, I.A.; Padavettan, V. Synthesis of Silica Nanoparticles by Sol-Gel: Size-Dependent Properties, Surface Modification, and Applications in Silica-Polymer Nanocomposites—A Review. J. Nanomater. 2012, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Lin, O.H.; Akil, H.M.; Ishak, Z.A.M. Characterization and Properties of Activated Nanosilica/Polypropylene Composites with Coupling Agents. Polym. Compos. 2009, 30, 1693–1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chen, S.; Hayakawa, S.; Shirosaki, Y.; Fujii, E.; Kawabata, K.; Tsuru, K.; Osaka, A. Sol-Gel Synthesis and Microstructure Analysis of Amino-Modified Hybrid Silica Nanoparticles from Aminopropyltriethoxysilane and Tetraethoxysilane. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2009, 92, 2074–2082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kang, S.; Hong, S.I.; Choe, C.R.; Park, M.; Rim, S.; Kim, J. Preparation and Characterization of Epoxy Composites Filled with Functionalized Nanosilica Particles Obtained via Sol-Gel Process. Polymer (Guildf) 2001, 42, 879–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Rouquerol, F.; Rouquerol, J.; Sing, K. Adsorption by Powders and Porous Solids; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  60. E2550-17. Standard Test Method for Thermal Stability by Thermogravimetry; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2017; Volume 11, pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Shang, H.; Lu, Y.; Zhao, F.; Chao, C.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, H. Preparing High Surface Area Porous Carbon from Biomass by Carbonization in Molten Salt Medium. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 75728–75734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kumar, R.D.; Kannan, G.K.; Kadirvelu, K.J. Populus Tree Wood: A Noble Bioresource from Western Himalayas for the Development of Various Carbon Types for the Effective Application in Environment Protection i.e., Phenol Adsorption from Wastewater. J. Bioremed. Biodegrad. 2017, 8, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Hamid, S.; Syed, W.H.; Mohammad, G.-M. Synthesis and Characterization of Amino-Functionalized Mesoporous Silicate MCM-41 for Removal of Toxic Metal Ions. Chin. J. Chem. 2009, 27, 915–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Marler, B.; Oberhagemann, U.; Vortmann, S.; Gies, H. Influence of the Sorbate Type on the XRD Peak Intensities of Loaded MCM-41. Microporous Mater. 1996, 6, 375–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Mercier, L.; Pinnavaia, T.J. Heavy Metal Ion Adsorbents Formed by the Grafting of a Thiol Functionality to Mesoporous Silica Molecular Sieves: Factors Affecting Hg(II) Uptake. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1998, 32, 2749–2754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ay, F.; Aydinli, A. Comparative Investigation of Hydrogen Bonding in Silicon Based PECVD Grown Dielectrics for Optical Waveguides. Opt. Mater. 2004, 26, 33–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Benmessaoud, A. Caracterización de Subóxidos de Silicio Obtenidos por las Técnicas de PECVD. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  68. Fukuda, Y.; Zhou, W.; Furuya, K.; Suzuki, H. Photoluminescence Change of As-Prepared and Aged Porous Silicon with NaOH Treatment. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1999, 146, 2697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Vázquez-Valerdi, D.E.; Luna-López, J.A.; García-Salgado, G.; Carrillo López, J.; Diaz-Becerril, T.; Rosendo, E.; Juárez-Santiesteban, H. Propiedades Ópticas, de Composición y Morfológicas de Películas Delgadas de SiOx Depositadas Por HFCVD. Superf. Vacío 2011, 24, 54–60. [Google Scholar]
  70. Vansant, E.F.; Van Der Voort, P.; Vrancken, K.C. Characterization and Chemical Modification of the Silica Surface; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  71. Al-Oweini, R.; El-Rassy, H. Synthesis and Characterization by FTIR Spectroscopy of Silica Aerogels Prepared Using Several Si(OR)4 and R’’Si(OR’)3 Precursors. J. Mol. Struct. 2009, 919, 140–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kim, J.; Seidler, P.; Wan, L.S.; Fill, C. Formation, Structure, and Reactivity of Amino-Terminated Organic Films on Silicon Substrates. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2009, 329, 114–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Vandenberg, E.T.; Bertilsson, L.; Liedberg, B.; Uvdal, K.; Erlandsson, R.; Elwing, H.; Lundström, I. Structure of 3-Aminopropyl Triethoxy Silane on Silicon Oxide. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1991, 147, 103–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Clogston, J.; Patri, A. Characterization of Nanoparticles Intended for Drug Delivery; McNeil, S.E., Ed.; Humana Press: New York, NY, USA, 2011; Volume 697, pp. 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Sikora, A.; Bartczak, D.; Geißler, D.; Kestens, V.; Roebben, G.; Ramaye, Y.; Varga, Z.; Palmai, M.; Shard, A.G.; Goenaga-Infante, H.; et al. A Systematic Comparison of Different Techniques to Determine the Zeta Potential of Silica Nanoparticles in Biological Medium. Anal. Methods 2015, 7, 9835–9843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Llinàs, M.C.; Sánchez-García, D. Nanopartículas de Sílice: Preparación y Aplicaciones En Biomedicina. Afinidad LXXI 2014, 565, 20–31. [Google Scholar]
  77. Alothman, Z.A. A Review: Fundamental Aspects of Silicate Mesoporous Materials. Materials (Basel) 2012, 5, 2874–2902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Vallejo, S.S. Estudio de Propiedades y Aplicaciones de Nanoestructuras de Sílice Mesoporosa y Aluminosilicatos En El Calzado. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad de la Rioja, La Rioja, Spain, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  79. Thommes, M.; Kaneko, K.; Neimark, A.V.; Olivier, J.P.; Rodriguez-Reinoso, F.; Rouquerol, J.; Sing, K.S.W. Physisorption of Gases, with Special Reference to the Evaluation of Surface Area and Pore Size Distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2015, 87, 1051–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Goeppert, A.; Meth, S.; Prakash, G.K.S.; Olah, G.A. Nanostructured Silica as a Support for Regenerable High-Capacity Organoamine-Based CO2 Sorbents. Energy Environ. Sci. 2010, 3, 1949–1960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Evonik. Aerosil—Fumed Silica: Technical Overview; Evonik: Essen, Germany, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  82. Xia, K.; Ferguson, R.Z.; Losier, M.; Tchoukanova, N.; Brüning, R. Synthesis of Hybrid Silica Materials with Tunable Pore Structures and Morphology and Their Application for Heavy Metal Removal from Drinking Water Synthesis of Hybrid Silica Materials with Tunable Pore Structures and Morphology and Their Application for H. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 183, 554–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Jaroniec, C.P.; Gilpin, R.K.; Jaroniec, M. Adsorption and Thermogravimetric Studies of Silica-Based Amide Bonded Phases. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 6861–6866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds A200S and nSiO2-APTES are available from the authors.
Molecules 25 02868 g001 550
Figure 1. Scheme of the modification of metal oxide particles with an alkoxysilane derivative. (a) Hydrolisis; (b) Condensation; (c) Self-condensation. MOx: metal oxide, and FG: H, Hal-, NH2, SH, acryloxy group, between others.
Figure 1. Scheme of the modification of metal oxide particles with an alkoxysilane derivative. (a) Hydrolisis; (b) Condensation; (c) Self-condensation. MOx: metal oxide, and FG: H, Hal-, NH2, SH, acryloxy group, between others.
Molecules 25 02868 g001
Molecules 25 02868 g002 550
Figure 2. Activation of the fumed silica NPs.
Figure 2. Activation of the fumed silica NPs.
Molecules 25 02868 g002
Molecules 25 02868 g003 550
Figure 3. Amino-functionalization of the silica NPs.
Figure 3. Amino-functionalization of the silica NPs.
Molecules 25 02868 g003
Molecules 25 02868 g004 550
Figure 4. SEM micrographs of (a,d) A200 NPs at 1200× and 40,000×, respectively; (b,e) A200A NPs at 1200× and 10,000×, (c,f) A200S NPs at 1200× and 30,000× and (g–i) nSiO2-APTES NPs at 600×, 50,000× and 100,000×, respectively.
Figure 4. SEM micrographs of (a,d) A200 NPs at 1200× and 40,000×, respectively; (b,e) A200A NPs at 1200× and 10,000×, (c,f) A200S NPs at 1200× and 30,000× and (g–i) nSiO2-APTES NPs at 600×, 50,000× and 100,000×, respectively.
Molecules 25 02868 g004
Molecules 25 02868 g005 550
Figure 5. EDS results of (a) A200, (b) A200S and (c) nSiO2-APTES NPs.
Figure 5. EDS results of (a) A200, (b) A200S and (c) nSiO2-APTES NPs.
Molecules 25 02868 g005
Molecules 25 02868 g006 550
Figure 6. Diffractograms of A200 and A200S NPs.
Figure 6. Diffractograms of A200 and A200S NPs.
Molecules 25 02868 g006
Molecules 25 02868 g007 550
Figure 7. Diffractogram of nSiO2-APTES NPs.
Figure 7. Diffractogram of nSiO2-APTES NPs.
Molecules 25 02868 g007
Molecules 25 02868 g008 550
Figure 8. Infrared Spectrum of (a) APTES, (b) A200, (c) A200A and (d)A200S NPs.
Figure 8. Infrared Spectrum of (a) APTES, (b) A200, (c) A200A and (d)A200S NPs.
Molecules 25 02868 g008
Molecules 25 02868 g009 550
Figure 9. Infrared spectra of (a) APTES, (b) nSiO2 and (c) nSiO2-APTES NPs.
Figure 9. Infrared spectra of (a) APTES, (b) nSiO2 and (c) nSiO2-APTES NPs.
Molecules 25 02868 g009
Molecules 25 02868 g010 550
Figure 10. ζ-potential values of (a) A200, A200A and A200S, and (b) nSiO2 and nSiO2-APTES NPs.
Figure 10. ζ-potential values of (a) A200, A200A and A200S, and (b) nSiO2 and nSiO2-APTES NPs.
Molecules 25 02868 g010
Molecules 25 02868 g011 550
Figure 11. DLS results of A200, A200A, and A200S NPs.
Figure 11. DLS results of A200, A200A, and A200S NPs.
Molecules 25 02868 g011
Molecules 25 02868 g012 550
Figure 12. DLS results of nSiO2 and nSiO2-APTES NPs.
Figure 12. DLS results of nSiO2 and nSiO2-APTES NPs.
Molecules 25 02868 g012
Molecules 25 02868 g013 550
Figure 13. Sorption isotherms of N2 on (a) A200, (b) A200S and (c) nSiO2-APTES NPs at 77 K.
Figure 13. Sorption isotherms of N2 on (a) A200, (b) A200S and (c) nSiO2-APTES NPs at 77 K.
Molecules 25 02868 g013
Molecules 25 02868 g014 550
Figure 14. Thermograms of A200, A200A, A200S and nSiO2-APTES NPs (heating rate of 10 °C/min in a nitrogen atmosphere).
Figure 14. Thermograms of A200, A200A, A200S and nSiO2-APTES NPs (heating rate of 10 °C/min in a nitrogen atmosphere).
Molecules 25 02868 g014
Table
Table 1. Weight and atomic percentage of A200, A200S and nSiO2-APTES S NPs by EDS analysis.
Table 1. Weight and atomic percentage of A200, A200S and nSiO2-APTES S NPs by EDS analysis.
ElementA200A200SnSiO2-APTES
wt%at%wt%at%wt%at%
C 3.446.3536.2947.16
N 1.171.850.500.50
O53.8065.1632.6945.3541.5140.50
Si36.8425.4153.3142.1222.2012.34
Na 3.833.70

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ruiz-Cañas, M.C.; Corredor, L.M.; Quintero, H.I.; Manrique, E.; Romero Bohórquez, A.R. Morphological and Structural Properties of Amino-Functionalized Fumed Nanosilica and Its Comparison with Nanoparticles Obtained by Modified Stöber Method. Molecules 2020, 25, 2868. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25122868

AMA Style

Ruiz-Cañas MC, Corredor LM, Quintero HI, Manrique E, Romero Bohórquez AR. Morphological and Structural Properties of Amino-Functionalized Fumed Nanosilica and Its Comparison with Nanoparticles Obtained by Modified Stöber Method. Molecules. 2020; 25(12):2868. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25122868

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ruiz-Cañas, María C., Laura M. Corredor, Henderson I. Quintero, Eduardo Manrique, and Arnold R. Romero Bohórquez. 2020. "Morphological and Structural Properties of Amino-Functionalized Fumed Nanosilica and Its Comparison with Nanoparticles Obtained by Modified Stöber Method" Molecules 25, no. 12: 2868. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25122868

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop