Next Article in Journal
Evaluating the Effect of Azole Antifungal Agents on the Stress Response and Nanomechanical Surface Properties of Ochrobactrum anthropi Aspcl2.2
Next Article in Special Issue
Molecular Sensing with Host Systems for Hyperpolarized 129Xe
Previous Article in Journal
Acyclic Triterpenoid Isolated from Alpinia katsumadai Alleviates Formalin-Induced Chronic Mouse Paw Inflammation by Inhibiting the Phosphorylation of ERK and NF-κB
Previous Article in Special Issue
In Situ SABRE Hyperpolarization with Earth’s Field NMR Detection
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hyperpolarization of Nitrile Compounds Using Signal Amplification by Reversible Exchange

1
Department of Chemistry, Seoul Women’s University, Seoul 01797, Korea
2
Department of Chemistry, Korea Military Academy, Seoul 01805, Korea
3
Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science, Daejeon 34113, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Molecules 2020, 25(15), 3347; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25153347
Submission received: 12 June 2020 / Revised: 8 July 2020 / Accepted: 21 July 2020 / Published: 23 July 2020

Abstract

:
Signal Amplification by Reversible Exchange (SABRE), a hyperpolarization technique, has been harnessed as a powerful tool to achieve useful hyperpolarized materials by polarization transfer from parahydrogen. In this study, we systemically applied SABRE to a series of nitrile compounds, which have been rarely investigated. By performing SABRE in various magnetic fields and concentrations on nitrile compounds, we unveiled its hyperpolarization properties to maximize the spin polarization and its transfer to the next spins. Through this sequential study, we obtained a ~130-fold enhancement for several nitrile compounds, which is the highest number ever reported for the nitrile compounds. Our study revealed that the spin polarization on hydrogens decreases with longer distances from the nitrile group, and its maximum polarization is found to be approximately 70 G with 5 μL of substrates in all structures. Interestingly, more branched structures in the ligand showed less effective polarization transfer mechanisms than the structural isomers of butyronitrile and isobutyronitrile. These first systematic SABRE studies on a series of nitrile compounds will provide new opportunities for further research on the hyperpolarization of various useful nitrile materials.

1. Introduction

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) is a powerful tool for identifying the (in)organic and biological structures of molecules in various states. The study of the dynamics of molecules is a key subject in the area of NMR studies with specific pulse sequences. One of the prominent applications of this NMR method is Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), which is a precise, non-invasive body-scanning technique. The signals in NMR depend on the population differences in magnetic-field-induced Zeeman splitting, which is proportional to the external field, and follows a Boltzmann distribution. Hence, a strong magnetic field is needed. This results in high costs in purchasing a strong magnet as well as maintaining the superconducting magnet. To overcome these shortcomings, hyperpolarization (HP) techniques have been developed to increase the signal strength [1,2,3,4]. Along with other well-known hyperpolarization techniques, parahydrogen-induced hyperpolarization, which uses a higher proportion of parahydrogen gas than orthohydrogen, has been proposed as a potential cost-efficient and rapid technique, with processing in non-harsh conditions. Hyperpolarization can be achieved using spin-state energy transfer from polarized antiparallel spins of parahydrogen [5,6]. Its benefits are particularly significant in focusing on various molecular structures and medical applications such as MRI. Parahydrogen-induced polarization (PHIP) uses the hydrogenation reaction on an unsaturated bond, which induces hyperpolarization through additional covalent bonding on carbon [7,8,9]. This process results in structural changes after the hydrogenation reaction. While signal amplification by reversible exchange (SABRE), which is another way of using parahydrogen, employs a non-hydrogenation parahydrogen-based hyperpolarization technique [10,11,12], SABRE relies on the temporary bonding of the substrate at the metal center (Iridium) to enable hyperpolarization creation on the nucleus spins of the substrates. With these powerful characteristics, most studies using SABRE have focused on specific structures with sp2 nitrogen atoms, such as pyridine, purines, diazirines, triazole, or their derivatives [13,14,15,16,17,18]. Previous studies helped in setting up the polarization mechanism, and its trend in the polarization for the structures has been studied over the last few decades [19,20,21,22,23]. On the other hand, newly discovered structures lack these perspectives. Hence, reports on detecting small concentrated materials and reaction mechanisms that have the potential for application in the near future are important [24,25,26,27]. In this context, polarization with nitrile is quite new and studies focusing on nitrile compounds have not been conducted systemically, other than for the aromatic and nonaromatic nitrile materials with low enhancement factors [28,29]. Furthermore, 13N and 13C polarization transfer via nitrile groups (short range coupling) has recently attracted interest due to its potentially long relaxation time (T1) [30,31]. Therefore, its systematic study with nitrile groups is expected to render more insights into the polarization transfer mechanism, such as SABRE-SHEATH (SABRE in SHield Enables Alignment Transfer to Heteronuclei), for a heteronuclear system in the future. The nitrile is an organic compound that has a −C≡N functional group in the structure. Nitriles are found in many useful organics including nitrile gloves, nitrile-containing polymers used in laboratory work, and methyl cyanoacrylate, which is used in super glue. More importantly, over 30 nitrile-containing pharmaceuticals are now prescribed all over the world [32,33]. The core structure, i.e., the nitrile group, is robust, and it is not well metabolized. It can stay for a long time in the body [34,35]. Overall, this material is widely used not only in industry but also in fundamental research and needs to be investigated more systematically and extensively.
Here, we present a systematic hyperpolarization study on nitriles using SABRE to obtain the maximum hyperpolarization in different magnetic fields and concentrations. Our study unveiled some unprecedented results, which showed much more signal enhancement than that ever reported before and polarization trends with different carbon attachments.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. SABRE on Acetonitrile

After the activation of an Ir-catalyst (3.12 µmol) in bubbling parahydrogen for 20 min, different volumes of acetonitrile were added to the solution (MeOH-d4 900 µL). The polarization transfer from parahydrogen to acetonitrile was performed in the solenoid coil, which was matched with different magnetic fields. Subsequent experiments with other nitrile compounds were performed using the same procedure (Figure 1).
The optimization for enhancing the polarization-transfer efficiency of acetonitrile was carried out with different magnetic fields with different concentrations of acetonitrile in MeOH-d4 solution. According to the results (Figure 2), all three protons in the methyl group on acetonitrile are hyperpolarized and its polarization is maximized to approximately 70 G in the solution. The signal enhancement ratio is calculated by comparing the thermal integral with the hyperpolarized integral obtained by SABRE (see the Supplementary Materials).
It is worth noting that the enhancement factor of more than 130-fold in the hyperpolarization is much bigger than any previously reported result. For example, it is only 8-fold in the case of acetonitrile. However, it can be enhanced as much as 60 times by adding pyridine-d5 (20 times for pyridine), which was introduced as a co-substrate. Further studies on this co-substrate with more nitrile compounds would be needed in the future [28]. Furthermore, its polarization is dependent on the concentration and is maximized with 5 μL of acetonitrile in 900 μL of solvent, which is normally attributed to the chemical exchange dynamics with optimized molar concentrations [36]. This is the main reason behind the polarization enhancement, and its efficiency is also related to the relaxation effect induced by the Ir-catalyst including the proton T1 time. Its phase trend (Figure 3) is changed from the earth magnetic field (~0.5 G) and reversed again by increasing the magnetic field. This is different from the previously reported phenomenon [28] and seems to be slightly different in terms of the polarization transfer mechanism from parahydrogen and needs further investigation. It is speculated to be because of the different matching condition of the magnetic field with different J–J coupling from both hydrides in the Ir-catalyst. We found that the concentration showing the maximum polarization number at the same magnetic field was different. In the earth field, a small amount of acetonitrile showed the biggest polarization, whereas there was a trend of a higher concentration of substrate leading to larger polarization in the higher magnetic field. This indicates that the polarization efficiency depends not only on the magnetic field but also on the concentration of the substrate in acetonitrile SABRE.

2.2. SABRE on Propionitrile

The different aspect of propionitrile compared to acetonitrile is that one more methyl group is attached than in acetonitrile, which can be polarized by the polarization transfer from the protons from H-1. Therefore, it causes less polarization on the H-2 than the H-1, which is supported by our result (Figure 4). The maximum enhancement factor is approximately 130-fold, which is shown in the 70 G in 1 μL and 120 G in 3 μL of propionitrile, which has almost the same trend as acetonitrile (the concentration for each volume is indicated in Supplementary Materials). However, more interestingly, the polarization in the earth field is bigger than 20 G in all the H-2 protons, whereas the H-1 showed the same trend as the acetonitrile case. This can be attributed to the polarization transfer through the long range J–J coupling [20], which can be matched with a low magnetic field. This is supported by the smaller polarization enhancement than of the protons in H-1. However, the protons in H-1 can be hyperpolarized in higher magnetic fields, and its polarization is transferred into the H-2. Even though the polarization transfer is active from H-1 to H-2, the enhancement factor of H-1 in propionitrile is similar to that of acetonitrile.

2.3. SABRE on Butyronitrile and Isobutyronitrile

These two structures are structural isomers with differently branched structures. The largest enhanced signals from protons were on H-1 in both structures—with an approximately 100-fold enhancement, which showed almost the same trend with propionitrile and acetonitrile. In both cases, 5 μL was the optimal volume for obtaining the highest polarization (Figure 5). For the polarization-transfer efficiency, polarization is transferred to the other protons from H-1 in butyronitrile. However, polarization transfer in isobutyronitrile is much less compared to that in butyronitrile case. This indicates that the polarization efficiency is closely related to the polarization-transferring proton number (two protons in butyronitrile vs. one proton in isobutyronitrile) and adjacent numbers of protons (polarization-transferred protons) that are coupled (two protons in butyronitrile vs. six protons in isobutyronitrile). This reveals that a linear type of nitrile or other functional groups that are chelated with the Ir-catalyst would be a better option for achieving higher polarization-transfer efficiency.

2.4. SABRE on Valeronitrile

We additionally performed SABRE on valeronitrile, which contains one more methyl group in the nitrile than butyronitrile. Its optimal polarization factor with different magnetic fields and concentrations also showed the same trend as the butyronitrile case—an approximately 100-fold enhancement in 70 G with a 5 μL amount of valeronitrile. It is hard to discern two hyperpolarized signals from the methyl group of H-2 in the spectrum, which have a small chemical shift difference. Therefore, we calculated the enhancement factor on all five hydrogens from H-2 of valeronitrile’s structure. Almost all the trends were similar to those for butyronitrile, except strong hyperpolarization on all protons in the 120 G for 1 μL of substrate, which may be attributed to the change in the chelating strength caused by the increased weight and coupling strength. (Figure 6) However, this needs to be studied further.

3. Materials and Methods

60 MHz 1H spectra were obtained with Spinsolve Ultra (Magritek, Abingdon, UK). This device was automated with a 5% D2O sample in shimming, and the NMR signal was checked using a Wilkinson’s catalyst. The parahydrogen generator was activated by a home-built instrument [37]. Hydrogen gases (a spin isomer mixture of ortho-H2 and para-H2) were passed through heat exchangers filled with Fe(OH)O catalysts in a liquid nitrogen dewar to obtain up to 50% p-H2.
An Ir-catalyst, (Ir(COD)(IMes)Cl) (COD=η4-1,5-cyclooctadiene and IMes=1,3-bis(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)imidazole-2-ylidene) [16,17] and nitrile compound for each concentration (1, 3, 5, and 7 μL of acetonitrile, corresponding to 19, 57, 96, and 134 μmol, respectively; all concentration amounts are tabulated in Supplementary Materials) were added to the NMR tube. After dissolving in 900 μL of deuterated methanol, the solution was bubbled through the tube with para-hydrogen for 20 min [38]. The mixture was foamed for 1 min at each magnetic field before being moved to the NMR spectrometer. The spectrum was obtained at 60 MHz. NMR data were processed and analyzed using the Mnova software (12.0.2, Masterlab Research, S.L, Abingdon, UK).

4. Conclusions

In this study, we applied the promising hyperpolarization technique SABRE on a series of nitrile compounds with an additional methyl group attached. By performing SABRE with various magnetic fields and substrate concentrations, we unveiled its hyperpolarization characteristics and properties to maximize the polarization and its transfer efficiency. Through this sequential study, we could conclude that the polarization on hydrogen decreases with increasing distance from the nitrile group and its highest polarization is observed at approximately 70 G and with 5 μL of substrates in all structures. Furthermore, we obtained the best enhancement factor of more than 130-fold for various nitrile compounds using 50 percent of parahydrogen. Therefore, we can expect enhanced polarization numbers in the future using a higher concentration of parahydrogen. This study has only been performed in methanol, which is not a biological solvent. To be applicable in biological systems, a hyperpolarization study in biological solvent systems or new strategy for obtaining hyperpolarization in an aqueous solvent would be needed [39,40,41]. Interestingly, the more branched structures in the ligand showed less effective polarization-transfer mechanisms than the butyronitrile and isobutyronitrile SABRE results. Furthermore, upon investigating several cases, the H-2 protons from nitrile compounds showed higher polarization, which is contrary to previously reported cases. It is noteworthy that the effective polarization transfer may be possible using low or ultralow magnetic fields, which are normally of approximately 100 G. These first-ever systematic SABRE studies on a series of nitrile compounds will certainly widen the new possibilities for more hyperpolarizable chemical materials using SABRE in the future.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online. Figure S1: NMR spectrum after SABRE in 70 G on 1 μL of acetonitrile (Ir.cat 14.04%). Figure S2: NMR spectrum after SABRE in 70 G on 1 μL of propionitrile (Ir.cat 18.35 mol%). Figure S3: NMR spectrum after SABRE in 70 G on 1 μL of butyronitrile (Ir.cat 21.5 mol%). Figure S4: NMR spectrum after SABRE in 20 G on 5 μL of isobutyronitrile (Ir.cat 5.32 mol%). Figure S5: NMR spectrum after SABRE in 70 G on 5 μL of valeronitrile (Ir.cat 6.15 mol%). Table S1: Concentration (mol%) of Ir-catalyst and nitrile compound for each concentration. Table S2: Nitrile compound (μmol) for each concentration. Table S3: Signal enhancement factor of acetonitrile. Table S4: Signal enhancement factor for propionitrile, Table S5: Signal enhancement factor for butyronitrile. Table S6: Signal enhancement factor for isobutyronitrile. Table S7: Signal enhancement factor for valeronitrile. Equation (S1): SABRE amplification calculation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.O. and K.J.; methodology, S.K., S.M., H.C., and H.J.J.; validation, S.K.N., S.O., and K.J.; investigation, S.K. and S.M.; writing—original draft preparation, S.K. and S.M.; writing—review and editing, K.J.; supervision, S.K.N., S.O., and K.J.; project administration, S.O. and K.J.; funding acquisition, S.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by IITP grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT No.20190004340011001). This work was also supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (No. 2020R1C1C1007888).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ardenkjær-Larsen, J.H.; Fridlund, B.; Gram, A.; Hansson, G.; Hansson, L.; Lerche, M.H.; Servin, R.; Thaning, M.; Golman, K. Increase in signal-to-noise ratio of >10,000 times in liquid-state NMR. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 10158–10163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Goldman, M.; Jóhannesson, H.; Axelsson, O.; Karlsson, M. Design and implementation of 13C hyper polarization from para-hydrogen, for new MRI contrast agents. Comptes Rendus Chim. 2006, 9, 357–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bowers, C.R.; Weitekamp, D.P. Transformation of symmetrization order to nuclear-spin magnetization by chemical reaction and nuclear magnetic resonance. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1986, 57, 2645–2648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Maly, T.; Debelouchina, G.T.; Bajaj, V.S.; Hu, K.N.; Joo, C.G.; Mak-Jurkauskas, M.L.; Sirigiri, J.R.; Van Der Wel, P.C.A.; Herzfeld, J.; Temkin, R.J.; et al. Dynamic nuclear polarization at high magnetic fields. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 128, 052211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Ivanov, K.L.; Yurkovskaya, A.V.; Vieth, H.-M. Parahydrogen Induced Polarization in Scalar Coupled Systems: Analytical Solutions for Spectral Patterns and their Field Dependence. Zeitschrift für Phys. Chemie 2012, 226, 1315–1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Bowers, C.R.; Weitekamp, D.P. Parahydrogen and Synthesis Allow Dramatically Enhanced Nuclear Alignment. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 5541–5542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Matthes, J.; Gründemann, S.; Buntkowsky, G.; Chaudret, B.; Limbach, H.H. NMR Studies of the Reaction Path of the o-H2/p-H2 Spin Conversion Catalyzed by Vaska’s Complex in the Solid State. Appl. Magn. Reson. 2013, 44, 247–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Natterer, J.; Bargon, J. Para-Hydrogen Induced Polarization (PHIP). Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 1997, 31, 293–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Eisenschmid, T.C.; Kirss, R.U.; Deutsch, P.P.; Hommeltoft, S.I.; Eisenberg, R.; Bargon, J.; Lawler, R.G.; Balch, A.L. Para Hydrogen Induced Polarization in Hydrogenation Reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 8089–8091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Adams, R.W.; Aguilar, J.A.; Atkinson, K.D.; Cowley, M.J.; Elliott, P.I.P.; Duckett, S.B.; Green, G.G.R.; Khazal, I.G.; Lopez-Serrano, J.; Williamson, D.C. Reversible Interactions with para-Hydrogen Enhance NMR Sensitivity by Polarization Transfer. Science 2009, 323, 1708–1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Adams, R.W.; Duckett, S.B.; Green, R.A.; Williamson, D.C.; Green, G.G.R. A theoretical basis for spontaneous polarization transfer in non-hydrogenative parahydrogen-induced polarization. J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 131, 194505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Rayner, P.J.; Norcott, P.; Appleby, K.M.; Iali, W.; John, R.O.; Hart, S.J.; Whitwood, A.C.; Duckett, S.B. Fine-tuning the efficiency of para-hydrogen-induced hyperpolarization by rational N-heterocyclic carbene design. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gong, Q.; Gordji-Nejad, A.; Blümich, B.; Appelt, S. Trace analysis by low-field NMR: Breaking the sensitivity limit. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 7078–7082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hövener, J.-B.B.; Schwaderlapp, N.; Borowiak, R.; Lickert, T.; Duckett, S.B.; Mewis, R.E.; Adams, R.W.; Burns, M.J.; Highton, L.A.R.R.; Green, G.G.R.R.; et al. Toward biocompatible nuclear hyperpolarization using signal amplification by reversible exchange: Quantitative in situ spectroscopy and high-field imaging. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 1767–1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zeng, H.; Xu, J.; Gillen, J.; McMahon, M.T.; Artemov, D.; Tyburn, J.-M.; Lohman, J.A.B.; Mewis, R.E.; Atkinson, K.D.; Green, G.G.R.; et al. Optimization of SABRE for polarization of the tuberculosis drugs pyrazinamide and isoniazid. J. Magn. Reson. 2013, 237, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Cowley, M.J.; Adams, R.W.; Atkinson, K.D.; Cockett, M.C.R.; Duckett, S.B.; Green, G.G.R.; Lohman, J.A.B.; Kerssebaum, R.; Kilgour, D.; Mewis, R.E. Iridium N-heterocyclic carbene complexes as efficient catalysts for magnetization transfer from para-hydrogen. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 6134–6137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Vazquez-Serrano, L.D.; Owens, B.T.; Buriak, J.M. The search for new hydrogenation catalyst motifs based on N-heterocyclic carbene ligands. Inorganica Chim. Acta 2006, 359, 2786–2797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Semenova, O.; Richardson, P.M.; Parrott, A.J.; Nordon, A.; Halse, M.E.; Duckett, S.B. Reaction Monitoring Using SABRE-Hyperpolarized Benchtop (1 T) NMR Spectroscopy. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 6695–6701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Kim, K.H.; Choi, J.W.; Kim, C.S.; Jeong, K. Parahydrogen-induced polarization in the hydrogenation of lignin-derived phenols using Wilkinson’s catalyst. Fuel 2019, 255, 115845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. HyeJin, J.; Sein, M.; Heelim, C.; Sara, K.; Gunwoo, L.; Sung Keon, N.; Keunhong, J. Signal Amplification by Reversible Exchange for COVID-19 Antiviral Drug Candidates. ChemRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kovtunov, K.V.; Barskiy, D.A.; Shchepin, R.V.; Coffey, A.M.; Waddell, K.W.; Koptyug, I.V.; Chekmenev, E.Y. Demonstration of heterogeneous parahydrogen induced polarization using hyperpolarized agent migration from dissolved Rh(I) complex to gas phase. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 6192–6196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Barskiy, D.A.; Knecht, S.; Yurkovskaya, A.V.; Ivanov, K.L. SABRE: Chemical kinetics and spin dynamics of the formation of hyperpolarization. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2019, 114–115, 33–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kovtunov, K.V.; Pokochueva, E.V.; Salnikov, O.G.; Cousin, S.F.; Kurzbach, D.; Vuichoud, B.; Jannin, S.; Chekmenev, E.Y.; Goodson, B.M.; Barskiy, D.A.; et al. Hyperpolarized NMR Spectroscopy: D-DNP, PHIP, and SABRE Techniques. Chem. Asian J. 2018, 13, 1857–1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Jeong, K.; Min, S.; Chae, H.; Namgoong, S.K. Detecting low concentrations of unsaturated C—C bonds by parahydrogen-induced polarization using an efficient home-built parahydrogen generator. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2018, 56, 1089–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Jeong, K.; Min, S.; Chae, H.; Namgoong, S.K. Monitoring of hydrogenation by benchtop NMR with parahydrogen-induced polarization. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2019, 57, 44–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Lee, S.J.; Jeong, K.; Shim, J.H.; Lee, H.J.; Min, S.; Chae, H.; Namgoong, S.K.; Kim, K. SQUID-based ultralow-field MRI of a hyperpolarized material using signal amplification by reversible exchange. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Chae, H.; Min, S.; Jeong, H.J.; Namgoong, S.K.; Oh, S.; Kim, K.; Jeong, K. Organic Reaction Monitoring of a Glycine Derivative Using Signal Amplification by Reversible Exchange-Hyperpolarized Benchtop Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. Anal. Chem. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mewis, R.E.; Green, R.A.; Cockett, M.C.R.; Cowley, M.J.; Duckett, S.B.; Green, G.G.R.; John, R.O.; Rayner, P.J.; Williamson, D.C. Strategies for the hyperpolarization of acetonitrile and related Ligands by SABRE. J. Phys. Chem. B 2015, 119, 1416–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fekete, M.; Bayfield, O.; Duckett, S.B.; Hart, S.; Mewis, R.E.; Pridmore, N.; Rayner, P.J.; Whitwood, A. Iridium(III) hydrido N-heterocyclic carbene-phosphine complexes as catalysts in magnetization transfer reactions. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 52, 13453–13461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Colell, J.F.P.; Logan, A.W.J.; Zhou, Z.; Shchepin, R.V.; Barskiy, D.A.; Ortiz, G.X.; Wang, Q.; Malcolmson, S.J.; Chekmenev, E.Y.; Warren, W.S.; et al. Generalizing, Extending, and Maximizing Nitrogen-15 Hyperpolarization Induced by Parahydrogen in Reversible Exchange. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 6626–6634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Barskiy, D.A.; Shchepin, R.V.; Tanner, C.P.N.; Colell, J.F.P.; Goodson, B.M.; Theis, T.; Warren, W.S.; Chekmenev, E.Y. The Absence of Quadrupolar Nuclei Facilitates Efficient 13C Hyperpolarization via Reversible Exchange with Parahydrogen. ChemPhysChem 2017, 18, 1493–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fleming, F.F.; Yao, L.; Ravikumar, P.C.; Funk, L.; Shook, B.C. Nitrile-Containing Pharmaceuticals: Efficacious Roles of the Nitrile Pharmacophore. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 7902–7917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Patterson, A.W.; Wood, W.J.L.; Hornsby, M.; Lesley, S.; Spraggon, G.; Ellman, J.A. Identification of selective, nonpeptidic nitrile inhibitors of cathepsin S using the substrate activity screening method. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 6298–6307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Boyd, M.J.; Crane, S.N.; Robichaud, J.; Scheigetz, J.; Black, W.C.; Chauret, N.; Wang, Q.; Massé, F.; Oballa, R.M. Investigation of ketone warheads as alternatives to the nitrile for preparation of potent and selective cathepsin K inhibitors. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 675–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Robichaud, J.; Oballa, R.; Prasit, P.; Falgueyret, J.P.; Percival, M.D.; Wesolowski, G.; Rodan, S.B.; Kimmel, D.; Johnson, C.; Bryant, C.; et al. A novel class of nonpeptidic biaryl inhibitors of human cathepsin K. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 3709–3727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Appleby, K.M.; Mewis, R.E.; Olaru, A.M.; Green, G.G.R.; Fairlamb, I.J.S.; Duckett, S.B. Investigating pyridazine and phthalazine exchange in a series of iridium complexes in order to define their role in the catalytic transfer of magnetisation from para-hydrogen. Chem. Sci. 2015, 6, 3981–3993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Kwon, S.; Min, S.; Chae, H.; Namgoong, S.K.; Jeong, K. Low Cost and Portable Parahydrogen Generator for the PHIP. J. Korean Magn. Reson. Soc. 2017, 21, 126–130. [Google Scholar]
  38. Atkinson, K.D.; Cowley, M.J.; Elliott, P.I.P.; Duckett, S.B.; Green, G.G.R.; López-Serrano, J.; Whitwood, A.C. Spontaneous transfer of Parahydrogen derived spin order to pyridine at low magnetic field. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 13362–13368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zeng, H.; Xu, J.; McMahon, M.T.; Lohman, J.A.B.; Van Zijl, P.C.M. Achieving 1% NMR polarization in water in less than 1 min using SABRE. J. Magn. Reson. 2014, 246, 119–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Hövener, J.B.; Pravdivtsev, A.N.; Kidd, B.; Bowers, C.R.; Glöggler, S.; Kovtunov, K.V.; Plaumann, M.; Katz-Brull, R.; Buckenmaier, K.; Jerschow, A.; et al. Parahydrogen-Based Hyperpolarization for Biomedicine. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 11140–11162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Reile, I.; Eshuis, N.; Hermkens, N.K.J.; Van Weerdenburg, B.J.A.; Feiters, M.C.; Rutjes, F.P.J.T.; Tessari, M. NMR detection in biofluid extracts at sub-μM concentrations: Via para-H2 induced hyperpolarization. Analyst 2016, 141, 4001–4005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.
Figure 1. Hyperpolarization procedure of Signal Amplification by Reversible Exchange (SABRE) with nitrile compounds [12]. NHC is N-heterocyclic compounds.
Figure 1. Hyperpolarization procedure of Signal Amplification by Reversible Exchange (SABRE) with nitrile compounds [12]. NHC is N-heterocyclic compounds.
Molecules 25 03347 g001
Figure 2. Amplification factors according to different magnetic fields for different amounts of acetonitrile in the solvent (MeOH-d4).
Figure 2. Amplification factors according to different magnetic fields for different amounts of acetonitrile in the solvent (MeOH-d4).
Molecules 25 03347 g002
Figure 3. NMR spectrum after SABRE in different magnetic fields on the 1 μL (19 μmol) of acetonitrile (a) and hyperpolarized spectrum in 70 G (b) All other examples of spectra are shown in Supplementary Materials.
Figure 3. NMR spectrum after SABRE in different magnetic fields on the 1 μL (19 μmol) of acetonitrile (a) and hyperpolarized spectrum in 70 G (b) All other examples of spectra are shown in Supplementary Materials.
Molecules 25 03347 g003
Figure 4. Amplification factors according to the different magnetic fields for different amounts of propionitrile in solvent (MeOH-d4).
Figure 4. Amplification factors according to the different magnetic fields for different amounts of propionitrile in solvent (MeOH-d4).
Molecules 25 03347 g004
Figure 5. Amplification factors according to the different magnetic fields for different amounts of (a) butyronitrile and (b) isobutyronitrile in solvent (MeOH-d4).
Figure 5. Amplification factors according to the different magnetic fields for different amounts of (a) butyronitrile and (b) isobutyronitrile in solvent (MeOH-d4).
Molecules 25 03347 g005
Figure 6. Amplification factors according to the different magnetic fields for the different amounts of valeronitrile in solvent (MeOH-d4).
Figure 6. Amplification factors according to the different magnetic fields for the different amounts of valeronitrile in solvent (MeOH-d4).
Molecules 25 03347 g006

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, S.; Min, S.; Chae, H.; Jeong, H.J.; Namgoong, S.K.; Oh, S.; Jeong, K. Hyperpolarization of Nitrile Compounds Using Signal Amplification by Reversible Exchange. Molecules 2020, 25, 3347. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25153347

AMA Style

Kim S, Min S, Chae H, Jeong HJ, Namgoong SK, Oh S, Jeong K. Hyperpolarization of Nitrile Compounds Using Signal Amplification by Reversible Exchange. Molecules. 2020; 25(15):3347. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25153347

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Sarah, Sein Min, Heelim Chae, Hye Jin Jeong, Sung Keon Namgoong, Sangwon Oh, and Keunhong Jeong. 2020. "Hyperpolarization of Nitrile Compounds Using Signal Amplification by Reversible Exchange" Molecules 25, no. 15: 3347. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25153347

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop